1. Introduction
Many of the liquid crystal (LC) phases known from applications in displays are based on rod-shaped molecules, so called calamitic mesogens, which exhibit the liquid crystal behaviour as a function of changing temperature and are called thermotropic. Nevertheless, for the formation of liquid crystals only general shape anisotropy of the molecules is necessary, and in 1977, Chandrasekhar et al. [
1] reported liquid crystallinity from disk-shaped molecules, called discotic liquid crystals, which are also part of the family of thermotropic LC phases. But liquid crystallinity can also be observed as a function of changing concentration of either amphiphilic molecules, or anisotropic nanoparticles and colloids, in an isotropic host fluid, often water. This leads to a wholly new class of LCs, the lyotropic phases, which are the topic of this paper and indeed of the whole journal volume of this special issue of
Crystals. Besides those formed from amphiphilic molecules, several types of lyotropic LCs may be distinguished. Chromonics [
2,
3] are liquid crystals of dissolved rigid dyes, thus flat molecules, in an isotropic solvent. These stack to form super-molecular structures which then exhibit nematic and columnar phases. Inorganic liquid crystals [
4] are lyotropics that can be formed by rod-like colloids, such as vanadium pentoxide, V
2O
5, and other minerals, but also by disc-shaped colloids, especially clays [
5,
6,
7]. Such systems have already been observed by Langmuir in 1938 on bentonite clays [
8] and form the basis of the Onsager theory, which will be discussed herein.
Somewhere in between the molecular size of chromonic dyes and the macroscopic platelets of clays, lies graphene oxide. Since the discovery of graphene in 2004 [
9], a stable, two-dimensional hexagonal lattice of carbon with quite surprising and unprecedented physical properties [
10], this material has attracted enormous interest (
Figure 1a). This is on the one side founded by questions of fundamental research, and on the other side by the promise of a large range of possible high volume technological applications. When working with graphene in a liquid crystal environment, one will unfortunately quickly arrive at the conclusion that these composites and mixtures are by no means easy to handle, because graphene is largely insoluble in nearly all liquid solvents. This is very different for graphene–oxide (GO) which exhibits different functional groups at the edges and the plane of the graphene oxide sheets, and is readily soluble in many solvents, including water, which is a significant advantage for environmentally friendly applications (
Figure 1b). At certain concentrations, roughly > 0.1–1 wt%, GO often exhibits very stable lyotropic nematic phases [
11,
12,
13]. One of the interesting aspects of GO liquid crystals is the possibility of self-organized and self-ordered systems of graphene oxide. This order can then easily be manipulated by application of external stimuli, such as boundary conditions, mechanical shear, but possibly also electric and magnetic fields. After obtaining a certain directional order one could wash away or evaporate the solvent, leaving an ordered GO structure, which may even be reduced chemically or through heat application to produce reduced graphene oxide (rGO), which displays some of the originally desirable graphene properties. Lyotropic graphene oxide liquid crystals are thus of immense interest for nanotechnology and its applications. There have been several review articles on the properties of GO liquid crystals [
14,
15,
16]. In this paper we want to give a short critical account of what is known, what is not yet known, and what are the controversial questions with regards to graphene oxide liquid crystals. Effects of flake size and solvent will be discussed, alignment, addition of salts and polymers, as well as electro-optic properties, and electric and magnetic field effects.
2. Graphene and Graphene Oxide
Pristine graphene is a two-dimensional hexagonal lattice of sp
2 hybridized carbon with a basis of two, giving rise to a honeycomb structure [
10]. Graphene oxide is a very different material to graphene. Graphene is often obtained by mechanical exfoliation of graphite (the so-called Scotch Tape
® method) or grown by chemical vapor deposition. On the other hand, graphite that has undergone treatment to become graphite oxide readily exfoliates into monolayers when dispersed in water (
Figure 1) [
17]. Thus, graphene oxide is often easier to produce in large quantities than graphene and is readily dispersible in solution for storage or further processing [
18]. There are two main processes described in the literature for producing graphite oxide, the Hummers [
19] and Brodie [
20] methods.
The structure of graphene oxide is reminiscent of graphene but the lattice is now distorted and the covalent bonding of oxygen functional groups such as epoxy, hydroxyl and carboxyl groups [
21] means much more of the carbon is now sp3 hybridized. The disruption to the sp
2 bonding network means graphene oxide is not electrically conductive. Typically, graphene oxide is produced by a modified Hummers method [
22] and the degree of oxidation is characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. From XPS measurements one can determine the ratio of oxygen to carbon atoms in the material, which is often taken as a measure of how oxidized the graphene sheet is. Graphene oxide can be reduced by thermal or chemical means, and the product is known as rGO. When GO is reduced, the first change to occur is that the C–O peak in XPS decreases in intensity relative to the C–C and the C–O=O/C=O bonds (
Figure 2) [
23,
24]. This can be interpreted as a relative decrease in the abundance of epoxy groups (which only include C–O bonds) on the GO surface.
Stable dispersions of graphene oxide in appropriate solvents can be described as a colloid—a suspension of one phase (in this case a solid) inside another. Colloids of anisodiametric (shape-anisotropic) particles are known to make lyotropic liquid crystal phases, and the same is true of graphene oxide.
3. Colloidal Liquid Crystals of Graphene Oxide
Liquid crystals are soft condensed matter systems which exhibit orientational ordering of their basic units (and in some cases, a degree of positional order) as a solid phase does, but which can also flow. As mentioned above, there are two main classes of liquid crystals—thermotropic and lyotropic (
Figure 3) [
25]. Thermotropic liquid crystals are systems in which phases exhibiting liquid crystal properties can be observed to occur between the solid and liquid states. Thus, temperature and pressure are the main variables of state which alters their phase. The best known example of thermotropic liquid crystals are the rod-like (calamitic) molecules found in everyday display screens [
26]. Lyotropic liquid crystals are systems of at least two components, and it is their relative concentration that brings about orientational ordering of self-assembled structures [
27]. Examples include the columnar and lamellar phases of amphiphilic molecules in water [
28]. Amphiphilic lyotropic liquid crystals are also the most common type of all liquid crystals, since their lamellae form the basic structure of biological cell membranes [
27,
29]. Colloids of anisodiametric particles in liquid solvents can also possess orientational ordering at sufficiently high concentrations [
30]. Though the structures that are aligning are quite different to the case of amphiphiles, they are nevertheless referred to as lyotropic liquid crystals.
In 2010, Behabtu et al. [
31] described the observation in polarized optical microscopy (POM) of birefringence in suspensions of graphene in chlorosulphonic acid. The authors interpreted these observations as being due to orientational alignment and hence lyotropic liquid crystallinity of the graphene flakes [
31]. Just one year later, Kim et al. [
11], Dan et al. [
13], and Xu and Gao [
12,
32] reported that graphene oxide dispersed in water behaved in the same way.
Typical POM images of graphene oxide dispersion in the nematic phase from Xu and Gao [
12] are shown in
Figure 4. These images show the evolution in the microstructure of graphene oxide dispersions as the concentration is increased from the isotropic phase (image 1) through the biphase region (image 2) and into the nematic liquid crystal phase (image 3).
Theoretically, the lyotropic phase behaviour of anisodiametric nano- and micro-particles is described by the Onsager theory [
33]. In his original work of 1949 [
33], Onsager used a virial expansion method to describe the orientational ordering that had been observed in suspensions of tobacco mosaic viruses. The underlying principle of the theory is that some volume a particle would otherwise be able to move into is excluded by the presence of a further particle i.e., the particles cannot interpenetrate one another. As the volume concentration of particles increases, this means there is less and less space available to a particular particle and for anisodiametric particles orientational ordering spontaneously emerges at a critical concentration. The transition is known as an entropy-driven transition [
34]. Thus far, all known theories about entropy driven phase transitions in colloidal lyotropics have used the approximation that the particles are inflexible.
Forsyth et al. [
35] extended the Onsager model to the hard-disk fluid in 1977. Their findings showed that the phase behaviour of disks was distinctly different from rods. When the aspect ratio (diameter/thickness) of the discs increases, transitions to the biphase and the nematic phase occur at lower volume concentrations. The reverse happens for rods; as their aspect ratio (length/diameter) increases so does the minimum volume concentration required for the onset of orientational ordering.
Bates and Frenkel [
36], almost two decades later, have argued that the extension of Onsager’s theory from rods to discs is invalid. Furthermore, they argued that since real systems are polydisperse, model systems should be as well. Their approach was to use Monte–Carlo simulations of infinitely thin disks with varying polydispersity (σ = 〈D〉/√(〈D
2 〉 – 〈D〉
2), where 〈D〉 is the average diameter of the disk). Their results are summarized in
Figure 5. For ease of interpretation, these results have been converted into units typically used in experimental graphene oxide research (i.e., micrometers, vol %) using the method of Shen et al. [
37]. It can be seen that the width of the biphasic region increases with increasing polydispersity, but the range of polydispersity investigated in the simulations does not stretch to that typically encountered for graphene oxide dispersions [
37].
When the concentration of graphene oxide is further increased, other phases can be observed. The first phase to appear with increasing concentration is the lamellar phase. In the lamellar phase, the graphene oxide sheets form layers which lead to Bragg reflection in small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) [
12]. On the basis of ellipsometry measurements and freeze-fracture cryo-SEM (scanning electron microscopy), Xu and Gao have also proposed that this lamellar phase is in fact chiral. They propose the structure of this phase to be an analogue of the twist grain boundary phases of thermotropic liquid crystals, with lamellar blocks of GO twisted relative to one another forming a helical superstructure. This observation is remarkable, since neither the graphene oxide nor the solvent is chiral, so it is not clear from where the chirality of the system arises. When the graphene oxide is covalently functionalized with polyacrylonitrile, there is also evidence of a chiral nematic phase, in which the GO sheets form a helical structure but are not yet in lamellae. These results were established using ellipsometry and SAXS [
38]. When the sheet-to-sheet interaction is modified with salt, the phase diagram becomes more complex, and this will be discussed later in this review. Meanwhile in the next section, the nematic phase is discussed in more detail.
4. Effects of Flake Size and Solvent
Recently, Ahmad et al. [
39] have investigated the dependence of the electro-optical properties of GO dispersions on the graphene oxide flake size. We will return to electro-optic effects later but we note here that the authors’ experimentally determined phase diagram is quite different to that produced from the simulations of Bates and Frenkel [
36] (
Figure 6). There are various explanations as to why this could be the case. Firstly, GO sheets are not rigid but in fact are highly flexible [
40]. Secondly, they are not infinitely thin but have a finite thickness of around 1 nm as determined by atomic force microscopy (AFM) [
24,
41]. Furthermore, the polydispersity of GO systems cannot usually be approximated by a normal distribution (as the simulations do), and is usually asymmetric with a tail to higher particle sizes (skewed distribution, Pearson distribution). Ahmad et al. [
39] determined the phase boundaries through polarized photography of graphene oxide dispersions contained within a Pasteur pipette. Under such conditions, the isotropic phase appears black. However, it is possible to observe transient birefringence caused by flow driven alignment in the isotropic phase [
37] (see the next section for more detail), which could be misinterpreted as the onset of the biphasic region. Furthermore, the transition from the two-phase region to the nematic phase is effectively continuous, making the boundary difficult to determine by either photography of macroscopic samples or microscopy.
The overall trend of the phase diagram is at odds with the theoretical model of Bates and Frenkel [
36] with the phase boundaries shifting to higher concentration with decreasing mean particle size – the inverse of the theoretical prediction. The reasons for this are not currently well understood. What is known is that current theoretical models are too restrictive and do not accurately represent an experimental system. GO sheets are not, for example, infinitely thin, ridged and of approximately equal size. Although it still appears that the primary driver for the onset of liquid crystallinity is excluded volume effects, there are other ways flakes can interact with each other, as will be discussed herein.
Since, in principle, the phase behaviour of colloidal systems of graphene oxide is only dependent on concentration, the isotropic liquid which acts as the solvent should not play any part, and all solvents that can disperse graphene oxide without aggregation, flocculation or sedimentation should be equal. It has been widely reported [
21,
41,
42] that water, dimethylformamide (DMF) and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) are the best of the common laboratory solvents for dispersing graphene oxide. Accordingly, lyotropic liquid crystalline behavior was found in all three of these in another paper by Ahmad et al. [
42] (
Figure 7).
Ionization of the polar oxygen functional groups on the GO surface in solvents leads to GO being negatively charged, and thus electrostatic interactions play a role in the dispersion of graphene oxide and the pair-wise interaction. By measuring the conductivity of GO dispersions in the three different solvents Ahmad et al. [
42] showed that the surface ionization of GO varies depending on the solvent, with water having the highest conductivity and hence aqueous GO having the highest surface ionization.
5. Alignment of GO Liquid Crystals
The alignment of conventional thermotropic liquid crystals can be achieved using surface treatment of the glass used to confine them for study. Examples include rubbed polyimide for planar alignment and the use of surfactants such as C-TAB or DMOAP for homeotropic alignment. Graphene oxide liquid crystals are a very different system however, with flakes being tens of thousands of times larger than thermotropic liquid crystal molecules. In 2011, Dan et al. [
13] reported that nematic GO confined in a rectangular capillary aligned spontaneously with the average GO sheet normal (the optical axis in this case) being parallel to the capillary axis. However, they suspected this was a metastable state [
13]. Recently Al-Zangana et al. [
43] have shown that graphene oxide sheets in solution tend to prefer to lie parallel to glass. Thus, the director aligns perpendicularly to a glass surface. This has been demonstrated by the construction of both covered and uncovered glass channels constructed from microscope slides and coverslips (
Figure 8). In polarized optical microscopy, the channel appears bright when its axis is placed at 45° to each of the polarizers, indicating uniform alignment of the director field perpendicular to the axis of the channel, along its length. When a glass plate is placed on top of this channel, the middle section becomes dark, irrespective of the position of the channel relative to the polarizers. This indicates local homeotropic alignment of the director field i.e. the graphene oxide is parallel to the glass plate.
Shear flows can also cause GO liquid crystals in the isotropic phase to be birefringent. This has been demonstrated by Shen et al. [
37] by using magnetic stirring and manual shaking of samples between crossed polarizers (
Figure 9). The birefringence observed can be explained by the graphene oxide flakes feeling a torque caused by the velocity field of the solvent. This causes local alignment of the graphene oxide flakes, and hence birefringence, where the change in velocity of the solvent is greatest.
Tkacz et al. [
44] have also shown that dispersions of reduced graphene oxide can be used to produce highly aligned films on glass substrates. The authors proposed that diffusion of sheets in the fluid, assisted by capillary forces, causes the self-assembly of the sheets on the substrate.
6. Ions and Polymers in GO Liquid Crystals
Xu and Gao [
12] have demonstrated that electrostatic interactions also play a role in the lyotropic behaviour of graphene oxide to some degree. To reveal this, they measured the phase behaviour by observing POM images as a function of salt (NaCl) concentration. If the NaCl concentration was too high, the repulsive force between the sheets was reduced such that flocculation occurred. Small amounts of NaCl did however influence the width of the two-phase region significantly (
Figure 10). The authors also measured the zeta-potential of the dispersion for each concentration studied and found the absolute value decreased with increasing NaCl content. These results indicate that both electrostatic and excluded volume effects play a role in the lyotropic behaviour of graphene oxide, and that the overall stability of the nematic phase is reduced in an electrolyte environment. However, Zhao et al. [
45] have shown that by coating the GO flakes with polyelectrolytes, the nematic phase can remain stable even in NaCl concentrations of up to 6.2 M, depending on the polyelectrolyte employed.
Konkena and Vasudevan [
46] have also demonstrated that by varying the GO and NaCl salt concentrations, a number of different phases or arrested states can be formed (
Figure 11). By arrested states, the authors refer to structures which are not at global minima of the thermodynamic potential, thus metastable [
46]. At high GO concentrations, but low salt concentrations where electrostatic repulsion dominates the interactions, a glass is observed. This is attributed as a Wigner glass, which is analogous to the Wigner crystals of electrons in solids [
47,
48]. Wigner glasses have also been observed in dispersions of other plate-like materials such as laptonite [
49]. GO glasses and gels do not flow, unlike nematic liquid crystals, and so can be easily identified by inverting the container of the GO dispersion. To further demonstrate a glass experimentally, the authors performed dilution experiments. The glass, in which GO interactions are predominantly repulsive, melts upon the addition of further solvent whereas the states observed at higher salt concentrations do not [
46] Konkena and Vasudevan further suggest that at higher salt concentrations, the dominant GO interaction is an attractive one which leads to a phase which appears dark between crossed polarizers but turns bright when sheared. These observations point towards homeotropic alignment of the graphene oxide sheets i.e. collectively the sheets are in the same plane as the substrate and perpendicular to the light path. This behaviour is attributed to the onset of a columnar phase by the authors, based on the appearance of the POM textures [
46] though recent X-ray scattering experiments by Rubim et al. suggest that this observation could be a lamellar phase [
50].
Graphene oxide liquid crystals are often observed with water as the solvent. Typically, the water is deionized and at pH ~7 for a fresh dispersion. However, the LC behaviour can also be observed at pH 2, 6 and 9 as reported by Tkacz et al. [
51] As the pH increases, the fraction of dissociated carboxylic groups changes (the
pKa value is ~4 for these groups [
52]) and so too does the width of the biphasic region between the isotropic and nematic phases. This work further suggests that electrostatic interactions between GO sheets are important for the onset of lyotropic behavior. Furthermore, at biphasic concentrations, highly ordered phase-separated nematic droplets were observed [
51].
The addition of polymers to a colloidal liquid crystal system is often performed to better stabilize the dispersion via steric hindrance or to cause gelation. Recently, Shim et al. [
53] have reported that the addition of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to GO LCs causes the onset of the nematic phase to occur at lower concentrations of GO in the total volume. Furthermore, they report that the Wigner glass transition of the GO dispersion is pushed up to higher GO concentrations. [
53] Therefore the overall effect of the addition of PEG widens the nematic phase. The concentrations of PEG required to observe these effects are rather high (
Figure 12).
The addition of PEG to a concentration of 20 wt% in the mixture causes the macroscopic viscosity of the whole dispersion to decrease by a factor of 20–30 relative to that of GO in pure water, for the same concentration of GO. This, the authors rightly suggest, points to a need for a greater understanding of the micro-structure of the polymer-solvent-GO system at the GO surface. In a follow-up work by the same group [
54], a selection of molecular weights of PEG were used. It was shown that PEG with a larger average molecular weight (10,000 gmol
−1) reduced electrostatic repulsion between the sheets, which is the origin of the glass transition in GO. Reduction of this repulsive energy was offered as explanation for a decrease in the macro-viscosity of the LC. If PEG with a lower molecular weight (400 gmol
−1) was added, the viscosity did not decrease by the same amount.
7. Electro-Optic Effects
Birefringence induced by electric fields can be observed in a variety of otherwise optically isotropic materials. These effects are commonly grouped into one of two categories, the Pockels effect or the Kerr effect, depending on whether the induced birefringence is proportional to the magnitude of the applied electric field or its square, respectively [
55]. The Pockels effect only occurs in crystals which lack inversion symmetry. Dispersions of graphene oxide in the isotropic, biphasic and nematic phases have displayed electric field-induced birefringence [
37,
39,
42,
56]. In the case of the nematic phase, this corresponds most likely to a reorientation of the director field as a whole, as is the case with thermotropic nematics. In the less concentrated phases, a Kerr effect is observed where each flake, from whichever orientation it was in, aligns itself to the electric field. This behavior of a GO flake in an electric field can be described by the Maxwell–Wagner–O’Konski model [
57,
58]. The key parameters of the GO in this framework are the aspect ratio and the ionic conductivity at the surface. It is known that in aqueous dispersions GO is negatively charged with an ionic double layer at its surface [
12].
Shen et al. [
37] measured the Kerr coefficient of aqueous dispersions of graphene oxide and found values of the order 10
−5 mV
−2. This value is very high in comparison to other materials known to have high Kerr coefficients such as thermotropic liquid crystal blue phases (~10
−9 mV
−2) [
59,
60,
61] or nitrobenzene (10
−12 mV
−2) [
62]. In a qualitatively similar system consisting of suspended platelets of clay the Kerr coefficient was four orders of magnitude lower than that of graphene oxide [
62]. Shen et al. [
37] also observed that the electric field-induced birefringence decreased as the concentration was increased through the biphasic region and that in the concentrated nematic phase there was barely any effect of the electric field at up to 20 Vmm
−1. By analogy, thermotropic nematic liquid crystals require much higher field strengths to switch the director (~0.7 Vµm
−1). In contrast, Ahmad et al. [
42] measured a significant field-induced birefringence in the nematic phase with field strengths of 10 Vmm
−1 or lower (
Figure 13). Interestingly, they also found that the maximum field-induced birefringence of a given flake size distribution depended on what solvent it was dispersed in [
42]. Water was found to outperform both DMF and NMP at high frequency (10 kHz), but electrophoretic drift of the GO particles was observed at lower frequencies (100 Hz). Both of these results were attributed to the higher ionic content of the aqueous dispersion [
42] which occurs because the surface functional groups of graphene oxide are easily ionized in aqueous dispersions. The maximum field-induced birefringence has been shown to be affected by the flake size and distribution [
63] (
Figure 13) but interestingly also the number of cleaning steps taken in the production of the graphene oxide [
64].
The time taken for the graphene oxide dispersions to become fully aligned to the electric field is known as the response time. The relaxation time is defined as the time taken for the system to relax once the electric field is removed. Both the response and relaxation times for graphene oxide dispersions have been found to be just under half a second, depending on the flake size distribution and concentration (
Figure 14) [
39,
63]. This has been shown to be affected by flake size and in particular the flake size distribution [
39,
63]. The higher the fraction of large flakes (>1 µm) in a mixture which otherwise contains mainly small flakes (<1 µm) the slower the response to electric fields and the slower the relaxation time when the field is removed. This has been attributed to increased inter-particle friction when larger flakes are present [
63].
Graphene oxide in aqueous dispersions ages with time. This is due to C–C bond cleavage and the formation of vinylogous carboxylic acids [
65]. This reaction also releases protons and decreases the pH of the dispersion. Consequently, the electro-optic performance has been shown to decrease with time [
66]. Over the course of one week of storage at room temperature, Shen et al. [
66] found that the field-induced birefringence fell by approximately 25% as compared to fresh GO. However, they did find that re-cleaning the material with fresh water in a centrifuge restores the performance completely [
66].
8. Effect of Magnetic Fields
Early in the story of graphene oxide lyotropic liquid crystals, Kim et al. [
11] reported that over a long time (5 h) a magnetic field (0.25T) could cause a nematic graphene oxide dispersion to align (
Figure 15).
Since that time, it appears that this effect has not been independently demonstrated. Recently, we have performed small angle X-ray scattering measurements of the nematic phase of graphene oxide with an in situ magnetic field of approximately 0.9 T, applied perpendicularly to the X-ray beam. The experiments used a SAXSLAB Ganesha 300XL machine. This uses a copper Kα X-ray source and a 2D Pilatus 300K detector which is movable along the beam axis so the sample-detector distance can be adjusted. The experimental set-up is well described by
Figure 1 in Sims et al. [
67]. The diffraction pattern was initially anisotropic, presumably due to an average preferred orientation in the diffraction capillary used to contain the dispersion, or from shear alignment as it entered. After approximately 19 hours in the magnetic field, there was no change in the alignment of the GO sheets and they remained out of alignment with the direction of the field (
Figure 16c). The graphene oxide used had the XPS spectrum shown in
Figure 16a and the size distribution shown in
Figure 16b. The stark difference in behaviour we observe compared to that of Kim et al. [
11] could be due to the degree of oxidation of the GO. Recently Diamantopoulou et al. [
68] have demonstrated that the magnetic response of GO and rGO is very different. This suggests that the precise conditions during the fabrication and storage of the graphene oxide, which affect the degree of reduction, could have an effect on its magneto-optic response.
9. Applications of Graphene Oxide Colloids Lyotropic Behaviour
Graphene oxide dispersions are an ideal example of stable dispersions of high aspect ratio plate-like particles. The stability of such dispersions opens up a variety of solution-based processing routes. The spontaneous self-assembly into nematic and lamellar phases with increasing concentration has been shown to assist in the manufacture of novel three-dimensional architectures. An example of this is in the production of graphene oxide membranes [
69]. Such membranes have received increased interest over recent years due to their potential use in the desalination of water [
69,
70]. The technology has arisen from the observation that water permeates the membranes rapidly, faster even than helium [
71]. Membranes have been fabricated by vacuum filtration of a GO dispersion [
71] or by evaporation of the solvent [
72]. However, in 2016, Akbari et al. [
69] showed that the shear alignment of a concentrated dispersion in the nematic state on a substrate can produce membranes with very even topography over a large area (
Figure 17b). A further example of nematic behavior leading to ordered three-dimensional architectures is the observation of photonic behavior in GO dispersions. Li et al. [
73] found that for a dispersion of high aspect-ratio sheets with low polydispersity, Bragg reflections could be observed in natural light at nematic concentrations (
Figure 17c). The exact mechanism for this is not fully understood, but the authors noted that a sensitive balance of forces and flake sizes was key to the appearance of reflections, since the addition of NaCl or sonication (to reduce the flake size) both removed Bragg reflections [
73]. Nevertheless, appropriately designed, such photonic crystals could be used in novel inks, or since their colour is based on concentration, humidity sensors. Li et al. also propose that if such structures could be controlled by external fields, GO-based photonic crystals could also be used for energy-efficient colour display applications [
73].
Since the liquid crystallinity of graphene oxide dispersions was first discovered [
11], the anisotropic ordering and self-assembly properties have been exploited in the production of fibrous materials. Kim et al. have shown that fibres drawn from concentrated GO dispersions with added poly(acrylic acid) have highly ordered microstructures and display birefringence (
Figure 17d) [
11]. The rheological properties of nematic graphene oxide dispersions make them favourable for wet-spinning of fibres [
14] which was first demonstrated by Xu and Gao in 2011 [
32]. A topic at the forefront of graphene applications is that of smart clothing and wearable electronics. GO can be reduced to restore some of graphene’s conductivity, and conductive fibres using liquid crystal-assisted assembly, followed by reduction, are already at a mature stage of research [
14,
16,
74].
As well as the potential for display technology based on the Kerr effect of GO dispersions in the isotropic phase (as discussed earlier in this review) He et al. have reported on a re-writable reflective display using nematic-phase GO dispersions [
75]. When the concentrated dispersion is sheared in the plane of the surface, the surface becomes more reflective due to the larger amount of GO-surface area interacting with the light. Then, using a stick-like implement, the GO director field can be disturbed, and one is able to create writing on the surface (
Figure 17a).
10. Conclusions
In the present paper we have reviewed the general properties of lyotropic graphene oxide liquid crystals. We especially discussed some characterization methods of the employed graphene oxide sheets or flakes, the occurrence of liquid crystallinity with respect to flake size and solvent, including a comparison to a simple theoretical description, which was found to only poorly describe the experimental observations. Alignment properties of GO liquid crystals were discussed, as were the effects of added salt and polymers. Only few investigations have been carried out so far concerning the effect of applied electric and magnetic fields. Some of the reported results indicate a controversial and even opposing behaviour, whose underlying possible reasons were considered. Graphene oxide liquid crystals are certainly a very interesting, timely and worthwhile field of investigation, with a potential for the development of fundamental liquid crystal and soft matter understanding, as well as for future applications in the areas of nanotechnology, templating, electro-optic devices, all the way to possibilities in fibre composites or the desalination of sea water.