Next Article in Journal
Room Temperature Synthesis of Various Color Emission Rare-Earth Doped Strontium Tungstate Phosphors Applicable to Fingerprint Identification
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Study of Benzothiazole Derivatives for Conformational, Thermodynamic and Spectroscopic Features and Their Potential to Act as Antibacterials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perovskite Photo-Sensors with Solution-Processed TiO2 under Low Temperature Process and Ultra-Thin Polyethylenimine Ethoxylated as Electron Injection Layer

Graduate School of Science & Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama 930-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(7), 914; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12070914
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Revised: 15 June 2022 / Accepted: 20 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Materials for Energy Applications)

Abstract

:
A perovskite photo-sensor is promising for a lightweight, thin, flexible, easy-to-coat fabrication process, and a higher incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency. We have investigated perovskite photo-sensors with a solution-processed compact TiO2 under a low-temperature process and an ultra-thin polyethylenimine ethoxylated (PEIE) as an electron injection layer. The TiO2 film is grown from an aqueous solution of titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) at 70 °C by a chemical bath deposition method. For an alternative process, the ultra-thin PEIE is spin coated on the TiO2 film. Then, the perovskite layer is deposited on the substrate by the one- or two-step methods in the glovebox. Next, a hole transport layer of 2,2,7,7-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)-9, 9-spiro-bifluorene (Spiro-OMeTAD) solution is spin coated. The fabricated device structure is a photodiode structure of FTO/TiO2/(without or with) PEIE/(one- or two-step) perovskite layer/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au. For the sensing characteristics, a ratio of photo-to-dark-current density was 2.88 × 104 for the device with PEIE layer. In addition, a power-law relationship is discussed.

1. Introduction

Organic electronic devices, such as organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) [1,2,3], organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) [4,5,6,7,8], organic sensing devices [9,10,11] and organic solar cells (OSCs) [12,13,14,15] are widely studied. Especially in OSCs, one of the most interesting topics is an organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cell (PeSC) that has been considered an alternative photovoltaic technology due to its excellent photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) along with its low material costs, and its recorded power conversion efficiency of 25.5% [16]. A compact titanium dioxide (TiO2) layer is the most common electron-transport layer for the PeSC [15]. For achieving the higher efficiency PeSCs with a suitable electronic property of TiO2, several methods, such as sol−gel, spin coating, slot-die coating, blade coating, electrodeposition, atomic layer deposition, and electron beam (EB) evaporation have been used [17,18,19]. On the other hand, by employing the perovskite materials as an active layer of photo-sensing characteristics, a perovskite photo-sensors (PePS) using a photodiode (PD) structure [20,21,22,23,24], an X-ray detection using the PD structure [25], a photodetector with a photoconductive phenomenon [26], and a printable and flexible photodetector [27,28] were reported. This series of perovskite devices are effective for their higher carrier generation of electron and hole, and their higher carrier mobility during light irradiation. During this time, we studied the PePS with a solution-processed TiO2 at a low temperature of 70 °C by the chemical bath deposition (CBD) method [29]. For improving device performance, an ultra-thin polyethylenimine ethoxylated (PEIE) [30,31,32,33] as an electron injection layer is fabricated and device characteristics are evaluated. One of the preliminary experimental results is presented at the international conference on the 26th and 27th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices [34,35].

2. Experimental Section

The typical device structure of the PePS under study is shown in Figure 1. Except for the solution-processed TiO2 layer, the fabrication of the device structure and evaluation of the device characteristics are identical to that of our previous PeSC experiment as follows [29,34]. First, an FTO glass substrate was cleaned using the process of ultra-sonication dipped into organic-alkali and UV-irradiation in a UV-ozone chamber. Then, 20 nm thickness of the TiO2 layer was grown onto the FTO substrates using a mixture of solution TiCl4 and pure water (2000 μL/100 mL) at 70 °C for 50 min by the CBD method. Then, the substrate was rinsed into pure water. For the case of device fabrication with a very thin PEIE layer, 4 wt% solution of PEIE dissolved with ethanol was spin coated. Thereafter, spin-rinse using the ethanol solution was performed. After the UV-irradiation, the perovskite layer was deposited on theTiO2 films by the one- or two-step method in the glovebox under a nitrogen environment. For fabricating the perovskite layer, two types of fabrication processes were tried and tested. For the case of the one-step method, perovskite precursor solutions were prepared by dissolving mixed powders of PbI2 (Aldrich) and methyl-ammonium iodide (MAI, Aldrich) in the mixed solution of anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide and dimethyl sulfoxide, where the ratio was 3:1. Then, the perovskite precursor solutions were spin coated on FTO/TiO2 films under the nitrogen environment. During the spin-coating process, a single drop (180 μL) of chlorobenzene was added as antisolvent crystallization. Finally, the perovskite-coated FTO/TiO2 electrode was heated at 100 °C for 10 min. For the case the of two-step method, the PbI2 solution was prepared by dissolving PbI3 powders into the mixture of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), and a mixture of formamidinium iodine (FAI), methylammonium bromide (MABr), and methylammonium chloride (MACl) dissolved in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) as the second-step solution. Firstly, first-step PbI2 solution was spin coated and annealed at 70 °C for 10 min. Additionally, sequentially, second-step solutions were spin coated and annealed at 150 °C for 30 min, and the perovskite film was formed. For finishing the coating of the perovskite layer, the 2,2,7,7-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenylamine)-9,9-spirobifluorene (Spiro-OMeTAD) solution was prepared by dissolving 80 mg of Spiro-OMeTAD (Aldrich), 22.4 μL of lithium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)imide (LiTSFI, Wako) solution (520 mg of LiTSFI in 1 mL acetonitrile, Aldrich), and 36 μL of 4-tert-butylpyridine (Aldrich) in 1 mL of chlorobenzene (Aldrich). This hole-transport layer was deposited on top of the FTO/TiO2/perovskite substrate by the spin-coating method in air. Finally, 40 nm-thick gold was thermally evaporated with an evaporation rate of around 1.0 Å/s. Final fabricated device structures are FTO/TiO2/(without or with PEIE)/(one- or two-step) perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au [29,34].
The surface morphologies were investigated using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JEOL 6700F). The photo-sensing characteristics of the PePSs were measured using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (HP4145B) and solar simulator (Yamashita Denso, YSS E40) under Air Mass (AM) 1.5, 100 mW/cm2. Photocurrent density Jp and dark-current density Jd are evaluated at the voltage of −0.2 V.

3. Results and Discussions

Figure 2 shows the FE-SEM observation on the TiO2 layer fabricated by the CBD method [33]. The surface morphology was comparatively flat and grain size was observed between 0.1 and 1 μm. In our previous EB evaporation method [36], a flat surface was also observed; however, there are many raised portions with shadow regions on the TiO2 surface. In the CBD method, there are few raised portions and many small structures of several 10 nm on the TiO2 surface.
There is much literature on morphology-photovoltaic properties correlation [37], comparative study [38], and the effects of process parameters by the sequential-coating method [39] fabricated by one-step and two-step coating method. However, combined with the perovskite layer, the CBD method of TiO2 is not confirmed in detail. Therefore, various combinations of perovskite layers using one-step and two-step methods on the TiO2 using the CBD method are evaluated again. Figure 3 shows photographs of FE-SEM observation of perovskite structures. Figure 3a,b are the structure of FTO/TiO2 (CBD method)/perovskite (one-step method), and Figure 3c,d are the structure of FTO/TiO2 (CBD method)/perovskite (two-step method). Upper view photographs (Figure 3a,c) are lower magnification, and lower view photographs (Figure 3b,d) are higher magnification. The crystalline size of the one-step method was slightly larger than that of the two-step method. In Figure 3b, black opening points are holes without perovskite structure. In Figure 3d, the white particles are unreacted PbI2.
Photo-sensing characteristics of current density (J) versus voltage (V) characteristics under dark and AM1.5 illumination for the case of the one-step method without PEIE are shown in Figure 4 [34] The Jp and Jd are 15.1 mA/cm2 and 2.58 μA/cm2, respectively. The ratio of photo- and dark-current density was 5.85 × 103. This value was a little higher than that of the previous study with the EB-evaporated TiO2 layer of 1.33 × 103 [36]. One of the possible reasons why the ratio of photo- and dark-current density was larger compared to the device with the EB-evaporated TiO2 is due to the smaller Jd for the case of a device with TiO2 layer by the CBD method. In this method, the surface morphology of the TiO2 layer was smoother with no obvious pin-hole than that of the EB evaporation method. This smoother surface reduces some defect points and resultant current flow due to the higher concentration of electric field at a convex and concave surface. By the way, we will discuss the polarity of the dark-current density changed at +0.57 V. This could be explained that some generation current will affect this offset voltage. As discussed later, in Figure 5, the current density below +0.57 V was smaller than in the case of the one-step method without PEIE. Thus, within the bias condition of the measurement under reversed bias condition, the current density measured by the dark condition is constant; in other words, there is no reverse bias dependence. Therefore, the generation current will occur at some generation point, for example, at the interfacial states between TiO2 and the perovskite layer. Other remaining issues are a lower series resistance and an optimization of the thickness in the TiO2 and the perovskite layer. Nevertheless, the photocurrent density of 15.1 mA/cm2 could be achieved. For the evaluation of the solar cell characteristics, the PCE of 12.4%, the short-circuit current density of 15.1 mA/cm2, the open-circuit voltage of 1.06 V, and the fill-factor of 0.77 were obtained. The fabrication condition of the perovskite layer for further lowering humidity is the still an issue for this lowness of device characteristics.
In order to obtain process controllability of the device fabrication process, the two-step method for the perovskite layer preparation is tested because the timing of the single-drop of the MAI solution is crucial and less reproducible than the single-step method. In the previous paper, the perovskite crystal formation on a modified self-assembled monolayer, 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES), a protonated amine silane coupling agent (PASCA-Br), between TiO2 and perovskite layers are discussed [29]. As in a similar matter to this situation, large polycrystalline domains will be grown on the surface and the electron injection condition will be also improved [32]. Figure 5a,b show the photo-sensing characteristics, without and with 4 wt% solutions-coated PEIE device, respectively. By inserting the PEIE layer, the photocurrent of 22.4 mA/cm2 was a little decreased by comparing 27.6 mA/cm2 for the device without PEIE layer. The ratio of photo to dark current was 2.23 × 104 and 2.88 × 104 for the case of without and with PEIE layer, respectively. At this moment, the photocurrent was decreased a little by inserting the PEIE layer. If the tunneling current between the perovskite layer and TiO2 is dominant, the photocurrent will be increased regardless of the insertion of insulating PEIE layer. On the other hand, if a thicker PEIE layer is formed on the TiO2 layer, the series resistance Rs will be increased. In addition, the dark-current will also be decreased. There is an optimum thickness of PEIE layer by changing the concentration and spin-rinse condition. As a result, the photodiode performance was slightly better for the device with the PEIE layer.
For this device fabrication condition, the series resistance Rs, estimated to be 466 Ωcm2, was observed at the voltage of around +0.90 V, as shown in Figure 6. By inserting the PEIE layer, this series resistance was dramatically decreased to 20.5 Ωcm2. As a result, the photo-sensing characteristics around the voltage of +0.9 V were different between Figure 5a,b. It is considered that a tunneling current was increased and better electron injection was carried out by employing the PEIE layer. Additionally, another interesting point for these experimental results is discussed. The photocurrent of 27.6 mA/cm2 (−0.2 V) and 31.1 mA/cm2 (−1.0 V) was larger than that of the short circuit in the common solar cells of 24.5 mA/cm2 [40]. Therefore, in the common solar cells, there is still an improvement point for the perovskite crystal growth even in the PCE of over 20%. Finally, the dark current under the bias voltage is discussed. For the case of MAPbI3 perovskite single-crystal system, a linear ohmic regime followed by the trap-filled regime with a steep increase in current was reported using a low trap-state density of the order of 109 to 1010 cm−3 [41]. Figure 7 shows the logarithm plot of the current density vs. voltage characteristics under forward and reverse bias condition in the device with FTO/TiO2/PEIE/two-step perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au. Under reverse bias condition, the dark-current density depends on the applied reverse voltage as J ~ | V | 1.6 .
This index number could not explain the common sense of the diode characteristics. However, the dark-current density is changed by changing the reverse bias condition. Therefore, the dark current under reverse bias conditions may be generated at the depletion layer of the perovskite layer and/or bias-dependent carrier injection layer between the electrode and perovskite layer [42].
Many issues will be solved by reducing the humidity of the glovebox (up to now, 30 ppm at the present situation) in order to reduce pinholes in the perovskite films [42] and the physical properties of the photo-sensing device by varying the temperature and device structures.

4. Conclusions

We investigated the PePSs with the solution-processed compact TiO2 under a low-temperature process. The fabricated device structure is a photodiode structure of FTO/TiO2/(without or with) PEIE/(one- or two-step) perovskite layer/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au. For the sensing characteristics, a ratio of photo-to-dark-current density was 2.88 × 104 for the device with PEIE layer. During the device fabrication process, the maximum temperature of the baking condition for the fabrication of perovskite layer is 150 °C. Therefore, this process condition possibly applies to a flexible substrate. In addition, we checked the validity of the two-step process and PEIE interfacial layer. Further investigations are necessary to realize practical PePS devices.

Author Contributions

Investigation, I.H., K.M. and C.Z.; Supervision, H.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work is supported by Scholarly Research Support from Toshiba Electron Devices & Storage Corp.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Naka of the University of Toyama, M. F. Hossain of Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology and Z. Wang from Soochow University for establishing the device fabrication process and valuable discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tang, C.W.; VanSlyke, S.A. Organic electroluminescent diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adachi, C.; Baldo, M.A.; Thompson, M.E.; Forrest, S.R. Nearly 100% internal phosphorescence efficiency in an organic light-emitting device. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 90, 5048. [Google Scholar]
  3. Endo, A.; Ogasawara, M.; Takahashi, A.; Yokoyama, D.; Kato, Y.; Adachi, C. Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence from Sn4+–Porphyrin Complexes and Their Application to Organic Light Emitting Diodes—A Novel Mechanism for Electroluminescence. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kudo, K.; Yamashina, M.; Morizumi, T. Field Effect Measurement of Organic Dye Films. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 23, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tsumura, A.; Koezuka, H.; Ando, T. Macromolecular electronic device: Field-effect transistor with a polythiophene thin film. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1986, 49, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, Y.-Y.; Gundlach, D.I.; Nelson, S.F.; Jackson, T.N. Pentacene-based organic thin-film transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1997, 44, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hyodo, T.; Morita, F.; Naka, S.; Okada, H.; Onnagawa, H. Self-Aligned Organic Field-Effect Transistors Using Back-Surface Exposure Method. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 43, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Katsuhara, M.; Yagi, I.; Yumoto, A.; Noda, M.; Hirai, N.; Yasuda, R.; Moriwaki, T.; Ushikura, S.; Imaoka, A.; Urabe, T.; et al. A flexible OLED display with an OTFT backplane made by scalable manufacturing process. SID 2010, 18, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, G.; Wang, J.; McElvain, J.; Heeger, A.J. Large-Area, Full-Color Image Sensors Made with Semiconducting Polymers. Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ng, T.N.; Wong, W.S.; Chabinyc, M.L.; Sambandan, S.; Street, R.A. Flexible image sensor array with bulk heterojunction organic photodiode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 213303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zukawa, T.; Naka, S.; Okada, H.; Onnagawa, H.J. Organic heterojunction phototransistor. Appl. Phys. 2002, 91, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tang, C.W. Two-layer organic photovoltaic cell. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1986, 48, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, G.; Heeger, A.J. Charge separation and photovoltaic conversion in polymer composites with internal donor/acceptor heterojunctions. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 78, 4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Ke, X.; Xiao, Z.; Ding, L.; Xia, R.; et al. Organic and solution-processed tandem solar cells with 17.3% efficiency. Science 2018, 361, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T.J. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. NREL. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 15 June 2022).
  17. Rojas, D.M.; Sun, H.; Iza, D.C.; Weickert, J.; Chen, L.; Wang, H.; Schmidt-Mende, L.; MacManus-Driscol, J.L. High-speed atmospheric atomic layer deposition of ultra thin amorphous TiO2 blocking layers at 100 C for inverted bulk heterojunction solar cells. Progr. Photovolt. 2013, 21, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Weerasinghe, H.C.; Franks, G.V.; Plessis, J.D.; Simona, G.P.; Cheng, Y.-B. Anomalous rheological behavior in chemically modified TiO2 colloidal pastes prepared for flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2010, 213, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gong, J.; Liang, J.; Sumathy, K. Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): Fundamental concepts and novel materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 5848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, D.; Dong, G.; Li, W.; Wang, L. High performance organic-inorganic perovskite-optocoupler based on low-voltage and fast response perovskite compound photodetector. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lin, Q.; Armin, A.; Lyons, D.M.; Burn, P.L.; Meredith, P. Low noise, IR-blind organohalide perovskite photodiodes for visible light detection and imaging. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, H.-W.; Sakai, N.; Sanehira, A.K.J.Y.; Ikegami, M.; Ho, K.-C.; Miyasaka, T.J. A switchable high-sensitivity photodetecting and photovoltaic device with perovskite absorber. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sutherland, B.R.; Johnston, A.K.; Ip, A.H.; Xu, J.; Adinolfi, V.; Kanjanaboos, P.; Sargent, E.H. Sensitive, fast, and stable perovskite photodetectors exploiting interface engineering. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fang, Y.; Huang, J. Resolving Weak Light of Sub-picowatt per Square Centimeter by Hybrid Perovskite Photodetectors Enabled by Noise Reduction. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2804–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yakunin, S.; Sytnyk, M.; Kriegner, D.; Shrestha, S.; Richter, M.; Matt, G.J.; Azimi, H.; Brabec, C.J.; Stangl, J.; Kovalenko, M.V.; et al. Detection of X-ray photons by solution-processed lead halide perovskites. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dong, R.; Fang, Y.; Chae, J.; Dai, J.; Xiao, Z.; Dong, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Centrone, A.; Zeng, X.C.; Huang, J. High-gain and low-driving-voltage photodetectors based on organolead triiodide perovskites. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, J.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Xue, J.; Dong, Y.; Li, X.; Zeng, H. Monolayer and few-layer all-inorganic perovskites as a new family of two-dimensional semiconductors for printable optoelectronic devices. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, W.; Wang, X.; Han, X.; Yang, Z.; Gao, G.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, J.; Tan, Y.; Pan, A.; Pan, C. Flexible photodetector arrays based on patterned CH3NH3PbI3−xClx perovskite film for real-time photosensing and imaging. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1805913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, C.-C.; Yuan, S.; Lou, Y.-H.; Liu, Q.-W.; Li, M.; Okada, H.; Wang, Z.-K. Perovskite films with reduced interfacial strains via a molecular-level flexible interlayer for photovoltaic application. Adv. Mater. 2020, 2020, 2001479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xiong, T.; Wang, F.; Qiao, X.; Ma, D. A soluble nonionic surfactant as electron injection material for high-efficiency inverted bottom-emission organic light emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 123310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, Y.; Fuentes-Hernandez, C.; Shim, J.; Meyer, J.; Giordano, A.J.; Li, H.; Winget, P.; Papadopoulos, T.; Cheun, H.; Kim, J.; et al. A universal method to produce low–work function electrodes for organic electronics. Science 2012, 336, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shoda, K.; Morimoto, M.; Naka, S.; Okada, H. Semitransparent Organic Solar Cells with Polyethylenimine Ethoxylated Interfacial Layer Using Lamination Process. IEICE Trans. Electron. 2019, 102, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Morimoto, M.; Yoshida, T.; Naka, S.; Okada, H. Characteristics of electron injection at the oxide electrode/polyethylenimine ethoxylated/Alq3 interface. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 59, SDDC03. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hirano, I.; Takano, R.; Zhang, C.; Okada, H. Study on Perovskite Photo-sensors with Solution-Processed Compact TiO2 Under Low Temperature Fabrication Process. In Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices, Kyoto, Japan, 1–4 September 2020; p. 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hossain, M.F.; Hirano, I.; Naka, S.; Okada, H. Evaluation of Perovskite Photo-sensors with Electron-beam Evaporated Titanium Dioxide Films. In Proceedings of the 26th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices, Kyoto, Japan, 2–5 July 2019; p. 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hossain, M.F.; Naka, S.; Okada, H.J. Annealing effect of E-beam evaporated TiO2 films and their performance in perovskite solar cells. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 360, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Im, J.-H.; Kim, H.-S.; Parka, N.-G. Morphology-photovoltaic property correlation in perovskite solar cells: One-step versus two-step deposition of CH3NH3PbI3. APL Mater. 2014, 2, 081510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, M.; Feng, Y.; Bian, J.; Liu, H.; Shi, Y. A comparative study of one-step and two-step approaches for MAPbI3 perovskite layer and its influence on the performance of mesoscopic perovskite solar cell. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2018, 692, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahmadian-Yazdi, M.R.; Zabihi, F.; Habibi, M.; Eslamian, M. Effects of process parameters on the characteristics of mixed-halide perovskite solar cells fabricated by one-step and two-step sequential coating. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhang, C.-C.; Lou, Y.-H.; Li, M.; Okada, H.; Wang, Z.-K. Electric-field-manipulated crystal stacking for high-quality organic–inorganic halide perovskites. Appl. Phys. Express 2020, 13, 085503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, D.; Adinolfi, V.; Comin, R.; Yuan, M.; Alarousu, E.; Buin, A.; Chen, Y.; Hoogland, S.; Rothenberger, A.; Katsiev, K.; et al. Low trap-state density and long carrier diffusion in organolead trihalide perovskite single crystals. Science 2015, 347, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dongaonkar, S.; Servaites, J.D.; Ford, G.M.; Loser, S.; Moore, J.; Gelfand, R.M.; Mohseni, H.; Hillhouse, H.W.; Agrawal, R.; Ratner, M.A.; et al. Universality of non-Ohmic shunt leakage in thin-film solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 124509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Typical device structure of the PePS under study. Tested device structures are FTO/TiO2/without and with PEIE/one- and two-step perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au.
Figure 1. Typical device structure of the PePS under study. Tested device structures are FTO/TiO2/without and with PEIE/one- and two-step perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au.
Crystals 12 00914 g001
Figure 2. Photographs of FE-SEM observation of TiO2 layer fabricated by (a) electron-beam evaporation, and (b) chemical bath deposition method.
Figure 2. Photographs of FE-SEM observation of TiO2 layer fabricated by (a) electron-beam evaporation, and (b) chemical bath deposition method.
Crystals 12 00914 g002
Figure 3. Photographs of FE-SEM observation of perovskite structures. (a,b) FTO/TiO2 (CBD method)/perovskite (one-step method); (c,d) FTO/TiO2 (CBD method)/perovskite (two-step method).
Figure 3. Photographs of FE-SEM observation of perovskite structures. (a,b) FTO/TiO2 (CBD method)/perovskite (one-step method); (c,d) FTO/TiO2 (CBD method)/perovskite (two-step method).
Crystals 12 00914 g003
Figure 4. Current density versus voltage characteristics under dark and AM1.5 illumination for case of one-step method with TiO2 layer fabricated by chemical bath deposition method.
Figure 4. Current density versus voltage characteristics under dark and AM1.5 illumination for case of one-step method with TiO2 layer fabricated by chemical bath deposition method.
Crystals 12 00914 g004
Figure 5. Device characteristics of photo-sensor without (a) and with PEIE (b) as electron injection layer using two-step method.
Figure 5. Device characteristics of photo-sensor without (a) and with PEIE (b) as electron injection layer using two-step method.
Crystals 12 00914 g005
Figure 6. Linear J-V curve of photo-sensor without and with PEIE as electron injection layer using two-step method.
Figure 6. Linear J-V curve of photo-sensor without and with PEIE as electron injection layer using two-step method.
Crystals 12 00914 g006
Figure 7. Logarithm plot of current density vs. voltage characteristics in FTO/TiO2/PEIE/two-step perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au structure under dark condition.
Figure 7. Logarithm plot of current density vs. voltage characteristics in FTO/TiO2/PEIE/two-step perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au structure under dark condition.
Crystals 12 00914 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hirano, I.; Maruyama, K.; Zhang, C.; Okada, H. Perovskite Photo-Sensors with Solution-Processed TiO2 under Low Temperature Process and Ultra-Thin Polyethylenimine Ethoxylated as Electron Injection Layer. Crystals 2022, 12, 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12070914

AMA Style

Hirano I, Maruyama K, Zhang C, Okada H. Perovskite Photo-Sensors with Solution-Processed TiO2 under Low Temperature Process and Ultra-Thin Polyethylenimine Ethoxylated as Electron Injection Layer. Crystals. 2022; 12(7):914. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12070914

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hirano, Ikuma, Kazuya Maruyama, Congcong Zhang, and Hiroyuki Okada. 2022. "Perovskite Photo-Sensors with Solution-Processed TiO2 under Low Temperature Process and Ultra-Thin Polyethylenimine Ethoxylated as Electron Injection Layer" Crystals 12, no. 7: 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12070914

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop