Inhomogeneities in PNIPAM Aqueous Solutions: The Inside View by Spin Probe EPR Spectroscopy

Abstract

Coil to globule transition in poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) aqueous solutions was studied using spin probe continuous-wave electronic paramagnetic resonance (CW EPR) spectroscopy with an amphiphilic TEMPO radical as a guest molecule. Using Cu(II) ions as the “quencher” for fast-moving radicals in the liquid phase allowed obtaining the individual spectra of TEMPO radicals in polymer globule and observing inhomogeneities in solutions before globule collapsing. EPR spectra simulations confirm the formation of molten globules at the first step with further collapsing and water molecules coming out of the globule, making it denser.

1. Introduction

Thermoresponsive polymers are of great interest because they undergo coil-to-globule transitions of single-polymer chains in polar solvents near the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) [1,2,3]. This peculiarity gives them potential for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications such as drug and gene delivery, tissue engineering, cell expansion, sensors, microarrays, and imaging [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Phase transition in the thermoresponsive polymers solutions passes due to molecular interaction and the cohesion of solvent molecules with hydrophilic fragments in the polymer chains [10,11]. Hydrophilic groups form hydrogen bonds with water molecules at low temperatures, resulting in good solubility in aqueous solutions. Increasing the temperature leads to the degradation of the hydrogen bonds system and the formation of an intramolecular interaction between polymers chains, further collapsing the polymer globule. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) is one of the most studied thermoresponsive polymers, which has LCST in a physiologically relevant temperature range of ≈32 °C in aqueous solutions [1]. Macroscopic methods (turbidimetry, DSC, etc.) usually fix sharp and reversible changes of PNIPAM properties in the vicinity of LCST [11,12]. In addition, the formation of small, even nanoscopic inhomogeneities of polymer gels or films in different solvents before LCST is proved by continuous-wave electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (CW EPR) [13,14,15]. The EPR spectra of paramagnetic molecules (spin probes) are sensitive to the microenvironment and can give valuable information concerning collapse processes at the molecular level [14,16,17]. Stable nitroxide radicals containing a >N–O●·group have been the most popular spin probes during the last 55 years [17,18]. Hyperfine interaction of the unpaired electron spin with the magnetic moment of 14N (S = 1) nucleus leads to splitting of the EPR signal of nitroxides to three lines. Local polarity, viscosity, and the ability of a media to form hydrogen bonds influence the electron density distribution in the spin probe, affecting the shape of the EPR signal and spin-Hamiltonian parameters (g-tensor and hyperfine splitting (hfs) tensor), which can be estimated by modeling the EPR spectra. The small amphiphilic radical 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) (ca. 6.7 Å in diameter) is a powerful tool to detect and control the formation of polymer globules [14,19,20,21]. It is known that the micropolarity in polymeric globules of thermoresponsive polymers is significantly lower than the polarity of water and is close to that of chloroform [18]. A lower polarity and higher viscosity of the globules [15] result in changes of spin Hamiltonian parameters and the line widths of TEMPO spectra compared with those in aqueous solution, reflecting a decrease of the amplitudes of the spectral lines belonging to the radicals in the solution and the appearance of broader components of the TEMPO spectrum corresponding to probes localized in the globules. This effect was used by Junk et al. [19] to reveal the formation of heterogeneities in thin photocrosslinked films of PNIPAM notably earlier and later the LCST detected by macroscopic methods. However, the spin probe technique was not applied to study coil-to-globule transitions and the nature of inhomogeneities in PNIPAM aqueous solutions up to now. In the present paper, we applied CW EPR to study the structure and features of formation of nano- and/or micro heterogeneities of PNIPAM with two different polydispersities and the dynamics of spin probes inside the globules and in aqueous solutions upon heating from room temperature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Substances

The stable radical (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) and copper(II) chloride dihydrate CuCl₂·2H₂O purchased from Sigma-Aldrich were used without further purification. N-Isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) (99%, Acros, Geel, Belgium) was recrystallized from solution in n-hexane, dried in vacuum, and then stored under argon atmosphere. 2,2′-Azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN) (98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) was recrystallized from ethanol and dried in vacuum at 20 °C. Benzene (anhydrous, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and n-hexane (reagent grade, Ekos-1) were used as received.

2.2. Polymer Synthesis

Two poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) samples I and II were synthesized via conventional radical and RAFT polymerization, respectively. The sample I (number-average molar mass M_n = 175.5 kDa, polydispersity index Đ = 4.3; yield: 97%) was prepared by free radical polymerization in benzene at 60 °C for 24 h using azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) as an initiator according to the procedure reported in [20]. Then, the reaction mixture was precipitated in n-hexane. Then, the obtained polymer was purified by dissolving in acetone followed by precipitation in n-hexane at least three times, and the product was dried at 45 °C in a vacuum oven. Sample II (M_n = 107.6 kDa, Đ = 2.05; yield: 95%) was prepared by RAFT-mediated radical polymerization. The polymerization was carried out in benzene at 60 °C for 24 h using 2-(dodecylthiocarbonothioylthio)-2-methylpropionic acid as the RAFT agent. The polymerization was conducted in an argon atmosphere in a Schlenk reactor equipped with a magnetic stir bar. The reactor was charged by N-isopropylacrylamide (0.502 g, 4.44 mmol), vacuumed, and filled with argon. Then, 0.22 mL of 0.02 M benzene solution of RAF-agent, 1.11 mM of 0.02 M benzene solution of AIBN, and 2.87 mL of benzene were added into the reactor. The mixture was bubbled with argon for 30 min, and then, the reactor was placed into an oil bath heated to 60 °C. After 24 h, the reactor was opened and frozen with liquid nitrogen. The polymer purification was performed similarly to the purification of sample I (see above).

2.3. Polymers Characterization

2.3.1. H NMR Spectroscopy

¹H NMR (500 MHz) spectra were recorded in CDCl₃ at 25 °C on a Bruker AC-500 (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) spectrometer calibrated relative to the residual solvent resonance. The ¹H NMR spectra of sample I and sample II are presented in Figure A1 (see Appendix A).

2.3.2. Spectrophotometry

The temperature transition was monitored by UV-Vis spectrophotometry using a Victor Nivo instrument (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at a wavelength of 405 nm. The studied polymer solution was poured into a 96 (48)-well plate, and the absorbance at each point was registered. The range of measurement was 4–40 °C. The cloud points were determined at 10% of the transmission reduction.

2.3.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

The DSC studies were carried out using a NETZSCH STA 449 F3 synchronous thermal analyzer (Selb, Germany) in a helium atmosphere at gas flow rates of 70 mL/min (main) and 50 mL/min (protective). An aluminum crucible was used with a solution weight of 30–45 mg. The calibration of the temperature and sensitivity of the device was carried out using standard samples of adamantane, indium, and distilled water. The aqueous solution of the polymer sample (5 wt %) was heated and cooled at 2 K/min. TGA measurements were performed with the same device using solid PNIPAM samples at heating rate of 20 °C min⁻¹ under nitrogen flow.

2.3.4. Size Exclusion Chromatography

Size exclusion chromatography was performed using an Ultimate 3000 Thermo Scientific chromatographic complex (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with PLgel precolumn guard (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA, size 7.5 × 50 mm, particle size 5 μm) and PLgel MIXED-C column (Agilent, size 7.5 × 300 mm, particle size 5 μm) thermostated at 50 °C. The elution was performed in the isocratic mode with DMF containing 0.10 M LiBr at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min⁻¹. SEC traces were recorded as mentioned above, and polymethylmethacrylate standards (ReadyCal Kit, PSS GmbH) with Mw/Mn ≤ 1.05 were used to calculate Mw/Mn.

2.4. EPR Samples Preparation

In all cases, ≈0.5 mM TEMPO and 10 wt % PNIPAM freshwater solutions were prepared, dissolving the required predefined amounts of TEMPO radical and PNIPAM polymer. In the first step, the dissolution of TEMPO was performed at room temperature using ultrasonication. Then, PNIPAM was added, and the mixture was aged at 4 °C for 24 h until the complete dissolution of the polymer. The solutions were put into glass tubes with 2 mm inner diameter; then, the tubes were sealed to prevent water evaporation.

2.5. EPR Measurements

EPR spectra were recorded using X-band spectrometer Bruker EMX-500 (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). The temperature of the samples was varied in the range of 300–353 K using the flow of nitrogen gas. The thermostatic device from Bruker was used; the accuracy of the temperature setting was about ±0.5 K. Each sample was left at the particular temperature for precisely 5 min for equilibration before recording. At 305 K, the waiting time was 60 min to equilibrate the samples. Typical parameters of the spectra recording were a microwave power of 0.8 mW, modulation amplitude of 0.04 mT, and a sweep width of 8 mT. «Quenching» of fast spin probes in water was performed by adding 10 mg of CuCl₂∙2H₂O to 0.5 mL PNIPAM solution, as recommended in [21].

2.6. Data Analysis

The integration of EPR spectra and the amplitude measuring were performed by the EsrD program developed at the Chemistry Department of Lomonosov Moscow State University [16]. For LCST measurements, the amplitude value of TEMPO EPR spectra was normalized to the Q-factor [22] at each temperature and to the amplitude of the left component of the spectra at 300 K. All spectra simulations were performed using homemade scripts for the MATLAB program employing an Easyspin (v. 5.2.28) toolbox [23]. Spectra of TEMPO radical in solutions (type A) were simulated using a model based on fast motion implemented as a ‘garlic’ function in Easyspin. Simulations of the spectra of radicals in polymer globule (type B) were made in a slow-motion regime using a ‘chili’ function from the Easyspin program. The slow-motion model ‘chili’ is based on the Schneider–Freed theory [24], solving equations for slow tumbling nitroxides. Anisotropic values of Spin-Hamiltonian parameters (g-tensor and hyperfine splitting (hfs) tensor, usually denoted as a-tensor) were averaged to obtain g_iso and a_iso values, the rotational correlation time tensor (τ_corr), denoted as the average time required for the rotation of a molecule at one radian, was calculated from averaged rotational diffusion constant. Fitting errors for g_iso and a_siso were ±0.00003 and ±0.01 mT, respectively. More details of the spectra simulation are presented in Appendix A.

3. Results

According to DSC (Figure A2 in Appendix A) data from the heating step, the measured LCST of the polymers I and II in aqueous solutions was ≈305 K and did not depend on the synthesis method and molar mass distribution of polymers, which is typical for PNIPAM solutions [25]. TGA measurements showed that both PNIPAM samples are stable at the temperatures used in this work (≤353 K), and the thermal decomposition (5 wt % weight loss) began at ≈625 K (Figure A3a). Note that the weight loss between 320 and 400 K (Figure A3a) is consistent with the presence of ca. 10–12 wt % of water in poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) samples. This is confirmed by the disappearance of this weight loss after annealing the samples at 470 K for 15 min (Figure A3b).

At temperatures below LSCT (305 K), the EPR spectrum of TEMPO in PNIPAM solution (sample I, 10 wt%) and TEMPO spectrum in water have a shape close to the isotropic fast-motion limit (Figure 1). The EPR spectrum of TEMPO in the polymer II solution and its changes during heating were very similar to those of polymer I. However, all these spectra (see Figure A4 in Appendix A) are slightly asymmetric; i.e., the signal amplitude above the baseline is bigger than that below it. This asymmetry may appear due to the following reasons. Firstly, the existence of the solvent shells with different polarities around TEMPO molecules in aqueous media revealed by the analysis of Q-band EPR spectra was postulated by Hunold et al. [26]. This fact leads to a bimodal distribution of magnetic and dynamic parameters of TEMPO probes, which manifest itself in asymmetric signals due to the superposition of the spectra. Secondly, the asymmetry of the nitroxide signal can be caused either by the intermolecular spin-exchange interaction between spin probes in solutions [27,28] or by mixing with the dispersion signal of the resonance effect [29]. Fortunately, in our case, the observed effects are too small and can be neglected to simplify the spectra modeling in aqueous solutions. According to our simulation, the TEMPO spectrum in water at room temperature corresponds to probes with a g_iso value equal to 2.00579 and the hfs constant a_iso equal to 1.73 mT. The isotropic rotational correlation time (τ_corr) is about 11 ps. TEMPO in 10 wt % PNIPAM solution has parameters typical for less polar media: g_iso equal to 2.00585 and a_iso is equal to 1.72 mT, wherein τ_corr = 16 ps, manifesting the higher viscosity of polymer solution. A simple estimation of viscosity using the Stocks–Einstein equation from rotational correlation time shows increasing viscosity of 10 wt% PNIPAM solution below LCST in ≈1.5 times compared to pure water.

At temperatures higher than 305 K, the intensity of the TEMPO spectra decreases rapidly, and the lines shape changes: the spectra become broader, and the central line turns to more asymmetric. At 320 K and higher, the components in the high-field region corresponding to the probe in the hydrophobic globule clearly manifest themselves in the spectra. Changes in the lines’ shape can be empirically presented as the amplitude A of the high field component vs. temperature T (Figure 2). As seen from Figure 2, this dependence allows measuring the LCST of polymer solutions. A fast drop of the amplitude occurs due to the appearing of the more broadened and hence less intensive signal of TEMPO radicals located in globules.

At temperatures above the LCST, the TEMPO spectrum in the PNIPAM solution appears to be the sum of at least two signals. One of them belongs to the radicals in the solution (type A). At the same time, the position and shape of the second signal (denoted as the spectrum of B-type probes) manifest a more hydrophobic local environment and a hindered rotation of TEMPO radicals comparing to A probes. The simulation of experimental spectra as the sum of the spectra of two probes applies a considerable number of parameters, the variation of which leads to similar changes in EPR spectra. For example, a shift of the components can occur both due to changes in the hfs constant or rotational correlation time. The use of the spin-Hamiltonian and dynamic parameters of radicals A at different temperatures determined from the temperature dependence of TEMPO spectra in an aqueous solution makes it possible to slightly reduce the number of parameters to be varied in the modeling. Nevertheless, the parameters of probes B cannot be quantitatively determined from the simulation of experimental spectra due to their simultaneous influence on the shape of the spectral line and overlapping signals of probes B with the component corresponding to the hyperfine splitting on ¹³C nuclei of TEMPO, the so-called satellite in the probes A spectrum. The spectrum of B probes can be elucidated by subtracting the spectrum of centers A from the total spectrum or as the spectra of polymer films swollen in the probe solution [19]. Nevertheless, the subtracting does not allow obtaining a fully “pure” single-particle spectrum and may lead to artifacts in the line shape.

The perspective method to get the individual spectrum of radicals inside a polymer globule is “quenching” the signal of rapidly rotating radicals A due to the spin-exchange broadening of EPR lines [21]. A Heisenberg exchange interaction occurs between unpaired electrons as a result of the collision of two paramagnetic particles, leading to an exchange of spin states between partners. In turn, the exchange of spin states between partners leads to a change in the width of the EPR line of the paramagnetic particle up to its confluence with the baseline. Such broadening may appear in the presence of some inert paramagnetic particles, e.g., Cu(II) ions, not chemically interacting with components of solutions. Figure A5 presents the change of the EPR spectra of TEMPO radicals in aqueous solutions in the presence of Cu(II) ions. Adding small amounts of the paramagnetic ions firstly leads to minor broadening of the signal of motile radicals in the solution. Further increasing of Cu(II) concentration continues to broaden the TEMPO signal up to the baseline. The optimal concentration of Cu(II) ions is about 0.2 M, and this amount was used for “quenching” the signal of radicals A in PNIPAM (polymer I) solutions.

Due to the spin exchange between Cu(II) ions and TEMPO, the experimental spectrum transfers practically to a base line at the temperature range of 295–301 K. At 302 K, a new slight signal of slow-moving radicals appears, and its intensity and double integral increase with temperature rising (see Figure A6, Appendix A). We suppose that the new signal corresponds to TEMPO radicals located in inhomogeneities of the polymer solution and not contacted with the quencher. Over 305 K, polymer globules start collapsing, and the spectra become more intensive due to an increase in the fraction of the radicals captured by polymer globules. Heating up to 323 K leads to a further increase in the TEMPO signal, but the lines’ shape does not change noticeably. At 333–353 K, the components of the spectra narrow, apparently, because of the increasing mobility of TEMPO radicals. The number of spin probes that depends linearly on the double integral of EPR spectra stays constant at 333–353 K. We assume that the spectrum at 353 K shown in Figure 3 matches the TEMPO spectra of the radicals in dense PNIPAM globules (probes B). According to our simulation results, these spectra correspond to the anisotropic rotation of TEMPO radicals with g_iso and a_iso equal to 2.00615 and 1.60 mT, respectively. Such value of the isotropic hfs constant matches to the local polarity close to that of the chloroform or low-molecular alcohols [30]. Rotational movements of radicals are anisotropic and more hindered along the x-axis: D_x = 7.6 × 10⁶ s⁻¹ < D_z = 8.7 × 10⁷ s⁻¹ < D_y = 5.9 × 10⁸ s⁻¹, where D_x,y,z are the components of the rotational diffusion tensor. The obtained magnetic and dynamic parameters of TEMPO radicals in PNIPAM globules (probes B) were used in our simulations of the total spectra series (Figure 1).

All spectra of the samples I and II at temperatures above 305 K were excellently fitted as a sum of the spectra of two types: “hydrophilic, fast” A probes and “hydrophobic, slow” B probes (Appendix A, Figure A7). The root-mean-square deviation obtained from simulations of all fitted spectra was less than 1%. The complete simulation results obtained from EPR spectra fitting at several temperatures are collected in Appendix A in

Table A1. Selected spectral parameters from simulation TEMPO EPR spectra in 10 wt% aqueous solutions at 300–353 K.

T, K	Type A			Type B
	giso	aiso, mT	τcorr, ps	giso	aiso, mT	τcorr, ns	χB, % (Polymer I)	χB, % (Polymer II)
300	2.00585	1.72	16	-	-	-	0	0
305	2.00588	1.73	10	2.00593	1.60	1.26	26.5	44.6
306	2.00588	1.73	8	2.00593	1.60	1.31	50.0	52.6
308	2.00589	1.73	8	2.00593	1.60	1.31	56.1	54.5
310	2.00589	1.73	5	2.00593	1.60	1.31	58.3	55.9
313	2.00589	1.73	5	2.00593	1.60	1.31	61.7	58.8
318	2.00591	1.73	2	2.00599	1.60	1.31	63.1	62.0
323	2.00591	1.73	2	2.00602	1.60	1.25	64.5	63.2
333	2.00593	1.72	2	2.00608	1.60	1.01	65.9	64.3
343	2.00594	1.72	2	2.00611	1.60	0.86	68.8	67.2
353	2.00597	1.72	2	2.00615	1.60	0.74	70.1	69.9

. The difference between the two samples comes out only as the content of the B probes at 305 K: 26% in sample I and 44% in sample II. This difference may occur due to various polydispersities of polymers I (Đ = 4.3) and II (Đ = 2.05). Actually, the content of macromolecules with similar molecular mass is bigger in polymer II, leading to a more rapid globule collapse and the capturing of bigger content of the TEMPO radical. The simulation results of the EPR spectra of samples I and II registered higher than 305 K are similar, so only the simulation results obtained for sample II will be discussed further.

Figure 4 illustrates the fitted EPR spectrum recorded at 333 K as a superposition of two individual spectra. The spectrum of probes A looks like a “fast limit” spectrum of TEMPO radicals dissolved in water. Its EPR parameters become less polar with heating due to decreasing the polarity of liquids (for example, the dielectric constant ε of water changes from 78 to 60 at temperatures 298 and 350 K, respectively) [31]. A hyperfine coupling constant also decreases from 1.73 to 1.71 mT, and giso increases from 2.00588 to 2.00598. The rotation correlation time of A probes decreases with heating from 10 to 1 ps due to the diminishing water viscosity [32]. The magnetic and dynamic parameters of type A probes after LCST do not depend on PNIPAM concentration and are similar to those for the pure aqueous solution without PNIPAM.

The spectrum of B probes (radicals located in hydrophobic globules) is more broadened and looks like a «slow-motion» signal. The EPR spectrum of type B at 353 K coincides with the experimental spectrum of the TEMPO radical in the polymer globule obtained by the “quenching” experiment (Figure 3).

Figure 5 shows changes of a_iso and g_iso of radicals A and B as a function of temperature. The complete simulation results obtained from EPR spectra fitting at several temperatures are collected in Table A1 of Appendix A. At 305–313K, the g_iso values corresponding to B particles are similar to those of probe A in aqueous solution, but after 313 K, they rise to 2.00615 at 353 K. In contrast, a_iso values corresponding to B probes do not change at 305–353 K being equal to 1.60 mT. The average rotation correlation time of particles B is 1300 ps at 305–318 K. After 318 K, a two-fold decrease of τ_corr to 620 ps resulting in narrowing of the line width of the EPR signal of the B probes is observed, signaling that TEMPO molecules in the globule become more mobile. The mole fraction of type B probes rises upon heating to 353 K to 70%.

4. Discussion

All the applied methods: DSC, spectrophotometry, and the EPR spin probe technique determine the same value of LCST (305 K) in aqueous PNIPAM solutions of polymers I and II, which is consistent with the literature data [33]. Coil-to-globule transition on PNIPAM aqueous solutions studied by the EPR spin probe method occurs in a narrow temperature range of 8–10 K. Thus, in solutions, hydrophilic bonds between water molecules and PNIPAM individual chains quickly degrade, and the rapid formation of polymer globules takes place. To the contrary, Junk et al. also fixed LCST at 305 K in PNIPAM-based photocrosslinked films swollen in water, but the temperature range of the collapse as measured by spin-probe CW EPR spectroscopy was substantially broadened to 40–50 K [19]. Therefore, only one type of radical (A probes) prevails in the aqueous solution of PNIPAM below LSCT (305 K). Nevertheless, at 302–304 K, some part of TEMPO molecules is captured into polymer globules, transferring to B probes and testifying to the generation of heterogeneities that begin to collapse at 305 K, when the coil-to-globule transition takes place.

We suppose that the observed increase in g-factor values of B particles in the globules with increasing temperature occurs due to the breakdown of hydrogen bonds between water molecules and the N–O^● group of TEMPO [34,35]. At higher temperatures, these complexes decompose, and g_iso rises to lower polar values corresponding to individual TEMPO radicals. In addition, water molecules may come out of the globules while heating, making the media surrounding TEMPO radicals more hydrophobic. Such evolution from molten globule to tight globule was previously observed by Wang et al. [36] by laser scattering for PNIPAM with narrow mass distribution, and it may also lead to the change of g_iso value to be less polar.

The changes of content in A probes obtained from spectra simulation are similar to the normalized amplitude changes of the high-field component of the full TEMPO spectrum in PNIPAM solutions (see Figure 2 and Table A1). Therefore, the amplitude changes may be used not only for LCST determination but for estimation of the content of probe molecules A(χ_A) in the aqueous solution after the globule collapse. Since χ_A+ χ_B = 1, the molar fraction of B probes could be valued, too. The content of probes in the collapsed globules relates to an affinity of the probe to the polymer and amphiphilicity of the collapsed globules. Thus, the measuring of amplitudes of EPR spectra of probe molecules in thermoresponsive polymers aqueous solutions gives the opportunity to determine and predict its properties using the spin-probe technique without making challenging spectra simulations.

5. Conclusions

The CW EPR method with the spin-probe technique and “quenching” approach was applied for studying coil-to-globule phase transition in PNIPAM aqueous solution upon heating at 298–353 K. The broadening of fast-moving radicals in water by spin exchange with Cu(II) ions allows obtaining individual spectra of the spin probe in polymer globule after collapsing and reliable spin-Hamiltonian parameters of both types of TEMPO probes in solutions. In addition, the “quenching” approach has shown the formation of inhomogeneities in PNIPAM aqueous solution at 2–3 degrees below the critical temperature, whereas the temperature range of the collapse in PNIPAM-based photocrosslinked films swollen in water is substantially broadened to 40–50 K. A simple analysis based on amplitude measurement of TEMPO EPR spectra registered at different temperatures gives a cloud point and allows estimating the content of probe in collapsed globule. According to EPR spectra simulations, the formation of dense globules at high temperatures through molten ones at the first step takes place in PNIPAM solutions.