Next Article in Journal
Stressful Conditions Affect Seed Quality in Glyphosate Resistant Conyza bonariensis (L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
The Colonization of Grape Bunch Trash by Microorganisms for the Biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea as Influenced by Temperature and Humidity
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of PGRs on Antioxidant Activity and Phytochemical in Delay Senescence of Lily Cut Flowers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensitivity of Zasmidium citri-griseum to Fenbuconazole and Control of Citrus Greasy Spot in Panama
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

An Overview of the Bionomics, Host Plant Resistance and Molecular Perspectives of Sesamia inferens Walker in Cereals and Millets

Agronomy 2020, 10(11), 1705; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111705
by Niranjanadevi Jeevanandham 1, Nalini Ramiah 2, Vanniarajan Chockalingam 3 and Ramalingam Jegadeesan 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2020, 10(11), 1705; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111705
Submission received: 16 July 2020 / Revised: 24 August 2020 / Accepted: 25 August 2020 / Published: 4 November 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Excellent literate review. Few comments are suggested in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Respected Editor,

With due respect, I am writing this to your good self to submit my revised review paper entitled “An overview on the bionomics, host plant resistance and molecular perspectives of Sesamia inferens Walker" in cereals and millets.

  1. Latin binomial name was added to the text.
  2. Graphical abstract was included in the manuscript.
  3. The conclusion was already added to the manuscript.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall good job. scientific name protocols of italicizing and underlining have been consistently omitted. I am attaching the pdf with highlights for which the correction is given below. Areas that need to be deleted are marked by "Strikethrough text" in red color in the pdf.

Line 25: change to “detecting”

              : change to “the crop”

Line 27: change to “mechanism”

Line 42: change to “and”

Line 45: sentence case

Line 55,56,58,60: Italicize

Line 63-64: “promoting”

Line 70: Italicize

Line 81: “and”

Line 83: “problems”

Line 89: italicize

Line 93: “Foremost damage of the pink stem borer”

Line 94: “and” “,”

Line 96: redo Figure 1 after eliminating the red squiggly lines in the word document image.

Line 100: Italicize

Line 102 & 104: Proper nouns need to be capitalized

Line 106: “,”

Line 108: “sugarcane, some grasses in XX state and maize in Chattisgarh state”

Line 110-115: Italicize

Line 117: Italicize

Line 118: Italicize al scientific names

Line 139: no reference for being seen across the world. All places of account are listed.

Line 156: “becoming”

Line 159: “of”

Line 161: “are”

Line 182: “and”      “days were reported”

Line 186: “is segmented, stout, and robust”

Line 188: “were recorded in”

Line 194: “duration”

Line 199: “in”

Line 205-206: incomplete sentence

Line 207: “pupa was noticed”

Line 217: “by Ateyim”

Line 275: underline for species name when rest of the sentence is in italics

Line 336 & 339: “at”

Line 334: “Echinochloa sp.

Line 378: “Understanding more about”

Line 414: “more explored”

Line 421: “Also, the”

Line 423: “ it is pertinent to re-evaluate the”

Line 436: change “at” to “in”

Line 472: “in an”   “exhaustively”

Line 493: within table double space

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Respected Reviewer,

With due respect, I am writing this to your goodself to submit my revised review paper entitled with “An overview on the bionomics, host plant resistance and molecular perspectives of Sesamia inferens Walker" in cereals and millets. Looking forward for your positive reply from your end.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop