Next Article in Journal
Lignocelluloses-Based Furan-Acetone Adducts as Wood Adhesives for Plywood Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrosprayed Particles Loaded with Kartogenin as a Potential Osteochondral Repair Implant
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical and Thermo-Mechanical Performance of Natural Fiber-Based Single-Ply and 2-Ply Woven Prepregs
Previous Article in Special Issue
3D Printing of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Triblock Copolymers of Styrene–Isobutylene–Styrene as a Slow-Release System
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 4
10.3390/polym15040995
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Optimization of Itraconazole Transferosomes-Loaded HPMC Hydrogel for Enhancing Its Antifungal Activity: 2^3 Full Factorial Design

by
Eidah M. Alyahya
1,
Knooz Alwabsi
1,
Amal E. Aljohani
1,
Rawan Albalawi
1,
Mohamed El-Sherbiny
2,3,*,
Rehab Ahmed
4,5,
Yasmin Mortagi
6 and
Mona Qushawy
7,*
1
Pharm D Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh 13713, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
4
Department of Natural Products and Alternative Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Khartoum, Khartoum 11111, Sudan
6
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sinai University, Alarish 45511, North Sinai, Egypt
7
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(4), 995; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040995
Submission received: 27 January 2023 / Revised: 11 February 2023 / Accepted: 14 February 2023 / Published: 16 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insights into Biodegradable Polymer-Based Delivery Vehicles for Pharmaceutical Applications: Traditional and Current Approaches)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Itraconazole (ITZ) is a triazole antifungal agent characterized by broad-spectrum activity against fungal infections. The main drawback of ITZ, when applied topically, is the low skin permeability due to the stratum corneum, the outermost layer of the skin, which represents the main barrier for drug penetration. Therefore, this study aimed to prepare itraconazole as transferosomes (ITZ-TFS) to overcome the barrier function of the skin. ITZ-TFSs were prepared by thin lipid film hydration technique using different surfactants, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and sodium deoxycholate (SDC). The prepared ITZ-TFS were evaluated for entrapment efficiency (EE) %, particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential, and in vitro drug release to obtain an optimized formula. The surface morphology of the optimized formula of ITZ-TFS was determined by transmission electron microscope (TEM). The optimized formulation was prepared in the form of gel using hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) gel base. The prepared ITZ-TFS gel was evaluated for homogeneity, drug content, spreadability, pH, and in vitro antifungal activity in comparison with the free ITZ gel. The prepared ITZ-TFS formulations exhibited high EE% ranging from 89.02 ± 1.65% to 98.17 ± 1.28% with particle size ranging from 132.6 ± 2.15 nm to 384.1 ± 3.46. The PDI for all ITZ-TFSs was less than 0.5 and had a negative zeta potential. The TEM image for the optimized formulation (ITZ-TFS4) showed spherical vesicles with a smooth surface. The prepared gels had good spreadability, pH, and acceptable drug content. ITZ-TFS gel showed higher antifungal activity than free ITZ gel as determined by zone of inhibition. ITZ was successfully prepared in form of TFSs with higher antifungal activity than the free drug.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Superficial mycosis is a fungal disease that often affects the top layers of the skin, nails, and hair but can also spread to deeper tissues. Numerous microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, commonly inhabit the human skin (normal flora) [1]. Overgrowth of any of these members of normal flora can occur as a result of many potential underlying medical conditions. Candida albicans is a yeast that typically lives on the skin folds such as the armpits, digestive tract, mouth, and vagina [2]. Skin infection by Candida albicans (candidiasis) can cause intense itching and redness [3]. The main causes of candidiasis are warm weather, tight clothing, poor hygiene, obesity, the use of antibiotics, the use of corticosteroids, and the suppressed immune system [4].
Itraconazole (ITZ) is a triazole antifungal agent that has broad-spectrum activity [5]. It works by inhibiting ergosterol synthesis by interacting with the fungal 14 alpha-demethylase substrate-binding sites, thus inhibiting the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol [6]. This impaired ergosterol synthesis leads to deformity of the fungal membrane that enhances permeability and disrupts the integrity of the fungal cell membrane, and membrane-bound enzyme activity is changed [7]. ITZ belongs to a BCS class II which is characterized by low water solubility. It has an extremely low aqueous solubility of approximately 1 ng/mL at neutral pH and 5 µg/mL at pH 1 [8,9].
Oral preparations of ITZ including solutions and capsules as well as intravenous preparations are well-known and widely used in medicine. Recently, due to toxicity concerns associated with systemic use, ITZ is increasingly being investigated for its topical antifungal activities and many reports proved it can be successfully delivered via this route [10,11].
Conventional topical preparations such as lotions, gels, ointments, and creams are facing several challenging factors affecting the drug delivery process [12]. These factors include low lipid solubility, the high molecular weight of the drug, and the barrier properties of the skin [13]. The stratum corneum is the outer shell of the epidermis which acts as a barrier preventing the penetration of topically applied antifungal drugs [14]. The skin permeability can be enhanced by either modifying the drug formulation or skin permeation enhancers [15]. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems offer effective drug delivery to overcome these problems [16]. Nanotechnology is a collection of techniques including the design, synthesis, characterization, and application of structures, materials, devices, and systems by controlling the size and shape on the nanoscale, which is capable of overcoming various challenges in drug delivery [17]. Transferosomes (TFS) are highly flexible, deformed vesicles with an aqueous core surrounded by a lipid bilayer which enables them to be a good carrier for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs [18]. Several studies used nanotechnology for improving the skin permeability of ITZ. Alomrani et al. developed ITZ niosomes using different nonionic surfactants, (tween, span, and Birj) to enhance its antifungal activity [19]. Passos et al. prepared ITZ-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers to improve its skin permeability and increase its localization in skin lesions associated with fungal infections [20]. Hashem et al. prepared ITZ-loaded ufasomes to enhance the skin permeability and improve its antifungal activity against Candida albicans [21].
The aim of this work was the preparation of ITZ-TFS to enhance its antifungal activity against Candida albicans, using different surfactants (sodium deoxycholate (SDC) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)), different surfactant amounts (200 and 400 mg), and different phospholipid amounts (200 and 400 mg). Eight formulations were prepared by thin lipid film hydration technique. The prepared formulations were examined for the entrapment efficiency % (EE%), particle size, zeta potential, polydispersity index (PDI), and in vitro permeation. The best formulation was incorporated in Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose (HPMC) gel base and evaluated for spreadability, pH, drug content, and in vitro antifungal activity, in comparison with HPMC gel base loaded with free ITZ.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Itraconazole (ITZ) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Phospholipid 90 H was kindly donated by Lipoid GmbH (Ludwigshafen, Germany). Sodium deoxycholate (SDC) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) were purchased from Loba Chemie (Mumbai, India). Hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) was purchased from Alpha Chemica (Mumbai, India). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

2.2. Design of ITZ-TFS Formulations Using 2^3 Full Factorial Design

Design Expert software is designed to help with the design and interpretation of multi-factor experiments [22]. It offers a wide range of analytical and graphical techniques for model fitting and interpretation. A 2^3 full factorial design is a type of experimental design that designs 8 formulations and allows researchers to understand the effects of three independent variables (each of 2 levels) on the dependent variable.
In this study, design expert version 11 (Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used to obtain the composition of ITZ-TFS formulations. The independent variables were type of surfactant (X1), amount of surfactant (X2), and amount of phospholipid (X3) while the dependent variables were the entrapment efficiency % (Y1), particle size (Y2), and zeta potential (Y3).
The type of surfactant (X1) was used in two levels (SLS and SDC), the amount of surfactant (X2) was used in two levels (200 and 400 mg), and the amount of phospholipid was used in two levels (200 and 400 mg). The independent and dependent variables of ITZ-TFS formulations are represented in Table 1.

2.3. Preparations of ITZ-TFS Formulations Using Thin Lipid Film Hydration Technique

In a dry, round-bottom flask, accurate amounts of phospholipid, surfactant, and drug were dissolved in a mixture of organic solvents (10 mL) consisting of chloroform and methanol (1:1, v/v). To prepare a thin lipid film on the wall of the round-bottom flask, the organic solvent was allowed to evaporate using a Heidolph rotavap (P/N Hei-AP Precision ML/G3, Schwabach, Germany) set to 60 rpm at 45 °C under low pressure [23]. The dry thin lipid film was hydrated with 10 mL of distilled water by rotating it at 60 rpm for 1 h at room temperature. The formed lipid vesicles were allowed to swell at room temperature for 2 h [24]. The transferosomal dispersions were then collected and sonicated, in a water bath sonicator, for 2 min then kept in a refrigerator at 4 °C overnight to complete maturation for further investigation.

2.4. Determination of the Entrapment Efficiency % (EE%) of ITZ-TFS Formulations

The centrifugation method was used to determine the EE% of ITZ in the prepared ITZ-TFSs. To separate the entrapped ITZ from the unentrapped medication, 2 mL of each formulation was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 45 min in a cooling centrifuge (Biofuge, primo Heraeus, Germany) [25]. Using a UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), the supernatant was examined spectrophotometrically for the presence of un-entrapped ITZ at 262 nm after dilution to 100 mL with phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4). The following equation was used to compute the EE%:
E E % = T o t a l   I T Z − U n e n t r a p p e d   I T Z T o t a l   I T Z × 100

2.5. Measurement of the Particle Size, Zeta Potential, and Polydispersity Index (PDI) of ITZ-TFS Formulations

Particle size, zeta potential, and polydispersity index were measured for the ITZ-TFS formulations that were prepared. Zeta potential is the value of charge in the boundary between the nanoparticle and the dispersion medium, the higher the value of zeta potential, the higher the physical stability of the dispersion. PDI is a value, which indicates the homogeneity or heterogeneity of particle size. Each ITZ-TFS sample was diluted to 1% concentration before being evaluated by Zetasizer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) at 25 °C. The measurement was done at a 90° angle using the dynamic light scattering technique [26].

2.6. In Vitro Drug Release of ITZ-TFS Formulations

The ITZ-TFS formulations’ in vitro release study was conducted utilizing Franz’s diffusion cell apparatus (Maharashtra, Mumbai, India). The donor compartment was filled with 2 mL of each ITS-TFS formulation, and the receptor compartment was filled with 12 mL of phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4). Throughout the experiment, the dissolving medium was stirred at 100 rpm and maintained at 37 ± 1 °C [15]. The donor and receptor chambers were separated by a cellophane membrane (1.7 cm diameter). At predetermined intervals, 1 mL samples were obtained (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h). After the necessary dilutions, all samples were subjected to spectrophotometric examination using a UV spectrophotometer at 262 nm. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, and the mean ± SD was computed.

2.7. Selection of the Optimized Formulation of ITZ-TFS

The best ITZ-TFS was selected to complete further studies. The best formulation was selected based on the highest EE%, smallest particle size, and highest zeta potential. The optimization process was done using Design Expert software version 11 (accessed on 7 February 2023) to obtain the optimized formulae with the optimum responses.

2.8. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Image of the Optimized ITZ-TFS

A transmission electron microscope (TEM), (JEOL®, Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze the surface morphology of the best formulation (ITZ-TFS). After the optimal formulation was diluted with distilled water, one drop was deposited on a collodion-covered copper grid. Uranyl acetate solution was used to stain the sample, and a TEM image was captured after the stain solution had dried at room temperature [27]. TEM image was captured by TEM camera at the acceleration voltage of 100 kV and 10–100 k magnification power [28].

2.9. Preparation of ITZ-TFS Gel

Gels were prepared using 5% HPMC as a gelling agent. The gelling agent was dispersed in distilled water overnight to prevent the formation of clumps during preparation. The gels were prepared by the addition of 0.1% (w/w) of the drug (either free ITZ or ITZ-TFS) with continuous stirring using a magnetic stirrer to obtain homogenous dispersion. Methyl and propyl parabens were used as preservatives [29].

2.10. Evaluation of the Prepared ITZ Gels

Free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel were examined for their homogeneity, spreadability, pH, drug content, in vitro permeation study, and in vitro antifungal activity.

2.10.1. Homogeneity

The homogeneity of semisolid dosage forms that are placed topically on the skin is critical for patient compliance. This was accomplished by pressing a small amount of the prepared gels (free ITZ gel, and ITZ-TFS gel) between the thumb and index finger. The consistency was evaluated to determine whether it was homogeneous or not [24].

2.10.2. Spreadability

The spreadability of the prepared gels (free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel) was evaluated by pressing 0.5 g of each gel formulation between two circular glass slides. The lower slide was fixed while the upper one was movable [30]. Constant pressure was applied above the upper slide for 5 min to allow maximum spreading of each gel. The experiment was done in triplicate and the mean ± SD was calculated.

2.10.3. pH Determination

One gram of each prepared gel was mixed with 20 mL of distilled water and then the pH value was determined by the digital pH meter [31]. The measurements were done in triplicates and the mean ± SD was calculated.

2.10.4. Drug Content %

The drug content was determined by transferring 100 mg of each gel (free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel) into a clean volumetric flask (100 mL) and filling the remaining space with distilled water [32]. The contents were agitated for 2 h before being filtered and spectrophotometrically measured at 262 nm. The measurements were taken three times to ensure accuracy, and then the mean and standard deviation were calculated.

2.10.5. In Vitro Permeation Study

The permeation study was done using the Franz diffusion cell apparatus as mentioned before in the previous section using rat skin to separate between donor and receptor compartments [33]. The protocol of this research paper was approved by the scientific research ethics committee at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Sinai University, Arish, Egypt (approval number SU-SREC-3-01-23). The rat skin was shaved and cleaned then soaked at the diffusion medium for 2 h before the experiment. One gram of each gel (free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel) was placed on the donor compartment while the receptor was filled with 12 mL of phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) as a diffusion medium. The soaked skin was placed between the donor and receptor where the epidermis faced up and the hypodermis faced down. The permeated amount of ITZ was calculated by taking samples of the diffusion medium (1 mL) at different predetermined time intervals (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h). The samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically at 262 nm using a UV-spectrophotometer. The experiment was done in triplicate for each gel and the mean ± SD was calculated. The amount of drug permeated at different time intervals was plotted against the time to compare the permeability of ITZ from different gels.

2.10.6. In Vitro Antifungal Activity (Zone of Inhibition)

The antifungal activity of ITZ-TFS gel was determined by the cup plate technique in comparison with free ITZ gel. Sabouraud dextrose agar was added to Petri dich inoculated with Candida albicans and the Petri dich was rotated to allow uniform distribution of fungi within the agar. After the solidification of agar, a sterile metallic cork borer was used to make holes. Both free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel were transferred to the holes and left for 2 h to allow diffusion. Then, the plates were incubated for 24 h at 25 °C. After 24 h, the zones of inhibition were measured in mm for both gels. The experiment was done in triplicate and mean ± SD was determined.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were done in triplicate and the mean and standard deviation of the data were calculated (mean ± SD). ANOVA test was used to assess the significant differences among various experimental groups. Significance was considered at p values less than 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

Eight formulations of ITZ-TFS were prepared by thin lipid film hydration technique and evaluated for EE%, particle size, and zeta potential to obtain the optimized formulation. See Table 2.

3.1. Effect of the Formulation Factors in the EE% (Y1) of ITZ-TFS Formulations

The EE% is the percentage of drug encapsulated within the nanoparticles and considered from the important formulation factors that are required to be optimized in the transferosomes formulations. As represented in Table 3, the EE% was high ranging from 89.02 ± 1.65% for ITZ-TFS8 to 98.17 ± 1.28 for ITZ-TFS1.
As shown in Figure 1, the EE% of the prepared ITZ-TFS formulations was affected by the surfactant type. SLS resulted in higher EE% compared to SDC. These results may be due to the lower HLB (hydrophilic lipophilic balance) of SLS (HLB = 11) than SDC (HLB = 16). The lower the HLB value, the higher the lipophilicity and the affinity to the phospholipid and hence the increase in EE% [24,34]. These results were in good agreement with Abdelmonem et al., who prepared Cinnarizine transferosomes using three different surfactants (Pluronic F-127, sodium cholate, and sodium deoxycholate), with different HLB values (22, 18, and 16, respectively). They found that EE% was increased using SDC (the lowest HLB) [35].
Moreover, the EE% decreased by increasing the amount of surfactant which may be due to the increase in the solubility of the drug in the aqueous phase by the increasing amount of surfactant [36]. Other researchers explained the reduction in EE% by increasing the surfactant concentration by the formation of pores in the lipid bilayer membrane which resulted in leakage of the drug [37]. The previous results were in agreement with Mayangsari et al., who prepared berberine chloride tranferosomes for transdermal use using Tween 80 as a surfactant and found that the EE% was decreased by increasing the surfactant concentration from 15% to 25% [38]. Both the type and amount of surfactant exhibited significant impact on the EE% (p < 0.05) as indicated in Table 4.

3.2. Effect of the Formulation Factors on the Particle Size (Y2) of ITZ-TFS Formulations

The particle size of transferosomes is an important parameter, which gives an indication about the skin penetrating; the smaller the size, the higher the skin penetration. The particle size of the prepared ITZ-TFS formulations was in the range of 132.6 ± 2.15 for ITZ-TFS4 to 384.1 ± 3.46 for ITZ-TFS5. As shown in Figure 2, the particle size of the prepared ITZ-TFS formulations was small when SLS was used as a surfactant and increased by using SDC. These results may be due to the difference in HLB value which resulted in the difference in the hydrophilicity and hence the reduction in surface free energy by using SLS. Moreover, the long chain length of SDC leads to an increase in the critical packing parameter, thus the vesicle size increases. It has been reported that the use of a negatively charged surfactant reduces the average particle size because the negative charge causes the complex lipid bilayer of the transferosome to be susceptible to curvature due to the attractive force between the positively charged choline group on phospholipids and the negative charge on the surfactant [39].
In addition, the particle size decreased by increasing the amount of surfactant, which may be due to the reduction in the interfacial tension resulting in a smaller size [40]. Another explanation for the previous results may be due to the solubilization of the surfactant within the lipid bilayer as a result of the formation of hydrogen bonding between the alkyl chain of surfactant and the polar head of phospholipid which led to a reduction of the vesicle size [41].
The particle size also decreased by increasing the amount of phospholipid which may be attributed to the reduction in surface free energy resulting from high hydrophobicity [34]. Similar findings were obtained by Qushawy et al., who developed miconazole transferosomes and found that the vesicle size was decreased by increasing the total lipid. As represented in Table 5, it was found that all formulation factors had a significant effect on the particle size (p < 0.05).
As represented in Table 3, the PDI value for all ITZ-TFS formulations was less than 0.5, which indicates the homogeneity of size distribution [42].

3.3. Effect of the Formulation Factors in the Zeta Potential (Y3) of ITZ-TFS Formulations

Zeta potential is the magnitude of the charge on the surface of transferosomes vesicles in the colloidal dispersion. The value of zeta potential indicates the degree of repulsion between vesicles and the degree of physical stability. As represented in Table 3, all prepared ITZ-TFS formulations had negative zeta potential ranging from −40.9 ± 1.66 for ITZ-TFS7 to −67.4 ± 0.82 for ITZ-TFS4. The negative charge may be attributed to the anionic phospholipid and anionic surfactants. Similar results were obtained by Balata et al., who prepared vabradine HCl transferosomes and found that the negative zeta potential was attributed to SLS and phospholipid [43].
As shown in Figure 3, the zeta potential value was the highest in the formulations prepared by SLS followed by SDC. These results may be due to the small size of vesicles prepared by SLS. Moreover, the negative zeta potential value was increased by increasing the amount of surfactant, which may be due to the increase in surface area due to the reduction in the interfacial tension [44]. The negative zeta potential value also increased by increasing the amount of phospholipid, which may be attributed to the increase in the negatively charged phosphate group [45]. As represented in Table 6, it was found that all factors had a non-significant effect on the zeta potential (p > 0.05).

3.4. The Release Study of ITZ

As shown in Figure 4, the release of ITZ from the prepared TFS was done in two distinct phases. The initial rapid phase may be due to the release of ITZ which adsorbed on the surface of transferosomes, while the slow second phase may be due to the slow diffusion of ITZ through the phospholipid bilayer of transferosomes [46]. It was found that the release was high in the case of using SLS as a surfactant than in case of SDC. These results may be attributed to the smaller size of the prepared TFS in presence of SLS which resulted in the large surface being subjected to the dissolution medium. Moreover, the release was increased as the amount of surfactant increased which may be due to the decrease in the interfacial tension. The cumulative amount released was decreased in formulation with a high amount of phospholipid which may be due to the increase in the diffusion path length. Similar results were obtained by El-Gizawy et al., who prepared deferoxamine-loaded transferosomes to accelerate the healing of pressure ulcers in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats [40].

3.5. Optimization of the Formulation Factors

Design expert version 11 was used to optimize the formulation factors to obtain an optimized formulation with high EE%, small particle size, and high zeta potential. As shown in Figure 5, it was found that ITS-TFS4, which was prepared with SLS, 400 mg of surfactant, and 400 mg of phospholipid, was selected as the optimized formulation with a desirability index of 0.865 and it was used to complete the study. Figure 6 shows the particle size distribution curve and zeta potential of the optimized formulation (ITZ-TFS4). Kumar et al. succeeded in obtaining an optimized formulation of itraconazole niosomes with EE% of 73.03 ± 2.39%, a particle size of 272.3 nm, and a zeta potential of −47.2 ± 0.2 [47]. Samy et al. developed itraconazole as proniosomes and were able to obtain an optimized formulation with 94.9 ± 0.36 % regarding the EE%, −30.15 ± 0.41 mV regarding zeta potential, and 340.48 ± 0.581 nm regarding the particle size [48].

3.6. The Surface Morphology of the Optimized Formulation

As shown in Figure 7, the optimized formulation appeared spherical with a smooth surface. These results were in agreement with Demartis et al. [49]. Similar results were obtained by Hady et al., who developed nystatin transferosomes for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis and examined the surface morphology by TEM, and found that the prepared vesicles were spherical [50].

3.7. Evaluation of ITZ-TFS Gel

All prepared gels (free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel) were homogenous. As represented in Table 7, the spreadability of free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel was 4.5 ± 0.46 and 4.6 ± 0.29 cm, respectively. These results indicate the ability of prepared gels to be spread easily on the skin with low shear [51]. The pH value for the prepared gels were 6.62 ± 0.52 and 6.61 ± 0.74 for free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS respectively. These results indicate that these gels were suitable to be applied on the skin as the skin can tolerate the pH value from 4 to 7 [52]. These results are in agreement with Parveen et al., who prepared a transferosomal gel of bifonazole to enhance its antifungal activity and found that the pH of the prepared formulations was in the range of 6.3–6.6 [53]. The drug content of free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel was 98.40 ± 2.47 and 95.44 ± 1.69%, respectively, which is within the acceptable range, see Table 7.

In Vitro Permeation Study

As shown in Figure 8, the cumulative amount permeated of ITZ from ITZ-TFS gel was 88.33 ± 2.41% which is higher than free ITZ gel (72.77 ± 1.62%) after 24 h. These results may be attributed to the high deformability of TFS which resulted in higher permeability of the drug through the skin [54]. Furthermore, the presence of phospholipid in the prepared TFS increased their affinity to the skin and hence improved the permeation of the encapsulated drug. Similar findings were obtained by Omar et al., who prepared lidocaine transferosomes-loaded HPMC gel base and evaluated the permeation through the skin in comparison with the free lidocaine gel and found that the cumulative amount of drug permeated was higher in the case of TFS gel [52].

3.8. In Vitro Antifungal Activity

As shown in Figure 9, it was found that the zone of inhibition of ITZ-TFS gel (55.1 ± 0.65 mm) was higher than that for free ITZ gel (24.3 ± 0.24 mm). These results may be attributed to the high flexibility and deformability of TFS, which facilities its penetration through the cell wall of Candida albicans resulting in the inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis, which results in the lysis of fungal cell membrane and loss of integrity. The results were in agreement with Singh et al., who prepared ketoconazole transferosomal gel and found that the zone of inhibition was higher than for free ketoconazole [55].

4. Conclusions

The authors concluded that ITZ could be successfully prepared as TFSs, achieving a high EE% that ranged from 89.02 ± 1.65% to 98.17 ± 1.28%, with particle sizes that varied from 132.6 ± 2.15 nm to 384.1 ± 3.46 nm. The PDI for all ITZ-TFS was lower than 0.5 and had a high negative zeta potential value with high physical stability. The ITZ-TFS displayed spherical vesicles as determined by TEM. The prepared gels had good spreadability, an acceptable pH, and a high drug content %. According to the results of the zone of inhibition test, the antifungal activity of ITZ-TFS gel was significantly higher than that of free ITZ gel. ITZ in the form of TFS was successfully prepared, and its antifungal activity was found to be significantly higher than that of the free drug.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A. (Rehab Ahmed), Y.M. and M.Q.; data curation, R.A. (Rehab Ahmed), Y.M. and M.Q.; formal analysis, M.E.-S., R.A. (Rehab Ahmed), Y.M. and M.Q.; funding acquisition, M.E.-S.; investigation, M.E.-S. and M.Q.; methodology, E.M.A., K.A., A.E.A., R.A. (Rawan Albalawi), R.A. (Rehab Ahmed), Y.M. and M.Q.; resources, M.E.-S., Y.M. and M.Q.; software, E.M.A., K.A., A.E.A., R.A. (Rawan Albalawi), M.E.-S., R.A. (Rehab Ahmed), Y.M. and M.Q.; supervision, R.A. (Rehab Ahmed) and M.Q.; validation, M.E.-S., Y.M. and M.Q.; visualization, E.M.A., K.A., A.E.A., R.A. (Rawan Albalawi), M.E.-S., R.A. (Rehab Ahmed), Y.M. and M.Q.; writing—original draft, E.M.A., K.A., A.E.A., R.A. (Rawan Albalawi), M.E.-S., R.A. (Rehab Ahmed), Y.M. and M.Q.; writing—review and editing, M.E.-S., R.A. (Rehab Ahmed), Y.M. and M.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by AlMaarefa Researchers Supporting program (MA-006), AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol of this research paper was approved by the scientific research ethics committee at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Sinai University, Arish, Egypt (approval number SU-SREC-3-01-2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cogen, A.L.; Nizet, V.; Gallo, R.L. Skin Microbiota: A Source of Disease or Defence? Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 158, 442–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Granato, P.A. The Microbiota of Humans and Microbial Virulence Factors. Biol. Saf. Princ. Pract. 2017, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vázquez-González, D.; Perusquía-Ortiz, A.M.; Hundeiker, M.; Bonifaz, A. Opportunistic Yeast Infections: Candidiasis, Cryptococcosis, Trichosporonosis and Geotrichosis. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2013, 11, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Metin, A.; Dilek, N.; Bilgili, S.G. Recurrent Candidal Intertrigo: Challenges and Solutions. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 11, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gao, Q.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; He, G.; Zhang, S.; Altmeyer, R.; Zou, G. Discovery of Itraconazole with Broad-Spectrum in Vitro Antienterovirus Activity That Targets Nonstructural Protein 3A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 2654–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hargrove, T.Y.; Friggeri, L.; Wawrzak, Z.; Qi, A.; Hoekstra, W.J.; Schotzinger, R.J.; York, J.D.; Guengerich, F.P.; Lepesheva, G.I. Structural Analyses of Candida Albicans Sterol 14α-Demethylase Complexed with Azole Drugs Address the Molecular Basis of Azole-Mediated Inhibition of Fungal Sterol Biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 6728–6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hossain, C.M.; Ryan, L.K.; Gera, M.; Choudhuri, S.; Lyle, N.; Ali, K.A.; Diamond, G. Antifungals and Drug Resistance. Encyclopedia 2022, 2, 1722–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Smet, L.; Saerens, L.; De Beer, T.; Carleer, R.; Adriaensens, P.; Van Bocxlaer, J.; Vervaet, C.; Remon, J.P. Formulation of Itraconazole Nanococrystals and Evaluation of Their Bioavailability in Dogs. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 87, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Machado Cruz, R.; Boleslavská, T.; Beránek, J.; Tieger, E.; Twamley, B.; Santos-Martinez, M.J.; Dammer, O.; Tajber, L. Identification and Pharmaceutical Characterization of a New Itraconazole Terephthalic Acid Cocrystal. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lamie, C.; Elmowafy, E.; Ragaie, M.H.; Attia, D.A.; Mortada, N.D. Assessment of Antifungal Efficacy of Itraconazole Loaded Aspasomal Cream: Comparative Clinical Study. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 1345–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kolimi, P.; Youssef, A.A.A.; Narala, S.; Nyavanandi, D.; Dudhipala, N.; Bandari, S.; Repka, M.A. Development and Characterization of Itraconazole Non-Aqueous Creams for the Treatment of Topical Fungal Infections. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 76, 103818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tan, X.; Feldman, S.R.; Chang, J.; Balkrishnan, R. Topical Drug Delivery Systems in Dermatology: A Review of Patient Adherence Issues. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2012, 9, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reddy, Y.D.; Sravani, A.B.; Ravisankar, V.; Prakash, P.R.; Reddy, Y.S.R.; Bhaskar, N.V. Transferosomes a Novel Vesicular Carrier for Transdermal Drug Delivery System. J. Innov. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2015, 2, 193–208. [Google Scholar]
  14. Asadi, P.; Mehravaran, A.; Soltanloo, N.; Abastabar, M.; Akhtari, J. Nanoliposome-Loaded Antifungal Drugs for Dermal Administration: A Review. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2021, 7, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, P.; Chien, Y.W. Enhanced Skin Permeability for Transdermal Drug Delivery: Physiopathological and Physicochemical Considerations. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Syst. 1991, 8, 211–236. [Google Scholar]
  16. Saleem, S.; Iqubal, M.K.; Garg, S.; Ali, J.; Baboota, S. Trends in Nanotechnology-Based Delivery Systems for Dermal Targeting of Drugs: An Enticing Approach to Offset Psoriasis. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17, 817–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ochekpe, N.A.; Olorunfemi, P.O.; Ngwuluka, N.C. Nanotechnology and Drug Delivery Part 1: Background and Applications. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2009, 8, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alenzi, A.M.; Albalawi, S.A.; Alghamdi, S.G.; Albalawi, R.F.; Albalawi, H.S.; Qushawy, M. Review On Different Vesicular Drug Delivery Systems (VDDSs) And Their Applications. Recent Pat. Nanotechnol. 2023, 17, 18–32. [Google Scholar]
  19. Alomrani, A.H.; Al-Agamy, M.H.; Badran, M.M. In Vitro Skin Penetration and Antimycotic Activity of Itraconazole Loaded Niosomes: Various Non-Ionic Surfactants. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2015, 28, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Passos, J.S.; de Martino, L.C.; Dartora, V.F.C.; de Araujo, G.L.; Ishida, K.; Lopes, L.B. Development, Skin Targeting and Antifungal Efficacy of Topical Lipid Nanoparticles Containing Itraconazole. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 149, 105296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hashem, S.M.; Gad, M.K.; Anwar, H.M.; Saleh, N.M.; Shamma, R.N.; Elsherif, N.I. Itraconazole-Loaded Ufasomes: Evaluation, Characterization, and Anti-Fungal Activity against Candida Albicans. Pharmaceutics 2022, 15, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sopyan, I.; Gozali, D.; Sriwidodo; Guntina, R.K. Design-expert software (DOE): An application tool for optimization in pharmaceutical preparations formulation. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2022, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abdellatif, M.M.; Khalil, I.A.; Khalil, M.A. Sertaconazole Nitrate Loaded Nanovesicular Systems for Targeting Skin Fungal Infection: In-Vitro, Ex-Vivo and in-Vivo Evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 527, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qushawy, M.; Nasr, A.; Abd-Alhaseeb, M.; Swidan, S. Design, Optimization and Characterization of a Transfersomal Gel Using Miconazole Nitrate for the Treatment of Candida Skin Infections. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Omar, M.M.; Eleraky, N.E.; El Sisi, A.M.; Hasan, O.A. Development and Evaluation of In-Situ Nasal Gel Formulations of Nanosized Transferosomal Sumatriptan: Design, Optimization, in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2019, 13, 4413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Luiz, M.T.; Viegas, J.S.R.; Abriata, J.P.; Tofani, L.B.; de Menezes Vaidergorn, M.; da Silva Emery, F.; Chorilli, M.; Marchetti, J.M. Docetaxel-Loaded Folate-Modified TPGS-Transfersomes for Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 124, 112033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahad, A.; Al-Saleh, A.A.; Al-Mohizea, A.M.; Al-Jenoobi, F.I.; Raish, M.; Yassin, A.E.B.; Alam, M.A. Formulation and Characterization of Phospholipon 90 G and Tween 80 Based Transfersomes for Transdermal Delivery of Eprosartan Mesylate. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2018, 23, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tawfeek, H.M.; Abdellatif, A.A.H.; Abdel-Aleem, J.A.; Hassan, Y.A.; Fathalla, D. Transfersomal Gel Nanocarriers for Enhancement the Permeation of Lornoxicam. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 101540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Helal, D.A.; El-Rhman, D.A.; Abdel-Halim, S.A.; El-Nabarawi, M.A. Formulation and Evaluation of Fluconazole Topical Gel. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 4, 176–183. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mohan, S.D.; Gupta, V.R.M. Formulation of Fluconazole as Topical Antifungal Gels by Microsponge Based Delivery Systems. Indones. J. Pharm. 2017, 28, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mannaa, S.; Lakshmia, U.S.; Racharlaa, M.; Sinhab, P.; Kanthala, L.K.; Kumara, S.P.N. Bioadhesive HPMC Gel Containing Gelatin Nanoparticles for Intravaginal Delivery of Tenofovir. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 6, 022–029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Singh, N.; Goyal, K.; Sondhi, S.; Jindal, S. Development and Characterization of Barbaloin Gel for the Safe and Effective Treatment of Psoriasis. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2020, 10, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dudhipala, N.; Phasha Mohammed, R.; Adel Ali Youssef, A.; Banala, N. Effect of Lipid and Edge Activator Concentration on Development of Aceclofenac-Loaded Transfersomes Gel for Transdermal Application: In Vitro and Ex Vivo Skin Permeation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2020, 46, 1334–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. El Zaafarany, G.M.; Awad, G.A.; Holayel, S.M.; Mortada, N.D. Role of Edge Activators and Surface Charge in Developing Ultradeformable Vesicles with Enhanced Skin Delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 397, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Abdelmonem, R.; Hamed, R.R.; Abdelhalim, S.A.; ElMiligi, M.F.; El-Nabarawi, M.A. Formulation and Characterization of Cinnarizine Targeted Aural Transfersomal Gel for Vertigo Treatment: A Pharmacokinetic Study on Rabbits. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 6211–6223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nasr, A.M.; Qushawy, M.K.; Elkhoudary, M.M.; Gawish, A.Y.; Elhady, S.S.; Swidan, S.A. Quality by Design for the Development and Analysis of Enhanced In-Situ Forming Vesicles for the Improvement of the Bioavailability of Fexofenadine HCl in Vitro and in Vivo. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Khan, M.I.; Yaqoob, S.; Madni, A.; Akhtar, M.F.; Sohail, M.F.; Saleem, A.; Tahir, N.; Khan, K.-R.; Qureshi, O.S. Development and In Vitro/Ex Vivo Evaluation of Lecithin-Based Deformable Transfersomes and Transfersome-Based Gels for Combined Dermal Delivery of Meloxicam and Dexamethasone. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 8170318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mayangsari, F.; Surini, S.; Iswandana, R. Development of Transfersomal Emulgel to Enhance the Permeation of Berberine Chloride for Transdermal Delivery. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 12, 048–055. [Google Scholar]
  39. Miatmoko, A.; Marufah, N.A.; Nada, Q.; Rosita, N.; Erawati, T.; Susanto, J.; Purwantari, K.E.; Nurkanto, A.; Purwati; Soeratri, W. The Effect of Surfactant Type on Characteristics, Skin Penetration and Anti-Aging Effectiveness of Transfersomes Containing Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Metabolite Products in UV-Aging Induced Mice. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 3443–3453. [Google Scholar]
  40. El-Gizawy, S.A.; Nouh, A.; Saber, S.; Kira, A.Y. Deferoxamine-Loaded Transfersomes Accelerates Healing of Pressure Ulcers in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 58, 101732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Varia, U.; Joshi, D.; Jadeja, M.; Katariya, H.; Detholia, K.; Soni, V. Development and Evaluation of Ultradeformable Vesicles Loaded Transdermal Film of Boswellic Acid. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hsieh, W.-C.; Fang, C.-W.; Suhail, M.; Vu, Q.L.; Chuang, C.-H.; Wu, P.-C. Improved Skin Permeability and Whitening Effect of Catechin-Loaded Transfersomes through Topical Delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 607, 121030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Balata, G.F.; Faisal, M.M.; Elghamry, H.A.; Sabry, S.A. Preparation and Characterization of Ivabradine HCl Transfersomes for Enhanced Transdermal Delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 60, 101921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Amnuaikit, T.; Limsuwan, T.; Khongkow, P.; Boonme, P. Vesicular Carriers Containing Phenylethyl Resorcinol for Topical Delivery System; Liposomes, Transfersomes and Invasomes. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 13, 472–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ascenso, A.; Raposo, S.; Batista, C.; Cardoso, P.; Mendes, T.; Praça, F.G.; Bentley, M.V.L.B.; Simões, S. Development, Characterization, and Skin Delivery Studies of Related Ultradeformable Vesicles: Transfersomes, Ethosomes, and Transethosomes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 5837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Allam, A.A.; Fathalla, D.; Safwat, M.A.; Soliman, G.M. Transferosomes versus Transethosomes for the Dermal Delivery for Minoxidil: Preparation and in Vitro/Ex Vivo Appraisal. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 76, 103790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumar, A.; Dua, J.S. Formulation and Evaluation of Itraconazole Niosomal Gel. Asian J. Pharm. Res. Dev. 2018, 6, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Samy, A.M.; Ramadan, A.A.; Abu El-Enin, A.S.M.; Mortagi, Y.I. Formulation and Optimization of Itraconazole Proniosomes Using Box Behnken Design. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2018, 10, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Demartis, S.; Anjani, Q.K.; Volpe-Zanutto, F.; Paredes, A.J.; Jahan, S.A.; Vora, L.K.; Donnelly, R.F.; Gavini, E. Trilayer Dissolving Polymeric Microneedle Array Loading Rose Bengal Transfersomes as a Novel Adjuvant in Early-Stage Cutaneous Melanoma Management. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 627, 122217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hady, M.A.; Darwish, A.B.; Abdel-Aziz, M.S.; Sayed, O.M. Design of Transfersomal Nanocarriers of Nystatin for Combating Vulvovaginal Candidiasis; A Different Prospective. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 211, 112304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gayathri, H.; Sangeetha, S. Pharmaceutical Development Of Methotrexate Loaded Transferosomal Gel For Skin Cancer By Doe Approach. J. Pharm. Negat. Results 2022, 2456–2468. [Google Scholar]
  52. Omar, M.M.; Hasan, O.A.; El Sisi, A.M. Preparation and Optimization of Lidocaine Transferosomal Gel Containing Permeation Enhancers: A Promising Approach for Enhancement of Skin Permeation. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Parveen, S.; Mittapally, S. Formulation and Invitro Evaluation of Topical Transferosomal Gel of Bifonazole for Fungal Infections. Pharm. Innov. J. 2018, 7, 711–720. [Google Scholar]
  54. Khallaf, R.A.; Aboud, H.M.; Sayed, O.M. Surface Modified Niosomes of Olanzapine for Brain Targeting via Nasal Route; Preparation, Optimization, and in Vivo Evaluation. J. Liposome Res. 2020, 30, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Singh, S.; Verma, D.; Mirza, M.A.; Das, A.K.; dudeja, M.; Anwer, M.K.; Sultana, Y.; Talegaonkar, S.; Iqbal, Z. Development and Optimization of Ketoconazole Loaded Nano-Transfersomal Gel for Vaginal Delivery Using Box-Behnken Design: In Vitro, Ex Vivo Characterization and Antimicrobial Evaluation. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2017, 39, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 15 00995 g001 550
Figure 1. The effect of formulation factors in the EE% (Y1).
Figure 1. The effect of formulation factors in the EE% (Y1).
Polymers 15 00995 g001
Polymers 15 00995 g002 550
Figure 2. The effect of formulation factors on the particle size (Y2).
Figure 2. The effect of formulation factors on the particle size (Y2).
Polymers 15 00995 g002
Polymers 15 00995 g003 550
Figure 3. The effect of formulation factors on the Zeta potential (Y3).
Figure 3. The effect of formulation factors on the Zeta potential (Y3).
Polymers 15 00995 g003
Polymers 15 00995 g004 550
Figure 4. In vitro release study profile of the prepared ITZ-TFS formulations.
Figure 4. In vitro release study profile of the prepared ITZ-TFS formulations.
Polymers 15 00995 g004
Polymers 15 00995 g005 550
Figure 5. The independent (red color) and dependent variables (blue color) of optimized ITZ-TFS4.
Figure 5. The independent (red color) and dependent variables (blue color) of optimized ITZ-TFS4.
Polymers 15 00995 g005
Polymers 15 00995 g006a 550Polymers 15 00995 g006b 550
Figure 6. The particle size distribution curve (A) and zeta potential (B) of the optimized ITZ-TFS4.
Figure 6. The particle size distribution curve (A) and zeta potential (B) of the optimized ITZ-TFS4.
Polymers 15 00995 g006aPolymers 15 00995 g006b
Polymers 15 00995 g007 550
Figure 7. TEM image of the optimized ITZ-TFS4.
Figure 7. TEM image of the optimized ITZ-TFS4.
Polymers 15 00995 g007
Polymers 15 00995 g008 550
Figure 8. In Vitro permeation study of ITZ from the prepared gels. “*” (p ˂ 0.05) denotes a significant difference between ITZ-TFS gel and free ITZ gel.
Figure 8. In Vitro permeation study of ITZ from the prepared gels. “*” (p ˂ 0.05) denotes a significant difference between ITZ-TFS gel and free ITZ gel.
Polymers 15 00995 g008
Polymers 15 00995 g009 550
Figure 9. In vitro antifungal activity test showing the zone of inhibition of free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel.
Figure 9. In vitro antifungal activity test showing the zone of inhibition of free ITZ gel and ITZ-TFS gel.
Polymers 15 00995 g009
Table
Table 1. The formulation factors and responses of 2^3 full factorial design for ITZ-TFS formulations.
Table 1. The formulation factors and responses of 2^3 full factorial design for ITZ-TFS formulations.
Factors and ResponsesUsed Levels
FactorNameLow (−1)High (+1)
A: X1Type of surfactantSLS SDC
B: X2Amount of surfactant (mg)200400
C: X3Amount of phospholipid (mg)200400
ResponseNameGoal
Y1EE (%)Maximize
Y2Particle size (nm)Minimize
Y3Zeta potential (mV)Maximize
Table
Table 2. The designed ITZ-TFS formulations using 2^3 full factorial design.
Table 2. The designed ITZ-TFS formulations using 2^3 full factorial design.
F No.Itraconazole (mg)Type of SurfactantAmount of Surfactant (mg)Amount of Phospholipid (mg)
ITZ-TFS1100SLS200200
ITZ-TFS2100SLS200400
ITZ-TFS3100SLS400200
ITZ-TFS4100SLS400400
ITZ-TFS5100SDC200200
ITZ-TFS6100SDC200400
ITZ-TFS7100SDC400200
ITZ-TFS8100SDC400400
Table
Table 3. The characterization of ITZ-TFS formulations.
Table 3. The characterization of ITZ-TFS formulations.
F No.EE%Particle Size (nm)PDIZeta Potential (mV)
ITZ-TFS198.17 ± 1.28249.9 ± 2.010.468 ± 0.02−23.5 ± 0.65
ITZ-TFS297.87 ± 1.75227.9 ± 1.960.379 ± 0.01−54.2 ± 0.97
ITZ-TFS397.27 ± 0.94159.9 ± 3.440.470 ± 0.01−64.2 ± 1.03
ITZ-TFS496.16 ± 0.88132.6 ± 2.150.400 ± 0.02−67.4 ± 0.82
ITZ-TFS592.57 ± 2.64384.1 ± 3.460.426 ± 0.01−49.01 ± 1.35
ITZ-TFS689.63 ± 1.76364.4 ± 2.760.468 ± 0.03−43.7 ± 0.95
ITZ-TFS789.87 ± 1.14301.6 ± 4.950.318 ± 0.02−40.9 ± 1.66
ITZ-TFS889.02 ± 1.65274.9 ± 2.650.350 ± 0.01−41.5 ± 2.01
Table
Table 4. ANOVA analysis for the effect of formulation factors in the EE% (Y1).
Table 4. ANOVA analysis for the effect of formulation factors in the EE% (Y1).
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model108.44336.1571.390.0006Significant
A—Surfactant type100.681100.68198.840.0001Significant
B—Amount of surfactant4.3814.388.650.0423Significant
C—Amount of phospholipid3.3813.386.680.0611Not significant
Residual2.0340.5063
Cor Total110.467
Significance was considered at p values less than 0.05.
Table
Table 5. ANOVA analysis for the effect of formulation factors on the particle size (Y2).
Table 5. ANOVA analysis for the effect of formulation factors on the particle size (Y2).
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model55,564.23318,521.411745.86<0.0001Significant
A—Surfactant type38,461.51138,461.513625.45<0.0001Significant
B—Amount of surfactant15,957.91115,957.911504.22<0.0001Significant
C—Amount of phospholipid1144.8111144.81107.910.0005Significant
Residual42.44410.61
Cor Total55,606.677
Significance was considered at p values less than 0.05.
Table
Table 6. ANOVA analysis for the effect of formulation factors on the Zeta potential (Y3).
Table 6. ANOVA analysis for the effect of formulation factors on the Zeta potential (Y3).
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model490.403163.470.72720.5869Not significant
A—Surfactant type146.201146.200.65040.4652Not significant
B—Amount of surfactant237.621237.621.060.3620Not significant
C—Amount of phospholipid106.581106.580.47410.5290Not significant
Residual899.224224.80
Cor Total1389.627
Significance was considered at p values less than 0.05.
Table
Table 7. Evaluation of the prepared ITZ gels.
Table 7. Evaluation of the prepared ITZ gels.
Gel NameSpreadability (cm)pHDrug Content %
Free ITZ gel4.5 ± 0.466.62 ± 0.5298.40 ± 2.47
ITZ-TFS gel4.6 ± 0.296.61 ± 0.7495.44 ± 1.69
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alyahya, E.M.; Alwabsi, K.; Aljohani, A.E.; Albalawi, R.; El-Sherbiny, M.; Ahmed, R.; Mortagi, Y.; Qushawy, M. Preparation and Optimization of Itraconazole Transferosomes-Loaded HPMC Hydrogel for Enhancing Its Antifungal Activity: 2^3 Full Factorial Design. Polymers 2023, 15, 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040995

AMA Style

Alyahya EM, Alwabsi K, Aljohani AE, Albalawi R, El-Sherbiny M, Ahmed R, Mortagi Y, Qushawy M. Preparation and Optimization of Itraconazole Transferosomes-Loaded HPMC Hydrogel for Enhancing Its Antifungal Activity: 2^3 Full Factorial Design. Polymers. 2023; 15(4):995. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040995

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alyahya, Eidah M., Knooz Alwabsi, Amal E. Aljohani, Rawan Albalawi, Mohamed El-Sherbiny, Rehab Ahmed, Yasmin Mortagi, and Mona Qushawy. 2023. "Preparation and Optimization of Itraconazole Transferosomes-Loaded HPMC Hydrogel for Enhancing Its Antifungal Activity: 2^3 Full Factorial Design" Polymers 15, no. 4: 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040995

APA Style

Alyahya, E. M., Alwabsi, K., Aljohani, A. E., Albalawi, R., El-Sherbiny, M., Ahmed, R., Mortagi, Y., & Qushawy, M. (2023). Preparation and Optimization of Itraconazole Transferosomes-Loaded HPMC Hydrogel for Enhancing Its Antifungal Activity: 2^3 Full Factorial Design. Polymers, 15(4), 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040995

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop