Next Article in Journal
In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of a Polycaprolactone (PCL)/Polylactic-Co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) (80:20) Scaffold for Improved Treatment of Chondral (Cartilage) Injuries
Previous Article in Journal
Gelatin/Na2Ti3O7 Nanocomposite Scaffolds: Mechanical Properties and Characterization for Tissue Engineering Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks

1
The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST), Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
2
Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Jinan 250012, China
3
Department of Stomatology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
4
School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325015, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2023, 15(10), 2323; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102323
Submission received: 8 March 2023 / Revised: 7 May 2023 / Accepted: 9 May 2023 / Published: 16 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Functional Polymer Materials)

Abstract

:
The complex or compromised bone defects caused by osteomyelitis, malignant tumors, metastatic tumors, skeletal abnormalities, and systemic diseases are difficult to be self-repaired, leading to a non-union fracture. With the increasing demands of bone transplantation, more and more attention has been paid to artificial bone substitutes. As biopolymer-based aerogel materials, nanocellulose aerogels have been widely utilized in bone tissue engineering. More importantly, nanocellulose aerogels not only mimic the structure of the extracellular matrix but could also deliver drugs and bioactive molecules to promote tissue healing and growth. Here, we reviewed the most recent literature about nanocellulose-based aerogels, summarized the preparation, modification, composite fabrication, and applications of nanocellulose-based aerogels in bone tissue engineering, as well as giving special focus to the current limitations and future opportunities of nanocellulose aerogels for bone tissue engineering.

1. Introduction

As a common clinical disease, large-sized bone defects caused by trauma, infection, tumor, surgical debridement of osteomyelitis, and congenital diseases destroy the structural integrity of bone and have caused an urgent demand for highly effective bone substitutes in the coming years [1,2,3,4,5]. Strategies for repairing bone defects include distraction osteogenesis, autologous bone transplantation, allogeneic bone graft, and artificial grafts [2]. Currently, the gold standard approach is autologous graft transplantation, which has been widely used in clinical practice due to its advantages of non-immunogenic, histocompatibility, and excellent osteogenic ability [6]. However, the limited sources and secondary injury in the donor site have limited the usage of autologous bone grafts [5,6,7]. The application of distraction osteogenesis has also been hindered by a low success rate, long healing period, and narrow range of application [8]. Although allogeneic bone grafts partially overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks of autologous bone graft and distraction osteogenesis, they have also faced the risks of immune rejection, transplant site infection, and the poor qualities of the generated bone tissues [9,10,11].
Bone tissue engineering (BTE), which is based on the principles of biology and engineering, has been widely utilized in recent years to construct a substitute to repair and improve the function of bone [12]. This process is to seed enough seeding cells onto the artificial scaffolds to construct tissue-engineered compounds in vitro and then to regenerate the newly formed tissues in vivo. Therefore, successful BTE depends on enough undifferentiated cells, biomimetic scaffolds, and signaling molecules that induce cell differentiation [13], and the tissue-engineered scaffolds are expected to replace other existing bone grafts due to evident advantages such as unlimited supply and controllable physiochemical or mechanical properties [2,14,15,16].
In recent years, higher requirements for tissue-engineered biomaterials have promoted the design and development of double-pore (major pores with sizes ranging from 50 to 150 μm and minor pores with a size smaller than 20 μm) biomaterials. Compared with the traditional fully random porous structure, the double-pore scaffold system has significant advantages in BTE [17]. As an excellent double-pore scaffold, the minor pores (20–50 μm) of aerogels and their connectivity in 3D nanostructures facilitate cell attachment, and additionally, major pores (>50 μm) provide nutrient and oxygen channels to cells [18,19,20]. The controllable porous structure and designable flexibility and shape memory of aerogels have significant advantages in repairing bone defects, especially for those with irregular shapes [21].
Traditional aerogels are generally prepared based on inorganic components such as silica and metal oxide, while the mechanical brittleness of these inorganic aerogels severely limits their application in BTE [22]. The new generation of aerogels is mainly based on polysaccharide organic aerogels that appeared in the early 21st century. Compared with silica aerogels, the breaking of polysaccharide aerogels under compression is relatively difficult [23]. Among them, nanocellulose-based aerogels exhibited flexibility, repeatability, degradability, and excellent biocompatibility [24].
Cellulose aerogel is known as “the third-generation aerogel material” and has a great potential for BTE [25,26,27,28]. Recent studies have frequently focused on nanocellulose-based materials for the fabrication of degradable scaffolds and tissue regeneration [1,27,29]. However, the hydrophilicity, poor mechanical properties, and poor osteoconductive properties of nanocellulose aerogels restrict their applications in the field of BTE [30]. Notably, the modification and composition of the preparation procedures of nanocellulose aerogels can overcome these drawbacks to a certain degree [31]. Nanocellulose aerogels have special advantages in promoting tissue healing, and their composite has huge potential in manufacturing biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering [27,32]. In general, nanocellulose aerogels could be utilized alone and combined with other components, active molecules, and seed cells in various sources for BTE [33,34,35,36]. In this paper, we summarized the preparation and modification methods of nanocellulose aerogels, discussed the advantages of nanocellulose aerogels in drug loading and biomimetic manufacturing, and, finally, put forward their remaining limitations and future development.

2. Preparation and Characteristics of Nanocellulose Aerogels

Aerogel, as one of the highly porous scaffolds, is made from various kinds of organic or inorganic biomaterials and exhibits a large surface-to-volume ratio and highly interconnected pore structure [37]. Along with their great progress in the past decades, aerogels have been attractive for their utilization in biomedical applications, such as tissue engineering, drug delivery systems, and tissue regeneration. However, the high requirements on the tissue-engineered scaffolds accelerated the design and fabrication of bioactive aerogels by promoting the attachment, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of seeding cells, which played vital roles in their applications for BTE.

2.1. Isolation of Nanocellulose

Cellulose, as an insoluble and hydrophilic polysaccharide polymer containing a glucopyranose ring unit bound by a β-(1,4) glycosidic linkage [38], has a wide range of sources and can be extracted from plants, bacteria, and algae in nature [39,40]. The molecular formula of cellulose is (C6H10O5) n, consisting of β-D-glucose units. Each unit contains three hydroxyl groups, with one primary hydroxyl group located at C6 and two secondary hydroxyl groups situated at C2 and C3. The reactivity of these hydroxyl sites enables the modification and functionalization of cellulose. The degree of polymerization, n, varies depending on the source of cellulose as well as the methods employed for isolation and purification [41]. Nanocellulose is the nanoscale cellulose obtained by the physical and chemical treatment of cellulose. The preparation of nanocellulose materials from raw cellulose is divided into two stages. The first step is the purification that removes lignin, hemicellulose, and impurities from the raw material and the second step is to separate these pretreated cellulose materials to form a nanoscale cellulose material [42]. Hydrolysis plays a crucial role in pretreating cellulose by catalyzing the breakdown of β-D-glucose units into monosaccharides or oligosaccharides through water addition, with assistance from strong acids, alkalis, or enzymes [43]. Strong acids such as hydrochloric and sulfuric acid promote the acidic hydrolysis of cellulose to yield glucose and oligosaccharides. Under basic conditions, sodium hydroxide promotes alkaline breakdown [44].

2.2. Purification of Nanocellulose

Purification methods of cellulose include enzymatic hydrolysis, mechanical and chemical treatments including alkaline–acid pretreatment, oxidation, and ionic liquid treatment [45,46]. Cellulose can be oxygenated and separated at low temperatures using a CuCl2-NaClO2-MgCl2 solution, or through strong acid-based methods such as nitric acid and sodium hydroxide. These chemical oxidation methods can induce chemical reactions, such as carboxylation, hydroxylation, esterification, etc., thus altering the properties of cellulose and making it more convenient for subsequent processing and utilization [47]. The choice of purification method depends on the sources of cellulose. For example, the alkaline–acid pretreatment is suitable for soy hull fibers or wheat straw cellulose. The ionic liquid treatment can be selected when bagasse is used as a source of cellulose [48]. The method of enzymatic hydrolysis can separate fibers through the laccase degradation of lignin and hemicellulose. Mechanical treatment, including high-pressure homogenization, ultrasonic, freezing crushing, micro-jet mean and grinding methods, would generate a critical pressure at the center of the fibrous material and break the interaction between cellulose fibers [49]. Among them, the ultrasonic and high-pressure homogenization techniques have no significant effect on the physical and chemical properties of cellulose materials [50]. Although mechanical treatment has the above-mentioned advantages in the fabrication of nanocellulose materials, it is still powerless in scale-up processing. Consequently, many large-scale preparation methods of nanocellulose were developed, such as electrostatic spinning, melt-blown spinning, wet spinning, dry spinning, and gas foaming [25,51]. Gas foaming refers to a technique whereby an inert gas foaming agent is incorporated into the polymer phase, leading to the formation of gas bubbles inside 2D scaffolds via a series of chemical reactions. This results in the expansion of interconnected pores within the scaffolds [52]. The aerogels could also be prepared by the technology of gas foaming to reassemble the tightly packed 2D electrospinning nanofibers into fluffy 3D scaffolds with high porosity and large pores [35]. Although the 3D aerogels prepared by the gas foaming method showed great promise in BTE, there are still very few studies to fabricate nanocellulose-based aerogels via the technology of gas foaming. The subsequent research should focus on this field.

2.3. Various Kinds of Nanocellulose

Nanocellulose refers to nanoscale cellulose, and they comprise cellulose nanofiber (CNF), cellulose nanocrystalline (CNC), and bacterial cellulose (BC) [49]. CNF, with crystalline and amorphous regions, is obtained by the chemical removal of hemicellulose and then acid hydrolysis or mechanical treatment. The amorphous region of CNF contributes to its flexibility and plasticity, while the crystalline region contributes to its stiffness and elasticity [45]. CNC is a highly crystalline and needle-like structure obtained by sulfuric acid hydrolysis [48]. BC is produced by Gram-negative acetic acid bacteria from low molecular weight carbon sources which is completely free of lignin and hemicellulose [53].
The mechanical properties of CNF are higher than those of CNC and BC. Cellulose nanofibers with a higher mechanical strength can be obtained by sequential self-assembly strategies [54,55]. In addition, the self-assembly of nanocellulose might lead to inhomogeneous dispersion in non-polar solvents. The hydrogen bonds between the nanocellulose network are dynamic and could be broken and reorganized when they were stretched, which improved the performance of the nanocellulose materials [56]. As to the aerogels with a high CNF content, the porous structures might result in a higher density due to the continuous self-assembly.

2.4. Fabrication Steps for Nanocellulose Aerogels

The preparation of nanocellulose aerogels generally includes three processes: preparation of a polymer in the solvent, sol–gel polymerization by crosslinking, and gel-drying [26,57,58] (Figure 1).

2.4.1. Preparation of Nanocellulose Polymer Dispersion

The first step to constructing the nanocellulose-based aerogels is to prepare an aqueous nanocellulose-based suspension/gel by dispersing the raw nanocellulose materials into the dispersion. Due to the existence of an abundant active hydroxyl group on the surface of nanocellulose, it is easy to form intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonds among the nanocellulose-based scaffolds [59]. Therefore, nanocellulose is difficult to disperse in an aqueous solution uniformly and tends to self-assemble and produce an entangled or 3D networks scaffold in the first step. To conquer this problem, some negatively charged groups can be introduced onto the nanocellulose surface to form a uniform nanocellulose dispersion in water by electrostatic repulsion [60,61]. For instance, a methylcellulose additive effectively eliminated delamination during the process of homogenization and prevented the aggregation of nanocrystals in the cellulose dispersion [62].

2.4.2. Sol–Gel Transition

During the process of sol–gel transition, the stable nanocellulose was formed by transformation from a liquid polymer to a solid gel after chemical, physical, or enzymatic crosslinking. Crosslinking is a stabilization process which connects the functional groups of a polymer chain to another functional group through covalent bonds or non-covalent bonds, and finally leads to a network structure [63]. Crosslinking of the nanocellulose polymer can not only form a more stable 3D structure and improve the properties of the biomaterials in BTE, but also result in undesirable changes and cytotoxicity [64,65,66]. Chemical crosslinking through chemical reactions, producing irreversible covalent linkages between the cellulose molecules such as esterification reactions and salinization [67]. Physical crosslinking of nanocellulose began with the physical interactions between polymers such as ion–ion interaction, metal coordination, hydrogen bonding, host–guest interaction, p–p stacking, dehydration heat treatment, and ultraviolet treatment [67,68]. For example, inorganic salts and metal ions can be physically added to nanocellulose dispersions to form reversible crosslinks [69,70]. Compared with chemical crosslinkers, physical crosslinkers have a lower toxicity and higher biocompatibility. However, chemical crosslinkers could improve the mechanical properties of cellulose and are suitable for large bone defects [71]. An enzymatic crosslinking method utilizes specific enzymes to catalyze the polymer under specific conditions, and this process can usually be controlled by changing the temperature, pH, or ionic strength [72]. However, enzyme crosslinking cannot be scale-up used and is limited in the treatment of large bone defects due to its high cost (Table 1). If more than one type of crosslinking method was applied in fabricating cellulose aerogel, a more stable network structure could usually be achieved. This technology is called dual or multicrosslinking.

2.4.3. Gel-Drying

Gel-drying refers to the replacement of aqueous in the nanocellulose gel by air to obtain an aerogel after the dispersion and gelation of nanocellulose. The key to successfully preparing nanocellulose-based aerogels is to maintain the porous structure during solvent removal. Different drying techniques, such as CO2 supercritical drying (scCO2), ambient pressure-drying [76], freeze-drying [74], phase separation [59,77], and gas foaming [78,79,80], have been used and produced different types of aerogels [26]. Among them, CO2 supercritical drying (scCO2) is the most versatile method for preparing aerogels. CO2 supercritical drying controls the temperature and pressure appropriately to make the solvent reach its critical point and for it to be converted from a liquid phase to gas phase. Since the solvent has no obvious surface tension in this process, it can produce aerogel materials with a more uniform structure while maintaining its 3D network skeleton structure [81]. The disadvantages of supercritical drying are the requirement for expensive high-pressure equipment and extremely harsh processing conditions.
Freeze-drying is essentially a sublimation drying process, which can reduce gel shrinkage when compared with ambient pressure-drying and supercritical drying [76,82]. As the two-phase contact between gas and liquid needs to be avoided in this process, it can effectively prevent the capillary pressure during the drying process to produce highly aligned and controlled porous aerogels. Compared with CO2 supercritical drying, cellulose aerogel processed by freeze-drying has a higher compression modulus and higher yield behavior at the same density [83]. However, scaffolds fabricated by freeze-drying exhibited lamellar and honeycomb structures rather than real nonporous structures, due to the freeze–thaw and solvent exchange processes reducing the aggregation and hydrogen bonding between CNF [84,85]. Due to its distinct advantage of sustainable and low cost, freeze-drying is still the most utilized gel-drying technology in the fabrication of nanocellulose aerogels [26,59,76]. Different from the method of freeze-drying, phase separation required no solvent exchange and could effectively reduce the gel-drying time of aerogels [77,85]. On the other hand, aerogels prepared by ambient pressure-drying showed a smaller pore size, large shrinkage after gelation, and fragile structure.

3. Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in BTE

Bone is a highly mineralized, vascularized, and connective tissue that has remarkable mechanical strength, which provides fracture toughness and load-bearing ability to protect internal organs [86]. The ideal bone substitutes should mimic the microstructure of native bone tissues and offer a biological environment for bone regeneration and tissue repair. Moreover, the design and preparation of hybrid nanocellulose aerogels should fully understand the structure and compositions of natural bone tissue.

3.1. Microstructure of Bone ECM

The main inorganic component of bone is hydroxyapatite (HA) crystals, which are embedded in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of bone. As the organic component of bone tissue, bone ECM is mainly composed of type I collagen fibers and serves as an inductive template for bone repair [87,88]. The mineral hydroxyapatite crystals deposit along the long axis of collagen type I fibers and present a hierarchical deposition within zones between collagen fibrils at the nanoscale [89,90,91].
The minerals of bone tissue are hierarchically assembled from nanoscale [89]. Before mineralization, the organic phase of bone has been assembled, which can finely regulate crystal nucleation and growth. Needle-like mineral particles coalesce horizontally into platelets, neither inside nor outside the fibers, but form fractal-like hierarchical bone architecture with continuous intersecting fibers [89]. The mineralized collagen fibers on the microscopic scale are arranged in a complex hierarchical structure. At the macro level, most bones contain helical patterns in their anatomical shapes to increase adaptation to force. At the micro level, the spiral secondary bone itself is formed by concentric slices of mineralized collagen fibers. In terms of scaffold designing, biomimetic approaches, which can simulate molecular structural and biocompatibility with complex natural bone tissue [92,93,94,95] (Figure 2A), have gained increasing attention. By exploiting the unique properties of the pure or composite nanocellulose scaffolds, it is possible to improve the properties of the biomimetic materials with controlled and layered structures in nanostructures [55].
Electrospinning offers clear advantages for the preparation of scaffolds based on nanocellulose, including control over composition, structural design, and functional expansion [96,97]. It is a promising method for producing 3D aerogels in BTE and for mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM) [35,98,99,100]. The core–shell structure of electrospinning is composed of PHB/G and PHB/G/Fe3O4 compositions, which result in lower melting points compared to pure PHB scaffolds. The resulting hybrid scaffolds have a lower crystallinity and are non-toxic, with the added benefit of high saturation magnetization in the magnetite composite scaffolds, which makes them well suited for biomedical applications [101]. In addition, gas foaming is a process that involves introducing inert gas foaming agents into the polymer phase, generating gas bubbles inside the 2D scaffolds via subsequent chemical reactions to expand the interconnected pores within the scaffolds [50]. Aerogels can also be prepared using gas foaming technology, which involves reassembling tightly packed 2D electrospinning nanofibers into fluffy 3D scaffolds with high porosity and large pores [35]. While 3D aerogels produced by gas foaming show great promise in BTE applications, there have been very few studies on fabricating nanocellulose-based aerogels using this technology. Therefore, future research should focus on this area.
Figure 2. (A) Patterns of the bone mineral organization in different directions [89]. Copyright 2018, Science. (B) Composite preparation of bone biomimetic material. Created with BioRender.com. (C) Schematic illustration of the mineralization process [102]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (D) (a,b) Pure chitosan gel and aerogel. (c,d) CNC-modified chitosan gel and aerogel. (e,f) Microstructure of pure chitosan aerogel and CNC-modified chitosan aerogel [103]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. (A) Patterns of the bone mineral organization in different directions [89]. Copyright 2018, Science. (B) Composite preparation of bone biomimetic material. Created with BioRender.com. (C) Schematic illustration of the mineralization process [102]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (D) (a,b) Pure chitosan gel and aerogel. (c,d) CNC-modified chitosan gel and aerogel. (e,f) Microstructure of pure chitosan aerogel and CNC-modified chitosan aerogel [103]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Polymers 15 02323 g002

3.2. Nanocellulose Aerogel Alone

Since 1971, when the first generation of a cellulose-based aerogel with a large specific surface area was fabricated, various studies have been performed to evaluate the toxicity, antibacterial properties, and mechanical properties of nanocellulose aerogels and provide a theoretical basis for their application in BTE [83,104,105,106]. Li et al. prepared a CNC-based aerogel by direct ink writing and freeze-drying and proved that the resulting aerogel exhibited dual porous and controllable structures [107]. The main disadvantage of the CNC-based aerogels is obviously their brittleness, which would lead to structural damage during cell incorporation and growth. Optimizing the crosslinking method might improve mechanical performance by adding 2.5 wt% polyamide-epichlorohydrin (kymene) into the nanocellulose polymer dispersion before crosslinking. This increased the Young’s modulus of the composite aerogel from 7 MPa to 8.94 MPa [107]. Epoxypropane exhibits significant cytotoxicity, and its linear structure with bulky side chains limits its degradation compared to other types of chemical crosslinking agents, which restricts its usage in tissue engineering [63,108]. In another study, Osorio et al. grafted a hydrazide group onto a carboxylic acid group to form a hydrazone linkage on the surface of a CNC-based aerogel and proved that the prepared cellulose aerogel presented an excellent flexibility, high porosity, and osteoconductive properties after chemical crosslinking [64].

3.3. Nanocellulose-Based Composite Aerogels

Due to the existence of hydrogen bonds, nanocellulose can not only be self-assembled itself, but also assembled with other polymer materials. The aerogels with cellulose alone presented the disadvantages of hydrophilicity and poor osteoconduction [109,110]. In order to overcome these drawbacks and preserve their inherent superiorities, the composite fabrication methods of nanocellulose aerogels have received more and more attention, as the mechanical properties, biodegradability, bioactivity, and superior biological properties of bone scaffolds are adjusted by combining cellulose with different organic and inorganic compounds (Figure 2B) [111,112]. The contents regarding the combination of nanocellulose with other materials are summarized as follows (Table 2).

3.3.1. HA–Nanocellulose Aerogel

Scaffolds with both organic and inorganic components could biomimic the microstructures of natural bone, which not only facilitates the proliferation of osteoblast lineage cells but also provides an optimal microenvironment for the formation of blood vessels. Traditionally, biomimicking the inorganic phase of bone tissues has mainly focused on inorganic materials such as nano-silicate particles, calcium phosphate, and bioactive glasses.
As one kind of environment-friendly biomaterial, hydroxyapatite (HA), with an excellent biocompatibility, constitutes the inorganic phase of bone and could release various osteoconductive ions into the surrounding environment [95,122,123]. However, the shortcomings of HA, such as low absorption rate in vivo, low crack resistance, and poor bone stimulation, limit its clinical application [124]. Adding HA to cellulose-based aerogels can enhance the mechanical properties to construct organic–inorganic aerogels. Huang et al. attached an in situ HA coating at approximately 10 nm onto the surface of CNC and then crosslinked it with polymethyl vinyl ether-malonic acid (PMVEMA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) to enhance the mechanical properties of the composites. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) showed esterification reactions occurring between CNCs, HAP, PMVEMA, and PEG. The results showed that the attachment of HA increased the compressive strength of the resulting scaffold up to 41.8 MPa, which provides a broad potential in the development of BTE scaffolds [113]. Cheng et al. have also fabricated an HA–BC aerogel and performed the in situ mineralization by embedding the aerogel into the CaCl2 and K2HPO4 solutions, and the results demonstrated that the composite aerogel with excellent biocompatibility enhanced the mechanical properties and biomimicked the structure of natural bone (Figure 2C) [102]. The above-mentioned studies proved that the incorporation of HA into the nanocellulose aerogels could not only enhance their mechanical properties but also functioned as a promising template for biomimetic mineralization. Moreover, advanced preparation techniques such as 3D printing could be used to orderly deposit HA layers onto the collagen fibers to mimic the microstructure of the native bone tissue due to the urgent requirement of biomimic theory.

3.3.2. Bioactive Glasses–Nanocellulose Aerogel

Bioactive glasses (BG) can release calcium and phosphate into the surrounding environment and result in the deposition of HA on the surface of biomaterials after the transplantation of bioactive glass in vivo. Bioactive glasses-based bone substitutes have been widely applied in BTE. Kamel et al. prepared a nano-fibrillated cellulose aerogel loaded with strontium borate-based bioactive ceramic particles and rosuvastatin to treat the extraction socket [34]. The results showed that the composite aerogel exhibited excellent mechanical properties and promoted the proliferation of MG-63 cells, which exhibit a promising material for the preservation of dental sockets.

3.3.3. Collagen–Nanocellulose Aerogel

As we all know, the organic phase of native bone tissue functions as the hierarchical skeleton and plays a crucial role in biomineralization. Commonly used biopolymers include chitosan (CS), collagen, cellulose, etc. All have been proven to be suitable platforms that mimic inorganic phases of bone and substitutes to fabricate composite scaffolds with a similar structure and composition to native bone [125]. As the main component of the organic phase of bone tissue, collagen (Col) in native bone could be treated as a template for biomineralization that controls the orientation and shape of HA crystal by providing nucleation sites. Then, the in vivo biomineralization process happens and leads to the nucleation and growth of HA nanocrystals along the axial of the Col fibers [126]. In recent years, many studies have focused on the preparation of cellulose biomimetic scaffolds. For instance, a biomimetic collagen–carboxymethyl cellulose/hydroxyapatite scaffold was prepared by He et al. through a biomolecular template of collagen–carboxymethyl cellulose, and the scaffold presented good biocompatibility. By controlling the ratio of collagen to carboxymethyl cellulose in the template, the osteoinductivity, the osteoconductive, and the mechanical strength of composites could be changed and adjusted according to the requirement of BTE [127]. Xu et al. prepared nanocellulose–collagen (COL)-nanohydroxyapatite(n-HA) organic–inorganic hybrid aerogels by adding collagen and HA into cellulose aerogels and found that the composite aerogels exhibited a porous 3D structure with high compressive strength, excellent osteogenesis, and angiogenesis abilities both in vitro and in vivo [119]. Based on the above-mentioned research, it is safely concluded that the organic–inorganic hybrid materials based on the combination of Col and nanocellulose could construct multilevel bionic scaffolds from macro to micro and present great potential for repairing bone defects.

3.3.4. Chitosan–Nanocellulose Aerogel

Chitosan (CS), with a structural similarity with glycosaminoglycan, has excellent osteoconduction ability [128,129]. In a study, high-pressure homogenization and freeze-drying technologies were utilized to fabricate CNF-based and chitosan-based composite aerogels. The results showed the CNF aerogels exhibited the highest porosity, lowest density, and worst mechanical properties. However, adding chitosan into CNF can not only significantly improve the mechanical properties but also reduce the water absorption of the composite aerogels [117]. In another study, Matinfar et al. prepared biphasic and triphasic calcium phosphate fiber-reinforced CS- carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) porous scaffolds by a freeze-drying method [114]. The broad band observed in the chitosan spectrum between 3367–3449 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of N–H and O–H groups. In addition, the CMC powder spectrum exhibited distinctive bands at 1602 cm−1, 1424 cm−1, and 1330 cm−1, which are characteristic of carboxyl, methyl, and hydroxyl groups, respectively. Furthermore, a band at 1057 cm−1, attributed to the stretching vibrations of -CH2OH, was also observed. The biphasic fiber was composed of HA and triclinic apatite, and the triphasic fiber was composed of HA, β-tricalcium phosphate, and calcium pyrophosphate. After adding CMC to CS aerogel, its mechanical properties and cell viability were significantly improved. After adding CS into CMC aerogel, the viability of cells attached to the composite aerogels was significantly improved (Figure 2D) [103]. However, its mechanical properties need to be further improved. Thus, the incorporation of the organic phase into the CS–CMC aerogels further enhanced their mechanical properties and effectively solved the above-mentioned problem.

3.3.5. PVA–Nanocellulose Aerogel

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is also a favorable biopolymer. With insufficient mechanical strength, which is significantly lower than natural bone, PVA alone is not suitable to be fabricated into BTE substitutes. Incorporation of PVA into the nanocrystalline cellulose scaffolds could also solve this problem and tailor their biological performance. Zhou et al. synthesized a PVA/CNFs/gelatin hybrid aerogel by the utilization of gelatin as the crosslinking agent. The modulus of the PVA/CNFs/gelatin aerogels is 1.65 MPa, significantly higher than those of the pure CNF and PVA/CNF aerogels [109]. Cataldi et al. combined nanocrystalline cellulose with PVA to fabricate a composite scaffold with enhanced tensile stress, contributed by the involvement of the nanocrystalline cellulose. However, the incorporation of an excessive amount of nanocrystalline cellulose also led to the agglomeration of nanoparticles and decreased the tensile stress of the composite scaffold [130]. Liu et al. prepared CNFs/PVA/montmorillonite aerogels and investigated the effects of crosslinkers (borax and glutaraldehyde) on the formation of the interface bonding and porous network. The results proved that glutaraldehyde crosslinking resulted in larger and looser pores of the composite aerogels as compared with those prepared by the borax crosslinking method [131]. Therefore, adding nanocellulose would increase the mechanical performance of the composite scaffolds, whereas incorporation of PVA enhances their biocompatibility.

3.3.6. SF–Nanocellulose Aerogel

Silk fibroin (SF), with a favorable biocompatibility and noncarcinogenic ability, is extracted from silkworm cocoons and has the ability to promote preosteoblasts proliferation and MSCs osteogenic differentiation, demonstrating favorable advantages in bone regeneration [132,133]. However, its short absorption times and low mechanical properties limited the application of SF in the BTE field due to the high requirements for bone substitutes and the relatively long healing process of bone tissues. After the combination of SF and nanocellulose materials with relatively longer absorption periods and higher mechanical properties than SF, SF/nanocellulose composites exhibit the advantages of both SF (good biocompatibility, easy degradation, and excellent osteoinductive ability) and nanocellulose (remarkable mechanical strengths and long absorption time), making them great prospects for functional applications in BTE. Chen et al. prepared mineralized self-assembled silk fibroin (SF) –cellulose composite aerogels with an interpenetrating network by freeze-drying. In situ mineralization was then performed to control the nucleation and growth of n–HA crystals onto the surface of the composite aerogels [116]. After the mineralization of HA, the zeta potentials of the cellulose aerogel and SF/nanocellulose composite decreased from −11.1 mV and −26.3 mV to −6.3 mV and −4.1 mV, respectively. These zeta potentials are close to the −5.8 mV of n–HA. The results show that mineralized SF–cellulose composite aerogels have a good microstructure such as ideal cancellous bone, moderately adjusted compressive strength, and high degradative rate in vitro. In addition, it can also promote the proliferation of human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T) which has potential in BTE [116]. Although only a few studies have focused on SF–cellulose-based aerogels and their application in BTE fields, there is still an attractive potential for nanocellulose-based aerogels in repairing bone defects.

4. Nanocellulose Aerogels-Based Controlled Releasing System for BTE

Cellulose-based aerogels can also serve as antibiotics, bioactive factors, and herbal ingredient carriers to affect the adhesion, proliferation, and migration of seed cells and enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis for bone regeneration [134,135]. According to the literature, 22% of aerogels have been utilized for drug loading, while only 19% of aerogels have been used for tissue engineering in biomedical applications [112]. The aim of the nanocellulose aerogel-based controlled-release approaches is to maintain the stability of the cargo and the concentration within the therapeutic window for an extended period, further increasing therapeutic effects by lowering the loading dosage and reducing side effects. Due to a large surface area, the nanocellulose aerogel-based controlled releasing systems could effectively absorb the loading cargo and release them into the surrounding environment [136]. After combing the nanocellulose aerogels and drug/bioactive molecules, the nanocellulose aerogel-based control releasing system not only had intrinsic properties of the nanocellulose-based aerogels such as low density, high space surface area, and high mechanical strength, but also benefited from the features of drug/bioactive molecules such as osteogenic and osteoinductive abilities [21].

4.1. Antibiotic, Growth Factors, and Chinese Herbal Medicine Delivery

Various kinds of antibiotic are typical delivery cargos and have been widely applied in biomedical research in recent years [137,138,139]. For example, a CNF aerogel-based controlled releasing system loaded with amoxicillin had been prepared by Ye et al. and showed a controlled releasing performance of amoxicillin. The results of an in vitro antibacterial experiment demonstrated that the prepared controlled releasing system exhibited an antibacterial activity and the antibacterial effects increased with the content of the loading amoxicillin (Figure 3A) [140]. Wang et al. also designed an antibacterial aerogel based on a TOCNF/∂-poly-l-lysine (∂-PL) crosslinked network, and the results showed that the fabricated controlled releasing system exhibited a good degradability and excellent antibacterial efficiency (up to 99.9%), thus confirming its potential in BTE (Figure 3B). Nevertheless, the grafting and esterification reactions have slightly reduced the thermal stability of the cellulose aerogel. This is potentially caused by the disruption of the hydrogen-bond network between ε-PL and cellulose upon its incorporation [120].
Various kinds of cells and growth factors were also loaded into the nanocellulose aerogels to treat bone defects to achieve rapid tissue repair. The potential growth factors which could be control released by the nanocellulose aerogels for BTE include bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), sclerostin monoclonal antibody, etc. [119]. Among them, BMP and VEGF are commonly utilized factors to promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Recent studies have shown that BMP plays a crucial role in the initial stage of osteogenesis and can still play a role in promoting osteogenesis 16 days after complete release [141]. BMP-2 and BMP-7 have shown satisfactory osteoinduction and osteoconduction in clinical studies and relevant products containing rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [142]. However, BMP-2 has some dose-related side effects including ectopic one formation, osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, inappropriate adipogenesis, and unwanted immunogenic responses of the host [143,144]. Notably, side effects of BMP-2 were expected to be reduced by optimizing the total amount of the loaded factors and controlled releasing approaches [145]. In addition, short chain BMP-2 peptide mimics the activity of BMP-2 protein by binding to cell receptors. In addition, it has been reported that calcium-conjugated BMP-2 peptide with a controlled release rate can significantly improve the binding ability of BMP-2 to the surface of hydroxyapatite (HA) to enhance the efficiency of bone mineralization and reduce side effects (Figure 3C) [146,147]. Moreover, a study investigated BC scaffolds loaded with a low dose of BMP-2 and primary mouse mesenchymal stem cells (C3H10T1/2 cells). The results showed that BMP-2 induced the adhesion and proliferation of cells [17]. VEGFs play a critical role in angiogenesis; QK peptide is a VEGF mimetic peptide that promotes angiogenesis and bone regeneration by activating VEGF receptors [148]. John et al. prepared a poly(𝜖-caprolactone)/gelatin/gelatin methacryloyl nanofiber aerogel coupled with QK peptide to regulate the formation of microvascular networks in seed endothelial cells [149]. In conclusion, the above-mentioned nanofiber aerogel can be applied in combination with signal molecules and cells to provide an ideal microenvironment for cell infiltration and proliferation for tissue repair.
Figure 3. (A) SEM images of amoxicillin loaded into cellulose aerogels and optical images of inhibition zones of cellulose aerogels [140]. Copyright 2018, Molecular Diversity Preservation International. (B) Characterization of antibacterial aerogel based on ε-poly-L-lysine/nanocellulose by using citric acid as crosslinker [120]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (C) Representative radiographs of cranial bone defects. (A1/A2), without treatment (4 w/8 w); (B1/B2), 3D hybrid nanofiber aerogel (4 w/8 w); (C1/C2), E7-BMP-2 peptide loaded 3D hybrid nanofiber (4 w/8 w); and d Masson’s trichrome stained images of unfilled defect (4 w) and E7-BMP-2 peptide loaded 3D hybrid nanofiber aerogel (8 w) [147]. Copyright 2018, Wiley.
Figure 3. (A) SEM images of amoxicillin loaded into cellulose aerogels and optical images of inhibition zones of cellulose aerogels [140]. Copyright 2018, Molecular Diversity Preservation International. (B) Characterization of antibacterial aerogel based on ε-poly-L-lysine/nanocellulose by using citric acid as crosslinker [120]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (C) Representative radiographs of cranial bone defects. (A1/A2), without treatment (4 w/8 w); (B1/B2), 3D hybrid nanofiber aerogel (4 w/8 w); (C1/C2), E7-BMP-2 peptide loaded 3D hybrid nanofiber (4 w/8 w); and d Masson’s trichrome stained images of unfilled defect (4 w) and E7-BMP-2 peptide loaded 3D hybrid nanofiber aerogel (8 w) [147]. Copyright 2018, Wiley.
Polymers 15 02323 g003
The bioactive molecules of traditional Chinese medicine such as icariin, drynaria, salvia miltiorrhiza, etc., have a certain role in promoting bone repair, and the sustained release of these traditional Chinese medicines by the nanocellulose-based aerogels might have promising potential for bone regeneration [150,151]. Resveratrol (Res) is a phenolic compound with a chemical formula of C14H12O3. It has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, but is known for its limited solubility in water, which can make oral administration challenging [152]. Qin et al. prepared resveratrol-loaded TEMPO-oxidized cellulose aerogels by a freeze-drying method. FTIR spectroscopy revealed a wide peak at 3192 cm−1, indicating a Res–OH stretching vibration and the presence of intramolecular hydrogen bonding. Furthermore, a significant alteration in the hydroxyl stretching band has been observed with an increase in the cellulose content, suggesting the existence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between cellulose and Res’s hydroxyl groups [153]. The study proved that the resveratrol-loaded TEMPO-oxidized cellulose aerogels showed excellent stability in PBS and the simulated gastric fluid and could stably release resveratrol, indicating that it has good potential in the treatment of osteoarthritis [153].Puerarin is a natural isoflavone compound commonly extracted from kudzu roots, which has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in tissue engineering by binding with endotoxin and synergistically destroying the bacterial membrane structure [154]. FTIR and XRD analyses showed that the hydroxyl groups of puerarin were bound to the amino groups of chitosan. Moreover, puerarin has also been shown to promote new bone formation in β-tricalcium phosphate osteoblast complexes in vivo [155]. However, there is no research to study puerarin-loaded cellulose aerogels. Therefore, the relevant research remains to be further studied.

4.2. Smart Drug Delivery System

The smart responsive nanofibrous cellulose aerogel has broad application prospects and development potential in tissue engineering. It can respond intelligently to external factors such as temperature, pH value, light, and magnetism, thus enabling precise control of the release of active substances and cell growth behavior in the aerogel [29,156]. It can facilitate tissue growth and wound healing, providing better conditions for tissue repair and regeneration. Liang and her colleagues devised and produced cellulose nanofibers that are biocompatible and smartly dual-responsive by attaching a temperature and pH-responsive polymer (PEI-NIPAM: polyethyleneimine-N-isopropylacrylamide) onto CNF-COOH. CNF-PEI-NIPAM aerogels, and demonstrated excellent dual-responsiveness to pH and temperature, with over 99% antibacterial activity against E. coli. Additionally, under conditions of 37 °C and pH 3, the drug-loading capacity of the CNF-PEI-NIPAM aerogel for doxorubicin reached 330.12 mg/g, with an accumulated release rate of 59.45%. The wettability of CNF-PEI-NIPAM is mutually promoted under low-temperature and acidic conditions, while it is mutually inhibited under high-temperature and alkaline conditions. Its hydrophilicity increases with temperature, while its wettability decreases with increasing pH (Figure 4A). When the pH value increases from 1 to 9, CNF-PEI-NIPAM changes from hydrophilic (contact angle, CA = 49.1°) to hydrophobic (CA = 135.5°) due to its large number of pH responsive amino groups [157]. This novel temperature and pH dual-responsive smart nanofiber cellulose provides a new avenue for the design of novel bone tissue repair materials.
The use of magnetic nanocellulose in the biomedical field has promising applications, including drug delivery, hyperthermia, and tissue engineering. Recent studies have shown that magnetic nanocellulose can significantly improve drug delivery efficiency, leading to greater therapeutic benefits with lower dosages. With the addition of drugs and magnetic responsiveness, nanocellulose can achieve precise and rapid drug delivery control [158,159]. This can improve drug bioavailability and efficacy while reducing side effects and waste. Iron oxide nanoparticles have been widely investigated and applied in the preparation of magnetic nanocellulose due to their superior biocompatibility and low toxicity. Arifa Naznin et al. prepared cellulose-loaded magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. The swelling capacity of the particles increased from 155.0% to 159.5%. Furthermore, the drug loading and release time of metronidazole also increased [160]. According to research findings, it has been demonstrated that n–HA was deposited on the surface of CNF, and magnetic nanoparticles on the CNF were oriented on the surface of chitosan under the action of a magnetic field. The oriented cellulose fibers enhance the compressive properties of the scaffold, while the n–HA on the oriented cellulose fiber surface promotes the formation of new blood vessels and accelerates chondrogenesis, ultimately guiding bone growth orientation and promoting bone activity [161] (Figure 4B,C). Ultrasound has emerged as a promising tool in the field of tissue engineering due to its capacity to modulate cellular behavior, enhance cell proliferation and migration, and induce changes in extracellular matrix production. For instance, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been demonstrated to stimulate MC3T3-E1 proliferation and differentiation [162].
Figure 4. (A) CNF-PEI-NIPAM exhibits a dual-responsive mechanism to temperature and pH changes. [157] Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (B) ALP activity and Alizarin Red staining showing that magnetic-oriented CS–cellulose promoted BMSC osteogenic differentiation and adhesion [161]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (C) Micro-CT demonstrated that magnetic-oriented CS–cellulose significantly facilitated the healing of cranial bone defect, [161]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Figure 4. (A) CNF-PEI-NIPAM exhibits a dual-responsive mechanism to temperature and pH changes. [157] Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (B) ALP activity and Alizarin Red staining showing that magnetic-oriented CS–cellulose promoted BMSC osteogenic differentiation and adhesion [161]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier. (C) Micro-CT demonstrated that magnetic-oriented CS–cellulose significantly facilitated the healing of cranial bone defect, [161]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Polymers 15 02323 g004

4.3. Modification of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels

Commonly, modification after aerogel fabrication can be conducted by surface coating and chemical vapor deposition [163,164,165]. Based on the limitations of the cellulose aerogels in BTE, this part mainly introduces hydrophobicity modification and mechanical property enhancement. These modification methods might be effective ways to adjust the surface chemical structure and broaden its application in BTE.

4.3.1. Enhancement of Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of cellulose-based aerogels play a vital role in bone repair, and the selection of precursor materials, crosslinking methods, and modification after preparation all affect the mechanical properties of nanocellulose-based aerogels [166]. Drawing on the recent literature, it was discovered that there exists an inverse relationship between the porosity and mechanical strength of cellulose aerogels [167]. More specifically, as the porosity of cellulose aerogels increases, their mechanical strength tends to decrease, and vice versa. This phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that when the porosity is high, more voids are present within the material, which results in a decrease in the contact area between the cellulose fibers and an increase in the pore size, ultimately reducing the structural integrity of the material. In contrast, in the case of a lower porosity, the reduced number of voids facilitates a higher effective area of contact between fibers, thereby increasing the mechanical strength of the final product. Therefore, achieving a balance between the porosity and mechanical strength of cellulose aerogels is of utmost importance for their effective application in the field of tissue engineering. Crosslinking strategies can functionally modify the mechanical, biological, and degradable characteristics of nanocellulose aerogels with a specific composition and structure [63]. The mechanical properties of cellulose-based aerogels play a vital role in bone repair, and the selection of precursor materials, crosslinking methods, and modification after preparation all affect the mechanical properties of nanocellulose-based aerogels [168]. Krishnakumar et al. published a systematic review and summarized the limitations and future development potential of different types of biocrosslinking methods in BTE. The results showed that chemical crosslinking significantly enhanced the mechanical properties of cellulose aerogels when compared with those of physical crosslinking [169]. Traditional chemical crosslinkers such as glutaraldehyde (GA), genipin (GP), tannic acid (TA), citric acid (CA), and hexamethylenediamine (HMDA) could also improve the degree of gelation and their mechanical performance [71,73,74,170].
The commonly utilized surface modification methods of nanocellulose-based aerogels include esterification, salinization, surface coating, and graft copolymerization [171,172,173]. Esterification and etherification are the most common derivatization modifications of cellulose (Table 3). A modification technique using 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidation was recently developed to defibrillate raw cellulose and create a modified aerogel with an improved mechanical performance [174]. TEMPO/NaBr/NaClO was added to the oxidation of natural cellulose in an aqueous solution at pH 10. Most of the C6-hydroxyl groups on the surface of crystalline cellulose microfibers were converted to C6-sodium carboxylate groups [175]. The TEMPO-oxidized wood cellulose fibers formed fully individualized TOCN dispersed in an aqueous solution after mechanical decomposition. The tensile strength and elastic modulus of the modified cellulose fibers increased to 200–300 MPa and 6–7 GPa, respectively [176]. Zheng et al. grafted polyethylene glycol (PEG) onto CNC to construct PVA–CNC composites and found that the composites exhibited a higher stress transfer efficiency and better stiffness strength when compared with the ungrafted composites [177]. After adding 1% CNC–PEG as the reinforcing filler, the ultimate strength and stiffness of the composites were increased by 40.4% and 34.2%, respectively [177].

4.3.2. Enhancement of Their Osteogenic Ability

Enhancing the osteogenic induction activity of cellulose aerogels can be achieved by simulating the ECM of bone, enhancing vascularization, and surface modification.
Scaffolds of cellulose and its derivatives have been extensively studied in bone tissue regeneration due to their renewable and biodegradable properties. The multifunctionality of the nanocellulose-based aerogels are attributed to the involvement of new components into the nanocellulose-based aerogels system, which enhanced their osteogenic abilities. Recent studies have shown that carboxymethyl cellulose could induce osteogenic differentiation and it has great potential in the study of tissue engineering scaffolds [127]. A novel surface modification method was utilized to deposit cell-derived proteins onto the surface of BC and the results proved that this kind of surface modification increased the water contact angle and improved the mechanical strength, cell adhesion, and mitochondrial activities [180]. Osorio et al. also fabricated a hydrazone crosslinked CNC aerogel by adding aldehyde and hydrazide functional groups onto CNC, allowing for the formation of a hydrazone bond, and facilitation of bone regeneration [64]. Thus enhancing the osteogenic activity of cellulose aerogels,
Notably, the 3D printing of cellulose-based aerogels provides a hierarchically composite geometry with excellent controllability of personalized design and macroscopic structure [181]. The use of 3D printing can also enable organic–inorganic cellulose aerogels to perform hierarchical deposition, improve the mechanical strength of materials to suit irregular defects, and fabricate layered biomimetic scaffolds [66,182]. The use of 3D printing bone biomimetic preparation can improve the osteogenic ability of biomaterial. For example, a CNF and polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) composite aerogel with adjustable Poisson’s ratio was prepared by 3D printing and provided dynamic stress environments for the differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) [115]. In another study, Tang et al. also prepared a PEGDA–CNF aerogel and evaluated its chondrogenic-inductive characteristics. The results showed that the scaffolds could facilitate the proliferation and chondrogenic induction of BMSC (Figure 5) [118]. All in all, 3D printing is expected to achieve a good balance of other functional characteristics while achieving rapid and large-scale production.

4.3.3. Improvement in Hydrophilicity

Scaffolds for BTE require moderate hydrophilicity to promote tissue infiltration and cell attachment, but scaffolds with too much hydrophilicity are easy to collapse before the formation of bone tissues. Nanocellulose aerogels with extensive hydrogen bonds and hydroxyl on their surface would result in excessive hydrophilicity and cannot maintain their stability in vivo [45]. To enhance the stability of nanocellulose aerogels, the hydrophobicity of nanocellulose needs to be promoted by gel impregnation or surface coating [163]. Polydopamine (PDA) can be coated on the surface of various materials through self-polymerization under aqueous conditions to improve scaffolds’ hydrophobicity and mechanical property [177,184,185]. Tannic acid (TA), a low-cost natural polyphenol, can also be coated on nanomaterials to decrease the hydrophobicity of nanocellulose scaffolds through surface coating [56,186].

5. Challenges and Outlook

At present, although academic activity on nanocellulose-based aerogels has flourished in recent years, few have been transformed into clinical applications. The side effects of polymeric nanoparticles including nanocellulose on cells, which is not observable within a short time period, might account for this. In vitro experimental studies concerning the toxicity of nanocellulose-based aerogels need to be conducted for a long time to clarify their safety. Moreover, the optimal balance between biocompatibility, osteoinduction, and mechanical properties remains a major challenge for the application of nanocellulose-based aerogels in BTE. The development and application of nanocellulose-based aerogels can be accelerated by the incorporation of the promising organic polymer and enhancement of their osteogenic induction ability.
As to the drug releasing systems based on cellulose aerogels, the drug releasing time and rate have a close connection with the special properties, thermal, or pH response of carriers and need to be precisely controlled. Thus, it is urgent for researchers to develop drug-loaded cellulose aerogels with an intelligent response for BTE. The use of magnetic fields can enhance the targeting and delivery of therapeutic agents to specific sites, while minimizing their systemic toxicity. Furthermore, the integration of magnetic nanoparticles into cellulose matrices can lead to improved mechanical and physical properties, which can enhance their utility in various industrial applications. Overall, the research and development of magnetically responsive cellulose is an exciting and rapidly growing field with great potential for future innovations. More importantly, it is tempting to enhance the osteoinduction ability of nanocellulose-based aerogels and modulate the host immune system by gene delivery in BTE [187]. Compared with a protein molecular delivery system, gene delivery therapy, which is based on the delivery of therapeutic genes and subsequent protein expression for bone regeneration, has gained more remarkable achievements over the past few decades [188,189]. However, nanocellulose-based aerogel scaffolds for gene delivery therapy have rarely been studied, which will be one of the research directions in the next few years.
Through 3D printing, the personalized design of macroscopic structures could be effectively realized, and the properties of cellulose aerogels for specific applications can be fine-tuned and improved. The use of 3D bioprinting can provide cellular support while constructing tissues and organs, facilitating cell growth and settlement. Compared to traditional 3D printing, 3D bioprinting has the advantages of higher precision in detail, stronger biocompatibility, and better support for cells. Therefore, it has tremendous potential in the field of biomedical research and medicine. Cellulose composite materials and their derivatives can serve as suitable 3D bioink for bioprinting.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and G.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z., D.X. and S.J.; writing—review and editing, Z.L. (Zhi Li); supervision, G.C., J.G., Z.L. (Zubing Li) and Z.L. (Zhi Li); funding acquisition, G.C. and D.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Knowledge Innovation Project of Wuhan, grant number 230171408, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 82170932, and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number LBQ20H140001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ko, H.F.; Sfeir, C.; Kumta, P.N. Novel synthesis strategies for natural polymer and composite biomaterials as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2010, 368, 1981–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ho-Shui-Ling, A.; Bolander, J.; Rustom, L.E.; Johnson, A.W.; Luyten, F.P.; Picart, C. Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives. Biomaterials 2018, 180, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Weinstein, A.M.; Rome, B.N.; Reichmann, W.M.; Collins, J.E.; Burbine, S.A.; Thornhill, T.S.; Wright, J.; Katz, J.N.; Losina, E. Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2013, 95, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Waldrop, R.; Cheng, J.; Devin, C.; McGirt, M.; Fehlings, M.; Berven, S. The Burden of Spinal Disorders in the Elderly. Neurosurgery 2015, 77, S46–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. O’Keefe, R.J.; Mao, J. Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: From discovery to the clinic—An overview. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2011, 17, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dimitriou, R.; Jones, E.; McGonagle, D.; Giannoudis, P.V. Bone regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Myeroff, C.; Archdeacon, M. Autogenous bone graft: Donor sites and techniques. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2011, 93, 2227–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hopper, R.A.; Ettinger, R.E.; Purnell, C.A.; Dover, M.S.; Pereira, A.R.; Tuncbilek, G. Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2020, 145, 1073e–1088e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moraschini, V.; de Almeida, D.C.F.; Calasans-Maia, M.D.; Kischinhevsky, I.C.C.; Louro, R.S.; Granjeiro, J.M. Immunological response of allogeneic bone grafting: A systematic review of prospective studies. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2020, 49, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cohen, D.J.; Scott, K.M.; Kulkarni, A.N.; Wayne, J.S.; Boyan, B.D.; Schwartz, Z. Acellular mineralized allogenic block bone graft does not remodel during the 10 weeks following concurrent implant placement in a rabbit femoral model. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2020, 31, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Diallo, A.M.; Rota, S.; Boissiere, M.; Bardonnet, R.; Pauthe, E.; Petite, H.; Benoist, H.M.; Bensidhoum, M.; Anagnostou, F. Osteoformation potential of an allogenic partially demineralized bone matrix in critical-size defects in the rat calvarium. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 127, 112207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, T.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wu, G. Slowly Delivered Icariin/Allogeneic Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Promote the Healing of Calvarial Critical-Size Bone Defects. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 1416047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sordi, M.B.; Cruz, A.; Fredel, M.C.; Magini, R.; Sharpe, P.T. Three-dimensional bioactive hydrogel-based scaffolds for bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 124, 112055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Roseti, L.; Parisi, V.; Petretta, M.; Cavallo, C.; Desando, G.; Bartolotti, I.; Grigolo, B. Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 78, 1246–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mirkhalaf, M.; Men, Y.; Wang, R.; No, Y.; Zreiqat, H. Personalized 3D printed bone scaffolds: A review. Acta Biomater. 2022, 156, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, H.; Xue, K.; Kong, N.; Liu, K.; Chang, J. Silicate bioceramics enhanced vascularization and osteogenesis through stimulating interactions between endothelia cells and bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3803–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dubey, S.; Mishra, R.; Roy, P.; Singh, R. 3-D macro/microporous-nanofibrous bacterial cellulose scaffolds seeded with BMP-2 preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells exhibit remarkable potential for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 167, 934–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ziegler, C.; Wolf, A.; Liu, W.; Herrmann, A.K.; Gaponik, N.; Eychmuller, A. Modern Inorganic Aerogels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2017, 56, 13200–13221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, J.; Su, B.L.; Xia, H.; Zhao, S.; Gao, C.; Wang, L.; Ogbeide, O.; Feng, J.; Hasan, T. Printed aerogels: Chemistry, processing, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 3842–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A.; Budtova, T.; Duraes, L.; Erkey, C.; Del Gaudio, P.; Gurikov, P.; Koebel, M.; Liebner, F.; Neagu, M.; Smirnova, I. An Opinion Paper on Aerogels for Biomedical and Environmental Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, M.; Shafiq, M.; Sun, B.; Wu, J.; Wang, W.; El-Newehy, M.; El-Hamshary, H.; Morsi, Y.; Ali, O.; Khan, A.U.R.; et al. Composite Superelastic Aerogel Scaffolds Containing Flexible SiO2 Nanofibers Promote Bone Regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022, 11, e2200499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lin, D.; Yuen, P.Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Liu, N.; Dauskardt, R.H.; Cui, Y. A Silica-Aerogel-Reinforced Composite Polymer Electrolyte with High Ionic Conductivity and High Modulus. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1802661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pircher, N.; Carbajal, L.; Schimper, C.; Bacher, M.; Rennhofer, H.; Nedelec, J.M.; Lichtenegger, H.C.; Rosenau, T.; Liebner, F. Impact of selected solvent systems on the pore and solid structure of cellulose aerogels. Cellular 2016, 23, 1949–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wan, C.; Jiao, Y.; Wei, S.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Li, J. Functional nanocomposites from sustainable regenerated cellulose aerogels: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 359, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dos Santos, D.M.; Correa, D.S.; Medeiros, E.S.; Oliveira, J.E.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Advances in Functional Polymer Nanofibers: From Spinning Fabrication Techniques to Recent Biomedical Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 45673–45701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Pang, B.; Xu, W.; Duan, G.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, K. Recent Progress on Nanocellulose Aerogels: Preparation, Modification, Composite Fabrication, Applications. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2005569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Khan, S.; Siddique, R.; Huanfei, D.; Shereen, M.A.; Nabi, G.; Bai, Q.; Manan, S.; Xue, M.; Ullah, M.W.; Bowen, H. Perspective Applications and Associated Challenges of Using Nanocellulose in Treating Bone-Related Diseases. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 616555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Budtova, T. Cellulose II aerogels: A review. Cellulose 2019, 26, 81–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Bashir Yahya, E.; Jummaat, F.; Adnan, A.S.; Olaiya, N.G.; Rizal, S.; Abdullah, C.K.; Pasquini, D.; Thomas, S. Biopolymers based aerogels: A review on revolutionary solutions for smart therapeutics delivery. Progress Mater. Sci. 2023, 131, 101014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sehaqui, H.; Zhou, Q.; Berglund, L.A. High-porosity aerogels of high specific surface area prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC). Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 1593–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kontturi, E.; Laaksonen, P.; Linder, M.B.; Nonappa; Groschel, A.H.; Rojas, O.J.; Ikkala, O. Advanced Materials through Assembly of Nanocelluloses. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1703779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A.; Sosnik, A.; Kalmar, J.; De Marco, I.; Erkey, C.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Aerogels in drug delivery: From design to application. J. Control. Release 2021, 332, 40–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Das, S.; Ghosh, B.; Sarkar, K. Nanocellulose as sustainable biomaterials for drug delivery. Sens. Int. 2022, 3, 100135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kamel, R.; Mabrouk, M.; El-Sayed, S.A.M.; Beherei, H.H.; Abouzeid, R.E.; Abo El-Fadl, M.T.; Mahmoud, A.A.; Maged, A. Nanofibrillated cellulose/glucosamine 3D aerogel implants loaded with rosuvastatin and bioactive ceramic for dental socket preservation. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 616, 121549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, Y.; Shafiq, M.; Liu, M.; Morsi, Y.; Mo, X. Advanced fabrication for electrospun three-dimensional nanofiber aerogels and scaffolds. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 5, 963–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, M.; Chen, F.; Liu, H.; Wu, P.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Su, J.; Cai, L.; Zhang, Y. Bioinspired sandwich-like hybrid surface functionalized scaffold capable of regulating osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and osteoclastogenesis for robust bone regeneration. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 17, 100458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Z.J.; Shi, H.H.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, H.; Cha, Y.Y.; Ruan, H.X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.C. A new cancellous bone material of silk fibroin/cellulose dual network composite aerogel reinforced by nano-hydroxyapatite filler. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 182, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cosgrove, D.J. Re-constructing our models of cellulose and primary cell wall assembly. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 22, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abitbol, T.; Rivkin, A.; Cao, Y.; Nevo, Y.; Abraham, E.; Ben-Shalom, T.; Lapidot, S.; Shoseyov, O. Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 39, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59, 302–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Trache, D.; Tarchoun, A.F.; Derradji, M.; Hamidon, T.S.; Masruchin, N.; Brosse, N.; Hussin, M.H. Nanocellulose: From Fundamentals to Advanced Applications. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zulaikha, W.; Hassan, M.Z.; Ismail, Z. Recent development of natural fibre for nanocellulose extraction and application. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 66, 2265–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huang, Y.-B.; Fu, Y. Hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose by solid acid catalysts. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1095–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Morales-dela Rosa, S.; Campos-Martin, J.M.; Fierro, J.L.G. Optimization of the process of chemical hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose. Cellulose 2014, 21, 2397–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Surendran, G.; Sherje, A. Cellulose nanofibers and composites: An insight on basics and biomedical applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 75, 103601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rojas, J.; Bedoya, M.; Ciro, Y. Current Trends in the Production of Cellulose Nanoparticles and Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications. Cellulose: Fundamental Aspects and Current Trends; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2015; pp. 193–228. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hirota, M.; Tamura, N.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Oxidation of regenerated cellulose with NaClO2 catalyzed by TEMPO and NaClO under acid-neutral conditions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 78, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nasir, M.; Hashim, R.; Sulaiman, O.; Asim, M. Nanocellulose. In Cellulose-Reinforced Nanofibre Composites; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 261–276. [Google Scholar]
  49. Patil, T.V.; Patel, D.K.; Dutta, S.D.; Ganguly, K.; Santra, T.S.; Lim, K.T. Nanocellulose, a versatile platform: From the delivery of active molecules to tissue engineering applications. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 9, 566–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Salimi, S.; Sotudeh-Gharebagh, R.; Zarghami, R.; Chan, S.Y.; Yuen, K.H. Production of Nanocellulose and Its Applications in Drug Delivery: A Critical Review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15800–15827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xue, J.; Wu, T.; Dai, Y.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5298–5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lavoine, N.; Bergström, L. Nanocellulose-based foams and aerogels: Processing, properties, and applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 16105–16117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Revin, V.V.; Liyaskina, E.V.; Parchaykina, M.V.; Kuzmenko, T.P.; Kurgaeva, I.V.; Revin, V.D.; Ullah, M.W. Bacterial Cellulose-Based Polymer Nanocomposites: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jiang, F.; Hsieh, Y.L. Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 95, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. De France, K.; Zeng, Z.; Wu, T.; Nystrom, G. Functional Materials from Nanocellulose: Utilizing Structure-Property Relationships in Bottom-Up Fabrication. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2000657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yang, X.; Biswas, S.K.; Han, J.; Tanpichai, S.; Li, M.C.; Chen, C.; Zhu, S.; Das, A.K.; Yano, H. Surface, and Interface Engineering for Nanocellulosic Advanced Materials. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2002264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Adnan, A.S.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.G.; Safrida, S.; Hossain, M.S.; Balakrishnan, V.; Gopakumar, D.A.; Abdullah, C.K.; Oyekanmi, A.A.; et al. A Review on Plant Cellulose Nanofibre-Based Aerogels for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Long, L.Y.; Weng, Y.X.; Wang, Y.Z. Cellulose Aerogels: Synthesis, Applications, and Prospects. Polymers 2018, 10, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ganesan, K.; Budtova, T.; Ratke, L.; Gurikov, P.; Baudron, V.; Preibisch, I.; Niemeyer, P.; Smirnova, I.; Milow, B. Review on the Production of Polysaccharide Aerogel Particles. Materials 2018, 11, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, F.; Liu, W.; Dong, Z.; Deng, Y. Underwater superoleophobicity cellulose nanofibril aerogel through regioselective sulfonation for oil/water separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 330, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Park, M.; Lee, D.; Shin, S.; Hyun, J. Effect of negatively charged cellulose nanofibers on the dispersion of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. Coll. Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 130, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, B.; Zheng, Q.; Zhu, J.; Li, J.; Cai, Z.; Chen, L.; Gong, S. Mechanically strong fully biobased anisotropic cellulose aerogels. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 96518–96526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Oryan, A.; Kamali, A.; Moshiri, A.; Baharvand, H.; Daemi, H. Chemical crosslinking of biopolymeric scaffolds: Current knowledge and future directions of crosslinked engineered bone scaffolds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Osorio, D.A.; Lee, B.E.J.; Kwiecien, J.M.; Wang, X.; Shahid, I.; Hurley, A.L.; Cranston, E.D.; Grandfield, K. Cross-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as viable bone tissue scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2019, 87, 152–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ghavami Nejad, A.; Ashammakhi, N.; Wu, X.Y.; Khademhosseini, A. Crosslinking Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Polymeric Hydrogels. Small 2020, 16, e2002931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mirkhalaf, M.; Dao, A.; Schindeler, A.; Little, D.G.; Dunstan, C.R.; Zreiqat, H. Personalized Baghdadite scaffolds: Stereolithography, mechanics and in vivo testing. Acta Biomater. 2021, 132, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rodin, M.; Li, J.; Kuckling, D. Dually cross-linked single networks: Structures and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8147–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shah, R.A.; Runge, T.; Ostertag, T.W.; Tang, S.; Dziubla, T.D.; Hilt, J.Z. Development of temperature-responsive polymeric gels with physical crosslinking due to intermolecularinteractions. Polym. Int. 2021, 71, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jacobs, A.; Renaudin, G.; Forestier, C.; Nedelec, J.M.; Descamps, S. Biological properties of copper-doped biomaterials for orthopedic applications: A review of antibacterial, angiogenic and osteogenic aspects. Acta Biomater. 2020, 117, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jodati, H.; Yilmaz, B.; Evis, Z. In vitro and in vivo properties of graphene-incorporated scaffolds for bone defect repair. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 29535–29549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xue, X.; Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, X.; Jiang, Y.; Su, J. Fabrication of physical and chemical crosslinked hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 12, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Teixeira, L.S.; Feijen, J.; van Blitterswijk, C.A.; Dijkstra, P.J.; Karperien, M. Enzyme-catalyzed crosslinkable hydrogels: Emerging strategies for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1281–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lim, D.J. Cross-Linking Agents for Electrospinning-Based Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Campodoni, E.; Heggset, E.B.; Rashad, A.; Ramirez-Rodriguez, G.B.; Mustafa, K.; Syverud, K.; Tampieri, A.; Sandri, M. Polymeric 3D scaffolds for tissue regeneration: Evaluation of biopolymer nanocomposite reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 94, 867–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, C.; Yang, H.; Yang, X.; Ma, Q. Tannic acid: A crosslinker leading to versatile functional polymeric networks: A review. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 7689–7711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sahin, I.; Ozbakir, Y.; Inonu, Z.; Ulker, Z.; Erkey, C. Kinetics of Supercritical Drying of Gels. Gels 2017, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, R.; Wang, J.; Du, Y.; Liao, J.; Zhang, X. Phase-separation induced synthesis of superhydrophobic silica aerogel powders and granules. J. Solid-State Chem. 2019, 279, 120971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jing, X.; Li, H.; Mi, H.-Y.; Liu, Y.-J.; Tan, Y.-M. Fabrication of fluffy shish-kebab structured nanofibers by electrospinning, CO2 escaping foaming and controlled crystallization for biomimetic tissue engineering scaffolds. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 785–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jing, X.; Li, H.; Mi, H.-Y.; Liu, Y.-J.; Tan, Y.-M. Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Fluffy Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering via Electrospinning and CO2 Escaping Foaming. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 9412–9421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Udeni Gunathilake, T.M.S.; Ching, Y.C.; Chuah, C.H. Enhancement of Curcumin Bioavailability Using Nanocellulose Reinforced Chitosan Hydrogel. Polymers 2017, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dervin, S.; Pillai, S.C. An Introduction to Sol-Gel Processing for Aerogels. In Sol-Gel Materials for Energy, Environment and Electronic Applications; Pillai, S.C., Hehir, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  82. Maleki, H.; Durães, L.; Portugal, A. An overview on silica aerogels synthesis and different mechanical reinforcing strategies. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2014, 385, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Buchtová, N.; Pradille, C.; Bouvard, J.-L.; Budtova, T. Mechanical properties of cellulose aerogels and cryogels. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 7901–7908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dilamian, M.; Joghataei, M.; Ashrafi, Z.; Bohr, C.; Mathur, S.; Maleki, H. From 1D electrospun nanofibers to advanced multifunctional fibrous 3D aerogels. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 22, 100964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, Y.; Grishkewich, N.; Liu, L.; Wang, C.; Tam, K.C.; Liu, S.; Mao, Z.; Sui, X. Construction of functional cellulose aerogels via atmospheric drying chemically cross-linked and solvent exchanged cellulose nanofibrils. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 366, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhu, G.; Zhang, T.; Chen, M.; Yao, K.; Huang, X.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z. Bone physiological microenvironment and healing mechanism: Basis for future bone-tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 4110–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Yi, S.; Ding, F.; Gong, L.; Gu, X. Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Curr. Stem Cell Res. 2017, 12, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hing, K.A. Bone repair in the twenty-first century: Biology, chemistry, or engineering? Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2004, 362, 2821–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Reznikov, N.; Bilton, M.; Lari, L.; Stevens, M.M.; Kroger, R. Fractal-like hierarchical organization of bone begins at the nanoscale. Science 2018, 360, eaao2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, Y.; Luo, D.; Wang, T. Hierarchical Structures of Bone and Bioinspired Bone Tissue Engineering. Small 2016, 12, 4611–4632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Reznikov, N.; Shahar, R.; Weiner, S. Bone hierarchical structure in three dimensions. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 3815–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ressler, A. Chitosan-Based Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications: A Short Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Morouco, P.; Lattanzi, W.; Alves, N. Four-Dimensional Bioprinting as a New Era for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Miao, S.; Castro, N.; Nowicki, M.; Xia, L.; Cui, H.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, W.; Lee, S.J.; Sarkar, K.; Vozzi, G.; et al. 4D printing of polymeric materials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater Today 2017, 20, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, S.; Li, D.; Chen, X.; Jiang, L. Biomimetic cuttlebone polyvinyl alcohol/carbon nanotubes/hydroxyapatite aerogel scaffolds enhanced bone regeneration. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 210, 112221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, C.; Wang, S.; Wang, N.; Yu, J.; Liu, Y.T.; Ding, B. From 1D Nanofibers to 3D Nanofibrous Aerogels: A Marvellous Evolution of Electrospun SiO2 Nanofibers for Emerging Applications. Nanomicro Lett. 2022, 14, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Rosen, T.; Hsiao, B.S.; Soderberg, L.D. Elucidating the Opportunities and Challenges for Nanocellulose Spinning. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2001238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ao, C.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, X.; He, X.; Zhang, W.; Lu, C. Fabrication, and characterization of electrospun cellulose/nano-hydroxyapatite nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 97, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Si, Y.; Yu, J.; Tang, X.; Ge, J.; Ding, B. Ultralight nanofibre-assembled cellular aerogels with superelasticity and multifunctionality. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Zhang, Y.; Yin, C.; Cheng, Y.; Huang, X.; Liu, K.; Cheng, G.; Li, Z. Electrospinning Nanofiber-Reinforced Aerogels for the Treatment of Bone Defects. Adv. Wound Care 2020, 9, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Pryadko, A.S.; Botvin, V.V.; Mukhortova, Y.R.; Pariy, I.; Wagner, D.V.; Laktionov, P.P.; Chernonosova, V.S.; Chelobanov, B.P.; Chernozem, R.V.; Surmeneva, M.A.; et al. Core-Shell Magnetoactive PHB/Gelatin/Magnetite Composite Electrospun Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Cheng, Z.; Ye, Z.; Natan, A.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Wan, L.; Aparicio, C.; Zhu, H. Bone-Inspired Mineralization with Highly Aligned Cellulose Nanofibers as Template. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 42486–42495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhang, S.; He, J.; Xiong, S.; Xiao, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Ding, F.; Ji, H.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z. Construction and Nanostructure of Chitosan/Nanocellulose Hybrid Aerogels. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 3216–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Matsuyama, K.; Morotomi, K.; Inoue, S.; Nakashima, M.; Nakashima, H.; Okuyama, T.; Kato, T.; Muto, H.; Sugiyama, H. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of Ag nanoparticle-loaded cellulose nanofiber aerogels prepared by supercritical CO2 drying. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 143, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cai, H.; Sharma, S.; Liu, W.; Mu, W.; Liu, W.; Zhang, X.; Deng, Y. Aerogel microspheres from natural cellulose nanofibrils and their application as cell culture scaffold. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 2540–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lu, T.; Li, Q.; Chen, W.; Yu, H. Composite aerogels based on dialdehyde nanocellulose and collagen for potential applications as wound dressing and tissue engineering scaffold. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 94, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, V.C.; Dunn, C.K.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, Y.; Qi, H.J. Direct Ink Write (DIW) 3D Printed Cellulose Nanocrystal Aerogel Structures. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Poursamar, S.A.; Lehner, A.N.; Azami, M.; Ebrahimi-Barough, S.; Samadikuchaksaraei, A.; Antunes, A. The effects of crosslinkers on physical, mechanical, and cytotoxic properties of gelatin sponge prepared via in-situ gas foaming method as a tissue engineering scaffold. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 63, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhou, T.; Cheng, X.; Pan, Y.; Li, C.; Gong, L. Mechanical performance, and thermal stability of polyvinyl alcohol–cellulose aerogels by freeze drying. Cellulose 2018, 26, 1747–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhou, C.; Shi, Q.; Guo, W.; Terrell, L.; Qureshi, A.T.; Hayes, D.J.; Wu, Q. Electrospun bio-nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by cellulose nanocrystals reinforcing maleic anhydride grafted PLA. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 3847–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yu, H.; Oh, S.; Han, Y.; Lee, S.; Jeong, H.S.; Hong, H.J. Modified cellulose nanofibril aerogel: Tunable catalyst support for treatment of 4-Nitrophenol from wastewater. Chemosphere 2021, 285, 131448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Maleki, H.; Duraes, L.; Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A.; Del Gaudio, P.; Portugal, A.; Mahmoudi, M. Synthesis, and biomedical applications of aerogels: Possibilities and challenges. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 236, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Huang, C.; Hao, N.; Bhagia, S.; Li, M.; Meng, X.; Pu, Y.; Yong, Q.; Ragauskas, A.J. Porous artificial bone scaffold synthesized from a facile in situ hydroxyapatite coating and crosslinking reaction of crystalline nanocellulose. Materialia 2018, 4, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Matinfar, M.; Mesgar, A.S.; Mohammadi, Z. Evaluation of physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties of chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose reinforced with multiphasic calcium phosphate whisker-like fibers for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 100, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Sun, D.; Liu, W.; Tang, A.; Guo, F.; Xie, W. A new PEGDA/CNF aerogel-wet hydrogel scaffold fabricated by a two-step method. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 8092–8101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Chen, Z.J.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, H.; Shi, H.H.; Zhang, X.C.; Liu, B. Mineralized self-assembled silk fibroin/cellulose interpenetrating network aerogel for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 134, 112549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Rizal, S.; Yahya, E.B.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Abdullah, C.K.; Marwan, M.; Ikramullah, I.; Muksin, U. Preparation and Characterization of Nanocellulose/Chitosan Aerogel Scaffolds Using Chemical-Free Approach. Gels 2021, 7, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Tang, A.; Ji, J.; Li, J.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Li, Q. Nanocellulose/PEGDA Aerogels with Tunable Poisson’s Ratio Fabricated by Stereolithography for Mouse Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Xu, B.; Luo, Z.; Wang, D.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, H. In vitro and in vivo Repair Effects of the NCF-Col-NHA Aerogel Scaffold Loaded with SOST Monoclonal Antibody and SDF-1 in Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 825231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, C.; Cao, H.; Jia, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, P. Characterization of antibacterial aerogel based on varepsilon-poly-l-lysine/nanocellulose by using citric acid as crosslinker. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 291, 119568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sun, D.; Liu, W.; Tang, A.; Zhou, F. Tuning the Poisson’s ratio of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate/cellulose nanofibril aerogel scaffold precisely for cultivation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2022, 111, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ressler, A.; Žužić, A.; Ivanišević, I.; Kamboj, N.; Ivanković, H. Ionic substituted hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration applications: A review. Open Ceram. 2021, 6, 100122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Bharadwaz, A.; Jayasuriya, A.C. Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 110, 110698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Family, R.; Solati-Hashjin, M.; Namjoy Nik, S.; Nemati, A. Surface modification for titanium implants by hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. CasJ Intern. Med. 2012, 3, 460–465. [Google Scholar]
  125. Yahya, E.B.; Amirul, A.A.; HPS, A.K.; Olaiya, N.G.; Iqbal, M.O.; Jummaat, F.; AK, A.S.; Adnan, A.S. Insights into the Role of Biopolymer Aerogel Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Polymers 2021, 13, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Landis, W.J.; Silver, F.H. Mineral deposition in the extracellular matrices of vertebrate tissues: Identification of possible apatite nucleation sites on type I collagen. Cells Tissues Organs 2009, 189, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. He, X.; Tang, K.; Li, X.; Wang, F.; Liu, J.; Zou, F.; Yang, M.; Li, M. A porous collagen-carboxymethyl cellulose/hydroxyapatite composite for bone tissue engineering by bi-molecular template method. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Saravanan, S.; Sameera, D.K.; Moorthi, A.; Selvamurugan, N. Chitosan scaffolds containing chicken feather keratin nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. LogithKumar, R.; KeshavNarayan, A.; Dhivya, S.; Chawla, A.; Saravanan, S.; Selvamurugan, N. A review of chitosan and its derivatives in bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cataldi, A.; Rigotti, D.; Nguyen, V.D.H.; Pegoretti, A. Polyvinyl alcohol reinforced with crystalline nanocellulose for 3D printing application. Mater. Today Commun. 2018, 15, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, A.; Medina, L.; Berglund, L.A. High-Strength Nanocomposite Aerogels of Ternary Composition: Poly (vinyl alcohol), Clay, and Cellulose Nanofibrils. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 6453–6461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Omenetto, F.G.; Kaplan, D.L. New opportunities for an ancient material. Science 2010, 329, 528–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Cheng, G.; Chen, J.; Wang, Q.; Yang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Z.; Tu, H.; Deng, H.; Li, Z. Promoting osteogenic differentiation in pre-osteoblasts and reducing tibial fracture healing time using functional nanofibers. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 3658–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Oest, M.E.; Dupont, K.M.; Kong, H.J.; Mooney, D.J.; Guldberg, R.E. Quantitative assessment of scaffold and growth factor-mediated repair of critically sized bone defects. J. Orthop. Res 2007, 25, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Tatara, A.M.; Mikos, A.G. Tissue Engineering in Orthopaedics. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2016, 98, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Janmohammadi, M.; Nazemi, Z.; Salehi, A.O.M.; Seyfoori, A.; John, J.V.; Nourbakhsh, M.S.; Akbari, M. Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 20, 137–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wan, C.; Jiao, Y.; Sun, Q.; Li, J. Preparation, characterization, and antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles embedded into cellulose aerogels. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 1137–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Esquivel-Castro, T.A.; Ibarra-Alonso, M.C.; Oliva, J.; Martinez-Luevanos, A. Porous aerogel and core/shell nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 96, 915–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Saini, A.; Yadav, C.; Sethi, S.K.; Xue, B.L.; Xia, Y.; Li, K.; Manik, G.; Li, X. Microdesigned Nanocellulose-Based Flexible Antibacterial Aerogel Architectures Impregnated with Bioactive Cinnamomum cassia. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 4874–4885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ye, S.; He, S.; Su, C.; Jiang, L.; Wen, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Shao, W. Morphological, Release and Antibacterial Performances of Amoxicillin-Loaded Cellulose Aerogels. Molecules 2018, 23, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kundu, K.; Jaswandkar, S.V.; Katti, D.R.; Katti, K.S. Initial upsurge of BMPs enhances long-term osteogenesis in in-vitro bone regeneration. Materialia 2022, 26, 101576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. INFUSE(R) Bone Graft; Medtronic: Dublin, Ireland, 2016.
  143. Carragee, E.J.; Hurwitz, E.L.; Weiner, B.K. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: Emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011, 11, 471–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. James, A.W.; LaChaud, G.; Shen, J.; Asatrian, G.; Nguyen, V.; Zhang, X.; Ting, K.; Soo, C. A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2016, 22, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Cheng, G.; Yin, C.; Tu, H.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Xing, X.; Xie, C.; Shi, X.; Du, Y.; et al. Controlled Co-delivery of Growth Factors through Layer-by-Layer Assembly of Core-Shell Nanofibers for Improving Bone Regeneration. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 6372–6382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Madl, C.M.; Mehta, M.; Duda, G.N.; Heilshorn, S.C.; Mooney, D.J. Presentation of BMP-2 mimicking peptides in 3D hydrogels directs cell fate commitment in osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Weng, L.; Boda, S.K.; Wang, H.; Teusink, M.J.; Shuler, F.D.; Xie, J. Novel 3D Hybrid Nanofiber Aerogels Coupled with BMP-2 Peptides for Cranial Bone Regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, e1701415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. John, J.V.; Choksi, M.; Chen, S.; Boda, S.K.; Su, Y.; McCarthy, A.; Teusink, M.J.; Reinhardt, R.A.; Xie, J. Tethering peptides onto biomimetic and injectable nanofiber microspheres to direct cellular response. Nanomedicine 2019, 22, 102081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. John, J.V.; McCarthy, A.; Wang, H.; Luo, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, F.; Zhang, Y.S.; Xie, J. Freeze-Casting with 3D-Printed Templates Creates Anisotropic Microchannels and Patterned Macrochannels within Biomimetic Nanofiber Aerogels for Rapid Cellular Infiltration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, e2100238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Seyedi, Z.; Amiri, M.S.; Mohammadzadeh, V.; Hashemzadeh, A.; Haddad-Mashadrizeh, A.; Mashreghi, M.; Qayoomian, M.; Hashemzadeh, M.R.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Taghavizadeh Yazdi, M.E. Icariin: A Promising Natural Product in Biomedicine and Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Wang, S.; Yuan, Y.; Lin, Q.; Zhou, H.; Tang, B.; Liu, Y.; Huang, H.; Liang, B.; Mao, Y.; Liu, K.; et al. Antiosteoporosis effect of tanshinol in osteoporosis animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 937538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Baur, J.A.; Sinclair, D.A. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: The in vivo evidence. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Qin, L.; Zhao, X.; He, Y.; Wang, H.; Wei, H.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, T.; Qin, Y.; Du, A. Preparation, Characterization, and In vitro Evaluation of Resveratrol-Loaded Cellulose Aerogel. Materials 2020, 13, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhang, Y.; Yan, M.; Yu, Q.F.; Yang, P.F.; Zhang, H.D.; Sun, Y.H.; Zhang, Z.F.; Gao, Y.F. Puerarin Prevents LPS-Induced Osteoclast Formation and Bone Loss via Inhibition of Akt Activation. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 39, 2028–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ouyang, L.; Chen, B.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Liao, Y.; Yeung, K.W.K.; Liu, X. Puerarin@Chitosan composite for infected bone repair through mimicking the bio-functions of antimicrobial peptides. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 21, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Emam, H.E.; Shaheen, T.I. Design of a dual pH and temperature responsive hydrogel based on esterified cellulose nanocrystals for potential drug release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 278, 118925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Liang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Wang, L.; He, H.; Wang, S. Biocompatible smart cellulose nanofibres for sustained drug release via pH and temperature dual-responsive mechanism. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 249, 116876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Panja, S.; Maji, S.; Maiti, T.K.; Chattopadhyay, S. A Smart Magnetically Active Nanovehicle for on-Demand Targeted Drug Delivery: Where van der Waals Force Balances the Magnetic Interaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 24229–24241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Senapati, S.; Mahanta, A.K.; Kumar, S.; Maiti, P. Controlled drug delivery vehicles for cancer treatment and their performance. Signal. Transduct. Target Ther. 2018, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Naznin, A.; Dhar, P.K.; Dutta, S.K.; Chakrabarty, S.; Karmakar, U.K.; Kundu, P.; Hossain, M.S.; Barai, H.R.; Haque, M.R. Synthesis of Magnetic Iron Oxide-Incorporated Cellulose Composite Particles: An Investigation on Antioxidant Properties and Drug Delivery Applications. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Ge, Y.W.; Chu, M.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Ke, Q.F.; Guo, Y.P.; Zhang, C.Q.; Jia, W.T. Nacre-inspired magnetically oriented micro-cellulose fibres/nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan layered scaffold enhances pro-osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 16, 100439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Tang, L.; Wu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Sun, L.; Guo, J.; Fan, X.; Ta, D. Study on synergistic effects of carboxymethyl cellulose and LIPUS for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 286, 119278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Cherian, R.M.; Tharayil, A.; Varghese, R.T.; Antony, T.; Kargarzadeh, H.; Chirayil, C.J.; Thomas, S. A review on the emerging applications of nano-cellulose as advanced coatings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 282, 119123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Cunha, A.G.; Lundahl, M.; Ansari, M.F.; Johansson, L.S.; Campbell, J.M.; Rojas, O.J. Surface Structuring and Water Interactions of Nanocellulose Filaments Modified with Organosilanes toward Wearable Materials. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 5279–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chen, N.; Kim Do, H.; Kovacik, P.; Sojoudi, H.; Wang, M.; Gleason, K.K. Polymer Thin Films and Surface Modification by Chemical Vapor Deposition: Recent Progress. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2016, 7, 373–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zhao, S.; Malfait, W.J.; Guerrero-Alburquerque, N.; Koebel, M.M.; Nystrom, G. Biopolymer Aerogels and Foams: Chemistry, Properties, and Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 7580–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Ganesan, K.; Barowski, A.; Ratke, L.; Milow, B. Influence of hierarchical porous structures on the mechanical properties of cellulose aerogels. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Xie, C.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, H.; Yang, S.; Guo, Z.X.; Qiu, T.; Tuo, X. Macroscopic-Scale Preparation of Aramid Nanofiber Aerogel by Modified Freezing-Drying Method. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 10000–10009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Krishnakumar, G.S.; Sampath, S.; Muthusamy, S.; John, M.A. Importance of crosslinking strategies in designing smart biomaterials for bone tissue engineering: A systematic review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 96, 941–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Iglesias-Mejuto, A.; Garcia-Gonzalez, C.A. 3D-Printed, Dual Crosslinked and Sterile Aerogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2022, 14, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhao, J.; Lu, C.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X. Polyethylenimine-grafted cellulose nanofibril aerogels as versatile vehicles for drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 2607–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Tortorella, S.; Vetri Buratti, V.; Maturi, M.; Sambri, L.; Comes Franchini, M.; Locatelli, E. Surface-Modified Nanocellulose for Application in Biomedical Engineering and Nanomedicine: A Review. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 9909–9937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Demirdogen, R.E.; Kilic, D.; Emen, F.M.; Aşkar, Ş.; Karaçolak, A.İ.; Yesilkaynak, T.; Ihsan, A. Novel antibacterial cellulose acetate fibers modified with 2-fluoropyridine complexes. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1204, 127537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ahmad, H.; Anguilano, L.; Fan, M. Microstructural architecture, and mechanical properties of empowered cellulose-based aerogel composites via TEMPO-free oxidation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 298, 120117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Isogai, A.; Hänninen, T.; Fujisawa, S.; Saito, T. Review: Catalytic oxidation of cellulose with nitroxyl radicals under aqueous conditions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 86, 122–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Isogai, A.; Saito, T.; Fukuzumi, H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Zheng, T.; Clemons, C.M.; Pilla, S. Grafting PEG on cellulose nanocrystals via polydopamine chemistry and the effects of PEG graft length on the mechanical performance of composite film. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 271, 118405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Zeng, G.; Zhang, L.; Qi, B.; Luo, J.; Wan, Y. Cellulose esterification with carboxylic acid in deep eutectic solvent pretreatment inhibits enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 380, 129085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Hadimani, S.; Supriya, D.; Roopa, K.; Soujanya, S.K.; Rakshata, V.; Netravati, A.; Akshayakumar, V.; De Britto, S.; Jogaiah, S. Biodegradable hybrid biopolymer film based on carboxy methyl cellulose and selenium nanoparticles with antifungal properties to enhance grapes shelf life. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 237, 124076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Osorio, M.; Ortiz, I.; Ganan, P.; Naranjo, T.; Zuluaga, R.; van Kooten, T.G.; Castro, C. Novel surface modification of three-dimensional bacterial nanocellulose with cell-derived adhesion proteins for soft tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 100, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Tetik, H.; Zhao, K.; Shah, N.; Lin, D. 3D freeze-printed cellulose-based aerogels: Obtaining truly 3D shapes, and functionalization with cross-linking and conductive additives. J. Manuf. Process. 2021, 68, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Holzwarth, J.M.; Ma, P.X. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 9622–9629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Ajdary, R.; Huan, S.; Zanjanizadeh Ezazi, N.; Xiang, W.; Grande, R.; Santos, H.A.; Rojas, O.J. Acetylated Nanocellulose for Single-Component Bioinks and Cell Proliferation on 3D-Printed Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 2770–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Orlacchio, R.; Zuppolini, S.; Cruz-Maya, I.; Pragliola, S.; Borriello, A.; Guarino, V.; Fittipaldi, R.; Lettieri, M.; Venditto, V. Polydopamine-Coated Poly-Lactic Acid Aerogels as Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Lee, H.; Dellatore, S.M.; Miller, W.M.; Messersmith, P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Lin, F.; Wang, Z.; Shen, Y.; Tang, L.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, B.; Lu, B. Natural skin-inspired versatile cellulose biomimetic hydrogels. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 26442–26455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Sun, K.; Lin, H.; Tang, Y.; Xiang, S.; Xue, J.; Yin, W.; Tan, J.; Peng, H.; Alexander, P.G.; Tuan, R.S.; et al. Injectable BMP-2 gene-activated scaffold for the repair of cranial bone defect in mice. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2020, 9, 1631–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Lu, C.H.; Chang, Y.H.; Lin, S.Y.; Li, K.C.; Hu, Y.C. Recent progresses in gene delivery-based bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 1695–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Li, Y.; Maciel, D.; Rodrigues, J.; Shi, X.; Tomas, H. Biodegradable Polymer Nanogels for Drug/Nucleic Acid Delivery. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 8564–8608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The scheme of fabrication of cellulose-based aerogels by sol–gel method. The first step is preparation of nanocellulose including purification by chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis and separation of these pretreated cellulose materials to form a nanoscale cellulose material by mechanical approaches. The second step is a sol–gel process including polymer dispersing in solvent and crosslinking stage and the third step is gel-drying process. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. The scheme of fabrication of cellulose-based aerogels by sol–gel method. The first step is preparation of nanocellulose including purification by chemical and enzymatic hydrolysis and separation of these pretreated cellulose materials to form a nanoscale cellulose material by mechanical approaches. The second step is a sol–gel process including polymer dispersing in solvent and crosslinking stage and the third step is gel-drying process. Created with BioRender.com.
Polymers 15 02323 g001
Figure 5. (A) Cardiomyocyte attachment and morphology on CNF (g,j) and TOCNF (h,k) [183]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (B) CNF, TOCNF scaffolds in the wet state soon after printing and after freeze-drying [183]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C) (gl) SEM images of CNF/PEGDA scaffolds with different Poisson’s ratios and (mo) SEM images of cell adhesion after inoculation on CNF/PEGDA scaffolds [118]. Copyright 2021, Molecular Diversity Preservation International. (D) DIW 3D printed models. Displayed scale bars are 1 cm [107]. Copyright 2017, Nature.
Figure 5. (A) Cardiomyocyte attachment and morphology on CNF (g,j) and TOCNF (h,k) [183]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (B) CNF, TOCNF scaffolds in the wet state soon after printing and after freeze-drying [183]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C) (gl) SEM images of CNF/PEGDA scaffolds with different Poisson’s ratios and (mo) SEM images of cell adhesion after inoculation on CNF/PEGDA scaffolds [118]. Copyright 2021, Molecular Diversity Preservation International. (D) DIW 3D printed models. Displayed scale bars are 1 cm [107]. Copyright 2017, Nature.
Polymers 15 02323 g005
Table 1. Types of crosslinking [63].
Table 1. Types of crosslinking [63].
CrosslinkingCrosslinkerAdvantagesDisadvantages
PhysicalHydrogen linkages, electrostatic interaction, ionic crosslinking, p–p stacking, dehydration heat treatment, and ultraviolet treatment [68,71]Safe, cheap, small tissue responseLow degree of crosslinking,
difficult to control the crosslinking reaction, time-consuming
ChemicalGA, CA, GP [73], HMDA [74], TA [75]Forming a strong covalent bondCytotoxic
EnzymaticH2O2, horseradish peroxidase, transglutaminase, tyrosinase [72]Controlled by temperature, pH, or ionic strengthExpensive price,
substrate specificity
Table 2. Cellulose aerogel in bone tissue engineering.
Table 2. Cellulose aerogel in bone tissue engineering.
CompositePreparation MethodPorosity or Pore SizeMechanical PropertiesSeeding CellResultsYearRef.
HA–CNCEsterification reaction and freeze-drying91%Compressive strength: 41.8 MPa Biodegradable, non-toxic, low immunogenicity, and biocompatibility
flexible-shaped ability
2018[113]
CNCHydrazone crosslinking and CO2 supercritical drying98.8–99.3%Young’s modulus: 25–65 KPaOsteoblast-like Saos-2 cellsHigh porosity and effective bone growth promotion
osteoconduction
2019[64]
HA–BCFreeze-drying (cryogels) and scCO2 drying(aerogels)30–80 nmElastic modulus: 10.91 ± 3.26 G Pa, hardness of 0.37 ± 0.18 G Pa.-Excellent mechanical strength2019[102]
Gelatin–CNFHMDA crosslinking94–95%35.2–54.7 KPaL929 fibroblastsSuitable for cell adhesion and growth2019[74]
Freeze-drying300 μm
CS–CMCGA crosslinking and freeze-drying82 ± 5%Strength: 2.51 GPa modulus: 139 MPaMG63The cell viability increased significantly2019[114]
Mesoporous:
>100 μm
Micropore: <50 μm
PEGDA–CNFSLA and freeze-dryingAverage pore size: 46–69 μmThe elastic deformation was 35 KPa under 30% stressBMSCSuitable for cell adhesion and growth2019[115]
PCL–CS-cellulose acetateElectrospinning and freeze-drying-The compression modulus can reach 0.31 MPa modulus of compression: 45 ± 6 KpaMC3T3-E1Improve cell adhesion, infiltration, and osteogenic differentiation2020[100]
SF–celluloseChemical crosslinking and freeze-drying-Tensile strength: 7.73 MPaHEK-293 T cellsExcellent mechanical strength2021[116]
Strength of bending: 25.91 MPa
CS–CNFFreeze-drying97.20%Young’s modulus: 0.28 MPa-Excellent mechanical properties2021[117]
SF–n–HA–celluloseChemical crosslinking and freeze-drying99.20%Young’s modulus: 12.7–22.4 MPaHEK-293T cellsControllable degradation rate;2021[37]
Good mineralization ability;
PEGDA–CNFStereolithography and freeze-dryingMesoporous: 400–800 umYoung’s modulus: 2.94 MPaMouse BMSCControllable pore structure2021[118]
Micropore size: 20~100 µmAdjustable Poisson’s ratio
CS–CNCChemical crosslinking and CO2 supercritical drying20–60 nmCompressive strength was 0.13 MPa at 3% strain-Reduce the gel shrinkage2021[103]
BCFreeze-drying and seeded with BMP2Macropores: >100-BMSCExcellent osteoconduction2021[17]
μm, micropores: <100 μm, nanopores: <100 nmOsteoinduction
COL–n–HA–CNFThermal crosslinking90%The elastic modulus was (12.95 ± 4.77) MPa, and the compressibility was (0.4067 ± 0.084) MPa.Rabbit BMSC and human vascular endothelial cellsControl releasing ability; osteogenesis and vascularization abilities.2022[119]
and freeze-drying75 ± 18 µm
ɛ-poly-l-lysine-TEMPO CNFEsterification, crosslinking with CA and freeze-drying≥85.05%Tensile strength: 22 MPa-Antibacterial property and degradable2022[120]
PEGDA/celluloseSLA and freeze-drying20–50 μm0.58  ±  0.0222 MPaBMSCDynamic Poisson’s ratio promotion differentiation at different stages of BMSC2022[121]
Table 3. Characteristics of esterification and etherification modification of cellulose.
Table 3. Characteristics of esterification and etherification modification of cellulose.
Derivatization/Modification MethodIntroduced Functional GroupsAdvantagesSurface PropertyRef.
Esterification-COOREnhanced hydrophobicity and mechanical strength. Reduced water uptake. The specific surface area of cellulose increased.FTIR confirmed the occurrence of carboxylic esterification on hydroxyl groups. The particle size decreased by 25–35 µm
DY11 compared to the original cellulose, while the adsorption amount increased by 20–30 mg/g
[178]
Etherification-OR |Enhanced hydrophobicity, mechanical strength, and thermal stability. Improved hydrophilicity.The FTIR spectra results indicate the presence of carboxyl characteristic peaks.
TGA analysis shows higher thermal stability.
[179]
Direct Yellow 11 (DY11) was used to evaluate cellulose accessibility through the modified Simons’ staining.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Jiang, S.; Xu, D.; Li, Z.; Guo, J.; Li, Z.; Cheng, G. Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks. Polymers 2023, 15, 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102323

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Jiang S, Xu D, Li Z, Guo J, Li Z, Cheng G. Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks. Polymers. 2023; 15(10):2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yaoguang, Shengjun Jiang, Dongdong Xu, Zubing Li, Jie Guo, Zhi Li, and Gu Cheng. 2023. "Application of Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Outlooks" Polymers 15, no. 10: 2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop