Next Article in Journal
Effect of Polymer Composition on the Optical Properties of a New Aggregation-Induced Emission Fluorophore: A Combined Experimental and Computational Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Selected Bio-Components on the Cell Structure and Properties of Rigid Polyurethane Foams
Previous Article in Journal
Polymer-Derived Carbon Nanofiber and Its Photocurrent-Switching Responses of Carbon Nanofiber/Cu Nanocomposite in Wide Ranges of Excited Light Wavelength
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chitosan Oligomer as a Raw Material for Obtaining Polyurethane Foams
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of the Effect of Waste from Agricultural Production on the Properties of Flexible Polyurethane Foams

Polymers 2023, 15(17), 3529; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173529
by Joanna Paciorek-Sadowska *, Marcin Borowicz and Marek Isbrandt
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2023, 15(17), 3529; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173529
Submission received: 29 July 2023 / Revised: 19 August 2023 / Accepted: 22 August 2023 / Published: 24 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polyols and Polyurethane Foams Based on Natural Resources)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript is well organized in all aspects of research background & purpose, experimental method and results, and conclusion, so can be adopted by Polymers; however, additional explanations are required for the following prior to publication.

1.  Data for morphology and particle size distribution of corn powder fillers are required. The surface characteristics of the filler and the size and shape of the filler affect the formation of air cells in the foam structure.

2. Qualitative information can be obtained through SEM images on cell size, but it is difficult to accurately consider changes in particle size or size distribution.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This article is well written and the present is sound and clear. The reviewer suggest some additional polish to make it better:

1. Label your FTIF with functional group location can help reader understand easily.

2. Scale bar in microscopy images should be larger. Current one is impossible to read.

3. A picture as Figure. 1 to graphically illustrate your entire procedures, which make this article more attractive and easier to catch the content.

4. Any pictures of how the foam looks like? I would suggest a photo in Figure. 1(c)

5. Separate the testing method from sample preparing method. Testing method is better in group, like: mechanical testing, microscopy, spectroscopy....

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop