Next Article in Journal
Bibliometrics of Functional Polymeric Biomaterials with Bioactive Properties Prepared by Radiation-Induced Graft Copolymerisation: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Fiber Content and Dosing Position on the the Mechanical Properties of Short-Carbon-Fiber Polypropylene Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Catalytic Reduction of Dyes and Antibacterial Activity of AgNPs@Zn@Alginate Composite Aerogel Beads
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adhesion Improvement of Solvent-Free Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives by Semi-IPN Using Polyurethanes and Acrylic Polymers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 22
10.3390/polym14224830
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Micro Silica Filler Particle Size on Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Based Composite Material

by
Sidra Siraj
1,
Ali H. Al-Marzouqi
1,*,
Muhammad Z. Iqbal
1 and
Waleed Ahmed
2
1
Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
2
Engineering Requirements Unit (ERU), College of Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(22), 4830; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224830
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 9 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Processing of High Performance Polymeric Materials: Modeling and Characterization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, silica in the form of raw local natural sand was added to high-density-polyethylene (HDPE) in order to develop a composite material in the form of sheets that could have potential applications in thin film industries, such as packaging, or recycling industries, such as in 3D printing. The silica/HDPE composite sheets were developed using a melt extruder followed by using a hot press for compression molding. The impact of two different particle sizes (25 µm and 5 µm) of the silica particles on selected properties such as toughness, elastic modulus, ductility, and composite density were analyzed. A considerable increase in the toughness and elastic modulus was observed from 0 wt% to 20 wt% with a 25 µm filler size. However, a general decreasing trend was observed in the material’s toughness and elastic modulus with decreasing particle size. A similar trend was observed for the ductility and the tensile strength of the sheets prepared from both filler particle sizes. In terms of the composite density, as the filler was increased from 20 wt% to 50 wt%, an increase in the composite densities was noticed for both particle sizes. Additionally, the sheets developed with 25 µm particle size had a slightly higher density than the 5 µm particle size, which is expected as the size can account for the higher weight. Results from this work aim to analyze the use of local sand as a filler material that can contribute towards maximizing the potential of such composite materials developed in extrusion industries.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Over the past century, the use of plastics has been on the rise globally and is becoming alarming due to its disposal techniques that are damaging the environment, and at this current rate of usage, it is estimated that the earth will hold over 3 billion tons of plastic in the next 30 years [1]. Furthermore, it is approximated that over 50% of all the current plastic consumed ends up in nature, whether in landfills or the ocean [2]. Additionally, the waste from plastics is reported to be harmful to living organisms as their pigmentation consists of toxic and hazardous trace elements if left in the environment for long [3].
Researchers globally are developing solutions to utilize plastics in a more efficient way to incorporate them in a variety of industries for a prolonged duration of time to sustain their consumption.
Polymers are widely used in industrial applications ranging from automotive, to petroleum, to medicine, and even upcoming industries such as 3D printing [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. One of the common types of polymers that is widely used in sheet-type applications is polyethylene, which includes all its variants such as HDPE, low-density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), etc. These polymeric materials exhibit higher mechanical strength and greater resistance to environmental stresses than other polymers [12]. These long-chained polymeric plastics are relatively easy to mold and manufacture and provide a cost-effective base polymer to start with good overall qualities [3].
The blown-film process or extrusion is the key technique typically used in fabricating thin sheets or films for packaging applications, food packaging, trashcan liners, merchandise packaging, etc. One of the critical features of any packaging material is its durability and high stability. Another key feature for thin packaging material is its high strength. However, incorporating additives and additional components is preferred to lower the use of developing completely plastic-based products. To tackle this issue, it is reported that the use of inorganic fillers is employed as it enhances the thermal and mechanical properties of the polymer as well as their durability [13,14,15,16,17]. Studies report that minerals, fillers, and hard particles increase the overall dimensional stability of the polymers [18]. Significant improvements, particularly in the mechanical properties, can be observed with increasing filler additions of inorganic exfoliated clay minerals in polymer matrices, including layered silicate compounds [19]. Studies report that the addition of small-size mineral particles with smooth spherical surfaces can result in increased matrix compactness that can lead to higher friction bonding [20].
Additionally, the elastic modulus is a property that can be easily enhanced by adding micro- or nanoscale particles since the particles have a higher stiffness than the polymeric matrices. The applied stress can be easily transferred from the polymer matrix to the particles, enhancing the material’s tensile strength [19,21]. Studies report that the addition of hard particles in polymers, such as in polyethylene, resulted in improved impact toughness as well [22,23,24]. Moreover, it can be said that the addition of particles has an effect at smaller stress levels. For instance, the plastic deformation can be distributed by the cavitation caused by adding fillers, which allows the polymer to yield. This results in extended areas of plastic deformation and, thus, increases the amount of energy that can be absorbed by the composite material, thereby improving the overall toughness [22]
Mineral fillers such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3), titanium dioxide (TiO2), silicon dioxide (SiO2), etc., are widely used to develop polymer composite materials [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Combinations of several minerals to develop hybrid composites have also contributed to improved mechanical properties. Studies report that the element detected the most is considered the first primary phase, which mainly contributes and impacts the properties [15]. However, if the same filler with the same combination of mineral content is added, mechanical comparisons can be performed on composites with varying filler additions [32]. It is to be noted that the mechanical properties of a polymer-composite material depend strongly on key factors, such as the particle size of the filler, the interface adhesion between the particle and the matrix, and the particle loading [19]. Adding fillers can even enhance the tight packing of the polymer matrices; for instance, smaller particles can provide higher strength and increase the compactness of a polymer matrix Additionally, fillers can appear spherical but be present in clusters rather than individual particles due to interparticle interactions. The particles can vary anywhere from 0.1 µm up to 1000 µm depending on the application type and properties desired at the micro scale [19,20,33].
Overall, composites developed with fillers are reported to exhibit several advantages over conventional materials or their individual components, for instance providing key benefits in bulk weight and costs [34]. Inorganic fillers such as silica are also considered because they fulfil the purpose of enhancing mechanical properties such as strength and durability and, at the same time, are safe for human health; therefore, they can be incorporated into products that involve human interaction, such as packaging or even in building construction materials [35].
Due to its unreactive nature, high thermal stability, and high durability, silica is one of the most widely chosen fillers in a variety of fields such as electronics, textiles, construction, 3D printing, etc. [10,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. It is also reported that the surface of precipitated or hydrated silica is hydrophilic due to the presence of a high number of silanol groups that can bond and adhere through the presence of hydrogen bonding [43]. Studies also show the incorporation of sand into polymers in building materials, recycling, and managing wastes [44,45,46,47,48]. Furthermore, silica can be easily surface-modified as per the need of an application to increase or decrease the hydrophilicity, making it a very versatile mineral to use as a filler material [49,50]. For instance, studies report that hydrophobic silica has the ability to double the adhesion of binders in contrast to hydrophilic silica, which halves it [51]. Moreover, modifying silica particles’ surface hydrophobicity leads to improved overall compound stability [52]. This gives the ability to finely tune the interparticle interactions, which can modify the way the particles assemble under applied stress [53]. Silica and its derivates are also expected to self-aggregate and form a network of particles within the matrix, increasing the formation of links and resulting in an overall integrated structure [54].
Furthermore, geographically speaking, the middle east has a vast abundance of areas with raw sand whose main component is usually silica. Since variants of silica are extensively used as fillers to improve the properties of composite materials, the consideration of using local raw sand by itself was decided to be studied. Additionally, in terms of polymers, since HDPE is widely used as a large-scale commodity polymer for thin film products [36,55], and due to its ease of availability, recyclability [56], good mechanical strength, high chemical resistance, and low cost [54,57], HDPE was considered as the choice of polymer for this study. HDPE is very light in weight, is water-resistant, and can be easily recycled, making it a good choice for packaging applications. HDPE also has good impact resistance, as well as has shown good resistance to insects, molds, and mildew. Fillers can enhance several properties of HDPE, for instance, strength, modulus, toughness, hardness, and durability, as well as improve thermal conductivity [57,58]. The addition of fillers to HDPE also helps prevents shrinkage of the material and is also reported to adsorb high-energy photons when exposed to UV light, prolonging its ability to extended outdoor exposure [59,60].
Moreover, since in thin film applications, extrusion is considered the major technique [61], a lab-scale twin-screw extruder setup is a great bench-scale option to be considered for developing such composites employed in this study [62].
There is a significant rise globally in the use or reuse of natural items and industrial by-products as raw materials or additional supplementary materials in order to maximize material usage and potential and reduce their negative environmental and economic impacts. Since these by-products or raw materials are abundant, it is smart to incorporate them into products to reduce the ecological and economic burden caused due to an increase in plastics and limited natural resources [20]. Several industries also prefer opting for low-cost reinforcements that can improve the properties of the material and, at the same time, also take into consideration how easily the material can be accessed and manufactured. Additionally, the already existing industrial-scale processing techniques, such as casting, extrusion, or compression, are an added advantage as they involve low fixed capital and production costs to utilize these materials [15]. Moreover, according to a study conducted for a silica based composite material, one of the key mechanical properties, i.e., the elastic modulus, increased linearly with the content of the silica added and the impact of the particle size was insignificant. Since filler at a micro level is easier to access and develop, opting for a filler at the microscale to enhance properties is a more efficient and cost-effective approach to develop composite materials rather than investing in expensive technology to obtain finer particles that essentially will perform a similar job at the nanoscale with a higher loading [19]. Another study highlights the comparison of values of Young’s modulus between micro silica and nano-silica, which demonstrated values higher in the micro case up to a certain filler weight loading [21]. Another study suggested that filler loading is the determining property for mechanical properties, for instance, for the elastic modulus. In contrast, other filler characteristics such as shape and size are secondary fine-tuning factors that contribute towards altering the properties of the material [63]. Additionally, research also suggests that it is difficult to recognize the effect of filler size and shape on the mechanical property of composites [64]. Another property to keenly monitor with smaller particles is their high surface-free energy. When the interparticle forces exceed the particulate mass, agglomerations can easily occur and this may contribute negatively by reducing the polymer–filler interactions [63]. It all comes down to the desired outcome one requires for their developed material, and how much time, technology, and energy one is willing to invest to obtain the filler size they are satisfied with that gives them acceptable results.
The results from this study will explore the possibility of using raw sand (silica) in sheets that could be used in packaging applications. Therefore, the key objective of this study was to incorporate local sand as a filler material to develop composite sheets and study the impact of particle size on some of the mechano-physical properties of the developed material. The novelty of this study lies in the efforts and contributions made towards studying the potential of using local sand as a filler particle that can be of great interest to further research in this geographical area. The aim here is to develop simple yet effective solutions focused on utilizing local resources that simultaneously can be focused on utilizing local resources and contributing towards developing sustainable products that can lower ecological and economical burdens. Such a study can open pathways to develop innovations focused on sustainable materials and promote the incorporation of local resources that are abundant in nature to decrease the negative environmental impacts.

2. Materials and Methods

The sand (mainly in the form of silica) was collected from local areas of the country. The obtained sand was handpicked to remove any more oversized items and sieved through a 25 microns aperture sieve (200 mm diameter, stainless steel mesh) to obtain 25 µm size of particles and further ground using a planetary ball mill (PL-400, Retsch, Haan, Germany) to obtain 5 µm size of particles. The composition of the local sand was reported to be 47 wt% silicates, with 26 wt% carbonates and approximately 14 wt% quartz. Additionally, the mineral component of SiO2 was reported to be approximately 37 wt% [55]. HDPE pellets were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA (Density = 0.98 g/cm3, Mw~125,000 g/mol, melt flow index 2.2 g/10 min, shear rate 0.004 s−1) [65,66,67,68].
The two sets of particle sizes were added to the HDPE pellets in a chosen set of weight ratios (20, 35, and 50 wt%). The mix was added into a twin-screw melt-blend extruder (MiniLab HAAKE Rheomex CTW5, Karlsruhe, Germany). The closed loop cycle followed a set temperature of 170 °C, 15 min at an rpm of 100. These parameters were kept constant through all the ratios. A similar run was also performed for pure HDPE pellets [69,70,71,72]. The total feed to the extruder was kept constant at 4 g as required by the setup [8,55]. Once the run was complete, the composite material was collected as the extruded material from the exit valve of the setup. The material was chopped into small sizes of 1 g and placed into the hot press for compression molding to obtain the composite sheets. The hot press (Carver’s press (CarverTM Lab Presses)) was operated under 5000 psi and at the same extrusion temperature for approximately 10 min. All the processing conditions were chosen after following literature reviews for similar systems and successful results from trial and error [12,22,73]. The only variables that would be changed in this experiment are the particle size and the filler loading. The sheets were then cut into dumbbell-shaped mechanical testing specimens using a blanking machine to analyze their toughness, elastic modulus, and ductility properties. Figure 1 presents the process, Table 1 presents chosen weight percentages for the preparation of the sand/polymer composite sheets, and the experimental conditions are illustrated in Table 2. Additionally, the data in Table 1 and Table 2 are also represented in a simple table format for the ease of any researcher trying to replicate the experiment and for the ease of anyone only referring to the amounts needed while experimenting for such a system of composite material.
Table 3 shows images of sand/polymer composite sheets prepared from 25 µm sand particles and 5 µm sand particles, respectively. All the sheets were roughly 100 mm in diameter. The sheets were inspected visually. It was evident that increasing the filler led to a darker appearance of the sheets. Additionally, it could also be seen that the dispersion of the particles in the composite sheets was quite random, and an increase in the non-homogeneity was observed with increasing particle wt% for both sets of particle sizes.

2.1. Characterization

2.1.1. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

A JEOL/EO scanning electron microscope (SEM) with a spot size of 40 was operated at 2 kV to image the particles of sand measuring 25 µm and 5 µm at their surface. Using a vacuum sputter coater, samples were coated with Au/C to improve the image’s conductivity and quality. Similarly, SEM analysis was used to observe the surface morphology of the selected composite sheets as well as neat HDPE sheets. Using double-sided carbon tape, the selected composite sheets were placed on an aluminum pin-mount adapter and then using a sputter-coater, they were coated with gold to avoid any electrostatic charging during the examination. A high vacuum mode with an acceleration voltage of 15 kV was used and the images were obtained.

2.1.2. Mechanical Properties

The universal testing machine (UTM) determined the composite sheets’ mechanical properties using the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)-D 638. Dumbbell-shaped test specimens (as seen in Figure 2) were prepared using a blanking machine. Slight variations in sample thicknesses were observed, which is attributed directly to the processing itself [3]. The study was conducted on a Zwick 50 kN. The crosshead motion rate was set to 100 mm/min, which was taken from the ASTM D 790 standard. Replicates of each sample test were performed for increased accuracy. The sample thickness was measured at several locations along the gage length, and the samples with consistent and similar values were selected for further analysis [74]. All dimensions (i.e., the length (l), width (w), and thickness (t)) of the samples are tabulated in Table 4.
One of the mechanical properties that is of great significance is the toughness of a material. It indicates the amount of energy the material can absorb on an impact, and this value can be estimated by determining the area under the stress-strain curve. Using the following Equation (1):
Toughness   [ MPa ] = σ × ε
where σ is the stress in MPa and ε is the strain.
Additionally, the elastic modulus for the developed composite material was analyzed by examining the data obtained from the linear part of their corresponding stress-strain plots. The elastic modulus is the stiffness or the ratio between the stress–strain plot of the material undergoing elastic deformation in a tensile test [19]. The modulus of elasticity was estimated by using the average initial cross-sectional area concerning the gage length of the sample. Equation (2) represents how the elastic modulus can be calculated.
  E   [ M P a ] = F × L o   A × ∆ L
where E is the elastic modulus in MPa, F is the force exerted on the sample under tension in N, Lo is the original gage length of the sample in mm, A represents the original cross-sectional area of the sample material in mm2, and ∆L is the change in length of the sample in mm.
When the uniform deformation for gage length is a property of consideration, measuring elongation is quite helpful. This property quantifies the importance of good engineering design. Additionally, the elongation at break (ductility) can be prevented by observing the extension of the sample at the final breakpoint. Ductility can be calculated using the following Equation (3):
Ductility   ( % ) = L f − L o   L o × 100
where Lo is the original gage length in mm, and Lf is the final length at the break in mm.

2.1.3. Composite Density

In order to calculate the dry density of the filler, ASTM D7263-09 was followed [75]. A controlled drying process in an electric drying oven was used to dry the sand. Using the following Equation (4), the density of the sand was calculated [76].
                        ρ filler = m filler V o l u m e
where ρfiller is the density in kg/m3 of the filler particle, mfiller is the mass in kg of the filler particle and Volume is the measured cylinder used in m3
In order to calculate the apparent densities of the polymers, ASTM D792-20 was followed [75]. The masses of the samples were measured in air and water and using this data, the apparent densities can be estimated using the following Equation (5):
ρ pol = m a s s air   ρ water m a s s air + m a s s water
where ρpol is the apparent density in kg/m3 of the polymer, massair is the mass in kg of the measured sample in air, masswater is the mass in kg of the measured sample in water, and ρwater is the density in kg/m3 of water.
Next, the linear rule of mixing assumes that the volume-weighted average of the matrix and the dispersed phases can account for the composite material’s theoretical density. The equation also assumes that the filler does not affect the polymer matrix in any crystal formation nor is there any air in the composite material. The density of the composite material can simply be defined as the ratio of the densities of the filler and polymer to the total volume, which is represented by the sum of the products of the filler and polymer densities and their corresponding masses [77].The equation for composite density is represented in Equation (6):
ρ composite = ρ f   ρ m ρ m   m f   + ρ f   ( 1 − m f )
where ρcomposite is the density in kg/m3 of the composite material, ρf is the density in kg/m3 of the sand (silica filler), ρm is the density of the polymer matrix (HDPE) in kg/m3, and mf is the mass fraction of the filler used.
The samples were cut as per ASTM D6287-17 to measure their volumes [78], and the thickness of the samples was measured using a thickness gauge (model 547–526S, Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan, resolution 0.001 mm) along several points to ensure uniformity, First, their weights were measured using a weighing balance (Citizen-CX 220, d 0.001 g, ManualsLib, Bangalore, India) for the experimental densities of the developed composite. These values were used to estimate the experiential densities of the composite material by calculating their respective mass-to-volume ratios.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology

SEM analysis was conducted to estimate the particle sizes and shapes of the local raw sand used as the filler in the experiment. Table 5 represents the SEM images of sand filler of both 25 µm and 5 µm particle size as selected sheets prepared, respectively.
The images illustrate that the 25 µm particle has a higher inter-particle distance than those in 5 µm particles. Additionally, the 25 µm are larger and more irregular in size compared to the 5 µm particle size, which is smaller and finer in appearance. A few sheets were selected to observe the morphology. Table 5 also shows a neat HDPE sheet (0 wt%) and selected 35 wt% particle size composite sheets prepared from 25 µm and 5 µm particles, respectively. The pure HDPE sheet shows a smooth structure with an absence of any particles in it. The outcome of the variation in the particle size as fillers in the composite sheets can be well observed as in the case of 25 µm, the particles are much further apart, whereas in the case of 5 µm, the particles appear closer together. However, it is to be noted that a decreased inter-particle distance can led to agglomeration formation, which can lead to material with a brittle nature [36].

3.2. Mechanical Properties

The impact of the filler particle size was assessed on selected mechanical properties such as toughness, elastic modulus, and ductility of the prepared composite sheets.
Toughness is associated with the energy a material can absorb in an impact, which can be a critical value to monitor based on the type of application. Figure 3 represents the toughness value for both 25 µm and 5 µm filler sizes. It can be seen that the toughness value experiences a sharp increase from around 611 MPa at 0 wt% to 811 MPa at 20 wt% in the case of 25 µm. Beyond this point, the toughness starts to decrease. Such a substantial increase is noted in some other composite studies as well [79], and it can be associated with the adsorption of silica clusters to the polymeric chains [80,81] and due to the silica particles promoting partial stress within the matrix, which can change the direction of crack development [82,83,84].
Furthermore, as the filler wt% was increased, the toughness decreased for sheets prepared from the 5 µm filler size. The decrease in these values can be associated with the agglomerate formation, which leads to structural instability of the material, thereby reducing the ability of the composite to have a higher absorption of energy at impact, leading to the formation of cracks at the surface and eventually breaking. Many researchers add modifying agents to increase the impact resistance of materials [85,86]. However, it is noteworthy that at 35 wt%, the toughness of the 5 µm particle is higher than the 25 µm particle. This can probably be based on how the particles have arranged themselves in the matrix. Due to 25 µm being a larger size, the random dispersion of bigger particles could have created more stress concentrations than in the case of smaller-sized particles, leading to such a possibility.
Furthermore, it was observed that an increase in filler addition from 0 wt% to 20 wt% increased the elastic modulus from 1201 MPa to 1298 MPa for a filler size of 25 µm, which is comparable to the literature values [1,87,88]. Beyond this point, a gradual decrease was observed. For the composite material developed with a 5 µm filler size, a similar decreasing trend was observed with the exception at 50 wt%. Moreover, as a comparison, it could be said that all the composite sheets prepared from 5 µm filler particles resulted in a lower elastic modulus value than those prepared from 25 µm particles with an exception at 50 wt%. The decrease in values can be associated with the development of stress concentrations weakening the matrix. Additionally, the formation of hydrogen bonding can also propagate cracks at weak interfaces, which can facilitate the brittle nature of the sheets, leading to failure [56,87,89]. Moreover, the possible variation at a higher wt% could be due to extensive molecular orientation that could occur in thermoplastic-based films, along with random dispersion of the filler particles leading to inconsistent results [1]. Figure 4 represents the elastic modulus for composite sheets prepared with both sets of filler particles.
The strain at the point of failure can be better understood by studying the material’s ductility. A material’s ability to deform plastically and adapt to the load applied can be of great value in several industrial applications requiring highly flexible materials. Figure 5 represents the ductility of all the prepared composite sheets. The pure HDPE sheet had a high ductility of over 150%, which is well reported [90,91]. Almost similar decreasing trends in the ductility were observed with an increase in filler addition from 0 wt% to 50 wt% for sheets prepared from both particle sizes. Additionally, it can be said that a substantial decrease in the ductility (up to 98%) was noted for both 25 µm and 5 µm filler sizes from 0 wt% to 50 wt%. This degrading behavior can possibly be linked to unexfoliated aggregate development and the formation of structural voids, which reduces the matrix to show improved ductility. This kind of behavior is also noted in other polymer-composite studies [85,92]. The literature reports that the addition of particles and aggregates delays the initiation of cracks and inhibits the steady-state flat crack propagation resulting in a loss of the ductility of the material. Additionally, particles larger than the fiber spacing contribute to the balling of fibers, resulting in poor dispersion and lowering the property [20].
Figure 6 represents the effect of varying filler concentrations and particle size on the tensile strength of the developed composites. In general, a decrease in the tensile strength was noticed for the composite material developed from both 25 µm and 5 µm size filler particles. For instance, for the composite developed from 25 µm particles, the tensile strength decreased from approximately 20 MPa at 10 wt% to 10 MPa at 50 wt%, whereas with the composites prepared from 5 µm particles, the value decreased from 22 MPa at 10 wt% to 16 MPa at 50 wt%. Such a decreasing trend can be explained by the particles randomly arranging themselves in a way that limits the stress transfer [93]. Not much difference was observed for the values at 20 wt% and 25 wt% at both filler sizes. However, a large variation in properties, for instance, at 50 wt% is expected to occur in thermoplastic-based thin films undergoing extensive molecular orientation [93]. Moreover, the decreased tensile strength also causes increased brittleness, and this can be attributed to the formation of agglomerates. These agglomerates form initiation spots of stress concentrations that lead to failure. Moreover, the formation of voids in matrices is also reported to contribute towards decreased strength values [94,95]. All the mechanical data for all the prepared composite sheets are tabulated in Table 6.

3.3. Composite Density

In general, the experimental composite density experienced a decrease from 0 wt% to 20 wt% in both the cases of composite sheets prepared from 25 µm and 5 µm particles, respectively. This could be due to the matrix’s random filler dispersion of the introduced filler particles. Additionally, since the sand particles’ density (1047.53 kg/m3) [55] is slightly higher than that of the polymer, it could have impacted the calculated value. Beyond this point, a slight increase was noted with an increase in filler addition. In the case of 25 µm particles, that density varied from 766 kg/m3 at 20 wt% to 789 kg/m3 at 50 wt%. For the composite sheets prepared from 5 µm particles, the density ranged from 750 kg/m3 to 780 kg/m3. In all cases, the density of the sheets prepared from 25 µm particles was more than its corresponding sheets prepared from 5 µm particles. These representations can be seen in Figure 7. This can be possibly explained by the fact that the 25 µm particles are bigger in size and nature than the 5 µm particles, thereby contributing to a greater density value. Furthermore, both cases obtained significantly lower values than theoretical values. For instance, a decrease of up to 23% was observed for sheets prepared from 25 µm particles and close to 25% for the sheets prepared from 25 µm particles at 20 wt% filler addition. Such high variations can be associated with the high temperatures applied during the processing of the sample material. Moreover, residual moisture can be degassed with the sample material due to inadequate and non-homogeneous mixing, which can also contribute to the lowered density value as the polymer matrix attains high viscosity [96,97]. In industrial applications requiring materials to have a lower density, for instance, applications requiring floating, fillers can be a great way to lower this property [98]. Furthermore, handling the materials can benefit from it as lighter materials can be easier to transport, thereby reducing cost [99]. Table 7 reports the composite density data for all the prepared composite sheets.

4. Conclusions

This study developed composite sheets using silica microparticles of two different sizes as a filler in a HDPE polymeric matrix. This was analyzed on the mechanical properties and composite densities. In general, the majority of the mechanical characterization showed a decrease in their values with the filler addition. However, a notable increase in the toughness and elastic modulus of the composite material was observed with 20 wt% filler at 25 µm particle size, promoting that at this particle size and wt%, enhanced properties were obtained. As for the ductility of the material, a sharp decrease was observed in both cases of particle size, implying the idea that the filler addition led to agglomerates that resulted in several areas of stress concentrations, leading to such lowered values, which is expected in composite materials. In terms of the composite densities, increasing the filler particles at both particle sizes led to a decrease in the density value from 0 wt% to 20 wt%, and this can be considered an enhanced property, depending on the type of application, for instance, when transportation is considered. Further studies on silica with polymers are underway to understand its potential to be used as a filler material in thin film applications. The data from this research promote the promising use of local sand as a filler material that can enhance composites’ mechanical and density properties and open pathways to conduct more studies to explore suitable applications for such an abundant filler. Future work is recommended to be directed towards studying and analyzing the rheology of the developed composite materials, as rheological properties can further help in understanding the microscopic and mesoscopic level of structures within the matrix as the filler dispersion and filler–matrix interactions are highly linked to the viscoelastic properties of the material. Additionally, the impact of potential additives such as coupling agents and compatibilizers that can improve the interfacial adhesion in the composite material, which can further enhance the mechanical properties, must be explored. Moreover, this research can further be extended by extensively studying the hydrophobization of the surface of the silica filler particles and the evaluation of the impact on the nature of the surface of the filler particle and the influence on the properties of the developed composite material [100,101]. Future studies can also be aimed at utilizing recycled HDPE to lower the ecological impact further and promote an even more sustainable approach to developing such a composite material. The potential to recycle such a product can invite scientific and business interests that could be vital to contributing towards global economic strategy [15,47,68,102,103,104]. This study aimed to highlight the potential of using a local resource and test its feasibility to be used as a useful material in developing an innovative product that can be easily commercialized with further development.

Author Contributions

S.S.: formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation. A.H.A.-M.: conceptualization, visualization, writing—review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition, supervision. M.Z.I.: methodology, software, validation, supervision, resources. W.A.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by UAE University, Grant number 21N221.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University Innovation Program (UIP’18) of Expo Live 2020 for partially funding this research under Grant Number 21N221.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Santi, C.R.; Correa, A.C.; Manrich, S. Films of post-consumer polypropylene composites for the support layer in synthetic paper. Polímeros 2006, 16, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rochman, C.M.; Browne, M.A.; Halpern, B.S.; Hentschel, B.T.; Hoh, E.; Karapanagioti, H.K.; Rios-Mendoza, L.M.; Takada, H.; Teh, S.; Thompson, R.C. Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature 2013, 494, 169–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Al-Mazrouei, N.; Ismail, A.; Ahmed, W.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H. ABS/Silicon Dioxide Micro Particulate Composite from 3D Printing Polymeric Waste. Polymers 2022, 14, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bouafif, H.; Koubaa, A.; Perré, P.; Cloutier, A.; Riedl, B. Wood particle/high-density polyethylene composites: Thermal sensitivity and nucleating ability of wood particles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, B.; Ma, H.; Wu, D.; Zhu, L.; Jin, Z. Toughening polypropylene by tiny amounts of fillers. Pigment Resin Technol. 2017, 46, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Srisawat, N.; Nithitanakul, M.; Srikulkit, K. Spinning of fibers from polypropylene/silica composite resins. J. Compos. Mater. 2011, 46, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ou, Y.; Yang, F.; Yu, Z.-Z. A New Conception on the Toughness of Nylon 6/Silica Nanocomposite Prepared via in Situ Polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1998, 36, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Siraj, S.; Al Marzouqi, A.; Lqbal, M. Mechanical and Wettability Performance of Sand/HDPE Composite Sheets. Mater. Sci. Forum 2020, 1015, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elsheikh, A.H.; Panchal, H.; Shanmugan, S.; Muthuramalingam, T.; El-Kassas, A.M.; Ramesh, B. Recent Progresses in Wood-Plastic Composites: Pre-Processing Treatments, Manufacturing Techniques, Recyclability and Eco-Friendly Assessment. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 8, 100450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmed, W.; Siraj, S.; Alnajjar, F.; Al Marzouqi, A.H. 3D Printed Implants for Joint Replacement. In Applications of 3D Printing in Biomedical Engineering; Sharma, N.R., Subburaj, K., Sandhu, K., Sharma, V., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 97–119. [Google Scholar]
  11. Elsheikh, A. Bistable Morphing Composites for Energy-Harvesting Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Charinpanitkul, T.; Ruenjaikaen, K.; Sunsap, P.; Wijitamornlert, A.; Kim, K.S. Optical Transmission of Greenhouse Film Prepared from Composite of Polyethylene and Microsilica. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2007, 13, 992–996. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hyun, K.; Chong, W.; Koo, M.; Chung, I.J. Physical properties of polyethylene/silicate nanocomposite blown films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 2131–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rangasamy, G.; Mani, S.; Kolandavelu, S.K.S.; Alsoufi, M.S.; Ibrahim, A.M.M.; Muthusamy, S.; Panchal, H.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Elsheikh, A.H. An extensive analysis of mechanical, thermal and physical properties of jute fiber composites with different fiber orientations. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2021, 28, 101612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Açıkbaş, G.; Özcan, S.; Açıkbaş, N. Production and characterization of a hybrid polymer matrix composite. Polym. Compos. 2017, 39, 4080–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elsheikh, A.H.; Elaziz, M.A.; Ramesh, B.; Egiza, M.; Al-Qaness, M.A. Modeling of drilling process of GFRP composite using a hybrid random vector functional link network/parasitism-predation algorithm. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 14, 298–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raj, M.K.A.; Muthusamy, S.; Panchal, H.; Ibrahim, A.M.M.; Alsoufi, M.S.; Elsheikh, A.H. Investigation of mechanical properties of dual-fiber reinforcement in polymer composite. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 3908–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kosciuszko, A.; Czyzewski, P.; Wajer, Ł.; Osciak, A.; Bielinski, M. Properties of Polypropylene Composites Filled with Microsilica Waste. Polimery 2020, 65, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fu, S.-Y.; Feng, X.-Q.; Lauke, B.; Mai, Y.-W. Effects of Particle Size, Particle/Matrix Interface Adhesion and Particle Loading on Mechanical Properties of Particulate—Polymer Composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2008, 39, 933–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sahmaran, M.; Yücel, H.E.; Demirhan, S.; Arýk, M.T.; Li, V.C. Combined Effect of Aggregate and Mineral Admixtures on Tensile Ductility of Engineered Cementitious Composites. ACI Mater. J. 2012, 109, 627. [Google Scholar]
  21. Othman, R.N.R.; Subramaniam, D.K.; Ezani, N.; Abdullah, M.F.; Ahmad, K.Z.K. The Synergistic Effects of Hybrid Micro and Nano Silica in Influencing the Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Composites—A New Model. Polymers 2022, 14, 3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, Q.; Wang, G. Polyethylene toughened by rigid inorganic particles. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1992, 32, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fu, Q.; Wang, G.; Shen, J. Polyethylene toughened by CaCO3 particle: Brittle-ductile transition of CaCO3-toughened HDPE. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1993, 49, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bartczak, Z.; Argon, A.; Cohen, R.; Weinberg, M. Toughness mechanism in semi-crystalline polymer blends: II. High-density polyethylene toughened with calcium carbonate filler particles. Polymer 1999, 40, 2347–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Menendez, H.; White, J.L. A Wide-angle X-ray diffraction method of determining chopped fiber orientation in composites with application to extrusion through dies. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1984, 24, 1051–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nguyen, H.X.; Ishida, H. Poly (Aryl-ether-ether-ketone) and Its Advanced Composites: A Review. Polym. Compos. 1987, 8, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bhattachrya, S.; Gupta, R.; Kamal, M.R. Polymeric Nanocomposite: Theory and Practice; Hanser: Munich, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Elleithy, R.H.; Ali, I.; Ali, M.A.; Al-Zahrani, S.M. High Density Polyethylene/Micro Calcium Carbonate Composites: A Study of the Morphological, Thermal, and Viscoelastic Properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 2413–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Siraj, S.; Al-Marzouqi, A.; Ahmed, W. Processing Biodegradable Fused Filament Fabrication Waste with Micro-Silica Particles. Key Eng. Mater. 2022, 907, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jun, Q.; Ma, L.; Gao, F.; Wen, Y.; Kang, L.; Liu, H.; Zhao, X.; Xie, X.; Jun, C.; Chen, K.; et al. Method for Manufacturing Light Stone Paper from Micro Talcum Powder. CN103102569A (15/5/2013). Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN103102569A/en (accessed on 19 October 2022).
  31. Chauhan, I.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Mohanty, P. Fabrication of titania nanowires incorporated paper sheets and study of their optical properties. Mater. Express 2013, 3, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bezerra, E.M.; Joaquim, A.P.; Savastano, H., Jr.; John, V.M.; Agopyan, V. The Effect of Different Mineral Additions and Synthetic Fiber Contents on Properties of Cement Based Composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2006, 28, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hubbe, M.A.; Gill, R.A. Fillers for Papermaking: A Review of Their Properties, Usage Practices, and Their Mechanistic Role. BioResources 2016, 11, 2886–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Faria, D.L.; Júnior, L.M.; de Almeida Mesquita, R.G.; Júnior, M.G.; Pires, N.J.; Mendes, L.M.; Junior, J.B.G. Production of castor oil-based polyurethane resin composites reinforced with coconut husk fibres. J. Polym. Res. 2020, 27, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ślosarczyk, A.; Vashchuk, A.; Klapiszewski, Ł. Research Development in Silica Aerogel Incorporated Cementitious Composites—A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Corrêa, A.C.; de Santi, C.R.; Manrich, S. Synthetic Paper from Plastic Waste: The Effect of CaCO3 on Physical, Surface Properties and Printability. In Macromolecular Symposia; Wiley Online Library: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 611–620. [Google Scholar]
  37. Borges, J.R.V.; Santos, A.S.F.E.; Manrich, S. The Influence of Organoclay on Polypropylene Composite Films for Synthetic Paper. Polym. Technol. Eng. 2011, 50, 1443–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Buddi, T.; Rao, B.N.; Singh, S.K.; Purohit, R.; Rana, R.S. Development and analysis of high density poly ethylene (HDPE) nano SiO2 and wood powder reinforced polymer matrix hybrid nano composites. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2018, 13, S24–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ahmed, W.; Ahmed, S.; Alnajjar, F.; Zaneldin, E. Mechanical performance of three-dimensional printed sandwich composite with a high-flexible core. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2021, 235, 1382–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Almazrouei, N.; Siraj, S.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H.; Ahmed, W. Producing Particulate Composite Using 3D Printing Plastics Waste. In Proceedings of the 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 21–24 February 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, X.; Wu, L.; Yu, H.; Xiao, T.; Li, H.; Yang, J. Modified silica-based isoprene rubber composite by a multi-functional silane: Preparation and its mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties. Polym. Test. 2020, 91, 106840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ahmed, W.; Siraj, S.; Al-Marzouqi, A. Embracing Additive Manufacturing Technology through Fused Filament Fabrication for Antimicrobial with Enhanced Formulated Materials. Polymers 2021, 13, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Marković, G.; Samaržija-Jovanović, S.; Jovanović, V.; Marinović-Cincović, M. Thermal stability of CR/CSM rubber blends filled with nano- and micro-silica particles. J. Therm. Anal. 2009, 100, 881–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kumar, P.; Das, V.; Gupta, A.; Ameta, N.K. Stabilization of Dune Sand Mixed with Plastic (LDPE) Waste Strips for Design of Flexible Pavement in Construction of Roads. Am. J. Eng. Res. 2016, 5, 315–320. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ding, T.; Xiao, J.; Zou, S.; Yu, J. Flexural properties of 3D printed fibre-reinforced concrete with recycled sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 288, 123077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bamigboye, G.O.; Ngene, B.U.; Ademola, D.; Jolayemi, J.K. Experimental Study on the Use of Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) and River Sand in Roof Tile Production. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1378, 042105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumi-Larbi, A.; Yunana, D.; Kamsouloum, P.; Webster, M.; Wilson, D.C.; Cheeseman, C. Recycling waste plastics in developing countries: Use of low-density polyethylene water sachets to form plastic bonded sand blocks. Waste Manag. 2018, 80, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dang, X.; Gao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, S.; Wu, H.; Wang, H.; Zhao, P. Windproof Efficiency with New Biodegradable PLA Sand Barrier and Traditional Straw Sand Barrier. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2015, 37, 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lau, K.Y.; Vaughan, A.S.; Chen, G.; Hosier, I.; Holt, A.F. On the dielectric response of silica-based polyethylene nanocomposites. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2013, 46, 095303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ahn, S.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, B.C.; Shim, K.B.; Cho, B.G. Mechanical Properties of Silica Nanoparticle Reinforced Poly (Ethylene 2, 6-Naphthalate). Macromol. Res. 2004, 12, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yadykova, A.Y.; Ilyin, S.O. Rheological and adhesive properties of nanocomposite bitumen binders based on hydrophilic or hydrophobic silica and modified with bio-oil. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 342, 127946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Moro, S.; Parneix, C.; Cabane, B.; Sanson, N.; de Lacaillerie, J.-B.D. Hydrophobization of Silica Nanoparticles in Water: Nanostructure and Response to Drying Stress. Langmuir 2017, 33, 4709–4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Krzan, M.; Jarek, E.; Petkova, H.; Santini, E.; Szyk-Warszynska, L.; Ravera, F.; Liggieri, L.; Mileva, E.; Warszynski, P. Hydrophobisation of Silica Nanoparticles Using Lauroyl Ethyl Arginate and Chitosan Mixtures to Induce the Foaming Process. Polymers 2022, 14, 4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dorigato, A.; D’Amato, M.; Pegoretti, A. Thermo-mechanical properties of high density polyethylene—fumed silica nanocomposites: Effect of filler surface area and treatment. J. Polym. Res. 2012, 19, 9889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Siraj, S.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H.; Iqbal, M.Z. Development and Mechano-Chemical Characterization of Polymer Composite Sheets Filled with Silica Microparticles with Potential in Printing Industry. Polymers 2022, 14, 3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tanniru, M.; Yuan, Q.; Misra, R. On significant retention of impact strength in clay–reinforced high-density polyethylene (HDPE) nanocomposites. Polymer 2006, 47, 2133–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alshammari, B.A.; Alenad, A.M.; Al-Mubaddel, F.S.; Alharbi, A.G.; Al-Shehri, A.S.; Albalwi, H.A.; Alsuabie, F.M.; Fouad, H.; Mourad, A.-H.I. Impact of Hybrid Fillers on the Properties of High Density Polyethylene Based Composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Agüero, Á.; Garcia-Sanoguera, D.; Lascano, D.; Rojas-Lema, S.; Ivorra-Martinez, J.; Fenollar, O.; Torres-Giner, S. Evaluation of Different Compatibilization Strategies to Improve the Performance of Injection-Molded Green Composite Pieces Made of Polylactide Reinforced with Short Flaxseed Fibers. Polymers 2020, 12, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Dalloul, F.; Mietner, J.B.; Navarro, J.R.G. Production and 3D Printing of a Nanocellulose-Based Composite Filament Composed of Polymer-Modified Cellulose Nanofibrils and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) for the Fabrication of 3D Complex Shapes. Fibers 2022, 10, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Alghamdi, M.N. Performance for Fly Ash Reinforced HDPE Composites over the Ageing of Material Components. Polymers 2022, 14, 2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rane, A.V.; Kanny, K.; Abitha, V.K.; Thomas, S. Methods for Synthesis of Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Nanocomposites. In Synthesis of Inorganic Nanomaterials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 121–139. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yazıcı, N.; Kodal, M.; Özkoç, G. Lab-Scale Twin-Screw Micro-Compounders as a New Rubber-Mixing Tool: ‘A Comparison on EPDM/Carbon Black and EPDM/Silica Composites’. Polymers 2021, 13, 4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Leprince, J.; Palin, W.; Mullier, T.; Devaux, J.; Vreven, J.; Leloup, G. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types. J. Oral Rehabil. 2010, 37, 364–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rueggeberg, F.A.; Caughman, W.F.; Curtis, J.W., Jr.; Davis, H.C. Factors Affecting Cure at Depths within Light-Activated Resin Composites. Am. J. Dent. 1993, 6, 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  65. Polyethylene High Density, Average Mw 125,000 9002-88-4. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/RS/en/product/aldrich/181900 (accessed on 19 October 2022).
  66. Polyethylene High Density Pellet | Sigma-Aldrich. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/AU/en/ (accessed on 19 October 2022).
  67. Polyethylene High Density, 2.2 g/10 Min 190 °C/2.16 kg 9002-88-4. Available online: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/ (accessed on 19 October 2022).
  68. Erbetta, C.D.C.; Manoel, G.F.; Oliveira, A.P.L.R.; Silva, M.E.S.R.E.; Freitas, R.F.S.; Sousa, R.G. Rheological and Thermal Behavior of High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) at Different Temperatures. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2014, 5, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lung, M. Stonepaper, Taiwan Lung Meng Technology Co., Ltd. Available online: http://www.taiwanlm.com/ (accessed on 17 February 2020).
  70. Peşman, E.; Tufan, M. The Effects of CaCO3 Coated Wood Free Paper Usage as Filler on Water Absorption, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Cellulose-High Density Polyethylene Composites. Mater. Sci. 2016, 22, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Mittal, V.; Chaudhry, A.U. Effect of amphiphilic compatibilizers on the filler dispersion and properties of polyethylene-thermally reduced graphene nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42484–42494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. US3788923A—Silica-Filled, High Molecular Weight Polyolefin—Google Patents. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3788923A/en (accessed on 18 February 2020).
  73. Ahmed, W.; Siraj, S.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H. 3D Printing PLA Waste to Produce Ceramic Based Particulate Reinforced Composite Using Abundant Silica-Sand: Mechanical Properties Characterization. Polymers 2020, 12, 2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. D20 Committee. Guide for Determination of Thickness of Plastic Film Test Specimens; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  75. D18 Committee. Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Density (Unit Weight) of Soil Specimens; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  76. Lee, I.K.; White, W.; Ingles, O.G. Soil Formation, Classification and Exploration. Princ. Geotech. Eng. 1983, 1, 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  77. Meyers, R.A. Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology; Academic: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  78. D20 Committee. Practice for Cutting Film and Sheeting Test Specimens; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  79. Li, Z.; Muiruri, J.K.; Thitsartarn, W.; Zhang, X.; Tan, B.H.; He, C. Biodegradable silica rubber core-shell nanoparticles and their stereocomplex for efficient PLA toughening. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 159, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kotoky, T.; Dolui, S.K. Synthesis and Characterisation of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)/Silica Hybrid Composites Derived Through the Sol-Gel Method in Aqueous Medium: Effect of Acid Content, Silica Content and Viscosity of PVA on the Dispersion Characteristics of Silica and the Physical Properties of the Composites. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2004, 29, 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  81. Peng, Z.; Kong, L.X.; Li, S.-D.; Spiridonov, P. Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Silica Nanocomposites: Morphology and Thermal Degradation Kinetics. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006, 6, 3934–3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xia, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Kan, Z.; Chen, H.; Fu, W.; Li, Z. Role of poly(ethylene glycol) grafted silica nanoparticle shape in toughened PLA-matrix nanocomposites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 168, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wen, X.; Lin, Y.; Han, C.; Zhang, K.; Ran, X.; Li, Y.; Dong, L. Thermomechanical and optical properties of biodegradable poly (L-lactide)/silica nanocomposites by melt compounding. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 114, 3379–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, L.; Ma, H.; Zhu, X.; Fan, Y.; Jin, Z. Preparation and Properties of Polylactide/Nano-silica in Situ Composites. Pigment. Resin Technol. 2010, 39, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zdiri, K.; Elamri, A.; Hamdaoui, M.; Harzallah, O.; Khenoussi, N.; Brendlé, J. Reinforcement of recycled PP polymers by nanoparticles incorporation. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2018, 11, 296–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Watanabe, R.; Sugahara, A.; Hagihara, H.; Sato, H.; Mizukado, J.; Shinzawa, H. Study of matrix-filler interaction of polypropylene/silica composite by combined infrared (IR) spectroscopic imaging and disrelation mapping. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 128, 105658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Brostow, W.; Datashvili, T.; Jiang, P.; Miller, H. Recycled HDPE reinforced with sol–gel silica modified wood sawdust. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 76, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Albano, C.; Cataño, L.; Figuera, L.; Perera, R.; Karam, A.; González, G.; Noris, K. Evaluation of a composite based on high-density polyethylene filled with surface-treated hydroxyapatite. Polym. Bull. 2008, 62, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bulatović, V.O.; Mihaljević, A.; Bajsić, E.G. Mechanical and interfacial properties of compatibilized polyurethane blends. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2017, 58, 1911–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Overview of Materials for High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), Sheet/Thermoforming Grade. Available online: https://www.matweb.com/search/ (accessed on 19 October 2022).
  91. Savini, G.; Oréfice, R.L. Comparative study of HDPE composites reinforced with microtalc and nanotalcs: High performance filler for improving ductility at low concentration levels. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 16387–16398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wangworn, P.; Wanakamol, P. Mechanical properties of compression-molded electrospun silica fiber/nylon-6 composites. Polym. Compos. 2018, 40, 1123–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rodrigue, D.; Kavianiboroujeni, A.; Cloutier, A. Determination of the optimum coupling agent content for composites based on hemp and high density polyethylene. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1914, 030003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Meng, Q.; Hetzer, M.; De Kee, D. PLA/clay/wood nanocomposites: Nanoclay effects on mechanical and thermal properties. J. Compos. Mater. 2010, 45, 1145–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tsai, P.-A.; Chiu, W.-M.; Lin, C.-E.; Wu, J.-H. Fabrication and Characterization of PLA/SiO2/Al2O3 Composites Prepared by Sol-Gel Process. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2013, 52, 1488–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rothon, R. Particulate-Filled Polymer Composites; iSmithers Rapra Publishing: Shrewsbury, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  97. Farah, S.; Anderson, D.G.; Langer, R. Physical and Mechanical Properties of PLA, and Their Functions in Widespread Applications—A Comprehensive Review. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 107, 367–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Wypych, G. Handbook of Fillers—Book Reviews. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2004, 20, 64–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Modjarrad, K.; Ebnesajjad, S. Handbook of Polymer Applications in Medicine and Medical Devices; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  100. Mishra, S.; Mitra, R.; Vijayakumar, M. Structure–property correlation in cellular silica processed through hydrophobized fused silica powder for aerospace application. J. Alloy. Compd. 2010, 504, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Flinn, D.; Guzonas, D.; Yoon, R.-H. Characterization of silica surfaces hydrophobized by octadecyltrichlorosilane. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1994, 87, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, Y.; Han, C.; Bian, J.; Han, L.; Dong, L.; Gao, G. Rheology and biodegradation of polylactide/silica nanocomposites. Polym. Compos. 2012, 33, 1719–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xiao, M.; Mohler, C.; Tucker, C.J.; Walther, B.W.; Lu, X.; Chen, Z. Structures and Adhesion Properties at Polyethylene/Silica and Polyethylene/Nylon Interfaces. Langmuir 2018, 34, 6194–6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Maris, J.; Bourdon, S.; Brossard, J.-M.; Cauret, L.; Fontaine, L.; Montembault, V. Mechanical recycling: Compatibilization of mixed thermoplastic wastes. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 147, 245–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 04830 g001 550
Figure 1. Experimental process.
Figure 1. Experimental process.
Polymers 14 04830 g001
Polymers 14 04830 g002 550
Figure 2. Sample dimensions.
Figure 2. Sample dimensions.
Polymers 14 04830 g002
Polymers 14 04830 g003 550
Figure 3. Toughness of the prepared composite sheets.
Figure 3. Toughness of the prepared composite sheets.
Polymers 14 04830 g003
Polymers 14 04830 g004 550
Figure 4. Elastic modulus of the prepared composite sheets.
Figure 4. Elastic modulus of the prepared composite sheets.
Polymers 14 04830 g004
Polymers 14 04830 g005 550
Figure 5. Ductility of the prepared composite sheets.
Figure 5. Ductility of the prepared composite sheets.
Polymers 14 04830 g005
Polymers 14 04830 g006 550
Figure 6. Tensile strength of the prepared composite sheets.
Figure 6. Tensile strength of the prepared composite sheets.
Polymers 14 04830 g006
Polymers 14 04830 g007 550
Figure 7. Composite density.
Figure 7. Composite density.
Polymers 14 04830 g007
Table
Table 1. Chosen weight percentages for sand, and HDPE.
Table 1. Chosen weight percentages for sand, and HDPE.
SampleSand (wt%)HDPE (wt%)
Sand/polymer composite sheets prepared from 25 µm and 5 µm sand particles0 wt%0100
20 wt%2080
35 wt%3565
50 wt%5050
Table
Table 2. Experimental conditions.
Table 2. Experimental conditions.
Parameters
Temperature (°C)Time (min)Particle Size (µm)Total Input (g)Screw Speed (rpm)Pressure (psi)
Melt extrusion1701525 and 54100-
Hot press compression1701025 and 51-5000
Table
Table 3. Prepared composite sheets with varying filler wt%.
Table 3. Prepared composite sheets with varying filler wt%.
0 wt%20 wt%35 wt%50 wt%
Sand/polymer composite sheets prepared from 25 µm Polymers 14 04830 i001Polymers 14 04830 i002Polymers 14 04830 i003Polymers 14 04830 i004
Sand/polymer composite sheets prepared from 5 µm Polymers 14 04830 i005Polymers 14 04830 i006Polymers 14 04830 i007
Table
Table 4. Dimensions of prepared composite sheets.
Table 4. Dimensions of prepared composite sheets.
SampleDimensions (l × w × t)
Sand/polymer composite sheets prepared from 25 µm sand particles0 wt%10 × 4 × 0.62
20 wt%10 × 4 × 0.41
35 wt%10 × 4 × 0.45
50 wt%10 × 4 × 0.57
Sand/polymer composite sheets prepared from 5 µm sand particles20 wt%10 × 4 × 0.33
35 wt%10 × 4 × 0.44
50 wt%10 × 4 × 0.53
Table
Table 5. SEM images of 25 µm, 5 µm, 0 wt%, and 35 wt% were prepared from both particle sizes.
Table 5. SEM images of 25 µm, 5 µm, 0 wt%, and 35 wt% were prepared from both particle sizes.
25 µmPolymers 14 04830 i008Polymers 14 04830 i009
5 µmPolymers 14 04830 i010Polymers 14 04830 i011
SheetsPolymers 14 04830 i012
Pure HDPE		Polymers 14 04830 i013
35 wt%, 25 µm		Polymers 14 04830 i014
35 wt%, 5 µm
Table
Table 6. Mechanical properties of the composite sheets.
Table 6. Mechanical properties of the composite sheets.
SampleToughness (MPa)Elastic Modulus (MPa)Ductility (%)Tensile Strength (MPa)
0 wt%643.5 ± 40.31200.77 ± 127.3215 ± 49.533.76 ± 6.2
Sand/polymer composite sheets prepared from 25 µm sand particles20 wt%810.75 ± 8.11298.33 ± 169.829.67 ± 1.4120.23 ± 3.5
35 wt%44.80 ± 15.91182.33 ± 328.43.7 ± 0.7218.96 ± 5.5
50 wt%26.85 ± 22.7905.72 ± 343.13.25 ± 1.349.93 ± 4.7
Sand/polymer composite sheets prepared from 5 µm sand particles20 wt%217.33 ± 42.4950.59 ± 86.620.67 ± 0.5821.56 ± 0.6
35 wt%95.33 ± 38.6887.47 ± 96.211.87 ± 4.5117.28 ± 2.8
50 wt%18.85 ± 1.61137.05 ± 8.22.07 ± 0.2516.3 ± 1.48
Table
Table 7. Composite density of the composite sheets.
Table 7. Composite density of the composite sheets.
SampleComposite Density Theoretical
(kg/m3)		Composite Density for Sheets with 25 µm
(kg/m3)		Composite Density for Sheets with 5 µm
(kg/m3)
0 wt%980.00812.5812.5
20 wt%992.80766.14750.0
35 wt%1002.62772.92 767.71
50 wt%1012.64788.82780.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siraj, S.; Al-Marzouqi, A.H.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Ahmed, W. Impact of Micro Silica Filler Particle Size on Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Based Composite Material. Polymers 2022, 14, 4830. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224830

AMA Style

Siraj S, Al-Marzouqi AH, Iqbal MZ, Ahmed W. Impact of Micro Silica Filler Particle Size on Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Based Composite Material. Polymers. 2022; 14(22):4830. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224830

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siraj, Sidra, Ali H. Al-Marzouqi, Muhammad Z. Iqbal, and Waleed Ahmed. 2022. "Impact of Micro Silica Filler Particle Size on Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Based Composite Material" Polymers 14, no. 22: 4830. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224830

APA Style

Siraj, S., Al-Marzouqi, A. H., Iqbal, M. Z., & Ahmed, W. (2022). Impact of Micro Silica Filler Particle Size on Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Based Composite Material. Polymers, 14(22), 4830. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224830

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop