Next Article in Journal
Electrospun Cyclodextrin/Poly(L-lactic acid) Nanofibers for Efficient Air Filter: Their PM and VOC Removal Efficiency and Triboelectric Outputs
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Furan-Based Diamine and Its Application in the Preparation of Bio-Based Polyimide
Previous Article in Journal
Crystallization Kinetics of Modified Nanocellulose/Monomer Casting Nylon Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Removal of Organic Pollutants with Polylactic Acid-Based Nanofiber Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/polym15030720
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ring-Opening Polymerization of Trimethylene Carbonate with Phosphazene Organocatalyst

by
Jianglin Zhu
*,
Xiaoming Luo
and
Xin Li
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhanjiang), Zhanjiang 524000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(3), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030720
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 15 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eco-Friendly Polymers and Polymer Composites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aliphatic polycarbonate (APC) compounds are an important class of biodegradable materials with excellent biocompatibility, good biodegradability, and low toxicity, and the study of these compounds and their modification products aims to obtain biodegradable materials with better performance. In this context, the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of trimethylene carbonate (TMC) from a low nucleophilic organic superbase of phosphazene (t-BuP4) as a catalyst and benzyl alcohol (BnOH) as an initiator at room temperature was carefully studied to prepare poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) which is one of the most studied APC. 1H NMR and SEC measurements clearly demonstrate the presence of a benzyloxy group at the α-terminus of the obtained PTMC homopolymers while investigation of the polymerization kinetics confirms the controlled/living nature of t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC. On the basis of this, the block copolymerization of TMC and δ-valerolactone (VL)/ε-caprolactone (CL) was successfully carried out to give PTMC-b-PCL and PTMC-b-PVL copolymers. Furthermore, PTMC with terminal functionality was also prepared with the organocatalytic ROP of TMC through functional initiators. We believe that the present ROP system is a robust, highly efficient, and practical strategy for producing excellent biocompatible and biodegradable PTMC-based materials.

1. Introduction

Biodegradable polymeric materials have important applications in many biomedical fields, such as drug delivery, tissue engineering, and surgical medicine, and their research is receiving increasing attention [1,2,3,4]. Aliphatic polycarbonate (APC) compounds are an important class of biodegradable materials with excellent biocompatibility, good biodegradability, and low toxicity, and the study of these compounds and their modification products aims to obtain biodegradable materials with better performance [5,6,7,8]. In the past decades, great efforts have been made to develop functional materials based on APCs by controlling their composition, structure, molecular weight, dispersity, and functionality. Among them, amorphous poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) with a glass transition temperature of −17 °C, represents the most studied for its potential application in biomedical fields [9,10,11,12].
In general, PTMC was produced by ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of the cyclic monomer of trimethylene carbonate with metal-based catalysts, such as Sn(II)2-ethylhexanoate (SnOct2) and aluminum isopropoxide Al(O-i-Pr)3 [13]. However, due to the inherent disadvantages of the widely accepted “coordination-insert” polymerization mechanism for metal-based ROP catalysts, the residues resulting from the metallic catalyst seem difficult to remove from the final product, as they appear as impurities, and thus limit the further application of PTMC in biomedical fields, where even very small amounts of catalyst residues cannot be accepted [14,15,16,17]. Although enzymes have been used to produce PTMC instead of metal catalysts, it generally takes longer to produce polymers with a molecular weight below 104 g/mol, which would not be suitable for the applications [18,19,20]. Therefore, it is still highly attractive to develop new catalysts for the ROP of TMC to produce PTMC with high efficiency and controllability.
Organocatalysts, which have been extensively surveyed since the pioneering work of Hedrick and Waymouth over the last two decades, have also been used prominently to proceed the ROP of TMC, and they typically include organic acids (e.g., sulfonic and phosphoric acids and their derivatives) and organic bases (e.g., guanidine, amidine, and carbene) [21,22,23,24,25]. Aiming at how acidity affected catalytic activity, Hedrick and co-workers used molecular modeling to calculate the energy based on the reaction mechanism, and the results showed that catalysis is indeed dependent on both acid strength and the ability of the conjugate base to act as a hydrogen-bond acceptor, suggesting the superiority of bifunctional activation [26].
Among various organocatalysts, phosphazenes, representing a type of nitrogen-phosphor hybrid organobase with low nucleophilicity, have been widely used for the ROP of epoxides, cyclic lactams, lactones, siloxanes, and methacrylates [27,28,29]. Bulk ROP of TMC with a less basic organocatalyst 2-tert-butylimino-2-diethylamino-1,3-dimethylperhydro-1,3,2-di-azaphosphorine (BEMP) with an alcohol initiator produced PTMC with high molecular weight at 100 °C (Mn = 45,800 g/mol, Ð = 1.49), while polymer with lower molecular weight and lower dispersity were obtained at lower temperatures (60 °C), but polymerization control is lost at higher temperatures leading to larger dispersities [30,31]. However, compared to an ocean of publications focusing on the ROP of cyclic lactones, the ROP of carbonate catalyzed by phosphazene receives less attention. In particular, the strongest basicity and non-nucleophilicity of phosphazene t-BuP4 (MeCNpKa is 42.6) not only transform protic compounds into nucleophilic initiating species by deprotonation or activation of weak initiators but also guarantee that the polymerization process is not influenced by catalysts due to nucleophilicity [32]. Based on the above discussions, in this study, we perform (a) ROP of TMC catalyzed by t-BuP4 and the details of the polymerization kinetics, (b) the preparation of block copolymers composed of PTMC and poly(δ-valerolactone) (PVL)/poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL). We envision that it can afford a versatile and robust way to make PTMC with t-BuP4.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

TMC from Aladdin (Shanghai, China) was purified by recrystallizing twice from anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) and stored at −10 °C in a glove box [33]. CL and VL from Aldrich (Shanghai, China) were stirred overnight with calcium hydride (CaH2), distilled under reduced pressure, and stored in a glove box. Benzyl alcohol (BnOH) from Aladdin was purified by refluxing sodium under nitrogen for two hours and then distilling under reduced pressure. Azeotropic distillation using anhydrous toluene (TOL) was selected to purify methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG, Mn = 2.0 × 103 g/mol, Aldrich) due to the hydrophilic nature of PEG. Anhydrous TOL and THF (Aladdin) were obtained by distillation from the sodium/benzophenone mixture on the basis of the color change of the mixture (purple indicates the absence of water) and stored in a glove box. Other reagents from Aldrich were used as received.

2.2. Methods

Characterization by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) was performed on a Bruker AV400 NMR (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) spectrometer using deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) as the solvent, to which tetramethylsilane (TMS) was added as an internal standard. A Waters size exclusion chromatography (SEC, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) system equipped with a model 510 pump, a model 410 differential refractive index (RI) detector and a Waters 2487 UV detector operating at a wavelength of 254 nm was used to measure the number average molecular weight (Mn) and dispersity (Ð) of the isolated polymers at 35 °C with an eluent rate of 1.0 mL/min (HPLC-THF, Aladdin), while a series of monodisperse polystyrene samples were used as standards to calibrate the molecular weight tested. The samples had a concentration of ~5 mg/mL, and a 400 nm hydrophobic PTFE membrane was used to clean the samples prior to detection. A Bruker-Autoflex III Smartbeam MALDI-TOF MS machine (Bruker, Germany) operated at an accelerating voltage of 25 kV (reflector mode) was used to measure the absolute molecular weight and end-functionality of the obtained polymers (HPLC THF was used as solvent; a mixture of 50 μL of 10 mg/mL polymer, 50 μL of 15 mg/mL 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid matrix, and 10 μL of 4.0 mg/mL sodium iodide cationic agent was deposited on the sample platform and then dried for testing). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurement was conducted on a NETZSCH DSC 200F3 machine (Netzsch, Berlin, Germany) at a scan rate of 10 °C/min under a flowing nitrogen atmosphere. The sample was rapidly heated to 150 °C and held for 10 min to remove thermal history and then cooled to −50 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. Subsequently, the sample was reheated to 150 °C at the same rate, where the glass transition temperature (Tg) was taken as centered around the transition of the curve. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) test was carried out on a TA SDT Q600 instrument (TA, New Castle, DE, USA) in a nitrogen atmosphere with a heating rate of 10 °C/min in the range of 25–600 °C. The samples used for the thermal test were previously dried under vacuum at 80 °C.

2.3. Polymerization

The details of a typical preparation for the ROP of TMC using BnOH as an initiator and t-BuP4 as a catalyst are as follows: TMC (0.51 g, 5.0 mmol, 50 equiv), THF (2 mL), and BnOH (10.40 μL, 0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv) were first placed in a dried Shrek flask fitted with a magnet stirrer in a glove box. Subsequently, t-BuP4 (50 μL, 0.05 mmol, 1.0 equiv in hexane) was added to the flask to start the polymerization. In order to measure the evolution of molecular weight and Ð value on the monomer conversion, a small amount of the reaction mixture was taken for 1H NMR analysis and SEC measurement for the designated time. Finally, the reaction mixture was poured into a large excess of cold methanol to precipitate the polymer after the designated time, and a white solid was obtained after drying in a vacuum. The polymerizations of TMC under other conditions and the polymerizations of PCVL or PCL were carried out in a similar way (Table 1). PTMC (Yield: 90%, Mn,SEC = 5500 g/mol, Ð = 1.18, Figure 1), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 2.03 (2H, −COOCH2CH2CH2O−), 3.63 (2H, −COO(CH2)2CH2OH), 4.22 (4H, −COOCH2CH2CH2O−), 5.10 (2H, PhCH2O−), 7.33 (5H, aromatic); PCL (Yield: 90%, Mn,SEC = 5200 g/mol, Ð = 1.30). 1.33 (2H, −CO(CH2)2CH2(CH2)2O−), 1.63 (4H, −COCH2CH2CH2CH2CH2O−), 2.28 (2H, −COCH2(CH2)4O−), 3.63 (2H, −CO(CH2)4CH2OH), 4.05 (2H, −CO(CH2)4CH2O−), 5.10 (2H, PhCH2O−), 7.32 (5H, aromatic); PVL (Yield: 97%, Mn,SEC = 5200 g/mol, Ð = 1.20), 1.65 (4H, −COCH2(CH2)2CH2O−), 2.32 (−COCH2(CH2)3O−), 3.65 (2H, −CO(CH2)3CH2OH), 4.05 (2H, −CO(CH2)3CH2O−), 5.10 (2H, PhCH2O−), 7.34 (5H, aromatic).
The details of a typical preparation for the block copolymerization of TMC and CL using BnOH as an initiator and t-BuP4 as a catalyst are as follows: TMC (0.30 g, 3.0 mmol, 30 equiv), BnOH (10.40 μL, 0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), and THF (3 mL) were first placed in a dried Shrek flask fitted with a magnet stirrer in a glove box. Subsequently, t-BuP4 (100 μL, 0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added to the flask to start the polymerization. After allowing the TMC polymerization to proceed for 4 h, an aliquot was taken from the flask and quenched to determine the molecular properties of the PTMC block, and then the polymerization of the second block was started by the addition of CL (0.34 g, 3.0 mmol, 30 equiv). The polymerization was quenched by the addition of 0.1 mL of acetic acid after an additional period of 4 h, and the reaction mixture was precipitated in a large excess of cold methanol to give white solid PTMC-b-PCL. (Yield 80%). 1H NMR (Table 2, 400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 1.35 (2H, −CO(CH2)2CH2(CH2)2O−), 1.65 (4H, −COCH2CH2CH2CH2CH2O−, 4H, −COCH2CH2CH2CH2O−), 2.32 (2H, −COCH2(CH2)4O−, 2H, −COCH2(CH2)3O−), 3.63 (2H, −CO(CH2)4CH2OH, 2H, −CO(CH2)3CH2OH), 4.07 (2H, −CO(CH2)4CH2O−, 2H, −COCH2(CH2)3OH), 5.10 (2H, PhCH2O−), 7.32 (5H, aromatic). The copolymerization of TMC and VL was performed in a similar process to give PTMC-b-PVL (yield 68%). 1H NMR (Table 2, 400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm): 1.34 (2H, −CO(CH2)2CH2(CH2)2O−), 1.63 (4H, −COCH2CH2CH2CH2CH2O−), 2.04 (2H, −COOCH2CH2CH2O−), 2.30 (2H, −COCH2(CH2)4O−), 3.65 (2H, −CO(CH2)4CH2OH), 4.06 (2H, −CO(CH2)4CH2O−), 4.12 (4H, −COOCH2CH2CH2O−), 5.10 (2H, PhCH2O−), 7.32 (5H, aromatic).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Ring Opening Polymerization of TMC by t-BuP4

First, t-BuP4 was used to catalyze the ROP of TMC with BnOH as the initiator and THF as the solvent at room temperature (Scheme 1). Figure 1 shows the 1H NMR spectrum of S3 (Table 1) over 30 min. The signals attributed to the methylene protons of the PTMC backbone and smaller signals due to the methylene protons of the benzyloxy group are clearly observed, indicating that t-BuP4 and BnOH separately played the role of catalyst and initiator in the ROP system. In addition, the integration of the methylene peak attributed to BnOH is equivalent to the area of the methylene peak adjacent to the terminal hydroxyl group at the ω-chain end, implying good chain-end fidelity. It is worth noting that the main side reaction in the cyclic carbonate ROP, the formation of ether bonds by decarboxylation, did not occur in the catalytic system according to 1H NMR analysis. In fact, some monomer is still present in the reaction mixture from Figure 1, and the monomer conversion is about 80% according to the 1H NMR calculation (monomer conversion reaches ~95% after 8 h).
Notably, the number-average molecular weight (Mn,NMR) calculated according to 1H NMR spectra and that based on the conversion rate and the initial monomer/initiator feed ratio maintain good consistency (Table 1). The SEC trace of the obtained PTMC is monomodal, while the Ð values are below 1.30. These results demonstrate that the room-temperature ROP of TMC catalyzed by t-BuP4 has good control over molecular weight and dispersity. PVL and PCL were also prepared using t-BuP4 as a catalyst and BnOH as an initiator. We found that the rate of consumption of CL is lower than that of VL (Table 1), which is consistent with other ROP situations involving VL and CL [34,35,36,37,38,39].

3.2. Controlled/Living Manner of the ROP of PTMC by t-BuP4

In order to further confirm that the t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC was initiated by BnOH, we performed MALDI-TOF MS analysis (Figure 2). From the figure it can be seen that there is only a series of single peaks consistent with the molecular weight of PTMC calculated with BnO- and hydroxyl as chain ends. This result indicates that the t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC with the initiator of BnOH proceeds in a controlled or living manner with negligible side reactions (e.g., backbiting, transesterification). Figure 3A displays the SEC curves of the isolated PTMC with different monomer/initiator ratios (30 to 100). It is obvious that the Mn,SEC of the obtained PTMC increases with increasing monomer to initiator ratio, which is also evidence for controllable polymerization. Figure 3B clearly shows that monomer conversion increases with reaction time, and the monomer conversion achieved 80% at about 10 min, indicating the high reactivity of t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC (which is important to the controllability).
After that, we focused on the polymerization kinetics of the t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC. As shown in Figure 4a, Mn,SEC (○) increases linearly with increasing monomer conversion, consistent with Mn,theo. (●) while the values of Ð remains stable (~1.15) during the polymerization process. Figure 4b shows that the monomer conversion and polymerization time represent the typical kinetic nature of the first-order polymerization, which not only indicates the stable consumption of monomer during the ROP but also further confirms the living feature of the t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC [37,38,39].
Chain extension experiments are also commonly used to demonstrate active polymerization. Figure 5 shows the SEC curves of the chain extension experiments with PTMC comprising a hydroxyl chain end as the macroinitiator (Table 2, runs 3 and 4). Subsequently, we added 40 equiv of VL to the reaction mixture containing PTMC (Mn,SEC = 2600, Ð = 1.13) macroinitiator and thus a PTMC-b-PVL block copolymer was obtained (Mn,SEC = 7500 g/mol, Ð = 1.24, Figure 5a). Compared with the PTMC polymer, the SEC curve of the block polymer has shifted to the high molecular weight region while maintaining a low Ð value, indicating that the chain extension polymerization has good controllability. PTMC-b-PCL was prepared in a similar way, and the molecular weight of the polymer increased from 2500 g/mol (PTMC homopolymer) to 8000 g/mol and Ð increased from 1.12 to 1.32 (Figure 5b). These results demonstrate that the PTMC chain ends retain their active or living character for further polymerization, thereby providing a method for preparing biodegradable PTMC-based block copolymers.

3.3. A Plausible Reaction Mechanism

A possible initiator/chain-end mechanism is proposed in Scheme 2 (see also other works on the anionic ROP of TMC through the initiator/chain-end mechanism). An alkoxy active center was generated by the hydrogen bond of t-BuP4 with the initiator alcohol [40,41,42]. Then, alkoxy active center attacks the carbonyl of TMC subsequently with ring opening reaction to form the alkoxy active growth chain end. Then, the active chain end continues to carry out the ring opening of TMC to form PTMC homopolymer.

3.4. Preparation of Functional PTMC

In order to further explore the possible applications of this catalytic system, we attempted to synthesize end-functionalized PTMC with functionalized initiators. We employed 6-azide-1-hexanol (AHA) as an initiator to prepare PTMC-based polymers with azido at one end, and polymers with block, branch, and other topological structures could be easily assembled using the highly efficient azido-alkyne click reaction with the synthesized alkyne-terminal polymers. From the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure 6a), we can clearly see a signal attributed to methylene hydrogen adjacent to azido, and the molecular weight Mn,NMR (1960 g/mol) calculated from the 1H NMR spectrum was consistent with the theoretical calculation value Mn,theo (2148 g/mol). PEG was one of the most commonly applied commercial products in light of its prominent biocompatibility, antifouling, and so-called “stealth” character [43,44]. Thus, a macroinitiator, mPEG, was also used to initiate the ROP of TMC with a t-BuP4 catalyst, and an amphiphilic block copolymer, PEG-b-PTMC, was successfully synthesized (Figure 6b), which may find application in intracellular imaging and drug delivery systems. These results confirm that this catalytic system has a wide range of applications in the preparation of functionalized polycarbonate-based materials.

3.5. Thermal Properties of the Obtained PTMC

Finally, we focused on the thermal properties of the PTMC prepared by the t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC to extend this study. Figure 7 shows the DSC (a) and TGA (b) curves of the obtained PTMC. As we know, PTMC is amorphous with a glass transition temperature (Tg) of around −17 °C [45]. The homopolymer of PTMC is a white powder when the molecular weight is higher than 3 × 103 g/mol; below this, it appears as a waxy solid. The DSC measurement was chosen to examine the Tg of the isolated PTMC. Figure 7a clearly shows that the Tg of the tested PTMC (5 × 103 g/mol) is around −15 °C, which is close to the literature, while the difference may be due to the different molecular weights of the polymers. This result also confirms the pure structure of the PTMC synthesized by the t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC. Figure 7b shows the TGA curve of the PTMC produced by the t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC. The degradation temperature of PTMC is similar to that reported [45], and there is only one stage of degradation, which also confirms the homopolymer of PTMC.

4. Conclusions

In summary, t-BuP4 organic superbase was investigated to exhibit its catalytic performance on the ring-opening polymerization of carbonate (TMC) at room temperature, and the results demonstrated that the polymerizations were in a controlled or living manner, allowing isolated polymers with designed molecular weight and narrow dispersity with t-BuP4 as the catalyst and BnOH as the initiator. Well-defined PTMC-b-PVL and PTMC-b-PCL were also prepared through the chain-extension method. In addition, end-functionalized PTMCs with azido group and mPEG-b-PTMC copolymer were also produced using 6-azido-1-hexanol (AHA) and methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG) as functional initiators. t-BuP4 could be removed from the crude product with high feasibility just by precipitation to give PTMC with fewer catalyst residues. DSC and TGA characterizations also confirm the expected structure of PTMC produced by the t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that t-BuP4 is an excellent catalyst in the preparation of PTMC-based functional polymers.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation and funding acquisition J.Z.; investigation and data curation X.L. (Xiaoming Luo); formal analysis, methodology X.L. (Xin Li). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The financial support was provided by the Fund of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (012S22004-006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data could be supported when required.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carboue, Q.; Fadlallah, S.; Lopez, M.; Allais, F. Progress in Degradation Behavior of Most Common Types of Functionalized Polymers: A Review. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2022, 43, e2200254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dirauf, M.; Muljajew, I.; Weber, C.; Schubert, U.S. Recent Advances in Degradable Synthetic Polymers for Biomedical Applications-Beyond Polyesters. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2022, 129, 101547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pagar, R.R.; Musale, S.R.; Pawar, G.; Kulkarni, D.; Giram, P.S. Comprehensive Review on the Degradation Chemistry and Toxicity Studies of Functional Materials. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 2161–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Saghebasl, S.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Gorabi, A.M.; Nikzamir, N.; SeyedSadjadi, M.; Mostafavi, E. Biodegradable Functional Macromolecules as Promising Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2022, 33, 2044–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fukushima, K.; Fukushima, K. Biodegradable Functional Biomaterials Exploiting Substituted Trimethylene Carbonates and Organocatalytic Transesterification. Polym. J. 2016, 48, 1103–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, W.; Maynard, E.; Chiaradia, V.; Arno, M.C.; Dove, A.P. Aliphatic Polycarbonates from Cyclic Carbonate Monomers and Their Application as Biomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 10865–10907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, J.; Zhuo, R.-X.; Zhang, X.-Z. Construction of Functional Aliphatic Polycarbonates for Biomedical Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 211–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dai, Y.; Zhang, X. Recent Development of Functional Aliphatic Polycarbonates for the Construction of Amphiphilic Polymers. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 7429–7437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Bochove, B.; Grijpma, D.W. Mechanical Properties of Porous Photo-Crosslinked Poly(trimethylene carbonate) Network Films. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 143, 101456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhai, H.; Chen, K.; Meng, Y.; Wu, Z.; Deng, R.; Bai, Y.; Zhou, J.; Quan, D. Synthesis and Self-Assembly of Amphiphilic Diblock Polycarbonates with Various Pendant Hydrophilic Groups. Polymer 2022, 244, 10234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaluzynski, K.; Pretula, J.; Kaźmierski, S.; Lewinski, P.; Cypryk, M.; Penczek, S. Cationic Polymerization of Cyclic Trimethylene Carbonate Induced with Initiator and Catalyst in One Molecule: Polymer Structure, Kinetics and DFT. J. Catal. 2022, 415, 200–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, J.; Branford-White, C.J.; Zhu, L.-M. Preparation of Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Poly(trimethylene carbonate) Blend Nanofibers by Electrospinning. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, X.-L.; Zhuo, R.-X.; Liu, L.-J.; He, F.; Liu, G. Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Aliphatic Polycarbonates. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ang, P.; Mothe, S.R.; Chennamaneni, L.R.; Aidil, F.; Khoo, H.H.; Thoniyot, P. Laboratory-Scale Life-Cycle Assessment: A Comparison of Existing and Emerging Methods of Poly(ε-caprolactone) Synthesis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 9, 669–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hege, C.S.; Siegel-Axel, D.; Kohler, K.; Delorme, N.; Le Houérou, V.; Schiller, S.M.; Dolderer, J.H. Biopolymer Systems in Soft Tissue Engineering: Cell Compatibility and Effect Studies Including Material, Catalyst, and Surface Properties. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 3251–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy Metal Pollution in the Environment and Their Toxicological Effects on Humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Le Grognec, E.; Chretien, J.M.; Zammattio, F.; Quintard, J.P. Methodologies Limiting or Avoiding Contamination by Organotin Residues in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10207–10260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nikulin, M.; Svedas, V. Prospects of Using Biocatalysis for the Synthesis and Modification of Polymers. Molecules 2021, 26, 2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Matsumura, S.; Tsukada, K.; Toshima, K. Enzyme-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Polymerization of 1,3-Dioxan-2-one to Poly(trimethylene carbonate). Macromolecules 1997, 30, 3122–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Azemi, T.F.; Bisht, K.S. Novel Functional Polycarbonate by Lipase-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Polymerization of 5-Methyl-5-benzyloxycarbonyl-1,3-dioxan-2-one. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 6536–6540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, F.; Shi, Y.; Li, P.; Jiang, T. Research Progress of Ring-opening Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone Initiated by Degradable Biopolymers. Curr. Org. Chem. 2020, 24, 1507–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nifant’ev, I.; Ivchenko, P. DFT Modeling of Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters: A Crucial Role of Proton Exchange and Hydrogen Bonding. Polymers 2019, 11, 2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Khalil, A.; Cammas-Marion, S.; Coulembier, O. Organocatalysis Applied to the Ring-Opening Polymerization of β-Lactones: A Brief Overview. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2019, 57, 657–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xia, Y.; Zhao, J. Macromolecular Architectures Based on Organocatalytic Ring-Opening (co)Polymerization of Epoxides. Polymer 2018, 143, 343–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mezzasalma, L.; Dove, A.P.; Coulembier, O. Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization of l-Lactide in Bulk: A Long Standing Challenge. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 95, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Coady, D.J.; Horn, H.W.; Jones, G.O.; Sardon, H.; Engler, A.C.; Waymouth, R.M.; Rice, J.E.; Yang, Y.Y.; Hedrick, J.L. Polymerizing Base Sensitive Cyclic Carbonates Using Acid Catalysis. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, L.; Nederberg, F.; Pratt, R.C.; Waymouth, R.M.; Hedrick, J.L.; Wade, C.G. Phosphazene Bases:  A New Category of Organocatalysts for the Living Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4154–4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boileau, S.; Illy, N. Activation in Anionic Polymerization: Why Phosphazene Bases Are Very Exciting Promoters. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1132–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, S.; Ren, C.; Zhao, N.; Shen, Y.; Li, Z. Phosphazene Bases as Organocatalysts for Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 39, e1800485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Helou, M.; Miserque, O.; Brusson, J.M.; Carpentier, J.F.; Guillaume, S.M. Organocatalysts for the Controlled “Immortal” Ring-Opening Polymerization of Six-Membered-Ring Cyclic Carbonates: A Metal-Free, Green Process. Chemistry 2010, 16, 13805–13813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brignou, P.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Guillaume, S.M. Metal- and Organo-Catalyzed Ring-Opening Polymerization of α-Methyl-Trimethylene Carbonate: Insights into the Microstructure of the Polycarbonate. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 5127–5135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kiesewetter, M.K.; Shin, E.J.; Hedrick, J.L.; Waymouth, R.M. Organocatalysis Opportunities and Challenges for Polymer Synthesis. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 2093–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brossier, T.; Volpi, G.; Lapinte, V.; Blanquer, S. Synthesis of Poly(Trimethylene Carbonate) from Amine Group Initiation: Role of Urethane Bonds in the Crystallinity. Polymers 2021, 13, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ren, C.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, N.; Zhen, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, S.; Li, Z. Polystyrene Beads Supported Phosphazene Superbase as Recyclable Organocatalyst for Ring-Opening Polymerization of δ-Valerolactone. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 119, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ren, C.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, N.; Fang, S.; Li, Z. Using Recyclable Polystyrene Supported Cyclic Trimeric Phosphazene Base as Catalyst to Directly Prepare Hypotoxic Polyesters via Ring-Opening Polymerizations. Polymer 2020, 204, 122797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, Y.; Xiao, W.; Zhang, J.; Bu, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, A.; Xu, J.; Lei, C. Development of Recoverable and Recyclable Fe3O4-Supported Organocatalysts for Ring-Opening Polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 3411–3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mezzasalma, L.; Harrisson, S.; Saba, S.; Loyer, P.; Coulembier, O.; Taton, D. Bulk Organocatalytic Synthetic Access to Statistical Copolyesters from l-Lactide and epsilon-Caprolactone Using Benzoic Acid. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 1965–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaluzynski, K.; Pretula, J.; Lewinski, P.; Kaźmierski, S.; Penczek, S. Catalysis in Polymerization of Cyclic Esters. Catalyst and Initiator in One molecule. Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone. J. Catal. 2020, 392, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lewinski, P.; Kaluzynski, K.; Pretula, J.; Mielniczak, G.; Penczek, S. Catalysis in polymerization of Cyclic Esters. Catalyst and Initiator in One Molecule. Polymerization of Lactide. J. Catal. 2022, 405, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Se, K.; Miyawaki, K.; Hirahara, K.; Takano, A.; Fujimoto, T. Model Block-Graft Copolymer via Anionic Living Polymerization: Preparation and Characterization of Polystyrene-block-[Poly(p-hydroxystyrene)-graft-Poly(ethylene oxide)]-block-Polystyrene. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 1998, 36, 3021–3034.41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mountrichas, G.; Mantzaridis, C.; Pispas, S. Well-Defined Flexible Polyelectrolytes with Two Cationic Sites per Monomeric Unit. Macromol. Rapid Comm. 2006, 27, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mundil, R.; Zhigunov, A.; Uchman, M. Metal-Free Synthesis and Self-Assembly of Poly(ethylene glycol) Methyl Ether-block-Poly(ε-decalactone)-block-Poly(methyl methacrylate) Triblock Terpolymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 166, 110966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Engler, A.C.; Ke, X.; Gao, S.; Chan, J.M.W.; Coady, D.J.; Ono, R.J.; Lubbers, R.; Nelson, A.; Yang, Y.Y.; Hedrick, J.L. Hydrophilic Polycarbonates: Promising Degradable Alternatives to Poly(ethylene glycol)-Based Stealth Materials. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 1673–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. De los Santos Pereira, A.; Sheikh, S.; Blaszykowski, C.; Pop-Georgievski, O.; Fedorov, K.; Thompson, M.; Rodriguez-Emmenegger, C. Antifouling Polymer Brushes Displaying Antithrombogenic Surface Properties. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 1179–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Díaz-Celorio, E.; Franco, L.; Rodríguez-Galán, A.; Puiggalí, J. Synthesis of Glycolide/Trimethylene Carbonate Copolymers: Influence of Microstructure on Properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2012, 48, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 15 00720 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture (Table 1 and S3, 30 min.) in CDCl3.
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture (Table 1 and S3, 30 min.) in CDCl3.
Polymers 15 00720 g001
Polymers 15 00720 sch001 550
Scheme 1. General scheme for the ring-opening polymerization of TMC using benzyl alcohols as initiators and t-BuP4 as catalyst, as well as the synthesis of block copolymers.
Scheme 1. General scheme for the ring-opening polymerization of TMC using benzyl alcohols as initiators and t-BuP4 as catalyst, as well as the synthesis of block copolymers.
Polymers 15 00720 sch001
Polymers 15 00720 g002 550
Figure 2. MALDI-TOF MS spectra of the obtained PTMC. The theoretical values were calculated using the following equation: 107.13 + n × 102.09 + 1.01 + 22.99, where n is the degree of polymerization and the mass values correspond to the segments and end groups comprising the PTMC chain as shown in the scheme.
Figure 2. MALDI-TOF MS spectra of the obtained PTMC. The theoretical values were calculated using the following equation: 107.13 + n × 102.09 + 1.01 + 22.99, where n is the degree of polymerization and the mass values correspond to the segments and end groups comprising the PTMC chain as shown in the scheme.
Polymers 15 00720 g002
Polymers 15 00720 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) SEC curves of PTMC obtained with different initial monomer/initiator ratios: a 10, b 30, c 50, d 100, (B) Dependence of monomer conversion on reaction time.
Figure 3. (A) SEC curves of PTMC obtained with different initial monomer/initiator ratios: a 10, b 30, c 50, d 100, (B) Dependence of monomer conversion on reaction time.
Polymers 15 00720 g003
Polymers 15 00720 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Dependence of Mn,SEC (○), Mn,theo (●) and Ð (▲) of the obtained PTMC on the conversion of TMC and (b) kinetic plot for the t-BuP4 catalyzed ROP of TMC initiated with BnOH.
Figure 4. (a) Dependence of Mn,SEC (○), Mn,theo (●) and Ð (▲) of the obtained PTMC on the conversion of TMC and (b) kinetic plot for the t-BuP4 catalyzed ROP of TMC initiated with BnOH.
Polymers 15 00720 g004
Polymers 15 00720 g005 550
Figure 5. SEC curves of (a) PTMC-b-PVL and (b) PTMC-b-PCL copolymers.
Figure 5. SEC curves of (a) PTMC-b-PVL and (b) PTMC-b-PCL copolymers.
Polymers 15 00720 g005
Polymers 15 00720 sch002 550
Scheme 2. A possible initiator/chain-end mechanism for t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC.
Scheme 2. A possible initiator/chain-end mechanism for t-BuP4-catalyzed ROP of TMC.
Polymers 15 00720 sch002
Polymers 15 00720 g006 550
Figure 6. 1H NMR spectra of PTMC initiated by (a) 6-azido-1-hexanol (AHA) (N3-PTMC) and (b) methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG-b-PTMC).
Figure 6. 1H NMR spectra of PTMC initiated by (a) 6-azido-1-hexanol (AHA) (N3-PTMC) and (b) methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG-b-PTMC).
Polymers 15 00720 g006
Polymers 15 00720 g007 550
Figure 7. The DSC (a) and TGA (b) curves of PTMC.
Figure 7. The DSC (a) and TGA (b) curves of PTMC.
Polymers 15 00720 g007
Table
Table 1. Summarized results of the ROP of TMC, CL, and VL using t-BuP4 as a catalyst and BnOH as an initiator. a
Table 1. Summarized results of the ROP of TMC, CL, and VL using t-BuP4 as a catalyst and BnOH as an initiator. a
SamplesMonomer[M]0/[I]0 bTime (h)Conv. (%) cMn,NMR × 10−4
(g/mol) c		Mn,theo × 10−4
(g/mol) d		Mn,SEC × 10−4
(g/mol) e		Ðe
S1TMC101990.100.110.131.07
S2TMC304970.300.330.291.07
S3TMC508950.480.540.551.18
S4TMC10010941.101.041.221.19
S5TMC20017951.902.072.161.26
S6TMC50024853.524.854.321.30
S7VL301990.300.300.411.18
S8VL502980.420.510.521.20
S9CL1004980.941.080.981.25
S10CL504980.450.490.521.55
a Reaction temperature is 25 °C, THF as solvent; b Initial molar ratio of monomer to initiator; c Determined by 1H NMR; d Calculated from ([M]0/[I]0) × conv. × (MW of TMC) + (MW of initiator); e Determined by SEC.
Table
Table 2. Synthesis of end-functionalized and block copolymers of PTMC. a
Table 2. Synthesis of end-functionalized and block copolymers of PTMC. a
RunMonomerInitiatorConv.(%) bMn,NMR
(g/mol) b		Mn,theo
(g/mol) c		Mn,SEC
(g/mol) d		Ðd
1TMCAHA971960214825001.07
2TMCmPEG985960600069001.17
3VLPTMC e99----75001.24
4CLPTMC e90----80001.32
a Reaction temperature was 25 °C with THF as solvent; b determined by 1H NMR; c calculated from ([M]0/[I]0) × conv. × (MW of TMC) + (MW of initiator); d determined by SEC; e PTMC macroinitiator.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, J.; Luo, X.; Li, X. Ring-Opening Polymerization of Trimethylene Carbonate with Phosphazene Organocatalyst. Polymers 2023, 15, 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030720

AMA Style

Zhu J, Luo X, Li X. Ring-Opening Polymerization of Trimethylene Carbonate with Phosphazene Organocatalyst. Polymers. 2023; 15(3):720. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Jianglin, Xiaoming Luo, and Xin Li. 2023. "Ring-Opening Polymerization of Trimethylene Carbonate with Phosphazene Organocatalyst" Polymers 15, no. 3: 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15030720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop