Next Article in Journal
Foaming Behavior and Microcellular Morphologies of Incompatible SAN/CPE Blends with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as a Physical Blowing Agent
Next Article in Special Issue
Recyclable and Mendable Cellulose-Reinforced Composites Crosslinked with Diels–Alder Adducts
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of the Compactability and Cracking Behavior of Polyacrylamide-Treated Saline Soil in Gansu Province, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing of Sustainable Innovative Materials and Structures
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Characterization and Actuation of Ionic Polymer Metal Composites with Various Thicknesses and Lengths

Polymers 2019, 11(1), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010091
by Shufeng Li 1,* and Joanne Yip 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2019, 11(1), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11010091
Submission received: 28 November 2018 / Revised: 23 December 2018 / Accepted: 6 January 2019 / Published: 8 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recycling of Polymers and Multiphase Polymer-Based Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this manuscript, the authors report fabrication of IPMC actuators with different thicknesses by hot pressing multiple layers of Nafion together. They varied multiple parameters and measured their effect on actuator displacement and tip force. IPMC actuators are a promising class of soft actuators and this is a timely study. However, the paper mainly lists experimental results with not much analysis. Some of the observed trends and effects might be easily explained by existing theory. Others might require deeper analysis outside of the scope of this paper. I can recommend the paper for publication once some more analysis has been added. In particular, I have the following comments:

6-film actuators are observed to have the lowest Pt content. Do the authors have any explanation for this?

The exponential fit in figure 3 only makes sense if there is an explanation. Otherwise, the line is just a guide for the eye.

The resistance in figure 4 should be quoted as sheet resistance.

In figures 5 and 6, the 6-film sample doesn’t reach its peak during the experimental time frame. The authors should extend the measurement time until they see a peak and update part c of the figures and its discussion.

The bar graphs in part c of many figures has two bars for the different voltages stacked on top of each other. This makes it difficult to compare values for 4.5V. The two bars should be placed next to each other.

Effects of thickness and length on displacement and tip force should be discussed in terms of beam theory to understand experimental results and separate the effects of geometry and material. The following papers have reported similar modeling for IPMC actuators and might be useful:

Lee, S., Park, H. C. & Kim, K. J. Equivalent modeling for ionic polymer–metal composite actuators based on beam theories. Smart Materials and Structures 14, 1363–1368 (2005).

Grau, G., Frazier, E. J. & Subramanian, V. Printed unmanned aerial vehicles using paper-based electroactive polymer actuators and organic ion gel transistors. Microsystems & Nanoengineering 2, 16032 (2016).

What is the effect of voltage on stability and reusability?

 


Author Response

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper investigated the characterization and actuating performs of 1, 2, 4 and 6-films IPMC actuators. The following points should be changed before publication.

 

1.        Tip force: Units should be SI units. Please change gf to mN.

2.        The term of “Angle displacement” is strange. Angle is not displacement. “Root angle” is better.

 

3.        In Figure 10, the vertical axes seems to be not loss values. The title of vertical axes should be changed.


Author Response

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have addressed most of my comments. The level of analysis to explain the experimental findings is still not very deep. The authors justify this with the maximum length of the paper and plan to publish a follow-on paper. I would prefer this paper to be longer with more analysis but if this violates the length requirements of the journal, it can be published as-is.


Back to TopTop