Next Article in Journal
Bio-Based Packaging: Materials, Modifications, Industrial Applications and Sustainability
Previous Article in Journal
Nanohybrid Membrane Synthesis with Phosphorene Nanoparticles: A Study of the Addition, Stability and Toxicity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Preparation of (Acrylic Copolymer) Ternary System Peelable Sealing Decontamination Material

1
State Key Laboratory of Environment-Friendly Energy Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
2
Communist Youth League of Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
3
Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621010, China
4
Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Jiangyou 621908, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(7), 1556; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071556
Submission received: 16 June 2020 / Revised: 3 July 2020 / Accepted: 8 July 2020 / Published: 14 July 2020

Abstract

:
Traditional methods that are used to deal with radioactive surface contamination, which are time-consuming and expensive. As one effective measure of radioactive material purification, strippable coating, which effectively coats the pollutant, and settles them on the surface of objects. However, there are some shortcomings in terms of film formation and peelability, such as a brittle coating and poor peelability. Therefore, in order to meet the treatment methods for radioactive contaminants needs, the strippable coating must have excellent sealing, corrosion resistance, weather resistance, low environmental pollution, short film formation time, and good mechanical properties; in addition, the spraying process should be simple, with moderate adhesion, and it should be capable of being quickly and completely peeled off. In this paper, a ternary system was prepared by pre-emulsion polymerization with butyl-acrylate, methyl methacrylate, acrylic acid as the reactive monomer, sodium dodecyl sulfate as the active agent, potassium persulfate as the initiator, and water as the dispersion medium. The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR), ICP emission spectrometer, surface tension tester, and universal testing machine were used to characterize the structure and morphology of the composite materials. The results show that the decontaminant can quickly wet the powder particles and the surface pollutants. The sealing efficiency of Fe and Cu was over 90%. After the decontaminant was cured, it could be continuously formed on the surface of different substrates and be completely peeled off, as well as having excellent film formation and peelability.

1. Introduction

Upon the retirement of nuclear facilities, hazards include the large number of radioactive surface contaminations generated. When the large surface contaminants are moved or transported or even decontaminated, they can cause the surface discharge of pollutants into the atmosphere, leading to the generation of radioactive aerosols, creating environmental problems [1]. Therefore, in the process of the decontamination of nuclear facilities, it is necessary to find a kind of decontamination agent that can effectively coat the pollutants on the surface of nuclear facilities. It needs to not only effectively coat the pollutants on the surface of the equipment, but must also play a fixed and isolated role in preventing the generation of secondary wastes.
At present, the treatment methods for radioactive contaminants on the surface of equipment mainly include cleaning, heating, chemical, electrochemical, and mechanical cleaning methods [2,3,4,5].
At the same time, the treatment methods for radioactive contaminants are generally divided into physical methods and chemical methods. Such as mechanical decontamination, sandblasting, ultrasonic decontamination, washing, decontamination [6,7,8].and reagent washing, electrochemical gel decontamination, and self-brittle film peeling [9,10,11,12]. The common problem with the existing decontamination methods is that secondary pollution occurs easily. For example, because produced a lot of radioactive contaminated water [13,14,15,16]. the application of high-pressure jet cleaning and the use of ammonium salt for ion cleaning to promote the exchange of radioactive cesium ions have been limited. Therefore, the surface purification of radioactive materials is an urgent task of great significance. As one of the effective measures of radioactive material purification, a strippable solid seal coating has been developed [17,18,19] to effectively enrich surface contaminants during the formation of the coating. At the same time, it can effectively capture suspended particles in the air; enrich and settle them on the surface of objects; and finally, achieve the purpose of capturing, enriching, stripping, and deconsolidating surface pollutants.
In the study of Sun et al. [20], By using the P-DAP prepolymer as the main film-forming material, TPGDA as the active diluent, and bis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phenylphosphorous oxide (BAPO) as the light initiator, a new type of UV-curable strippable coating was prepared. William M.M. et al. [21] using the emulsion polymerization method, prepared water-based peel emulsion decontamination coatings, which exhibited an excellent protective effect and were easy to peel off. Gertzmann Shan et al. [22] prepared a water-based peel coating with acrylic polymer emulsion—the coatings had good water resistance, protective effects, and adhesion. R. et al. [23] used acrylate and methacrylate to prepare water-based decontamination coatings by emulsion polymerization, which can be widely used on different surfaces. Zhou et al. [24] prepared self-brittle decontamination coatings by emulsion polymerization. Li et al. [25,26] reported that a type of gas phase antirust coating was prepared using vinyl polymer resin as the main film-forming material, adding a compound oil–soluble gas phase corrosion inhibitor, lubricating oil, mixed solvent and functional additives. Yin et al. [27] reported an efficient approach for the fabrication of a strippable coating through doped SO42−/TiO2 into polyphenylamine;this coating had a good electrical conductivity, and it had good decontamination performance.
Existing strippable coatings have obvious problems in film forming and strippability, which are mainly manifested in the high brittleness of the coating and the poor strippability. As a result, their application is greatly restricted. Therefore, in order to keep the equipment in good condition at all times and to meet emergency needs, the future strippable decontaminant will surely have the following comprehensive performance [28,29,30,31]:
  • Short curing time, good physical properties, and friendly to the environment.
  • The film body formed by the coating has better elongation at break and tensile strength; it can adapt to different object surface.
  • The painting process is simple, the adhesion is moderate, it can be quickly and completely peeled off.
  • On the premise of meeting the requirements of decontamination, it is necessary to expand and study the protective performance of the decontaminant on the surface of objects.
Compared with other films, acrylate film has good transparency and glossiness, diversity of comonomers, and adjustability of the resin structure. However, the homopolymer properties of acrylate and methacrylate make it difficult to meet the requirements needed for coating film-forming materials; for example, polymethyl methacrylate, which is the raw material of plexiglass, is too brittle as a film-forming material, and polybutyl acrylate is too soft and sticky, and is not suitable for coatings. Therefore, as the film-forming material of the paint, acrylate copolymers are ideal, and are usually obtained by polymerizing different monomers [32,33,34].
Table 1 is the monomer commonly used in acrylic polymer emulsions. In the ternary copolymerization, two main monomers are often used to determine the basic properties of the synthetic substance, and then a small amount of a third monomer is added for special modification. In this paper, acrylic resins are used for the synthesis of peelable coating substrates. Most of the synthesis methods are emulsion polymerizations. Compared with other polymerization methods, emulsion polymerization has the following advantages [35]:
  • The temperature effect is small, the polymerization reaction can be carried out at a lower temperature at night, it has a higher polymerization rate, and the synthesized polymer has a higher molecular weight;
  • Using water as a medium, the reaction system has a large specific heat capacity, and the system viscosity is small and conducive to heat dissipation;
  • Emulsion products can be directly used as coatings, adhesives, and surface treatment agents; the synthesized substances are environmentally friendly and have less potential safety hazards.
With the development of technology, the preparation methods of polyacrylate emulsion are as follows: (1) batch emulsion polymerization, (2) semi-continuous emulsion polymerization, (3) continuous emulsion polymerization, and (4) seed emulsion polymerization. In terms of industrial production, more conventional emulsion polymerization is used, mainly because of technical difficulties, controllability of conditions, and production costs [36].
In order to get closer to the actual production, in this paper, pre-emulsion polymerization was used to synthesize the polyacrylate emulsion. Compared with the existing methods, pre-emulsion polymerization has the following characteristics and advantages [37,38,39]:
When the pre-emulsification process is used, compared with the non-pre-emulsification system, the monomer droplets formed by the monomers will not adsorb the emulsifier from the surroundings, which reduces the probability of gel formation and helps maintain the stability of the party system.
When the pre-emulsification process is used, the addition of an emulsifier and monomer is not completed in one addition and instead is added gradually. When the emulsifier and monomer are gradually added as the reaction proceeds, the monomer conversion rate can be improved and the particle size of the colloidal particles can be controlled.
When the pre-emulsification process is adopted, the functional monomers before the reaction are mixed by the pre-emulsification machine, which is conducive to the reaction between the monomers and makes the structure of the synthesized copolymer more uniform.
Therefore, in this paper, methyl methacrylate and butyl acrylate were used as reactive monomers. A pre-emulsification method was used to prepare a peelable coating. Methyl methacrylate can provide a certain hardness and adhesion to the membrane body and can improve the mechanical performance of the membrane. Butyl acrylate can adjust the flexibility of the film body, and can make the film body soft and hard, with a better peelability after curing it into a film. It was characterized by infrared and nuclear magnetic methods, and the results show that the target product was synthesized. Through the research on the film forming, peeling, and airtightness of the different substrate surfaces, the results show that the synthetic coating can form a continuous film and completely peel off on different surfaces, which can effectively prevent gas penetration. After curing and forming a film, the blocking rate of the iron and copper elements was greater than 90%.

2. Experiment

2.1. Chemicals

Acrylic acid (AA), Butyl propionate (BA), Methyl methacrylate (MMA), potassium persulfate, sodium dodecarboxybenzene sulfonate, and OP-10 were all analytically pure and were purchased from Kelong Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China).

2.2. Synthesis

Figure 1 is the Process flow chart of decontaminant preparation. Details are as follows:
(1)
First, 5 g of OP-10 emulsifier was dissolved in 450 mL of distilled water, and was stirred and dissolved in a 30 °C water bath; 5 g of sodium dodecyl sulfate was dissolved in a clear solution containing an emulsifier, and was stirred until clear. Then, 500 mL of water was added, stirred well, and set aside; 6 g of potassium persulfate was added to the water and was dissolved.
(2)
We added 100 g monomer, 100 mL emulsifier, and 100 mL distilled water into a beaker at room temperature, and used an emulsifying machine for the pre-emulsification of the fluid.
(3)
We added the distilled water and emulsifier into four mouth flasks, each equipped with a reflux condensing tube thermometer with an agitator and a constant pressure drip funnel, then heated the water to 75 °C. Next, we added 100 mL of pre-emulsion and 50 mL of potassium persulfate solution, and the remaining pre-emulsion was preserved in a constant pressure funnel for later use.
(4)
When the emulsion was blue, the remaining pre-emulsion and potassium persulfate solution were added synchronously and slowly, which lasted 2–3 h, and then the temperature was raised to 80 °C. After 2 h of insulation, the reaction ended. Next, cooling and discharging were completed.
(5)
Then, the pH value was adjusted to the desired viscosity in order to obtain the polymer substrate.

2.3. Structural Characterization

The contact angle was tested using a surface tension tester. The temperature ranged from −10 to 130 °C, and the temperature control precision was 0.01 °C.
Mechanical spraying device: air compressor by Zhejiang Wuyi Guangli Mechanical and Electrical Co, Ltd. (Zhejiang, China).
Physical and mechanical properties of the coating: an electronic universal testing machine, namely Qj-210, from Shanghai QING JI instrument technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The sample was 1 mm thick, the shape was a #4 dumbbell-shaped specimen, and the tensile speed was 200 mm/min−1.
FTIR and nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) characterization: the chemical structures of the samples were analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Nicolet 5700, (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a KBr sampling sheet.
The 1H-NMR spectrum of the powder samples was obtained using an Avanceow 600 spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany), with D2O as the solvent.
Particle size analysis: the test was carried out using a Malvern 3000 HS nanoparticle (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) size and potential analyzer.
Gel permeation chromatography: instrument model: Waters-201 GPC instrument; separation column type: Plgei10μMlXED-B×3 (Agilent Technologies Inc./HP, Palo Alto, CA, USA) high cross-linked spherical polystyrene-divinylbenzene polymer column; standard sample: polystyrene; tetrahydrofuran; flow rate: 1.000ml/min; detector: differential refractometer; temperature: 40 °C.
H2 permeability test: according to GB/T1308-2000, use the GDP-C permeability tester of German Brugger company (Munich, Germany), the permeation gas is H2, and the test temperature is 25 °C. The test result is the permeation rate of hydrogen when it permeates steadily, and has been converted to standard pressure and temperature.

2.4. Seal Performance Rate Test

Seven sets of symmetrical points were selected on the work surface, which were counted as left side 1, left side 2, right side 1, and right side 2, and convex 1, convex 2, and convex 3. Left side 1, left side 2, right side 1, and right side 2 were the ordinary surfaces of the spheres in the can body, which were grouped into one group; on the other hand, convex 1, convex 2, and convex 3 were classified as one group. The points above the seven test points were the base pollutant extraction points. The surface before treatment without the sealant was sampled at a sampling point of a predetermined area (10 cm × 10 cm), by using a cotton yarn impregnated with petroleum ether, and the cotton yarn was repeatedly rubbed and sampled while the background contaminant was extracted. The cotton yarn samples (14 pieces), sampled before and after the solid sealing, were immersed in a nitric acid solution that had a volume of 200 mL and a concentration of 5 mol/L, and were heated to 80 °C in a water bath for 1 h. After the solid matter on the cotton yarn was completely dissolved and the petroleum in the upper layer of the aqueous solution was completely volatilized, the pH of the solution was tested to ensure that it was about pH 4–5, which became the test sample solution after filtration. The treated solution passed through an ICP emission spectrometer, an inductively coupled plasma spectrometer, and the content of Fe and Cu in the solution was measured. The test of the seal performance rate is calculated using Formula 1.
S e a l   P e r f o r m a n c e   R a t e = 1   M e t a l   I o n   C o n t e n t   A f t e r   S e a l i n g M e t a l   I o n   C o n t e n t   B e f o r e   S e a l i n g

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 displays the FTIR spectra of the polymer. It can be found that the O-H stretching vibration of the hydroxyl groups was confirmed by the band at 3418 cm−1. The bands at 2958 and 2876 cm−1 resulted from the -CH3 and -CH2- stretching vibrations, respectively. The C=O stretch of the butyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate was confirmed by the bands at 1737 and 1731 cm−1, respectively. The C-O stretching vibration of the carbon–oxygen bond of ester groups was confirmed by the bands at 1454 and 1168 cm−1. As shown in the magnified 1700–1600 cm−1 infrared spectrum diagram, there were no characteristic C=C bond absorption peaks in the regions of 1690 and 1620 cm−1. The results indicate that the reaction occurred successfully in the monomers. In addition, the 1H-NMR spectra of the polymer are shown in Figure 3. For the calculation of the number of H bonds in the polymer, the area under the peak (3.6 ppm (h)) corresponding to the CH2-CHCH2 bonds was used for normalization to a constant of 1. In the 1H-NMR test results, the chemical shift at 0.96 ppm was mainly attributed to the absorption peak of H in the methylene hydrogen of CH3(CH2)3OOC; the chemical shift at δ3.6 ppm was mainly attributed to the absorption peak of the H in the methylene hydrogen of CH2-CH-CH2-. As shown in Figure 4, the number average and weight average molecular weight of the products synthesized with different monomer ratios are kept above 2.0 × 106, which is much larger than the molecular weight of the homopolymer formed by the monomer in the synthesis reaction. The distribution is in the range of 1.1–1.3, the closer the value is to 1, the narrower the molecular weight distribution of the polymer. In combination with the infrared analysis, no double bonds were found to exist, indicating that the copolymerization was carried out successfully by AA, BA, and MMA with active double bonds.

3.1. Effect of Monomer Ratio on Emulsion

It is evident from Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9, with the change in monomer ratios, that the decontaminant showed different film-forming effects after curing. As the proportion of BA in the component increased, the coating became soft, and the film-forming property increased, but became sticky after exceeding a certain proportion. From the structures of MMA and BA, it can be seen that the minimum film-forming temperature (MFT) of the BA monomer was much lower than that of the MMA monomer. In general, when the proportion of BA reached the continuous phase of the coating, the MFT of the coating was close to the MFT of BA, so it had a good film-forming property at room temperature. When the MMA ratio reached the continuous phase ratio in the film, the MFT of the film was close to the MMA-MFT, and its film-forming property was poor at room temperature. However, in order to reduce the film-forming temperature, the ratio of BA should not be too large, otherwise the film will become sticky.
Researchers suggest that the reason for this is in the process of film-coating formation, where the following steps will be carried out: solvent evaporation, random movement of latex particles, aggregation and accumulation of emulsion particles, and film solidification. Therefore, when the particle size was smaller, the heap gathered more closely, which is beneficial to the interpenetration and film formation between particles [40,41], for example, as shown in Figure 5, the log-normal distribution curve of particle size under different monomer ratios. In different monomer ratios, the size of the particle size and the distribution of the particle size range are different, and the corresponding film formation result of the coating also changes.
A good curing and film-forming ability is a prerequisite for the use of a decontaminant. Based on coating experiments on different monomer ratios, it can be seen that the test samples for BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1) were the best, as they formed continuous films on the surfaces and met the overall recovery requirements. Therefore, in the following study, this ratio of synthetic decontaminant was used as the standard for research.

3.2. Film-Forming Properties and Peelable Properties BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1)

In order to verify the film-forming property and strippability of the synthesized detergent, the film-forming and strippability of the detergent after curing were investigated by coating the detergent on iron, wood, and cement floors. It can be seen from Figure 10 that the membrane was completely formed and separated at the selected experimental interface.
Good curing and film-forming abilities are significant factors influencing the use of decontaminants. At the same time, A moderate peel strength can ensure a good bonding ability, and it can quickly unseal. It can be seen in Table 2 that the test samples continuously formed films on different surfaces with complete peeling, and the peeling strength was moderate.

3.3. Dust Capture and Surface Decontamination Performance of Polymer Substrate BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1)

The wettability of the polymer is also one of the major indicators affecting the decontamination performance. In the decontamination process, it is inevitable that large particles or substances that are loosely present on the surface of the object will be encountered. Wetting is used as a prerequisite for decontamination, which is a prerequisite for the smooth progress of the purification process; therefore, the wettability of the decontaminant should be studied.
Figure 11 and Figure 12 indicate that the initial contact angle was 50.9°, and it showed a gradual decrease before eventually stabilizing over time. In addition, Figure 13 shows that as time progressed, the surface tension of the polymer was stable at 61.1 mN/m. The removal of contaminants from solid surfaces can be considered a capillary infiltration process by the decontaminant.
Δ P = γ 1 C O S θ 1 r
From Formula (2), it can be inferred that a smaller contact angle and surface tension will be conducive to the process of capillary penetration; consequently, a better decontamination performance is expected because of the smaller contact angle and smaller surface tension in the polymer substrate. Therefore, obtaining a smaller contact angle and smaller surface tension are properties of great importance for the strippable decontaminant material.
Through the synthesis of raw decontaminant materials, and the preparation processes and the effects of the wetting analysis on the samples, we can see that, first, the decontaminant using water as a dispersing agent can wet the object effectively. Second, because of the existence of a hydrophobic microblock structure in the polymer, the hydrophobic groups in the microblock structure avoid contact with water and are adsorbed onto the gas–liquid surface of the solution. The water molecules in the solution exert less force on the hydrophobic groups on the surface of the solution, so the surface tension of the solution is rapidly reduced.

3.4. Solid Seal Performance BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1)

The solid seal performance is another important parameter for evaluating the decontamination efficiency. The sealing performance of the detergent was tested using Fe and Cu, as shown in Table 3 and Table 4. The sealing rate of all the sample areas was above 99%, and the average sealing rate reached 99.5%/99.6%. In addition, the H2 gas permeability of the polymer film is shown in Table 5.

Standard Deviation and Dispersion Measurements Regarding the Sealing Rate of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1)

We calculated the standard deviation and dispersion degree of the paint sealing rate in different environments using Formulas (3) and (4) and the data in Table 6 and Table 7. The degree of dispersion of the data is calculated from the standard deviation of the data. From the data of Table 8 and Table 9, it can be seen that there was no large deviation in the tested data. The measured data were within the interval, proving that the data were authentic.
μ = X ± Z 2 σ n
σ = i = 1 N ( x i x ) N
As show in the Table 8 and Table 9,the results indicate that the detergent processes showed a good sealing performance and can meet the requirements of radioactive decontamination in practical applications. This may be attributed to two main factors, namely: (1) the molecular chain of the prepared terpolymer is rigid, or (2) the prepared polymer has a relatively regular structure and good crystallinity; therefore, the diffusion of small molecules in the amorphous region of the polymer is limited. Similar results were found by Mittal K.L [42], who showed that a polymer with a relatively regular structure enhanced the polymer seal performance.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a kind of ternary system was prepared by pre-emulsion polymerization with butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, acrylic acid as the reactive monomer, sodium dodecyl sulfate as the active agent, potassium persulfate as the initiator, and water as the dispersion medium. The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR), ICP emission spectrometer, surface tension tester, and universal testing machine were used to characterize the structure and the morphology of the composite materials. The factors affecting the decontamination performance of the stripping decontaminant were studied: the results show the use of acrylic esters as monomers and the use of pre-emulsification polymerization can achieve a suitable particle size and a relatively small particle size distribution. It can effectively promote film formation and form a film body with a good sealing performance. Based on the coating experiments on the different monomer ratios, the test samples with the ratio of BA/MMA/AA at 1:0.9:0.1 are the best. The membrane has good mechanical properties and sealing performances, moderate peel strength—the tensile strength was 12.8 Mpa and elongation at break was 840%—and can be completely peeled off after application on different surfaces. The prepared decontamination coating can be used to remove loose contaminants from a large area of surface because it can play a fixed role in pollutants. In the experiment, the sealing rate of metals on different surfaces was above 90%, which can meet the needs of equipment that needs to continue to be used in the polluted environment.
It was found through experiments that when the coating has a good wettability, it can be brought into close contact with the pollutants. The smaller particle size can help the coating to form a film, and it can better allow the coating to penetrate into the pores formed between the surface of the object and the pollutant while improving the removal efficiency of the pollutant and avoiding secondary pollution. Therefore, the particle size will affect the process of suppressing and collecting pollutants, and should be controlled during the polymerization of the monomer in order to obtain a better particle size and distribution. At the same time, it is necessary to consider the selection of synthetic monomers and additives. For example, acrylates as hydrophobic monomers can reduce the surface tension, so that the coating has better wettability and lower surface tension, which can facilitate the decontamination process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.H., D.L., and Y.Z.; methodology, Z.H., Y.L.; validation, Z.H., Y.L., Z.X., H.-J.; formal analysis, Z.H., Y.L.; investigation, Z.H.; resources, Y.L., Z.X., H.J., and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.H.; project administration, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian Fund Project [grant number SKLNBC2018-16], National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 11zg2119], and Longshan Academic Talent Research Support Program [grant number 18LZX631] supported this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian Fund Project [grant number SKLNBC2018-16], National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 11zg2119] and Longshan Academic Talent Research Support Program [grant number 18LZX631].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luo, S.G. Introduction to Radioactive Waste; Atomic Energy Press: Beijing, China, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pang, Z.Q. Series of Books to Minimize Radioactive Waste [M]; Atomic Energy Press: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shi, B.; Zuo., M.; Li, X.Q.; Ma, J. Translate Nuclear Facilities Decontamination Technology [M]; Atomic Energy Press: Beijing, China, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pan, Z.Q. General Discussion on the Minimization of Radioactive Waste; Atomic Energy Press: Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, J.B.; Li, H.Z.; Xie, L.; Wu, X.L.; Li, Q.W. Research status of chemical decontamination technology in nuclear facilities. Uranium Min. Metall. 2010, 29, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu, Q. Current status and recommendations of mechanical decontamination technology. In Proceedings of the National Symposium on Radiation Protection for Young and Middle Aged, Hangzhou, China, 17–21 October 1999. [Google Scholar]
  7. Myodo, M. Application of laser to decontamination and decommissioning of nuclear facilities at JAERI. Proc. SPIE -Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2000, 3887, 94–103. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar, A.; Bhatt, R.B.; Behere, P.G.; Afzal, M. Ultrasonic decontamination of prototype fast breeder reactor fuel pins. Ultrasonics 2014, 54, 1052–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, C.H.; Sun, Y. Development of chemical decontamination technology and its application in decommissioning of nuclear facilities. Environ. Eng. 2002, 20, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ishida, K.; Nagase, M.; Uetake, N.; Anazawa, K.; Nakamura, F.; Aizawa, M.; Yoshikawa, H. Low corrosive chemical decontamination method using pH control, (II) decomposition of reducing agent by using catalyst with hydrogen peroxide. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2002, 39, 941–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bargues, S.; Favier, F.; Pascal, J.L.; Lecourt, J.P.; Damerval, F. Organomineral Decontamination Gel and Use Thereof for Surface Decontamination. U.S. Patent No. 6,203,624, 20 March 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou, Y.L.; Li, Y.T.; Xie, C.Q.; Li, Y.J. Preparation of a Self-Brittle Radioactive Decontamination Coating. CN Patent 102690579 B, 15 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. International Atomic Energy Agency. Report of the International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Dai-Ichi NPPGoogle Scholar; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. Real, J.; Persin, F.; Camarasa-Claret, C. Mechanisms of desorption of 134Cs and 85Sr aerosols deposited on urban surfaces. J. Environ. Radioact. 2002, 62, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Samuleev, P.V.; Andrews, W.S.; Creber, K.; Azmi, P.; Velicogna, D.; Juang, W.; Volchek, K. Decontamination of radionuclides on construction materials. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2013, 296, 811–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaminski, M.D.; Lee, S.D.; Magnuson, M. Wide-area decontamination in an urban environment after radiological dispersion: A review and perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 305, 67–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kohli, R.; Mittal, K.L. Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning; Kohli, R., Mittal, K.L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 2, Chapter 5; p. 178224. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rao, S.V.S.; Lal, K.B. Surface decontamination studies using polyvinyl acetate based strippable polymer. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2004, 260, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Joseph, R. The lowdown on peelable coatings specs and usage. Met. Finish. 2004, 102, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, F.C.; Shen, B. Synthesis and properties of novel UV curable strippable metallic coatings. Chem. Ind. Times 2010, 24, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  21. William, M.M.; Trachan, R.J. Water Stripping Coating Composition for Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives. CN Patent 1089284A, 13 July 1994. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yamashita, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Asai, H.; Matsuyama, T.; Tojoh, H.; Yarita, T.; Akasaka, K.; Ohara, H. Water Dispersion of Peel Coatings. CN Patent 1215073A, 28 April 1999. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gertzmann, R.; Petzoldt, J.; Miller, H. Emulsion Polymer for Stripping Coatings. CN Patent 1585805A, 23 February 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, R.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.Y.; Zhang, Q.P.; Zheng, J.; Wang, S.Q. Fabrication of poly (methyl methacrylate)-block-poly (methacrylic acid) diblock copolymer as self-embrittling strippable coating for radioactive decontamination. Chem. Lett. 2016, 45, 793–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, K.H.; Hu, X.G.; Xu, Y.F.; Sun, J.D. Synthesisofnano MoS2 /TiO2 composite and its catalytic degradation effect on methylorange. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 2640–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, W.P.; Xiao, X.Y.; Zheng, L.L.; Wan, C. Fabrication of TiO2/MoS2 @ zeolite photocatalyst and its photocatalytic activity for degradation of methyl orange under visible light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, H.L.; Tan, Z.Y.; Liao, Y.T.; Feng, Y.J. Application of SO42_/TiO2solid superacid in decontaminating radioactive pollutants. J. Environ. Radioact. 2006, 87, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu H., Y.; Song, Z.; Song, Z. Research advances in strippable protected coating. New Chem. Mater. 2010, 38, 34–35, 79. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, H.L.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.Y.; Tang, J.L. Research advances and prospectp of strippable coating. New Chem. Mater. 2018, 6, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gu, B.; Zhou, Y.L.; Xie, C.Q.; Fu, W.F. Research situation and development of strippable coating. New Chem. Mater. 2008, 9, 8–9, 23. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tan, M.; Whitaker, J.D.; Schwartz, D.T. Simulation Study On The Use Of Strippable Coatings For Radiocesium Decontamination Of Concrete. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, L.; Wu, F.; Zhuang, X.; Yang, J.; Li, R. Preparation of styrene-acrylate latex used in ultralow VOC building internal wall coating. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 2008, 23, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kimerling, A.S.; Bhatia, S.R. Block copolymers as low-VOC coatings for wood: Characterization and tannin bleed resistance. Prog. Org. Coat. 2004, 51, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.F.; Jiang, Y.P.; Yao, X.Y.; Chen, Y.J. Synthesis and Properties of Core-shell Acrylic Copolymer Latex by Using Reactive Emulsifier. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 2011, 33, 37–40, 55. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cao, T.Y. Synthesis Principle, Properties and Application of Polymer Emulsion; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, H.T.; Huang, J.X. New Technology and Application of Emulsion Polymerization; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cui, M.; Rui, H.L.; Chuan, L.; Qian, X. Preparation and Properties Characterization of Acrylate Latex and Its Film. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 30, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  38. Qiu, H.G. Application of preemulsification in emulsion polymerization. Coat. Ind. 1994, 1, 20. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shuang, Y.W.; Hong, Z.; Cheng, S.G.; Yan, H.Z.; Xiao, K.B.; Hua, Y.Y.; Zhang, S.L.L. Synthesis and Properties of Core-Shell Polyacrylic Latex via Pre-Emulsified Semi-Continuous Seeded Emulsion Polymerization. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 34, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ghorbani, R.E.; Zohuri, G.H.; Gholami, M. Novel Synthesis Method and Characterization of Poly(vinyl acetate-butyl acrylate) Latex Particles: Effect of Silanol-Terminated Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Surfactant on the Seeded Emulsion Copolymerization. J. Surf. Deterg. 2017, 20, 891–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kobayashi, M.; Rharbi, Y.; Winnik, M.A. Effect of Inorganic Pigments on Polymer Interdiffusion in a Low-TgLatex Film. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 1855–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mittal, K.L. Adhesion Aspects of Metallization of Organic Polymer Surfaces. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1976, 13, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Process flow chart of decontaminant preparation.
Figure 1. Process flow chart of decontaminant preparation.
Polymers 12 01556 g001
Figure 2. The infrared spectra of polymer.
Figure 2. The infrared spectra of polymer.
Polymers 12 01556 g002
Figure 3. NMR spectra of polymer.
Figure 3. NMR spectra of polymer.
Polymers 12 01556 g003
Figure 4. The GPC (Gel Permeation Chromatography) test of different monomer ratios (BA/MMA/AA).
Figure 4. The GPC (Gel Permeation Chromatography) test of different monomer ratios (BA/MMA/AA).
Polymers 12 01556 g004
Figure 5. Article size distribution at different monomer ratios (butyl acrylate (BA)/methyl acrylate (MMA)/acrylic acid (AA)).
Figure 5. Article size distribution at different monomer ratios (butyl acrylate (BA)/methyl acrylate (MMA)/acrylic acid (AA)).
Polymers 12 01556 g005
Figure 6. The average particle sizes of different monomer ratios (BA/MMA/AA).
Figure 6. The average particle sizes of different monomer ratios (BA/MMA/AA).
Polymers 12 01556 g006
Figure 7. Mechanical properties of different monomer ratios (BA/MMA/AA).
Figure 7. Mechanical properties of different monomer ratios (BA/MMA/AA).
Polymers 12 01556 g007
Figure 8. Curing time of different monomer ratios (BA/MMA/AA).
Figure 8. Curing time of different monomer ratios (BA/MMA/AA).
Polymers 12 01556 g008
Figure 9. Forming properties of different monomers ratio (BA/MMA/AA).Visual inspection after film formation curing.
Figure 9. Forming properties of different monomers ratio (BA/MMA/AA).Visual inspection after film formation curing.
Polymers 12 01556 g009
Figure 10. Examples of practical application BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Figure 10. Examples of practical application BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Polymers 12 01556 g010
Figure 11. Contact angle of polymer substrate BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Figure 11. Contact angle of polymer substrate BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Polymers 12 01556 g011
Figure 12. Contact angle data of polymer BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Figure 12. Contact angle data of polymer BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Polymers 12 01556 g012
Figure 13. Tension of polymer BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Figure 13. Tension of polymer BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Polymers 12 01556 g013
Table 1. The monomer commonly used in acrylic polymer emulsions.
Table 1. The monomer commonly used in acrylic polymer emulsions.
MonomerBoiling Point (°C/mmHg)Specific Gravity (D)Refractive IndexTg (k)
TypeNameEnglish Abbreviation
Soft monomer (flexibility)Butyl acrylateBA35/80.89981.4190219.15
Ethyl acrylateEA43/1030.92341.4068251.15
Octyl acrylic esterOA
Isooctyl acrylate2-EHA85/50.88521.4365
Isooctyl methacrylate2-EHMA47/0.11.4380
Dodecane methacrylateLMA
Hard monomer (hardness)Methyl acrylateMA80095241.4040281.15
Methyl methacrylateMMA1000.9391.4120373.15
Ethyl methacrylateEMA1190.9091.4116338.15
N-butyl methacrylateBMA98/900.8891.4220293.15
Vinyl acetateVAc72-730.932 303.15
StyreneST145-60.9091.4116373.15
Functional monomer (abrasion resistance, cross-linking degree, water resistance, etc.)AcrylonitrileAN77.30.80613888369.15
Acrylic acidAA1411.0451.4185379.15
MethacrylateMAA1601.0151.4288403.15
AcrylamideAM12.5/251.1221.460426.15
N-carboxyacrylamideN-MAM751.185
Hydroxyethyl acrylate2-HEA82/51.10381.4505
Hydroxypropyl acrylate2-HPA77/51.0561.4448
Carboxypropyl methacrylate2-HPMA96/101.0271.4460346.15
Glycidyl acrylateGA57/21.10741.4460
Glycidyl methacrylateGMA1891.0731.4482
Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate97/41.0511.4520
Dimethacrylic acid-glycol ester 162/21.0711.4570
Itaconic acidIAresolve1.632
Maleic acidNA139–1401.609
Maleic anhydrideNAA601341
Table 2. Film formation and peelable properties of polymer substrate BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Table 2. Film formation and peelable properties of polymer substrate BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Sample Test EnvironmentMean Peel Strength (N.M−1)Film Forming PropertyStripping Degree
Wood Surface0.570Continuous film100%
Metal plateFlat Surface0.873Continuous film100%
Irregular Surface0.852Continuous film100%
Cement flat surface0.653Continuous film100%
Table 3. Sealing rate of concave and convex parts of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Table 3. Sealing rate of concave and convex parts of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Samples123Average
Solid seal beforeFe3+/(mg/L)117.572.9143.0111.1
Fe/(mg/dm2)23.514.628.622.2
Cu2+/(mg/L)18.928.951.133.0
Cu/(mg/dm2)3.85.810.26.6
Solid seal afterFe3+/(mg/L)2.66.06.95.2
Fe/(mg/dm2)0.51.21.41.0
Cu2+/(mg/L)1.40.90.91.1
Cu/(mg/dm2)0.30.20.20.2
Enclosed rateFe (%)99.899.299.599.5
Cu (%)99.299.799.999.6
Table 4. Sealing ratio of the vertical surface of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Table 4. Sealing ratio of the vertical surface of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
SamplesLeft Side 1Left Side 2Right Side 3Right Side 4Average
Solid seal beforeFe3+/(mg/L)57.1117.7327.678.5145.2
Fe/(mg/dm2)11.423.565.515.729.0
Cu2+/(mg/L)17.818.337.418.322.9
Cu/(mg/dm2)3.63.77.53.74.6
Solid seal afterFe3+/(mg/L)1.91.817.42.96.0
Fe/(mg/dm2)0.40.43.50.61.2
Cu2+/(mg/L)1.20.91.80.61.1
Cu/(mg/dm2)0.20.20.40.10.2
Enclosed rateFe (%)99.799.899.599.699.7
Cu (%)99.499.599.599.999.6
Table 5. Gas permeability of polymer substrate film BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Table 5. Gas permeability of polymer substrate film BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
SamplesSample Thickness/mmPermeability/(cm3.cm/cm2 d.bar)
10.300.0070
20.300.0069
30.300.0072
40.300.0069
Table 6. Sealing rate of concave and convex parts of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Table 6. Sealing rate of concave and convex parts of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Samples123Average
Enclosed rateFe (%)99.899.299.599.5
Cu (%)99.299.799.999.6
Table 7. Sealing ratio of the vertical surface of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Table 7. Sealing ratio of the vertical surface of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
SamplesLeft Side 1Left Side 2Right Side 3Right Side 4Average
Enclosed rateFe (%)99.7 99.8 99.5 99.6 99.7
Cu (%)99.499.599.599.999.6
Table 8. Deviation and dispersion measurements regarding the sealing rate of the concave and convex parts of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Table 8. Deviation and dispersion measurements regarding the sealing rate of the concave and convex parts of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Sampleσ (Standard Deviation)μ (p = 95%) Estimation Error
Fe (%)0.33999.16199.839
Cu (%)0.40999.91100.09
Table 9. Deviation and dispersion measurements regarding the sealing ratio of the vertical surface of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Table 9. Deviation and dispersion measurements regarding the sealing ratio of the vertical surface of BA/MMA/AA (1:0.9:0.1).
Sampleσ (Standard Deviation)μ (p = 95%) Estimation Error
Fe (%)0.12699.52499.810
Cu (%)0.21899.35799.793

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Z.; Li, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Luo, D. Synthesis and Preparation of (Acrylic Copolymer) Ternary System Peelable Sealing Decontamination Material. Polymers 2020, 12, 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071556

AMA Style

He Z, Li Y, Xiao Z, Jiang H, Zhou Y, Luo D. Synthesis and Preparation of (Acrylic Copolymer) Ternary System Peelable Sealing Decontamination Material. Polymers. 2020; 12(7):1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071556

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Zhiyu, Yintao Li, Zhiqiang Xiao, Huan Jiang, Yuanlin Zhou, and Deli Luo. 2020. "Synthesis and Preparation of (Acrylic Copolymer) Ternary System Peelable Sealing Decontamination Material" Polymers 12, no. 7: 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop