Next Article in Journal
Efficient Synthesis and Characterization of Polyaniline@Aluminium–Succinate Metal-Organic Frameworks Nanocomposite and Its Application for Zn(II) Ion Sensing
Next Article in Special Issue
Graphene-Based Polymer Nanocomposites: Recent Advances
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Pineapple Leaf Fiber Orientation and Volume Fraction on Methyl Methacrylate-Based Polymer Matrix for Prosthetic Socket Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Properties of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyhexanoate)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Biological Characterization of Polymeric Matrix and Graphene Oxide Biocomposites Filaments for Biomedical Implant Applications: A Preliminary Report

Polymers 2021, 13(19), 3382; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193382
by Thamires Santos Silva 1,†, Marcelo Melo Soares 2,†, Ana Claudia Oliveira Carreira 1,†, Gustavo de Sá Schiavo Matias 1,†, Carolina Coming Tegon 2, Marcos Massi 2, Andressa de Aguiar Oliveira 2, Leandro Norberto da Silva Júnior 1, Hianka Jasmyne Costa de Carvalho 1, Gustavo Henrique Doná Rodrigues Almeida 1, Michelle Silva Araujo 1, Paula Fratini 1 and Maria Angelica Miglino 1,*,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2021, 13(19), 3382; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193382
Submission received: 23 August 2021 / Revised: 9 September 2021 / Accepted: 12 September 2021 / Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graphene-Based Polymer Nanocomposites: Recent Advances)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Refer to the reviewer report 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, 

Please see the attachment.

Thank you!

Maria Angelica Miglino.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This work presents a GO-PLLA nanobiocomposite that is biocompatible and could be a great advance in Tissue Engineering. It is novel and could be interesting for the readers of this journal. Nevertheless, the authors must be considered the following comments before its publication:

1) Define MSCs with its complete name the first time that you use it.

2) The groups of references in the introduction (i.e. 5-8, 11-14 or 22-24) must be better describe in this section in order to improve the explanation of the state of art of this investigation in the literature.

3) Omit the first person plural in the manuscript. Use passive sentences.

4) Line 68: Put a point between "test" and "the biocompatibility".

5) Who is the supplier of the graphite?

6) The extrusion processes must be better explained. Were GO and PLLA incorporated in the same zone of the extruder? Were they mixed previously? Were any plasticizer used? What is the pression, screew diameter, screew rate and production rate in the extruder? Was the specific mechanical energy calculated?

7) What is the molecular weight of the used PLLA?

8) What do you talk about the mechanical properties of the nanobiocomposites? Were they evaluated?

9) Line 106; Four what? Rats?

10) How was the statitical tests performed? Please indicate it in the experimental section of the manuscript.

11) Figure 1: The colors of the legend is difficult to follow.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, 

Please see the attachment.

Thank you!

Maria Angelica Miglino.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have revised and corrected all the reviewer's comments. Thus, they have improve the quality of this work, which can be published in the present form.

Back to TopTop