Next Article in Journal
Soil–Plant Interaction: Effects on Plant Growth and Soil Biodiversity
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Soil S Pools under 23 Years of Maize Monoculture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/agronomy11122377
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Strawberry WRKY Transcription Factor WRKY50 Is Required for Resistance to Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogen Botrytis cinerea

by
Chuangju Ma
†,
Jinsong Xiong
*,†,
Morong Liang
,
Xiaoyu Liu
,
Xiaodong Lai
,
Yibo Bai
and
Zongming Cheng
*
State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2021, 11(12), 2377; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122377
Submission received: 1 October 2021 / Revised: 9 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 24 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Horticultural and Floricultural Crops)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
WRKY protein is one of the largest plant-specific transcription factors that plays critical roles in plant stress responses, but few WRKY transcription factors have been functionally analyzed in strawberry. In this study, a Botrytis cinerea response WRKY gene, FvWRKY50, was isolated from the woodland strawberry. Expression analysis indicated that the transcript of FvWRKY50 was gradually decreased with fruit ripening, but was significantly induced by B. cinerea infection in mature strawberry fruit. Subcellular localization assay revealed that FvWRKY50 was localized in the nucleus. Several cis-elements related to pathogen responses were observed in the promoter region of FvWRKY50. Pathogen infection assay indicated that overexpression of FvWRKY50 in strawberry fruit significantly enhanced their resistance against B. cinerea, while the silencing of FvWRKY50 dramatically compromised their disease-resistant ability. The expression levels of several genes involved in jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis, signaling transduction, and antimicrobial protein biosynthesis were regulated to diverse extents in FvWRKY50 overexpressed and silenced fruit. Collectively, our study inferred that FvWRKY50 is a positive regulator that mediates resistance against B. cinerea through regulating some JA pathway and defense-related genes.

1. Introduction

Strawberry is an important fruit with high nutritional and economical value, which has been appreciated by consumers worldwide. Similar to other plants, the strawberries are frequently attacked by various pathogens such as viruses, bacteria, fungi, and nematodes during their growth processes [1]. Among these pathogens, fungi are the most harmful to strawberry. Several disastrous diseases are caused by fungi pathogen infection. For example, the Fusarium wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Fragariae [2], anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum spp fungi [3], powdery mildew disease invaded by Podosphaera aphanis [4], and gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea [1].
Among these diseases, B. cinerea, which causes gray mold, is considered to be one of the most serious diseases to the strawberry industry, for it can lead to the infected tissues rotting in a short period, which consequently results in large economical losses. Currently, the predominant method for controlling B. cinerea in strawberry production is applying fungicides [5], but the effects are usually inferior due to the rapid evolution of fungicide resistance of B. cinerea [6]. In addition, the frequent use of fungicides increases the risk of food safety [7]. Therefore, exploring the gray mold disease-resistant mechanisms and further breeding cultivars with high pathogen-resistant capability are effective and sustainable alternatives for the strawberry industry.
Plants have developed sophisticated defense mechanisms in response to pathogen infection. To date, a large set of genes involved in plant immunity have been identified. Among these genes, transcription factors (TFs) are key regulators that play important roles in defense responses [8]. Up to now, many classes of defense-related TF families such as NAC, MYB, bZIP, ERF and WRKY have been identified and characterized in plants [9,10].
The WRKY gene family encodes a class of plant-specific TFs which are well known to involve in plant stress responses and development [11,12]. Since the first isolation of the WRKY gene, SPF1 (SWEET POTATO FACTORS 1), from sweet potato [13], WRKY genes have been identified in many plant species. For example, there are 74 WRKY genes in Arabidopsis [14], 105 WRKYs in rice [15], 119 WRKYs in maize [16], 81 WRKYs in tomato [17], 59 WRKYs in grape [18,19,20], 127 WRKYs in apple [21], 59 WRKYs in wild strawberry [22], and 47 WRKYs in cultivated strawberry [23]. Sequence analysis has indicated that all the members of WRKY TFs contain at least one WRKY domain which is required for the DNA-binding ability of WRKYs [24]. Further analysis has found the “WRKYGQK” sequence and the zinc-finger motif, which are respectively located at the N- and C-terminus of the WRKY domain, and are indispensable for the DNA-binding ability of WRKY proteins [24]. In addition, the WRKY TFs family could be divided into three major groups based on the number of WRKY domains and type of zinc-finger motif [24]. Group I WRKY proteins possess two WRKY domains and one C2H2 type zinc-finger motif; group II WRKY proteins could be further classified into five subgroups (II a-e) with one WRKY domain and one identical C2H2 zinc-finger motif; and group III WRKYs contain one WRKY domain and a C2HC type zinc-finger motif [24].
Numerous studies have demonstrated that WRKY TFs play essential roles in plant pathogen defense. In Arabidopsis, many WRKY TFs have been found functioning in resistance to B. cinerea. For example, AtWRKY18, AtWRKY40, and AtWRKY60 co-regulate the resistance of plants to B. cinerea [25]. AtWRKY33 and AtWRKY70 have been identified as transcriptional activators that positively regulate plant resistance to B. cinerea [26,27]. In tomato, many WRKY genes such as SlWRKY31 (also named SlDRW1), SlWRKY33, and SlWRKY75 have been found positively regulating plant defense responses, overexpression of these genes enhanced resistance to B. cinerea [28,29,30]. Interestingly, in addition to these positive regulators, SlWRKY46 has also been reported negatively regulating defense to B. cinerea, transgenic tomato plants overexpression SlWRKY46 increase susceptibility to B. cinerea infection [31]. In strawberry, FaWRKY1 and FaWRKY25 have been identified negatively regulating plant resistance to B. cinerea and Colletotrichum acutatum respectively [32,33]. However, FaWRKY11 is demonstrated as a positive regulator in response to B. cinerea infection [31]. Although a few strawberry WRKY proteins have been functionally analyzed [32,33,34,35], the function of major part of WRKY proteins in strawberry are still not clear.
The cultivated strawberry, Fragaria x ananassa (Duch.), is an allo-octoploid species that is derived from diploid progenitor species [36]. Therefore, due to the high degree of genomic synteny between octoploid strawberry and diploid strawberry, the diploid strawberry Fragaria vesca is considered to be an ideal model plant for genetic analysis of the cultivated strawberry [37]. In our previous study, we observed that one strawberry WRKY gene, FvWRKY50, was significantly induced when the mature strawberry fruit was infected by B. cinerea [38]. To explore the function of FvWRKY50, we isolated this gene for detail study. We confirmed that FvWRKY50 could be significantly up-regulated by B. cinerea infection. Further studies indicate that transiently overexpressing FvWRKY50 in strawberry fruit enhances the resistance to B. cinerea, while silencing this gene in strawberry fruit increases the susceptibility to B. cinerea. In addition, the transcript levels of a large set of defense-related genes are affected by FvWRKY50. These results indicate that FvWRKY50 positively regulates resistance to B. cinerea through complicate mechanisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal and Plant Materials

B. cinerea strain B05.10 was maintained on complete medium (CM) plates at 25 °C in dark for conidia induction. The diploid strawberry Fragaria vesca accession Hawaii-4 and octoploid strawberry Fragaria x ananassa cultivar ‘Benihoppe’ were used in this study. Plants were grown in a greenhouse; tissues of diploid strawberry were used for tissue expression analysis and octoploid strawberry fruit were used for transient expression and B. cinerea infection assay. Strawberry fruit infection assay was performed as previously described [38]. Tissues used for gene expression analysis were harvested at the indicated time point, immediately frozen by liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

2.2. RNA Isolation and Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA of woodland strawberry or cultivated strawberry fruit was extracted by Plant total RNA Isolation Kit (Foregene, Chengdu, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Reagent for reverse transcription or quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) were all produced by Takara (Dalian, China). M-MLV reverse transcriptase was used for cDNA synthesis, and SYBR Premix Ex Taq was used for RT-qPCR.
RT-qPCR was conducted on the real-time system (CFX96, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). FvGAPDH2 was selected as the internal control for gene tissue expression assay, and FaActin was used as internal control for B. cinerea induction assay. The transcription level of detected genes was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [39]. Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were conducted. All the primers were listed in the Supplementary Table S1.

2.3. Gene Cloning and Vector Construction

The full length of FvWRKY50 was cloned from woodland strawberry accession Havaii-4. After sequence verification, the gene was cloned into the binary vector pJX003 downstream of the CaMV 35S promoter in frame with the GFP tag (35S:FvWRKY50-GFP) for subcellular localization assay. For transient assay, FvWRKY50 was cloned into binary vector pJX001 under the control CaMV 35S promoter (35S:FvWRKY50) for overexpression. A specific fragment of FvWRKY50 was amplified and then cloned into pFGC5941 vector for gene silence assay. Primers were listed in the Supplementary Table S1.

2.4. Bioinformatics Analysis of FvWRKY50

For phylogenetic analysis, the protein sequences of FvWRKY50 and selected WRKY TFs from strawberry and Arabidopsis were aligned with the Clustal W algorithm and phylogenic tree was generated by MEGA software (version 7.0) through using neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates [40]. A 2000 bp fragment of the promoter region of FvWRKY50 was downloaded from JGI Phytozome 13 database (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/, accessed on 16 September 2021). PlantCARE online tool (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 13 July 2021) was used to analyze the cis-regulate elements of FvWRKY50 promoter.

2.5. Subcellular Localization Analysis of FvWRKY50

The binary vector containing 35S:FvWRKY50-GFP expression cassette was transiently expressed in tobacco leaves by Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration. The expressed fluorescence signal was detected using a laser scanning confocal microscope (FV3000, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.6. Strawberry Fruit Infiltration and Sample Treatment

Strawberry fruit transient expression assay was performed as described by Zhao et al. [41]. Strawberry fruit were divided into four treatments, i.e., fruit transiently expressed the FvWRKY50 overexpression vector (FvWRKY50-OE), the overexpression empty vector (EV-OE), FvWRKY50 gene silence vector (FvWRKY50-RNAi) and gene silence empty vector (EV-RNAi). Fruit that were infiltrated with empty vectors were defined as control. Three days after infiltration, 20% of the fruit of each treatment were randomly chosen to detect the expression level of FvWRKY50. After detection, the rest strawberry fruit were inoculated with B. cinerea for disease resistance assay. Photographs were taken at 48 h after Agrobacterium infiltration. The lesion area caused by B. cinerea infection on the strawberry fruit surface was calculated by the Image J software [42]. For each treatment, 30 fruit were analyzed, and three biological replicates were analyzed.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of the Expression of FvWRKY50 in Response to B. cinerea Infection

According to the transcriptome database developed by our previous study [36], we have observed that the expression level of FvWRKY50 is significantly up-regulated by B. cinerea infection at three detected time points (i.e., the 12th h, the 24th h, and the 48th h). Accordingly, we speculate that FvWRKY50 might be involved in strawberry defense response to B. cinerea. To verify our speculation, we first analyze the expression patterns of FvWRKY50 by RT-qPCR in this study. As shown in Figure 1, compared to that of time zero, FvWRKY50 is slightly depressed at the 12th h after B. cinerea infection, but significantly induced along with B. cinerea infection after 24 h and increased to 20 times higher at the 120th h after B. cinerea inoculation. These results reveal that FvWRKY50 is involved in response to B. cinerea infection in strawberry.

3.2. Analysis of Sequence and Phylogenesis of FvWRKY50

A cDNA fragment encoding FvWRKY50 was isolated from woodland strawberry Hawaii-4 with gene specific primers. The full length of FvWRKY50 gene contains 504 bp, which encodes a protein with 168 amino acids. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that FvWRKY50 belongs to subgroup II c (Figure 2A). As the WRKY domain is critical for the function of WRKY domains, we analyze the WRKY domain sequence of the group II c FvWRKY TFs. The results show that all the group II c WRKYs, except FvWRKY7, FvWRKY46, and FvWRKY50, contain a conserved WRKYGQK hepta-peptide. In FvWRKY7, FvWRKY46, FvWRKY50, FaWRKY50, and AtWRKY50, this hepta-peptide has changed into WRKYGKK. In addition, the zinc-finger motif of all group II c WRKY TFs except FvWRKY50 are C-X4-X23-H-X-H type, but in FvWRKY50, a deca-peptide of RKIRAAGAAD is inserted in the zinc-finger motif. Moreover, the first histidine in the zinc-finger motif of FvWRKY50 is substituted by arginine (Figure 2B). The question of whether these two variations in the WRKY domain of FvWRKY50 might influence its function needs further investigation.

3.3. Analysis of Tissue Expression Pattern and Subcellular Localization of FvWRKY50

The expression profiles of genes generally reflect their function. Here, we employ RT-qPCR to analyze the expression pattern of FvWRKY50. The results indicate that this gene is expressed in all tissues, with high expression level in the leaves (2.8-fold) and low expression level in red fruit (0.15-fold) relative to those in the roots. Moreover, the expression level of FvWRKY50 is found decreasing gradually along with the ripening of fruit (Figure 3A). Intriguingly, although the expression level of FvWRKY50 in the red fruit is the lowest, this gene is significantly up-regulated when the red fruit are inoculated with B. cinerea. As shown in Figure 1, it is gradually up-regulated to about 22-fold higher at the 5th day after inoculation. These results confirm our previous speculation that FvWRKY50 is in response to B. cinerea infection.
To identify the localization of FvWRKY50 in the cells, we fused FvWRKY50 to the N-terminal of green fluorescent protein under the control of CaMV35S promoter (35S:FvWRKY50-GFP). As shown in Figure 3B, the fluorescent signal of the fusion protein is specifically located in the nucleus. This result indicates that FvWRKY50 is a nuclear localization protein.

3.4. Analysis of Promoter of FvWRKY50

The spatial and temporal-specific expression of genes are generally determined by the cis-regulatory elements in their promoter and the later are specifically recognized and bound by transcriptional regulators of different classes. These regulators regulate gene expression in response to internal and/or external stimuli such as phytohormone, abiotic, and biotic stresses and others. To analyze the cis-regulatory elements in the promoter of FvWRKY50, a 2000 bp promoter sequence located in the upstream of the star codon of FvWRKY50 was predicted using PlantCARE online tool (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ (accessed on 30 September 2021)). The results indicates that beside a large number of the core promoter elements TATA-box (57 sites) and CAAT-box (35 sites), there are 22 other types of cis-regulatory elements in the promoter of FvWRKY50 (Table 1). Among these cis-regulatory elements, seven of them are light-response elements, i.e., the ACE, ATCT-motif, G-Box, GATA-motif, GT1-motif, TCT-motif and chs-CMA1a, and six of them are defense-related elements, i.e., ABRE, CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif, WER3, WUN-motif, and W-box. In addition, other elements involved in abiotic stress response and development such as LTR, MBS, MYB, and STRE are also identified in the promoter of FvWRKY50. These data suggest that FvWRKY50 is probably involved in plant growth, development, and disease response.

3.5. Effect of FvWRKY50 in Regulation of Defense to B. cinerea

To determine the function of FvWRKY50 in response to B. cinerea infection, we first transiently expressed it in strawberry fruit by Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration. As shown in Figure 4A, on the third day after agroinfiltration, compared with that in the fruit infiltrated with empty vector (EV-OE), the expression level of FvWRKY50 increases about four folds in the fruit infiltrated with the FvWRKY50 overexpression vector (FvWRKY50-OE). However, compared with the fruit infiltrated with RNAi empty vector (EV-RNAi), the transcription level of FvWRKY50 decreases about three folds in the fruit that transiently express FvWRKY50 gene silence vector (FvWRKY50-RNAi). After confirming the reliability of strawberry fruit transient expression system, we further inoculated these fruit with B. cinerea respectively to determine the disease resistance of FvWRKY50. As shown in Figure 4B, 48 h after B. cinerea inoculation, the lesion area on the fruit of FvWRKY50-OE is significantly smaller than those of EV-OE. Consistently, the lesion area on the fruit of FvWRKY50-RNAi is bigger than that of empty vector. These results demonstrate that overexpression of FvWRKY50 could increase the resistance of strawberry against B. cinerea (Figure 4B).

3.6. Effect of FvWRKY50 on the Transcript Levels of Disease Resistance Genes

Promoter analysis implying FvWRKY50 might be involved in JA signaling pathway in response to B. cinerea infection. To explore the regulation mechanism of FvWRKY50 in pathogen resistance, we detected the transcript levels of several defense-related genes in FvWRKY50 overexpression and silencing fruit, respectively. As shown in Figure 5, many genes have been affected by FvWRKY50. For example, the expression pattern of FaAOC, one key gene that involves in JA biosynthesis, is similar to FvWRKY50, suggesting significantly up-regulated in FvWRKY50-OE fruit and significantly suppressed in FvWRKY50-RNAi fruit, while the expression pattern of other genes such as FaAOS, FaLOX, FaOPR2 that involve in JA biosynthesis is not closely correlated with FvWRKY50 (Figure 5). Interestingly, the expression pattern of FaJAZ5 and FaJAZ10, two genes involved in JA signaling pathway, are negatively relative to FvWRKY50. This suggests that they were suppressed in FvWRKY50-OE fruit but up-regulated in FvWRKY50-RNAi fruit. In addition, we observed that the transcript of FaJAZ1, FaJAZ4 and FaJAZ8 were strongly up-regulated in FvWRKY50-OE fruit but not influenced in FvWRKY50-RNAi fruit (Figure 5). Accordingly, FvWRKY50 may have been involved in JA-mediated resistance against B. cinerea through regulating the expression of genes in biosynthesis and signaling pathway.
In addition, the expression of several transcription factor genes such as FaWRKY1, FaWRKY11, FaWRKY25, FaWRKY33, FaWRKY75, FaWHIRLY1, and FaWHIRLY2 were also detected. The results indicate that the expression pattern of FaWRKY1 is positively related to FvWRKY50, while the expression pattern of FaWRKY33 is negatively related to FvWRKY30. The expression pattern of other transcription factor genes is not closely related to FvWRKY50.
Finally, several defense-related genes coding antimicrobial proteins (PR proteins) and fungi cell wall degradation hydrolases were also detected. The results show that FaCHI3-1, a chitinase coding gene, was significantly up-regulated in FvWRKY50-OE fruit and suppressed in FvWRKY50-RNAi fruit. In addition, FaPR1 gene was also significantly induced in FvWRKY50-OE fruit. Moreover, other defense-related genes including FaPR5-1, FaCHI2-2, FaBG2-2, FaBG2-3, and FaPGIP1 were down-regulated in FvWRKY50-RNAi fruit.

4. Discussion

WRKY gene family encodes one of the largest plant-specific transcription factors and plays a critical role in plant growth processes, especially in response to abiotic and biotic stresses. For example, AtWRKY8 was found to interact with AtVQ9 to regulate salt stresses [57]. Interestingly, AtWRKY8 was also found to positively regulate plant basal resistance against B. cinerea through interaction with AtVQ10, knockout of AtVQ10 decreased the resistance to B. cinerea, whereas plants that constitutively express AtVQ10 or AtWRKY8 enhanced resistance to B. cinerea [58]. In addition, Wei et al. reported that ectopic expression of FvWRKY42 in Arabidopsis could not only enhance the pathogenic resistance, but also improve salt and drought stress tolerance of the transgenic plants [35]. In addition, in Arabidopsis, AtWRKY33 was identified as a substrate of AtMPK3/MPK6. Upon B. cinerea infection, AtWRKY33 was phosphorylated by the two kinases, which subsequently activated the expression of camalexin biosynthesis genes [59]. In strawberry, transient expression of FaWRKY11 in strawberry fruit increased their resistance to B. cinerea by regulating several disease resistance transcription factors and metabolic genes [32].
Based on our previous study, we isolated and characterized a WRKY gene, FvWRKY50, from woodland strawberry accession Hawaii-4 in this study. Tissue expression pattern analysis indicates that FvWRKY50 is ubiquitously expressed in all detected tissues (Figure 3A). Interestingly, despite the expression levels of FvWRKY50 being gradually decreased in strawberry fruit along with ripening, it was constantly up-regulated when the ripe fruit was infected by B. cinerea (Figure 1). This result implies that FvWRKY50 might be involved in regulating plant defense responses not only at the early stage, but also at the later stage. The induction pattern of FvWRKY50 was similar to that of FaWRKY11 which has been found positively regulating resistance to B. cinerea and whose expression has also been proved to be able to last for four to five days [34], implying the two strawberry WRKY genes might play similar roles in plant disease response. Further promoter sequence analysis also confirms that FvWRKY50 gene is involved in plant disease response, because several defense-related signal response cis-regulatory elements are identified in its promoter region (Table 1). Sequence analysis indicates that FvWRKY50 is classified into subgroup II c (Figure 2A). Interestingly, different from other subgroup II c strawberry WRKYs, two variations were observed in WRKY domain of FvWRKY50. The first variation means that the most conserved WRKYGQK hepta-peptide in FvWRKY50 is changed into WRKYGKK, which is located at the N-terminal of the WRKY domain. The second variation refers to the change of the conserved C-X4-C-X23-H-X-H type in the group II c WRKY TFs into C-X4-C-X33-R-X-H type in FvWRKY50, which is located at the zinc-finger motif region. Variation in the amino acid residues number of the zinc-finger has only been found in rice, moso bamboo and wheat group III WRKY TFs, but not been reported in other group WRKY TFs [60]. Numerous studies have demonstrated both the WRKYGQK region and the zinc-finger motif are indispensable for the DNA-binding function of WRKY proteins [60]. Therefore, it is worthwhile to further analyze whether these amino acid variations could influence the function of FvWRKY50. Interestingly, these variations did not affect its subcellular localization, as shown in Figure 3B which demonstrates that the fluorescent signal of FvWRKY5-GFP fusion protein is exclusively localized in the nucleus.
To explore the function of FvWRKY50 in response to B. cinerea infection, we transiently expressed this gene in strawberry fruit by Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration. Through analyzing the relationship between the expression level of FvWRKY50 and lesion area that is caused by B. cinerea infection, we conclude that FvWRKY50 may be able to positively regulate plant defense to B. cinerea. The reasons for this are that the lesion area on the fruit that overexpresses this gene is significantly smaller than that of the control, and that the opposite symptom was observed on the FvWRKY50 silenced strawberry fruit (Figure 4B).
Numerous studies have revealed that a large portion of WRKY TFs participated in disease response through jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway [11]. To test whether FvWRKY50 is also involved in JA pathway to regulate disease response, we analyzed the expression levels of several JA biosynthesis and signaling pathway genes in FvWRKY50 overexpressed and silenced strawberry fruit. The results showed that when FvWRKY50 was overexpressed or silenced in fruit, the transcript pattern of FaAOC, one of the key gene involves in JA biosynthesis, was highly similar to FvWRKY50. Additionally, two JA signaling pathway genes, FaJAZ5 and FaJAZ10, exhibit opposite expression pattern to FvWRKY50 in FvWRKY50 overexpression and silencing fruit. Based on these results, we propose that FvWRKY50 might be involved in JA biosynthesis and signaling transduction to regulate plant defense. In addition, the expression levels of four FaWRKY genes in FvWRKY50 overexpressed and silenced fruit were varied (Figure 5). For example, we observed when FvWRKY50 was overexpressed, FaWRKY1 was significantly up-regulated, while other two genes, FaWRKY25 and FaWRKY33, were down-regulated. As studies in Arabidopsis have revealed that AtWRKY57 and AtWRKY33 competitively binding to the W-box in the promoter of JAZ1 and JAZ5 to regulate response to B. cinerea infection via JA signaling pathway [61], further analyses are required to explore the roles of FvWRKY50 in JA signaling pathway. Fungi cell wall degradation enzymes and antimicrobial proteins play important roles in defense against plant pathogen [62]. Therefore, the transcript levels of FaPR1, FaPR5-1, FaPR10, FaCHI2-2, FaCHI3-1, FaBG2-1, FaBG2-2, FaBG2-3, FaPGIP1, and FaPGIP2 were detected. The results indicated that FaCHI3-1 and FaPR1 were significantly induced in FvWRKY50-OE fruit. Taken together, these data imply FvWRKY50 might increase the resistance ability of strawberry against B. cinerea through regulating JA biosynthesis and signaling transduction, fungi cell degradation enzymes, and antimicrobial proteins biosynthesis.
In summary, the present study has functionally characterized the FvWRKY50 gene in strawberry fruit by transient expression system. With this study, we have provided primary evidence for the relationship between FvWRKY50 and the resistance of strawberry against B. cinerea. Our results indicate that FvWRKY50 positively regulates strawberry resistance to B. cinerea. In addition, because several defense-related WRKY transcription factors are also found to play roles in against abiotic stresses, further studies to generate stable transgenic strawberry plants for overexpression and/or knockout of FvWRKY50 to confirm its functions are required in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy11122377/s1, Table S1: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

C.M., J.X., M.L., X.L. (Xiaoyu Liu), X.L. (Xiaodong Lai) and Y.B., performed the experiments and analyzed the data. J.X. and Z.C. designed the research, J.X. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the open funds of the State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, China (ZW201813) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions Project (PAPD).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Guoqing Li (Huazhong Agricultural University, China) for presenting the B. cinerea strain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Petrasch, S.; Knapp, S.J.; van Kan, J.A.L.; Blanco-Ulate, B. Grey mould of strawberry, a devastating disease caused by the ubiquitous necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 877–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Koike, S.T.; Gordon, T.R. Management of Fusarium wilt of strawberry. Crop. Prot. 2015, 73, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Q.Y.; Zhang, L.Q.; Song, L.L.; Duan, K.; Li, N.; Wang, Y.X.; Gao, Q.H. The different interactions of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides with two strawberry varieties and the involvement of salicylic acid. Hortic. Res. 2016, 3, 16007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Vielba-Fernandez, A.; Polonio, A.; Ruiz-Jimenez, L.; de Vicente, A.; Perez-Garcia, A.; Fernandez-Ortuno, D. Fungicide resistance in powdery mildew fungi. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Li, B.Q.; Qin, G.Z.; Tian, S.P. Pathogenic mechanisms and control strategies of Botrytis cinerea causing post-harvest decay in fruits and vegetables. Food Qual. Saf. Oxf. 2018, 2, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hu, X.R.; Dai, D.J.; Wang, H.D.; Zhang, C.Q. Rapid on-site evaluation of the development of resistance to quinone outside inhibitors in Botrytis cinerea. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Droby, S.; Wisniewski, M.; Macarisin, D.; Wilson, C. Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 52, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ng, D.W.; Abeysinghe, J.K.; Kamali, M. Regulating the Regulators: The control of transcription factors in plant defense signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Amorim, L.L.B.; da Fonseca Dos Santos, R.; Neto, J.P.B.; Guida-Santos, M.; Crovella, S.; Benko-Iseppon, A.M. Transcription factors involved in plant resistance to pathogens. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2017, 18, 335–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seo, E.; Choi, D. Functional studies of transcription factors involved in plant defenses in the genomics era. Brief. Funct. Genom. 2015, 14, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jiang, J.J.; Ma, S.H.; Ye, N.H.; Jiang, M.; Cao, J.S.; Zhang, J.H. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Agarwal, P.; Reddy, M.P.; Chikara, J. WRKY: Its structure, evolutionary relationship, DNA-binding selectivity, role in stress tolerance and development of plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 3883–3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ishiguro, S.; Nakamura, K. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1, that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5′ upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and beta-amylase from sweet potato. Mol. Genet. Genom. 1994, 244, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ulker, B.; Somssich, I.E. WRKY transcription factors: From DNA binding towards biological function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Song, Y.; Ai, C.-r.; Jing, S.-j.; Yu, D.-q. Research progress on functional analysis of rice WRKY genes. Rice Sci. 2010, 17, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, K.F.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.F.; Wu, L.J.; Xie, D.X. Molecular phylogenetic and expression analysis of the complete WRKY transcription factor family in maize. DNA Res. 2012, 19, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Huang, S.; Gao, Y.; Liu, J.; Peng, X.; Niu, X.; Fei, Z.; Cao, S.; Liu, Y. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in Solanum lycopersicum. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2012, 287, 495–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, C.; Guo, R.; Xu, X.; Gao, M.; Li, X.; Song, J.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, X. Evolution and expression analysis of the grape (Vitis vinifera L.) WRKY gene family. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1513–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, L.; Zhu, W.; Fang, L.; Sun, X.; Su, L.; Liang, Z.; Wang, N.; Londo, J.P.; Li, S.; Xin, H. Genome-wide identification of WRKY family genes and their response to cold stress in Vitis vinifera. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, M.; Vannozzi, A.; Wang, G.; Liang, Y.H.; Tornielli, G.B.; Zenoni, S.; Cavallini, E.; Pezzotti, M.; Cheng, Z.M. Genome and transcriptome analysis of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) WRKY gene family. Hortic. Res. 2014, 1, 14016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Meng, D.; Li, Y.; Bai, Y.; Li, M.; Cheng, L. Genome-wide identification and characterization of WRKY transcriptional factor family in apple and analysis of their responses to waterlogging and drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biol. 2016, 103, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ren, S.; Shen, Y.; Qin, L.; Xing, Y. Genome-wide analysis of the expression of wrky family genes in different developmental stages of wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca) fruit. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, P.; Liu, Q.Z. Genome-wide characterization of the WRKY gene family in cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) and the importance of several group III members in continuous cropping. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, X.; Chen, C.; Fan, B.; Chen, Z. Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1310–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Zheng, Z.; Qamar, S.A.; Chen, Z.; Mengiste, T. Arabidopsis WRKY33 transcription factor is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. Plant J. 2006, 48, 592–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, J.; Brader, G.; Palva, E.T. The WRKY70 transcription factor: A node of convergence for jasmonate-mediated and salicylate-mediated signals in plant defense. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, B.; Hong, Y.B.; Zhang, Y.F.; Li, X.H.; Huang, L.; Zhang, H.J.; Li, D.Y.; Song, F.M. Tomato WRKY transcriptional factor SlDRW1 is required for disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea and tolerance to oxidative stress. Plant Sci. 2014, 227, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Zheng, Z.; Fan, B.; Yu, J.Q.; Chen, Z. Characterization of the promoter and extended C-terminal domain of Arabidopsis WRKY33 and functional analysis of tomato WRKY33 homologues in plant stress responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 4567–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, C.; Ren, Z. Overexpression of SlMYB75 enhances resistance to Botrytis cinerea and prolongs fruit storage life in tomato. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Shu, P.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Yao, L.; Sheng, J.; Shen, L. Over-expression of SlWRKY46 in tomato plants increases susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea by modulating ROS homeostasis and SA and JA signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. Biol. 2021, 166, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Higuera, J.J.; Garrido-Gala, J.; Lekhbou, A.; Arjona-Girona, I.; Amil-Ruiz, F.; Mercado, J.A.; Pliego-Alfaro, F.; Munoz-Blanco, J.; Lopez-Herrera, C.J.; Caballero, J.L. The strawberry fawrky1 transcription factor negatively regulates resistance to colletotrichum acutatum in fruit upon infection. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jia, S.Z.; Wang, Y.H.; Zhang, G.; Yan, Z.M.; Cai, Q.S. Strawberry FaWRKY25 transcription factor negatively regulated the resistance of strawberry fruits to Botrytis cinerea. Genes 2021, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, Y.H.; Zhao, F.X.; Zhang, G.; Jia, S.Z.; Yan, Z.M. FaWRKY11 transcription factor positively regulates resistance to Botrytis cinerea in strawberry fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 279, 109893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wei, W.; Cui, M.Y.; Hu, Y.; Gao, K.; Xie, Y.G.; Jiang, Y.; Feng, J.Y. Ectopic expression of FvWRKY42, a WRKY transcription factor from the diploid woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca), enhances resistance to powdery mildew, improves osmotic stress resistance, and increases abscisic acid sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2018, 275, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shulaev, V.; Sargent, D.J.; Crowhurst, R.N.; Mockler, T.C.; Folkerts, O.; Delcher, A.L.; Jaiswal, P.; Mockaitis, K.; Liston, A.; Mane, S.P.; et al. The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Edger, P.P.; Poorten, T.J.; VanBuren, R.; Hardigan, M.A.; Colle, M.; McKain, M.R.; Smith, R.D.; Teresi, S.J.; Nelson, A.D.L.; Wai, C.M.; et al. Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Xiong, J.S.; Zhu, H.Y.; Bai, Y.B.; Liu, H.; Cheng, Z.M. RNA sequencing-based transcriptome analysis of mature strawberry fruit infected by necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 104, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhao, Y.; Mao, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Dai, Z.; Dou, Z.; Zhang, K.; Wei, L.; Li, T.; Zeng, B.; et al. Optimization and standardization of transient expression assays for gene functional analyses in strawberry fruits. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Schindelin, J.; Rueden, C.T.; Hiner, M.C.; Eliceiri, K.W. The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2015, 82, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Fujita, Y.; Fujita, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J. Plant Res. 2011, 124, 509–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Weisshaar, B.; Armstrong, G.A.; Block, A.; da Costa e Silva, O.; Hahlbrock, K. Light-inducible and constitutively expressed DNA-binding proteins recognizing a plant promoter element with functional relevance in light responsiveness. EMBO J. 1991, 10, 1777–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Olive, M.R.; Walker, J.C.; Singh, K.; Dennis, E.S.; Peacock, W.J. Functional properties of the anaerobic responsive element of the maize Adh1 gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 1990, 15, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Roy, S.; Choudhury, S.R.; Singh, S.K.; Das, K.P. Functional analysis of light-regulated promoter region of AtPol lambda gene. Planta 2012, 235, 411–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lescot, M.; Dehais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouze, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Turner, J.G.; Ellis, C.; Devoto, A. The jasmonate signal pathway. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S153–S164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chattopadhyay, S.; Ang, L.H.; Puente, P.; Deng, X.W.; Wei, N. Arabidopsis bZIP protein HY5 directly interacts with light-responsive promoters in mediating light control of gene expression. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Dunn, M.A.; White, A.J.; Vural, S.; Hughes, M.A. Identification of promoter elements in a low-temperature-responsive gene (blt4.9) from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 38, 551–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, Z.W.; Wang, M.P.; Guo, Z.T.; Zhu, X.F.; Xia, Z.L. Identification of a 119-bp promoter of the maize sulfite oxidase gene (zmso) that confers high-level gene expression and aba or drought inducibility in transgenic plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lin, Z.M.; Yan, J.W.; Yan, H.X.; Wang, F. Characterization of a strong green tissue-specific motif in rice photosystem I gene promoter Ppsak. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2017, 11, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rouster, J.; Leah, R.; Mundy, J.; CameronMills, V. Identification of a methyl jasmonate-responsive region in the promoter of a lipoxygenase 1 gene expressed in barley grain. Plant J. 1997, 11, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Asao, H.; Yoshida, K.; Nishi, Y.; Shinmyo, A. Wound-responsive cis-element in the 5 '-upstream region of cucumber ascorbate oxidase gene. Biosci. Biotechol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hayashi, T.; Kobayashi, D.; Kariu, T.; Tahara, M.; Hada, K.; Kouzuma, Y.; Kimura, M. Genomic cloning of ribonucleases in Nicotiana glutinosa leaves, as induced in response to wounding or to TMV-infection, and characterization of their promoters. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 2574–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Palm, C.J.; Costa, M.A.; An, G.H.; Ryan, C.A. Wound-inducible nuclear-protein binds dna fragments that regulate a proteinase inhibitor-ii gene from potato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hu, Y.R.; Chen, L.G.; Wang, H.P.; Zhang, L.P.; Wang, F.; Yu, D.Q. Arabidopsis transcription factor WRKY8 functions antagonistically with its interacting partner VQ9 to modulate salinity stress tolerance. Plant J. 2013, 74, 730–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Pan, J.; Hu, Y.; Yu, D. Arabidopsis VQ10 interacts with WRKY8 to modulate basal defense against Botrytis cinerea. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 956–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Eckardt, N.A. Induction of phytoalexin biosynthesis: wrky33 is a target of MAPK signaling. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, X.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Guo, Z. WRKY transcription factors: Evolution, binding, and action. Phytopathol. Res. 2019, 1, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jiang, Y.; Yu, D. The WRKY57 transcription factor affects the expression of jasmonate ZIM-domain genes transcriptionally to compromise Botrytis cinerea resistance. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2771–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Saavedra, G.M.; Sanfuentes, E.; Figueroa, P.M.; Figueroa, C.R. Independent preharvest applications of methyl jasmonate and chitosan elicit differential upregulation of defense-related genes with reduced incidence of gray mold decay during postharvest storage of Fragaria chiloensis fruit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Agronomy 11 02377 g001 550
Figure 1. FvWRKY50 induced by B. cinerea. Mature cultivated strawberry fruit were inoculated with spore suspension (5 μL of 1 × 106 spores) of B. cinerea. Tissues around the inoculated sites were collected for the detection of the expression level of FvWRKY50 by RT-qPCR analysis at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h after inoculation. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks above the columns represent a significant difference at ** p < 0.01 levels according to Student’s t-test.
Figure 1. FvWRKY50 induced by B. cinerea. Mature cultivated strawberry fruit were inoculated with spore suspension (5 μL of 1 × 106 spores) of B. cinerea. Tissues around the inoculated sites were collected for the detection of the expression level of FvWRKY50 by RT-qPCR analysis at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h after inoculation. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks above the columns represent a significant difference at ** p < 0.01 levels according to Student’s t-test.
Agronomy 11 02377 g001
Agronomy 11 02377 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequence information and phylogenetic tree of FvWRKY50. (A) The amino acid sequences of FvWRKY50 and other selected WRKY TFs of strawberry and Arabidopsis were aligned using the Clustal W algorithm, and the neighbor-joining tree was constructed by MEGA7.0 software. The scale bar represents a distance of 0.1 substitutions per site. (B) Amino acid sequences alignment of FvWRKY50 and its homologs from Arabidopsis, tomato, apple, cucumber, and rice. Identical amino acids were highlighted in black, the WRKY domain in the sequences is underlined, the conserved WRKYGKK sequence is boxed and the cystine residues in the zinc-finger is marked by triangle. Proteins used for analysis are: AtWRKY44 (NP_181263.2), AtWRKY20(NP_849450.1), AtWRKY60 (NP_180072.1), AtWRKY40 (NP_178199.1), FvWRKY11 (XP_011459611.1), FvWRKY44 (XP_004303242.1), AtWRKY36 (NP_564976.1), AtWRKY9 (NP_176982.1), FvWRKY30 (XP_004299966.1), FvWRKY34 (XP_004302348.1), AtWRKY8 (NP_199447.1), FvWRKY15 (XP_004293668.1), FvWRKY50, AtWRKY11 (NP_849559.1), AtWRKY39 (NP_566236.1), FvWRKY9 (XP_004291076.1), FvWRKY8 (XP_011457977.1), AtWRKY14 (NP_564359.1), AtWRKY35 (NP_181029.1), FvWRKY6 (XP_004293685.1), FvWRKY31 (XP_004300445.1), AtWRKY30 (NP_568439.1), AtWRKY54 (NP_181607.1), FvWRKY54 (XP_004307738.1), FvWRKY38 (XP_004302592.1), FvWRKY25 (XP_004294758), FvWRKY42 (KU207053), AtWRKY50 (NP_197989.2), FvWRKY50 (gene15421), FaWRKY50 (FANhyb_rscf00000148.1.g00011.1), FvWRKY4 (XP_011464713.1), FvWRKY6 (XP_004288542.1), FvWRKY7 (XP_004288553.1), FvWRKY22 (XP_004295061.1), FvWRKY46 (XP_004303487.1), FvWRKY48 (XP_004304530.1), FvWRKY24 (XP_004306730.1), FvWRKY52 (XP_011469209.1), FvWRKY59 (XP_004310100.1), FvWRKY23 (XP_011463029.1).
Figure 2. Sequence information and phylogenetic tree of FvWRKY50. (A) The amino acid sequences of FvWRKY50 and other selected WRKY TFs of strawberry and Arabidopsis were aligned using the Clustal W algorithm, and the neighbor-joining tree was constructed by MEGA7.0 software. The scale bar represents a distance of 0.1 substitutions per site. (B) Amino acid sequences alignment of FvWRKY50 and its homologs from Arabidopsis, tomato, apple, cucumber, and rice. Identical amino acids were highlighted in black, the WRKY domain in the sequences is underlined, the conserved WRKYGKK sequence is boxed and the cystine residues in the zinc-finger is marked by triangle. Proteins used for analysis are: AtWRKY44 (NP_181263.2), AtWRKY20(NP_849450.1), AtWRKY60 (NP_180072.1), AtWRKY40 (NP_178199.1), FvWRKY11 (XP_011459611.1), FvWRKY44 (XP_004303242.1), AtWRKY36 (NP_564976.1), AtWRKY9 (NP_176982.1), FvWRKY30 (XP_004299966.1), FvWRKY34 (XP_004302348.1), AtWRKY8 (NP_199447.1), FvWRKY15 (XP_004293668.1), FvWRKY50, AtWRKY11 (NP_849559.1), AtWRKY39 (NP_566236.1), FvWRKY9 (XP_004291076.1), FvWRKY8 (XP_011457977.1), AtWRKY14 (NP_564359.1), AtWRKY35 (NP_181029.1), FvWRKY6 (XP_004293685.1), FvWRKY31 (XP_004300445.1), AtWRKY30 (NP_568439.1), AtWRKY54 (NP_181607.1), FvWRKY54 (XP_004307738.1), FvWRKY38 (XP_004302592.1), FvWRKY25 (XP_004294758), FvWRKY42 (KU207053), AtWRKY50 (NP_197989.2), FvWRKY50 (gene15421), FaWRKY50 (FANhyb_rscf00000148.1.g00011.1), FvWRKY4 (XP_011464713.1), FvWRKY6 (XP_004288542.1), FvWRKY7 (XP_004288553.1), FvWRKY22 (XP_004295061.1), FvWRKY46 (XP_004303487.1), FvWRKY48 (XP_004304530.1), FvWRKY24 (XP_004306730.1), FvWRKY52 (XP_011469209.1), FvWRKY59 (XP_004310100.1), FvWRKY23 (XP_011463029.1).
Agronomy 11 02377 g002
Agronomy 11 02377 g003 550
Figure 3. Tissue expression pattern and subcellular localization of FvWRKY50. (A) Tissue specific expression pattern of FvWRKY50 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. R, root; ST, shoot; S, stolon; L, leaf; FOF, fully opened flower; FB, flower bud; YF, young fruit; GF, green fruit; RF, ripe fruit. (B) Subcellular localization of FvWRKY50. Subcellular localization of FvWRKY50 was analyzed by transient expression of the binary vector containing 35S:FvWRKY50-GFP in tobacco leaves. The tobacco used for assay is a stable transgenic line that has been transformed with a specific nucleus-localized red fluorescent protein construct. The fluorescence was detected at 72 h after infiltration. The red fluorescence shows the localization of nucleus. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks above the columns represent a significant difference at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 levels according to Student’s t-test. Bar, 20 μm.
Figure 3. Tissue expression pattern and subcellular localization of FvWRKY50. (A) Tissue specific expression pattern of FvWRKY50 was analyzed by RT-qPCR. R, root; ST, shoot; S, stolon; L, leaf; FOF, fully opened flower; FB, flower bud; YF, young fruit; GF, green fruit; RF, ripe fruit. (B) Subcellular localization of FvWRKY50. Subcellular localization of FvWRKY50 was analyzed by transient expression of the binary vector containing 35S:FvWRKY50-GFP in tobacco leaves. The tobacco used for assay is a stable transgenic line that has been transformed with a specific nucleus-localized red fluorescent protein construct. The fluorescence was detected at 72 h after infiltration. The red fluorescence shows the localization of nucleus. Error bars represent the standard deviations of three biological replicates. Asterisks above the columns represent a significant difference at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 levels according to Student’s t-test. Bar, 20 μm.
Agronomy 11 02377 g003
Agronomy 11 02377 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of FvWRKY50 in resistance to B. cinerea. (A) Expression level of FvWRKY50 in the fruit that transiently expressed FvWRKY50-OE, -RNAi, and the corresponding empty vectors. (B) Lesion areas caused by B. cinerea infection on the surface of strawberry fruit that transiently expressed FvWRKY50-OE, -RNAi, and the corresponding empty vectors. Gene expression levels were detected three days after agroinfiltration. After detecting the transcript level of FvWRKY50, rest fruit were inoculated with B. cinerea. Lesion area and photographs were analyzed at 48 h after B. cinerea inoculation. Values are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks above the columns represent a significant difference at ** p < 0.01 levels according to Student’s t-test.
Figure 4. Effects of FvWRKY50 in resistance to B. cinerea. (A) Expression level of FvWRKY50 in the fruit that transiently expressed FvWRKY50-OE, -RNAi, and the corresponding empty vectors. (B) Lesion areas caused by B. cinerea infection on the surface of strawberry fruit that transiently expressed FvWRKY50-OE, -RNAi, and the corresponding empty vectors. Gene expression levels were detected three days after agroinfiltration. After detecting the transcript level of FvWRKY50, rest fruit were inoculated with B. cinerea. Lesion area and photographs were analyzed at 48 h after B. cinerea inoculation. Values are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Asterisks above the columns represent a significant difference at ** p < 0.01 levels according to Student’s t-test.
Agronomy 11 02377 g004
Agronomy 11 02377 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of FvWRKY50 overexpression and silence on transcription of resistance-related genes. OE and RNAi represent overexpression and silence of FvWRKY50 gene. The relative expression levels of the resistance-related genes in the fruit that transiently expressed FvWRKY50 -OE, -RNAi, and the corresponding empty vectors (EV-OE or EV-RNAi) were calculated, and the results were used to create a heat map.
Figure 5. Effects of FvWRKY50 overexpression and silence on transcription of resistance-related genes. OE and RNAi represent overexpression and silence of FvWRKY50 gene. The relative expression levels of the resistance-related genes in the fruit that transiently expressed FvWRKY50 -OE, -RNAi, and the corresponding empty vectors (EV-OE or EV-RNAi) were calculated, and the results were used to create a heat map.
Agronomy 11 02377 g005
Table
Table 1. The cis-elements in the promoter of FvWRKY.
Table 1. The cis-elements in the promoter of FvWRKY.
Cis-ElementPositionSequencesFunction
ABRE- 789 (-), - 546 (+),
- 588 (+), - 547 (+, -)		ACGTG/TACGTG/CACGTACis-acting element involved in the abscisic acid responsiveness [43]
ACE- 1196 (+), - 429 (+)CTAACGTATTCis-acting element involved in light responsiveness [44]
ARE- 1414 (+), - 661 (+),
- 899 (-), - 214 (-)		AAACCAcis-acting regulatory element essential for the anaerobic induction [45]
ATCT-motif- 561 (+)AATCTAATCCPart of a conserved DNA module involved in light responsiveness [46]
CCGTCC motif- 1027 (-)CCGTCCCis-acting regulatory element related to meristem specific activation [47]
CAT-box- 986 (-)GCCACTCis-acting regulatory element related to meristem expression [47]
CGTCA-motif- 1462 (-), - 94 (-),
- 797 (+)		CGTCACis-acting regulatory element involved in the MeJA-responsiveness [48]
G-Box- 789 (+), - 589 (-),
- 1870 (-), - 547 (+)		CACGTT/CACGAC/
TACGTG		Cis-acting regulatory element involved in light responsiveness [49]
GATA-motif- 1031 (+)GATAGGAPart of a light responsive element [49]
GC-motif- 715 (-)CCCCCGEnhancer-like element involved in anoxic specific inducibility [45]
GT1-motif- 1458 (+)GGTTAALight responsive element [49]
LTR- 1450 (-), - 1388 (+)CCGAAACis-acting element involved in low-temperature responsiveness [50]
MBS- 1704 (+)CAACTGMYB binding site involved in drought-inducibility [47]
MYB- 1444 (-), - 972 (-)CAACCAMYB binding site [51]
MYC- 1423 (+), - 257 (-),
- 348 (-), - 760 (-), - 288 (-)		CAATTGMYC binding site [47]
STRE- 1995 (+), - 397 (+),
- 1491 (-), - 248 (+)		AGGGGStress response elements [47]
TCT-motif- 416 (-)TCTTACPart of a light responsive element [52]
TGACG-motif- 1462 (+), - 94 (+),
- 797 (-)		TGACGCis-acting regulatory element involved in the MeJA-responsiveness [53]
WER3- 1124 (-)CCACCTWound-responsive elements [54]
WUN-motif- 1561 (+), - 948 (+),
- 1060 (+)		AAATTACTA/AAATTACT/
AAATTTCCT		Wound-responsive element [55]
chs-CMA1a- 945 (+)TTACTTAAPart of a light responsive element [47]
W-box- 1164 (+), - 1135 (-),
- 645 (-), - 285 (+)		TTGACTWounding and pathogen responsiveness [56]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, C.; Xiong, J.; Liang, M.; Liu, X.; Lai, X.; Bai, Y.; Cheng, Z. Strawberry WRKY Transcription Factor WRKY50 Is Required for Resistance to Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122377

AMA Style

Ma C, Xiong J, Liang M, Liu X, Lai X, Bai Y, Cheng Z. Strawberry WRKY Transcription Factor WRKY50 Is Required for Resistance to Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Agronomy. 2021; 11(12):2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122377

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Chuangju, Jinsong Xiong, Morong Liang, Xiaoyu Liu, Xiaodong Lai, Yibo Bai, and Zongming Cheng. 2021. "Strawberry WRKY Transcription Factor WRKY50 Is Required for Resistance to Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogen Botrytis cinerea" Agronomy 11, no. 12: 2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122377

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop