Next Article in Journal
Effect of Silver Vanadate Nanowires Addition on Structural and Morphological Properties of Dental Porcelain Prepared from Economic Raw Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Nb and B on the Precipitation Behaviors in Al-Ti-Nb Balanced-Ratio Ni-Based Superalloy: A Phase-Field Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Curing Temperature and UV Light Intensity on the Performance of Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Devices Exhibiting a Permanent Memory Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Post-Annealing Treatment on Some Physical Properties of Cerium Oxide Thin Films Prepared by the Sol–Gel Method

Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Ha’il University, Hail 81451, Saudi Arabia
Crystals 2024, 14(7), 615; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070615
Submission received: 11 June 2024 / Revised: 24 June 2024 / Accepted: 25 June 2024 / Published: 2 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optoelectronics of Thin Films and Nanoparticles (2nd Edition))

Abstract

:
In this study, thin films of Cerium Oxide CeO2 were fabricated using the sol–gel technique and deposited onto a glass substrate. The annealing process was carried out at various temperatures ranging from 200 to 600  ° C  to investigate the structural, morphological, and optical properties of the films and their interrelations. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns revealed the crystalline nature of the prepared films, with film quality exhibiting enhancement with increasing annealing temperature. The average crystallite size, dislocation density, microstrain, and lattice constant were determined from XRD patterns. Higher annealing temperatures were found to increase the crystallite size values from 4.71 to 15.33 nm and decrease the dislocation density and microstrain of the unit cell. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images illustrated the uniformity of the films, presenting a spheroid shape. Optical properties such as transmittance, absorbance, reflectance, the direct band gap, extinction coefficients, the refractive index, and optical conductivity were assessed using optical measurements. The direct optical band gap of the CeO2 film was observed to decrease from 3.99 to 3.75 eV with increasing film thickness. Using the Wemple and DiDomenico (WDD) single-oscillator model, dispersion energy parameters were calculated based on the refractive index. The nonlinear optical properties of the CeO2 thin films were evaluated using these dispersion energy parameters. The improvement of optical parameters holds significance in standardizing CeO2 thin films for various optoelectronic applications.

1. Introduction

Nanocrystalline thin films have attracted increasing research interest over the last three decades due to their small and intermediate particle sizes, typically ranging from 1 to 100 nm in at least one dimension. These thin films are extensively used in diverse fields including solar cells, storage systems, chemical and biological sensors, and optoelectronic devices.
Ceria (CeO2), among metallic oxides, has received considerable attention due to its wide optical energy gaps ranging from 3.4 to 3.6 eV [1,2], high transparency in the visible and near-Infrared regions, and high refractive index [3]. It exhibits high chemical resistance, resistance to photo corrosion, and an excellent capacity for oxygen storage [4]. CeO2 is a rare-earth oxide and is classified as an n-type semiconductor with a fluorite structure (FCC). Each cerium site is surrounded by eight oxygen sites, and each oxygen site is coordinated with the four nearest cerium cations [5]. Cerium oxide is an interesting material because it can exist in both +3 and +4 oxidation states, corresponding to CeO2 and Ce2O3, respectively, which are appropriate for valency change switching procedures [6]. Cerium oxide thin films are widely used in electronics, catalysis, hydrogen production, gas sensing, and energy-related fields. The structure of cerium oxide thin films can vary depending on factors such as the deposition method, deposition conditions, substrate type, and composition. By controlling epitaxial growth and these parameters, polycrystalline films with varying grain sizes ranging from a few nanometres can be prepared [7].
Many studies have reported on the physical properties of CeO2 thin films fabricated using various physical and chemical methods, including thermal evaporation, electron beam evaporation, spray pyrolysis, laser ablation deposition, sputtering, pulsed-laser deposition, and the sol–gel method [8,9,10,11,12].
In a recent study, Anandan and Parthasarathi Bera [13] investigated the growth of CeO2 on a Si3N4 substrate using magnetron sputtering. They found that the interfacial reaction between CeO2 and Si leads to the creation of silicate, and heat treatment improves this interfacial reaction. Additionally, CeO2 thin films were deposited onto glass substrates using electron beam evaporation. It was observed that the film exhibited a crystalline structure with a smaller crystallite size, and the optical band gap increased with an increase in film thickness [14]. Moreover, cerium dioxide films deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) on TiN and Si substrates at 250 °C exhibited polycrystalline cubic phases on both substrates. However, an improvement in the diffraction signal was observed along the <111> direction for the TiN substrate compared to the Si substrate due to the higher interface roughness of CeO2/TiN [15]. Furthermore, CeO2 was synthesized with different molar concentrations using the spray pyrolysis method at 350  ° C . The resulting thin films exhibited cubic fluorite structures, with a preferred orientation of crystals along the (111) direction. Crystallite size, dislocation density, and lattice constant were found to be affected by the molar concentration [6].
The sol–gel method is a large-scale production technique, offering several advantages such as simplicity, low cost, the ability to produce large-area films with uniform thickness, and good adherence properties [16].
The flexibility of cerium oxide properties is thus a strength and a weakness and can open a variety of new concepts for thin-film growth. Changing the preparation conditions and methods can produce films with various properties. Annealing of the films can reduce stress and improve the crystallinity of the relaxed films, which can be used for device purposes. There are only a few studies on the effect of annealing treatment on the physical properties of CeO2 using different preparation methods [17].
In this work, our aim is to explore a simple method of obtaining good-quality CeO2 films using the sol–gel method followed by the spin coating technique and investigate the changes in structural, morphological, and optical properties as a result of changing the post-annealing treatment.

2. Experimental Method

Cerium oxide (CeO2) thin films were prepared using the sol–gel method onto glass substrates. Cerium (III) chloride (CeCl3, 99.9% pure, anhydrous, Thermo Scientific Chemicals) and distilled water were used to create precursor solutions at concentrations of 0.5 M. To achieve a clear and homogeneous solution, 2.4 g of cerium chloride was dissolved in distilled water and stirred using a magnetic stirrer at 60 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, the solution was kept at room temperature for 1 week. Glass substrates, cut from standard microscope glass slides with dimensions of 2 cm × 2.5 cm, were employed for coating. To ensure better adhesion, the glass substrates were properly washed with distilled water, methanol, and acetone in an ultrasonic bath and then dried to eliminate water molecules. The films were deposited using a spin coater (KW-4A) operating at 500 revolutions per minute for 10 s and then at 3000 revolutions per minute for 30 s. Finally, the films were annealed at various temperatures (200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 °C) using a furnace with a heating rate of 5 °C/min. The chemical reaction process was described as the thermal decomposition of cerium chloride to form clusters of cerium oxide in the presence of water, as follows [18]:
4 CeCl3 + 3 H2O = Ce (OH)3+ 3 HCl
Ce (OH)3 + O2 + 2 H2O = 4 Ce (OH)4
Ce (OH)4 = CeO2 + 2 H2O
The resulting CeO2 thin films exhibited desirable properties, including thinness, strong adherence to the substrates, and uniformity.

Characterization

The structural characteristics of the thin films were analyzed using a Shimadzu XRD 700 X-ray diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) with Cuk α  radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) to obtain XRD patterns. The elemental composition was assessed using Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. The surface morphology of the films and film thickness were examined using Thermo Scientific Quattro (ESEM). The samples were mounted on aluminum stubs using double-sided sticky discs of conductive carbon, then gold-coated (up to 2–3 nm thick) using the sputtering method. Additionally, the optical properties were determined using the Thermo Scientific Evo 201 spectrophotometer, and the measurements were carried out within the wavelength range of 300 to 1000 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Analysis

The structural characteristics were investigated using X-ray diffractograms. The X-ray plots of CeO2 thin films with various annealing temperatures are depicted in Figure 1. A distinct intense broad peak was observed at an angle of 32.28 °  along the (200) plane in all samples. The X-ray plot peaks closely match the cubic ceria of a fluorite structure, consistent with the JCPDS data 34-0394, with a strong preferred orientation along the (200) plane [19]. It is evident from the XRD spectrum that the intensity of the (200) peak increases with higher annealing temperatures, which may be attributed to the relaxation of the structure induced by the heating treatment. The size of crystallites, dislocation density, and film microstrain were assessed to determine the effect of annealing temperature on lattice parameters.
Scherrer’s equation was used to calculate the average crystallite size:
D = 0.94   λ β   C O S θ
where D is the average crystallite size, λ is the wavelength of the X-ray,  β  is the full width at half maximum, and ϴ is the Bragg diffraction angle; the constant is equal to 0.94 for spherical crystallites with cubic symmetry.
Table 1 presents the computed structural parameters. The size of the crystallites was determined to range between 4.7 nm and 15.33 nm for annealing temperatures of 200–600  ° C .
An increase in annealing temperature provides higher energy in the system, leading to the creation of thin films with larger crystallite sizes and good crystallinity. As the heating temperature increased, higher energy controlled crystallite growth, causing the particles to increase in size and resulting in a sharper intensity of the diffraction peaks. A similar trend was observed in another study [20].
On the other hand, the dislocation density δ and lattice strain  ε  were calculated using the following equations:
δ = 1 D 2
ε = β c o s θ 4
According to Table 1, the reduction in the dislocation density and microstrain of the unit cells indicates the formation of higher-quality films, which can be observed from the sharp peaks in Figure 1. This reduction accompanying annealing temperature is attributed to the relaxation promoted by the higher energy provided to the system. The decrease in dislocation density indicates the formation of high-quality films.
The lattice constant is estimated by the Miller indices (hkl) and the interplanar spacing d using Equation (7):
d = a h 2   + k 2 + l 2
From Table 1, it is evident that the lattice parameter values, which are consistent with those reported for CeO2 thin films prepared by different techniques [6], exhibit significant improvement with an increasing annealing temperature. This enhancement can be attributed to the formation of oxygen vacancies and an increase in Ce3+ ions.

3.2. EDX Analysis

The elemental composition of the films was investigated using EDX spectroscopy. Figure 2 depicts the EDX spectra of the CeO2 thin film. The highest peak corresponding to cerium was recorded at 4.4 keV, while the oxygen peak was observed at 0.25 keV. Other smaller peaks originate from the glass substrate and potential impurities such as Si and H. The detected Si element was from the substrate and the H element was expected to originate from the starting material used during the preparation of the thin films.

3.3. Microstructural Analysis

Scanning electron microscope measurements were performed to examine the surface morphology of CeO2 deposited on glass and annealed at various temperatures. Figure 3 illustrates SEM images, revealing uniform film surfaces that effectively cover the substrates. A pronounced influence of annealing temperatures on the morphology of the CeO2 films was observed. The films displayed a homogeneous distribution of grains on the substrates with low porosity at a high annealing temperature of 600  ° C . After annealing, the grain size increased and the film surfaces became denser. At higher annealing temperatures, spheroid shapes were formed by the growth of film crystals from a nucleation site. A similar result was shown in another study for CeO2 prepared by the chemical route method [17].
Figure 4 displays the thickness of the CeO2 thin films measured from SEM cross-sections at different annealing temperatures. As shown in Figure 4, the thickness of the films increased with higher annealing temperatures across all samples. This phenomenon can be attributed to the increased energy gained by the molecules due to the elevated annealing temperatures, as well as the enhancement of the potential force between the substrate and the films. This results in a reduction in porosity, as mentioned previously, and an increase in film thickness. The porosity of the films is inversely related to crystallite size as well as film thickness.

3.4. Optical Analysis

The optical band transition in the films offers vital details on the film’s electronic structure and helps in the construction of optoelectronic devices. The films’ transmittance, absorbance, and reflection spectra were obtained using UV–vis spectroscopy measured in room-temperature air. The wavelength dependence of the optical transmittance spectra for the CeO2 films annealed at different temperatures (200–600  ° C ), within the wavelength range of 300–1000 nm, is depicted in Figure 5. It is clearly seen that all films are highly transparent in the visible and near-infrared regions, with transmittance values ranging between 60% and 80%, indicating uniformity and good adherence to the glass substrates. However, it is observed that the transmission of CeO2 decreased with increasing annealing temperatures due to certain physical effects, such as crystal orientation, low porosity, and an increase in the film thickness. Similar results have been reported by Elmas et al. for CdS thin films grown on glass substrates using a spray pyrolysis technique annealed at different annealing temperatures [21]. This finding is similar to that of CdS because the same dependencies of annealing temperature and transmittance have not been found for CeO2 thin films. The decrease in transmittance is crucial for certain applications, particularly optical devices that necessitate controlled light transmittance [22].
The absorbance of CeO2 thin films at different annealing temperatures is shown in Figure 6. It is observed that the band absorption edge occurs in the visible region at 315 nm and the absorbance spectra sharply increase with decreasing wavelength, indicating the initiation of interband transitions at the critical edge.
Reflectance measurement is key to understanding real absorption. Figure 7 displays the experimental reflectance spectra of CeO2 thin films at different annealing temperatures. As can be observed, reflectance is clearly dependent on the post-annealing temperature. A larger crystallite size leads to increased optical reflectance. Another study observed similar results for CeO2 thin films deposited by magnetron sputtering [23]. The increase in optical reflectance of the thin films with increasing film thickness can be attributed to light scattering within the film layers, resulting in reflections from the film surface.
Tauc’s equation was employed to predict the optical band gap (Eg) of the CeO2 films [16]:
( α h v ) = A ( h v E g ) n
where  h v  is the photon energy and A is the transition constant; the exponent n depends on the type of transition and  α  is the optical absorption coefficient calculated using the following relation:
α = 1 t   ln T
where t is the film thickness and T is the transmittance.
For direct transition, n = 1/2. Tauc plots of CeO2 films annealed at different annealing temperatures are shown in Figure 8. By extrapolating the linear portion at  α = 0 , the optical band gap energy of the films can be determined. It was found that, for all deposited films, an increase in annealing temperature led to a decrease in optical band gaps from 3.99 to 3.75 eV. Nunes et al. [24] observed a decrease in the band gap of TiO2–CeO2 multilayer thin films with increasing temperatures. The obtained values for the band gap Eg are in good agreement with the literature [9,23,25]. The reduction in the energy band gap can be attributed to the presence of oxygen ion vacancies, which act as positively charged centers occupied by electrons. These vacancies serve as donor centres, with their energy levels lying close to the valence band. Post-heating treatment modifies the energy gap by lowering the conduction band edge and correspondingly raising the valence band edge, akin to the Moss–Burstein shift observed in semiconductors [24,26]. Additionally, the narrowing of the film’s band gap may also result from the improvement in crystallinity with increasing annealing temperatures, as evidenced by the XRD results.
The extinction coefficient ( κ )  was calculated from the following equation:
κ = α   λ 4 π
where  λ  is the wavelength of incoming light. The spectra of the extinction coefficient of the CeO2 thin films deposited at different annealing temperatures are shown in Figure 9. A continuous variation in the extinction coefficient is obtained with increasing annealing temperatures.
Studying the refractive index of films offers several advantages. High-refractive-index films have been used in optoelectronic applications. The n values are influenced by many factors, such as molecular structure, film thickness, dopants, lattice defect, porosity, and stretching [24,26]. The relationship between reflectance and the refractive index (n) can be determined using the following equation:
n = 1 + R 1 R  
The refractive index rises in direct proportion to the increase in annealing temperature, as seen in Figure 10. Furthermore, data analysis revealed a variation in refractive indices along the film thickness, consistent with established findings indicating enhanced crystallinity with increasing film thickness. Films with higher crystallinity typically contain larger crystallites, resulting in a larger refractive index.
The optical conductivity was obtained from the relation given by the following equation [25,27]:
σ = α n C 4 π
Figure 11 displays the variations in optical conductivity for CeO2 thin films with different annealing temperatures. As observed from the figure, there is an enhancement in optical conductivity with increasing annealing temperatures. This variation in optical conductivity makes these films good candidates for many applications, such as nanophotonic systems, optical coatings, and optical devices.
The values of the refractive index can be fitted using a single oscillator by the Wemple and DiDomenico (WDD) relationship to estimate the dispersion parameters, such as oscillator energy (Eo), dispersion energy (Ed), and the static refractive index (no) [28].
( n 2 1 ) 1 = E 0 E d 1 E 0 E d   ( h ν ) 2
Figure 12 illustrates the (n2 1)−1 plots against (h ν )2, where linear regression was used to determine the values of E0 and Ed from the intercept  E 0   E d  and the slope, (E0Ed)−1. The obtained values of E0 and Ed are listed in Table 2. The oscillator energy E0 increases with increasing annealing temperature, as suggested by the WDD model (E0 ≈ 0.7Eg). This increment may be attributed to the decrease in the energy gap. Conversely, the dispersion energy Ed values decrease when increasing the annealing temperature from 200 to 600  ° C .
The static refractive index (n0) can be determined at zero photon energy by the WDD model as follows:
n 0 = ( 1 + E o E 0   )
The estimated values of n0 are listed in Table 2, revealing an enhancement with increasing annealing temperature, attributed to the densification of the annealed films. Films with high refractive indices have potential applications in various optoelectronic devices.

3.5. Nonlinear Optical Properties of the CeO2 Thin Films

For a better understanding of the optical properties, the values of linear optical susceptibility  χ ( 1 )  and third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility  χ ( 3 )  can be determined using the dispersion energy parameter by the following relations [29]:
χ ( 1 ) = E d / E 0 4 π
χ ( 3 ) = 6.82 × 10 15 ( E d E 0 ) 4
The calculated values of  χ ( 1 )  and  χ ( 3 )  are listed in Table 2 for CeO2 thin films. It is evident that the value of χ(3) changes with increasing annealing temperatures, which can be attributed to alterations in the material structure and homogenization of the films due to the increasing rates of chemical reactions during the annealing process [30].
The nonlinear refractive index n2 can be determined from the following relation [31]:
n 2 = 12 π χ ( 3 ) n 0
The values of n2 are recorded in Table 2. The results indicate that the nonlinear refractive index of CeO2 thin films decreased with increasing annealing temperatures due to the reduction in defect gap states and changes in polarization of the films during the annealing treatment. Therefore, the nonlinearity parameters decreased during the annealing process.

4. Conclusions

In summary, CeO2 thin films were successfully fabricated via the sol–gel technique and deposited onto glass substrates, followed by annealing at different temperatures (200, 300, 400, 500, and 600  ° C ). The effects of annealing temperature on the structure, morphology, and optical properties of the CeO2 films were thoroughly investigated. XRD analyses confirmed a noticeable improvement in the crystallinity of the deposited films with increasing annealing temperatures, revealing a cubic ceria fluorite structure. The main XRD diffraction peak located at 2ϴ = 32.28° corresponds to the (200) plane phase. Annealing temperature escalation led to an increase in crystallite size (from 4.71 to 15.32 nm) and film thickness (from 18 to 67.78 mm), along with a reduction in dislocation density and microstrain of the unit cells due to the relaxation promoted by higher energy. EDX analysis confirmed the presence of cerium particles on the surface, while SEM surface morphology revealed a homogeneous distribution of spheroid crystals with low porosity at higher annealing temperatures. UV-visible transmission spectra showed high transparency of all films in the visible and near-infrared regions, with the band absorption edge observed at 315 nm. However, film reflectance increased with increasing film thickness. Variations in the annealing temperature resulted in modifications to the electronic structure of the films, leading to a decrease in the energy gap. The extinction coefficient, refractive index, and optical conductivity of the films were found to increase with increasing annealing temperatures. Oscillator energy (E0), dispersion energy (Ed), and the static refractive index were calculated using the WDD model. Nonlinear optical parameters, such as linear optical susceptibility  χ ( 1 ) , third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility  χ ( 3 ) , and the nonlinear refractive index n2, exhibited a decline during the annealing process due to variations in polarization and changes in the film structure. The changes in the physical properties of CeO2 thin films are dependent on the post-annealing treatment. Thus, the annealing effects on the physical properties of CeO2 thin films will be useful for the formation of highly crystalline and high optical conductivity thin films for optoelectrical devices, thin-film sensors, and solar cells.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge Ha’il University for their facilities and support. Also, the author would like to thank al-jouf university for providing some devices.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Abdelmounaïm, C.; Amara, Z.; Maha, A.; Mustapha, D. Effects of molarity on structural, optical, morphological and CO2 gas sensing properties of nanostructured copper oxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2016, 43, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lv, C.; Zhu, C.; Wang, C.; Gao, Y.; Ma, X.; Yang, D. Electroluminescence from metal-oxide-semiconductor devices with erbium-doped CeO2 films on silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 141102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gatea, H.A.; Hachim, F.K. Impact of Molarity on the Structural, Morphological and Optical Properties of CeO2 Thin Films Prepared by Spray Pyrolysis Technique. Int. J. Thin Film. Sci. Technol. 2023, 12, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, C.H.S.S.P.; Pandeeswari, R.; Jeyaprakash, B.G. Structural, morphological and optical properties of spray deposited Mn-doped CeO2 thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 602, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Dao, D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Song, H.-Y.; Yang, J.-K.; Kim, T.-W.; Yu, Y.-T.; Lee, I.-H. Ionic liquid-assisted preparation of Ag-CeO2 nanocomposites and their improved photocatalytic activity. Mater. Des. 2018, 159, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Govindarajan, D.; Nithya, C.K. Structural and Optical properties of Cerium oxide thin films prepared by Spray Pyrolysis technique. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2014, 5, 2229–5518. Available online: http://www.ijser.org (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  7. Cresi, J.S.P.; Di Mario, L.; Catone, D.; Martelli, F.; Paladini, A.; Turchini, S.; D’addato, S.; Luches, P.; O’keeffe, P. Ultrafast Formation of Small Polarons and the Optical Gap in CeO2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 5686–5691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zumeta-Dubé, I.; Rangel, J.M.G.; Roque, J.; Romero-Ibarra, I.C.; Sánchez, M.F.G. Strong texture tuning along different crystalline directions in glass-supported CeO2 thin films by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sriubas, M.; Pamakštys, K.; Laukaitis, G. Investigation of microstructure and electrical properties of Sm doped ceria thin films. Solid State Ion. 2017, 302, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mysliveček, J.; Matolín, V.; Matolínová, I. Heteroepitaxy of Cerium Oxide Thin Films on Cu(111). Materials 2015, 8, 6346–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. García-Sánchez, M.F.; Ortiz, A.; Santana, G.; Bizarro, M.; Peña, J.; Cruz-Gandarilla, F.; Aguilar-Frutis, M.A.; Alonso, J.C. Synthesis and characterization of nanostructured cerium dioxide thin films deposited by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Szymczewska, D.; Karczewski, J.; Chrzan, A.; Jasinski, P. CGO as a barrier layer between LSCF electrodes and YSZ electrolyte fabricated by spray pyrolysis for solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ion. 2017, 302, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anandan, C.; Bera, P. XPS studies on the interaction of CeO2 with silicon in magnetron sputtered CeO2 thin films on Si and Si3N4 substrates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 283, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Debnath, S.; Islam, M.R.; Khan, M.S.R. Optical properties of CeO2 thin films. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2007, 30, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vangelista, S.; Piagge, R.; Ek, S.; Sarnet, T.; Ghidini, G.; Martella, C.; Lamperti, A. Structural, Chemical and Optical Properties of Cerium Dioxide Film Prepared by Atomic Layer Deposition on TiN and Si Substrates. Thin Solid Film. 2017, 636, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Al-Shomar, S.M.; Barakat, M.A.Y.; Abdallah, A.W. Ellipsometric and ultrasonic studies of nano titanium dioxide specimens doped with Erbium. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 106413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sbera, T.; Nayak, H.; Medicherla, V.R.R.; Kamilla, S.K. Effect of heat treatment on structural properties of CeO2 prepared by chemical-route method. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 74, 1063–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xue, S.; Wu, W.; Bian, X.; Wu, Y. Dehydration, hydrolysis and oxidation of cerium chloride heptahydrate in air atmosphere. J. Rare Earths 2017, 35, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sánchez, M.F.G.; Rosas, I.P.; García, J.F.M.; Adame, J.A.A.; Lartundo-Rojas, L.; Santana, G. Visible emission on nanostructured CeO2 thin films obtained by spray pyrolysis. Phys. Status Solidi (a) 2020, 217, 2000235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Emami, M.; Goodarzi, R. Optoelectronic correlations for gold thin films in different annealing temperature. Optik 2018, 171, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Elmas, S.; Ozcan, S.; Ozder, S.; Bilgin, V. Influence of Annealing Temperature on the Electrical and Optical Properties of CdS Thin Films. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2012, 121, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Avellaneda, C.O.; Berton, M.A.; Bulhões, L.O. Optical and electrochemical properties of CeO2 thin film prepared by an alkoxide route. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2008, 92, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Murugan, R.; Vijayaprasath, G.; Mahalingam, T.; Hayakawa, Y.; Ravi, G. Effect of rf power on the properties of magnetron sputtered CeO2 thin films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 2800–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nunes, T.B.O.; Neto, N.F.A.; Garcia, L.M.P.; Nascimento, R.M.; Bomio, M.R.D.; Motta, F.V. Effect of temperature on the photocatalytic properties of TiO2-CeO2 multilayer thin films obtained by spin coating method. Cerâmica 2020, 66, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kalu, P.N.; Augustine, C.; Nwachukwu, A.N.; Chikwenze, R.A.; Amadi, S.O.; Robert, B.J.; Okpani, P.E.; Daniel, T.O.; Ukwu, C.N.; Obot, E.P.; et al. Comparative analysis of the effect of annealing temperature on the structural and optical properties of chemically deposited CeO2/ZnO and CeO2/NiO core-shell thin films for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications. Chalcogenide Lett. 2021, 18, 649–665. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356292414 (accessed on 1 January 2020). [CrossRef]
  26. Vidhya, R.; Sankareswari, M.; Neyvasagam, K. Effect of annealing temperature on structural and optical properties of Cu-TiO2 thin films. Int. J. Tech. Res. Appl. 2016, 37, 42–46. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6153/6f3cae97f7435bd56aad6695d24ccf6f59ab.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  27. Al-Shomar, S.M. Investigation the effect of doping concentration in Ruthenium-doped TiO2 thin films for solar cells and sensors applications. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 036409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Joshi, J.H.; Khunti, D.D.; Joshi, M.J.; Parikh, K.D. Penn Model and Wemple-DiDomenico Single Oscillator Analysis of Cobalt Sulfide Nanoparticles, American institute of physics. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1837, 040033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dahshan, A.; Amer, H.H.; Aly, K.A. Compositional dependence of the optical constants of amorphous GexAs20Se80−x thin films. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2008, 41, 215401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sahoo, D.; Priyadarshini, P.; Dandela, R.; Alagarasan, D.; Ganesan, R.; Varadharajaperumal, S.; Naik, R. Optimization of linear and nonlinear optical parameters in As40Se60 film by annealing at different temperature. Optik 2020, 219, 165286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arasu, P.A.; Williams, R.V. Effect of annealing temperature on the dispersion energy parameters of sol-gel routed molybdenum oxide thin film. Int. J. Dev. Res. 2016, 6, 6875–6879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD measurements of CeO2 thin films as a function of the substrate temperature.
Figure 1. XRD measurements of CeO2 thin films as a function of the substrate temperature.
Crystals 14 00615 g001
Figure 2. EDX spectra of the CeO2 thin film.
Figure 2. EDX spectra of the CeO2 thin film.
Crystals 14 00615 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of CeO2 thin films deposited at various annealing temperatures: (a) 200  ° C  (b) 300  ° C  (c) 400  ° C  (d) 500  ° C  and (e) 600  ° C .
Figure 3. SEM images of CeO2 thin films deposited at various annealing temperatures: (a) 200  ° C  (b) 300  ° C  (c) 400  ° C  (d) 500  ° C  and (e) 600  ° C .
Crystals 14 00615 g003aCrystals 14 00615 g003b
Figure 4. Variation in crystallite size and film thickness for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Figure 4. Variation in crystallite size and film thickness for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Crystals 14 00615 g004
Figure 5. Plots of transmittance spectra for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Figure 5. Plots of transmittance spectra for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Crystals 14 00615 g005
Figure 6. Plots of absorbance spectra for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Figure 6. Plots of absorbance spectra for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Crystals 14 00615 g006
Figure 7. Plots of reflectance spectra for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Figure 7. Plots of reflectance spectra for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Crystals 14 00615 g007
Figure 8. Variation of  ( α h v ) 2  vs.  h v  for CeO2 thin films.
Figure 8. Variation of  ( α h v ) 2  vs.  h v  for CeO2 thin films.
Crystals 14 00615 g008
Figure 9. Variation in extinction coefficient vs. wavelength for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Figure 9. Variation in extinction coefficient vs. wavelength for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Crystals 14 00615 g009
Figure 10. Variation in refractive index vs. wavelength for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Figure 10. Variation in refractive index vs. wavelength for CeO2 thin films prepared at various annealing temperatures.
Crystals 14 00615 g010
Figure 11. Variations in optical conductivity vs. annealing temperature for CeO2 thin films.
Figure 11. Variations in optical conductivity vs. annealing temperature for CeO2 thin films.
Crystals 14 00615 g011
Figure 12. Variations of (n2 − 1)−1 vs. (h ν )2 for CeO2 thin films.
Figure 12. Variations of (n2 − 1)−1 vs. (h ν )2 for CeO2 thin films.
Crystals 14 00615 g012
Table 1. XRD-calculated parameters at different temperatures for CeO2 thin films.
Table 1. XRD-calculated parameters at different temperatures for CeO2 thin films.
FilmAnnealing Temperature (°C)Average Crystallite Size D (nm) Dislocation   Density   δ
(×1016 lines/m3)
  Microstrain   ε Lattice   Constant
( Å )
CeO22004.714.500.07685.498
30013.920.5180.02605.538
40014.160.4980.02555.541
50014.310.4880.02625.542
60015.330.4250.02365.546
Table 2. Dispersion parameters for CeO2 thin films.
Table 2. Dispersion parameters for CeO2 thin films.
Film Annealing   Temperature   ( ° C ) E0 (eV)Ed (eV)no χ ( 1 )  (esu) χ ( 3 )  × 10−13 (esu)n2 × 10−11 (esu)
CeO22002.0815.0281.180.19279.525.20
3002.5424.8751.230.15212.473.82
4002.5914.35191.260.1334.331.29
5002.673.6751.310.1090.7810.249
6004.3883.3041.520.0590.070.017
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Shomar, S.M. Influence of Post-Annealing Treatment on Some Physical Properties of Cerium Oxide Thin Films Prepared by the Sol–Gel Method. Crystals 2024, 14, 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070615

AMA Style

Al-Shomar SM. Influence of Post-Annealing Treatment on Some Physical Properties of Cerium Oxide Thin Films Prepared by the Sol–Gel Method. Crystals. 2024; 14(7):615. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070615

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Shomar, S. M. 2024. "Influence of Post-Annealing Treatment on Some Physical Properties of Cerium Oxide Thin Films Prepared by the Sol–Gel Method" Crystals 14, no. 7: 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070615

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop