Next Article in Journal
Pitch Gradation by Ion-Dragging Effect in Polymer-Stabilized Cholesteric Liquid Crystal Reflector Device
Next Article in Special Issue
Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Poly(Lactic Acid) Blends Compatibilized by Peroxide Initiators: Comparison of Two Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Nano-Brushes of Alcohols Grafted onto Cellulose Nanocrystals for Reinforcing Poly(Butylene Succinate): Impact of Alcohol Chain Length on Interfacial Adhesion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Glycerolysis of Poly(lactic acid) as a Way to Extend the “Life Cycle” of This Material
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/polym12010097
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copolymerization of Styrene and Pentadecylphenylmethacrylate (PDPMA): Synthesis, Characterization, Thermomechanical and Adhesion Properties

by
Tomy Muringayil Joseph
1,*,
Sumi Murali Nair
2,
Suresh Kattimuttathu Ittara
2,
Józef T. Haponiuk
1,* and
Sabu Thomas
3
1
Polymers Technology Department, Chemical Faculty, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
2
Polymers & Functional Materials Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500007, India
3
School of Chemical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam 686560, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(1), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12010097
Submission received: 15 November 2019 / Revised: 20 December 2019 / Accepted: 22 December 2019 / Published: 4 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmentally-Friendly Polymeric Materials Based on Recycling and Bio-Based Components)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The copolymerization of styrene (St) with a bioderived monomer, pentadecylphenyl methacrylate (PDPMA), via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) was studied in this work. The copolymerization reactivity ratio was calculated using the composition data obtained from 1H NMR spectroscopy, applying Kelen-Tudos and Finemann-Ross methods. The reactivity ratio of styrene (r1 = 0.93) and PDPMA (r2 = 0.05) suggested random copolymerization of the two monomers with alternation. The copolymerization conversion increased with increasing PDPMA concentration of the feed, upto 70 wt % PDPMA, but decreased thereafter. The molecular weight determined by gel permeation chromatography was lower than the theoretical values and the polydispersity increased from 1.32 to 2.19, with increasing PDPMA content in the feed. The influence of styrene content on the glass transition and thermal decomposition behavior of the copolymers was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis, respectively. Morphological characterization by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed a phase separated soft core-hard shell type structure. The complex viscosity and adhesion properties like peel strength and lap shear strength of the copolymer on different substrates increased with increasing styrene content.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bio-based materials decrease the ecological footprint at every single phases of the product’s life cycle. Global spread of economic development and rapidly rising population are highly demanding towards the world’s resources. The textile, food and plastic packaging industry have attained greater exposure in the core of the sustainability agenda as consumers are directly affected by its utilization. Recycling of bio-based materials should be more based on composting as a terminating procedure and then such products will become more attractive. The process development to tailor the physico-chemical properties of bio-based materials to specific end application is a significant tool, like cross-linking the matrix to enhance mechanical strength. It is worth noticing that even if at the current stage, such materials seem to be a tiny compromise between economic efficiency and sustainability. Recent advances focus on the development of pure bio-based products identical to the petroleum-based materials.
There are many reports on the development of sustainable products using biobased materials and their structure-property correlation. Alginate fibres are used in commercial wound dressings as they resorb wound exudate while even a fence to external infective agents assisting a suitable microenvironment for tissue regrowth [1]. Chitosan, being biodegradable, non-toxic and biocompatible is presented in reports as a candidate for several applications in various industrial products like those from biomedical, pharmaceutical, agricultural, food, cosmetics, and textiles industries [1]. The development of films and coatings by proteins for applications in paper products or board, besides, prospective industrial potential also has been reported. The amide-based chemical structure of proteins shows diverse properties however it is the most significant fact that the high intermolecular binding potential such that protein-based films exhibit improved mechanical properties compared to fat-based films or polysaccharide films [2]. The multifunctional effect could be achieved from green coconut shell extract (CSE) employed on wool (proteinous), jute (lingo-cellulosic) and cotton (cellulosic) that can be a worthy low-cost bio-based packaging material [3,4,5]. Another review reports the properties of sugar palm fibres and starch and its products in green composites and also revealed the prospects of sugar palm fibres and biopolymer for industrial applications such as packaging, bioenergy, automotive and others [6]. The cost-efficient films thus manufactured would have applications where biodegradable films are usable for packaging films, consumer bags, agricultural mulch films and silage wraps [7].
Biobased monomers and polymers, in-lieu of their structural diversity and complexity, offer tremendous scope for sustainable material development through appropriate chemical modification strategies [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Biobased alkyl (meth) acrylate monomers, with long alkyl side chain like lauryl, stearyl or octyl chain, yield polymers with special properties [16,17,18]. The basic and applied research potential of several of these resources has been well reported [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The effect of polymer synthesis conditions and techniques employed on the polymer as well as application properties was studied by several groups [23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
Cardanol, obtained from cashew nut shell liquid, is an important phenolic renewable resource carrying a 15-carbon side chain in the meta position of the benzene ring with varying degree of unsaturation and useful in the development of value added products [30,31]. It has been utilized in several industrial applications, ranging from adhesives and coatings, to lining materials, and recently, the development of some new polymers with novel properties have been reported [32,33,34,35]. We have reported the application of controlled radical polymerization methods, like atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), to cardanol based monomers which yielded polymers with novel processability, performance, and its nanocomposite with graphene showing superior adhesion and surfactant properties [36,37,38]. In this regard, the acrylate and methacrylate derivatives of hydrogenated cardanol (PDP, 3-pentadecylphenol) offer great potential and consistent characteristics as compared to cardanol. The complexation of PDP with block copolymers and its side chain crystallization was studied by ten Brinke et al. and reported the formation of comb-like polymers resulting from immiscibility between alkyl side chain and the main chain [39,40,41,42]. The synthesis of a novel reactive surfactant starting from the acrylate derivative of PDP and its application in the preparation of internally plasticized polystyrene with improved hydrophobic characteristics was reported by us [43,44]. The methacrylate derivative of PDP was hybridized with graphene and the nanocomposite showed side chain crystallization and improved adhesion properties [37]. The adhesion properties could be further controlled by copolymerization with monomers like styrene or MMA and the copolymerization data are important in such cases [45]. In this work, we report the copolymerization of styrene with pentadecylphenylmethacrylate (PDPMA) via ATRP and the effect of styrene content on the conversion, molecular weight, and polydispersity was studied. From the composition data the reactivity ratios were calculated using Finemann Ross and Kelen-Tudos methods. The side chain crystallization behavior and thermal stability of the copolymers were studied using DSC and TGA, respectively. The adhesion, morphology and rheological properties have also been reported.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The monomers, styrene (St) and methacrylic acid (MAA), as well as the ligands, pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) and bypyridine (dNBpy), initiator ethyl-2-bromo isobutyrate (EBriB), metal catalyst Cu(I)Br, ethanol, glacial acetic acid and diethyl ether were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA and used as such. Hydrogenated cardanol (pentadecylphenol, PDP) was kindly supplied by Cardolite Specialty Chemical LLP, Mangaluru, India. Methacryloyl chloride was prepared from methacrylic acid and benzoyl chloride which are purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA and used as such. Triethylamine (TEA) was purchased from Spectrochem, Mumbai, India. Styrene monomer was purified by washing with aqueous (5%) NaOH solution, deionised water and finally distilled under reduced pressure and stored at −18 °C. The metal catalyst, Cu(I)Br, was purified by stirring with glacial acetic acid overnight, washed with ethanol and diethyl ether, filtered and dried at 50 °C under vacuum for 6 h.

2.2. Monomer Synthesis

Pentadecylphenylmethacrylate monomer was prepared from methacryloyl chloride and pentadecylphenol as per Scheme 1, according to the procedure of Sitaramam and Chatterjee [28].
In a typical experiment 125 mL dichloromethane and 50 gm (0.16 mol) pentadecylphenol (PDP) were taken in a 250 mL 3-neck RB flask and kept under magnetic stirring. The homogeneous solution was cooled to 0–5 °C and 23 mL (0.17 mol) of triethyl amine was added slowly. Then, 15.6 mL (0.16 mol) of methacryloyl chloride was added slowly over a period of 1 h. The reaction was continued for 12 h at room temperature (RT). The reaction mixture was neutralized with 5% sodium bicarbonate solution and washed with distilled water. The product was extracted in diethyl ether and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. The product was further purified on a silica gel column (60–120 mesh) using hexane-ethyl acetate (98:2) solvent system. The monomer structure was confirmed by 1H NMR and mass spectroscopy. Product yield was 71%.

2.3. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP)

The homopolymerization of PDPMA was carried out using a typical ATRP procedure reported earlier [29], as in Scheme 2 below.
In a typical ATRP experiment (Scheme 2), CuBr (11.46 mg, 0.00008 mol), PMDETA (33.51 µL, 0.00016 mol) and monomer 3-pentadecylphenylmethacrylate (PDPMA) (3 g, 0.008 mol) were added to a two neck flask and magnetically stirred until homogeneous. The reaction mixture was purged with argon through repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Then, ethyl-2-bromo-isobutyrate (11.8 μL, 0.00008 mol) was added as initiator using the syringe and the reaction mixture was kept at 95 °C. The reaction mixture became viscous in about 30 min and the product was diluted with THF (5 mL), and passed through silica gel column (100–200 mesh) for removing the catalyst. The product was purified through repeated precipitation into methanol-water [75:25] mixture, repeated three times, and the final product was dried at 50 °C under vacuum 4 h.
The styrene homopolymer was also prepared following standard procedure. In a typical experiment, CuBr (41.3 mg, 0.00028 mol), PMDETA (119 µL, 0.000576 mol) and monomer styrene (St) (3 g, 0.0288 mol) were taken in a two neck flask and magnetically stirred until homogeneous. The reaction mixture was freeze dried and purged with argongas for 15 min through repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Initiator ethyl-2-bromoisobutyrate (43 μL, 0.00028 mol) was added through a syringe and the flask was kept in a thermostated bath maintained at 95 °C. The polymerization was continued for specified time and the product was diluted with THF (3 mL), passed through a silica gel column to remove the catalyst and then precipitated into methanol-water [75:25] mixture for recovery of the polymer. The procedure is repeated thrice, and then dried at 60 °C under vacuum for 6 h. Conversions were calculated gravimetrically and polymer structure was confirmed by 1H NMR.
The copolymerization experiments were carried out at different feed compositions following similar procedure. The required weight of monomers and the catalyst CuBr (0.028 mol) were first charged into a 50 mL RB flask. The ligand PMDETA (119 µL 0.0288 mol) and initiator ethyl-2-bromoisobutyrate (42 μL, 0.0288 mol) were added to flask and sealed. The contents were subjected to repeated freeze thaw cycles (3 times) and sealed under argon. The flask was placed in an oil bath maintained at 95 °C. After 14 h, the reaction was quenched by adding methanol to the reaction mixture. The product was dissolved in THF and precipitated into methanol-water mixture. The procedure was repeated till the isolated polymer was freed from residual monomer, as confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

2.4. Characterization

The IR spectrum was recorded using a Thermo Nicolet Nexus 670 spectrometer, (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The spectra were recorded at a resolution of 4 cm−1 using KBr pellets at room temperature and a minimum of 32 scans were signal averaged. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on an AVANCE-500 (Bruker, Switzerland) spectrometer in CDCl3 with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. Mass spectra were recorded on FINNGAN LCQ Advance Max (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in methanol. Molecular weights of the synthesized copolymers were determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) on a Waters machine (1200 series, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a column combination of Styragel HR 5E and Styragel HR 3 (300 mm × 7.8 mm, 6 µm) and a RI detector. Calibration plots were prepared using narrow molecular weight 1, 4-Polyisoprene standards (molecular weights: 31,400−10,500 g/mol from Polymer Labs). THF was used as the eluant at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1 at 30 °C. Thermal stability studies were performed on a TGA machine from TA Instruments, New Castle, PA, USA (Model: Q500). The tests were run using 3–5 mg samples at 10 °C/min, from RT to 800 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. Thermal transitions were recorded on a TA-Q100 differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) at a heating/cooling rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere. Electron microscopy analysis was performed on samples dispersed in THF:water mixture (9:1) and deposited on carbon coated copper grids and dried. TEM measurements were conducted using a PHILIPS TECHNAI FE12 instrument (Phillips, Holland) at 200 kV. The rheological properties were measured in oscillatory shear mode on a DMA instrument, Anton Paar, Graz, Austria, (model: MCR102).

3. Results and Discussion

The objective of the present work was to develop copolymers of PDP methacrylate and evaluate the influence of copolymerization on the adhesion and viscoelastic properties. The adhesion properties of PDPMA and its nanocomposites were reported by us and others previously. The PDPMA monomer was synthesized from hydrogenated cardanol and characterized by FT-IR, 1H-NMR and mass spectroscopy. The 1H NMR spectrum of PDPMA monomer (Figure S1) revealed its important structural features of the monomer. The characteristic aromatic proton signals appear at 6.9, 7.2 ppm. The terminal methyl (−CH3) protons of the alkyl side chain appeared at δ 0.87 ppm. The resonance signal at 2.6 ppm was assigned to the presence of α-CH2 protons adjacent to the phenyl ring (Ph−CH2−(CH2)13 CH3 of PDPMA), in the aliphatic side chain. The vinyl proton signals were seen at 5.6 and 6.4 ppm (multiplet 2H, −C(CH3)=CH2). The prominent peak at δ 1.25 ppm was assigned to the internal methylene protons (−CH2−(CH2)12−CH3) and the singlet observed at 2.1 ppm was assigned to the methacrylate methyl group.
The FT-IR (Figure S2) showed characteristic C−H stretching vibration at about 2926 cm−1. The –C=O− group stretching was at 1756–1747 cm−1. The −C=C− acrylic and aromatic vibrations were centred at 1645 cm−1 and 1629 cm−1, respectively. The monomer structure was further confirmed using mass spectroscopy (Figure S3), with the molecular ion peak at 390.6, corresponding to the molar mass of ammonium adduct (m/z + 18.039 g/mole) and the peak at 373.6 was assigned to the proton adduct (m/z + 1).

3.1. Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

The monomer PDPMA was polymerized using atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and the copolymers with styrene were also prepared. The copolymerization scheme of styrene and PDPMA using bulk ATRP at 95 °C is shown as Scheme 3.
The composition and characteristics of the styrene-PDPMA copolymers synthesized via ATRP are summarized in Table 1.
The homopolymerization of PDPMA was very fast and the reaction mixture became every viscous in about half an hour. However, only 7% conversion was achieved with styrene homopolymerization under the same conditions. Typical 1H NMR spectrum of the PDPMA homopolymer synthesized via ATRP is shown in Figure 1. As compared to Figure 1, the main difference observed in 1H NMR upon polymerization was disappearance of the vinylic proton peaks.
The copolymerization experiments were run for 14 h to observe viscosity build up, so that appreciable conversion was reached. The copolymer structure was confirmed by 1H NMR (Figure 2) and the composition was determined by integration of peaks characteristic of styrene and PDPMA.
The broad peak observed at δ 7–7.4 ppm (a) corresponds to the phenyl ring protons. To determine the composition, the peak (b) at δ 2.5–2.6 ppm due to the protons α to the phenyl ring of PDPMA (Ph-CH2-(CH2)13-CH3) was selected as the characteristic peak of PDPMA. Other peaks, (c) the hydrogen on carbon β to the aromatic ring (Ph‒CH2‒CH2‒) was seen at δ 2.2 ppm and (d), broad peak) the ‒CH2‒ and ‒CH‒ protons of the main chain were observed at δ 1.6‒1.43 ppm. The internal methylene protons of the side chain of PDPMA appeared at δ 1.2 ppm (e), and the peak at δ 0.83 ppm(f) was due to the terminal -CH3 protons of the alkyl side chain. Look at the composition data determined from 1H NMR and the feed composition tabulated in Table 1, it can be seen that the copolymers had lower PDPMA content than the feed. The F-R and K-T parameters, for determination of the reactivity ratio (r1, r2), were calculated from the composition data and the values are tabulated in Table 2 and corresponding plot is shown as Figure 3.
The r1, r2 values determined from the plots were tabulated in Table 3.
The reactivity ratio for styrene (r1) was higher than that of PDPMA (r2) and the product r1 r2 was close to zero (the value is between zero and 1). The values suggested random copolymerization and the chances for incorporation of styrene was more with a tendency to alternate, as the product r1 × r2 was less than 1 and close to zero [46]. If the average of r1 and r2 obtained from F-R and K-T methods were taken, then r1 = 0.93 and r2 = 0.05. The values imply that styrene-type radical S* shows slightly more preference for copolymerization than for homopolymerization. The r2 value suggests PDPMA has very less preference for homopolymerization but prefer copolymerization with styrene monomer. Thus, styrene enters the copolymer faster than PDPMA, since it has equal chance of copolymerization and homopolymerization resulting in long sequences of sty units throughout the whole composition range studied.
Basing on the reactivity ratio, the sequence length was determined and the values, given in Table 4, suggest higher styrene sequence length (I1) with high styrene content in the feed. The PDPMA sequence length (I2) remained more or less the same, in agreement with its alternating tendency, or inability to form long sequences of PDPMA units.
The composition data, determined from 1H NMR given in Table 1, also supports this observation as the PDPMA content in copolymer was low, despite the increase in feed concentration.
The observed value of reactivity ratio was different from that reported in the literature for copolymerization of styrene and hydrogenated cardanyl acrylate or PDPA [38]. They reported r1 = 0.34 for styrene and r2 = 0.97 for PDPA [38]. The observed difference shows the methacrylate has low propensity for homopolymerization in presence of styrene than PDP acrylate. The difference might also be due to the different initiating system employed; as the literature studies were performed using cobalt based initiating system [38]. Similar observation of initiating system influencing the reactivity was also observed by Koiry and Singha in the polymerization of styrene with 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate [47]. They suggested a difference in the polymerization mechanism of ATRP and conventional radical polymerization due to the difficulty in formation of the polar catalyst complex with monomers having non-polar side chain. This would be applicable to the present case as well, since the monomer has a 15 carbon alkyl side chain to impart hydrophobicity.

3.2. Molecular Characterization of Styrene-PDPMA Copolymers

The molecular characteristics of the synthesized copolymers were studied using SEC and the values are tabulated in Table 1. In all cases, except for styrene homopolymerization, deviation from the theoretically calculated molecular weight was seen. The difference increases with increasing the PDPMA content of the feed. The difference might be attributed to the variation in hydrodynamic volume of SPDPMA copolymers resulting from the 15 carbon alkyl chain present in PDPMA. The alkyl chain on each repeat unit would act like short branches and branched polymers have a compact structure, thus smaller hydrodynamic radius and consequently have lower molecular weight. The relation between branching, hydrodynamic radius and intrinsic viscosity or molecular weight had been previously reported [48]. Similar observations were also reported in the case of styrene-ethyl hexyl acrylate copolymers synthesized by ATRP [33].
The variations in molecular weight distribution of the different copolymers with increasing PDPMA concentration are shown in Figure 4. The polydispersity values obtained from GPC were also found to vary with increasing PDPMA content in the copolymer.
The polystyrene homopolymer showed the narrowest distribution and with increasing PDPMA content, the polydispersity increased, suggesting loss of control over the polymerization or indications of a branched structure with increasing PDPMA content.

3.3. Glass Transition Behaviour of Styrene-PDPMA Copolymers

The glass transition behaviour of representative styrene-PDPMA copolymers studied by DSC are shown in Figure 5.
The homopolymer (PDPMA100) showed a small endotherm at about 1 °C. At 10 wt % PDPMA content. Base line shift characteristic of the Tg of amorphous polymer was seen at about 10 °C and a crystalline melting like transition at about 47 °C. At 30 wt % PDPMA the endothermic melting like transition became clearer. The copolymer with 50 wt % PDPMA content showed a broad glass transition, centered at about 3.85 °C but no clear endothermic, melting peak was visible, though we expected a better side chain melting transition in this case due to the higher PDPMA content. However, as expected, with increasing PDPMA concentration in the copolymer the glass transition temperature (Tg) was found to be decreasing. The melting transitions, other than glass transition were earlier observed in comb-like polymers of n-alkyl acrylate polymers, due to the crystallizable side chains, as in the case of PDPMA. The melting transitions are characteristic of side chain crystallisable polymers and the Tg mostly overlaps with the melting transition [18,37,49].
With 10 wt % PDPMA mostly a softening effect was observed, with 30% PDPMA the crowding of alkyl chains lead to better crystallization, and with 50 wt % PDPMA, the crystallization appears to be not favoured, though the present studies, could not provide any insight for this observation. Sidney et al. described an investigation of the side chain crystallinity found in polymethacrylates and polyacrylates with n-alkyl groups from 12 to 18 carbon atoms in length as the similar way. These crystallites are made up of the n-alkyl groups which extend from the backbone of the molecules, rather than of segments of the backbone itself [50]. The overlap/crowding or interdigitation of alkyl chains on different polymer chains are shown here. If crystallization is favored in the copolymer then a two-phase structure resembling packed alkyl crystalline domains (LHS of Scheme 4) distributed in the amorphous matrix is formed. On the RHS of Scheme 4, the interdigitation of alkyl chains on two different chains is shown. The observed phase separation/crowding of alkyl chains in SPDPMA30, might be presented schematically as in Scheme 4 below.
The formation of this type of a phase separated domain structure was further confirmed using transmission electron microscopy. The TEM images of SPDPMA70 shown in Figure 6, confirms the formation of a phase separated, core-shell type structure with crystalline (light color) domains and aromatic, electron rich styrene domains.

3.4. Thermal Stability of Copolymers

In order to assess the thermal stability of the copolymers, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out in the temperature range from −50 °C to 200 °C at 10 °C min−1.Typical plots are shown in Figure 7.
Copolymers with high (90 and 70 wt %) styrene content displayed the maximal thermal stability. The derivative thermogram of the copolymer sample with lower styrene content (30 wt %) (Figure 8B) showed two step decomposition, at 265 °C and 435 °C, whereas the sample with 50 and 70 wt % styrene content decomposed in a single step. The reduction in thermal stability at high PDPMA concentration might be attributed to polar carbonyl groups, increasing its susceptibility to degradation whereas at higher styrene content the thermal stability of the phenyl group contributes.

3.5. Rheological Properties

The rheological properties were measured in oscillatory shear mode as a function of frequency, to study the changes in storage modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″) and complex viscosity (η*). The analysis was carried out at different temperatures with a strain rate of 0.5%. Typical data are shown in Figure 8.
With increasing PDPMA content in the feed, the modulus and complex viscosity was decreasing. The copolymer with 70 wt % PDPMA content showed very low modulus at elevated temperature and so the maximum measurement temperature was 80 °C but 130 °C for the copolymer with 30 wt % PDPMA content. In other words, on increasing styrene content the viscoelastic properties were better retained at elevated temperature and the data could be measured at 130 °C as well. On similar grounds, the minimum temperature was 50 °C for the sample with 70 wt % styrene content, since the high styrene resin was hard at lower temperatures to facilitate data collection. Probably, such samples with high styrene content might be useful for hot melt adhesives.

3.6. Adhesion Behavior

The adhesion properties, namely lap shear strength (LSS) and peel strength (PS), were evaluated on different substrates as per ASTM standards D1002-10 and D903-98, respectively. The copolymers with 70, 50, and 30 wt % styrene content were tested. Test specimens were prepared using Kraft paper and polyethyleneterepthalate (PET). The sample with 30 wt % styrene content showed negligible adhesion strength, irrespective of the substrate and so could not be tested. The results obtained for 70 wt % and 50 wt % styrene content copolymers were summarized in Table 5 below.
As seen from Table 5, the LSS on paper substrate decreased from 393,000 Pa to nearly half the value, and the peel strength decreased by six times, as the styrene content was decreased from 70 to 50 wt %. On the mixed substrate (paper-PET), the LSS was 367,000 Pa at 70 wt % styrene content and only a marginal decrease was observed at 50 wt % styrene content whereas the peel strength values decreased by nearly half. Thus, the maximum lap shear strength values were obtained on both paper-paper and on mixed substrate (paper-PET) at 70 wt % styrene content. The maximum peel strength was obtained on paper substrate at 70 wt % styrene content and the value reduced with 50 wt % styrene content without any appreciable variation on other substrate. In all cases, the lap shear strength was higher in comparison to the peel strength, for the 70 wt % styrene content copolymer. To summarize, the variation in adhesion properties with composition suggests tuneability of the adhesion properties through copolymerization of styrene and PDPMA.

4. Conclusions

In this work the copolymerization behavior of styrene and pentadecyl phenyl methacrylate (PDPMA), at different monomer feed ratio was studied using atom transfer radical polymerisation technique. The copolymer composition and reactivity ratios were calculated following Finemann–Ross and Kelen-Tudos methods, using the composition data obtained from 1H NMR spectroscopy. The values suggest preferential copolymerization of styrene with alternation tendency and the formed copolymer was rich in styrene at any feed composition, despite increasing the PDPMA content in feed. Sequence length determination based on the reactivity ratio values suggest more less constant sequence length of PDPMA and decreasing styrene sequence length with increasing PDPMA content in feed. Molecular characterization of the copolymers by GPC reveals dependence of molecular weight and polydispersity on the feed composition. The copolymer molecular weight varied between 3000–32,000 g/mole and the polydispersity was in the range 1.32–2.19, depending upon the feed composition. The glass transition behavior of the copolymers varied with the feed composition and the thermal stability of the copolymer was also high with increasing styrene content. The morphological characterization by TEM suggested a phase separated morphology. Rheological and adhesion tests suggest tuneability of the adhesion properties through copolymerization of styrene and PDPMA and their utility in hotmelt adhesives.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/1/97/s1. Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of PDPMA monomer. Figure S2: FT-IR spectrum of PDPMA monomer, Figure S3: Mass Spectrum of PDPMA monomer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M.J.; methodology, T.M.J.; validation, T.M.J., S.K.I., J.T.H. and S.T.; formal analysis, T.M.J., S.M.N.; investigation, T.M.J.; resources, S.K.I., J.T.H. and S.T.; data curation, T.M.J., S.M.N.; writing—original draft preparation, T.M.J.; writing—review and editing, T.M.J.; visualization, T.M.J.; supervision, J.T.H., S.T. and S.K.I.; project administration, J.T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the PhD Programme of the Faculty of Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Raafat, D.; Sahl, H.G. Chitosan and its antimicrobial potential—A critical literature survey. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 186–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Coltelli, M.-B.; Wild, F.; Bugnicourt, E.; Cinelli, P.; Lindner, M.; Schmid, M.; Weckel, V.; Müller, K.; Rodriguez, P.; Staebler, A.; et al. State of the Art in the Development and Properties of Protein-Based Films and Coatings and Their Applicability to Cellulose Based Products: An Extensive Review. Coatings 2016, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Teli, M.D.; Pandit, P. Novel method of ecofriendly single bath dyeing and functional finishing of wool protein with coconut shell extract biomolecules. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 8323–8333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Teli, M.D.; Pandit, P. Development of thermally stable and hygienic colored cotton fabric made by treatment with natural coconut shell extract. J. Ind. Text. 2018, 48, 87–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pandey, R.; Patel, S.; Pandit., P.; Nachimuthu, S.; Jose, S. Colouration of textiles using roasted peanut skin-an agro processing residue. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sanyang, M.L.; Sapuan, S.M.; Jawaid, M. Recent developments in sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) based biocomposites and their potential industrial applications: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 533–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mekonnen, T.; Misra, M.; Mohanty, A.K. Fermented soymeals and their reactive blends with poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) in engineering biodegradable cast films for sustainable packaging. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 782–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Coma, M.; Martinez-Hernandez, E.; Abeln, F.; Raikova, S.; Donnelly, J.; Arnot, T.C.; Allen, M.J.; Honge, D.D.; Chuck, C. Organic waste as a sustainable feedstock for platform chemicals. Faraday Discuss. 2017, 202, 175–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhang, X.; Fevre, M.; Jones, G.O.; Waymouth, R.M. Catalysis as an enabling science for sustainable polymers. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 839–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schneiderman, D.K.; Hillmyer, M.A. 50th anniversary perspective: There is a great future in sustainable polymers. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 3733–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, S.; Kesava, S.V.; Gomez, E.D.; Robertson, M.L. Sustainable thermoplastic elastomers derived from fatty acids. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 7202–7212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bocquè, M.; Voirin, C.; Lapinte, V.; Caillol, S.; Robin, J.J. Petro-based and bio-based plasticizers: Chemical structures to plasticizing properties. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Uyama, H.; Kuwabara, M.; Sujimoto, T.T.; Nakano, M.; Usuki, A.; Kobayashi, S. Green nanocomposites from renewable resources: Plant oil-Clay hybrid materials. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 2492–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tsujimoto, T.; Uyama, H.; Kobayashi, S. Green nanocomposites from renewable resources: Biodegradable plant oil-silica hybrid coatings. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2003, 24, 711–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Maffezzoli, A.; Calò, E.; Zurlo, S.; Mele, G.; Tarzia, A.; Stifani, C. Cardanol based matrix biocomposites reinforced with natural fibres. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hofman, A.H.; Chen, Y.; Ten Brinke, G.; Loos, K. Interaction strength in poly (4-vinylpyridine)-n-alkyl phenol supramolecular comb-shaped copolymers. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 1554–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shi, H.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, X.; Zhoua, Y.; Wang, D. Frustrated crystallisation and hierarchical self-assembly behaviour of comb-like polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2075–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. O’Leary, K.A.; Paul, D.R. Physical properties of poly (n-alkyl acrylate) copolymers. Part 1. Crystalline/crystalline combinations. Polymer 2006, 47, 1226–1244. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kazantsev, O.A.; Kamorina, S.I.; Rumyantsev, M.; Kamorin, D.M.; Sivokhin, A.P. Radical copolymerization of higher alkyl methacrylates with acrylic esters and amides in toluene: Influence of monomer association on copolymer composition. J. Polym. Res. 2016, 23, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ternorutsky, L.; Kilian, L.; Dutta, S.; Lee, K.I.; Ramsey, N.K. Ultra-High Solids Emulsion and Application. U.S. Patent 20180134888 A1, 17 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, T.H.; Kim, J.C. Redox-responsive solid lipid microparticles composed of octadecyl acrylate and allyl disulfide. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018, 29, 476–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gu, Z.X.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, M.Z.; He, J.I.; Ni, P.H. Effect of sequence structure on wetting behaviors of fluorinated methacrylate polymers based on perfluorohexylethyl methacrylate and stearyl acrylate. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2017, 35, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, L.; Wang, S.; Huang, C.; Tian, Y.; Yang, X.; Jing, X.; Li, A. Screening of synthesis conditions of polymers and the effects on viscosity reduction performance. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 108, 022032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Navarro, J.R.G.; Edlund, U. Surface-initiated controlled radical polymerization approach to enhance nanocomposite integration of cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18, 1947–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arua, U.N.; Blum, F.D. Disruptions in the crystallinity of poly (lauryl methacrylate) due to adsorption on silica. J. Polym. Sci. Part. B Polym. Phys. 2018, 56, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gupta, J.; Wan, C.; Haddleton, D.M.; Tony, M.N. Plasticisation and compatibilisation of poly (propylene) with poly (lauryl acrylate) surface modified MWCNTs. Polymer 2017, 133, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kuo, C.F.J.; Chen., J.B. Synthesis of high-solid-content, acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives by solvent polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta, J.; Keddie, D.J.; Wan, C.G.; Haddleton, D.M.; McNally, T. Functionalisation of MWCNTs with poly (lauryl acrylate) polymerised by Cu (0)-mediated and RAFT methods. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 3884–3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, Q.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, J.; Zhan, X.; Chen, F. Microphase structure, crystallization behavior, and wettability properties of novel fluorinated copolymers poly (perfluoroalkyl acrylate-co-stearyl acrylate) containing short perfluorohexyl chains. Langmuir 2015, 31, 4752–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Suresh, K.I.; Prasad, V.S.K. Synthesis, structure, and properties of novel polyols from cardanol and developed polyurethanes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 4504–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gedam, P.H.; Sampathkumaran, P.S.; Sivasamban, M.A. Examination of the components of cashew nut shell liquid by NMR. Indian J. Chem. 1972, 10, 388–391. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, W.S.J.; Negrell, C.; Ladmiral, V.; laikeehim, J.; Bron, P.; Lacroix-Desmazes, P.; Duhamel, C.J.; Caillol, S. Cardanol based polymer Latex by radical aqueous miniemulsionpolymerization. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 2468–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Voirin, C.; Caillol, S.; Sadavarte, N.V.; Tawade, B.V.; Boutevin, B.; Wadgaonkar, P.P. Functionalization of cardanol: Towards biobased polymers and additives. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 3142–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jhon, G.; Pillai, C.K.S. Synthesis and characterization of a self crosslinkable polymer from cardanol: Autooxidation of poly (cardanyl acrylate) to crosslinked film. J. Polym. Sci. Part. A Polym. Chem. 1993, 31, 1069–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sitaramam, B.S.; Chatterjee, P.C. Synthesis, polymerization, and end-use evaluation of 3-pentadecylphenyl acrylate and methacrylate. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1989, 37, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Suresh, K.I.; Jaikrishna, M. Synthesis of novel crosslinkable polymers by atom transfer radical polymerization of cardanyl acrylate. J. Polym. Sci. Part. A Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 5953–5961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rajender, N.; Suresh, K.I.; Sreedhar, B. Comb-like polymer-graphene nanocomposites with improved adhesion properties via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nutenki, R.; Darapureddi, P.R.; Nayak, R.R.; Suresh, K.I. Amphiphilic comb-like polymer-modified graphene oxide and its nanocomposite with polystyrene via emulsion polymerization. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2018, 296, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ruokolainen, J.; ten Brinke, G.; Ikkala, O.; Torkkeli, M.; Serimaa, R. Mesomorphic structures in flexible polymer-Surfactant systems due to hydrogen bonding:  Poly(4-vinylpyridine)-Pentadecylphenol. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 3409–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ruokolainen, J.; Saariaho, M.; Ikkala, O.; ten Brinke, G.; Thomas, E.L.; Torkkeli, M.; Serimaa, R. Supramolecular routes to hierarchical structures:  comb-coil diblock copolymers organized with two length scales. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luyten, M.C.; Alberda van Ekenstein, G.O.R.; ten Brinke, G.; Ruokolainen, J.; Ikkala, O.; Torkkeli, M.; Serimaa, R. Crystallization and cocrystallization in supramolecular comb copolymer-like systems:  blends of poly(4-vinylpyridine) and pentadecylphenol. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4404–4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Faber, M.; Hofman, A.H.; Polushkin, E.; vanEkenstein, G.A.; Seitsonen, J.; Ruokolainen, J.; Loos, K.; ten Brinke, G. Hierarchical self-assembly in supramolecular double-comb diblock copolymer complexes. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 500–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Suresh, K.I.; Foerst, G.; Schubert, R.; Bartsch, E. Synthesis and micellization properties of new anionic reactive surfactants based on hydrogenated cardanol. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2012, 15, 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  44. Suresh, K.I.; Bartsch, E. Effect of sulfonated 3-pentadecyl phenyl acrylate as surfmer in the emulsion polymerization of styrene: Synthesis and polymer properties. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2013, 291, 1843–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nguyen, L.H.; Koerner, H.; Lederer, K. Free radical co- and terpolymerization of styrene, hydrogenated cardanyl acrylate, and cardanyl acetate. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 88, 1399–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chanda, M. Introduction to Polymer Science; CRC Press: Florida, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 429–436. ISBN 0849373840. [Google Scholar]
  47. Koiry, B.P.; Singha, N.K. Copper mediated controlled radical copolymerization of styrene and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate and determination of their reactivity ratios. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Mieras, H.J. Solution and bulk flow properties of linear and branched styrene–butadiene rubbers. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Symp. 1973, 42, 987–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Donth, E.; Beiner, M.; Reissig, S.; Korus, J.; Garwe, F.; Vieweg, S.; Kahle, S.; Hempel, E.; Schröter, K. Fine structure of the main transition in amorphous polymers:  entanglement spacing and characteristic length of the glass transition. discussion of examples. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6589–6600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Greenberg, S.A.; Alfrey, T. Side Chain Crystallization of n-Alkyl Polymethacrylates and Polyacrylates1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 6280–6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 00097 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Preparation of 3-pentadecyl phenyl methacrylate (PDPMA).
Scheme 1. Preparation of 3-pentadecyl phenyl methacrylate (PDPMA).
Polymers 12 00097 sch001
Polymers 12 00097 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Scheme of the homopolymerization of pentadecylphenyl methacrylate via atom transfer radical polymerization.
Scheme 2. Scheme of the homopolymerization of pentadecylphenyl methacrylate via atom transfer radical polymerization.
Polymers 12 00097 sch002
Polymers 12 00097 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Schematic of the copolymerization of styrene-pentadecylphenyl methacrylate via ATRP.
Scheme 3. Schematic of the copolymerization of styrene-pentadecylphenyl methacrylate via ATRP.
Polymers 12 00097 sch003
Polymers 12 00097 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of pentadecylphenylmethacrylatehomopolymer (poly PDPMA).
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of pentadecylphenylmethacrylatehomopolymer (poly PDPMA).
Polymers 12 00097 g001
Polymers 12 00097 g002 550
Figure 2. NMR spectrum of styrene-PDPMA copolymer (in the feed ratio 70:30) in CDCl3.
Figure 2. NMR spectrum of styrene-PDPMA copolymer (in the feed ratio 70:30) in CDCl3.
Polymers 12 00097 g002
Polymers 12 00097 g003 550
Figure 3. Fineman-Ross and Kelen-Tudos plot for determination of reactivity ratio in the copolymerization of styrene and PDP methacrylate.
Figure 3. Fineman-Ross and Kelen-Tudos plot for determination of reactivity ratio in the copolymerization of styrene and PDP methacrylate.
Polymers 12 00097 g003
Polymers 12 00097 g004 550
Figure 4. dwt/dlogM vs. log Mwplots of styrene-PDPMA copolymers showing variation in mol.wt. distribution as a function of the feed composition.
Figure 4. dwt/dlogM vs. log Mwplots of styrene-PDPMA copolymers showing variation in mol.wt. distribution as a function of the feed composition.
Polymers 12 00097 g004
Polymers 12 00097 g005 550
Figure 5. DSC curves of Styrene- PDPMA copolymers synthesized via one pot ATRP copolymerization (The Tg of poly (PDPMA) was = 1 °C [30] and poly (styrene) = 106 °C).
Figure 5. DSC curves of Styrene- PDPMA copolymers synthesized via one pot ATRP copolymerization (The Tg of poly (PDPMA) was = 1 °C [30] and poly (styrene) = 106 °C).
Polymers 12 00097 g005
Polymers 12 00097 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Schematic of the crystalline alkyl chain domains (LHS) formed duetoaggregation behavior of alkyl chains on alternate repeat units (RHS of scheme).
Scheme 4. Schematic of the crystalline alkyl chain domains (LHS) formed duetoaggregation behavior of alkyl chains on alternate repeat units (RHS of scheme).
Polymers 12 00097 sch004
Polymers 12 00097 g006 550
Figure 6. TEM Images of SPDPMA70 showing the presence of a phase separated domain structure, where the light coloured domains are from the PDPMA segments.
Figure 6. TEM Images of SPDPMA70 showing the presence of a phase separated domain structure, where the light coloured domains are from the PDPMA segments.
Polymers 12 00097 g006
Polymers 12 00097 g007 550
Figure 7. Thermal degradation properties of styrene-PDPMA copolymers (A) weight loss curve and (B) derivative plot.
Figure 7. Thermal degradation properties of styrene-PDPMA copolymers (A) weight loss curve and (B) derivative plot.
Polymers 12 00097 g007
Polymers 12 00097 g008 550
Figure 8. Variation in storage modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″) and complex viscosity (η*) of styrene-PDPMA copolymers of varying styrene content at different temperatures. (Strain rate: 0.5%). Feed ratios for figures are, (A,B)—Styrene 70–PDPMA 30, (C,D)—Styrene 50–PDPMA 50 and (E,F)—Styrene30–PDPMA 70.
Figure 8. Variation in storage modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″) and complex viscosity (η*) of styrene-PDPMA copolymers of varying styrene content at different temperatures. (Strain rate: 0.5%). Feed ratios for figures are, (A,B)—Styrene 70–PDPMA 30, (C,D)—Styrene 50–PDPMA 50 and (E,F)—Styrene30–PDPMA 70.
Polymers 12 00097 g008
Table
Table 1. Composition and characteristics of styrene (St)-PDPMA copolymers synthesized via ATRP.
Table 1. Composition and characteristics of styrene (St)-PDPMA copolymers synthesized via ATRP.
Sample CodeCompositionGPCMn TheoryPDI
Feed1H NMRMw
g/mole		Mn
g/mole
StPDPMAStPDPMA
PS1000100-3012255131121.18
PDPMA0100-10017,98110,96422,3201.64
SPDPMA109010--3758282833381.33
SPDPMA30703075.35 24.6531,92323,04736,5211.38
SPDPMA50505065.535.529,06813,89637,3782.09
SPDPMA70307057 4321,325787234,7782.71
SPDPMA901090--26,69017,55433,7111.52
Note: Mn Theory was calculated using the relation [ M } o [ I ] o × conversion ×repeat unit mol.wt.
Table
Table 2. Finemann-Ross (FR), and Kelen-Tudos (KT) parameters for the copolymerization of styrene and PDP methacrylate.
Table 2. Finemann-Ross (FR), and Kelen-Tudos (KT) parameters for the copolymerization of styrene and PDP methacrylate.
Styrene: PDPMACompositionM = M1/M2P = m1/m2M/PGHα + Hηξ
Sample1H NMR
SPDPMA3075.35:24.652.333.050.761.571.771.950.800.90
SPDPMA5065.5:35.511.840.540.460.540.720.630.74
SPDPMA7057:430.421.320.310.110.130.320.330.42
(α = Hmin × Hmax)1/2 i,e = 0.48, G = M − M/P, H = M2/P, η = G/(α + H), ξ = H/(α + H).
Table
Table 3. Reactivity ratio of styrene (r1) and PDPMA (r2) determined by different methods.
Table 3. Reactivity ratio of styrene (r1) and PDPMA (r2) determined by different methods.
Methods Usedr1 (Styrene)r2 (PDPMA)r1:r2
FR0.89650.01820.016
KT0.97320.08160.073
Table
Table 4. The monomer composition and sequence length ratio.
Table 4. The monomer composition and sequence length ratio.
Monomer Feed Styrene: PDPMAM1/M2M2/M1l1l2l1:l2
70:302.330.423.081.013.05
50:50111.891.021.85
30:700.422.331.381.041.33
The values where calculated using r1 = 0.896, r2 = 0.018 obtained by FR method.
Table
Table 5. Adhesion properties of styrene-PDPMA copolymers on different substrates.
Table 5. Adhesion properties of styrene-PDPMA copolymers on different substrates.
S70 PDPMA30S50-PDPMA50
Substrate TestedLap Shear Strength (Pa)aPeel Strength (Pa) aLap Shear Strength (Pa) aPeel Strength (Pa) a
Paper-Paper 3.93 × 1051.75 × 1041.5 × 1052.5 × 103
PET-PET 6.0 × 1042.25 × 1032.91 × 1042.22 × 103
Paper-PET 3.67 × 1052.25 × 1033.23 × 1051.3 × 103
a = peel strength or lap shear = load (N)/bonded area (mm2) and in both case adhesion area is 25 × 25 mm2.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muringayil Joseph, T.; Murali Nair, S.; Kattimuttathu Ittara, S.; Haponiuk, J.T.; Thomas, S. Copolymerization of Styrene and Pentadecylphenylmethacrylate (PDPMA): Synthesis, Characterization, Thermomechanical and Adhesion Properties. Polymers 2020, 12, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12010097

AMA Style

Muringayil Joseph T, Murali Nair S, Kattimuttathu Ittara S, Haponiuk JT, Thomas S. Copolymerization of Styrene and Pentadecylphenylmethacrylate (PDPMA): Synthesis, Characterization, Thermomechanical and Adhesion Properties. Polymers. 2020; 12(1):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12010097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muringayil Joseph, Tomy, Sumi Murali Nair, Suresh Kattimuttathu Ittara, Józef T. Haponiuk, and Sabu Thomas. 2020. "Copolymerization of Styrene and Pentadecylphenylmethacrylate (PDPMA): Synthesis, Characterization, Thermomechanical and Adhesion Properties" Polymers 12, no. 1: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12010097

APA Style

Muringayil Joseph, T., Murali Nair, S., Kattimuttathu Ittara, S., Haponiuk, J. T., & Thomas, S. (2020). Copolymerization of Styrene and Pentadecylphenylmethacrylate (PDPMA): Synthesis, Characterization, Thermomechanical and Adhesion Properties. Polymers, 12(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12010097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop