Next Article in Journal
Machine Learning for Prediction of Energy Consumption and Broken Force in the Chopping Process of Maize Straw
Next Article in Special Issue
Harvesting of Arachis hypogaea L. in an Italian Area: Synergy between Cultural Techniques and Mechanization
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Restoration Strategies on the Ion Distribution and Transport Characteristics of Medicago sativa in Saline–Alkali Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cropping Systems and Agronomic Management Practices of Field Crops
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/agronomy13123029
Review Report
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Pearl Millet–Groundnut Cropping Systems for the Sahel

Agronomy 2023, 13(12), 3029; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123029
by Nouri Maman 1,* and Stephen C. Mason 2
Reviewer 1:
Xiaolin Wang
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2023, 13(12), 3029; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123029
Submission received: 21 October 2023 / Revised: 2 December 2023 / Accepted: 4 December 2023 / Published: 10 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cropping Systems and Agronomic Management Practices of Field Crops—2nd Edition)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1. the title needs to be improved for fitting the whole paper perspectives, "optimizing" including too many works in cropping systems.

2. the abstract showed all the valuable details about this research, but the results about the intercrops of pearl millet-groundnut not very clear, please refined them.

3. too many keywords, generally 5-6 keywords.

4. the lines from 64-73, are these in one paragraph? 

5. do you have the temperature data about the two experimental years? 

6. over two years, the great difference existed in rainfall, did it effects the final yield and VCR?

7. the discussion, needs improving for a better clearly understand.

8. land use efficiency/land equivalent ratio, they are the same or not.

9. the conclusion should lay out based on the data and results, and with simple and significant sentence importantly. 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

based on my own proficiency and reading feel，moderate editing of English language required in this paper.

Author Response

We very grateful for you review and we would like to thank you for the time and suggestions for the manuscript quality improvement.

The reviews of the manuscript were reviewed in detail, and edits made as authors thought best.  Apologize that our health issues have slowed this process, but we have done are best and hope that Agronomy finds this manuscript adequate for publishing. Below we will address the specific points identified in the reviews.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We very grateful for you review and we would like to thank you for the time and suggestions for the manuscript quality improvement.

The reviews of the manuscript were reviewed in detail, and edits made as authors thought best.  Apologize that our health issues have slowed this process, but we have done are best and hope that Agronomy finds this manuscript adequate for publishing. Below we will address the specific points identified in the reviews.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop