Next Article in Journal
A Flexible Multifunctional PAN Piezoelectric Fiber with Hydrophobicity, Energy Storage, and Fluorescence
Next Article in Special Issue
Triumfetta cordifolia Gum as a Promising Bio-Ingredient to Stabilize Emulsions with Potentials in Cosmetics
Previous Article in Journal
Wet-Spun Polycaprolactone Scaffolds Provide Customizable Anisotropic Viscoelastic Mechanics for Engineered Cardiac Tissues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hemocompatibility Evaluation of Thai Bombyx mori Silk Fibroin and Its Improvement with Low Molecular Weight Heparin Immobilization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chitosan Modified by Kombucha-Derived Bacterial Cellulose: Rheological Behavior and Properties of Convened Biopolymer Films

1
Centre of Polymer Systems, University Institute, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Tr. T. Bati 5678, 76001 Zlin, Czech Republic
2
Institute of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, 12 Nguyen Van Bao, Ward 4, Go Vap District, Ho Chi Minh City 727000, Vietnam
3
Department of Biomaterials and Cosmetics Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Gagarina 7, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
4
Footwear Research Centre, University Institute, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Nad Ovcirnou IV 3685, 76001 Zlin, Czech Republic
5
Faculty of Technology, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Vavrečkova 275, 76001 Zlin, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(21), 4572; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214572
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 22 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 28 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymers for Beauty and Health)

Abstract

:
This work investigates the rheological behavior and characteristics of solutions and convened biopolymer films from Chitosan (Chi) modified by kombucha-derived bacterial cellulose (KBC). The Arrhenius equation and the Ostwald de Waele model (power-law) revealed that the Chi/KBC solutions exhibited non-Newtonian behavior. Both temperature and KBC concentration strongly affected their solution viscosity. With the selection of a proper solvent for chitosan solubilization, it may be possible to improve the performances of chitosan films for specific applications. The elasticity of the prepared films containing KBC 10% w/w was preferable when compared to the controls. FTIR analysis has confirmed the presence of bacterial cellulose, chitosan acetate, and chitosan lactate as the corresponding components in the produced biopolymer films. The thermal behaviors of the Chi (lactic acid)/KBC samples showed slightly higher stability than Chi (acetic acid)/KBC. Generally, these results will be helpful in the preparation processes of the solutions and biopolymer films of Chi dissolved in acetic or lactic acid modified by KBC powder to fabricate food packaging, scaffolds, and bioprinting inks, or products related to injection or direct extrusion through a needle.

1. Introduction

In the context of the aggravation of environmental pollution and the energy crisis, the evolution of sustainable or renewable materials has been recorded as a global necessity to ensure a sustainable development society. Chitosan/bacterial cellulose (Chi/KBC) blends have also received particular research interest due to the unique structure and properties of individual components. Chitosan (Chi) is a linear polysaccharide consisting of randomly distributed β-(1→4)-linked D-glucosamine (deacetylated unit) and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (acetylated unit) [1,2,3,4]. Chi has been verified as an important biomaterial with many commercial applications, such as tissue engineering, drug delivery, biomedical, food packaging, and chemical industries [5,6,7,8,9]. Chi is biodegradable, biocompatible, non-toxic, edible, antibacterial, and available in many physical forms [3,5,10,11]. Molecular weight, acetylation, and dissolved solvent play an important role in the viscosity, thermal stability, and mechanical properties of this polycationic biopolymer [2,3,4,5,6,10,11,12,13].
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is an emerging, extracellular natural polymer with polymerization degrees up to several million in β-1,4-linked glucopyranosyl chains [14,15]. BC is considered to be an unlimited raw material resource due to its distinguished properties, such as high purity, elasticity, durability, porosity, biodegradability, a high degree of crystallinity, good biocompatibility, non-toxicity, high thermal stability, and water holding capacity, as well as its three-dimensional fibrillar structure without lignin and hemicellulose [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Currently, BC is mainly biosynthesized through the control enzyme systems (cell-free BC synthesis) [24] or aerobic culture processes using different microorganism groups, including Agrobacterium, Acetobacter, Gluconacetobacter, Komagataeibacter, Sarcina, and Pseudomonas [25,26] in Hestrin and Schramm (HS) standard medium [27], as well as alternative inexpensive nutrient media prepared from rotten apple, pineapple, pomegranate, watermelon, tomato, orange fruits, potato peel wastes, sugarcane molasses, vinasse, distillery effluent, and the by-products of dairy foods [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In particular, BC has also been harvested from kombucha fermentation of a traditional beverage, which is simpler than all other cellulose production methods [37,38,39,40]. Kombucha fermentation is chemical-free and normally only requires a short-time fermentation of tea, sugar, and bio-wastes. According to structural analysis, these harvested kombucha-derived bacterial cellulose (KBC) possessed similar characteristics to the BC of HS standard medium or the alternative nutrient media [37,39,40]. In order to respond well to specific applications, Chi and BC or KBC have often had their properties modified by impregnating, casting, blending, or mixing together, or with different biopolymers, as well as directly adding these reinforcements to the culture media of cellulose synthesis bacteria [23,41,42]. Among those common derivatives, the interesting structures, multifunctional properties, eco-friendliness, and biocompatibility of Chi/BC or KBC blends are the main driving forces that promote the development of these green biocomposites as edible food films or coatings [5,6,11,12], pollution removal or treatment agents [7,8], wound dressing materials [1,9], drug delivery products, cell or enzyme immobilization matrices, or scaffolds in tissue engineering [3], some of which are shown in Table 1.
Nevertheless, the rheological properties of such blends have not been evaluated in-depth [53,54], despite the fact that they have strong potential to undergo procedures related to dispersing, mixing, stirring, extrusion, coating, spinning, injection molding, gelation, phase transitions, coagulation, and sedimentation, and even aging. Essentially, the rheological properties of the solutions can affect the spreadability, thickness, and uniformity of the forming film. It should be noted that both the product properties and economic effectiveness of the production are strongly dependent upon the rheology of the initial film-forming solutions [55,56], and it is anticipated that rheology will be an indispensable field for applied research for almost all elastic polymers.
In the preparation of Chi/BC or KBC blends, the dissolution acid concentration or types strongly affected the structural organization and rheological characteristics of the initial Chi solution, resulting in the differences in the structure, mechanical properties, thermal stability, water vapor permeability, and anti-microbial activity of the prepared biofilms [13,57,58]. Acetic acid at a concentration of 0.1 M or 1% is commonly used as organic acid for solubilizing Chi, with pH values slightly higher than Chi solution prepared with lactic acid. The inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonds, or semi-crystalline structure, render Chi difficult to dissolve in water, alkali, alcohol, acetone, and most organic solvents [59]. Conversely, in acidic solutions such as acetic, hydrochloric, formic, butyric, malic, citric, lactic, oxalic, propionic, and succinic acids, amine groups on the Chi molecule chains are protonated to NH 3 + , resulting in the destruction of the hydrogen-bonded networks by electrostatic repulsion between positive charges, leading to the dissolution process of Chi [13,58,60]. Furthermore, the rheological characteristics of Chi/BC or KBC variants are strongly affected by temperature, hydrostatic pressure, and the amount of BC or KBC present. Therefore, the present study focuses on investigating the rheological properties of Chi solutions modified by KBC in order to specify the affect of preparation condition and concentration of KBC on the viscosity of the prepared solutions, as well as the characteristics of these formed Chi/KBC biopolymer films.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Chitosan, from squid (Chi, molecular weight 580,000 g·mol−1 and degree of deacetylation 90%) was purchased from Pol-Aura (Dywity, Poland). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), acetic acid (CH3COOH), and lactic acid (C3H6O3) were purchased from Chempur (Piekary Śląskie, Poland). Sucrose was supplied by Amersco LLC (Framingham, MA, USA). All reagents were used without further purification. Waste whey was collected from Kromilk A.S (Kromeriz, Czech Republic). Black tea was purchased from a grocery store in Zlin, Czech Republic.
The KBC used was synthesized at the laboratory of the Centre of Polymer Systems, University Institute, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czech Republic via kombucha fermentation of waste whey, black tea, and sucrose using Komagatacibacter xylinus CCM 3611 for 15 days under static culture conditions at 30 °C, as shown in our previous studies [38,61]. Harvested KBC membranes were treated by immersion in 0.5% w/v NaOH at 80 °C for 1 h (volume of biopolymer mass and volume of alkaline solution were taken in a 1:2 ratio), accompanied by triplicate washing with double distilled water, over-drying at 40 °C until a constant weight was reached, and milling for 1 min at room temperature to fine granular powder using a micro ball mill (Lab Wizz 320, Laarmann Group, Roermond, The Netherlands) under a frequency rate of 25 Hz. The concentration of KBC was then determined based on its dry weight percentage as the main ingredient of the solutions and films prepared.

2.2. Preparation of Chi/KBC Solutions and Films

Chi (2% w/v) was completely dissolved in acetic or lactic acid (0.1 M) for 24 h at room temperature. KBC powder was then added with the ratios of 0, 1, 2, 5, and 10% w/w. Each 40 mL of Chi/KBC film-forming solution was stirred at 100 rpm for 24 h before being studied for rheological behavior.
To achieve biofilms, 40 mL Chi/KBC film-forming solutions were poured into squared Petri dishes (100 × 15 (mm)), air-dried at room temperature for 3 days with Chi dissolved in acetic acid (Chi (acetic acid)/KBC), and for 7 days with Chi dissolved in lactic acid (Chi (lactic acid)/KBC). Subsequently, the samples were stored in a dehumidifier and used for further analysis.

2.3. Rheological Study

The rheological behavior of Chi/KBC solutions was measured at 25, 30, 35, and 40 °C using a Bohlin Visco 88 viscometer (Marlvern, Panalytical, Malvern, UK). The measurement cell consisted of a concentric cylinder with an inner diameter of 17 mm. Rheological curves were obtained after 5 min stabilization, and the heating rate was 0.2 °C/min. The shear stress (τ) was determined as a function of shear rate (γ) from 18 to 1230 s−1, and a minimum range of 1.5%. The testing solution temperature remained constant during the measurement via the use of a water bath circulator directly installed on the device. Experimental data were fitted to the Arrhenius equation (Equation (1)) and the Ostwald de Waele model (power-law) (Equation (2)) to determine the values of the activation energy of flow (Ea), preexponential factor (A), the consistency index (k), and the flow behavior index (n).
η = A e x p ( E a R T )
where η is the viscosity of the Chi solution modified by KBC (Pas), A is a preexponential factor (1/s), Ea is the activation energy of flow (kJ/mol), R is the gas constant (kJ/mol K), and T is the absolute temperature (K).
τ = kγn
where τ is shear stress (Pas), γ is shear rate (1/s), n is a rheological parameter known as a non-Newtonian index (dimensionless), and k corresponds to consistency index (Pa·sn).

2.4. Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)

AFM was used to explore the surface of the prepared Chi/KBC biofilms. The scans were performed on a scanning probe microscope (Veeco, Digital Instrument, Santa Barbara, CA, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), with a resonant frequency of 110 kHz and a nominal tip radius of 10 nm. All recordings were conducted under standard room conditions (RH 30%, temperature 25 °C), with a scan rate of 0.5 Hz and resolution of 512 × 512 points, without additional data filtration.

2.5. Fourier-Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

FTIR analysis was performed to examine the chemical groups and structures of the Chi/KBC biopolymer films using a Nicolet iS10 spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) fitted with an attenuated total reflectance mode (iD5-Ge-ATR) assembly. The samples were scanned at a 4.0 cm−1 resolution using 64 scans in the wavenumber range of 400–4000 cm−1.

2.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal stability capacity of the Chi/KBC films was analyzed using a TGA Q500 (TA Instruments, New Castle, PA, USA). The sample weigh was in the range of 6.5–7.0 mg. The analyzed temperature was increased from 25 to 600 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating/cooling rate of 10 °C/min and a flow rate of 40 to 60 mL/min.

2.7. Mechanical Analysis

In order to investigate the mechanical properties of Chi/KBC films, the elastic modulus (GPa) and elongation at break (%) were determined as a function of displacement by applied force using Zwick Roell (Ulm, Germany) under a static load of 10 kg and a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min at room temperature (25 °C). The testing was conducted following the ASTM standard method D882 [62].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All measurements were recorded in triplicate, and the results were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for statistical evaluation, and experimental results were displayed as mean ± standard error, where p < 0.05 was determined as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Rheological Data and Viscosity of Chi/KBC Film-Forming Solutions

Figure 1 shows a significant difference in the rheological behavior of Chi/KBC film-forming solutions in differently dissolved solvents, different temperatures, and various KBC concentrations. In differently dissolved acid types, interaction patterns between chitosan and acids mainly include electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions. In Chi (acetic acid)/KBC samples, Chi is partially crystalline and consist mainly of ionic interactions. In contrast, in Chi (lactic acid)/KBC samples, Chi is amorphous, with the existence of both ionic interactions and hydrogen bonding [58,60,63]. These factors substantially explain the higher viscosity values, as well as the lower viscosity reduction percentage when comparing Chi (lactic acid)/KBC samples and Chi (lactic acid)/KBC film-forming solutions (Table 2).
Regarding temperature issues, the viscosity of all examined solutions decreased when the temperature increased. It is possible for the viscosity reduction percentages to be over 50 and 60% as the temperature rises from 25 °C to 40 °C for both Chi (acetic acid)/KBC and Chi (lactic acid)/KBC, as shown in Table 2. Essentially, solution viscosity is formed by the adhesive forces between molecules. With thermal increase, the thermal energy of the molecules in the testing solutions increased, even overcoming the adhesive forces, which led to them moving more freely and the intermolecular distances being extended (called the thermal expansion associated with Brownian motion). Ultimately, their collision frequency was greater, their resistance against the flow was higher, and their total intermolecular linking forces were lower, leading to a decrease in the investigated solutions’ viscosities. For the effect of KBC concentrations, considered at each temperature (25, 30, 35, and 40 °C), the results exhibited a decrease in the viscosity of all analysis solutions due to the presence of KBC powder with the sequential reduction ratio in the samples from non-KBC ≥ 10 > 1 ≥ 2 ≥ 5 (% w/w) of Chi (acetic acid)/KBC samples. This result was completely in contrast to Chi (lactic acid)/KBC samples, with a viscosity increasing from non-KBC ≤ 1 < 2 ≤ 5 ≤ 10 (% w/w) samples. In the case of Chi (acetic acid)/KBC, the viscosity values were decreased, which was ascribed to KBC presence, causing several collisions and cleavages of intramolecular bonds to shorten the linear chain of the glucosamine groups of the chitosan matrix, leading to a decrease in the pure viscosity of these modified composite solutions. Conversely, in the increase of the viscosity obtained in Chi (lactic acid)/KBC samples, these displayed results were often related to the rise in solid particle concentration (KBC powder) in the solution followed by a limit in the movement, collision, or cleavage. Another point worth noting is that KBC possesses an OH-rich nature and high hydrophilicity. The increases in the viscosity of the prepared solution were also attributed to high sufficient KBC concentrations having increased hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl groups of KBC and the amine and carboxylic groups of Chi. Herein, the sample containing 1 (% w/w) KBC showed an insignificant difference in viscosity compared to the control sample (Figure 1b). This might be due to the lower presence of KBC, which is unable to cause dramatic effects on the viscosity of this measured solution.
The interaction between temperature and the viscosity of the prepared solutions was illustrated via the Arrhenius equation, and the values of constants Ea and A have been calculated, as shown in Table 3. As observed, there was a difference in the magnitudes of activation energy, Ea, at different KBC concentrations, which were similar to the viscosity measured results exhibited in Figure 1. This has confirmed the results used to calculate the viscosity of modified Chi/KBC solutions at a specific measured temperature. Expressly, taking into consideration the Chi (acetic acid)/KBC samples, the activation energy, Ea, of non-KBC and 5 (% w/w) KBC samples were higher than the remaining samples. This phenomenon was attributed to their higher viscosity (Figure 1a), which required more space or a more extensive track for the molecules in these solutions to flow into; therefore, their activation energy, Ea, was higher. Similarly, for Chi (lactic acid)/KBC samples, the viscosity of non-KBC and 1 (% w/w) KBC samples were low (Figure 1b); consequently, their activation energy was also lower.
For the evaluation of another aspect, it is evident from Figure 1 that the viscosities of the testing samples have significantly decreased with increasing shear rates. This relationship revealed that the investigated solutions exhibited non-Newtonian behavior. As such, to model the viscosity performances of these solutions under the concurrent influence of temperature and KBC concentration (both the temperature and concentration will change during the process), the Ostwald de Waele model (power-law) was applied, and the computation results of the constants of the model are presented in Table 4. The value of constants was as follows: “n” was close to 1, and “k” fluctuated over a wide range (0.73–0.99 and 0.14–0.89 for Chi (acetic acid)/KBC, or 0.71–0.96 and 0.12–0.99 for Chi (lactic acid)/KBC). This revealed that the prepared solution displayed shear thinning behavior. These results indicate that the temperature and KBC concentration have a strong effect on the viscosity of Chi solutions modified by KBC. Generally, this model will be useful for the manufacturing procedure of biopolymer films, scaffolds, bio-printing inks, and products related to injection or direct extrusion through a needle, using Chi solutions dissolved in acetic or lactic acid and modified by KBC powder. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the obtained constants in Table 4 are only suitable for the range of evaluated temperatures and concentrations.

3.2. Characterization of Chi/KBC Biopolymer Films

3.2.1. Morphology Analysis

The physical appearance and topography of the prepared Chi/KBC films can be seen in Figure 2. In brief, these biopolymer films were transparent, explicit, opalescent, or pale yellow, with considerably flexibility. The results from AFM suggested that the surface characteristics of the Chi (lactic acid)/KBC films were smoother than the Chi (acetic acid)/KBC samples, clearly displayed by the samples of non-KBC. The interaction capacity between Chi and dissolved acid was the main reason for these dissimilarities. The pKa of lactic acid (~3.86) is lower than that of acetic acid (~4.8), resulting in the ionic interactions between the amine and carboxylic groups of Chi molecules being stronger in lactic acid compared to the same interactions in acetic acid [13,63]. Additionally, the increase of KBC presence was directly proportional to the scabrous level of the formed film topography. This phenomenon was attributed to the drying, condensation, and displacement of granulated KBC, leading to the formation of aggregates or their in-situ association on Chi substrates.

3.2.2. Chemical Structure Analysis

FTIR analysis was used to examine the structural differences of Chi/KBC films. All of the characteristic peaks of neat Chi, KBC, acetic, and lactic acid were observed in the prepared related biopolymer films (Figure 3): essentially, the bands near 3328 cm−1 (N-H and O-H stretching), 2925 cm−1 (C-H asymmetric stretching in methyl, methylene, or methoxy groups), and 1640 cm−1 (C=O bending and N-H stretching) from Chi, KBC, acetic, or lactic acid. Parallel to that, the vibrations at 1394–1332 cm−1 are ascribed to amine groups (-NH bending); those at 1020–1195 cm−1 relate to C-O-C symmetric stretching; and C-N, C-C, and C-O stretching form used raw materials. The bands at 1125, 1216, and 1732 cm−1 are characteristic bands of lactic acid, which reveal the presence of lactic acid in all Chi blend films.
Nevertheless, slight differences were still recorded in the FTIR spectra of these analyzed biopolymer films. As can be seen from Figure 3, a higher density of the peaks at the region around 3300–3400 cm−1 was detected in the analysis result of biomaterial containing KBC compared to pristine materials. This phenomenon is ascribed to the extra-presence of KBC with varying content in the composition of finished biopolymer films. Furthermore, the insignificant difference between the spectra of chitosan modified by KBC and neat materials has also been observed. These variations might be due to some transformations in the original properties under the combination and dissolution process of the ingredients together. In addition, the peaks in the area 1400–1700 cm−1 slightly deviated, with a higher wavenumber observed in Chi (lactic acid)/KBC samples compared to Chi (acetic acid)/KBC samples, which is attributed to the amide II of chitosan shifted to a higher frequency when the lactic acid was used to dissolve Chi instead of acetic acid. These results were in close agreement with the results obtained by Phatchayawat et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022; Qiao et al., 2019; and Lin et al., 2013 [3,4,8,13].

3.2.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal behaviors of Chi/KBC films are shown in Figure 4, with insignificant different stability in thermal degradation behavior via the TGA and DTG curves. In the beginning, a slight weight loss in the prepared samples was observed when the temperature grew from 25 to 180 °C. This loss was attributed to the water releasing process of the prepared biofilms by the hydrophilicity natural KBC and NH 3 + groups or the degree of protonation of Chi ingredients. Herein, this similarity also indicates that the moisture content of the samples is the same. Subsequently, a sharp weight loss has appeared in the increasing temperature from 180 to 360 °C, related to the decomposition and deacetylation or evaporation of residual acids of Chi and KBC composition. Finally, forming carbon char took place when the temperature was over 360 °C. These results closely correspond to the DTG curves of the samples (Figure 4b). It is easily seen that there are two prominent peaks for both Chi (acetic acid)/KBC and Chi (lactic acid)/KBC films. One peak is around 80 °C and exhibited water evaporation, and the other peaks revealed polymer decomposition, around 200 and 300 °C, respectively.

3.2.4. Mechanical Analysis

The mechanical strength of the Chi/KBC films was examined via the values of elastic modulus and elongation at break and are presented in Figure 5. Chi (lactic acid)/KBC films exhibited superior resilience at all evaluated concentrations, particularly the values of elastic modulus and elongation of break in the range 0.052–0.196 (GPa) and 56.8–63.2 (%) compared to 0.409–2.848 (GPa) and 9.6–17.5 (%) of Chi (acetic acid)/KBC. This phenomenon was attributed to the interactions between Chi and the lactic acid, which was stronger than the acetic acid, leading to higher elasticity and percentage of elongation at break with Chi (lactic acid)/KBC samples. In addition, the molecular weight of Chi dissolved in acetic acid was more extensive than that dissolved in lactic acid, resulting in Chi (acetic acid)/KBC films often presenting a pattern similar to brittle materials that are different from Chi (lactic acid)/KBC films, which have a rubber-like quality [13,63,64]. In brief, with the selection of a proper solvent for Chi solubilization, it may be possible to improve the performances of Chi/KBC variants for certain special applications.
Regarding the influence of the granulated KBC ingredient on the mechanical properties of Chi/KBC films, the measurements revealed that the most positive results were recorded at KBC 10% w/w, with the elasticity higher than the control samples (6.94-fold and 1.85-fold better for biopolymer films dissolved in acetic and lactic acid, respectively). In addition, it should be emphasized that this enhancement effectiveness was insignificant in the majority of cases of KBC in low concentrations (1 and 2% w/w), even causing a reverse effect with the samples of Chi (lactic acid)/KBC, from which it might be implied that KBC has a strong contribution to the durability of the prepared films [23].

4. Conclusions

The Arrhenius equation and the Ostwald de Waele model (power-law) were applied to model the rheological behaviors of Chi/KBC film-forming solutions. Activation energy of flow (Ea), preexponential factor (A), non-Newtonian index (n), and consistency index (k) were calculated, and the results revealed that these investigated solutions exhibited a non-Newtonian behavior. Temperature and KBC concentration all strongly affected their viscosity, and with the selection of a proper solvent for chitosan solubilization, it may be possible to improve the performances of chitosan films for certain special applications. These obtained models can be useful in the preparation process of the solutions of Chi dissolved in acetic or lactic acid modified by KBC powder. In addition, FTIR, TGA, and mechanical analysis results of the biopolymer films have confirmed the presence of Chi, bacterial cellulose, acetic, and lactic acid as the corresponding components in the products possessing the elasticity excessive control samples, especially in the samples containing KBC 10% w/w. This research also promoted some further tests on the influence of the molecular weight of Chi, polydispersity, and particle size of KBC powder or other cellulose sources (such as leaves, wild plants, rice husks, banana fibers, and coconut fibers), to move towards the complete rheological models of Chi-based green biocomposites.

Author Contributions

This study’s conceptualization and methodology were performed by H.T.N., A.S. and K.L. Formal analysis was carried out by H.T.N., K.L., P.B. and M.S. Investigation and data curation were carried out by H.T.N., K.L., P.B. and M.S. Writing—original draft preparation was performed by H.T.N. The paper was reviewed and edited by A.S., K.L. and N.S. The work was supervised by A.S. and K.L., and funding acquisition was done by A.S., K.L., N.S., T.S. and P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (DKRVO RP/CPS/2022/005) and (FRC/2022/2102). This work is also supported by the Tomas Bata University internal project grant IGA/CPS/2022/002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The nutrient sources of waste whey collected from Kromilk A.S. were used with informed consent and permission from the responsible authorities of the company. In addition, the authors declare no conflict of interest in this study.

References

  1. Zhao, H.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, S.; Chai, S.N.; Wei, J.L.; Zhong, L.L.; He, Y.; Xue, J. Bacteriostatic activity and cytotoxicity of bacterial cellulose-chitosan film loaded with in-situ synthesized silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 281, 11907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, S. Competitive Biological Activities of Chitosan and Its Derivatives: Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, Anticancer, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2018, 2018, 1708172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Phatchayawat, P.P.; Khamkeaw, A.; Yodmuang, S.; Phisalaphong, M. 3D bacterial cellulose-chitosan-alginate-gelatin hydrogel scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 184, 108476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Guo, C.; Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Gao, J.; Lin, G.; Yang, H.; Xia, W. Effect of chitosan grafting oxidized bacterial cellulose on dispersion stability and modulability of biodegradable films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 204, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ashrafi, A.; Jokar, M.; Nafchi, A.M. Preparation and characterization of biocomposite film based on chitosan and kombucha tea as active food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, X.; Cui, J.; Xu, X.R.; Sun, B.J.; Zhang, L.; Dong, W.; Chen, C.; Sun, D. Bacterial cellulose/attapulgite magnetic composites as an efficient adsorbent for heavy metal ions and dye treatment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, D.W.; Tian, X.J.; Wang, Z.Q.; Guan, Z.; Li, X.Q.; Qiao, H.; Ke, Z.; Luo, L.; Wi, Q. Multifunctional adsorbent based on metal-organic framework modified bacterial cellulose/chitosan composite aerogel for high efficient removal of heavy metal ion and organic pollutant. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 383, 123127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, W.C.; Lien, C.C.; Yeh, H.J.; Yu, C.M.; Hsu, S.H. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Siqueira, G.; Bras, J.; Follain, N.; Belbekhouche, S.; Marais, S.; Dufresne, A. Thermal and mechanical properties of bio-nanocomposites reinforced by Luffa cylindrica cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Amorim, L.F.A.; Mouro, C.; Riool, M.; Gouveia, I.C. Antimicrobial Food Packaging Based on Prodigiosin-Incorporated Double-Layered Bacterial Cellulose and Chitosan Composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hosseini, S.F.; Rezaei, M.; Zandi, M.; Ghavi, F.F. Preparation and functional properties of fish gelatin-chitosan blend edible films. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1490–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pavoni, J.M.F.; Luchese, C.L.; Tessaro, I.C. Impact of acid type for chitosan dissolution on the characteristics and biodegradability of cornstarch/chitosan based films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 138, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qiao, C.D.; Ma, X.G.; Wang, X.J.; Liu, L.B. Structure and properties of chitosan films: Effect of the type of solvent acid. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 135, 109984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shrivastav, P.; Pramanik, S.; Vaidya, G.; Abdelgawad, M.A.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Singh, A.; Abualsoud, B.M.; Amaral, L.S.; Abourehab, M.A.S. Bacterial cellulose as a potential biopolymer in biomedical applications: A state-of-the-art review. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 3199–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roman, M.; Haring, A.P.; Bertucio, T.J. The growing merits and dwindling limitations of bacterial cellulose-based tissue engineering scaffolds. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2019, 24, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Beaufort, S.; Bouajila, J.; Souchard, J.P.; Taillandier, P. Understanding Kombucha Tea Fermentation: A Review. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jang, W.D.; Hwang, J.H.; Kim, H.U.; Ryu, J.Y.; Lee, S.Y. Bacterial cellulose as an example product for sustainable production and consumption. Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 1181–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Andriani, D.; Apriyana, A.Y.; Karina, M. The optimization of bacterial cellulose production and its applications: A review. Cellulose 2020, 27, 6747–6766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Coseri, S. Insights on Cellulose Research in the Last Two Decades in Romania. Polymers 2021, 13, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dutta, S.D.; Patel, D.K.; Lim, K.T. Functional cellulose-based hydrogels as extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. J. Biol. Eng. 2019, 13, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Tavakoli, J.; Tang, Y.H. Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods—A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Halib, N.; Ahmad, I.; Grassi, M.; Grassi, G. The remarkable three-dimensional network structure of bacterial cellulose for tissue engineering applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 566, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, B.; Lin, F.; Li, X.; Ji, X.; Liu, S.; Han, X.; Yuah, Z.; Luo, J. Transcrystallization of isotactic polypropylene/bacterial cellulose hamburger composite. Polymers 2019, 11, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ullah, M.W.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khana, S.; Kim, Y.; Park, J.K. Innovative production of bio-cellulose using a cell-free system derived from a single cell line. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 132, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Augimeri, R.V.; Varley, A.J.; Strap, J.L. Establishing a Role for Bacterial Cellulose in Environmental Interactions: Lessons Learned from Diverse Biofilm-Producing Proteobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kim, Y.; Ullah, M.W.; Ul-Islam, M.; Khan, S.; Jang, J.H.; Park, J.K. Self-assembly of bio-cellulose nanofibrils through intermediate phase in a cell-free enzyme system. Biochem. Eng. J. 2019, 142, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hestrin, S.; Schramm, M. Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem. J. 1954, 58, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bandyopadhyay, S.; Saha, N.; Zandraa, O.; Pummerova, M.; Saha, P. Essential Oil Based PVP-CMC-BC-GG Functional Hydrogel Sachet for ‘Cheese’: Its Shelf Life Confirmed with Anthocyanin (Isolated from Red Cabbage) Bio Stickers. Foods 2020, 9, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hussain, Z.; Sajjad, W.; Khan, T.; Wahid, F. Production of bacterial cellulose from industrial wastes: A review. Cellulose 2019, 26, 2895–2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ul-Islam, M.; Ullah, M.W.; Khan, S.; Park, J.K. Production of bacterial cellulose from alternative cheap and waste resources: A step for cost reduction with positive environmental aspects. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jozala, A.F.; Pertile, R.A.N.; dos Santos, C.A.; Santos-Ebinuma, V.D.; Seckler, M.M.; Gama, F.M.; Pessoa, A., Jr. Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus by employing alternative culture media. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Rastogi, A.; Banerjee, R. Statistical optimization of bacterial cellulose production by Leifsonia soli and its physico-chemical characterization. Process Biochem. 2020, 91, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rodrigues, A.C.; Fontao, A.I.; Coelho, A.; Leal, M.; da Silva, F.; Wan, Y.Z.; Dourado, F.; Gama, M. Response surface statistical optimization of bacterial nanocellulose fermentation in static culture using a low-cost medium. New Biotechnol. 2019, 49, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Barshan, S.; Rezazadeh-Bari, M.; Almasi, H.; Amiri, S. Optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagatacibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 using vinasse as a cheap cultivation medium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sperotto, G.; Stasiak, L.G.; Godoi, J.; Gabiatti, N.C.; De Souza, S.S. A review of culture media for bacterial cellulose production: Complex, chemically defined and minimal media modulations. Cellulose 2021, 28, 2649–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jahan, F.; Kumar, V.; Saxena, R.K. Distillery effluent as a potential medium for bacterial cellulose production: A biopolymer of great commercial importance. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 922–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coelho, R.M.D.; e Almeida, A.L.; do Amaral, R.Q.G.; da Mota, R.N.; de Sousa, P.H.M. Kombucha: Review. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 22, 100272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nguyen, H.T.; Saha, N.; Ngwabebhoh, F.A.; Zandraa, O.; Saha, T.; Saha, P. Kombucha-derived bacterial cellulose from diverse wastes: A prudent leather alternative. Cellulose 2021, 28, 9335–9353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Bouajila, J.; Beaufort, S.; Bonneaud, D.; Souchard, J.P.; Taillandier, P. Physicochemical properties of bacterial cellulose obtained from different Kombucha fermentation conditions. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2021, 27, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Leonarski, E.; Cesca, K.; Borges, O.M.A.; de Oliveira, D.; Poletto, P. Typical kombucha fermentation: Kinetic evaluation of beverage and morphological characterization of bacterial cellulose. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e16100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stumpf, T.R.; Yang, X.Y.; Zhang, J.C.; Cao, X.D. In situ and ex situ modifications of bacterial cellulose for applications in tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 82, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hu, W.L.; Chen, S.Y.; Yang, J.X.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.P. Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 1043–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liang, J.; Wang, R.; Chen, R.P. The Impact of Cross-linking Mode on the Physical and Antimicrobial Properties of a Chitosan/Bacterial Cellulose Composite. Polymers 2019, 11, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Sheng, J.; Yang, R.D. Nano-sized fibrils dispersed from bacterial cellulose grafted with chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 214, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kim, H.J.; Jin, J.N.; Kan, E.; Kim, K.J.; Lee, S.H. Bacterial Cellulose-chitosan Composite Hydrogel Beads for Enzyme Immobilization. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2017, 22, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Indriyati; Dara, F.; Primadona, I.; Srikandace, Y.; Karina, M. Development of bacterial cellulose/chitosan films: Structural, physicochemical and antimicrobial properties. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cacicedo, M.L.; Pacheco, G.; Islan, G.A.; Alvarez, V.A.; Barud, H.S.; Castro, G.R. Chitosan-bacterial cellulose patch of ciprofloxacin for wound dressing: Preparation and characterization studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 147, 1136–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khattak, S.; Qin, X.T.; Huang, L.H.; Xie, Y.Y.; Jia, S.R.; Zhong, C. Preparation and characterization of antibacterial bacterial cellulose/chitosan hydrogels impregnated with silver sulfadiazine. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zmejkoski, D.Z.; Zdravkovic, N.M.; Trisic, D.D.; Budimir, M.D.; Markovic, Z.M.; Kozyrovska, N.O.; Markovic, B.M.T. Chronic wound dressings-Pathogenic bacteria anti-biofilm treatment with bacterial cellulose-chitosan polymer or bacterial cellulose-chitosan dots composite hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 191, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kai, J.; Zhou, X.S. Preparation, Characterization, and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Zinc Oxide-Bacterial Cellulose-Chitosan Hydrogels for Antibacterial Dressing. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2020, 221, 2000257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stanescu, P.O.; Radu, I.C.; Alexa, R.L.; Hudita, A.; Tanasa, E.; Ghitman, J.; Stoian, O.; Tsatsakis, A.; Ginghina, O.; Zaharia, C.; et al. Novel chitosan and bacterial cellulose biocomposites tailored with polymeric nanoparticles for modern wound dressing development. Drug Deliv. 2021, 28, 1932–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ju, S.Y.; Zhang, F.L.; Duan, J.F.; Jiang, J.X. Characterization of bacterial cellulose composite films incorporated with bulk chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles: A comparative study. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 237, 116167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Silva-Weiss, A.; Bifani, V.; Ihl, M.; Sobral, P.J.A.; Gomez-Guillen, M.C. Structural properties of films and rheology of film-forming solutions based on chitosan and chitosan-starch blend enriched with murta leaf extract. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 31, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Lipovka, A.; Kharchenko, A.; Dubovoy, A.; Filipenko, M.; Stupak, V.; Mayorov, A.; Fomenko, V.; Geydt, P.; Parshin, D. The effect of adding modified chitosan on the strength properties of bacterial cellulose for clinical applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fischer, P.; Windhab, E.J. Rheology of food materials. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 16, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kalyani, P.; Khandelwal, M. Modulation of morphology, water uptake/retention, and rheological properties by in-situ modification of bacterial cellulose with the addition of biopolymers. Cellulose 2021, 28, 11025–11036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Song, S.; Liu, X.Y.; Ding, L.; Abubaker, M.A.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.L.; Yang, S.; Fan, Z. Conformational and rheological properties of bacterial cellulose sulfate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 2326–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lakehal, I.; Montembault, A.; David, L.; Perrier, A.; Vibert, R.; Duclaux, L.; Reinert, L. Prilling and characterization of hydrogels and derived porous spheres from chitosan solutions with various organic acids. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 129, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. de Souza Soares, L.; Perim, R.B.; de Alvarenga, E.S.; de Moura Guimarães, L.; de Carvalho Teixeira, A.V.N.; dos Reis Coimbra, J.S.; de Oliveira, E.B. Insights on physicochemical aspects of chitosan dispersion in aqueous solutions of acetic, glycolic, propionic or lactic acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kjm, K.M.; Son, J.H.; Kim, S.K.; Weller, C.L.; Hanna, M.A. Properties of chitosan films as a function of pH and solvent type. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, E119–E124. [Google Scholar]
  61. Nguyen, H.T.; Ngwabebhoh, F.A.; Saha, N.; Zandraa, O.; Saha, T.; Saha, P. Development of novel biocomposites based on the clean production of microbial cellulose from dairy waste (sour whey). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, 51433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. ASTM. Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. In Standard D882 Annual Book of American Standard Testing Methods; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001; pp. 162–170. [Google Scholar]
  63. Velásquez-Cock, J.; Ramírez, E.; Betancourt, S.; Putaux, J.-L.; Osorio, M.; Castro, C.; Gañán, P.; Zuluaga, R. Influence of the acid type in the production of chitosan films reinforced with bacterial nanocellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 69, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Xu, Y.X.; Liu, X.L.; Jiang, Q.X.; Yu, D.W.; Xu, Y.S.; Wang, B.; Xia, W. Development and properties of bacterial cellulose, curcumin, and chitosan composite biodegradable films for active packaging materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 260, 117778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Variation of the viscosity of Chi dissolved in (a) acetic acid and (b) lactic acid containing various KBC concentrations at 25, 30, 35, and 40 °C.
Figure 1. Variation of the viscosity of Chi dissolved in (a) acetic acid and (b) lactic acid containing various KBC concentrations at 25, 30, 35, and 40 °C.
Polymers 14 04572 g001
Figure 2. Physical appearance and AFM topography of modified Chi films at various concentrations of KBC.
Figure 2. Physical appearance and AFM topography of modified Chi films at various concentrations of KBC.
Polymers 14 04572 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of prepared films (Chi (acetic and lactic acid)/KBC) at various concentrations of KBC.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of prepared films (Chi (acetic and lactic acid)/KBC) at various concentrations of KBC.
Polymers 14 04572 g003
Figure 4. Plots of (a,c) TGA and (b,d) DTG of prepared films (Chi (acetic and lactic acid)/KBC) at various concentrations of KBC.
Figure 4. Plots of (a,c) TGA and (b,d) DTG of prepared films (Chi (acetic and lactic acid)/KBC) at various concentrations of KBC.
Polymers 14 04572 g004
Figure 5. (a) Elastic modulus and (b) Elongation at break of Chi films modified by KBC; bars represent mean ± SD (standard deviation).
Figure 5. (a) Elastic modulus and (b) Elongation at break of Chi films modified by KBC; bars represent mean ± SD (standard deviation).
Polymers 14 04572 g005
Table 1. List of recent research regarding the combination of Ch with BC or KBC and desired application.
Table 1. List of recent research regarding the combination of Ch with BC or KBC and desired application.
MaterialsPreparation MethodEnhanced
Properties
Desired
Application
Ref.
Chi/KBCImpregnationWater vapor permeability; antioxidant activity; against ultravioletActive food
packaging
[5]
Chi/BCCastingMechanical
properties
Food packaging[6]
Chi/BC/metal-organic frameworkImpregnationWater stabilityWastewater
treatment
[7]
Chi/BC/magnetic attapulgiteBlendingAdsorption capabilityWater treatment[8]
Chi/BCGraftingUniform; acid and temperature stabilityPapermaking;
Food packaging;
Textiles; Medical
[43]
Chi/BCBlendingThermal stabilityImmobilize proteins[44]
Chi/BC/glycerol
/carboxymethyl cellulose
CastingWater vapor
transmission rate; tensile strength
Antimicrobial films[45]
Chi/BC/
ciprofloxacin
ImpregnationAntimicrobial activityWound dressing[46]
Chi/BC/silver sulfadiazineImpregnationMechanical and
antibacterial
properties
Food packaging,
Tissue engineering, Drug delivery,
Biomedical
[47]
Chi/BCImpregnationAntimicrobial
activity; porosity;
migration of cell
Chronic wound healing agents[48]
Chi/BC/ZnOBlendingantimicrobial activity; thermal stability;
Compressive strength
Antibacterial
dressing
[49]
Chi/BC/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide/polyvinyl
alcohol/methyl oleate/silver sulfadiazine
BlendingMechanical strength and biocompatibilityWound dressing
materials
[50]
Chi/BC/Poly(vinyl alcohol)CastingTensile strength and
antibacterial
properties
Food packaging[51]
Chi/BC/collagenImpregnationBreathability and
antibacterial
properties
Wound dressing[52]
Table 2. The viscosity reduction percentage of Chi/KBC film-forming solutions as temperature increases from 25 °C to 40 °C.
Table 2. The viscosity reduction percentage of Chi/KBC film-forming solutions as temperature increases from 25 °C to 40 °C.
KBC
(% w/w)
Viscosity Reduction Percentage (%)
Chi (Acetic Acid)/KBCChi (Lactic Acid)/KBC
060.5351.38
158.2251.54
257.8453.43
557.8154.21
1059.4254.63
Table 3. The parameters of Arrhenius equation of Chi solutions modified by KBC with different concentrations.
Table 3. The parameters of Arrhenius equation of Chi solutions modified by KBC with different concentrations.
KBC
(% w/w)
Chi (Acetic Acid)/KBCChi (Lactic Acid)/KBC
Ea (kJ/mol)A
(1/s)
r2Ea (kJ/mol)A
(1/s)
r2
013.670.054 × 10−60.998910.802.46 × 10−60.9994
111.950.25 × 10−60.995510.261.55 × 10−60.9996
211.430.28 × 10−60.987411.751.23 × 10−60.9977
512.130.22 × 10−60.999911.724.43 × 10−60.9962
1011.790.28 × 10−60.997211.524.99 × 10−60.9997
Table 4. The combined effect of temperature and KBC concentration on the viscosity of modified Chi solutions.
Table 4. The combined effect of temperature and KBC concentration on the viscosity of modified Chi solutions.
Chi (Acetic Acid)/KBC
KBC
(% w/w)
25 °C30 °C35 °C40 °C
knr2knr2knr2knr2
00.890.730.99520.570.770.99460.570.770.99460.240.850.9952
10.690.760.99440.290.880.9970.140.990.99630.180.900.9954
20.590.800.99390.380.810.99520.230.870.99640.180.890.9954
50.810.740.99580.520.780.9950.350.820.99230.250.850.9954
100.670.760.99610.370.820.99510.260.860.99530.180.880.9962
Chi(Lactic Acid)/KBC
00.350.810.99440.260.840.9960.260.840.9960.150.880.9977
10.350.810.99520.2000.890.99810.120.960.9990.120.910.9963
20.980.720.99530.730.750.99460.510.780.99080.350.820.9917
50.990.710.99440.590.780.9940.430.800.99240.320.830.9948
100.840.730.99570.550.780.99440.380.820.99230.290.840.9942
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, H.T.; Sionkowska, A.; Lewandowska, K.; Brudzyńska, P.; Szulc, M.; Saha, N.; Saha, T.; Saha, P. Chitosan Modified by Kombucha-Derived Bacterial Cellulose: Rheological Behavior and Properties of Convened Biopolymer Films. Polymers 2022, 14, 4572. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214572

AMA Style

Nguyen HT, Sionkowska A, Lewandowska K, Brudzyńska P, Szulc M, Saha N, Saha T, Saha P. Chitosan Modified by Kombucha-Derived Bacterial Cellulose: Rheological Behavior and Properties of Convened Biopolymer Films. Polymers. 2022; 14(21):4572. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214572

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Hau Trung, Alina Sionkowska, Katarzyna Lewandowska, Patrycja Brudzyńska, Marta Szulc, Nabanita Saha, Tomas Saha, and Petr Saha. 2022. "Chitosan Modified by Kombucha-Derived Bacterial Cellulose: Rheological Behavior and Properties of Convened Biopolymer Films" Polymers 14, no. 21: 4572. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214572

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop