Next Article in Journal
Stimuli-Responsive Principles of Supramolecular Organizations Emerging from Self-Assembling and Self-Organizable Dendrons, Dendrimers, and Dendronized Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Bond Strength of Sandblasted PEEK with Dental Methyl Methacrylate-Based Cement or Composite-Based Resin Cement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Atomistic Simulation of Flow-Induced Microphase Separation and Crystallization of an Entangled Polyethylene Melt Undergoing Uniaxial Elongational Flow and the Role of Kuhn Segment Extension

by
Mohammad Hadi Nafar Sefiddashti
,
Brian J. Edwards
* and
Bamin Khomami
Materials Research and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(8), 1831; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081831
Submission received: 24 February 2023 / Revised: 28 March 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 9 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Physics and Theory)

Abstract

:
Atomistic simulations of the linear, entangled polyethylene C1000H2002 melt undergoing steady-state and startup conditions of uniaxial elongational flow (UEF) over a wide range of flow strength were performed using a united-atom model for the atomic interactions between the methylene groups constituting the polymer macromolecules. Rheological, topological, and microstructural properties of these nonequilibrium viscoelastic materials were computed as functions of strain rate, focusing on regions of flow strength where flow-induced phase separation and flow-induced crystallization were evident. Results of the UEF simulations were compared with those of prior simulations of planar elongational flow, which revealed that uniaxial and planar flows exhibited essentially a universal behavior, although over strain rate ranges that were not completely equivalent. At intermediate flow strength, a purely configurational microphase separation was evident that manifested as a bicontinuous phase composed of regions of highly stretched molecules that enmeshed spheroidal domains of relatively coiled chains. At high flow strength, a flow-induced crystallization (FIC) occurred, producing a semicrystalline material possessing a high degree of crystallinity and primarily a monoclinic lattice structure. This FIC phase formed at a temperature (450 K) high above the quiescent melting point (≈400 K) and remained stable after cessation of flow for temperature at or below 435 K. Careful examination of the Kuhn segments constituting the polymer chains revealed that the FIC phase only formed once the Kuhn segments had become essentially fully extended under the UEF flow field. Thermodynamic properties such as the heat of fusion and heat capacity were estimated from the simulations and found to compare favorably with experimental values.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Elongational flows of polymeric liquids are of great theoretical and practical interest. These strong flows can typically induce dramatic changes in the conformation of individual molecules, from random coils in the quiescent state to highly ordered and stretched chains at high deformation rates. The wide variation of conformational changes of individual macromolecules renders a diverse spectrum of complex microstructural and rheological responses that are not trivial to describe theoretically. Examples of such complex responses include extension thinning or thickening, depending on the strain rate [1,2,3,4,5,6], configurational microphase separation of entangled polymer melts at intermediate deformation rates [7,8,9,10], concentration fluctuations [11,12] and chemical phase separation [13,14,15,16] in entangled solutions, and flow-induced melting point elevation [17,18] and crystallization [14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] in both melts and solutions.
Sophisticated tube-based constitutive models of entangled liquids that incorporate various relaxation mechanisms, such as reptation, contour length fluctuations, convective constraint release, tube stretch, and finite extensibility of polymer molecules, typically predict qualitatively similar behavior for all entangled solutions and melts in response to elongational flow fields. Specifically, these models predict a nearly constant extensional viscosity, η , within the linear viscoelastic regime, ε ˙ < τ d 1 , extension thinning within the range τ d 1 < ε ˙ < τ R 1 , followed by an upturn and extension thickening for ε ˙ > τ R 1 driven by chain stretching, and a final plateau-like region at extremely high extension rates where chains become almost fully extended–see, e.g., Figure 1 of Ref. [37]. In these inequalities, ε ˙ is the extension rate, τ d is the disengagement or reptation time of the liquid, and τ R is the Rouse time. Experimental observations of the rheological responses, however, are not as uniform and unique as the theoretical picture portrays. In fact, in many cases, the tube model fails at predicting the extensional stress and viscosity, even qualitatively, when ε ˙ > τ R 1 . Specifically, the predicted upturn in elongational viscosity at ε ˙ > τ R 1 is not observed in many experimental measurements. Experiments, rather, typically exhibit a monotonic decrease in the extensional viscosity for ε ˙ > τ d 1 , within the nonlinear viscoelastic regime, even at very high extension rates. Furthermore, the measured viscosity power-law exponents vary over a wide range for different liquids, in contradiction to theoretical predictions.
The discrepancy between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements has been attributed to the different behavior of entangled melts and concentrated solutions in uniaxial flow fields, the argument being that while entangled solutions extension thicken at ε ˙ > τ R 1 , melt extensional viscosity monotonically decreases in the nonlinear regime [3]. Extension thinning was proposed to be caused by the reduction of monomeric friction at high extension rates as polymer chains became highly oriented and aligned along the flow direction [38,39]. Wingstrand et al. [4] studied the uniaxial extension of entangled solutions of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dissolved in oligomeric (low molecular weight) PMMA and showed that this liquid exhibited a monotonic extension thinning similar to that of entangled polystyrene (PS) melts of a similar number of entanglements per chain. They concluded that using an oligomeric solvent provided a local environment around the polymer molecules analogous to that in a melt, and hence a similar potential for friction reduction that ultimately eliminated the strain hardening of the solution at high extension rates.
Nafar Sefiddashti et al. studied planar elongational flow (PEF) of an entangled linear polyethylene (PE) melt and also an entangled PE solution in n-hexadecane using united-atom nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulations [7,8,10,16]. They observed monotonic extension thinning for the primary extensional viscosity in the nonlinear viscoelastic regime with power-law exponents in the range 0.35 to 0.4 for ε ˙ > τ R 1 , in agreement with typical experiments. They also simulated the PEF of an entangled PE solution in benzene as a typical small-molecule organic solvent. They observed a qualitatively similar extension thinning response for ε ˙ > τ R 1 for this solution with a scaling exponent of 0.51 , contradicting the notion that a small molecule (rather than an oligomeric) solvent exhibits extension hardening at ε ˙ > τ R 1 . The power-law exponent in the range τ d 1 < ε ˙ < τ R 1 was evidently smaller; however, the uncertainty in the calculated viscosities in this region was rather large. Nevertheless, it is not known whether the same response would be observed under uniaxial extension flow (UEF).
Huang et al. [40] examined the extensional viscosity of a series of polystyrene solutions in oligomeric PS at various concentrations but nearly constant number of entanglements per chain. These experiments revealed a wide range of responses from simple extension thinning to substantial thinning at high deformation rates, suggesting that the solvent type (small molecule or oligomeric) is not the only prominent factor of the high extension-rate response. Furthermore, Ianniruberto et al. [6] analyzed experiments on entangled polyisoprene solutions, polyisoprene melts, and poly(n-butyl acrylate) melts, demonstrating the occurrence of strain hardening at high elongation rates and contradicting the notion that all entangled melts monotonically thin under uniaxial elongation.
Overall, experimental evidence implies that there should be a molecular mechanism involved in the high extension-rate response of entangled liquids, which has been overlooked in tube-based models. Ianniruberto et al. [6] proposed that the missing mechanism was the flow-induced reduction of the monomeric friction coefficient due to the alignment of Kuhn segments at high extension rates. They argued that the ratio of the extensional viscosity at low and very high extension rates can be approximated as
3 η 0 η = M 1.4 M K M c 2.4 ζ eq ζ aligned ,
where η 0 and η are the zero-shear and asymptotic high extension-rate viscosities, respectively, M is polymer molar mass, M K is Kuhn segment molar mass, M c the critical molar mass signifying the onset of the entangled regime, and ζ eq and ζ aligned are the Kuhn segment friction coefficients under quiescent conditions and extremely high extension rates, respectively.
Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) simulations have been used to examine rheological responses and microstructural properties of polymeric liquids under experimental conditions as well as conditions not conveniently accessible in the laboratory. Understanding the physical mechanisms that govern the flow response of entangled polymers requires an accurate model of the intramolecular and intermolecular interactions that maintains validity over a wide range of length and time scales. Furthermore, a simulation methodology must be able to track the dynamical evolution of the macromolecular constituent particles over the same ranges in length and time scales, including those associated with bond-stretching and bond-bending dynamics up to macroscopic dimensions; therefore, nonequilibrium molecular dynamics is the method of choice for studying the flow dynamics of these complex materials.
Nonequilibrium molecular dynamic simulations were used to study atomic and mesoscale properties under shear and elongational flows, including flow-induced phenomena, over wide ranges of strain rates for a series of unentangled and entangled polymeric liquids during the last few decades [41,42]. Nafar Sefiddashti et al. [7,8] simulated PEF of entangled C700H1402 and C1000H2002 monodisperse linear PE melts and examined microstructural (e.g., chain fractional extension), topological (e.g., number of entanglements), and rheological (e.g., viscosity) flow responses with a focus on the nonlinear viscoelastic regime. The response of the C700H1402 melt was more or less intuitive based on simulation results. Specifically, the steady-state distribution of the chain fractional extension, x, was unimodal and Gaussian at equilibrium and low D e , where D e ε ˙ τ R is the dimensionless Deborah number. With increasing D e , the distribution shifted to higher fractional extensions, demonstrating orientation and stretching of individual molecules in the direction of flow. At high extension rates, e.g., D e 6 , molecules were about 80% stretched and fully aligned in the extension direction. Furthermore, the probability distribution function (PDF) of the individual chain fractional extension remained essentially unimodal with a peak position corresponding to the ensemble-averaged fractional extension, x . The distributions of the number of entanglement kinks per chain, Z k , were also unimodal at all flow strengths (Poisson-like at high D e , and Gaussian-like at low and intermediate D e ). The average number of entanglements decreased with increasing D e , in a manner inversely proportional to x .
The C1000H2002 melt behaved very similarly to C700H1402 undergoing, PEF at low and high D e . At intermediate extension rates (i.e., 0.3 D e 1.5 ), however, the steady-state PDF of the fractional extension was bimodal with a peak at low values of x, corresponding to relatively coiled configurations of a fraction of the chains, and a second peak at relatively high values of x corresponding to rather stretched molecules. This behavior was attributed to the coil-stretch transition of the macromolecules [7], qualitatively similar to that predicted for dilute solutions by de Gennes [43]. Furthermore, it was observed that the coiled and stretched molecules underwent a configurational microphase separation such that the coiled molecules segregated into distinct ellipsoidal domains that were surrounded by sheet-like regions of stretched macromolecules. Several other structural and topological properties of the system, including the number of entanglements, the radius of gyration, and the order parameter [17], exhibited similar bimodal distributions with peaks corresponding to the coiled and stretched configurations. These simulations suggested that the existence and manifestation of configurational microphase separation in entangled melts depends on the molecular weight (equivalently, number of entanglements) of the polymeric liquid.
The molecular-weight and strain-rate dependencies of flow-induced microphase separation were examined via high-fidelity nonequilibrium dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulations using model parameters that were fine-tuned to capture accurately the dynamics of entangled polyethylene melts [44]. Boudaghi et al. [10] simulated replicas of C1000H2002 and C3000H6002 melts (the latter possessing 38 entanglements per chain under quiescent conditions) using a fine-tuned DPD force-field system and demonstrated that the C3000H6002 melt underwent microphase separation in the range 0.1 D e 7 in PEF. The biphasic range of C3000H6002 was significantly wider than that of C1000H2002 (i.e., 0.3 D e 3 ), based on these simulations, verifying the intensifying effect of molecular weight on the strain-rate range where microphase separation was observed. Furthermore, they demonstrated via NEMD and DPD simulations that highly stretched molecules could experience a qualitatively similar configurational microphase separation while relaxing back to the quiescent state after cessation of flow.
In another modeling study, Nafar Sefiddashti et al. [9] expressed the Rolie-Poly constitutive equation [45] in terms of the chain conformation tensor (rather than the stress or tube orientation tensor) and demonstrated that, provided the convective constraint release rate parameter was large enough (i.e., fast disentanglement rates), the model was capable of predicting a bistable steady-state for PEF of entangled liquids at intermediate extension rates. They also investigated the effect of various model parameters and fluid properties on the predicted D e range of the bistable region. Different flow-induced inhomogeneities were also observed later in the UEF of shorter normal alkanes [36]. It is worth mentioning that a configurational microphase separation was not reported for concentrated entangled solutions (as opposed to melts); rather, these solutions underwent a thermodynamic phase separation into concentrated domains of polymer and solvent at intermediate and high extension rates; i.e., at D e 1.5 for entangled solutions of PE in n-hexadecane or benzene solvents [16].
At very high extension rates, some polymeric systems are prone to experience flow-induced crystallization (FIC). This phenomenon has been studied experimentally for several decades [14,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,46] and via nonequilibrium atomistic simulations [16,17,18,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. The majority of the simulation work on FIC followed a protocol consisting of an initial nonequilibrium UEF simulation at temperatures above the melting point of the polymeric liquid, followed by quenching the simulation temperature to a value below the quiescent melting point ranging from 15–35% undercooling. Nafar Sefiddashti et al. studied FIC of a C1000H2002 PE melt [17] and solution in n-hexadecane [16] under PEF at 450 K, roughly 50 K above the quiescent melting point of linear PE. They demonstrated that a first-order reversible crystallization reaction quantified FIC kinetics fairly accurately, and subsequently calculated the forward and reverse rate constants. The computed values showed that both forward and reverse rate constants scaled linearly with increasing extension rate; however, the scaling slope for the forward rate constant was an order of magnitude greater than that of the reveres reaction, which remained mostly unaffected by strain rate [18].
Due to the relatively long relaxation times of entangled polymers, simulating extensional flows for sufficiently long periods of time requires special periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) to avoid unreasonably small simulation cell dimensions in directions parallel to the compression axes of the elongational flow. This type of PBC was developed by Kraynik and Reinelt, [47] who formulated the KRBC by establishing sufficient conditions for compatibility of arbitrary lattices under PEF. From an experimental perspective, producing PEF in a laboratory is not a simple matter, and the majority of experimental rheological measurements are performed under uniaxial elongation kinematics. Therefore, for PEF, a direct comparison of NEMD results and relatively rare experimental measurements cannot be readily accomplished. However, there is occasional evidence suggesting that the rheological response of entangled liquids under PEF and UEF are similar within a fairly wide range of extension rates. Nguyen et al. [48] modified a filament stretching rheometer and performed PEF and UEF experiments for a 10% solution of polystyrene constituted of 30 entanglements per molecule. These experiments revealed a nearly identical extensional viscosity response for PEF and UEF over the range of extension rates examined; i.e., 0.1 < W i < 100 , where the Weissenberg number is defined as W i ε ˙ τ d . Nevertheless, until recently it was not possible to perform sufficiently long UEF simulations to verify similarities in the responses of entangled polymers to different types of elongational flows due to the absence of applicable PBCs.
Boundary conditions were recently developed by Dobson [49] and Hunt [50] for uniaxial elongational flow and implemented into the LAMMPS [51] simulation package by Nicholson and Rutledge [33] to extend UEF NEMD simulation to arbitrarily long times. Murashima et al. [52] performed Kramer/Grest-type coarse-grained NEMD simulations of a lightly entangled (less than three entanglements per chain) melt under planar, uniaxial, and biaxial elongational flows. The extensional viscosities for all three types of extensional flow behaved qualitatively similar at all flow strengths and practically overlapped for ε ˙ > τ R 1 . Specifically, viscosities exhibited extension thickening in the range τ d 1 < ε ˙ < τ e 1 , and a plateau region at higher extension rates, where τ e is the entanglement time. Nevertheless, the lack of extension-thinning behavior in these results is dubious. O’Connor et al. [53] also used a Kramer/Grest bead-spring coarse-grained model in NEMD simulations and studied two series of entangled liquids of various chain stiffness and number of entanglements under UEF. Overall, these simulations suggested that strain hardening became more pronounced as the chain stiffness and number of entanglements decreased. An upturn in extensional viscosity could even disappear for a particular polymer as the chain length (or the number of entanglements) increased. They also underlined the changes in the friction coefficient that occurred due to chain alignment at high flow strength and suggested that macromolecular architecture (e.g., the existence of large side groups attached to the polymer backbone) could significantly alter such changes and, consequently, significantly impact the rheological response at high extension rates.
Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations greatly facilitate the discovery and understanding of a broad spectrum of flow-induced phenomena of entangled polymeric liquids under both shear and extensional flows. While simulating the UEF of these fluids has been made attainable using the Dobson and Hunt (DH) periodic boundary conditions, their computational cost is typically significantly higher than simulating the PEF of a similar liquid. This primarily arises from the necessity of using an initial cubic simulation cell (similar cell dimensions in all three directions of Cartesian coordinates) when employing the DH boundary conditions. On the other hand, the KR boundary conditions only require a rectangular parallelepiped initial cell (with similar cell dimensions in extension and contraction directions). Furthermore, during the course of a simulation, the cell in the DH method does not deviate significantly from its initial cubic shape. Hence, the box length should be chosen long enough such that it can accommodate a substantial portion of a stretched chain at steady-state at the (potentially high) extension rate of simulation. In the KR method, however, the simulation cell length grows in the extension direction between the lattice strain periods (i.e., the period in which the lattice reproduces itself, typically 0.9624 Hencky strain units). This means that the cell size in the extension direction is, on average, significantly (1–2.6 times) longer than its initial length, which in return allows a somewhat shorter initial cell size compared to the DH method. Note that the cell size in the neutral direction of PEF could be as short as the radius of gyration of the polymer under quiescent conditions since no compression or expansion occurs in this dimension. Heuristically, the box volume (or the number of particles) of a PEF simulation of a polymeric liquid using the KRBC would be typically 3–15 times smaller than that of a UEF simulation for a similar liquid using the DHBC. (The average cell length in the extension direction during a lattice strain period ( ε H = 0.9624 ) equals 1.68 times the initial cell length in that direction. A cubic box that is 1.68 times longer than the presumed box would have (at least) a 1.68 3 = 4.7 times larger volume, assuming the KR box size in the neutral direction equals that in the other directions. However, the cell size in the neutral direction could be significantly smaller than the others. Therefore, a 3-times shorter length in the neural direction (as for the PEF of C1000H2002 in Ref. [8]) leads to a factor 14.2 fewer number of particles). This is exceedingly consequential from a computational cost perspective, especially if the conclusion of Nguyen et al. [48] respecting the equivalency of the PEF and UEF responses of entangled liquids proves to be generally valid. In that event, PEF simulations could be performed at significantly lower computation costs (or, equivalently, run for longer molecules at a similar cost) compared to UEF simulations and still be indirectly compared against experimental data.
An explicit and comprehensive comparison of PEF and UEF responses of entangled liquids, especially at an atomistically detailed resolution, is scarce. Hence the objectives of the present article are two-fold. First, the united-atom NEMD simulation results of uniaxial extensional flow of an entangled linear C1000H2002 polyethylene melt over a wide range of extension rate are presented, and various structural, topological, rheological, and thermodynamic properties of the system are investigated. Specifically, extension-induced phenomena, including the coil-stretch transition, configurational microphase separation, and flow-induced nucleation and crystallization, as well as their corresponding extension-rate ranges, will be examined systematically. Second, a one-to-one comparison of these results with those obtained for the same PE melt undergoing PEF will be made over the same range of extension rates. The majority of the PEF simulation results presented below were taken from a series of papers of prior work on this subject [7,8,17,18,54].

2. Simulation Methodology

Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of uniaxial elongational flow of the monodisperse linear entangled C1000H2002 PE melt were performed in the N p T statistical ensemble at 450 K and a density of 0.766 g/cm3 (constant pressure corresponding to the equilibrium pressure of the system obtained from equilibrium MD simulations at D e = 0 ), spanning a wide range of extension rates, i.e., 0 D e 60 , expressed in terms of a dimensionless Deborah number as defined above. The N p T ensemble was chosen to allow for cell volume and density adjustment, which facilitates the accurate calculation of the structural, rheological, and thermodynamic properties of the system in cases where FIC occurs. The simulation cell contained 540 linear C1000H2002 macromolecules. At the start of each simulation, the box was cubic of length 254 Å in each direction. As a simulation proceeded, these box dimensions changed as the fluid extended in the flow direction (z) and compressed in the orthogonal directions (x and y). The simulation cell contained 540,000 united atoms, each representing a distinct methyl or methylene unit of the respective chain. Given the enormous computational cost of these simulations, the choice of cell dimensions was motivated based on extensive prior NEMD simulations of the same polymeric melt under planar elongational flow. Steady-state was determined by monitoring key output variables (such as average chain length) and determining that the time evolution of these quantities had been reduced to less than 5 % variation.
The NEMD simulations employed the Siepmann-Karaborni-Smit (SKS) united-atom potential [55] to model the energetic interactions between the atoms comprising the C1000H2002 macromolecules. The SKS model has been used in many prior simulation studies of alkane and polyethylene fluid behavior [41]. However, the rigid bond between adjacent atoms in the original model was replaced with a harmonic potential function [56]; this is a common procedure in molecular dynamics simulations employing this potential model as it alleviates integration difficulties associated with constrained bonds [57,58,59]. The intermolecular and intramolecular nonbonded energetic interactions in the SKS model are given by a 12-6 Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential,
U L J ( r i j ) = 4 ϵ i j [ ( σ i j r i j ) 12 ( σ i j r i j ) 6 ] ,
where r i j is the distance between atoms i and j. Note that the intramolecular energy is only applied to atoms separated by more than three bonds. The energetic parameters ( ϵ / k B ) were 47 K for CH2 units and 114 K for CH3 units [57,58,59], where k B is Boltzmann’s constant. The distance parameters were σ C H 2 = σ C H 3 = 3.93 Å for both CH2 and CH3 units. Lorentz-Berthelot mixing rules were used to calculate the interaction parameters between atomic units i and j, such that
ϵ i j = ( ϵ i ϵ j ) 1 / 2 , σ i j = σ i + σ j 2 .
A cutoff distance r c = 2.5 σ CH2 was employed for all LJ potentials.
The bond-stretching interaction energy was described by a harmonic potential function,
U s t r ( l ) = 1 2 k l ( l l e q ) 2 ,
where l is the distance between adjacent atom centers of the same molecule. The bond-stretching constant was k l / k B = 452,900 K/Å2 and the equilibrium bond length was l e q = 1.54 Å for adjacent united-atom particles. The bond-bending potential energy also was governed by a harmonic potential function of the form
U b e n ( θ ) = 1 2 k θ ( θ θ e q ) 2 ,
where θ is the angle formed between three successive atoms. The bond-bending constant in this equation was k θ / k B = 62,500 K/rad2 and the equilibrium angle was θ e q = 114 .
The bond-torsional interaction energy was expressed as
U t o r ( ϕ ) = m = 0 3 a m ( cos ϕ ) m ,
where the bond-torsional coefficients were a 0 / k B = 1010 K, a 1 / k B = 2019 K, a 2 / k B = 136.4 K, and a 3 / k B = 3165 K. This potential was used on atoms of the same chain that were separated by three bonds. Using the physical parameters described above, the maximum possible extension of the C1000H2002 chains is approximately 1290 Å when all bond dihedral angles assume trans configurations, with all bonds and angles taken to be at their equilibrium values.
NEMD simulations of uniaxial elongational flow were performed in the NpT statistical ensemble using the Nosé-Hoover thermostat and barostat [60,61,62] implemented within the Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator (LAMMPS [51]) computing environment developed at Sandia National Laboratory, subject to the UEF velocity gradient tensor,
u = ε ˙ / 2 0 0 0 ε ˙ / 2 0 0 0 ε ˙
Boundary conditions were periodic at all box surfaces with a deforming/rotating simulation box that elongated in the z direction and compressed in the x and y directions. The NEMD equations of motion were integrated using the reversible-Reference System Propagator Algorithm, r-RESPA, with two different time steps: a long time step of 4.7 fs, which was used for the slowly varying nonbonded LJ interactions, and a short time step of 1.176 fs (one-fourth of the long time step) for the rapidly varying forces, including bond-bending, bond-stretching, and bond-torsional interactions. The relaxation time of the thermostat and barostat were set equal to 100 and 10 times the long time step, respectively. The barostat was applied to the contracting x and y dimensions to maintain a constant pressure equal to the equilibrium pressure of the system in those directions. This was especially useful when FIC occurred and a denser semicrystalline phase formed within the simulation cell: in an N p T simulation, the cell size and volume can be adjusted accordingly to capture the new density of the semicrystalline polymer. Note that a constant pressure in the contraction directions corresponded to free surfaces in those directions, while the fluid was stretched along the other perpendicular direction according to the uniaxial elongational deformation. Simulations were started from an equilibrated configuration at D e = 0 for a specific D e ( 0 ) and run until all statistical indicators revealed that a steady-state condition had been achieved. The Dobson-Hunt (DH) [49,50] periodic boundary condition was employed to allow for unrestricted simulation time of the deforming simulation box undergoing uniaxial elongational flow over the full range of imposed strain rates.
Table 1 displays equilibrium properties of the simulated melt under quiescent conditions as obtained from equilibrium MD simulations. These properties are the same as indicated in prior work of this particular simulated melt [63,64]. The reptation or disengagement time, τ d , was obtained from the decorrelation time of the chain end-to-end unit vector autocorrelation function [63,65,66,67], and the Rouse time, τ R , was calculated as τ R = τ d / 3 Z according to reptation theory [68]. R 2 1 / 2 and R g 2 1 / 2 represent the ensemble-averaged chain end-to-end distance and the radius of gyration, respectively. The ensemble-averaged number of entanglements, Z , and kinks, Z k , (each on a per-chain basis) were calculated using the Z1 code developed by Kröger [69,70].
Theoretically, one can calculate the equilibrium chain entanglement number by Z = L 2 / R 2 , where L is the average primitive chain contour length. The entanglement network topological analysis using the Z1 code provides L (508.6 Å) for calculation of Z (12.9). The effective reptation tube diameter, a t , can be obtained from the relationship a t = L / Z as 39.4 Å. Moreover, the Z1 code introduces an alternative topological quantifier, the number of kinks per chain, Z k . Typically, the number of kinks is roughly twice the number of entanglements under quiescent conditions; however, it is unknown if such a relationship applies away from the equilibrium state. It is also not clear if the physical definitions of Z , L , and a t remain valid under nonequilibrium conditions. Therefore, in the following, Z k is used primarily as the indicator of entanglements under nonequilibrium flow conditions since it is directly calculated by the Z1 code via an unambiguous geometrical algorithm.
According to equilibrium ( D e = 0 ) simulations, the Kuhn length is estimated as L K = R 2 / | R | max = 15.6 Å, which implies N K = | R | max / L K = 83 Kuhn segments. Consequently, an estimate of the equilibrium R 2 1 / 2 = ( N k L k 2 ) 1 / 2 = 142.1 Å demonstrates internal consistency when compared to the tabulated value of 141.8 Å. Note that each Kuhn segment is constituted by 12 carbon atom units. According to R g 2 = N K L K 2 / 6 , a theoretical estimate of R g 2 1 / 2 is thus 58.0 Å, which closely matches the simulated value of 57.9 Å displayed in Table 1. The entanglement molecular weight for linear polyethylene at 443 K of M e = 1150 g/mol was reported by Fetters et al. [71], which can be used to estimate an experimental entanglement density of Z = M / M e = 12.2 and tube diameter a t = R 2 1 / 2 / Z 1 / 2 = 40.7 Å. These values agree well with the simulation results.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructural and Rheological Properties

Polymer dynamics are characterized by a wide range of length and time scales, ranging from Angstroms to meters and femtoseconds to years, respectively. Processing operations span many orders of magnitude of time and length scales in virtually all applications. Different flow strengths and types lead to various flow-induced phenomena and rheological responses in polymeric liquids that are each best scrutinized with special microstructural quantities, depending on the time and length scales inherent to the specific phenomenon under investigation. These quantities range from long length and time scale properties, such as chain end-to-end distance and radius of gyration that influence mechanical properties like the rheological characteristic functions, to small length and time scale properties, such as the local order parameter and atomistic thermodynamic-like variables [18] relevant to flow-induced crystallization.

3.1.1. Configurational Microphase Separation and General Flow Behavior

The mean fractional extension of chains, x R 2 1 / 2 / | R | max , is defined as the ensemble-averaged end-to-end distance normalized by the theoretical maximum end-to-end distance | R | max ( = 1290 Å for C 1000 H 2002 ). Figure 1a displays the average fractional extension as a function of the Hencky strain, ε H = ε ˙ t , for startup of uniaxial elongational flow (solid lines) at various values of D e . Flows of D e < 0.3 were not simulated (except for the quiescent case of D e = 0 ) because of the excessive computational resources required for such large simulation cells in UEF at very low D e and because the results of the prior PEF simulations [7,8,16,17] revealed that only the expected behavior arising from reptation theory manifested at such small strain rates. For comparison, the values obtained from prior PEF simulations are also presented in Figure 1a using dotted lines of the same color for similar values of D e . Note that PEF simulations at D e = 1 and D e = 9 were not performed in the prior work due to limitations of computational resources [7,8,16,17]; hence these two D e values for PEF are not included in Figure 1 and other figures throughout the paper.
The mean fractional extension increases very slowly at all D e during the first Hencky strain of deformation. At higher strains, x begins to grow at a faster rate with a slope that increases with D e . The transient response of x afterward can be classified into three categories of extension rates, namely, 0.3 D e < 1.5 , 1.5 D e < 9 , and D e 9 . Simulations of UEF at D e < 0.3 were not feasible from a computational standpoint, but results are expected to be very similar to those of PEF for D e < 0.3 [7,8,17,18]. In the first region, 0.3 D e < 1.5 , the fractional extension undergoes an overshoot roughly at ε H 4 –5.5, followed by a gradual decay to an eventual quasisteady-state plateau. However, the mean fractional extension at ε H > 6 fluctuates such that an indisputable steady state cannot be achieved even after ε H 20 units of deformation. This leads to some ambiguity in determining the steady-state fractional extension. Indeed, the steady-state fractional extension in this region could change significantly depending on the cutoff Hencky strain for calculating the ensemble averages. As discussed below (with reference to Panel (e) of Figure 1), this is caused by individual macromolecules gradually transitioning from relatively coiled to more stretched configurations, and vice versa. Consequently, steady-state values throughout this article were calculated as ensemble averages of the respective data at ε H 8 . The lower limit Hencky strain of 8 was chosen because this value is roughly the highest deformation that can be achieved using common rheological measurements of polymeric liquids for reporting steady-state properties, such as extensional viscosity. The fractional extension exhibited in the UEF simulations at these D e is qualitatively similar to that of PEF, although quantitatively there is a greater degree of extension in the UEF simulations due to the higher degree of stretching in UEF imparted by the compression in both directions perpendicular to the direction of flow.
In the second region, 1.5 D e < 9 , the overshoot in mean fractional extension vanishes, and x smoothly approaches its steady-state value at ε H 8 . Unlike the lower D e range, the fluctuation in x at steady state is insignificant in this range of extension rates, indicating that individual macromolecules mostly remain in either relatively stretched or coiled configurations. Furthermore, the steady-state fractional extension monotonically increases as D e increases.
The behavior of x is fairly similar at higher extension rates in the third region, i.e., D e 9 , except that the steady-state x exhibits a jump compared to the second region, resembling a discontinuity in steady-state fractional extension, and remains nearly independent of D e . This discontinuity is associated with flow-induced crystallization, which will be discussed later. The fractional extension under PEF is qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that of UEF within this range of D e . Furthermore, at D e = 9.0 , which is at the lower limit of the FIC range, the initial increase of x with ε H is commensurate with that of lower values of D e . However, at ε H 4 , it experiences an increase in slope before settling at its steady-state value at ε H 6 . Hence the initial response at D e = 9.0 is that of a stretched liquid state, which begins to evidence FIC only once the molecules are sufficiently extended at ε H 4 .
The steady-state probability distribution functions (PDFs) for the molecular radius of gyration, p ( R g ) , and fractional extension, p ( x ) , are plotted in Figure 1b–d for both UEF and PEF. Under quiescent conditions, the PDFs depict essentially coiled macromolecules distributed almost symmetrically about the peak values (i.e., possessing Gaussian-like characteristics), with means of 57.9 Å and 141.8 Å, respectively, as indicated in Table 1. The three characteristic extension rate regions described above can also be recognized in these PDF plots. It is evident from these distributions that the flow response in the first regime, 0.3 D e < 1.5 , is quite different and somewhat unexpected compared to the other two flow strength regimes. Specifically, the PDFs are broad and bimodal, with one peak positioned at values approximately corresponding to the radius of gyration and end-to-end distance of the molecules under quiescent conditions, mostly assuming coiled configurations, and a second peak appearing at relatively high values of R g and x, corresponding to more highly stretched configurations. Note that the coiled-peak position is somewhat independent of flow strength, whereas the stretched-peak moves to the right (higher chain extension) as D e increases. This behavior was attributed to a coil-stretch transition in entangled melts, as reported in the past for PEF simulations of C 1000 H 2002 and C 3000 H 6002 PE melts using NEMD [7] and DPD [10]. In this range of flow strength, the chain-like macromolecules can exist in either of the two stable configurational states (i.e., coiled and stretched). Moreover, individual chains can occasionally transition from one configurational state to the other. Such transitions may be inferred from the small but nonzero population of the chains between the two peaks of the distributions—see the orange curves ( D e = 0.6 ) of Figure 1b,c, for instance.
Figure 1e depicts the transition of a few selected molecules between the coiled and stretched states at D e = 0.6 by plotting their individual chain fractional extension as a function of Hencky strain. These plots indicate that the transitioning of molecules between the two states is a random and gradual process, taking about 10 Hencky stain units of deformation (or dimensionless time). Such random exchanges between the coiled and stretched populations give rise to significant fluctuations in the mean fractional extension of the chains, as discussed earlier—see the blue, orange, and green curves of Figure 1a corresponding to D e = 0.3 , 0.6 , 1.0 , respectively. These fluctuations of individual chain extension could manifest as fluctuations (or even anomalies) in other properties of the system, such as stress and extensional viscosity, which will be discussed later. Both UEF and PEF simulations exhibit similar behavior, although the stretched-peaks of UEF are narrower and shifted to higher extensions compared to those of PEF.
In the second region, 1.5 D e < 9 , the distributions p ( x ) and p ( R g ) become unimodal and sharply peaked, shifting to the right as D e is increased, implying a highly stretched liquid state at higher extension rates. The PDFs remain unimodal at even higher extension rates, i.e., D e 9 ; however, the peak positions shift discontinuously to higher extension at D e = 9 and asymptotically approach that of fully stretched molecules ( x 1 ). The observed discontinuity resembles a first-order phase transition, and it can be associated with flow-induced crystallization, as briefly mentioned earlier and discussed in Section 3.1.2 in greater detail. Note that the UEF and PEF distributions at D e 9 are virtually identical to each other.
A rough sketch of a configurational phase diagram can be constructed by plotting the peak positions of the steady-state p ( x ) at various D e , as shown in Figure 1f. Blue symbols denote UEF data, whereas orange symbols specify PEF data. Furthermore, squares represent coiled configurational states and triangles denote stretched states. These data points were obtained from the positions of the relevant peaks of the p ( x ) distributions, as displayed in Figure 1c,d. At low D e < 0.3 (PEF data only), the melt is composed of coiled molecules that are barely discernible from those of the quiescent state. At 0.3 D e < 1.5 , the liquid is comprised of molecules that are relatively coiled and others that are relatively extended. At 1.5 D e < 9 , the steady-state liquid is comprised solely of relatively extended molecules, whereas at D e 9 one observes a predominantly monoclinic flow-induced semicrystalline state.
Individual molecular trajectories of fractional extension are plotted vs. Hencky strain in Figure 2 for startup of UEF at various D e . At D e = 0.3 , 0.6 , 1.0 , the distribution of individual molecular configurations is quite wide, as indicated by the broad PDFs of Figure 1a. There are molecules that rapidly become relatively highly extended upon application of flow, and others that remain relatively coiled even after 20 Hencky strain units. Other molecules gradually transition from one configurational state to the other over multiple ε H units. (This is hard to visualize from Figure 2 because of the large number of molecules in the UEF simulations; see Figure 1e for an easier visualization of some selected chains). At D e = 1.5 , 3.0 , all macromolecules eventually assume relatively stretched configurations, although some molecules rapidly increase in extension after inception of flow, whereas others slowly transition from a relatively coiled configuration over a much longer period of time. At D e = 9 , many molecules rapidly rise to a pseudosteady state at ε H 3 , corresponding to a stretched liquid state, and then quickly transition to an even more extended state at ε H 6 , which is a manifestation of FIC. Even so, there remain some relatively coiled molecules that only begin to transition to the stretched state after ε H 10 .
Snapshots of the simulation cell of the PE melt undergoing startup of UEF at D e = 0.6 are displayed in Figure 3 at various values of Hencky strain. Cooler colors are assigned to molecules that are relatively coiled whereas warmer colors denote relatively stretched molecules. Under quiescent conditions ( ε H = 0 ), the molecules are exclusively coiled. With the onset of flow, certain individual molecules begin to elongate in the direction of flow, whereas others remain relatively coiled, retaining configurations that are essentially similar to those they possessed under quiescent conditions. As time elapses, the stretched molecules approach steady-state configurations and the coiled molecules mostly remain unaffected by the flow; however, after a substantial amount of deformation has occurred, a bicontinuous phase structure is developed wherein the stretched chains form into a mesh-like network of highly elongated molecules that enwrap ellipsoidal domains of relatively coiled chains. The bicontinuous inhomogeneous phase appears to be formed by a migration of stretched and coiled chains into domains of similarly configured molecules rather than a spontaneous heterogeneous development at certain locations within the simulation cell. This statement is supported by the lower right snapshot, which is the same snapshot at ε H = 0 but with the assignment of individual molecular colors according to the final steady-state configuration rather than the corresponding one at t = 0 ; this snapshot provides evidence that the chains forming specific domains at steady-state are more or less randomly distributed throughout the simulation cell at t = 0 .
The spatial inhomogeneity of the biphasic structure exhibited under UEF is distinctly different than that exhibited for the same PE melt undergoing PEF, as presented in preceding publications [8,10,17]. In PEF, a biphasic system is also formed over a similar range of D e , but there the heterogeneous liquid is comprised of sheet-like regions of highly stretched molecules that interweave between spheroidal domains of relatively coiled molecules. This difference seems intuitively to be a manifestation of the fact that PEF maintains a neutral direction, whereas UEF implies compression in both directions perpendicular to that of flow. It is not clear, in either PEF or UEF, if the coiled chains are migrating to regions near the flow stagnation point, or vice versa; at first glance, this does not appear to be the case, but the nature of applying the KRBC or DHBC complicates the analysis considerably.
Snapshots of the PE melt undergoing steady-state UEF at various D e are displayed in Figure 4. Individual chain molecules are again colored according to the relative end-to-end extension, with tightly coiled chains displayed in a cool blue color and highly extended chains in a warm red color. The bicontinuous liquid microstructure is observed throughout the range 0.3 D e < 1.5 , where a 3-dimensional mesh-work of elongated chains essentially envelope spatial domains of concentrated coiled molecules. At lower D e , the numbers of molecules comprising the two phases are similar (see Figure 2), but as D e increases, the fraction of coiled chains diminishes relative to the fraction of stretched chains. However, even at D e = 1.5 , vestigial traces can be discerned of a spatially inhomogeneous bicontinuous liquid phase (see the bottom left snapshot of Figure 4), although the difference in extension of the coiled and stretched phase molecules is rather slight and the p ( x ) distribution of Figure 1 remains practically unimodal. At higher D e , the inhomogeneous microstructural has essentially dissolved into a homogeneous liquid phase composed of highly stretched molecules.
As discussed briefly above, Figure 1f displays the average steady-state fractional extension for different states of the liquid as a function of D e for the UEF and PEF simulations. Hence, in the range 0.3 D e < 1.5 , where the distributions are bimodal, two values are plotted corresponding to the coiled and stretched states. For other flow strengths ( D e 3.0 ), where p ( x ) is unimodal, the peak position is virtually the same as the mean fractional extension of the highly stretched liquid. Note that PEF and UEF data are practically the same, indicating that this biphasic microstructure is possibly a universal phenomenon of elongational flows. Due to the configurational bistability of the system at intermediate extension rates, Figure 1f effectively exhibits a hysteresis loop in the fractional extension profile of the liquid at steady state. It should be noted that exhibiting a hysteresis means that either purely coiled or stretched states within the bistable region should be achievable by some appropriate manipulation of the flow kinematics. This hysteresis phenomenon has not been directly studied herein; i.e., the flow conditions under which a coiled-only or stretched-only configurational state could appear in the range 0.3 D e < 3.0 . However, it was demonstrated in previous work [7,10] on PEF of C 1000 H 2002 that a metastable stretched-only state could be attained by decreasing the flow strength of a system composed of stretched molecules at steady state at a higher value of D e (e.g., D e = 3 ) to a lower D e located within the bistable region (e.g., D e = 0.6 ). In other words, the purely stretched state of the bistable region could be generated by moving from the right branch (high D e ) of the sigmoidal curve in Figure 1f toward the left (low D e ). Nevertheless, it was also demonstrated that such purely stretched states were not globally stable and eventually transitioned into biphasic states similar to those depicted in Figure 3 and Figure 4 for sufficiently long simulation times [7,10].
As noted in prior simulations of the same PE melt undergoing steady-state PEF [8], the extensional stress and temperature of the bicontinuous phase remain homogeneous throughout the simulation cell—see Supplementary Materials of Ref. [8]. This implies that the average stress state is not affected by spatial location within the simulation cell, indicating a homogeneous stress state in both space and time. Consequently, the segregation of the macromolecules observed does not seem to be driven by stresses developed within the system under UEF or PEF. This observation points to a microphase separation that is thermodynamically induced by architecturally identical chain molecules whose sole point of difference lies in their adopted individual steady-state configurations which are developed under flow.
Topological properties of the C 1000 H 2002 melt are displayed in Figure 5 for both UEF and PEF at various D e as calculated using the Z1 code [69,70]. Figure 5a displays the ensemble-averaged number of kinks per chain, Z k , plotted as a function of D e under both types of flow. At low D e (<0.3; PEF only), Z k remains close to its quiescent value of 24.3, roughly twice the number of entanglements. At intermediate D e within the biphasic region ( 0.3 D e < 1.5 ), however, Z k drops precipitously to a low value less than 2.5, which subsequently remains relatively close to zero at all higher D e .
Figure 5b displays the steady-state PDFs of the number of entanglement kinks, p ( Z k ) , of individual chains at various D e for the C 1000 H 2002 melt undergoing UEF. Within the biphasic region, these PDFs are decidedly bimodal, with peaks located at both small and large values of Z k . The high- Z k peak is associated with the coiled liquid phase, whereas the low- Z k peak is associated with the stretched phase. Indeed, both phases tend to maintain the same level of entanglements that would be expected from either a homogeneous coiled or stretched liquid phase hypothetically existing under the same flow conditions. At higher D e where only the homogeneous stretched liquid state exists ( 3.0 D e < 9.0 ) as well as the FIC phase ( D e 9.0 ), the p ( Z k ) are unimodal, possessing tall, narrow peaks at very small values of Z k , indicating almost completely unentangled systems. (Note that the PDFs of the FIC phases all overlap each other in the plot).
The positions of the peaks, Z k p e a k , of the PDFs displayed in Figure 5b (as well as those of the corresponding PDFs under PEF; not shown) are plotted versus D e in Figure 5c. This entanglement phase diagram makes clear the biphasic nature of the intermediate D e (0.3–1.0) regime with its characteristic inverse-S shape, wherein higher values of Z k are associated with the coiled phase and lower values with the stretched phase. It also implies that metastable entanglement phases of either homogeneous coiled or stretched states could be induced by gradually increasing or decreasing D e from a monophasic D e state point, leading to a hysteresis effect; such stretched metastable states were previously observed for the same C 1000 H 2002 melt under PEF at D e = 0.6 , 1.5 [17].
The tube stretch is plotted versus D e for the C 1000 H 2002 melt under steady-state UEF in Figure 5d. At low D e , the tube stretch increases only slightly from its quiescent value of unity, and this trend continues for D e as high as 0.6, which is well within the nonlinear viscoelastic regime. At D e = 1 , which corresponds to the applied strain rate, ε ˙ , equalling the reciprocal of the Rouse time, τ R 1 , the tube stretch parameter begins to climb substantially with D e , indicating strong stretching of the polymer entanglement strands. This increase in chain extension is commensurate with the decrease in chain entanglements discussed above. The rate of increase of λ with D e eventually plateaus for D e 9.0 , where FIC has evidently occurred. Note that the plateau value of ≈2.4 observed in panel (d) is close to the theoretical maximum value of 2.77 [64].
The elongational viscosity upon startup ( η + ) of UEF at various D e is displayed in Figure 6a as a function of applied Hencky strain. At low values of D e ( 1.0 ) , a rapid initial increase in η + eventually leads to a maximum that gradually fades to a steady-state plateau at large ε H . At all larger D e , the overshoot is not apparent, with the initial increase eventually plateauing at its steady-state value. The sole exception is the case of D e = 9.0 , which is at the lower limit of the FIC range of D e . In this case, there is an initial plateau that appears in η + at ε H 2 , and then a rapid increase to a larger value of η + at ε H 6 . This behavior is consistent with that discussed above with reference to the molecular mean fractional extension evident upon startup of UEF at D e = 9.0 in Figure 1a (as well as the bottom right panel of Figure 2) and is associated with the initial formation of a stretched liquid phase upon startup of flow, which eventually transitions into a semicrystalline state after the molecules have become sufficiently stretched and aligned along the flow direction.
Steady-state values of the elongational viscosity are displayed in Figure 6b for both UEF and PEF. These quantities are defined as
η = σ 11 1 / 2 σ 22 1 / 2 σ 33 3 ε ˙ for UEF and η 1 = σ 11 σ 22 4 ε ˙ for PEF ,
where σ i i is a diagonal component of the Irving-Kirkwood stress tensor [72] with the 1-component denoting the flow direction. At low D e and within the biphasic region, the PEF data are subject to large statistical error because of the small size of these simulations; however, the much larger UEF simulations have much greater statistical certainty. At low D e (<0.1) (where only PEF data are available), the viscosity is consistent with a linear viscoelastic behavior exhibiting a constant viscosity, within statistical limitations. At intermediate D e (0.3–1.5) within the biphasic region, however, the viscosity appears to decrease to a plateau value, and then decreases again at higher D e (>3.0). The steady-state viscosity data of the PE melt under UEF and PEF evidently overlap, within statistical uncertainty, over the entire range of simulated D e . This observation is quite remarkable physically, and it also speaks to the consistency of the simulations since the PEF simulations were drastically smaller in size than the UEF simulations, and given the fact that the PEF simulations at D e < 15.0 were performed in the N V T ensemble, whereas all UEF simulations were performed in the N p T ensemble. Furthermore, the PEF simulations were performed with KRBC, whereas the UEF simulations implemented the DHBC.
The steady-state elongational stress, σ σ 11 σ 22 for PEF and σ σ 11 σ 22 / 2 σ 33 / 2 for UEF (where the index 1 is associated with the flow direction), is plotted versus D e in Figure 7 for both UEF and PEF. Again, the results of both types of flow simulations appear to overlap to within statistical error. As expected, the stress increases monotonically at low D e where only a coiled liquid phase exists (C), but within the biphasic region (C & S) where coiled and stretched liquid states coexist, the trend is not definitive. At higher D e (> 1.5), however, the trend is once again monotonically increasing (S), even throughout the semicrystalline FIC regime (M).

3.1.2. Flow-Induced Crystallization at High Deborah Number

Typical semicrystalline polyethylenes have normal melting points that vary greatly from low density to high density materials (0.88–0.96 g / cm 3 ), ranging roughly from 385–420 K for common varieties. The heat of fusion, Δ H f , is generally accepted at roughly 290 J/g [73,74,75], and many studies indicate that single crystals formed from a quiescent melt assume orthorhombic or hexagonal lattices [46,76], whereas crystals formed under application of a mechanical tension tend to arrange into a monoclinic structure [77,78,79,80]. Indeed, a wide array of interesting semicrystalline morphologies can be generated under the application of a flow field, including the “shish-kebab” fibrillar structure of transverse lamellae emanating from a central axial fibril [81,82,83], at temperatures several decades above the quiescent melting point [24,84].
Toda [85] observed a melting point ( T m ) of 398–403 K for single crystals of a linear PE of molar mass 13,000 g/mol grown under quiescent conditions. This is very close to the molar mass of the linear C 1000 H 2002 melt (14,002 g/mol) simulated in this study. To date, it has been unfeasible computationally to simulate quiescent crystallization of entangled polyethylenes to determine a precise value of T m from molecular dynamics simulations, but the accrued evidence suggests a reasonable range would be 385–400 K [28,32,33,59,86]. Therefore, the simulated melt temperature employed in the present simulations is likely greater than 50 K than the value of T m determined via experiment or equilibrium MD simulation.
The observed discontinuities in fractional extension profiles at high D e 9.0 in Figure 1a, as well as the two-stage behavior at D e = 9.0 evidenced in the same figure, and also Figure 2 (bottom right panel) and Figure 6a at 3 ε H 6 , serve to indicate the possibility of a phase transition occurring within the PE liquid after an initial rapid formation of a highly stretched homogeneous liquid state. In fact, prior work has demonstrated that C 1000 H 2002 undergoes flow-induced crystallization when subjected to strong PEF at D e 15 at a temperature of 450 K [17,18]. In this subsection, the FIC phase produced under UEF is examined in detail and compared with the same FIC phase developed under PEF at comparable D e .
A variety of mathematical variables have been used to distinguish between liquid and crystalline phases in molecular simulations, as well as to quantify the degree of order induced in the FIC phase. These quantities aim to estimate the global or local ordering of polymer molecules or constituent segments within the simulation cell. One of the most common ones is the order parameter defined as q 3 2 λ , where λ is the eigenvalue of the segmental order parameter tensor, Q , with the largest absolute value. The segmental order parameter tensor is defined herein as
Q t i t i 1 3 I ,
where t i is a unit vector connecting adjacent even-numbered and odd-numbered carbon atoms along the chain backbone (which are separated by a single monomeric unit). The brackets · denote an ensemble average over all unit vectors, and I is the unit tensor. This definition and similar order parameters, which describe an ensemble average of the local degree of ordering within the sample, are somewhat arbitrary and are usually made based on a priori assumptions about the state of the polymeric material obtained from the simulation at specific state points. For example, Nafar Sefiddashti et al. [16,17,18] used the ranges q > 0.75 to define a semicrystalline state, 0.65 < q < 0.75 for an ordered pretransitional liquid state, 0.25 < q < 0.65 for a stretched liquid, and q < 0.15 for a coiled liquid; however, these points were defined rather arbitrarily from a preconstructed nonequilibrium phase diagram [17].
The transient startup behavior of the order parameter is displayed in Figure 8a as a function of Hencky strain for both UEF and PEF at various D e . These data are qualitatively similar to their counterparts in Figure 1a for the mean fractional extension. Specifically, the same three flow regions described in Section 3.1.1 are noticeable here as well. Characteristic overshoots and pronounced long-lived fluctuations are evident within the biphasic range 0.3 D e < 1.5 , followed by smoothly and monotonically ascending q within the range 1.5 D e < 9.0 , with q values indicating a stretched liquid state. At D e 9.0 , a discontinuity is evident as the steady-state values of the curves jump significantly from those at lower D e , similarly to the plots of x in Figure 1a. All D e 9.0 display steady-state values greater than the critical value of q = 0.75 that indicates a transition from a stretched liquid state to a semicrystalline one.
The startup behavior of q at D e = 9.0 is a special case that requires additional deliberation. Indeed, D e = 9.0 is the critical flow strength at the lower limit of the transition from the stretched liquid phase to the semicrystalline phase. This transition is tracked by observing the evolution of the order parameter, which initially increases with ε H in a similar fashion as those of D e = 1.5 and D e = 3.0 . Specifically, q exhibits a stretched liquid-like response by approaching a steady-state value of about q 0.6 , well below the critical order parameter of 0.75, up to a Hencky strain of ε H 3 . At this point, the q curve passes through an inflection point and rises at a high rate for nearly two Hencky strains until it attains a new steady-state of roughly q 0.8 . Note that for PEF, a similar qualitative behavior with an inflection point at ε H 2 was observed at D e = 15.0 , which was the lower limit of the FIC regime under PEF noted in Ref. [18]. This provides an indication that UEF is a stronger flow for orienting and extending the chain-like molecules than PEF due to the simultaneous compression along the two perpendicular axes with respect to the flow direction under UEF.
The steady-state PDFs of the order parameter (see Figure 8b) of the PE melt under both UEF and PEF are bimodal in the first D e (< 1.5) region, with a low-q peak at q 0.075 corresponding to essentially random coils and a high-q peak at q 0.25 –0.4, corresponding to moderately aligned and stretched chains. The high-q peak position shifts to the right (i.e., higher q values) as D e increases. Within the range 1.5 D e < 9.0 , the distributions become unimodal and approximately Gaussian, varying roughly within the range 0.25 < q < 0.65 , which is consistent with a purely stretched liquid state. At higher D e , the PDFs significantly shift to the right and become narrower at q values greater than 0.75, demonstrating a highly ordered semicrystalline phase. Although differences between UEF and PEF in the PDFs of x are difficult to discern in Figure 1c, the PDFs of q are more clearly evident, where it is obvious that UEF is a stronger flow, producing the same effects as PEF but at slightly lower D e . For instance, the biphasic region for UEF occurs within the range 0.3 D e 1.0 , whereas for PEF it occurs at 0.3 D e 1.5 . Furthermore, the FIC region begins at D e = 9.0 under UEF but at D e = 15.0 under PEF [18], although once inside the FIC regime, the PDFs of UEF and PEF practically coincide.
The peak positions of the p ( q ) are plotted as functions of D e in Figure 8c. Note that outside the biphasic region (C & S), the peak positions and the ensemble averages are virtually identical. This figure is very similar to that of fractional extension displayed in Figure 1f, except that the distinction between the liquid and semicrystalline phases is significantly more pronounced here. This plot effectively serves as a nonequilibrium phase diagram of the PE melt under elongational flow, and a hysteresis loop for the C 1000 H 2002 liquid in the biphasic region is evident at the constant temperature of 450 K, rendering this D e region as a possibly universal feature of extensional flow.
A plot of q versus time after cessation of steady-state UEF at D e = 30.0 and 450 K is presented as Figure 9. In these virtual experiments, the temperature can be quenched at the moment that the flow is turned off. If temperature is held fixed at 450 K, q rapidly relaxes back to its quiescent value associated with a liquid composed of coiled macromolecules, indicating melting of the semicrystalline phase that was formed under flow. Interestingly, if the temperature is simultaneously quenched to 425 K or 435 K at the moment of flow cessation, q remains essentially fixed at the same steady-state value (≈0.83), indicating that the semicrystalline phase remains indefinitely. This provides evidence that the semicrystalline phase formed under UEF has a melting point somewhere between 420–450 K, which is somewhat higher than the case for PEF of the same C 1000 H 2002 liquid that melted between 415 K and 420 K in prior work [17]. Hence the FIC semicrystalline phase formed under UEF appears to be more stable than a similar FIC phase formed under PEF. The effective melting point is at least 35 K above the melting point of the quiescently grown crystal of 385–400 K, which implies a greater thermal stability of the FIC phase. This stability was examined by Baig and Edwards from the perspective of configurational temperature [28,29,87] and found that the FIC phase corresponded to a configurational state of the material, as imposed by the flow, that could be as much as several decades below the kinetic temperature. In other words, the configurational state adopted by the system in response to the flow implied a molecular ordering of the chains that was consistent with a much lower effective temperature, possibly even lower then the nominal melting point.
The enthalpy change of the C 1000 H 2002 melt under an applied UEF at several D e is presented in Figure 10, where the enthalpy was calculated as H = E t o t + p V and E t o t is the ensemble-averaged sum of the potential and kinetic energies. At D e = 3.0 (and similarly for lower values), the enthalpy gradually decreases upon startup of flow, but this descent accelerates after one Hencky strain unit of deformation and eventually settles into a lower enthalpy state associated with the stretched liquid phase. This decrease in H is due to the changing configuration of the chains from random coils within the quiescent melt to highly elongated and aligned molecules in the stretched liquid phase, which represents a more favorable energy state once entropic forces have been overcome by the applied flow. At higher D e within the FIC regime, the rapid descent of enthalpy is much larger in magnitude before eventually levelling off to a steady-state value. Note that at D e = 9.0 , the decrease in enthalpy follows a two-step process in which there is an initial decrease to a stretched liquid state ( ε H < 4 ), followed by a further decrease to the FIC phase at ε H 7 . Evidently, a sufficient degree of ordering and stretching of the macromolecules is necessary before the FIC phase can begin to develop. At D e higher than 9.0, the ordering and alignment is sufficiently fast that the first step of the process blends in with the second. This is related to the formation and propagation of flow-enhanced nucleation events, which will be discussed later.
The heat of fusion of the semicrystalline phase grown under elongational flow can be estimated from the steady-state enthalpy at various D e and compared to the quiescent value (≈707.7 J/g) according to Δ H = H ( D e ) H ( 0 ) = Δ E t o t + Δ p V . Several steady-state values of enthalpy in the FIC region are computed as H ( 15 ) = 510.4 J/g, H ( 30 ) = 476.1 J/g, and H ( 60 ) = 439.0 J/g, which provide Δ H values of 197.3 , 231.6 , and 268.7 J/g, respectively. A similar value of 252 J/g was calculated at D e = 60.0 in the PEF simulations of Nafar Sefiddashti et al. [17]; note that this value was erroneously reported by the authors in Ref. [17] as 283.5 J/g. These values effectively quantify the amount of heat released upon stretching and packing the molecules into the semicrystalline phase. At D e = 9.0 , the enthalpy change associated with the stretched liquid state comprises about 50% of the total steady-state Δ H . This indicates that a substantial amount of the imposed elongational force is required to deform and orient the macromolecules, which subsequently can more readily pack into the monoclinic lattices of the semicrystalline phase (with a commensurate density reduction), as discussed below. The reported values are of similar magnitude and range to experimental heats of fusion for typical (linear) PEs, which range from 250 to 290 J/g for PEs with degrees of crystallinity covering a wide range of values (roughly, 60–90%) [73,74,75,88].
Specific heat capacity at constant pressure, C p , is plotted versus Hencky strain in Figure 11 under startup of UEF (panel a) and PEF (panel b) at several values of D e in the FIC regime. The quantity was calculated from the energy dispersion relationship used in N p T equilibrium molecular dynamics [89],
C p = E t o t 2 E t o t 2 k B T 2 ,
although there is no explicit guarantee that this expression remains valid away from equilibrium. As evident from the figure, this quantity fluctuated markedly, although the y-axes in the panels are magnified to accentuate the differences between the various curves, which serves to exaggerate the actual magnitude of the fluctuation. At low ε H , all curves emanate from the quiescent value of about 1.305 J/(g K). Note that for D e less than 9.0, where the PE melt remains in a liquid state, C p retains its quiescent value even under nonequilibrium conditions, as illustrated in panel (a) for UEF at D e = 0.6 . However, at D e inside the FIC regime, C p decreases slightly upon startup of flow in both UEF and PEF, ultimately approaching steady-state plateaus with values that decrease with increasing D e . Nevertheless, from the quiescent state to the steady-state value at D e = 60.0 (about 1.28 J/(g K)), the change in heat capacity is minimal (about 2%). Typical experimental values of specific heat capacities for polyethylenes generally range from 1.3–2.7 J/(g K) [88,90,91,92] at temperatures up to about 450 K. Hence the values computed from the NEMD simulations are at the low end of the range.
Ensemble-averaged measures of order, such as x and q, cannot provide any information concerning the heterogeneous, localized microstructure development that occurs under application of elongational flow. Recently, local thermodynamic-like variables at the atomistic level, such as entropy and enthalpy, were introduced as a means of quantifying the spatial and temporal evolution of flow-enhanced nucleation that spontaneously occurred in the C 1000 H 2002 melt under PEF at 450 K [16]. The advantage of these variables is that they are associated with each atom in the simulation, defined within a very small environment of that particular particle. They are thus defined based on very localized spatial averages, but no temporal averaging is applied. This implies that these variables can change from one time step to the next, and their time evolution can thus be tracked, rendering an efficient mechanism for observing flow-enhanced nucleation (FEN) events as they appear and grow in size or wane and fade away over the course of a simulation. A key aspect of these variables is their ability to distinguish between small liquid-like and crystalline-like regions within the bulk sample. Of course, these variables can also be ensemble-averaged, if desired, to provide a gross measure of the macroscopic entropy and enthalpy of the bulk liquid.
The local or atomistic entropy, S i , is estimated from the atomic radial distribution (pair correlation) function defined relative to particle i according to
S i = 2 π ρ N k B 0 r m [ g i ( r ) ln g i ( r ) g i ( r ) + 1 ] r 2 d r ,
where ρ N ( = 2.0 in LJ units for the quiescent liquid) is the overall particle number density, k B is Boltzmann’s constant, r is the spatial coordinate, and r m = 20 Å (5.1 in LJ units) is the cut-off limit for the integration [18]. g i ( r ) is the radial distribution function (RDF) centered at the i-th atom. (Note that the effect of particle density on atomic entropy was discussed extensively in Appendix A of Ref. [18]. The effects of the other parameters were analyzed in Appendix B of Ref. [18]. In addition, note that ρ N 2.0 in LJ units for the liquid state and higher for the semicrystalline state; its value was adjusted in accordance with the N p T simulations). The RDF is approximated as
g m i ( r ) = 1 4 π ρ N r 2 j 1 2 π σ 2 e ( r r i j ) 2 / ( 2 σ 2 ) ,
where r i j is the distance between atoms i and j (i.e., the neighbors of atom i) and σ (=0.07 in LJ units) is a broadening parameter [18]. The average local atomistic entropy, S ¯ i , is defined as
S ¯ i = j S j + S i N n e i g h + 1 ,
and it is used herein in lieu of S i to increase the resolution and continuity in distinguishing between different highly localized phases. In this expression, N n e i g h is the number of neighbors of atom i within a cut-off distance of r c = 9.83 Å (or 2.5 σ C H 2 ). One advantage of S i and S ¯ i over other measures of entropy is that they are defined only over a small neighborhood of a given particle, not ensemble-averaged over all particles within the simulation cell [18]. Therefore, they can distinguish local regions of liquid-like or solid-like behavior that coexist within an inhomogeneous sample. This can be a great aid to examining flow-enhanced nucleation and flow-induced crystallization, as discussed below.
The local or atomistic enthalpy is defined as H i = E i + ( p V ) / N , where p and V are the system pressure and volume, respectively, and N is the total number of particles. (An extensive discussion of this definition was provided in Appendix A of Ref. [18]). E i is the potential energy of atom i, which is readily calculated from the simulation output. The average local enthalpy, H ¯ i , is defined in a similar manner as the corresponding average local entropy, S i ¯ in Equation (13). It should be noted that the atomistic entropy and enthalpy were first introduced and used by Piaggi et al. [93] to distinguish between liquid and various solid crystalline phases of sodium and aluminium in molecular dynamics simulations. See Refs. [18,93] for additional details of the method and analysis of the numerical values of the model parameters in Equations (11)–(13).
By examining the 3-dimensional probability distribution functions of S ¯ i and H ¯ i for liquid and semicrystalline phases of the C 1000 H 2002 melt at 450 K (9.5745 in LJ units), the liquid-to-crystalline state threshold values for the average local entropy, S ¯ i t h , and enthalpy, H ¯ i t h , were determined as S ¯ i t h = 5.8 and H ¯ i t h = 7.0 , both expressed in reduced LJ units— see Figure 2 of Ref. [18]. In other words, particles occupying liquid-like local locations most likely possess a local entropy greater than 5.8 and a local enthalpy greater than 7.0, whereas the local entropy and enthalpy for particles in crystal-like neighborhoods would be less than 5.8 and less than 7.0, respectively. These threshold values provide a simple and direct criterion for distinguishing liquid and crystalline phases in MD simulations of polyethylene melts [18].
The local thermodynamic-like variables defined above can be ensemble averaged (with respect to space and time) to provide some bulk-scale measures of the atomistic energetics and local ordering of the PE melt under elongational flow. Note, however, that these quantities should not be interpreted as inherent thermodynamic properties of the fluid. For instance, the long-range configurational entropy of the polymer chains is not accounted for in the atomistic entropy expression for S i , nor the kinetic energy of the atoms included in the atomistic enthalpy calculation, and so on. Rather, these variables are in essence microstructural variables, such as q, whose magnitude provides a rough measure of system order. The advantage of using these ensemble-averaged variables over q is that they possess a clear discontinuity at phase transitions, which is completely lacking in q.
Figure 12a displays the steady-state ensemble-averaged local atomistic entropy, S i ¯ , and enthalpy, H i ¯ , as functions of D e for the PE melt under both UEF and PEF. Both quantities practically overlap for the UEF and PEF simulations, suggesting a minor difference between uniaxial and planar extension concerning the short-range or local configurational properties and energetic responses of entangled linear melts to these purely extensional flow fields. The average local entropies are practically independent of the flow strength in the range 0 D e < 9 , but exhibit a dramatic discontinuous drop at D e = 9 , again remaining constant at higher flow strengths. This discontinuity arises from a first-order type transition of a liquid to semicrystalline phase induced by the extensional flow. It is evident that the local ordering of the polymer is solely a function of the material phase and does not change with the flow strength and long-range orientation and stretching of the molecules. The local enthalpy behaves somewhat similarly in the sense that it exhibits a discontinuous drop at D e = 9 where the phase transition occurs. However, unlike S i ¯ , H i ¯ is a relatively weak decreasing function of D e in the liquid phase and a moderate descending function in the semicrystalline phase. This decreasing trend is attributed to the intermolecular LJ and torsional energies that continuously decrease even at very high D e as molecules stretch and the inherent dihedral angles assume more trans conformations, which consequently, allow segments of individual chains to approach each other and pack into definite crystal lattices, thereby reducing the intermolecular LJ energy—see also Figure 11b of Ref. [18].
Inspired by a thermodynamic Legendre transformation, an average local Gibbs free energy can be defined as G i ¯ = H i ¯ T S i ¯ . Figure 12b depicts the ensemble-average local atomic Gibbs free energy, G i ¯ , for UEF and PEF as a function of D e . Despite the large error bars, it is evident from this figure that the liquid and semicrystalline phases possess very different local Gibbs free energies, rendering this quantity a valuable phase assessment tool. Note that at high temperatures (such as 450 K), G i ¯ is dominated by the local entropy and seemingly not particularly informative; however, it was demonstrated previously [18] that the transient G i ¯ response exhibits a minimum at the initiation of FIC, which is an indication of FIC not manifested by either S i ¯ or H i ¯ individually. Using the stated values of S ¯ i t h = 5.8 and H ¯ i t h = 7.0 , and the dimensionless temperature corresponding to 450 K (9.5745), the threshold value of atomic Gibbs free energy is G i ¯ t h = 62.5 in LJ units. This quantity then provides a rather definitive value for distinguishing between liquid-like and solid-like behavior of the PE material, which can be exploited in the transient response of the melt under elongational flow.
To illustrate the use of local Gibbs energy in determining the state of the local microstructure in the PE material, Figure 13 displays snapshots of the simulation cell at various Hencky strain units for startup of UEF at D e = 9.0 . The atoms comprising the simulation box are colored in the instantaneous snapshots based on their individual values of G ¯ i , with cooler colors representing low values of G ¯ i and the opposite for warmer colors. Under quiescent conditions ( ε H = 0 ), almost all simulation atoms have G ¯ i values below the threshold value of G i ¯ t h = 62.5 ; however, there are a number of randomly-located localized regions (of roughly 5–10 Å in size) that possess G i ¯ t h > 62.5 , indicating a degree of crystal-like ordering. These nucleation sites tend to appear spontaneously for a brief period of time and then gradually fade away, like fireflies flashing over a grassy field at dusk. At 0 < ε H < 4 after inception of flow, these crystal-like nucleation sites continue to appear spontaneously and then fade away at random locations under flow, but in greater number and possibly a larger overall dimension. (To date, work continues on a viable method to quantify the size and kinetics of this flow-enhanced nucleation.) At 4 < ε H < 6 , the nucleates stabilize and begin to increase in size rapidly, ultimately forming into relatively large crystallites on the order of 50 Å in diameter.
We hypothesize that the onset of the phase transition behavior at ε H 4 of the D e = 9.0 simulation discussed above originates from random (with respect to space and time) flow-enhanced nucleation events of local crystal-like order that appear within small localized regions of the sample. At D e < 9.0 , these fluctuating nucleates are unstable, possessing very short lifetimes, and disappear rapidly after formation before they can stabilize into localized semicrystalline regions. It is worth emphasizing that these random FEN events occur at all flow strengths, even under quiescent conditions (see the first snapshot at ε h = 0 of Figure 13). At higher D e ( 9.0 ) , once a critical value of strain deformation has been attained ( ε H > 4 for D e = 9.0 , but around two strain units for higher D e ), these nucleates stabilize and begin to grow in size, developing into stable crystalline domains that eventually enlarge to a global steady-state FIC phase (at ε H > 6 ).
An important aspect of FIC from both theoretical and practical perspectives is the kinetics of nucleation and crystallization. The threshold values of the local thermodynamic-like variables provide a means to delineate and quantify phase transitions in atomistic simulations. Since these quantities are computed for individual atomic units, they can be conveniently used to determine an average concentration or size for the liquid and semicrystalline phases at each time step of simulation. Such information conceptually facilitates the quantification of the dynamic process of crystallization (or melting), hence enabling measurement of the kinetics of the FIC process. Using these threshold values, the number of particles occupying liquid-like, N l , and crystalline-like, N c , neighborhoods, can be calculated, respectively, as the number of particles whose S i ¯ > S ¯ i t h and S i ¯ < S ¯ i t h . The fraction of atoms occupying liquid and semicrystalline states are given by N l ˜ = N l / N t o t and N c ˜ = N c / N t o t = 1 N l ˜ , where N t o t = N l + N c is the total number of particles (united atoms) in the simulation cell.
In prior work [18], a first-order reversible reaction ( L S ) between the liquid and semicrystalline states (or localized domains within the simulation cell) was proposed [18], and an expression was derived for quantifying the fraction of liquid-like particles within the simulation box as
N l ˜ ( t ) = N ˜ l , s s + [ N l ˜ ( 0 ) N ˜ l , s s ] e ( k 1 + k 1 ) t ,
where k 1 and k 1 are the forward and reverse reaction rate constants with
N ˜ l , s s = k 1 k 1 + k 1 = 1 K + 1 ,
where N ˜ l , s s is the fraction of atoms occupying local liquid-like environments at steady state and K = k 1 / k 1 is the equilibrium constant—see Ref. [18] for more details. The overall degree of crystallinity can be approximated as χ = 1 N ˜ l , s s = K / ( K + 1 ) , which is essentially the steady-state fraction of particles occupying a semicrystalline local state.
The fraction for the liquid-like phase upon startup of the C 1000 H 2002 melt under UEF at various D e is depicted in Figure 14 as a function of the Hencky strain (dimensionless time). It is apparent that the system remains liquid-like at D e = 3 with a value of N ˜ l 1 at all times, in agreement with all other evidence discussed in this section. At D e = 9 , however, N ˜ l 1 only up to ε H 4 , at which time the fraction of liquid-like particles begins to drop precipitously, plateauing at a low value of approximately 0.15 once steady state has been attained at ε H 6 . The behavior of N ˜ l at higher D e is qualitatively similar, although the onset of crystallization shifts to lower Hencky strains ranging from 2.0–2.5. These results are in agreement with the observed FIC onset in terms of ε H of prior PEF simulations [18]. The longer delay of FIC at D e = 9 arises from the fact that the dominant phase of the system at this critical flow strength is liquid up to ε H 4 when the crystallization initiated via flow-enhanced nucleation events (that are randomly located throughout the sample) begins to develop from stable nuclei—see Figure 8a, Figure 10 and Figure 13.
Table 2 summarizes the forward, k 1 , and reverse, k 1 , rate constants obtained from a nonlinear least-squares fitting of N l ˜ data versus time (after excluding the initial lag times) to Equation (14) for D e 9 under steady-state UEF. The equilibrium constants, K, densities of the semicrystalline phase, ρ c , and degrees (percentages) of crystallinity, χ , are also listed. The corresponding values from the PEF simulations (see Table 2 of Ref. [18]) are displayed in parentheses for comparison. It is evident from these values that the forward rate constants increase almost linearly with flow strength, implying a faster FIC at higher D e . The reverse rate constants, equilibrium constants, and χ also increase with flow strength, although with significantly smaller slope values than that of k 1 . Furthermore, the corresponding values of PEF agree reasonably well with the UEF values: the PEF rate constants are slightly higher than those of UEF at all D e , however, their ratio, and therefore the equilibrium constants and degrees of crystallinity under PEF are slightly lower than the corresponding UEF values. Consequently, direct evidence once again indicates that UEF has stronger orientation and ordering capability than PEF. The values of ρ c and χ are quite reasonable based on observations from experiments of stretched PE samples [77,78,79,80].
The semicrystalline phase developed under flow via FIC using NEMD simulations can be characterized in terms of the radial distribution (pair correlation) function and structure factor, which allow direct comparison with spectroscopic experimental data. Figure 15 displays the total RDF, g ( r ) , and intermolecular pair correlation function, g i n t e r ( r ) (inset) of the C 1000 H 2002 melt at equilibrium ( D e = 0 ) and under UEF (solid lines) and PEF (dashed lines) for two representative extension rates, the lower ( D e = 3 ) depicting a stretched liquid state and the larger ( D e = 15.0 ) a semicrystalline phase. The first point to notice in this figure is the virtually identical curves of UEF and PEF at corresponding values of D e , indicating negligible influence of the geometry of extensional flows on the short to medium length-scale ordering and microstructure of the molecules; this observation agrees very well with the overlapping curves of S i ¯ , H i ¯ , and G i ¯ observed in Figure 12.
As discussed by Nafar Sefiddashti et al. [18], there are five prominent peaks in each total RDF ( g ( r ) ) at positions 1.54, 2.58, 3.14, 4.04, and 5.16 Å (relative to the test atom at r = 0 ), respectively denoting the bond distance (1,2 carbon atoms), bond angle (1,3 atoms), a gauche configuration, and trans configurations (1,4 and 1,5 atoms)—see Figure 9 of Ref. [41]. These peaks are present at all D e , but the relative heights of the last three change with increasing D e : the peak at 3.14 Å shrinks as the number of gauche dihedral angles diminishes as the molecules extend, whereas the last two peaks grow in height due to the increasing number of trans dihedral angles. At higher distances from the test atom ( r > 6 Å ), the equilibrium and D e = 3.0 distributions practically overlap since neither liquid possess any long-range order; however, at D e = 15.0 , evident long-range ordering persists out to 20–25 Å.
The intermolecular distributions ( g i n t e r ( r ) ) at D e = 0 , 3.0 (shown in the inset of Figure 15) possess two distinct peaks at 5.46 and 10.34 Å, but practically no long-range order beyond the second nearest neighbor shell is observed. This suggests significant local longitudinal ordering of the stretched liquid-phase molecules along the flow direction at D e = 3.0 , but very little lateral ordering of the individual chains perpendicular to their common axis of orientation. At D e = 15.0 , however, the first two peaks of the intermolecular RDF shift slightly to the left at positions 5.10 and 9.48 Å, indicating a relatively higher density in the semicrystalline phase. The N p T ensemble simulations allow calculation of the density change due to crystallization, as the simulation cell dimensions are adjusted by the applied barostat. The simulation results show a 15–17.5% increase in the system density in the range 9.0 D e 60.0 for the semicrystalline phase compared to the quiescent melt at 450 K, as tabulated in Table 2. Furthermore, the g i n t e r ( r ) curve at D e = 15.0 has several additional peaks beyond the second one, indicating long-range intermolecular packing of the semicrystalline structure. These additional peaks decay after approximately 20–25 Å, indicating crystallites on the order of 50 Å in diameter. With the degree of crystallinity at roughly 90% at steady state, this implies that the various nucleation sites formed at small strains and random locations grow in size under continued strain and eventually encroach upon each other (see Figure 13), but do not merge together to form a single larger crystallite. It is therefore likely that there exist dislocation (and possibly disclination) defects lying between them.
The global ordering of the FIC state is depicted in Figure 16a for a random slab of width 11.8 Å (oriented perpendicularly to the direction of flow) of the PE semicrystalline phase produced under steady-state UEF at D e = 60.0 . In this snapshot, taken at a random time step within the steady-state regime, atoms occupying different molecules have been assigned various assorted colors, whereas atoms belonging to the same molecule all possess the same color. Most of the molecules shown in the snapshot appear as single dots because the molecules are almost fully aligned axially, and the snapshot is perpendicular to the direction of alignment. Throughout the sample, semicrystalline order is apparent, interlaced with small regions of amorphous character.
The pair correlation function for a random slab of 3 Å width (oriented perpendicularly to the direction of flow) of the semicrystalline state at D e = 60.0 is displayed in Figure 16b. A very narrow slab was chosen to minimize the peak-broadening effects on g ( r ) from the axial (z) dimension; this allows for a much more accurate calculation of the crystal lattice parameters in the xy plane, as discussed shortly. The first tall, narrow peak at 1.54 Å is associated with the carbon-carbon (1,2) bond distance. The second peak corresponds to the (1,3) carbon distance of 2.58 Å. The reason this peak is so small is because the slab is only 3 Å thick, and the molecules are mostly aligned axially such that these chain units are perpendicular to the slab; therefore, very few of these units lie within the slab chosen for the calculation. This distance represents the lattice vector b. The next two peaks are associated with lattice vectors c (4.73 Å) and a (8.72 Å), respectively. The fact that all three vectors are of unequal length, and since angles a b and b c are orthogonal whereas a c is not, indicates a monoclinic lattice structure. Seto et al. [79] indexed a linear PE material formed under mechanical stress to a monoclinic lattice with a = 8.09 , b = 2.53 , and c = 4.79 Å, which agrees reasonably well with the simulation results. The PEF simulations generated lattice parameters of a = 8.68 , b = 2.58 , and c = 4.44 Å [17], which also agree well with the UEF and experimental values.
A method for characterizing and distinguishing liquid-like and crystal-like microstructures using MD data that offers direct comparison to experimental data is to calculate the static structure factor from the Fourier transform of the total radial distribution function, g ( r ) . The structure factor can then be directly compared to experimental crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) data. Figure 17 presents the structure factors for the simulated C 1000 H 2002 melt at 450 K under equilibrium conditions ( D e = 0.0 ; blue curve) and steady-state UEF at D e = 60.0 (orange curve). In addition, there are the structure factors determined using XRD experiments for a n-eicosane liquid at 315 K (green curve) and at 298 K for a quiescently grown crystal [27]. A comparison of the structure factors for the C 1000 H 2002 melt at D e = 0 and 450 K and eicosane at 315 K reveals a direct overlap of the two curves at essentially all wavenumbers, one simulated and the other obtained from experiment. This provides reasonable evidence for the accuracy of the SKS potential model for alkane and PE materials. Both structure factors display characteristics of liquid alkane materials, as discussed elsewhere [27]. Of more importance, however, are the S ( k ) profiles for the simulated melt at D e = 60.0 and the experimental XRD data of the eicosane crystal, where the simulated PE exhibits distinct Bragg peaks at low wavenumbers that correspond closely to similar peaks in the experimental eicosane crystal, which was indexed to a triclinic crystal arrangement with lattice vector dimensions a = 4.322 Å , b = 4.7999 Å , and c = 27.43 Å , where the final value lies along the axis of the fully extended eicosane molecules constituting the crystalline material. The overall degree of similarity between the simulated and experimental S ( k ) curves provide additional evidence of the occurrence of FIC in the simulated PE melt under UEF. Note that a more detailed comparison between simulation and experimental S(k) can be found for PEF in Ref. [17].

3.2. The Role of Kuhn Segment Stretching in Flow-Induced Crystallization

As mentioned in Section 2, the Kuhn segment length was calculated from the equilibrium simulation of the PE melt as 15.6 Å, comprised of 12 methylene units lying in a single plane, corresponding to all torsional dihedral angles occupying trans configurations. Hence the entire macromolecule consists of 83 Kuhn segments. However, plotting the probability distribution functions of the magnitude of the end-to-end vector of these segments, | R K | , as displayed in Figure 18 at various D e for both UEF (panel a) and PEF (panel b), revealed that the quoted length is actually the contour length of the Kuhn segments, not their end-to-end length, which takes on a rather wide distribution of magnitudes but rarely assumes the fully extended value of 15.6 Å. Even at intermediate D e = 0.3 , 0.6 , 1.0 , these distributions essentially overlap the equilibrium PDF (not shown) with a mean of 11.8 Å and a peak at 12.8 Å, indicating that the Kuhn segments are significantly arced or bow-shaped. The distributions approach the null value on the left side around 8 Å, indicating the persistence length of the segments (which is roughly half the Kuhn length, as might have been expected), but they also approach the null value on the right side significantly below 15.6 Å, indicating the presence of essentially no fully extended segments. According to the SKS model, the torsional energy is minimized when all dihedral angles of the Kuhn segment are in the trans configuration (see Equation (6)), implying full extension, but the intramolecular LJ energy applies an attraction between carbon atoms within the segment separated by more than three bonds (see Equation (2)), which serves to collapse the segment into a bent structure.
As D e increases into the stretched liquid state ( D e = 1.5 , 3.0 ), the PDFs of the Kuhn segment magnitude shifts to the right and narrows, indicating that the segments are being extended by the flow. The effective persistence length, herein defined by the approach to the null value on the left side of the distribution, shifts higher to approximately 10 Å. These PDFs also tend to exhibit a small shoulder on the right side, indicating a slight fraction of fully extended Kuhn segments. At D e where FIC has occurred ( D e 9.0 ), however, the peaks of the PDFs become quite large and are positioned at the maximum segmental extension of 15.6 Å, indicating that the majority of segments are fully extended. There remains a small shoulder on the left side of the PDFs located at about 14.5 Å, which is associated with the existence of a single gauche dihedral angle at either end of the segment (see the bottom right stick diagram in Figure 9 of Ref. [41] and add 6 × 1.29 Å). The mean of these FIC distributions is 14.65 Å, and the effective persistence length has increased to approximately 12.5 Å. Over the entire range of D e simulated, the PDFs under UEF and PEF essentially overlap each other at corresponding values of D e .
In Figure 2 at D e = 9.0 , the mean fractional extension begins to develop a steady-state value of x 0.85 at 2 < ε H < 4 corresponding to a stretched liquid state, followed by a rapid extension to the final steady-state value of x 0.95 over the range 4 < ε H < 6 , which corresponds to an FIC phase. At a maximum extension length of 1290 Å, this difference amounts to 129 Å in molecular extension between the semicrystalline and stretched liquid phases, or 1.5 Å per Kuhn segment (based on 83 Kuhn segments per macromolecule). The peaks of the Kuhn segment PDFs in the stretched liquid state are observed at | R K | 13.8 Å. An additional 1.5 Å renders | R K | 15.4 Å, which is very nearly the maximum molecular extension. Hence this last bit of extension appears to be absolutely necessary to transition from the stretched liquid state to the semicrystalline phase.
A plot of the startup behavior of UEF at D e = 9.0 of the mean Kuhn segment magnitude, | R K | , and average number of chain kinks, Z k , as functions of Hencky strain units is displayed in Figure 19. The mean length of the Kuhn segments remains at its quiescent liquid value of 11.8 Å until ε H 0.6 , after which it rises rapidly before approaching a steady-state plateau at 13.75 Å corresponding to a stretched liquid phase at ε H 4 . During this same period of time, the entanglement network has been completely destroyed, as evident from the average number of chain kinks, which has decreased from its quiescent value of 24.3 to practically 0. At ε H = 4 , the Kuhn segments begin to extend further while flow-induced crystallization is initiated, until the process attains a new steady-state at ε H 6 where the Kuhn segments are almost fully extended. It appears evident that 13.75 Å is a critical value of extension of the Kuhn segments before FIC can commence, and this value can only be achieved once the chain network is virtually completely disentangled, which occurs once the Kuhn segments of the individual molecules are all aligned along the flow direction end-to-end with a common axis. The additional extension (about 1.5 Å per segment, as mentioned above) of the Kuhn segments beyond the stretched liquid condition is apparently the primary driver of FIC, since all molecular extension within the range 4 ε H 6 appears to be at the length scale of the Kuhn segments.
These results imply that flow-induced crystallization is not possible until the flow is strong enough to extend almost fully the majority of the Kuhn segments of the constituent chain-like macromolecules. This is physically sensible because crystallization occurs due to the lateral alignment of the extended molecules into local nucleates on the order of tens of Angstroms, and the lateral packing required to develop the observed monoclinic crystalline microstructures is only possible once the bow-like shape of the Kuhn segments has been almost fully straightened out. This appears to be possible once the entanglement network has been almost completely destroyed (which occurs at D e = 3.0 in the steady-state data of Figure 5a). Hence a sufficiently strong applied elongational flow that mandates an almost full extension of the Kuhn segments appears to be a prerequisite for FIC in this linear PE melt.

4. Conclusions

The atomistic simulations of the C1000H2002 melt undergoing steady-state and startup of uniaxial elongational flow reported herein complement those of prior simulations of the same polyethylene melt under planar elongational flow [7,8,17,18]. Indeed, most of the results regarding rheological, topological, and microstructural properties under both types of flow generally overlapped at corresponding values of D e . This provided an indication of the universality of the observed properties since the different types of simulations, UEF and PEF, N V T and N p T , employed vastly different cell sizes and boundary conditions, yet still produced mutually consistent results at comparable Deborah numbers. Both types of flow generated a configurationally based microphase separation over similar D e ranges, although the geometry of the bicontinuous phase was consistent with the geometry of the type of applied elongational flow. Both types of flow generated a flow-induced semicrystalline material at high D e , with no apparent differences based on type of flow. However, the formation of the FIC phase was apparently predicated by the extension of the Kuhn segments constituting the polyethylene macromolecules. The FIC material possessed a nominal melting point roughly 35–40 K over the melting point of a quiescently formed crystal, and the heat of fusion and heat capacity of the simulations FIC phase compared favorably with experimentally determined values. Overall, the flow-induced phase separation and crystallization behavior was evidently a universal feature of elongational flows.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.N.S. and B.J.E.; Formal analysis, M.H.N.S. and B.J.E.; Funding acquisition, B.J.E. and B.K.; Methodology, M.H.N.S. and B.J.E.; Project administration, B.J.E. and B.K.; Resources, B.J.E. and B.K.; Supervision, B.J.E.; Writing—original draft, M.H.N.S. and B.J.E.; Writing—editing and review, B.J.E. and B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CBET-1602890. The simulations were partially performed on the computational resources at the Infrastructure for Scientific Applications and Advanced Computing (ISAAC), supported by the University of Tennessee–Knoxville, and SUMMIT at the ORNL Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) at The University of Texas at Austin for providing HPC resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Laun, H.; Schuch, H. Transient elongational viscosities and drawability of polymer melts. J. Rheol. 1989, 33, 119–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nielsen, J.K.; Rasmussen, H.K.; Hassager, O.; McKinley, G.H. Elongational viscosity of monodisperse and bidisperse polystyrene melts. J. Rheol. 2006, 50, 453–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Huang, Q.; Mednova, O.; Rasmussen, H.K.; Alvarez, N.J.; Skov, A.L.; Almdal, K.; Hassager, O. Concentrated polymer solutions are different from melts: Role of entanglement molecular weight. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 5026–5035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wingstrand, S.L.; Alvarez, N.J.; Huang, Q.; Hassager, O. Linear and nonlinear universality in the rheology of polymer melts and solutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 078302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Costanzo, S.; Huang, Q.; Ianniruberto, G.; Marrucci, G.; Hassager, O.; Vlassopoulos, D. Shear and extensional rheology of polystyrene melts and solutions with the same number of entanglements. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 3925–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ianniruberto, G.; Marrucci, G.; Masubuchi, Y. Melts of linear polymers in fast flows. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 5023–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Communication: A coil-stretch transition in planar elongational flow of an entangled polymeric melt. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 141103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Configurational microphase separation in elongational flow of an entangled polymer liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 247802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B.; Shaqfeh, E.S. A theory for the coexistence of coiled and stretched configurational phases in the extensional flow of entangled polymer melts. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 204907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boudaghi, M.; Nafar Seddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Elucidating the role of network topology dynamics on the coil-stretch transition hysteresis in extensional flow of entangled polymer melts. J. Rheol. 2022, 66, 551–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fuller, G.G.; Leal, L.G. Flow birefringence of concentrated polymer solutions in two-dimensional flows. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1981, 19, 557–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cromer, M.; Villet, M.C.; Fredrickson, G.H.; Gary Leal, L.; Stepanyan, R.; Bulters, M.J.H. Concentration fluctuations in polymer solutions under extensional flow. J. Rheol. 2013, 57, 1211–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hashimoto, T.; Murase, H.; Ohta, Y. A new scenario of flow-induced shish-kebab formation in entangled polymer solutions. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 6542–6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wingstrand, S.L.; Imperiali, L.; Stepanyan, R.; Hassager, O. Extension induced phase separation and crystallization in semidilute solutions of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Polymer 2018, 136, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhang, W.; Larson, R.G. Tension-induced nematic phase separation in bidisperse homopolymer melts. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 1545–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Flow-induced phase separation and crystallization in entangled polyethylene solutions under elongational flow. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 6432–6451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Flow-induced crystallization of a polyethylene liquid above the melting temperature and its nonequilibrium phase diagram. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 013035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. A thermodynamically inspired method for quantifying phase transitions in polymeric liquids with application to flow-induced crystallization of a polyethylene melt. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 10487–10502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Keller, A.; Machin, M.J. Oriented crystallization in polymers. J. Macromol. Sci. 1967, B1, 41–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hill, M.J.; Keller, A. Direct evidence for distinctive, stress-induced nucleus crystals in the crystallization of oriented polymer melts. J. Macromol. Sci. 1969, B3, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mackley, M.R.; Keller, A. Flow induced crystallization of polyethylene melts. Polymer 1973, 14, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nadkami, V.M.; Schultz, J.M. Extensional flow-induced crystallization in polyethylene melt spinning. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 1977, 15, 2151–2183. [Google Scholar]
  23. McHugh, A.J.; Forrest, E.H. A discussion of nucleation and growth in flow-induced crystallization from solution and an improved model for the growth process. J. Macromol. Sci. 1975, B11, 219–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McHugh, A.J.; Guy, R.K.; Tree, D.A. Extensional flow-induced crystallization of a polyethylene melt. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1993, 271, 629–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Blundell, D.J.; MacKerron, D.H.; Fuller, W.; Mahendrasingam, A.; Martin, C.; Oldman, R.J.; Rule, R.J.; Riekel, C. Characterization of strain-induced crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) at fast draw rates using synchrotron radiation. Polymer 1996, 37, 3303–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lavine, M.S.; Waheed, N.; Rutledge, G.C. Molecular dynamics simulation of orientation and crystallization of polyethylene during uniaxial extension. Polymer 2003, 44, 1771–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ionescu, T.; Baig, C.; Edwards, B.J.; Keffer, D.J.; Habenschuss, A. Structure formation under steady-state isothermal planar elongational flow of n-eicosane: A comparison between simulation and experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 037802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Baig, C.; Edwards, B.J. Atomistic simulation of flow-induced crystallization at constant temperature. EPL 2010, 89, 36003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baig, C.; Edwards, B.J. Atomistic simulation of crystallization of a polyethylene melt in steady uniaxial extension. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 2010, 165, 992–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ko, M.J.; Waheed, N.; Lavine, M.S.; Rutledge, G.C. Characterization of polyethylene crystallization from an oriented melt by molecular dynamics simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 2823–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yi, P.; Rutledge, G.C. Molecular simulation of bundle-like crystal nucleation from n-eicosane melts. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 024903. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Yi, P.; Locker, C.R.; Rutledge, G.C. Molecular dynamics simulation of homogeneous crystal nucleation in polyethylene. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 4723–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Nicholson, D.A.; Rutledge, G.C. Molecular simulation of flow-enhanced nucleation in n-eicosane melts under steady shear and uniaxial extension. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 145, 244903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Anwar, M.; Turci, F.; Schilling, T. Crystallization mechanism in melts of short n-alkane chains. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 214904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sliozberg, Y.R.; Yeh, I.-C.; Kröger, M.; Masser, K.A.; Lenhart, J.L.; Andzelm, J.W. Ordering and crystallization of entangled polyethylene melts under uniaxial tension: A molecular dynamics study. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 9635–9648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nicholson, D.A.; Rutledge, G.C. Flow-induced inhomogeneity and enhanced nucleation in a long alkane melt. Polymer 2020, 200, 122605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marrucci, G.; Ianniruberto, G. Interchain pressure effect in extensional flows of entangled polymer melts. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 3934–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ianniruberto, G.; Brasiello, A.; Marrucci, G. Friction coefficient does not stay constant in nonlinear viscoelasticity. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual European Rheology Conference, Suzdal, Russia, 10–14 May 2011; p. 61. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yaoita, T.; Isaki, T.; Masubuchi, Y.; Watanabe, H.; Ianniruberto, G.; Marrucci, G. Primitive chain network simulation of elongational flows of entangled linear chains: Stretch/orientation-induced reduction of monomeric friction. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 2773–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, Q.; Hengeller, L.; Alvarez, N.J.; Hassager, O. Bridging the gap between polymer melts and solutions in extensional rheology. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 4158–4163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Edwards, B.J.; Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Khomami, B. Atomistic simulation of shear flow of linear alkane and polyethylene liquids: A 50-year retrospective. J. Rheol. 2022, 66, 415–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Graham, R.S. Understanding flow-induced crystallization in polymers: A perspective on the role of molecular simulations. J. Rheol. 2019, 63, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. De Gennes, P. Coil-stretch transition of dilute flexible polymers under ultrahigh velocity gradients. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 60, 5030–5042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Boudaghi-Khajehnobar, M.; Edwards, B.; Khomami, B. High-fidelity scaling relationships for determining dissipative particle dynamics parameters from atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of polymeric liquids. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Likhtman, A.E.; Graham, R.S. Simple constitutive equation for linear polymer melts derived from molecular theory: Rolie-Poly equation. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 2003, 114, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Z.; Ju, J.; Yang, J.; Ma, Z.; Liu, D.; Cui, K.; Yang, H.; Chang, J.; Huang, N.; Li, L. The non-equilibrium phase diagrams of flow-induced crystallization and melting of polyethylene. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kraynik, A.M.; Reinelt, D.A. Extensional motions of spatially periodic lattices. Inter. J. Multiph. Flow 1992, 18, 1045–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nguyen, D.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Sridhar, T. Response of an entangled polymer solution to uniaxial and planar deformation. J. Rheol. 2015, 59, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dobson, M. Periodic boundary conditions for long-time nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of incompressible flows. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 184103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hunt, T.A. Periodic boundary conditions for the simulation of uniaxial extensional flow of arbitrary duration. Mol. Simul. 2016, 42, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Murashima, T.; Hagita, K.; Kawakatsu, T. Elongational viscosity of weakly entangled polymer melt via coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulation. Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi 2018, 46, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. O’Connor, T.C.; Alvarez, N.J.; Robbins, M.O. Relating chain conformations to extensional stress in entangled polymer melts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 047801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Edwards, B.J.; Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Khomami, B. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of polymeric liquids via atomistic simulation. Entropy 2022, 24, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Siepmann, J.I.; Karaborni, S.; Smit, B. Simulating the critical properties of complex fluids. Nature 1993, 365, 330–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Mundy, C.J.; Siepmann, J.I.; Klein, M.L. Calculation of the shear viscosity of decane using a reversible multiple time-step algorithm. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 3376–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moore, J.; Cui, S.; Cochran, H.; Cummings, P. A molecular dynamics study of a short-chain polyethylene melt.: I. steady-state shear. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 2000, 93, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Baig, C.; Edwards, B.J.; Keffer, D.J.; Cochran, H.D. A proper approach for nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of planar elongational flow. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 114103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ionescu, T.; Mavrantzas, V.G.; Keffer, D.J.; Edwards, B.J. Atomistic simulation of energetic and entropic elasticity in short-chain polyethylenes. J. Rheol. 2008, 52, 567–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hoover, W.G. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Tuckerman, M.E.; Mundy, C.J.; Balasubramanian, S.; Klein, M.L. Modified non-equilibrium molecular dynamics for fluid flows with energy convservation. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 5615–5621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Individual molecular dynamics of an entangled polyethylene melt undergoing steady shear flow: Steady-state and transient dynamics. Polymers 2019, 11, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Elucidating the molecular rheology of entangled polymeric fluids via comparison of atomistic simulations and model predictions. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 8124–8143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Individual chain dynamics of a polyethylene melt undergoing steady shear flow. J. Rheol. 2015, 59, 119–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Steady shearing flow of a moderately entangled polyethylene liquid. J. Rheol. 2016, 60, 1227–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Edwards, C.N.; Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. In-plane and out-of-plane rotational motion of individual chain molecules in steady shear flow of polymer melts and solutions. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2018, 81, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Doi, M.; Edwards, S.F. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kröger, M. Shortest multiple disconnected path for the analysis of entanglements in two-and three-dimensional polymeric systems. Comp. Phys. Commun. 2005, 168, 209–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Karayiannis, N.C.; Kröger, M. Combined molecular algorithms for the generation, equilibration and topological analysis of entangled polymers: Methodology and performance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 5054–5089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Fetters, L.J.; Lohse, D.J.; Milner, S.T.; Graessley, W.W. Packing length influence in linear polymer melts on the entanglement, critical, and reptation molecular weights. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 6847–6851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Irving, J.H.; Kirkwood, J.G. Statistical mechanical theory of transport processes. IV. The equations of hydrodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18, 817–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wunderlich, B.; Cormier, C.M. Heat of fusion of polytheylene. J. Polym. Sci. Part A-2 1967, 5, 987–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mathot, V.B.F.; Pijpers, M.F.J. Heat capacity, enthalpy and crystallinity for a linear polyethylene obtained by DSC. J. Therm. Anal. 1983, 28, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Peacock, A.J. Handbook of Polyethylene: Structure, Properties, and Applications; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hikosaka, M.; Tsukijima, K.; Rastogi, S.; Keller, A. Equilibrium triple point pressure and pressure-temperature phase diagram of polyethylene. Polymer 1992, 33, 2502–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Teare, P.W.; Holmes, D.R. Extra reflections in the X-ray diffraction pattern of polyethylenes and polymethylenes. J. Polym. Sci. 1957, 24, 496–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Turner-Jones, A. The triclinic crystal form of polymethylenes and polyethylenes. J. Polym. Sci. 1962, 24, S53–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Seto, T.; Hara, T.; Tanaka, K. Phase transformation and deformation processes in oriented polyethylene. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1968, 7, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Russell, K.E.; Hunter, B.K.; Heyding, R.D. Monoclinic polyethylene revisited. Polymer 1997, 38, 1409–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Monks, A.W.; White, H.M.; Bassett, D.C. On shish-kebab morphologies in crystalline polymers. Polymer 1996, 37, 5933–5936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hobbs, J.K.; Miles, M.J. Direct observation of polyethylene shish-kebab crystallization using in-situ atomic force microscopy. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Somani, R.H.; Yang, L.; Zhu, L.; Hsiao, B.S. Flow-induced shish-kebab precursor structures in entangled polymer melts. Polymer 2005, 46, 8587–8623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Tan, V.; Gogos, C.G. Flow-induced crystallization of linear polyethylene above its normal melting point. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1976, 16, 512–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Toda, A. Growth of polyethylene single crystals from the melt: Change in lateral habit and regime I–II transition. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1992, 270, 667–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zubova, E.A. Chapter Polymorphism and Melting in Crystalline polyethylene and alkanes: Molecular dynamics simulations. In Encyclopedia of Polymers and Composites; Palsule, S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  87. Baig, C.; Edwards, B.J. Analysis of the configurational temperature of polymeric liquids under shear and elongational flows using nonequilibrium molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 184906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Shang, S.S. Heat capacities of polyethylene from 2 to 360 K. II. Two high density linear polyethylene samples and thermodynamic properties of crystalline linear polyethylene. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. A Phys. Chem. 1974, 78A, 387–400. [Google Scholar]
  89. Allen, M.P.; Tildesley, D.J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  90. Atkinson, C.M.L.; Larkin, J.A.; Richardson, M.J. Enthalpy changes in molten n-alkanes and polyethylene. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1969, 1, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Guar, U.; Wunderlichn, B. Heat capacity and other thermodynamic properties of linear macromolecules. II. Polyethylene. J. Chem. Phys, Ref. Data 1981, 10, 119–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Guar, U.; Wunderlich, B. Heat capacity and other thermodynamic properties of linear macromolecules. IV. Polypropylene. J. Chem. Phys, Ref. Data 1981, 10, 1051–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Piaggi, P.M.; Valsson, O.; Parrinello, M. Enhancing entropy and enthalpy fluctuations to drive crystallization in atomistic simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 015701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Mean fractional extension, x , as a function of Hencky strain, ε H , for startup of elongational flow at various values of D e : solid lines correspond to UEF and dotted lines to PEF. (b) Steady-state probability distribution functions, p ( R g ) , of the molecular radius of gyration, R g , at various values of D e in both UEF and PEF. Panels (c,d) display steady-state probability distribution functions, p ( x ) , of the fractional extension at various values of D e ; (c) displays p ( x ) at lower D e whereas (d) presents p ( x ) at high D e where FIC was observed. (e) Fractional extension vs. ε H for several selected individual chains undergoing startup of UEF at D e = 0.6 depicting the gradual transitioning of molecules between coiled and stretched configurations. (f) Steady-state mean fractional extension versus D e for UEF and PEF; blue symbols denote UEF data and orange symbols denote data taken from PEF simulations. Vertical dashed lines delineate approximate boundaries of various configurational states or phases: C, S, and M denote coiled liquid, stretched liquid, and predominantly monoclinic semicrystalline states, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) Mean fractional extension, x , as a function of Hencky strain, ε H , for startup of elongational flow at various values of D e : solid lines correspond to UEF and dotted lines to PEF. (b) Steady-state probability distribution functions, p ( R g ) , of the molecular radius of gyration, R g , at various values of D e in both UEF and PEF. Panels (c,d) display steady-state probability distribution functions, p ( x ) , of the fractional extension at various values of D e ; (c) displays p ( x ) at lower D e whereas (d) presents p ( x ) at high D e where FIC was observed. (e) Fractional extension vs. ε H for several selected individual chains undergoing startup of UEF at D e = 0.6 depicting the gradual transitioning of molecules between coiled and stretched configurations. (f) Steady-state mean fractional extension versus D e for UEF and PEF; blue symbols denote UEF data and orange symbols denote data taken from PEF simulations. Vertical dashed lines delineate approximate boundaries of various configurational states or phases: C, S, and M denote coiled liquid, stretched liquid, and predominantly monoclinic semicrystalline states, respectively.
Polymers 15 01831 g001
Figure 2. Time evolution of fractional extension of all molecules after startup of UEF at various D e plotted in terms of Hencky strain, ε H . Each individual molecular trajectory is plotted using a line of randomly chosen color.
Figure 2. Time evolution of fractional extension of all molecules after startup of UEF at various D e plotted in terms of Hencky strain, ε H . Each individual molecular trajectory is plotted using a line of randomly chosen color.
Polymers 15 01831 g002
Figure 3. Transient snapshots at various values of Hencky strain of the PE melt undergoing startup of UEF at D e = 0.6. Individual macromolecules are assigned a color based on their fractional extension: cooler colors denote relatively coiled chains whereas warmer colors imply stretched chains. The bottom right snapshot is the same as the upper left snapshot corresponding to ε H = 0 , except that the colors of the individual molecules are assigned according to the final steady-state extension, not that which they possessed at t = 0 . Note that the boxes are displayed at random angles (and sizes) relative to the flow direction because the simulation cell rotates (and elongates/compresses) with time under UEF due to the imposed boundary conditions.
Figure 3. Transient snapshots at various values of Hencky strain of the PE melt undergoing startup of UEF at D e = 0.6. Individual macromolecules are assigned a color based on their fractional extension: cooler colors denote relatively coiled chains whereas warmer colors imply stretched chains. The bottom right snapshot is the same as the upper left snapshot corresponding to ε H = 0 , except that the colors of the individual molecules are assigned according to the final steady-state extension, not that which they possessed at t = 0 . Note that the boxes are displayed at random angles (and sizes) relative to the flow direction because the simulation cell rotates (and elongates/compresses) with time under UEF due to the imposed boundary conditions.
Polymers 15 01831 g003
Figure 4. Snapshots of steady-state UEF of the PE melt at various values of D e . Cooler colors denote relatively coiled molecules whereas warmer colors signify more highly stretched molecules. The black arrow denotes the direction of flow for all snapshots.
Figure 4. Snapshots of steady-state UEF of the PE melt at various values of D e . Cooler colors denote relatively coiled molecules whereas warmer colors signify more highly stretched molecules. The black arrow denotes the direction of flow for all snapshots.
Polymers 15 01831 g004
Figure 5. Steady-state topological characteristics of the C 1000 H 2002 melt undergoing UEF and PEF: (a) average number of chain kinks per molecule vs. D e ; (b) probability distributions of Z k at various D e (UEF only); (c) peak positions of the PDFs of panel (b) plotted vs. D e , including those of the same melt undergoing PEF (which are not shown in panel (b); and (d) tube stretch vs. D e under UEF only. Note that the PDFs of D e 9.0 in panel (b) all overlap each other.
Figure 5. Steady-state topological characteristics of the C 1000 H 2002 melt undergoing UEF and PEF: (a) average number of chain kinks per molecule vs. D e ; (b) probability distributions of Z k at various D e (UEF only); (c) peak positions of the PDFs of panel (b) plotted vs. D e , including those of the same melt undergoing PEF (which are not shown in panel (b); and (d) tube stretch vs. D e under UEF only. Note that the PDFs of D e 9.0 in panel (b) all overlap each other.
Polymers 15 01831 g005
Figure 6. Startup ((a); UEF only) and steady-state ((b); both UEF and PEF) viscosity for the PE melt undergoing elongational flow at various D e . Statistical error bars are indicated for the steady-state data displayed in panel (b).
Figure 6. Startup ((a); UEF only) and steady-state ((b); both UEF and PEF) viscosity for the PE melt undergoing elongational flow at various D e . Statistical error bars are indicated for the steady-state data displayed in panel (b).
Polymers 15 01831 g006
Figure 7. Nonequilibrium phase diagram of the C 1000 H 2002 melt under both steady-state UEF and PEF based on the extensional stress, σ , plotted vs. D e . Upper-case Roman letters within the figure are described in the caption to Figure 1.
Figure 7. Nonequilibrium phase diagram of the C 1000 H 2002 melt under both steady-state UEF and PEF based on the extensional stress, σ , plotted vs. D e . Upper-case Roman letters within the figure are described in the caption to Figure 1.
Polymers 15 01831 g007
Figure 8. (a) Transient order parameter, q, as a function of Hencky strain, ε H , at various values of D e for startup of UEF and PEF of the PE melt at 450 K. (b) Steady-state probability distribution functions, p ( q ) , of the order parameter at various values of D e under UEF and PEF. (c) Steady-state order parameter vs. D e for both UEF and PEF simulations. Vertical dashed lines define approximate boundaries of the various states or phases. Symbols C, S, and M denote coiled liquid, stretched liquid, and monoclinic semicrystalline states, respectively. The solid curves in panels (a,b) depict UEF data, whereas the dashed lines represent PEF data. Note that D e = 1.0 and 9.0 were not simulated under PEF, and D e = 0.015 , 0.06, and 45.0 were not simulated under UEF.
Figure 8. (a) Transient order parameter, q, as a function of Hencky strain, ε H , at various values of D e for startup of UEF and PEF of the PE melt at 450 K. (b) Steady-state probability distribution functions, p ( q ) , of the order parameter at various values of D e under UEF and PEF. (c) Steady-state order parameter vs. D e for both UEF and PEF simulations. Vertical dashed lines define approximate boundaries of the various states or phases. Symbols C, S, and M denote coiled liquid, stretched liquid, and monoclinic semicrystalline states, respectively. The solid curves in panels (a,b) depict UEF data, whereas the dashed lines represent PEF data. Note that D e = 1.0 and 9.0 were not simulated under PEF, and D e = 0.015 , 0.06, and 45.0 were not simulated under UEF.
Polymers 15 01831 g008
Figure 9. Transient order parameter q vs. time, t, after cessation of steady-state UEF at D e = 30.0 of the PE melt at 450 K with and without simultaneous quenching to a lower temperature, as labelled in the legend.
Figure 9. Transient order parameter q vs. time, t, after cessation of steady-state UEF at D e = 30.0 of the PE melt at 450 K with and without simultaneous quenching to a lower temperature, as labelled in the legend.
Polymers 15 01831 g009
Figure 10. Transient ensemble-averaged enthalpy vs. Hencky strain upon startup of UEF of the PE melt at selected values of D e . The precipitous drop of enthalpy at ε H 4 at D e = 9.0 corresponds to the steep increase of q, as depicted in Figure 8a, which underscores the onset of FIC at this value of Hencky strain.
Figure 10. Transient ensemble-averaged enthalpy vs. Hencky strain upon startup of UEF of the PE melt at selected values of D e . The precipitous drop of enthalpy at ε H 4 at D e = 9.0 corresponds to the steep increase of q, as depicted in Figure 8a, which underscores the onset of FIC at this value of Hencky strain.
Polymers 15 01831 g010
Figure 11. Specific heat capacity vs. Hencky strain of the PE melt under startup of UEF (a) and PEF (b) at various D e . Note that data at D e = 0.6 in panel (a) were taken under steady-state conditions.
Figure 11. Specific heat capacity vs. Hencky strain of the PE melt under startup of UEF (a) and PEF (b) at various D e . Note that data at D e = 0.6 in panel (a) were taken under steady-state conditions.
Polymers 15 01831 g011
Figure 12. The ensemble-average local atomic entropy, enthalpy (panel (a)), and Gibbs free energy (panel (b)) as functions of D e for the UEF and PEF simulations of the C 1000 H 2002 melt in (dimensionless) reduced LJ units. Note the high degree of agreement between UEF and PEF data, in spite of the large error bars on some of the data.
Figure 12. The ensemble-average local atomic entropy, enthalpy (panel (a)), and Gibbs free energy (panel (b)) as functions of D e for the UEF and PEF simulations of the C 1000 H 2002 melt in (dimensionless) reduced LJ units. Note the high degree of agreement between UEF and PEF data, in spite of the large error bars on some of the data.
Polymers 15 01831 g012
Figure 13. Snapshots of the simulation cell at various Hencky strains after startup of UEF at 450 K of the PE melt at D e = 9.0 . Individual atoms are colored based on their instantaneous values of G ¯ i , according to the legend color bar. Note that the boxes are displayed at random angles (and sizes) relative to the flow direction because the simulation cell rotates (and elongates/compresses) with time under UEF due to the imposed boundary conditions.
Figure 13. Snapshots of the simulation cell at various Hencky strains after startup of UEF at 450 K of the PE melt at D e = 9.0 . Individual atoms are colored based on their instantaneous values of G ¯ i , according to the legend color bar. Note that the boxes are displayed at random angles (and sizes) relative to the flow direction because the simulation cell rotates (and elongates/compresses) with time under UEF due to the imposed boundary conditions.
Polymers 15 01831 g013
Figure 14. Fraction of liquid-like particles, N ˜ l , as a function of Hencky strain within the PE material for startup of UEF at various D e .
Figure 14. Fraction of liquid-like particles, N ˜ l , as a function of Hencky strain within the PE material for startup of UEF at various D e .
Polymers 15 01831 g014
Figure 15. Steady-state radial distribution function, g ( r ) , of the C 1000 H 2002 melt at three values of D e = 0.0 , 3.0 , 15.0 under both UEF (solid lines) and PEF (dotted lines). Note that UEF and PEF data virtually overlap at all D e ; therefore, the PEF data curves are not labelled in the legend. The inset displays the intermolecular contribution to the overall RDFs displayed in the main graph.
Figure 15. Steady-state radial distribution function, g ( r ) , of the C 1000 H 2002 melt at three values of D e = 0.0 , 3.0 , 15.0 under both UEF (solid lines) and PEF (dotted lines). Note that UEF and PEF data virtually overlap at all D e ; therefore, the PEF data curves are not labelled in the legend. The inset displays the intermolecular contribution to the overall RDFs displayed in the main graph.
Polymers 15 01831 g015
Figure 16. Panel (a): A snapshot of a random slab of thickness 11.8 Å and oriented perpendicular to the direction of flow of the semicrystalline PE taken under steady-state UEF at D e = 60.0 . Individual molecules are assigned random colors, and each atom contained within the slab of a particular molecule is assigned the same color. Most molecules are aligned parallel to the flow direction and hence appear as large dots in the plane of the slab. Panel (b): A graph of g ( r ) for a random slab of thickness 3 Å oriented perpendicular to the flow direction, similar (but thinner than) the slab of Panel (a). The monoclinic lattice parameters are labelled in the plot.
Figure 16. Panel (a): A snapshot of a random slab of thickness 11.8 Å and oriented perpendicular to the direction of flow of the semicrystalline PE taken under steady-state UEF at D e = 60.0 . Individual molecules are assigned random colors, and each atom contained within the slab of a particular molecule is assigned the same color. Most molecules are aligned parallel to the flow direction and hence appear as large dots in the plane of the slab. Panel (b): A graph of g ( r ) for a random slab of thickness 3 Å oriented perpendicular to the flow direction, similar (but thinner than) the slab of Panel (a). The monoclinic lattice parameters are labelled in the plot.
Polymers 15 01831 g016
Figure 17. Steady-state structure factor, S ( k ) , vs. wavenumber, k, of the C 1000 H 2002 melt at D e = 0 and D e = 60 as calculated from the UEF simulations. In addition, there are the structure factors for an n-eicosane liquid (labelled as ‘equilibrium XRD’ in the legend) and solid crystal as obtained from X-ray diffraction experiments.
Figure 17. Steady-state structure factor, S ( k ) , vs. wavenumber, k, of the C 1000 H 2002 melt at D e = 0 and D e = 60 as calculated from the UEF simulations. In addition, there are the structure factors for an n-eicosane liquid (labelled as ‘equilibrium XRD’ in the legend) and solid crystal as obtained from X-ray diffraction experiments.
Polymers 15 01831 g017
Figure 18. Probability distributions of the magnitude of Kuhn segments, | R K | , comprising the PE melt under steady-state UEF (panel (a)) and PEF (panel (b)) at various D e .
Figure 18. Probability distributions of the magnitude of Kuhn segments, | R K | , comprising the PE melt under steady-state UEF (panel (a)) and PEF (panel (b)) at various D e .
Polymers 15 01831 g018
Figure 19. Mean value of the Kuhn segment magnitude, | R K | , and average number of chain kinks, Z k , vs. Hencky strain for startup of UEF at D e = 9.0 .
Figure 19. Mean value of the Kuhn segment magnitude, | R K | , and average number of chain kinks, Z k , vs. Hencky strain for startup of UEF at D e = 9.0 .
Polymers 15 01831 g019
Table 1. Quiescent properties of the simulated C1000H2002 melt. τ d is the disengagement time, τ R is the Rouse time, R 2 1 / 2 is the average chain end-to-end distance, R g 2 1 / 2 is the average chain radius of gyration, Z is the average number of entanglements per chain, and Z k is the average number of kinks per chain.
Table 1. Quiescent properties of the simulated C1000H2002 melt. τ d is the disengagement time, τ R is the Rouse time, R 2 1 / 2 is the average chain end-to-end distance, R g 2 1 / 2 is the average chain radius of gyration, Z is the average number of entanglements per chain, and Z k is the average number of kinks per chain.
τ d (ns) τ R (ns) R 2 1 / 2 (Å) R g 2 1 / 2 (Å) Z Z k
5270137141.857.912.924.3
Table 2. Forward ( k 1 ) and reverse ( k 1 ) kinetic rate constants at several D e as calculated from the simulation output. Displayed are the corresponding equilibrium constant, K = k 1 / k 1 , steady-state density of the semicrystalline phase, ρ c , and degree of crystallinity, χ . Note that tabulated values in parentheses are the rate constants from the PEF simulations obtained from Ref. [18].
Table 2. Forward ( k 1 ) and reverse ( k 1 ) kinetic rate constants at several D e as calculated from the simulation output. Displayed are the corresponding equilibrium constant, K = k 1 / k 1 , steady-state density of the semicrystalline phase, ρ c , and degree of crystallinity, χ . Note that tabulated values in parentheses are the rate constants from the PEF simulations obtained from Ref. [18].
D e k 1 (ns−1) k 1 (ns−1)K ρ c  ( g / cm 3 ) χ (%)
90.03330.00477.08790.8887.6
150.0532 (0.0634)0.0048 (0.0069)11.0 (9.14)0.89 (0.91)91.7 (90.1)
300.1194 (0.1497)0.0087 (0.0149)13.65 (10.05)0.90 (0.91)93.2 (91.0)
600.3264 (0.3467)0.0228 (0.0354)14.30 (9.80)0.91 (0.91)93.5 (90.7)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nafar Sefiddashti, M.H.; Edwards, B.J.; Khomami, B. Atomistic Simulation of Flow-Induced Microphase Separation and Crystallization of an Entangled Polyethylene Melt Undergoing Uniaxial Elongational Flow and the Role of Kuhn Segment Extension. Polymers 2023, 15, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081831

AMA Style

Nafar Sefiddashti MH, Edwards BJ, Khomami B. Atomistic Simulation of Flow-Induced Microphase Separation and Crystallization of an Entangled Polyethylene Melt Undergoing Uniaxial Elongational Flow and the Role of Kuhn Segment Extension. Polymers. 2023; 15(8):1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nafar Sefiddashti, Mohammad Hadi, Brian J. Edwards, and Bamin Khomami. 2023. "Atomistic Simulation of Flow-Induced Microphase Separation and Crystallization of an Entangled Polyethylene Melt Undergoing Uniaxial Elongational Flow and the Role of Kuhn Segment Extension" Polymers 15, no. 8: 1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081831

APA Style

Nafar Sefiddashti, M. H., Edwards, B. J., & Khomami, B. (2023). Atomistic Simulation of Flow-Induced Microphase Separation and Crystallization of an Entangled Polyethylene Melt Undergoing Uniaxial Elongational Flow and the Role of Kuhn Segment Extension. Polymers, 15(8), 1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop