Next Article in Journal
Translocation of Hydrophobic Polyelectrolytes under Electrical Field: Molecular Dynamics Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Determination of the Attenuation Coefficients of Epoxy Resin with Carbopol Polymer as a Breast Phantom Material at Low Photon Energy Range
Previous Article in Journal
Assembly of Supramolecular Nanoplatelets with Tailorable Geometrical Shapes and Dimensions
Previous Article in Special Issue
NMR and GPC Analysis of Alkyd Resins: Influence of Synthesis Method, Vegetable Oil and Polyol Content
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/polym15112549
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Understanding the Mechanical, Surface, and Color Behavior of Oral Bioactive Prosthetic Polymers under Biodegradation Processes

by
Cristina B. Neves
1,*,
Joana Costa
2,
Jaime Portugal
1 and
Ana F. Bettencourt
3,*
1
Biomedical and Oral Sciences Research Unit (UICOB), Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, 1600-277 Lisboa, Portugal
2
Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinar Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health and Science, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal
3
Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(11), 2549; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112549
Submission received: 14 May 2023 / Revised: 29 May 2023 / Accepted: 30 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resin-Based Polymer Materials and Related Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Changes in the properties of resin-based polymers exposed to the oral environment can emerge when chlorhexidine (CHX) is incorporated to develop bioactive systems for treating denture stomatitis. Three reline resins loaded with CHX were prepared: 2.5 wt% in Kooliner (K), 5 wt% in Ufi Gel Hard (UFI), and Probase Cold (PC). A total of 60 specimens were submitted to physical aging (1000 cycles of thermal fluctuations, 5–55 °C) or chemical aging (28 days of pH fluctuations in artificial saliva, 6 h at pH = 3, 18 h at pH = 7). Knoop microhardness (30 s, 98 mN), 3-point flexural strength (5 mm/min), and surface energy were tested. Color changes (ΔE) were determined using the CIELab system. Data were submitted to non-parametric tests (α = 0.05). After aging, bioactive K and UFI specimens were not different from the controls (resins without CHX) in mechanical and surface properties. Thermally aged CHX-loaded PC specimens showed decreased microhardness and flexural strength but not under adequate levels for function. The color change was observed in all CHX-loaded specimens that underwent chemical aging. The long-term use of CHX bioactive systems based on reline resins generally does not impair removable dentures’ proper mechanical and aesthetic functions.

1. Introduction

Tooth loss is associated with a decrease in the masticatory system’s integrity, which promotes functional, aesthetic, psychological, and quality-of-life negative consequences [1]. In the last decades, worldwide demographic and the average life expectancy increased the risk of tooth loss, especially among the elderly [2,3]. Despite the ultimate developments of fixed rehabilitation and implants, removable acrylic dentures are still valid treatment approaches for partial and total tooth loss, restoring chewing, phonetics, and aesthetics [2,4].
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is the most common resin-based polymer to manufacture these removable dentures [5].
Despite the advantages of acrylic resins in availability, good mechanical properties, and cost feasibility, they are sensitive to discoloration and represent excellent support for biofilm formation through the adhesion of microorganisms to their porous surface that may contribute to denture stomatitis [6,7].
Although the etiology of denture stomatitis is multifactorial, infection by Candida species, especially Candida albicans, is considered the primary etiologic factor [8,9,10].
The treatment of denture stomatitis includes the mechanical control of biofilm, the proper removal of the denture’s biofilm, and the pharmacological control using antimicrobial agents [11]. Systemic and topical antifungal treatment is advised, but recurrences are frequent, and one of the problems is that it requires daily compliance with the appropriate dosage to maintain its efficacy [8,12]. In addition, most of the antimicrobial agent is dissolved and removed from the oral cavity due to the renovation of saliva and the self-cleaning effect of the oral musculature. According to that, the efficacy of the topical agents is limited to short-term action [13,14].
For these reasons, drug delivery systems are being suggested based on incorporating an antimicrobial drug into acrylic resins [15,16]. This biomaterial system can be classified as bioactive material since when it enters in contact with the oral tissues, it starts to release the leachable antimicrobial drug, inducing a specific antimicrobial response at the material–tissue interface, such as the inhibition of biofilm formation and suppression of further microbial growth [17].
Compared to the conventional systemic therapeutic approach, these local delivery systems have advantages such as preserving therapeutic levels by continuous drug release at the infection site, minimal risk of systemic toxicity, and decreased need for patient compliance [18,19,20]. In this context, one antimicrobial with high interest to be incorporated into these systems is chlorhexidine (CHX), an antimicrobial agent widely prescribed as an antiseptic mouthwash in dentistry due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, including C. albicans [21].
Effectively, CHX has shown better results than other drugs such as fluconazole, both on releasing and microbiological tests [13,14,22]. Some studies have evaluated the CHX release when incorporated in resin-based prosthetic polymers and concluded that there is a high initial rate of elution from the material during the first 2–7 days, followed by a controlled, sustained elution process that continues throughout the 28-day test period [13,14]. A recent study showed promising results from a CHX-loaded reline acrylic resin used to enhance the fit of pre-existing ill-fitted dentures. The CHX release prevented microbiological development and did not negatively affect the resins’ mechanical, structural, and surface properties, showing a low cytotoxic profile [23]. Nevertheless, a major drawback in those studies refers to the testing methodologies. In fact, testing of dental devices is usually performed without the simulation of the oral environment’s influence on their properties, remaining some concerns about the long-term behavior of the devices after being in function and subjected to tissue fluids, blood, and saliva [24]. Oral biodegradation defines the changes in the devices’ chemical, physical, and mechanical properties due to environmental conditions that can ultimately compromise their function. Its processes can be produced by factors such as saliva constituents (e.g., water, enzymes), mechanical (e.g., chewing forces), physical (e.g., thermal variations), and chemical (e.g., pH variations) changes induced by daily eating, drinking, and breathing [25,26,27].
Concerning the evaluation of drug release profile from dental devices, most published studies use distilled water or artificial saliva at pH = 7 as the media solution to investigate drug liberation [12,14,18]; however, drug release has different behavior when submitted to acidic conditions and lower pH showed higher concentrations of leachable residual compounds [28]. Since the devices are exposed to endogenous and exogenous acids, it is essential to simulate pH variations that mimic the oral cavity environment. Moreover, pathological conditions such as denture stomatitis promote a lower pH environment and should be simulated when testing the properties of dental devices [29].
In the case of bioactive systems, these undergoing physical and chemical environmental changes also can affect the drug’s leachability and, consequently, the properties of the devices.
Another critical aspect is pointed out in some studies, which concluded that incorporating an antimicrobial drug into resin-based polymers produces color changes with clinical relevance when submitted to stainable liquids, such as coffee and wine [30,31,32]. In the case of CHX used as a mouthwash or gel, brownish staining of the teeth, mucosa, and biomaterials can cause unesthetic results [33]. However, studies on the color stability of CHX bioactive polymers are scarce, and that matter must be investigated.
Motivated by the gap in the literature concerning the oral biodegradation of dental devices, the main purpose of this work was to evaluate the mechanical, surface, and color of CHX-loaded polymeric resins after undergoing physical or chemical aging that mimics 1 month of exposition in the oral cavity. The null hypotheses were that the microhardness, flexural strength, surface energy, and color change of acrylic resins after each thermal or chemical aging process were not affected by the incorporation of CHX.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Resin-Based Polymers Preparation

Three auto-polymerized reline acrylic resins, with differences in their chemical composition and physical structure, were selected: two polyethylmethacrylate (PEMA)-based resins for direct curing on the oral cavity Kooliner (K) from GC America Inc., Alsip, IL, USA, and Ufi Gel Hard (UFI) from VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany; and one PMMA-based resin for indirect curing in the laboratory Probase Cold (PC) from Ivoclar Vivadent AG Schaan, Liechtenstein. The CHX diacetate monohydrate (Panreac Applichem, Darmstadt, Germany) was selected to be incorporated in the reline acrylic resins (Table 1).
Two groups of specimens were established for each material: a control group with no drug incorporation and an experimental group with the incorporation of 2.5 wt% CHX (K) or 5 wt% CHX (UFI and PC). The selection of the CHX concentrations was based on the results of a previous study corresponding to the minimal concentration that promoted antimicrobial activity against C. albicans in each structurally distinct resin [23]. The correspondent CHX was mixed with the reline resin powder using a mortar and a pestle for homogenization. Then, the liquid monomer was added to the resulting powder, and the final mixture was placed into a specific mold maintained under compression at a time, temperature, and pressure recommended by the manufacturers (Table 1). The edges of each specimen were polished with 600-grit silicon carbide paper (Carbimet Paper Discs, Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA) on a polisher with constant water cooling (DAP-U, Struers, Denmark) to remove irregularities.

2.2. Aging Processes

Control and experimental groups of specimens of each acrylic resin were then randomly divided to further submission to physical or chemical aging processes. The physical aging process included 1000 cycles of thermal fluctuations between 5 °C and 55 °C (20 s dwell time) with a transfer time of 5s in a thermocycling machine (Refri 200-E, Aralab, Cascais, Portugal) [34].
The chemical aging process included daily cycles of pH changes for 28 days. Each specimen was weighed on a precision scale (A&D Company, Limited, Tokyo, Japan) and immersed in artificial saliva with a ratio of 1 g/5 mL in individual graduated falcon tubes [27]. The specimens were stored at 37 °C (Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) with constant gentle shaking (300 rpm) for 28 days. The specimens were subjected to a protocol of chemical aging based on 6 h cycles in artificial saliva at pH = 3, interchanging with 18 h cycles in artificial saliva at pH = 7. Between each cycle, the samples were washed with distilled water and dried with absorbent paper.

2.3. Resin-Based Polymers Characterization

The mechanical properties of the bioactive polymers and controls after aging (thermal or chemical) were determined in rectangular-shaped specimens obtained by stainless-steel molds (64 × 10 × 3.3) mm [35] (n = 8). The Knoop microhardness test was performed (Duramin A/S, StruersDK 2750, Ballerup, Denmark) with a 98.12 mN (10.01 gf) load for 30 s. Twelve equidistant measurements were made in each specimen, and the mean value was considered the specimen’s Knoop microhardness (KHN—kgf mm−2). Immediately after the microhardness test, specimens were submitted to the three-point flexural test in a universal machine (Instron model 4502, Instron Ltd., Bucks, England) with 1 kN load cell at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min and 50 mm between rods [35].
Another set of rectangular-shaped specimens (16 × 25 × 1) mm (n = 5) obtained from rectangular-shaped metallic strip molds were prepared to calculate the surface free energy after aging (thermal or chemical) with a tensiometer(K12, Kruss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) using the Wilhelmy plate method by immersing plates into deionized water and 1,2-propanediol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at a speed of 20 mm/s and 25 °C. Using the harmonic mean method, advancing contact angles estimated the specimens’ surface free energy (γ). Equations for surface free energy estimation were solved using the equation-handling software programsystem (K121 contact angle measuring version 2.05, Kruss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) [36].
To determine the color change [37], groups of 12 × 6 mm cylindric specimens (n = 5) of each resin were prepared within 60 specimens. Color measurements were performed before and after aging processes using a spectrophotometer (Easyshade, VITA, Bad Säckingen, Germany) in a dark chamber. In each measurement, the L (lightness), C (chroma), and h (hue) values were registered. Since measurements of each specimen were performed in triplicates, an average value of L, C, and h was calculated per specimen. The CieLCh system C and h values were then converted to the CIELab system using the formulas C = (a2 + b2)1/2 and h = tang−1(b/a), and the L value was the same [31,32]. The overall color change (∆E) of each specimen was calculated through ∆E = [(∆L*)2 + (∆a*)2 + (∆b*)2]1/2.
As National Institute of Standards and Technology recommends, the ∆E values were then converted to National Bureau of Standards (NBS) units using the formula NBS units = ∆E* × 0.92, which expresses the color differences from a clinical perspective as extremely slight change (NBS < 0.5), slight change (0.5 < NBS < 1.5), perceivable change (1.5 < NBS < 3), appreciable change (3 < NBS < 6), much appreciable (6 < NBS < 12), and change to another color (NBS > 12) [33].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The sample size (n) was estimated with a power analysis to provide statistical significance (a = 0.05) at a power of 80%. Since normality and homogeneity of variance were not verified in scale variables (Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests, p < 0.05), data were submitted to Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (α = 0.05).

3. Results

Descriptive and statistical analysis of the microhardness, flexural strength, and surface free energy data was performed for each material (Table 2).
Microhardness medians variated between 7.0 ± 3.44 KHN in chemically aged CHX-loaded K specimens and 13.5 ± 0.58 KHN in thermally aged control PC specimens. Flexural strength medians varied from 42.0 ± 14.88 to 180.0 ± 57.31 MPa in chemically aged control K and thermally aged control PC specimens, respectively. The surface free energy changed between 24.0 ± 5.65 mM/m thermally aged control UFI specimens and 42.5 ± 0.28 mM/m chemically aged CHX-loaded UFI specimens.
After thermal and chemical aging, CHX-loaded K and UFI specimens did not reveal statistically significant (p > 0.05) differences in microhardness, flexural strength, and surface free energy compared to the control. However, the 5 wt% CHX-loaded PC specimens showed decreased microhardness (p = 0.010) and flexural strength (p = 0.038) and increased surface free energy (p = 0.008) after thermal aging, but only decreased (p = 0.021) flexural strength after chemical aging (Table 2).
The color change of the resins submitted to aging processes was also evaluated. Considering the thermal aging, the color change medians varied between 1.4 ± 1.62 ∆E for the CHX-loaded PC specimens and 10.3 ± 3.00 ∆E for the CHX-loaded K specimens. CHX-loaded K specimens showed statistically significant (p = 0.008) higher ∆E values than the control. On the other hand, CHX-loaded UFI and PC specimens did not show statistically significant (p = 0.548 and p = 1.000, respectively) differences in ∆E values than the control (Figure 1).
After chemical aging, the color change medians varied between 1.8 ± 3.36 ∆E in control PC specimens and 16.3 ± 2.13 ∆E in CHX-loaded PC specimens, revealing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.008). In addition, K and UFI acrylic resins with CHX showed higher ∆E values (p = 0.008) than controls (Figure 2).
Moreover, the data related to the NBS units and the color differences were determined (Table 3).
After thermal aging, CHX incorporation in K specimens reveals a “much appreciable change” in the color of the resin. This change was even more significant when the CHX-loaded K specimens “changed to another color” when submitted to chemical aging. Considering chemical aging, loading the acrylic resins PC and UFI with CHX caused a “change to another color” and an “appreciable change”, respectively.

4. Discussion

This study evaluated the behavior of three CHX-loaded reline polymeric resins used to treat denture stomatitis after being submitted to thermal and chemical aging, simulating oral biodegradation processes. The results showed that the direct K and UFI resins did not change their mechanical and surface properties when loaded with CHX but changed their color, especially after chemical aging. In addition, the indirect PC resin loaded with CHX reveals a decrease in mechanical properties after both aging processes and a color change when submitted to chemical aging.
The specimens were submitted to physical and chemical alterations in both aging processes to simulate 4–6 weeks of oral biodegradation. This time was selected since the authors concluded in a previous study that the highest CHX release from the studied resins occurred within the first 24–48 h of incubation, followed by a steadier and slower release rate for the next 2 weeks, and ending with a minor release from the 20th day until the end of testing (28 days) [23]. Presumably, since the resin does not leach more relevant CHX after this period, the properties of the bioactive resins after aging will be similar to the resin without incorporation. Further aging processes can add little information about the bioactive system degradation. In addition, this time selection is in line with other works that also choose 28 days as the threshold for testing bioactive systems [12,13,14].
Concerning thermal degradation, a laboratory testing procedure of 1000 cycles of thermal fluctuations between water baths of 5 °C and 55 °C, corresponding to 6 weeks in function, was used to simulate the temperature fluctuations that occur in the oral cavity when mouth breathing and intake of food and beverages with different temperatures [25,38,39]. As in the study of Bettencourt et al. [23] conducted without aging, the incorporation of CHX decreases the microhardness and flexural strength of PC specimens submitted to thermal aging. The decrease in these parameters may be due to CHX loading and further enhanced by high temperatures, which promote high leachability of CHX molecules from the material network to the surrounding medium, leaving spaces in the polymer net [40]. Finally, the water molecules penetrate the areas between the polymer chains and push them farther apart.
Consequently, the secondary chemical bonding forces (van der Waals forces) between the polymer chains decline [41,42]. As so, the water molecules can act as plasticizers that damage the material’s mechanical resistance through the formation of microcracks related to absorption and hydrolytic degradation of the polymer, resulting in linkage cleavage and gradual deterioration of its infrastructure [31]. On the contrary, the CHX incorporation did not influence the flexural strength and microhardness of K and UFI resins. Differences in the bulk structure of these direct reline materials can explain why the mechanical parameters were affected only for the indirect PC resin. Specifically, the PC resin has a more robust and rigid polymer matrix organization than K and UFI [43]. Thus, the flexural strength and microhardness reduction in the 5 wt% CHX-loaded PC group may be related to a higher increase in intermolecular distance between the polymer chains after the CHX leaching compared to the other two resins (K and UFI) [44].
Nevertheless, although PC showed a decrease in mechanical properties with the incorporation of CHX, under current experimental conditions, its median value was still higher than that obtained with K and UFI. In this situation, the 5 wt% CHX-loaded PC group still reached a flexural strength value clinically accepted by the ISO 20795 standard (60 MPa) [35,45,46]. Furthermore, the tested reline acrylic resins are not used independently in the oral cavity since they are always associated with a denture base material, so this result should be interpreted cautiously.
Along with thermal fluctuations, the media’s chemical environment was identified to influence the properties of polymer resins [30]. In the present study, specimens were subjected to a chemical aging process by immersion in artificial saliva with a cyclic procedure of 6 h at pH = 3, interchanging with 18 h at pH = 7 for 28 days. In the present study, only CHX-loaded PC specimens decreased flexural strength after chemical aging. Once again, this result shows that the inner structure of the CHX-loaded PC polymer suffers more changes by the aging processes, not only thermal but also chemical, compared to K and UFI resins.
Besides mechanical properties, the effect of aging on the reline resins’ surface properties was evaluated since surface energy plays an essential role in the wettability of the material which can interfere with the adhesion of fungal cells [33,47]. In the present study, only CHX-loaded PC specimens showed a minor increase in the surface free energy parameter after undergoing thermal aging than the control group. Thus, this indirect resin became slightly more hydrophilic (i.e., with high surface free energy) by increasing its polar component after the drug’s incorporation [40,42,48,49,50]. This tendency was also observed in previous studies without aging [23,47,50] and with other acrylic resins (Lucitone 550) loaded with an antimicrobial polymer poly (2-tert-butylaminoethyl) methacrylate [33].
The increase in surface energy can also be associated with changes in the surface layer due to the sorption of the surrounding fluids, particularly water, leading to an increase in the volume of the polymer [40,47]. Furthermore, the insignificant effect of aging on the surface energy of the K and UFI resins possibly suggests that these materials do not absorb saliva when subjected to chemical aging or change the structure of their surface layer after thermal aging keeping their dimensional over time [51].
The success of removable dentures depends not only on their mechanical and surface properties but also on their aesthetic appearance related to their color. For example, in acrylic reline resins, the mucosa-like pink color is obtained by adding pigments to the powder–liquid mixture during the polymerization.
The structure of the polymer is one factor that influences color stability since its intrinsic porosity favors the leachability of the pigment molecules and consequent replacement with molecules from the surrounding media, turning it sensitive to discoloration [52]. In the present study, this discoloration was shown since all the control specimens (without incorporation) underwent a color change after aging. In line with another study [8], our results showed that different resins presented distinct color changes. K showed an “appreciable change” of color (>3.3 NBS units as the limit for acceptability in clinical dentistry), while UFI and PC showed only perceivable change [33,53].
At last, the effect of the aging processes and CHX loading on the polymer´s color stability was evaluated. Considering the thermal aging, only K showed color differences when CXH was incorporated, going to a “much appreciable” change of color that is not considered clinically acceptable. As mentioned above, K comprises the isobutyl methacrylate monomer and forms a simple non-cross-linking PEMA net when the polymerization is complete [54]. However, since the polymer net is not robust, it is more accessible to the movements of internal pigments and water molecules, which may contribute to the formation of aberrant optical properties affecting the polymer´s color stability [30,55].
Additionally, all CHX-loaded specimens submitted to chemical aging showed a considered clinically relevant color change. For example, loading CHX to K caused a “change to another color”, and UFI caused an “appreciable change”. Moreover, PC resin showed a “change to another color”, probably related to its hydrophilic character, which was already shown to exhibit more significant color change than hydrophobic materials [56,57]. It should also be emphasized that chemical aging using an artificial saliva medium leads to a more evident color change than aging using just water [58,59,60]. These conclusions follow a previous study with soft lining materials [61,62], where the authors stated that a complex solution such as artificial saliva might affect the tested biomaterials more than plain water since saliva has more components, such as organic substances, including immunoglobulins, proteins, enzymes, and mucins [6,57].
In summary, there were clinically relevant color changes due to aging processes and CHX loading. However, considering that this bioactive system is used in reline resins placed under the denture resins, the impact on the color change may be insignificant to patients. Therefore, the benefit of a long-term therapeutic effect will likely outweigh the disadvantage of the lack of color stability.
Future investigations should be carried out by combining multiple aging methods (e.g., mechanical, thermal, and chemical) to better reproduce the oral environment. After the in vitro experiments, clinical studies should be designed and conducted to confirm the potential of this bioactive chlorhexidine system in treating denture stomatitis.

5. Conclusions

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be established that CHX bioactive systems based on reline acrylic resins showed different results in mechanical and surface properties after aging. While direct reline resins did not show differences when CHX was incorporated, PC revealed decreased mechanical properties after thermal aging but not inadequate levels for function. In addition, chemical aging affects CHX bioactive systems since it presents a color change in all resins. Considering the overall results, loading CHX into reline acrylic resins do not impair the relevant mechanical and aesthetic functions of removable dentures and continues to be a potential approach in preventing or treating denture stomatitis, but further research is required before their possible clinical use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B.N. and A.F.B.; methodology, J.C. and A.F.B.; validation, C.B.N. and J.C.; formal analysis, J.C. and J.P.; investigation, C.B.N. and J.C.; resources, C.B.N., J.P. and A.F.B.; data curation, J.C. and J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C. and J.P.; writing—review and editing, C.B.N. and A.F.B.; visualization, C.B.N. and J.P.; supervision, C.B.N. and A.F.B.; project administration, C.B.N. and A.F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available on request.

Acknowledgments

Partially funded by the Faculty of Dental Medicine of the University of Lisbon Scholarship for Open Access Publications. The authors thank the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal for support through the following projects: UIDB/04138/2020 and UIDP/04138/2020 (iMed.ULisboa). The authors would like to thank VOCO GmbH (Cuxhaven, Germany) for the donation of the Ufi Gel Hard.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Krausch-Hofmann, S.; Cuypers, L.; Ivanova, A.; Duyck, J. Predictors of Patient Satisfaction with Removable Denture Renewal: A Pilot Study. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 27, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, J.J. Revisiting the Removable Partial Denture. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 63, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pratap, B.; Gupta, R.; Bhardwaj, B.; Nag, M. Resin based restorative dental materials: Characteristics and future perspectives. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2019, 55, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fueki, K.; Ohkubo, C.; Yatabe, M.; Arakawa, I.; Arita, M.; Ino, S.; Kanamori, T.; Kawai, Y.; Kawara, M.; Komiyama, O.; et al. Clinical application of removable partial dentures using thermoplastic resin. Part II: Material properties and clinical features of non-metal clasp dentures. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2014, 58, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zafar, M.S. Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update. Polymers 2020, 12, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lee, H.H.; Lee, J.H.; Yang, T.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, S.C.; Kim, G.R.; Kim, H.R.; Lee, C.J.; Okubo, C. Evaluation of the flexural mechanical properties of various thermoplastic denture base polymers. Dent. Mater. J. 2018, 37, 950–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Marra, J.; Paleari, A.G.; Rodriguez, L.S.; Leite, A.R.; Pero, A.C.; Compagnoni, M.A. Effect of an acrylic resin combined with an antimicrobial polymer on biofilm formation. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2012, 20, 643–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Figueiral, M.H.; Fonseca, P.; Lopes, M.M.; Pinto, E.; Pereira-Leite, T.; Sampaio-Maia, B. Effect of Denture-Related Stomatitis Fluconazole Treatment on Oral Candida albicans Susceptibility Profile and Genotypic Variability. Open Dent. J. 2015, 9, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dagistan, S.; Aktas, A.E.; Caglayan, F.; Ayyildiz, A.; Bilge, M. Differential diagnosis of denture-induced stomatitis, Candida, and their variations in patients using complete denture: A clinical and mycological study. Mycoses 2009, 52, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Redding, S.; Bhatt, B.; Rawls, H.R.; Siegel, G.; Scott, K.; Lopez-Ribot, J. Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation on denture material. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2009, 107, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gomes, A.S.; Sampaio-Maia, B.; Vasconcelos, M.; Fonesca, P.A.; Figueiral, H. In situ evaluation of the microbial adhesion on a hard acrylic resin and a soft liner used in removable prostheses. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2015, 28, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Salim, N.; Moore, C.; Silikas, N.; Satterthwaite, J.D.; Rautemaa, R. Fungicidal amounts of antifungals are released from impregnated denture lining material for up to 28 days. J. Dent. 2012, 40, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ryalat, S.; Darwish, R.; Amin, W. New form of administering chlorhexidine for treatment of denture-induced stomatitis. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2011, 7, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Salim, N.; Moore, C.; Silikas, N.; Satterthwaite, J.; Rautemaa, R. Candidacidal effect of fluconazole and chlorhexidine released from acrylic polymer. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Amin, W.M.; Al-Ali, M.H.; Salim, N.A.; Al-Tarawneh, S.K. A new form of intraoral delivery of antifungal drugs for the treatment of denture-induced oral candidosis. Eur. J. Dent. 2009, 3, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Costa, J.; Portugal, J.; Neves, C.B.; Bettencourt, A. Should local drug delivery systems be used in dentistry? Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2022, 12, 1395–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Montoya, C.; Roldan, L.; Yu, M.; Valliani, S.; Ta, C.; Yang, M.; Orrego, S. Smart dental materials for antimicrobial applications. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 24, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malakhov, A.; Wen, J.; Zhang, B.X.; Wang, H.; Geng, H.; Chen, X.D.; Sun, Y.; Yeh, C.K. Rechargeable anticandidal denture material with sustained release in saliva. Oral Dis. 2016, 22, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Skupien, J.A.; Valentini, F.; Boscato, N.; Pereira-Cenci, T. Prevention and treatment of Candida colonization on denture liners: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2013, 110, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gad, M.M.; Al-Thobity, A.M. Flexural and Surface Properties of PMMA Denture Base Material Modified with Thymoquinone as an Antifungal Agent. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brookes, Z.; Bescos, R.; Belfield, L.; Ali, K.; Roberts, A. Current uses of chlorhexidine for management of oral disease: A narrative review. J. Dent. 2020, 103, 103497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Salim, N.; Silikas, N.; Satterthwaite, J.D.; Moore, C.; Ramage, G.; Rautemaa, R. Chlorhexidine-impregnated PEM/THFM polymer exhibits superior activity to fluconazole-impregnated polymer against Candida albicans biofilm formation. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2013, 41, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bettencourt, A.F.; Costa, J.; Ribeiro, I.A.C.; Gonçalves, L.; Arias-Moliz, M.T.; Dias, J.R.; Franco, M.; Alves, N.M.; Portugal, J.; Neves, C.B. Development of a chlorhexidine delivery system based on dental reline acrylic resins. Int. J. Pharm. 2023, 631, 122470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Camilleri, J.; Arias Moliz, T.; Bettencourt, A.; Costa, J.; Martins, F.; Rabadijeva, D.; Rodriguez, D.; Visai, L.; Combes, C.; Farrugia, C.; et al. Standardization of antimicrobial testing of dental devices. Dent. Mater. 2020, 36, e59–e73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Barclay, C.W.; Spence, D.; Laird, W.R. Intra-oral temperatures during function. J. Oral Rehabil. 2005, 32, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Seo, R.S.; Murata, H.; Hong, G.; Vergani, C.E.; Hamada, T. Influence of thermal and mechanical stresses on the strength of intact and relined denture bases. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2006, 96, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Neves, C.B.; Costa, J.; Nepomuceno, L.; Madeira, A.; Portugal, J.; Bettencourt, A. Microhardness and Flexural Strength after Chemical Aging of chlorhexidine delivery systems based on acrylic resin. Rev. Port. Estomatol. Med. Dent. Cir. Maxilofac. 2019, 60, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bettencourt, A.F.; Feliz, M.; Sousa, C.; Gonçalves, L.; Neves, C.B. An acrylic reline resin loaded with chlorhexidine: Insights on drug release. Rev. Port. Estomatol. Cir. Maxilofac. 2016, 57, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moon, J.D.; Seon, E.M.; Son, S.A.; Jung, K.H.; Kwon, Y.H.; Park, J.K. Effect of immersion into solutions at various pH on the color stability of composite resins with different shades. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2015, 40, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alhotan, A.; Elraggal, A.; Yates, J.; Haider, J.; Jurado, C.A.; Silikas, N. Effect of Different Solutions on the Colour Stability of Nanoparticles or Fibre Reinforced PMMA. Polymers 2022, 14, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Goiato, M.C.; Nobrega, A.S.; dos Santos, D.M.; Andreotti, A.M.; Moreno, A. Effect of different solutions on color stability of acrylic resin-based dentures. Braz. Oral Res. 2014, 28, S1806-83242013005000033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vichi, A.; Ferrari, M.; Davidson, C.L. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent. Mater. 2004, 20, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pero, A.C.; Ignárcio, J.; Giro, G.; Mendoza-Marin, D.O.; Paleari, A.G.; Compagnoni, M.A. Surface properties and color stability of an acrylic resin combined with an antimicrobial polymer. Rev. Odontol. UNESP 2013, 42, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rijo, I.; Pedro, D.; Costa, J.; Bettencourt, A.F.; Portugal, J.; Neves, C.B. Chlorhexidine loading of acrylic reline resins—Microhardness and flexural strength after thermal aging. Rev. Port. Estomatol. Cir. Maxilofac. 2018, 59, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. ISO 20795-1:2013; Dentistry—Base Polymers—Part 1: Denture Base Polymers, 1st Edition. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/62277.html (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  36. Costa, J.; Matos, A.; Bettencourt, A.; Portugal, J.; Neves, C.B. Effect of ethanol solutions as post-polymerization treatment on the properties of acrylic reline resins. Rev. Port. Estomatol. Med. Dent. Cir. Maxilofac. 2016, 57, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. ISO 7491:2000; Dental Materials: Determination of Colour Stability, 1st Edition. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/26857.html (accessed on 10 April 2023).
  38. Goiato, M.C.; dos Santos, D.M.; Baptista, G.; Moreno, A.; Andreotti, A.M.; Dekon, S.F. Effect of thermal cycling and disinfection on microhardness of acrylic resin denture base. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2013, 37, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Polychronakis, N.; Sarafianou, A.; Zissis, A.; Papadopoulos, T. The Influence of Thermocycling on the Flexural Strength of a Polyamide Denture Base Material. Acta Stomatol. Croat. 2017, 51, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hiraishi, N.; Yiu, C.K.; King, N.M.; Tay, F.R.; Pashley, D.H. Chlorhexidine release and water sorption characteristics of chlorhexidine-incorporated hydrophobic/hydrophilic resins. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24, 1391–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gong, K.; Braden, M.; Patel, M.P.; Rehman, I.U.; Zhang, Z.; Darr, J.A. Controlled release of chlorhexidine diacetate from a porous methacrylate system: Supercritical fluid assisted foaming and impregnation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 96, 2048–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salim, N.; Satterthwaite, J.D.; Rautemaa, R.; Silikas, N. Impregnation with antimicrobials challenge bonding properties and water sorption behaviour of an acrylic liner. J. Dent. 2012, 40, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bayraktar, G.; Guvener, B.; Bural, C.; Uresin, Y. Influence of polymerization method, curing process, and length of time of storage in water on the residual methyl methacrylate content in dental acrylic resins. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2006, 76, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rodriguez, L.S.; Paleari, A.G.; Giro, G.; de Oliveira Junior, N.M.; Pero, A.C.; Compagnoni, M.A. Chemical characterization and flexural strength of a denture base acrylic resin with monomer 2-tert-butylaminoethyl methacrylate. J. Prosthodont. 2013, 22, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Salgado, H.; Fialho, J.; Marques, M.; Vaz, M.; Figueiral, M.H.; Mesquita, P. Mechanical and surface properties of a 3D-printed dental resin reinforced with graphene. Rev. Port. Estomatol. Med. Dent. Cir. Maxilofac. 2023, 64, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Punset, M.; Brizuela, A.; Pérez-Pevida, E.; Herrero-Climent, M.; Manero, J.M.; Gil, J. Mechanical Characterization of Dental Prostheses Manufactured with PMMA-Graphene Composites. Materials 2022, 15, 5391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lima, J.F.; Maciel, J.G.; Arrais, C.A.; Porto, V.C.; Urban, V.M.; Neppelenbroek, K.H. Effect of incorporating antifungals on the water sorption and solubility of interim resilient liners for denture base relining. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 115, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sahin, O.; Koroglu, A.; Dede, D.Ö.; Yilmaz, B. Effect of surface sealant agents on the surface roughness and color stability of denture base materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 116, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Salim, N.; Moore, C.; Silikas, N.; Satterthwaite, J.; Rautemaa, R. Chlorhexidine is a highly effective topical broad-spectrum agent against Candida spp. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2013, 41, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jin, N.Y.; Lee, H.R.; Lee, H.; Pae, A. Wettability of denture relining materials under water storage over time. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2009, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Barnard, R.G.; Clarke-Farr, P.C.; Latief, A. Factors affecting sorption and solubility of denture base acrylic materials: A review. Ann. Dent. Univ. Malaya 2022, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kamonkhantikul, K.; Arksornnukit, M.; Takahashi, H. Antifungal, optical, and mechanical properties of polymethylmethacrylate material incorporated with silanized zinc oxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2353–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Waldemarin, R.F.; Terra, P.C.; Pinto, L.R.; Faot, F.; Camacho, G.B. Color change in acrylic resin processed in three ways after immersion in water, cola, coffee, mate and wine. Acta Odontol. Latinoam. 2013, 26, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Szaloki, M.; Gall, J.; Bukovinszki, K.; Borbeli, J.; Hegedus, C. Synthesis and characterization of cross-linked polymeric nanoparticles and their composites for reinforcement of photocurable dental resin. React. Funct. Polym. 2013, 73, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alp, G.; Johnston, W.M.; Yilmaz, B. Optical properties and surfasse roughness of prepolymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) denture base materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019, 121, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zoidis, P.; Polychronakis, N.; Lagouvardos, P.; Polyzois, G.; Ngo, H.C. Evaluation of a Realistic Cleansing Protocol for Preventing Discoloration of Denture Resins. J. Prosthodont. 2019, 28, e89–e95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Giorgi, M.C.; Vogt, A.P.; Corneta, C.J.; Velo, M.; Lima, D.; Baron, G.M.M.; Aguiar, F.H.B. Influence of a hydrophobic monomer on the physical and mechanical properties of experimental surface sealants. Braz. Oral Res. 2018, 32, e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, Y.K.; Powers, J.M. Influence of salivary organic substances on the discoloration of esthetic dental materials-a review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2006, 76, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pytko-Polonczyk, J.; Jakubik, A.; Przeklasa-Bierowiec, A.; Muszynska, B. Artificial saliva and its use in biological experiments. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2017, 68, 807–813. [Google Scholar]
  60. Agarwalla, S.V.; Malhotra, R.; Rosa, V. Translucency, hardness and strength parameters of PMMA resin containing graphene-like material for CAD/CAM restorations. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 100, 103388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nowakowska-Toporowska, A.; Raszewski, Z.; Wieckiewicz, W. Color change of soft silicone relining materials after storage in artificial saliva. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 115, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nezu, T.; Nagano-Takebe, F.; Endo, K. Designing an antibacterial acrylic resin using the cosolvent method -Effect of ethanol on the optical and mechanical properties of a cold-cure acrylic resin. Dent. Mater. J. 2017, 36, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 15 02549 g001 550
Figure 1. Boxplot of the color change (∆E) distribution among experimental groups after thermal aging. Note: * corresponds to p < 0.05, and ns corresponds to “not significant”.
Figure 1. Boxplot of the color change (∆E) distribution among experimental groups after thermal aging. Note: * corresponds to p < 0.05, and ns corresponds to “not significant”.
Polymers 15 02549 g001
Polymers 15 02549 g002 550
Figure 2. Boxplot of the color change (∆E) distribution among experimental groups after chemical aging. Note: * corresponds to p< 0.05.
Figure 2. Boxplot of the color change (∆E) distribution among experimental groups after chemical aging. Note: * corresponds to p< 0.05.
Polymers 15 02549 g002
Table
Table 1. Dental materials under evaluation.
Table 1. Dental materials under evaluation.
MaterialManufacturerP/L
Ratio (g/mL)		CompositionCuring Cycle
KGC America Inc., Alsip,
IL, USA		1.4/1P: PEMA 88–90%, dibenzoyl peroxide 1-<2.5%, silicon and titanium dioxides 5-<10%, cellulose acetate <2.5%
L: IBMA 90-<100%, N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine 1-<2.5%		10 min
37 °C
UFIVOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany1.77/1P: PEMA 90–95%, benzoyl peroxide ≤2.5%
L: HDMA 50–100%, hydroxyethyl methacrylate ≤2.5%		7 min
37 °C
PCIvoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein1.5/1P: PMMA > 95%, softening agent <1%, benzoyl peroxide 1-<2.5%, catalyst, pigments
L: MMA 50–100%, BDMA 2.5-<10%, catalyst		15 min
40 °C, 4 bar
K—Kooliner; UFI—Ufi Gel Hard; PC—Probase Cold; P—powder; L—liquid; PEMA—poly (ethyl methacrylate); IBMA—isobutyl methacrylate; HDMA—hexanediol dimethacrylate; PMMA—poly (methyl methacrylate); MMA—methyl methacrylate; BDMA—1,4-butanediol dimethacrylate.
Table
Table 2. Microhardness (KHN), flexural strength (MPa), and surface free energy (γ) data by polymer resin.
Table 2. Microhardness (KHN), flexural strength (MPa), and surface free energy (γ) data by polymer resin.
RESIN-BASED POLYMER CHX LOADING
(wt%)		AGING
PROCESS		MICROHARDNESS (KHN, kgf mm−2)FLEXURAL STRENGTH
(MPa)		SURFACE FREE
ENERGY (mN/m)
MED ± IQRp-ValueMED ± IQRp-ValueMED ± IQRp-Value
K0Thermal7.9 ± 2.73p = 1.00078.9 ± 26.00p = 0.05427.9 ± 4.45p = 0.222
2.57.9 ± 1.6091.1 ± 17.6327.0 ± 1.85
0Chemical7.2 ± 2.97p = 0.79842.0 ± 14.88p = 0.95931.8 ± 2.95p = 0.222
2.57.0 ± 3.4442.1 ± 12.8933.4 ± 3.05
UFI0Thermal8.2 ± 1.85p = 0.87867.0 ± 20.08p = 0.13024.0 ± 5.65p = 0.095
58.4 ± 0.5475.6 ± 13.6032.0 ± 6.50
0Chemical7.6 ± 2.25p = 0.87836.5 ± 6.51p = 0.64541.8 ± 2.70p = 0.548
57.9 ± 1.9437.4 ± 5.6042.5 ± 0.28
PC0Thermal13.5 ± 0.58p = 0.010180.0 ± 57.31p = 0.03826.3 ± 0.40p = 0.008
512.8 ± 0.53124.6 ± 38.7530.5 ± 2.40
0Chemical13.1 ± 4.17p = 0.19587.3 ± 19.04p = 0.02137.2 ± 3.30p = 0.841
512.4 ± 3.9465.6 ± 9.7436.6 ± 2.25
K—Kooliner; UFI—Ufi Gel Hard; PC—Probase Cold; CHX—chlorhexidine; MED—median; IQR—interquartile range.
Table
Table 3. NBS units and color differences by polymer resin.
Table 3. NBS units and color differences by polymer resin.
POLYMER RESINCHX
LOADING
wt%		AGING PROCESSM ± SD
NBS Units		Color Differences
K0Thermal3.5 ± 0.85Appreciable change
2.58.5 ± 2.21Much appreciable
0Chemical3.7 ± 0.50Appreciable change
2.513.9 ± 0.58Change to another color
UFI0Thermal2.2 ± 0.56Perceivable change
53.4 ± 2.58Appreciable change
0Chemical2.9 ± 0.66Perceivable change
55.5 ± 1.19Appreciable change
PC0Thermal1.7 ± 0.82Perceivable change
51.8 ± 1.15Perceivable change
0Chemical2.4 ± 1.65Perceivable change
514.8 ± 1.08Change to another color
CHX—chlorhexidine; M—medium; SD—standard deviation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neves, C.B.; Costa, J.; Portugal, J.; Bettencourt, A.F. Understanding the Mechanical, Surface, and Color Behavior of Oral Bioactive Prosthetic Polymers under Biodegradation Processes. Polymers 2023, 15, 2549. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112549

AMA Style

Neves CB, Costa J, Portugal J, Bettencourt AF. Understanding the Mechanical, Surface, and Color Behavior of Oral Bioactive Prosthetic Polymers under Biodegradation Processes. Polymers. 2023; 15(11):2549. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112549

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neves, Cristina B., Joana Costa, Jaime Portugal, and Ana F. Bettencourt. 2023. "Understanding the Mechanical, Surface, and Color Behavior of Oral Bioactive Prosthetic Polymers under Biodegradation Processes" Polymers 15, no. 11: 2549. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112549

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop