Next Article in Journal
Eco-Sustainability of the Textile Production: Waste Recovery and Current Recycling in the Composites World
Previous Article in Journal
Cellulose Derived Graphene/Polyaniline Nanocomposite Anode for Energy Generation and Bioremediation of Toxic Metals via Benthic Microbial Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cyclic Peptide Inhibitors of the Tsg101 UEV Protein Interactions Refined through Global Docking and Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploiting the Amazing Diversity of Natural Source-Derived Polysaccharides: Modern Procedures of Isolation, Engineering, and Optimization of Antiviral Activities

1
Department of Chemistry, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal 713104, India
2
Institute for Clinical and Molecular Virology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally.
Polymers 2021, 13(1), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010136
Submission received: 9 December 2020 / Revised: 28 December 2020 / Accepted: 28 December 2020 / Published: 30 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Bio-Based Polymeric Materials)

Abstract

:
Naturally occurring polysaccharide sulfates are highly diverse, owning variations in the backbone structure, linkage pattern and stereochemistry, branching diversity, sulfate content and positions of sulfate group(s). These structural characteristics bring about diverse sulfated polymers with dissimilar negative charge densities and structure–activity relationships. Herein, we start with a short discussion of techniques needed for extraction, purification, chemical sulfation, and structural characterization of polysaccharides. Processes of isolation and sulfation of plant-derived polysaccharides are challenging and usually involve two steps. In this context, we describe an integrated extraction-sulfation procedure that produces polysaccharide sulfates from natural products in one step, thereby generating additional pharmacological activities. Finally, we provide examples of the spectrum of natural source-derived polysaccharides possessing specific features of bioactivity, in particular focusing on current aspects of antiviral drug development and drug–target interaction. Thus, the review presents a detailed view on chemically engineered polysaccharides, especially sulfated derivatives, and underlines their promising biomedical perspectives.

1. Introduction

A variety of different macromolecules are preserved in natural ecosystems. Specifically, the world’s oceans carry significant biological diversity and a huge variety of so far unexploited marine bioproducts. On the global scale, oceans cover 70% of the earth’s surface, encompassing >90% of the known biosphere volume. It is thus an accepted concept that the immense size and range of life in the oceans point to a great potential for discovery that surpasses all other environments [1]. The main basis of biodiversity is the almost limitless abundance, and distribution of life in the ocean, also including microorganism and infectious agents, with extreme virus titers of up to 107/mL in water and 109/cm3 in sediments [2]. From the application-related and medical points of view, it is a highly attractive perspective to utilize the sea’s richness in bioactive macromolecules spanning pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, adhesives, biocatalysts/enzymes, and source-materials for cosmetics. Despite the greater numbers of documented species and established bioactive compounds for land biota compared with marine biota [3], the oceans nonetheless support substantially higher diversity at a higher taxonomic level, i.e., taxonomic distinctness, and thus may well eventually yield more species and a greater pool of bioactive compounds than all other environments combined [1]. Considering that many current drugs are still derived from terrestrial sources, a substantial number of drugs, drug candidates and other metabolites from marine organisms have been identified in recent years. About 30,000 compounds of marine origin are known and, since 2008, more than 1000 compounds are newly discovered each year, which are often characterized by structural novelty, complexity, and diversity [4,5]. Life in the marine environment has evolved on the basis of special conditions, which necessitate appropriate mechanisms of adaption of organisms to growing in the ocean that may be fundamentally different from those in land-based organisms. One important adaption mechanism is the production of biologically active secondary metabolites. Functions of such metabolites are diverse and may span intra- and interspecific signaling, deterrence of herbivores and predators, suppression of competing neighbors and the inhibition of bacterial or fungal invasion. These bioactive compounds thus possess an enormous potential to become drugs, medicinal products, experimental tools, or food supplements [6].
For decades, specific focus has been given to the generation of bioactive substances isolated from plant organisms, as derived from both, marine or land biota. The variety of active plant-derived products is extraordinary and covers the sources of huge numbers of algae, seaweed extracts, plant-based food, herbs, traditional medicines and many more. Plant products often have the advantage to be available at abundant quantities and low cost, some of these even received from manufacturing waste such as rice bran [7,8]. Specifically, herbal medicines and other natural product-derived phytochemicals as well reported to be potential agents against viruses of various types, also including coronaviruses as current investigations illustrated that were associated with the COVID-19 crisis [9]. In this regard, particularly the sulfated derivatives of naturally occurring polysaccharides exhibit a number of biological activities and these are highly dependent on structural compound characteristics [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Intrinsically, the composition, structure, and biological properties of polysaccharide sulfates are of deep interest for both, the basic molecular studies and the development of new products for various applications and industrial production. The manifestation of a sulfate functionality on the polysaccharide provides several chemically significant prerequisites and production-specific consequences. Firstly, sulfate groups carry a negative charge throughout a broad pH range leading to an electrostatical binding to positively charged biomolecules [16,17]. Additionally, this functionality is able to coordinate water molecules that increase and maintain tissue hydration [18,19]. Moreover, multiple sulfates on a single polysaccharide uphold an exposed extended solution conformation structure to minimize electrostatic repulsion between the negative charges [19]. Furthermore, contrary to carboxylated species, polysaccharide sulfates are able to maintain their low pH unchanged over a wide range of conditions Given the various biological activities of polysaccharide sulfates recently described by studies of our groups and other investigators, extensive research efforts are in progress to generate and translationally exploit this rich potential [19,20,21]. However, owing to the presence of a large number of stereogenic centers in these polysaccharide species, the frequent occurrence of hydroxyls with alike reactivities, and the necessity to conserve the position and configuration of glycosidic linkages, renders the synthesis of polysaccharide sulfates a challenging aspect. For this reason, from a chemical synthesis perspective, polymeric sulfated structures are generally obtained by the in vitro sulfation process of polysaccharides previously isolated from natural products, i.e., generally using a two-step process. In our analyses, however, a recently developed cost-effective one-step process revealed the ability to produce huge numbers of directly, isolation-associated sulfated derivatives of polysaccharides and, thereby inducing potential bioactive properties such as, especially, a strong level of antiviral activity in the final product [7]. These newly synthesized molecules are not only helpful in developing advances knowledge of structure–activity relationship (SAR), but also to contribute to broaden the attractive arsenal of antiviral candidate compounds. This review focuses on the chemical and biotechnological utilization of the amazing diversity of natural source-derived macromolecules, in particular polysaccharides. Specifically, the modern procedures of isolation, targeted engineering, and optimization of bioactivity of such candidate polysaccharides is discussed in the light of near-future developmental processes.

2. Chemical Profile of Bioactive Sulfated Polysaccharides

The biological activities, in particular antiviral activity, of naturally occurring polysaccharide sulfates are greatly reliant on the saccharide composition, glycosidic linkage pattern, backbone structure, molecular mass, and, importantly, the amount of sulfation and position of sulfate groups. Particularly, wide-spectrum activities may originate from discreet polysaccharide–protein interactions (e.g., sulfated glucans with antiviral activity) [7,11], as well as from the coordination and storage of water (e.g., lubricity). These sulfated derivatives are most abundant in and almost limited to seaweed and mammals [22,23]. Selected representatives of seaweed-derived polysaccharides possessing in vitro antiviral activities are fucoidan, carrageenan, agar, alginic acid and ulvan, and their structural features are highlighted below (Figure 1). Additional seaweed-derived polysaccharides such as xylan [24], xylomannan [25,26,27] and xyloglucan [28,29] have been described, some of which likewise possess antiviral activity, whereas other seaweed-derived polysaccharides are lacking antiviral activity.

3. Classical and Modern Extraction Techniques

The basic challenge, and in many cases an initial problem in the structural elucidation of naturally occurring polysaccharides, is the isolation of these substances in their natural form. Several techniques exist, but none of these appears ideal for all applications, and the establishment of a generic extraction procedure proved to be a challenging goal [30]. Moreover, seasonal variations, conditions and places of harvest are the parameters that should be taken into account [31,32]. Most extraction procedures have several features in common but are distinct in other parts, leading to individual benefits or pitfalls. Conventionally, the first stage involves solubilisation of the polysaccharides in an aqueous solvent, but precaution should be taken to ascertain that the process does not alter the polysaccharides’ structures by acid- or and alkali-catalyzed hydrolysis as well as alkali-induced β-elimination reaction. Regarding sulfated polysaccharides, the duration of extraction does not have a considerable influence on efficiency, however, long extraction time may lead to desulfation, so that a short incubation timeframe (1–3 h) is desirable [33]. Selective extraction of polysaccharides is possible by conventional methods. For example, the extraction of fucoidan using HCl or CaCl2 in water leads to the precipitation of alginic acid or alginates, and this strategy was found to be very useful [33,34,35]. The removal of low molecular weight compounds, exclusion of starch and protein, and then isolation of the polysaccharides by precipitation, or drying are the succeeding steps. To date, sulfated polysaccharides, which generally exert an evidently high potential of bioactivities, have most frequently been extracted from seaweed biomass by conventional water extraction methods [24,36,37,38], but a long extraction time, poor yield, low selectivity and a lack of automation are the associated drawbacks [39,40]. Heparin is the oldest clinically used anticoagulant isolated from porcine intestine and bovine lung [41]. It has a complex structure comprising of repeating disaccharide units encompassing of uronic acid residues (l-iduronic (IdoA) or d-glucuronic acid (GlcA)) and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine [42,43]. On the other hand, low cost levels and nontoxic water-based solvents represent the advantages of such extraction methods. The isolation of numerous bioactive polysaccharides from natural sources contributed to the improvement of classical methods and the development of modern technologies [14,39,44], which include microwave assisted extraction [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52], pressurized liquid assisted extraction [53,54,55,56,57], ultrasonic assisted extraction [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65], ionic liquid based extraction [66,67,68,69,70], and enzyme mediated extraction [71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78] (Figure 2). The goals of these isolation methods are to accomplish a high yield of polymer extraction, to reduce extraction time, to reduce expenditure of energy, to explore the recycling processes, to minimize structural change and to augment the scale of diversity. Table 1 highlights the pros and cons of these extraction techniques.
Modern methods provide a number of advantages over conventional procedures, including the lower volumes of required solvents, so that the term ‘green techniques’ has been introduced [14]. Notably, microwave assisted extraction is characterized by its high extraction efficiency, short extraction time and low energy consumption in an efficient process. Similarly, the enzyme-aided extraction is another of the most efficient techniques for the isolation of sulfated polysaccharides isolated from the mucus of freshwater fish Misgurnus anguillicudatus [79], fucans [34] or ulvans [80], due to the high efficiency of isolation yields when applying mild reaction conditions. Indeed, the enzyme-mediated extraction is able to convert a formerly untapped, renewable algal biomass into a valuable, ecologically sustainable resource [80].

4. Purification

Another challenge in the structure elucidation of polysaccharides, subsequent to extraction, is the purification of the extracted raw material (Figure 3). As a result of microheterogeneity, the definition of purity of the isolated polysaccharides is not as precise as initially thought. The polymer can connect itself to several non-carbohydrate molecules either by physical forces or through chemical bonding. An additional difficulty can be given by a limited solubility in most of the organic solvents. In most cases, purification is achieved by solvent extraction, dialysis and repetitive precipitation of the polymer from aqueous solution by using ethanol or acetone [81], antisolvent [82], or alternatively by complexation with polyvalent cations like copper/calcium, or quaternary ammonium salts such as cetylpyridinium chloride/cetyltrimethylammonium bromide [83,84,85]. Membrane filtration [86], liquid liquid fractionation, ultrafiltration and ultracentrifugation have also been used [47,87,88]. Liquid chromatographic processes such size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and as anion-exchange chromatography (AEC) have extensively been applied for the purification before determining the structural features, physicochemical properties and biological activities of polysaccharide sulfates. AEC is mostly useful to eliminate unwarranted proteins and neutral polymers [47,89,90,91,92]. Weak anion-exchangers, such as diethylaminoethyl (DEAE), tertiary amine-functionalized media [93,94] or strong anion-exchangers including quaternary (Q) amine-functionalized media [95], have been successfully utilized to purify polysaccharide sulfates. SEC is extensively employed for the measurement of total molecular masses and molecular mass distributions [96,97,98,99,100]. Moreover, this analytical technique has been effectively employed in many examples for the elucidation of fine-structures of oligosaccharides and polysaccharides [94] and to produce size classes for the determination of structure–activity relationship [101,102,103].

5. Techniques for Structural Characterization of Polysaccharides

Considering the multifold modes of monosaccharide-based polysaccharide and particularly glycan linkages, variations in saccharide compositions and sequences, linkage regio- and stereo-chemistry as well as branching diversity produces an enormous structural diversity. As a consequence of this complexity, the comprehensive assignment of covalent structures of naturally occurring polysaccharides is a major challenge to the organic chemist [104,105,106,107,108]. Indeed, no method available for structural analysis will offer sufficient data to allow the structure of a polysaccharide to be defined in the above-mentioned terms. This information can only be obtained using a number of techniques, particularly in conjunction with one another, as illustrated below (Figure 4).
In specific terms under standard conditions, the analysis of the structure of a given polysaccharide begins with its hydrolysis into constituent monosaccharides. Subsequently, the liberated monosaccharides are then analyzed by approved methods such as gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [96,109,110,111]. The glycosidic linkages within polysaccharides are normally determined by methylation analysis with the classical Hakomori method or a modification thereof [112,113,114,115,116,117,118]. It involves the following steps: firstly, free hydroxyl groups of the polysaccharide constituents are fully substituted with methoxyl groups; secondly, the permethylated polysaccharide thereby formed is depolymerized by acid hydrolysis to a mixture of constituents including partially methylated monosaccharides; finally, each component of the mixture is then converted into partially methylated alditol acetates (PMAAs) as usually examined by GC-MS.
The glycosyl linkage patterns can be deduced from the MS fragmentation patterns of PMAAs and from the retention times [116,119]. The ring scaffold of monosaccharide units (i.e., furanose or pyranose), which occupies terminal positions in such polymers, is established by the O-methyl substitution patterns arising from methylation analysis. Once the glycosidic linkages of the individual monosaccharide residues within the polysaccharides are known, the sequence in which they are linked to each other has to be determined. Fragmentation of polysaccharide molecules, either by mild acid hydrolysis or enzyme hydrolyses into oligosaccharides, and the characterization of the purified fragments, is often employed to determine the sequence of monosaccharide residues [115,120]. The oligosaccharides generated are fractionated and purified by size exclusion chromatography [7,8,25,121,122,123,124], HPAE-PAD chromatography, or other techniques. Precise structures of these purified oligosaccharides may be determined by sugar compositional analysis, glycosidic linkage composition, periodate oxidation, NMR, MALDI-TOF-MS or other methods [125,126,127].
Recently, a method based on ESI-MS analysis of peracetylated oligomeric portions, as derived from polysaccharides by Smith degradation or by enzyme hydrolysis followed by acetylation, has been described as an expedient tool for providing critical structural information on a spectrum of oligosaccharides [37,128,129,130,131]. Moreover, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is an effective, non-invasive method in general studies on biopolymers, and NMR is a particularly valuable technique in the determination of molecular structures of polysaccharides [132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140]. This spectroscopic technique provides information not only on the saccharide composition, glycosidic linkage patterns and sugar sequences, but also on its molecular mass. As a specific aspect of polysaccharides comprising pronounced levels of bioactivity, the presence of sulfate groups in polysaccharides creates additional challenges in deducing their structure, since the position of sulfation and the degree of sulfation (DS) needs be additionally determined. Traditional methods for the determination of sulfate contents in polysaccharides include the HPLC analysis of sulphates [94], turbidometric barium chloride method [7,8,25,122,124] and IR spectrometry [7,8,25,121,122,123,124]. The position of sulfate groups can be determined conventionally by comparison of methylation analysis results obtained for the polysaccharide sulfates with those for its desulfated derivatives [7,8,121,123,124,130]. Infrared spectroscopy (IR) spectroscopy, 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy may provide additional information on the position of sulfate groups [8,121,123,137,138,139,140].

6. Sulfate-Specific Modification of Polysaccharides

Several techniques useful for the enrichment of sulfated polysaccharides have been applied so far. The feeble reactivity of the hydroxyl functionality, the solubilisation of both the polysaccharide and its sulfated derivatives in the same organic solvent, the preservation of the glycosidic linkage, the regioselectivity, and the isolation of the products, however, are challenges associated with polysaccharide sulfation. Significant research endeavors are directed towards sulfation of polysaccharides [141,142] and both the advantages and limitations have been recognized dependent on the characteristics of the source materials [19]. A selection of typical reagents namely, oleum [7,8,123,143], chlorosulfonic acid [141,144,145,146,147,148], sulfamic acid [149,150,151,152,153,154], piperidine-N-sulfonic acid [155,156,157] and SO3-pyridine [25,121,122,158,159,160,161,162] used in these sulfation processes is highlighted in Figure 5. The benefits and drawbacks of the sulfation modification techniques are presented by Table 2.

7. Targeted Engineering

While a huge number of polysaccharide types occur in living organisms, the existence of their sulfated derivatives is limited to marine algae and mammals [22,163]. Polysaccharide sulfates from plant sources may thus be produced by targeted engineering using a two-step procedure: an initial isolation of polysaccharides from the plant source materials, followed by a sulfation reaction on the isolated polymer. Recently, we developed a single-step approach for the direct production of sulfated glucans from rice bran, i.e., carrying out an amalgamated extraction-sulfation procedure using an oleum-DMF reagent [8]. A benefit of this process is conferred by the usage of DMF−fuming H2SO4 as a ’double agent’, which extracts the polysaccharide effctively from the source material and at the same time promotes the warranted modification with sulfate groups. Regarding the methodology, DMF being a polar aprotic solvent is competent in extracting the polysaccharides, which represent polar constituents comprising of hydroxyl and other polar groups. Hereby, fuming H2SO4 is expected to promote the solubilization process by disrupting the hydrogen and ionic bonds, mainly presented in the cell-wall constituents of plant material. This procedure has been validated, on the one hand, by its cost-effectiveness and, on the other hand, by generating a variety of sulfated polysaccharides with diverse building blocks from natural sources. Importantly, the obtained polymers may possess significant characteristics of bioactivity, especially antiviral activity, since the respective studies indicated that the functionalization with sulfate groups strongly induced antiviral activity [7,8]. Thus, the strategy allows for the production of bioactive macromolecules via chemical diversification and functionalization of natural source materials, typically composed of compounds rich in number and diverse in scaffolds [164,165]. Notably, such a facile procedure may be ultimately standardized and made applicable for larger-scale processes. Thus, specifically our experiences with a one-step sulfation procedure may stimulate further research projects to apply this experimental approach in related studies, likewise generating biologically active compounds, and possibly aiming at a pharmaceutical development of natural source-derived drugs. This integrated extraction-sulfation technique is efficient and can provide plentiful material for biological assays and for comparative studies to naturally occurring polysaccharide sulfates.

8. Current Focus on Antiviral Activity: The Spectrum of Natural Source-Derived Bioactive Polysaccharides

To date, a huge variety of natural sources, such as marine flora and fauna, bacteria, fungi and higher plants have been utilized for the screening of suitable natural substances for medical or biochemical use. In particular, marine algae are considered a promising source for bioactive compounds, as they are increasingly used and studied for medical purposes [6,166]. The antiviral potential of polysaccharides was first discovered by Ginsberg et al. in 1947, where they showed an inhibition against mumps [167]. Eleven years later in 1958, Gerber and colleagues could demonstrate an inhibition of mumps and hepatitis virus B by marine algae-derived polysaccharides [168]. Since that finding, a number of carbohydrate compounds from marine algae, cyanobacteria, and animal sources were described showing potent inhibitory effects against several human and animal viruses [169,170,171,172,173,174]. A selection of promising natural substances will be discussed in the following section. Fucan sulfates from marine brown algae are normally structured in a complex and heterogenous manner. However, these polysaccharides consistently contain a backbone of either α-(1→ 3)-linked or changing α-(1→ 3)- and α-(1→ 4)-linked L-fucopyranosyl residues with sulfate groups at position 4 [35,175,176,177,178]. This backbone is in many cases masked by monosaccharides (galactose, glucose, mannose, xylose or glucuronic acid), acetyl groups, and/or sulfate esters. Fucan sulfates have potent antiviral activity against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) without effects of cytotoxicity in cell culture [124,179,180,181,182]. In contrast, polysaccharides from red seaweeds consist of linear sulfated galactans containing alternating β-(1→ 3)-d- and α-(1→4)-galactopyranosyl residues [183,184,185]. These galactans can be distinguished by the configuration of the α-linked units: polymers containing the L-type configuration are termed agaran; For D-type configuration it is carrageenan. Agaran has been shown to exert antiviral activity against HSV-1 [186], carrageenans show activity against HSV-2 and dengue virus [187]. Moreover, DL-hybrid galactan sulfate, a polymer in which α-linked units can have D- and L-configuration in the same molecules, has been shown to have strong antiviral activity against HSV-1 and dengue virus [188]. Concerning marine green algae, polysaccharides called ulvan are of high research interest for the development of new therapeutic agents. It consists mainly of sulfate, rhamnose, glucuronic acid, iduronic acid, and xylose; the major repeating disaccharide units are glucuronic acid and rhamnose 3-sulfate, and iduronic acid with rhamnose 3-sulfate [94,189,190,191,192]. As other sulfated polysaccharides, ulvan can block the adsorption of the virus and thereby block the viral entry into the cell. Ulvan has been demonstrated to have activity against the Japanese encephalitis virus and the influenza virus A (IAV) and HSV-1 [123,193,194]. Seen apart from the specific topic of sulfated polysaccharides, another promising biopolymer, called alginate, can either be derived from brown algae or several bacteria [195,196]. Alginate consists of β-(1→ 4-d-mannuronic acid (M) and α-(1→ 4)-l-guluronic acid (G) residues, which can either be arranged in a homogenous (poly-G, poly-M) or heterogeneous (MG) manner [197,198,199]. The alginate-derived drug 911 exhibits activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by inhibiting the viral reverse transcriptase [200], against hepatitis B virus by inhibiting the viral polymerase [201] and HSV-1 [36]. Alginate polymers also showed antiviral activity against other viruses, such as HSV-1 and HSV-2 or the human papillomavirus [202,203,204]. Specifically, Sinha et al. (2010) reported that the chemically sulfated derivatives of a guluronic acid-rich alginate derived from Sargassum tenerrimum showed activity against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) by mimicking the active domain of the entry receptor [205]. Sulfated polysaccharides with antiviral activity are found rarely in higher plants. Therefore, original natural substances can be chemically engineered via a two-step procedure: the initial isolation of the polysaccharide of interest followed by chemical sulfation. These chemically modified natural substances offer interesting pharmacological alternatives for antiviral drug development. Importantly, our group developed a novel single-step strategy for the direct production of sulfated glucans from rice bran [8]. The high antiviral potential of sulfated glucans could be repeatedly underlined by a pronounced activity against the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), HSV-1, HSV-2, respiratory syncytial virus, IAV and HIV-1 [7,122,206,207]. Also other natural substances are target of chemical modifications, such as arabinogalactan, which can serve as a carrier of therapeutic agents [208] or xylomannan, which either in its natural form or artificially over-sulfated form exerts strong antiviral activity against HSV-1 [25,27,209].

9. Structure–Activity Relationship of Sulfated Glucans with Antiviral Activity

A large number of sulfated polysaccharides possessing antiviral activities has been described in the last decades. However, substantial structural differences between the various bioactive compounds and limited data made it difficult to establish a convincing structure–activity relationship (SAR). Nonetheless, based on recent findings, several common structural motifs can be considered to be generally important for antiviral activity. A special focus has been directed to sulfated glucans. One major determinant of antiviral activity is (i) the molecular weight (MW) of the sulfated polysaccharide. In general, high MW often indicates strong antiviral activity. Semisynthetic glucans with MWs ranging between 1 and 500 kDa had the highest antiviral activity for the higher MW fractions, even though no increased antiviral activity was observed for fractions higher than 100 kDa [210]. This correlation can also be observed for naturally occurring polysaccharides, like agarans [186], carrageenans [211], fucans [212] or chemically sulfated polysaccharides from Azadirachta indica leaves [121]. In a similar fashion, (ii) chain length can also play a major role for a high compound activity. In such manner, the long chains of CS-E (approx. 70 kDa) blocks viral entry of HSV-1 at lower concentrations than heparin chains (approx. 12.5 kDa), even though DS of CS-E is lower (approx. 1.7 sulfates/disaccharide) than that of heparin (approx. 2.7 sulfates/disaccharide) [213]. Unfortunately, derivatives with high MW can have the disadvantage of poor tissue-penetrating capabilities and are therefore often not suitable for applications in humans [214]. To address this problem, oligosaccharides, e.g., carrageenan, can be chemically and enzymatically degraded, which improves bioavailability and biological activity significantly [215]. Another major determinant is (iii) the degree of sulfation (DS; i.e., the amount of sulfate groups per monosaccharide) [216]. The obvious correlation between intensively investigated naturally sulfated polysaccharides, such as carrageenan or fucans, and their antiviral activity despite different structures underlines the relevance of DS. This also applies for chemically sulfated glucans, where the antiviral activity also differs significantly depending on the DS, i.e., highly sulfated glucans being generally more active. Removal of the sulfate functionality from glucans drastically reduced the antiviral activity [7]. Current research suggests that this correlation is mainly due to electrostatic interactions between positively charged regions of the viral glycoprotein and cellular HS chains on the cell surface. A highly charged molecule, such as strongly sulfated saccharides, are more likely to interfere with this interaction [11]. Chemically sulfated glucans, however, showed antiviral activity even when added after virus adsoroption/infection, suggesting additional modes of action [7]. In addition, (iv) the distribution of sulfate moieties is important, since an overall barely sulfated polysaccharide still can possess certain highly charged parts in the polysaccharide backbone and, therefore, exert antiviral activity [11]. Nonetheless, recent studies with glucans showed that DS and high MW alone are not sufficient to make an effective compound, since derivatives with various MW and an identical degree of sulfation of glucose, maltose and β-cyclodextrin were not able to interfere with HCMV entry and replication [7]. In a similar direction, carrageenan with similar sulfate contents (approx. 50 mol%) derived from different sources (Callophyllis variegate, Gigartina skottsbergi, Gymnogongrus griffithsiae and Meristiella gelidium) showed different degrees of antiviral activity [187,211,217,218]. This phenomenon could be explained with the charge density, since it correlated with the antiviral IC50 values against HSV-1 in fractions obtained from the same marine algae [211]. Next, (v) the overall sugar composition and chemical structures have an impact on antiviral activity of chemically sulfated glucans: sulfated glucans containing no uronide and high DS of 1.7 showed higher antiviral activity compared to saccharides containing high amounts of uronic acid residues (9%, w/w) and DS of 1.2. For this reason, anionic sulfate groups seem to be important for the antiviral activity of substances, in contrast to carboxyl groups, which do not have a comparable impact [7]. To summarize, recent data reported by our group and other research clearly illustrated that antiviral properties of sulfated polysaccharides are not only a question of charge density, DS and MW, but also of the compounds’ detailed structural features, which will have to be elucidated even further in the upcoming years [7,8,11,219].

10. Future Perspectives: A Specific Focus on COVID-19 and Other Emerging Viral Diseases

The COVID-19 pandemic, which spanned over 2020 in a devastating graveness that is casting shadows into 2021 and the following years, requires novel strategies of rapid and strain-crossing treatment and prevention. Natural source-derived polysaccharides might provide one of such keys for the concise control of another early epidemic or pandemic development [72,220]. Notably, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic resembled the mode of dissemination of influenza viruses in several aspects, as both viruses use sialic acids (SA). Currently, information on SARS-CoV-2 and its receptors is limited, although the human ACE-2 surface protein (uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) is considered as the general viral entry receptor [221]. In addition, O-acetylated SAs interact with the lectin-like spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 for the initial virus attachment to the host cell. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) acts as the classical glycan-binding lectin and receptor-degrading enzyme. Most CoVs recognize 9-O-acetyl-SAs, but occasionally switched to recognizing the 4-O-acetyl-SA form during virus evolution. Type I HE is specific for the 9-O-Ac-SAs and type II HE is specific for 4-O-Ac-SAs [222]. In either case, competitive use of pharmacologically developed polysaccharide products may interfere with virus-host cell binding and might thus act as a topical therapeutical measure to prevent surface binding of SARS-CoV-2 or related CoVs particularly considering mucosal body surfaces. This concept is based on the known fact that the first attachment step of viral infection is initiated on the respiratory cell surfaces, driven by the viral S protein, thus postulated as a potential therapeutic target. In SARS-CoV-2, the ACE-2 receptor interacts with the S glycoprotein cleaved by a specific serine protease. SARS-CoV-2 infection is regulated by glycosylated SARS-CoV-2 viral particles and glycosylated ACE-2 in the lung epithelial cells. Recently, anti-CoV drugs have been approached using molecular modeling, docking and simulation methods. Computation-assisted drugs via molecular modeling and docking toward drug targets are applied as antiviral compounds against CoVs. In this manner, a marine product-derived library containing more than 14,000 compounds was recently analyzed for antiviral activity against the essential main protease of SARS-CoV-2, revealing 17 potential hit substances with inhibitory activity [223]. Intriguingly, most of these selected substances belonged to the class of phlorotannins and were derived from Sargassum spinuligerum brown algae, which are extensively used in the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) [224]. Also other TCM formula, such as Lianhuaqingwen, which is composed of 13 different herbs, showed strong anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in cell culture-based test systems and is therefore currently considered for clinical applications in China in comparison to or combination with alredy existing therapeuticals [225]. The applications of TCM have moved into a major focus of interest, particularly in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic and the perspectives of current investigations and near-future use [226]. Thus, natural source-derived polysaccharides are thorougly investigated at the moment, among which carrageenan is considered as one of the most promissing. The prophylactic efficacy of ioata-carrageenan for health care professionals is currently investigated in a phase III clinical trial (NCT04590365). The potent efficacy of iota-carrageenan has previously been demonstrated in clinical trials against virus-confirmed common cold (caused by rhinovirus, coronavirus or IAV), reducing both the duration of disease and the number of relapses significantly [227]. Importantly, natural substances might not exclusively be applied for antiviral treatment but may also prove to become helpful in the prevention of pulmonary fibrosis, which is frequently developed during the post-symptomatic phase succeeding a viral respiratory infection, such as cases of SARS-CoV infection in 2003. This potentially life-threatening disesase is caused by a hyperactive host response caused by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling [228]. Several sulfated polysaccharides such as fucoidan have the ability to inhibit the expression or the downstream pathway of EGFR, which may therefore support the prevention of consequential damages of SARS-CoV-2 infection [229,230]. These points illustrate the broad potential of natural source-derived polysaccharides. Combined, future antiviral applications might not only include direct antiviral inhibitory effects but might also target antiviral infections indirectly or follow-up diseases. On the basis of modern procedures of an optimization of bioactivity, the translational exploitation of polysaccharide products may open up many so far untapped opportunities of compound development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.R., S.R. and M.M.; methodology, B.R., M.S., S.M., S.J., S.R. and M.M.; validation, B.R., S.R. and M.M.; methodology, B.R., M.S., S.M., S.J., S.R. and M.M.; investigation, M.S., S.M. and S.J.; resources, B.R., S.M., S.J. and S.R.; data curation, M.S., S.R. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, B.R., S.R. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, B.R., M.S., S.M., S.J., S.R. and M.M.; visualization, M.S., S.M., S.J., S.R. and M.M.; supervision, B.R., S.R. and M.M.; funding acquisition, M.S., S.R. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present research work was funded by University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India (Project No. F.30-425/2018 (BSR) to Sayani Ray, and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, MA1289/7-3) and the Matching Funds Program of the Forschungsstiftung Medizin, Medical Center UKER (Erlangen) together with the Manfred Roth-Stiftung (Fürth) to Manfred Marschall.

Acknowledgments

Shuvam Mukherjee and Subrata Jana thank Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India for fellowship. We like to acknowledge all members of our research groups for providing valuable contributions to the Burdwan–Erlangen long-term laboratory cooperation on natural source-derived antiviral compounds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Snelgrove, P.V. An ocean of discovery: Biodiversity beyond the census of marine life. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Suttle, C.A. Viruses in the sea. Nature 2005, 437, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leal, M.C.; Puga, J.; Serôdio, J.; Gomes, N.C.; Calado, R. Trends in the discovery of new marine natural products from invertebrates over the last two decades–where and what are we bioprospecting? PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kiuru, P.; D’Auria, M.V.; Muller, C.D.; Tammela, P.; Vuorela, H.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J. Exploring marine resources for bioactive compounds. Planta Med. 2014, 80, 1234–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, Y.; Chen, J.; Hu, G.; Yu, J.; Zhu, X.; Lin, Y.; Chen, S.; Yuan, J. Statistical research on the bioactivity of new marine natural products discovered during the 28 years from 1985 to 2012. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 202–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lindequist, U. Marine-derived pharmaceuticals–challenges and opportunities. Biomol. Ther. 2016, 24, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mukherjee, S.; Ghosh, K.; Hahn, F.; Wangen, C.; Strojan, H.; Müller, R.; Anand, N.; Ali, I.; Bera, K.; Ray, B. Chemically sulfated polysaccharides from natural sources: Assessment of extraction-sulfation efficiencies, structural features and antiviral activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ray, B.; Hutterer, C.; Bandyopadhyay, S.S.; Ghosh, K.; Chatterjee, U.R.; Ray, S.; Zeitträger, I.; Wagner, S.; Marschall, M. Chemically engineered sulfated glucans from rice bran exert strong antiviral activity at the stage of viral entry. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 2180–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mani, J.S.; Johnson, J.B.; Steel, J.C.; Broszczak, D.A.; Neilsen, P.M.; Walsh, K.B.; Naiker, M. Natural product-derived phytochemicals as potential agents against coronaviruses: A review. Virus Res. 2020, 284, 197989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, X.; Han, W.; Wang, G.; Zhao, X. Application prospect of polysaccharides in the development of anti-novel coronavirus drugs and vaccines. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ghosh, T.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Marschall, M.; Karmakar, P.; Mandal, P.; Ray, B. Focus on antivirally active sulfated polysaccharides: From structure–activity analysis to clinical evaluation. Glycobiology 2009, 19, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gomes, D.L.; Melo, K.R.T.; Queiroz, M.F.; Batista, L.A.N.C.; Santos, P.C.; Costa, M.S.S.P.; Almeida-Lima, J.; Camara, R.B.G.; Costa, L.S.; Rocha, H.A.O. In vitro studies reveal antiurolithic effect of antioxidant sulfated polysaccharides from the green seaweed Caulerpa cupressoides var flabellata. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Jiao, G.; Yu, G.; Zhang, J.; Ewart, H.S. Chemical structures and bioactivities of sulfated polysaccharides from marine algae. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 196–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xu, S.-Y.; Huang, X.; Cheong, K.-L. Recent advances in marine algae polysaccharides: Isolation, structure, and activities. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yang, J.; Luo, K.; Li, D.; Yu, S.; Cai, J.; Chen, L.; Du, Y. Preparation, characterization and in vitro anticoagulant activity of highly sulfated chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 52, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dinoro, J.; Maher, M.; Talebian, S.; Jafarkhani, M.; Mehrali, M.; Orive, G.; Foroughi, J.; Lord, M.S.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A. Sulfated polysaccharide-based scaffolds for orthopaedic tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2019, 214, 119214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, X.; Nian, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Q.; Zeng, X.; Hu, B. High internal phase emulsions stabilized with amyloid fibrils and their polysaccharide complexes for encapsulation and protection of β-carotene. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2019, 183, 110459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Appleyard, R.; Burkhardt, D.; Ghosh, P.; Read, R.; Cake, M.; Swain, M.; Murrell, G. Topographical analysis of the structural, biochemical and dynamic biomechanical properties of cartilage in an ovine model of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2003, 11, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Caputo, H.E.; Straub, J.E.; Grinstaff, M.W. Design, synthesis, and biomedical applications of synthetic sulphated polysaccharides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2338–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hansen, S.U.; Miller, G.J.; Cliff, M.J.; Jayson, G.C.; Gardiner, J.M. Making the longest sugars: A chemical synthesis of heparin-related [4] n oligosaccharides from 16-mer to 40-mer. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 6158–6164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Osborn, M.; Rosen, S.; Rothfield, L.; Zeleznick, L.; Horecker, B. Lipopolysaccharide of the Gram-Negative Cell Wall: Biosynthesis of a complex heteropolysaccharide occurs by successive addition of specific sugar residues. Science 1964, 145, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Arad, S.M.; Levy-Ontman, O. Red microalgal cell-wall polysaccharides: Biotechnological aspects. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Allakhverdiev, S.I.; Sakamoto, A.; Nishiyama, Y.; Inaba, M.; Murata, N. Ionic and osmotic effects of NaCl-induced inactivation of photosystems I and II in Synechococcus sp. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1047–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mandal, P.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; Ghosh, T.; Ray, B. Xylans from Scinaia hatei: Structural features, sulfation and anti-HSV activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 46, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ray, S.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; Ray, B. Additionally sulfated xylomannan sulfates from Scinaia hatei and their antiviral activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 131, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pujol, C.A.; Ray, S.; Ray, B.; Damonte, E.B. Antiviral activity against dengue virus of diverse classes of algal sulfated polysaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mandal, P.; Pujol, C.A.; Carlucci, M.J.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Damonte, E.B.; Ray, B. Anti-herpetic activity of a sulfated xylomannan from Scinaia hatei. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 2193–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ray, B. Polysaccharides from Enteromorpha compressa: Isolation, purification and structural features. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 66, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chattopadhyay, K.; Mandal, P.; Lerouge, P.; Driouich, A.; Ghosal, P.; Ray, B. Sulphated polysaccharides from Indian samples of Enteromorpha compressa (Ulvales, Chlorophyta): Isolation and structural features. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kennedy, J.F.; White, C.A. Bioactive Carbohydrates: In Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biology; Ellis Horwood Ltd.: Birmingham, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sfriso, A.A.; Gallo, M.; Baldi, F. Seasonal variation and yield of sulfated polysaccharides in seaweeds from the Venice Lagoon. Bot. Mar. 2017, 60, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kravchenko, A.; Barabanova, A.B.; Glazunov, V.; Yakovleva, I.; Yermak, I. Seasonal variations in a polysaccharide composition of Far. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 30, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hahn, T.; Lang, S.; Ulber, R.; Muffler, K. Novel procedures for the extraction of fucoidan from brown algae. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 1691–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ale, M.T.; Meyer, A.S. Fucoidans from brown seaweeds: An update on structures, extraction techniques and use of enzymes as tools for structural elucidation. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 8131–8141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Karmakar, P.; Ghosh, T.; Sinha, S.; Saha, S.; Mandal, P.; Ghosal, P.K.; Ray, B. Polysaccharides from the brown seaweed Padina tetrastromatica: Characterization of a sulfated fucan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 78, 416–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bandyopadhyay, S.S.; Navid, M.H.; Ghosh, T.; Schnitzler, P.; Ray, B. Structural features and in vitro antiviral activities of sulfated polysaccharides from Sphacelaria indica. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Banerjee, P.; Jana, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Bera, K.; Majee, S.K.; Ali, I.; Pal, S.; Ray, B.; Ray, S. The heteropolysaccharide of Mangifera indica fruit: Isolation, chemical profile, complexation with β-lactoglobulin and antioxidant activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fernando, I.; Sanjeewa, K.; Samarakoon, K.W.; Lee, W.W.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, E.-A.; Gunasekara, U.; Abeytunga, D.; Nanayakkara, C.; De Silva, E. FTIR characterization and antioxidant activity of water soluble crude polysaccharides of Sri Lankan marine algae. Algae 2017, 32, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kadam, S.U.; Tiwari, B.K.; O’Donnell, C.P. Application of novel extraction technologies for bioactives from marine algae. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2013, 61, 4667–4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ibañez, E.; Herrero, M.; Mendiola, J.A.; Castro-Puyana, M. Extraction and characterization of bioactive compounds with health benefits from marine resources: Macro and micro algae, cyanobacteria, and invertebrates. In Marine Bioactive Compounds; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 55–98. [Google Scholar]
  41. Torri, G.; Naggi, A. Heparin centenary–an ever-young life-saving drug. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 212, S1–S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Oduah, E.I.; Linhardt, R.J.; Sharfstein, S.T. Heparin: Past, present, and future. Pharmaceuticals 2016, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Casu, B. Structure and biological activity of heparin. In Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1985; Volume 43, pp. 51–134. [Google Scholar]
  44. Michalak, I.; Chojnacka, K. Algal extracts: Technology and advances. Eng. Life Sci. 2014, 14, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. e Silva, A.d.S.; de Magalhães, W.T.; Moreira, L.M.; Rocha, M.V.P.; Bastos, A.K.P. Microwave-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis using the concept of green chemistry. Algal Res. 2018, 35, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Flórez, N.; Conde, E.; Domínguez, H. Microwave assisted water extraction of plant compounds. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 590–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Flórez-Fernández, N.; Balboa, E.M.; Domínguez, H. Extraction and purification of fucoidan from marine sources. Encycl. Mar. Biotechnol. 2020, 2, 1093–1125. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lorbeer, A.; Lahnstein, J.; Fincher, G.; Su, P.; Zhang, W. Kinetics of conventional and microwave-assisted fucoidan extractions from the brown alga, Ecklonia radiata. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 2079–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sivakumar, M.; Ruckmani, K. Microwave-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Cyphomandra betacea and its biological activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 92, 682–693. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tsubaki, S.; Oono, K.; Hiraoka, M.; Onda, A.; Mitani, T. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal extraction of sulfated polysaccharides from Ulva spp. and Monostroma latissimum. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yuan, Y.; Macquarrie, D. Microwave assisted extraction of sulfated polysaccharides (fucoidan) from Ascophyllum nodosum and its antioxidant activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 129, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mirzadeh, M.; Arianejad, M.R.; Khedmat, L. Antioxidant, antiradical, and antimicrobial activities of polysaccharides obtained by microwave-assisted extraction method: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Balboa, E.M.; Rivas, S.; Moure, A.; Domínguez, H.; Parajó, J.C. Simultaneous extraction and depolymerization of fucoidan from Sargassum muticum in aqueous media. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 4612–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Heavisides, E.; Rouger, C.; Reichel, A.F.; Ulrich, C.; Wenzel-Storjohann, A.; Sebens, S.; Tasdemir, D. Seasonal variations in the metabolome and bioactivity profile of Fucus vesiculosus extracted by an optimised, pressurised liquid extraction protocol. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Mena-García, A.; Ruiz-Matute, A.I.; Soria, A.C.; Sanz, M.L. Green techniques for extraction of bioactive carbohydrates. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 119, 115612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Saldaña, M.D.; Ekaette, I.; Valdivieso Ramirez, C.S.; dos Reis Coimbra, J.S.; Cardozo-Filho, L. Pressurized Fluid Extraction of Phytochemicals from Fruits, Vegetables, Cereals, and Herbs. In Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals: Chemistry and Human Health, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 721–748. [Google Scholar]
  57. Saravana, P.S.; Cho, Y.-J.; Park, Y.-B.; Woo, H.-C.; Chun, B.-S. Structural, antioxidant, and emulsifying activities of fucoidan from Saccharina japonica using pressurized liquid extraction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 153, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bendicho, C.; De La Calle, I.; Pena, F.; Costas, M.; Cabaleiro, N.; Lavilla, I. Ultrasound-assisted pretreatment of solid samples in the context of green analytical chemistry. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 31, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ebringerová, A.; Hromádková, Z. An overview on the application of ultrasound in extraction, separation and purification of plant polysaccharides. Cent. Eur. J. Chem 2010, 8, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Flórez-Fernández, N.; López-García, M.; González-Muñoz, M.J.; Vilariño, J.M.L.; Domínguez, H. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of fucoidan from Sargassum muticum. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 1553–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Obluchinsksya, E.; Makarova, M.; Pozharitskaya, O.; Shikov, A. Effects of ultrasound treatment on the chemical composition and anticoagulant properties of dry fucus extract. Pharm. Chem. J. 2015, 49, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tang, W.; Lin, L.; Xie, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Dong, Y.; Shen, M.; Xie, M. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of polysaccharide from Cyclocarya paliurus. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wan, P.; Yang, X.; Cai, B.; Chen, H.; Sun, H.; Chen, D.; Pan, J. Ultrasonic extraction of polysaccharides from Laminaria japonica and their antioxidative and glycosidase inhibitory activities. J. Ocean Univ. China 2015, 14, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhu, W.; Xue, X.; Zhang, Z. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction, structure and antitumor activity of polysaccharide from Polygonum multiflorum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 91, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zou, Y.; Chen, X.; Yang, W.; Liu, S. Response surface methodology for optimization of the ultrasonic extraction of polysaccharides from Codonopsis pilosula Nannf. var. modesta LT Shen. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Isik, M.; Sardon, H.; Mecerreyes, D. Ionic liquids and cellulose: Dissolution, chemical modification and preparation of new cellulosic materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 11922–11940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kunz, W.; Häckl, K. The hype with ionic liquids as solvents. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 661, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Martins, M.; Vieira, F.A.; Correia, I.; Ferreira, R.A.; Abreu, H.; Coutinho, J.A.; Ventura, S.P. Recovery of phycobiliproteins from the red macroalga Gracilaria sp. using ionic liquid aqueous solutions. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 4287–4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xiao, J.; Chen, G.; Li, N. Ionic liquid solutions as a green tool for the extraction and isolation of natural products. Molecules 2018, 23, 1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Yan, J.-K.; Ma, H.-L.; Pei, J.-J.; Wang, Z.-B.; Wu, J.-Y. Facile and effective separation of polysaccharides and proteins from Cordyceps sinensis mycelia by ionic liquid aqueous two-phase system. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 135, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Charoensiddhi, S.; Lorbeer, A.J.; Lahnstein, J.; Bulone, V.; Franco, C.M.; Zhang, W. Enzyme-assisted extraction of carbohydrates from the brown alga Ecklonia radiata: Effect of enzyme type, pH and buffer on sugar yield and molecular weight profiles. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. de Borba Gurpilhares, D.; Cinelli, L.P.; Simas, N.K.; Pessoa Jr, A.; Sette, L.D. Marine prebiotics: Polysaccharides and oligosaccharides obtained by using microbial enzymes. Food Chem. 2019, 280, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hardouin, K.; Bedoux, G.; Burlot, A.-S.; Donnay-Moreno, C.; Bergé, J.-P.; Nyvall-Collén, P.; Bourgougnon, N. Enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) for the production of antiviral and antioxidant extracts from the green seaweed Ulva armoricana (Ulvales, Ulvophyceae). Algal Res. 2016, 16, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Nadar, S.S.; Rao, P.; Rathod, V.K. Enzyme assisted extraction of biomolecules as an approach to novel extraction technology: A review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 309–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Olivares-Molina, A.; Fernández, K. Comparison of different extraction techniques for obtaining extracts from brown seaweeds and their potential effects as angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rhein-Knudsen, N.; Ale, M.T.; Meyer, A.S. Seaweed hydrocolloid production: An update on enzyme assisted extraction and modification technologies. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3340–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rodrigues, D.; Sousa, S.r.; Silva, A.; Amorim, M.; Pereira, L.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.; Gomes, A.M.; Duarte, A.C.; Freitas, A.C. Impact of enzyme-and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods on biological properties of red, brown, and green seaweeds from the central west coast of Portugal. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3177–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wijesinghe, W.; Jeon, Y.-J. Enzyme-assistant extraction (EAE) of bioactive components: A useful approach for recovery of industrially important metabolites from seaweeds: A review. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Xiong, Q.; Song, Z.; Hu, W.; Liang, J.; Jing, Y.; He, L.; Huang, S.; Wang, X.; Hou, S.; Xu, T. Methods of extraction, separation, purification, structural characterization for polysaccharides from aquatic animals and their major pharmacological activities. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Reisky, L.; Prechoux, A.; Zühlke, M.-K.; Bäumgen, M.; Robb, C.S.; Gerlach, N.; Roret, T.; Stanetty, C.; Larocque, R.; Michel, G. A marine bacterial enzymatic cascade degrades the algal polysaccharide ulvan. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Whistler, R.; Sannella, J. Fractional Precipitation with Ethanol; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1965; Volume 5, pp. 34–36. [Google Scholar]
  82. Hu, X.; Goff, H.D. Fractionation of polysaccharides by gradient non-solvent precipitation: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 81, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shi, L. Bioactivities, isolation and purification methods of polysaccharides from natural products: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 92, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Scott, J. Fractionation by precipitation with quaternary ammonium salts. In Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, General Polysaccharides; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1965; pp. 38–44. [Google Scholar]
  85. Jones, J.; Stoodley, R. Fractionation using copper complexes. Methods Carbohydr. Chem. 1965, 5, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ai, C.; Meng, H.; Lin, J.; Zhang, T.; Guo, X. Combined membrane filtration and alcohol-precipitation of alkaline soluble polysaccharides from sugar beet pulp: Comparision of compositional, macromolecular, and emulsifying properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 109, 106049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, Z.-P.; Shen, C.-C.; Gao, F.-L.; Wei, H.; Ren, D.-F.; Lu, J. Isolation, purification and structural characterization of two novel water-soluble polysaccharides from Anredera cordifolia. Molecules 2017, 22, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Brou, A.; Jaffrin, M.; Ding, L.; Courtois, J. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of polysaccharides produced by fermentation using a rotating disk dynamic filtration system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 82, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. García-Vaquero, M.; Rajauria, G.; O’doherty, J.; Sweeney, T. Polysaccharides from macroalgae: Recent advances, innovative technologies and challenges in extraction and purification. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Mohan, K.; Muralisankar, T.; Uthayakumar, V.; Chandirasekar, R.; Revathi, N.; Abirami, R.G.; Velmurugan, K.; Sathishkumar, P.; Jayakumar, R.; Seedevi, P. Trends in the extraction, purification, characterisation and biological activities of polysaccharides from tropical and sub-tropical fruits-A comprehensive review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 238, 116185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Izydorczyk, M. Understanding the Chemistry of Food Carbohydrates; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhang, R.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Mao, J. Composition, isolation, purification and biological activities of Sargassum fusiforme polysaccharides: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 228, 115381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Siddhanta, A.; Goswami, A.; Ramavat, B.; Mody, K.; Mairh, O. Water Soluble Polysaccharides of Marine Algal Species of Ulva (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) of Indian Waters. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 2001, 30, 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ray, B.; Lahaye, M. Cell-wall polysaccharides from the marine green alga Ulva “rigida”(Ulvales, Chlorophyta). Extraction and chemical composition. Carbohydr. Res. 1995, 274, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Robic, A.; Rondeau-Mouro, C.; Sassi, J.-F.; Lerat, Y.; Lahaye, M. Structure and interactions of ulvan in the cell wall of the marine green algae Ulva rotundata (Ulvales, Chlorophyceae). Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 77, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ren, Y.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, W.; Del Rio Flores, A. The preparation and structure analysis methods of natural polysaccharides of plants and fungi: A review of recent development. Molecules 2019, 24, 3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Guo, Q.; Chang, S. Tetra-detector size exclusion chromatography characterization of molecular and solution properties of soluble microbial polysaccharides from an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng 2017, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. He, K.; Mergens, B.; Yatcilla, M.; Zheng, Q.; Bao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Xie, Z. Molecular weight determination of aloe polysaccharides using size exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle laser light scattering and refractive index detectors. J. AOAC Int. 2018, 101, 1729–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Jiang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, D.D. Combining online size exclusion chromatography and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to characterize plant polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 246, 116591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Lee, Y.R.; Row, K.H. Ionic liquid-modified mesoporous silica stationary phase for separation of polysaccharides with size exclusion chromatography. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 196, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, H.-J.; Mao, W.-J.; Fang, F.; Li, H.-Y.; Sun, H.-H.; Chen, Y.; Qi, X.-H. Chemical characteristics and anticoagulant activities of a sulfated polysaccharide and its fragments from Monostroma latissimum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 71, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jaulneau, V.; Lafitte, C.; Jacquet, C.; Fournier, S.; Salamagne, S.; Briand, X.; Esquerré-Tugayé, M.-T.; Dumas, B. Ulvan, a sulfated polysaccharide from green algae, activates plant immunity through the jasmonic acid signaling pathway. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010, 2010, 525291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Kidgell, J.T.; Magnusson, M.; de Nys, R.; Glasson, C.R. Ulvan: A systematic review of extraction, composition and function. Algal Res. 2019, 39, 101422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Venkataraman, G.; Shriver, Z.; Raman, R.; Sasisekharan, R. Sequencing complex polysaccharides. Science 1999, 286, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nishimura, S.I.; Niikura, K.; Kurogochi, M.; Matsushita, T.; Fumoto, M.; Hinou, H.; Kamitani, R.; Nakagawa, H.; Deguchi, K.; Miura, N. High-throughput protein glycomics: Combined use of chemoselective glycoblotting and MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Laroy, W.; Contreras, R.; Callewaert, N. Glycome mapping on DNA sequencing equipment. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gray, C.J.; Migas, L.G.; Barran, P.E.; Pagel, K.; Seeberger, P.H.; Eyers, C.E.; Boons, G.-J.; Pohl, N.L.; Compagnon, I.; Widmalm, G.R. Advancing solutions to the carbohydrate sequencing challenge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14463–14479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ashline, D.; Singh, S.; Hanneman, A.; Reinhold, V. Congruent strategies for carbohydrate sequencing. 1. Mining structural details by MS n. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 6250–6262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. White, C.; Kennedy, J. Identification and structural analysis of monomeric and polymeric carbohydrates. In Carbohydrate Chemistry; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 42–72. [Google Scholar]
  110. Nagy, G.; Peng, T.; Pohl, N.L. Recent liquid chromatographic approaches and developments for the separation and purification of carbohydrates. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 3579–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Brummer, Y.; Cui, S.W. Understanding carbohydrate analysis. In Food Carbohydrates: Chemistry, Physical Properties and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  112. Laine, C.; Tamminen, T.; Vikkula, A.; Vuorinen, T. Methylation analysis as a tool for structural analysis of wood polysaccharides. Holzforschung 2002, 56, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sims, I.M.; Carnachan, S.M.; Bell, T.J.; Hinkley, S.F. Methylation analysis of polysaccharides: Technical advice. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 188, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hakomori, S.-I. A rapid permethylation of glycolipid, and polysaccharide catalyzed by methylsulfinyl carbanion in dimethyl sulfoxide. J. Biochem. 1964, 55, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Fry, S.C. The Growing Plant Cell Wall: Chemical and Metabolic Analysis; Longman Group Ltd.: Harlow, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  116. Carpita, N.C.; Shea, E.M. Chromatography-mass spectrometry (GS-MS) of partially methylated alditol acetates. In Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1988; p. 157. [Google Scholar]
  117. Blakeney, A.B.; Stone, B.A. Methylation of carbohydrates with lithium methylsulphinyl carbanion. Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 140, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cui, S.W. Structural analysis of polysaccharides. In Food Carbohydrates: Chemistry, Physical Properties, and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, LF, USA, 2005; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  119. Jansson, P.-E. A Practical Guide to the Methylation Analysis of Carbohydrates; Arrhenius Laboratory, University of Stockholm: Stockholm, Sweden, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  120. Selvendran, R.R.; Oï, N. Isolation and analysis of cell walls from plant material. Methods Biochem. Anal. 1987, 32, 25–153. [Google Scholar]
  121. Faccin-Galhardi, L.C.; Ray, S.; Lopes, N.; Ali, I.; Espada, S.F.; Dos Santos, J.P.; Ray, B.; Linhares, R.E.C.; Nozawa, C. Assessment of antiherpetic activity of nonsulfated and sulfated polysaccharides from Azadirachta indica. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ghosh, T.; Auerochs, S.; Saha, S.; Ray, B.; Marschall, M. Anti-cytomegalovirus activity of sulfated glucans generated from a commercial preparation of rice bran. Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 2010, 21, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Lopes, N.; Ray, S.; Espada, S.F.; Bomfim, W.A.; Ray, B.; Faccin-Galhardi, L.C.; Linhares, R.E.C.; Nozawa, C. Green seaweed Enteromorpha compressa (Chlorophyta, Ulvaceae) derived sulphated polysaccharides inhibit herpes simplex virus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Saha, S.; Navid, M.H.; Bandyopadhyay, S.S.; Schnitzler, P.; Ray, B. Sulfated polysaccharides from Laminaria angustata: Structural features and in vitro antiviral activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mazumder, S.; Lerouge, P.; Loutelier-Bourhis, C.; Driouich, A.; Ray, B. Structural characterisation of hemicellulosic polysaccharides from Benincasa hispida using specific enzyme hydrolysis, ion exchange chromatography and MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 59, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ghosh, P.; Ghosal, P.; Thakur, S.; Lerouge, P.; Loutelier-Bourhis, C.; Driouich, A.; Ray, B. Polysaccharides from Sesamum indicum meal: Isolation and structural features. Food Chem. 2005, 90, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ray, B.; Loutelier-Bourhis, C.; Lange, C.; Condamine, E.; Driouich, A.; Lerouge, P. Structural investigation of hemicellulosic polysaccharides from Argania spinosa: Characterisation of a novel xyloglucan motif. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Banerjee, P.; Mukherjee, S.; Bera, K.; Ghosh, K.; Ali, I.; Khawas, S.; Ray, B.; Ray, S. Polysaccharides from Thymus vulgaris leaf: Structural features, antioxidant activity and interaction with bovine serum albumin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 125, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Raja, W.; Bera, K.; Ray, B. Polysaccharides from Moringa oleifera gum: Structural elements, interaction with β-lactoglobulin and antioxidative activity. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 75699–75706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ghosh, K.; Ray, S.; Ghosh, D.; Ray, B. Chemical structure of the arabinogalactan protein from gum ghatti and its interaction with bovine serum albumin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ghosh, D.; Ray, S.; Ghosh, K.; Micard, V.; Chatterjee, U.R.; Ghosal, P.K.; Ray, B. Antioxidative carbohydrate polymer from Enhydra fluctuans and its interaction with bovine serum albumin. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 1761–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ramakrishnan, V.; Luthria, D.L. Recent applications of NMR in food and dietary studies. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Bubb, W.A. NMR spectroscopy in the study of carbohydrates: Characterizing the structural complexity. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A Bridg. Educ. Res. 2003, 19, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Cheng, H.; Neiss, T.G. Solution NMR spectroscopy of food polysaccharides. Polym. Rev. 2012, 52, 81–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Koerner, T.A.; Prestegard, J.H.; Robert, K.Y. [4] Oligosaccharide structure by two-dimensional proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In Methods Enzymol; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987; Volume 138, pp. 38–59. [Google Scholar]
  136. Dabrowski, J.; Ejchart, A.; Kordowicz, M.; Hanfland, P. Identification of constituent sugar residues in oligosaccharides by two-dimensional 1H NMR phase-sensitive correlated spectroscopy. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1987, 25, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mourão, P.A.; Vilanova, E.; Soares, P.A. Unveiling the structure of sulfated fucose-rich polysaccharides via nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2018, 50, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Pomin, V.H. Solution NMR conformation of glycosaminoglycans. Prog. Biophys. Mol. 2014, 114, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Pomin, V.H. NMR structural determination of unique invertebrate glycosaminoglycans endowed with medical properties. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 413, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Tsai, C.-T.; Zulueta, M.M.L.; Hung, S.-C. Synthetic heparin and heparan sulfate: Probes in defining biological functions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 40, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, Z.; Xie, J.; Shen, M.; Nie, S.; Xie, M. Sulfated modification of polysaccharides: Synthesis, characterization and bioactivities. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 74, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Bedini, E.; Laezza, A.; Parrilli, M.; Iadonisi, A. A review of chemical methods for the selective sulfation and desulfation of polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 174, 1224–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Jiang, J.; Meng, F.-Y.; He, Z.; Ning, Y.-L.; Li, X.-H.; Song, H.; Wang, J.; Zhou, R. Sulfated modification of longan polysaccharide and its immunomodulatory and antitumor activity in vitro. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 67, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lu, X.; Mo, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Y. Sulfation modification and anticoagulant activity of the polysaccharides obtained from persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) fruits. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51, 1189–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Lu, Y.; Wang, D.; Hu, Y.; Huang, X.; Wang, J. Sulfated modification of epimedium polysaccharide and effects of the modifiers on cellular infectivity of IBDV. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 71, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Nguyen, T.L.; Chen, J.; Hu, Y.; Wang, D.; Fan, Y.; Wang, J.; Abula, S.; Zhang, J.; Qin, T.; Chen, X. In vitro antiviral activity of sulfated Auricularia auricula polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 90, 1254–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Wei, D.; Wei, Y.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, L. Sulfated modification, characterization and antitumor activities of Radix hedysari polysaccharide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2012, 51, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Xu, Y.; Song, S.; Wei, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhao, M.; Guo, J.; Zhang, J. Sulfated modification of the polysaccharide from Sphallerocarpus gracilis and its antioxidant activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 87, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Akman, F.; Kazachenko, A.S.; Vasilyeva, N.Y.; Malyar, Y.N. Synthesis and characterization of starch sulfates obtained by the sulfamic acid-urea complex. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1208, 127899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Huang, X.; Zhang, W.-D. Preparation of cellulose sulphate and evaluation of its properties. J. Fiber Bioeng. Inform. 2010, 3, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  151. Levdansky, V.A.; Kondracenko, A.S.; Levdansky, A.V.; Kuznetsov, B.N.; Djakovitch, L.; Pinel, C. Sulfation of microcrystalline cellulose with sulfamic acid in N, N-dimethylformamide and diglyme. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Chem. 2014, 7, 162–169. [Google Scholar]
  152. Santra, A.; Guchhait, G.; Misra, A.K. Efficient acylation and sulfation of carbohydrates using sulfamic acid, a mild, eco-friendly catalyst under organic solvent-free conditions. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Si, X.; Zhou, Z.; Bu, D.; Li, J.; Strappe, P.; Blanchard, C. Effect of sulfation on the antioxidant properties and in vitro cell proliferation characteristics of polysaccharides isolated from corn bran. CyTA J. Food 2016, 14, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Zhou, C.L.; Liu, W.; Kong, Q.; Song, Y.; Ni, Y.Y.; Li, Q.H.; O’Riordan, D. Isolation, characterisation and sulphation of soluble polysaccharides isolated from Cucurbita maxima. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Hatanaka, K.; Hirobe, T.; Yoshida, T.; Yamanaka, M.; Uryu, T. Synthesis and sulfation of branched dextrans. Polym. J. 1990, 22, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Yamamoto, I.; Takayama, K.; Gonda, T.; Matsuzaki, K.; Hatanaka, K.I.; Yoshida, T.; Uryu, T.; Yoshida, O.; Nakashima, H.; Yamamoto, N. Synthesis, structure and antiviral activity of sulfates of curdlan and its branched derivatives. Br. Polym. J. 1990, 23, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yoshida, T.; Yasuda, Y.; Mimura, T.; Kaneko, Y.; Nakashima, H.; Yamamoto, N.; Uryu, T. Synthesis of curdlan sulfates having inhibitory effects in vitro against AIDS viruses HIV-1 and HIV-2. Carbohydr. Res. 1995, 276, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Daus, S.; Petzold-Welcke, K.; Kötteritzsch, M.; Baumgaertel, A.; Schubert, U.S.; Heinze, T. Homogeneous sulfation of xylan from different sources. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2011, 296, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Qin, Z.; Ji, L.; Yin, X.; Zhu, L.; Lin, Q.; Qin, J. Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose sulfates using a SO3/pyridine complex in DMAc/LiCl. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Richter, A.; Klemm, D. Regioselective sulfation of trimethylsilyl cellulose using different SO 3-complexes. Cellulose 2003, 10, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sun, Y.; Sun, W.; Guo, J.; Hu, X.; Gong, G.; Huang, L.; Cao, H.; Wang, Z. Sulphation pattern analysis of chemically sulphated polysaccharide LbGp1 from Lycium barbarum by GC–MS. Food Chem. 2015, 170, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Zhang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tao, X.; Wei, H. Characterization and sulfated modification of an exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY2013 and its biological activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 153, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gao, Y.; Schofield, O.M.; Leustek, T. Characterization of sulfate assimilation in marine algae focusing on the enzyme 5′-adenylylsulfate reductase. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. López, S.N.; Ramallo, I.A.; Sierra, M.G.; Zacchino, S.A.; Furlan, R.L. Chemically engineered extracts as an alternative source of bioactive natural product-like compounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Nicolaou, K.; Pfefferkorn, J.; Mitchell, H.; Roecker, A.; Barluenga, S.; Cao, G.-Q.; Affleck, R.; Lillig, J. Natural product-like combinatorial libraries based on privileged structures. 2. Construction of a 10 000-membered benzopyran library by directed split-and-pool chemistry using NanoKans and optical encoding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9954–9967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Bhatnagar, I.; Kim, S.-K. Immense essence of excellence: Marine microbial bioactive compounds. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2673–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Ginsberg, H.S.; Goebel, W.F.; Horsfall, F.L., Jr. Inhibition of mumps virus multiplication by a polysaccharide. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1947, 66, 99–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gerber, P.; Dutcher, J.D.; Adams, E.V.; Sherman, J.H. Protective effect of seaweed extracts for chicken embryos infected with influenza B or mumps virus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1958, 99, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Luescher-Mattli, M. Algae, a possible source for new drugs in the treatment of HIV and other viral diseases. Curr. Med. Chem. Anti Infect. Agents 2003, 2, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Damonte, E.B.; Matulewicz, M.C.; Cerezo, A.S. Sulfated seaweed polysaccharides as antiviral agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 2399–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Fingerman, M. Biomaterials from Aquatic and Terrestrial Organisms; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  172. Pujol, C.A.; Carlucci, M.J.; Matulewicz, M.C.; Damonte, E.B. Natural sulfated polysaccharides for the prevention and control of viral infections. In Bioactive Heterocycles V; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 259–281. [Google Scholar]
  173. Ahmadi, A.; Zorofchian Moghadamtousi, S.; Abubakar, S.; Zandi, K. Antiviral potential of algae polysaccharides isolated from marine sources: A review. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 825203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Valcarcel, J.; Novoa-Carballal, R.; Pérez-Martín, R.I.; Reis, R.L.; Vázquez, J.A. Glycosaminoglycans from marine sources as therapeutic agents. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35, 711–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Daniel, R.; Berteau, O.; Jozefonvicz, J.; Goasdoue, N. Degradation of algal (Ascophyllum nodosum) fucoidan by an enzymatic activity contained in digestive glands of the marine mollusc Pecten maximus. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 322, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chevolot, L.; Foucault, A.; Chaubet, F.; Kervarec, N.; Sinquin, C.; Fisher, A.-M.; Boisson-Vidal, C. Further data on the structure of brown seaweed fucans: Relationships with anticoagulant activity. Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 319, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Patankar, M.S.; Oehninger, S.; Barnett, T.; Williams, R.L.; Clark, G.F. A revised structure for fucoidan may explain some of its biological activities. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 21770–21776. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  178. Cumashi, A.; Ushakova, N.A.; Preobrazhenskaya, M.E.; D’Incecco, A.; Piccoli, A.; Totani, L.; Tinari, N.; Morozevich, G.E.; Berman, A.E.; Bilan, M.I. A comparative study of the anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, antiangiogenic, and antiadhesive activities of nine different fucoidans from brown seaweeds. Glycobiology 2007, 17, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Adhikari, U.; Mateu, C.G.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; Ray, B. Structure and antiviral activity of sulfated fucans from Stoechospermum marginatum. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 2474–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Karmakar, P.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; Ghosh, T.; Ray, B. Polysaccharides from Padina tetrastromatica: Structural features, chemical modification and antiviral activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Mandal, P.; Mateu, C.G.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; Ray, B. Structural features and antiviral activity of sulphated fucans from the brown seaweed Cystoseira indica. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2007, 18, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Preeprame, S.; Hayashi, K.; Lee, J.-B.; Sankawa, U.; Hayashi, T. A novel antivirally active fucan sulfate derived from an edible brown alga, Sargassum horneri. Chem. Pharm. Bull 2001, 49, 484–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Painter, T.J. Algal polysaccharides. In The Polysaccharides; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983; pp. 195–285. [Google Scholar]
  184. Percival, E.; McDowell, R.H. Chemistry and Enzymology of Marine Algal Polysaccharides; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  185. Rees, D.A. Structure, conformation, and mechanism in the formation of polysaccharide gels and networks. In Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1969; Volume 24, pp. 267–332. [Google Scholar]
  186. Duarte, M.E.; Cauduro, J.P.; Noseda, D.G.; Noseda, M.D.; Gonçalves, A.G.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; Cerezo, A.S. The structure of the agaran sulfate from Acanthophora spicifera (Rhodomelaceae, Ceramiales) and its antiviral activity. Relation between structure and antiviral activity in agarans. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. De Sf-Tischer, P.C.; Talarico, L.B.; Noseda, M.D.; Guimarães, S.M.P.B.; Damonte, E.B.; Duarte, M.E.R. Chemical structure and antiviral activity of carrageenans from Meristiella gelidium against herpes simplex and dengue virus. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 63, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Pujol, C.; Estevez, J.; Carlucci, M.; Ciancia, M.; Cerezo, A.; Damonte, E. Novel DL-galactan hybrids from the red seaweed Gymnogongrus torulosus are potent inhibitors of herpes simplex virus and dengue virus. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2002, 13, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Lahaye, M. NMR spectroscopic characterisation of oligosaccharides from two Ulva rigida ulvan samples (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) degraded by a lyase. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Lahaye, M.; Ray, B. Cell-wall polysaccharides from the marine green alga Ulva” rigida”(Ulvales, Chlorophyta)-NMR analysis of ulvan oligosaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 1996, 283, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Lahaye, M.; Robic, A. Structure and functional properties of ulvan, a polysaccharide from green seaweeds. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Ray, B.; Lahaye, M. Cell-wall polysaccharides from the marine green alga Ulva “rigida” (Ulvales, Chlorophyta). Chemical structure of ulvan. Carbohydr. Res. 1995, 274, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Chiu, Y.-H.; Chan, Y.-L.; Li, T.-L.; Wu, C.-J. Inhibition of Japanese encephalitis virus infection by the sulfated polysaccharide extracts from Ulva lactuca. Mar. Biotechnol. 2012, 14, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Jiao, G.; Yu, G.; Wang, W.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, J.; Ewart, S.H. Properties of polysaccharides in several seaweeds from Atlantic Canada and their potential anti-influenza viral activities. J. Ocean Univ. China 2012, 11, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Remminghorst, U.; Rehm, B.H. Bacterial alginates: From biosynthesis to applications. Biotechnol. Lett. 2006, 28, 1701–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Sachan, N.K.; Pushkar, S.; Jha, A.; Bhattcharya, A. Sodium alginate: The wonder polymer for controlled drug delivery. J. Pharm. Res. 2009, 2, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar]
  197. Haug, A.; Larsen, B.; Smidsrød, O. Uronic acid sequence in alginate from different sources. Carbohydr. Res. 1974, 32, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Larsen, B.R.; Smidsrød, O.; Painter, T.; Haug, A.; Rasmussen, S.; Sunde, E.; Sørensen, N. Calculation of the nearest-neighbour frequencies in fragments of alginate from the yields of free monomers after partial hydrolysis. Acta Chem. Scand. 1970, 24, 726–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Usov, A.I. Alginic acids and alginates: Analytical methods used for their estimation and characterisation of composition and primary structure. Russ. Chem. Rev 1999, 68, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Xianliang, X.; Meiyu, G.; Huashi, G.; Zelin, L. Study on the mechanism of inhibitory action of 911 on replication of HIV-1 in vitro. Zhongguo Hai Yang Yao Wu Chinese J. Mar. Drugs 2000, 19, 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  201. Jiang, B.; Xu, X.; Li, L.; Yuan, W. Study on―911‖ anti-HBV effect in HepG2. 2.15 cells culture. Prev. Med. 2003, 30, 517–518. [Google Scholar]
  202. Lee, J.-B.; Takeshita, A.; Hayashi, K.; Hayashi, T. Structures and antiviral activities of polysaccharides from Sargassum trichophyllum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Son, E.-W.; Rhee, D.-K.; Pyo, S. Antiviral and tumoricidal activities of alginate-stimulated macrophages are mediated by different mechanisms. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2003, 26, 960–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Wang, S.-X.; Zhang, X.-S.; Guan, H.-S.; Wang, W. Potential anti-HPV and related cancer agents from marine resources: An overview. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2019–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Sinha, S.; Astani, A.; Ghosh, T.; Schnitzler, P.; Ray, B. Polysaccharides from Sargassum tenerrimum: Structural features, chemical modification and anti-viral activity. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Wang, S.C.; Bligh, S.A.; Zhu, C.L.; Shi, S.S.; Wang, Z.T.; Hu, Z.B.; Crowder, J.; Branford-White, C.; Vella, C. Sulfated β-glucan derived from oat bran with potent anti-HIV activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 2624–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Zhang, M.; Cheung, P.C.; Ooi, V.E.; Zhang, L. Evaluation of sulfated fungal β-glucans from the sclerotium of Pleurotus tuber-regium as a potential water-soluble anti-viral agent. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 2297–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Enriquez, P.M.; Jung, C.; Josephson, L.; Tennant, B.C. Conjugation of adenine arabinoside 5’-monophosphate to arabinogalactan: Synthesis, characterization, and antiviral activity. Bioconjug. Chem. 1995, 6, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Recalde, M.P.; Carlucci, M.J.; Noseda, M.D.; Matulewicz, M.C. Chemical modifications of algal mannans and xylomannans: Effects on antiviral activity. Phytochemistry 2012, 73, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. De Clerq, E. Antiviral drugs in current use. J. Clin. Virol. 2004, 30, 115–133. [Google Scholar]
  211. Carlucci, M.J.; Scolaro, L.A.; Errea, M.I.; Matulewicz, M.C.; Damonte, E.B. Antiviral activity of natural sulphated galactans on herpes virus multiplication in cell culture. Planta Med. 1997, 63, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Feldman, S.; Reynaldi, S.; Stortz, C.; Cerezo, A.; Damonte, E. Antiviral properties of fucoidan fractions from Leathesia difformis. Phytomedicine 1999, 6, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Bergefall, K.; Trybala, E.; Johansson, M.; Uyama, T.; Naito, S.; Yamada, S.; Kitagawa, H.; Sugahara, K.; Bergström, T. Chondroitin sulfate characterized by the E-disaccharide unit is a potent inhibitor of herpes simplex virus infectivity and provides the virus binding sites on gro2C cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 32193–32199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Wang, W.; Wang, S.-X.; Guan, H.-S. The antiviral activities and mechanisms of marine polysaccharides: An overview. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 2795–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Ji, J.; Wang, L.; Wu, H.; Luan, H.-M. Bio-function summary of marine oligosaccharides. Int. J. Biol 2011, 3, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Witvrouw, M.; De Clercq, E. Sulfated polysaccharides extracted from sea algae as potential antiviral drugs. Gen. Pharmacol. Vasc. Syst. 1997, 29, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Rodríguez, M.C.; Merino, E.R.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B.; Cerezo, A.S.; Matulewicz, M.C. Galactans from cystocarpic plants of the red seaweed Callophyllis variegata (Kallymeniaceae, Gigartinales). Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 2742–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Talarico, L.B.; Zibetti, R.G.; Faria, P.C.; Scolaro, L.A.; Duarte, M.E.; Noseda, M.D.; Pujol, C.A.; Damonte, E.B. Anti-herpes simplex virus activity of sulfated galactans from the red seaweeds Gymnogongrus griffithsiae and Cryptonemia crenulata. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2004, 34, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Becke, S.; Fabre-Mersseman, V.; Aue, S.; Auerochs, S.; Sedmak, T.; Wolfrum, U.; Strand, D.; Marschall, M.; Plachter, B.; Reyda, S. Modification of the major tegument protein pp65 of human cytomegalovirus inhibits virus growth and leads to the enhancement of a protein complex with pUL69 and pUL97 in infected cells. J. Gen. Virol. 2010, 91, 2531–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Cao, P.; Wu, S.; Wu, T.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Y. The important role of polysaccharides from a traditional Chinese medicine-Lung Cleansing and Detoxifying Decoction against the COVID-19 pandemic. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Zhang, H.; Penninger, J.M.; Li, Y.; Zhong, N.; Slutsky, A.S. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: Molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med. 2020, 46, 586–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  222. Kim, C.-H. SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary adaptation toward host entry and recognition of receptor O-Acetyl sialylation in virus–host interaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Gentile, D.; Patamia, V.; Scala, A.; Sciortino, M.T.; Piperno, A.; Rescifina, A. Putative inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease from a library of marine natural products: A virtual screening and molecular modeling study. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  224. Liu, L.; Heinrich, M.; Myers, S.; Dworjanyn, S.A. Towards a better understanding of medicinal uses of the brown seaweed Sargassum in Traditional Chinese Medicine: A phytochemical and pharmacological review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 142, 591–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Runfeng, L.; Yunlong, H.; Jicheng, H.; Weiqi, P.; Qinhai, M.; Yongxia, S.; Chufang, L.; Jin, Z.; Zhenhua, J.; Haiming, J. Lianhuaqingwen exerts anti-viral and anti-inflammatory activity against novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 156, 104761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Yang, Y.; Islam, M.S.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, X. Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of patients infected with 2019-new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): A review and perspective. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Koenighofer, M.; Lion, T.; Bodenteich, A.; Prieschl-Grassauer, E.; Grassauer, A.; Unger, H.; Mueller, C.A.; Fazekas, T. Carrageenan nasal spray in virus confirmed common cold: Individual patient data analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Multidiscip. Respir. Med. 2014, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Venkataraman, T.; Frieman, M.B. The role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in SARS coronavirus-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Antiviral Res. 2017, 143, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Lee, N.Y.; Ermakova, S.P.; Zvyagintseva, T.N.; Kang, K.W.; Dong, Z.; Choi, H.S. Inhibitory effects of fucoidan on activation of epidermal growth factor receptor and cell transformation in JB6 Cl41 cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 1793–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Wang, W.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Hao, C.; Zhao, X.; Jiao, G.; Shan, X.; Tai, W.; Yu, G. Inhibition of influenza A virus infection by fucoidan targeting viral neuraminidase and cellular EGFR pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of seaweed-derived polysaccharides possessing in vitro antiviral activity: alginic acid (A), carrageenan (Ba,Bb), agar (Ca,Cb), fucoidan (Da,Db) and ulvan (EaEd).
Figure 1. Structures of seaweed-derived polysaccharides possessing in vitro antiviral activity: alginic acid (A), carrageenan (Ba,Bb), agar (Ca,Cb), fucoidan (Da,Db) and ulvan (EaEd).
Polymers 13 00136 g001
Figure 2. Conventional and modern procedures for the extraction of sulfated polysaccharides from marine algae.
Figure 2. Conventional and modern procedures for the extraction of sulfated polysaccharides from marine algae.
Polymers 13 00136 g002
Figure 3. Techniques for the purification of polysaccharide sulfates extracted from seaweed.
Figure 3. Techniques for the purification of polysaccharide sulfates extracted from seaweed.
Polymers 13 00136 g003
Figure 4. Methods for the chemical characterization of polysaccharides.
Figure 4. Methods for the chemical characterization of polysaccharides.
Polymers 13 00136 g004
Figure 5. Structures of a selection of sulfation reagents.
Figure 5. Structures of a selection of sulfation reagents.
Polymers 13 00136 g005
Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of polysaccharide extraction techniques.
Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of polysaccharide extraction techniques.
Extraction TechniquesAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences
Conventional water extraction
  • Simple and low-cost equipment
  • Ease of operation
  • Limited yield and selectivity
  • Long extraction time
  • High energy consumption
  • Lack of automation
[24,36,37,38]
Pressurized liquid assisted extraction
  • Selective solubilization by modulating operation severity
  • Shorter extraction time
  • Equipment costs
  • Degradation of thermolabile compounds
  • Hydrolysis of polymers
[53,54,55,56,57]
Ultrasonic assisted extraction
  • Low cost
  • Reduction of extraction time
  • Low solvent consumption
  • Reproducibility and scalability
  • Possibility to scale up to industry requirements
  • Noise pollution
  • Lack of uniformity in the vessel
  • Uneven heating in the vessel
  • Long-term ultrasonication possibly inducing structural changes
[58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]
Ionic liquid extraction
  • High extraction efficiency
  • ‘Green’ solvents
  • Negligible emulsion formation
  • Minimal viscosity
  • Fast phase separation
  • High cost factor
  • Very high corrosiveness
  • Highly hygroscopic
[66,67,68,69,70]
Microwave assisted extraction
  • High extraction efficiency
  • Short extraction time
  • Low energy consumption
  • Degradation of thermolabile compounds
[45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]
Enzymatic assisted extraction
  • High specificity
  • High catalytic efficiency
  • Mild reaction conditions
  • Low energy consumption
  • Food-grade enzymes
  • Limited enzyme recycling
  • Enzyme costs
  • Availability of suitable enzymes
[71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]
Table 2. Benefits and drawbacks of sulfation modification techniques.
Table 2. Benefits and drawbacks of sulfation modification techniques.
Sulfation ReagentsBenefitsDrawbacksReferences
Oleum
  • Broad DS values a
  • Low toxicity
  • Corrosive reagent, may lead to polysaccharide degradation
  • Strongly oxidizing agent
  • Powerful dehydrating agent
[7,8,123,143]
Chlorosulfonic acid
  • High DS values
  • High yields
  • Reaction difficult to control
  • Long reaction times
  • Complicated operation
  • Strongly oxidizing agent
[141,144,145,146,147,148]
Sulfamic acid
  • Mild reaction conditions
  • Low degradation of products
  • Low DS values
  • Low yields
  • High temperatures may lead to degradation
[149,150,151,152,153,154]
Piperidine-N-sulfonic acid
  • Mild reagent
  • Low degradation of products
  • Slow reaction
[155,156,157]
SO3-pyridine
  • Ease of handling
  • Compatibility with polar solvents
  • Regioselective sulfation by modulating reaction conditions
  • Stability of reaction conditions
  • High DS values
  • Mild reaction conditions
  • High costs
  • Oxidizing agent
[25,121,122,141,158,159,160,161,162]
a DS, degree of sulfation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ray, B.; Schütz, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Jana, S.; Ray, S.; Marschall, M. Exploiting the Amazing Diversity of Natural Source-Derived Polysaccharides: Modern Procedures of Isolation, Engineering, and Optimization of Antiviral Activities. Polymers 2021, 13, 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010136

AMA Style

Ray B, Schütz M, Mukherjee S, Jana S, Ray S, Marschall M. Exploiting the Amazing Diversity of Natural Source-Derived Polysaccharides: Modern Procedures of Isolation, Engineering, and Optimization of Antiviral Activities. Polymers. 2021; 13(1):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ray, Bimalendu, Martin Schütz, Shuvam Mukherjee, Subrata Jana, Sayani Ray, and Manfred Marschall. 2021. "Exploiting the Amazing Diversity of Natural Source-Derived Polysaccharides: Modern Procedures of Isolation, Engineering, and Optimization of Antiviral Activities" Polymers 13, no. 1: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010136

APA Style

Ray, B., Schütz, M., Mukherjee, S., Jana, S., Ray, S., & Marschall, M. (2021). Exploiting the Amazing Diversity of Natural Source-Derived Polysaccharides: Modern Procedures of Isolation, Engineering, and Optimization of Antiviral Activities. Polymers, 13(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop