Next Article in Journal
Elemental and Molecular Composition of Humic Acids Isolated from Soils of Tallgrass Temperate Rainforests (Chernevaya taiga) by 1H-13C HECTCOR NMR Spectroscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
Agricultural Production on Erosion-Affected Land from the Perspective of Remote Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Soilless System with Supplementary LED Light to Obtain a High-Quality Out-of-Season Production of Green Beans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Natural Rehabilitation of Degraded Land by Exclosure on Selected Soil Physicochemical Properties in Eastern Ethiopia
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Phosphorus Behaviour and Its Basic Indices under Organic Matter Transformation in Variable Moisture Conditions: A Case Study of Fen Organic Soils in the Odra River Valley, Poland

Agronomy 2021, 11(10), 1997; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101997
by Magdalena Debicka *, Adam Bogacz and Karolina Kowalczyk
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Agronomy 2021, 11(10), 1997; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101997
Submission received: 1 September 2021 / Revised: 25 September 2021 / Accepted: 29 September 2021 / Published: 1 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Management Impacts on Soil Properties and Soil Erosion Processes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I found the work interesting from a pedological point of view. However, I have some doubts about the agronomic value of the manuscript.
Indeed, no data were shown on differences in terms of flora or crops of agronomic value.

Furthermore, the authors discuss little about the hydrographic aspects of the territory. 
In which season were the measurements taken? What fungal population was present in the soil?

In general the manuscript is descriptive and no hypotheses or experimental comparisons are reported.
For this reason I suggest a thorough revision of the manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

please modify the manuscript according to the suggestions

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Manuscript titled: Phosphorus behaviour and its basic indices under organic matter transformation in variable moisture conditions: a case study of fen organic soils in the Odra river valley, Poland prepared by Debicka et al. presents very interesting results and valuable data. I appreciate the topic and main aim of the research. However, I have found some discrepancies and details that needs to be completed.

  • english language has to be improved
  • Abstract needs to be re-styled- please add details of results
  • Introduction- some informations are too general and not required - remove pharagraph 3 - lines 46-59.
  • Some arguments need to be corrected - line 130- P2 and P3 areas are fed by rivers or groundwater - please specify
  • Figure 1-  improve quality
  • Figure 1 - graph is not readable (x and y axis)
  • Methods (part 2.1) -soil sampling description is fully required
  • Soil samples were sieved with biological (plants) residues ? Please specify
  • For analysis fresh soil samples were used. however I did not find information about soil homogenization and how was obtained the representative soil sample from each soil for chemical analysis?
  • Add reference or describe Sheibler method for carbonate analysis
  • Please add information how did you distinguish organic carbon from total carbon by Varion Macro macroanalyser. Additionally add producer and country to instrument
  • change M to mol/l in whole manuscript
  • Charcterize Mehlich III extraction agent  (line 199) or use reference for extraction protocol
  • Table 2 -Ash content - use another abbreviation as Ac (activated carbon)
  • Table 2 - results of all pH determinations need to be clarified. Is the presented value equal to average value of replicates measurement? Or is it single measurement? The standard deviations are fully required.
  • Please correct description of statistical analysis (p or P value ?)
  • Figure 4 - improve quality
  • conclusions - more details and obtained results are required

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop