Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Light Source on Detecting Thin Film Transistor
Previous Article in Journal
Cocrystal Assembled by Pyrene Derivative and 1,4-Diiodotetrafluorobenzene via a C=O···I Halogen Bond
Previous Article in Special Issue
Radiation Damage in Macromolecular Crystallography—An Experimentalist’s View
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/cryst8100393
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Crystals 2018, 8(4), 157.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Taberman, H. Radiation Damage in Macromolecular Crystallography—An Experimentalist’s View. Crystals 2018, 8, 157

by
Helena Taberman
Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK
Crystals 2018, 8(10), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8100393
Submission received: 26 September 2018 / Accepted: 18 October 2018 / Published: 20 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Protein Crystallography)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes
The author wishes to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
On page 161, lines 9–10, the sentence “The probability of fluorescence emission increases with atomic number and becomes greater than 10% for Z ≤ 18,” should be “The probability of fluorescence emission increases with atomic number and becomes greater than 10% for Z ≥ 18,”.
There is an error in Figure 1, “Primary photoelectron (12.4 keV - E1s-binding)” should say “Primary photoelectron (13.0 keV - E1s-binding)”. It should be corrected as follows:
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.

References

  1. Taberman, H. Radiation Damage in Macromolecular Crystallography—An Experimentalist’s View. Crystals 2018, 8, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Crystals 08 00393 g001 550
Figure 1. The different primary X-ray scattering processes of an incident 13.0 keV beam with an example lysozyme crystal simulated using RADDOSE-3D. Elastic scattering (6.5% of the interacting beam): The X-ray photon is scattered, resulting in diffraction. Compton scattering (6.6% of the interacting beam): The photon loses part of its energy in an atomic electron, being scattered at a longer wavelength. A recoil electron may then be ejected from the atom. Photoelectric absorption (86.9% of the interacting beam): The photon transfers all its energy to an inner shell electron, which is ejected from the atom (photoelectron). The resulting orbital vacancy is filled by a higher shell electron, followed by either the fluorescence emission or ejection of a lower energy Auger electron. The X-ray source in the figure is Diamond Light Source beamline I03.
Figure 1. The different primary X-ray scattering processes of an incident 13.0 keV beam with an example lysozyme crystal simulated using RADDOSE-3D. Elastic scattering (6.5% of the interacting beam): The X-ray photon is scattered, resulting in diffraction. Compton scattering (6.6% of the interacting beam): The photon loses part of its energy in an atomic electron, being scattered at a longer wavelength. A recoil electron may then be ejected from the atom. Photoelectric absorption (86.9% of the interacting beam): The photon transfers all its energy to an inner shell electron, which is ejected from the atom (photoelectron). The resulting orbital vacancy is filled by a higher shell electron, followed by either the fluorescence emission or ejection of a lower energy Auger electron. The X-ray source in the figure is Diamond Light Source beamline I03.
Crystals 08 00393 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taberman, H. Correction: Taberman, H. Radiation Damage in Macromolecular Crystallography—An Experimentalist’s View. Crystals 2018, 8, 157. Crystals 2018, 8, 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8100393

AMA Style

Taberman H. Correction: Taberman, H. Radiation Damage in Macromolecular Crystallography—An Experimentalist’s View. Crystals 2018, 8, 157. Crystals. 2018; 8(10):393. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8100393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taberman, Helena. 2018. "Correction: Taberman, H. Radiation Damage in Macromolecular Crystallography—An Experimentalist’s View. Crystals 2018, 8, 157" Crystals 8, no. 10: 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8100393

APA Style

Taberman, H. (2018). Correction: Taberman, H. Radiation Damage in Macromolecular Crystallography—An Experimentalist’s View. Crystals 2018, 8, 157. Crystals, 8(10), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8100393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop