Next Article in Journal
Self-Organization of Micro- and Nanosystems in the Form of Patterns
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Modification of Graphene Oxide and Its Strengthening and Toughening Mechanism for Alumina-Based Ceramic Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

AlGaN-Based Ultraviolet PIN Photodetector Grown on Silicon Substrates Using SiN Nitridation Process and Step-Graded Buffers

1
Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
College of Materials Science and Opto-Electronic Technology, University of Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Crystals 2024, 14(11), 952; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14110952
Submission received: 14 October 2024 / Revised: 29 October 2024 / Accepted: 29 October 2024 / Published: 31 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crystal Growth of III–V Semiconductors)

Abstract

:
The integration of aluminum gallium nitride (AlGaN) with silicon substrates attracts significant attention due to the superior UV sensitivity of AlGaN and the cost-effectiveness as well as mechanical robustness of silicon. A PIN ultraviolet photodetector with a peak detection wavelength of 274 nm is presented in this paper. By employing a SiN nucleation layer and a step-graded buffer, a high-quality AlGaN-based photodetector structure with a dislocation density of 2.4 × 109/cm2 is achieved. A double-temperature annealing technique is utilized to optimize the Ohmic contact of the n-type AlGaN. The fabricated UV photodetector attains a dark current of 0.12 nA at −1 V and a peak responsivity of 0.12 A/W.

1. Introduction

Ultraviolet (UV) photodetectors are indispensable in various applications, including environmental monitoring, flame detection, biological research, and space exploration [1,2,3,4]. Historically, photomultiplier tubes and silicon photodetectors were the primary technologies for ultraviolet photodetectors. But they have limitations such as achieving high solar blindness and rejecting near-UV and visible spectra [5]. Aluminum gallium nitride (AlGaN) is a suitable semiconductor material ideal for ultraviolet (UV) photodetectors, especially in the solar-blind region (below 290 nm), due to its tunable wide bandgap. This property is crucial for applications requiring the detection of UV radiation while filtering out visible and near-UV wavelengths [6,7,8,9]. The tunability of AlGaN’s bandgap, achieved through the modulation of the aluminum content, enables a variation in bandgap energy ranging from 3.39 to 6.024 eV, effectively encompassing the ultraviolet spectrum and particularly the entire solar-blind wavelength region. This characteristic is highly advantageous for the development of efficient solar-blind photodetectors.
While sapphire has traditionally been the preferred substrate for AlGaN-based photodetectors due to its UV transparency, the use of silicon (Si) substrates is becoming increasingly popular because of their lower cost, compatibility with standard semiconductor processes, and availability in large diameters [10]. However, significant challenges arise when growing AlGaN on Si, including a substantial lattice mismatch (~17%) and thermal expansion differences that lead to high dislocation densities and potential cracking. These issues can severely deteriorate the performance of the photodetectors, making it necessary to develop advanced techniques for enhancing the crystal quality of the AlGaN layers grown on Si [11,12,13].
One successful approach to address these challenges is the utilization of AlN template layers, which serve as a buffer to alleviate lattice mismatch effects and reduce dislocation densities. The crack density decreases with the increase of AlGaN layer thickness. When the thickness of the AlGaN layer reaches approximately 250 nm, the crack density will tend to zero. However, the cracks reappear when the film thickness increases further [14]. The occurrence of cracks can be reduced by introducing an about 70 nm thick AlN nucleation layer as well as a GaN/AlGaN superlattice [15]. According to the former researchers’ reports, as noted in ref. [16,17], cracking can be avoided during sample cooling by preventing the formation of amorphous Si3N4 on the Si surface in the early growth stages and ensuring uniform AlN nucleation [16,17]. Step-graded AlGaN layers are also used to prevent stress relaxation in GaN on Si layers, acting as a dislocation filter and achieving a smooth surface morphology for crack-free epitaxial AlGaN layers [18,19,20,21,22]. Techniques like maskless lateral epitaxial overgrowth have also been utilized to further improve the crystalline quality by decoupling the epilayers from the substrate, enabling the growth of thick, crack-free layers [23].
The research group Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics in Russia, has been investigating the effect of a monolayer SiN film on the surface states of the AlN/GaN heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy since 2015 [24,25,26]. Al atoms deposited on top of a highly ordered (8 × 8) structure can help the formation of a graphene-like AlN (g-AlN) layer, which greatly enhances the growth quality of Si/AlGaN materials.
In this paper, we report a high performance AlGaN-based ultraviolet PIN photodetector grown on a Si (111) substrate using a graphene-like AlN nucleation layer and step-graded AlGaN buffers. The tested threading dislocation density (TDD) of the PIN material is 2.4 × 109/cm2. Through the application of the double-temperature annealing technique, the resistance of the n-type Ohmic contact can be reduced to 3.4 × 10−5 Ωcm2. After an optimization of the fabrication process, the detectors achieve a dark current of 0.12 nA@−1 V and a peak responsivity of 0.12 A/W@274 nm.

2. Materials and Methods

The AlGaN-on-Si photodetector materials were grown by molecular-beam epitaxy on 2-inch diameter Si (111) substrates in Riber CBE-32 system. The Si (111) substrates were pretreated using the wet chemical etching procedure to form the hydrogen-saturated surface [27,28,29]. After the etching, the substrates were dried by high purity N2 with 5-nines (5N) purity and introduced into the vacuum chamber for 15–20 min. Subsequently, the outgas procedure was carried out in a preparatory vacuum chamber at 600 °C for two hours. The substrate temperature was controlled by an infrared pyrometer. The high-purity ammonia (8N) utilized as the active nitrogen underwent an additional purifying process via a filter. The aluminum cold lip source with cold neck pyrolytic boron nitride (PBN) crucible and gallium double zone source with pyrolytic graphite (PG) crucible were employed as the gallium and aluminum sources, respectively.
In order to completely remove the surface oxide, the silicon substrates underwent high-temperature annealing up to 1100 °C, resulting in the formation of a 7 × 7 reconstruction on the reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) pattern of the Si (111) surface upon cooling below 830 °C. The de-oxidation process occurred during the annealing procedure, forming a clean and smooth surface for the nitridation of the silicon substrates.
After the surface annealing process, a standard initial nitridation process in NH3-MBE was performed. The Si substrate was heated to 950 °C and exposed to the ammonia flux of 10 sccm. Within a few seconds, the SiN-8 × 8 structure fractional reflections appeared in the RHEED patterns. It is believed that the dominant role in the formation of the SiN-8 × 8 structure was played by mobile Si adatoms that were in equilibrium with the Si surface [30]. After 40 s of nitridation, graphene-like SiN covered the silicon surface and the intensity of the 8 × 8 refractive patterns reached a maximum. Further increasing the nitridation time would form an amorphous Si3N4 layer on the silicon surface, and the diffraction pattern would disappear after several minutes.
An AlN flat ultrathin nucleation layer was prepared by depositing Al while the ammonia flux was off and achieving a background ammonia pressure of ~10−7 to 10−8 Torr. The ammonia flux was turned off when the optimal 8 × 8 RHEED pattern with sharp and bright eightfold fractional spots appeared. During the Al deposition, the source flux was set to match an AlN growth rate of ~0.1 ML/s. After approximately 5 MLs g-AlN growth, an ~150 nm thick AlN bulk layer was grown as a buffer layer for the step-graded buffer and the full photodetector structure growth.
The step-graded buffer consisted of 3 different composition AlGaN layers. After the 150 nm AlN layer, 150 nm Al0.85GaN, 150 nm Al0.75GaN, and 200 nm Al0.6GaN buffer layers were grown sequentially to enhance the strain relaxation and dislocation annihilation.
The entire photodetector structure, which has been verified as effective by the Center for Quantum Devices in Northwestern University (CQD) [31], was grown following the step-graded buffer. On top of the last step of the step-graded buffer, the Al0.6GaN buffer layer, a 600 nm thick Si doped n-type Al0.5GaN conduction layer was grown. This layer also served as a dislocation annihilation layer to further reduce the dislocation density. Following this highly conductive layer, the p-i-n active region consisted of 35 nm Si-doped n-type Al0.45GaN with a doping concentration of 7.2 × 1017/cm3, followed by 200 nm not intentionally doped (NID) intrinsic absorber region, and 50 nm Mg-doped p-type Al0.38GaN with a doping concentration of 2.4 × 1016/cm3 was grown. To facilitate the formation of the Ohmic contacts, a 100 nm Mg doped p-type GaN with a doping concentration of 2.1 × 1018/cm3 was grown as a cap layer. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) cross-sectional images of the entire epitaxial structure and the microscopic images of the grown material’s surface under 100× and 1000× magnifications are shown in Figure 1.
The epitaxial wafer was cleaned in acetone and ethanol before the subsequent processing procedure to remove surface-organic and pollutants. A photodetector mesa was etched with inductively coupled plasma (ICP) to the n-contact layer and protected with SiO2 grown by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) to suppress the leakage current on the mesa side. P- and n-type contact windows were opened on SiO2 with photolithography and reactive ion etching (RIE). After that, the p-type Ti/Pt/Au and n-type Ti/Al/Ti/Au were deposited with magnetron sputtering and evaporation, respectively, and protected with SiO2 grown by PECVD again. Finally, two electrode pads were symmetrically deposited following the opening contact pad windows. The fabrication procedure for the photodetectors is illustrated in Figure 2.

3. Results and Discussion

The substrate preparation process, including high-temperature annealing for 7 × 7 reconstruction and pre-nitridation of the Si substrate for 8 × 8 reconstruction with a SiN-like intermediate layer has been extensively studied previously [16,17,24,25,26,30]. Figure 3a presents a transmission electron microscope (TEM) high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) image depicting the Si/AlN interface along with the step-graded buffers. At the Si/AlN interface, the nucleation layer functions as a dislocation filter, localizing stress on the interface by generating misfit dislocations. This effect is accomplished by introducing both SiN and AlN ultrathin flat nucleation layers during the nitridation process. Additionally, the TEM dark field image of the interface is also shown in Figure 3b, where a regularly arranged stress field can be seen, indicating periodic stress release at the Si/AlN interface.
The dark field image corresponding to step-graded buffers is also presented in Figure 3c. The orange dash dot lines indicate interfaces within these graded structures. By finely tuning the growth parameters across the steps, it becomes possible to terminate dislocation lines at these interfaces, as illustrated by red arrows. To further assess the effectiveness of these step-graded buffers, additional TEM HAADF images were employed to capture inclined dislocation configurations between AlGaN layers as shown in Figure 4.
Former analysis has elucidated mechanisms underlying stress relaxation and their correlation with dislocation inclinations [32,33]. As observed in Figure 4a, dislocations exhibit abrupt inclinations at the interface between different graded AlGaN layers. The projected length of the inclined dislocation acts as a misfit dislocation segment to relax the compressive strain [33]. It is posited that greater lattice mismatch strains induce larger bend angles of dislocation inclination. This can be proved in Figure 4b, which reveals that significant compositional differences between Al0.75GaN and Al0.6GaN yield larger inclination angles compared to those observed between Al0.85GaN and Al0.75GaN, thereby enhancing opportunities for interactions among dislocations.
The dislocation density in the step-graded buffer layers can be expressed using an empirical formula proposed by Fitzgerald et al. [34,35]:
ρ t = 2 R g R g r e U k T b B Y m ε e f f m R g R g r V
where rt is the threading dislocation (TD) density, B is a constant with a unit of velocity, Y is Yang’s modulus, εeff is the strain reduced by the dislocation flow, m is an exponent between 1 and 2, Rg is the growth rate, Rgr is the variation rate (lattice mismatch per unit thickness), U is the dislocation glide activation energy, k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and V is the dislocation slip velocity.
According to the empirical formula, the TD density exhibits a positive correlation with both growth rates and variations between respective grading structures. This is evidenced in Figure 4c, where an increased number of dislocation lines is generated at the interface between AlN/Al0.85GaN and Al0.75GaN/Al0.6GaN. In contrast, at the interface between Al0.85GaN/Al0.75GaN, dislocation lines tend to merge, resulting in a reduction of TDs (indicated by yellow circles).
Considering these mechanisms, the careful design of step-graded buffer layers is essential to enhance the bend angle of dislocation lines, thereby facilitating TDs annihilation through increased compositional differences between step layers while simultaneously reducing interface dislocation generation by decreasing either growth rate or compositional variation rate across steps. Following systematic optimization of growth parameters, the TD density for the entire photodetector structure was estimated to be 2.4 × 109/cm2 based on XRD FWHM and TEM analyses.
An important factor limiting the performance of the solar-blind UV devices is achieving effective Ohmic contacts between high Al composition AlGaN and the Ohmic contact metals. It is well known that the increase in the aluminum fraction raises both the band gap and the election affinity of AlGaN, worsening the Ohmic contact barriers, causing nonlinear behavior, and elevating the device resistivity [36,37,38,39]. To optimize the contact resistivity, we introduced a double-temperature annealing technique to improve the fabricated 30 nm-Ti/100 nm-Al/30 nm-Ti/30 nm-Au Ohmic contact performance of the n-type AlGaN.
L. Wang et al. [40] conducted a comprehensive analysis of the n-type Ohmic contact in GaN over a temperature range of 400–950 °C, determining that the optimal annealing temperature for Ti/Al/Mo/Au is 850 °C. We have adopted this finding and established our primary annealing temperature at 850 °C. Figure 5 illustrates the IV curve of the metal pad used for the circular transmission line method (CTLM) Ohmic contact test under different annealing conditions. And the annealing condition and the calculated resistivity are listed in Table 1. As depicted in Figure 5, the as-grown sample exhibits pronounced modulation characteristics indicating Schottky contact behavior at the metal/Al0.5GaN interface. Annealing at 850 °C improves the Ohmic behavior of the contact. However, if the annealing time is too short, the effectiveness of annealing will be affected; if the annealing time is too long, the surface morphology of the contact pad will be greatly deteriorated (as shown in the inset of Figure 5, deteriorated surface of the metal pad after annealing at 850 °C for 60 s). Further increasing the annealing temperature or the time optimizes Ohmic contact characteristics within a limited range but compromises surface quality.
To further decrease the resistivity of the Ohmic contact, a low-temperature annealing procedure was introduced before high-temperature annealing. As shown in Table 1, after 10 min at 350 °C and 30 s at 900 °C, the resistivity of the n-type Ohmic contact reduced to 3.43 × 10−5. It is believed that the reaction between Ti and Al starts at lower temperatures (250–300 °C), forming primary products such as Al3Ti and α-Ti [39]. Also, Au is mobile at this low annealing temperature, allowing it to diffuse into the interior of the metal contacts and react with Al and Ti, forming AlAuxTi alloys. The formation of this alloy layer hinders the out diffusion of Al/Ti and prevents the oxidation of aluminum from generating Al/Ti-oxide at a high temperature and reduces conductivity. Annealing at 900 °C after low-temperature annealing promotes the further in-diffusion of Ti to AlGaN, form TiN at the metal/AlGaN interface and generate nitrogen vacancies in the AlGaN layers that help form 2DEG at the metal-semiconductor interface and finally reduce the resistivity of the Ohmic contact [40].
Figure 6 illustrates the responsivity and the dark current of the fabricated photodetectors. The dark current of the 100 um diameter device is tested to be 0.12 nA at −1 V. The responsivity of the photodetectors was measured using a high-intensity xenon arc lamp, monochromator, and reference calibrated UV-enhanced silicon photodetector. The tested peak responsivity of the photodetector is 0.12 A/W at −5 V and the peak detection wavelength is 274 nm. A low photo response persists because of the weak Schottky-photodetector-like behavior of the p-type contact and should be eliminated by optimizing the p-type Ohmic contacts. To validate the performance of this device, we also compared it with previously reported similar devices as presented in Table 2.

4. Conclusions

An AlGaN-based UV PIN photodetector fabricated on Si(111) substrates is reported in this study. The incorporation of silicon nitridation, in conjunction with an AlN nucleation layer and step-graded buffer layer growth, enhances the quality of the AlGaN/Si structure and reduces the dislocation density of the whole photodetector structure to 2.4 × 109/cm2. The application of a double-temperature annealing technique effectively lowers the resistance of the n-type Ohmic contact by facilitating the formation of AlAuxTi alloys at relatively low temperatures and TiN at elevated temperatures. Consequently, the optimized n-type resistivity for the metal/AlGaN contact has been reduced to 3.43 × 10−5 Ω·cm2. Following process optimization, the detectors exhibit a dark current of 0.12 nA at −1 V and a peak responsivity of 0.12 A/W at 274 nm.

Author Contributions

J.L. and Y.M. contributed to this work equally. Conceptualization, J.L., Y.S. and K.Z.; methodology, J.L. and Y.M.; validation, J.L. and Y.M.; formal analysis, J.L., Y.Z. and Y.M.; investigation, J.L., Y.Z. and Y.M.; resources, J.L., Y.S., G.W., K.Z. and X.W.; data curation, J.L. and Y.Z.; writing–original draft preparation, J.L.; writing–review and editing, J.L. and Y.M.; visualization, J.L., Y.Z. and Y.M.; supervision, Y.S., K.Z. and X.W.; project administration, Y.S., K.Z. and X.W.; funding acquisition, X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R and D Program of China (2018YFE0203102, 2018YFE0203103), the Open Fund of IPOC (BUPT) IPOC2022A10.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Y.M. and K.Z. acknowledges partial support within the State Assignments from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation to the Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics SB RAS (0242-2022-0005).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Razeghi, M.; Rogalski, A. Semiconductor ultraviolet detectors. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 7433–7473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Razeghi, M. Short-wavelength solar-blind detectors-status, prospects, and markets. Proc. IEEE 2002, 90, 1006–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Patrick, K.; Alireza, Y.; Ryan, M.; Shaban, D.; Kan, M.; Manijeh, R. Future of AlxGa1-xN materials and device technology for ultraviolet photodetectors. Proc. SPIE 2002, 4650, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kamiyama, S.; Amano, H.; Akasaki, I. The Evolution of Nitride Semiconductors, Optoelectronic Devices: III Nitrides; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2005; Chapter 3; pp. 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cicek, E.; McClintock, R.; Cho, C.Y.; Rahnema, B.; Razeghi, M. AlxGa1-xN-based back-illuminated solar-blind photodetectors with external quantum efficiency of 89%. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 191108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cicek, E.; Vashaei, Z.; Huang, E.K.; McClintock, R.; Razeghi, M. AlGaN-based deep ultraviolet 320×256 focal plane array. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 896–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, G.S.; Lu, H.; Xie, F.; Chen, D.J.; Ren, F.F.; Zhang, R.; Zheng, Y.D. High quantum efficiency back-illuminated AlGaN based solar-blind ultraviolet pin photodetectors. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2012, 29, 097302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yuan, Y.G.; Zhang, Y.; Chu, K.H.; Li, X.Y.; Li, X.Y.; Zhao, D.G.; Yang, H. Development of solar-blind AlGaN 128×128 ultraviolet focal plane arrays. Sci. China Ser. E-Technol. Sci. 2008, 51, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reverchon, J.L.; Bansropun, S.; Truffer, J.P.; Costard, E.; Frayssinet, E.; Brault, J.; Duboz, J.Y.; Giuliani, A.; Idir, M. Performances of AlGaN based focal plane arrays form 10 nm to 200 nm. In Space Missions and Technologies, Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Orlando, FL, USA, 7 May 2010; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2010; Volume 7691, p. 769109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, M.; Lee, C.Y.; Sekiguchi, H.; Okada, H.; Wakahara, A. Demonstration of a large area AlGaN/GaN Schottky barrier photodetector on Si with high detection limit. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2013, 28, 094005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Varshney, U.; Affarwal, N.; Gupta, G. Current advances in solar-blind photodetection technology: Using Ga2O3 and AlGaN. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 1573–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cai, Q.; You, H.F.; Guo, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Xie, Z.L.; Chen, D.J.; Lu, H.; Zheng, Y.D.; Zhang, R. Progress on AlGaN based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors and focal plane arrays. Light Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gu, Y.; Guo, J.; Ye, B.; Yang, X.; Xie, F.; Qian, W.; Zhang, X.; Lu, N.; Liu, Y.; Yang, G. Self-powered AlGaN-based MSM solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors with high Al-content AlxGa1-xN/AlyGa1-yN asymmetrical heterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 123, 232103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, N.H.; Wang, X.L.; Zeng, Y.P.; Xiao, H.L.; Wang, J.X.; Liu, H.X.; Li, J.M. Growth and properties of GaN on Si (111) substrates with AlGaN/AlN buffer layer by NH3-GSMBE. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, 1888–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nikishin, S.A.; Faleev, N.N.; Antipov, V.G.; Francoeur, S.; De Peralta, L.G.; Seryogin, G.A.; Temkin, H.; Prokofyeva, T.I.; Holtz, M.; Chu, S.N.G. High quality GaN grown on Si (111) by gas source molecular beam epitaxy with ammonia. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 2073–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Malin, T.; Maidebura, Y.; Mansurov, V.; Gavrilova, T.; Gutakovsky, A.; Vdovin, V.; Ponomarev, S.; Loshkarev, I.; Osinnykh, I.; Volodin, V.; et al. Influence of substrate nitridation conditions and buffer layer structures on the crack free GaN layers on Silicon substrate grown by ammonia-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. Thin Solid Films 2024, 791, 140246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Milakhin, D.; Malin, T.; Mansurov, V.; Maidebura, Y.; Bashkatov, D.; Milekhin, I.; Goryainov, S.; Volodin, V.; Loshkarev, I.; Vdovin, V.; et al. Tackling residual tensile stress in AlN on Si nucleation layers via the controlled Si(111) surface nitridation. Surf. Interfaces 2024, 51, 104817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gkanatsiou, A.; Lioutas, C.B.; Frangis, N.; Polychroniadis, E.K.; Prystawko, P.; Leszczynski, M. Electron microscopy characterization of AlGaN/GaN heterostructures grown on Si (111) substrates. Superlattices Microstruct. 2017, 103, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghosh, S.; Hinz, A.M.; Frentrup, M.; Alam, S.; Wallis, D.J.; Oliver, R.A. Design of step graded AlGaN buffer for GaN on Si heterostructures grown by MOCVD. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2023, 38, 044001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, H.; Woodward, J.; Yin, J.; Moldawer, A.; Pecora, E.F.; Nikiforov, A.Y.; Negro, L.D.; Paiella, R.; Ludwig, K.; Smith, D.J.; et al. Development of AlGaN-based graded-index-separate-confinement-heterostructure deep UV emitters by molecular beam epitaxy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2013, 31, 03C117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carneiro, E.; Rennesson, S.; Tamariz, S.; Harrouche, K.; Semond, F.; Medjdoub, F. Submicrometer-thick setp-graded AlGaN buffer on Silicon with a high buffer breakdown field. Phys. Status Solidi A 2023, 220, 2200846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, T.; Liu, S.; Zheng, X.; Wang, P.; Wang, D.; Chen, Z.; Wei, J.; Rong, X.; Tao, R.; Guo, S.; et al. Microstructure and dislocation evolution in composition gradient AlGaN grown by MOCVD. Superlattices Microstruct. 2021, 152, 106842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kung, P.; Walker, D.; Hamilton, M.; Diaz, J.; Razeghi, M. Lateral epitaxial overgrowth of GaN films on sapphire and silicon substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74, 570–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mansurov, V.; Malin, T.; Galitsyn, Y.; Zhuravlev, K. Graphene-like AlN layer formation on (111) Si surface by ammonia molecular beam epitaxy. J. Cryst. Growth 2015, 428, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mansruov, V.G.; Galitsyn, Y.G.; Malin, T.V.; Teys, S.A.; Fedosenko, E.V.; Kozhukhov, A.S.; Zhuravlev, K.S.; Cora, I.; Pecz, B. Formation of a graphene-like SiN layer on the surface Si (111). Semiconductor 2018, 52, 1511–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhuravlev, K.S.; Mansurov, V.; Galitsyn, Y.; Malin, T.; Milakhin, D.; Zemlyakov, V. Evolution of the surface states during the in situ SiN layer formation on AlN/GaN heterostrucutres. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2020, 35, 075004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ishizaka, A.; Shiraki, Y. Low temperature surface cleaning of silicon and its application to silicon MBE. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1986, 133, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kern, W.; Puotinen, D.A. Cleaning solutions based on hydrogen peroxide for use in silicon semiconductor technology. RCA Rev. 1970, 31, 187–206. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mansurov, V.; Xu, X.Y.; Pandikunta, M.; Uddin, R.; Nikishin, S. Reflection high energy electron diffraction investigation and comparison of the initial stage during molecular beam epitaxy of AlN on Si (111) and Si(110) substrates. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2011, 29, 03C129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tamariz, S.; Martin, D.; Grandjean, N. AlN grown on Si (111) by ammonia molecular beam epitaxy in the 900–1200 °C temperature range. J. Cryst. Growth 2017, 476, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cicek, E.; McClintock, R.; Cho, C.Y.; Rahnema, B.; Razeghi, M. AlxGa1-xN-based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector based on lateral epitaxial overgrowth of AlN on Si substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 181113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Romanov, A.E.; Speck, J.S. Stress relaxation in mismatched layers due to threading dislocation inclination. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 2569–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cheng, J.; Yang, X.; Sang, L.; Guo, L.; Hu, A.; Xu, F.; Tang, N.; Wang, X.; Shen, B. High mobility AlGaN/GaN heterostructures grown on Si substrates using a large lattice mismatch induced stress control technology. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 142106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fitzgerald, E.A.; Kim, A.Y.; Currie, M.T.; Langdo, T.A.; Taraschi, G.; Bulsara, M.T. Dislocation dynamics in relaxed graded composition semiconductors. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 1999, 67, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, J.; Wei, X. Step-graded InAsP buffer layers with gradient interface grown via metal organic chemical vapor deposition. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hiroki, M.; Kumakura, K. Ohmic contact to AlN:Si using graded AlGaN contact layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 115, 192104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Razzak, T.; Hwang, S.; Coleman, A.; Xue, H.; Sohel, S.H.; Bajaj, S.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, W.; Khan, A.; Rajan, S. Design of compositionally graded contact layers for MOCVD grown high Al-content AlGaN transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 115, 043502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bajaj, S.; Akyol, F.; Krishnamoorthy, S.; Zhang, Y.; Rajan, S. AlGaN channel field effect transistors with graded heterostructure ohmic contacts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 133508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Motayed, A.; Bathe, R.; Wood, M.C.; Diouf, O.S.; Vispute, R.D.; Mohammad, S.N. Electrical, thermal, and microstructural characteristics of Ti/Al/Ti/Au multilayer Ohmic contacts to n-type GaN. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, L.; Mohammed, F.M.; Adesida, I. Formation mechanism of Ohmic contacts on AlGaN/ GaN heterostructure: Electrical and microstructural characterizations. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 093516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pau, J.L.; Monroy, E.; Munoz, E.; Naranjo, F.B.; Calle, F.; Sanchez-Garcia, M.A.; Calleja, E. AlGaN photodetectors grown on Si (111) by molecular beam epitaxy. J. Cryst. Growth 2001, 230, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chiou, Y.Z.; Lin, Y.C.; Wang, C.K. AlGaN photodetectors prepared on Si substrates. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2007, 28, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. McClintock, R.; Razeghi, M. Growth of AlGaN on Silicon substrates: A novel way to make back illuminated ultraviolet photodetectors. Proc. SPIE 2015, 9555, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kang, S.; Chatterjee, U.; Um, D.Y.; Yu, Y.T.; Seo, I.S.; Lee, C.R. Ultraviolet-C photodetector fabricated using Si-doped n-AlGaN nanorods grown by MOCVD. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 2595–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ravikiran, L.; Radhakrishnan, K.; Dharmarasu, N.; Wang, M.A.Z.L.; Bruno, A.; Soci, C.; Lihuang, T.; Ang, K.S. GaN Schottky metal-semiconductor-metal UV photodetectors on Si(111) grown by ammonia-MBE. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lee, C.J.; Won, C.H.; Lee, J.H.; Hahm, S.H.; Park, H. GaN based ultraviolet passive pixel sensor on silicon(111) substrate. Sensors 2019, 19, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rathkanthiwar, S.; Kalra, A.; Muralidharan, R.; Nath, D.N.; Raghavan, S. V-Pits-induced photoresponse enhancement in AlGaN UV-B photodetectors on Si(111). IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2020, 67, 4281–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cao, Z.K.; Zhao, D.G.; Liang, F.; Liu, Z.S. Fabrication of high quantum efficiency p-i-n AlGaN detector and optimization of p-layer and i-layer thickness. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 115902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lyu, Q.F.; Jiang, H.X.; Lau, K.M. High gain and high ultraviolet/visible rejection ratio photodetectors using p-GaN/AlGaN/GaN heterostructures gorwn on Si. Appl. Physs. Lett. 2020, 117, 0171101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aiello, A.; Wu, Y.P.; Mi, Z.T.; Bhattacharya, P. Deep ultraviolet monolayer GaN/AlN disk-in-nanowire array photodiode on Silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 061104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liang, F.Z.; Feng, M.X.; Huang, Y.N.; Sun, X.J.; Zhan, X.N.; Liu, J.X.; Sun, Q.; Wang, R.X.; Ge, X.T.; Ning, J.Q.; et al. AlGaN based Schottky barrier deep ultraviolet photodetector grown on Si substrate. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 17188–17195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lyu, Q.F.; Jiang, H.X.; Lau, K.M. Monolithic integration of ultraviolet light emitting diodes and photodetectors on a p-GaN/AlGaN/GaN/Si platform. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 8358–8364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) cross-sectional image of the entire photodetector structure and microscope images under (b) 100× and (c) 1000×.
Figure 1. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) cross-sectional image of the entire photodetector structure and microscope images under (b) 100× and (c) 1000×.
Crystals 14 00952 g001
Figure 2. Processing procedure and the microscope image of fabricated photodetectors.
Figure 2. Processing procedure and the microscope image of fabricated photodetectors.
Crystals 14 00952 g002
Figure 3. Cross-sectional TEM images of the step-graded AlGaN buffers: (a) STEM HAADF image, (b) dark field image of the Si/AlN interface, and (c) dark field image of the step-graded buffer. (Orange lines indicate the interface of different graded steps).
Figure 3. Cross-sectional TEM images of the step-graded AlGaN buffers: (a) STEM HAADF image, (b) dark field image of the Si/AlN interface, and (c) dark field image of the step-graded buffer. (Orange lines indicate the interface of different graded steps).
Crystals 14 00952 g003
Figure 4. Cross-sectional TEM images of the step-graded AlGaN buffers: (a) STEM HAADF image, (b) bend angle of the dislocation inclination at the different step interfaces, and (c) dislocation annihilation efficiency at different step interfaces. (orange lines indicate the interfaces of different graded steps and the yellow lines indicate the dislocation).
Figure 4. Cross-sectional TEM images of the step-graded AlGaN buffers: (a) STEM HAADF image, (b) bend angle of the dislocation inclination at the different step interfaces, and (c) dislocation annihilation efficiency at different step interfaces. (orange lines indicate the interfaces of different graded steps and the yellow lines indicate the dislocation).
Crystals 14 00952 g004
Figure 5. IV profile under different annealing conditions. Inset: metal surface morphology deterioration under high-temperature long-time annealing.
Figure 5. IV profile under different annealing conditions. Inset: metal surface morphology deterioration under high-temperature long-time annealing.
Crystals 14 00952 g005
Figure 6. Responsivity and the IV curve of the fabricated photodetectors.
Figure 6. Responsivity and the IV curve of the fabricated photodetectors.
Crystals 14 00952 g006
Table 1. Resistivity of the n-type Ohmic contact under different annealing conditions.
Table 1. Resistivity of the n-type Ohmic contact under different annealing conditions.
Annealing ConditionResistivity (Ω·cm2)Profile
As grown0.1087Nonlinear
850 °C 10 s0.0660Nonlinear
850 °C 60 s0.0075Linear
900 °C 30 s0.0032Linear
350 °C 1 min + 900 °C 30 s0.0011Linear
350 °C 10 min + 900 °C 30 s3.43 × 10−5Linear
Table 2. Comparison of AlGaN UV photodetectors.
Table 2. Comparison of AlGaN UV photodetectors.
YearSubstrateTypeWavelengthDark CurrentResponsivity
2001 [41]SiPN310 nm200 uA@5 V6 mA/W
2007 [42]SiMSM297 nm7.5 × 10−9 A/cm2110 mA/W
2013 [5]SaphirePIN275 nm2 × 10−9 A/cm2@10 V176 mA/W
2015 [43]SiPIN290 nm1.6 × 10−8 A/cm218.3 mA/W
2017 [44]Sinanorods276 nm-115 mA/W
2017 [45]SiMSM362 nm0.43 nA@15 V0.183 A/W
2020 [46]SiMSM365 nm3.3 × 10−7 A/cm2-
2020 [47]SiV-Pit MSM315 nm0.7 nA125 A/W@5 V
2020 [48]SaphirePIN270 nm-190.96 mA/W
2020 [49]SiHEMT365 nm2.9 × 10−8 mA/mm2 × 104 A/W
2020 [50]SiDisk240 nm10 nA@6 V-
2020 [51]SiSchottky~278 nm3 × 10−8 A/cm2-
2021 [52]SiHEMT360 nm~1 × 10−7 mA/mm3.5 × 105 A/W
This workSiPIN274 nm0.12 nA120 mA/W
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Maidebura, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, G.; Su, Y.; Zhuravlev, K.; Wei, X. AlGaN-Based Ultraviolet PIN Photodetector Grown on Silicon Substrates Using SiN Nitridation Process and Step-Graded Buffers. Crystals 2024, 14, 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14110952

AMA Style

Li J, Maidebura Y, Zhang Y, Wu G, Su Y, Zhuravlev K, Wei X. AlGaN-Based Ultraviolet PIN Photodetector Grown on Silicon Substrates Using SiN Nitridation Process and Step-Graded Buffers. Crystals. 2024; 14(11):952. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14110952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jian, Yan Maidebura, Yang Zhang, Gang Wu, Yanmei Su, Konstantin Zhuravlev, and Xin Wei. 2024. "AlGaN-Based Ultraviolet PIN Photodetector Grown on Silicon Substrates Using SiN Nitridation Process and Step-Graded Buffers" Crystals 14, no. 11: 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14110952

APA Style

Li, J., Maidebura, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, G., Su, Y., Zhuravlev, K., & Wei, X. (2024). AlGaN-Based Ultraviolet PIN Photodetector Grown on Silicon Substrates Using SiN Nitridation Process and Step-Graded Buffers. Crystals, 14(11), 952. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14110952

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop