Next Article in Journal
Functionalized Particles Designed for Targeted Delivery
Next Article in Special Issue
Biosynthesis of Bacterial Cellulose by Extended Cultivation with Multiple Removal of BC Pellicles
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Initiated Butyl Acrylate Polymerizations in Bulk and in Solution Monitored By In-Line Techniques
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Bioinspired Functional Chitosan/Cellulose Nanofiber 3D Hydrogel Constructs by 3D Printing for Application in the Engineering of Mechanically Demanding Tissues
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Controlled Polyelectrolyte Association of Chitosan and Carboxylated Nano-Fibrillated Cellulose by Desalting

by
Sarah Amine
1,
Alexandra Montembault
1,
Matthieu Fumagalli
1,
Anayancy Osorio-Madrazo
2,3,4 and
Laurent David
1,*
1
Ingénierie des Matériaux Polymères IMP UMR 5223—CNRS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
2
Laboratory for Sensors, Institute of Microsystems Engineering—IMTEK, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
3
Freiburg Materials Research Center—FMF, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
4
Freiburg Center for Interactive Materials and Bioinspired Technologies—FIT, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(12), 2023; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13122023
Submission received: 2 June 2021 / Revised: 16 June 2021 / Accepted: 18 June 2021 / Published: 21 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chitosan, Chitin, and Cellulose Nanofiber Biomaterials)

Abstract

:
We prepared chitosan (CHI) hydrogels reinforced with highly charged cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) by the desalting method. To this end, the screening of electrostatic interactions between CHI polycation and CNF polyanion was performed by adding NaCl at 0.4 mol/L to the chitosan acetate solution and to the cellulose nanofibrils suspension. The polyelectrolyte complexation between CHI polycation and CNF polyanion was then triggered by desalting the CHI/CNF aqueous mixture by multistep dialysis, in large excess of chitosan. Further gelation of non-complexed CHI was performed by alkaline neutralization of the polymer, yielding high reinforcement effects as probed by the viscoelastic properties of the final hydrogel. The results showed that polyelectrolyte association by desalting can be achieved with a polyanionic nanoparticle partner. Beyond obtaining hydrogel with improved mechanical performance, these composite hydrogels may serve as precursor for dried solid forms with high mechanical properties.

1. Introduction

Natural polymers such as polysaccharides are gaining interest and application niches over synthetic polymers for a variety of reasons. They are dispersible or soluble in aqueous solvents, they are non-toxic, issued from renewable sources, and can be degraded in different biological media.
However, in the particular field of biomaterials, polysaccharides are of major interest for their cytocompatibility and resorption as materials constituting implants. They exhibit a wide range of physico-chemical properties with specific biological behaviors and can be reproducibly processed in absence of organic solvent and toxic crosslinkers, the use of the latter complicating the marking procedures of medical devices.
Biomedical applications for chitosan (CHI) [1,2] and cellulose [3] have largely been investigated, and their association is also attractive [4,5,6].
In particular, chitosans with a low degree of acetylation (DA) and chitosan derivatives possess special interests for their healing properties, possibly due to (i) the ability of complexation with a variety of transition metal cations [7,8,9,10] (Cu2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Fe3+, etc.), contributing in vivo to the restoration of metallic homeostasis; (ii) the release of bioactive chito-oligosaccharides with chitosan degradation (with anti-inflammatory [11] and radical scavenger effects [12]); and (iii) binding with cells [13,14,15], proteins [16], extracellular matrices deposits, and mucus [17] through a variety of physical interaction types: electrostatic interactions when CHI is partly protonated or hydrogel bonds or hydrophobic interactions when CHI is in its neutralized free amine form at pH above 6.2. Chitosan is currently used as hydrogel (Chitogel for sinus surgery, Medtronics) and solution (Cargel Bioscaffold for cartilage repair, Smith and Nephew) but other possible physical forms are of interest, i.e., reinforced hydrogels, fibers, and films, for applications where good mechanical properties may be required, such as suture threads or knitted fabrics for parietal implants. Thus, there is still a need to develop CHI-based materials with improved mechanical properties. Different strategies have been explored to optimize the mechanical properties of CHI biomaterials. A first approach is based on the control and orientation of the crystallinity (crystallinity ratio, type of allomorph, crystalline orientation) through the fine tuning of polymer processing and formulation [18,19,20]. A second possibility is to use nanofillers, in particular nanofibrils, to reinforce a chitosan matrix. In the context of biomaterials, successful approaches were proposed to introduce resorbable fibrillar fillers such as collagen fibrils [21], chitosan nanofibrils [22,23,24], or cellulose nanofibrils [25] in chitosan solids or hydrogels.
Cellulose nanofibrils also exhibit a wide range of morphologies and can be found and extracted from biomass in the form of elongated crystals (cellulose nanocrystals or cellulose whiskers) [26,27] or semicrystalline interconnected fibrils known as micro-/nano-fibrillated cellulose (CNF) [28,29,30]. Such nano-objects can be redispersed in aqueous media to form suspensions or hydrogels with good cytocompatibility for applications in tissue engineering [31,32,33]. As a colloid or nanofiller, the physico-chemical and mechanical properties of microfibrillated cellulose are strongly impacted by the aspect ratio of the fibrils, their degree of interconnection, and the negative charge carried on the surface of the nanofibrils. Sulfuric acid treatments during the extraction process are known to introduce sulfate groups [34], but oxidation treatments (e.g., TEMPO-mediated oxidation [35]) can bring carboxylic moieties at the surface. Introducing high charge density onto cellulose nano-fibrils favors their dispersion in aqueous suspensions, but could also promote interactions with polycations, the charged nanofibril acting as a polyanion to form polyelectrolyte complexes [32].
The association of chitosan with cellulose was addressed in the case of cellulose-rich materials [36] where chitosan chains are adsorbed onto the cellulose network by electrostatic interactions (when chitosan is in the hydrophilic protonated state) and H-bonds and hydrophobic interactions when chitosan is further neutralized by an alkaline treatment. Such interaction tuning results in a strong increase of the apparent modulus of films after casting, even in the presence of water. In the case of chitosan-rich systems, nanofibrillated cellulose-reinforced chitosan hydrogels were successfully obtained using a weakly charged nanocellulose and ultrasonic treatment of a pre-mixture to ensure a satisfactory dispersion of the nanofibrils within the chitosan solution, before gelation of chitosan with a base [31,32]. The possibility to tune the mechanical properties of hydrogels, at subcellular scale, with the possibility to prepare soft materials in a wide elastic modulus range appears to be key to control the fate of cells at their contact [37], since cell phenotype may be impacted by the mechanical cues of their micro-environment. The stretching and drying of such nanocomposite hydrogels yields solid materials with inherited improved mechanical properties, in particular in the case of yarns [38]. Hence, like in other polysaccharide polyelectrolyte systems, the difficulty of ensuring a molecular dispersion of both polycation (chitosan) and polyanion(s) for an optimal polyelectrolyte interaction remains a challenge. In this work, we performed highly anionic CNF and CHI polyelectrolyte associations by desalting CHI/CNF suspensions. With the electrostatic interactions being screened by the presence of salts, we thus performed a controlled polyelectrolyte complexation, initially designed for soluble polyelectrolytes [39,40,41].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chitosan Sourcing and Characterization

Chitosan from squid pen chitin was supplied by Mahtani Chitosan (Veraval, India; batch type 144). 1H NMR analysis was used to determine the degree of acetylation (DA) close to 4.0 ± 0.5% following the methodology of Hirai et al. [42]. A weight-average molar mass Mw of 580 ± 50 kg/mol and a dispersity Đ of 1.5 ± 0.3 were determined as previously described [43], using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled online with a differential refractometer (Optilab T-rEX, Wyatt; λ = 658 nm) and with a multi-angle laser light scattering (SEC-MALLS) detector (Dawn-HELOES II, Wyatt; λ = 664 nm) at the Chromatography Center of Institute of Chemistry of Lyon (ICL).
Preparation of chitosan acetate solutions: Chitosan powder was dispersed in deionized water. Then, a stoichiometric amount of acetic acid vs. amine groups was added to protonate chitosan, accounting for a DA value of 4% and a water content close to 8% w/w, determined by thermogravimetry analysis (mass loss between 30 °C and 200 °C). This acetic acid amount allowed complete solubilization of chitosan under mechanical stirring in a closed reactor for 12 h. Chitosan solutions were obtained at different concentrations, ranging from 1.7% w/w to 5% w/w.

2.2. Cellulose Nanofibers

Carboxylated nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions were provided by the Centre Technique du Papier (CTP, Grenoble, France). These suspensions were obtained from a bisulfite birch pulp which was pretreated with TEMPO to introduce surface carboxylic groups, and nanofibrils were subsequently mechanically individualized through two passes in a homogenizer at 1500 bar. The resulting suspension had a gel like texture and a solid content of 1.2 % w/w. The suspension diluted in deionized water at a concentration of 0.44% w/w was further purified by dialysis against deionized water using a membrane with cut-off of 6–8 kD, until the conductivity of the dialysis bath was constant close to 0.9 mS/cm.
Carboxylate content of CNF: The carboxylate content of the nanofibrillated cellulose was determined by conductimetric titration with NaOH solution in the presence of an excess of hydrochloric acid (pH ~2.5). The low conductivity plateau ΔV was measured and allowed to calculate the ionic exchange capacity [18]. The carboxylate content can also be expressed as the molar ratio of oxidized repeat units of cellulose, i.e., degree of oxidation (DO) and calculated from:
DO=m AGU ×ΔV×C NaOH m(m ox×AGUm AGU)×ΔV×C NaOH
where mAGU = 162 g/mol is the molar mass of the anhydroglucose repeat unit of cellulose, mOx.AGU = 198 g/mol is the molar mass of oxidized repeat unit, CNaOH is the molar concentration of NaOH used for the titration, ΔV = V2V1 is the volume extent of the low conductivity plateau, and m (g) is the mass of the dry CNF sample. The value of the DO was close to 0.22 mol/mol and the corresponding equivalent ionized carboxylate content (ion exchange capacity) of 1.3 meq/g. For hardwood pulp, it was reported that the reaction reached a threshold at 1.6 meq/g corresponding to the oxidation of all the primary hydroxyls lying on the surface of the nanofibrils. Herein, about 75% of the primary surface hydroxyls were oxidized to carboxylate.
Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR): ATR-FTIR analyses were performed on dry CNF films. FTIR spectra were recorded with a Thermoscientific iS–10 operating in ATR mode with a germanium crystal (64 scans, wavenumber range 670 to 4000 cm−1, normal contact, resolution of 4 cm−1).
Transmission electron microscopy observation of CNFs: Drops of about 0.001 wt% of aqueous suspension of CNCs were deposited onto glow-discharged carbon-coated 3 mm grids for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). After 2 min, the liquid in excess was wicked off with a filter paper and a drop of Uranyless staining solution was deposited on the specimen. After 2 min, the stain in excess was wicked off and the remaining thin liquid film allowed to dry. The specimens were observed with a Philips CM120 CRYO TEM operated at 120 kV.

2.3. Rheological Study

The viscoelastic properties of mixtures of CNF suspensions and chitosan solutions as well as hydrogels produced after neutralization in NaOH solution 1 M were studied by dynamic-mechanical rheological measurements. These measurements were carried out using an ARES rheometer (TA Instruments) operating with a plate-plate geometry (diameter of 25 mm) at room temperature. The strain amplitude was monitored to ensure the measurements, which were carried out within the linear viscoelastic region, resulting in a storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) independent of the strain amplitude. Thus, we carried out angular frequency sweep measurements at an applied strain of 1%. We repeated these analyses at least three times for each type of hydrogel.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Stability of Chitosan (CHI) Solution and CNF Suspension in the Presence of NaCl Salt

Figure 1 shows the evolution of suspensions of chitosan with increasing NaCl content, for a solution at a chitosan concentration of 3% (w/w). Screening effects at high salt concentration induces a precipitation of chitosan [40]. Thus, the accessible NaCl concentration was restricted to be below 0.4 M. Above this limit, the solution became highly turbid and scattered light at 650 nm and 400 nm.

3.2. Cellulose Nanofibers (CNF) Microstructure and Stability of Suspensions in the Presence of NaCl Salt

The chemical structure of the TEMPO oxidized CNF and the starting non-oxidized cellulose nanofibers were investigated by ATR-FTIR (Figure 2a). The spectra displayed a broad absorption band around 3350–3150 cm−1, corresponding to the O–H stretching, which indicates the formation of intermolecular H-bonds in both nanofiber samples. The peaks at around 2850–2930 cm−1 are attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the C–H group, respectively. In the non-oxidized CNF, absorption around 1635 cm−1 was observed, attributed to -OH bending [44]. The ATR-FTIR spectrum of the TEMPO-mediated oxidized CNF showed the specific band of the C=O stretching signal, around 1600 cm−1, evidencing the presence of carboxylate ions in the TEMPO-oxidized CNFs [45]. Then, the deformation vibrations of the CH, CH2 groups were visible around 1300–1400 cm−1 in both spectra, but with reduced intensity of the asymmetric deformation of methylene normally appearing higher than 1400 cm−1 in the spectrum of TEMPO-oxidized CNF as expected after carboxylation of the CH2OH groups of cellulose. Then, the asymmetric stretching of the C–O from primary, secondary alcohol, and (hemi)acetal groups presented their characteristic bands at 1000–1300 cm−1, and the C-O-C symmetric stretching at around 800–900 cm−1. Finally, the fingerprint pattern of polysaccharides was clearly observed at the range between 1300 and 800 cm−1.
Figure 3a displays the gel aspect of CNF suspensions. The tube inversion test showed a gel-like behavior for concentrations higher than ~1% w/w, as a result of the formation of a network of interacting cellulose fibrils.
The TEM micrograph of the TEMPO-oxidized CNF (Figure 3b) shows well individualized fibrils of 200–300 nm length and 6–8 nm width, in good agreement with previous reports from the literature [35].
CNF suspension stability (pH = 5.1) was qualitatively studied as shown in Figure 4. Laser scattering appeared similar in the NaCl concentration range from 0 to 0.8 M. As a result, in order to obtain the highest screening effect without precipitation, a NaCl concentration of 0.4M could be determined. In these conditions, the stability of salted CNF suspensions and CHI solutions were obtained over 1 week.
Lastly, we investigated the impact of the pH of CNF suspensions and CHI solutions on their turbidity. Gelation of CNF suspensions occurred at pH ~3 and below, in good agreement with the pKa range of glucuronic acids (typically between 2.7 to 3.3) [46,47]. The pH of CHI solutions ranged from 5.1 to 4 with concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 5% w/w. The stability of CHI was preserved up to a pH close to 5.8, a value slightly below the apparent pKa ~6.2 of CHI at low DA [48]. Thus, the pH window for the association of chitosan and CNF without precipitation was located between their pKa values, typically between 4 and 5.5. As a result, in order to mix the CHI solution with the CNF suspension, the pH and NaCl concentration of both media should stay in a well-defined processing window.

3.3. Formulation and Desalting of Polyelectrolyte Mixtures of CHI Solutions and CNF Suspensions

We easily prepared homogeneous CHI/CNF mixtures by imposing a pH of 4 both on the CHI solution and on the CNF suspension by the addition of a diluted acetic acid solution. For a proof of concept, the values of the CHI and CNF concentration tested were chosen below the gelation threshold in both cases. This ensured excellent mixing conditions with magnetic stirring, but higher concentrations are assessable for both components with mechanical blending. The resulting systems are described in Table 1. As expected, when comparable systems were prepared without NaCl addition, precipitation resulted in a macroscopically heterogeneous system with no satisfactory dispersions of CNF within the chitosan solution.
Desalting of final mixtures with a 6–8 kD cut-off membrane could not be performed directly against deionized water, since it induced a large dilution of the samples. To minimize the effect of reverse osmosis, we used a 5-staged dialysis (engaging about 10 mL of salted polyelectrolyte mixture) against NaCl aqueous solutions (500 mL) with concentrations of 0.32 M, 0.24 M, 0.16 M, 0.08 M, and 0 M, successively, each step of dialysis lasted 4 h, 16 h, 4 h, 4 h, and 16 h respectively. This strongly limited the dilution effects to a constant net water gain of 15% (w/w). The systems remained transparent after dialysis. Then, complete gelation was induced by submerging the dialysates in NaOH 1 M for 12 h, and further water washing for 24 h. Syneresis was negligible (as in the pure chitosan hydrogels of same low concentration, low DA, and high mean molar masses) and thus, the washed gels were obtained using CCHI = 1.01% and CCNF ranging from 0 to 0.15%.

3.4. Viscoelastic Properties of Resulting Hydrogels

Figure 5 displays the viscoelastic behavior of the mixtures 1 and 2 before dialysis (circles) and after neutralization in the alkaline bath (squares). Similarly, all formulated systems exhibited a solution-like behavior after mixing in presence of NaCl, but exhibited a gel behavior after desalting and neutralization, with G′ >> G″ in the entire investigated angular frequency range.
A comparison of the elastic shear moduli of hydrogel samples prepared from the mixtures detailed in Table 1 is given in Figure 6. The reinforcement effect is clear as the elastic modulus increased with CNF content. Such behavior was previously analyzed [32] through the Einstein’s generalized relation (Equation (2)):
G = G 0 ( 1 + k E φ v , C N F ) G 0 (1+kE φm ,CNFρCNF/ρ H20 )
where G0 is the value of the modulus of the non-reinforced reference system, φv,CNF is the volume fraction of CNF filler, and φm,CNF = CCNF is the mass fraction of CNF filler, ρCNF ~ 1.43 g/cm3 is close to the density of nanofibrilated cellulose [49], and kE is the Einstein coefficient (~2.5 for spherical objects) quantitatively accounting for the reinforcement effect. The value found for kE was close to 120, corresponding to an extremely strong reinforcement effect. Since the CNF were not oriented by the hydrogel processing technique, the reinforcement effect should be related to crosslinking of the chitosan matrix by nanofibrils, as a result of CHI and CNF physical interactions. Chitosan in hydrogel samples is neutralized, hence its polyelectrolyte character is not directly responsible for these interactions. Nevertheless, electrostatic interactions may be understood as the first driving force for chitosan adsorption onto CNF nanofibers during the polyelectrolyte complexation. After neutralization of the complex, H-bonding and hydrophobic interactions must take over to ensure physical crosslinking, as is the case for the complexation of chitosans with other macromolecular polysaccharide polyanions [50]. In agreement with previous studies [31,32,36], the morphology of reinforced CNF/CHI hydrogels obtained in this work can be schematized as (i) a first fibrillar nanocellulose network resulting from H-bonds between nanofibers and chitosan chains bridging nearby nanofibers, and (ii) a second chitosan hydrogel network where isolated fibrils portions play the role of physical crosslinks of high functionality for chitosan chains. The formation of CHI/CNF interaction in both networks is driven by electrostatic interactions, that are in turn controlled by the charge density of the initial polyelectrolytes, i.e., by the degree of acetylation (DA) of chitosan and the degree of oxidation (DO) of nanocellulose. After the neutralization of chitosan, the remaining interactions of chitosan adsorbed onto the CNF nano-rods are due to H-bonds and hydrophobic interactions.
The reinforcement effects of CNF/CHI hydrogels may also be compared to pure CHI hydrogels at same total polymer concentration. The elastic shear modulus of CHI hydrogels may vary with mass concentration according to:
G = G 00 ( C C H I ) β
where G00 should be close to the measured value at CCHI = 1% w/w (i.e., G0 ~ 0.31 kPa) and β is an exponent previously found close to 4.4 by AFM force spectroscopy [51] for a chitosan of same mean molar mass and DA. Our rheological analyses combined with previous viscoelastic measurements [52] (see Sample H3b: CCHI = 1.6% w/w, E = 6 kPa; sample H4: CCHI = 2.6% w/w, E = 31 kPa, and assuming E = G/3, i.e., the Poisson’s coefficient ν = 0.5) yield similar values (G00 = 0.29 kPa, β = 4.15, R2 = 0.9998) after a linear regression in logarithmic scales. As a result, for a pure CHI hydrogel 1.2% w/w, G’/G00 > 2 and the resulting shear modulus ratio G’/G0 should largely exceed the values displayed in Figure 6. This can be explained, at a macromolecular level, by the involvement of all chitosan chains contributing to the CHI-CHI network via H-bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and the formation of nanocrystallites [53]. On the other hand, CNF physical crosslinking with CHI only occurs at the surface of the nanofibrils. Indeed, cellulose chains entrapped within the cellulose nanofiber cores should not contribute to crosslinking with the matrix: considering a given mass of polymer, the reinforcement effect of CNF in CHI hydrogels stays below the effect of CHI concentration. However, for materials obtained in the dry state, chitosan concentration of the parent hydrogel does not significantly impact the final hydration, density, interactions, and microstructure. As a result, composite reinforcement effects of CNF are more apparent in the solid (dry) state. Thus, the interest of CHI/CNF associations is particularly attractive in the case of films or fibers prepared from CHI/CNF associations [38].

4. Conclusions

In this work, we designed a controlled polyelectrolyte association between highly charged nanofibrillated cellulose (CNF) and chitosan (CHI) of low DA in excess. It required evaluating the stability of CNF suspensions and CHI solutions in the presence of a screening salt (NaCl) and the use of a multiple step dialysis against aqueous solutions with decreasing salt concentrations.
In comparison with previous literature results, we obtained hydrogels with higher mechanical properties using a highly charged CNF vs. weakly charged cellulose nanofibrils [32]. This effect should reflect the high physical crosslink capacity of highly charged CNF interacting with chitosan chains adsorbed onto their surface, thanks to the initial polyelectrolyte complexation of CHI and CNF.
Future studies should focus on the preparation strategies of systems at higher concentrations (for CHI and CNF), including the processing of dry fibers or films, where the composite reinforcement effects are expected to yield higher mechanical properties. In particular, yarns prepared by stretching and drying reinforced hydrogels should yield bioinspired solid materials with enhanced mechanical properties, with practical interest in the field of textile knitting.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.D., A.O.-M., M.F. and A.M.; methodology, M.F., A.M. and S.A.; investigation, S.A., M.F. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D.; writing—review and editing S.A., L.D., M.F., A.M., A.O.-M.; supervision, M.F., A.M. and A.O.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.O.-M. was funded by the Emmy Noether Programme of the German Research Foundation DFG (Grant number: OS 497/6-1) for financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Agnès Crépet heading the Plateforme de Chromatographie ICL–IMP, France. It is an immense pleasure to thank Thierry Delair for helpful and refreshing discussions. Laurent Heux (CERMAV-CNRS) is kindly acknowledged for the gift of the carboxylated CNF sample.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, D.K.; Ray, A.R. Biomedical Applications of Chitin, Chitosan, and Their Derivatives. J. Macromol. Sci. Part C 2000, 40, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Singh, R.; Shitiz, K.; Singh, A. Chitin and chitosan: Biopolymers for wound management. Int. Wound J. 2017, 14, 1276–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gopi, S.; Balakrishnan, P.; Chandradhara, D.; Poovathankandy, D.; Thomas, S. General scenarios of cellulose and its use in the biomedical field. Mater. Today Chem. 2019, 13, 59–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, J.; Cai, Z.; Lee, H.S.; Choi, G.S.; Lee, D.H.; Jo, C. Preparation and characterization of a Bacterial cellulose/Chitosan composite for potential biomedical application. J. Polym. Res. 2011, 18, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jia, Y.; Wang, X.; Huo, M.; Zhai, X.; Li, F.; Zhong, C. Preparation and characterization of a novel bacterial cellulose/chitosan bio-hydrogel. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 2017, 7, 1847980417707172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cai, Y.; Geng, L.; Chen, S.; Shi, S.; Hsiao, B.S.; Peng, X. Hierarchical Assembly of Nanocellulose into Filaments by Flow-Assisted Alignment and Interfacial Complexation: Conquering the Conflicts between Strength and Toughness. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 32090–32098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guibal, E. Interactions of metal ions with chitosan-based sorbents: A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 38, 43–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. RHernández, B.; Franco, A.P.; Yola, O.R.; López-Delgado, A.; Felcman, J.; Recio, M.A.L.; Mercê, A.L.R. Coordination study of chitosan and Fe3+. J. Mol. Struct. 2008, 877, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pestov, A.; Bratskaya, S. Chitosan and Its Derivatives as Highly Efficient Polymer Ligands. Molecules 2016, 21, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Toeri, J.; Osorio-Madrazo, A.; Laborie, M.-P. Preparation and Chemical/Microstructural Characterization of Azacrown Ether-Crosslinked Chitosan Films. Materials 2017, 10, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pangestuti, R.; Bak, S.-S.; Kim, S.-K. Attenuation of pro-inflammatory mediators in LPS-stimulated BV2 microglia by chitooligosaccharides via the MAPK signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mendes, P.M. Cellular nanotechnology: Making biological interfaces smarter. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 9207–9218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cuy, J.L.; Beckstead, B.L.; Brown, C.D.; Hoffman, A.S.; Giachelli, C.M. Adhesive protein interactions with chitosan: Consequences for valve endothelial cell growth on tissue-engineering materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2003, 67, 538–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zubareva, A.A.; Svirshchevskaya, E.V. Interactions of chitosan and its derivatives with cells review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2016, 52, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. von Palubitzki, L.; Wang, Y.; Hoffmann, S.; Vidal-y-Sy, S.; Zobiak, B.; Failla, A.V.; Schmage, P.; John, A.; Osorio-Madrazo, A.; Bauer, A.T.; et al. Differences of the tumour cell glycocalyx affect binding of capsaicin-loaded chitosan nanocapsules. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 22443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lall, A.; Tamo, A.K.; Doench, I.; David, L.; de Oliveira, P.N.; Gorzelanny, C.; Osorio-Madrazo, A. Nanoparticles and Colloidal Hydrogels of Chitosan–Caseinate Polyelectrolyte Complexes for Drug-Controlled Release Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sogias, I.A.; Williams, A.C.; Khutoryanskiy, V.V. Why is Chitosan Mucoadhesive? Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 1837–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Desorme, M.; Montembault, A.; Lucas, J.-M.; Rochas, C.; Bouet, T.; David, L. Spinning of hydroalcoholic chitosan solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Desorme, M.; Montembault, A.; Tamet, T.; Maleysson, P.; Bouet, T.; David, L. Spinning of hydroalcoholic chitosan solutions: Mechanical behavior and multiscale microstructure of resulting fibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agüero, H.P.; David, L.; Covas, C.P.; Osorio-Madrazo, A. Bioinspired chitosan-BSA fibres for applications in intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus tissue engineering. Rev. Cuba. Investig. Biomédicas 2017, 36, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  21. Oliveira, P.N.; Montembault, A.; Sudre, G.; Alcouffe, P.; Marcon, L.; Gehan, H.; Lux, F.; Albespy, K.; Centis, V.; Campos, D.; et al. Self-crosslinked fibrous collagen/chitosan blends: Processing, properties evaluation and monitoring of degradation by bi-fluorescence imaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Osorio-Madrazo, A.; David, L.; Trombotto, S.; Lucas, J.-M.; Peniche-Covas, C.; Domard, A. Kinetics Study of the Solid-State Acid Hydrolysis of Chitosan: Evolution of the Crystallinity and Macromolecular Structure. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 1376–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Osorio-Madrazo, A.; David, L.; Trombotto, S.; Lucas, J.-M.; Peniche-Covas, C.; Domard, A. Highly crystalline chitosan produced by multi-steps acid hydrolysis in the solid-state. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 1730–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Osorio-Madrazo, A.; David, L.; Peniche-Covas, C.; Rochas, C.; Putaux, J.-L.; Trombotto, S.; Alcouffe, P.; Domard, A. Fine microstructure of processed chitosan nanofibril networks preserving directional packing and high molecular weight. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 131, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tamo, A.K.; Doench, I.; Walter, L.; Montembault, A.; Sudre, G.; David, L.; Morales-Helguera, A.; Selig, M.; Rolauffs, B.; Bernstein, A.; et al. Development of Bioinspired Functional Chitosan/Cellulose Nanofiber 3D Hydrogel Constructs by 3D Printing for Application in the Engineering of Mechanically Demanding Tissues. Polymers 2021, 13, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Osorio-Madrazo, A.; Eder, M.; Rueggeberg, M.; Pandey, J.K.; Harrington, M.J.; Nishiyama, Y.; Putaux, J.-L.; Rochas, C.; Burgert, I. Reorientation of Cellulose Nanowhiskers in Agarose Hydrogels under Tensile Loading. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mao, J.; Osorio-Madrazo, A.; Laborie, M.-P. Preparation of cellulose I nanowhiskers with a mildly acidic aqueous ionic liquid: Reaction efficiency and whiskers attributes. Cellulose 2013, 20, 1829–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Samyn, P.; Osorio-Madrazo, A. Native Crystalline Polysaccharide Nanofibers: Processing and Properties. In Handbook of Nanofibers; Barhoum, A., Bechelany, M., Makhlouf, A.S.H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2019; pp. 287–321. [Google Scholar]
  29. Osorio-Madrazo, A.; Laborie, M.P. Morphological and Thermal Investigations of Cellulosic Bionanocomposites. In Biopolymer Nanocomposites; Dufresne, A., Thomas, S., Pothen, L.A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 411–435. [Google Scholar]
  30. Abushammala, H.; Pontes, J.F.; Gomes, G.H.; Osorio-Madrazo, A.; Thiré, R.M.S.M.; Pereira, F.V.; Laborie, M.-P.G. Swelling, viscoelastic, and anatomical studies on ionic liquid-swollen Norway spruce as a screening tool toward ionosolv pulping. Holzforschung 2015, 69, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Doench, I.; Tran, T.A.; David, L.; Montembault, A.; Viguier, E.; Gorzelanny, C.; Sudre, G.; Cachon, T.; Louback-Mohamed, M.; Horbelt, N.; et al. Cellulose Nanofiber-Reinforced Chitosan Hydrogel Composites for Intervertebral Disc Tissue Repair. Biomimetics 2019, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Doench, I.; Torres-Ramos, M.E.W.; Montembault, A.; de Oliveira, P.N.; Halimi, C.; Viguier, E.; Heux, L.; Siadous, R.; Thiré, R.M.S.M.; Osorio-Madrazo, A. Injectable and Gellable Chitosan Formulations Filled with Cellulose Nanofibers for Intervertebral Disc Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2018, 10, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tamo, A.K.; Doench, I.; Helguera, A.M.; Hoenders, D.; Walther, A.; Osorio-Madrazo, A. Biodegradation of Crystalline Cellulose Nanofibers by Means of Enzyme Immobilized-Alginate Beads and Microparticles. Polymers 2020, 12, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Voronova, M.I.; Surov, O.V.; Zakharov, A.G. Nanocrystalline cellulose with various contents of sulfate groups. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Isogai, A.; Saito, T.; Fukuzumi, H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Toivonen, M.S.; Kurki-Suonio, S.; Schacher, F.H.; Hietala, S.; Rojas, O.J.; Ikkala, O. Water-Resistant, Transparent Hybrid Nanopaper by Physical Cross-Linking with Chitosan. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Carrancá, M.; Griveau, L.; Remoué, N.; Lorion, C.; Weiss, P.; Orea, V.; Sigaudo-Roussel, D.; Faye, C.; Ferri-Angulo, D.; Debret, R.; et al. Versatile lysine dendrigrafts and polyethylene glycol hydrogels with inherent biological properties: In vitro cell behavior modulation and in vivo biocompatibility. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2021, 109, 926–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marquez-Bravo, S.; Doench, I.; Molina, P.; Bentley, F.E.; Tamo, A.K.; Passieux, R.; Lossada, F.; David, L.; Osorio-Madrazo, A. Functional Bionanocomposite Fibers of Chitosan Filled with Cellulose Nanofibers Obtained by Gel Spinning. Polymers 2021, 13, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Costalat, M.; David, L.; Delair, T. Reversible controlled assembly of chitosan and dextran sulfate: A new method for nanoparticle elaboration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Costalat, M.; Alcouffe, P.; David, L.; Delair, T. Controlling the complexation of polysaccharides into multi-functional colloidal assemblies for nanomedicine. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 430, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Costalat, M.; Alcouffe, P.; David, L.; Delair, T. Macro-hydrogels versus nanoparticles by the controlled assembly of polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 134, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hirai, A.; Odani, H.; Nakajima, A. Determination of degree of deacetylation of chitosan by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Polym. Bull. 1991, 26, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Montembault, A.; Viton, C.; Domard, A. Rheometric study of the gelation of chitosan in a hydroalcoholic medium. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 1633–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Leng, W.; Pan, B. Thermal Insulating and Mechanical Properties of Cellulose Nanofibrils Modified Polyurethane Foam Composite as Structural Insulated Material. Forests 2019, 10, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Saini, S.; Quinot, D.; Lavoine, N.; Belgacem, M.N.; Bras, J. β-Cyclodextrin-grafted TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers for sustained release of essential oil. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 3849–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, H.M.; Loganathan, D.; Linhardt, R.J. Determination of the pKa of glucuronic acid and the carboxy groups of heparin by 13C-nuclear-magnetic-resonance spectroscopy. Biochem. J. 1991, 278 Pt 3, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kohn, R.; Kovac, P. Dissociation constants of D-galacturonic and D-glucuronic acid and their O-methyl derivatives. Chem. Zvesti 1978, 32, 478–485. [Google Scholar]
  48. Schatz, C.; Viton, C.; Delair, T.; Pichot, C.; Domard, A. Typical Physicochemical Behaviors of Chitosan in Aqueous Solution. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sun, C. True Density of Microcrystalline Cellulose. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 94, 2132–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, D.; Delair, T. Stabilization of chitosan/hyaluronan colloidal polyelectrolyte complexes in physiological conditions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 119, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bouali, A.B.; Montembault, A.; David, L.; von Boxberg, Y.; Viallon, M.; Hamdi, B.; Nothias, F.; Fodil, R.; Féréol, S. Nanoscale mechanical properties of chitosan hydrogels as revealed by AFM. Prog. Biomater. 2020, 9, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rami, L.; Malaise, S.; Delmond, S.; Fricain, J.-C.; Siadous, R.; Schlaubitz, S.; Laurichesse, E.; Amédée, J.; Montembault, A.; David, L.; et al. Physicochemical modulation of chitosan-based hydrogels induces different biological responses: Interest for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2014, 102, 3666–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pochat-Bohatier, C.; Venault, A.; Bouyer, D.; Vachoud, L.; David, L.; Faur, C. Development and characterization of composite chitosan/active carbon hydrogels for a medical application. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 128, 2945–2953. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Solubility study of chitosan acetate solutions with added NaCl. The concentration of chitosan was 3% w/w. Solubility is quantified by the evolution of absorbance at 400 nm (adapted from [40]), and precipitation is displayed by images of the samples submitted to a laser beam (λ = 650 nm). Solubility of chitosan acetate in saline aqueous solution was limited to the NaCl concentration range from 0 to 0.4 M.
Figure 1. Solubility study of chitosan acetate solutions with added NaCl. The concentration of chitosan was 3% w/w. Solubility is quantified by the evolution of absorbance at 400 nm (adapted from [40]), and precipitation is displayed by images of the samples submitted to a laser beam (λ = 650 nm). Solubility of chitosan acetate in saline aqueous solution was limited to the NaCl concentration range from 0 to 0.4 M.
Polymers 13 02023 g001
Figure 2. (a) ATR-FTIR spectra of the starting non-oxidized and the TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. (b) Determination of the degree of oxidation (DO) by electric conductivity titration method. The corrected conductivity σc was related to the measured conductivity σm according to σ c = σ m ( V i + V N a O H ) / V where Vi (= 83 mL) was the initial volume of the acidic CNF suspension (m = 0.102 g, pH = 2.5) and VNaOH is the added NaOH volume (CNaOH = 1 M). The value of DO was deduced from parameter ΔV = V2V1 (V2 = 3.59 mL, V1 = 2.28 mL) according to Equation (1).
Figure 2. (a) ATR-FTIR spectra of the starting non-oxidized and the TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. (b) Determination of the degree of oxidation (DO) by electric conductivity titration method. The corrected conductivity σc was related to the measured conductivity σm according to σ c = σ m ( V i + V N a O H ) / V where Vi (= 83 mL) was the initial volume of the acidic CNF suspension (m = 0.102 g, pH = 2.5) and VNaOH is the added NaOH volume (CNaOH = 1 M). The value of DO was deduced from parameter ΔV = V2V1 (V2 = 3.59 mL, V1 = 2.28 mL) according to Equation (1).
Polymers 13 02023 g002
Figure 3. (a) Photos showing the appearance and flow of viscous suspensions containing TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers (CNF) at different concentrations of 1.5, 1.0, and 0.5 % w/w. S: Solution/suspension, A: air. (b) TEM micrograph of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers.
Figure 3. (a) Photos showing the appearance and flow of viscous suspensions containing TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers (CNF) at different concentrations of 1.5, 1.0, and 0.5 % w/w. S: Solution/suspension, A: air. (b) TEM micrograph of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers.
Polymers 13 02023 g003
Figure 4. Laser light scattering observation (λ = 650 nm) for a qualitative evaluation of turbidity of 0.45% w/w CNF suspensions with different NaCl concentrations. The suspensions at pH = 5.1 were not significantly affected by the presence of NaCl salt in the range 0 to 0.8 M.
Figure 4. Laser light scattering observation (λ = 650 nm) for a qualitative evaluation of turbidity of 0.45% w/w CNF suspensions with different NaCl concentrations. The suspensions at pH = 5.1 were not significantly affected by the presence of NaCl salt in the range 0 to 0.8 M.
Polymers 13 02023 g004
Figure 5. Viscoelastic properties of CHI/CNF associations obtained from mixtures 1 and 2 (Table 1) as G′; G″ sweeps of angular frequency ω: Samples were characterized after mixing of salted solutions and suspensions (circles) (G′: ●; G″: ○) and after multistep dialysis and gelation in NaOH 1 M (squares) (G′: ■; G″:□).
Figure 5. Viscoelastic properties of CHI/CNF associations obtained from mixtures 1 and 2 (Table 1) as G′; G″ sweeps of angular frequency ω: Samples were characterized after mixing of salted solutions and suspensions (circles) (G′: ●; G″: ○) and after multistep dialysis and gelation in NaOH 1 M (squares) (G′: ■; G″:□).
Polymers 13 02023 g005
Figure 6. (*): Evolution of the elastic part of the shear modulus of hydrogels obtained from the controlled polyelectrolyte assembly of CHI and highly charged CNF by desalting, in normalized scales. The value of G0 for non-reinforced systems obtained in this work was close to 0.31 kPa. These results are compared with literature data (□) for CHI/CNF hydrogels obtained with weakly charged CNF [32].
Figure 6. (*): Evolution of the elastic part of the shear modulus of hydrogels obtained from the controlled polyelectrolyte assembly of CHI and highly charged CNF by desalting, in normalized scales. The value of G0 for non-reinforced systems obtained in this work was close to 0.31 kPa. These results are compared with literature data (□) for CHI/CNF hydrogels obtained with weakly charged CNF [32].
Polymers 13 02023 g006
Table 1. Parameters of formulation used for the preparation of CHI/CNF mixtures from precursors CHI acetate solutions and CNF suspensions, and of the resulting formulations of two CHI/CNF mixtures, before dialysis and gelation. CCHI: mass concentration of chitosan (CHI); CCNF: mass concentration of nanofibrilated cellulose.
Table 1. Parameters of formulation used for the preparation of CHI/CNF mixtures from precursors CHI acetate solutions and CNF suspensions, and of the resulting formulations of two CHI/CNF mixtures, before dialysis and gelation. CCHI: mass concentration of chitosan (CHI); CCNF: mass concentration of nanofibrilated cellulose.
Sample TypeCHI
Reference Solution
CHI-CNF
Mix 1
CHI-CNF
Mix 2
Precursor
CNF suspension
(30%)
Acetic Acid/NaCl solution without CNF, pH = 4
CNaCl = 0.4 M
CNF/NaCl
CCNF = 0.4%
pH = 4
CNaCl = 0.4 M
CNF/NaCl
CCNF = 0.6%
pH = 4
CNaCl = 0.4 M
Final mixesCCHI = 1.19% w/w
CCNF = 0% w/w
CNaCl = 0.4 M
pH = 4
CCHI = 1.19% w/w
CCNF = 0.12% w/w
CNaCl = 0.4 M
pH = 4
[NH3+]/[COO] = 47
CCHI = 1.19% w/w
CCNF = 0.18% w/w
CNaCl = 0.4 M
pH = 4
[NH3+]/[COO] = 31
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amine, S.; Montembault, A.; Fumagalli, M.; Osorio-Madrazo, A.; David, L. Controlled Polyelectrolyte Association of Chitosan and Carboxylated Nano-Fibrillated Cellulose by Desalting. Polymers 2021, 13, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13122023

AMA Style

Amine S, Montembault A, Fumagalli M, Osorio-Madrazo A, David L. Controlled Polyelectrolyte Association of Chitosan and Carboxylated Nano-Fibrillated Cellulose by Desalting. Polymers. 2021; 13(12):2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13122023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amine, Sarah, Alexandra Montembault, Matthieu Fumagalli, Anayancy Osorio-Madrazo, and Laurent David. 2021. "Controlled Polyelectrolyte Association of Chitosan and Carboxylated Nano-Fibrillated Cellulose by Desalting" Polymers 13, no. 12: 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13122023

APA Style

Amine, S., Montembault, A., Fumagalli, M., Osorio-Madrazo, A., & David, L. (2021). Controlled Polyelectrolyte Association of Chitosan and Carboxylated Nano-Fibrillated Cellulose by Desalting. Polymers, 13(12), 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13122023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop