Next Article in Journal
Ionic Selenium and Nanoselenium as Biofortifiers and Stimulators of Plant Metabolism
Next Article in Special Issue
Sensitivity of Zasmidium citri-griseum to Fenbuconazole and Control of Citrus Greasy Spot in Panama
Previous Article in Journal
Interactive Effects of Nitrogen and Humic Substances Applications on Bioethanol Production from Sweet Sorghum and Combustion Characteristics of Its Bagasse
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Antifungal Activity of Gold–Chitosan and Carbon Nanoparticles on Fusarium oxysporum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Role of Biocontrol Agents in Management of Corm Rot of Saffron Caused by Fusarium oxysporum

1
Advanced Centre for Horticulture Research, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu, Udheywalla 180018, India
2
Division of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu, Chatha 180009, India
3
Division of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu, Chatha 180009, India
4
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Leh 194101, India
5
Saffron Research Station, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Srinagar 192121, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(9), 1398; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091398
Submission received: 1 July 2020 / Revised: 8 September 2020 / Accepted: 9 September 2020 / Published: 16 September 2020

Abstract

:
Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is considered as one of the most expensive spices. Fusarium corm rot of saffron, caused by Fusarium oxysporum, is known to cause severe yield losses worldwide. In the present study, efficacy of biocontrol agents (Trichoderma asperellum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Bacillus stratosphericus, Bacillus pumilus, and Bacillus subtilis) along with a chemical fungicide, carbendazim, was evaluated for managing the corm rot of saffron. Under in vitro conditions, using dual culture and poison food techniques on potato dextrose agar, T. asperellum and carbendazim significantly reduced the mycelial growth of the pathogen F. oxysporum, with the inhibition of 62.76 and 60.27%, respectively, compared with control. Under field conditions, dipping of saffron corms in carbendazim and T. asperellum exhibited maximum reduction of 82.77 and 77.84%, respectively, in the disease incidence, during the first year of experiment. However, during the second year, maximum reduction in the incidence of corm rot (68.63%) was recorded with the T. asperellum. Moreover, the population density of F. oxysporum was also significantly reduced by 60 and 80.19% while using T. asperellum after 75 and 260 days of sowing of saffron corms, compared to its population before planting of corms. In case of growth promotion traits, such as sprouting and flowering, biocontrol treatments reduced the number of days (average) of sprouting and flower emergence after sowing, compared to control.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

India is among few countries in the world that are gifted with the commercial cultivation of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) on an area of 3674 ha with production and productivity of 9.6 MT and 2.61 kg ha−1 during 2015, respectively [1]. Traditionally, this crop is associated with rituals, cuisines, and cosmetic industries [2], and also has numerous health benefits with potent medicinal properties [3,4,5]. The union territory of Jammu and Kashmir in India has the monopoly to grow saffron, which is mainly confined to the Kishtwar, Pulwama, Srinagar, and Budgam districts, accounting for 4%, 76%, 6%, and 14%, respectively, of the total area [6]. Throughout the last decade, the productivity of saffron in India has been in continuous decline, due to regional climate variability. such as flood, frequent drought [7], and outbreaks of biotic stresses [8]. The production of saffron is severely affected by different diseases caused by fungi and bacteria [9,10].
Corm rot of saffron is caused by various soil-borne pathogens, which impose serious economic losses and are broadly prevalent throughout the saffron-growing areas of the world [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Corm rot is of immense importance in the Kishtwar District, an upland valley situated in the northeast corner of Jammu, where saffron is a major source of earnings for the farmers [19]. Saffron is exclusively vegetatively propagated by corms [20] and a perennial crop (four years planting cycle) cultivated under rain-fed conditions [19]. Corm rot incidence and intensity ranged from 4 to 42 and 0.80% to 17.46%, respectively, in Kashmir during 1999–2000 [21], and 59.33% and 35%, respectively, in Kishtwar during 2016 [22]. The disease is primarily characterized by the yellowing and wilting of the shoots [23] that cause the decline in the production of saffron flower and stigma, whereas rotting and decay of corms [24] reduce the production of daughter corms. Among the various plant pathogens associated with corm rot, Fusarium oxysporum (Schlecht.) is the most predominant one, occurring worldwide [25,26]. Fusarium oxysporum is a soil-borne pathogen causing diseases in many important crops [27]. It survives in the infected corms and in soil, forming mycelium, microconidia, and macroconidia, along with resting structures (chlamydospore), which are resistant to desiccation and unfavorable environmental conditions. The resting structures have the ability to survive in the soil for more than 20 years in the absence of a host in the Fusarium–banana pathosystem [28,29], and are mainly dispersed through infected corms [30] and farming tools. Excessive soil moisture, injuries to the corms due to inter-cultural operations and nematodes [31], poor soil aeration [32], high temperatures [27,33], and poor drainage are the primary factors that predispose the saffron crop to the epidemic of corm rot.
Because of the lack of improved resistant genotypes due to sterile triploid, the disease is mainly managed by chemical fungicides [13,34]. However, their continuous application not only has a deleterious impact on environment, beneficial microflora, and human health [35], but it is also responsible for evolution of resistant races of the Fusarium pathogens [36]. Application of biocontrol agents has emerged as a sustainable alternative strategy for managing soil-borne plant pathogens, as it reduces the disease-producing activity of pathogens through a multi-faceted mechanism [37,38], and, besides this, has no deleterious impact on human health or the environment [39]. Biocontrol may be achieved by introducing a prospective microorganism or using indigenous microorganisms that have potential to delimit the survival and dispersal of the pathogen [25]. Since the crop is export-oriented, the indigenous and putative biocontrol agents were explored for the management of corm rot of saffron caused by F. oxysporum, with an aim to test the efficacy of biocontrol agents: (1) in reducing the disease incidence of corm rot; (2) on population of Fusarium oxysporum; and (3) on promotion of certain growth parameters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Multiplication of Pathogen

Fusarium oxysporum isolated from the diseased corms collected from Kishtwar were identified by morphological and molecular techniques (GenBank accession no. MT395512). The pathogen was preserved in potato dextrose agar (PDA, HiMedia, Mumbai) slants at −4 °C and sub-cultured every two weeks. For conidia production of F. oxysporum, the plugs (5 mm) of actively growing mycelia were aseptically transferred in an Erlenmeyer flask (500 mL) containing 350 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB, HiMedia, Mumbai) and incubated at 26 ± 2 °C in a Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) incubator. After twenty days, the flask was vigorously shaken with the addition of sterilized distilled water (50 mL). The colony forming unit (cfu) of F. oxysporum culture was assessed by a serial dilution agar plating method [40].

2.2. Multiplication of Biocontrol Agents

The fungal and bacterial biocontrol agents used in these experiments were Trichoderma asperellum (Samuels, Liech & Nirenberg) (GenBank accession no MT395682), Pseudomonas fluorescens Migula (GenBank accession no KJ194131), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Schroeter) Migula (GenBank accession no. KJ194126), Pseudomonas putida Trevisan (GenBank accession no. KJ194130), Bacillus stratosphericus Shivaji (GenBank accession no KY423499), Bacillus pumilus Meyer and Gottheil (GenBank accession no KY423498), and Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn (GenBank accession no MT395353). All the biocontrol agents were isolated from saffron fields of the Kishtwar District, and properly characterized on the bases of morphology, molecular, and biochemical tests [41,42]. All the selected biocontrol agents were sub-cultured regularly and maintained on their respective media at −4 °C (Trichoderma asperellum on potato dextrose agar, P. fluorescens, P. aeruginosa, and P. putida on King’s B agar, and B. stratosphericus, B. pumilus, and B. subtilis on Luria Bertani agar medium). For mass production of these biocontrol agents, T. asperellum plugs (5 mm) were transferred in an Erlenmeyer flask (500 mL) containing potato dextrose broth (PDB, HiMedia, Mumbai), P. fluorescens, P. aeruginosa, and P. putida were transferred in the King’s B broth (KB, HiMedia, Mumbai), and B. stratosphericus, B. pumilus, and B. subtilis were transferred in Luria Bertani broth (LB, HiMedia, Mumbai). All the inoculated Erlenmeyer flasks containing the fungal and bacterial biocontrol agents were incubated separately in the BOD at 26 ± 2 °C. After the growth, the flasks were agitated vigorously, mixed with sterilized distilled water (50 mL), and subjected to serial dilution agar plating assay for calculating the concentration of colony forming unit/mL.

2.3. In Vitro Evaluation of Biocontrol Agents

To evaluate the antagonism potential, T. asperellum, P. fluorescens, P. aeruginosa, P. putida, B. stratosphericus, B. pumilus, and B. subtilis were tested against F. oxysporum, using the dual culture technique [43]. Five mm discs of T. asperellum and F. oxysporum were taken from the margins of actively growing cultures (seven days old) and transferred to Petri plates (90 mm) containing PDA medium, on opposite sides, one cm away from the periphery of the Petri plate. In case of bacterial antagonists, P. fluorescens, P. aeruginosa, P. putida, B. stratosphericus, B. pumilus, and B. subtilis were streaked individually on one side of the Petri plate containing potato dextrose agar medium and 5 mm disc of F. oxysporum was placed at the opposite sides of the streaked Petri plates. Efficacy of carbendazim (100 μg mL−1) was checked by poison food assay [44]. Petri plates containing PDA amended with the desired concentrations of fungicide (100 μg mL−1) were inoculated in the center with a 5 mm disc taken from seven-day-old culture of F. oxysporum. Pure culture of F. oxysporum was also maintained as a control. The details of treatments are as follows: T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus, T2 = B. pumilus, T3 = B. subtilis, T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa, T5 = P. putida, T6 = P. fluorescens, T7 = Trichoderma asperellum, T8 = carbendazim, and T9 = control (only Fusarium oxysporum). The experiment was laid in a completely randomized design (CRD), with four replications. The plates were incubated at 27 ± 1 °C, and mycelial growth (mm) of F. oxysporum was recorded in different treatments, including control, after 15 days. Percentage inhibition of the mycelium was calculated as: inhibition (%) = ((T1−T2)/T1) × 100, where T1 = growth of the F. oxysporum in control, and T2 = growth of the F. oxysporum in different treatments (T1−T8).

2.4. Management of Corm Rot of Saffron under Field Conditions

A field experiment was conducted from the first week of August 2017 to November 2018, to evaluate biocontrol agents and a chemical fungicide to manage the corm rot of saffron. The studies were conducted in a corm-rot-infested field in Upper Pochhal of Kishtwar District, situated at 75.7,667° E and latitude of 33.31° N, and at an altitude of 1638 m above sea level. The field was thoroughly ploughed and properly levelled for the sowing of healthy corms. The experiment was conducted in 3 m2 plots, each having 18 corms/plot in a randomized block design (RBD) with nine treatments and four replications. The details of treatments are as follows: T1 = corm treatment with Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = corm treatment with B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = corm treatment with B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = corm treatment with Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = corm treatment with P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = corm treatment with P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = corm treatment with Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; T8 = corm treatment with carbendazim 50 WP (M/s BASF India Limited, New Delhi) at 0.2%; and T9 = corm treatment with water (control). Before sowing, 2000 kg of healthy corms (Kishtwar cultivar), each approximately 10 g, were dipped in the suspension of F. oxysporum (1 × 107 cfu/mL) for 10 min, and subsequently dipped in the suspensions of different treatments for 30 min. In treatment T9 (control), the healthy corms were treated with F. oxysporum inoculums only. All the treated corms were shade dried for 30 min before sowing. Data regarding disease incidence (%) calculated as (total number of plants infected in selected treatment/total number of plants in selected treatment × 100), disease reduction efficiency (%) calculated as (disease incidence of control − disease incidence of treatment/disease incidence of control × 100) during 2017 (80 days after sowing) and 2018 (430 days after sowing) [45,46], days taken for sprouting (emergence of corm lets/buds), and flowering after sowing during 2017 were recorded.

2.5. Dynamics of Fusarium oxysporum Propagules

For assessing the effects of different treatments on the survival and persistence of the F. oxysporum in the treated field, population count was assessed using the Warcup soil plating method [47] on specific Komada modified (KM) medium [48]. Soil samples (250 g) from each treatment plot were collected randomly from the cormosphere, without disturbing the plant, in pre-sterilized polythene bags at different intervals, such as before sowing, 75, and 260 days after sowing. Air-dried soil (0.5 g) was placed in sterilized Petri plates of different treatments, with four replications each, to which 15–20 mL of melted, cooled (45 °C) KM medium was added. Gentle rotation of Petri plates clockwise and anticlockwise was done to ensure uniform mixing of soil with medium, and the plates were incubated at 25 °C in the BOD in an inverted position. After four days of incubation, the plates were observed daily for the emergence of the fungal colonies. Developing colonies were counted visually, and identified based on morphological characters.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the statistical package R (1.14.4) [49]. The values of the replication, which included mycelial growth (mm) of the F. oxysporum, disease incidence (%), population dynamics of F. oxysporum (cfu/g), and emergence of sprouting and flowering (days after sowing) among the treatments were compared using Duncan’s new multiple range test (DNMRT) by agricolae package [50]; p-values (<0.05) were considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. In Vitro Evaluation

In the present study, dual plate and poison food assays, we demonstrated the antagonistic effect of different treatments against F. oxysporum (Figure 1). T. asperellum and carbendazim significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced the radial growth of F. oxysporum (24.79 and 26.76 mm, respectively), compared to control. Among the bacterial antagonists, P. fluorescens reduced mycelial growth of F. oxysporum by 34.02 mm. This was followed by P. putida, P. aeruginosa, and Bacillus subtilis, reducing mycelial growth of F. oxysporum by 43.47, 45.22, and 43.19 mm, respectively, which were statistically similar to each other. The maximum radial growth of F. oxysporum (54.70 and 67.30 mm) was recorded by B. pumilus and B. stratosphericus, respectively.
Previous studies have also proved the efficacy of Trichoderma spp., Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Bacillus spp. for the inhibition of radial growth of F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli [8,21,51]. Our results are in conformity to those findings. Several other researchers have also reported Trichoderma viride and Trichoderma harzianum as potential antagonists for inhibiting the growth of several soil- and seed-borne plant pathogens by possessing various mechanisms of action, such as mycoparasitism, competition for nutrients/space, and production of volatile compounds [52,53]. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens has been reported to significantly inhibit the radial growth of F. oxysporum, causing corm rot of saffron, which may be due to the production of antibiotics, siderophores, and enzymes [25]. Burkholderia cepacia, Bacillus subtilis, and P. fluorescens have also been observed to significantly inhibit the mycelial growth of F. oxysporum f. sp. gladioli, with the inhibition ranging from 6 to 10 mm [54]. Inhibition of mycelial growth of F. oxysporum and Fusarium solani reported in this work is similar to the inhibition previously reported for chemical fungicides [34]. Carbendazim is a benzimidazole group of fungicides that interfere with the energy production and cell wall synthesis of fungi [55], and also induce nuclear instability by disturbing the cell division [56].

3.2. Disease Incidences of Corm Rot of Saffron

Biocontrol agents and carbendazim were evaluated for the management of corm rot of saffron during 2017–2019 in a naturally-infested, diseased field (Table 1). In the first year, maximum suppression in disease incidence (82.77%) was recorded when the corms were treated with carbendazim (T8), which was statistically similar with the T. asperellum T7 (77.84%). During the second year, a maximum disease reduction of 68.63% was observed with T. asperellum (T7), which was statistically similar with P. fluorescens (T6), followed by P. putida (T5), and carbendazim (T8), having disease reduction of 58.88, 51.67, and 48.24%, respectively. The maximum disease incidence of 83.33% was observed in control (T9).
The present observations are in conformity to the results obtained by earlier researchers, as benzimidazole (carbendazim) fungicides play an important role in the management of soil- and seed-borne diseases by inhibiting DNA synthesis and blocking the nuclear division in pathogenic fungi [57]. Corm rot reduction of 85.49% was recorded by dipping the corm in mancozeb 75 WP (0.3%) + carbendazim 50 WP (0.1%), in saffron-growing areas of Kashmir [58]. Other researchers have also demonstrated that the chemical fungicide (carbendazim) was very effective in managing corm rot of saffron under pot and field conditions [8,59]. However, there is growing concern about the deleterious impacts of synthetic chemicals on the environment, as well as human beings, along with pesticide residues in the product [60]. It has caused the awareness to explore alternative methods, which are eco-friendly and sustainable, for the management of soil-borne diseases. Nowadays, beneficial microbes are widely applied for the management of soil-borne diseases in various agricultural production systems [61]. Bacillus spp., due to the advantages of producing heat and desiccation-resistant spores, are reported to significantly reduce the corm rot incidence (40%) of saffron under pot conditions [25], which may be due to the competition for energy, food, and ecological niche or substrate, production of inhibitory allelochemicals, and induction of systemic resistance [62]. Pseudomonas fluorescens has also been applied as a potential biocontrol agent for the management of many diseases in agriculture and horticultural crops [63,64]. In the present study, carbendazim, fungal and bacterial biocontrol agents gave better management of corm rot of saffron than the control.

3.3. Dynamics of F. oxysporum Propagules

Besides suppressing the incidence of saffron corm rot, different treatments evaluated in the present study also significantly reduced the propagule density of Fusarium oxysporum in the soil. The population of F. oxysporum was drastically reduced after 75 and 260 days of sowing of saffron crop in all the treatments except control (Table 2). At 75 days after sowing (DAS), a maximum reduction in the population by 60% was recorded in T. asperellum (T7), which was significantly higher than in all other treatments. However, treatments B. stratosphericus (T1), B. pumilus (T2), B. subtilis (T3), P. aeruginosa (T4), P. putida (T5), P. fluorescens (T6), and carbendazim (T8) were statistically similar in reducing the F. oxysporum population by 29.77, 36.38, 35.85, 37.44, 37.77, 40.41, and 44.44%, respectively (Figure 2). At 260 DAS, treatments T. asperellum (T7) and P. fluorescens (T6) were statistically similar in reducing the population of F. oxysporum by 80.19 and 68.75%, respectively, followed by P. aeruginosa (T4) and P. putida (T5). The minimum reduction in propagules (4.44%) was observed with carbendazim (T8). The results obtained in the present study are in conformity to the observations made by other researchers. Applications of T. harzianum, Trichoderma hamatum, and T. viride have been reported to reduce the populations of F. oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani propagules by 46–56% and 31–44%, respectively, after two months of planting chickpea, whereas the reductions of 36–54% and 15–27% were observed after four months [65]. Bacterial biocontrol agents (Bacillus and Pseudomonas spp.) gradually become ideal candidates for the biological control, due to their simple nutrition requirements, faster colonization ability, rapid reproduction, endogenous spores, and strong resistance to stress [64]. Carbendazim has been observed to decrease the populations of Fusarium in chickpea by 30–42 and 26–30% at two and four months, respectively, by other researchers also [65]. Even the seed treatment with Trichoderma spp. isolates reduced the F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici population under greenhouse and field conditions, and were also responsible for the reductions in tomato wilt incidence [66].

3.4. Growth Parameters

In our studies, minimum days (average) were taken for sprouting (30, 29, 29, 28, 28, 27, and 26 days) and also for flower emergence (86.25, 81.50, 79.00, 78.25, 78.00, 77.25, and 77.25 days) in T1 to T7 treatments, respectively as compared to T8 and T9 treatments. Whereas, maximum days (average) taken for sprouting and emergence of flowers (35 and 90 DAS) were observed in control (Figure 3). Other studies have also shown an effect on agronomical variables, whereby the application of beneficial microorganisms (Azospirillum spp. + Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza VAM + Pseudomonas spp.) increase in the leaf number (34.1), plant height (36.3 cm), and number of flowers (385/plot) in saffron crop, compared to control (21.9, 28.0, and 364 cm, respectively), was observed [67]. Combined application of Bacillus atrophaeus (S2BC-2) and Burkholderia cepacia (TEPF-Sungal) has also shown reductions in the vascular wilt and corm rot incidences by 48.6 and 46.1%, respectively, resulting in increased spike and corm yield by 58.3 and 27.40%, respectively, in comparison to the control, in gladiolus. This may be due to the activation of defense gene products, such as chitinase and β-1, 3-glucanase [53]. To promote sustainable agriculture, application of plant-growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) and plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are widely advocated in a range of different crops for amelioration of biotic and abiotic stresses. Being inhabitants of outer and internal tissues of host, these beneficial microbes promote plant growth by having diverse mechanisms, such as production of useful metabolites and signals, phytohormones, biofertilization, phytostimulation, antibiotic resistance, bioremediation, rhizosphere engineering, lytic enzymes, or increased resistance to osmotic stress and other abiotic factors [64,68].

4. Conclusions

The observations recorded in the present studies suggest that carbendazim is useful in managing corm rot of saffron, but in order to minimize the dependence on chemical pesticides in such a valuable crop, alternative methods, like the use of biocontrol agents, are very essential. It was observed that Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Trichoderma asperellum successfully managed the corm rot of saffron caused by Fusarium oxysporum. These biocontrol agents not only reduced the disease incidence and pathogen population in the soil, but also improved certain growth parameters, such as reducing the days for sprouting and flowering in saffron crop. The persistence of the biocontrol agents in the soil plays a vital role in managing the plant disease, especially in perennial crops. Further research is, however, needed to develop the consortia of putative and native strains and their suitable formulation, along with the elucidation of the mechanisms involved in the growth promotion and disease suppression in saffron. Effects of biocontrol agents in regulation of quality parameters may also be examined in order to increase the eminence of this functional food.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.G. (Vishal Gupta) and V.K.R.; methodology, K.K.; software, V.M.; validation, V.G. (Vishal Gupta), K.K. and K.F.; formal analysis, V.G. (Vikas Gupta); investigation, K.K.; resources, P.K.R., A.S. and M.G.H.; data curation, V.G. (Vishal Gupta) and R.H.; writing—original draft preparation, V.G. (Vishal Gupta); writing—review and editing, V.G. (Vishal Gupta); visualization, B.C.S.; supervision, V.G. (Vishal Gupta); project administration, V.G. (Vishal Gupta); All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dass, A.A.; Deshpande, S.V. Production and Productivity of Saffron in Jammu and Kashmir. Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev. 2017, 2, 1205–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Koocheki, A.; Khajeh-Hosseini, M. Saffron: Science, Technology and Health; Woodhead Publ.: Duxford, UK, 2020; p. 569. [Google Scholar]
  3. Caballero-Ortega, H.; Pereda-Miranda, R.; Abdullaev, F.I. HPLC quantification of major active components from 11 different saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Food Chem. 2007, 100, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Razak, M.S.; Anwar, H.; Yee, F.C.; Kadir, M.R.A.; Nayan, N.H.M. A review on medicinal properties of saffron toward major diseases. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2017, 23, 98–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Boskabady, M.H.; Gholamnezhad, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Tavakol-Afshari, J. Antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of saffron and its derivatives. In Saffron: Science, Technology and Health; Koocheki, A., Khajeh-Hosseini, M., Eds.; Woodhead Publ.: Duxford, UK, 2020; pp. 405–421. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dass, A.A.; Deshpande, S.V. Saffron Cultivation: Area, Production and Productivity in District Pulwama (J&K). New Man Inter. J. Multidiscip. Stud. 2018, 5, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  7. Husaini, A.M. Challenges of climate change: Omics-based biology of saffron plants and organic agricultural biotechnology for sustainable saffron production. GM Crops Food 2014, 5, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gupta, V.; Kalha, C.S.; Razdan, V.K.; Dolly. Etiology and management of corm rot of saffron in Kishtwar district of Jammu and Kashmir, India. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 41, 361–366. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ahrazem, O.; Rubio-Moraga, A.; Castillo-Lopez, R.; Trapero-Mozos, A.; Gómez-Gómez, L. Crocus sativus pathogens and defence responses. In Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology; Special Issue: Saffron; Husaini, A.M., Ed.; Global Science Books, Ltd.: London, UK, 2010; pp. 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fiori, M. Identification and characterization of Burkholderia isolates obtained from bacterial rot of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) grown in Italy. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2011, 50, 450–461. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yamamoto, W.; Omatsu, T.; Takami, K. Studies on the corm rots of Crocus sativus L. I. on saprophytic propagation of Sclerotinia gladioli and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli on various plants and soils. Sci. Rep. Hyogo Univ. Agric. 1954, 1, 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, T.; Huang, C.; Deng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, R.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Y.; Kai, G. First report of corm rot on saffron caused by Penicillium solitum in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 104, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shah, A.; Srivastava, K.K. Control of corm rot of saffron. Prog. Horti. 1984, 16, 141–143. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kalha, C.S.; Gupta, V.; Gupta, D.; Satya, P. First Report of Sclerotial Rot of Saffron caused by Sclerotium rolfsii in India. Plant Dis. 2007, 9, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cappelli, C. Occurrence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli on saffron in Italy. Phyto. Medi. 1994, 33, 93–94. [Google Scholar]
  16. García-Jiménez, J.; Alfaro-García, A. Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht. as causal agent of a seed-borne disease of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). In Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union, Granada, Spain, 20–26 September 1987; p. 156. [Google Scholar]
  17. Aymani, I.E.; Qostal, S.; Mouden, N.; Selmaoui, K.; Touhami, A.O.; Benkirane, R.; Douira, A. Fungi associated with saffron (Crocus sativus) in Morocco. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 2019, 20, 1180–1188. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ghorbani, R.; Koocheki, A. Sustainable Cultivation of Saffron in Iran. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Lichtfouse, E., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 169–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kalha, C.S.; Gupta, V.; Gupta, D.; Mohiddin, F.A. Saffron cultivation in Kishtwar. In Saffron Production in Jammu and Kashmir; Nehvi, F.A., Wani, S.A., Eds.; Directorate of Extension Education, SKUAST-K: Shalimar, India, 2008; pp. 142–152. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nemati, Z.; Harpke, D.; Gemicioglu, A.; Kerndorff, H.; Blattner, F.R. Saffron (Crocus sativus) is an autotriploid that evolved in Attica (Greece) from wild Crocus cartwrightianus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2019, 136, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wani, M.A. Studies on Corm Rot of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, India, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar, K. Biological Control of Corm Rot of Saffron. Master’s Thesis, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu, Jammu, India, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jan, B.; Baba, S.A. Corm rot of saffron: Symptoms and biological management. EC Microbiol. 2018, 14, 1. [Google Scholar]
  24. Husaini, A.; Hassan, B.; Ghani, M.; Teixeira da Silva, J.; Kirmani, N. Saffron (Crocus sativus Kashmirianus) cultivation in Kashmir: Practices and problem. Funct. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 4, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gupta, R.; Vakhlu, J. Native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W2 as a potential biocontrol for Fusarium oxysporum R1 causing corm rot of Crocus sativus. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2015, 143, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Palmero, D.; Rubio-Moraga, A.; Galvez-Paron, L.; Nogueras, J.; Abato, C.; Gomez-Gomez, L.; Ahrazem, O. Pathogenicity and genetic diversity of Fusarium oxysporum isolates from corms of Crocus sativus. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 61, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Orr, R.; Nelson, P.N. Impacts of soil abiotic attributes on Fusarium wilt, focusing on bananas. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 132, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stover, R.H. Fusarial Wilt (Panama Disease) of Bananas and Other Musa Species; Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Wallingford, UK, 1962; p. 117. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ploetz, R.C. Fusarium wilt of banana. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 1512–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cappelli, C.; Di-Minco, G. Results of a triennial study on saffron diseases in Abruzzi. Info. Fito 1999, 49, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zaki, F.A.; Mantoo, M.A. Pests complex of saffron in Kashmir and their management. In Proceedings of the National Seminar Cum Workshop in the Development of Saffron in Kashmir; Zaki, F.A., Ed.; SKUAST: Shalimar, India, 2001; pp. 113–117. [Google Scholar]
  32. Francesconi, A. The rotting of bulbs of Crocus sativus L. by Penicillium cycloprium. Werstling. Ann. Bot. Univ. 1974, 32, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  33. Abe, T. Studies on a new dry rot disease of the bulb of Crocus sativus L. caused by Fusarium bulbigenum Cke. et Mass var. blasticola (Rostr.) Wr. Trans. Tottori Soc. Agric. Sci. 1933, 4, 212–228. [Google Scholar]
  34. Shah, M.U.D.; Sagar, V.; Padder, B.A. In vitro evaluation of bioagents and fungitoxicants against Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium solani causing corm rot of saffron (Crocus sativus) in Kashmir. Acta Hortic 2018, 1200, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aktar, W.; Sengupta, D.; Chowdhury, A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2009, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Rampersad, S.N. Pathogenomics and management of Fusarium diseases in plants. Pathogens 2020, 9, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cook, R.; Baker, K.F. The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens; American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1983; p. 539. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pal, K.K.; Gardener, B.M. Biological control of plant pathogens. Plant Health Instructor. 2006, 2, 1117–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Baker, R.; Paulitz, T.C. Theoretical basis for microbial interactions leading to biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens. In Principles and Practice of Managing Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens; Hall, R., Ed.; American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1996; pp. 50–79. [Google Scholar]
  40. Aneja, K.R. Experiments in Microbiology, Plant Pathology and Biotechnology; New Age International: New Delhi, India, 2005; p. 632. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gupta, V. Project completion report of DST funded project. In Diversity Analysis of Pseudomonas Fluorescens and Its Utilization in Disease Suppression and Nutrient Management; Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu: Jammu, Kashmir, 2016; p. 25. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gupta, V. Project completion report of ICAR funded project. In Exploration of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria, Antagonistic and Plant Pathogenic Microbial Resources from High Altitude Agro-Climatic/Cropping Systems of Jammu and Kashmir State for Sustainable Agriculture; Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu: Jammu, Kashmir, 2018; p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jeyaseelan, E.C.; Tharmila, S.; Niranjan, K. Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma spp. and Bacillus spp. against Pythium aphanidermatum isolated from tomato damping off. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2012, 4, 1623–1627. [Google Scholar]
  44. Grover, R.K.; Moore, J.D. Toxicometric studies of fungicides against brown rot organism, Sclerotinia fruiticola and S. laxa. Phytopathology 1962, 52, 876. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rodrigues, A.C.; Menezes, M. Identification and pathogenic characterization of endophytic Fusarium species from cowpea seeds. Mycopathologia 2005, 159, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, B.; Wang, B.; Pan, P.; Li, P.; Qi, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, C.; Hao, W.; Zhou, B.; Lin, R. Bacillus altitudinis strain AMCC 101304: A novel potential biocontrol agent for potato common scab. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 1009–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mc Mullen, M.P.; Stack, R.W. Effects of Isolation techniques and media on the differential isolation of Fusarium species. Phytopathology 1983, 73, 458–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Komada, H. Development of selective media for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soil. Rev. Plant Prot. Res. 1975, 8, 114–125. [Google Scholar]
  49. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  50. Mendiburu, F.D. Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R Package Version 1.2-3. 2015. Available online: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  51. Couillerot, O.; Prigent-Combaret, C.; Caballero-Mellado, J.; Moënne-Loccoz, Y. Pseudomonas fluorescens and closely related fluorescent pseudomonads as biocontrol agents of soil-borne phytopathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 48, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Elad, Y.; Chet, I.; Katan, J. Trichoderma harzianum: A biocontrol agent effective against Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani. J. Phytopathol. 1980, 70, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Poddar, R.K.; Singh, D.V.; Dubey, S.C. Integrated application of Trichoderma harzianum mutants and carbendazim to manage chickpea wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2004, 74, 346–348. [Google Scholar]
  54. Shanmugam, V.; Kanoujia, N.; Singh, M.; Singh, S.; Prasad, R. Biocontrol of vascular wilt and corm rot of gladiolus caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli using plant growth promoting rhizobacterial mixture. Crop Prot. 2011, 30, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nene, Y.L.; Thapliya, P.N. Fungicides in Plant Disease Control; Oxford and IBH Publishing CO. Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1973; p. 325. [Google Scholar]
  56. Davidse, L.C. Benzimidazoles, fungicides mechanism of action and biological impact. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1986, 24, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Duan, Y.; Zhou, M. Mechanism of action of the benzimidazole fungicide on Fusarium graminearum: Interfering with polymerization of monomeric tubulin but not polymerized microtubule. Phytopathology 2016, 106, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kamili, A.S.; Nehvi, F.A.; Trag, A.R. Saffron—A legendry crop of Kashmir Himalaya. J. Himalyan Ecol. Sustain. Dev. 2007, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ahmad, M.; Sagar, V.; Shah, M.U.D.; Padder, B.A.; Ahanger, F.A.; Sofi, T.A.; Mir, A.A.; Nabi, A.F.; Khan, M.A. Management of corm rot of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in Kashmir, India. Acta Hortic 2018, 1200, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bourguet, D.; Guillemaud, T. The hidden and external costs of pesticide use. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Lichtfouse, E., Ed.; Springer: Gewerbestr, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 35–120. [Google Scholar]
  61. Handelsman, J.; Stabb, E.V. Biocontrol of Soilborne Plant Pathogens. Plant Cell. 1996, 8, 1855–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Choudhary, D.; Varma, A. Microbial-mediated Induced Systemic Resistance in Plants; Springer: Singapore, 2016; p. 226. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ganeshan, G.; Kumar, A.M. Pseudomonas fluorescens: A potential bacterial antagonist to control plant diseases. J. Plant Interact. 2005, 1, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gupta, V.; Razdan, V.K.; Fatima, K.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, A. Pseudomonas-A potential biocontrol agent for managing plant diseases. In Microbial Antagonists: Their Role in Biological Control of Plant Diseases; Pandey, R.N., Chakraborty, B.N., Singh, D., Sharma, P., Eds.; Today & Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers: New Delhi, India, 2017; pp. 399–430. [Google Scholar]
  65. Khan, M.R.; Ashraf, S.; Rasool, F.; Salati, K.M.; Mohiddin, F.A.; Haque, Z. Field performance of Trichoderma species against wilt disease complex of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2014, 38, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bhagat, S.; Bambawale, O.M.; Tripathi, A.K.; Ahmad, I.; Srivastava, R.C. Biological management of fusarial wilt of tomato by Trichoderma spp. in Andamans. Indian J. Hort. 2013, 70, 397–403. [Google Scholar]
  67. Nehvi, F.A.; Lone, A.; Khan, M.A.; Maqhdoomi, M.I. Comparative study on effect of nutrient management on growth and yield of saffron under temperate conditions of Kashmir. Acta Hortic. 2010, 850, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ambardar, S.; Singh, H.R.; Gowda, M.; Vakhlu, J. Comparative metagenomics reveal phylum level temporal and spatial changes in mycobiome of belowground parts of Crocus sativus. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Mycelial growth rate (mm) of Fusarium oxysporum treated with biocontrol agents and chemical. Bars represent mean (±standard error) of mycelial growth rate (mm) of Fusarium oxysporum treated with T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus; T2 = Bacillus pumilus; T3 = Bacillus subtilis; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa; T5 = Pseudomonas putida; T6 = Pseudomonas fluorescens; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum; T8 = carbendazim, and T9 = control (only Fusarium oxysporum). Means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ (p < 0.05) with DNMRT.
Figure 1. Mycelial growth rate (mm) of Fusarium oxysporum treated with biocontrol agents and chemical. Bars represent mean (±standard error) of mycelial growth rate (mm) of Fusarium oxysporum treated with T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus; T2 = Bacillus pumilus; T3 = Bacillus subtilis; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa; T5 = Pseudomonas putida; T6 = Pseudomonas fluorescens; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum; T8 = carbendazim, and T9 = control (only Fusarium oxysporum). Means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ (p < 0.05) with DNMRT.
Agronomy 10 01398 g001
Figure 2. Percentage reduction of population of Fusarium oxysporum by treatments T1 to T8, compared with control treatment (T9) at 75 and 260 days after sowing (DAS). T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; and T8 = carbendazim 50 WP at 0.2%.
Figure 2. Percentage reduction of population of Fusarium oxysporum by treatments T1 to T8, compared with control treatment (T9) at 75 and 260 days after sowing (DAS). T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; and T8 = carbendazim 50 WP at 0.2%.
Agronomy 10 01398 g002
Figure 3. Effect of different treatments on the sprouting and flowering of saffron. Bars represent mean (± standard error) of sprouting and flowering of saffron in T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; T8 = carbendazim 50 WP at 0.2%; and T9 = water (control). Means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ (p < 0.05) with DNMRT.
Figure 3. Effect of different treatments on the sprouting and flowering of saffron. Bars represent mean (± standard error) of sprouting and flowering of saffron in T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; T8 = carbendazim 50 WP at 0.2%; and T9 = water (control). Means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ (p < 0.05) with DNMRT.
Agronomy 10 01398 g003
Table 1. Field experiment of percentage incidence of corm rot of saffron in different treatments during 2017 and 2018. T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; T8 = carbendazim 50 WP at 0.2%; and T9 = water (control). ± is the standard error of the mean of disease incidence. * Means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ (p < 0.05) with DNMRT. Disease incidence = Total number of plants infected in selected treatment/total number of plants in selected treatment × 100. Disease reduction efficacy = Disease incidence of control - disease incidence of treatment/disease incidence of control × 100.
Table 1. Field experiment of percentage incidence of corm rot of saffron in different treatments during 2017 and 2018. T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; T8 = carbendazim 50 WP at 0.2%; and T9 = water (control). ± is the standard error of the mean of disease incidence. * Means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ (p < 0.05) with DNMRT. Disease incidence = Total number of plants infected in selected treatment/total number of plants in selected treatment × 100. Disease reduction efficacy = Disease incidence of control - disease incidence of treatment/disease incidence of control × 100.
TreatmentDisease Incidence (%)Disease Reduction Efficacy (%)
1st Year2nd Year1st Year2nd Year
T140.27 ± 1.39 ab *71.22 ± 3.58 ab28.6314.52
T236.10 ± 3.20 ab66.11 ± 0.55 abc36.0220.65
T322.22 ± 0.01 ab47.49 ± 0.83 bcd60.6242.99
T437.50 ± 2.77 ab50.00 ± 2.04 bcd33.5439.99
T531.00 ± 5.55 ab40.27 ± 1.39 cd45.0651.67
T621.00 ± 2.78 ab34.50 ± 0.73 d62.7858.88
T712.50 ± 2.77 b26.13 ± 1.34 d77.8468.63
T89.72 ± 2.97 b43.12 ± 1.41 cd82.7748.24
T956.43 ± 10.84 a83.32 ± 2.26 a
Table 2. Colony forming units (CFUs) recovering of Fusarium oxysporum in saffron field at different days after sowing (DAS). T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; T8 = carbendazim 50 WP at 0.2%; and T9 = water (control). ± is the standard error of the mean of Fusarium oxysporum (cfu/g). * Means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ (p < 0.05) with DNMRT.
Table 2. Colony forming units (CFUs) recovering of Fusarium oxysporum in saffron field at different days after sowing (DAS). T1 = Bacillus stratosphericus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T2 = B. pumilus at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T3 = B. subtilis at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T4 = Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T5 = P. putida at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T6 = P. fluorescens at 1 × 109 cfu/mL; T7 = Trichoderma asperellum at 1 × 108 cfu/mL; T8 = carbendazim 50 WP at 0.2%; and T9 = water (control). ± is the standard error of the mean of Fusarium oxysporum (cfu/g). * Means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ (p < 0.05) with DNMRT.
Fusarium oxysporum (cfu/g)
TreatmentBefore Sowing (×104)75 DAS (×103)250 DAS (×102)
T14.50 ± 0.408 a *3.16 ± 0.121 b3.80 ± 0.058 c
T24.70 ± 0.004 a2.99 ± 0.023 b3.50 ± 0.020 cd
T34.49 ± 0.298 a2.88 ± 0.054 bc3.10 ± 0.029 de
T44.70 ± 0.027 a2.94 ± 0.066 bc2.90 ± 0.027 e
T54.50 ± 0.064 a2.80 ± 0.007 bc2.80 ± 0.033 e
T64.80 ± 0.057 a2.86 ± 0.075 bc1.50 ± 0.001 f
T75.00 ± 0.043 a2.00 ± 0.013 c0.99 ± 0.002 f
T84.50 ± 0.001 a2.50 ± 0.009 bc4.30 ± 0.064 b
T94.50 ± 0.004 a5.49 ± 0.011 a5.99 ± 0.004 a

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gupta, V.; Kumar, K.; Fatima, K.; Razdan, V.K.; Sharma, B.C.; Mahajan, V.; Rai, P.K.; Sharma, A.; Gupta, V.; Hassan, M.G.; et al. Role of Biocontrol Agents in Management of Corm Rot of Saffron Caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091398

AMA Style

Gupta V, Kumar K, Fatima K, Razdan VK, Sharma BC, Mahajan V, Rai PK, Sharma A, Gupta V, Hassan MG, et al. Role of Biocontrol Agents in Management of Corm Rot of Saffron Caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Agronomy. 2020; 10(9):1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091398

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gupta, Vishal, Krishna Kumar, Kausar Fatima, Vijay Kumar Razdan, Bhagwati Charan Sharma, Vidushi Mahajan, Pradeep Kumar Rai, Akash Sharma, Vikas Gupta, Mir Gulam Hassan, and et al. 2020. "Role of Biocontrol Agents in Management of Corm Rot of Saffron Caused by Fusarium oxysporum" Agronomy 10, no. 9: 1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091398

APA Style

Gupta, V., Kumar, K., Fatima, K., Razdan, V. K., Sharma, B. C., Mahajan, V., Rai, P. K., Sharma, A., Gupta, V., Hassan, M. G., & Hussain, R. (2020). Role of Biocontrol Agents in Management of Corm Rot of Saffron Caused by Fusarium oxysporum. Agronomy, 10(9), 1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091398

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop