Next Article in Journal
Dual-Modified Lignin-Assembled Multilayer Microsphere with Excellent Pb2+ Capture
Previous Article in Journal
Chiroptical Characteristics of Nanosegregated Phases in Binary Mixture Consisting of Achiral Bent-Core Molecule and Bent-Core Base Main-Chain Polymer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 14
10.3390/polym14142825
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Melting Point Depression of Poly(ethylene oxide)-Poly(propylene oxide)-Poly(ethylene oxide) Triblock Polymers in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Menthol as a Solid Co-Plasticiser

by
Vivek Trivedi
1,*,
Adejumoke Lara Ajiboye
1,
Nichola J. Coleman
2,
Ruchir Bhomia
3 and
Marion Bascougnano
2
1
Medway School of Pharmacy, University of Kent, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
2
Department of Pharmaceutical, Chemical and Environmental Science, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
3
Procter & Gamble, 452 Basingstoke Road, Reading RG2 0RX, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(14), 2825; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142825
Submission received: 20 January 2022 / Revised: 6 July 2022 / Accepted: 7 July 2022 / Published: 11 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Processing and Engineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The melting behaviour of the triblock polymers, Pluronic F38, F68, F77, F108, and F127, was investigated in pressurised CO2 and in the presence of menthol. The melting points of the polymers combined with 0, 10, 25, and 50 wt% of menthol were studied at atmospheric pressure and compared with those at 10 and 20 MPa in supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2). The highest melting point depressions of 16.8 ± 0.5 °C and 29.0 ± 0.3 °C were observed at 10 and 20 MPa, respectively. The melting point of triblock polymers in pressurised CO2 was found to be dependent on molecular weight, poly(propylene oxide) (PPO) content, and menthol percentage. The melting point of most of the polymers studied in this work can be reduced to room temperature, which can be pivotal to the formulation development of thermolabile substances using these polymers.

1. Introduction

Triblock copolymers commonly, known as poloxamers or Pluronics, consist of hydrophilic poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and hydrophobic poly(propylene oxide) (PPO) segments which are arranged in an A-B-A structure as shown in Figure 1.
These polymers are synthesised by sequential polymerisation by building the PPO block first followed by the addition of PEO chains at both ends of the polymer [1]. The lengths of the PPO and PEO blocks can be tailored to fine-tune the properties of the polymers, including crystallinity conferred by the PEO block, melting point (Tm), hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB), and solubility [2]. The triblock polymers studied in this work are commercially available as Pluronic® F38, F68, F77, F108, and F127. These are solid at room temperature and their average molecular weight, Tm, and the number of PEO/PPO units are presented in Table 1.
The interaction of scCO2 with polymers is well documented where the dissolution of CO2 in the polymer is known to cause a depression in Tm and/or glass transition temperature (Tg) [3,4]. The knowledge of the phase behaviour of polymers in pressurised systems is of great importance, as this may enable the processing of formulations at lower temperatures to avoid the decomposition of thermolabile drugs during formulation. Investigations of the solubility or miscibility of a single solute in a binary system in contact with a single supercritical fluid (SCF) are widely reported [5,6,7,8,9,10]. For example, Tm depression in polymers caused by the dissolution of CO2 is very well known and has been widely reported [3,4,11,12,13,14]. This phenomenon and the extent of Tm reduction are dependent on numerous factors including the actual melting temperature, crystal density, amorphous phase density, enthalpy of fusion, repeat unit molecular weight, and presence of CO2-philic moieties. However, interactions between a solute, excipient(s), and SCF in multicomponent systems are less frequently documented in the literature, especially with regard to the alteration of physical properties such as the Tm and/or Tg by their possible action as a co-plasticiser.
The present study investigates the effect of menthol (Figure 2) on the melting behaviour of these triblock polymers in scCO2. Menthol (C6H9OHCH3C3H7), a naturally occurring saturated secondary alcohol, is one of the major components in peppermint oil [15].
There are numerous reports on the use of menthol as a co-solvent for particle engineering and to improve solubility in SCF processes as listed in Table 2.
Menthol is a favoured plasticiser for SCF processes because it has excellent solubility in scCO2 along with sufficiently high vapour pressure for facile removal by sublimation at the end of the process [28]. Menthol is a non-toxic and inexpensive chemical with ‘GRAS’ (generally recognised as safe) status and is regularly used in cosmetic, food, pharmaceutical, and consumer health products (e.g., mouthwashes, sprays, comestibles, and topical formulations) [29].
Pluronics have found numerous applications in the pharmaceutical industry due to their non-ionic, amphiphilic, and non-toxic nature; ability to form micelles; thermoresponsive gelling properties; and excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability [30,31]. They are commonly used in drug solubilisation, gene/therapeutic delivery, diagnostics, and tissue engineering applications. Their properties and various applications in pharmaceutical formulations and drug delivery are comprehensively discussed in a number of recently published reviews [31,32,33,34,35,36]. Pluronics are also commonly used in the preparation of solid dispersions (SDs) to improve the dissolution rate of poorly soluble drugs. The SDs can be prepared using several techniques, but the heat fusion method is still one of the most common and simple methods, which requires heating the Pluronic–drug mixture above the polymer’s melting point [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. The temperatures involved in the preparation of these SDs using Pluronics range from 63 to 160 °C. The importance of the current study is in establishing if the working temperature for Pluronics in applications such as in the preparation of SDs can be significantly lowered. The principal objective of this work was to investigate whether menthol could be used to depress the Tm of a range of triblock polymers in scCO2 to room temperature (25 °C). The significance of the presented information relates to particle engineering and in the formulation development of thermolabile substances using PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Pluronic® F38 and F77 were kindly donated by BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany). Other polymers (Pluronic® F68, F108, and F127) and menthol (>99%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Gillingham, UK). Liquid carbon dioxide was obtained from BOC Ltd. (Guildford, UK) with a purity of 99.9%. All reagents used in this study were of analytical grade and used without further purification.

2.2. Methods

Mixtures of poloxamer and menthol were prepared by manually homogenising 10, 25, and 50 wt% menthol with each polymer in a pestle and mortar. Samples were initially analysed by differential scanning calorimetry at atmospheric pressure and then at 10 and 20 MPa in scCO2 using a supercritical phase monitor (SPM). Menthol content was incrementally increased until a Tm of 25 °C (i.e., room temperature) was achieved.

2.2.1. Determination of Melting Temperature of Pluronics and Mixtures in scCO2

The melting point depression in scCO2 was determined using a supercritical phase monitor (Supercritical Fluid Technologies (SFT) Inc., Newark, DE, USA). The phase monitor (Figure 3) contains a manually controlled syringe pump attached to a 30 mL pressure vessel, a CCD camera with a fibre optic light source to allow clear viewing of the vessel’s interior, and a magnetic stirrer for effective mixing. The heating of the vessel is controlled by an internal resistance thermometer up to a maximum temperature of 150 °C.
The instrument was calibrated using a naphthalene standard prior to the experiments. For Tm determination, a melting point capillary was filled with 1–3 mg of sample, and CO2 was introduced into the vessel to achieve the desired pressure which was then kept constant during the experiment by manually rotating the piston. The temperature under constant pressure was increased in increments of 0.2 °C until the complete melt was observed. The melting of the polymer and the polymer/menthol mixtures was monitored through a quartz window via a camera attached to the vessel. The melting point depression (ΔT) was calculated by subtracting the Tm of the polymer in the presence of menthol at atmospheric (0.1 MPa) or higher pressures (10 or 20 MPa) in scCO2 from their actual melting temperature. The experiments were conducted in triplicate and each repeat was performed on a freshly prepared Pluronic–menthol mixture to establish sample homogeneity. No further experiments were conducted on the polymer–menthol mixtures below 25 °C, primarily as the major objective of this study was to determine if the Tm of Pluronics could be lowered to ‘room temperature’ using a scCO2–menthol binary mixture. Moreover, it would also have been technically impossible to conduct experiments below room temperature due to the instrument’s lack of cooling capability.
The menthol in samples after processing was completely removed prior to any analysis. All processed samples were removed from the vessel and were maintained for 1 week at ambient temperature and pressure. Thereafter, polymers were kept under a vacuum (5 mbar) for 4 h to ensure the complete removal of menthol from the samples. The complete removal of menthol was determined via weight loss, i.e., until samples achieved constant weight and no more weight reduction was observed with the longer or higher vacuum.

2.2.2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Melting point determinations of the samples with menthol at atmospheric pressure (0.1 MPa) and after processing were performed using a DSC-1 calorimeter (Mettler-Toledo). Between 5 and 8 mg of each sample was sealed in a standard aluminium pan and DSC thermograms were recorded from 25 to 100 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 with an equilibration time of 120 s.

2.2.3. X-ray Diffraction

The diffractograms of unprocessed and scCO2-processed polymers were collected using a Bruker D8 Advance (Bruker, Germany) diffractometer in theta–theta reflection mode with a copper anode. Each sample was scanned from 2° to 60° at a step size of 0.02° in the 2θ range. Data collection and interpretations were performed using DiffracPlus and the EVA V.14 program, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

The Tm of triblock polymers and their menthol mixtures at atmospheric pressure (0.1 MPa) was determined using DSC and compared to understand the plasticisation effect of menthol. Table 3 presents the Tm of individual polymers and mixtures with 10, 25, and 50 wt% of menthol at 0.1, 10, and 20 MPa.
It is evident from the data in Table 3 that menthol is a suitable plasticiser for Pluronics and is capable of depressing the Tm by its interposition between the polymer chains resulting in the weakening of the attractive forces between adjacent polymer molecules. The depression in Tm of the Pluronics with varying menthol content was found to be between 6 and 9 °C depending on the polymer. The lowering of the Tm was found to be highest for F108, the Pluronic with the greatest PEO content and highest average molecular weight, indicating that the interaction of menthol with Pluronics is dependent on molecular weight and PEO/PPO ratio.
The addition of menthol led to a further reduction in Tm in the range of 17 to 29 °C for these polymers in the presence of scCO2. The melting point depression obtained at 10 MPa with increasing menthol content is presented in Figure 4.
In general, there was an increase in the extent of Tm depression for all polymers which was highest for F127 with 50 wt% of menthol at 10 MPa. This is attributed to the comparatively high polarity of the scCO2–menthol solution compared with that of CO2 alone and the resulting ease with which the menthol and CO2 molecules interact with the polymer [5]. Notably, both Pluronic F77 and F127 melted at room temperature (25 °C) with 25% and 50 wt% additions of menthol, respectively. Polymers with comparatively greater PPO fractions (F77 and F127 with ~30% PPO) showed a higher depression in Tm with increasing menthol content in scCO2 in comparison to those with lower PPO fractions of ~20% (F38, F68, and F108).
The density of the scCO2 phase can also play an important role with respect to the Tm depression phenomena. The trend in Tm reduction at 20 MPa was similar to that observed at 10 MPa where a higher depression was obtained with increasing menthol content. Interestingly, an increase in pressure from 10 to 20 MPa alone did not have a significant impact on the melting temperatures of these polymers, as reported in a previous study by Bhomia et al. [3]. However, the combined effect of a higher density of scCO2 and the presence of a co-plasticiser on the melting behaviour of Pluronics is evident from the data presented in Figure 5.
The addition of 10 wt% menthol showed minimal effect on the Tm of polymers but mixtures with 25 wt% menthol lowered the Tm of F38, F68, and F77 to 25 °C at 20 MPa. A further increase in menthol to 50 wt% also resulted in the lowering of the Tm of F108 and F127 to 33 and 25 °C, respectively. Hence, with the exception of F108, the melting points of all polymers studied in this work could be reduced to room temperature in the presence of menthol and in scCO2.
A correlation between the PPO content, molecular weight, and PEO/PPO ratio to the extent of Tm depression could be seen in the data obtained in this study. The polymers with a higher number of PPO units showed a higher ΔT at 10 MPa, which could especially be seen with 50 wt% menthol (F38 > F68 ≈ F77 > F108 > F127). The depression in melting temperature of Pluronics was still dependent on the PPO content at 20 MPa, but an increase in pressure had a significantly greater impact on the melting of polymers with 14 and 30 PPO units (F38 and F68, respectively). This can be attributed to several factors, including the polarity of the scCO2–menthol binary mixture, improved accessibility of the CO2-philic functional groups at 20 MPa, the density of the medium, and the lower molecular weight of these polymers.
A summary of the lowest Tm obtained for all five Pluronics at respective pressure and menthol content is presented in Table 4.
The reduction in Tm in compressed CO2 is not a hydrostatic pressure effect but a colligative property which is enhanced by the incorporation and accessibility of CO2-philic functionalities, e.g., ether linkages, carbonyl, and fluro groups. It is known that the gas molecules preferentially penetrate the amorphous regions of a semicrystalline polymer to facilitate Lewis acid/base interactions between the polymer and CO2 [12,43]. This leads to the depression in Tm due to the reduction in the chemical potential of the amorphous regions, driving the morphology to a more amorphous state and therefore reducing the crystallinity [11,12,13,44,45]. Furthermore, scCO2 is also known to act as a molecular lubricant by weakly solvating the molecular segments of the polymer, thus assisting in the reduction of Tm. Menthol and scCO2 are individually good plasticisers for Pluronics, but this research has demonstrated that a mixture of both clearly improves their interaction with the polymer, resulting in a higher Tm depression. It is conjectured that the addition of menthol and its impact on the overall polarity of the fluid medium may be responsible for this effect.
The plasticisation effect of menthol alone was generally higher for Pluronics containing 80% PEO (F38, F68, and F108), which was in contrast to the results obtained with the binary mixture of menthol and scCO2. F77 and F127 with 70% PEO showed a sharp decrease in Tm even at 10 MPa and melted at 25 °C in the presence of 25% and 50 wt% menthol, respectively. The effect of pressure was particularly evident on polymers with lower PPO content, where a pressure increase to 20 MPa resulted in the lowering of the Tm of F38 and F68 to 25 °C with 25 wt% menthol. The Tm of the ‘largest’ polymer (F108) in the study was lowered by ~25 °C in the presence of 50 wt% menthol but could not be decreased to room temperature as could the rest of the Pluronics. The effect of pressure could be explained by the improved rate of diffusion of the plasticisers in the polymer matrix. In view of the dynamic solvation–desolvation between the plasticiser molecules and the polymer chains, the higher the diffusion rate, the greater the efficiency of the compound as a plasticiser. Moreover, an increase in pressure does not only increase the density of scCO2 at a given temperature but also improves the solubility of menthol; hence, an improvement in plasticisation efficiency of this binary mixture can be expected for the same group of polymers. However, interactions between scCO2 and polymers are complicated where numerous factors (i.e., temperature, pressure, co-solvent/plasticiser) can have a simultaneous effect on their phase behaviour. Menthol is an excellent choice for a co-plasticiser with scCO2 due to its non-toxic and GRAS status.
The use of plasticisers to reduce the Tm of polymers is very common, but it is usually impossible to remove the plasticiser from the matrix after processing. Menthol can be easily removed after the scCO2 treatment from the mixture due to its low vapour pressure, resulting in the final product without the presence of residual plasticisers after processing [11]. DSC and XRD analyses were performed to establish this and to determine if the processing at stated conditions had any impact on the polymer. The samples prepared for these analyses were at the pressure and temperatures where the lowest Tm was obtained in this study. Figure 6 presents the DSC thermograms of all five Pluronics before and after processing with scCO2.
The thermograms of unprocessed and processed Pluronics resulted in a similar melting onset and peaks for all, indicating that the processing of these polymers at the stated conditions had no impact on their thermal properties. Few of the thermograms had shoulders in the peaks, which could be due to the presence of admixtures of PPO homopolymer within the block copolymers, and the differences in the peak height can be attributed to the sample size [3,46].
XRD diffractograms of the processed and unprocessed samples of polymers are presented in Figure 7.

4. Conclusions

Additions of menthol in the presence of compressed scCO2 were observed to increase the interaction between the fluid phase and the Pluronics. In this study, Tm depressions in the range 16.8 to 29.0 °C were observed for the polymers. The extent of Tm depression was found to be dependent on PPO content, molecular weight, menthol content, and pressure. In general, increases in menthol content led to higher depressions in Tm at both 10 and 20 MPa. Also, there was a direct correlation between the PPO content and melting behaviour, where higher PPO-containing polymers showed a greater reduction in Tm. The increase in pressure to 20 MPa had a significant impact on the depression in melting temperature of Pluronics with lower PPO. This study clearly shows that menthol is an appropriate co-plasticiser for Pluronics that can enable the processing of these polymers near room temperature at comparatively low pressures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T. and R.B.; data curation, M.B.; formal analysis, M.B., R.B., A.L.A. and N.J.C.; investigation, M.B.; project administration, R.B. and V.T.; supervision, V.T.; validation, V.T. and N.J.C.; writing—original draft, V.T. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, V.T. and A.L.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexandridis, P.; Hatton, T.A. Poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) block copolymer surfactants in aqueous solutions and at interfaces: Thermodynamics, structure, dynamics, and modeling. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1995, 7757, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fusco, S.; Borzacchiello, A.; Netti, A.P. Perspectives on: PEO-PPO-PEO Triblock Copolymers and their Biomedical Applications. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2006, 21, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhomia, R.; Trivedi, V.; Mitchell, J.C.; Coleman, N.J.; Snowden, M.J. Effect of Pressure on the Melting Point of Pluronics in Pressurized Carbon Dioxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 10820–10825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yoganathan, R.B.; Mammucari, R.; Foster, N.R. Dense Gas Processing of Polymers. Polym. Rev. 2010, 50, 144–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kirby, C.F.; McHugh, M.A. Phase Behavior of Polymers in Supercritical Fluid Solvents. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 565–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Conway, S.E.; Lim, J.S.; McHugh, M.A.; Wang, J.D.; Mandel, F.S. Phase behavior of semicrystalline polyester resin in supercritical fluid solvents and solvent mixtures: Implications for supercritical fluid processing. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 81, 2642–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rindfleisch, F.; DiNoia, T.P.; McHugh, M.A. Solubility of Polymers and Copolymers in Supercritical CO2. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 15581–15587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Trivedi, V.; Bhomia, R.; Mitchell, J.C.; Coleman, N.; Douroumis, D.; Snowden, M. Study of the Effect of Pressure on Melting Behavior of Saturated Fatty Acids in Liquid or Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2013, 58, 1861–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ciftci, O.N.; Temelli, F. Melting point depression of solid lipids in pressurized carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 92, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nalawade, S.P.; Picchioni, F.; Janssen, L.P.B.M. Supercritical carbon dioxide as a green solvent for processing polymer melts: Processing aspects and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 19–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lian, Z.; Epstein, S.A.; Blenk, C.W.; Shine, A.D. Carbon dioxide-induced melting point depression of biodegradable semicrystalline polymers. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2006, 39, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kelly, C.; Harrison, K.L.; Leeke, G.; Jenkins, M. Detection of melting point depression and crystallization of polycaprolactone (PCL) in scCO2 by infrared spectroscopy. Polym. J. 2013, 45, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Shenoy, S.L.; Fujiwara, T.; Wynne, K.J. Quantifying supercritical CO2 dilation of poly(vinylidene fluoride) and poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoro-propylene) utilizing a linear variable differential transducer: Plasticization and melting behavior. Macromol. Symp. 2003, 201, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pasquali, I.; Comi, L.; Pucciarelli, F.; Bettini, R. Swelling, melting point reduction and solubility of PEG 1500 in supercritical CO2. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 356, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Thakur, R.; Gupta, R.B. Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solution with Solid Cosolvent (RESS−SC) Process: Formation of Griseofulvin Nanoparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 7380–7387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Samei, M.; Vatanara, A.; Fatemi, S.; Najafabadi, A.R. Process variables in the formation of nanoparticles of megestrol acetate through rapid expansion of supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2012, 70, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Keshmiri, K.; Vatanara, A.; Tavakoli, O.; Manafi, N. Production of ultrafine clobetasol propionate via rapid expansion of supercritical solution (RESS): Full factorial approach. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 101, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thakur, R.; Gupta, R.B. Formation of phenytoin nanoparticles using rapid expansion of supercritical solution with solid cosolvent (RESS-SC) process. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 308, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hosseinpour, M.; Vatanara, A.; Zarghami, R. Formation and Characterization of Beclomethasone Dipropionate Nanoparticles Using Rapid Expansion of Supercritical Solution. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 5, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sodeifian, G.; Sajadian, S.A. Solubility measurement and preparation of nanoparticles of an anticancer drug (Letrozole) using rapid expansion of supercritical solutions with solid cosolvent (RESS-SC). J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 133, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sodeifian, G.; Sajadian, S.A.; Daneshyan, S. Preparation of Aprepitant nanoparticles (efficient drug for coping with the effects of cancer treatment) by rapid expansion of supercritical solution with solid cosolvent (RESS-SC). J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 140, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sodeifian, G.; Sajadian, S.A. Experimental measurement of solubilities of sertraline hydrochloride in supercriticalcarbon dioxide with/without menthol: Data correlation. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 149, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, P.C.; Su, C.S.; Tang, M.; Chen, Y.P. Micronization of tolbutamide using rapid expansion of supercritical solution with solid co-solvent (RESS-SC) process. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2011, 37, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sodeifian, G.; Sajadian, S.A.; Razmimanesh, F.; Hazaveie, S.M. Solubility of Ketoconazole (antifungal drug) in SC-CO2 for binary and ternary systems: Measurements and empirical correlations. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sabet, J.K.; Ghotbi, C.; Dorkoosh, F.; Striolo, A. Solubilities of acetaminophen in supercritical carbon dioxide with and without menthol cosolvent: Measurement and correlation. Sci. Iran. 2012, 19, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hosseini, M.H.; Alizadeh, N.; Khanchi, A.R. Effect of menthol as solid cosolvent on the solubility enhancement of clozapine and lamorigine in supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2010, 55, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rostamian, H.; Lotfollahi, M.N. Production and characterization of ultrafine aspirin particles by rapid expansion of supercritical solution with solid co-solvent (RESS-SC): Expansion parameters effects. Part. Sci. Technol. 2020, 38, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta, R.B.; Shims, J.-J. Solubility in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  29. Keating, L.; Harris, H.H.; Chickos, J.S. Vapor pressures and vaporization enthalpy of (−) α-bisabolol and (dl) menthol by correlation gas chromatography. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2017, 107, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Singla, P.; Singh, O.; Chabba, S.; Mahajan, R.K. Pluronic-SAILs (surface active ionic liquids) mixed micelles as efficient hydrophobic quercetin drug carriers. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 249, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singla, P.; Garg, S.; McClements, J.; Jamieson, O.; Peeters, M.; Mahajan, R.K. Advances in the therapeutic delivery and applications of functionalized Pluronics: A critical review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 299, 102563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kamboj, V.K.; Verma, P.K. Poloxamers based nanocarriers for drug delivery system. Pharm. Lett. 2015, 7, 264–269. [Google Scholar]
  33. Abdeltawab, H.; Svirskis, D.; Sharma, M. Formulation strategies to modulate drug release from poloxamer based in situ gelling systems. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bodratti, A.M.; Alexandridis, P. Formulation of Poloxamers for Drug Delivery. J. Funct. Biomater. 2018, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mehanna, M.M.; Motawaa, A.M.; Samaha, M.W. In sight into tadalafil–block copolymer binary solid dispersion: Mechanistic investigation of dissolution enhancement. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 402, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Patil, S.B.; Shete, D.K.; Narade, S.B.; Surve, S.S.; Khan, Z.K.; Bhise, S.B.; Pore, Y.V. Improvement in the dissolution profile of diacerein using a surfactant-based solid dispersion technique. Drug Discov. Ther. 2010, 4, 435–441. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pore, Y.V.; Sancheti, P.P.; Karekar, P. Preparation and physicochemical characterization of surfactant based solid dispersions of ezetimibe. Pharmazie. 2009, 64, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Karolewicz, B.; Gajda, M.; Owczarek, A.; Pluta, J.; Górniak, A. Physicochemical Characterization and Dissolution Studies of Solid Dispersions of Clotrimazole with Pluronic F127. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Karolewicz, B.; Górniak, A.; Owczarek, A.; Żurawska-Płaksej, E.; Piwowar, A.; Pluta, J. Thermal, spectroscopic, and dissolution studies of ketoconazole–Pluronic F127 system. J. Therm. Anal. 2014, 115, 2487–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Shaker, M.A.; Elbadawy, H.M.; Shaker, M.A. Improved solubility, dissolution, and oral bioavailability for atorvastatin-Pluronic® solid dispersions. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 574, 118891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Castro, S.G.; Bruni, S.S.; Lanusse, C.E.; Allemandi, D.; Palma, S.D. Improved Albendazole Dissolution Rate in Pluronic 188 Solid Dispersions. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010, 11, 1518–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Karolewicz, B.; Gajda, M.; Pluta, J.; Górniak, A. Dissolution study and thermal analysis of fenofibrate–Pluronic F127 solid dispersions. J. Therm. Anal. 2016, 125, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kazarian, S.G.; Vincent, M.F.; Bright, F.V.; Liotta, C.L.; Eckert, C.A. Specific Intermolecular Interaction of Carbon Dioxide with Polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1729–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shieh, Y.T.; Su, J.H.; Manivannan, G.; Lee, P.H.; Sawan, S.P.; Dale Spall, W. Interaction of supercritical carbon dioxide with polymers. I. Crystalline polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 59, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shieh, Y.; Su, J. Interaction of supercritical carbon dioxide with polymers. II. Amorphous polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 59, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kabanov, A.V.; Lemieux, P.; Vinogradov, S.; Alakhov, V. Pluronic® block copolymers: Novel functional molecules for gene therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002, 54, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 02825 g001 550
Figure 1. Generalised structure of a PEO-PPO-PEO triblock polymer (x and y represent the length of PEO and PPO blocks, respectively).
Figure 1. Generalised structure of a PEO-PPO-PEO triblock polymer (x and y represent the length of PEO and PPO blocks, respectively).
Polymers 14 02825 g001
Polymers 14 02825 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemical structure of menthol.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of menthol.
Polymers 14 02825 g002
Polymers 14 02825 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematics of supercritical phase monitor.
Figure 3. Schematics of supercritical phase monitor.
Polymers 14 02825 g003
Polymers 14 02825 g004 550
Figure 4. Melting point depression (ΔT) in Pluronics at 10 MPa in scCO2 as a function of menthol content.
Figure 4. Melting point depression (ΔT) in Pluronics at 10 MPa in scCO2 as a function of menthol content.
Polymers 14 02825 g004
Polymers 14 02825 g005 550
Figure 5. Melting point depression (ΔT) in Pluronics at 20 MPa in scCO2 as a function of menthol content.
Figure 5. Melting point depression (ΔT) in Pluronics at 20 MPa in scCO2 as a function of menthol content.
Polymers 14 02825 g005
Polymers 14 02825 g006 550
Figure 6. DSC thermograms of Pluronics before and after processing.
Figure 6. DSC thermograms of Pluronics before and after processing.
Polymers 14 02825 g006
Polymers 14 02825 g007 550
Figure 7. XRD diffractograms of Pluronics before and after processing. Pluronics are semi-crystalline polymers due to the presence of crystalline PEO and amorphous PPO fractions in the structure. The diffractograms of all Pluronics (processed and unprocessed) were identical with peaks at 19 and 23° 2θ originating from the PEO fraction. Similar to DSC, this also confirms that the CO2 processing did not cause any changes to the crystal structure of these polymers and indicates the absence of menthol in the sample.
Figure 7. XRD diffractograms of Pluronics before and after processing. Pluronics are semi-crystalline polymers due to the presence of crystalline PEO and amorphous PPO fractions in the structure. The diffractograms of all Pluronics (processed and unprocessed) were identical with peaks at 19 and 23° 2θ originating from the PEO fraction. Similar to DSC, this also confirms that the CO2 processing did not cause any changes to the crystal structure of these polymers and indicates the absence of menthol in the sample.
Polymers 14 02825 g007
Table
Table 1. Properties of PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers.
Table 1. Properties of PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers.
Polymer
(Pluronic®)		Molecular Weight (g·mol−1)Tm (°C)Weight PEOWeight PPOPEO UnitsPPO UnitsPEO:PPO (Units)
F38460048368092084165.3:1.0
F6884005267201680152305.2:1.0
F10814,6005711,6802920266505.3:1.0
F7766004846201980106343.1:1.0
F12712,6005688203780202653.1:1.0
Table
Table 2. Examples of the application of menthol as a solid co-solvent with scCO2.
Table 2. Examples of the application of menthol as a solid co-solvent with scCO2.
APIP (MPa)T (°C)PurposeOutcomeRef.
Megestrol acetate15–2540–60Size reduction103–515 nm[16]
Clobetasol propionate20–2670–110Size reduction95–319 nm[17]
Phenytoin9.6–19.645Size reduction75–120 nm[18]
Beclomethasone dipropionate20–2670–110Size reduction65–294 nm[19]
Letrozole12–3645–75Size reduction19–260 nm[20]
Aprepitant12–3335–65Size reduction85–523 nm[21]
Sertraline hydrochloride12–3035–65Solubility improvement in scCO259-fold increase[22]
Tolbutamide15–2035–45Size reduction2.1–2.9 μm[23]
Ketoconazole12–3035–65Solubility improvement in scCO262-fold increase[24]
Acetaminophen10–2540–70Solubility improvement in scCO28-fold increase[25]
Clozapine
Lamotrigine		12.3–33.640–50Solubility improvement in scCO256-fold increase
8-fold increase		[26]
Aspirin7.3–8.530–70Size reduction0.17–6.61 μm[27]
Griseofulvin19.640Size reduction150–155 nm[15]
Table
Table 3. Melting points of Pluronics and polymer/menthol mixtures at 0.1, 10, and 20 MPa.
Table 3. Melting points of Pluronics and polymer/menthol mixtures at 0.1, 10, and 20 MPa.
Pressure (MPa)Menthol (wt%)Melting Point of Pluronics (°C)
F38F68F108F77F127
0.1049.4 ± 0.152.1 ± 0.257.8 ± 0.146.5 ± 0.154.1 ± 0.2
1047.1 ± 0.150.6 ± 0.354.1 ± 0.346.6 ± 0.253.1 ± 0.3
2544.1 ± 0.247.1 ± 0.251.1 ± 0.243.6 ± 0.448.6 ± 0.2
5043.2 ± 0.244.9 ± 0.149.1 ± 0.441.6 ± 0.246.1 ± 0.2
10030.9 ± 0.634.5 ± 0.540.3 ± 0.529.0 ± 0.337.5 ± 0.7
1031.7 ± 0.833.7 ± 1.340.1 ± 0.325.4 ± 2.334.5 ± 0.3
2531.0 ± 0.730.5 ± 0.738.3 ± 0.425.0 ± 0.2 *33.6 ± 1.3
5031.4 ± 1.130.7 ± 0.834.4 ± 1.025.0 ± 0.3 *25.0 ± 0.2 *
20031.2 ± 0.633.9 ± 0.238.9 ± 0.327.3 ± 0.236.6 ± 0.8
1032.6 ± 1.133.9 ± 1.140.1 ± 0.427.1 ± 0.536.1 ± 0.9
2525.0 ± 0.2 *25.1 ± 0.2 *37.5 ± 1.625.0 ± 0.2 *32.8 ± 0.7
5025.0 ± 0.1 *25.0 ± 0.4 *33.1 ± 1.225.1 ± 0.2 *25.0 ± 0.2
* Tm of 25 °C was already obtained with lower menthol content or at lower pressures.
Table
Table 4. Lowest Tm of Pluronics in scCO2.
Table 4. Lowest Tm of Pluronics in scCO2.
PolymerPressure (MPa)Menthol (wt%)Melting Point (°C)
F38202525
F68202525.1
F108205033.1
F77102525
F127205025.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trivedi, V.; Ajiboye, A.L.; Coleman, N.J.; Bhomia, R.; Bascougnano, M. Melting Point Depression of Poly(ethylene oxide)-Poly(propylene oxide)-Poly(ethylene oxide) Triblock Polymers in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Menthol as a Solid Co-Plasticiser. Polymers 2022, 14, 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142825

AMA Style

Trivedi V, Ajiboye AL, Coleman NJ, Bhomia R, Bascougnano M. Melting Point Depression of Poly(ethylene oxide)-Poly(propylene oxide)-Poly(ethylene oxide) Triblock Polymers in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Menthol as a Solid Co-Plasticiser. Polymers. 2022; 14(14):2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142825

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trivedi, Vivek, Adejumoke Lara Ajiboye, Nichola J. Coleman, Ruchir Bhomia, and Marion Bascougnano. 2022. "Melting Point Depression of Poly(ethylene oxide)-Poly(propylene oxide)-Poly(ethylene oxide) Triblock Polymers in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Menthol as a Solid Co-Plasticiser" Polymers 14, no. 14: 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142825

APA Style

Trivedi, V., Ajiboye, A. L., Coleman, N. J., Bhomia, R., & Bascougnano, M. (2022). Melting Point Depression of Poly(ethylene oxide)-Poly(propylene oxide)-Poly(ethylene oxide) Triblock Polymers in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Menthol as a Solid Co-Plasticiser. Polymers, 14(14), 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142825

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop