Next Article in Journal
Improvement of the Thermo-Oxidative Stability of Biobased Poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) Using Biogenic Wine By-Products as Sustainable Functional Fillers
Previous Article in Journal
Multi Scale Analysis of the Retting and Process Effect on the Properties of Flax Bio-Based Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of an Epoxy Matrix Hybrid Composite with Astrocaryum Aculeatum (Tucumã) Endocarp and Kaolin from the Amazonas State in Brazil

by
Antonio Claudio Kieling
1,*,
José Costa de Macedo Neto
2,
Gilberto Garcia del Pino
1,
Ricardo da Silva Barboza
3,
Francisco Rolando Valenzuela Diáz
4,
José Luis Valin Rivera
5,
Meylí Valin Fernández
6,
Cristobal Galleguillos Ketterer
5,
Alvaro González Ortega
5 and
Roberto Iquilio Abarzúa
5
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, State University of Amazonas, Manaus 69850-020, Brazil
2
Department of Materials Engineering, State University of Amazonas, Manaus 69850-020, Brazil
3
Computer Engineering Department, State University of Amazonas, Manaus 69850-020, Brazil
4
Department of Materials Engineering and Metallurgy, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil
5
Escuela de Ingeniería Mecánica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340025, Chile
6
Department of Mechanical Engineering (DIM), Faculty of Engineering (FI), University of Concepción, Concepción 4030000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(11), 2532; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112532
Submission received: 26 April 2023 / Revised: 17 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023

Abstract

:
Composites with natural lignocellulosic fillers are being cited as a viable and sustainable alternative to conventional materials, as they combine lower costs with lower weight. In many tropical countries, such as Brazil, there is a considerable amount of lignocellulosic waste that is improperly discarded, which causes pollution of the environment. The Amazon region has huge deposits of clay silicate materials in the Negro River basin, such as kaolin, which can be used as fillers in polymeric composite materials. This work investigates a new composite material (ETK) made of epoxy resin (ER), powdered tucumã endocarp (PTE), and kaolin (K), without coupling agents, with the aim of producing a composite with lower environmental impact. The ETK samples, totaling 25 different compositions, were prepared by cold molding. Characterizations of the samples were performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR). In addition, the mechanical properties were determined via tensile, compressive, three-point flexural and impact tests. The FTIR and SEM results showed an interaction between ER, PTE, and K, and the incorporation of PTE and K reduced the mechanical properties of the ETK samples. Nonetheless, these composites can be considered potential materials to be used for sustainable engineering applications in which high mechanical strength is not a main requirement of the material.

1. Introduction

With the development of new production technologies that demonstrate significant increases in quality and reductions in aggressive waste into the environment, it has become important to use new materials and techniques to improve the properties of such materials [1,2]. Among these new materials are composite materials that first emerged in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia as mixtures of mud and straw, as well as combinations of other plant fibers that have been found by archaeologists in ancient burial chambers. The current era of composite materials began with the discovery of plastic and its numerous applications [3].
Due to their ease of production and their low weight and flexibility, polymers have been applied in various solutions in a wide range of industrial sectors [4]. Among the various forms of polymeric materials that are now on the market, epoxy resins stand out, and their particular characteristic of thermosetting is of industrial interest due to their properties of chemical resistance, electrical insulation, thermal and mechanical characteristics, and low contraction during their curing. With their huge commercial production for applications in, for example, the automotive and aerospace industries, the global epoxy market reached USD 26 billion in 2019, with an expected increase from 2020 to 2028 of a compound annual growth rate of 6.2% [5,6,7,8].
Different fibers—mainly synthetic fibers such as glass fiber, carbon fiber, and aramid—are used for composite materials, and clays are being used to reinforce these materials. Recently, the addition of clay nanoparticles has attracted attention in academic and industrial circles due to improvements in mechanical and thermal properties [9]. Clays are abundant materials in nature and, due to the combination of low cost and the low environmental impact involved in obtaining them, the study and development of applications of their nanoparticles has been widespread [10]. The State of Amazonas, which is the largest state in Brazil, is rich in deposits of clay minerals, principally in the geological formations of the Solimões (upper Miocene period) and Içá (Pleistocene period), with a predominance of kaolinite (kaolin) deposits [11].
In composite studies, bentonite nanoparticles with maleic anhydride added to polymers at levels of up to 5% mass provided an increase in tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of up to 35%, as demonstrated by Venkatesan et al. [12] and Rao and Sankar [13]. The addition of clay nanoparticles has resulted in significant improvements in mechanical properties, UV resistance, and anti-bubble characteristics in different types of composites with plant fibers, as shown by Deka et al. [14]. The addition of organophilic bentonite nanoparticles in the order of 2.5%, 5%, and 10% by weight in polyester resulted in a composite with higher tensile, flexural, and impact strength, as demonstrated by Garcia et al. [15].
The application of lignocellulosic fibers as reinforcements in composite materials has found increasing use in recent years, replacing synthetic fibers such as glass, carbon, and aramid fibers, due to the characteristics of natural fibers, such as their low cost, low density, high specific modulus, economic and environmental advantages, biodegradability, abundance, and many technical qualities [15,16,17]. These advantages place lignocellulosic fiber composites among the high-performance composites, with economic and environmental advantages [18,19]. Although completely synthetic composites dominate the automobile, aircraft, sporting goods, and infrastructure sectors [8,9,10], they have significant disadvantages, such as high input costs, high costs of production, non-recyclability, toxicity, and non-biodegradability [20,21,22].
The tucumã (Astrocaryum aculeatum) is a palm tree that is native to the Amazon, and the pulp of its fruit is consumed in several dishes in the cuisine of the Amazon. It has high lipid, energy, and vitamin A content, and its content of beta-carotene is considered medium. Its core is used in local crafts, although 92% is discarded as trash without reuse—discards that could yield up to 30 tons of woody endocarp on a monthly basis, as demonstrated by Kieling et al. [23].
Composites with thermoplastic polymer and powdered tucumã endocarp were developed by the addition of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%, by weight in a recycled polypropylene matrix. Additionally, endocarps of other fruits, such as coconut, can be used for applications that are similar to those of the endocarp of tucumã, as shown by Kieling et al. [20].
In this work, we discuss the development of a composite produced with powdered tucumã endocarp (PTE) and kaolin clay (K) in the epoxy resin (ER) matrix and provide an analysis of that development. The tucumã fruit is highly consumed in the State of Amazonas and there are large amounts of endocarpium that are not used. Such amounts of unused endocarpium could be utilized in compost. In addition, there are large reserves of kaolin in the State of Amazonas which, together with tucumã, could be used in composites to reduce the cost of materials. To carry out this study, different techniques for characterizing materials were used, as well as tensile, bending and impact tests.

2. Materials and Methods

The manufacture of the composite began at the Manaus Moderna market with the acquisition of 250 tucumã cores with an average diameter of 34.28 ± 4.84 mm and an average mass of 22.08 ± 2.63 g (measurement with a Mitutoyo digital caliper, precision 0.05 mm, and a Prix 3400 analytical balance, precision 0.001 g). The tucumã endocarp was initially processed by breaking the cores with the help of a sledgehammer, by which the woody endocarp was separated from the fleshy inner, taking care to break it into small parts. Afterwards, the material was ground in knife mill (Marconi, 200 mesh). The material was then dried at 60 °C in a vacuum oven (Quimis) for four hours and the powder was stored in a container inside a dryer for further use. Figure 1 shows details of the tucumã fruit, where the endocarp that was used in this work can be seen.
The kaolin for this study (kaolin-AM, white in color) was obtained in the city of Careiro, Amazonas (3°49′10.0″ S 60°21′40.4″ W). Initially, the kaolin was dried in an oven (Quimis) with air circulation for 24 h at a temperature of 105 °C. Subsequently, the material passed through a sieve tower with a final mesh of 200.
Transparent epoxy resin (2001, Redelease do Brasil) with hardener (3154, Redelease do Brasil) was used in the ratio of 1:2 (resin to hardener) by mass/weight. In addition, to avoid the formation of bubbles as much as possible, the anti-bubble additive (Siladit 53, Redelease do Brasil) for epoxy resins was used, at a proportion of 0.5% of the total weight of the formulation.
The samples were produced considering variations with and without the clay and also with and without the powdered tucumã endocarp, and totaled 25 types of samples, as shown in Table 1. The name of the samples was considered as epoxy/tucumã/kaolin (ETK). The following sequence was used in the formulation and manipulation of the composite material: (a) resin, (b) hardener, (c) additive, (d) powder, and (e) kaolin. The materials were deposited in the sequence indicated in a transparent polypropylene cup, and the mixture was homogenized for 5 min with a bamboo spatula (rod). Then, the material was deposited in metal molds up to the thickness limit. A level meter (Mitutoyo) with a resolution of 0.1° was used to level the molds on the workbench. The resin was left to cure for 24 h at a temperature greater than 18 °C. After the curing time, the samples were removed from the molds. Figure 2 shows the specimens manufactured using this methodology.
The PTE and kaolin were analyzed for particle size (Mastersizer 2000, Malvern Instruments, resolution from 0.02 μm to 2000 μm) and their cumulative volumetric dispersion, according to ASTM d4464-14 [24]. The objectives of carrying out the characterization of the particle size were as follows: first, to verify whether the granulometry presented in this work coincided with the granulometry presented in previous works such as [25] and second, to use it as a reference base to analyze, in future works, the influence of particle size on the mechanical properties of the composite. In the sample preparation, distilled water was used as dispersant medium, 1.56 refractive index, 0.1 absorption, 1750 rpm stirring and pumping. The previously dispersed samples were placed in the vat to obtain the readings. For the homogenization of the samples, it was necessary to treat them with 1 min of ultrasound following the equipment PLANATC, CBU100/3LDG. The results obtained can be seen in the graph of Figure 3.
With the objective of knowing the different chemical groups that were present in the tucumã powder, in the kaolin, and then in the interaction of these components in the composite, a characterization of the composite in its different combinations was performed using a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) (Shimazdu, IRAffinity-1S) in samples ranging from 10 to 20 mg, as recommended by the ASTM E-1252-98 standard [27]. The analyses were performed on the attenuated total reflectance (ATR) module (%T as a function of the wave number in cm−1). The spectra were obtained in the mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIR) region, in the range of 4000 to 500 cm−1. The results obtained can be seen in the graph provided in Figure 4.
The percentage of the chemical components of the vegetable fibers was determined following the Van Soest methodology [28], which uses an acid-type detergent, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), to determine the percentage of ADF (fiber + lignin), lignin and cellulose of the vegetable fibers. For this, four samples were elaborated, using 27.19 mL of concentrated H2SO4 for 1 L of distilled water and 720 mL of concentrated H2SO4 for 280 mL of distilled water, and they were dissolved in 50 g of CTAB in 5 L of 0.5 M H2SO4. First, 1 g (weight 1) of plant material was weighed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Next, 100 mL of CTAB and drops of octan-2-ol were added as antifoam, and then it was heated for 1 h at a temperature of 80 °C to 90 °C. To determine the percentage of ADF, the extract was filtered under hot water, pre-ignition at 550 °C, and weighed (weight 2). The residue was washed three times with 50 mL of distilled water at approximately 95 °C to 100 °C and then with acetone, until the acetone was crystalline. Suction was imposed until the sample was dry, finishing the drying in an oven at 105 °C for 2 h to be weighed later (weight 3). The ADF percentage was determined by Equation (1).
% A D F = w e i g h t 3 w e i g h t 2 · 100 w e i g h t 1
To determine the percentage of cellulose, the H2SO4 solution (cold) was added, homogenizing it with a glass rod. Instead of draining naturally, the same quantity of H2SO4 was placed again, homogenizing it again. After 3 h, hot water was added, and the acid was removed by suction. Next, the sample was washed using acetone, dried first by suction, and then in an oven at 105 °C for 2 h, to be weighed (weight 4). The cellulose percentage was determined by Equation (2).
% C e l u l o s e = w e i g h t 3 w e i g h t 4 · 100 w e i g h t 1
To determine the lignin, the sample was subjected to 550 °C in a muffle furnace for 2 h, then cooled and weighed (weight 5). The lignin percentage was determined by Equation (3).
% L i g n i n = w e i g h t 4 w e i g h t 5 · 100 w e i g h t 1
The results obtained of cellulose and lignin percentage are shown in Figure 5.
Subsequently, scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs of the kaolin and tucumã endocarp powder reinforcement were performed separately and on the composite to study the distribution of these components within the composite. Initially, gold metallization was performed in all samples to increase the conduction of electrons and allow for a better image. Then, using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-IT500HR), the voltage acceleration was adjusted to 15 kV with a secondary electron beam at varying magnifications. The ER and ETKs samples used in the analyses were obtained after the performance of the tensile test, and their fracture regions were preserved; the PTE and kaolin samples were also analyzed. The reference standard employed was ASTM E986-04 [29] and the results obtained are shown in Figures 6–11.
Finally, to determine the mechanical properties of the hybrid composite as a function of the amount of powdered tucumã endocarp and kaolin, mechanical tests of traction, compression, flexion, and impact were carried out on the specimens made in molds, as shown in Figure 2. For the tensile, flexural, and compression tests, a universal test machine (Instron 5984) was used, which was equipped with a 150 kN load cell with a displacement speed in the order of 10 mm min−1. A set of five samples was tested for each composition. The tensile test was carried out according to the reference standard ASTM D638-14 [30], considering the type I test sample with a size of 165 × 19 × 3.2 mm.
The flexural test was performed in accordance with the ASTM D790-03 standard [31]. In the performance of the test, procedure A was adopted using the three-point method, considering a specimen with dimensions of 127 × 12.7 × 3.2 mm.
The compression test was carried out according to the reference standard ASTM D695-2A [32], considering a sample with a length of 25.4 mm and a diameter of 12.7 mm.
The reference standard for the Izod impact test, ASTM D256-04 [33], which is recommended for polymeric materials and their derivatives, was applied to three samples for each composition. The impact rupture energy of the polymeric material is quantified in the form of joules per meter (J/m). Test type A of the standard was chosen for use with samples of 63.5 × 12.5 × 104 3.2 mm with notches at 45° in the middle. A pendulum impact testing machine on IT504 plastics (Tinius Olsen, Horsham, PA, USA) was used.

3. Results

3.1. Particle Size Characterization

In Figure 3a, it can be observed that the granulometric curve of the powdered tucumã presents an approximately normal distribution, while the kaolin presents a bimodal distribution with deviation to the left. In the particle size range of 0.6 µm to 290 µm for kaolin and powdered tucumã, respectively, there are significant peaks, with volume ratios of 6.7 to 6.4. For kaolin, the peak volume ratio was larger, and the particle size was finer than in the powdered tucumã. The curves of granulometric distribution by accumulated volume are presented in Figure 3b. For kaolin, the effective diameter (d10) was 0.61 μm, and 10% of the particles had a diameter less than this value [31], while for the powdered tucumã it was 24.5 μm. It can be seen that, for kaolin, 43% of the particles were below 2 μm and 87% were below 20 μm, while for tucumã powder, 8% were below 20 μm, 37% were below 100 μm, and 8% were below 330 μm. The powder, which has a very fine granulation, has a degraded appearance and, therefore, it was preferable to work with the granulation presented above.

3.2. FTIR Characterization

Figure 4 shows the results of the FTIR assay for the ER, PTE, kaolin, and the resulting composite ETKs. Absorptions were found in the middle part of the spectrum for ER, which consists of epoxy and hydrocarbon groups. Vibrational regions of C-H elongation were observed between 2870 cm−1 and 3025 cm−1, with hydroxyl groups vibrating at 3200 cm−1 and epoxy functional groups at around 1000 cm−1, with significant peaks between 827 cm−1 and 1506 cm−1, which were similar to those mentioned by Zhang et al. [34].
The PTE exhibited molecular group vibrations in the range of 3500 cm−1, referring to O-H stretch that was due to existing moisture. In the region of 2750 cm−1, O-H binding bands were identified. The addition of powdered tucumã tended to decrease the presence of benzene rings in the molecular structure, thus explaining the potential loss of mechanical properties, which was corroborated by the increase of peaks in the region of 1500 cm−1 to 1600 cm−1 of the aromatic groups; this is also mentioned by Otieno et al. [35] and Kieling et al. (2023) [26].
In the region of 3620 cm−1 to 3680 cm−1, kaolin showed O-H stretching due to the presence of moisture, and at 1120 cm−1 longitudinal Si-O stretching, between 1000 cm−1 and 1030 cm−1 Si-O stretching due to the presence of quartz, O-H folding at 911 cm−1 from internal hydroxyl, Si-O folding at 753 cm−1, perpendicular stretching at 755 cm−1, Si-O-Si folding at 677 cm−1, Al-O-Si folding at 556 cm−1, and Si-O folding at 427 cm−1, which were similar to what was indicated by Deju et al. [36].
The spectrum of ETK13 indicated combined characteristics of ER + PTE + kaolin in the regions between 820 cm−1 to 1200 cm−1, 1400 cm−1 to 1600 cm−1, and 3580 cm−1 to 3800 cm−1, and it can be concluded that there is an interaction between the elements in the formation of the composite.

3.3. Percentage of Chemical Components of Vegetable Fibers

As indicated in the section on materials and methods, the components of the vegetable fiber were determined using the Van Soest methodology [28], using Equations (1)–(3). The results obtained are shown in Figure 5, where tucumã is composed of 49.35% of cellulose, 37.43% of lignin, and 13.22% of other components.

3.4. SEM Characterization of the ER, Kaolin, and ETKS

Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the SEM images generated in isolation for the powdered tucumã, kaolin, and epoxy resin, as well as the images of the combinations of these elements. Isolated images of clay and PTE show their morphologies and images of composites show particle distribution and interaction with the epoxy matrix. The surface of the PTE (Figure 6) appears to be rough, prismatic, and irregular with pores, similar to that seen by Kieling et al. [20].
The kaolin (Figure 7) contains its characteristic pseudo-hexagonal structure in the form of lamellar layers, as evidenced in the study of Otieno et al. [35].
The ER + 2% kaolin (ETK2) composite (Figure 8) has small particles of scattered kaolin grains in the ER matrix.
The ER + PTE + kaolin composites (ETK8) (Figure 9) present more evident regions of rupture, with a dispersion of the kaolin and PTE grains in the ER structure, in which the granular forms of the added fillers are not clearly evident.
This characterizes the intermolecular interaction resulting from these elements added to the ER and is corroborated by the interaction of the benzene rings observed in the FTIR assay and by the effect of the addition of PTE in the ER, combined with the addition of kaolin. The ER (ETK1) (Figure 10) has a structure of the fracture in the form of a smooth, region of resistance to crack propagation that led to brittle failure and voids [33].
The ER (ETK1) (Figure 10) has a structure in the form of overlapping layers due to the cold molding process. The ER + PTE + kaolin composites (ETK8 and ETK22) (Figure 9 and Figure 11) present more evident regions of rupture, with a dispersion of the kaolin and PTE grains in the ER structure, in which the granular forms of the added fillers are not clearly evident.
This characterizes the intermolecular interaction resulting from these elements added to the ER and is corroborated by the interaction of the benzene rings observed in the FTIR assay and by the effect of the addition of PTE in the ER, combined with the addition of kaolin. Microbubbles are formed in the samples (Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10) even with the addition of the anti-bubble additive as recommended by the manufacturer of the ER, which also contributes to a reduction in the mechanical strength of the resulting composites.

3.5. Mechanical Properties of the Composite

Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15 present the results of the mechanical tests for tensile strength (Figure 12), flexural strength (Figure 13), compressive strength (Figure 14), and Izod impact of the samples developed for the current study (Figure 15). In the tensile test (Figure 12), the samples ETK2, ETK3, ETK4, and ETK5, with ER + kaolin without PTE, showed stability around 38 MPa, even with the increase in kaolin ranging from 2% to 8% by weight, which is a result that is about 100% superior to that presented in previous studies with recycled PP + PTE thermoplastic resin, as presented by Kieling et al. [20]. The PTE increment of 10% to 40% by weight in the composition without kaolin (samples ETK6, ETK11, ETK16, and ETK21) showed a significant decrease in tensile strength. The flexural test (Figure 13) showed a decrease from 61 MPa (sample ETK1) to approximately 26 MPa (samples ETK18, ETK11, and ETK24)—in other words, a reduction of 57%. The increase in kaolin from 2% to 8% in weight showed an average decrease of up to 50% in flexural strength for ER + PTE + kaolin composites. The best performance was in the ETK7 sample, with 47 MPa. For the compressive strength (Figure 14), the samples without PTE, with ER + kaolin, showed better performance, as can be seen in the samples ETK2, ETK3, ETK4, and ETK5, with emphasis on ETK11 (ER + 20% PTE) which had the best performance at around 120 MPa. For the Izod impact test (Figure 15), the compositions without PTE and with kaolin showed a reduction of 50%, on average, in resistance, and the addition of powdered tucumã did not improve impact resistance. The best performance was in the ETK6 (ER + 10% PTE) sample and the ETK11 (ER + 20% PTE) sample, which was between 18 J.m and 20 J.m.
Tucumã endocarp and kaolinite are abundant in the State of Amazonas and can be a sustainable alternative for the bioeconomy. Studies presenting organic particles of tucumã endocarp and inorganic clay minerals, which act together as fillers in polymer matrices, are still uncommon in the literature; this increases the importance of this work.
Composites with ER combined with kaolin (ETK2, ETK3, ETK4, and ETK5), without PTE, generally had better mechanical characteristics when compared with those with ER + PTE + kaolin, since the addition of kaolin leads to the loss of important mechanical properties. Despite these losses, composites resulting from ER + PTE (10% to 40%) + kaolin (2% and 4%), ETK7 to ETK10, and ETK12 to ETK15, presented significant potential for use in general industrial products.

4. Conclusions

The characterization of the powdered tucumã endocarp and kaolin from the State of Amazonas, as well as the composition epoxy resin + tucumã powder + kaolin, was carried out using FTIR, particle size analysis, and scanning electron microscopy and mechanical testing. The kaolin presented a significant clay portion (granulation below 2 μm) and pseudo-hexagonal structure in lamellar layers and the powdered tucumã had a polymorphic irregular rough structure. The results showed that composites with epoxy resin + powdered tucumã had mechanical characteristics that were superior to the composites with epoxy resin + kaolin and epoxy resin + powdered tucumã + kaolin. Tensile strength, flexural strength, compression tests, and impact tests were carried out with the aim of discovering which combination had the best mechanical characteristics. In this sense, in addition to the epoxy resin + powdered tucumã compounds, the epoxy resin + powdered tucumã (10% to 40% by weight) + kaolin (2% to 4% by weight) compounds stood out as promising composites for applications in general industry, especially in the civil construction industry for boards and coatings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.V.R.; methodology, G.G.d.P.; software, C.G.K.; validation, A.G.O.; formal analysis, J.C.d.M.N.; resources, M.V.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.K.; writing—review and editing, A.C.K.; visualization, R.I.A.; supervision, F.R.V.D. and R.d.S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the State University of Amazonas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, University of Concepción, and University of São Paulo for the support provided to carry out the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Filizzola, D.M.; Santos, T.D.S.; de Miranda, A.G.; da Costa, J.C.M.; Nascimento, N.R.D.; dos Santos, M.D.; Bello, R.H.; del Pino, G.G.; Neto, J.C.D.M. Annealing Effect on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AA 5182 Aluminum Alloy. Mat. Res. 2021, 24, e20200545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vieira, A.; de Macedo Neto, J.; de Miranda, A.; Verçosa, L.; Garcia del Pino, G.; Rodrigues, R.D.; Nascimento, D. Influence of Thermal Treatment of Standardization in the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Sae 1035 Steel Used In Motorcycles. In Engenharia de Materiais e Metalúrgica: Tudo à Sua Volta 2; Atena: Pomta Grossa, Brazil, 2021; pp. 29–39. ISBN 9786557069622. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nagavally, R.R. Composite materials—History, types, fabrication techniques, advantages, and applications. In Proceedings of the 29th IRF International Conference, Bengaluru, India, 24 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Botha, N.; Inglis, H.M.; Labuschagne, F. Analysis of mechanical property degradation in polymer nanoclay composites. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Composites, Biocomposites and Nanocomposites, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 7–9 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Awwad, K.E.; Yousif, B.; Mostafa, A.; Alajarmeh, O.; Zeng, X. Tribological and mechanical performances of newly developed eco-epoxy composites incorporating flax fibres and graphene nanoplatelets. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Krauklis, A.E.; Karl, C.W.; Gagani, A.I.; Jørgensen, J.K. Composite Material Recycling Technology—State-of-the-Art and Sustainable Development for the 2020s. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Post, W.; Susa, A.; Blaauw, R.; Molenveld, K.; Knoop, R.J.I. A Review on the Potential and Limitations of Recyclable Thermosets for Structural Applications. Polym. Rev. 2020, 60, 359–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mishnaevsky, L. Sustainable End-of-Life Management of Wind Turbine Blades: Overview of Current and Coming Solutions. Materials 2021, 14, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Effect of Clay Modification on the Morphological, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties of Polyamide 6/polypropylene/montmorillonite Nanocomposites-Kusmono-2010-Polymer Composites-Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://4spepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pc.20902 (accessed on 21 March 2023).
  10. Guo, F.; Aryana, S.; Han, Y.; Jiao, Y. A Review of the Synthesis and Applications of Polymer–Nanoclay Composites. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sarges, R.R.; Nogueira, A.C.R.; Frota, C.A.; da Silva, C.L. Depósitos Argilosos Cenozóicos do Estado do Amazonas: Utilização Como Agregados de Argilas Calcinadas Para Pavimentações Na Região Amazônica. Braz. Geogr. J. 2010, 1, 33–49. [Google Scholar]
  12. Venkatesan, N.; Bhaskar, G.B.; Rajesh, S.; Pazhanivel, K.; Sagadevan, S. Effect of Cloisite 30B nanoclay on the mechanical properties of HDPE nanocomposites. Mater. Test. 2017, 59, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rao, G.S.; Shankar, H.R. Effect of Nano Clay inclusions on Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastics. Eur. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2018, 1, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Deka, B.K.; Maji, T.K. Effect of TiO2 and nanoclay on the properties of wood polymer nanocomposite. Polym. Bull. 2013, 70, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. García del Pino, G.; Kieling, A.C.; Bezazi, A.; Boumediri, H.; Rolim de Souza, J.F.; Valenzuela Díaz, F.; Valin Rivera, J.L.; Dehaini, J.; Panzera, T.H. Hybrid Polyester Composites Reinforced with Curauá Fibres and Nanoclays. Fibers Polym. 2020, 21, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Robledo-Ortíz, J.R.; del Campo, A.M.; López-Naranjo, E.J.; Arellano, M.; Jasso-Gastinel, C.F.; González-Núñez, R.L.; Pérez-Fonseca, A.A. Effect of low nanoclay content on the physico-mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid) nanocomposites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2019, 27, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Islam, S.M.; Hamdan, S.; Talib, Z.A.; Ahmed, A.S.; Rahman, M.R. Tropical wood polymer nanocomposite (WPNC): The impact of nanoclay on dynamic mechanical thermal properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 1995–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pickering, K.L.; Efendy, M.G.A.; Le, T.M. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 83, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Khelifa, H.; Bezazi, A.; Boumediri, H.; del Pino, G.G.; Reis, P.N.B.; Scarpa, F.; Dufresne, A. Mechanical characterization of mortar reinforced by date palm mesh fibers: Experimental and statistical analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 300, 124067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kieling, A.C.; Santana, G.P.; Santos, M.C.D.; Neto, J.C.D.M.; Pino, G.G.D.; Santos, M.D.D.; Duvoisin, S.; Panzera, T.H. Wood-plastic Composite Based on Recycled Polypropylene and Amazonian Tucumã (Astrocaryum aculeatum) Endocarp Waste. Fibers Polym. 2021, 22, 2834–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Richely, E.; Bourmaud, A.; Placet, V.; Guessasma, S.; Beaugrand, J. A critical review of the ultrastructure, mechanics and modelling of flax fibres and their defects. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022, 124, 100851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baley, C.; Gomina, M.; Breard, J.; Bourmaud, A.; Davies, P. Variability of mechanical properties of flax fibres for composite reinforcement. A review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 145, 111984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kieling, A.C.; Santana, G.P.; Santos, M.C.D.; de Cassia Castro Jaqtinon, H.; Monteiro, C.C.P. Cadeia do tucumã comercializado em Manaus-AM. Sci. Amazon. 2019, 8, B1–B9. [Google Scholar]
  24. ASTM D4464-15; Standard Test Method for Particle Size Distribution of Catalytic Materials by Laser Light Scattering. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020.
  25. Savazzini-Reis, A.; Savazzini-Reis, V.P.; Valenzuela Díaz, F.R. Caracterização e propriedades cerâmicas de argilas usadas em cerâmica vermelha no Estado do Espírito Santo. In Proceedings of the 22° CBECiMat—Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia e Ciência dos Materiais, Natal, RN, Brasil, 6–10 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kieling, A.C.; Neto, J.C.M.; Pino, G.G.; Dantas-dos Santos, M.; Santana, G.P.; Da-Silva, R.J.; Panzera, T.H.; Valenzuela, M.S.; Diáz, F.R.V. Epoxy-based hybrid composites reinforced with Amazonian Tucumã endocarp and kaolin: A statistical approach to mechanical Properties. Materialia 2023, 101808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ASTM E-1252-98; Standard Practice for General Techniques for Obtaining Infrared Spectra for Qualitative Analysis. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  28. Van Soest, P.J. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. 2. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J. Assoc. Off. Agric. Chem. 1963, 46, 829–835. [Google Scholar]
  29. ASTM E986-04; Standard Practice for Scanning Electron Microscope Beam Size Characterization. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
  30. ASTM D638-14; American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
  31. ASTM D790-03; Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2006.
  32. ASTM D695-02a; Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2002.
  33. ASTM D256-04; Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2002.
  34. Zhang, W.; Yin, L.; Zhao, M.; Tan, Z.; Li, G. Rapid and non-destructive quality verification of epoxy resin product using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy coupled with chemometric methods. Microchem. J. 2021, 168, 106397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Otieno, S.O.; Kengara, F.O.; Kemmegne-Mbouguen, J.C.; Langmi, H.W.; Kowenje, C.B.O.; Mokaya, R. The effects of metakaolinization and fused-metakaolinization on zeolites synthesized from quartz rich natural clays. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 290, 109668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Deju, R.; Mazilu, C.; Stanculescu, I.; Tuca, C. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Thermal Treated Kaolin. Rom. Rep. Phys. 2020, 72, 806. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Characteristics of the tucumã: (a) tucumã palm and (b) fruit of the tucumã palm [20].
Figure 1. Characteristics of the tucumã: (a) tucumã palm and (b) fruit of the tucumã palm [20].
Polymers 15 02532 g001
Figure 2. ER + PTE + kaolin composite test samples for the following tests: (a) tensile, (b) flexural, (c) compression, and (d) Izod impact.
Figure 2. ER + PTE + kaolin composite test samples for the following tests: (a) tensile, (b) flexural, (c) compression, and (d) Izod impact.
Polymers 15 02532 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of (a) individual granulometric and (b) cumulative volume of kaolin and powdered tucumã (PTE) [26].
Figure 3. Distribution of (a) individual granulometric and (b) cumulative volume of kaolin and powdered tucumã (PTE) [26].
Polymers 15 02532 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectrum for ER, PTE, kaolin from the State of Amazonas, and the resulting composite ETK13 [26].
Figure 4. FTIR spectrum for ER, PTE, kaolin from the State of Amazonas, and the resulting composite ETK13 [26].
Polymers 15 02532 g004
Figure 5. Components of vegetable fibers.
Figure 5. Components of vegetable fibers.
Polymers 15 02532 g005
Figure 6. SEM micrograph of PTE before tensile test.
Figure 6. SEM micrograph of PTE before tensile test.
Polymers 15 02532 g006
Figure 7. SEM micrograph of kaolin before traction test [26].
Figure 7. SEM micrograph of kaolin before traction test [26].
Polymers 15 02532 g007
Figure 8. SEM micrograph of ER + 2% kaolin (ETK2) in fracture region after tensile test.
Figure 8. SEM micrograph of ER + 2% kaolin (ETK2) in fracture region after tensile test.
Polymers 15 02532 g008
Figure 9. SEM micrograph of ER + 10% PTE + 4% kaolin (ETK8) in fracture region after tensile test.
Figure 9. SEM micrograph of ER + 10% PTE + 4% kaolin (ETK8) in fracture region after tensile test.
Polymers 15 02532 g009
Figure 10. SEM micrograph 100% ER (ETK1) in fracture region after tensile test.
Figure 10. SEM micrograph 100% ER (ETK1) in fracture region after tensile test.
Polymers 15 02532 g010
Figure 11. SEM micrograph of ER + 40% PTE + 2% kaolin (ETK22) in fracture region after tensile test.
Figure 11. SEM micrograph of ER + 40% PTE + 2% kaolin (ETK22) in fracture region after tensile test.
Polymers 15 02532 g011
Figure 12. Results of the mechanical tests for tensile strength.
Figure 12. Results of the mechanical tests for tensile strength.
Polymers 15 02532 g012
Figure 13. Results of the mechanical tests for flexural strength.
Figure 13. Results of the mechanical tests for flexural strength.
Polymers 15 02532 g013
Figure 14. Results of the mechanical tests for compressive strength.
Figure 14. Results of the mechanical tests for compressive strength.
Polymers 15 02532 g014
Figure 15. Results of the mechanical tests for Izod impact.
Figure 15. Results of the mechanical tests for Izod impact.
Polymers 15 02532 g015
Table 1. Identification of ER, PTE, and kaolin samples and compositions.
Table 1. Identification of ER, PTE, and kaolin samples and compositions.
SamplePTEKaolin
ETK100
ETK202
ETK304
ETK406
ETK508
ETK6100
ETK7102
ETK8104
ETK9106
ETK10108
ETK11200
ETK12202
ETK13204
ETK14206
ETK15208
ETK16300
ETK17302
ETK18304
ETK19306
ETK20308
ETK21400
ETK22402
ETK23404
ETK24406
ETK25408
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kieling, A.C.; de Macedo Neto, J.C.; del Pino, G.G.; da Silva Barboza, R.; Diáz, F.R.V.; Rivera, J.L.V.; Fernández, M.V.; Ketterer, C.G.; Ortega, A.G.; Abarzúa, R.I. Development of an Epoxy Matrix Hybrid Composite with Astrocaryum Aculeatum (Tucumã) Endocarp and Kaolin from the Amazonas State in Brazil. Polymers 2023, 15, 2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112532

AMA Style

Kieling AC, de Macedo Neto JC, del Pino GG, da Silva Barboza R, Diáz FRV, Rivera JLV, Fernández MV, Ketterer CG, Ortega AG, Abarzúa RI. Development of an Epoxy Matrix Hybrid Composite with Astrocaryum Aculeatum (Tucumã) Endocarp and Kaolin from the Amazonas State in Brazil. Polymers. 2023; 15(11):2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112532

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kieling, Antonio Claudio, José Costa de Macedo Neto, Gilberto Garcia del Pino, Ricardo da Silva Barboza, Francisco Rolando Valenzuela Diáz, José Luis Valin Rivera, Meylí Valin Fernández, Cristobal Galleguillos Ketterer, Alvaro González Ortega, and Roberto Iquilio Abarzúa. 2023. "Development of an Epoxy Matrix Hybrid Composite with Astrocaryum Aculeatum (Tucumã) Endocarp and Kaolin from the Amazonas State in Brazil" Polymers 15, no. 11: 2532. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112532

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop