Next Article in Journal
Short- and Long-Term Effects of Lime and Gypsum Applications on Acid Soils in a Water-Limited Environment: 2. Soil Chemical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Aerodynamic and Canopy Resistances in a Mediterranean Greenhouse Based on Instantaneous Leaf Temperature Measurements
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Endophytic Bacillus subtilis and Salicylic Acid to Improve Wheat Growth and Tolerance under Combined Drought and Fusarium Root Rot Stresses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Integrated Defense Responses in Crops against Soil-Borne Pathogens”

1
Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979 Großbeeren, Germany
2
The Julius Kühn Institute, Messeweg 11/12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(12), 1986; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121986
Submission received: 3 December 2020 / Accepted: 5 December 2020 / Published: 17 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Defense Responses in Crops Against Soil-Borne Pathogens)
Soil-borne pathogenic organisms can have severe detrimental effects on crop growth and yield production and represent a serious threat to food security. Conventional control measures are often not effective enough in constraining the spread of pathogens, due to their ubiquitous presence in the environment, their propagation inside the plant host, their persistence in plant debris and in soil over years due to the formation of resting organs or because of non-specific symptom development. A recent assessment on the five major crops worldwide revealed a 20 to 30% yield loss caused by pathogens and pests, with soil-borne fungi (true fungi and oomycetes) and nematodes reducing the yield by up to 9% [1]. It is further projected that the disease pressure caused by soil-borne pathogens will rise in the future due to the ongoing climate change [2]. Therefore, improved strategies are needed for controlling soil-borne diseases that integrate the application of beneficial microorganisms, agricultural practice, plant health stimulation, and soil treatments.
Plants are not rendered helpless to cope with these diseases and do respond with a set of integrated signal transduction pathways and defense responses that can lead to an enhanced plant protection or even resistance. A better understanding of these stress responses at the molecular, physiological, and phenotypic level will lead to new avenues in crop-breeding activities. It is also essential that the research is conducted under conditions close to the production systems. Although demanding with respect to labor, time, and money, experiments on glasshouse and/or field-grown crops will deliver more relevant results as compared to growth chamber or in vitro assays.
Twelve articles have been published in the Special Issue of Agronomy entitled “Integrated Defense Responses in Crops Against Soil-Borne Pathogens” that provide insights into the current activities to improve plant performance under disease pressure, promising solutions for disease management as well as elaborate summaries of research topics.
For the latter, the background and current status of managing Fusarium wilt disease in legume crops was reviewed by Sampaio et al. [3]. The review of Hanschen and Winkelmann [4] compiled the latest information on containing the complex replant disease by soil biofumigation measures. In a meta-study, Mesa-Valle et al. [5] investigated the most urgent directions of future research on plant nematodes by considering global publication efforts.
Two articles investigated the effect of beneficial microorganisms to alleviate disease responses. Beneficial Bacillus subtilis, combined with salicylic acid, improved plant performance of wheat when challenged with Fusarium and drought treatment [6]. Some rather uncharacterized beneficial Serendipita fungi were tested for their protective activity against Fusarium in two tomato genotypes with or without resistance toward the pathogen [7]. Ren et al. [8] reported on a novel seed coating agent that was efficient against Rhizoctonia cerealis infection of wheat.
Adapted agricultural practice is a promising strategy to decrease yield losses by soil-borne pathogens. Winter cover crops reduced the disease severity in red maple nursery production when inoculated with different soil pathogenic fungi [9]. The possibility of crop rotation between sugar beet and oilseed rape was addressed with respect to limiting the occurrence of beet cyst nematode [10]. Two articles investigated the use of plants or plant extracts as biocontrol agents. Cruz-Rodriguez et al. [11] showed that the supplementation of branch extracts of Crotalaria longirostrata reduced the disease severity in maize upon Fusarium infection. The supplementation of dried spearmint and oregano increased tomato growth with respect to Fusarium and Verticillium infection [12].
Two articles report on plant stress responses. The time-dependency in the pathogen–pathogen interaction of potato with both root-lesion nematodes and the pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani, was demonstrated by Edin and co-workers [13]. A second paper shows a dual challenge with a root knot nematode and the pathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum, in which two tomato genotypes with different levels of resistance against those pathogens exhibit specific photosynthetic responses and oxidative stress signatures [14].
Severe losses of crop quality and quantity by soil-borne diseases are a perpetual threat. Particularly the relevance of pathogenic fungi and nematodes is reflected in the articles published in this special issue. Especially the role of antagonists and amendments in fighting soil-borne pests was affirmed as well as the reasonable use of trap and cover crops. The authors point out that strategies beyond conventional measures controlling the diseases are promising and recommendable to consider for implementation in agricultural production systems.

Author Contributions

Both authors equally contributed to the writing of this paper and edited the Special Issue. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the reviewers for devoting time and effort to review the papers of this Special Issue. Moreover, we thank Rachel Hu, Contact Editor of our Special Issue, for her excellent support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Savary, S.; Willocquet, L.; Pethybridge, S.J.; Esker, P.; McRoberts, N.; Nelson, A. The Global Burden of Pathogens and Pests on Major Food Crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Guerra, C.A.; Cano-Díaz, C.; Egidi, E.; Wang, J.-T.; Eisenhauer, N.; Singh, B.K.; Maestre, F.T. The Proportion of Soil-Borne Pathogens Increases with Warming at the Global Scale. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2020, 10, 550–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sampaio, A.M.; Araújo, S.D.S.; Rubiales, D.; Patto, M.C.V. Fusarium Wilt Management in Legume Crops. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hanschen, F.S.; Winkelmann, T. Biofumigation for Fighting Replant Disease—A Review. Agronomy 2020, 10, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mesa-Valle, C.M.; Garrido-Cardenas, J.A.; Cebrian-Carmona, J.; Talavera, M.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Global Research on Plant Nematodes. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lastochkina, O.; Kulabuhova, D.; Allagulova, C.; Fedorova, K.; Koryakov, I.; Vladimirova, A. Application of Endophytic Bacillus subtilis and Salicylic Acid to Improve Wheat Growth and Tolerance under Combined Drought and Fusarium Root Rot Stresses. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sefloo, N.G.; Wieczorek, K.; Steinkellner, S.; Hage-Ahmed, K. Serendipita Species Trigger Cultivar-Specific Responses to Fusarium Wilt in Tomato. Agronomy 2019, 9, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Ren, X.-X.; Chen, C.; Ye, Z.-H.; Su, X.-Y.; Xiao, J.-J.; Liao, M.; Cao, H.-Q. Development and Application of Seed Coating Agent for the Control of Major Soil-Borne Diseases Infecting Wheat. Agronomy 2019, 9, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Panth, M.; Baysal-Gurel, F.; Simmons, T.; Addesso, K.M.; Witcher, A. Impact of Winter Cover Crop Usage in Soilborne Disease Suppressiveness in Woody Ornamental Production System. Agronomy 2020, 10, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Daub, M. Effect of Winter Oilseed Rape Cropping on the Development of the Sugar Beet Cyst Nematode, Heterodera schachtii, and Control of Volunteer Plants as a Trap Crop Method. Agronomy 2020, 10, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cruz-Rodríguez, R.I.; Cruz-Salomón, A.; Ruiz-Lau, N.; Pérez-Villatoro, J.I.; Esquinca-Avilés, H.A.; Meza-Gordillo, R. Potential Application of Crotalaria longirostrata Branch Extract to Reduce the Severity of Disease Caused by Fusarium. Agronomy 2020, 10, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kadoglidou, K.; Chatzopoulou, P.; Maloupa, E.; Kalaitzidis, A.; Ghoghoberidze, S.; Katsantonis, D.Ν. Mentha and Oregano Soil Amendment Induces Enhancement of Tomato Tolerance against Soilborne Diseases, Yield and Quality. Agronomy 2020, 10, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Edin, E.; Gulsher, M.; Franko, M.; Englund, J.-E.; Flöhr, A.; Kardell, J.; Viketoft, M. Temporal Interactions between Root-Lesion Nematodes and the Fungus Rhizoctonia solani Lead to Reduced Potato Yield. Agronomy 2019, 9, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Maqsood, A.; Wu, H.Y.; Kamran, M.; Altaf, H.; Mustafa, A.; Ahmar, S.; Hong, N.T.T.; Tariq, K.; He, Q.; Chen, J.-T. Variations in Growth, Physiology, and Antioxidative Defense Responses of Two Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Cultivars after Co-Infection of Fusarium oxysporum and Meloidogyne incognita. Agronomy 2020, 10, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Witzel, K.; Berger, B. Special Issue “Integrated Defense Responses in Crops against Soil-Borne Pathogens”. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121986

AMA Style

Witzel K, Berger B. Special Issue “Integrated Defense Responses in Crops against Soil-Borne Pathogens”. Agronomy. 2020; 10(12):1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121986

Chicago/Turabian Style

Witzel, Katja, and Beatrice Berger. 2020. "Special Issue “Integrated Defense Responses in Crops against Soil-Borne Pathogens”" Agronomy 10, no. 12: 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121986

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop