Next Article in Journal
Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene-Based Composites with Permalloy with Tailored Magnetic Response
Previous Article in Journal
Combined Effects from Dual Incorporation of ATBC as Plasticizer and Mesoporous MCM-41 as Nucleating Agent on the PLA Isothermal Crystallization in Environmentally-Friendly Ternary Composite Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Surface Polishing on Physical Properties of an Occlusal Splint Material for Additive Manufacturing under Protection Gas Post-Curing Condition

1
Department of Biomaterials Science, Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre–TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4B, 20520 Turku, Finland
2
Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University–TMDU, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113–8510, Japan
3
Department of Pediatric Dentistry/Special Needs Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University–TMDU, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113–8510, Japan
4
Wellbeing Services County of South-West Finland, Lemminkäisenkatu 23, 20520 Turku, Finland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(3), 625; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030625
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 25 January 2023

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface polishing as well as the post-curing atmospheres (air and nitrogen gas) on the physical properties of an occlusal splint material for additive manufacturing. Flexural strength, flexural modulus, Vickers hardness number (VHN), degree of carbon double bond conversion (DC), water sorption (WSP), and water solubility (WSL) were evaluated. Surface polishing significantly affected the evaluated properties. Regardless of the post-curing atmosphere, flexural strength, flexural modulus, VHN, and DC showed significantly higher values for the polished specimens when compared with the unpolished ones, while WSP and WSL were significantly lower for the polished specimens. Unpolished specimens post-cured at nitrogen gas showed significantly higher VHN and DC values. However, the effect of the post-curing at a nitrogen gas atmosphere was non-significant in polished specimens. The current results suggested that surface polishing plays a role in the physical properties of the evaluated occlusal splint material and can enhance all the evaluated properties regardless of the post-curing atmosphere. Meanwhile, the post-curing at a nitrogen gas atmosphere can enhance the VHN and DC but its effect is confined only to the surface layers, which can be removed during surface polishing.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The fabrication of prostheses and oral appliances using digital technology has been recently applied in several clinical situations [1,2,3]. The mainstream methods for the fabrication of dental objects using digital technologies can be classified into milling and additive manufacturing, which is well known as 3D printing [4,5,6]. As reported in previous studies, objects fabricated by milling have advantages in terms of strength and fitting accuracy [7,8], while additive manufacturing can provide objects with minimal cutting material waste at a low cost [9]. Generally, except for interim prostheses, milling manufacturing is recommended for the fabrication of fixed crowns and bridges that need enough strength and accurate fitting [10]. Nevertheless, additive manufacturing is suitable for the fabrication of occlusal splints (OS) that are expected to be clinically used for a short time and do not demand higher aesthetics (Figure 1) [11].
Additive manufacturing systems can be mainly classified into inkjet printing, extrusion printing, selective laser melting, and stereolithography printing [12,13,14,15]. In this classification, the stereolithography printing system has been widely used for OS fabrication. For the stereolithography printing system, digital light processing (DLP) and liquid crystal display (LCD) are mainly used as the principles of pattern formation for 3D printers [16]. Thanks to the increased light intensity, DLP printers can produce items more effectively, leading to the widespread development of dental materials for DLP-based stereolithography printing systems [17,18]. On the other hand, previous studies reported that LCD printers could provide objects with a smoother surface and a higher degree of conversion than DLP printers [19,20]. Although LCD printers might have several advantages, only a few studies have been performed on objects printed using LCD printers.
The post-curing procedure is considered as an essential step after stereolithographic printing. Previous studies reported that post-curing could enhance the degree of surface conversion [21] and improve several physical properties of 3D-printed objects [22]. Nevertheless, some other studies found that the effect of post-curing conditions was limited only to the surface layers but not the core [19,20]. Adjustment is hardly necessary for the fitting surface of OS fabricated by 3D printers, suggesting that the post-curing conditions would have an impact on the inner surface. However, adjustments on the occlusal surface of OS in the form of cutting and polishing is frequently required to achieve appropriate occlusal contact with the antagonists, resulting in the removal of surface layers from the occlusal surface of OS. Nevertheless, there is no report evaluating the effect of post-curing methods and surface polishing on the physical properties of 3D-printed occlusal splints.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface polishing on the physical properties of 3D-printed OS materials post-cured at different atmospheres. The evaluated properties were flexural strength, flexural modulus, surface microhardness, degree of carbon double bond conversion, water sorption, and water solubility. The null hypotheses were as follows: (1) the surface polishing would have no impact on the evaluated properties of 3D-printed OS materials, and (2) the post-curing method would have no impact on the evaluated properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Fabrication

Figure 2 summarizes the preparation procedures and classification of specimens. Eighty bar-shaped specimens were made of a photopolymerizing material used for additive-manufactured OS (KeySplint® Hard, Keystone Industries GmbH, Singen, Germany) which is based on methacrylate chemistries. All specimens were additive-manufactured at room temperature (23 ± 1 °C) using an LCD printer of which the LED wavelength was 405 nm (Creo™ C5, PLANMECA OY, Helsinki, Finland) with a print orientation of 90° and a layer thickness of 100 µm (Figure 3), followed by rinsing with isopropanol for 10 min in an ultrasonic cleaning unit (Quantrex® 90, L&R Ultrasonics, Kearny, NJ, USA). Afterward, half of the specimens (n = 40) underwent stroboscopic post-curing with 2000 flashes on each surface (Otoflash G171, BEGO GmbH & Co, Bremen, Germany) in the air with an absence of nitrogen gas (N2) atmosphere (without N2), while the other half (n = 40) underwent stroboscopic post-curing at an N2 atmosphere (with N2). Each post-cured group was divided into the following two subgroups based on the polishing condition: unpolished and polished subgroups (n = 20/subgroup). For the polished subgroups, wet polishing was performed using a silicon carbide grinding paper 4000-grit with a grain size of 5 µm (SiC Paper #4000, Struers LLC, Cleveland, USA). The size of each specimen was standardized with a dimension of 3.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 60.0 mm (±0.2 mm). In addition, half of the specimens in each subgroup (n = 10) were exposed to accelerated aging procedures by boiling in distilled water for 16 h as the aging procedure (aged specimens), while the other half (n = 10) were not boiled (non-aged specimens).

2.2. Flexural Strength and Modulus Testing

For each specimen, a 3-point bending test was performed to assess the flexural strength (MPa) and elastic modulus (GPa) in the air atmosphere at room temperature by a universal testing machine (Model LRX; Lloyds Instruments Ltd., Hampshire, UK) using a load cell with a capacity of 2500 N. The crosshead speed was 5.0 mm/min and the span length was 50 mm. Each test was detected to be finished based on one of the following test conditions: 1) the reduction in the load reached 10% of the maximum load, and 2) the deflection of the specimen reached 12 mm. Additionally, the number of specimens broken during the testing was counted and the broken ratio (%) was calculated.

2.3. Surface Microhardness (Vickers Hardness)

For each subgroup, surface microhardness was measured at 10 different regions on two randomly selected specimens using a Vickers hardness testing device (Duramin-5, Struers, Ballerup, Denmark). The diagonals of the square-based pyramid indentation impressed on the specimen were measured, and the Vickers hardness number (VHN) was calculated using the following equation:
VHN = 0.1891 × F d 2
where F is the indenting force (N) and d is the mean length of two diagonals of the pyramid indentation (mm).

2.4. Degree of Carbon Double Bond Conversion (DC)

The degree of carbon double bond conversion (DC) on the surface of five specimens randomly selected from each non-aged group was measured using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Frontier FT–IR spectrometer, PerkinElmer, Llantrisant, UK) based on the unpolymerized material as the control. The absorbance intensity of the aliphatic C=C absorbance peak ratio at 1638 cm−1 against the reference aromatic peak at 1600 cm−1 was measured for both unpolymerized material and selected specimens. The values of DC were calculated as a percentage (%) using the following equation:
DC = ( 1 C 1638 / C 1600 U 1638 / U 1600 ) × 100
where C1638 is the polymerized aliphatic peaks ratio; C1600 is the polymerized aromatic peaks ratio; U1638 is the unpolymerized aliphatic peaks ratio; and U1600 is the unpolymerized aromatic peaks ratio.

2.5. Water Sorption and Solubility

Based on the previous studies, water sorption (WSP) and solubility (WSL) were measured using eight non-aged specimens randomly selected from each group [19,20,23,24]. During the first drying cycle procedures, the specimens were dried in a vacuum desiccator containing freshly dried silica at 37 ± 1 °C for 22 h, and then stored at 23 ± 1 °C for 2 h. The initial mass (m1) of each specimen was measured by a digital analytical balance (XS105; Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). Then, the drying procedure was repeated until the decrease in mass during a single day was not more than 0.1 mg for each specimen. After finishing the first drying procedure, the specimens were immersed in 40.0 mL of distilled water and stored at 37 ± 1 °C for 30 days. At 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 30 days after immersion into the water, the specimens were removed from the water and carefully dried with absorbent paper for 60 s. Then, the mass of each specimen was measured. The mass at 30 days after the first water immersion was recorded and considered as m2. Similarly as the first drying procedure, specimens were dried during the second drying cycle until a consistent mass (m3) of each specimen was achieved. Finally, WSP and WSL were estimated in percentages using the following equations:
W SP = ( m 2 m 3 m 1 ) × 100
and
W SL = ( m 1 m 3 m 1 ) × 100
where m1 is the initial mass of the specimen after the first drying cycle (mg); m2 is the mass of the specimen at 30 days after water immersion (mg); and m3 is the constant mass of the specimen achieved after the second drying cycle (mg).

2.6. Optical Observation of Surface Condition

One specimen was randomly selected from each non-aged group for optical observation of the surface condition using a 3D optical profilometer (OP) (ContourGT–I, Bruker Nano, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). The size of the regions of interest for observation was 236.0 µm × 314.2 µm.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Since the equality of variance was detected by the Levene test in each acquired data, parametric testing methods were used. Three predictors including the post-curing atmosphere, polishing, and aging were tested for the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and VHN using a 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), while the two predictors including the post-curing atmosphere and polishing were tested for the DC, WSP, and WSL using a 2-way ANOVA. Additionally, all the acquired data were statistically compared among the groups using a 1-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons as a post hoc analysis. Regarding the broken ratio of specimens during the flexural strength and modulus test, the Chi-squared test was performed for the comparison between unpolished and polished groups independently within each subgroup and classified based on the post-curing atmosphere and aging procedure. Statistical software (IBM SPSS Statistics v28.0, IBM, Redmond, WA, USA) was used for all the statical analyses with the significance level set at 0.05.

3. Results

The data of unpolished subgroups overlapped with the data in the previous study [19]. Table 1 shows the p-values acquired by multiple ANOVA. The 3-way ANOVA revealed that the post-curing atmosphere, polishing, and aging significantly affected the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and VHN (p < 0.001). Additionally, the 2-way ANOVA revealed that the polishing significantly affected the DC, WSP, and WSL (p < 0.001), while the post-curing atmosphere significantly affected the DC (p < 0.001) and WSP (p = 0.038). On the other hand, no significant effect was found for the post-curing atmosphere on the WSL (p = 0.607).
Figure 4 shows the mean values and standard deviations of the flexural strength, and Table 2 shows the mean values and standard deviations of the flexural modulus and VHN. Polishing generally resulted in a statistically significant improvement of the evaluated physical properties except for the flexural strength and modulus in the aged group post-cued with N2 (p < 0.001 for all). Only in unpolished subgroups, the post-curing at N2 significantly enhanced the flexural strength and modulus after the aging in boiling water, while it significantly enhanced the VHN both in non-aged (p < 0.001 for all) and aged specimens (p < 0.001 for all). Additionally, aging in boiling water significantly deteriorated the evaluated physical properties (p < 0.05), with the exception of the flexural modulus (p = 1.000) and VHN (p = 0.091) of the unpolished specimens post-cured with N2. Figure 5 shows the broken ratio of specimens broken during the flexural strength and modulus test. Polishing generally resulted in a lower broken ratio in all subgroups. The polished specimens were never broken, and the polished group revealed a significantly lower broken ratio than the unpolished group in the non-aged subgroup post-cured with N2 (p = 0.025).
Table 3 shows the mean values and standard deviations of the DC, WSP, and WSL. Comparing the DC between the unpolished subgroups, the one post-cured without N2 revealed significantly lower DC than that post-cured with N2 (p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference among polished subgroups post-cured without and with N2. The WSP and WSL of the polished subgroups were significantly lower than those of the unpolished subgroups (p < 0.05), while the post-curing atmosphere did not significantly affect WSP and WSL in both unpolished and polished subgroups. Figure 6 shows the mass changes (%) of each group against time during the water immersion and second drying procedures. Saturation was achieved 14 days after water immersion. Nevertheless, the drying was completed 20 days after drying began in all groups. Figure 7 shows the OP images in typical specimens. The wavelike structures with a height of less than 10 µm were observed only in polished specimens, and there was no optical difference between specimens post-cured without and with N2.

4. Discussion

This study demonstrated the effect of post-curing atmospheres and surface polishing on the physical properties, including flexural strength, flexural modulus, surface microhardness (VHN), DC, WSP, and WSL in an additive-manufactured OS material fabricated by an LCD printer. The overall results rejected the two null hypotheses and revealed that the stroboscopic post-curing at an N2 atmosphere and surface polishing enhanced some of the evaluated properties of the additive-manufactured OS material.
Under the air atmosphere, an oxygen-inhibited layer could be formed on the surface of polymerized objects [25]. In this study, the post-curing with N2 enhanced the evaluated properties except for the WSP and WSL. This was in agreement with the previous studies, where the nitrogen post-curing atmosphere could prevent the oxygen-inhibited layer formation [21,26]. On the other hand, some of the evaluated physical properties were significantly improved by a surface polishing, which might be due to the removal of the surface layer of the specimens. In addition, as shown in Figure 7, polishing results in more flat and smooth surfaces for the specimens and eliminates irregularities, including grooves that might act as a pre-crack. Therefore, the geometrical flattening of the surface might be crucial for the flexural strength and modulus.
The post-curing with N2 significantly enhanced the VHN and DC of the non-aged unpolished subgroups, while it had no impact on the physical properties of aged and non-aged polished subgroups. This finding indicates that the effect of post-curing atmospheres would be only restricted to the surface layers which are usually removed during surface polishing, coinciding with the findings of previous studies [19,20]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in flexural strength and modulus between aged unpolished and polished subgroups post-cured with N2, suggesting that the enhancement of those properties gained by the post-curing with N2 against the aging would be comparable to that gained by surface polishing. It was also suggested that the post-curing with N2 could diminish the deterioration of flexural strength and modulus during aging, while it would have no impact on those properties in the additive-manufactured OS before aging. Additionally, surface polishing had no significant impact on DC in groups post-cured with N2.
Unlike fixed prostheses where the inner surfaces never appear outside, OS is an oral appliance that includes the outer (occlusal) surface which requires adjustments with surface layer removal, and the inner (fitting) surface which hardly needs any adjustment. The occlusal surface of the OS should resist mechanical stress from the antagonist. In this study, the surface layers with a thickness of around 250 µm were removed from the surface of each specimen during the polishing procedures. Polishing seemed to have a significant role in enhancing flexural strength, flexural modulus, and VHN regardless of the post-curing atmosphere. This finding highlights the clinical significance of occlusal surface adjustment procedures, including cutting and polishing for the OS.
Materials with a higher DC could present lower levels of cytotoxicity [27,28], supposing that the DC is a clinically critical factor for the inner surfaces of the OS. The DC of unpolished subgroups was dramatically improved by the post-curing with N2, suggesting that N2 used as the post-curing atmosphere would be clinically recommended, especially from the viewpoint of biological compatibility. Meanwhile, WSP and WSL were hardly enhanced by the post-curing with N2. WSP and WSL are related to the dimensional change in the OS leading to internal stresses that adversely impact its longevity [23,29], indicating that it is clinically important to maintain WSP and WSL at a lower level to prevent the fracture of the OS and gain its long-term success. Therefore, even for OSs with an inner surface that needs almost no adjustment, it is necessary to investigate different methods to decrease WSP and WSL in further studies.
Only one printer with an LCD system was used in this study. Furthermore, the layer thickness during printing was unified to 100 µm. The printing layer thickness of 3D-printed OS materials can have an impact on their physical properties [30]. Future studies should be considered to determine the effect of surface polishing and/or post-curing atmospheres on additive-manufactured OSs with various layer thicknesses. Finally, the aging condition used in this study was not identical to the actual clinical scenario. However, the accelerated aging procedure has been reported to be efficient in simulating hydrolytic deteriorations and thermal breakdown [31,32].

5. Conclusions

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that surface polishing can enhance flexural strength, flexural modulus, surface microhardness, degree of carbon double bond conversion, water sorption, and water solubility of the evaluated additively manufactured occlusal splint material regardless of the post-curing atmosphere. The post-curing atmosphere also plays a role in the physical properties of the evaluated material. Stroboscopic post-curing at a nitrogen gas atmosphere can enhance surface microhardness and the degree of double carbon bond conversion of the evaluated splint material and minimize the aging deterioration of the flexural strength and modulus. However, the effect of post-curing atmospheres is limited only to the surface layers which can be removed by surface polishing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W., K.W., P.K.V. and L.L.; Methodology, J.W., K.W., M.G. and L.L.; Software, J.W. and L.L.; Validation, J.W., N.W. and T.I.; Formal Analysis, J.W. and L.L.; Investigation, J.W., K.W. and M.G.; Resources, L.L.; Data Curation, J.W., K.W. and M.G.; Writing–Original Draft Preparation, J.W. and K.W.; Writing–Review & Editing, J.W., M.G., P.K.V. and L.L.; Visualization, J.W.; Supervision, J.W., P.K.V. and L.L.; Project Administration, P.K.V. and L.L.; Funding Acquisition, J.W. and L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science grant number 20K10030 and ERDF React-EU (Helsinki-Uusimaa Regional Council) project code A78579.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out with the support of the Biocity Turku Biomaterials Research Program (www.biomaterials.utu.fi).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Watanabe, H.; Fellows, C.; An, H. Digital Technologies for Restorative Dentistry. Dent. Clin. 2022, 66, 567–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Francisco, I.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Marques, F.; Travassos, R.; Nunes, C.; Pereira, F.; Caramelo, F.; Paula, A.B.; Vale, F. Application of Three-Dimensional Digital Technology in Orthodontics: The State of the Art. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tian, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, X.; Wang, J.; Hou, X.; Li, K.; Lu, X.; Shi, H.; Lee, E.S.; Jiang, H.B. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning 2021, 2021, 9950131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Valenti, C.; Isabella Federici, M.; Masciotti, F.; Marinucci, L.; Xhimitiku, I.; Cianetti, S.; Pagano, S. Mechanical properties of 3D-printed prosthetic materials compared with milled and conventional processing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tigmeanu, C.V.; Ardelean, L.C.; Rusu, L.C.; Negrutiu, M.L. Additive Manufactured Polymers in Dentistry, Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives-A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Anadioti, E.; Kane, B.; Zhang, Y.; Bergler, M.; Mante, F.; Blatz, M.B. Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers. J. Prosthodont. 2022, 31, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ellakany, P.; Fouda, S.M.; Mahrous, A.A.; AlGhamdi, M.A.; Aly, N.M. Influence of CAD/CAM Milling and 3D-Printing Fabrication Methods on the Mechanical Properties of 3-Unit Interim Fixed Dental Prosthesis after Thermo-Mechanical Aging Process. Polymers 2022, 14, 4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al Hamad, K.Q.; Al-Rashdan, B.A.; Ayyad, J.Q.; Al Omrani, L.M.; Sharoh, A.M.; Al Nimri, A.M.; Al-Kaff, F.T. Additive Manufacturing of Dental Ceramics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Prosthodont. 2022, 31, e67–e86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goodacre, B.J.; Goodacre, C.J. Additive Manufacturing for Complete Denture Fabrication: A Narrative Review. J. Prosthodont. 2022, 31, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chou, W.T.; Chuang, C.C.; Wang, Y.B.; Chiu, H.C. Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three-dimensional printing. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schutz, B.M.; Sudbury, D.; Scott, N.; Mayoh, B.; Chan, B. Customized Three-Dimensional Printed Splints for Neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Three Case Reports. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2022, 76, 7606205020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wickström, H.; Hilgert, E.; Nyman, J.O.; Desai, D.; Karaman, D.Ş.; de Beer, T.; Sandler, N.; Rosenholm, J.M. Inkjet printing of drug-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles-a platform for drug development. Molecules 2017, 22, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Panwar, A.; Tan, L.P. Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules 2016, 21, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fina, F.; Goyanes, A.; Gaisford, S.; Basit, A.W. Selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing of medicines. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 529, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. van Noort, R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent. Mater. 2012, 28, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Quan, H.; Zhang, T.; Xu, H.; Luo, S.; Nie, J.; Zhu, X. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 5, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Revilla-León, M.; Özcan, M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: Current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J. Prosthodont. 2019, 28, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tulcan, A.; Vasilescu, M.D.; Tulcan, L. Study of the influence of technological parameters on generating flat part with cylindrical features in 3D printing with resin cured by optical processing. Polymers 2020, 2, 1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wada, J.; Wada, K.; Gibreel, M.; Wakabayashi, N.; Iwamoto, T.; Vallittu, P.K.; Lassila, L. Effect of Nitrogen Gas Post-Curing and Printer Type on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Hard Occlusal Splint Material. Polymers 2022, 14, 3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wada, J.; Wada, K.; Gibreel, M.; Wakabayashi, N.; Iwamoto, T.; Vallittu, P.K.; Lassila, L. Effect of 3D Printer Type and Use of Protection Gas during Post-Curing on Some Physical Properties of Soft Occlusal Splint Material. Polymers 2022, 14, 4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reymus, M.; Lümkemann, N.; Stawarczyk, B. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: Impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 2019, 22, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Li, P.; Lambart, A.L.; Stawarczyk, B.; Reymus, M.; Spintzyk, S. Postpolymerization of a 3D-printed denture base polymer: Impact of post-curing methods on surface characteristics, flexural strength, and cytotoxicity. J. Dent. 2021, 115, 103856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Figuerôa, R.M.S.; Conterno, B.; Arrais, C.A.G.; Sugio, C.Y.C.; Urban, V.M.; Neppelenbroek, K.H. Porosity, water sorption and solubility of denture base acrylic resins polymerized conventionally or in microwave. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2018, 26, e20170383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gibreel, M.; Perea-Lowery, L.; Vallittu, P.K.; Lassila, L. Characterization of occlusal splint materials: CAD-CAM versus conventional resins. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 124, 104813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vallittu, P.K. Unpolymerized surface layer of autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate resin. J. Oral Rehabil. 1999, 26, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shawkat, E.S.; Shortall, A.C.; Addison, O.; Palin, W.M. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25, 1338–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Franz, A.; König, F.; Lucas, T.; Watts, D.C.; Schedle, A. Cytotoxic effects of dental bonding substances as a function of degree of conversion. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bural, C.; Aktaş, E.; Deniz, G.; Ünlüçerçi, Y.; Kızılcan, N.; Bayraktar, G. Effect of post-polymerization heat-treatments on degree of conversion, leaching residual MMA and in vitro cytotoxicity of autopolymerizing acrylic repair resin. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Berli, C.; Thieringer, F.M.; Sharma, N.; Müller, J.A.; Dedem, P.; Fischer, J.; Rohr, N. Comparing the mechanical properties of pressed, milled, and 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020, 124, 780–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perea-Lowery, L.; Gibreel, M.; Vallittu, P.K.; Lassila, L. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 115, 104254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ozcan, M.; Barbosa, S.H.; Melo, R.M.; Galhano, G.A.; Bottino, M.A. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent. Mater. 2007, 23, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brendeke, J.; Ozcan, M. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J. Adhes. Dent. 2007, 9, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. 3D-printed occlusal splint. (A): occlusal surface on which adjustment including polishing is frequently required, and (B): fitting surface on which adjustment is hardly necessary.
Figure 1. 3D-printed occlusal splint. (A): occlusal surface on which adjustment including polishing is frequently required, and (B): fitting surface on which adjustment is hardly necessary.
Polymers 15 00625 g001
Figure 2. Flowchart of specimen fabrication. N2: nitrogen gas; DC: degree of carbon double bond conversion; WSP: water sorption; WSL: water solubility; and VHN: Vickers hardness number. Post-curing w/o N2: stroboscopic post-curing in the air atmosphere. Post-curing w/ N2: stroboscopic post-curing at a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
Figure 2. Flowchart of specimen fabrication. N2: nitrogen gas; DC: degree of carbon double bond conversion; WSP: water sorption; WSL: water solubility; and VHN: Vickers hardness number. Post-curing w/o N2: stroboscopic post-curing in the air atmosphere. Post-curing w/ N2: stroboscopic post-curing at a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
Polymers 15 00625 g002
Figure 3. The printing direction (red arrow), direction of light illumination (yellow arrows), and evaluated surface for Vickers hardness number (VHN) testing and optical observation.
Figure 3. The printing direction (red arrow), direction of light illumination (yellow arrows), and evaluated surface for Vickers hardness number (VHN) testing and optical observation.
Polymers 15 00625 g003
Figure 4. Mean values (standard deviations) of flexural strength. The same superscripted letters indicate groups not statistically significantly different when compared by 1-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis with Tukey multiple comparisons. #: data of unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19].
Figure 4. Mean values (standard deviations) of flexural strength. The same superscripted letters indicate groups not statistically significantly different when compared by 1-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis with Tukey multiple comparisons. #: data of unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19].
Polymers 15 00625 g004
Figure 5. The broken ratio of specimens broken during the flexural strength and modulus test. The asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference between the unpolished and polished groups when compared by the Chi-squared test. It was noted that the polished group showed a lower broken ratio than the unpolished group in each subgroup. #: data of the unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19].
Figure 5. The broken ratio of specimens broken during the flexural strength and modulus test. The asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference between the unpolished and polished groups when compared by the Chi-squared test. It was noted that the polished group showed a lower broken ratio than the unpolished group in each subgroup. #: data of the unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19].
Polymers 15 00625 g005
Figure 6. The representative plots of mass changes (%) against time during the water immersion and the second drying procedures. w/o N2: stroboscopic post-curing in the air atmosphere. Post-curing w/ N2: stroboscopic post-curing at a nitrogen gas atmosphere. It was noted that saturation was achieved 14 days after water immersion and drying was completed 20 days after drying began in all groups. #: data of unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19].
Figure 6. The representative plots of mass changes (%) against time during the water immersion and the second drying procedures. w/o N2: stroboscopic post-curing in the air atmosphere. Post-curing w/ N2: stroboscopic post-curing at a nitrogen gas atmosphere. It was noted that saturation was achieved 14 days after water immersion and drying was completed 20 days after drying began in all groups. #: data of unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19].
Polymers 15 00625 g006
Figure 7. Optical profilometer (OP) images in typical specimens. The yellow arrows represent the light illuminating direction. It was noted that the wavelike structures with a height of less than 10 µm were observed only in polished specimens and there was no difference between specimens post-cured without and with N2. #: images of unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19].
Figure 7. Optical profilometer (OP) images in typical specimens. The yellow arrows represent the light illuminating direction. It was noted that the wavelike structures with a height of less than 10 µm were observed only in polished specimens and there was no difference between specimens post-cured without and with N2. #: images of unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19].
Polymers 15 00625 g007
Table 1. p-values acquired by 3- and 2-way ANOVA for the evaluated mechanical properties.
Table 1. p-values acquired by 3- and 2-way ANOVA for the evaluated mechanical properties.
Predictor □Flexural Strength #Flexural
Modulus #
VHN #DC $WSP $WSL $
post-curing atmosphere<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *0.038 *0.607
polishing<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *
aging<0.001 *<0.001 *<0.001 *
#: p-values acquired by 3-way ANOVA; $: p-values acquired by 2-way ANOVA; and *: statistically significant.
Table 2. Mean values and standard deviations of flexural modulus and VHN, and results of 1-way ANOVA statistical analysis.
Table 2. Mean values and standard deviations of flexural modulus and VHN, and results of 1-way ANOVA statistical analysis.
Post-Curing
Atmosphere
AgingPolishingFlexural Modulus (GPa)VHN
$$
Without N2non-agedUnpolished #2.21 (0.11)a12.5 (0.4)a
Polished2.60 (0.11)b16.9 (0.2)b
agedUnpolished #1.70 (0.14)c12.1 (0.4)c
Polished2.13 (0.11)a12.7 (0.5)a
With N2non-agedUnpolished #2.13 (0.13)a15.7 (0.5)d
Polished2.54 (0.12)b17.0 (0.2)b
agedUnpolished #2.11 (0.07)a15.3 (0.5)d
Polished2.12 (0.13)a12.5 (0.4)a
#: data of unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19], and $: the same superscripted letters indicate groups not statistically significantly different when compared by 1-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis with Tukey multiple comparisons.
Table 3. Mean values and standard deviations of DC, WSP, and WSL, and results of 1-way ANOVA statistical analysis.
Table 3. Mean values and standard deviations of DC, WSP, and WSL, and results of 1-way ANOVA statistical analysis.
Post-Curing
Atmosphere
PolishingDC (%)WSP (%)WSL (%)
$ $ $
Without N2Unpolished #64.7 (6.4)a1.685 (0.004)a0.495 (0.020)a
Polished96.0 (3.0)b1.657 (0.006)b0.139 (0.022)b
With N2Unpolished #92.3 (4.5)b1.696 (0.006)a0.496 (0.036)a
Polished97.3 (3.7)b1.664 (0.017)b0.138 (0.022)b
#: data of unpolished subgroups were quoted from the previous study [19], and $: the same superscripted letters indicate groups not statistically significantly different when compared by 1-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis with Tukey multiple comparisons.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wada, J.; Wada, K.; Gibreel, M.; Wakabayashi, N.; Iwamoto, T.; Vallittu, P.K.; Lassila, L. Effect of Surface Polishing on Physical Properties of an Occlusal Splint Material for Additive Manufacturing under Protection Gas Post-Curing Condition. Polymers 2023, 15, 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030625

AMA Style

Wada J, Wada K, Gibreel M, Wakabayashi N, Iwamoto T, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Effect of Surface Polishing on Physical Properties of an Occlusal Splint Material for Additive Manufacturing under Protection Gas Post-Curing Condition. Polymers. 2023; 15(3):625. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030625

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wada, Junichiro, Kanae Wada, Mona Gibreel, Noriyuki Wakabayashi, Tsutomu Iwamoto, Pekka K. Vallittu, and Lippo Lassila. 2023. "Effect of Surface Polishing on Physical Properties of an Occlusal Splint Material for Additive Manufacturing under Protection Gas Post-Curing Condition" Polymers 15, no. 3: 625. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030625

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop