Next Article in Journal
Robust Electrospinning-Constructed Cellulose Acetate@Anthocyanin Ultrafine Fibers: Synthesis, Characterization, and Controlled Release Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Fabrication and Characterization of Intelligent Multi-Layered Biopolymer Film Incorporated with pH-Sensitive Red Cabbage Extract to Indicate Fish Freshness
Previous Article in Journal
Crushing Characteristics Comparison between Aluminum/CFRP and Aluminum/CFRP/Aluminum Hybrid Tubes
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Characterization of Biodegradable Edible Films Based on Potato Peel Starch Plasticized with Glycerol
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Edible and Quick-Dissolving Film from Cassia Gum and Ethyl Cellulose with Improved Moisture Barrier for Packaging Dried Vegetables

Polymers 2022, 14(19), 4035; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194035
by Tingting Li, Fansong Meng, Wenrui Chi, Shiyu Xu and Lijuan Wang *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2022, 14(19), 4035; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194035
Submission received: 7 September 2022 / Revised: 15 September 2022 / Accepted: 20 September 2022 / Published: 27 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biopolymer-Based Films and Coatings for Packaging Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Li et al studied a quick dissolving and edible film from cassia gum (CG) and ethyl cellulose (EC). This film exhibits an improved moisture barrier for potential food packaging applications. The results show that the incorporation of 5% EC results in higher mechanical properties like the tensile strength of the edible film. These improvements are promising for their use as packaging applications. The paper and its subject are interesting. however, it can be further improved and can be considered after minor revision. A few points are –

[1] The introduction is well written. However, please provide 4-5 references from MDPI on the subject of research and highlight the advancement and novelty of the present work over existing literature in MDPI.

[2] In the material section, the details of EC are missing. Please also provide the physical and chemical properties of EC in this section.

[3] In section 2.4.1, what ISO standards are followed?

[4] In Figure 2, the resolution scale is not visible. Please insert the scale manually.

[5] Table 1 is not sufficient. Please provide stress-strain curves of all samples and describe their mechanical behavior briefly.

[6] Please justify why the authors studied TGA. How they are correlated with packaging applications?

[7] The conclusion section is poorly written. Please brief the outcome of the present work more precisely. Please also insight importance of this work in packaging applications. Which sample is best and why?

Good Luck with the revisions!

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors

 

Your article is interesting and well organized. The topic is described in a clear and concise way. There are some suggestions that I recommend in order to improve the manuscript (please see the attached version of your manuscript).

 

The Introduction part provides sufficient data on the topic with relevant references. The experimental part gives all details needed. Results consequently come and are based on the experiments done in this study work. All data presented in this section (tabular or graphs) are explained and achieve a visual effect.

The conclusion section is well written and provides an adequate summary of the work.

 

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop