Next Article in Journal
Effect of Microwave Treatment at 2.45 GHz on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Community Characteristics in Phaeozems of Northeast China
Next Article in Special Issue
Biofumigation by Mustard Plants as an Application for Controlling Postharvest Gray Mold in Apple Fruits
Previous Article in Journal
GmERF54, an ERF Transcription Factor, Negatively Regulates the Resistance of Soybean to the Common Cutworm (Spodoptera litura Fabricius)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Activity of Propolis Extracts against Postharvest Pathogen Phlyctema vagabunda
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Action of Different Exposures of Chilled Atmospheric Treatments on the Mortality of Granary Weevil and Embryo Viability of the Treated Wheat

by
Sándor Keszthelyi
1,*,†,
Helga Lukács
1,†,
Szilvia Gibicsár
1,
Roman Rolbiecki
2 and
Ferenc Pál-Fám
1
1
Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agronomy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kaposvár Campus, S. Guba Str. 40, H-7400 Kaposvár, Hungary
2
Department of Agrometeorology, Plant Irrigation and Horticulture, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85-029 Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2023, 13(2), 597; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020597
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Revised: 13 February 2023 / Accepted: 18 February 2023 / Published: 19 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Post-harvest Pest and Disease Management)

Abstract

:
The granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.), is considered a serious pest in stored grain worldwide. As residual-based protection possibilities become scarcer, the development of eco-friendly control technologies that can be implemented in practice is becoming urgent. In this spirit, our objective was to assess the effectiveness of different levels of atmospheric cooling against S. granarius under laboratory conditions. We also analysed the effects of cooling on progeny generation and the viability of treated wheat. Thus, we investigated the consequences of atmospheric exposures to temperatures of −5, −10, −15, −20, and −25 °C for 60, 75, and 90 min on these factors, and also explored the effects of nearby ranges using extrapolation. The viability of the treated wheat embryo was analysed using a TTC test. Our results showed that the highest efficacy was observed at an atmospheric cooling temperature of −25 °C (with a parallel recorded temperature of −10.5 °C in the stored grains zone), with a 90 min exposure at suboptimal relative humidity (40%). At 60% relative humidity, the mortality averages were more dispersed, and the expected efficiencies above 95% occurred at longer exposures. The post-suppressive effect of cooling can be confirmed in all three exposures. The different cooling temperatures of the tested exposure times did not produce any appreciable changes in the viability of treated wheat embryos. In conclusion, our results show that the use of atmospheric cooling can be an effective solution for stored product protection.

1. Introduction

The granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L., 1758) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is a cosmopolitan species and is one of the most devastating arthropod pests of stored cereals [1]. The damage caused by this species reduces the quality and quantity of stored grain [2]. It reduces the content of thiamin (vitamin B1), riboflavin (vitamin B2), and α-tocopherol (vitamin E) in grains [3,4], and it has been shown to change the fatty acid composition [4,5] and increase the uric acid content of stored cereal grains.
The global assortment decline of residual insecticides significantly reduces the range of management opportunities for stored product protection [6]. Thus, research into environmentally friendly control technologies is increasingly becoming a priority in line with the criteria of sustainable agricultural production and integrated pest management (IPM). Several different methods were tested or experimentally developed for the protection of stored products, such as the effect of different ionising radiations [7,8] or modifications of atmospheric parameters [9,10] on stored product pests, as well as the stored product protection aspects of natural substances (plant essential oils, diatomaceous earth, inert dust, etc.) added to stored products for the same purpose [11,12]. For all these reasons, the translation of the results of new scientific experiments in this field into direct practice is of particular relevance today.
One sustainable control method is the artificial alteration of the atmospheric environment surrounding stored products [9]. The establishment of air temperature conditions other than the temperature preference of S. granarius has been shown to reduce the vitality of the pest. Decreased egg production, altered activity, and mating behaviour were reported [13]. Finally, the persistence of these effects may trigger pest population mortality. Several lines of research have addressed the possibilities of changing the atmospheric temperature for the protection of stored products, dealing exclusively with the possibility of applying heat stress against arthropods damaging stored products [14,15,16].
Insects are poikilothermal organisms. Thus, the temperature is a critical abiotic factor, causing significant physiological changes in them [17]. The results of experimental work by Fields [18] confirmed that the more extreme the temperature, the faster the insects die. Thus, according to his data, absolute mortality is induced within a few minutes at −20 or 55 °C. The lethal temperature varies considerably between species and depends on the developmental stage, relative humidity, and acclimatisation. The pest-killing effect of low temperatures has been used in stored product management in many countries, which has even allowed for the reduction of fumigation techniques [14]. The effect of air cooling on storage pests has been studied mainly on closely related species of S. granarius such as S. oryzae (L., 1763) and S. zeamais (Motschulsky, 1855) [19,20]. In their experimental work, Nakakita and Ikenata [14] showed that the oxygen consumption of adult S. oryzae and S. zeamais retrogressed with decreasing temperature. Metamorphosis and hatching from eggs stopped completely at 10 °C for all species. The knock-down effects of temperature changes were also analysed in combination with residual insecticide applications. The work of Kljajic et al. [21] showed that short-term cooling to −5 °C enhances the insect-mortality-inducing effects of dichlorvos and deltamethrin.
The side effects of using cooling-based eradication methods for pest control may cause changes in the viability of the treated stored grains, affecting embryonic survival [22]. This, in turn, may directly impair the germination ability of the seeds.
Although some results are available on the effects of low temperatures, even freezing, on S. granarius [18,23], there is rather little relevant information on mortality and seed viability under different negative temperatures and relative humidity settings. Previously, we investigated the effect of the upper pessimum range on S. granarius [24]. In connection with these related investigations, our experimental study aims to provide information on the efficacy of extremely low temperature freezing treatments in different relative humidity environments against S. granarius in winter wheat grain. Our objective was to determine the effect of different exposure times in combination with different freezing temperatures on the mortality of S. granarius, as well as assess progeny production. In addition, we were curious about the degressive effect of these treatments on the viability of treated wheat grains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Sample Preparation

Infestation-free wheat grains were used for our experimental work (one-year-old with 13.5% moisture content, stored at 21 °C). At first, 100 g wheat grain was placed in glass jars. Then, 20 healthy S. granarius imagoes (mixed sex and age) were put into the glass jars containing the grain samples. These sample containers were covered with well-ventilated tissues and placed in a Pol-Eco Apartura KK 1450 climate chamber (Wodzislav-Slenski, Poland) at 26 ± 3 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) and a 16/8 photoperiod. These are the most favourable developmental conditions for S. granarius [25]. Two days elapsed between the experimental sample preparation and the beginning of the actual laboratory treatments to allow egg-laying to take place.

2.2. Insect Eradication Test

To survey the impact of the low temperatures combined with different relative humidities (RH) on insect mortality (besides the intact samples), a total of five target temperatures were adjusted. The examined temperature values, starting from the lower tolerance border value (−5 °C) of the species, were −5 °C, −10 °C, −15 °C, −20 °C, and −25 °C. The effects of these temperature values were analysed in combination with two different relative humidity values, 40 ± 5 and 60 ± 5 percent RH (hereafter 40 and 60% RH, respectively). The exposure time (exposure to freezing) was uniformly 75 min at 60% RH and 60, 75, and 90 min at 40% RH. After each cooling exposure, the temperature of the grains was measured with a ThermoPro TP-01H digital thermometer (ThermoPro, Atlanta, GA, USA).
Alfa Laval CCEH251 (1AS 230V BO PCE EP 7.0 CU) freezing chamber (Alfa Laval Krakow Sp. zoo, Krakow, Poland) was used for the cooling experiment. All treatments consisted of 4 repetitions, and right after the freezing, the samples were reinstated into the climate chamber at 26 ± 3 °C and the above-mentioned two different relative humidity values. Dead adults were counted after 48 h. At this point, all adults (dead or alive) from the treated samples were removed and placed in the climate chamber (26 ± 3 °C, 60 ± 5% RH, 14/8 photoperiod). Progeny survival was determined after 45 days, from the adult emergence analysis of samples originally containing eggs, larvae, and pupae.

2.3. Determination of Viability of Wheat Grain by TTC Test

To assess the viability of embryos, a TTC (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride) test was used, with a slightly modified version of the methodology recommended by Carvalho et al. [26]. During preparation, seeds were immersed in water, using 10 mL of water for each sample, for six hours at 20 °C. The seeds were then cut in half lengthwise along the embryo and placed in plastic containers between filter paper discs. Staining was done with a 1.0% TTC solution and placed in an incubator at 30 °C for 2 h. The amount of TTC solution used for staining each sample was 2.5 times the weight of the filter papers. Viable seeds were those in which the embryo was bright red and uniformly stained, with no large unstained areas.
The viability percentage of seeds (V%) was determined as follows: V% = (nv/tn) × 100, where nv = the number of viable embryos, tn = the total number of embryos.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Abbott’s formula [27] was applied to determine mortality values. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess normality in the mortality data of granary weevil. The evaluation of the normal distribution of data was by Ghasemi and Zahediasl approach. Data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA in SPSS 11. 5 software (response variable: adult mortality; main effects: temperature, humidity). The nature of the relationship between 75 min cooling exposure set at different humidity levels and mortality was investigated using correlation regression analysis. Mortality values for progenies were also statistically analysed using the Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA.
Moreover, the effects of different levels of cooling at 75 min exposure on the viability of wheat grains at different humidity levels (40 and 60% RH) were compared using a Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). In parallel, the registered viability values triggered by applied minimum temperatures and different cooling exposures at 40% RH were tested by one-way ANOVA. The Tukey HSD test (p < 0.05) was used to separate means uniformly.

3. Results

3.1. Insect Mortalities Triggered by Freezing

Table 1 shows the recorded stored grain temperature data. The 100 g of wheat has a significant temperature buffer effect. Even at the longest exposures to the set atmospheric minimum values, grain temperatures were up to 10 °C higher for several treatments. Lower temperature settings and longer exposures naturally create a lower temperature zone around the pest in the stored grain zone.
Abbot’s corrected mortalities at the different minimum temperatures and relative humidity values are shown in Figure 1. The mortality values were unequivocally increased as a function of the applied temperatures with 75 min exposure times at both 40 and 60 RH values. At both 40 and 60% RH, the effect of temperature decrease on observed mortality change can be statistically proven (df = 4; F = 12.112; p = 5.62 × 10−6) (p < 0.05). The data registered at different relative humidity settings are statistically different (Student’s t-value: 0.015). In contrast, the consequences of different humidity values (df = 1; F = 0.367; p = 0.548), as well as the interaction of temperature and relative humidity (df = 4; F = 1.186; p = 0.336) on the mortality change cannot be confirmed by a two-way ANOVA (p > 0.05).
The tendencies of the triggered mortality are strictly exponential in the case of both relative humidity values. The relationships are strong for both applied relative humidity values, but for 40% relative humidity, the relationship is somewhat stronger (40% RH: y = 15.856e0.2973x; R² = 0.8902; 60% RH: y = 6.6245e0.4564x; R² = 0.9190) (e is a mathematical constant: Euler-type value). Additionally, in both 40 and 60 percent humidity settings, about 80 percent mortality of the experimental population was triggered by the applied temperature of −25 °C (stored grain temperature in the pest zone: −10.5 °C) for the 75 min exposures. At 60 percent relative humidity, mortality averages are more dispersed, and efficiencies between −5 and −20 temperature settings triggered much lower mortalities than in the case of the same settings at 40 percent relative humidity. In the case of a 75-min exposure, the complete extermination of the experimental insect population can be expected with atmospheric minimum values of −28.46 °C at 40% RH and −27.23 °C at 60% RH.
The mortality percentages produced by data extrapolation as a function of the interaction of exposures and applied temperatures are shown in Figure 2. The mortality rate has increased with exposure time and lower pessimum temperature values. Atmospheric temperatures approaching zero until −20 °C (stored grain temperature in the pest zone: from 5 to −7 °C) have not triggered an acceptable efficacy in the case of 60 min of exposure yet. The effect of a 75 min exposure at −20 °C cooling produces mortality to between 70 and 80 percent. Mortality above 90 percent was only registered when cooling the samples to −25 °C for 75 min (stored grain temperature in the pest zone: −10.5 °C). Combinations of atmospheric cooling of the samples at or below −20 °C or for longer than 90 min in all cases triggered total eradication of the experimental pest’s population.
The continuously decreasing atmospheric temperature effects examined at different exposure times (60, 75, and 90 min) verifiably caused a clear decline in the number of adult progeny (Table 2). This observation was statistically confirmed for all exposure times (p < 0.05) by one-way ANOVA. After forty-five days, the number of progenies was statistically verified to be different for some exposure times of −20 and −25 °C atmospheric cooling (p < 0.05). In contrast, no similar correlation was demonstrated for different exposure times at lower cooling settings (−5, −10, and −15 °C). The longest exposure at the lowest temperature (−25 °C for 90 min) resulted in the greatest reduction in progeny, effectively wiping out all developmental stages of the experimental insect population and preventing the imago stage from developing.

3.2. Viability of the Treated Wheat

The embryo viability of the treated wheat grains was uniformly shown to be between 75–100 percent for each cooling level at different relative humidity values with the 75 min long exposure (Figure 3). The obtained values could not be determined to reflect statistically significant differences (p > 0.05).
When examining the effects of different exposure times at different temperature settings on seed viability at 40% relative humidity (Figure 4), it can be seen that the dispersion of values is more significant as one moves towards longer exposures at the lowest cooling values. Independently of this observation, no effects of either the three examined exposure times or the interaction of the main influencing factors (different temperature and relative humidity parameters) on the seed viability could be determined by a two-way ANOVA (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

The optimum life activities of insects, as poikilotherm organisms, are realised in the presence of a specific abiotic interval [17]. This is called the optimum range. The vitality values of the individual development stages measured under the influence of various abiotic parameters are best characterised by their individual isothermal curves [28]. Values different from this can already lead to disruption of their homeostasis. In the case of insects, this disorder manifests itself in the shift of ontogenetic processes and the slowing down of life activities. Finally, beyond a certain value, the affected organisms die due to irreversible physiological processes [17,29].
Grain stored at 20 °C will negatively affect the development of most arthropod crop pests; a notable exception is S. granarius which can complete its development even at 15 °C [18]. Consequently, the insecticidal effects are expected well below this temperature range. Our experiment demonstrated that, in contrast to suboptimal high temperature exposures, where shorter exposures to higher values caused total mortality [24], longer exposures to lower temperature values closer to the lower tolerance trigger similar mortality.
The artificial temperature decrease of the stored product atmosphere can be deemed to be a potential protection against S. granarius, a supposition confirmed by our data. The highest efficacy has been detected at an atmospheric setting of −25 °C (stored grain temperature: −10.5 °C) with a 90 min exposure at suboptimal relative humidity values (40 RH). Furthermore, the insect perishing efficacy can be enhanced by the decrease in minimum temperature and increased exposure time, but at the same exposure, further cooling of about 1–2 °C causes 100 percent mortality. Our laboratory experiment was carried out with only 100 g of grain. Naturally, under storage conditions, the weight of cereals is much greater. Therefore, the buffering effect of the grain mass is much greater under storage conditions. For this reason, in practice, the exposure time to low temperatures will be significantly extended to cause the target pest to perish.
In his study, Fields [18] calls the temperature ranges we examined the lethal range for stored product pests, dividing it into two more sections from −5 to −10 °C, where death is triggered in weeks to months (acclimated) and from −15 to −25 °C, where death occurred in minutes. Overall, the more extreme the temperature, the more quickly insects die, with death occurring within a few minutes at −20 °C.
Our experiment confirms this finding in that the stored cereal item as a medium can significantly dampen and postpone the insecticidal effect of atmospheric cooling. In our case, due to the buffering effect of the grain medium, freezing at −25 °C (stored grain temperature: −10.5 °C) induces about 80 percent insect mortality after 75 min of exposure. Our calculations indicate that an atmospheric cooling of −28.46 °C at 40% RH is required to induce total mortality, or −27.23 °C at 60% RH. These findings are in line with the statements of Marpaung [30], who reports on the preservation of maize embryo viability besides successfully using atmospheric cooling against S. zeamais.
According to Grgac et al.’s [31] work, the cell membranes are likely to be the first targets of freezing injury. The cell membranes lose their integrity in frost-sensitive insects subjected to freezing stress, whereas their integrity is maintained by accumulated cryoprotective molecules and proteins in frost-tolerant insects. Furthermore, the formation of pointed ice crystals perforates the cell membranes, which eventually leads to the death of injured cells [32]. Basically, to avoid these adverse effects, the compounds (trehalose, ribulose) that accumulate in the insect’s cells aim to achieve a controlled, slow freezing of the water molecules [33].
Thorpe et al.’s [34] composite model indicates that there is an optimum aeration strategy characterised by specific temperature and humidity parameters that result in the lowest damaging insect population. Aeration with ambient air was also shown to render the population dynamics of S. oryzae relatively insensitive to grain moisture content and temperature. Consequently, the most outstanding insect killing efficiency can be expected from unannounced suboptimal temperature effects. This statement is confirmed by several entomological studies [18,35,36,37].
The basic requirement for crop protection technology is to be able to reduce the pest below economic damage thresholds [38] in a short time. As part of a biorational approach to insect pest control, modern methods of controlling stored products increasingly rely on the use of low or high temperatures as a physical control method, or a combination of these with some other pest control methods such as chemical control agents [39,40,41]. Our study showed that cooling has an insecticidal effect on the S. granarius imago and suppresses its progeny. An important specificity of this control method is that the germination capacity of treated wheat batches was not reduced due to the embryonic intactness of the tested setting parameters.
The weakness and disadvantage of the practical application of this method is the difficulty of handling large batches of stored cereal items. The technical realisation of the cooling technology for batches of cereal stored in a silo or silo tower can raise several issues, such as providing a uniform temperature throughout the batch. The latter concern may represent a significant additional cost in view of current energy prices [42], which may result in a significant increase in the cost of production of the produced crop, which may be a fundamental limitation for the successful practical adaptation of the technique. This methodology may also be a promising tool for the conservation of seed stock quality. The primary benefit of the method is therefore to provide a theoretical basis for stored product protection based on atmospheric temperature variation in the storage area, which could become the basis for a successful practical application method in the near future.
Overall, our results could contribute to the development of a reliable control method for plant product storage, which, even in combination with other control methods, could meet the criteria for integrated pest management (IPM).

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.K.; Methodology, S.K., H.L. and F.P.-F.; Validation and Investigation, S.K., H.L. and F.P.-F.; Data Curation, S.K., H.L., F.P.-F. and S.G.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.K, S.G. and F.P.-F.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.K. and R.R.; Visualisation, H.L.; Supervision, F.P.-F., R.R., S.G. and H.L.; Project Administration, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the financial support to Institute of Agronomy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bell, C.H. Insect and mite penetration and contamination of packaged food. In Food and Beverage Stability and Shelf Life. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; Kilcast, D., Subramaniam, P., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2011; pp. 106–131. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abass, A.B.; Ndunguru, G.; Mamiro, P.; Alenkhe, B.; Mlingi, N.; Bekunda, M. Post-harvest food losses in a maize-based farming system of semi-arid savannah area of Tanzania. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2014, 57, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lazzari, S.M.; Lazzari, F.A. Insect pests in stored grain. In. Insect Bioecology and Nutrition for Integrated Pest Management; Panizzi, A.R., Parra, J.R.P., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 417–450. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nietupski, M.; Ludwiczak, E.; Cabaj, R.; Purwin, C.; Kordan, B. Fatty acids present in wheat kernels influence the development of the grain weevil (Sitophilus granarius L.). Insects 2021, 12, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baker, J.E. Nitrogenous excretory products of adults of Sitophilus oryzae and Sitophilus granarius. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Comp. Biochem. 1976, 53, 107–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zettler, J.L.; Arthur, F.H. Chemical control of stored product insects with fumigants and residual treatments. Crop Prot. 2000, 19, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hallman, G.J. Control of stored product pests by ionizing radiation. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2013, 52, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Indiarto, R.; Qonit, M.A.H. A review of irradiation technologies on food and agricultural products. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 9, 4411–4414. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cao, Y.; Xu, K.; Zhu, X.; Bai, Y.; Yang, W.; Li, C. Role of modified atmosphere in pest control and mechanism of its effect on insects. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mason, L.J.; Strait, C.A. Stored product integrated pest management with extreme temperatures. In. Temperature Sensitivity in Insects and Application in Integrated Pest Management; Hallman, G.J., Denlinger, D.L., Eds.; CRC Pres, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 141–177. [Google Scholar]
  11. Korunić, Z.; Liška, A.; Lucić, P.; Hamel, D.; Rozman, V. Evaluation of diatomaceous earth formulations enhanced with natural products against stored product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 86, 101565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ziaee, M.; Ebadollahi, A.; Wakil, W. Integrating inert dusts with other technologies in stored products protection. Toxin Rev. 2021, 40, 404–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Longstaff, B.C. Biology of the grain pest species of the genus Sitophilus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: A critical review. Prot. Ecol. 1981, 3, 83–130. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakakita, H.; Ikenata, H. Action of low temperature on physiology of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in rice storage. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1997, 33, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ileleji, K.E.; Maier, D.E.; Woloshuk, C.P. Evaluation of different temperature management strategies for suppression of Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) in stored maize. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2007, 43, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Youssef, M.O.; Youssef, A.D.; Hassan, R.A.; Mahmoud, A.M. Threshold temperature and heat unit requirements for the development of the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.). Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2014, 47, 555–563. [Google Scholar]
  17. Remmert, H. Ecology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fields, P.G. The control of stored-product insects and mites with extreme temperatures. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1992, 28, 89–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thaung, M.; Collins, P.J. Joint effects of temperature and insecticides on mortality and fecundity of Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in wheat and maize. J. Econ. Entomol. 1986, 79, 909–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lü, J.; Zhang, H. The effect of acclimation to sublethal temperature on subsequent susceptibility of Sitophilus zeamais Mostchulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to high temperatures. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kljajić, P.; Andrić, G.; Pražić-Golić, M.; Inđić, D.; Vuković, S. The effects of cold pre-treatment on the toxicity of several contact insecticides on adults of three Sitophilus granarius (L.) populations. J. Pest Sci. 2014, 87, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Holubová, Ľ.; Švubová, R.; Slováková, Ľ.; Bokor, B.; Chobotová Kročková, V.; Renčko, J.; Uhrin, F.; Medvecka, V.; Zahoranová, A.; Gálová, E. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of maize grains—Induction of growth, enzyme activities and heat shock proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Eliopoulos, P.A.; Prasodimou, G.Z.; Pouliou, A.V. Time–mortality relationships of larvae and adults of grain beetles exposed to extreme cold. Crop Prot. 2011, 30, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lukács, H.; Pál-Fám, F.; Varga-Visi, É.; Rolbiecki, R.; Percze, A.; Keszthelyi, S. Impact of short-term atmospheric heat transfer on the survival of granary weevil in stored winter wheat. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Howe, R.W. A summary of estimates of optimal and minimal conditions for population increase of some stored products insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1965, 1, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carvalho, T.C.; Krzyzanowski, F.C.; Ohlson, O.C. Tetrazolium test adjustment for wheat seeds. J. Seed Sci. 2013, 35, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ Entomol. 1925, 8, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scotti, G. Les Insectes et les Acariens des ce ’re ’Alesstocke ’es; ITCF/AFNOR: Paris, France, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wellington, W.G. Returning the insect to insect ecology: Some consequences for pest management. Environ. Entomol. 1977, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marpaung, D.S.S. Mortality rate of Sitophilus zeamais in low temperature storage. Agrointek J. Tek. Ind. Pert. 2021, 15, 1046–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grgac, R.; Rozsypal, J.; Des Marteaux, L.; Štětina, T.; Koštál, V. Stabilization of insect cell membranes and soluble enzymes by accumulated cryoprotectants during freezing stress. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2211744119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Steinbrecht, R.A.; Müller, M. Freeze-substitution and freeze-drying. In Cryotechniques in Biological Electron Microscopy; Steinbrecht, R.A., Zierold, K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1987; pp. 149–179. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gurruchaga, H.; Del Burgo, L.S.; Hernandez, R.M.; Orive, G.; Selden, C.; Fuller, B.; Ciriza, J.; Pedraz, J.L. Advances in the slow freezing cryopreservation of microencapsulated cells. J. Contr. Rel. 2018, 281, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thorpe, G.R.; Cuff, W.R.; Longstaff, B. Control of Sitophilus oryzae infestation of stored wheat: An ecosystem model of the use of aeration. Ecol. Mod. 1982, 15, 331–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ke, D.; Kader, A.A. Potential of controlled atmospheres for postharvest insect disinfestation of fruits and vegetables. Postharv. News Inform. 1992, 3, 31N–37N. [Google Scholar]
  36. Meyer, G.L. How insects react to the cold. PSA J. 1994, 60, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rust, M.K.; Paine, E.O.; Reierson, D.A. Evaluation of freezing to control wood-destroying insects (Isoptera, Coleoptera). J. Econ Entomol. 1997, 90, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kenkel, P.; Criswell, J.T.; Cuperus, G.W.; Noyes, R.T.; Anderson, K.; Fargo, W.S. Stored product integrated pest management. Food Rev. Int. 1994, 10, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fields, P.G.; White, N.D.G. Alternatives to methyl bromide treatments for stored-product and quarantine insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 331–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Vincent, C.; Hallman, G.; Panneton, B.; Fleurat-Lessard, F. Management of agricultural insects with physical control methods. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2003, 48, 261–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Phillips, T.W.; Throne, J.E. Biorational approaches to managing stored-product insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 375–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Du, X.; He, W.; Gao, S.; Liu, D.; Wu, W.; Tu, D.; Kong, L.; Xi, M. Raised bed planting increases economic efficiency and energy use efficiency while reducing the environmental footprint for wheat after rice production. Energy 2022, 245, 123256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mortality percentage (mean ± SE) of S. granarius adults (corrected by the Abbott method [27]) treated with two different relative humidity values as a function of the applied temperatures with a 75 min exposure time. The dotted lines indicate trends of exponential change. A: applied atmospheric minimum temperature; B: stored grain temperature (mean ± SE) which is recorded in parallel with the atmospheric temperature setting.
Figure 1. Mortality percentage (mean ± SE) of S. granarius adults (corrected by the Abbott method [27]) treated with two different relative humidity values as a function of the applied temperatures with a 75 min exposure time. The dotted lines indicate trends of exponential change. A: applied atmospheric minimum temperature; B: stored grain temperature (mean ± SE) which is recorded in parallel with the atmospheric temperature setting.
Agronomy 13 00597 g001
Figure 2. Extrapolation of the effect of set-up temperatures and their exposure times on the mortality of the granary weevil as a function of its ecological preference [25].
Figure 2. Extrapolation of the effect of set-up temperatures and their exposure times on the mortality of the granary weevil as a function of its ecological preference [25].
Agronomy 13 00597 g002
Figure 3. TTC-based (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride) embryo survival at 75 min of exposure by different applied minimum temperature and relative humidity values.
Figure 3. TTC-based (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride) embryo survival at 75 min of exposure by different applied minimum temperature and relative humidity values.
Agronomy 13 00597 g003
Figure 4. TTC-based embryo survival at 60, 75, and 90 min of exposure and 40% relative humidity at different applied minimum temperatures.
Figure 4. TTC-based embryo survival at 60, 75, and 90 min of exposure and 40% relative humidity at different applied minimum temperatures.
Agronomy 13 00597 g004
Table 1. Stored grain temperature [mean (°C) ± SE] recorded as a function of set atmospheric temperatures and exposures (n = 4).
Table 1. Stored grain temperature [mean (°C) ± SE] recorded as a function of set atmospheric temperatures and exposures (n = 4).
Adjusted Atmospheric Temperature−5 ± 0.50−10 ± 0.50−15 ± 0.50−20 ± 0.50−25 ± 0.50
stored grains temperatureat 60 min of exposure7.8 ± 0.232.8 ± 1.250.2 ± 0.54−3.9 ± 0.65−6.4 ± 0.21
at 75 min of exposure5.3 ± 0.650.7 ± 0.44−2.7 ± 0.76−7 ± 0.26−10.5 ± 0.97
at 90 min of exposure3.8 ± 1.11−1.4 ± 0.85−4.2 ± 1.28−9.2 ± 1.06−15.3 ± 1.52
Table 2. The observed progeny production of S. granarius 45 days after the cold treatment., Statistical inferences with p < 0.05 were considered significant.
Table 2. The observed progeny production of S. granarius 45 days after the cold treatment., Statistical inferences with p < 0.05 were considered significant.
TreatmentsNo. Progeny
control6.75 ± 0.75statistical relationships
(df = 19)
set up the atmospheric temperature−5 °C−10 °C−15 °C−20 °C−25 °CFp
exposure times60 min3.25 ± 0.621.75 ± 0.750.75 ± 0.470.75 ± 0.750.75 ± 0.2511.2770.001
75 min3.00 ± 2.042.00 ± 0.403.50 ± 2.061.00 ± 0.411.00 ± 0.411.8340.003
90 min0.75 ± 0.250.75 ± 0.472.00 ± 1.680.50 ± 0.280 ± 021.0914.7 × 105
statistical relationships
(df = 11)
F1.4341.4340.00811.30120.509
p0.2430.2430.9280.0020.001
The mean number of adults ± SE are shown; italic characters denote statistically significant correlations).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Keszthelyi, S.; Lukács, H.; Gibicsár, S.; Rolbiecki, R.; Pál-Fám, F. Action of Different Exposures of Chilled Atmospheric Treatments on the Mortality of Granary Weevil and Embryo Viability of the Treated Wheat. Agronomy 2023, 13, 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020597

AMA Style

Keszthelyi S, Lukács H, Gibicsár S, Rolbiecki R, Pál-Fám F. Action of Different Exposures of Chilled Atmospheric Treatments on the Mortality of Granary Weevil and Embryo Viability of the Treated Wheat. Agronomy. 2023; 13(2):597. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020597

Chicago/Turabian Style

Keszthelyi, Sándor, Helga Lukács, Szilvia Gibicsár, Roman Rolbiecki, and Ferenc Pál-Fám. 2023. "Action of Different Exposures of Chilled Atmospheric Treatments on the Mortality of Granary Weevil and Embryo Viability of the Treated Wheat" Agronomy 13, no. 2: 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020597

APA Style

Keszthelyi, S., Lukács, H., Gibicsár, S., Rolbiecki, R., & Pál-Fám, F. (2023). Action of Different Exposures of Chilled Atmospheric Treatments on the Mortality of Granary Weevil and Embryo Viability of the Treated Wheat. Agronomy, 13(2), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020597

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop