Next Article in Journal
Biopolymer and Synthetic Polymer-Based Nanocomposites in Wound Dressing Applications: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Eucalyptus Species on the Structural and Thermal Performance of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) Isolated by Acid Hydrolysis
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Sucrolytic Enzyme by Bacillus licheniformis by the Bioconversion of Pomelo Albedo as a Carbon Source
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Dendritic Side Groups on the Mobility of Modified Poly(epichlorohydrin) Copolymers

1
Institute of Technology of Materials (ITM), Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV), Camí de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
2
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, Postfach 3148, 55021 Mainz, Germany
3
Department of Analytical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, Universitat Rovira I Virigili (URV), C/Marcel·lí Domingo s/n, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
4
Department of Chemical Engineering (DEQ), Universitat Rovira I Virgili (URV), Av. Païssos Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(12), 1961; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121961
Submission received: 19 May 2021 / Revised: 9 June 2021 / Accepted: 10 June 2021 / Published: 13 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure and Properties of Polymers for Smart Applications)

Abstract

:
The macromolecular dynamics of dendronized copolymer membranes (PECHs), obtained by chemical modification of poly(epichlorohydrin) with the dendron 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecan-1-yloxy)benzyloxy] benzoate, was investigated. In response to a thermal treatment during membrane preparation, these copolymers show an ability to change their shape, achieve orientation, and slightly crystallize, which was also observed by CP-MAS NMR, XRD, and DSC. The phenomenon was deeply analyzed by dielectric thermal analysis. The dielectric spectra show the influence of several factors such as the number of dendritic side groups, the orientation, their self-assembling dendrons, and the molecular mobility. The dielectric spectra present a sub-Tg dielectric relaxation, labelled as γ, associated with the mobility of the benzyloxy substituent of the dendritic group. This mobility is not related to the percentage of these lateral chains but is somewhat hindered by the orientation of the dendritic groups. Unlike other less complex polymers, the crystallization was dismantled before the appearance of the glass transition (αTg). Only after that, clearing transition (αClear) can be observed. The PECHs were flexible and offered a high free volume, despite presenting a high degree of modifications. However, the molecular mobility is not independent in each phase and the self-assembling dendrons can be eventually fine-tuned according to the percentage of grafted groups.

1. Introduction

The dendronized copolymers of poly(epichlorohydrin) (PECH), partially grafted with the dendron 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecan-1-yloxy)benzyloxy]benzoate, are large supramolecular systems. The backbones with their dendritic side groups form a self-assembled structure with arrangement into columnar channels. Their complex behavior is related to the interaction between both parts, and thus, it must be analyzed as a whole [1,2,3,4].
The self-organized dendritic side groups and the backbone in the columnar lattices were discovered and extensively investigated by the group of Percec, which described the properties of these materials as dependent on the shape of the supramolecular architecture [5,6,7].
It is known that the driving forces for the columnar self-assembly of dendronized polymers are given by the aromatic moieties in the dendrons through an exo-recognition process. These polymers can be homeotropically oriented by an external stimulus, due to π–π stacking of aromatic moieties. This evidence was also found in the case of the nanocylinder orientation of a liquid crystal block copolymer film, based on poly(ethylene oxide) and a polymethacrylate bearing azobenzene mesogenic side chains. Due to these properties, the membranes prepared with these materials show special characteristics that allow them to selectively transport charges, gases, and liquids. In particular, the membranes based on dendronized PECH have demonstrated promising properties in terms of proton transport and selectivity [8,9,10,11,12].
Nevertheless, the self-organized columnar structure has several limitations, resulting from the complexity of its molecular design, which restricts the number of possible applications of these materials. To obtain a certain performance, a specific orientation and size of the columns are required, as well as the combination of both order and mobility on a macroscopic level. In this sense, determining the relationship between the structure and the mobility of the large supramolecular systems is essential to design membranes that respond to the entailed properties.
Dielectric spectroscopy is a suitable technique to determine the reorientation of the permanent dipoles present on the side chains and on the backbone of polymeric materials, which manifest as molecular relaxations. Considering the response to an electrical perturbation field over a wide frequency range at different temperatures, the dielectric spectrum of these copolymers is obtained, and it provides information on the dynamics of large supramolecular systems [13,14].
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and 13C cross polarization magic-angle spinning (CP-MAS) NMR contribute to characterize these materials, as far as their structure and tendency to crystallize is concerned.
In a recently published manuscript [15], the dielectric properties of unoriented and oriented membranes, based on dendronized polymers and copolymers obtained by chemical modification of poly[2-(aziridin-1-yl) ethanol] (PAZE) with the dendron 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecan-1-yloxy)benzyloxy]benzoate, were analyzed. This study confirms changes in the molecular mobility of the dendritic side groups and the stability of the nano-channels with the orientation and the addition of dendritic groups. The dynamic fragility increases, with the increase in the grafting of the dendritic groups to the backbone structure, as well as a significantly weaker columnar structure. Nevertheless, the orientation procedure by means of an external stimulus, such as the thermal treatment during membrane preparation, increases the glass transition temperature and confirms the stabilization of the dendritic structure.
This work analyses the dielectric relaxation spectra of two copolymers, oriented and unoriented poly(epichlorohydrin) (PECH), with different proportions of mesogenic side groups, in order to understand the role of the backbone in self-assembled structures and the interaction between the side groups. These copolymers have the same mesogenic side groups, such as the PAZE copolymers analyzed in the previous work, but differ in the presence of the basic oxygen atoms instead of nitrogen in their backbones.
To predict the final properties of these functionalized copolymers, two factors must be considered, chain flexibility and structure regularity. Thus, it is desirable to establish whether the properties of these supramolecular systems may be tuned on the basis of either applying a thermal treatment or changing the number of grafted dendrons.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Membrane Preparation

Commercial poly(epichlorohydrin) (PECH) was purchased from Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Weight-average molecular weight (Mw) was 8.52 × 105 and the number-average molecular weight was (Mn) 3.2 × 105, which were determined by size exclusion chromatography-multi-angle laser light scattering (SEC-MALLS). The copolymers were obtained by grafting the net poly(epichlorohydrin) with 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecan-1-yloxy)benzyloxy]benzoate.
Copolymers have been labeled PECH80 and PECH40, where 80 and 40 represent the degree of modification of the net polyethers, PECH. The routes of synthesis and the characteristic differences are reported elsewhere [3,16,17].
The final chemical structure is schematized in Figure 1.
Membranes were prepared out of these polymers using phase inversion precipitation onto a Teflon® substrate. Homeotropic orientation of the LC columns was obtained by following the thermal treatment previously reported [3,17]. This columnar orientation is perpendicular to the membrane surface and improves the formation of ionic channels, which allows efficient cation transport. The thermal treatment consists of heating the obtained membranes above the copolymer clearing temperature on Teflon® support with a Linkam TP92 hot stage and keeping them at this temperature for ten minutes. Subsequently, they were slowly cooled (0.5 °C·min−1) to room temperature and then separated from the Teflon® support. Oriented copolymers are labeled as PECH80-O and PECH40-O.

2.2. Physico-Chemical Characterization

2.2.1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Calorimetric studies of dendronized polymers were performed in aluminum standard 40 mL crucibles without pin (ME-26763) with a Mettler DSC822e thermal analyzer (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA) at the heating rate of 10 K/min using about 5 mg of sample, nitrogen as a purge gas (100 mL/min) and liquid nitrogen for the cooling system. The equipment was previously calibrated with indium (429.7 K) and zinc (692.6 K) pearls.

2.2.2. Polarized Optical Microscopy (POM)

Clearing temperatures were estimated using polarized optical microscopy (POM); textures of the samples were observed with an Axiolab Zeiss optical microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a Linkam TP92 hot stage (Tadworth, UK). An image (Figure S1) of the PECH40 can be found in the Supplementary Materials.

2.2.3. Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

For all samples 1H MAS and 13C CP-MAS spectra have been recorded in a temperature range from 250 K to 350 K. The measurements have been performed at 25 kHz MAS and 850 MHz 1H Larmor frequency using a Bruker Avance III console (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) and a commercial double-resonance MAS probe supporting zirconia rotors with 2.5 mm outer diameter. The RF power levels on 1H and 13C have been adjusted to an RF nutation frequency of 100 kHz, corresponding to a 90° pulse length of 2.5 µs. The CP-MAS spectra have been acquired with a CP contact pulse length of 1 ms and 2048 transients, using the SPINAL64 decoupling scheme during acquisition. The adjusted VT gas temperatures have been corrected for frictional heating under fast MAS conditions using the known temperature-dependent chemical shift of lead nitrate so that the given temperature values reflect the actual sample temperature under the chosen MAS conditions.

2.2.4. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

X-ray diffraction measurements were performed with a Siemens (Siemens AG, München, Germany) D5000 diffractometer (Bragg–Brentano parafocusing geometry and vertical θ-θ goniometer) fitted with a curved graphite diffracted-beam monochromator, incident and diffracted-beam Soller slits, a 0.06° receiving slit and scintillation counter as a detector. Samples were dissolved in a few drops of THF, placed directly onto a low background Si(510) sample holder for reflection analysis and then the solvent was evaporated before analysis. The X-ray diffractometer was operated at 40 kV and 30 mA to generate CuKα radiation. The angular 2θ diffraction range was between 1 and 40°. The data were collected with an angular step of 0.03° at 6 s per step.

2.2.5. Dielectric Thermal Analysis (DETA) Assessment

The dielectric spectra were measured under isothermal conditions in the frequency range of f = 10−2–107 Hz, at temperatures between 123 K and 393 K, with dielectric thermal analysis equipment (DETA-Novocontrol Technologies GmbH & Co. KG, Hundsangen, Germany). To avoid any interference caused by electrode polarization, a PTFE film was inserted between the sample and the electrode [15,18,19]. The intermolecular relaxations were characterized in terms of dynamic fragility, free volume, and thermal expansion coefficients as has been carried out elsewhere [20,21,22,23,24,25].

3. Results

3.1. Morphological and Calorimetric Characterization

The presence of crystallinity and liquid crystalline organization in the copolymers PECH40 and PECH80 was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The measurements were carried out at different temperatures and the XRD diffractograms were recorded according to the following schedule, designed on the basis of the DSC evidence shown below: (i) start at 297 K; (ii) cooling 1 K/min to 223 K; (iii) heating 10 K/min to 283 K; (iv) heating 10 K/min to 383 K. Figure 2 shows the corresponding diffractograms of PECH40 at the temperature of 297 K. A reflection at a low angle (around 2θ = 1.5°) was observed, which may be assigned to the columnar mesophase. Figure 2 also recorded the diffractogram at 223 K. It puts into more evidence this reflection at 2θ = 1.6°, corresponding to d = 55.2 Å; besides, a very small crystalline reflection at 2θ = 19.8° can be foreseen. Moreover, the sharpening and asymmetry of the region around 20° also suggest the presence of some crystallinity. These small reflections were still evident when the experiment was performed at 283 K. When the sample was further analyzed at 383 K, only the broad halo around 2θ = 20° could be observed. This result evidences the existence of crystalline domains below 300 K and a columnar mesophase up to about 353 K.
Similar to PECH40, in the case of PECH80, XRD was recorded according to the following schedule: (i) start at 303 K; (ii) cooling 1 K/min to 223 K; (iii) heating 10 K/min to 433 K. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns recorded at three selected temperatures. At all the investigated temperatures, one can only see a halo around 2θ = 20° and a reflection around 2θ = 2°, characteristic of the LC columnar phase.
On the other hand, Figure 4 displays the calorimetric thermograms corresponding to the second heating scan of the PECH40 and PECH80 copolymers, performed at a 10 K/min heating rate. In both cases, it is possible to distinguish at least two prominent endotherms, the first one around 262 K and the other at 402 K. Between both, a small shoulder can be observed around 310 K. The combination of XRD and calorimetric analyses leads to the following conclusions: The former endotherm can be related to the melting of a small crystalline portion formed, while the latter relates to the clearing transition, both associated with the presence of the lateral mesogenic chains. The second shoulder could be assigned to the glass transition or/and the melting of another crystalline phase [26].
Table 1 reports the following important calorimetric features: melting temperature Tm; glass transition temperature Tg; clearing temperature Tc; melting enthalpy ΔHm; and clearing enthalpy ΔHc of PECH40 and PECH80.

3.2. Analysis of the Dielectric Spectra

The dielectric behavior of unoriented (PECH 40, PECH 80) and oriented (PECH 40-O, PECH 80-O) copolymers showed dielectric relaxations for the whole range of temperatures and frequencies, which are related to macromolecular motions in a wider temperature range. The dielectric relaxation spectra of these copolymers were analyzed in terms of the real (ε′) and imaginary (ε″) parts of the complex dielectric permittivity (ε*), and tan δ in the temperature range between 110 K and 400 K, in the frequency interval of 10−2 to 107 Hz. The dielectric relaxations plotted in terms of the loss factor, ε″, were initially deconvoluted following the Charlesworth method. To account for the additive character of the dielectric response, the data were fitted by adding up as many Havriliak–Negami (HN) functions as relaxation processes necessary to adjust all the values for each temperature. The HN function for ε″ is shown in Equation (1) [27,28,29,30].
ε * ( w ) ε =   k I m [ Δ ε ( 1 + ( i w τ H N k ) α k ) β k ]
where αk and βk are parameters corresponding to the width and asymmetry of the relaxation time distributions, respectively, τHNk is the Havriliak–Negami relaxation time, and the sub-index k represents the number of the individual contributions (k = 1 to 3, depending on the complexity of the ε″ curve at any temperature). The following parameters: the relaxation time (τ), the values of the dielectric intensity or relaxation strength (Δε), and aHN, bHN Havriliak–Negami parameters were assessed and compared between both the oriented and unoriented copolymers.
The relaxation time (τ), aHN, bHN Havriliak–Negami parameters, and the values of the dielectric intensity or relaxation strength (Δε), were assessed and compared between both the oriented and unoriented copolymers.
Δ ε = ε s ε
with ε s = ε at f 0 and ε = ε at f .
Figure 5 and Figure 6 display the isothermal curves of the real ε’ and imaginary ε″ parts of the complex dielectric permittivity ε* for all the unoriented and oriented samples. All the analyzed isothermal curves display a similar pattern, one plateau, followed by a decreasing step, which is especially evident for the PECH80 copolymer.
Besides, Figure 7 displays the evolution with the temperatures of the isochronal loss tan δ curves of all the unoriented and oriented samples.
In general terms, Figure 6 and Figure 7 exhibit a complex spectrum with at least two broad and complex dielectric relaxations, which may be the result of overlapped molecular mobilities. These dielectric relaxations have been labeled as γ and α with increasing temperature, and may be related to the different molecular motions of the benzyloxy group of the side dendrons, glass transition (αTg), and clearing of the mesophase (αClear), respectively.
Different factors must be taken into account to compare and analyze the dielectric spectrum of these systems, such as chain flexibility, structure regularity, and modification extent. The former can be responsible for an easier, but not necessarily stable, arrangement of the polymers into compact, ordered, or pseudo-ordered domains. In addition, the presence of side dendrons gives rise to an exo-recognition process, which favors polymer self-organization. Structure regularity is crucial for the formation of a stable crystalline phase. Nevertheless, the dielectric relaxation spectrum does not show large differences between the oriented and unoriented samples. The thermal orientation affected similarly the PECH copolymers.
The modification degree of the copolymers affected their behavior. In previous studies [7], it has been reported that the polymer backbone has no meaningful influence on the columnar self-assembly of dendronized polymers in the orientation of the polymeric columns perpendicular to the membrane surface. In general, the aromatic moieties are responsible for the self-assembly process of the dendrons and induce a helical arrangement of the main chain [31].
However, the higher the presence of liquid crystalline dendritic units in the structure was, the higher the polarization effect was, as the values of ε’ showed. The orientation decreased the values of the ε’ of the PECH copolymers, probably as a consequence of the increase in the crystalline content produced during thermal orientation.
Table 2 shows the dielectric strength below and above the glass transition of the unoriented and oriented PECH80, PECH40. As expected, the values increase with the temperature. The dielectric strength slightly decreased in the PECH copolymers when the orientation was induced by the thermal treatment.
The Havriliak–Negami shape aHN, bHN parameters, which were calculated for each system below and above Tg, are shown in Figure 8. The relationship between both parameters with temperature is very different. While bHN parameters corresponding to all relaxations were very close to the unity, independently of temperature, aHN parameters, as expected, increased with the temperature and lie in the range 0.8−0.9 at higher temperatures. This fact suggests a Cole−Cole behavior at high temperatures that come close to a semicircle in the low-frequency region. The orientation induced by heat treatment slightly reduced these values at γ relaxation and increased in the α relaxation. The crystalline organization of chains could be promoting a rather narrow distribution of relaxation times.

3.2.1. Macromolecular Origin and Thermal Activation of the γ Relaxation

The γ relaxation was located at low temperatures between 132 K and 128 K at a frequency of 1 kHz. Figure 9 plots the Arrhenius map of the oriented and unoriented copolymers. This figure shows a linear behavior in the log f vs. T−1, which means a temperature-frequency dependence for the maxima of loss factor isochrones, and, consequently, the thermal activation is governed by an Arrhenian-like function.
f m a x = f 0 · e x p ( E a R T )        
where fmax = 1/τmax is the frequency corresponding to the maxima in the relaxation peak (thus the reciprocal of the relaxation time, τmax), T is the temperature in Kelvin, R is the gas constant of 8.31 J·mol−1·K−1, Ea is the activation energy, and f0 is a pre-exponential term.
As Table 3 shows, the apparent activation energies Ea lie between 25 and 35 kJ·mol−1. These low values are characteristic of orientational changes of small angles concerning the longitudinal backbone of the copolymer. These motions were ascribed to the local mobility of the local secondary phenyl-aliphatic chain of the dendritic liquid crystal. The increase in the grafting degree has a slight increase in the apparent activation energies. The orientation during the preparation of the membrane also shifted the position of the maxima to higher temperatures. Polymer orientation determines a more ordered arrangement of polymer structure; therefore, more energy is needed to activate the dielectric relaxations in PECH copolymers. These results agree with those obtained from similar copolymers and confirm that orientation decreases the molecular motion of the lateral chains and, accordingly, the permittivity of the membranes [15].

3.2.2. Macromolecular Origin and Thermal Activation of the α Relaxation

At higher temperatures, close to the glass transition, both of the PECHs copolymers showed complex dielectric spectra, as is usually expected for dielectric relaxations of polymers turning from the glassy to the rubbery state, which high viscosity eases large-scale polarization effects. A high-intensity relaxation, constituted by two or more phenomena very close, was observed. These can be related to motions in both the side chains and the main chain, which makes their characterization difficult.
To elucidate the molecular motions that are the origin of these relaxations, the 1H MAS NMR and 13CP-MAS NMR spectra were recorded at different temperatures, and allowed us to distinguish more mobile and more rigid sites of the copolymers PECH40 and PECH80. Figure 10a gives the temperature-dependent 1H MAS NMR spectra of PECH40. Over the whole temperature range from 272 to 348 K, a gradual narrowing of all signals is observed. At all temperatures, the best spectral resolution is observed for the aliphatic sites of the outer side chains around 1 ppm, suggesting that the increasing molecular mobility with increasing temperature develops from the end of the aliphatic side chains. The temperature-dependent 13C CP-MAS NMR measurements shown in Figure 10b indicate a gradual simultaneous fading of the different signals of the side chains and along the polymer backbone, and thus increasing molecular mobility when the temperature increases. These results are in agreement with the dielectric result and confirm that motions of both the side chains and the main chain are in the origin of two or more overlapping α relaxation processes.
In PECH40, the aliphatic side chains are highly crystalline at low temperatures, as indicated by the signal at 34 ppm in the 13C CP MAS spectrum. Between 272 K and 302 K, the aliphatic side chains melt, as can be seen from the disappearance of the 13C NMR signal at 34 ppm as well as from the sudden decrease in the line width of the aliphatic signals in the 1H MAS spectrum, where the CH3 group at 0.8 ppm and the CH2 signals at 1.2 ppm are then clearly resolved. Therefore, these results corroborate that the first peak shown by DSC can be reasonably attributed to a side-chain melting. Above 333 K the motion of the molecules becomes fully isotropic, which leads to the loss of all CP-MAS signals. The very narrow signals in the 1H MAS spectrum at T = 350 K indicate a very high local mobility of all sites (polymer backbone, aromatic linker, and aliphatic side chains) of the polymer. The simultaneous fading of all signals indicates that there is only a minor mobility gradient between the different sites, as suggested from 1H MAS NMR.
The temperature-dependent 1H MAS NMR spectra of PECH80 are given in Figure 11a, which shows a gradual line narrowing of all signals, very similar to the behavior of PECH40.
Comparing the individual line shapes, similar spectral line shapes for the sample PECH80 are shifted towards higher temperatures by approximately 40–50 K, and in particular, the 1H signals of the aliphatic side chains remain significantly broader even at the highest temperature accessible to our NMR setup, which is still significantly below the isotropization temperature of 403 K determined by DSC. The temperature-dependent 13C CP-MAS spectra given in Figure 11b confirm the gradual increase in mobility. Remarkably, the decay of the signal intensity with increasing temperature appears to be non-uniform for the different sites. The signal intensities of the aromatic site seem to fade more rapidly with increasing temperature compared to the methoxy and aliphatic sites. However, the interpretation of this finding is very difficult as the aromatic CH bonds have an orientation of 60° degrees to the 1,4 axis of para-substituted phenylene rings, which leads to a much efficient motional averaging of CH dipolar couplings compared to the averaged orientations of methoxy or methylene groups. It should be pointed out that a significant motion, induced fading of the CP-MAS NMR signals in PECH80 occurs only above the glass transition temperature observed at 305 K in DSC. The glass transition is kinetic and so the temperature at which it occurs depends on the frequency, and the Williams–Landel–Ferry (WLF) equation predicts that Tg will change 6°–7° per decade of frequency [32].
Within the experimental error, the relation between the temperature and frequency follows the WLF equation even at the very high frequencies involved in NMR relaxation [33]. The DSC observation range is in the 1 Hz regime, whereas the NMR spectra allow the observation of molecular motions in the 10–100 kHz frequency regime; therefore, we could expect a shift of Tg approximately 30 K in the 13CP-MAS and 1H MAS NMR spectra.
In comparison to PECH40, where the CP-MAS signals fade completely in a narrow temperature range, the liquid crystalline order in PECH80 is sufficient to retain strong residual heteronuclear dipolar couplings for an efficient CP polarization transfer. This nicely coincides with the significantly higher enthalpy of PECH80 at the isotropization transition compared to PECH40. Therefore, higher modification degrees determine an increase in polymer rigidity, as it can be reasonably predicted; PECH80 contains more mesogenic units and has a higher clearing temperature compared to the less modified and less ordered PECH40. It should be remembered that starting PECH material is completely amorphous, and therefore the presence of the mesogenic side groups is responsible for inducing a hierarchical self-organization in the modified polymers through an exo-recognition process.
Therefore, according to the above calorimetric results, the first detected endotherm put into evidence the existence of a slight crystalline portion in these copolymers, which might be modified by the thermal treatment reported in the experimental part.
From calorimetric data, we could roughly estimate the crystallinity degree xc from the following equation [34]:
x c = Δ H m Δ H m 0
where ΔHm is the observed heat of melting per mesogen and ΔHm0 is the heat corresponding to 100% crystallinity, and it is equal to C + K·n; K is the constant heat of melting per mol methylene group, n is the number of methylene groups in the chain, and C takes into account the contribution of the terminal groups. Under the assumption that the crystalline side chains adopt the orthorhombic, all-anti zigzag conformation, we can consider the constant values found for polyethylene as K = 3.97 kJ/mol and C = −12.29 kJ/mol. In this way, the degree of crystallinity was estimated as 12% for PECH40 and 10% for PECH80 [35].
In previous papers [1,15], the thermal process gave satisfactory orientation when the membrane is lying on both a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic substrate (treated glass or Teflon® sheet, respectively), suggesting that the hierarchical structures in these copolymers tend to grow down from the top surface. This can be attributed to the dendrons anchoring to the air interface; in other words, the aliphatic tails of the dendrons, which possess higher mobility and low surface energy, would drive the dendrons towards the air interface over the main chain components. This evidence was also found in the case of the nanocylinder orientation of a liquid crystal block copolymer based on poly(ethylene oxide) and a polymethacrylate, also bearing azobenzene mesogen side chains [36].
In this same zone, and probably with values of temperatures in the surroundings to the glass transition to slightly higher temperatures, the clearing phenomenon also takes place. It is a supramolecular phenomenon that corresponds to the disassembling of the polymeric columns, which therefore provokes the disappearance of the liquid crystalline order. The clearing is a typical transition of thermotropic liquid crystals, based on the predominance of thermal motions over the weak interactions between the dipole-type molecules or dispersion forces that determine the arrangement into a liquid crystalline phase. These interactions are strong enough to maintain associations between molecules in a preferred orientation; however, molecules keep their freedom to move, since they are not covalently bound. In the case of the systems under investigation, the grafted tapered moieties form layers with their neighbors that are arranged at different angles, giving a liquid crystal with a helical arrangement. Thus, these moieties are placed parallel, but at the same time they can move one another along their axes. When the temperature is raised above the clearing point, thermal motions prevail over dispersion forces, and the polymeric material undergoes a first-order transition and turns isotropic.
In DETA analysis, the αClear relaxation appeared at temperatures between 315 and 337 K, according to the macromolecular investigations described in Table 2.
In agreement with the above results, the complex relaxation spectrum of unoriented and oriented PECH40 and PECH80 copolymers were analyzed with the following two relevant relaxations: αTg relaxation, related to the glass transition, and the other one being αClear relaxation, related to the clearing transition. However, the DSC observation shown in Table 1 suggests the existence of a third process at lower temperatures than the glass transition and overlapped to it, which can be related to precursor molecular motions of the melting of a certain crystalline portion induced by the presence of the lateral side chains.
Furthermore, the melting of these crystalline entities would occur before the co-axial crank-shaft motion that gives rise to the glass transition. Nevertheless, in the set of all relaxations, the one associated with the precursor motion of the fusion of this crystalline zone could not be observed. When melting occurs, probably it is completely masked by the relaxation associated with the glass transition; nevertheless, as it occurs at slightly lower temperatures, its presence may only displace the maximum temperature value of the αTg peak. Thus, the relaxation related to this motion cannot be observed.
The side-chain crystallinity, therefore, seems to be the main factor to influence the mobility of the main chain and therefore αTg relaxation; on the other hand, the orientation during membrane preparation did not affect the temperature for this relaxation since, when the cooperative motion of the main chain begins, the crystallinity of the side chains has already disappeared. The same occurs with the relaxation related to polymer clearing, i.e., αClear, the orientation did not seem to affect the clearing process.
To confirm the hypothesis of macromolecular cooperativeness, Figure 12 displays the Arrhenius plots of oriented and unoriented copolymers. The two relaxations were observed with a non-linear dependence between log f vs. T−1 representative of VFTH-like thermal activations, inherent of intermolecular segmental motions.
These intermolecular relaxations were characterized in terms of the dynamic fragility, free volume, and thermal expansion coefficient, as has been carried out elsewhere. Table 4 displays the VFTH parameters of αTg relaxation for unoriented and oriented PECH80 and PECH40 copolymers. Thus, the relationship between the relaxation time and the temperature was calculated by Equation (5) [15,21,22,23,25,37].
f m a x = f 0 · e x p ( B T T 0 )
where fmax = 1/τmax is the frequency corresponding to the maxima in the relaxation peak (thus the reciprocal of the relaxation time, τmax), T is the temperature in Kelvin, R is the gas constant of 8.31 J·mol−1·K−1, Ea is the activation energy, f0 is a pre-exponential term, B is related to the apparent activation energy,
B = E a R ( 1 T 0 T ) 2
and T0 is the Vogel temperature, below which polymeric segments become immobile. B is also related to the parameter D,
B = D·TK
which is correlated to the topology of the theoretical potential energy surface of the system, where fragile systems (D ≤ 6) present a high density of minimum energy, contrarily to strong systems (D ≥ 15), which present lower density.
The values of these parameters in Table 4 indicate that the orientation during preparation did not have much effect on the temperature of both relaxations, as previously explained.
Nevertheless, the fact that the melting occurs before the glass transition is not a common phenomenon and reflects the complexity of the structure of these copolymers. In a single-phase system, glass transitions must happen below the melting temperature. When amorphous and crystalline phases coexist, as is the case of polyethylene, it was reported that the α relaxation is associated with the crystalline phase and involves softening or deformation of the amorphous regions or splits it into two components, related to the lamellar thicknesses of crystals at the amorphous–crystalline interface [38,39,40,41,42].
For poly(L-lactic acid), dielectric loss curves put into evidence an α-process of the bulk-like amorphous phase, and an α-process of the constrained amorphous portion, in which the segmental motions are affected by the steric constraint exerted by the crystalline environment; this α-constrained relaxation process shows the usual curvature of cooperative relaxations in the Arrhenius maps [25,43].
However, for PECHs copolymers the relaxation process of the amorphous portions is somewhat constrained by the crystalline order of the dendritic lateral groups, and only when the crystalline order disappears upon melting does the molecular motion of the backbone start.
Thus, the modification degree is the most relevant factor for αTg and αClear relaxations of PECH copolymers. According to the above and elsewhere DSC results, the presence of the dendritic side chains forces the copolymers to adopt a specific spatial situation and constrains their steric influence; this is also probably promoted by the high molecular weight of these copolymers [1,2,44,45].
Concerning the αTg, the chain segment relaxes when the available free volume is higher than a critical volume, which is defined by the cooperative length of the segments. Thus, the values of the dynamic fragility parameter D are low enough to correspond, as Angell classification, as fragile systems. The dynamic fragility parameter D is lower in the oriented and unoriented PECH80 copolymers than in the PECH40 ones. This is in line with the high values of the free-volume coefficients Φ/B and the thermal expansion coefficients αf. However, TVFTH (K) is higher in the PECH80 copolymers, which indicates higher stability of these copolymers above the glass transition. Thus, PECH80 copolymers maintain a self-organized columnar structure more stably than PECH40 ones at temperatures below the glass transition [20,23,46,47].
Nevertheless, when the systems approach the glass transition, the lower values of the parameter D in the PECH80 copolymers indicate the growth of macromolecular rearrangements, which provoke the crank-shaft motion and promote a quick loosening of the rigid glassy structure. This heterogeneous behavior near the glass transition and below the clearing transition indicate that some side chains are already quite mobile, whereas others are still very rigid. This equilibrium between the mobility and stabilization of the dendritic chains allows turning these polymers into efficient membranes for ionic transport applications. These results are in agreement with the behavior of dendronized polymers and copolymers obtained by the chemical modification of poly[2-(aziridin-1-yl) ethanol] (PAZE), with the same dendron 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecan-1-yloxy)benzyloxy]benzoate analyzed elsewhere [15]. These copolymers with lower grafted dendritic groups maintain better the locally ordered structure near the glass transition than the polymer completely grafted.
Near αTg relaxation, the phenomenon of clearing also took place. The αClear relaxation is related to a precursor motion to the disassembling of the polymeric columns. The clearing is a supramolecular phenomenon that provokes the disappearance of the thermotropic liquid crystals order, as this temperature rises, the order of the system decreases, and a liquid crystal phase is converted into an isotropic liquid. In the PECH copolymers, the clearing temperature appears between 353 K and 405 K, according to the DSC results displayed in Table 1. The molecules get their freedom due to the predominance of thermal motions over the weak dipolar interactions between molecules.
As the Arrhenius plots in Figure 12 indicate, the αClear relaxation is an intermolecular motion and could be therefore explained by a VFTH-like function. Table 5 gathers the results of fitting the thermal activation of the relaxation times for oriented and unoriented copolymers. Despite this, only the highest regression parameters to the VFTH-like function have been considered. From these parameters, it can be deduced that orientation during the preparation of the samples did not have any effect on this relaxation process, as expected.
However, the grafted tapered moieties form layers with their neighbors that are arranged at different angles, giving a liquid crystal with a helical arrangement. Thus, these moieties are placed parallel, but at the same time, they can move past each other along their axes. For the αClear relaxation, the parameter D exhibits higher values for both the oriented and unoriented PECH80 copolymers than for the PECH40 ones. Besides, PECH40 has a TVFTH temperature related to the clearing relaxation higher than PECH80 copolymers. These results indicate that dispersion forces prevail when the number of the grafted dendritic group increases. Thus, the polymeric material undergoes a first-order transition and turns isotropic faster.

4. Conclusions

The dendronized copolymers, obtained by the chemical modification of poly(epichlorohydrin) (PECH) with the dendron 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecan-1-yloxy)benzyloxy]benzoate, partially organize into a crystalline structure and a liquid crystal mesophase. The thermal treatment applied for membrane orientation enhances nano-crystalline structures.
The dynamic mobility analyses by the dielectric spectra of the PECHs copolymers distinguish, at low temperatures, an intramolecular γ relaxation, which was associated with the reorientation of the benzyloxy substituent of the mesogenic side group. The addition of mesogenic side groups to the structure of PECHs does not affect the dynamic of the benzyloxy substituents. However, the crystalline organization, promoted by thermal treatment, increases the apparent activation energy of both copolymers.
At high temperatures, the intermolecular motions related to the glass (αTg) transition were observed. The modification degree is the most relevant factor for αTg relaxations of both PECH copolymers. The presence of the dendritic side chains induces a crystalline order, which somewhat constrains the αTg relaxation process of the amorphous portions. Only when the crystalline order melts can the molecular motion of the backbone start, unlike other less complex semi-crystalline polymers. The dynamic fragility displays lower values for PECH80 copolymers than the PECH40 ones, and the self-organized columnar structure is more stable at temperatures below the glass transition. At temperatures near the glass transition, the crank-shaft movement promotes a quicker loosening of the ordered glass structure in PECH80 than in PECH40.
The αClear relaxation occurs near αTg relaxation and is related to a precursor motion of the disassembling of the polymeric columns. A higher number of the grafted dendritic group enhances the dispersion forces and the polymeric material turns isotropic faster.
In general terms, the possibility of designing PECH-based copolymers stable over a wide range of temperatures, depending on the number of the grafted dendritic group, allows fine-tuning the ionic transport properties of these membranes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym13121961/s1, Figure S1. optical micrograph between crossed polars of PECH40, unoriented membrane after casting, room temperature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R.-G., M.G., J.A.R. and R.G.; methodology A.R.-G., M.G., J.A.R. and R.G.; formal analysis, R.T.-J. and B.P.-J.; investigation, A.R.-G., M.G., R.T.-J. and B.P.-J.; resources, A.R.-G., M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.-G., R.T.-J., M.G., B.P.-J.; supervision, A.R.-G., M.G., J.A.R. and R.G.; funding acquisition, A.R.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, grant POLYDECARBOCELL (ENE2017-86711-C3-1-R, ENE2017-86711-C3-3-R).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to currently it forms part of an ongoing investigation.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the support of the European Union through the European Regional Development Funds (ERDF) and the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, for the grant POLYDECARBOCELL (ENE2017-86711-C3-1-R, ENE2017-86711-C3-3-R). Universitat Politècnica de València is acknowledged for the post-doctoral aid for R. Teruel-Juanes, under the PAID-10-19 SUB.1 SP20190049 scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Šakalyte, A.; Reina, J.A.; Giamberini, M. Liquid crystalline polyamines containing side dendrons: Toward the building of ion channels based on polyamines. Polymer 2013, 54, 5133–5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ronda, J.C.; Reina, J.A.; Giamberini, M. Self-organized liquid-crystalline polyethers obtained by grafting tapered mesogenic groups onto poly(epichlorohydrin): Toward biomimetic ion channels 2. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 326–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bogdanowicz, K.A.; Bhosale, S.V.; Li, Y.; Vankelecom, I.F.J.; Garcia-Valls, R.; Reina, J.A.; Giamberini, M. Mimicking nature: Biomimetic ionic channels. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 509, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rosen, B.M.; Wilson, C.J.; Wilson, D.A.; Peterca, M.; Imam, M.R.; Percec, V. Dendron-Mediated self-assembly, disassembly, and self-organization of complex systems. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6275–6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Percec, V.; Schlueter, D.; Ungar, G.; Cheng, S.Z.D.; Zhang, A. Hierarchical control of internal superstructure, diameter, and stability of supramolecular and macromolecular columns generated from tapered monodendritic building blocks. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 1745–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Percec, V.; Ahn, C.H.; Ungar, G.; Yeardley, D.J.P.; Möller, M.; Sheiko, S.S. Controlling polymer shape through the self-assembly of dendritic side-groups. Nature 1998, 391, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Percec, V.; Glodde, M.; Bera, T.K.; Miura, Y.; Shiyanovskaya, I.; Singer, K.D.; Balagurusamy, V.S.K.; Heiney, P.A.; Schnell, I.; Rapp, A. Self-organization of supramolecular helical dendrimers into complex electronic materials. Nature 2002, 419, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xu, T. Ion exchange membranes: State of their development and perspective. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 263, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Montané, X.; Bogdanowicz, K.A.; Prats-Reig, J.; Colace, G.; Reina, J.A.; Giamberini, M. Advances in the design of self-supported ion-conducting membranes—New family of columnar liquid crystalline polyamines. Part 2: Ion transport characterisation and comparison to hybrid membranes. Polymer 2016, 105, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montané, X.; Bogdanowicz, K.A.; Colace, G.; Reina, J.A.; Cerruti, P.; Lederer, A.; Giamberini, M. Advances in the design of self-supported ion-conducting membranes-new family of columnar liquid crystalline polyamines. Part 1: Copolymer synthesis and membrane preparation. Polymer 2016, 105, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Henmi, M.; Nakatsuji, K.; Ichikawa, T.; Tomioka, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Yoshio, M.; Kato, T. Self-organized liquid-crystalline nanostructured membranes for water treatment: Selective permeation of ions. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2238–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Komura, M.; Yoshitake, A.; Komiyama, H.; Iyoda, T. Control of air-interface-induced perpendicular nanocylinder orientation in liquid crystal block copolymer films by a surface-covering method. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martínez-Felipe, A.; Santonja-Blasco, L.; Badia, J.D.; Imrie, C.T.; Ribes-Greus, A. Characterization of functionalized side-chain liquid crystal methacrylates containing nonmesogenic units by dielectric spectroscopy. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 8722–8731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kremer, F.; Huwe, A.; Schönhals, A.; Różański, S.A. Molecular dynamics in confining space. In Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2003; pp. 171–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Teruel-Juanes, R.; Bogdanowicz, K.A.; Badia, J.D.; Sáenz de Juano-Arbona, V.S.d.; Graf, R.; Reina, J.A.; Giamberini, M.; Ribes-Greus, A. Molecular Mobility in Oriented and Unoriented Membranes Based on Poly[2-(Aziridin-1-yl)ethanol]. Polymers 2021, 13, 1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Percec, V.; Heck, J. Liquid Crystalline Polymers Containing Mesogenic Units Based on Half-Disc and Rod-like Moieties. 1. Synthesis and Characterization of 4-(1l-Undecan-l-yloxy)-4′-[3,4,5-Tri(p-n-Dodecan-1-yloxybenzyloxy) benzoate] Biphenyl Side Groups. J. Polym. Sci. Part A 1991, 29, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bogdanowicz, K.A.; Rapsilber, G.A.; Reina, J.A.; Giamberini, M. Liquid crystalline polymeric wires for selective proton transport, part 1: Wires preparation. Polymer 2016, 92, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gross, G.W.; Johnson, J. The layered capacitor method for dielectric bridge measurements, data analysis and interpretation of fluoride doped ice. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 1983, EI-18, 485–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, Z.; Evangelos, M.; Digby, D.M. Dielectric Relaxation Spectroscopy Studies on Water Saturated Nafion 117 Membranes. In Proceedings of the Electrochemical Society 204th National Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 12–16 October 2003. [Google Scholar]
  20. Angell, C.A. Perspective on the glass transition. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1988, 49, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vogel, H. The temperature dependence law of the viscosity of fluids. Phys. Z. 1921, 22, 645–646. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fulcher, G.S. Analysis of recent measurements of the viscosity of glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1992, 75, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Angell, C.A. Relaxation in liquids, polymers and plastic crystals—Strong/fragile patterns and problems. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1991, 131–133, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pascual-Jose, B.; Badia, J.D.; Múgica, A.; Addiego, F.; Müller, A.J.; Ribes-Greus, A. Analysis of plasticization and reprocessing effects on the segmental cooperativity of polylactide by dielectric thermal spectroscopy. Polymer 2021, 223, 123701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Badia, J.D.; Monreal, L.; Sáenz De Juano-Arbona, V.; Ribes-Greus, A. Dielectric spectroscopy of recycled polylactide. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2014, 107, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sakalyte, A. Proton Transport Membranes Based on Liquid Crystalline Polymers Having Columnar Mesophases. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vogel, H. The law of the relation between the viscosity of liquids and the temperature. Phys. Z. 1921, 22, 645–646. [Google Scholar]
  28. Charlesworth, J.M. Deconvolution of overlapping relaxations in dynamic mechanical spectra. J. Mater. Sci. 1993, 28, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Havriliak, S.; Negami, S. A complex plane representation of dielectric and mechanical relaxation processes in some polymers. Polymer 1967, 8, 161–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Havriliak, S.; Negami, S. A complex plane analysis of α-dispersions in some polymer systems. J. Polym. Sci. Part C Polym. Symp. 1966, 14, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rapp, A.; Schnell, I.; Sebastiani, D.; Brown, S.P.; Percec, V.; Spiess, H.W. Supramolecular Assembly of Dendritic Polymers Elucidated by 1H and 13C Solid-State MAS NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13284–13297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sperling, L.H. Introduction to Physical Polymer Science; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; ISBN 047170606X. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferry, J.D. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1980; ISBN1 0471048941. ISBN2 9780471048947. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jordan, E.F.; Artymyshyn, B.; Speca, A.; Wrigley, A. Wournal of Polymer Science Part A-1. Polym. Chem. 1971, 9, 1835–1851. [Google Scholar]
  35. Flory, P.J.; Vrij, A. Melting Points of Linear-Chain Homologs. The Normal Paraffin Hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3548–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Silva, M.A.; De Paoli, M.A.; Felisberti, M.I. Flory-Huggins interaction parameter of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(epichlorohydrin) and poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(epichlorohydrin-co-ethylene oxide) blends. Polymer 1998, 39, 2551–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tammann, G.; Hesse, W. Die Abhängigkeit der Viscosität von der Temperatur bie unterkühlten Flüssigkeiten. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1926, 156, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Heijboer, J. Molecular origin of relaxations in polymers. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1976, 279, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ribes-Greus, A.; Calleja, R.D. Dielectric relaxations of high and low density irradiated polyethylenes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1989, 38, 1127–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mandelkern, L. Crystallization of Polymers: Volume 2, Kinetics and Mechanisms; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004; ISBN 1139453505. [Google Scholar]
  41. Boyd, R.H. Relaxation processes in crystalline polymers: Experimental behaviour—A review. Polymer 1985, 26, 323–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brás, A.R.; Viciosa, M.T.; Wang, Y.; Dionísio, M.; Mano, J.F. Crystallization of poly(L-lactic acid) probed with dielectric relaxation spectroscopy. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 6513–6520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Percec, V.; Heck, J.; Lee, M.; Ungar, G.; Alvarez-Castillo, A. Poly{2-vinyloxyethyl 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecanyloxy) benzyloxy] benzoate}: A self-assembled supramolecular polymer similar to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Mater. Chem. 1992, 2, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bogdanowicz, K.A.; Sistat, P.; Reina, J.A.; Giamberini, M. Liquid crystalline polymeric wires for selective proton transport, part 2: Ion transport in solid-state. Polymer 2016, 92, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qin, Q.; McKenna, G.B. Correlation between dynamic fragility and glass transition temperature for different classes of glass forming liquids. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 2977–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Adam, G.; Gibbs, J.H. On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation properties in glass-forming liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Turnbull, D.; Cohen, M.H. Free-volume model of the amorphous phase: Glass transition. J. Chem. Phys. 1961, 34, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of the PECH copolymers and the dendron 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecan-1-yloxy)benzyloxy]benzoate.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of the PECH copolymers and the dendron 3,4,5-tris[4-(n-dodecan-1-yloxy)benzyloxy]benzoate.
Polymers 13 01961 g001
Figure 2. XRD diffraction pattern of PECH40 at (a) 223 K; (b) 283 K; (c) 297 K; (d) 383 K.
Figure 2. XRD diffraction pattern of PECH40 at (a) 223 K; (b) 283 K; (c) 297 K; (d) 383 K.
Polymers 13 01961 g002
Figure 3. XRD diffraction pattern of PECH80 at (a) 223 K; (b) 303 K; (c) 433 K.
Figure 3. XRD diffraction pattern of PECH80 at (a) 223 K; (b) 303 K; (c) 433 K.
Polymers 13 01961 g003
Figure 4. DSC second heating scan (rate: 10 K/min) of PECH40 (a) and PECH80 (b).
Figure 4. DSC second heating scan (rate: 10 K/min) of PECH40 (a) and PECH80 (b).
Polymers 13 01961 g004
Figure 5. Isothermal curves (in K) of the real part of the dielectric permittivity of oriented and unoriented PECH copolymers.
Figure 5. Isothermal curves (in K) of the real part of the dielectric permittivity of oriented and unoriented PECH copolymers.
Polymers 13 01961 g005
Figure 6. The imaginary part of the dielectric permittivity of oriented and unoriented PECH copolymers.
Figure 6. The imaginary part of the dielectric permittivity of oriented and unoriented PECH copolymers.
Polymers 13 01961 g006
Figure 7. Comparative isochrones curves at 1 kHz of the imaginary part of dielectric permittivity of unoriented and oriented PECH80, PECH40.
Figure 7. Comparative isochrones curves at 1 kHz of the imaginary part of dielectric permittivity of unoriented and oriented PECH80, PECH40.
Polymers 13 01961 g007
Figure 8. Comparative isochrones curves at 1 kHz of the imaginary part of dielectric permittivity of unoriented and oriented PECH80, PECH40.
Figure 8. Comparative isochrones curves at 1 kHz of the imaginary part of dielectric permittivity of unoriented and oriented PECH80, PECH40.
Polymers 13 01961 g008
Figure 9. Arrhenius maps of the γ relaxations of unoriented (full symbol) and oriented (hollow symbol) PECH80 and PECH 40 copolymers.
Figure 9. Arrhenius maps of the γ relaxations of unoriented (full symbol) and oriented (hollow symbol) PECH80 and PECH 40 copolymers.
Polymers 13 01961 g009
Figure 10. PECH40 1H MAS (a) and 13C CP-MAS (b) NMR spectra at variable temperature. In brackets, the temperature values corrected for frictional heating under fast MAS conditions are reported.
Figure 10. PECH40 1H MAS (a) and 13C CP-MAS (b) NMR spectra at variable temperature. In brackets, the temperature values corrected for frictional heating under fast MAS conditions are reported.
Polymers 13 01961 g010
Figure 11. PECH80 1H MAS (a) and 13C CP-MAS (b) NMR spectra at variable temperature. In brackets, the temperature values corrected for frictional heating under fast MAS conditions are reported.
Figure 11. PECH80 1H MAS (a) and 13C CP-MAS (b) NMR spectra at variable temperature. In brackets, the temperature values corrected for frictional heating under fast MAS conditions are reported.
Polymers 13 01961 g011
Figure 12. Arrhenius maps of the αTg and αClear relaxations of unoriented (full symbol) and oriented (hollow symbol) PECH80 and PECH40 copolymers.
Figure 12. Arrhenius maps of the αTg and αClear relaxations of unoriented (full symbol) and oriented (hollow symbol) PECH80 and PECH40 copolymers.
Polymers 13 01961 g012
Table 1. Calorimetric data for the investigated systems. Scan rate: 10 K/min.
Table 1. Calorimetric data for the investigated systems. Scan rate: 10 K/min.
SampleTm
(K)
Tg
(K)
Tc
(K)
ΔHm
(J/g)
ΔHc
(J/g)
PECH40230–28030335311.61.0
PECH80225–29030640317.31.9
Table 2. Dielectric strength of unoriented and oriented PECH80 and PECH40.
Table 2. Dielectric strength of unoriented and oriented PECH80 and PECH40.
Δ ε″ PECH80
T (K)153163173
γ0.0300.0320.028
γ-O0.0220.0230.024
T (K)223233243
αTg0.0940.1490.245
αTg-O0.0500.0590.080
T (K)343353363
αClear0.2180.2320.246
αClear-O0.0790.1120.127
Δ ε″ PECH40
T (K)153163173
γ0.0140.0140.016
γ-O0.0150.0210.027
T (K)243253263
αTg0.6230.0550.070
αTg-O0.0310.0410.045
T (K)313323333
αClear0.1630.1960.226
αClear-O0.0910.1680.193
Table 3. Apparent activation energies of γ relaxation the gamma relaxation of the oriented and unoriented PECH copolymers.
Table 3. Apparent activation energies of γ relaxation the gamma relaxation of the oriented and unoriented PECH copolymers.
Copolymerlogf0 (Hz)Ea (kJ·mol−1)Tmax 1 kHz (K)R2
PECH8013.726.5129.10.99
PECH80-O15.431.1130.60.99
PECH4014.930.2132.70.99
PECH40-O16.434.5135.10.98
Table 4. VFTH parameters of αTg relaxation for unoriented and oriented PECH80 and PECH40 copolymers.
Table 4. VFTH parameters of αTg relaxation for unoriented and oriented PECH80 and PECH40 copolymers.
Tg (K)τ0 (s)DTVFTH (K)ΦTgαTg 104 (K−1)R2
PECH80287.08.1 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.1237 ± 10.37775.40.99
PECH80-O283.37.9 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.1233 ± 10.34468.90.99
PECH40270.89.7 ± 0.81.6 ± 0.5220 ± 30.14528.90.95
PECH40-O270.89.7 ± 0.61.8 ± 0.3221 ± 20.12925.70.99
Table 5. VFTH parameters of αClear relaxation for unoriented and oriented PECH80 and PECH40.
Table 5. VFTH parameters of αClear relaxation for unoriented and oriented PECH80 and PECH40.
αClearτ0 (s)DTVFTH (K)Φg/Bαf × 104 (K−1)R2
PECH8010.4 ± 0.24.4 ± 0.182600.0448.70.98
PECH80-O10.5 ± 0.44.4 ± 0.32600.0448.70.97
PECH408.5 ± 0.50.89 ± 0.12---------0.92
PECH40-O9.8 ± 0.71.9 ± 0.3280------0.93
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teruel-Juanes, R.; Pascual-Jose, B.; Graf, R.; Reina, J.A.; Giamberini, M.; Ribes-Greus, A. Effect of Dendritic Side Groups on the Mobility of Modified Poly(epichlorohydrin) Copolymers. Polymers 2021, 13, 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121961

AMA Style

Teruel-Juanes R, Pascual-Jose B, Graf R, Reina JA, Giamberini M, Ribes-Greus A. Effect of Dendritic Side Groups on the Mobility of Modified Poly(epichlorohydrin) Copolymers. Polymers. 2021; 13(12):1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121961

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teruel-Juanes, R., B. Pascual-Jose, R. Graf, J. A. Reina, M. Giamberini, and A. Ribes-Greus. 2021. "Effect of Dendritic Side Groups on the Mobility of Modified Poly(epichlorohydrin) Copolymers" Polymers 13, no. 12: 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121961

APA Style

Teruel-Juanes, R., Pascual-Jose, B., Graf, R., Reina, J. A., Giamberini, M., & Ribes-Greus, A. (2021). Effect of Dendritic Side Groups on the Mobility of Modified Poly(epichlorohydrin) Copolymers. Polymers, 13(12), 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121961

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop