Next Article in Journal
Temperature and Soil Moisture Drive Coumestrol Concentration in Annual Medicago spp. in the Presence but Not Absence of Phoma Black Stem and Leaf Spot (Phoma medicaginis)
Previous Article in Journal
Durum Wheat Response to Organic and Mineral Fertilization with Application of Different Levels and Types of Phosphorus-Based Fertilizers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effect of Mulch Materials on Selected Soil Properties, Yield and Grape Quality in Vineyards under Central European Conditions

Agronomy 2022, 12(8), 1862; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081862
by Patrik Burg 1,*, Alice Čížková 1, Vladimír Mašán 1, Aleksandar Sedlar 2, Arkadiusz Matwijczuk 3 and Jiří Souček 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2022, 12(8), 1862; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081862
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 3 August 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 7 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript Title:The effect of mulch materials on selected soil properties, yield and grape quality in vineyards under central European conditions

General Comment:

The presented paper deals with the effect of two different mulch materials that are applied to  the soil surface and on the yield and quality parameters of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.).  The manuscript has scientific merit. However,there are some concerns and points which must be improved. Please also remove ANY lumped references. Please define each of them separately to avoid inappropriate citations. Authors are suggested to undergo the following correction so as to improve the quality of manuscript.

*The abstract should exclude an introduction and general statements and must provide enough scientific information that will allow a reader to understand the key findings of the manuscript. Your abstract should clearly state the essence of the problem you are addressing, what you did and what you found and recommend. That would help prospective readers of the abstract to decide if they wish to read the entire article. Revise the abstract.

*Arrange the keywords in alphabetical order.

*Please briefly clarify the problem statement, objectives, and future prospects in the introduction section.

*Enhance the introduction by inserting some environmental aspects about mulching.

*Line no 79-81; provide the coordinates of the study area.
* Authors are suggested to add discussion by explaining trends in the obtained results along with the possible mechanisms behind the trends.

*Improve the discussion part by adding more new supporting data from the literature.

* It is strongly recommended to add a subsection, 'practical implications of this study,' outlining the challenges in the current research, future work, and recommendations, before the conclusion

 

*Please make sure your conclusions section underscores the scientific value-added of your paper and/or the applicability of your results.
In your conclusions, please discuss the implications of your research.

For citations and reference within the text, author must follow guide for authors. The references must be also in the format of the journal.

The Table legends, figure captions, and foot notes need improvement. All legends, captions, and foot notes should have enough description for a reader to understand the figure without having to refer back to the main text of the manuscript.

The manuscript contains numerous typos, stylistic issues, and some grammatical errors. The manuscript should be checked once for any grammatical as well as typological errors like somewhere spaces and comma (,).

Author Response

Dear editor and oponents,

 

We really appreciate all the attached comments and recommendations, which we tried to incorporate and to respond in all cases. They contributed to the higher quality of the entire article. We also made another language correction as recommended. We believe that now the contribution will be in appropriate form and will be accepted for publication.

 

We are looking forward to further cooperation!

 

Kindly,

 

Vladimír & author's team

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Over all the manuscript well written in my opinion.

It need little explanation about the experiment design.

 

Author Response

Dear editor and oponents,

 

We really appreciate all the attached comments and recommendations, which we tried to incorporate and to respond in all cases. They contributed to the higher quality of the entire article. We also made another language correction as recommended. We believe that now the contribution will be in appropriate form and will be accepted for publication.

 

We are looking forward to further cooperation!

 

Kindly,

 

Vladimír & author's team

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed all of previous queries, therefore the manuscript may be accepted in the present form. 

Author Response

Dear editor and reviewer,

We really appreciate the attached comment, which we tried to incorporate to the manuscript. 

We believe that now the contribution will be in appropriate form and will be accepted for publication.

We are looking forward to further cooperation!

Kindly,

Vladimír & author's team

 

Back to TopTop