Next Article in Journal
Development of Natural Fibre-Reinforced Semi-Finished Products with Bio-Based Matrix for Eco-Friendly Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Adult Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells on 3D Silk Fibroin Nonwovens Release Exosomes Enriched in Angiogenic and Growth-Promoting Factors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphology and Degradation of Multicompartment Microparticles Based on Semi-Crystalline Polystyrene-block-Polybutadiene-block-Poly(L-lactide) Triblock Terpolymers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Block Copolymers with Crystallizable Blocks: Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Applications

1
Macromolecular Chemistry II and Bavarian Polymer Institute, Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
2
Institute of Physical Chemistry, Universität Hamburg, Grindelallee 117, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
3
Institute of Membrane Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(4), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14040696
Submission received: 31 January 2022 / Accepted: 8 February 2022 / Published: 11 February 2022

Abstract

:
Block copolymers with crystallizable blocks are a highly interesting class of materials owing to their unique self-assembly behaviour both in bulk and solution. This Special Issue brings together new developments in the synthesis and self-assembly of semicrystalline block copolymers and also addresses potential applications of these exciting materials.

Block copolymers bearing one or more crystallizable blocks have moved into the focus of current research owing to their unique self-assembly behaviour both in bulk and in solution. The bulk morphology and, hence, the properties of semicrystalline block copolymers are influenced by a complex interplay between crystallization and micro phase separation. Depending on the segregation strength (confinement) in the melt, crystallization can either be confined in the pre-existing microphase-separated morphology for strongly segregated melts, whereas for weakly segregated systems, a “breakout crystallization” can occur, which overwrites any existing morphology leading exclusively to lamellar structures [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. This opens a broad parameter space for tuning the properties of semicrystalline block copolymers in bulk. First studies on semicrystalline AB diblock, ABA triblock and multiblock copolymers with one crystallizable block based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), polyester blocks like poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), or polyethylene (PE, based on hydrogenated poly(1,4-butadiene)) have already been reported in the mid-1970s to 1980s [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. An important milestone in this field was the development of ABC triblock terpolymers with one or two crystallizable blocks based on polystyrene-block-poly(1,4-butadiene)-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) (SBC) and the corresponding hydrogenated analogues with PE middle blocks (SEC), reported first by the group of R. Stadler in 1996 and 1998, respectively, and intensively studied thereafter together with the group of A. J. Müller [18,19,20,21,22]. Shortly after, in 1998, Floudas et al. reported on the first µ-ABC miktoarm star terpolymer with two crystallizable PEO and PCL blocks [23]. An important and technically highly relevant application of block copolymers with crystallizable blocks are thermoplastic elastomers. Here, ABC triblock terpolymers with a glassy polystyrene and a semicrystalline PE end block were shown to exhibit superior elastic properties compared to conventional amorphous ABA-type thermoplastic elastomers at moderate deformations [24,25]. Additionally, commercially available multiblock copolymers with semicrystalline polyamide or polyester hard blocks and polyether-based soft blocks are well-known thermoplastic elastomers and have inspired the development of more complex multiblock copolymers with improved elasticity employing well-defined ABA triblock copolymers as soft segments [26]. Some of the semicrystalline multiblock copolymers containing polyether segments, especially poly(ethylene oxide) segments, also attracted interest for gas separation membranes [27,28,29]. New synthetic concepts give access to even more complex block copolymer architectures such as triblock or tetrablock copolymers with three or even four different crystallizable blocks, [30,31] as well as to the implementation of new semicrystalline blocks, e.g., poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) [32]. Some of these recent developments are addressed in this Special Issue.
Crystallization-driven self-assembly (CDSA) of block copolymers with one core-forming, crystallizable block has developed to an extremely active and innovative field of research, starting from the first observation of defined cylindrical micelles with crystalline poly(ferrocenyl dimethylsilane) (PFS) cores in 1998 [33] and following the development of living CDSA in the groups of I. Manners and M. A. Winnik [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. This paved the way to a myriad of crystalline-core micellar structures and hierarchical super-structures that were not accessible before via the self-assembly of fully amorphous block copolymers, e.g., cylindrical micelles with defined length, length distribution, and corona chemistries (block type or patchy corona), branched micelles, non-centrosym metric cylindrical micelles, and fascinating micellar superstructures (e.g., 2D lenticular platelets, scarf-shaped micelles, multidimensional micellar assemblies, cross and “wind mill”-like supermicelles). Another intriguing material class is based on amphiphilic crystalline-core micelles with poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) or corresponding stereocomplexes (PLLA/PDLA (poly(D-lactide)), showing interesting potential for biomedical applications, such as controlled release and drug delivery [43,44].
This Special Issue brings together new developments in the synthesis and self-assembly (bulk and solution) of block copolymers with crystallizable blocks, including emerging applications of these exciting materials. In a fundamental work, Rahman studied the use of semicrystalline multiblock copolymer membranes with polyether soft segments for hydrocarbon separation [45]. The permeability of hydrocarbons was found to decrease with the number of carbons and polytetrahydrofuran (PTHF)-based systems were superior to PEO-based systems in terms of permeability and permselectivity, making these systems interesting for applications in the petrochemical industry. In addition, the lower performance of multiblock copolymers with longer PEO soft segments was attributed to partial PEO crystallization. The combination of homologation (C1 polymerization) with ring-opening (ROP) or iodine transfer polymerization (ITP) is a facile route to block copolymers with polymethylene (structurally identical to PE) blocks. Hadjichristidis and Müller et al. utilized this approach to synthesize PE-b-PEO-b-PCL triblock terpolymers, in which all three blocks are able to crystallize. Here, PE crystallizes first upon cooling from the phase-separated melt followed by PCL and PEO [46]. They note that a combination of different characterization techniques (DSC, WAXS, PLOM) is necessary to fully deduce the complex behaviour of triple crystalline triblock terpolymers. In a joint work with Maiz et al. phase transitions in PE-b-PVDF diblock copolymers and blends were studied [47]. Due to the polymorphic nature of semicrystalline PVDF control over crystal structure is crucial, as for example the piezoelectric and ferroelectric β-phase is interesting for applications in electronic devices or renewable energies.Compared to PVDF homopolymer the formation of the β-phase was found to be strongly promoted in PE-b-PVDF diblock copolymers at low cooling rates. Living, stereoselective olefin polymerization is an efficient method for the synthesis of double crystalline diblock copolymers with PE and sPP (syndiotactic polypropylene) blocks, as described by De Rosa et al. [48]. By using selective crystalline substrates for the epitaxial crystallization of PE (benzoic acid) and sPP (p-terphenyl), well-ordered morphologies with crystalline lamellae of PE and sPP highly oriented along one direction are accessible. A relatively new approach is the evaporation-induced confinement assembly (EICA) of semicrystalline block copolymers in microemulsions that after solvent evaporation gives rise to microparticles with confinement specific morphologies, e.g., helical cylinders or axially stacked rings. In this context, Gröschel and Schmalz et al. have studied the confinement assembly of a series of PS-b-PB-b-PLLA triblock terpolymers [49]. It turned out that over a broad composition range, microparticles with predominantly hexagonally packed core–shell cylinders consisting of a PLLA core, a PB shell and a PS matrix were formed, which upon hydrolysis of the PLLA block resulted in highly porous microparticles with pronounced surface corrugations.
Considering the CDSA of block copolymers with crystallizable blocks in solution, this Special Issue includes two reviews focussing on the preparation and application of micelles with a patch-like microphase-separated (patchy) corona [50], as well as on glycine-based diblock copolypeptoids [51], respectively. Patchy micelles can be prepared by CDSA of triblock terpolymers with crystallizable middle blocks and two incompatible amorphous end blocks, or from mixtures of diblock copolymers with one common crystallizable block. Owing to their unique corona structure, patchy micelles can be utilized as highly efficient surfactants and blend compatibilizers, as nanoparticle templates, and in heterogeneous catalysis. Polypeptoids with N-substituted polyglycine backbones are a promising class of materials as, in contrast to natural polypeptides, they provide a good thermal stability, solubility in organic solvents and protease stability. This can be attributed to the absence of hydrogen bonding and stereogenic centres. Crystallinity can be easily tuned by the length of the alkyl substituents, giving rise to bioinspired worm-like 1D nanofibrils, nanorods and nanosheets. In an intriguing study, Reiter et al. prepared stacked lamellar crystals from a PS-b-PEO diblock copolymer in solution using a self-seeding approach [52]. By varying the diblock copolymer concentration and employed self-seeding temperature control over size, the number of platelet-like crystals and even the number of stacked lamellae in the crystals was achieved. A seed-trapping protocol was developed by Guerin and Winnik et al. to study the impact of seed fragmentation on CDSA to cylindrical micelles at elevated temperatures, where both seed dissolution and fragmentation occur [53]. Seed fragmentation was found to increase with annealing time at elevated temperatures, resulting in a decrease in length of the regrown cylindrical micelles. Furthermore, kinetics follow a stretched exponential that might indicate a fractionation upon crystallization as the rate of unimer addition to the seeds depends on the length and fraction of the crystallizable block. Finally, going toward potential applications in tissue engineering, a systematic study on the reinforcement of alginate hydrogel matrices with fibre-like micelles prepared by living CDSA of a PCL-b-PMMA-b-PDMA triblock terpolymer (PMMA = poly(methyl methacrylate); PDMA = poly(N,N-dimethyl acrylamide)) is presented by Dove and O’Reilly et al. [54]. Varying the micelle length and concentration in the hydrogel revealed an optimum fibre micelle length of 500 nm at a loading of 0.1 wt%, resulting in a significantly increased strain at flow of 37%.
In summary, the manuscripts in this Special Issue provide a nice overview of the recent developments in block copolymers with crystallizable blocks, spanning from synthesis to self-assembly approaches and potential applications.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Loo, Y.L.; Register, R.A.; Ryan, A.J. Modes of crystallization in block copolymer microdomains: Breakout, templated, and confined. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 2365–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Müller, A.J.; Balsamo, V.; Arnal, M.L.; Jakob, T.; Schmalz, H.; Abetz, V. Homogeneous nucleation and fractionated crystallization in block copolymers. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 3048–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. van Horn, R.M.; Steffen, M.R.; O’Connor, D. Recent progress in block copolymer crystallization. Polym. Cryst. 2018, 1, 10039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sangroniz, L.; Wang, B.; Su, Y.; Liu, G.; Cavallo, D.; Wang, D.; Müller, A.J. Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021, 115, 101376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Loo, Y.-L.; Register, R.A. Crystallization within block copolymer mesophases. In Developments in Block Copolymer Science and Technology; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2004; pp. 213–243. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, S.; Register, R.A. Crystallization in copolymers. In Handbook of Polymer Crystallization; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 327–346. [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, S.; Jiang, S. Structures and morphologies of biocompatible and biodegradable block copolymers. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 24566–24583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Castillo, R.V.; Müller, A.J. Crystallization and morphology of biodegradable or biostable single and double crystalline block copolymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 516–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, W.N.; Xu, J.T. Crystallization assisted self-assembly of semicrystalline block copolymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1350–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Herman, J.-J.; Jérome, R.; Teyssié, P.; Gervais, M.; Gallot, B. Structural study on styrene/ε-caprolactone block copolymers in absence and in presence of a solvent of the polystyrene block. Die Makromol. Chem. 1981, 182, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gervais, M.; Gallot, B. Structural study of polybutadiene-poly(ethylene oxide) block copolymers. Influence of the nature of the amorphous block on the refolding of the poly(ethylene oxide) chains. Die Makromol. Chem. 1977, 178, 1577–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morton, M.; Lee, N.-C.; Terrill, E.R. Elastomeric polydiene ABA triblock copolymers with crystalline end blocks. In ACS Symposium Series; Mark, J.E., Lal, J., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1982; pp. 101–118. [Google Scholar]
  13. O’Malley, J.J.; Stauffer, W.J. Morphology and properties of crystalline polyester-siloxane block copolymers. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1977, 17, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hirata, E.; Ijitsu, T.; Soen, T.; Hashimoto, T.; Kawai, H. Domain structure and crystalline morphology of AB and ABA type block copolymers of ethylene oxide and isoprene cast from solutions. Polymer 1975, 16, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Robitaille, C.; Prud’homme, J. Thermal and mechanical properties of a poly(ethylene oxide-b-isoprene-b-ethylene oxide) block polymer complexed with NaSCN. Macromolecules 1983, 16, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heuschen, J.; Jérôme, R.; Teyssié, P. Polycaprolactone-based block copolymers. II. Morphology and crystallization of copolymers of styrene or butadiene and ε-caprolactone. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1989, 27, 523–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Donth, E.; Kretzschmar, H.; Schulze, G.; Garg, D.; Höring, S.; Ulbricht, J. Influence of the chain-end mobility on the melt crystallization of the ethylene oxide (B) sequences in systems containing diblock AB and triblock ABA copolymers with methyl methacrylate (A). Acta Polym. 1987, 38, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balsamo, V.; von Gyldenfeldt, F.; Stadler, R. Synthesis of SBC, SC and BC block copolymers based on polystyrene (S), polybutadiene (B) and a crystallizable poly(ε-caprolactone) (C) block. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Balsamo, V.; von Gyldenfeldt, F.; Stadler, R. Thermal behavior and spherulitic superstructures of SBC triblock copolymers based on polystyrene (S), polybutadiene (B) and a crystallizable poly(ε-caprolactone) (C) block. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 3317–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Balsamo, V.; von Gyldenfeldt, F.; Stadler, R. “Superductile” semicrystalline ABC triblock copolymers with the polystyrene block (A) as the matrix. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 1226–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Balsamo, V.; Stadler, R. Ellipsoidal core-shell cylindrical microphases in PS-b-PB-b-PCL triblock copolymers with a crystallizable matrix. Macromol. Symp. 1997, 117, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Balsamo, V.; Müller, A.J.; von Gyldenfeldt, F.; Stadler, R. Ternary ABC block copolymers based on one glassy and two crystallizable blocks: Polystyrene-block-polyethylene-block-poly(ε-caprolactone). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1998, 199, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Floudas, G.; Reiter, G.; Lambert, O.; Dumas, P. Structure and dynamics of structure formation in model triarm star block copolymers of polystyrene, poly(ethylene oxide), and poly(ε-caprolactone). Macromolecules 1998, 31, 7279–7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schmalz, H.; Böker, A.; Lange, R.; Krausch, G.; Abetz, V. Synthesis and properties of ABA and ABC triblock copolymers with glassy (A), elastomeric (B), and crystalline (C) blocks. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 8720–8729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schmalz, H.; Abetz, V.; Lange, R. Thermoplastic elastomers based on semicrystalline block copolymers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1179–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schmalz, H.; van Guldener, V.; Gabriëlse, W.; Lange, R.; Abetz, V. Morphology, surface structure, and elastic properties of PBT-based copolyesters with PEO-b-PEB-b-PEO triblock copolymer soft segments. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 5491–5499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rahman, M.M.; Shishatskiy, S.; Abetz, C.; Georgopanos, P.; Neumann, S.; Khan, M.M.; Filiz, V.; Abetz, V. Influence of temperature upon properties of tailor-made PEBAX® MH 1657 nanocomposite membranes for post-combustion CO2 capture. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 469, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Rahman, M.M.; Lillepärg, J.; Neumann, S.; Shishatskiy, S.; Abetz, V. A thermodynamic study of CO2 sorption and thermal transition of PolyActiveTM under elevated pressure. Polymer 2016, 93, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rahman, M.M.; Abetz, C.; Shishatskiy, S.; Martin, J.; Müller, A.J.; Abetz, V. CO2 selective PolyActive membrane: Thermal transitions and gas permeance as a function of thickness. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 26733–26744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ladelta, V.; Zapsas, G.; Abou-Hamad, E.; Gnanou, Y.; Hadjichristidis, N. Tetracrystalline tetrablock quarterpolymers: Four different crystallites under the same roof. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 16267–16274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Palacios, J.K.; Mugica, A.; Zubitur, M.; Iturrospe, A.; Arbe, A.; Liu, G.; Wang, D.; Zhao, J.; Hadjichristidis, N.; Müller, A.J. Sequential crystallization and morphology of triple crystalline biodegradable PEO-b-PCL-b-PLLA triblock terpolymers. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 4739–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Voet, V.S.D.; Tichelaar, M.; Tanase, S.; Mittelmeijer-Hazeleger, M.C.; ten Brinke, G.; Loos, K. Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/nickel nanocomposites from semicrystalline block copolymer precursors. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Massey, J.; Power, K.N.; Manners, I.; Winnik, M.A. Self-assembly of a novel organometallic-inorganic block copolymer in solution and the solid state: Nonintrusive observation of novel wormlike poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane)-b-poly(dimethyl siloxane) micelles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9533–9540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. MacFarlane, L.; Zhao, C.; Cai, J.; Qiu, H.; Manners, I. Emerging applications for living crystallization-driven self-assembly. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 4661–4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ganda, S.; Stenzel, M.H. Concepts, fabrication methods and applications of living crystallization-driven self-assembly of block copolymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020, 101, 101195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Harniman, R.; Winnik, M.; Manners, I. Hierarchical assembly of cylindrical block comicelles mediated by spatially confined hydrogen-bonding interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12902–12912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Boott, C.E.; Hayward, D.W.; Harniman, R.; Whittell, G.R.; Richardson, R.M.; Winnik, M.A.; Manners, I. “Cross” supermicelles via the hierarchical assembly of amphiphilic cylindrical triblock comicelles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4087–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Crassous, J.J.; Schurtenberger, P.; Ballauff, M.; Mihut, A.M. Design of block copolymer micelles via crystallization. Polymer 2015, 62, A1–A13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jia, L.; Zhao, G.; Shi, W.; Coombs, N.; Gourevich, I.; Walker, G.C.; Guerin, G.; Manners, I.; Winnik, M.A. A design strategy for the hierarchical fabrication of colloidal hybrid mesostructures. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rupar, P.A.; Chabanne, L.; Winnik, M.A.; Manners, I. Non-centrosymmetric cylindrical micelles by unidirectional growth. Science 2012, 337, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gilroy, J.B.; Gädt, T.; Whittell, G.R.; Chabanne, L.; Mitchels, J.M.; Richardson, R.M.; Winnik, M.A.; Manners, I. Monodisperse cylindrical micelles by crystallization-driven living self-assembly. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gädt, T.; Ieong, N.S.; Cambridge, G.; Winnik, M.A.; Manners, I. Complex and hierarchical micelle architectures from diblock copolymers using living, crystallization-driven polymerizations. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Petzetakis, N.; Dove, A.P.; O’Reilly, R.K. Cylindrical micelles from the living crystallization-driven self-assembly of poly(lactide)-containing block copolymers. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Inam, M.; Cambridge, G.; Pitto-Barry, A.; Laker, Z.P.L.; Wilson, N.R.; Mathers, R.T.; Dove, A.P.; O’Reilly, R.K. 1D vs. 2D shape selectivity in the crystallization-driven self-assembly of polylactide block copolymers. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4223–4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Rahman, M.M. Membrane separation of gaseous hydrocarbons by semicrystalline multiblock copolymers: Role of cohesive energy density and crystallites of the polyether block. Polymers 2021, 13, 4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Matxinandiarena, E.; Múgica, A.; Zubitur, M.; Ladelta, V.; Zapsas, G.; Cavallo, D.; Hadjichristidis, N.; Müller, A.J. Crystallization and morphology of triple crystalline polyethylene-b-poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) PE-b-PEO-b-PCL triblock terpolymers. Polymers 2021, 13, 3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. María, N.; Maiz, J.; Martínez-Tong, D.E.; Alegria, A.; Algarni, F.; Zapzas, G.; Hadjichristidis, N.; Müller, A.J. Phase transitions in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polymethylene-based diblock copolymers and blends. Polymers 2021, 13, 2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Rosa, C.; Di Girolamo, R.; Cicolella, A.; Talarico, G.; Scoti, M. Double crystallization and phase separation in polyethylene—syndiotactic polypropylene di-block copolymers. Polymers 2021, 13, 2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Janoszka, N.; Azhdari, S.; Hils, C.; Coban, D.; Schmalz, H.; Gröschel, A.H. Morphology and degradation of multicompartment microparticles based on semi-crystalline polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-poly(L-lactide) triblock terpolymers. Polymers 2021, 13, 4358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hils, C.; Manners, I.; Schöbel, J.; Schmalz, H. Patchy micelles with a crystalline core: Self-assembly concepts, properties, and applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, N.; Zhang, D. Solution self-assembly of coil-crystalline diblock copolypeptoids bearing alkyl side chains. Polymers 2021, 13, 3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bessif, B.; Pfohl, T.; Reiter, G. Self-seeding procedure for obtaining stacked block copolymer lamellar crystals in solution. Polymers 2021, 13, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guerin, G.; Rupar, P.A.; Winnik, M.A. In-depth analysis of the effect of fragmentation on the crystallization-driven self-assembly growth kinetics of 1D micelles studied by seed trapping. Polymers 2021, 13, 3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, Z.; Pearce, A.K.; Dove, A.P.; O’Reilly, R.K. Precise tuning of polymeric fiber dimensions to enhance the mechanical properties of alginate hydrogel matrices. Polymers 2021, 13, 2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schmalz, H.; Abetz, V. Block Copolymers with Crystallizable Blocks: Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14040696

AMA Style

Schmalz H, Abetz V. Block Copolymers with Crystallizable Blocks: Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Applications. Polymers. 2022; 14(4):696. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14040696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schmalz, Holger, and Volker Abetz. 2022. "Block Copolymers with Crystallizable Blocks: Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Applications" Polymers 14, no. 4: 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14040696

APA Style

Schmalz, H., & Abetz, V. (2022). Block Copolymers with Crystallizable Blocks: Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Applications. Polymers, 14(4), 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14040696

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop