Next Article in Journal
Electrospinning Silk Fibroin/Graphene Nanofiber Membrane Used for 3D Wearable Pressure Sensor
Next Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Polymeric Materials toward Sustainable Biodiesel Industry: A Recent Review
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Aggregate Size on the Axial Compressive Behavior of FRP-Confined Coral Aggregate Concrete
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Innovative Closed-Loop Recyclable Bio-Based Composites from Epoxidized Waste Flour and Recycled Carbon Fibers

Polymers 2022, 14(18), 3878; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183878
by Francesca Ferrari *, Gloria Anna Carallo and Antonio Greco
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Polymers 2022, 14(18), 3878; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183878
Submission received: 19 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 12 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The subject of article entitled “Innovative closed-loop recyclable bio-based composites from epoxidated waste flour and recycled carbon fibers” is very interesting and the article is well written and presented. However, there are one issues to be addressed before accepted for publications. namely, the authors used too little literature (11 items) to write the introduction. This would extend the introduction of this article.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript entitled “Innovative closed-loop recyclable bio-based composites from 1 epoxidated waste flour and recycled carbon fibers” has been submitted by authors. Some issues to be addressed which will improve the quality of manuscript. Therefore, I recommend this work could be published after the major revision

1.      What is the novelty of this paper?

2.      The English composition requires many improvements. The authors should proofread the manuscript carefully to minimize grammatical errors.

3.      Check the format of the reference and correct all the errors.

4.      All the references mentioned in the paper should be cited in the text or vice-versa.

5.      The table and figures heading should be incorporated and discussed in the text.

6.      Fig. 6 and 7 index FTIR peak value.

7.      This research topic is widely studied in past and lot of studies are performed. Author please added comparative table for reader clear understanding.

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The author solves all comments, and now it's ready to accept in its present form. 

Back to TopTop