Next Article in Journal
Optimizing the Extraction and Encapsulation of Mucilage from Brasenia Schreberi
Next Article in Special Issue
Ionic Porous Organic Polymers Based on Functionalized Tetraarylborates
Previous Article in Journal
Amphiphilic Block Copolymer Poly (Acrylic Acid)-B-Polycaprolactone as a Novel pH-sensitive Nanocarrier for Anti-Cancer Drugs Delivery: In-vitro and In-vivo Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adamantane-Based Micro- and Ultra-Microporous Frameworks for Efficient Small Gas and Toxic Organic Vapor Adsorption
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/polym11050821
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Room-Temperature Fabrication of a Nickel-Functionalized Copper Metal–Organic Framework (Ni@Cu-MOF) as a New Pseudocapacitive Material for Asymmetric Supercapacitors

by
Yi Wang
1,†,
Shengqiang Nie
1,†,
Yuan Liu
1,
Wei Yan
1,
Shaomin Lin
2,
Gang Cheng
1,
Huan Yang
2,* and
Jun Luo
1,*
1
College of Chemistry and Material Engineering, Gui Yang University, Guiyang 550005, China
2
School of Material Science and Engineering, Han Shan Normal University, Chaozhou 521041, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
The authors contribute equally.
Polymers 2019, 11(5), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050821
Submission received: 8 April 2019 / Revised: 26 April 2019 / Accepted: 3 May 2019 / Published: 7 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) and Related Porous Organic Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A nickel-functionalized copper metal–organic framework (Ni@Cu-MOF) was prepared by a facile volatilization method and a post-modification synthesis method at room temperature. The obtained Ni@Cu-MOF electrode delivered a high capacitance of 526 F/g at 1 A/g and had a long-term cycling stability (80% retention after 1200 cycles at 1 A/g) in a 6 M KOH aqueous solution. Furthermore, an asymmetric supercapacitor device was assembled from this Ni@Cu-MOF and activated carbon electrodes. The fabricated supercapacitor delivered a high capacitance of 48.7 F/g at 1 A/g and a high energy density of 17.3 Wh/kg at a power density of 798.5 kW/kg. This study indicates that the Ni@Cu-MOF has great potential for supercapacitor applications.

1. Introduction

With global energy demands and the high consumption of fossil fuels, accompanied by increasing environmental pollution, sustainable and renewable energy supplies are in high demand [1,2,3]. Supercapacitors (SCs) are energy storage devices (similar to lithium-ion batteries and fuel cells) that provide efficient renewable systems [4,5,6,7]. SCs have attracted widespread attention due to their large power density, fast charging and discharging time, and long life span [8,9,10].
According to the charge storage mechanism, SCs are divided into two types: electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) and faradaic pseudocapacitors. In an EDLC, the ions are stored at the Helmholtz double-layer interface found on materials such as carbon nanotubes and carbon fibers [11,12,13]. In pseudocapacitors, Faradic redox reactions occur at the surface or near-surface of electroactive sites on, for example, transition metal oxides and hydroxides [14,15,16]. To achieve a higher capacitance, it is important to search for and design porous materials with better energy storage properties for SCs.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are composed of metal ions and organic ligands. They are porous materials with a remarkable surface area, permanent porosity, and metal cations that participate in various redox reaction. MOFs are used as promising electrode materials in SCs [17,18,19]. According to the energy storage required for the application, there are two types of SCs formed from MOFs: (1) MOFs used as controlled templates or precursors for synthesizing mesoporous carbon, metal oxides, and metal sulfide via thermolysis or sulfurization [20,21,22,23,24,25,26], and (2) MOFs used as electroactive materials for SCs owing to their porous properties. To improve the electrochemical performance of MOFs, the supercapacitive properties of MOFs should be further evaluated [27,28,29,30].
In recent years, bimetallic transition metal–organic frameworks with two kinds of metal cations have been considered as promising materials for supercapacitors [31,32,33] and electrocatalysts [34,35,36,37]. It has been proven that bimetallic MOFs exhibit a better electrochemical performance than monometallic MOFs, including an improvement in framework stability and in magnetic properties, which can be ascribed to the synergies or the enhanced charge transfer between different ions. Bimetallic MOFs could be utilized as ideal templates for the construction of bimetallic sulfides and metallic (or metal) oxides and are often accompanied by porous carbon, which is produced by the decomposition of linkers in the MOFs. Various inexpensive binary compounds composed of transition metal species have been developed as electrode materials with higher theoretical specific capacitances or capacities [38,39,40,41]. Thus, it is important to fabricate porous bimetallic MOFs with enhanced electrochemical performance, but it is also a great challenge [42,43]. The postsynthetic modification method (PSM) has been used to achieve the chemical modification of many organic and inorganic materials. As the PSM avoids the decomposition of structures and other side reactions, it has become a relatively mature method for introducing ions into an MOF. However, there have been no reports on the engineering of Nickel-functionalized copper metal–organic frameworks and their electrochemical performance.
In this study, a nickel-functionalized copper MOF (Ni@Cu-MOF) was fabricated through a facile volatilization method and a PSM. The as-fabricated Ni@Cu-MOF was used as the electrode material for SCs and exhibited a high specific capacity of 526 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, compared with Cu–MOF (126 F g−1 at 1 A g−1), owing to the synergy effect, great rate performance (428 F g−1 at 8 A g−1), and high cycle stability (80% retention over 1200 cycles at 1 A/g). In addition, a flexible asymmetric SC was built from the Ni@Cu-MOF and active carbon, and the specific capacity was 48.7 F/g at 1 A/g. The energy density of the asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) was 17.3 W h kg−1, and the power density was 798.5 W kg−1.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Synthesis of the Cu-MOF

A mixture of Cu(NO3)2 (0.05 mmol) and 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (0.05 mmol) in 10 mL deionized water was put into a container for 48 hours at room temperature; blue block crystals filled the entire liquid. The crystals were picked from the mother liquor, washed with deionized water (8 mL) three times, and dried in air.

2.2. Synthesis of the Ni@Cu-MOF

The powder of the Cu-MOF was immersed in an aqueous solution of 1 × 10−3 M Ni(NO3)2. After two days, the product (Ni@Cu-MOF) was obtained and washed with deionized water, then dried in air. The content ratio of Ni/Cu was 1:4.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical experiments including cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge−discharge tests (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were conducted using a three-electrode system in a 6 M KOH solution. EIS experiments were recorded in the range of 0.01–105 Hz. These experiments were carried out using a CHI660E electrochemical workstation.

2.4. Materials Characterization

The metal ion (Cu/Ni) content in the Cu@Ni-MOF was recorded by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) (Icap Qc). The electrochemical measurements were carried out on a CHI 660E potentiostat electrochemical workstation (Thermo-Fisher, Berlin, Germany). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with a Rigaku Miniflex 600 X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) from 5° to 50°. An infrared spectrum was recorded using an IR Affinity-1 FT-IR spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. Cu(NO3)2, Ni(NO3)2, 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid were bought commercially(Jinan Henghua Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan, China), acetylene carbon black and PolyVinylidene Fluoride were bought commercially(TIMCAL, Changzhou, China)

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the as-prepared Cu-MOF, Ni@Cu-MOF, and simulated Cu-MOF. The measured XRD patterns of the as-prepared Cu-MOF were in good agreement with the XRD pattern of the simulated Cu-MOF [44]. After introducing Ni2+ into the Cu-MOF, the PXRD pattern of the Ni@Cu-MOF remained unchanged. The results suggested that the Cu-MOF and the Ni@Cu-MOF were synthesized successfully. The SEM (Figure 1b) and TEM (Figure S1) images of the Cu-MOF revealed that the size of the Cu-MOF nanorod was about 230 nm. On the basis of the SEM (Figure 1c) and TEM (Figure S2) images of the Ni@ Cu-MOF after the introduction of Ni2+ into the Cu-MOF, we speculated that the Cu-MOF nanorod dissolved in the nickel nitrate aqueous solution; meanwhile, the phase structures of the Cu-MOF particles changed from nanorods to smaller nanoparticles.
The surface areas of the Cu-MOF (67.908 m2·g−1) and the Ni@Cu-MOF (95.365 m2·g−1) were calculated by a multipoint BET model. The increase in surface area of the Ni@Cu-MOF was attributed to the smaller size of the Ni@Cu-MOF. In the range of P/P0 = 0.8–1.0, the hysteresis loop in the isotherms showed that mesopores and macropores existed in the MOF. Obviously, the pore distribution curve suggested that the Ni@Cu-MOF also possessed mesopores and macropores, and the pore diameters were about 60–90 nm. In addition, these mesopores and macropores were helpful to the rapid diffusion of ions and promoted a rapid faradaic reaction and high rate performance.
Figure 2 shows the FT-IR spectra. Several bands between 3200 and 3500 cm−1 were characteristic of the n(O–H) mode of carboxyl groups. The absorption band at 1620 cm−1 belonged to the n(C=O) mode of carboxyl groups. In addition, the bands at 1300 and 920 cm−1 were assigned to the d(O–H) mode of carboxyl groups. The band at 1420 cm−1 belonged to the n(C=N) mode of carboxyl groups. After the introduction of Ni2+ into the Cu-MOF, the IR bands of the Ni@Cu-MOF were consistent with those of the Cu-MOF. The results showed that the introduction of Ni2+ did not influence the crystalline structure, as shown by the PXRD patterns.
The energy storage capacitance of the as-prepared Ni@Cu-MOF was assessed by cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements. Figure 3 shows the CV responses of the Ni@Cu-MOF at different scan rates (2–100 mV s−1). The CV curves of the Ni@Cu-MOF showed an integrated pair of redox peaks due to the redox reaction (Ni@Cu-MOF) in the 6 M KOH electrolyte solution (reversible valence-state changes between Ni2+ and Ni3+), which occurred due to the adsorption/desorption of OH− in the layer during the electrochemical reaction. Furthermore, the peak current of the CV increased (scan rate from 2 to 100 mV s−1); accordingly, the current response increased. The results showed a good rate and reversibility of the fast charge–discharge response [17,45].
Figure 4 shows the galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) curves of Ni@Cu-MOF and Cu-MOF at different current densities (ranging from 0 to 0.5 V). Specific capacitances of 526, 484, 390, 320, and 280 F g−1 were observed at 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 8.0, and 10 A g−1, respectively. The discharge curves of the Ni@Cu-MOF and the Cu-MOF at 1 A g−1 were different from straight and flat curves, which indicated that the process of GCD can be ascribed to the Faradaic process. The GCD curves of Ni@Cu-MOF showed a better performance than the GCD curves of the Cu-MOF, reducing the polarization. As calculated, the specific capacitance of the Ni@Cu-MOF (526 F/g) was more than four times higher than the specific capacitance of the Cu-MOF (126 F/g) at 1 A/g (Figures S5 and S6).
The cycling tests of the Ni@Cu-MOF were also recorded by GCD measurements. Figure 5 shows the GCD curves of the Ni@Cu-MOF electrode at 1 A/g in a 6 mol/L KOH solution for 1200 cycles. The results showed that the Ni@Cu-MOF electrode maintained 80% of its specific capacitance after 1200 cycles, which demonstrated good long-term cycling stability and capacitance.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (potential of 0.3046 V in a 6 M KOH solution) was studied in the frequency range of 0.01 Hz to 100 kHz. In Figure 6, the Nyquist plots of the Ni@Cu-MOF show a semicircle and linear curve in the high- and low-frequency regions, respectively. The semicircle represents Faradaic charge transfer processes (Rct). The internal resistance (Rs) was deduced from the real axis intercept (Z’) and included the intrinsic resistance (Ni@Cu-MOF), the bulk resistance of the solution, and the resistance of the Ni@Cu-MOF and Ni foam (the current collector). The Rct of the Ni@Cu-MOF was 0.75 Ω. After 1200 cycles, the value of the Rct (Ni@Cu-MOF) showed a slight increase from 0.75 to 0.77. The phase angle of the line (Ni@Cu-MOF after 1200 cycles) was similar to 45 °C in the low-frequency region, which resulted from the synergistic effect of the Ni@Cu-MOF.
To further explore the energy storage application of the Ni@Cu-MOF electrode, an ASC device was built with a positive electrode (Ni@Cu-MOF) and a negative electrode (activated carbon, AC). According to the CV results, in the three-electrode system in the 6 M KOH solution, the potential window of the Ni@Cu-MOF and AC was in the ranges of 0–0.6 V and −1.0 to 0 V (Figures S7 and S8). As shown in Figure 7a,b, the CVs at various scan rates from 2 to 100 mV/s and the GCD curves at various current densities from 1 to 1 0 A/g displayed a potential window from 0 to 1.6 V. The CV curve did not change at a high scan rate (100 mV s−1). The results showed that the ASC device has the potential for a high power delivery [24]. The specific capacitance (C), power density (P), and energy density (E) of the ASCs were calculated from the GCD curves at 1 A/g. As shown in Figure 7b, the ASCs achieved a potential as high as 1.6 V. Moreover, the value of Cs was calculated from the GCD curves, and a specific capacitance of 48.7 F/g at a 1 A g−1 was observed. The ASCs delivered a high energy density of 17.3 Wh/kg at a power density of 798.5 kW/kg.
Furthermore, cycling stability tests of the ASCs were evaluated at 1 A/g, as shown in Figure 8. After 1000 cycles, the capacitance of the ASCs was maintained at ~63%. Therefore, the Ni@Cu-MOF has potential for practical applications.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a hybrid bimetallic Ni@Cu-MOF was prepared by a facile volatilization method and a post-modification synthesis method at room temperature. The bimetallic Ni@Cu-MOF delivered a higher specific capacitance of 526 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 than the monometallic Cu-MOF (126 F g−1). The results were attributed to the coexistence of Ni and Cu elements with good cycling stability (80% retention over 1200 cycles). An ASC based on Ni@Cu-MOF and activated carbon (as positive and negative electrodes) delivered a specific capacitance of 48.7 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 and a high energy density of 17.3 W h kg−1 at a power density of 798.5 W kg−1. These results show that bimetallic MOFs are promising materials for SCs. This work encourages us to design and fabricate multicomponent MOF electrode materials for SCs.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/5/821/s1, Figure S1, TEM of Cu-MOF; Figure S2, TEM of Cu-MOF; Figure S3, Pore-size distribution of Cu-MOF; Figure S4, Pore-size distribution of Ni@Cu-MOF; Figure S5, CV curves of Cu-MOF at scan rates 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 50, 80, 100 mV s−1; Figure S6, Galvanostatic charge/discharge curves of Cu-MOF at different current densities; Figure S7, CV curves of active carbon at scan rates 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 50, 80, 100 mV s−1; Figure S8, Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of active carbon at different current densities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Y. and J.L.; Data curation, Y.W.; Formal analysis, S.N. and S.L.; Investigation, W.Y.; Methodology, Y.L.; Software, G.C.

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by Guizhou Excellent Youth Scientific and Technological Talent Program ([2017]5628), Major construction project of first-rate university in Guizhou province (2017158134), Guizhou Youth Science and Technology Talents (2017243), Department of Science and Technology in Guangdong (2017B090921002), Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province of China [2018] 1008 and [2019] 1008, Discipline and Master’s Site Construction Project of Guiyang University by Guiyang City Financial Support Guiyang University [HC-2019].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cao, X.H.; Tan, C.L.; Sindoro, M.; Zhang, H. Hybrid micro-/nano-structuresderived from metal–organic frameworks: Preparation and applications in energy storage and conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2660–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, J.W.; Wang, B. Emerging crystalline porous materials as a multifunctional platform for electrochemical energy storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6927–6945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiang, J.; Liu, S.Y.; Liu, Y.N.; Meng, T.; Ma, L.; Zhang, H.; Xu, M.W.; Zhu, J.H.; Li, C.M. Electrode engineering starting from live biomass: A ‘smart’ way to construct smart pregnant hybrids for sustainable charge storage devices. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Haregewoin, A.M.; Wotango, A.S.; Wang, B.-J. Electrolyte additives for lithium ion battery electrodes: Progress and perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1955–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, S.Z.; Lim, Y.V.; Zhang, X.M.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Kong, D.Z.; Ding, M.; Yang SY, A.; Yang, H.Y. Regulating the polysulfide redox conversion by iron phosphide nanocrystals for high-rate and ultrastable lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Energy 2018, 51, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, L.L.; Niu, Z.Q.; Chen, J. Unconventional supercapacitors from nanocarbon-based electrode materials to device configurations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 4340–4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sui, Z.Y.; Zhang, P.Y.; Xu, M.Y.; Liu, Y.W.; Wei, Z.X.; Han, B.H. Metal–Organic Framework-Derived Metal Oxide Embedded in Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Network for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 43171–43178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Raza, W.; Ali, F.; Raza, N.; Luo, Y.; Kwon, E.E.; Yang, J.; Kumar, S.; Mehmood, A.; Kim, K.H. Recent advancements in supercapacitor technology. Nano Energy 2018, 52, 441–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Del Pino, Á.P.; Villarroya, A.M.; Chuquitarqui, A.; Logofatu, C.; Tonti, D.; György, E. Reactive laser synthesis of nitrogen-doped hybrid graphene-based electrodes for energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 16074–16086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, B.A.; Metwalli, O.I.; Khalil AS, G.; Allam, N.K. Unveiling the Effect of the Structure of Carbon Material on the Charge Storage Mechanism in MoS2 -Based Supercapacitors. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 16301–16308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salunkhe, R.R.; Kaneti, Y.V.; Kim, J.H.; Yamauchi, Y. Nanoarchitectures for Metal–Organic Framework-Derived Nanoporous Carbons toward Supercapacitor Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 2796–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Down, M.P.; Rowley-Neale, S.J.; Smith, G.C.; Banks, C.E. Fabrication of Graphene Oxide Supercapacitor Devices. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, D.B.; Ni, K.; Ye, J.L.; Xie, J.; Zhu, Y.W.; Song, L. Tailoring the Structure of Carbon Nanomaterials toward High-End Energy Applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cao, F.; Zhao, M.; Yu, Y.; Chen, B.; Huang, Y.; Yang, J.; Cao, X.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Synthesis of Two-Dimensional CoS1.097/Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanocomposites Using Metal–Organic Framework Nanosheets as Precursors for Supercapacitor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6924–6927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhou, S.S.; Ye, Z.C.; Hu, S.Z.; Hao, C.; Wang, X.H.; Huang, C.X.; Wu, F.S. Designed formation of Co3O4/ZnCo2O4/CuO hollow polyhedral nanocages derived from zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 for high-performance supercapacitors. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 15771–15781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, J.H.; Zheng, X.H.; Wang, Y.H.; Liang, H.Y.; Jia, H.N.; Chen, S.L.; Qi, J.L.; Cao, J.; Fei, W.D.; Feng, J.C. Rational construction of core–shell Ni3S2@Ni(OH)2 nanostructures as battery-like electrodes for supercapacitors. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 1985–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qu, C.; Jiao, Y.; Zhao, B.T.; Chen, D.C.; Zou, R.Q.; Walton, K.S.; Liu, M.L. Nickel-based pillared MOFs for high-performance supercapacitors: Design, synthesis and stability study. Nano Energy 2016, 26, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, J.; Wöll, C. Surface-supported metal–organic framework thin films: Fabrication methods, applications, and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 5730–5770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, L.; Feng, X.; Ren, L.T.; Piao, Q.H.; Zhong, J.Q.; Wang, Y.B.; Li, H.W.; Chen, Y.F.; Wang, B. Flexible Solid-State Supercapacitor Based on a Metal–Organic Framework Interwoven by Electrochemically-Deposited PANI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4920–4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Luo, X.L.; Young, C.; Kim, J.H.; Kaneti, Y.V.; You, J.; Kang, Y.-M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Wu, K.C.-W. A Glucose-Assisted Hydrothermal Reaction for Directly Transforming Metal–Organic Frameworks into Hollow Carbonaceous Materials. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 4401–4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cao, X.-M.; Sun, Z.-J.; Zhao, S.Y.; Wang, B.; Han, Z.-B. MOF-derived sponge-like hierarchical porous carbon for flexible all-solid-state supercapacitors. Mater. Chem. Front. 2018, 2, 1692–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guan, C.; Liu, X.M.; Ren, W.N.; Li, X.; Cheng, C.W.; Wang, J. Rational Design of Metal-Organic Framework Derived Hollow NiCo2O4 Arrays for Flexible Supercapacitor and Electrocatalysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiao, Z.Y.; Fan, L.L.; Xu, B.; Zhang, S.Q.; Kang, W.P.; Kang, Z.X.; Lin, H.; Liu, X.P.; Zhang, S.Y.; Sun, D.F. Green Fabrication of Ultrathin Co3O4 Nanosheets from Metal–Organic Framework for Robust High-Rate Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 41827–41836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Han, X.; Tao, K.; Wang, D.; Han, L. Design of a porous cobalt sulfide nanosheet array on Ni foam from zeolitic imidazolate frameworks as an advanced electrode for supercapacitors. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 2735–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kulkarni, P.; Nataraj, S.K.; Balakrishna, R.G.; Nagaraju, D.H.; Reddy, M.V. Nanostructured binary and ternary metal sulfides: Synthesis methods and their application in energy conversion and storage devices. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 22040–22094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, Y.Z.; Quan, L.; Liu, T.Q.; Chen, Q.D.; Cai, D.P.; Zhan, H.B. Construction of MOF-derived hollow Ni–Zn–Co–S nanosword arrays as binder-free electrodes for asymmetric supercapacitors with high energy density. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 14171–14181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gao, W.M.; Chen, D.Z.; Quan, H.Y.; Zou, R.; Wang, W.X.; Luo, X.B.; Guo, L. Fabrication of Hierarchical Porous Metal–Organic Framework Electrode for Aqueous Asymmetric Supercapacitor. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4144–4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xia, W.; Mahmood, A.; Zou, R.Q.; Xu, Q. Metal–organic frameworks and their derived nanostructures for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1837–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. HarmeetKaur, S.; KumarBhardwaj, S.; Ki-HyunKimcAkashDeep, S. Metal-organic frameworks and their composites as efficient electrodes for supercapacitor applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 369, 15–38. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liang, Z.; Qu, C.; Guo, W.; Zou, R.; Xu, Q. Pristine Metal–Organic Frameworks and their Composites for Energy Storage and Conversion. Adv. Mater. 2017, 30, 1702891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Han, Y.; Qi, P.; Feng, X.; Li, S.; Fu, X.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Wang, B. In Situ Growth of MOFs on the Surface of Si Nanoparticles for Highly Efficient Lithium Storage: Si@MOF Nanocomposites as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 2178–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gong, T.; Lou, X.B.; Gao, E.Q.; Hu, B.W. Pillared-Layer Metal–Organic Frameworks for Improved Lithium-Ion Storage Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 21839–21847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guo, W.X.; Sun, W.W.; Lv, L.-P.; Kong, S.F.; Wang, Y. Microwave-Assisted Morphology Evolution of Fe-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Derived Fe2O3 Nanostructures for Li-Ion Storage. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4198–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Q.; Pang, H. Facile synthesis of silver nanowire-zeolitic imidazolate framework 67 composites as high-performance bifunctional oxygen catalysts. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 15755–15762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qamar, M.; Adam, A.; Merzougui, B.; Helal, A.; Abdulhamid, O.; Siddiqui, M.N. Metal–organic framework-guided growth of Mo2C embedded in mesoporous carbon as a high-performance and stable electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 16225–16232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aiyappa, H.B.; Thote, J.; Shinde, D.B.; Banerjee, R.; Kurungot, S. Cobalt-Modified Covalent Organic Framework as a Robust Water Oxidation Electrocatalyst. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 4375–4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, X.; Pachfule, P.; Li, S.; Simke, J.R.J.; Schmidt, J.; Thomas, A. Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting from an Iron/Nickel-Based Bimetallic Metal–Organic Framework/Dicyandiamide Composite. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 8921–8926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jayakumar, A.; Antony, R.P.; Wang, R.; Lee, J.M. MOF-Derived Hollow Cage NixCo3−xO4 and Their Synergy with Graphene for Outstanding Supercapacitors. Small 2017, 13, 1603102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lee, Y.W.; Hong, J.; An, G.H.; Pak, S.; Lee, J.; Cho, Y.; Lee, S.; Cha, S.; Sohn, J.I.; Kim, J.M. Synergistic effects of engineered spinel hetero-metallic cobaltites on electrochemical pseudo-capacitive behaviors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 15033–15039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Niu, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, T.; Yu, M.; Yu, M.; Qiu, J. A Polymetallic Metal–Organic Framework-Derived Strategy toward Synergistically Multidoped Metal Oxide Electrodes with Ultralong Cycle Life and High Volumetric Capacity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guan, B.Y.; Kushima, A.; Yu, L.; Li, S.; Li, J.; Lou, X.W. Coordination Polymers Derived General Synthesis of Multishelled Mixed Metal-Oxide Particles for Hybrid Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1605902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Qu, C.; Zhao, B.T.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, D.C.; Dai, S.G.; Deglee, B.M.; Chen, Y.; Walton, K.S.; Zou, R.Q.; Liu, M.L. Functionalized Bimetallic Hydroxides Derived from Metal–Organic Frameworks for High-Performance Hybrid Supercapacitor with Exceptional Cycling Stability. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, S.; Li, D.; Chen, S.; Yang, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Q.; Komarneni, S.; Yang, D. Highly Stable Supercapacitors with MOF-derived Co9S8/Carbon Electrodes for High Rate Electrochemical Energy Storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 12453–12461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Koman, M. Copper(II) Pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylates. Coordination and Distortion Isomers of [Cu(pydca)(H2O)2]. Pol. J. Chem. 2001, 75, 957–964. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chaudhari, N.K.; Chaudhari, S.; Yu, J.S. Cube-like α-Fe2O3 Supported on Ordered Multimodal Porous Carbon as High Performance Electrode Material for Supercapacitors. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 3102–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 11 00821 g001a 550Polymers 11 00821 g001b 550
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the simulated, as-prepared copper metal–organic framework (Cu MOF), and nickel-functionalized copper metal–organic framework (Ni@Cu-MOF), (b) SEM of the Cu MOF, (c) SEM of the Ni@Cu MOF, and (d) Nitrogen adsorption of the Cu-MOF and Ni@Cu-MOF BET.
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the simulated, as-prepared copper metal–organic framework (Cu MOF), and nickel-functionalized copper metal–organic framework (Ni@Cu-MOF), (b) SEM of the Cu MOF, (c) SEM of the Ni@Cu MOF, and (d) Nitrogen adsorption of the Cu-MOF and Ni@Cu-MOF BET.
Polymers 11 00821 g001aPolymers 11 00821 g001b
Polymers 11 00821 g002 550
Figure 2. IR spectra of the Cu-MOF and the Ni@Cu-MOF.
Figure 2. IR spectra of the Cu-MOF and the Ni@Cu-MOF.
Polymers 11 00821 g002
Polymers 11 00821 g003 550
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the Ni@Cu-MOF at scan rates 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 50, 80, and 100 mV s−1.
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the Ni@Cu-MOF at scan rates 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 50, 80, and 100 mV s−1.
Polymers 11 00821 g003
Polymers 11 00821 g004 550
Figure 4. Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of the Ni@Cu-MOF at different current densities.
Figure 4. Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of the Ni@Cu-MOF at different current densities.
Polymers 11 00821 g004
Polymers 11 00821 g005 550
Figure 5. Cycle stability of the Ni@Cu-MOF-based supercapacitor at 1 A g−1.
Figure 5. Cycle stability of the Ni@Cu-MOF-based supercapacitor at 1 A g−1.
Polymers 11 00821 g005
Polymers 11 00821 g006 550
Figure 6. Nyquist plots of the Ni@Cu-MOF before and after 1200 cycles. Electrochemical properties of the Ni@Cu-MOF/activated carbon (AC) asymmetric supercapacitor.
Figure 6. Nyquist plots of the Ni@Cu-MOF before and after 1200 cycles. Electrochemical properties of the Ni@Cu-MOF/activated carbon (AC) asymmetric supercapacitor.
Polymers 11 00821 g006
Polymers 11 00821 g007 550
Figure 7. CV curves (a) and the charge–discharge curves (b) of the Ni@Cu-MOF/activated carbon asymmetric supercapacitor measured in a 6 mol L−1 KOH electrolyte solution.
Figure 7. CV curves (a) and the charge–discharge curves (b) of the Ni@Cu-MOF/activated carbon asymmetric supercapacitor measured in a 6 mol L−1 KOH electrolyte solution.
Polymers 11 00821 g007
Polymers 11 00821 g008 550
Figure 8. Cycle performance of the Ni@Cu-MOF-based asymmetric supercapacitor at a current density of 1 A/g.
Figure 8. Cycle performance of the Ni@Cu-MOF-based asymmetric supercapacitor at a current density of 1 A/g.
Polymers 11 00821 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Nie, S.; Liu, Y.; Yan, W.; Lin, S.; Cheng, G.; Yang, H.; Luo, J. Room-Temperature Fabrication of a Nickel-Functionalized Copper Metal–Organic Framework (Ni@Cu-MOF) as a New Pseudocapacitive Material for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Polymers 2019, 11, 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050821

AMA Style

Wang Y, Nie S, Liu Y, Yan W, Lin S, Cheng G, Yang H, Luo J. Room-Temperature Fabrication of a Nickel-Functionalized Copper Metal–Organic Framework (Ni@Cu-MOF) as a New Pseudocapacitive Material for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Polymers. 2019; 11(5):821. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050821

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yi, Shengqiang Nie, Yuan Liu, Wei Yan, Shaomin Lin, Gang Cheng, Huan Yang, and Jun Luo. 2019. "Room-Temperature Fabrication of a Nickel-Functionalized Copper Metal–Organic Framework (Ni@Cu-MOF) as a New Pseudocapacitive Material for Asymmetric Supercapacitors" Polymers 11, no. 5: 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050821

APA Style

Wang, Y., Nie, S., Liu, Y., Yan, W., Lin, S., Cheng, G., Yang, H., & Luo, J. (2019). Room-Temperature Fabrication of a Nickel-Functionalized Copper Metal–Organic Framework (Ni@Cu-MOF) as a New Pseudocapacitive Material for Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Polymers, 11(5), 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050821

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop