Figure 1.
Tools used to aid in hand-, self-, and cross-pollination. (A) Paper tags. (B) Battery-operated engraver used to vibrate pollen out of anthers. (C) Fine forceps used to emasculate flowers. (D) Small brush used to apply pollen to stigmata. (E) Pencil. (F) Brass ring used as pollen collector. (G) Gelatine capsules. (H) 20× magnification lens.
Figure 1.
Tools used to aid in hand-, self-, and cross-pollination. (A) Paper tags. (B) Battery-operated engraver used to vibrate pollen out of anthers. (C) Fine forceps used to emasculate flowers. (D) Small brush used to apply pollen to stigmata. (E) Pencil. (F) Brass ring used as pollen collector. (G) Gelatine capsules. (H) 20× magnification lens.
Figure 2.
Morphological diversity of floral structures of S. orbiculatum ssp. Orbiculatum, showing variation in shape, colour, and number of petals and anthers. (a,d–j,l,m) Flowers with 5 petals and 5 anthers. (b,c) Flowers with 4 petals and 4 anthers and lower length/width ratio. (k) A flower with six petals and 6 anthers. (n) A flower with 3 petals and 3 anthers. Lines of small grids are 10 mm apart.
Figure 2.
Morphological diversity of floral structures of S. orbiculatum ssp. Orbiculatum, showing variation in shape, colour, and number of petals and anthers. (a,d–j,l,m) Flowers with 5 petals and 5 anthers. (b,c) Flowers with 4 petals and 4 anthers and lower length/width ratio. (k) A flower with six petals and 6 anthers. (n) A flower with 3 petals and 3 anthers. Lines of small grids are 10 mm apart.
Figure 3.
Floral structure of S. orbiculatum. (A) Three-flowered cyme inflorescence, with flowers at different developmental stages. (B–D) Androecium and gynoecium. (E) Close-up view of the stigma. (F) Distal end of the anther showing pore. (G,H) Short-styled flower, showing a close-up view in (H). (I) Flower at pre-anthesis stage showing stigma exsertion. (J) A flower with 2 gynoecia. (K) Two fused flowers sharing one pedicel. (L,M) Flowers at anthesis showing underdeveloped anther in (L) and immature anthers in (M).
Figure 3.
Floral structure of S. orbiculatum. (A) Three-flowered cyme inflorescence, with flowers at different developmental stages. (B–D) Androecium and gynoecium. (E) Close-up view of the stigma. (F) Distal end of the anther showing pore. (G,H) Short-styled flower, showing a close-up view in (H). (I) Flower at pre-anthesis stage showing stigma exsertion. (J) A flower with 2 gynoecia. (K) Two fused flowers sharing one pedicel. (L,M) Flowers at anthesis showing underdeveloped anther in (L) and immature anthers in (M).
Figure 4.
Regression lines and correlation coefficients between 5 staining methods (acetocarmine, IKI, lactophenol blue, FCR, and Alexander’s stain) and the in vitro pollen germination of the bush tomato S. orbiculatum ssp. orbiculatum. Blue points represent in vitro germination data and red points represent predicted data.
Figure 4.
Regression lines and correlation coefficients between 5 staining methods (acetocarmine, IKI, lactophenol blue, FCR, and Alexander’s stain) and the in vitro pollen germination of the bush tomato S. orbiculatum ssp. orbiculatum. Blue points represent in vitro germination data and red points represent predicted data.
Figure 5.
Pollen histochemical viability tests. (A,B) Staining with the nuclear dyes acetocarmine in (A) and cotton blue in lactophenol in (B). (C,D) For starch staining, I + KI was used as 1% solution in (C) and 2% solution in (D). (E) Fluorochromatic reaction test (FCR) to test the integrity of the plasmalemma of the vegetative cell using fluorescein diacetate. (F) Differential staining of aborted and non-aborted pollen using Alexander’s staining solution. Arrows in all pictures indicate non-viable pollen grains.
Figure 5.
Pollen histochemical viability tests. (A,B) Staining with the nuclear dyes acetocarmine in (A) and cotton blue in lactophenol in (B). (C,D) For starch staining, I + KI was used as 1% solution in (C) and 2% solution in (D). (E) Fluorochromatic reaction test (FCR) to test the integrity of the plasmalemma of the vegetative cell using fluorescein diacetate. (F) Differential staining of aborted and non-aborted pollen using Alexander’s staining solution. Arrows in all pictures indicate non-viable pollen grains.
Figure 6.
Morphological floral developmental sequence of S. orbiculatum ssp. orbiculatum, as observed under controlled condition.
Figure 6.
Morphological floral developmental sequence of S. orbiculatum ssp. orbiculatum, as observed under controlled condition.
Figure 7.
Controlled pollination of Solanum orbiculatum. (A) Harvesting pollen grains from flowers on the morning after anthesis. (B) A hand-held battery-operated engraver is used to vibrate the anthers to release pollen grains through the opening at the distal end of each anther. (C) The amount of harvested pollen grains from 2 to 3 flowers. (D) Mature flower a few hours before full anthesis, ready for emasculation and pollination, as the stigma is fully receptive. (E) Emasculation after anthesis and before pollen shed. (F) Emasculated flower showing a pistil with a receptive stigma. (G) Pollination by gently dipping the stigma into the collected pollen grains. (H) Tagging the pollinated flower. (I) Image of Solanum orbiculatum showing controlled self- and cross-pollinated flowers.
Figure 7.
Controlled pollination of Solanum orbiculatum. (A) Harvesting pollen grains from flowers on the morning after anthesis. (B) A hand-held battery-operated engraver is used to vibrate the anthers to release pollen grains through the opening at the distal end of each anther. (C) The amount of harvested pollen grains from 2 to 3 flowers. (D) Mature flower a few hours before full anthesis, ready for emasculation and pollination, as the stigma is fully receptive. (E) Emasculation after anthesis and before pollen shed. (F) Emasculated flower showing a pistil with a receptive stigma. (G) Pollination by gently dipping the stigma into the collected pollen grains. (H) Tagging the pollinated flower. (I) Image of Solanum orbiculatum showing controlled self- and cross-pollinated flowers.
Figure 8.
In vivo and semi-in-vivo self- and cross-compatibility tests. (A–D) High compatibility between the male and female parents, showing pollen tubes growing within styles in (A,B) and entering micropyles of the ovules in (C,D). (E) Incompatibility, as the pollen tubes have stopped growing before reaching the ovary. (F) Covering flowers to test passive autogamy. (G) Semi-in-vivo technique to study compatibility. (H) Fruits resulting from controlled hand pollinations.
Figure 8.
In vivo and semi-in-vivo self- and cross-compatibility tests. (A–D) High compatibility between the male and female parents, showing pollen tubes growing within styles in (A,B) and entering micropyles of the ovules in (C,D). (E) Incompatibility, as the pollen tubes have stopped growing before reaching the ovary. (F) Covering flowers to test passive autogamy. (G) Semi-in-vivo technique to study compatibility. (H) Fruits resulting from controlled hand pollinations.
Figure 9.
Solanum orbiculatum self and interspecific compatibilities based on controlled pollination and pollen tube growth behaviour. Arrows, compatible cross pollinations; barred lines, incompatible cross pollinations. No indication of pre-zygotic reproductive barrier(s) when S. orbiculatum was used as the male parent. However, unilateral incompatibility was observed when S. orbiculatum was used as the female parent. No actual fruits or seeds have been produced from compatible crosses, due to post-zygotic barriers. Solanum orbiculatum is self-compatible, with 100% fruit setting obtained from controlled self-pollination. No spontaneous self-pollination or apomixes were observed. Abbreviations: SC, self-compatible.
Figure 9.
Solanum orbiculatum self and interspecific compatibilities based on controlled pollination and pollen tube growth behaviour. Arrows, compatible cross pollinations; barred lines, incompatible cross pollinations. No indication of pre-zygotic reproductive barrier(s) when S. orbiculatum was used as the male parent. However, unilateral incompatibility was observed when S. orbiculatum was used as the female parent. No actual fruits or seeds have been produced from compatible crosses, due to post-zygotic barriers. Solanum orbiculatum is self-compatible, with 100% fruit setting obtained from controlled self-pollination. No spontaneous self-pollination or apomixes were observed. Abbreviations: SC, self-compatible.
Table 1.
Floral structure of 20 flowers collected randomly from 100 plants of Solanum orbiculatum growing hydroponically in coco-peat media inside a greenhouse at PBI/Cobbitty.
Table 1.
Floral structure of 20 flowers collected randomly from 100 plants of Solanum orbiculatum growing hydroponically in coco-peat media inside a greenhouse at PBI/Cobbitty.
Flower No. | No. of Petals | Petal Width (mm) | Petal Length (mm) | No. of Anthers | Anther Length (mm) | Style Length (mm) | Comments (Petals, Pedicel) |
---|
1 | 5 | 6.77 | 12.07 | 5 | 6.76 | 10.69 | Long pedicel |
2 | 5 | 8.03 | 16.69 | 5 | 7.38 | 12.33 | |
3 | 5 | 7.51 | 15.14 | 5 | 7.45 | 12.65 | Long pedicel |
4 | 5 | 6.73 | 12.4 | 5 | 7.24 | 9.62 | |
5 | 4 | 7.45 | 14.27 | 4 | 6.93 | 11.33 | Light purple petals |
6 | 5 | 9.84 | 17.77 | 5 | 7.31 | 12.18 | Very light purple petals |
7 | 5 | 7.56 | 15.84 | 5 | 6.37 | 10.9 | Very light purple petals |
8 | 5 | 6.31 | 15.74 | 5 | 8.09 | 9.25 | - |
9 | 3 | 9.17 | 12.74 | 3 | 6.9 | 9.74 | - |
10 | 3 | 7.84 | 11.05 | 3 | 6.6 | 9.69 | - |
11 | 4 | 7.27 | 12.59 | 4 | 7.3 | 11.6 | - |
12 | 4 | 8.24 | 13.78 | 4 | 7.16 | 11.62 | - |
13 | 5 | 5.31 | 10.78 | 5 | 5.91 | 10.47 | - |
14 | 3 | 8.15 | 12.05 | 3 | 6.71 | 9.7 | - |
15 | 5 | 6.67 | 10.87 | 5 | 5.99 | 10.3 | - |
16 | 5 | 5.82 | 10.31 | 5 | 5.84 | 10.35 | - |
17 | 5 | 6.42 | 14.42 | 5 | 6.63 | 10.64 | Light purple petals |
18 | 5 | 8.95 | 16.57 | 5 | 7.2 | 9.74 | Light purple/long pedicel |
19 | 5 | 9.3 | 15.14 | 5 | 6.65 | 10.67 | - |
20 | 5 | 7.19 | 12.15 | 5 | 7.24 | 9.9 | - |
Mean ± s.e. | | 7.53 ± 0.27 | 13.62 ± 0.50 | | 6.88 ± 0.13 | 10.67 ± 0.22 | |
Table 2.
Means of pollen area (µm2) from long-styled and short-styled flowers of S. orbiculatum.
Table 2.
Means of pollen area (µm2) from long-styled and short-styled flowers of S. orbiculatum.
Flower Type | Means ± s.e. | Significance |
---|
Flower with long style * | 345.73 ± 2.91 | T Stat = 3.887 and t Critical = 0.003, the two means are significantly different. |
Flower with short style ** | 329.24 ± 3.09 |
Table 3.
Means of length of styles (µm) from long-styled and short-styled flowers of S. orbiculatum.
Table 3.
Means of length of styles (µm) from long-styled and short-styled flowers of S. orbiculatum.
Flower Type | Means ± s.e. | Significance |
---|
Long style length * | 9588.02 ± 374.56 | T Stat = 15.310 and t Critical = 2.2235, the two means are significantly different. |
Short style length ** | 2005.02 ± 143.89 |
Table 4.
In vitro pollen germination of Solanum orbiculatum using Brewbaker and Kwack basic media enriched with 18 combinations of sucrose and PEG at different concentrations.
Table 4.
In vitro pollen germination of Solanum orbiculatum using Brewbaker and Kwack basic media enriched with 18 combinations of sucrose and PEG at different concentrations.
Medium | Sucrose (%) | PEG (%) | Germination (%) * |
---|
1 | 0 | 0 | 11.61 hij |
2 | 0 | 2.5% | 16.68 ghi |
3 | 0 | 5% | 22.98 efg |
4 | 10% | 0 | 29.48 de |
5 | 10% | 2.5% | 28.60 de |
6 | 10% | 5% | 42.46 bc |
7 | 15% | 0 | 28.50 def |
8 | 15% | 2.5% | 37.96 cd |
9 | 15% | 5% | 52.04 ab |
10 | 20% | 0 | 31.70 de |
11 | 20% | 2.5% | 56.61 a |
12 | 20% | 5% | 50.31 ab |
13 | 25% | 0 | 11.36 hij |
14 | 25% | 2.5% | 13.30 ghij |
15 | 25% | 5% | 13.99 ghij |
16 | 30% | 0 | 19.11 fgh |
17 | 30% | 2.5% | 6.89 ij |
18 | 30% | 5% | 5.75 j |
Table 5.
Correlation between the in vitro pollen germination test and various stainability tests.
Table 5.
Correlation between the in vitro pollen germination test and various stainability tests.
Stain | R2 | p Value * | Relationship Strength |
---|
Acetocarmine | 0.884 | 0.017 | Strong positive relationship |
IKI (1%) | 0.555 | 0.149 | Weak relationship |
IKI (2%) | 0.592 | 0.128 | Weak relationship |
Lactophenol blue | 0.305 | 0.335 | Weak relationship |
FDA | 0.135 | 0.543 | Very weak relationship |
Alexander’s stain | 0.980 | 0.001 | Very strong positive relationship |
Table 6.
Means of in vitro pollen germination (%) of S. orbiculatum after storage durations (months) at 4 °C.
Table 6.
Means of in vitro pollen germination (%) of S. orbiculatum after storage durations (months) at 4 °C.
Months after Storage | Pollen Germination (%) * |
---|
0 | 59.26 ± 5.87 a |
1 | 56.92 ± 5.22 a |
2 | 39.31 ± 0.91 b |
3 | 35.05 ± 3.01 b |