Next Article in Journal
Pressure-Induced Structural Phase Transitions in the Chromium Spinel LiInCr4O8 with Breathing Pyrochlore Lattice
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Growth Interface of Large Nd:YAG Crystals
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of OP-GaP Grown on OP-GaAs Templates Using Nondestructive Reciprocal Space Mapping
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Blue Photorefractive Properties and Exponential Gain of Photorefraction in Sc-Doped Ru:Fe:LiNbO3 Crystals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pure and Yb-Doped LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4 Crystals: A Review of Recent Advances

1
National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, 077125 Magurele, Romania
2
Doctoral School of Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Bucharest, 077125 Magurele, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2023, 13(2), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020169
Submission received: 19 December 2022 / Revised: 15 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 18 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Rare-Earth Doped Materials)

Abstract

:
This paper reviews the progress in developing the LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4-LYSB and Yb-doped LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4-LYSB:Yb huntite-type crystals grown by the Czochralski method as new candidates for the next generation of nonlinear optical (NLO) and/or laser crystals. Considering the incongruent melting of these crystals, the initial compositions of the melt and the pulling and rotation rates were optimized. Additionally, a special thermal setup was engineered to grow LYSB-type crystals by the Czochralski crystal growth method. The chemical compositions of the LYSB and LYSB:Yb grown crystals were found to be La0.78Y0.32Sc2.90(BO3)4 and La0.78Y0.32Yb0.04Sc2.86(BO3)4, respectively. Therefore, for the LYSB:Yb crystal, the doping concentration of Yb3+ ions was considered to be 4 at.% with respect to the nonstoichiometric (La1-xYx)1.25Sc2.75(BO3)4 undoped compounds, i.e., LYSB:Yb (4 at.%). In terms of NLO properties, the obtained results demonstrate that LYSB and LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystals possess remarkable properties specific to huntite-type crystals. The main advantage of these crystals consists in the fact that they may be obtained with large dimensions and excellent optical quality by the Czochralski method, which recommends them as a new class of highly efficient crystals for different NLO applications, including second harmonic generation (SHG) of high-power or high-energy laser beams. The laser performances of the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal prove its favorable intrinsic properties to generate laser emissions in the 1 µm range with high efficiency. The efficient laser emission at ~1028 nm together with good NLO characteristics to convert its own emission into emission at ~514 nm via SHG make the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal a very promising active medium to be used in self-frequency doubling configuration.

1. Introduction

Nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals play a key role in the emergence of optoelectronic and photonic technologies, as they have the ability to change the characteristics of a laser beam in terms of frequency, amplitude, phase, and polarization. In the context of expanding laser applications over a wide variety of domains, the pursuit of new NLO crystals has attracted more interest in the scientific community. The specific criteria that a NLO crystal should meet are the following: (i) crystallizing in noncentrosymmetric structure (χ(2) ≠ 0); (ii) high transparency in the spectral range of interest; (iii) large nonlinear optical coefficients; (iv) moderate birefringence to meet the phase-matching conditions, especially in the UV spectral range; (v) large laser-induced damage threshold (LDT); (vi) chemical stability and good physical properties; and, last but not least, (vii) the possibility of obtaining crystals with large dimensions and high quality. Since the 1980s, more than a hundred different NLO crystals have been developed and studied. Among these, NLO crystals from the borate family, such as β-BaB2O4 (β-BBO), LiB3O5 (LBO), CsLiB6O10 (CLBO), GdCa4O(BO3)3 (GdCOB), YCa4O(BO3)3 (YCOB), and YAl3(BO3)4 (YAB), stood out for their good NLO properties. However, the main disadvantage of BBO, LBO, CLBO, and YAB crystals is that they have incongruent melting and can be obtained only by the flux crystal growth method, which involves complex and long-time growth processes as well as some limitations in the grown crystal dimension and quality. Two types of borate crystal are known to melt congruently or include congruently melting compounds that can be grown with large size and high quality by the Czochralski method: (i) rare-earth calcium oxyborates RCOB (R = Gd, Y, La) and (ii) binary borates LnMe3(BO3)4 (Ln = lanthanide, Me = Al, Ga, Sc) with trigonal huntite-type structure [1]. On the basis of the anionic group theory [2], huntite-type borates are predicted to possess very good NLO properties as a result of their favorable structure containing parallel-aligned (BO3)3- anionic groups. The most recognized member of this family is YAB crystal, because it presents the highest nonlinear efficiency (d11@1064nm = 1.5 ± 0.1 pm V−1) and also the highest laser damage threshold (0.4–0.6 GW/cm2) [3,4], but, as pointed out, it has the disadvantage of incongruent melting. In order to overcome the limitations imposed by the growth technology, research has focused on the development of huntite-type compounds based on scandium (Sc) cations LnSc3(BO3)4 that can crystallize in various structural phases depending on the ratio of the ionic radius of Ln and the ionic radius of Sc (rLn/rSc) [5]. For instance, LaSc3(BO3)4-LSB (Ln = La) crystallize in the monoclinic system with space group C2/c (centrosymmetric), whereas YSc3(BO3)4-YSB (Ln = Y) crystallize in the trigonal system with space group R32 (noncentrosymmetric) isostructural with huntite mineral CaMg3(CO3)4. Given that in centrosymmetric crystals the nonlinear susceptibility of second order (χ(2)) is zero, research focused on changing the LSB structure from monoclinic to trigonal structure by doping with Ln ions having smaller ionic radii, e.g., La1-xNdxSc3(BO3)4 or LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4, LaxLuySc4-x-y(BO3)4, BixLaySc4-x-y(BO3)4, and LaxGdySc4-x-y(BO3)4 [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Even though these compounds have incongruent melting, it was proved that, with the appropriate composition and a suitable thermal setup, the LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4-LYSB and LaxGdySc4-x-y(BO3)4-LGSB crystals could be grown by the Czochralski crystal growth technique [12,13]. This paper reviews the progress of developing the LYSB and Yb-doped LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4-LYSB:Yb crystals obtained by the Czochralski method as new candidates for the next generation of NLO and/or laser crystals.

2. Huntite-Type LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4 Crystal

2.1. Material Synthesis and Czochralski Growth

In a first approximation, based on the fact that the difference between the ionic radii of La3+ and Y3+ ions is smaller than that of Y3+ and Sc3+ ions in six-fold coordination (rLa-rY = 0.132 Å and rY-rSc = 0.155 Å) [14], in order to determine the minimum doping concentration with Y cations in the LSB structure that leads to the trigonal phase formation as the majority phase, we assumed that Y3+ ions replaced only La3+ cations in the LSB structure. This meant that, in this approximation, the general formula of LYSB was presumed to be La1-xYxSc3(BO3)4. Therefore, different La1-xYxSc3(BO3)4 compounds with 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.6 were synthesized by the solid-state reaction method. Oxide powders of 5N purity (La2O3, Y2O3, and Sc2O3) and 99.98% B2O3 were used as starting materials. Considering the evaporation of B2O3 during the synthesis of polycrystalline compounds, to the stoichiometric amounts was added an excess of B2O3 (5 wt. %). Before weighing, the oxide powders of Sc2O3, Y2O3, and La2O3 were heated for 12 h at 1000 °C in air to eliminate absorbed water. Then, the powders were mixed, pressed into tablets, and sintered in atmospheric air for 24 h at 1300 °C. The X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) spectra were measured at room temperature in the 2θ range of 10°–60° using a PANalytical Empyrean X-ray diffractometer (λ = 1.5406 Å). XRPD spectra of the polycrystalline compounds La1-xYxSc3(BO3)4 having x from 0 at. % to 60 at. % are presented in Figure 1. As can be seen, the phase transition from the monoclinic structure of LSB (space group C2/c) to the trigonal structure of LYSB (space group R32) was achieved for a Y concentration over 40 at. %. However, there were still some diffraction peaks that were not indexed by the trigonal structure. Therefore, the Rietveld method was employed to quantify each phase of the compounds with x > 40 at. %. As expected, the analysis revealed the existence of one dominant trigonal phase (space group R32) in a proportion larger than 93 wt. % and two minority phases, the monoclinic phase (space C2/c) and the cubic phase of Sc2O3, which were quantified to be smaller than 2 wt. % and 5 wt. %, respectively, in all synthesized compounds.
To test the second harmonic generation (SHG) property of the La1-xYxSc3(BO3)4 compounds having x > 0.4, a Q-smart 850 Nd:YAG laser with emission at 1064 nm (10 Hz, 6 ns) was employed. All of the investigated compounds generated green light, thus confirming that they had χ(2) ≠ 0.
Knowing the compositional domain regarding the achieving of the phase transition to the trigonal structure, we proceeded to the growth of the LYSB crystal by the Czochralski method. It is well known that LaxYyScz(BO3)4 (x + y + z = 4) are peritectic compounds and that, in order to crystallize the trigonal phase, a deficiency of ScBO3, i.e., z < 3, or a surplus of LaBO3-YBO3 is required in the initial melt [5]. Considering this, La0.754Y0.546Sc2.70(BO3)4, La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4, La0.7875Y0.4625Sc2.75(BO3)4, La0.8625Y0.4375Sc2.70(BO3)4, and La0.8125Y0.4375Sc2.75(BO3)4 nonstoichiometric compounds were synthesized by the solid-state reaction method using the same procedure described above and used as starting compounds (initial melt compositions) to grow, by the Czochralski technique, LYSB-type crystals. The melting behavior of these new compounds was investigated by thermogravimetric (TG) analysis and differential thermal analysis (DTA) using a SETARAM Setsys Evolution 18 analyzer. In this aim, powder from each synthesized compound was loaded into a platinum (Pt) crucible and heated in synthetic air flux (a mixture of 21% O2 and 79% N2 of 99.999% purity) to 1600 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and then cooled to room temperature at the same rate. Figure 2 shows DTA curves corresponding to the La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4 compound. During the heating (blue curve), two endothermic peaks at 1473 °C and 1492 °C were present, indicating the melting of two compounds with ~1.4% mass loss. Similarly, two peaks at 1466 °C and 1357 °C arose during the cooling process (red curve in Figure 2) with a similar mass loss. Most likely, the mass losses were mainly due to the continuous evaporation of B2O3 (melting point of about 450 °C). This behavior proves that compound La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4 has an incongruent melting. All investigated samples showed similar thermal behavior.
Compared to the growth of a congruent melting compound, the growth of an incongruent melting compound by the Czochralski method is more difficult and requires several supplementary precautions. Therefore, a special thermal setup shown in Figure 3 was developed for growing LYSB-type crystals by the Czochralski crystal growth method. The novelty of the thermal setup consists of the addition of two rings, one of ceramic Al2O3 and the second of Pt, placed at a distance of approximately 20 mm and 2 mm, respectively, above the crucible, which act as baffles and have the main role of achieving a balance between the thermal gradients in the melt and the evaporation of B2O3, thus avoiding the constitutional supercooling phenomenon [5]. The high viscosity of the melt and its tendency to separate into different phases and to vitrify require intense stirring. This can be achieved by increasing the radial thermal gradients in the melt, which, at the same time, leads to its overheating and implicitly to an increase in the concentration of B2O3 vapors above the melt. The condensation of B2O3 vapors on the surface of the growing crystal is very harmful, because the liquid B2O3 drains then into the high-temperature region and dissolves the growing crystal, thus leading to crystallization failure and even to the loss of contact between the melt and the growing crystal. In this respect, the developed thermal setup allows for efficient control of both the B2O3 vapors’ condensation on the growing crystal and the thermal gradients in the melt and over the crucible.
An ADL-MP crystal growth furnace equipped with a TruHeat MF 5030 induction heating generator (100 kHz) was used to grow LYSB-type crystals by the Czochralski technique. The growth experiments were performed using iridium (Ir) crucibles with a height of 30 mm and a diameter of 30 mm in a static atmosphere of N2 gas with 5N purity. In these conditions, five LYSB-type crystals were grown from melts with the initial compositions La0.754Y0.546Sc2.70(BO3)4, La0.7875Y0.4625Sc2.75(BO3)4, La0.8625Y0.4375Sc2.70(BO3)4, La0.8125Y0.4375Sc2.75(BO3)4, and La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4. Figure 4 shows the first four as-grown crystals. They were grown along the ⟨0 0 1⟩ direction using LGSB-oriented seeds and were of moderate quality, having a regular hexagonal shape typical of huntite-type crystals grown along the crystallographic c-axis [12]. As can be seen from Figure 4b, the crystal grown from the melt with initial composition La0.7875Y0.4625Sc2.75(BO3)4 had a large transparent region inside the crystal body, which was very promising for cutting and obtaining crystal samples. During the growth of this crystal, the pulling rate used was 1.8 mm/h, and the rotation rate of the seed was kept constant at 10 rpm. However, when the crystal was tested for SHG of the fundamental wavelength 1064 nm, diffuse green radiation scattered in different directions was observed, thus indicating the existence of twinning defects, similar to the case of LYSB and YAB crystals grown by the flux method [15].
A new crystal was grown from the initial melt with La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4 composition, a composition lying between the initial melt compositions (in terms of La/Y content) used to grow the LYSB crystals shown in Figure 4a,b. The as-grown crystal is shown in Figure 5. As can be observed, it had a high degree of transparency and was free of visible defects. Moreover, preliminary SHG tests of the 1064 fundamental wavelength confirmed the high quality of the grown crystal, the green radiation being generated only in the phase-matching direction. In this case, too, the crystal was grown along the ⟨0 0 1⟩ direction, using optimized rotation and pulling speeds of 8–10 rpm and 2 mm/h, respectively. Typically, in each crystal growth process, a maximum of ~15% of the initial melt mass (~90 g) was transformed into a single crystal. Similar to all grown crystals, the obtained crystal had typical dimensions of approximately 13 mm in diameter and 25 mm in length. Since the crystal grown from the initial melt composition La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4 had the best quality, the following investigations presented in this chapter were performed on this crystal.
The X-ray rocking curve (XRC) was measured on a laser-grade polished crystal sample oriented perpendicular to the c-axis (c-cut) using the same PANalytical Empyrean X-ray diffractometer. Figure 6 shows the XRC of the (003) reflection plane. The obtained peak had a symmetrical shape with a full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 0.013°, indicating the good crystalline quality of the grown crystal. The laser-induced damage threshold (LDT) was measured using a pulsed Q-smart 850 Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm, 10 Hz, 6 ns). It was found that the LYSB crystal had a high LDT of ~2 GW/cm2, being four times larger compared to the value of 0.4–0.6 GW/cm2 obtained for the YAB crystal [4].

2.2. Structural and Compositional Characterization

The XRPD spectrum at room temperature of LYSB crystal is presented in Figure 7. The spectrum was very well indexed by the trigonal phase (space group R32, PDF card 04-018-1225), and no impurity phase was detected. The lattice constants were found to be a = 9.8098(4) Å and c = 7.9802(3) Å. Compared to the LYSB crystal grown by the flux method (a = 9.774(1) Å, c = 7.946(2) Å) [8], the LYSB crystal grown by the Czochralski technique had a larger unit cell.
The ICP-AES (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry) method was used to determine the chemical composition of the grown crystal. A trace scan advantage spectrometer was employed. The compositional uniformity was evaluated using samples cut from different areas along the growth direction. Table 1 shows the chemical compositions of all measured samples. The crystal stoichiometry was determined according to the composition of the huntite-type compounds. Therefore, 4 B atoms and 12 O atoms were considered in each formula unit. As can be seen from Table 1, the crystal had a homogenous composition along the growth direction, and the chemical composition of LYSB crystal, with a measurement error of ±0.2%, was determined to be La0.78Y0.32Sc2.90(BO3)4. Considering the La/Y ratio (1.57 in the starting melt and over 2.40 in the grown crystal), we can deduce that the effective segregation coefficient of Y3+ ions in LSB matrix was less than one. Additionally, the La/Y ratio of over 2.40 in the grown crystal was higher than that of the flux-grown LYSB crystal of ~1.26 [8]. From Table 1, it can also be observed that the stoichiometry of Sc cations is very close to 3 (~2.90) in the grown crystal, which implies that Y3+ ions largely substituted La3+ cations in the LYSB structure and that only a small fraction was inserted in the sites of Sc3+ cations.
The LYSB crystal structure was refined using the Rietveld analysis according to XRPD data using the X’Pert High Score Plus software. During refinement, occupancy factors determined by elemental ICP analysis were used for the sites occupied by La and Sc cations. The obtained results are shown in Figure 8. The reliability parameters of the refinement were found to be Rp = 3.44, Rwp = 4.42, Rexp = 1.58, and GOF = 2.80, where Rp, Rwp, and Rexp are the unweighted profile R-factor, the weighted profile R-factor, and the expected R-factor, respectively, and GOF is the goodness of fit. The atomic coordinates and site occupancy fraction after the Rietveld refinement are summarized in Table 2.
The structure of LYSB crystal was visualized using VESTA software and is shown in Figure 9. It shows a typical huntite-type structure in which La3+ and a significant fraction of Y3+ ions (Y1 in Figure 9) are located in the trigonal prismatic sites with D3(32) symmetry and have six-fold oxygen coordination. The BO3 triangles are distributed in almost planar layers separating these prisms, and, therefore, the La(Y)O6 trigonal prisms are completely isolated from one another. The Sc3+ and a small fraction of Y3+ ions (Y2 in Figure 9) are located in the octahedral sites with C2(2) symmetry, forming distorted octahedra with shared edges.

2.3. Optical and Vibrational Characterization

The optical transmission spectrum of the LYSB crystal was registered at room temperature on a 1.75 mm thick c-cut crystal sample using a Varian Cary 5000 UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer. As shown in Figure 10, the LYSB crystal had a wide optical transparency window with a high transmittance of over 80% in the wavelength range of 400–2450 nm. No absorption peaks were detected in this wavelength range, and the UV cut-off wavelength was below 200 nm (the lower limit of the spectrophotometer). Compared to the LGSB crystal grown by the Czochralski method [12], which has a UV cut-off wavelength of 230 nm and some absorption peaks in the UV range due to the absorption of Gd3+ ions, the LYSB crystal is more suitable for use in various NLO devices in the UV domain. The energy band gap was calculated from Tauc’s plot (the inset of Figure 10) as Eg = 6.0 eV, close to the value of 5.7 eV reported for the YAB crystal [16].
The Raman spectrum of the LYSB crystal was also registered at room temperature under the laser excitation wavelength of λ = 633 nm on the same 1.75 mm thick oriented crystal sample. The obtained spectrum is shown in Figure 11. The maximum phonon energy was found to be ~1283 cm−1, lower than the values determined for the YAB (>1400 cm−1) and Czochralski-grown Pr:LGSB (~1414 cm−1) crystals [17,18].

2.4. NLO Properties

The refractive indices of the LYSB crystal were measured by the minimum deviation technique using a ZEISS optical goniometer. For this purpose, a prism having the prism axis parallel to the Z-axis and an apex angle of 60°28′ was cut from the LYSB crystal, and the entrance and exit faces of the light through the prism were well polished (Figure 12). Different gas-discharge lamps (Zn, Hg, Na, Cd) with emission in the visible domain and some laser diodes with emissions at 974 nm (Limo, Dortmund, Germany) and at 877 and 808 nm (Coherent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used as light sources.
The values of the ordinary (no) and extraordinary (ne) refractive indices as a function of wavelength are summarized in Table 3. The birefringence (Δn) is also presented. As can be seen in Table 3, LYSB is an optically negative uniaxial crystal, as ne < no.
The dispersion of the refractive indices was fitted by the least-squares method, using the following Sellmeier equation [19]:
n i 2 ( λ ) = A + B λ 2 C D λ 2  
where i denotes the ordinary (o) or extraordinary (e) indices; λ is the wavelength expressed in µm; and A, B, C, and D are the Sellmeier coefficients (listed in Table 4). Figure 13 shows the dispersion curves of the refractive indices along with the fit of the experimental data.
Based on the measured refractive indices and the Sellmeier equations, type-I and type-II phase-matching curves for LYSB were determined and are presented in Figure 14. The LYSB crystal was type-I and -II phase-matchable over a broad range of fundamental wavelengths. The SHG phase-matching lower limit was at the fundamental wavelength of 579 nm, being higher than that reported for the YAB crystal of 490 nm. Thus, the shortest wavelength obtainable by SHG was 289 nm. Regarding the type-I SHG of the 1064 nm fundamental wavelength, the value of the phase-matching angle was determined to be θpm = 33.4°, being close to the value of θpm = 33.5° found for the LYSB crystal grown by the flux method [7,8]. Moreover, 355 nm UV radiation may be generated in Czochralski-grown LYSB crystal by using type-II sum frequency generation (SFG, eoe) of the fundamental wavelengths of 532 and 1064 nm at θpm = 65.2° (Figure 15).
The spectral acceptance (Δλ × L), angular acceptance (Δθ × L), and walk-off angle (ρ) were determined using the following equations [20,21,22]:
Δ λ × L = 0.443   ( d n o d λ ( λ F ) 1 2 d n e d λ ( λ S H ) ) 1
Δ θ × L = 0.443 λ [ 1 + n o 2 ( 2 ω ) n e 2 ( 2 ω ) tan 2 ( θ ) tan ( θ ) | 1 ( n o ( 2 ω ) n e ( 2 ω ) ) 2 | n e ( 2 ω , θ ) ]
t a n   ρ = 1 2 [ n o ( ω ) ] 2 { 1 [ n e ( 2 ω ) ] 2 1 [ n o ( 2 ω ) ] 2 } sin 2 θ
where λF and λSH are the wavelengths of the fundamental and second harmonic radiation, respectively; L is the length of the crystal; θ is the phase-matching angle; and ne(2ω), no(2ω), and no(ω) are the extraordinary (e) and ordinary (o) refractive indices for second harmonic and fundamental frequencies. The LYSB crystal has only two non-zero independent nonlinear coefficients, d11 and d14, assuming Kleinman symmetry relations. Since d14 has no contribution in the case of type-I SHG, only d11 is considered in further calculations. Therefore, the effective nonlinear coefficient can be estimated using the following relation [23]:
d e f f t y p e   I = d 11 c o s θ c o s 3 φ  
where θ and φ are phase-matching angles for type-I SHG. More exactly, θ is defined as the angle between the crystallophysic Z axis and the direction of propagation through the crystal, and φ is the angle between the crystallophysic X axis and the projection of the direction of propagation in the XY plane of the crystal (Figure 16).
Based on the anionic group theory [2], the magnitude of the d11 nonlinear coefficient can be calculated using the following equation [7]:
d 11 = F   V p = 1 N   i j k   R 1 i R 1 j R 1 k β i j k
where F is the local-field factor; V represents the unit-cell volume; R1x denotes the orientation direction cosine for each BO3 group; and βijk is the component of the hyperpolarizability tensor for each BO3 anionic group with only one non-zero component, β111. The values of (θ, φ), Δn, ρ, Δθ × L, Δλ × L, and d11 for type-I SHG of the fundamental wavelength of 1064 nm are listed in Table 5.
Presently, the most well-known SHG crystals commonly used for the manufacture of various laser systems include NLO crystals such as YAl3(BO3)4 (YAB), LiB3O5 (LBO), β-BaB2O4 (BBO), Li2B4O7, CsLiB6O10 (CLBO), KTIOPO4 (KTP), KH2PO4 (KDP), LiNbO3, and KNbO3. A summary of their main properties (deff, phase-matching angles, transparency window, laser-induced damage threshold, crystal growth method, and some comments) for SHG of fundamental emission at 1064 nm compared to those of the LYSB crystal grown by the Czochralski method is presented in Table 6.
The main disadvantage of YAB, LBO, BBO, CLBO, KTP, and KDP crystals is that they can be obtained only by the flux crystal growth method, which involves complex and long-time growth processes as well as some limitations in the size and optical quality of the grown crystals. For example, in the case of YAB crystal, different flux components, such as Fe or Mo, are present as impurities, leading to the appearance of some absorption bands that limit its applications in the UV spectral range. LBO is currently the most widely used crystal for high-power SHG of 1064 nm radiation due to its high LDT and non-critical phase-matching. However, it is not phase-matchable for fundamental wavelengths shorter than 688 nm, which limits its functionality in obtaining near-UV radiation. BBO crystal presents both type-I and type-II phase-matching for a large range of fundamental radiations, with the shortest fundamental type-I phase-matched wavelength of 410 mm. The limitations of BBO are the difficulty of growing crystals of consistent quality and very high phase-matching angular sensitivity, thus requiring great precision and a very small tolerance regarding the positioning of the crystal into the system. Li2B4O7, CLBO, and KDP crystals have water solubility problems and, thus, require much attention in handling, packaging, and especially in use. Moreover, they all have low values of deff. As for the KTP, LiNbO3, and KNbO3 crystals, they possess high values of deff but are not optically transparent in the UV range. As can be seen from Table 6, the Czochralski-grown LYSB crystal has an effective nonlinear coefficient, deff = 1.13 pm/V, almost identical to that of LBO crystal (1.17 pm/V); it is type-I phase-matchable at 1064 nm (θpm = 33.4°); possesses a large transparency window in the range of 200–2800 nm, slightly larger than that of LBO crystal (198–2600 nm); has a high laser-induced damage threshold, LDT = 20 J/cm2, close to that of LBO and CLBO crystals of 20 J/cm2; and, last but not least, it can be obtained in large dimensions and excellent optical quality by the Czochralski technique. Taking into account all of these favorable properties, it can be assumed that Czochralski-grown LYSB crystals constitute a new class of highly efficient crystals for different NLO applications, including SHG of high-power or high-energy laser beams.

3. Yb-Doped LaxYyS4-x-y(BO3)4 Crystal

3.1. Material Synthesis and Czochralski Growth

In order to be used as starting compound (initial melt composition) for growth by the Czochralski method, the polycrystalline compound LYSB:Yb was synthesized by using the same procedure as for the undoped LYSB crystal. Oxide powders of 5N purity (La2O3, Y2O3, Yb2O3, and Sc2O3) and 99.98% B2O3 were used as raw materials. The Yb3+ ions’ doping concentration in the LYSB host matrix was selected to be 5 at.% with respect to the nonstoichiometric (La1-xYx)1.25Sc2.75(BO3)4 undoped compounds. Consequently, the raw materials were weighed according to the following chemical reaction:
0.4   L a 2 O 3 + 0.2   Y 2 O 3 + 0.025 Y b 2 O 3 + 1.375 S c 2 O 3 + 2 B 2 O 3 L a 0.8 Y 0.4 Y b 0.05 S c 2.75 ( B O 3 ) 4    
LYSB:Yb single crystal was grown by the Czochralski method using the same thermal setup as for the undoped crystal. A <001> oriented LYSB seed was used to initiate the growth, and the pulling rate was set at 2 mm/h, while the seed rotation varied between 8 and 10 rpm during the growth process. Figure 17 shows the as-grown LYSB:Yb crystal. As can be seen, the crystal was of excellent quality, being very transparent and without any visible defects. Moreover, the quality of the LYSB:Yb crystal appeared to be higher than that of the undoped LYSB crystal, which could be attributed to a better choice of the initial melt composition used to grow the LYSB:Yb crystal. The dimensions of the grown crystal were 35 mm in length and 12 mm in diameter. Preliminary SHG tests of the 1064 fundamental wavelength confirmed the high quality of the grown crystal, the green radiation being generated only in the phase-matching direction, thus indicating the absence of twinning defects existing in flux-grown LYSB and YAB crystals [15] or in LYSB crystals grown by the Czochralski method from inappropriate initial melt compositions.
The XRPD spectrum of the LYSB:Yb crystal was recorded at room temperature using the same PANalytical Empyrean X-ray diffractometer (λ = 1.5406 Å). The measured spectrum is presented in Figure 18 along with the PDF card 04-015-9641 of the La0.78Gd0.22Sc3(BO3)4 (LGSB) crystal (trigonal structure, space group R32 [10]). All diffraction peaks were very well indexed by the huntite-type structure of pure LGSB crystal. The lattice constants were determined as a = 9.8114(4) Å and c = 7.9808(9) Å, being slightly higher than for the undoped LYSB crystal (a = 9.8098(4) Å and c = 7.9802(3) Å) [13].
The ICP-AES method was employed to evaluate the chemical uniformity and determine the elemental composition of the as-grown crystal. Table 7 summarizes the chemical compositions of different samples cut from the grown crystal. The small compositional variation along the growth direction indicates good compositional uniformity, and the composition of the grown crystal was determined as being La0.78Y0.32Yb0.04Sc2.86(BO3)4, indicating a doping concentration of Yb3+ ions in the grown LYSB:Yb crystal of 4 at.%, i.e., LYSB:Yb (4 at.%). Taking into account that the concentration of Yb3+ ions in the starting melt was 5 at.%, the effective segregation coefficient (keff) of Yb3+ ions was determined to be keff = 0.8. It can also be observed that the Sc content was lower than in the undoped LYSB crystal, which means that Yb3+ ions substituted both RE (RE = La, Y) and Sc sites in the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal structure.

3.2. Evaluation of NLO Properties

The refractive indices of the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal were also measured using the minimum deviation method. The measured refractive indices (Table 8) were fitted according to the Sellmeier equations:
n o 2 ( λ ) = 3.3124 + 0.0296 λ 2 0.0192 0.0262 λ 2
n e 2 ( λ ) = 3.0254 + 0.0239 λ 2 0.0179 0.0159 λ 2  
Figure 19 shows the wavelength dispersion of the refractive indices together with the Sellmeier fit. The values of the refractive indices of the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal were determined to be very close to those of undoped LYSB crystal. Therefore, the phase-matching properties for type-I and type-II SHG and SFG are also similar.
The values of (θ, φ), (ρ), (Δθ × L) (Δλ × L), and (deff) for SHG of type I of the fundamental wavelength of 1028 nm were determined and are reported in Table 9.

3.3. Spectroscopic Properties

The spectroscopic properties of Yb3+ ions were evaluated to investigate the laser emission characteristics of the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal as a new laser material. Figure 20 presents the optical transmission spectrum in the range of 220–2500 nm recorded at room temperature using a Varian Cary 5000 UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer on a 1.0 mm thick c-cut crystal sample. The LYSB:Yb crystal had a high transparency of about 80% in both VIS and NIR spectral ranges, which is an essential property required to achieve efficient direct NIR laser emission or in the VIS range via SHG or self-frequency doubling processes. The only absorption lines observed in the spectrum were located in the 900–1000 nm range and corresponded to the 2F7/22F5/2 intraconfigurational absorption transition of Yb3+ ions. Compared to the undoped LYSB crystal, the cut-off wavelength of the transmission spectrum was red-shifted by 20 nm, having a value of 220 nm. Taking into account that Yb3+ ions may substitute both RE3+ (RE = La, Y) and Sc3+ ions, we can attribute this shift to the modification of the contents of RE and Sc cations in the LYSB host matrix induced by doping with Yb3+ ions. Compared to the isostructural LGSB:Yb crystal [46], LYSB:Yb had a higher transmission and also showed no absorption lines in the UV spectral range specific to Gd3+ ions, thus being more advantageous for NLO applications, particularly in the UV domain.
The room-temperature (300 K) and low-temperature (10 K) absorption and emission spectra of the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal were recorded in polarized light on a 0.93 mm thick crystal sample oriented perpendicular to the a-axis direction (a-cut). The detection system consisted of a Jarell Ash monochromator equipped with an S1 photomultiplier or Ge photodiode coupled to a lock-in amplifier and connected to a computer. As excitation sources, a halogen lamp (for absorption spectra) and an OPO laser OPOTEK RADIANT 355 LD (for emission spectra) were used. A closed-cycle He refrigerator ARS-2HW was used for low-temperature measurements.
The polarized absorption cross-section spectra of Yb3+ ions assigned to the 2F7/22F5/2 transitions at room temperature are presented in Figure 21. One can observe that the absorption cross-section (σabs) corresponding to the line centered at 904 nm was higher for π-polarization, having a maximum value of σabs = 0.37 × 10−20 cm2. On the other hand, the absorption cross-section at 980 nm was higher for σ-polarization, having a maximum value of σabs = 0.6 × 10−20 cm2 with an associated FWHM of 33 nm. Compared to other huntite-type crystals, the value of σabs at 980 nm was smaller than that of the well-known YAB:Yb crystal (σabs = 3.4 × 10−20 cm2) [45] and close to the value for the LGSB:Yb crystal (σabs = 0.47 × 10−20 cm2) [46]. However, the FWHM bandwidth was larger, with a factor of 1.65, than the corresponding value for the YAB:Yb crystal (FWHM of 20 nm at 975 nm) [45], thus being advantageous for laser diode pumping.
Figure 22 shows low-temperature (10 K) absorption spectra of the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal recorded in polarized light. The main absorption lines were broadened, and additional lines of weak intensity were observed in the vicinity of the electronic transitions, indicating the existence of different Yb3+ centers. The analysis of the 2F7/22F5/2 transition at 10 K showed that Yb3+ ions substituted both RE (Yb/RE) and Sc ions (Yb/Sc) in the structure of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal, thus leading to the presence of two different Yb3+ centers [44].
The room-temperature polarized emission spectra of 4 at.% Yb3+ ions doped in the LYSB host matrix under excitation at 900 nm are presented in Figure 23. Using the Füchtbauer-Ladenburg equation [47], the emission cross-sections in both polarizations corresponding to the 2F5/22F7/2 transition were determined, and the obtained values are shown in Table 10.
The low-temperature (10 K) emission spectra measured in polarized light under 902 nm (Yb/Sc center) and 906 nm (Yb/RE center) selective excitation are presented in Figure 24. The spectra show inhomogeneously broadened lines with an asymmetrical shape and a variation in the intensity of the emission lines with the excitation wavelength and polarization [44]. The energy Stark levels of the 2F7/2 and 2F5/2 manifolds, corresponding to each Yb3+/RE3+ and Yb3+/Sc3+ center, were determined. The obtained results are summarized and compared to those of the isostructural LGSB:Yb crystal in Table 11.
The room-temperature emission kinetics of the 2F5/2 level of Yb3+ ions was measured under excitation from the same OPO laser using a Tektronix 2024B oscilloscope for the detection. The decay curves were recorded by monitoring the emission line at 1070 nm under selective excitation at 902 and 906 nm and are shown in Figure 25. To measure an accurate value of the 2F5/2 level lifetime, unaffected by reabsorption processes, the 4 at. % LYSB:Yb powder sample was 99% diluted with KBr. The decay curves were measured to be about 1230 µs for the Yb/RE center (λex = 906 nm) and 1350 µs for the Yb/Sc center (λex = 902 nm), being long enough to allow efficient energy storage on the emitting level. Compared to other well-known Yb-doped crystals, the values of the 2F5/2 level lifetime for each Yb center in 4 at. % LYSB:Yb crystal were considerably higher than the values of 951 µs obtained for Yb:YAG crystal [48] and 680 µs for YAB:Yb crystal [45], indicating that 4 at. % LYSB:Yb crystal has suitable properties for generation of high-energy laser pulses.

3.4. Laser Performances

A fiber-coupled (100 µm diameter and NA = 0.22) laser diode (LIMO Co) operating in quasi-continuous wave (quasi-CW) regime with emission centered at 971.5 nm having a repetition rate of 5 Hz and a pump pulse duration of 1 ms was employed for longitudinal pumping of the crystal sample. The uncoated c-cut 3.5 mm thick LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal sample was placed inside an 8 mm long plane-plane resonator. The pumping mirror (PM) was highly transparent (T > 97%) in the wavelength range of 970–980 nm and highly reflective (R > 99.5%) in the 1020–1080 nm spectral domain. Out-coupling mirrors (OCM) with different transmissions (T = 1%, 3%, and 5%) in the 1020–1080 nm wavelength domain were employed. Figure 26 shows the laser pulse energy (Ep) as a function of the absorbed pump pulse energy (Eabs). The LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal sample delivered laser pulses with an energy of 1.23 mJ for an absorbed pump pulse energy of 4.52 mJ in the case of OCM with T = 3%. The slope efficiency (ηsa) was determined to be ηsa = 0.61. The maximum energy of the laser pulses was raised to 1.5 mJ in the case of the OCM with T = 1%, and the slope efficiency was ηsa = 0.57. The laser emission wavelength was centered at λem = 1028.06 nm with an FWHM of 0.85 nm. As seen in the inset of Figure 26, the transverse laser beam distribution was symmetric, being very close to a Gaussian shape.
Table 12 shows a comparison of laser emission performances of LYSB:Yb, LGSB:Yb, and YAB:Yb crystals operating in the quasi-CW regime. All of the presented active media were not antireflection-coated. In terms of slope efficiency, the value of ηsa = 0.61 obtained for the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal is higher than the values obtained for LGSB:Yb (ηsa = 0.44) [46] and YAB:Yb (ηsa = 0.58) [49] crystals, proving the good intrinsic properties of the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal to generate laser emissions in the 1 µm range with high efficiency.

4. Conclusions

This review presents the development of Czochralski-grown LYSB and LYSB:Yb crystals. Taking into account the incongruent melting of these compounds, the initial melt compositions were refined; a particular thermal setup was engineered, and the rotation and pulling speeds were optimized at 810 rpm and 2 mm/h, respectively, to obtain high-quality crystals. The chemical composition of the undoped LYSB grown crystal was determined to be La0.78Y0.32Sc2.90(BO3)4. Optical measurements revealed a large transparency window in the wavelength range of 2,002,800 nm. Moreover, the LYSB crystal had a high laser-induced damage threshold of 20 J/cm2p = 10 ns, λ = 1064 nm). The NLO characterization revealed that is type-I and -II phase-matchable over a broad range of fundamental wavelengths, and the SHG phase-matching lower limit was found to correspond to the fundamental wavelength of 579 nm. The effective nonlinear coefficient (deff) was determined to be 1.13 pm/V. Considering all of these favorable properties, it can be assumed that Czochralski-grown LYSB-type crystals constitute a new class of highly efficient NLO crystals for second-order applications, especially SHG of high-power or high-energy laser beams.
The LYSB:Yb crystal composition was determined as being La0.78Y0.32Yb0.04Sc2.86(BO3)4. The effective segregation coefficient (keff) of Yb3+ ions in the LYSB crystal was determined to be keff = 0.8. The transmission spectrum showed that the cut-off wavelength was red-shifted by 20 nm compared to the undoped crystal, having a value of 220 nm. This shift can be attributed to Yb3+ insertion in both RE3+ (RE = La, Y) and Sc3+ ion sites, leading to a modification of the contents of RE and Sc cations in the LYSB host crystal. The spectroscopic investigations revealed an intrinsic disorder in the structure of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal, thus offering inhomogeneously broadened absorption and emission bands. The LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal delivered laser pulses with 1.23 mJ of energy for an absorbed pump pulse energy of 4.52 mJ with a high slope efficiency of ηsa = 0.61. The laser emission wavelength was centered at λem = 1028.06 nm. The efficient laser emission at ~1028 nm together with the good NLO properties to generate radiation at ~514 nm via SHG make the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal a very promising medium to be used in self-frequency doubling configuration. Based on the successful growth by the Czochralski method of high-quality LYSB and LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystals, it can be stated that these types of crystals are very attractive candidates for various NLO and/or laser applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and L.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B., M.G. and C.G.; formal analysis, C.G. and L.G.; investigation, A.B., M.G., C.G., F.V. and L.G.; data curation, A.B., M.G., C.G., F.V. and L.G.; writing—review and editing, A.B. and L.G.; supervision, L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financed by the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization through grant agreement PCE 49/2021, project number PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020–2203.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank George Stanciu, Stefania Hau, Gabriela Croitoru, and Nicolaie Pavel (INFLPR, Laboratory of Solid-State Quantum Electronics, 077125 Magurele, Romania) for their support in crystal characterization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mills, A.D. Crystallographic Data for New Rare Earth Borate Compounds, RX3(BO3)4. Inorg. Chem. 1962, 1, 960–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, R. The Anionic Group-Theory of the Non-Linear Optical Effect and its Applications in the Development of New High-Quality NLO Crystals in the Borate Series. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1989, 8, 65–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leonyuk, N.I.; Leonyuk, L.I. Growth and characterization of RM3(BO3)4 crystals. Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. 1995, 31, 179–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tran, T.T.; Yu, H.; Rondinelli, J.M.; Poeppelmeier, K.R.; Halasyamani, P.S. Deep ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 5238–5258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Durmanov, S.T.; Kuzmin, O.V.; Kuzmicheva, G.M.; Kutovoi, S.A.; Martynov, A.A.; Nesynov, E.K.; Panyutin, V.L.; Rudnitsky, Y.P.; Smirnov, G.V.; Hait, V.L.; et al. Binary rare-earth scandium borates for diode-pumped lasers. Opt. Mater. 2001, 18, 243–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Y.; Aka, G.; Kahn-Harari, A.; Vivien, D. Phase transition, growth, and optical properties of NdxLa1-xSc3(BO3)4 crystals. J. Mater. Res. 2001, 16, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ye, N.; Stone-Sundberg, J.; Hruschka, M.; Aka, G.; Kong, W.; Keszler, D. Nonlinear optical crystal YxLayScz(BO3)4 (x + y + z = 4). Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 2687–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ye, N.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.; Keszler, D.; Aka, G. Growth of nonlinear optical crystal Y0.57La0.72Sc2.71(BO3)4. J. Cryst. Growth 2006, 292, 464–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, W.; Huang, L.; Zhang, G.; Ye, N. Growth and characterization of nonlinear optical crystal Lu0.66La0.95SC2.39(BO3)4. J. Cryst. Growth 2007, 307, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, X.; Ye, N. GdxLa1-xSc3(BO3)4: A new nonlinear optical crystal. J. Cryst. Growth 2011, 324, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, X.; Wang, S.; Ye, N. A new nonlinear optical crystal BixLayScz(BO3)4 (x + y + z = 4). J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 481, 664–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gheorghe, L.; Khaled, F.; Achim, A.; Voicu, F.; Loiseau, P.; Aka, G. Czochralski Growth and Characterization of Incongruent Melting LaxGdyScz(BO3)4 (x+ y+ z = 4) Nonlinear Optical Crystal. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, 3473–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gheorghe, L.; Greculeasa, M.; Broasca, A.; Voicu, F.; Stanciu, G.; Belikov, K.N.; Bryleva, E.Y.; Gaiduk, O. Incongruent Melting LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4: LYSB Nonlinear Optical Crystal Grown by the Czochralski Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 20987–20994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shannon, R. Revised Effective Ionic-Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Maillard, A.A.; Maillard, R.S.; Loiseau, P.; Aka, G.; Villeval, P.; Rytz, D. Defect Similitude in LYSB and YAB Crystals and ONL Characterization. In Proceedings of the 2014 Advanced Solid State Lasers, OSA Technical Digest, Shanghai China, 16–21 November 2014. paper ATh2A.12. [Google Scholar]
  16. Reshak, A.H.; Auluck, S.; Majchrowski, A.; Kityk, I.V. Optical second harmonic generation in Yttrium Aluminum Borate single crystals (theoretical simulation and experiment). PMC Phys. B 2008, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jaque, D.; Ramirez, M.O.; Bausa, L.E.; Sole, J.G.; Cavalli, E.; Spheghini, A.; Betinelli, M. Nd3+→Yb3+ energy transfer in the YAl3(BO3)4 nonlinear laser crystal. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 035118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Broasca, A.; Greculeasa, M.; Voicu, F.; Stanciu, G.; Hau, S.; Gheorghe, C.; Gheorghe, L. Pr:LGSB as a new nonlinear optical crystal: Czochralski growth and optical characterization. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 908, 164633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Born, M.; Wolf, E. Principles of Optics; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  20. Boyd, G.D.; Ashkin, A.; Dziedzic, J.M.; Kleinman, D.A. Second-Harmonic Generation of Light with Double Refraction. Phys. Rev. 1965, 137, A1305–A1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taylor, D. Spectral Acceptance for Second-Harmonic Generation in CD*A. J. Appl. Phys. 1975, 46, 3988–3991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hagen, W.F.; Magnante, P.C. Efficient Second-Harmonic Generation with Diffraction-Limited and High-Spectral-Radiance Nd-Glass Lasers. J. Appl. Phys. 1969, 40, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, Z.S.; Lin, J.; Wang, Z.Z.; Wu, Y.C.; Ye, N.; Chen, C.T.; Li, R.K. Theoretical calculations and predictions of the nonlinear optical coefficients of borate crystals. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2001, 13, R369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, H.; Chen, X.; Huang, L.X.; Xu, X.; Zhang, G.; Ye, N. Growth and optical properties of UV transparent YAB crystals. Mater. Res. Innov. 2011, 15, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, X.; Yue, Y.; Yao, J.; Hu, Z.G. YAl3(BO3)4: Crystal growth and characterization. J. Cryst. Growth 2010, 312, 3029–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gapontsev, V.P.; Tyrtyshnyy, V.A.; Vershinin, O.I.; Davydov, B.L.; Oulianov, D.A. Third harmonic frequency generation by Type-I critically phase-matched LiB3O5 crystal by means of optically active quartz crystal. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 3715–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, R. The development of new NLO crystals in the borate series. J. Cryst. Growth 1990, 99, 790–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maillard, R.S.; Maillard, A.; Polgár, K. Visible and UV effective non-linear optical coefficients of β-BaB2O4 as function of the growth technique. Opt. Mater. 2009, 31, 899–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kwon, T.Y.; Ju, J.J.; Cha, J.W.; Kim, J.N.; Yun, S.I. Characteristics of critically phase-matched second-harmonic generation of a Li2B4O7 crystal grown by the Czochralski method. Mater. Lett. 1994, 20, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Komatsu, R.; Sugawara, T.; Sassa, K. Growth and ultraviolet application of Li2B4O7 crystals: Generation of the fourth and fifth harmonics of Nd:Y3Al5O12 lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 70, 3492–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sifi, A.; Klein, R.S.; Maillard, A.; Kugel, G.E.; Péter, A.; Polgár, K. Absolute non-linear optical coefficients measurements of CsLiB6O10 single crystals by second harmonic generation. Opt. Mater. 2003, 24, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mori, Y.; Kuroda, I.; Nakajima, S.; Sasaki, T.; Nakai, S. New nonlinear optical crystal: Cesium lithium borate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1995, 67, 1818–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sasaki, T.; Mori, Y.; Yoshimura, M. Progress in the growth of a CsLiB6O10 crystal and its application to ultraviolet light generation. Opt. Mater. 2003, 23, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, W.; Shen, H.Y.; Zhang, G.F.; Zhang, D.Y.; Zhang, G.; Lin, W.X.; Zeng, R.R.; Huang, C.H. Studies on the phase-matching condition and the cut-off wavelength of Nb: KTiOPO4 crystal. Opt. Commun. 2000, 185, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Moorthy, S.G.; Kumar, F.J.; Balakumar, S.; Subramanian, C.; Ramasamy, P. Top seeded solution growth of KTiOPO4 (KTP) single crystals and their characterisation. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 1999, 60, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yankov, P.; Schumov, D.; Nenov, A.; Monev, A. Laser damage tests of large flux-grown KTiOPO4 crystals. Opt. Lett. 1993, 18, 1771–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Phan, V.T.; Do, T.T.P.; Ho, T.M.; Nguyen, D.T.; Le, B.V.; Le, A.T.Q.; Duong, P.A.; Huynh, D.T. Fabrication of KDP crystal prisms for second harmonic generation. Optik 2018, 171, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fujioka, K.; Matsuo, S.; Kanabe, T.; Fujita, H.; Nakatsuka, M. Optical properties of rapidly grown KDP crystal improved by thermal conditioning. J. Cryst. Growth 1997, 181, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, Y.; Yu, Z.; Wang, L.; Sun, X. Ultralow-Loss Etchless Lithium Niobate Integrated Photonics at Near-Visible Wavelengths. Adv. Optical Mater. 2021, 9, 2100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Furukawa, Y.; Yokotani, A.; Sasaki, T.; Yoshida, H.; Yoshida, K.; Nitanda, F.; Sato, M. Investigation of bulk laser damage threshold of lithium niobate single crystals by Q-switched pulse laser. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 69, 3372–3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Biaggio, I.; Looser, H.; Gunter, P. Intracavity frequency doubling of a diode pumped nd: Yag laser using a knbo3 crystal. Ferroelectrics 1989, 94, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cussat-Blanc, S.; Ivanov, A.; Lupinski, D.; Freysz, E. KTiOPO4, KTiOAsO4, and KNbO3 crystals for mid-infrared femtosecond optical parametric amplifiers: Analysis and comparison. Appl. Phys. B 2000, 70, S247–S252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vijayan, N.; Bhagavannarayana, G.; Ramesh Babu, R.; Gopalakrishnan, R.; Maurya, K.K.; Ramasamy, P. A Comparative Study on Solution- and Bridgman-Grown Single Crystals of Benzimidazole by High-Resolution X-ray Diffractometry, Fourier Transform Infrared, Microhardness, Laser Damage Threshold, and Second-Harmonic Generation Measurements. Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 1542–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Broasca, A.; Greculeasa, M.; Voicu, F.; Hau, S.; Croitoru, G.; Gheorghe, C.; Pavel, N.; Gheorghe, L. Efficient near-infrared laser emission and nonlinear optical properties of a newly developed LYSB:Yb laser crystal. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 844, 156143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, P.; Dawes, J.M.; Dekker, P.; Knowles, D.S.; Piper, J.A.; Lu, B. Growth and evaluation of ytterbium-doped yttrium aluminum borate as a potential self-doubling laser crystal. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1999, 16, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khaled, F.; Loiseau, P.; Voicu, F.; Achim, A.; Hau, S.; Gheorghe, C.; Croitoru, G.; Pavel, N.; Gheorghe, L.; Aka, G. Spectroscopic properties and laser performances of LGSB:Yb nonlinear optical crystal. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 688, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Krupke, W.F. Induced-emission cross sections in neodymium laser glasses. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 1974, 10, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brenier, A.; Boulon, G. New criteria to choose the best Yb3+-doped laser crystals. Europhys. Lett. 2001, 55, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, Y.J.; Ye, N.; Lin, Y.F.; Luo, Z.D.; Huang, Y.D. Enhanced performances of Yb3+:YAl3(BO3)4 laser crystal grown in Li2WO4-B2O3 flux. Appl. Phys. B 2011, 104, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Room-temperature XRPD spectra of La1-xYxSc3(BO3)4 polycrystalline compounds. The vertical bars in black, red, and green are associated with PDF card 01-087-1665 of C2/c monoclinic phase, PDF card 04-001-2439 of cubic Sc2O3 phase, and PDF card 04-018-1225 of R32 trigonal phase, respectively. (Adapted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 1. Room-temperature XRPD spectra of La1-xYxSc3(BO3)4 polycrystalline compounds. The vertical bars in black, red, and green are associated with PDF card 01-087-1665 of C2/c monoclinic phase, PDF card 04-001-2439 of cubic Sc2O3 phase, and PDF card 04-018-1225 of R32 trigonal phase, respectively. (Adapted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g001
Figure 2. DTA analysis of La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4 nonstoichiometric compound. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 2. DTA analysis of La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4 nonstoichiometric compound. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g002
Figure 3. Thermal setup developed for growing LYSB-type crystals by the Czochralski crystal growth technique. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 3. Thermal setup developed for growing LYSB-type crystals by the Czochralski crystal growth technique. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g003
Figure 4. LYSB-type crystals grown from initial melts La0.754Y0.546Sc2.70(BO3)4 (a), La0.7875Y0.4625Sc2.75(BO3)4 (b), La0.8625Y0.4375Sc2.70(BO3)4 (c), and La0.8125Y0.4375Sc2.75(BO3)4 (d). (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 4. LYSB-type crystals grown from initial melts La0.754Y0.546Sc2.70(BO3)4 (a), La0.7875Y0.4625Sc2.75(BO3)4 (b), La0.8625Y0.4375Sc2.70(BO3)4 (c), and La0.8125Y0.4375Sc2.75(BO3)4 (d). (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g004
Figure 5. LYSB crystal grown from initial melt composition La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4. The figure in the inset shows the LYSB crystal generating green light via SHG. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 5. LYSB crystal grown from initial melt composition La0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)4. The figure in the inset shows the LYSB crystal generating green light via SHG. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g005
Figure 6. XRC of the LYSB crystal on the (003) diffraction plane. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 6. XRC of the LYSB crystal on the (003) diffraction plane. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g006
Figure 7. XRPD spectrum of LYSB crystal. The vertical sticks (in red color) correspond to PDF card 04-018-1225 of trigonal phase (space group R32). (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 7. XRPD spectrum of LYSB crystal. The vertical sticks (in red color) correspond to PDF card 04-018-1225 of trigonal phase (space group R32). (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g007
Figure 8. The experimental (in red), calculated (in blue), and difference (in grey) patterns after Rietveld analysis and refinement reliability parameters. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 8. The experimental (in red), calculated (in blue), and difference (in grey) patterns after Rietveld analysis and refinement reliability parameters. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g008
Figure 9. LYSB crystal structure. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 9. LYSB crystal structure. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g009
Figure 10. Optical transparency window of the LYSB crystal. Tauc’s plot is shown in the figure inset. (Adapted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 10. Optical transparency window of the LYSB crystal. Tauc’s plot is shown in the figure inset. (Adapted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g010
Figure 11. Raman spectrum of the LYSB crystal.
Figure 11. Raman spectrum of the LYSB crystal.
Crystals 13 00169 g011
Figure 12. Prism for measuring the refractive indices of the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 12. Prism for measuring the refractive indices of the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g012
Figure 13. Variation of refractive indices with wavelength in the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 13. Variation of refractive indices with wavelength in the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g013
Figure 14. Phase-matching curves for SHG of types I and II in the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 14. Phase-matching curves for SHG of types I and II in the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g014
Figure 15. Phase-matching curves for SFG of types I and II in the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 15. Phase-matching curves for SFG of types I and II in the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystals 13 00169 g015
Figure 16. Definition of the phase-matching angles θ and φ.
Figure 16. Definition of the phase-matching angles θ and φ.
Crystals 13 00169 g016
Figure 17. Photo of the as-grown LYSB:Yb crystal (a) and the cross-section of the crystal (b). Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 17. Photo of the as-grown LYSB:Yb crystal (a) and the cross-section of the crystal (b). Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g017
Figure 18. XRPD spectrum of LYSB:Yb crystal (black line) together with PDF card 04-015-9641 (red sticks) of LGSB crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 18. XRPD spectrum of LYSB:Yb crystal (black line) together with PDF card 04-015-9641 (red sticks) of LGSB crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g018
Figure 19. Variation of refractive indices with wavelength in the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 19. Variation of refractive indices with wavelength in the LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g019
Figure 20. Transmission spectrum of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. The inset figure presents the transmission over UV and VIS wavelength ranges. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 20. Transmission spectrum of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. The inset figure presents the transmission over UV and VIS wavelength ranges. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g020
Figure 21. Polarized absorption cross-section spectra of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal at room temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 21. Polarized absorption cross-section spectra of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal at room temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g021
Figure 22. Low-temperature (10 K) absorption spectra in polarized light of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Yb/RE and Yb/Sc denote the absorption lines of Yb3+ ions associated with Yb3+ in the position of RE3+ (RE = La, Y) or Sc3+, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 22. Low-temperature (10 K) absorption spectra in polarized light of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Yb/RE and Yb/Sc denote the absorption lines of Yb3+ ions associated with Yb3+ in the position of RE3+ (RE = La, Y) or Sc3+, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g022
Figure 23. Polarized emission cross-section spectra of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal at room temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 23. Polarized emission cross-section spectra of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal at room temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g023
Figure 24. Emission spectra of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal under selective excitation in σ-polarization (a) and π-polarization (b) at 10 K. Adapted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 24. Emission spectra of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal under selective excitation in σ-polarization (a) and π-polarization (b) at 10 K. Adapted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g024
Figure 25. Luminescence decay curves of the 2F5/2 level in LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 25. Luminescence decay curves of the 2F5/2 level in LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g025
Figure 26. Laser pulse energy (Ep) versus absorbed energy of the pump pulse (Eabs). The laser beam distribution at the highest output level is shown in the figure inset. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 26. Laser pulse energy (Ep) versus absorbed energy of the pump pulse (Eabs). The laser beam distribution at the highest output level is shown in the figure inset. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Crystals 13 00169 g026
Table 1. Chemical compositions of samples cut from different regions of the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of samples cut from different regions of the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
LYSB Crystal SampleLa/Y Ratio
Starting meltLa0.765Y0.485Sc2.75(BO3)41.57
ShoulderLa0.780Y0.321Sc2.899(BO3)42.42
BodyLa0.783Y0.316Sc2.901(BO3)42.47
TailLa0.779Y0.324Sc2.897(BO3)42.40
Table 2. Atomic coordinates and site occupancy fraction in the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Table 2. Atomic coordinates and site occupancy fraction in the LYSB crystal. (Reprinted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
AtomxyzWyckoff PositionOccupancy
La0003a0.78
Y1 (La)0003a0.22
Sc−0.12350.66660.66669d0.9667
Y2 (Sc)−0.12350.66660.66669d0.0333
B1−0.23170.66660.16669e1
B2000.53b1
O10−0.41770.59e1
O2−0.02630.1894−0.200918e1
O30−0.13870.59e1
Table 3. LYSB crystal refractive indices. (Adapted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Table 3. LYSB crystal refractive indices. (Adapted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Wavelength
(µm)
noneΔn
MeasuredCalculatedMeasuredCalculatedMeasuredCalculated
0.404661.87401.87391.78471.78460.08930.0893
0.435841.86501.86491.77731.77720.08770.0877
0.467821.85781.85781.77141.77130.08640.0865
0.468011.85781.85771.77141.77130.08640.0864
0.472221.85701.85691.77071.77060.08630.0863
0.479991.85551.85541.76951.76940.0860.086
0.481051.85531.85521.76941.76920.08590.086
0.508581.85081.85071.76561.76550.08520.0852
0.546071.84571.84561.76141.76130.08430.0843
0.579061.84201.84201.75841.75840.08360.0836
0.58931.84111.84101.75761.75750.08350.0835
0.636231.83711.83701.75441.75430.08270.0827
0.643851.83651.83651.75391.75390.08260.0826
0.80821.82781.82771.74721.74710.08060.0806
0.87731.82531.82531.74551.74540.07980.0799
0.97451.82261.82261.74371.74360.07890.079
Table 4. Sellmeier coefficients of the LYSB crystal.
Table 4. Sellmeier coefficients of the LYSB crystal.
Sellmeier CoefficientsRefractive Index
n o 2 n e 2  
A3.301463.01189
B0.030040.02536
C0.022370.01722
D0.0127−0.0014
Table 5. NLO properties of the Czochralski-grown LYSB crystal for type-I SHG of 1064 nm fundamental wavelength. (Adapted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Table 5. NLO properties of the Czochralski-grown LYSB crystal for type-I SHG of 1064 nm fundamental wavelength. (Adapted with permission from ref. [13], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Crystal(θ, φ)
(deg)
Δn @1064
(nm)
ρ
(deg)
Δθ × L
(deg·cm)
Δλ × L
(nm·cm)
d 11 ( pm / V )
LYSB(33.4, 60)0.0782.410.0340.601.35
Table 6. NLO properties for SHG of 1064 nm fundamental emission in selected NLO crystals [4,13,19,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
Table 6. NLO properties for SHG of 1064 nm fundamental emission in selected NLO crystals [4,13,19,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
Crystaldeff
(pm/V)
θ Phase-Matching (deg)Phase-Matching TypeOptical Transparency Window (nm)LDT *
(J/cm2)
Growth MethodComments
LYSB
this work
1.1333.4I200–280020Czochralski
YAB1.4530.8I170–28004–6Flux
LiB3O5
(LBO)
1.17θ = 90
φ = 0 @150 °C
biaxial160–260025Flux
Β-BaB2O4
(BBO)
2.0122.8I198–260013Flux
1.4332.3II
Li2B4O70.0730.5I160–350040Czochralskisoluble in water
CsLiB6O10
(CLBO)
0.4929.2I170–260025Fluxhygroscopic
0.9542.1II
KTIOPO4
(KTP)
3.24θ = 90
φ = 22.81
biaxial350–450015Flux
KH2PO4
(KDP)
0.2642.0I177–170010Fluxsoluble in water
0.3458.6II
LiNbO3not phase-matchable @ 1064 nm330–550014Czochralski
KNbO310.90θ = 90
φ = 90
@188 °C
biaxial400–45001.7Czochralski
* τp = 10 ns, λ = 1064 nm.
Table 7. Chemical compositions of samples cut from different regions of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Table 7. Chemical compositions of samples cut from different regions of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
starting meltLa0.8Y0.4Yb0.05Sc2.75(BO3)4
shoulderLa0.780Y0.320Yb0.040Sc2.860(BO3)4
bodyLa0.778Y0.322Yb0.042Sc2.858(BO3)4
tailLa0.775Y0.325Yb0.042Sc2.858(BO3)4
Table 8. Refractive indices of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [45], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Table 8. Refractive indices of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [45], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Wavelength (µm)neno
CalculatedMeasuredCalculatedMeasured
0.404661.78521.78511.87441.8744
0.435841.77801.77831.86581.8656
0.467821.77231.77251.85891.8590
0.468011.77231.77201.85881.8589
0.472221.77161.77151.85801.8583
0.479991.77041.77011.85661.8564
0.481051.77031.77021.85641.8565
0.508581.76651.76691.85191.8522
0.546071.76241.76261.84691.8466
0.579061.75941.75901.84321.8429
0.636231.75521.75521.83811.8379
0.643851.75471.75481.83761.8377
0.80821.74721.74741.82811.8284
0.87731.74501.74471.82531.8255
0.97451.74241.74241.82191.8217
Table 9. NLO properties for SHG of type I of the fundamental wavelength of 1028 nm in LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Table 9. NLO properties for SHG of type I of the fundamental wavelength of 1028 nm in LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
LYSB:Yb
1028 nm
→ 514 nm
(θ, φ) (deg)deff (pm/V)Δλ × L (nm × cm)Δθ × L (deg × cm)ρ (deg)
(36.0, 60)1.090.740.0312.53
Table 10. Emission cross-sections of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal.
Table 10. Emission cross-sections of LYSB:Yb (4 at.%) crystal.
Polarizationλemission (nm)
98610261070
σem (×10−21 cm2)
π5.123.563.6
σ6.842.11.33
Table 11. Positions of the Stark levels of Yb3+ centers in LYSB:Yb [44] and LGSB:Yb crystals [46]. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Table 11. Positions of the Stark levels of Yb3+ centers in LYSB:Yb [44] and LGSB:Yb crystals [46]. Reprinted with permission from ref. [44], copyright 2020, Elsevier.
CrystalManifoldYb3+/RE3+Yb3+/Sc3+
LYSB:Yb2F7/20, 385, 562, 7570, 250, 547, 950
2F5/210,135, 10,659, 11,03310,285, 10,405, 11,085
LGSB:Yb2F7/20, 394, 545.5, 768.70, 86.8, 552.3, 927
2F5/210,144, 10,678.6, 11,04410,297, 10,412.6, 11,103.4
Table 12. Laser emission characteristics in quasi-CW operation of uncoated LYSB:Yb, LGSB:Yb, [44,46], and YAB:Yb [49] crystals.
Table 12. Laser emission characteristics in quasi-CW operation of uncoated LYSB:Yb, LGSB:Yb, [44,46], and YAB:Yb [49] crystals.
CrystalYb3+ Ions Doping Concentration (at.%)λpump
(nm)
λemission
(nm)
T (OCM Transmission)ηsa
LYSB:Yb4971.51028.060.030.61
LGSB:Yb12.99721069.40.030.44
YAB:Yb1097010430.0290.58
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Broasca, A.; Greculeasa, M.; Voicu, F.; Gheorghe, C.; Gheorghe, L. Pure and Yb-Doped LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4 Crystals: A Review of Recent Advances. Crystals 2023, 13, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020169

AMA Style

Broasca A, Greculeasa M, Voicu F, Gheorghe C, Gheorghe L. Pure and Yb-Doped LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4 Crystals: A Review of Recent Advances. Crystals. 2023; 13(2):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Broasca, Alin, Madalin Greculeasa, Flavius Voicu, Cristina Gheorghe, and Lucian Gheorghe. 2023. "Pure and Yb-Doped LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4 Crystals: A Review of Recent Advances" Crystals 13, no. 2: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020169

APA Style

Broasca, A., Greculeasa, M., Voicu, F., Gheorghe, C., & Gheorghe, L. (2023). Pure and Yb-Doped LaxYySc4-x-y(BO3)4 Crystals: A Review of Recent Advances. Crystals, 13(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13020169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop