Next Article in Journal
Polymerizable Ionic Liquid Crystals Comprising Polyoxometalate Clusters toward Inorganic-Organic Hybrid Solid Electrolytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Biodegradable Core–Multishell Nanocarriers: Influence of Inner Shell Structure on the Encapsulation Behavior of Dexamethasone and Tacrolimus
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of Fluoroalkyl End-Capped Vinyltrimethoxysilane Oligomeric Silica Nanocomposites Containing Gluconamide Units Possessing Highly Oleophobic/Superhydrophobic, Highly Oleophobic/Superhydrophilic, and Superoleophilic/Superhydrophobic Characteristics on the Modified Surfaces
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrowetting Performances of Novel Fluorinated Polymer Dielectric Layer Based on Poly(1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluoroctylmethacrylate) Nanoemulsion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/polym9070293
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Self-Assembly of Double Hydrophilic Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) Block Copolymers in Aqueous Solution

by
Jochen Willersinn
and
Bernhard V.K.J. Schmidt
*
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, 14424 Potsdam, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2017, 9(7), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9070293
Submission received: 23 June 2017 / Revised: 14 July 2017 / Accepted: 16 July 2017 / Published: 20 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymers and Block Copolymers at Interfaces and Surfaces)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The self-assembly of a novel combination of hydrophilic blocks in water is presented, namely poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) (PEtOx-b-PVP). The completely water-soluble double hydrophilic block copolymer (DHBC) is formed via copper-catalyzed polymer conjugation, whereas the molecular weight of the PVP is varied in order to study the effect of block ratio on the self-assembly process. Studies via dynamic light scattering, static light scattering as well as microscopy techniques, e.g., cryo scanning electron microscopy or laser scanning confocal microscopy, show the formation of spherical particles in an aqueous solution with sizes between 300 and 400 nm. Particles of the DHBCs are formed without the influence of external stimuli. Moreover, the efficiency of self-assembly formation relies significantly on the molar ratio of the utilized blocks. The nature of the formed structures relies further on the concentration, and indications of particular and vesicular structures are found.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Block copolymer self-assembly is one of the most prominent fields in polymer science with plenty of applications such as lithography [1,2], drug-delivery [3,4], nano reactors [5] or compatibilization of polymer blends [6,7]. In the dispersed state, block copolymers unleash their potential in the formation of nano particles with various shapes [8,9,10], vesicles [11,12] or micelles [13,14], which are mostly based on amphiphilic block copolymers. A key factor for the formation of defined block copolymer self-assemblies are polymer-polymer interfaces and the polymer-solvent interfaces [15]. Specifically, self-assemblies of amphiphilic block copolymers rely significantly on solvent-polymer interactions, where one of the blocks is, in contrast to the other block, insoluble in the solvent. In such a way, self-assembly formation is easily attainable via addition of the respective solvent. Moreover, the morphology of the formed structure can be changed, i.e., inverted, depending on the solvent. A frequently used way to form self-assembled structures in an aqueous solution is to change the solubility of one block via external stimuli, e.g., via temperature [16,17,18,19], pH [19,20,21] or redox [22,23]. In such a way, completely soluble block copolymers can be turned into an amphiphilic block copolymer, which results in the formation of self-assembled structures. Therefore, dynamic switches between colloidal states of polymer self-assemblies are possible as well as dissolution or formation of self-assembled structures.
In contrast to the self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers, including the utilization of stimuli to render the solubility of one block, e.g., to turn it hydrophobic via thermal stimuli [16,24,25], double hydrophilic block copolymers (DHBCs) can form self-assembled structures in an aqueous solution as well [26]. Considering two hydrophilic homopolymers, macroscopic demixing can be observed depending on polymer concentration and type [27,28]. Therefore, aqueous two phase systems are formed that can be utilized for protein [29] or nano particle [30] purification. These completely aqueous multi-phase systems have been focused on recently regarding all aqueous emulsions via various stabilization methods [31,32] and utilized as all aqueous bioreactors [33] or in conjunction with giant unilamellar vesicles [34]. The interface between the aqueous phases is not perfectly defined and can have dimensions of tens of nanometers, which is larger than the correlation length of the polymer solutions [32] that allow small water-soluble molecules to pass without encountering an interface in the classical sense [35]. Instead of a sharp change in the concentration of the polymer in one phase, a gradient of polymer concentration is observed. Moreover, interface tensions between different aqueous phases are below 10−2 mN·m−1 [35], which points towards a low stability of the multiphase system.
From aqueous two phase systems, the step towards DHBC self-assembly seems to be straightforward as the blocks cannot demix on a macroscopic scale anymore. Therefore, microphase separation should be induced. Nevertheless, rather high polymer concentrations have to be utilized and the choice of the blocks is crucial for a successful self-assembly, as a significant difference in hydrophilicity of the blocks has to be present to drive the system towards phase separation [26]. The phase separation itself is driven via differences in the osmotic pressure in the polymer domains due to differences in water uptake/swelling. As the system compensates the differences in osmotic pressure, the polymer domains demix and form self-assembled structures [36,37]. A variety of self-assembled structures from DHBCs have been described in the literature, e.g., the systems poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) (PEO-b-PVP) [38], pullulan-b-poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) [39], PEO-b-pullulan [26], PEO-b-poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) [36,40], PEO-b-poly(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine) [37], poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-b-poly(2-O-(N-acetyl-β-d-glucosamine)ethyl methacrylate) [41] as well as PEO-b-poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEO-b-PEtOx) 8-arm star polymers [42]. Nevertheless, the morphology of the polymer-polymer interface as well as the polymer-water interface is still unknown.
A DHBC combination that has not been investigated yet is PEtOx-b-PVP, which is—to the best of our knowledge—a novel block copolymer. A previously investigated combination between PEtOx and PVP were hydrogels formed from PEtOx macromonomers and VP [43]. Both blocks are considered quite biocompatible [44,45] and therefore are interesting with respect to future applications in biomedicine. Therefore, PEtOx is utilized in hydrogel formation or drug-encapsulation [46] as well as in bio- or surface conjugation [47,48,49]. PVP can be utilized as a reductant in metal nano particle synthesis [50], for drug-delivery [51], as a biocompatible surface coating [52] or as a blood plasma substitute [52]. As the synthesis of PEtOx-b-PVP involves two substantially different polymerization methods, a post polymerization conjugation is an efficient way to generate PEtOx-b-PVP (Scheme 1). One of the most common methods for polymer conjugation is copper catalyzed azide alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAc) [53,54], which is a versatile, efficient and convenient method for polymer conjugation. The PEtOx block can be synthesized via cationic ring opening polymerization (CROP) employing 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline as monomer [55]. Moreover, useful azide endgroups can be incorporated via termination with sodium azide [56]. On the other hand, PVP is accessible via the reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT)/macromolecular architectures via the interchange of xanthates (MADIX) process [38,57]. The introduction of an alkyne endgroup complimentary to the azide endgroup in PEtOx can be performed via an alkyne functionalized chain transfer agent. In such a way, the PEtOx-b-PVP block copolymer can be generated easily.
Herein, the self-assembly of a novel DHBC, namely PEtOx-b-PVP, in an aqueous solution is investigated. First, individual PEtOx and PVP building blocks are synthesized via CROP or RAFT/MADIX polymerization. Moreover, the degree of polymerization of PVP block is varied to study the effect of block length on the self-assembly behavior. The respective blocks are conjugated via CuAAc and subsequently the self-assembly process is studied via dynamic light scattering (DLS) and static light scattering (SLS). In addition, imaging techniques like optical microscopy, laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) in conjunction with differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy as well as cryo scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are utilized to visualize the formed structures in solution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Ammonium chloride (99%, Roth KG, Karlsruhe, Germany), ascorbic acid (98%, Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany), CuSO4 (99%, Roth KG), 2-bromopropionyl bromide (97%, Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), t-butyl hydroperoxide (70% solution in water, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), diethyl ether (ACS reagent, Sigma Aldrich), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, analytical grade, Sigma Aldrich), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, analytical grade, VWR Chemicals, Darmstadt, Germany), ethyl acetate (EtOAc, analytical grade, Chem Solute, Berlin, Germany), hexane (analytical grade, Fluka, Schwerte, Germany), magnesium sulfate (dried, Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany), methanol (MeOH, analytical grade, Fisher Scientific), N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA, 98%, Sigma Aldrich), potassium-O-ethyl xanthate (98%, Alfa Aesar), propargyl alchol (99%, Sigma Aldrich), pyridine (99% extra dry, Acros Organics), Rhodamine B (Sigma Aldrich), sodium azide (>99.5%, Fluka), sodium bicarbonate (>99%, Fluka), sodium sulfite (97%, Acros Organics) and triethylamine (99.5%, Sigma Aldrich) were used as received. Acetonitrile (Sigma Aldrich, 99.5%), 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline (EtOx, 99%, Acros Organics) and methyl tosylate (97%, Fluka) were dried over CaH2 (93%, Acros) and distilled under argon prior to use. N-Vinylpyrrolidone (VP, 99%, Sigma Aldrich) was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and purified by distillation under reduced pressure. Acetone (analytical grade, J.T. Baker, Schwerte, Germany) and dichloromethane (DCM, analytical grade, Acros Organics) were stored over molecular sieves (3 Å) prior to use. Millipore water was obtained from an Integra UV plus pure water system by SG Water (Hamburg, Germany). Azido functionalized PS-resin (Figure S1), PEtOx22k-N3 and prop-2-yn-1-yl 2-((ethoxycarbonothioyl)thio) propanoate (alkyne-CTA) were prepared according to the literature (refer to the SI for details) [39,58]. Spectra/Por dialysis tubes with MWCOs of 10,000 and 1,000,000 Da were purchased from Spectrum Labs (Los Angeles, CA, USA).

2.2. Synthesis of PVP14k-alkyne

In a dry argon, purged 25 mL Schlenk tube, alkyne-CTA (0.035 g, 0.15 mmol, 1.0 eq.) was dissolved in deionized water (3.36 mL). N-vinylpyrrolidone (6.67 g, 60.0 mmol, 400 eq.) and t-BuOOH solution (0.0069 g of 70 wt % solution, 0.054 mmol, 0.36 eq.) were added to the solution. The mixture was frozen in liquid nitrogen and sodium sulfite (0.0068 g, 0.054 mmol) was added. The flask was degassed via three freeze-pump-thaw cycles and immersed in an oil bath at 25 °C. After 6 h, the polymerization was quenched with liquid N2 and exposed to air. Water was removed via reduced pressure and the crude polymer was dissolved in a small amount of MeOH. The mixture was precipitated twice into cold diethyl ether to afford alkyne terminated PVP (PVP-alkyne) as a white powder. (Yield: 5.54 g, 0.332 mmol, Mn,app,SEC = 13,700 g·mol−1 (PEO equivalents in NMP), Ð = 1.4).

2.3. Synthesis of PVP14k-b-PEtOx22k

The conjugation reaction was performed according to the literature [59]. In a dry, argon purged 25 mL round bottom Schlenk flask, PVP alkyne (0.21 g, 0.015 mmol, 1.2 eq.) was dissolved in deionized water (5.0 mL). CuSO4 (1.3 mg, 8.0 µmol, 0.65 eq.) and DMSO (5.0 mL) were added to the solution. A solution of ascorbic acid (4.4 mg, 0.025 mmol, 2.0 eq.) in deionized water (2.5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture. PEtOx-N3 (0.25 g, 0.013 mmol, 1.0 eq.) and PMDETA (4.0 µL, 0.019 mmol, 1.5 eq.) were dissolved in DMSO (2.0 mL) and added to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 48 h. Azido functionalized PS-Resin (8.0 mg, 0.018 mmol) and ascorbic acid (4.4 mg, 0.025 mmol, 2.0 eq.) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred for additional 48 h. The resin was filtered off and the solution was dialyzed against deionized water for three days followed by lyophilization to afford PVP-b-PEtOx (0.35 g, 0.021 mmol, 77% recovery Mn = 16,900 g·mol−1, pullulan standard in acetate buffer with 20% MeOH, Ð = 1.9) as a white powder.

2.4. Investigations of Self-Assembly of PVPxxk-b-PEtOx22k in Water

The preparation of the aqueous block copolymer solutions with different concentrations are listed in Table S1. The according masses of block copolymer sample and Millipore water were weighed precisely into vials and filtered with 0.45 µm CA syringe filters into DLS vials unless otherwise stated. The samples for optical microscopy were prepared in the same way and 100 µL of the corresponding solution was drop casted on a glass slide and investigated with the microscope immediately. 2 mL of the 2.5 wt % solutions were stained with 10 µL of a 0.08 mmol Rhodamine B solution prior to the investigation via confocal microscopy. 60 µL of the stained solution were drop casted on a glass slide and sealed with a rubber ring and a second glass slide and placed into the microscope.

2.5. Characterization Methods

1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature at 400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C with an Ascend400 (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and static light scattering (SLS) was performed using an ALV-7004 Multiple Tau Digital Correlator (ALV, Langen, Germany) in combination with a CGS-3 Compact Goniometer (ALV, Langen, Germany) and a HeNe laser (Polytec, 34 mW, λ = 633 nm at θ = 30° to 150° with steps of 10° for DLS and SLS). Sample temperatures were adjusted to 25 °C. Toluene was used as immersion liquid. Apparent hydrodynamic radii (Rapp) have been determined from fitting autocorrelation functions by using REPES algorithm. Radii of gyration (Rg) were determined via SLS with ALV Stat ALV-5000 using a Guinier plot. Cryogenic scanning electron microscopy (cryo SEM) was performed on a Jeol JSM 7500 F (Jeol, Tokio, Japan) and the cryo-chamber from Gatan (Alto 2500, Gatan, Munich, Germany). Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) for PEtOx and PVP was conducted in NMP (Fluka, GC grade) with 0.05 mol·L−1 LiBr and BSME as internal standard at 70 °C using a column system by PSS GRAM 100/1000 column (8 × 300 mm, 7 µm particle size) with a PSS GRAM precolumn (8 × 50 mm) and a RI-71 detector (Shodex, Munich, Germany) and a poly(methyl methacrylate) calibration with standards from PSS (PSS, Mainz, Germany). SEC for block copolymers was conducted in acetate buffer containing 20% MeOH at 25 °C using a PSS NOVEMA Max analytical system XL (pre column size 50 mm × 8 mm–10 µm, main column size 300 mm × 8 mm–10 µm) using a pullulan calibration with standards from PSS. Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) measurements were conducted with a TCS SP5 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) confocal microscope, using a 63× (1.2 NA) water immersion objective. The dye stained samples were excited with a diode pumped solid-state laser at 561 nm and the emission bands were collected at 640 nm. Turbidimetry measurements to obtain the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) were conducted with a T70+ UV/Vis Spectrometer (PG Instruments Ltd., Leicestershire, UK) at a wavelength of 660 nm and a temperature control system consisting of a Peltier Temperature Controller PTC-2 (custom build, Potsdam, Germany) and a Manson Switching Mode Power Supply 1-36VDC-10A (Manson, Hong Kong, China).Typically, 0.5 wt % solutions were investigated with a heating rate of 1 K·min−1 and the transmission values were detected within a 5 s interval. Optical microscopy was performed on a Leica DVM6 digital microscope with a PLANAPO FOV 3.6 objective and a transmitted light adaptor by Leica (Wetzlar, Germany). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were acquired on a Nicolet iS 5 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany).

3. Results

In order to study the self-assembly behavior of PEtOx-b-PVP in aqueous solution, block copolymers were formed via a CuAAc approach and subsequently self-assembly was studied via DLS and microscopy techniques.

3.1. Synthesis of PEtOx22k-b-PVPxxk

The synthesis of PEtOx-b-PVP was performed in two steps (Scheme 2). At first, the individual homopolymers were synthesized with specific end groups that could be coupled subsequently.
The PEtOx building block was synthesized via CROP of 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline with methyl tosylate (MeOTs) as initiator at 80 °C in acetonitrile. To introduce an azide functionality as end group, the CROP was terminated with solid sodium azide. Finally, PEtOx with Mn of 22,200 g·mol−1 and Ð of 1.24 was obtained (Table 1 and Figure S2). The PVP building blocks were formed via RAFT/MADIX polymerization of VP with redox initiation in H2O/DMSO mixture at 25 °C. The alkyne end group was incorporated via utilization of an alkyne functionalized chain transfer agent (Scheme 2 and Figures S3–S5). In order to study the self-assembly behavior depending on the volume fractions of the individual blocks, different molecular weights of PVP, namely 10,000, 14,000 and 32,000 g·mol−1, were targeted. Moreover, narrow molecular weight distributions with Ð of 1.1 to 1.4 were obtained (Figures S3–S5).
The block copolymer formation was performed via CuAAc of the azide and alkyne end functionalized blocks. As no absolute molecular weights were obtained via SEC, an azide functionalized resin was added after the CuAAc reaction in order to avoid tedious purification or test reactions for stoichiometry assessment (Figure S1) [39]. Therefore, the alkyne functionalized building block was added in excess to ensure complete conversion of the azide block. Afterwards, the resin was utilized to capture remaining alkyne blocks and filtered off. To investigate the efficiency of the CuAAc reaction and the removal of unreacted alkyne functionalized polymer via the resin, FTIR and 1H NMR was performed. FTIR shows the removal of the azide band at around 2100 cm−1 (Figure S6), which supports the reaction of the PEtOX-block. Moreover, 1H NMR shows the complete shift of the methylene protons next to the alkyne in the PVP block at 4.8 ppm (Figure S7) as well as the shift of the methine proton at 3.4 ppm (Figure S7). Subsequently, the block copolymers were analyzed via SEC in acetate buffer that showed a shift of the elugram towards lower retention times as compared with the mixture of both homopolymers, which corresponds to higher molecular weights (Figure 1a and Figures S8 and S9). Moreover, unimodal distributions were obtained suggesting successful block copolymer formation. The block copolymer Mn from 17,000 to 38,800 g·mol−1 obtained via SEC do not match the expectation of the sum of both homo polymer Mn. A reason for the deviation might be interactions with the column in aqueous SEC. Furthermore, a significant increase of Ð to 1.8 to 2.2 was observed in the SEC measurements of the block copolymers, which might be due to interactions with the column and the change to aqueous SEC. Already the homopolymers show a significant increase of Ð compared to SEC in NMP (Table S2).
As the SEC results only state an unimodal molecular weight distribution, 1H NMR spectroscopy was performed in order to investigate the block copolymer composition (Figure 1b and Figures S10 and S11). Signals corresponding to both blocks are visible in the spectrum, which indicates incorporation of both building blocks. For example, the backbone protons of PEtOx around 3.5 ppm can be assigned as well as the signals from the pyrrolidone ring at 2.0, 2.3 and 3.2 ppm. Together with the elugrams from SEC, successful block copolymer formation can be stated. Moreover, integration of the respective peaks in the 1H NMR spectra allows quantification of the amount of the respective blocks in the material (Table 1), which clearly states the formation of the targeted block copolymers with the respective composition derived from the sum of both building blocks. For PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k a molar ratio of 0.48 was obtained, which is in accordance with the expectations (theoretical 0.4 from SEC of the homopolymers). Moreover, a molar ratio of 0.6 was calculated for PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k by 1H NMR (theoretical 0.56 from SEC of the homopolymers) and for PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k a ratio of 1.42 was calculated (theoretical 1.29 from SEC of the homopolymers). Both ratios are in-line with theoretical considerations. Thus, the formation of the intended block copolymers can be stated.

3.2. Self Assembly of PEtOx22k-b-PVPxxk in Water

At first, the self-assembly of PEtOx-b-PVP in aqueous solution was probed via DLS. Therefore, the block copolymers were dissolved in pre-determined concentrations in water at ambient temperature. Subsequently, the solutions were analyzed via DLS at 25 °C (Table 2).
Bimodal distributions with slow and fast diffusing species corresponding to larger and smaller structures were observed that might correspond to self-assembled DHBC particles and unimers respectively (Figure 2). The abundance of the species depends only weakly on polymer concentration with increasing abundances of unimers at lower concentrations. Particle sizes from 95 to 240 nm were obtained (Table 2 and Table S3). A significant effect of PVP volume fraction on the efficiency of the self-assembly is evident. An optimum is observed in the case of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k with an abundance of self-assembled particles of 99% at a concentration of 1.0 wt %. On the other hand, PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k has an abundance of 94% of particles at a concentration of 1.0 wt %, while only very few amounts of self-assembled structures are observed for PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k. It should be noted that the values given are obtained from the intensity weighted particle size distributions and therefore larger particle sizes are significantly overexpressed due to the increased scattering of larger particles compared to smaller particles. With increasing polymer concentration, the sizes of the self-assembled structures increase as well, e.g., from 183 nm at 0.1 wt % to 240 nm at 2.5 wt % for PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k. Comparing the different block copolymers with respect to the volume fraction of the PVP block at a given concentration of 1.0 wt %, similar particle sizes of the self-assembled structures between 140 and 197 nm are obtained in all cases. Although, the abundance of self-assembles structures significantly differs with different PVP content. Overall, DLS measurements point towards self-assembly of PEtOx-b-PVP block copolymers in aqueous solution. Moreover, a comparison between abundance of unimers and particles allows us to predicate self-assembly efficiency for the various block ratios.
In order to gain deeper insight into the nature of the formed structures, SLS was performed for PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k (Figure S12 and Table S4). A radius of gyration (Rg) of 119.5 nm was obtained, supporting the findings from DLS that particle structures are formed in solution. Nevertheless, the value of 119.5 nm is significantly below obtained Rh values from DLS. The quotient Rg/Rh gives a value of approximately 0.61, which might correspond to solid spheres. Nevertheless, the SLS results might be biased due to remaining unimers in solution especially at low concentrations. The obtained Mw from SLS is with 9412·kg·mol−1 also quite low for the obtained particle sizes.
PEtOx is well-known for its lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior, which leads to coil-to-globule transitions at the cloud point when aqueous PEtOx solutions are heated. In order to ensure that the LCST behavior has no effect on the self-assembly formation, turbidimetry was performed. It could be shown that no phase transition towards hydrophobic globules takes place for the utilized PEtOx22k up to temperatures of 60 °C (Figure S13), which is significantly above the temperatures of the present self-assembly investigations. Therefore, an effect of the LCST behavior of PEtOx can be excluded in the present DHBC self-assembly.
In order to support the findings from DLS, microscopy techniques were utilized as well. At first, optical microscopy was employed to investigate polymer particle formation at high concentration [26]. Spherical particles are observed via optical microscopy, which indicate self-assembly of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k at a concentration of 20 wt % (Figure 3a,b) and a temperature of 25 °C. Moreover, the particles appear to be hollow (Figure 3b), pointing towards vesicle formation as solid spheres would have significantly increased contrast. The observed particles have diameters from 1 to 3 µm. The system PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k has similar behavior as shown via optical microscopy as well (Figures S14 and S15). At a concentration of 20 wt %, particles with hollow interior, i.e., vesicles, with diameters between 3 and 10 µm are visible. A decrease in concentration leads to smaller particles with sizes between 1 and 2 µm for 10 wt % and particles sizes between 1 and 4 µm for 15 wt %, while at 5 wt % particles are barely visible anymore. To enhance the magnification, LSCM/DIC imaging was utilized. Therefore, the particles formed from PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k were stained with Rhodamine B which adsorbs at the surface of the particles. Again, spherical particles were observed in the fluorescence channel and via DIC (Figure 3c,d). The particles show sizes around 1 to 3 µm at a concentration of 2.5 wt % and a temperature of 25 °C. Moreover, particle aggregation could be observed as well (Figure 3d), e.g., via elongated structures that seem to be formed from various spherical subunits.
A deeper insight into the particle structures can be gained via cryo SEM. Therefore, aqueous solutions of the PEtOx-b-PVP block copolymers are frozen and the structures investigated in the SEM. So, a sample droplet is frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently fractured and sputtered in order to investigate the samples interior at a more natural state in comparison to conventional electron microscopy. In correspondence to the other imaging methods, spherical particles are observed (Figure 4). Block copolymer concentrations of 0.5 wt % were utilized. In contrast to the other microscopy methods, smaller particles in the range of 500 nm to 1 µm are observed via cryo SEM, which are similar sizes to the ones obtained from DLS. The comparison of micrographs obtained from block copolymers with different PVP content shows significant differences. In the case of PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k and PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k larger structures and connecting string like structures between particles are observed, while for PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k these structures are not observed or only to an insignificant extent. The larger structures and strings might be due to remaining non-assembled unimers in solution that were observed in a significant amount via DLS as well. Overall, cryo SEM shows a distinct interface between self-assembled polymer particles and the surrounding environment. Nevertheless, no direct comparison and assumptions towards the solution state are possible.

4. Discussion

In order to form self-assembled structures of DHBCs in aqueous solution both blocks should have significant difference in hydrophilicity [26], as the self-assembled structures are formed due to differences in the osmotic pressure in the polymer domains, which is caused by different swelling properties [36,37]. To compensate the differences in osmotic pressure, the polymer domains demix and form self-assembled structures. An option to gain insight into the interactions of polymer with the solvent is the second virial coefficient A2. For the present system second virial coefficients for PEtOx (A2,PEtOx = 8.7 × 10−4 mol·mL·g−2 [60]) and for PVP (A2,PVP = 9.3–11.2 × 10−4 mol·mL·g−2 [61]) are reported in the literature that show a slight difference pointing to different quality of water-polymer interactions. Moreover, the PEtOx block entails a LCST, which points to partial hydrophobic character. Albeit, the investigated self-assembled structures are observed at temperatures significantly below the cloud point of the PEtOX block, the less hydrophilic nature of the PEtOx block might support the formation of DHBC self-assemblies in water. A significant contrast in hydrophilicity between polymers exhibiting a LCST and completely water-soluble polymers can be assumed, which is similar to previous results [39]. Therefore, it can be assumed that the PVP block is preferably present on the outside of the formed structures. Interestingly, a significant influence of the molecular weight of the PVP block on the efficiency of the self-assembly was observed, which clearly states optimization potential. Moreover, these findings might be a hint towards architecture dependent tuning of self-assembly efficiency. Compared to other examples from the literature [38], increased efficiency is observed for PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k, which clearly supports that the combination of blocks has a significant influence on the self-assembly efficiency. Nevertheless, one has to keep in mind that the efficiency was assessed via DLS from the intensity weighted distributions that overestimate larger structures. Interestingly, the obtained particle sizes seem to be almost independent from PVP molecular weight. A major question is particle morphology in solution. While SLS results point towards solid spheres, the molecular weight obtained from SLS points towards loose aggregated structures. The contour length of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k can be calculated to 111 nm (224 × 0.36 nm + 123 × 0.25 nm) [36,62]. Particle sizes obtained from DLS and microscopy do not support the formation of micelles as the obtained particles with diameters measured via DLS around 394 nm are significantly too high for micelle formation in the lower concentration regime up to 2.5 wt %. Up to this point it cannot be clarified if loose aggregates [63] or vesicular structures [26] are present in solution. At higher concentrations (10–15 wt %), particular structures are formed as well and around 20 wt % a shift towards hollow structures might be the case as optical microscopy suggests, which is a similar effect to what was observed for pullulan-b-PEO [26]. In general, the molar ratio of the different blocks determines the efficiency of the self-assembly. Therefore, a significant effect of the more hydrophilic block, namely PVP, on self-assembly efficiency is the case. On the other hand, the concentration of the block copolymer seems to determine the type of formed structure from particle to vesicle. A reason for the concentration dependency of the inner particle structure might be the increased width of the polymer interfaces as well as multi lamellar morphologies that hinder bending of the polymer structure. Regarding the distribution of the formed structures, it can be stated that at high concentrations a broader range of particle sizes are formed as visible via optical microscopy. At lower concentrations, more uniform particles are formed as shown via DLS and cryo SEM.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, the self-assembly of a novel DHBC, namely PEtOx-b-PVP, in aqueous solution is shown. PEtOx and PVP building blocks were synthesized via CROP or RAFT/MADIX polymerization and conjugated via CuAAc. Subsequently, the self-assembly process was studied via DLS. In addition, imaging techniques like optical microscopy, LSCM in conjunction with DIC microscopy as well as cryo SEM were utilized and particular structures could be visualized in solution. Moreover, the volume ratio of the PVP block was varied in order to study the effect of block length on the self-assembly behavior. A significant effect on the efficiency of the self-assembly process was found and an optimum molar ratio of PVP and PEtOx was assigned via relative comparison of unimer and particle abundance from DLS results. Moreover, polymer concentration has a profound effect on the structures formed. It seems that particular structures are formed at lower concentrations (2.5 wt % and lower), while vesicular structures are obtained at higher concentrations (20 wt %).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/9/7/293/s1, Figure S1: IR spectrum of azidomethyl polystyrene resin recorded at 25 °C, Figure S2: 1H NMR spectra of PEtOx22k recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3, Figure S3: SEC elution curve of PVP10k recorded in NMP at 70 °C and corresponding 1H NMR spectra of PVP10k recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3, Figure S4: SEC elution curve of PVP32k recorded in NMP at 70 °C and corresponding 1H NMR spectra of PVP32k recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3, Figure S5: SEC elution curve of PVP14k recorded in NMP at 70 °C and corresponding 1H NMR spectra of PVP14k recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3, Figure S6: FTIR traces of PVP-alkyne PEtOx22k-N3 and PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k block copolymer, Figure S7: 1H-NMR overlay of PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k and PVP10k-alkyne recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3, Figure S8: SEC traces of PVP10k, PEtOx22k and PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k block copolymer recorded in acetate buffer with 20% MeOH, Figure S9: SEC traces of PVP32k, PEtOx22k and PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k block copolymer recorded in acetate buffer with 20% MeOH, Figure S10: 1H-NMR spectrum of PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3, Figure S11: 1H-NMR spectrum of PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3, Figure S12: SLS Guinier plot of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k with extrapolation of c→0, Figure S13: Turbidimetry measurements of PEtOx22k homopolymer, Figure S14: Optical microscopy images of PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k in water at 25 °C: (a,b) at a concentration of 10 wt %, (c,d) at a concentration of 15 wt % and (e,f) at a concentration of 20 wt %, Figure S15: Optical microscopy image of PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k in water at 25 °C at a concentration of 5 wt %; Table S1: Weights utilized for DHBC self-assembly investigations, Table S2: Homopolymer data obtained via SEC in aqueous acetate buffer at 25 °C against pullulan calibration, Table S3: Intensity weighted particle size distribution results obtained via DLS at various concentrations in water at 25 °C, Table S4: Calculated values of the quantities of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k determined via the Guinier plot.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Max-Planck Society for funding of the research work and open access publishing. The authors would like to acknowledge Marlies Gräwert for SEC measurements, Heike Runge for assistance with cryo SEM measurements, Tom Robinson as well as Carmen Remde for assistance with LSCM measurements.

Author Contributions

Jochen Willersinn, Bernhard V. K. J. Schmidt conceived and designed the experiments; Jochen Willersinn performed the experiments; Jochen Willersinn and Bernhard V. K. J. Schmidt analyzed the data; Bernhard V. K. J. Schmidt wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Suh, H.S.; Kim, D.H.; Moni, P.; Xiong, S.; Ocola, L.E.; Zaluzec, N.J.; Gleason, K.K.; Nealey, P.F. Sub-10-nm patterning via directed self-assembly of block copolymer films with a vapour-phase deposited topcoat. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tang, C.; Lennon, E.M.; Fredrickson, G.H.; Kramer, E.J.; Hawker, C.J. Evolution of Block Copolymer Lithography to Highly Ordered Square Arrays. Science 2008, 322, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kataoka, K.; Harada, A.; Nagasaki, Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: Design, characterization and biological significance. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 47, 113–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ge, Z.; Liu, S. Functional block copolymer assemblies responsive to tumor and intracellular microenvironments for site-specific drug delivery and enhanced imaging performance. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7289–7325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kim, K.T.; Cornelissen, J.J.L.M.; Nolte, R.J.M.; van Hest, J.C.M. A Polymersome Nanoreactor with Controllable Permeability Induced by Stimuli-Responsive Block Copolymers. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2787–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eagan, J.M.; Xu, J.; Di Girolamo, R.; Thurber, C.M.; Macosko, C.W.; LaPointe, A.M.; Bates, F.S.; Coates, G.W. Combining polyethylene and polypropylene: Enhanced performance with PE-i-PP multiblock polymers. Science 2017, 355, 814–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Matsen, M.W. Phase Behavior of Block Copolymer/Homopolymer Blends. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 5765–5773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schmidt, B.V.K.J.; Elbert, J.; Scheid, D.; Hawker, C.J.; Klinger, D.; Gallei, M. Metallopolymer-Based Shape Anisotropic Nanoparticles. ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boott, C.E.; Gwyther, J.; Harniman, R.L.; Hayward, D.W.; Manners, I. Scalable and uniform 1D nanoparticles by synchronous polymerization, crystallization and self-assembly. Nat. Chem. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gröschel, A.H.; Schacher, F.H.; Schmalz, H.; Borisov, O.V.; Zhulina, E.B.; Walther, A.; Müller, A.H.E. Precise hierarchical self-assembly of multicompartment micelles. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Blasco, E.; Schmidt, B.V.K.J.; Barner-Kowollik, C.; Piñol, M.; Oriol, L. A Novel Photoresponsive Azobenzene-Containing Miktoarm Star Polymer: Self-Assembly and Photoresponse Properties. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 3693–3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Antonietti, M.; Förster, S. Vesicles and Liposomes: A Self-Assembly Principle Beyond Lipids. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1323–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Blasco, E.; Schmidt, B.V.K.J.; Barner-Kowollik, C.; Pinol, M.; Oriol, L. Dual thermo- and photo-responsive micelles based on miktoarm star polymers. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 4506–4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hudson, Z.M.; Lunn, D.J.; Winnik, M.A.; Manners, I. Colour-tunable fluorescent multiblock micelles. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barner-Kowollik, C.; Goldmann, A.S.; Schacher, F.H. Polymer Interfaces: Synthetic Strategies Enabling Functionality, Adaptivity, and Spatial Control. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 5001–5016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schmidt, B.V.K.J.; Barner-Kowollik, C. Supramolecular X- and H-shaped star block copolymers via cyclodextrin-driven supramolecular self-assembly. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 2461–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smith, A.E.; Xu, X.; McCormick, C.L. Stimuli-responsive amphiphilic (co)polymers via RAFT polymerization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 45–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Skrabania, K.; Kristen, J.; Laschewsky, A.; Akdemir, Ö.; Hoth, A.; Lutz, J.-F. Design, Synthesis, and Aqueous Aggregation Behavior of Nonionic Single and Multiple Thermoresponsive Polymers. Langmuir 2007, 23, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, H.-C.; Hsueh, H.-Y.; Jeng, U.S.; Ho, R.-M. Functionalized Nanoporous Gyroid SiO2 with Double-Stimuli-Responsive Properties as Environment-Selective Delivery Systems. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 3041–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schacher, F.; Rudolph, T.; Wieberger, F.; Ulbricht, M.; Müller, A.H.E. Double Stimuli-Responsive Ultrafiltration Membranes from Polystyrene-block-poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) Diblock Copolymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 1, 1492–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kocak, G.; Tuncer, C.; Butun, V. pH-Responsive polymers. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 144–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schmidt, B.V.K.J.; Elbert, J.; Barner-Kowollik, C.; Gallei, M. Individually Addressable Thermo- and Redox-Responsive Block Copolymers by Combining Anionic Polymerization and RAFT Protocols. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ma, N.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X. Dual Redox Responsive Assemblies Formed from Diselenide Block Copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 442–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hirschbiel, A.F.; Schmidt, B.V.K.J.; Krolla-Sidenstein, P.; Blinco, J.P.; Barner-Kowollik, C. Photochemical Design of Stimuli-Responsive Nanoparticles Prepared by Supramolecular Host–Guest Chemistry. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 4410–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ge, Z.; Xie, D.; Chen, D.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Liu, S. Stimuli-Responsive Double Hydrophilic Block Copolymer Micelles with Switchable Catalytic Activity. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 3538–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brosnan, S.M.; Schlaad, H.; Antonietti, M. Aqueous Self-Assembly of Purely Hydrophilic Block Copolymers into Giant Vesicles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9715–9718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mace, C.R.; Akbulut, O.; Kumar, A.A.; Shapiro, N.D.; Derda, R.; Patton, M.R.; Whitesides, G.M. Aqueous Multiphase Systems of Polymers and Surfactants Provide Self-Assembling Step-Gradients in Density. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9094–9097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Keating, C.D. Aqueous Phase Separation as a Possible Route to Compartmentalization of Biological Molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 2114–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Long, M.S.; Keating, C.D. Nanoparticle Conjugation Increases Protein Partitioning in Aqueous Two-Phase Systems. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Akbulut, O.; Mace, C.R.; Martinez, R.V.; Kumar, A.A.; Nie, Z.; Patton, M.R.; Whitesides, G.M. Separation of Nanoparticles in Aqueous Multiphase Systems through Centrifugation. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4060–4064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. de Freitas, R.A.; Nicolai, T.; Chassenieux, C.; Benyahia, L. Stabilization of Water-in-Water Emulsions by Polysaccharide-Coated Protein Particles. Langmuir 2016, 32, 1227–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vis, M.; Opdam, J.; van ’t Oor, I.S.J.; Soligno, G.; van Roij, R.; Tromp, R.H.; Erné, B.H. Water-in-Water Emulsions Stabilized by Nanoplates. ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4, 965–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dewey, D.C.; Strulson, C.A.; Cacace, D.N.; Bevilacqua, P.C.; Keating, C.D. Bioreactor droplets from liposome-stabilized all-aqueous emulsions. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dimova, R.; Lipowsky, R. Giant Vesicles Exposed to Aqueous Two-Phase Systems: Membrane Wetting, Budding Processes, and Spontaneous Tubulation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1600451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Esquena, J. Water-in-water (W/W) emulsions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 25, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Casse, O.; Shkilnyy, A.; Linders, J.; Mayer, C.; Häussinger, D.; Völkel, A.; Thünemann, A.F.; Dimova, R.; Cölfen, H.; Meier, W.; et al. Solution Behavior of Double-Hydrophilic Block Copolymers in Dilute Aqueous Solution. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 4772–4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Blanazs, A.; Warren, N.J.; Lewis, A.L.; Armes, S.P.; Ryan, A.J. Self-assembly of double hydrophilic block copolymers in concentrated aqueous solution. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 6399–6403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Willersinn, J.; Drechsler, M.; Antonietti, M.; Schmidt, B.V.K.J. Organized Polymeric Submicron Particles via Self-Assembly and Cross-Linking of Double Hydrophilic Poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) in Aqueous Solution. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 5331–5341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Willersinn, J.; Bogomolova, A.; Brunet Cabré, M.; Schmidt, B.V.K.J. Vesicles of double hydrophilic pullulan and poly(acrylamide) block copolymers: A combination of synthetic- and bio-derived blocks. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 1244–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taubert, A.; Furrer, E.; Meier, W. Water-in-water mesophases for templating inorganics. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2170–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Park, H.; Walta, S.; Rosencrantz, R.R.; Korner, A.; Schulte, C.; Elling, L.; Richtering, W.; Boker, A. Micelles from self-assembled double-hydrophilic PHEMA-glycopolymer-diblock copolymers as multivalent scaffolds for lectin binding. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 878–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rudolph, T.; Crotty, S.; von der Lühe, M.; Pretzel, D.; Schubert, U.; Schacher, F. Synthesis and Solution Properties of Double Hydrophilic Poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEO-b-PEtOx) Star Block Copolymers. Polymers 2013, 5, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rueda, J.C.; Komber, H.; Cedrón, J.C.; Voit, B.; Shevtsova, G. Synthesis of New Hydrogels by Copolymerization of Poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) Bis(macromonomers) and N-Vinylpyrrolidone. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2003, 204, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Knop, K.; Hoogenboom, R.; Fischer, D.; Schubert, U.S. Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6288–6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gaitzsch, J.; Huang, X.; Voit, B. Engineering Functional Polymer Capsules toward Smart Nanoreactors. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1053–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hartlieb, M.; Kempe, K.; Schubert, U.S. Covalently cross-linked poly(2-oxazoline) materials for biomedical applications—From hydrogels to self-assembled and templated structures. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 526–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wendler, F.; Rudolph, T.; Gorls, H.; Jasinski, N.; Trouillet, V.; Barner-Kowollik, C.; Schacher, F.H. Maleimide-functionalized poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline): Synthesis and reactivity. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 2419–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mero, A.; Pasut, G.; Via, L.D.; Fijten, M.W.M.; Schubert, U.S.; Hoogenboom, R.; Veronese, F.M. Synthesis and characterization of poly(2-ethyl 2-oxazoline)-conjugates with proteins and drugs: Suitable alternatives to PEG-conjugates? J. Control. Release 2008, 125, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nawroth, J.F.; McDaniel, J.R.; Chilkoti, A.; Jordan, R.; Luxenhofer, R. Maleimide-Functionalized Poly(2-Oxazoline)s and Their Conjugation to Elastin-Like Polypeptides. Macromol. Biosci. 2016, 16, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xiong, Y.; Washio, I.; Chen, J.; Cai, H.; Li, Z.-Y.; Xia, Y. Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone):  A Dual Functional Reductant and Stabilizer for the Facile Synthesis of Noble Metal Nanoplates in Aqueous Solutions. Langmuir 2006, 22, 8563–8570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yao, X.; Xie, C.; Chen, W.; Yang, C.; Wu, W.; Jiang, X. Platinum-Incorporating Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-poly(aspartic acid) Pseudoblock Copolymer Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 2059–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chen, H. Poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone)-Modified Surfaces for Biomedical Applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2013, 13, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kempe, K.; Krieg, A.; Becer, C.R.; Schubert, U.S. “Clicking” on/with polymers: A rapidly expanding field for the straightforward preparation of novel macromolecular architectures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 176–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Barner-Kowollik, C.; Du Prez, F.E.; Espeel, P.; Hawker, C.J.; Junkers, T.; Schlaad, H.; Van Camp, W. “Clicking” Polymers or Just Efficient Linking: What Is the Difference? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hoogenboom, R.; Schlaad, H. Bioinspired Poly(2-oxazoline)s. Polymers 2011, 3, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Volet, G.; Lav, T.-X.; Babinot, J.; Amiel, C. Click-Chemistry: An Alternative Way to Functionalize Poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2011, 212, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pound, G.; Aguesse, F.; McLeary, J.B.; Lange, R.F.M.; Klumperman, B. Xanthate-mediated copolymerization of vinyl monomers for Amphiphilic and double-hydrophilic block copolymers with poly(ethylene glycol). Macromolecules 2007, 40, 8861–8871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Quemener, D.; Davis, T.P.; Barner-Kowollik, C.; Stenzel, M.H. RAFT and click chemistry: A versatile approach to well-defined block copolymers. Chem. Commun. 2006, 5051–5053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bernard, J.; Save, M.; Arathoon, B.; Charleux, B. Preparation of a xanthate-terminated dextran by click chemistry: Application to the synthesis of polysaccharide-coated nanoparticles via surfactant-free ab initio emulsion polymerization of vinyl acetate. J. Polym. Sci. A 2008, 46, 2845–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, F.P.; Ames, A.E.; Taylor, L.D. Aqueous solutions of poly(ethyloxazoline) and its lower consolute phase transition. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 4688–4695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Senak, L.; Wu, C.S.; Malawer, E.G. Size Exclusion Chromatography of Poly(vinylpyrrolidone). J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1987, 10, 1127–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hussain, H.; Tan, B.H.; Gudipati, C.S.; Liu, Y.; He, C.B.; Davis, T.P. Synthesis and self-assembly of poly(styrene)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) amphiphilic diblock copolymers made via a combined ATRP and MADIX approach. J. Polym. Sci. A 2008, 46, 5604–5615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ďorďovič, V.; Uchman, M.; Procházka, K.; Zhigunov, A.; Pleštil, J.; Nykänen, A.; Ruokolainen, J.; Matějíček, P. Hybrid Nanospheres Formed by Intermixed Double-Hydrophilic Block Copolymer Poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(2-ethyloxazoline) with High Content of Metallacarboranes. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 6881–6890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 09 00293 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Overview of block copolymer synthesis and self-assembly in aqueous solution.
Scheme 1. Overview of block copolymer synthesis and self-assembly in aqueous solution.
Polymers 09 00293 sch001
Polymers 09 00293 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis route for the formation of PEtOx-b-PVP block copolymers via RAFT/MADIX polymerization, CROP and CuAAc.
Scheme 2. Synthesis route for the formation of PEtOx-b-PVP block copolymers via RAFT/MADIX polymerization, CROP and CuAAc.
Polymers 09 00293 sch002
Polymers 09 00293 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) SEC traces of PVP14k, PEtOx22k and PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k block copolymer recorded in acetate buffer with 20% MeOH and (b) 1H-NMR spectrum of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3.
Figure 1. (a) SEC traces of PVP14k, PEtOx22k and PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k block copolymer recorded in acetate buffer with 20% MeOH and (b) 1H-NMR spectrum of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k recorded at 400 MHz in CDCl3.
Polymers 09 00293 g001
Polymers 09 00293 g002 550
Figure 2. Intensity weighted particle size distribution curves obtained via DLS at various concentrations in water at 25 °C: (a) PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k; (b) PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k and (c) PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k.
Figure 2. Intensity weighted particle size distribution curves obtained via DLS at various concentrations in water at 25 °C: (a) PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k; (b) PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k and (c) PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k.
Polymers 09 00293 g002
Polymers 09 00293 g003 550
Figure 3. (a,b) optical microscopy images of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k at a concentration of 20 wt % in water at 25 °C and (c,d) overlay of LSCM/DIC images from PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k at a concentration of 2.5 wt % in water stained with Rhodamine B at 25 °C.
Figure 3. (a,b) optical microscopy images of PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k at a concentration of 20 wt % in water at 25 °C and (c,d) overlay of LSCM/DIC images from PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k at a concentration of 2.5 wt % in water stained with Rhodamine B at 25 °C.
Polymers 09 00293 g003
Polymers 09 00293 g004 550
Figure 4. Cryo SEM images of block copolymers at a concentration of 0.5 wt % in water: (a) PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k; (b,c) PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k and (d) PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k.
Figure 4. Cryo SEM images of block copolymers at a concentration of 0.5 wt % in water: (a) PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k; (b,c) PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k and (d) PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k.
Polymers 09 00293 g004
Table
Table 1. Results of polymerizations and block copolymer formations.
Table 1. Results of polymerizations and block copolymer formations.
PolymerMn [g·mol−1] a,bÐ a,bRatio PVP/PEtOx [mol·mol−1] c
PEtOx22k-N322,2001.24 a-
PVP10k9400 a1.4 a-
PVP14k13,700 a1.37 a-
PVP32k31,500 a1.12 a-
PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k18,900 b2.15 b0.48
PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k17,000 b1.8 b0.60
PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k38,800 b2.0 b1.42
a measured in NMP at 70 °C against poly(ethylene oxide) calibration; b measured in acetate buffer at 25 °C against pullulan calibration; c obtained via 1H NMR in CDCl3.
Table
Table 2. Summary of apparent intensity weighted average hydrodynamic radii of PEtOx22k-b-PVPxxk determined via DLS.
Table 2. Summary of apparent intensity weighted average hydrodynamic radii of PEtOx22k-b-PVPxxk determined via DLS.
Block copolymerRapp [nm] a peak 1Abundance peak 1 [a.u.]Rapp [nm] a peak 2Abundance peak 2 [a.u.]
PEtOx22k-b-PVP10k5.00.061401.0
PEtOx22k-b-PVP14k4.00.011971.0
PEtOx22k-b-PVP32k7.00.531901.0
a obtained via DLS in deionized water at 25 °C and a concentration of 1.0 wt %.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Willersinn, J.; Schmidt, B.V.K.J. Self-Assembly of Double Hydrophilic Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) Block Copolymers in Aqueous Solution. Polymers 2017, 9, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9070293

AMA Style

Willersinn J, Schmidt BVKJ. Self-Assembly of Double Hydrophilic Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) Block Copolymers in Aqueous Solution. Polymers. 2017; 9(7):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9070293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Willersinn, Jochen, and Bernhard V.K.J. Schmidt. 2017. "Self-Assembly of Double Hydrophilic Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) Block Copolymers in Aqueous Solution" Polymers 9, no. 7: 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9070293

APA Style

Willersinn, J., & Schmidt, B. V. K. J. (2017). Self-Assembly of Double Hydrophilic Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) Block Copolymers in Aqueous Solution. Polymers, 9(7), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9070293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop