Synthesis, Characterization and Evaluation of Supercapacitive Response of Dodecylbenzenesulphonic Acid (DBSA) Doped Polypyrrole/Zirconium Dioxide Composites

Abstract

An in-situ chemical oxidative method was used to effectively synthesize a promising supercapacitor material based on PPy/ZrO₂ composites. The synthesized materials were characterized by different analytical techniques, such as UV/visible (UV/Vis) spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infra-red spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The inclusion of ZrO₂ into the PPy matrix was verified by vibrational spectra and structural analyses. The (TGA) results showed that incorporating ZrO₂ into the polymeric matrix improved its thermal stability. In addition, the electrochemical properties of the synthesizedmaterials were investigated byusing cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD). The PPy/ZrO₂ composite demonstrated excellent super capacitive performance, and high specific capacity of 337.83 F/g, with an exceedingly high energy density of 187.68 Wh/kg at a power density of 1000 W/kg. The composite materials maintain good stability after 1000 charge and discharge cycles, with 85% capacitance retention. The PPy/ZrO₂ possesses a high capacitance, an attractive micro-morphology, and a simple synthesis method. The findings indicate that the PPy/ZrO₂ composite could be a promising electrode material for high-performance supercapacitor applications.

1. Introduction

Electrochemical capacitors, also known as supercapacitors, are known for their ideal power storage capacity, which is achieved through rapid/reversible redox reactions and/or phase-change processes on the surface or subsurface areas of modified electrodes in various types of portable electronic equipment [1,2,3]. Supercapacitors show a number of interesting characteristics, including fast charge/discharge rate, safe operational features, ideal cyclic stability, and highpower density [4,5]. Solid-state supercapacitors demonstrate advantages such as ideal safety, light weight, and high flexibility, as compared to that of liquid electrolyte-based supercapacitors, and they are essential for the development of state-of-the-artportable electronic devices [6,7,8]. Supercapacitors occupied a very large significant portion of the market and research area among many electrochemical energy storage devices, due to their high power density, which can store significant amount of energy, long life cyclic stability (100 to 1000 of charge/discharge cycles before any significant deterioration of the charge capacity), andalmost unlimited charge/discharge rate [9].

The conducting polymer Polypyrrole (PPy) is broadly considered as a perfect candidate for the development of both electric double-layer capacitors (EDLC) and pseudocapacitors due to its fast and reversible redox process caused by the pi-conjugated polymeric chain [10,11]. Due to its advantages over its equivalents among the numerous conducting polymers (CPs), PPy performs admirably as an electrode material for the creation of supercapacitors. These noteworthy advantages of PPy include promising mechanical strength, ideal specific capacity, high electrical conductivity, and biocompatibility [12,13,14]. Still, like other CPs, PPy has a number of drawbacks, such as volumetric shrinking during discharge and a decrease in cyclic stability, which could be mitigated by adding potential modifiers [15,16]. Because of their rapid redox kinetics and perfect capacitance, transition metal oxides were widely employed to improve the PPy’s cyclic stability [17,18]. Different researchers synthesized nanocomposites of PPy with numerous MOs, including TiO₂ [19], Fe₂O₃ [20], SiO₂ [21], ZnO [22] and CeO₂ [23], due to the large potential of CPs and polymers doped with inorganic metal oxides (MOs), which increase the performance of materials in many applications. High electron affinity, better mechanical characteristics, and high electrical conductivity may all be achieved by doping MOs in CPs [24]. These nanomaterial-doped CPs are employed for a wide range of applications and purposes. For supercapacitors, high-performance ordered porous Polypyrrole/ZnO sheets with enhanced specific capacitance were developed [25]. PPy and its composites with titanium oxide demonstrate increased supercapacitative qualities [26]. Polypyrrole@silica composites with good performance as electrode materials for Lithium-ion batteries were prepared using a solution polymerization process [27]. The development of new materials with encouraging electrochemical properties is an important goal for energy storage applications. Furthermore, low working potential, low energy density, and large self-charge/discharge currents are all issues that must be addressed in the development of next-generation supercapacitors. Supercapacitors can use MOs electrodes, although they have limited current capability and poor cycle stability. As a result, there is a compelling need to enhance the electrochemical characteristics of MOs and CPs [28].

In the current study, PPy/ZrO₂ composites were synthesized by an in-situ chemical oxidative polymerization method with improved electrochemical performance and specific capacitance at a scan rate of 100 mV s⁻¹. The solid-state supercapacitor device, which is made up of as-prepared PPy/ZrO₂ composite electrodes, has good specific capacitance of 337.83 F/g and a maximum energy density of 187.68 Wh/kg. These findings indicate that the PPy/ZrO₂ composites could be promising electrode materials for high-performance supercapacitor applications, which was not previously reported.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The reagent grade pyrrole monomer (Fluka) was distilled twice before use. The following chemicals were used as received: dodecyl-benzenesulphonic acid (DBSA), chloroform, ammonium persulphate (APS), acetone and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). However, methanol and sulfuric acid were provided by Scharlau (Sentmenat, Spain). Double-distilled water was used for solution preparation and glassware washing/rinsing. The compounds that were utilized are listed in

Table 1. List of chemicals used and their molecular weight, density, and purity.

S. No.	Chemical Name	Molecular Formula	Molecular Weight	Density	% Purity
1	Pyrrole	C4H4NH	67.09 g/mol	0.966 g/mL	99.0%
2	DBSA	C18H30O3 S	326.49 g/mol	0.992 g/mL	70 wt. % in isopropanol
3	Ammonium persulphate	(NH4)2S2O8	228.20 g/mol	1.98 g/mL	98%
4	Methanol	CH3OH	32.04 g/mol	0.79 g/mL	98.55%
5	NMP	C5H9NO	99.13 g/mol	1.03 g/mL	99.5%
6	Chloroform	CHCl3	119.3 g/mol	1.492 g/mL	99.4%
7	Sulfuric acid	H2SO4	98.08 g/mol	1.84 g/mL	97%
8	Acetone	CH3COCH3	58.080 g/mol	0.7845 g/mL	99%
9	DMSO	C2H6OS	78.13 g/mol	1.01 g/mL	99%

below.

2.2. Synthesis of Polypyrrole (PPy)

In a round bottom flask placed in an ice bath, 0.2 mL pyrrole monomer and 50 mL deionized water were added and stirred to make PPy. After 10 min, 3.5 mL dodecyl-benzenesulfonic acid (DBSA) was added and stirred for another 10 min, then 10 mL ammonium per sulphate (APS) solution (0.1 M) was added dropwise as an initiator. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at 5 to 10 °C. The precipitate was separated by centrifugation (7000 rpm) after 24 h and washed several times with water followed by acetone. The resulting black powder was vacuum-dried at 60 °C for 12 h and labelled as PPy.

2.3. Synthesis of Polypyrrole/Zirconium Dioxide (PPy/ ZrO₂) Composites

The same procedure was followed for the synthesis of PPy/ZrO₂ composites by adding different amounts (0.1 g, 0.15 g, 0.2 g, 0.25 g and 0.3 g) of ZrO₂ into the reaction mixture just after the addition of DBSA. The samples thus obtained were named as PPy/ZrO₂ 1, PPy/ZrO₂ 2, PPy/ZrO₂ 3, PPy/ZrO₂ 4, and PPy/ZrO₂ 5, respectively.

2.4. Apparatus

For electrochemical measurements Autolab, and three electrode cell having different electrodes such as glassy carbon as working electrode, gold as counter electrode, and silver-silver chloride as reference electrode, were used.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. UV-Visible Characterization

The UV-visible spectra of pure PPy and its ZrO₂ composites were measured in the 200–900 nm region (Figure 1a–f). Pure PPy spectra reveal two distinct wide absorption bands, located at 359 nm and 589 nm, respectively (Figure 1a). The π-π* transition is responsible for the initial absorption band. At 584 nm, the second wide absorption band suggests that the PPy is in oxidized and non-conducting state [29]. Figure 1b–f shows the absorption spectra of PPy/ZrO₂ composites. The composites also show two absorption peaks, with a peak in the region of 401–410 nm indicating the PPy ring’s π-π* transition. The second absorption peak above 700 nm in the composites belongs to the sum of polarons and bipolarons [30]. The broad peaks for PPy/ZrO₂ composites curves (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) show that when the amount of ZrO₂ in the composites rises, the peak for the sum of polaron and bipolaron shifts towards the higher wavelength [30]. This results in a narrowing of the band gap and an increase in the composites’ conductivity.

3.2. UV Band Gap Calculation

The optical band gap was computed using the Tauc Equation (1). The UV-visible spectra of PPy and its composites aid in the identification of their optical band gaps, where αand h indicate the absorption coefficients and Planck’s constant, respectively. The symbols ν, A, and Eg stand for light frequency, a constant, and band gap, respectively.

$${\left(\alpha h\nu \right)}^2=A{(h\nu -Eg)}^n$$

(1)

PPy and PPy/ZrO₂ 1, PPy/ZrO₂ 2, PPy/ZrO₂ 3, PPy/ZrO₂ 4, and PPy/ZrO₂ 5 had band gaps of 2.8, 2.36, 2.28, 2.29, 2.4, and 2.39, respectively, as shown in Figure 2. These findings reveal that increasing the quantity of ZrO₂ in the polymer matrix reduces the band gap, resulting in an increase in conductivity. As demonstrated in Figure 2, the band gap of PPy/ZrO₂ 2 is less than that of other composites and pure PPy.

3.3. Vibrational Spectroscopy/FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectra of PPy and PPy/ZrO₂ composites are shown in Figure 3. The C–C stretching vibration in the pyrrole ring shows up as an absorption band at 1540 cm⁻¹ in PPy. The ring’s C–N stretching vibration is represented by the band at 1452 cm⁻¹ in the PPy spectrum [21]. The C–N in-plane band is at 1290 cm⁻¹, and the C–H bending modes are at 1164 cm⁻¹ and 1031 cm⁻¹ [21,22]. The C–C and C–H out-of-plane deformation vibration bands are at 963 and 891 cm⁻¹, respectively [21,22]. Except for the C–C, C–N and C–H bending modes of the pyrrole ring, the PPy/ZrO₂ composite spectra generated with various ZrO₂ weights displayed superimposed absorption bands of both components [21]. For pure PPy, the bands at 1540 cm⁻¹correspond to C–C stretching vibration, and 1452 cm⁻¹ to C–N stretching vibration, and 1031 cm⁻¹ to C–H bending modes are red-shifted to 1516, 1431, and 1000cm⁻¹ for the PPy/ZrO₂ 5 composite, respectively. The small absorption band at 963 cm⁻¹ was slightly red shifted down to 956 cm⁻¹. The peak intensity of pure PPy declines as the concentration of ZrO₂ grows and for the PPy/ZrO₂ 5 composite, it virtually vanishes (Figure 3). The formation of PPy/ZrO₂ composites is indicated by these findings.

3.4. X-ray Diffraction Studies

The X-ray diffraction patterns of PPy and PPy/ZrO₂ composites are shown in Figure 4. Only PPy has a broad peak at 2θ = 12° to 30°, with tiny shoulders at 17°, 19°, and 21° in the sample. In the PPy sample, the shoulder at 2θ = 17° and 2θ = 19° reflects the distance between the benzene ring planes in adjacent PPy chains. The PPy, like other CPs, has a broad peak, which is thought to imply a semicrystalline nature [31,32].

The composites’ XRD diffractograms exhibit a prominent and intense peak at 2θ = 30°, as well as less intense peaks at 2θ = 35°, 50°, and 60°, all of which may be attributed to ZrO₂ inside the polymer matrix [33]. These peaks for ZrO₂ in the PPy matrix imply an increase in crystallinity, which is consistent with the band gap calculation and related increase in conductivity. The broad PPy peak is flattened by ZrO₂ inclusion, and the ZrO₂ peaks dominate the diffractograms. It may be deduced from this that the addition of ZrO₂ had a significant impact on the crystallinity of PPy [34]. Scherrer’s Equation (2) was used to compute the average crystallite size.

$$D=\frac{k\lambda }{\beta Cos\mathsf{\theta }}$$

(2)

where β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM), λ is the X-ray wavelength, θ is the diffraction angle, and k is the Scherrer’s constant of order one. The average crystallite size in PPy/ZrO₂ composites is 19.56 nm.

3.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Figure 5 shows the thermograms of PPy and PPy/ZrO₂ composites, which demonstrate three step weight losses. For pure PPy, the absorbed water molecules are evaporated in the first stage, resulting in a weight loss of 5% at temperatures ranging from 25 °C to 150 °C. The DBSA molecules are removed from the polymer matrix in the second stage. The decomposition of the main polymer chain occurs in the third stage at high temperatures ranging from 425 °C to 800 °C, with 21.29% weight retention. In composites, ZrO₂ plays a crucial function in modifying the composites’ thermal behavior. The addition of ZrO₂ to PPy/ZrO₂ composites improves thermal stability significantly, as evidenced by curves (b–e) in Figure 5 [32]. The strong association/interaction between PPy and ZrO₂ particles-particles is responsible for the improved thermal stability [35]. In comparison to pure PPy, the major decomposition in composites begins at high temperatures, resulting in a 63.27% increase in weight retention.

Table 2. Weight loss at different temperature and weight retention.

	%Weight Loss				%Weight Retention
Sample	150 °C	200 °C	400 °C	600 °C	800 °C
PPy	4.56	6.72	27.16	54.95	21.29
PPy/ZrO2 1	3.72	5.43	25.21	43.11	54.24
PPy/ZrO2 2	5.04	6.63	21.37	38.83	55.07
PPy/ZrO2 3	2.24	3.64	20.49	36	60.03
PPy/ZrO2 4	4.92	5.84	17.55	32.76	63.27

summarizes weight loss and weight retention at different temperatures.

3.6. Morphological Study

Figure 6 shows SEM images of pure PPy and a PPy/ZrO₂4 composite. Pure PPy has a porous morphology with bigger aggregated particles and a large particle size. In the segregated form, the PPy/ZrO₂4 composite has a granular morphology with smaller particles and reduced particle size. The ZrO₂ particles appear to be evenly distributed over the porous surface of the PPy matrix. This causes an increase in the conductivity of the composite because of the ease of an electron hoping mechanism [36].

3.7. Cyclic Voltammetric (CV) Analysis

The electrochemical properties were studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV). Figure 7a,b shows the CV curves of neat PPy and tPPy/ZrO₂4 composite, respectively. CV curves were recorded using a three-electrode setup in acidic medium containing a 1 molar H₂SO₄ solution as the electrolyte, with glassy carbon, gold and silver-silver chloride electrodes serving as working, counter and reference electrodes, respectively. A potential window ranging from −1 to 1 V was selected at a scan rate of 100 mV/s. PPy’s CV curves have well-defined redox peaks. At a scan rate of 100 mV/s, the PPy voltammogram reveals an anodic peak potential (Epa) of 0.419 V with current density 0.214 mA and a cathodic peak potential (Epc) of 0.280 V with current density −0.125 mA. The cyclic voltammogram of the PPy/ZrO₂4 composite in Figure 7b shows an anodic peak potential (Epa) of 0.462 V with current density 0.241 mA and a cathodic peak potential (Epc) of 0.151 V with current density −0.196 mA. According to the CV curves, the current density has risen from 0.214 to 0.241 mA at the same scan rate (100 mV/s) and potential window, demonstrating that the composite material has a better response than the neat PPy modified electrode.

3.8. Effect of Scan Rate

Figure 8a demonstrates the influence of scan rate on the PPy/ZrO₂ 4 modified electrode, which displays an increase in redox peaks as the scan rate increases from 25 to 200 mV/s. Figure 8b shows that the square root of scan rate and anodic peak current (Ipa) have an excellent linearity (R² = 0.97792), indicating that the electron transfer reaction of the PPy/ZrO₂ 4 modified electrode with the electrolyte solution is a diffusion controlled process.

3.9. Galvanostatic Charge Discharge Studies

Figure 9a shows the galvanostatic charge discharge (GCD) of PPy and PPy/ZrO₂ 4 composite in a potential window of −1 to 1 V in 1.0 M H₂SO₄ solution. The applicability of the fabricated supercapacitor electrodes was studied using various parameters such as specific capacitance (Cs), energy density (E), and power density (P). The specific capacitance of the fabricated supercapacitor electrodes was calculated using Equation (3).

$$Cs=\frac{I\times \Delta t}{m\times \Delta V}$$

(3)

where I represents the current charge/discharge (A), Δt is the time of discharge, ΔV and m represent the potential window and mass deposited on the GSC electrode, respectively. Equations (4) and (5) help to deduce the energy and power densities, respectively.

$$E=\frac{1}{2\times 3.6}Cs\times \Delta V^2$$

(4)

$$P=\frac{E}{\Delta t}\times 3600$$

(5)

where Cs represent specific capacitance, E and P symbolized energy and power densities.

As can be seen in Figure 9b, the PPy/ZrO₂ 4 composite shows a long charge discharge time at a current density of 1 A/g. The charge/discharge time versus potential is linear in all of the curves, which is characteristic of capacitors. The specific capacitance of the PPy/ZrO₂ composite was 337.83 F/g at a current density of 1 A/g, whereas PPy had a specific capacitance of 225.225 F/g. The high specific capacitance of the PPy/ZrO₂ 4 electrode can be attributed to its smaller particle size and well-defined structure, which reduce ion diffusion length and increase ion and electron transport kinetics in electrodes and at the electrode/electrolyte interface [37]. Furthermore, at current densities ranging from 01 to 05 A/g, the specific capacitance of PPy/ZrO₂ 4 was 337.83 F/g to 168.92 F/g respectively. As a result, the electrode material in a supercapacitor, PPy/ZrO₂4, has good capacitance performance. Simultaneously, comparing GCD curves at various current densities reveals that the capacitance of sample PPy/ZrO₂ 4 increases as the current density decreases [38]. At a higher value of current density, the ions or electrons are mainly adsorbed on the upper surface of the working electrode and hindered because of a short time at a high current density to reach the whole surface.

Table 3. Comparative analysis of PPy/ZrO₂ with other electrode materials.

Electrode Material	Specific Capacitance (F/g)	Current Density (A/g)	Reference
PPy/ZnO	161.02	0.5	[25]
PPy/GO	249	2 mA cm−2	[39]
PPy/MnO2	205	1	[40]
PPy/CeO2	193	1	[41]
PPy/β MnO2	297	1	[42]
PPy/ZrO2	337.83	1	This work

compares the specific capacitance and current density of the PPy/ZrO₂ electrode used in this work to those of other well-known electrode materials, demonstrating that PPy/ZrO₂ outperforms them.

4. Conclusions

We found that in-situ chemical oxidative polymerization is a simple way to successfully synthesized PPy and PPy/ZrO₂ composites with outstanding electrochemical characteristics. The aromatic ring of the polymer exhibits π-π* transition in the UV-visible region. The presence of ZrO₂ in the PPy matrix was verified by vibrational spectroscopy. Sharp and fine XRD spectra were detected after the inclusion of ZrO₂ particles in PPy. The surface morphology showed a granular structure and agglomeration of particles with a higher concentration of ZrO₂. The thermograms show an excellent thermal stability of PPy by the addition of ZrO₂. Correspondingly, the modified electrode with the PPy/ZrO₂ 4 composite through three electrode system showed the specific capacitance of 337.83 F/g at a current density of 1 A/g and excellent energy density of 187.67 Wh/kg and an outstanding power density of 1000 W/kg. Moreover, the modified electrode PPy/ZrO₂ 4 demonstrated excellent specific capacitance performance and retained 85% of its specific capacitance after 1000 charge-discharge cycles. The modified PPy/ZrO₂ 4 electrode is a promising material for making CPs supercapacitor electrodes due to its excellent electrochemical performance and cycle stability.