Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of the Dehydrothermal Crosslinking of Electrospun Collagen Nanofibers: The Effects of Vacuum Conditions and Subsequent Chemical Crosslinking
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Design of Eco-Friendly High-Performance Thermoplastic Elastomer Based on Polyurethane and Ground Tire Rubber toward Upcycling of Waste Tires
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 16
Issue 17
10.3390/polym16172452
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial Coatings Based on a Photoreactive (Meth)acrylate Syrup and Ferulic Acid—The Effectiveness against Staphylococcus epidermidis

by
Agnieszka Kowalczyk
1,*,
Agata Kraśkiewicz
1,*,
Agata Markowska-Szczupak
2 and
Krzysztof Kowalczyk
1
1
Department of Chemical Organic Technology and Polymeric Materials, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 70-322 Szczecin, Poland
2
Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 71-065 Szczecin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(17), 2452; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16172452 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 26 July 2024 / Revised: 22 August 2024 / Accepted: 26 August 2024 / Published: 29 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A novel photopolymerizable (meth)acrylate oligomer syrup modified with ferulic acid (FA) was verified as an antimicrobial coating binder against a biofilm of Staphylococcus epidermidis. A solution-free UV-LED-initiated photopolymerization process of aliphatic (meth)acrylates and styrene was performed to prepare the oligomer syrup. The influence of ferulic acid on the UV crosslinking process of the varnish coatings (kinetic studies using photo-DSC) as well as their chemical structure (FTIR) and mechanical (adhesion, hardness), optical (gloss, DOI parameter), and antibacterial properties against S. epidermidis were investigated. The photo-DSC results revealed that FA has a positive effect on reducing the early occurrence of slowing processes and has a favorable effect on the monomer conversion increment. It turned out, unexpectedly, that the more FA in the coating, the greater its adhesion to a glass substrate and hardness. The coating containing 0.9 wt. part of FA exhibited excellent antimicrobial properties against S. epidermidis, i.e., the bacterial number after 24 h was only 1.98 log CFU/mL. All the coatings showed relatively high hardness, gloss (>80 G.U.), and DOI parameter values (30–50 a.u.).

1. Introduction

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Many recent studies have suggested that environmental contamination plays an important role in the transmission of multidrug-resistant microorganisms, viruses, mycobacteria, and fungi [1]. One of the pathogens is Staphylococcus epidermidis. This is a well-known Gram-positive and aerobic bacterium, which is commonly found on the mucous membranes of the mouth and nose, and on the skin of humans and other mammals. Although it is classified as commensal organism, it is considered as an opportunistic pathogen. Currently, this species ranks third on the list of pathogens that cause nosocomial infections and are responsible for HAIs. Importantly, S. epidermidis is extremely difficult to treat due to biofilm formation and having genes for resistance to several antibiotics (e.g., rifampicin, gentamicin, and fluoroquinolones) [2]. S. epidermidis has been reported as being predominant among theatrical species, colonizing implanted devices with its major virulence factor of framing biofilms on various polymeric surfaces [3]. Generally, patients are a major source of microorganisms in the hospital environment. These microorganisms can survive in the hospital environment for long periods of time and can be detected in the air, water, and on surfaces. It is now accepted that targeted and frequent cleaning and the selection of appropriate equipment (including medical equipment such as hospital furniture) can reduce the bioburden in the healthcare environment and the associated risk of infections [4]. Studies over the past decade have indicated that bed frames and patient tables are microflora reservoirs and promote microorganisms’ survival [5]. The solution to the problem may be to coat solid surfaces (e.g., bed rails, hospital furniture) with biocidal paints or varnishes. Some reports have shown the antibiofilm activity against S. epidermidis of certain compounds such as mefenamic acid, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, carvacrol, 2-aminobenzemidazole or 3-indole acetonitrile [6]. Pilz at al. demonstrate that a multilayer ceramic-covered surface with a zirconium nitride topcoat showed less S. epidermidis biofilm formation than other surface materials used for orthopedic implants [7]. Ma et al. have developed a novel coating based on trimethylsilane as a monomer to coat the surfaces of stainless steel and a titanium alloy, which are widely used in implantable medical devices [8]. Skovdal et al. improved an ultra-dense poly(ethylene glycol)-based coating, significantly reducing the number of S. epidermidis bacteria adhering to titanium surfaces [9]. Antimicrobial coatings have a big role in controlling disease spread and preventing microbial colonization on surfaces [10,11]. Owing to the fact that polymeric materials are characterized by good mechanical properties, chemical stability, flexibility, and low costs, they have been widely used as antimicrobial coatings [12]. Additionally, the wide possibilities of polymer modification contribute to the design of thin films resistant to various environmental conditions (including a corrosive atmosphere) [13,14] or UV radiation resistance [15]. Among the different methods of production of polymer coatings, the UV-initiated radiation curing has lately become extremely important. The UV technology provides numerous advantages, i.e., high curing rates at room temperature, solvent-free formulations, and low emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The mentioned benefits make the UV technology economical and environmentally friendly [16,17,18,19].
It is worth noting that UV-curable formulations usually contain functionalized acrylate oligomers/prepolymers, a photoinitiator(s), and a reactive diluent(s) [20]. Various types of acrylate-based resins (e.g., polyurethane, epoxy, polyether, or polyester acrylates) allow the preparation of materials with specific properties [21]. Bio-polymers (such as chitosan [22] and peptides [10]) as well as graphene [23] and compounds containing metals (Ag [24], Au [25], Zn [26], and Cu [27]) or TiO2 particles [28] are frequently used for improving the antimicrobial properties of conventional polymeric coatings. Additionally, the interest in the properties of natural compounds with health-promoting properties is constantly increasing. Examples of such compounds are ferulic acid (FA) or (E)-3-(4-hydroxy-3-meth oxyphenyl)prop-2-enoic acid (C10H10O4), belonging to the phenolic acids. FA was isolated in 1866 from the Ferula foetida plant, which gave it its name. Nevertheless, it can be extracted from cereals [29], sugar beet [30], or residues and by-products from the pine species [31]. In natural products, FA occurs in the form of a monomer, dimer, free oligomer, or polymers [32]. Nowadays, FA is obtained through chemical or biotechnology methods [33]. It was proved that it has antioxidant, antidiabetic, hepatoprotective, anti-atherosclerotic, neuroprotective, anticarcinogenic, and antibacterial properties [34]. This is due to the chemical reactivity of FA, which can involve donating an electron or hydrogen atom, removing free radicals, and interrupting oxidative reactions [35]. It is known that FA has strong antibacterial properties against Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae Citrobacter koseri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Helicobacter pylori, and Shigella sonnei) and selected Gram-positive bacteria [36]. The effectiveness of FA and its derivatives against Gram-positive S. aureus has been recently proven [37]. Moreover, its resistance to bacterial colonization and the additional unique properties of ferulic acid make it commonly used in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [38]. Additionally, the chemical structure of FA provides various application prospects. The presence of phenol and carboxylic groups allows a wide range of modifications [39], whereas the content of the double bonds enables its potential for use as a replacement in poly(ethylene terephthalate) [40], the starting building block for polyurethanes, epoxides, as well as phenolic resins [41]. Nevertheless, applications of FA in radical photopolymerization are little described. Pezzana et al. reported the allylation process of FA to achieve mono- and bifunctional allyl monomers to a UV-initiated thiol-ene polymerization. Notwithstanding this, the authors do not present the antimicrobial properties of the obtained protective coatings [42]. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is only one article describing the direct copolymerization of FA with methacrylic acid to obtain a useful material with antioxidant and antifungal properties. For this purpose, a one-step radical polymerization using water-soluble redox initiators was performed [43].
In this paper, we describe the use of low concentrations of ferulic acid in varnish coatings, enabling their radical UV crosslinking process and providing antimicrobial properties. The varnish coatings are based on a (meth)acrylate syrup prepared via a solvent-free UV-LED-initiated photopolymerization of a few aliphatic (meth)acrylates and styrene. In addition, the coating compositions contained a multifunctional crosslinking monomer and hydroxyl alkyl phenyl acetophenone (HAP) as a photoinitiator. The influence of ferulic acid on the UV crosslinking process of the varnish coatings and their adhesion, hardness, gloss, and antimicrobial properties were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The following materials were used: n-butyl acrylate (BA; BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany); methyl methacrylate (MMA; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA); 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA; Across Organics, Geel, Belgium); styrene (STY; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA); bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phenylphosphine oxide (a radical photoinitiator, APO; Omnirad 819, IGM Resins, Waalkwijk, The Netherlands); pentaerythritol triacrylate (a multifunctional crosslinking monomer, PETIA; Allnex, Drogenbos, Belgium), 1-hydroxycyclohexylphenyl ketone (a radical photoinitiator, HAP; Omnirad 184, IGM Resins, Waalkwijk, The Netherlands), and ferulic acid (FA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) (Figure 1).

2.2. Preparation of the (Meth)acrylate Syrup

The (meth)acrylate syrup (MAS) was synthesized via the solvent-free UV-induced polymerization process of a monomer mixture (BA, MMA, HEA, and STY) in the presence of a radical UV photoinitiator (APO) (Figure 2). The photopolymerization was conducted at 50 °C in a glass reactor (250 mL) equipped with a thermocouple, a mechanical stirrer (300 rpm), a water cooler, and a capillary dosing an inert gas (Ar). The reaction mixture was irradiated by UV-LED stripes (λ = 390 ± 5 nm; MEiSSA, Warsaw, Poland) for 40 min. The composition of the UV-polymerized mixture is presented in Table 1.

2.3. Preparation of the Varnish Compositions and Coatings

The UV-photocurable varnish compositions were prepared by mechanical mixing of the MAS, the PETIA monomer, the HAP UV photoinitiator, and ferulic acid, as indicated in Figure 3 and Table 2. The systems were applied onto glass substrates (24 h after mixing the ingredients) using a gap applicator (60 µm). The prepared varnish coatings were UV-irradiated with the medium-pressure mercury lamp (UV-ABC, Hönle UV-Technology, Gräfelfing, Germany). The total UV radiation dose was 6 J/cm2.

2.4. Characterization of the (Meth)acrylate Syrup

The dynamic viscosity (η) of MAS was measured at 25 °C using the DV-II Pro Extra viscometer (spindle #7; 50 rpm; Brookfield, New York, NY, USA). The solids content (SC) was checked utilizing a thermobalance (Radwag, Warsaw, Poland): samples (ca. 2 g) were heated in aluminum pans at 105 °C for 4 h. The molecular masses (Mw, Mn) and polydispersity (PDI) of copolymers (the solids of MAS) were characterized by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The GPC apparatus contained the refractive index detector (Merck Lachrom RI L-7490), pump (Merck Hitachi Liquid Chromatography L-7100), interface (Merck Hitachi Liquid Chromatography D-7000), and the Shodex OHpak SB-806M MQ column with the Shodex OHpak SB-G precolumn. The GPC tests were performed using the polystyrene standards (Fluka and Polymer Standards Service GmbH, Mainz, Germany) and tetrahydrofuran.

2.5. Kinetic Studies of the UV Curing Process of the Varnish Compositions

The kinetics of the photocuring process of the coating compositions were characterized using the differential scanning calorimeter with the UV equipment (Q100, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The varnish compositions (ca. 5 mg, Table 2) were UV-irradiated (280–420 nm) at an intensity of 500 mW/cm2 in a nitrogen atmosphere (the same conditions were applied during the UV curing process with a UV-ABC-type medium-pressure mercury lamp). The photopolymerization rate (Rp, s−1), conversion of double bonds (p,%), and the photoinitiation index (Ip; s−2), were calculated according to Equations (1)–(3), respectively. Additionally, the evaluation of slowing processes as the ratio of double bond conversion (at the point corresponding to the maximum reaction rate) to the total conversion of the monomers (pRpmax/pf) was studied.
R p = d H d t H 0 [ s − 1 ]
p = ∆ H t ∆ H 0 ∗ 100   [ % ]
I p = R p m a x t m a x   [ s − 2 ]
where dH/dt is the recorded heat flow during UV irradiation, H0 is the theoretical heat value for the complete degree of conversion (∆H = 86.2 kJ/mol for acrylates, ∆H = 54.8 kJ/mol for methacrylates, and ∆H = 67.4 kJ/mol for styrene), ∆Ht is the reaction heat released at time t, and tmax is the time taken to reach the maximum polymerization rate [44].

2.6. Structural Characteristics of the UV-Cured Varnish Coatings

A functional group analysis of the UV-cured varnish coatings containing ferulic acid was carried out using the Fourier-transform infrared spectroscope with ATR accessories (Nexus Euro, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A double bond peak at 1635 cm−1 (in acrylates) and a double bond at 1621 cm−1 (in ferulic acid) [45] were investigated.

2.7. Mechanical and Optical Characteristics of the UV-Cured Varnish Coatings

The pendulum hardness of the varnish coatings cured on a glass substrate was tested using the König pendulum (AWS-5, Dozafil, Warsaw, Poland) according to ISO 1522 [46] The pull-off adhesion of the coatings to this substrate was measured according to ISO 4624 [47] using the pull-off adhesion apparatus with Ø20 mm aluminum dollies (Elcometer 510; Elcometer, Manchester, UK) and a two-component epoxy adhesive (Loctite, Rocky Hill, CT, USA). The gloss (20°) and distinctness of the image parameters (DOI) of the varnish coatings cured on white paper panels (WDX Plain White Cards, Leneta Company, Mahwah, NJ, Leneta, USA) were determined by ISO 2813 [48] and ASTM D5767 [49], respectively. The measurements were realized using the IQ20/60/85 device (Rhopoint Instruments, St Leonards, UK). The values of the tested parameters were calculated by averaging five measurements of each sample.

2.8. Antibacterial Properties of the UV-Cured Varnish Coatings

The antibacterial properties of the UV-cured varnish coatings were determined according to ASTM E2149-20 [50]. Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 49461) was used as a model strain which was grown in Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHI) (Biocorp, Warsaw, Poland). The overnight cultures of the bacteria were transferred to a TBS buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl; 150 mM NaCl pH 7.5; Chemland; Stargard, Poland). The cultures were diluted with buffer until the final concentration of the bacteria was approx. 1.0 × 106. The varnish coatings were tested according to a modified standard test method for determining the antimicrobial activity of antimicrobial agents under dynamic contact conditions. Control glass plates and glass plates (1 × 1 cm) covered by the coatings were sterilized under a UV-C lamp for 15 min and placed into a sterile buffer in 250 mL screw-cap Erlenmeyer flasks. Then, a 50 ± 0.5 mL dose of the working dilution of the prepared bacterial inoculum was added to the flask. The series of flasks was shaken using a wrist-action shaker (at maximum stroke) at 37 °C for 1 h, and samples (0.5 mL) were collected after 0.5, 1, and 24 h. Bacterial concentration was measured at the “0” time and during the experiments by serial dilutions and standard plate-count techniques in triplicate. The Brain Heart Infusion Agar (Biocorp, Warsaw, Poland) was used. All the Petri dishes were incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for 24 h. The visible bacteria colonies were counted and reported as colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). The survivability of the bacteria (%) was calculated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Physicochemical Properties of the (Meth)acrylate Syrup and Copolymer

The product of the solvent-free UV-LED-initiated photopolymerization was a solution of a linear copolymer in unreacted monomers (MAS). The selected properties of the prepared syrup, i.e., the dynamic viscosity (ƞ), the solids content (SC) as well as the molecular masses (Mn; Mw) and the polydispersity index (PDI) of the (meth)acrylate copolymer are presented in Table 3.
In our previous publications, we have reported that free radical bulk photopolymerization (FRBP) is a particularly convenient method for obtaining adhesive binders [51,52] in a short time (tens of minutes) and in an energy-efficient way (using UV-LEDs). In this article, we tested the method during the preparation of varnish binders. The choice of monomers is justified. Namely, the main monomers are n-butyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. The former imparts flexibility as well as atmospheric and water resistance to the coatings, while the latter increases their hardness. The HEA monomer was used as a functional monomer with a hydroxyl group that provides good adhesion to various substrates. Styrene improves gloss and hardness as well. As can be seen, the prepared syrup contains ca. 50% of (meth)acrylate oligomers (due to small molecular weight values) with relatively low polydispersity (3.6). The syrup’s viscosity was relatively low and suitable (4.6 Pa∙s) for further modification using the crosslinking monomer, photoinitiator, and ferulic acid. As presented in Figure 3, during the UV curing process of the varnish coatings, the unreacted monomers in the syrup (ca. 50%) and the crosslinking monomer (PETIA) may create a polymer network. The result is a semi-IPN polymer blend containing a linear methacrylate copolymer and a crosslinked polyacrylate structure. We postulate that the semi-IPN polymer matrix includes ferulic acid which is not covalently bound to the polymeric system.

3.2. Kinetic Studies of UV Curing of the Varnish Composition

Considering the kinetics of the photocrosslinking process of the varnish compositions, a key aspect is the type of monomers, photoinitiator, and the presence of the phenolic compound (FA). The results of the NMR analysis of the syrup were presented in our previous publication [53] (MAS was tested as a reference sample (P-0) for systems modified with organophosphorus compounds). According to the NMR data, MAS contains unreacted BA (53 wt.%), MMA (22 wt.%), HEA (20 wt.%), and STY (5 wt.%). These outcomes (and the concentration of the added PETIA monomer) were taken into account in the calculations. The results of the kinetic studies of the varnish compositions with different contents of the HAP photoinitiator (1, 3 or 5 wt. parts) as well as ferulic acid (0.3, 0.6 or 0.9 wt. part per 100 wt. parts of MAS) are presented in Figure 4. Generally, the applied HAP photoinitiator generates two types of radicals, i.e., a benzoyl radical and a hydroxycyclohexyl radical, and they both react with the (meth)acrylate double bonds [54]. As mentioned earlier, ferulic acid belongs to the group of antioxidants. This is due to the possibility of forming a stable phenoxy radical. Generally, the rupture of the O-H bond in phenols with the formation of radicals may occur in the presence of ionizing radiation (including ultraviolet radiation) or by contact with free radicals. As a result, a phenoxy radical is formed which is stabilized by the influence of the aromatic ring and its substituents. In biotechnology, FA is an effective compound to combat scavenging and stop free radicals’ chain reactions. Our research shows that FA slows down the UV crosslinking process of the varnish coating compositions. The higher the FA concentration in the system, the significantly lower the Rpmax parameter values (Figure 5a). In addition, the slowing down of the process is evidenced by the values of tRpmax (Table 4). In the case of the FA-free systems, the tRpmax values vary from 1.8 s to 2.8 s (for 5 and 1 wt. parts of HAP, respectively). In contrast, the tRpmax values for the FA-based systems changed from 3.8 to even 9.4 s (the higher values for the higher HAP concentrations).
Moreover, it was shown that FA significantly reduces the initiation ability of the process because Ip values are lower for systems with FA than for the reference sample (Ip decreases with increasing FA content; Figure 5b). This is related to the reaction of benzoyl and hydroxycyclohexyl radicals (from HAP) with ferulic acid (i.e., abstraction of the hydrogen atom from the hydroxyl group of the acid and formation of a phenoxy radical). This phenomenon deactivates a certain number of radicals initiating the photopolymerization process (its rate is decreased). Nonetheless, it was found that FA has no negative effect on monomer conversion. These results are presented in Table 4. It should be noted that the monomer conversion was relatively large (67–81%); the lowest value was recorded for the CV-5/0 sample, while the highest was for CV-1/0.9. The result indicates that FA increases the conversion of the monomers (the increment of 3% was observed for samples containing 0.9 wt. part of the acid). Additionally, the photo-DSC results revealed that FA has a positive influence on the reduction of the early occurrence of slowing processes, such as chain transfer reactions (Figure 5c)—the low values of the pRmax/pf ratio reveal this phenomenon. It was proved that slowing down processes occur more intensively in the system containing 5 wt. parts of HAP (without FA), which is associated with a higher number of macroradicals.
In contrast, the higher the concentration of the acid, the higher the value of this ratio (FA has a positive influence on the photocrosslinking process). It confirms the deactivation of a certain number of primary radicals by acid molecules, which varies the amount of macroradicals and results in increased monomer conversion.

3.3. Structural Characterization of UV-Cured Varnish Coatings

FTIR spectroscopy was used to study the curing reaction of the varnish compositions via detection of the presence/intensity of the monomer double bonds; the FTIR spectra for FA and selected uncured and cured varnish compositions are shown in Figure 6. The observed trend was similar for all the tested systems. The intensities of the band at 1635 cm−1 (corresponding to the C=C bonds of the (meth)acrylate monomers and styrene) were the same for the uncured FA-free and FA-based compositions and they were reduced to similar values after the curing process. On the other hand, the values of the peak at 1621 cm−1 (the C=C bonds in FA and the PETIA monomer) were different for the cured reference and modified varnishes. Probably, it means that FA does not polymerize with other unsaturated components of the varnish systems.

3.4. Mechanical and Optical Properties of the UV-Cured Varnish Coatings

The aim of the studies was to determine the influence of FA on selected features of the UV-cured varnish compositions. The values of adhesion to the glass substrate and hardness of the coatings are presented in Figure 7.
Generally, the coatings were characterized by high adhesion (4.2–5.5 MPa); its values increased with increasing concentrations of the HAP photoinitiator and ferulic acid. As shown by the photo-DSC and FTIR results, the monomer conversion was reduced by a higher HAP dose, and it slightly increased with increasing acid content. It means that the crosslinking density is lower in the samples with the higher HAP concentration. For this reason, the adhesion was higher due to the easier access of the polar groups from the varnish matrix (-OH introduced by HEA, PETIA, and FA) to the surface layer, i.e., the easier formation of hydrogen bonds with HO-Si- groups from the glass substrate. Nevertheless, the best results were obtained for the systems containing 0.9 wt. part of FA (regardless of the HAP content). In contrast, the opposite tendency was observed for the pendulum hardness parameter. The lowest values (53–58 a.u.) were noted for the coatings with 5 wt. parts of HAP and they were also associated with low crosslinking densities of the systems. The best hardness results were registered for the V-3/0.6 and V-1/0.9 coatings (78 and 79 a.u., respectively).
The gloss and the DOI values for the cured varnish coatings are presented in Figure 8. The samples were characterized by relatively high gloss (ca. 85–89 G.U.), and this parameter was not markedly affected by the HAP and ferulic acid concentration; slightly lower results were recorded only for the V-1/0.3 and V-1/0.6 samples (probably due to the higher crosslinking density of these systems). Similar trends were observed for the DOI results. For these samples, DOI was slightly lower (ca. 36 a.u.) than for the others. On the other hand, the parameter values were generally higher for the samples containing FA and 5 wt. parts of the HAP photoinitiator. This feature (DOI) characterizes the sharpness/clarity of an image created by the reflection of an object surface. The observed DOI increment (for V-5-type systems) indicates that their surfaces have become more smooth. It correlates with the monomer conversion results (based on the photo-DSC test), which indicate the lower crosslinking density of these samples.

3.5. Antimicrobial Properties of the UV-Cured Varnish Coatings

The antimicrobial test results are presented in Figure 9. According to the existing EPA standards, a reduction greater than or equal to 6-fold logarithmic (≥6 log) in <10 min is needed to claim that a coating has excellent antimicrobial properties [55]. In the present study, we obtained twelve coatings with different contents of the photoinitiator and ferulic acid. In relation to the EPA standards, the obtained coatings exhibited a moderate antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis (<1.5 log in 30 min); however, this feature (after 24 h) was already satisfactory. Generally, the best results were achieved for V-3/0.9 (3.8 log in 24 h) and for the V-5/0.3, V-5/0.6, and V-5/0.9 samples (ca. 3 log in 24 h). A reduction in the number of bacteria >3 log indicates the removal of 99% of the bacteria. As can be seen, this excellent reduction in the number of bacteria was achieved for samples with the lower monomer conversion values (and therefore crosslinking density) because the FA molecules—trapped in the semi-IPN polymer network—can more easily penetrate the top coating and interact with the S. epidermidis anchored on its surface. Additionally, the surfaces of the V-5-type varnish coatings modified with FA are smoother (as indicated by the DOI parameter), thus there are fewer surface defects which reduces the adhesion of S. epidermidis to these surfaces. It was demonstrated by Pinheiro et al. [56] that lipidsoluble substances (including FA) may increase permeability of the bacterial outer membrane, tipping the balance of the in and the out and facilitating the transport of molecules in cells. It can be essential for the penetration and distribution of an antibacterial agent, e.g., detergents and antibiotics. An accelerated lipid peroxidation process in cytoplasmic membranes is also possible due to the affinity of FA for the bacterial membranes. These changes in membrane integrity may be a significant cause of cell death.
We postulate that the good antibacterial activity of the varnish coatings was observed only after 24 h because during this period, more FA molecules migrated from the polymer network to the surface. Nevertheless, in each case, the better results were noted for the FA-based samples than for the reference samples (i.e., V-1/0, V-3/0, and V-5/0).

4. Conclusions

New antimicrobial polymeric varnish coatings were prepared via the UV crosslinking process of a (meth)acrylic/styrene copolymer syrup modified with a crosslinking monomer (PETIA), a radical photoinitiator (HAP), and ferulic acid (FA). Mechanical and optical properties as well as antibacterial activity (against Staphylococcus epidermidis) of the coatings were tested. Moreover, the influence of the acid on the kinetics of the photocrosslinking process was investigated. The highest antimicrobial activity was demonstrated by the coating after 24 h and depended on FA and HAP concentrations; the best results were registered for the systems containing 0.9 wt. part and 3 wt. parts of these components, respectively (99% reduction in bacteria). Arguably, it resulted from the limited crosslinking density of the polymer network and the ability of the acid to migrate to the surface layer of the coatings. Although FA is known as an antioxidant, photo-DSC studies revealed its beneficial effect on the photocrosslinking process (FA increases monomer conversion and inhibits retarding phenomena). This acid addition positively influences the adhesion of the varnish coatings to a glass substrate and does not deteriorate their gloss or DOI parameter values.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. (Agnieszka Kowalczyk) and A.K. (Agata Kraśkiewicz); methodology, A.K. (Agata Kraśkiewicz) and A.K. (Agnieszka Kowalczyk); investigation, A.K. (Agata Kraśkiewicz), A.K. (Agnieszka Kowalczyk), and A.M.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K. (Agnieszka Kowalczyk), A.K. (Agata Kraśkiewicz), and A.M.-S.; writing—review and editing, A.K. (Agnieszka Kowalczyk), K.K.; visualization, A.K. (Agata Kraśkiewicz), A.K. (Agnieszka Kowalczyk), and K.K.; supervision, A.K. (Agnieszka Kowalczyk). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Donskey, C.J. Does improving surface cleaning and disinfection reduce health care-associated infections? Am. J. Infect. Control 2013, 41, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Otter, J.A.; Yezli, S.; Salkeld, J.A.; French, G.L. Evidence that contaminated surfaces contribute to the transmission of hospital pathogens and an overview of strategies to address contaminated surfaces in hospital settings. Am. J. Infect. Control 2013, 41, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Martínez-Santos, V.I.; Torres-Añorve, D.A.; Echániz-Aviles, G.; Parra-Rojas, I.; Ramírez-Peralta, A.; Castro-Alarcón, N. Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis Clinical Isolates from Hospitalized Patients with Bloodstream Infection Obtained in Two Time Periods. Peer J. 2022, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Steinka, I. The role of abiogenic factors in the transmission of microflora in hospital settings. Ann. Acad. Med. Gedan. 2013, 43, 165–174. [Google Scholar]
  5. Noskin, G.A.; Bednarz, P.; Suriano, T.; Reiner, S.; Peterson, L.R. Persistent contamination of fabric-covered furniture by vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Implications for upholstery selection in hospitals. Am. J. Infect. Control 2000, 28, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Akbar, M.U.; Haque, A.; Liaquat, S.; Schierack, P.; Ali, A. Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis and Its Inhibition Using Carvacrol, 2-Aminobenzemidazole, and 3-Indole Acetonitrile. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pilz, M.; Staats, K.; Tobudic, S.; Assadian, O.; Presterl, E.; Windhager, R.; Holinka, J. Zirconium Nitride Coating Reduced Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Formation on Orthopaedic Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2019, 477, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ma, Y.; Chen, M.; Jones, J.E.; Ritts, A.C.; Yu, Q.; Sun, H. Inhibition of Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm by Trimethylsilane Plasma Coating. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 5923–5937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Skovdal, S.; Jørgensen, N.P.; Petersen, E.; Jensen-Fangel, S.; Ogaki, R.; Zeng, G.; Johansen, M.I.; Wang, M.; Rohde, H.; Meyer, R.L. Ultra-dense polymer brush coating reduces Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms on medical implants and improves antibiotic treatment outcome. Acta Biomater. 2018, 76, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kazemzadeh-Narbat, M.; Cheng, H.; Chabok, R.; Alvarez, M.M.; de la Fuente-Nunez, C.; Phillips, K.S.; Khademhosseini, A. Strategies for Antimicrobial Peptide Coatings on Medical Devices: A Review and Regulatory Science Perspective. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 94–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Musa, N.H.; Chang, Z.H.; Teow, Y.H.; Rosli, N.A.; Mohammad, A.W. A Review on Polymer Based Antimicrobial Coating. J. Biochem. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ganguly, S.; Margel, S. Chapter 1—Introduction to Coatings and Surface Preparation. In Polymer-Based Nanoscale Materials for Surface Coatings; Thomas, S., George, J.S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gan, Y.X. A Brief Summary of Publications in the Special Issue: Advances in Corrosion Resistant Coatings. Coatings 2022, 12, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xue, J.; Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, K.; Huang, C. Corrosion Protection Mechanism Study of Nitrite-Modified CaAl-LDH in Epoxy Coatings. Coatings 2023, 13, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kotlík, P.; Doubravová, K.; Horálek, J.; Kubáč, L.; Akrman, J. Acrylic Copolymer Coatings for Protection against UV Rays. J. Cult. Herit. 2014, 15, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schwalm, R. UV Coatings: Basic, Recent Developments and New Application; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ligon-Auer, S.C.; Schwentenwein, M.; Gorsche, C.; Stampfl, J.; Liska, R. Toughening of Photo-Curable Polymer Networks: A Review. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 257–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Patil, R.S.; Thomas, J.; Patil, M.; John, J. To Shed Light on the UV Curable Coating Technology: Current State of the Art and Perspectives. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sheel Wali, A.; Kumar, S.; Khan, D. A Review on Recent Development and Application of Radiation Curing. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 82, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mendes-Felipe, C.; Oliveira, J.; Etxebarria, I.; Vilas-Vilela, J.L.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges of UV Curable Polymer-Based Smart Materials for Printing Technologies. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1800618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, F.; Liu, A.; Tao, W.; Yang, Y. Preparation of UV Curable Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Coatings-a Review. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 145, 105685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sarfraz, M.H.; Hayat, S.; Siddique, M.H.; Aslam, B.; Ashraf, A.; Saqalein, M.; Khurshid, M.; Sarfraz, M.F.; Afzal, M.; Muzammil, S. Chitosan Based Coatings and Films: A Perspective on Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Intelligent Food Packaging. Prog. Org. Coat. 2024, 188, 108235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Staneva, A.D.; Dimitrov, D.K.; Gospodinova, D.N.; Vladkova, T.G. Antibiofouling Activity of Graphene Materials and Graphene-Based Antimicrobial Coatings. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kędziora, A.; Speruda, M.; Krzyżewska, E.; Rybka, J.; Łukowiak, A.; Bugla-Płoskońska, G. Similarities and Differences between Silver Ions and Silver in Nanoforms as Antibacterial Agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sathiyaraj, S.; Suriyakala, G.; Dhanesh Gandhi, A.; Babujanarthanam, R.; Almaary, K.S.; Chen, T.-W.; Kaviyarasu, K. Biosynthesis, Characterization, and Antibacterial Activity of Gold Nanoparticles. J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 1842–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vijayakumar, S.; Krishnakumar, C.; Arulmozhi, P.; Mahadevan, S.; Parameswari, N. Biosynthesis, Characterization and Antimicrobial Activities of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles from Leaf Extract of Glycosmis Pentaphylla (Retz.) DC. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mitra, D.; Kang, E.T.; Neoh, K.G. Antimicrobial Copper-Based Materials and Coatings: Potential Multifaceted Biomedical Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 21159–21182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kumaravel, V.; Nair, K.M.; Mathew, S.; Bartlett, J.; Kennedy, J.E.; Manning, H.G.; Whelan, B.J.; Leyland, N.S.; Pillai, S.C. Antimicrobial TiO2 Nanocomposite Coatings for Surfaces, Dental and Orthopaedic Implants. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 416, 129071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boz, H. Ferulic Acid in Cereals—A Review. Czech. J. Food Sci. 2015, 33, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Puligundla, P.; Mok, C. Valorization of Sugar Beet Pulp through Biotechnological Approaches: Recent Developments. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021, 43, 1253–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ferreira-Santos, P.; Zanuso, E.; Genisheva, Z.; Rocha, C.M.R.; Teixeira, J.A. Green and Sustainable Valorization of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Pinus By-Products. Molecules 2020, 25, 2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kroon, P.A.; Garcia Cones, M.T.; Fillingham, I.J.; Williamson, G. Release of ferulic acid dehydrodimers from plant cell walls by feruloyl esterases. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Balasubashini, M.S.; Rukkumani, R.; Viswanathan, P.; Menon, V.P. Ferulic Acid Alleviates Lipid Peroxidation in Diabetic Rats. Phytother. Res. 2004, 18, 310–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brenelli de Paiva, L.; Goldbeck, R.; Dantas dos Santos, W.; Squina, F.M. Ferulic acid and derivatives: Molecules with potential appli-cation in the pharmaceutical field. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 49, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dędek, K.; Rosicka-Kaczmarek, J.; Nebesny, E.; Kowalska, G. Characteristics and biological properties of ferulic acid. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2019, 83, 71–85. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ou, S.; Kwok, K.C. Ferulic acid: Pharmaceutical functions, preparation and application in food. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pinheiro, P.G.; Santiago, G.M.P.; Freitas da Silva, F.E.; Justino de Araújo, A.C.; Tavares de Oliveira, C.R.; Ramos Freitas, P.; Rocha, J.E.; Bezerra de Araújo Neto, J.; Costa da Silva, M.M.; Tintino, S.R.; et al. Ferulic acid derivatives inhibiting Staphylococcus aureus tetK and MsrA efflux pumps. Biotechnol. Rep. 2022, 34, e00717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zduńska, K.; Dana, A.; Kolodziejczak, A.; Rotsztejn, H. Antioxidant Properties of Ferulic Acid and Its Possible Application. Ski. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2018, 31, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Janus, E.; Pinheiro, L.R.; Nowak, A.; Kucharska, E.; Świątek, E.; Podolak, N.; Perużyńska, M.; Piotrowska, K.; Duchnik, W.; Kucharski, Ł.; et al. New Ferulic Acid and Amino Acid Derivatives with Increased Cosmeceutical and Pharmaceutical Potential. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mialon, L.; Pemba, A.G.; Miller, S.A. Biorenewable polyethylene terephthalate mimics derived from lignin and acetic acid. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1704–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Llevot, A.; Grau, E.; Carlotti, S.; Grelier, S.; Cramail, H. From Lignin-derived Aromatic Compounds to Novel Biobased Pol-ymers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pezzana, L.; Mousa, M.; Malmström, E.; Johansson, M.; Sangermano, M. Bio-Based Monomers for UV-Curable Coatings: Al-lylation of Ferulic Acid and Investigation of Photocured Thiol-Ene Network. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 150, 105986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Iemma, F.; Puoci, F.; Curcio, M.; Parisi, O.I.; Cirillo, G.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Picci, N. Ferulic acid as a comonomer in the synthesis of a novel polymeric chain with biological properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 784–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Clark, S.C.; Hill, D.J.T.; Hoyle, C.E.; Miller, C.W.; Shao, L.Y. N-Substituent effect of maleimides on acrylate polymerization initiated by three-component systems. Polym. Int. 2003, 52, 1701–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sebastian, S.; Sundaraganesan, N.; Manoharan, S. Molecular structure, spectroscopic studies and first-order molecular hyperpolarizabilities of ferulic acid by density functional study. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2009, 74, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. ISO 1522:2022; Paints and Varnishes—Pendulum Damping Test. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  47. ISO 4624:2023; Paints and Varnishes—Pull-Off Test for Adhesion. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
  48. ISO 2813:2014; Paints and Varnishes—Determination of Gloss Value at 20°, 60° and 85°. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  49. ASTM D5767-18; Standard Test Method for Instrumental Measurement of Distinctness-of-Image (DOI) Gloss of Coated Surfaces. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
  50. ASTM E2149-20; Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Antimicrobial Agents under Dynamic Contact Conditions. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2020. Available online: www.astm.org (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  51. Gziut, K.; Kowalczyk, A.; Schmidt, B.; Idzik, T.J.; Sośnicki, J.G. Influence of Methacrylate and Vinyl Monomers on Radical Bulk Photopolymerization Process and Properties of Epoxy-Acrylate Structural Adhesives. Polymers 2023, 15, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gziut, K.; Kowalczyk, A.; Schmidt, B.; Kowalczyk, K.; Weisbrodt, M. Epoxy-Based Structural Self-Adhesive Tapes Modified with Acrylic Syrups Prepared via a Free Radical Photopolymerization Process. Polymers 2021, 13, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kraśkiewicz, A.; Kowalczyk, A.; Kowalczyk, K.; Markowska-Szczupak, A.; Idzik, T.J.; Sośnicki, J.G. Anticorrosive and antimicrobial efficiency of photopolymerizable phosphorus (meth)acrylate oligomers-based coating materials. Prog. Org. Coat. 2024, 187, 108141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cho, J.-D.; Ju, H.-T.; Hong, J.-W. Photocuring kinetics of UV-initiated free-radical photopolymerizations with and without silica nanoparticles. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 658–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. EPA Product Performance Test Guidelines. OCSPP 810.2200: Disinfectants for Use on Hard Surfaces—Efficacy Data Recommendations. 2012. Available online: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0150-0021 (accessed on 4 August 2023).
  56. Shirai, A.; Yasutomo, Y.K. Bactericidal action of ferulic acid with ultraviolet-A light irradiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 191, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 16 02452 g001
Figure 1. Chemical structure of ferulic acid.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of ferulic acid.
Polymers 16 02452 g001
Polymers 16 02452 g002
Figure 2. The preparation scheme of the (meth)acrylate syrup by free radical bulk photopolymerization.
Figure 2. The preparation scheme of the (meth)acrylate syrup by free radical bulk photopolymerization.
Polymers 16 02452 g002
Polymers 16 02452 g003
Figure 3. The preparation scheme of the UV-cured varnish coatings containing ferulic acid.
Figure 3. The preparation scheme of the UV-cured varnish coatings containing ferulic acid.
Polymers 16 02452 g003
Polymers 16 02452 g004
Figure 4. The kinetics curves of UV crosslinking processes of the varnish binders with various contents of ferulic acid and the HAP photoinitiator (1 wt. part (a), 3 wt. parts (b), and 5 wt. parts of HAP (c)).
Figure 4. The kinetics curves of UV crosslinking processes of the varnish binders with various contents of ferulic acid and the HAP photoinitiator (1 wt. part (a), 3 wt. parts (b), and 5 wt. parts of HAP (c)).
Polymers 16 02452 g004
Polymers 16 02452 g005
Figure 5. The influence of ferulic acid concentration on the maximum reaction rate (Rpmax) (a), the photoinitiation index (b), and the slowing process evaluation parameter (c) of the varnish coatings.
Figure 5. The influence of ferulic acid concentration on the maximum reaction rate (Rpmax) (a), the photoinitiation index (b), and the slowing process evaluation parameter (c) of the varnish coatings.
Polymers 16 02452 g005
Polymers 16 02452 g006
Figure 6. The FTIR spectra for ferulic acid and the selected uncured and UV-cured varnish compositions (full wavenumber range (a) and a narrow range (b)).
Figure 6. The FTIR spectra for ferulic acid and the selected uncured and UV-cured varnish compositions (full wavenumber range (a) and a narrow range (b)).
Polymers 16 02452 g006
Polymers 16 02452 g007
Figure 7. The adhesion to a glass substrate (a) and hardness (b) of the UV-cured varnish coatings.
Figure 7. The adhesion to a glass substrate (a) and hardness (b) of the UV-cured varnish coatings.
Polymers 16 02452 g007
Polymers 16 02452 g008
Figure 8. The gloss (a) and DOI values (b) for the UV-cured varnish coatings.
Figure 8. The gloss (a) and DOI values (b) for the UV-cured varnish coatings.
Polymers 16 02452 g008
Polymers 16 02452 g009
Figure 9. The reduction of Staphylococcus epidermidis after contact with the UV-cured varnish coatings.
Figure 9. The reduction of Staphylococcus epidermidis after contact with the UV-cured varnish coatings.
Polymers 16 02452 g009
Table 1. The components of the photoreactive (meth)acrylate syrup.
Table 1. The components of the photoreactive (meth)acrylate syrup.
(Meth)acrylate Syrup Monomers [wt. parts]APO
[wt. part]
BAMMAHEASTY
MAS403515100.75
Table 2. The composition of the UV-photocurable varnishes.
Table 2. The composition of the UV-photocurable varnishes.
Varnish
Symbol 		Components [wt. parts]
MASPETIA HAP FA
CV-1/01001510
CV-1/0.30.3
CV-1/0.60.6
CV-1/0.90.9
CV-3/030
CV-3/0.30.3
CV-3/0.60.6
CV-3/0.90.9
CV-5/050
CV-5/0.30.3
CV-5/0.60.6
CV-5/0.90.9
Table 3. The properties of the (meth)acrylate syrup and (meth)acrylate copolymer.
Table 3. The properties of the (meth)acrylate syrup and (meth)acrylate copolymer.
SyrupCopolymer
SC
(%)		ƞ
[Pa·s]		Mn
[g/mol]		Mw
[g/mol]		PDI
[a.u.]
514.615,00056,0003.7
Table 4. The characteristic parameters of the UV crosslinking process of the varnish compositions.
Table 4. The characteristic parameters of the UV crosslinking process of the varnish compositions.
HAP (wt. part)135
FA (wt. part)00.30.60.900.30.60.900.30.60.9
Conversion (%)787477817271727567687070
tRpmax (s)2.86.15.79.42.14.05.57.01.83.85.66.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kowalczyk, A.; Kraśkiewicz, A.; Markowska-Szczupak, A.; Kowalczyk, K. Antimicrobial Coatings Based on a Photoreactive (Meth)acrylate Syrup and Ferulic Acid—The Effectiveness against Staphylococcus epidermidis. Polymers 2024, 16, 2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16172452

AMA Style

Kowalczyk A, Kraśkiewicz A, Markowska-Szczupak A, Kowalczyk K. Antimicrobial Coatings Based on a Photoreactive (Meth)acrylate Syrup and Ferulic Acid—The Effectiveness against Staphylococcus epidermidis. Polymers. 2024; 16(17):2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16172452

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kowalczyk, Agnieszka, Agata Kraśkiewicz, Agata Markowska-Szczupak, and Krzysztof Kowalczyk. 2024. "Antimicrobial Coatings Based on a Photoreactive (Meth)acrylate Syrup and Ferulic Acid—The Effectiveness against Staphylococcus epidermidis" Polymers 16, no. 17: 2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16172452

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop