Next Article in Journal
Visualization of Polymer Crystallization by In Situ Combination of Atomic Force Microscopy and Fast Scanning Calorimetry
Previous Article in Journal
Writing Behavior of Phospholipids in Polymer Pen Lithography (PPL) for Bioactive Micropatterns
Previous Article in Special Issue
Degradable Polymer Stars Based on Tannic Acid Cores by ATRP
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/polym11050892
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

PET-RAFT Polymerization Catalyzed by Small Organic Molecule under Green Light Irradiation

by
Huazhen Tao
†,
Lei Xia
†,
Guang Chen
,
Tianyou Zeng
,
Xuan Nie
,
Ze Zhang
* and
Yezi You
*
Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, CAS Key Laboratory of Soft Matter Chemistry, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2019, 11(5), 892; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050892
Submission received: 21 March 2019 / Revised: 21 April 2019 / Accepted: 29 April 2019 / Published: 15 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Macromolecular Design via Controlled Polymerization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photocatalyzed polymerization using organic molecules as catalysts has attracted broad interest because of its easy operation in ambient environments and low toxicity compared with metallic catalysts. In this work, we reported that 4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (DTBT) can act as an efficient photoredox catalyst for photoinduced electron transfer-reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (PET-RAFT) polymerization under green light irradiation. Well-defined (co)polymers can be obtained using this technique without any additional additives like noble metals and electron donors or acceptors. The living characteristics of polymerization were verified by kinetic study and the narrow dispersity (Đ) of the produced polymer. Excellent chain-end fidelity was demonstrated through chain extension as well. In addition, this technique showed great potential for various RAFT agents and monomers including acrylates and acrylamides.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Photo-polymerization has received great attention because of its easy operation, temporal control, ambient condition, and so on. It has unique advantages in the synthesis of complex polymers, in bio-systems, and in microelectronics. Generally, visible light-driven polymerization is favored for its environmental friendliness and non-invasiveness. However, because conventional monomers have almost no absorption in visible region, a visible light-driven polymerization system generally requires photocatalysts or photosensitizers to harvest energy from visible light to trigger polymerization.
In recent years, visible light-driven polymerization has been rapidly developed, as many efficient photocatalysts or photosensitizers have been found, including metallic and non-metallic materials [1,2]. Owing to long excited lifetimes (microsecond) and high reductive abilities, transition metal compounds like Ir(ppy)3 and Ru(bpy)3Cl2 have exhibited high capabilities in photocatalyzed polymerization. Boyer et al. [3] reported photoinduced electron transfer-reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (PET-RAFT) polymerization using Ir(ppy)3 as a photocatalyst, which can be performed even in the presence of air. In addition, as a useful tool, this technique played an important role in the synthesis of multi-block copolymers [4,5], various stereopolymers [6], copolymers with well-defined sequence structures and sophisticated microstructures [7], and discrete oligomers [8]. Hawker et al. reported that Ir(ppy)3 could be utilized in visible light-induced atom transfer radical polymerization of methacrylates [9], acrylates [10], and to fabricate a 3D polymer brush [11]. Besides, many other metallic materials [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] have been developed to achieve living/controlled polymerization under irradiation by visible light as well.
Nevertheless, concerns of metal contamination in products have impeded its application; developing metal-free photo-polymerization is favored. Therefore, some dyes [20], phenazine derivatives [21], phenothiazine derivatives [22], phenoxazine derivatives [23], and other organic photocatalysts [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32] have been constructed for visible light-polymerization. Fors [33,34], Nicewicz [35], and Boydston [36] et al. found that pyrylium salts can drive the polymerization of vinyl ethers, 4-methoxystyrene, and norbornenes, through cationic pathways or ring-opening metathesis mechanisms. Yagci et al. [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] developed visible light-cationic and radical polymerizations using various non-metallic materials. Even so, the very limited category and quantity of organic photocatalysts have motivated researchers to exploit new organic catalysts.
Small organic molecules with donor–acceptor–donor (D–A–D)-type π-conjugated structures play a significant role in organic photovoltaic devices because of efficient light-generated electron transfer processes [45]. With a high efficiency of charge separation and a long exciton lifetime, some of these organic molecules have great potential in the field of photocatalyzed polymerization. But few successful examples have been published [46,47]. In this study, we found an organic molecule comprising the thiophene as a donor unit (D), benzothiadiazole as an acceptor unit (A), and 4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (DTBT) (Scheme 1), which can catalyze PET-RAFT polymerization for synthesis of well-defined (co)polymers with low molecular weight distribution and high end-group fidelity of product under green light. In addition, this system has great compatibility in a variety of RAFT agents and monomers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

1-Butanethiol (Energy Chemical, Shanghai, China, 98%), 2-bromopropionic acid (Energy chemical, Shanghai, China, 99%), tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate (Aladdin, Shanghai, China, 99%), 2,2’-(thiocarbonyldithio)diacetic acid, N,N-dimethyl acrylamide (DMA) (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 99%), N,N-dimethylaminoethyl acrylate (DMAEA) (Energy chemical, Shanghai, China, 98%), N,N-Diethylacrylamide (DEA) (Aladdin, Shanghai, China, 99%), N-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)acrylamide (DPAA) (Energy Chemical, Shanghai, China, 98%), 3-mercaptopropionic acid (Aladdin, Shanghai, China, 99%), 2-Bromoisobutyric acid (Energy chemical, Shanghai, China, 98%), 4,7-Di(thiophen-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (DTBT as photoredox catalyst in this study) (ARK, Chicago, IL, USA, >98.0%), bis(carboxymethyl) trithiocarbonate, CAS: 6326-83-6) (BCMT) (Energy Chemical, Shanghai, China, 98%), N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (Aladdin, Shanghai, China, 99.8%) were purchased from chemical company, respectively. Acetone, hydrochloric acid, carbon disulfide, chloroform, DCM, hexane, ether, K3PO4·3H2O, NaCl, NaOH, D2O, CDCl3, anhydrous Na2SO4 were obtained from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co., Shanghai, China.

2.2. Characterization

All chemical structures were measured by a 400 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). The number-average molar mass (Mn,GPC) and Đ were determined by a gel permeation chromatography (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) using DMF (1.0 mL/min) as the eluent with polystyrene standards. The absorption spectrum was measured by UV-Visible Spectroscopy (Sahimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

2.3. Polymerizations

The polymerizations were conducted in a sealed glass tube, in a typical experiment, a 3 mL glass vial charged with monomer, chain transfer agent (CTA), catalyst and DMF as solvent. The mixture was deoxygenated by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles and sealed under vacuum. Then, it were irradiated under LED light at ambient temperature. Monomer conversions were measured by 1H-NMR, the final polymers were obtained by precipitation and analyzed by 1H NMR and GPC.

3. Results and Discussion

According to the reported PET-RAFT polymerization, the redox property and lifetime of the excited state of the photocatalyst are important [20]. DTBT is a small organic molecule semiconductor. It has a broad absorption area in visible light, even to 550 nm (Figure 1A), and can be excited by blue or green light. It has a low reduction potential value of –1.15 V and a long-living photogenerated exciton, [48] which is comparable with the mostly used transition metal photocatalyst (Ru(III)/Ru(II)* = –0.8 V) [12]. Therefore, we can envision that DTBT will be a promising photocatalyst for PET-RAFT polymerization.
In order to verify whether DTBT was effective for PET-RAFT polymerization, we chose N, N-dimethylacrylamide (DMA) as the model monomer, 2-((((2-carboxyethyl)thio)carbonothioyl)thio)-2-methylpropanoic acid (CEMP) (Figure S1) as the RAFT agent, N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as the solvent, and a blue (λmax = 460 nm) or green (λmax = 530 nm) LED as the light source. When in the presence of DTBT, poly-(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) (PDMA) with an Mn of 11600 Da and a narrow dispersity (Đ = 1.23) formed after 12.0 h irradiation (Table 1, Entry 1, Figure S2), and higher conversion would be reached if we increased the amount of catalyst (Table 1, Entry 2-3, Figure S3). In 1H-NMR spectroscopy of the formed PDMA, the signal peak at 0.8 ppm was assigned to the proton of –CH3 from the RAFT agent of CEMP (Figure S2). Also, several control experiments were set to prove the roles of light, RAFT agent, and photocatalyst. As shown in Table 1, when we operated the experiment in dark conditions, no monomer consumption was detected over 12.0 h, indicating that polymerization was triggered by light. If we conducted polymerization under irradiation by green light without DTBT, no polymer was obtained because of very low monomer conversion (2.0%). But if blue light was used instead of green light, some polymers were obtained, because CEMP had an absorption in the blue region and a maximal absorption peak at 441 nm [49,50]. CEMP can be excited into the excitation state through the n→π* forbidden transition of the C=S group under blue light irradiation, then generate radicals, which could initiate polymerization [51,52,53]. Furthermore, a control experiment without the RAFT agent was also carried out, but no polymerization occurred either. All these results indicated that DTBT can act as a photocatalyst for PET-RAFT polymerization, and the trithiocarbonate molecule acted as both initiator and chain transfer agent.
Based on the above study, we proposed the polymerization procedure in Scheme 2. DTBT generated conduction-band electrons (e−) and valence-band holes (h+) under green light. The photo-generated electron (e−) had stronger reduction activity than the RAFT agent. Hence, the RAFT agent was deoxidized to produce a radical, which provided a radical source to initiate RAFT polymerization The thiocarbonylthio compound acted as both initiator and chain transfer agent, which was why DTBT became indispensable in polymerization. At the same time, the radical (Pn•) may also be deactivated by holes (h+) to regenerate the thiocarbonylthio compound, and the whole catalytic cycle would be restarted again.
As shown in Figure 1, the first order kinetic plot of ln([M]0/[M]t) as a function of polymerization time (Figure 1B) as well as the linear relationship between Mn,GPC of polymer and monomer conversion (Figure 1C) were observed. The plot of Mn,NMR (Figure 1C and Figure S4) versus monomer conversion gave a linear relationship in good agreement with that of the Mn,th (calculated by NMR). It demonstrated that almost constant active radicals existed in this system, and DTBT had remarkable activity in PET-RAFT polymerization of acrylamide driven by low-energy green light in ambient conditions. Moreover, GPC curves showed a single peak of produced polymer with narrow dispersity (Đ < 1.30), and it shifted to a short retention time (high molecular weight) region along with an increased polymerization time.
Chain extension is an available path to synthesize block copolymers to further attest fidelity of the polymeric chain, although the corresponding functional group has already been identified using 1H NMR spectroscopy. Chain extension of PDMA was performed using N, N-dimethylaminoethyl acrylate (DMAEA) as the second monomer. The shift of trace GPC product to the higher molecular weight side (Figure 2A) after the chain extension reaction and the signal peaks of protons of poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl acrylate) (PDMEA) and PDMA were all present (Figure 2B), verifying high end-group fidelity of PDMA.
To take full advantage of light stimulus, we performed “On” (in the presence of light) and “Off” (in the absence of light) experiments to investigate the temporal control of this DTBT-catalyzed PET-RAFT system. When the light was switched to the “On” state, polymerization occurred. When the light was in the “Off” state, no polymerization occurred based on 1H-NMR results (Figure 3A). The final product with a low Đ of 1.20 and an expected molecular weight in line with the trait of living/controlled polymerization was obtained (Figure 3B), which showed good ability of this system in the temporal control process.
In light of the versatility of PET-RAFT polymerization, it could be used in broad monomers and a variety of RAFT agents. Therefore, we envisioned that our DTBT-catalyzed PET-RAFT system had the same capabilities. As shown in Table 2, S,S′-bis(α,α′-dimethyl-α″-acetic acid)trithiocarbonate (BDMAT) (Figure S5), 2-(n-butyltrithiocarbonate)-propionic acid (BTPA) (Figure S6), and bis(carboxymethyl) trithiocarbonate (BCMT) were used as RAFT agents in this system instead of CEMP. As expected, all polymerizations (Figure S7–S9) were carried out successfully using these trithiocarbonates as chain transfer agents and initiators, and as a result, polymers with narrow dispersity and unimodal peaks in GPC curves were obtained.
Subsequently, some other monomers, such as N-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)acrylamide (DPAA), N, N-dimethylaminoethyl acrylate (DMAEA), N, N-diethylacrylamide (DEA) and N-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)acrylamide (DPAA), were applied in this system. Polymerizations of DPAA, DMAEA, and DEA were carried out under the same conditions as those of DMA. Polymerization of DEA resulted in a conversion of 85.9% with a low Đ of 1.31, which was similar to that of DMA because of their similar structures. Polymerization of DMAEA and DPAA had lower monomer conversions than DMA and DEA, but still produced polymers (Figure S10–S13) with low Đ, revealing the generality and compatibility of DTBT as a photocatalyst for the polymerization of these two monomers.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we developed a small organic molecule, DTBT, as photocatalyst for PET-RAFT polymerization. DTBT had noticeable activity in catalyzing PET-RAFT polymerization of common monomers (acrylamides and acrylates), and applying in several chain transfer agents without any help of sacrificial reagents or precious metal co-catalysts. Furthermore, this DTBT-catalyzed system showed excellent control over molecular weight, dispersity, and high group fidelity with successful chain extension.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/5/892/s1. Figure S1: 1H-NMR spectrum of CEMP, Figure S2: 1H-NMR spectrum and GPC curve of PDMA (CEMP as RAFT agent), Figure S3: GPC curve of PDMA, Figure S4: 1H-NMR spectra of obtained PDMA in D2O at different reaction time (Figure 1C) (Mn,NMR = 3 × (I1)/(I2) × MWDMA + MWCEMP)., Figure S5. 1H-NMR spectrum of BDMAT, Figure S6: 1H-NMR spectrum of BTPA, Figure S7: 1H-NMR spectrum and GPC curve of PDMA (BCMT as RAFT agent), Figure S8: 1H-NMR spectrum and PDMA curve of PDMA (BTPA as RAFT agent), Figure S9: 1H-NMR spectrum and GPC curve of PDMA (BDMAT as RAFT agent), Figure S10: 1H-NMR spectrum of PDMAEA, Figure S11: 1H-NMR spectrum of PDEA, Figure S12: 1H-NMR spectrum of PDPAA, Figure S13: GPC curves of PDEA, PDMAEA and PDPAA.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments, L.X., Z.Z. and Y.Y.; performed the experiments, H.T., L.X., G.C., T.Z., and X.N.; analyzed the data and wrote the paper, L.X., Z.Z., and Y.Y.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars (21525420 and 51625305) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51873202 and 21774113).

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Guang Yao Yi for useful work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Corrigan, N.; Shanmugam, S.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C. Photocatalysis in organic and polymer synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 6165–6212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shao, J.; Huang, Y.; Fan, Q. Visible light initiating systems for photopolymerization: Status, development and challenges. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 4195–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, J.; Jung, K.; Atme, A.; Shanmugam, S.; Boyer, C. A Robust and Versatile Photoinduced Living Polymerization of Conjugated and Unconjugated Monomers and Its Oxygen Tolerance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5508–5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kottisch, V.; Michaudel, Q.; Fors, B.P. Photocontrolled Interconversion of Cationic and Radical Polymerizations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10665–10668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peterson, B.M.; Kottisch, V.; Supej, M.J.; Fors, B.P. On Demand Switching of Polymerization Mechanism and Monomer Selectivity with Orthogonal Stimuli. ACS Central Sci. 2018, 4, 1228–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shanmugam, S.; Boyer, C. Stereo-, Temporal and Chemical Control through Photoactivation of Living Radical Polymerization: Synthesis of Block and Gradient Copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9988–9999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhang, Z.; Zeng, T.-Y.; Xia, L.; Hong, C.-Y.; Wu, D.-C.; You, Y.-Z. Synthesis of polymers with on-demand sequence structures via dually switchable and interconvertible polymerizations. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, J.; Fu, C.; Shanmugam, S.; Hawker, C.J.; Moad, G.; Boyer, C. Synthesis of Discrete Oligomers by Sequential PET-RAFT Single-Unit Monomer Insertion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8376–8383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fors, B.P.; Hawker, C.J. Control of a Living Radical Polymerization of Methacrylates by Light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8850–8853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Treat, N.J.; Fors, B.P.; Kramer, J.W.; Christianson, M.; Chiu, C.-Y.; de Alaniz, J.R.; Hawker, C.J. Controlled Radical Polymerization of Acrylates Regulated by Visible Light. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 580–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Poelma, J.E.; Fors, B.P.; Meyers, G.F.; Kramer, J.W.; Hawker, C.J. Fabrication of Complex Three-Dimensional Polymer Brush Nanostructures through Light-Mediated Living Radical Polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 6844–6848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, J.; Jung, K.; Boyer, C. Oxygen Tolerance Study of Photoinduced Electron Transfer-Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer (PET-RAFT) Polymerization Mediated by Ru(bpy)(3)Cl-2. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 4217–4229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shanmugam, S.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C. Exploiting Metalloporphyrins for Selective Living Radical Polymerization Tunable over Visible Wavelengths. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9174–9185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Corrigan, N.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C. A Photoinitiation System for Conventional and Controlled Radical Polymerization at Visible and NIR Wavelengths. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 3274–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kottisch, V.; Supej, M.J.; Fors, B.P. Enhancing Temporal Control and Enabling Chain-End Modification in Photoregulated Cationic Polymerizations by Using Iridium-Based Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 8260–8264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dadashi-Silab, S.; Pan, X.; Matyjaszewski, K. Photoinduced Iron-Catalyzed Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization with ppm Levels of Iron Catalyst under Blue Light Irradiation. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7967–7977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shanmugam, S.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C. Utilizing the electron transfer mechanism of chlorophyll a under light for controlled radical polymerization. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shanmugam, S.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C. Light-Regulated Polymerization under Near-Infrared/Far-Red Irradiation Catalyzed by Bacteriochlorophyll a. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1036–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, W.; Chen, D.; Ma, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhao, C.; Yang, W. Visible-light induced controlled radical polymerization of methacrylates with Cu(dap)(2)Cl as a photoredox catalyst. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 4226–4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, J.; Shanmugam, S.; Duong, H.T.; Boyer, C. Organo-photocatalysts for photoinduced electron transfer-reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (PET-RAFT) polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 5615–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Theriot, J.C.; Lim, C.-H.; Yang, H.; Ryan, M.D.; Musgrave, C.B.; Miyake, G.M. Organocatalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization driven by visible light. Science 2016, 352, 1082–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Treat, N.J.; Sprafke, H.; Kramer, J.W.; Clark, P.G.; Barton, B.E.; de Alaniz, J.R.; Fors, B.P.; Hawker, C.J. Metal-Free Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16096–16101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Pearson, R.M.; Lim, C.-H.; McCarthy, B.G.; Musgrave, C.B.; Miyake, G.M. Organocatalyzed Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization Using N-Aryl Phenoxazines as Photoredox Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11399–11407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jiang, J.; Ye, G.; Wang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Chen, J.; Matyjaszewski, K. Heteroatom-Doped Carbon Dots (CDs) as a Class of Metal-Free Photocatalysts for PET-RAFT Polymerization under Visible Light and Sunlight. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12037–12042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Y.; Chen, D.; Yang, W. Visible-light induced RAFT polymerization of styrenic monomers with aromatic aldehydes as organophotoredox catalysts. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 2018, 56, 2072–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Ma, W.; Ma, Y.; Chen, D.; Wang, L.; Zhao, C.; Yang, W. Visible light-induced RAFT polymerization of methacrylates with benzaldehyde derivatives as organophotoredox catalysts. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 2018, 56, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Zhu, X. Metal-free photoinduced electron transfer-atom transfer radical polymerization (PET-ATRP) via a visible light organic photocatalyst. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tu, K.; Xu, T.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Zhu, X. Visible light-induced PET-RAFT polymerization of methacrylates with novel organic photocatalysts. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 24040–24045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Huang, Z.; Gu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Zhu, X. Metal-Free Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate with ppm Level of Organic Photocatalyst. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2017, 38, 1600461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ohtsuki, A.; Goto, A.; Kaji, H. Visible-Light-Induced Reversible Complexation Mediated Living Radical Polymerization of Methacrylates with Organic Catalysts. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ohtsuki, A.; Lei, L.; Tanishima, M.; Goto, A.; Kaji, H. Photocontrolled Organocatalyzed Living Radical Polymerization Feasible over a Wide Range of Wavelengths. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5610–5617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Trotta, J.T.; Fors, B.P. Organic Catalysts for Photocontrolled Polymerizations. Synlett 2016, 27, 702–713. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kottisch, V.; Michaudel, Q.; Fors, B.P. Cationic Polymerization of Vinyl Ethers Controlled by Visible Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15535–15538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Michaudel, Q.; Chauvire, T.; Kottisch, V.; Supej, M.J.; Stawiasz, K.J.; Shen, L.; Zipfel, W.R.; Abruna, H.D.; Freed, J.H.; Fors, B.P. Mechanistic Insight into the Photocontrolled Cationic Polymerization of Vinyl Ethers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 15530–15538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perkowski, A.J.; You, W.; Nicewicz, D.A. Visible Light Photoinitiated Metal-Free Living Cationic Polymerization of 4-Methoxystyrene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7580–7583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ogawa, K.A.; Goetz, A.E.; Boydston, A.J. Metal-Free Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1400–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yagci, Y.; Hepuzer, Y. A novel visible light initiatiating system for cationic polymerization. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 6367–6370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aydogan, B.; Gundogan, A.S.; Ozturk, T.; Yagci, Y. A dithienothiophene derivative as a long-wavelength photosensitizer for onium salt photoinitiated cationic polymerization. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 3468–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yilmaz, G.; Aydogan, B.; Temel, G.; Arsu, N.; Moszner, N.; Yagci, Y. Thioxanthone-Fluorenes as Visible Light Photoinitiators for Free Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 4520–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yilmaz, G.; Beyazit, S.; Yagci, Y. Visible Light Induced Free Radical Promoted Cationic Polymerization Using Thioxanthone Derivatives. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 2011, 49, 1591–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kiskan, B.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Antonietti, M.; Yagci, Y. Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride as a Heterogeneous Visible Light Photoinitiator for Radical Polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dadashi-Silab, S.; Bildirir, H.; Dawson, R.; Thomas, A.; Yagci, Y. Microporous Thioxanthone Polymers as Heterogeneous Photoinitiators for Visible Light Induced Free Radical and Cationic Polymerizations. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 4607–4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Erdur, S.; Yilmaz, G.; Colak, D.G.; Cianga, I.; Yagci, Y. Poly(phenylenevinylene)s as Sensitizers for Visible Light Induced Cationic Polymerization. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 7296–7302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Sangermano, M.; Rodriguez, D.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Laurenti, E.; Yagci, Y. Visible Light Induced Cationic Polymerization of Epoxides by Using Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 39, 1800250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mishra, A.; Baeuerle, P. Small Molecule Organic Semiconductors on the Move: Promises for Future Solar Energy Technology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2020–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, L.; Li, R.; Zhang, K.A.I. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP) Catalyzed by Visible Light-Absorbed Small Molecule Organic Semiconductors. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 39, 1800466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Aydogan, B.; Yagci, Y.; Toppare, L.; Jockusch, S.; Turro, N.J. Photoinduced Electron Transfer Reactions of Highly Conjugated Thiophenes for Initiation of Cationic Polymerization and Conjugated Polymer Formation. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 7829–7834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, L.; Huang, W.; Li, R.; Gehrig, D.; Blom, P.W.M.; Landfester, K.; Zhang, K.A.I. Structural Design Principle of Small-Molecule Organic Semiconductors for Metal-Free, Visible-Light-Promoted Photocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9783–9787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Skrabania, K.; Miasnikova, A.; Bivigou-Koumba, A.M.; Zehm, D.; Laschewsky, A. Examining the UV-vis absorption of RAFT chain transfer agents and their use for polymer analysis. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2, 2074–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Carmean, R.N.; Becker, T.E.; Sims, M.B.; Sumerlin, B.S. Ultra-High Molecular Weights via Aqueous Reversible-Deactivation Radical Polymerization. Chem 2017, 2, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lu, L.; Zhang, H.; Yang, N.; Cai, Y. Toward rapid and well-controlled ambient temperature RAFT polymerization under UV-Vis radiation: Effect of radiation wave range. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 3770–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McKenzie, T.G.; Fu, Q.; Wong, E.H.H.; Dunstan, D.E.; Qiao, G.G. Visible Light Mediated Controlled Radical Polymerization in the Absence of Exogenous Radical Sources or Catalysts. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 3864–3872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McKenzie, T.G.; Costa, L.P.d.M.; Fu, Q.; Dunstan, D.E.; Qiao, G.G. Investigation into the photolytic stability of RAFT agents and the implications for photopolymerization reactions. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 4246–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 11 00892 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Diagram of photoredox catalyst for photoinduced electron transfer-reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (PET-RAFT), chemical structure of 4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (DTBT), and RAFT agents and monomers.
Scheme 1. Diagram of photoredox catalyst for photoinduced electron transfer-reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (PET-RAFT), chemical structure of 4,7-di(thiophen-2-yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole (DTBT), and RAFT agents and monomers.
Polymers 11 00892 sch001
Polymers 11 00892 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Outline of PET-RAFT polymerization in this study.
Scheme 2. Outline of PET-RAFT polymerization in this study.
Polymers 11 00892 sch002
Polymers 11 00892 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) The absorption spectrum of DTBT. Kinetic study of the PET-RAFT polymerization. Reaction conditions: [DMA]0:[CEMP]0:[DBTB]0 = 200:1:0.1, [DMA]0 = 3.0 M, DMF as solvent, the reactions were performed at room temperature under green LED. (B) The plot of ln([M]0/[M]t) as a function of reaction time. (C) The relationship of Mn,GPC, Mn,NMR, Mn,th, and Đ versus monomer conversion. (D) GPC traces at different times of irradiation.
Figure 1. (A) The absorption spectrum of DTBT. Kinetic study of the PET-RAFT polymerization. Reaction conditions: [DMA]0:[CEMP]0:[DBTB]0 = 200:1:0.1, [DMA]0 = 3.0 M, DMF as solvent, the reactions were performed at room temperature under green LED. (B) The plot of ln([M]0/[M]t) as a function of reaction time. (C) The relationship of Mn,GPC, Mn,NMR, Mn,th, and Đ versus monomer conversion. (D) GPC traces at different times of irradiation.
Polymers 11 00892 g001
Polymers 11 00892 g002 550
Figure 2. Chain extension of PDMA using PET-RAFT polymerization. Reaction conditions: [DMAEA]0:[macro-CTA]0:[DBTB]0 = 195:1:0.45, [DMAEA]0 = 1.3 M, DMF as solvent, the reactions were performed at room temperature under green LED light for 12.5 h. (A) GPC traces of PDMA and PDMA-b-PDMAEA. (B) 1H-NMR spectrum of PDMA-b-PDMAEA in D2O.
Figure 2. Chain extension of PDMA using PET-RAFT polymerization. Reaction conditions: [DMAEA]0:[macro-CTA]0:[DBTB]0 = 195:1:0.45, [DMAEA]0 = 1.3 M, DMF as solvent, the reactions were performed at room temperature under green LED light for 12.5 h. (A) GPC traces of PDMA and PDMA-b-PDMAEA. (B) 1H-NMR spectrum of PDMA-b-PDMAEA in D2O.
Polymers 11 00892 g002
Polymers 11 00892 g003 550
Figure 3. PET-RAFT polymerization of DMA in the presence (“On”) or in the absence (“Off”) of green light. Reaction conditions: [DMA]0:[CEMP]0:[DBTB]0 = 200:1:0.1, [DMA]0 = 3.0 M, DMF as solvent, the reactions were performed at RT under green LED. (A) Monomer conversion versus time. (B) GPC curve of final polymer.
Figure 3. PET-RAFT polymerization of DMA in the presence (“On”) or in the absence (“Off”) of green light. Reaction conditions: [DMA]0:[CEMP]0:[DBTB]0 = 200:1:0.1, [DMA]0 = 3.0 M, DMF as solvent, the reactions were performed at RT under green LED. (A) Monomer conversion versus time. (B) GPC curve of final polymer.
Polymers 11 00892 g003
Table
Table 1. Results of poly-(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) (PDMA) synthesized under different conditions. a
Table 1. Results of poly-(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) (PDMA) synthesized under different conditions. a
Entry[DMA]0:[CEMP]0:[DTBT]0conv. (%) dMn,the
(Da)		Mn,GPCf
(Da)		Đf
1200:1:0.178.915900116001.23
2200:1:0.287.517500127001.25
3200:1:0.0250.01017062001.32
4 b200:1:0.100--
5200:1:000--
6 c200:1:018.02830--
7200:1:0.12.0660--
a Reaction conditions: N,N-dimethylacrylamide [DMA]0 = 3.0 M, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvent, the reactions were performed at room temperature under green LED light for 12.0 h. b In dark conditions. c Blue LED as light source. d Monomer conversion was determined by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. e Mn,th = [DMA]0/[2-((((2-carboxyethyl)thio)carbonothioyl)thio)-2-methylpropanoic acid (CEMP)]0 × MWDMA × conv. + MWCEMP, where [DMA]0, [CEMP]0, MWDMA, conv., and MWCEMP correspond to DMA and CEMP concentration, molar mass of DMA, monomer conversion, and molar mass of CEMP. f Mn,GPC and Đ were determined by GPC with PS standards.
Table
Table 2. Results of polymers synthesized by PET-RAFT polymerization a.
Table 2. Results of polymers synthesized by PET-RAFT polymerization a.
EntryCTAMonomerconv. (%) bMn,thc
(Da)		Mn,GPCd
(Da)		Đd
1S, S′-bis(α, α′-dimethyl-α″-acetic acid)trithiocarbonate (BDMAT)DMA65.71330077001.62
22-(n-butyltrithiocarbonate)-propionic acid (BTPA)DMA35.1719024001.40
3bis(carboxymethyl) trithiocarbonate (BCMT)DMA45.2918073001.63
4CEMPDEA85.921800120401.31
5CEMPDMAEA61.517900255001.38
6CEMPDPAA57.61820065401.27
a Reaction conditions: [DMA]0:[CEMP]0:[DBTB]0 = 200:1:0.1, [M]0 = 3.0 M, DMF as solvent, the reactions were performed at room temperture under green LED for 12.0 h. b Monomer conversion was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. c Mn,th = [DMA]0/[CEMP]0 × MWDMA × conv. + MWCEMP, where [DMA]0, [CEMP]0, MWDMA, conv., and MWCEMP correspond to DMA and CEMP concentration, molar mass of DMA, monomer conversion, and molar mass of CEMP. d Mn,GPC and Đ were determined by GPC with PS standards.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tao, H.; Xia, L.; Chen, G.; Zeng, T.; Nie, X.; Zhang, Z.; You, Y. PET-RAFT Polymerization Catalyzed by Small Organic Molecule under Green Light Irradiation. Polymers 2019, 11, 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050892

AMA Style

Tao H, Xia L, Chen G, Zeng T, Nie X, Zhang Z, You Y. PET-RAFT Polymerization Catalyzed by Small Organic Molecule under Green Light Irradiation. Polymers. 2019; 11(5):892. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050892

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tao, Huazhen, Lei Xia, Guang Chen, Tianyou Zeng, Xuan Nie, Ze Zhang, and Yezi You. 2019. "PET-RAFT Polymerization Catalyzed by Small Organic Molecule under Green Light Irradiation" Polymers 11, no. 5: 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050892

APA Style

Tao, H., Xia, L., Chen, G., Zeng, T., Nie, X., Zhang, Z., & You, Y. (2019). PET-RAFT Polymerization Catalyzed by Small Organic Molecule under Green Light Irradiation. Polymers, 11(5), 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050892

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop