Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Functional Traits and Screening of Key Indicators of Leymus chinensis Germplasm Resources from Northern China and Mongolia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials
2.2. Index and Separate Evaluation Methods
2.2.1. Drought Tolerance
2.2.2. Rhizome Space Expansion Ability
2.2.3. Effect on Soil Improvement and Hay Yield
2.3. Comprehensive Evaluation Research Methods
2.4. Data Processing
3. Results
3.1. Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Functional Traits of L. chinensis
3.1.1. PCA
3.1.2. Comprehensive Evaluation
3.1.3. Cluster Analysis
3.2. Relationship between Comprehensive Evaluation Value of L. chinensis and Its Original Habitat Geographical Factors
3.3. Index Screening
3.4. Drought Tolerance, Rhizome Space Expansion Ability, and Effect on Soil Improvement Were Evaluated Separately
3.4.1. Drought Tolerance Evaluation
3.4.2. Evaluation of Rhizome Space Expansion Ability
3.4.3. Evaluation of Soil Improvement Effect
3.5. Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Functional Traits of L. chinensis Compared with Drought Tolerance, Rhizome Space Expansion Ability, and Soil Improvement Effect
4. Discussion
4.1. Comprehensive Evaluation and Methods of L. chinensis and Other Germplasm Resources
4.2. Relationship between Geographical Factors of Original Habitat and Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Functional Traits of L. chinensis Germplasm
4.3. Screening of Key Indicators for Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Functional Traits of L. chinensis Germplasm
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bai, Y.; Cotrufo, M.F. Grassland Soil Carbon Sequestration: Current Understanding, Challenges, and Solutions. Science 2022, 377, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Le, Q.B.; Nkonya, E.; Mirzabaev, A. Biomass Productivity—Based Mapping of Global Land Degradation Hotspots. In Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement—A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development; Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A., von Braun, J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2016; pp. 55–84. ISBN 978-3-319-19167-6. [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, H.-Y.; Nkonya, E.; Johnson, T.; Graw, V.; Kato, E.; Kihiu, E. Global Estimates of the Impacts of Grassland Degradation on Livestock Productivity from 2001 to 2011. In Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement—A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development; Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A., von Braun, J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2016; pp. 197–214. ISBN 978-3-319-19167-6. [Google Scholar]
- Nkonya, E.; Mirzabaev, A.; von Braun, J. (Eds.) Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement—A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–14. ISBN 978-3-319-19167-6. [Google Scholar]
- Murphy, B.P.; Andersen, A.N.; Parr, C.L. The Underestimated Biodiversity of Tropical Grassy Biomes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2016, 371, 20150319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Smith, P.; Martino, D.; Cai, Z.; Gwary, D.; Janzen, H.; Kumar, P.; McCarl, B.; Ogle, S.; O’Mara, F.; Rice, C.; et al. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Agriculture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2008, 363, 789–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tang, H.; Xin, X.; Li, L.; Wang, D.; Yan, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhou, D.; Cui, G.; Li, X.; et al. North meadow degraded grassland treatment technology and demonstration. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 7034–7039. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, S.; Feng, T.; Liu, G.; He, J. A bibliometric analysis of the application of grassland ecological restoration technology. Pratacultural Sci. 2020, 37, 685–702. [Google Scholar]
- He, J.; Liu, Z.; Yao, T.; Sun, S.; Lv, Z.; Hu, X.; Cao, G.; Wu, X.; Li, L.; Bu, H.; et al. Restrictive factors and restoration techniques of degraded grassland restoration in Qinghai—Tibet Plateau. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2020, 38, 66–80. [Google Scholar]
- Bardgett, R.D.; Bullock, J.M.; Lavorel, S.; Manning, P.; Schaffner, U.; Ostle, N.; Chomel, M.; Durigan, G.; L Fry, E.; Johnson, D.; et al. Combatting Global Grassland Degradation. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 720–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montanarella, L.; Scholes, R.; Brainich, A. (Eds.) IPBES (2018): The IPBES Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration; Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science—Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Bonn, Germany, 2018; p. 744. ISBN 978-3-947851-09-6. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, C.; Jia, Z.; Du, B.; He, L.; Li, Q. Reviews and Prospects of Ecological Restoration Measures for Degraded Grasslands of China. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2022, 31, 1465–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedlingstein, P.; O’Sullivan, M.; Jones, M.W.; Andrew, R.M.; Gregor, L.; Hauck, J.; Le Quéré, C.; Luijkx, I.T.; Olsen, A.; Peters, G.P.; et al. Global Carbon Budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2022, 14, 4811–4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ed.) Climate Change 2013—The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; ISBN 978-1-107-05799-9. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; Jia, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Cao, K.; Zhang, N.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Z. The Combined Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 and Cadmium Exposure on Flavonoids in the Leaves of Robinia Pseudoacacia L. Seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 210, 111878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2021—The Physical Science Basis. Chem. Int. 2021, 43, 22–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gang, C.; Zhou, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Z.; Li, J.; Qi, J.; Odeh, I. Quantitative Assessment of the Contributions of Climate Change and Human Activities on Global Grassland Degradation. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 72, 4273–4282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Gang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; An, R.; Wang, K.; Odeh, I.; et al. Quantitative Assess the Driving Forces on the Grassland Degradation in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, in China. Ecol. Inform. 2016, 33, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Yang, H.; Huang, L.; Chen, C.; Lin, X.; Hu, Z.; Li, J. Grassland Degradation Remote Sensing Monitoring and Driving Factors Quantitative Assessment in China from 1982 to 2010. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 83, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Tong, L.; Khalifa, M.; Wang, Q.; Gang, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Sun, Z. Assessing the Effects of Climate Variation and Human Activities on Grassland Degradation and Restoration across the Globe. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 106, 105504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wilkes, A.; Zhang, Z.; Chang, X.; Lang, R.; Wang, Y.; Niu, H. Management and Land Use Change Effects on Soil Carbon in Northern China’s Grasslands: A Synthesis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 142, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Li, T.; Duan, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, M.; Hou, H.; Wang, Z.; Yu, A.; Chen, D.; Zhang, X.; et al. The Degradation of Subalpine Meadows Significantly Changed the Soil Microbiome. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 349, 108470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allan, E.; Manning, P.; Alt, F.; Binkenstein, J.; Blaser, S.; Blüthgen, N.; Böhm, S.; Grassein, F.; Hölzel, N.; Klaus, V.H.; et al. Land Use Intensification Alters Ecosystem Multifunctionality via Loss of Biodiversity and Changes to Functional Composition. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Han, G. China’s grassland resource. Grassl. Prataculture 2021, 33, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Nan, Z. Thoughts on the development of grass seed industry in Gansu. Gansu CPPCC 2022, 12, 61–63+75. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, W.; Zhang, J.; Xie, W.; Fang, L.; Wang, Y.; Nan, Z. Some scientific issues of forage breeding in China. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2021, 30, 184–193. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, Z. Present situation and future prospect of forage breeding in China. For. By Prod. Spec. China 2021, 171, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, R.P.; Murray, S.; Rohweder, M. Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Grassland Ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2000, 4, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bai, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, K. Assessment of Ecosystem Services and Ecological Regionalization of Grasslands Support Establishment of Ecological Security Barriers in Northern China. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2020, 35, 675–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Huang, X.; Yan, X.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Peng, X.; Ma, X.; Zhang, L.; Cai, Y.; et al. Transcriptome Analysis in Sheepgrass (Leymus chinensis): A Dominant Perennial Grass of the Eurasian Steppe. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bai, Y.; Han, X.; Wu, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, L. Ecosystem Stability and Compensatory Effects in the Inner Mongolia Grassland. Nature 2004, 431, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bai, W.; Xun, F.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, L. Rhizome Severing Increases Root Lifespan of Leymus chinensis in a Typical Steppe of Inner Mongolia. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, G. Personal opinions on the development of Leymus chinensis seed industry. Grassl. Prataculture 2023, 35, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, F. Developing Ten Grass Industries in the New Era. J. Grassl. Forage Sci. 2020, 253, 1–3+10. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Gao, R.; Li, X. Heavy Grazing Effects on Stem Elongation and Internode Allometry: Insights from a Natural Pasture Grass. Grass Forage Sci. 2019, 74, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K. High yield, high quality and drought resistance new varieties of Leymus chinensis ‘Jisheng 1, 2, 3, 4’. 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, G. Introduction of Zhongke No.1 Leymus chinensis Variety. Grassl. Prataculture 2021, 33, 67. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, G. Breeding of a new high-yield and high-quality Leymus chinensis variety ‘Zhongke 2’. 2011.
- Ma, H.; Wan, T.; Wang, F. Characteristics of seed setting and causes of low seed yields in Aneurolepidium chinense. Grassl. China 1984, 15–21+81. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.; Chen, W.; Wu, M.; Wu, R.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ren, A. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Inoculation Reduces the Drought-Resistance Advantage of Endophyte-Infected versus Endophyte-Free Leymus chinensis. Mycorrhiza 2017, 27, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Yu, D.; Shi, Y.; Sheng, H.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Mu, C.; Li, X. Salt-Alkali Tolerance during Germination and Establishment of Leymus chinensis in the Songnen Grassland of China. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 95, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Hou, X.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Wu, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Guo, Y. Will the Climate of Plant Origins Influence the Chemical Profiles of Cuticular Waxes on Leaves of Leymus chinensis in a Common Garden Experiment? Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, C.; Xin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, S.; Yu, T.; Li, Y.; Yang, G.; Yan, R. Response of Temperate Leymus chinensis Meadow Steppe Plant Community Composition, Biomass Allocation, and Species Diversity to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition. Agronomy 2023, 13, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Li, G.; Li, Q.; Zhou, D. Effects of Mowing Frequency on Biomass Allocation and Yield of Leymus chinensis. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 83, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.; Yan, R.; Schellenberg, M.P.; Wang, H.; Han, G.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, J.; Wei, Z. Nitrogen Increased Aboveground Biomass of Leymus chinensis Grown in Semi-arid Grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China. Agron. J. 2020, 112, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y. Comprehensive Evaluation on Drought-resistance of Leymus chinensis Germplasm Resources and Research on Expression of Drought-resistance Related Genes. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, China, April 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, W. Intraspecific Differentiation of Clonal Growth Characteristics of Leymus chinensis Rhizomes and Its Relationship with Geographical and Climatic Factors of Original Habitat. Ph.D. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, China, June 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X. Effects of Germplasm Resources of Leymus chinensis from Different Geographical Sources on Soil Properties in Common Garden. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, China, June 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, X.; Zuo, X.; Yu, Q.; Xu, C.; Lv, P.; Zhang, J.; Knapp, A.K.; Smith, M.D. Response of Plant Functional Traits of Leymus chinensis to Extreme Drought in Inner Mongolia Grasslands. Plant Ecol. 2019, 220, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xue, H.; Li, Z.; Li, M. Effects of Saline-Alkali Stress on Bacterial and Fungal Community Diversity in Leymus chinensis Rhizosphere Soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 70000–70013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, X. Comprehensive Evaluation on Saline-alkali Tolerance of Leymus chinensis Germplasm Resources and Expression of Saline-alkali Tolerance Genes. Master’s Thesis, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China, 31 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, A.; Luo, R. Quality Evaluation of 23 Species of Clausena lansium (Lour.) Skeels Germplasm Resources Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis. Chin. J. Trop. Crop. 2022, 43, 1357–1364. [Google Scholar]
- Awad-Allah, M.M.A.; Shafie, W.W.M.; Alsubeie, M.S.; Alatawi, A.; Safhi, F.A.; ALshamrani, S.M.; Albalawi, D.A.; Al-Amrah, H.; Alshehri, D.; Alshegaihi, R.M.; et al. Utilization of Genetic Resources, Genetic Diversity and Genetic Variability for Selecting New Restorer Lines of Rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Genes 2022, 13, 2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Long, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Wu, J.; Chen, H.; Wang, P.; Wang, Q.; Du, C. Genetic Diversity of Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Germplasm Resources in Chongqing, Evidenced by Morphological Characterization. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Yang, P.; Peng, H.; Li, C.; Yue, C.; Li, W.; Jiang, X. Comprehensive Evaluation of 47 Tea [Camellia Sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] Germplasm Based on Entropy Weight Method and Grey Relational Degree. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2021, 68, 3257–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Lai, J.; Zhang, H.; Cui, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, H. Phenotyping Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fresh Spring Soybean Germplasms in Jiangsu Province. Soybean Sci. 2022, 41, 385–396. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, Z.; Hu, M.; Bai, L.; Zhu, W.; Liao, F. Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Characters and Quality Indexes of Different Pepper Varieties. North Hortic. 2023, 520, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, H.; Wang, C.; Hu, F.; Xiao, C.; Xian, K.; Niu, X. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation for the Relationship Among Agronomic, Yield and Quality of Xinjiang Garlic. Seed 2022, 41, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, F.; Tang, C.; Zhang, F.; Dong, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Dai, L. Diversity of Resistance to Bacterial Blight and Geographical Distribution of 29 Populations of Wild Rice [Oryza Meyeriana (Zoll. & Moritzi) Baill.] in Yunnan, China. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2021, 68, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Li, S.; Lu, X.; Wang, Q.; Han, H.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Y.; Gan, X. Leaf Phenotypic Variation of Endangered Plant Tetracentron Sinense Oliv. and Influence of Geographical and Climatic Factors. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 623–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y. Evaluation of Germplasm Resources of Bermudagrass Materials from Regions with Different Latitudes and Longitudes. Master’s Thesis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China, 6 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, R.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Qin, Y.; Wei, X. Performance Evaluation of Different Elymus sibiricus L. Germplasm Resources in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2020, 21, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Rui, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, G.; Wang, L.; Weng, X.; Chen, Z.; Jia, L. Biogeographic Divergence in Leaf Traits of Sapindus mukorossi and Sapindus delavayi and Its Relation to Climate. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saulnier, M.; Corona, C.; Stoffel, M.; Guibal, F.; Edouard, J.-L. Climate-Growth Relationships in a Larix Decidua Mill. Network in the French Alps. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 554–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yemataw, Z.; Chala, A.; Ambachew, D.; Studholme, D.; Grant, M.; Tesfaye, K. Morphological Variation and Inter-Relationships of Quantitative Traits in Enset (Ensete Ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) Germplasm from South and South-Western Ethiopia. Plants 2017, 6, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, L.; Li, H.; Li, Q.; Guo, Q.; Li, J. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Potential Distribution Prediction of Sophora Moorcroftiana Endemic to Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China. Forests 2021, 12, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C. Comprehensive Evaluation and Distribution pattern of Agronomic Characters and Quality of Leymus chinensis Germplasm Resources. Ph.D. Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China, June 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Smelser, A.; Gardner, C.; Blanco, M.; Lübberstedt, T.; Frei, U. Germplasm Enhancement of Maize: A Look into Haploid Induction and Chromosomal Doubling of Haploids from Temperate-Adapted Tropical Sources. Plant Breed. 2016, 135, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.-L.; Wu, D.; Hui, M.; Wang, Y.; Han, X.; Yao, F.; Cao, X.; Li, Y.-H.; Li, H.; Wang, H. Screening of Cold Hardiness-Related Indexes and Establishment of a Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Grapevines (V. vinifera). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1014330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, F.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Q.; Jiang, M.; Qu, Y. Yield-Based Drought Tolerance Index Evaluates the Drought Tolerance of Cotton Germplasm Lines in the Interaction of Genotype-by-Environment. PeerJ 2023, 11, e14367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, J.; Hu, W.; Li, Y.; He, J.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, Z. Screening of Drought Resistance Indices and Evaluation of Drought Resistance in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, R.; Liu, Y.; Luo, G.; Yin, J.; Xiao, Z.; Hu, T. Using Optimal Subset Regression to Identify Factors Associated with Insulin Resistance and Construct Predictive Models in the US Adult Population. Endocr. Connect. 2022, 11, e220066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Z.; Ci, D.; Ding, H.; Song, W.; Fu, F.; Kang, T.; Dai, L. Indices selection and comprehensive evaluation of salinity tolerance for peanut varieties. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 24, 3487–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Li, X.; Wan, Y.; Giu, Z.; Nie, Y.; Xie, J. Index screening and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits of low nitrogen tolerance using BILs population derived from Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2015, 26, 2346–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Li, K.; Zhou, J.; Guo, H.; Li, J. Comprehensive evaluation of drought tolerance of different cultivars (lines) of potatoes and screening of the indicators. Chin. J. Ecol. 2023. [Google Scholar]
Code | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude/m | Soil Regime | Climate Type | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LC01 | 48°32′ | 119°41′ | 778 | brown soil, dark brown soil | temperate continental climate | Evenk Autonomous Banner of Hulunbuir City, Inner Mongolia |
LC02 | 49°47′ | 118°41′ | 613 | common chernozem, dark chestnut soil, etc. | temperate continental climate | Chenbaerhu Banner of Hulunbuir City, Inner Mongolia |
LC03 | 47°22′ | 111°34′ | 1076 | black soil | continental climate | Kent Province, Mongolia |
LC04 | 48°39′ | 112°17′ | 1195 | black soil | continental climate | Kent Province, Mongolia |
LC05 | 48°35′ | 113°29′ | 890 | dark brown soil, black soil, saline-alkali soil | temperate continental climate | Eastern Province of Mongolia |
LC06 | 47°52′ | 114°38′ | 830 | dark brown soil, black soil, saline-alkali soil | temperate continental climate | Eastern Province of Mongolia |
LC07 | 47°30′ | 115°24′ | 678 | dark brown soil, black soil, saline-alkali soil | temperate continental climate | Eastern Province of Mongolia |
LC08 | 46°36′ | 115°22′ | 762 | dark brown soil, black soil, saline-alkali soil | temperate continental climate | Eastern Province of Mongolia |
LC09 | 46°35′ | 121°26′ | 577 | thick black soil, fire black loess | continental monsoon climate | Inner Mongolia Xing’an League Horqin Right Wing Front Flag |
LC10 | 45°50′ | 120°27′ | 934 | chestnut soil, dark brown soil, chernozem, and meadow soil | temperate continental monsoon climate | Horqin Right Wing Middle Banner, Xing’an League, Inner Mongolia |
LC11 | 44°45′ | 121°15′ | 288 | meadow soil, chestnut soil, and chernozem | mid-temperate continental monsoon climate | Zhalute Banner, Tongliao City, Inner Mongolia |
LC12 | 43°17′ | 117°49′ | 1167 | mainly dark chestnut soil, chernozem, and meadow soil. | mid-temperate continental monsoon climate | Keshiketeng Banner, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia |
LC13 | 43°55′ | 118°23′ | 1073 | black soil, gray forest soil, brown soil, chestnut soil, meadow soil, aeolian sandy soil | temperate monsoon continental climate | Balin Right Banner, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia |
LC14 | 46°48 | 124°31′ | 144 | chernozem, meadow soil, saline-alkali soil, sandy soil | mid-temperate continental climate | Durbert Mongolian Autonomous County, Heilongjiang Province |
LC15 | 47°33′ | 124°14′ | 152 | chernozem, saline-alkali soil, meadow soil | mid-temperate continental monsoon climate | Fuyu County, Qiqihar City, Heilongjiang Province |
LC16 | 48°20′ | 122°37′ | 619 | brown coniferous forest soil, dark brown soil, black soil, meadow soil, marsh soil, paddy soil | mid-temperate continental monsoon climate | Hulun Buir City, Inner Mongolia Zhalantun City |
LC17 | 38°37′ | 112°22′ | 1879 | meadow soil, brown soil, yellow loamy soil | north temperate continental monsoon climate | Jingle County, Xinzhou City, Shanxi Province |
LC18 | 43°38′ | 116°37′ | 1237 | aeolian sandy soil, chestnut soil, chernozem | mid-temperate semi-arid continental climate | Xilinhot City, Xilin Gol League, Inner Mongolia |
LC19 | 44°51′ | 118°37′ | 1016 | ash forest soil, light chernozem, meadow soil | mid-temperate arid and semi-arid continental climate | Inner Mongolia Xilin Gol League West Wuzhu Muqin Banner |
LC20 | 44°41′ | 117°41′ | 1047 | ash forest soil, light chernozem, meadow soil | mid-temperate arid and semi-arid continental climate | Inner Mongolia Xilin Gol League West Wuzhu Muqin Banner |
LC21 | 47°40′ | 106°45′ | 1349 | dark chestnut soil, chestnut soil, and lowland dark soil | temperate continental climate | Central Province of Mongolia |
LC22 | 46°54′ | 106°35′ | 1433 | dark chestnut soil, chestnut soil, and lowland dark soil | temperate continental climate | Central Province of Mongolia |
LC23 | 47°38′ | 107°48′ | 1706 | dark chestnut soil, chestnut soil, and lowland dark soil | temperate continental climate | Central Province of Mongolia |
LC24 | 47°45′ | 108°48′ | 1701 | black soil | continental climate | Kent Province, Mongolia |
LC25 | 47°24′ | 110°42′ | 1043 | black soil | continental climate | Kent Province, Mongolia |
LC26 | 46°27′ | 111°47′ | 997 | chestnut soil | temperate continental climate | Sukhbaatar Province, Mongolia |
LC27 | 46°47′ | 113°27′ | 1050 | chestnut soil | temperate continental climate | Sukhbaatar Province, Mongolia |
LC28 | 43°38′ | 115°37′ | 1145 | chestnut soil | mid-temperate semi-arid continental climate | Abaga Banner, Xilinguole League, Inner Mongolia |
LC29 | 41°39′ | 113°35′ | 1445 | chestnut soil | mid-temperate continental monsoon climate | Shangdu County, Ulanqab City, Inner Mongolia |
LC30 | 41°37′ | 109°47′ | 1590 | chestnut calcium soil, brown calcium soil | mid-temperate semi-arid continental climate | Darhan Maomingan United Banner, Baotou City, Inner Mongolia |
LC31 | 41°47′ | 115°22′ | 1504 | pale chernozem, chestnut soil, meadow soil | mid-temperate sub-arid continental climate | Taipusi Banner, Xilinguole League, Inner Mongolia |
LC32 | 44°20′ | 114°48′ | 1100 | chestnut soil | mid-temperate semi-arid continental climate | Abaga Banner, Xilinguole League, Inner Mongolia |
LC33 | 44°34′ | 113°15′ | 1245 | brown calcium soil, chestnut soil, gray meadow soil | semi-arid continental climate | Sunite Left Banner, Xilin Gol League, Inner Mongolia |
LC34 | 42°33′ | 113°48′ | 1140 | chestnut soil, brown soil, gray meadow soil | mid-temperate sub-arid continental monsoon climate | Sunite Right Banner, Xilin Gol League, Inner Mongolia |
LC35 | 42°27′ | 116°15′ | 1420 | dark chestnut soil, meadow soil, sandy soil | mid-temperate continental climate | Inner Mongolia Xilin Gol League is the blue flag |
LC36 | 42°33′ | 115°42′ | 1415 | dark chestnut soil, meadow soil, sandy soil | mid-temperate continental climate | Inner Mongolia Xilin Gol League is the blue flag |
LC37 | 46°39′ | 103°50′ | 2000 | black soil | temperate continental climate | Former Hangai Province, Mongolia |
LC38 | 47°35′ | 104°34′ | 1165 | dark chestnut soil, chestnut soil, and lowland dark soil | temperate continental climate | Central Province of Mongolia |
LC39 | 48°29′ | 106°21′ | 1205 | dark chestnut soil, chestnut soil, and lowland dark soil | temperate continental climate | Central Province of Mongolia |
LC40 | 46°51′ | 102°45′ | 1696 | black soil | temperate continental climate | Former Hangai Province, Mongolia |
LC41 | 47°53′ | 105°26′ | 1032 | dark chestnut soil, chestnut soil, and lowland dark soil | temperate continental climate | Central Province of Mongolia |
LC42 | 47°50′ | 102°47′ | 1541 | black soil | temperate continental climate | Houhangai Province, Mongolia |
Trait | Principal Component | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
PH | 0.223 | 0.447 | 0.056 | 0.563 | −0.011 | −0.068 | −0.109 | 0.372 |
LL | 0.147 | 0.375 | −0.214 | 0.430 | 0.284 | −0.213 | 0.306 | 0.400 |
LW | 0.095 | 0.070 | 0.090 | −0.250 | 0.759 | 0.263 | 0.220 | −0.018 |
LN | 0.245 | −0.408 | −0.191 | 0.244 | 0.545 | 0.243 | 0.219 | 0.049 |
NT | −0.251 | 0.305 | 0.273 | −0.267 | −0.199 | 0.266 | 0.143 | 0.496 |
SPAD | 0.083 | 0.187 | 0.182 | 0.230 | −0.297 | 0.681 | 0.318 | −0.203 |
MDA | 0.490 | 0.010 | 0.418 | 0.337 | 0.136 | 0.402 | −0.070 | −0.074 |
PRO | 0.216 | 0.072 | 0.574 | 0.247 | 0.151 | 0.213 | −0.585 | 0.168 |
SFW | −0.056 | 0.514 | 0.569 | 0.065 | 0.064 | −0.242 | −0.216 | −0.160 |
SDW | −0.039 | 0.447 | 0.757 | −0.101 | 0.253 | 0.033 | −0.001 | −0.130 |
RFW | −0.096 | 0.584 | 0.551 | −0.113 | 0.006 | −0.256 | 0.049 | 0.003 |
RDW | −0.206 | 0.370 | 0.562 | −0.457 | 0.052 | −0.077 | 0.301 | −0.008 |
NED | 0.788 | −0.391 | 0.154 | −0.097 | −0.247 | −0.073 | 0.136 | 0.016 |
MED | 0.707 | −0.435 | 0.331 | 0.159 | −0.019 | −0.244 | 0.021 | −0.002 |
AED | 0.796 | −0.419 | 0.240 | −0.102 | −0.133 | −0.046 | 0.127 | 0.065 |
ED | 0.817 | −0.416 | 0.299 | 0.009 | −0.003 | −0.164 | 0.071 | −0.003 |
EA | 0.791 | −0.426 | 0.340 | 0.003 | 0.007 | −0.107 | 0.115 | 0.067 |
TN | 0.663 | 0.530 | −0.326 | −0.121 | 0.156 | −0.022 | 0.021 | −0.248 |
TP | 0.563 | 0.509 | −0.442 | −0.169 | −0.098 | −0.108 | −0.046 | 0.091 |
TK | −0.340 | 0.251 | 0.167 | 0.535 | −0.161 | −0.135 | 0.419 | −0.017 |
AN | 0.666 | 0.567 | −0.261 | −0.072 | 0.107 | 0.047 | 0.002 | −0.163 |
AP | 0.429 | 0.600 | −0.060 | 0.093 | −0.240 | −0.043 | 0.230 | 0.075 |
AK | 0.569 | 0.296 | −0.297 | −0.117 | −0.032 | 0.248 | −0.282 | 0.302 |
OM | 0.681 | 0.580 | −0.268 | −0.108 | 0.133 | −0.036 | −0.048 | −0.213 |
pH | −0.257 | −0.164 | −0.079 | 0.131 | 0.725 | −0.219 | 0.000 | 0.047 |
DW | 0.086 | −0.114 | 0.071 | −0.717 | 0.114 | 0.058 | 0.064 | 0.350 |
Eigenvalue | 5.960 | 4.207 | 3.192 | 2.105 | 1.958 | 1.305 | 1.180 | 1.037 |
Contribution rate % | 22.922 | 16.179 | 12.277 | 8.096 | 7.530 | 5.019 | 4.539 | 3.990 |
Cumulative contribution rate % | 22.922 | 39.101 | 51.378 | 59.473 | 67.003 | 72.022 | 76.581 | 80.551 |
Code | Principal Component | F | Rank | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | |||
LC01 | −1.320 | −0.249 | 0.647 | 1.604 | −0.128 | 1.109 | −0.641 | −0.224 | −0.156 | 25 |
LC02 | 0.017 | 0.609 | −0.847 | 0.542 | −2.269 | 0.076 | −0.215 | −1.193 | −0.226 | 29 |
LC03 | 0.294 | 0.206 | −0.906 | 1.305 | −2.232 | 0.099 | 0.661 | 0.156 | −0.040 | 19 |
LC04 | 1.470 | 0.963 | −0.542 | 1.605 | −0.400 | −2.168 | 0.880 | 0.963 | 0.615 | 5 |
LC05 | −0.837 | 2.370 | 0.951 | 0.948 | −0.129 | −1.506 | −0.743 | −0.621 | 0.299 | 9 |
LC06 | −0.920 | 0.807 | 1.380 | 0.748 | 0.240 | −0.477 | −2.053 | 0.339 | 0.080 | 15 |
LC07 | 1.823 | 2.447 | 0.709 | 0.806 | 2.564 | 0.749 | 0.458 | −1.531 | 1.436 | 1 |
LC08 | −0.728 | −0.294 | −0.952 | 0.595 | 2.150 | 0.812 | −0.093 | −0.659 | −0.138 | 23 |
LC09 | −0.266 | 0.213 | −1.519 | 0.526 | 0.816 | 1.468 | 1.311 | −0.228 | 0.019 | 17 |
LC10 | −0.189 | −0.189 | 0.046 | −0.354 | −0.772 | −1.252 | −0.065 | −0.358 | −0.292 | 34 |
LC11 | −0.029 | −0.305 | 0.497 | −0.759 | 0.189 | −1.225 | 1.326 | −0.814 | −0.094 | 20 |
LC12 | −0.171 | −2.006 | −0.009 | −0.253 | 0.306 | −1.392 | −0.096 | 1.160 | −0.484 | 40 |
LC13 | 0.786 | −1.835 | 0.592 | 1.432 | 0.256 | 0.950 | 1.272 | −0.142 | 0.237 | 11 |
LC14 | 0.196 | −0.505 | 0.717 | −0.574 | −0.767 | 0.407 | −2.145 | 0.996 | −0.112 | 21 |
LC15 | 2.017 | −1.075 | 1.241 | −0.458 | 0.523 | −0.026 | 0.658 | 0.322 | 0.601 | 6 |
LC16 | 2.156 | 0.729 | 0.354 | 0.228 | −1.748 | 0.278 | −0.775 | −0.075 | 0.643 | 3 |
LC17 | −1.409 | 0.275 | 0.761 | −0.369 | −1.188 | 0.723 | −0.777 | −0.835 | −0.418 | 38 |
LC18 | 0.718 | 1.436 | −0.211 | −0.975 | −0.487 | 0.278 | 0.373 | 0.264 | 0.368 | 7 |
LC19 | 1.755 | −0.808 | 0.963 | 0.565 | −0.098 | 3.099 | −0.104 | −0.079 | 0.715 | 2 |
LC20 | 0.406 | 0.429 | 1.687 | 0.122 | 1.247 | 0.059 | −0.256 | 0.881 | 0.620 | 4 |
LC21 | −0.569 | 0.066 | −1.241 | 0.486 | −0.257 | 1.299 | −0.881 | 1.026 | −0.231 | 30 |
LC22 | 1.962 | 0.614 | −1.368 | −0.935 | −0.968 | −0.555 | −0.306 | −0.409 | 0.217 | 12 |
LC23 | −1.045 | 0.813 | −0.428 | −0.969 | −1.564 | 1.676 | 1.350 | 2.716 | −0.128 | 22 |
LC24 | −0.414 | 0.212 | 1.327 | −0.895 | −0.652 | 0.329 | −0.273 | −0.312 | −0.034 | 18 |
LC25 | −0.588 | −0.812 | 0.019 | 1.180 | −0.878 | −0.267 | 1.182 | −0.628 | −0.272 | 33 |
LC26 | −0.413 | −0.102 | 1.771 | 1.878 | −0.142 | −1.174 | 0.465 | −0.326 | 0.244 | 10 |
LC27 | −0.464 | 1.222 | 0.128 | −0.048 | 0.411 | 0.850 | 0.246 | 2.011 | 0.333 | 8 |
LC28 | 0.378 | −0.341 | −1.034 | −0.544 | 1.295 | −0.168 | −2.539 | 0.951 | −0.159 | 26 |
LC29 | −0.232 | 0.423 | −0.623 | −0.738 | 0.640 | 0.072 | −1.211 | −1.614 | −0.234 | 31 |
LC30 | 0.635 | −0.587 | −0.819 | −1.120 | −0.723 | −0.632 | 0.052 | −1.897 | −0.373 | 36 |
LC31 | 0.203 | −0.938 | −0.198 | −1.159 | 0.567 | 0.238 | 0.977 | −0.524 | −0.180 | 27 |
LC32 | 0.769 | −1.403 | −0.061 | −1.907 | −0.131 | 0.007 | −0.812 | −0.435 | −0.343 | 35 |
LC33 | −0.074 | −0.841 | 0.139 | −0.516 | 0.259 | −0.963 | 0.808 | −0.519 | −0.236 | 32 |
LC34 | −1.039 | 1.069 | 2.121 | −2.642 | 0.179 | −0.427 | 1.793 | 0.650 | 0.100 | 13 |
LC35 | −1.004 | −0.783 | −0.146 | −0.201 | 0.269 | 0.037 | 1.191 | −0.449 | −0.413 | 37 |
LC36 | 0.078 | 1.102 | −2.169 | −1.195 | 1.055 | −0.629 | −0.520 | 0.454 | −0.155 | 24 |
LC37 | −1.239 | −0.716 | −1.382 | 1.169 | 0.064 | −0.565 | −0.360 | −0.562 | −0.667 | 42 |
LC38 | −1.244 | 1.006 | −1.627 | 0.046 | 0.859 | 0.000 | 1.505 | 0.200 | −0.220 | 28 |
LC39 | −1.075 | −0.772 | 0.560 | −0.196 | 0.288 | −0.519 | −0.710 | 0.118 | −0.435 | 39 |
LC40 | −1.433 | −0.708 | 0.137 | −0.426 | 0.037 | 0.634 | −0.549 | −1.353 | −0.627 | 41 |
LC41 | 0.618 | −1.198 | −0.417 | 0.939 | 0.829 | −1.625 | −0.190 | 2.520 | 0.057 | 16 |
LC42 | 0.420 | −0.544 | −0.245 | 0.508 | 0.492 | 0.319 | −0.195 | 0.060 | 0.082 | 14 |
Index | Longitude/° | Latitude/° | Altitude/m | F |
---|---|---|---|---|
Longitude/° | 1 | |||
Latitude/° | −0.157 | 1 | ||
Altitude/m | −0.731 ** | −0.369 * | 1 | |
F | 0.326 * | 0.257 | −0.434 ** | 1 |
Trait | Estimated Value | Std. Error | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | −4.298 | 0.257 | −16.732 | <2 × 10−16 *** |
PH | 1.228 | 0.140 | 8.779 | 3.80 × 10−10 *** |
LN | 1.117 | 0.177 | 6.309 | 3.90 × 10−7 *** |
NT | 0.331 | 0.056 | 5.897 | 1.31 × 10−6 *** |
SPAD | 0.543 | 0.160 | 3.392 | 0.00182 ** |
MDA | 0.117 | 0.037 | 3.143 | 0.00352 ** |
SDW | 0.899 | 0.111 | 8.103 | 2.37 × 10−9 *** |
MED | 0.004 | 0.001 | 6.353 | 3.42 × 10−7 *** |
OM | 0.045 | 0.004 | 11.977 | 1.47 × 10−13 *** |
Trait | Principal Component | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
PH | 0.271 | 0.599 | −0.572 | 0.128 | 0.039 |
LL | 0.060 | 0.431 | −0.493 | 0.674 | 0.025 |
LW | 0.128 | 0.211 | 0.726 | 0.493 | 0.172 |
LN | −0.469 | 0.539 | 0.379 | 0.328 | −0.037 |
NT | 0.403 | −0.348 | −0.084 | −0.073 | 0.492 |
SPAD | 0.125 | 0.299 | −0.126 | −0.252 | 0.779 |
MDA | 0.150 | 0.757 | 0.189 | −0.316 | 0.144 |
PRO | 0.355 | 0.522 | 0.198 | −0.499 | −0.313 |
SFW | 0.771 | 0.049 | −0.120 | −0.019 | −0.354 |
SDW | 0.880 | 0.152 | 0.281 | 0.004 | −0.014 |
RFW | 0.838 | −0.109 | −0.169 | 0.166 | −0.096 |
RDW | 0.719 | −0.331 | 0.289 | 0.240 | 0.150 |
Eigenvalue | 3.228 | 2.083 | 1.543 | 1.324 | 1.159 |
Contribution rate % | 26.899 | 17.354 | 12.857 | 11.032 | 9.655 |
Cumulative contribution rate % | 26.899 | 44.253 | 57.110 | 68.142 | 77.797 |
Trait | Principal Component | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
TN | 0.925 | 0.030 | 0.260 |
TP | −0.236 | 0.896 | 0.062 |
TK | 0.872 | 0.022 | −0.041 |
AN | 0.916 | 0.026 | 0.173 |
AP | 0.676 | 0.514 | −0.143 |
AK | 0.705 | −0.339 | −0.243 |
OM | 0.944 | 0.008 | 0.188 |
pH | −0.286 | −0.086 | 0.905 |
Eigenvalue | 4.437 | 1.192 | 1.036 |
Contribution rate % | 55.467 | 14.898 | 12.954 |
Cumulative contribution rate % | 55.467 | 70.365 | 83.319 |
Code | Ecological Functional Traits | Drought Tolerance | Rhizome Space Expansion | Soil Improvement Effects | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | Rank | D value | Rank | D value | Rank | F | Rank | |
LC01 | −0.156 | 25 | 0.431 | 19 | 0.181 | 35 | −1.696 | 39 |
LC02 | −0.226 | 29 | 0.288 | 41 | 0.325 | 26 | 0.881 | 9 |
LC03 | −0.040 | 19 | 0.258 | 42 | 0.435 | 20 | 1.023 | 7 |
LC04 | 0.615 | 5 | 0.416 | 23 | 0.633 | 8 | 2.397 | 4 |
LC05 | 0.299 | 9 | 0.560 | 7 | 0.118 | 41 | 0.825 | 11 |
LC06 | 0.080 | 15 | 0.519 | 11 | 0.225 | 31 | −0.979 | 32 |
LC07 | 1.436 | 1 | 0.804 | 1 | 0.478 | 17 | 4.155 | 1 |
LC08 | −0.138 | 23 | 0.509 | 12 | 0.156 | 37 | −0.588 | 29 |
LC09 | 0.019 | 17 | 0.441 | 17 | 0.191 | 33 | 0.831 | 10 |
LC10 | −0.292 | 34 | 0.337 | 35 | 0.424 | 21 | −0.003 | 18 |
LC11 | −0.094 | 20 | 0.455 | 13 | 0.528 | 12 | −0.257 | 21 |
LC12 | −0.484 | 40 | 0.293 | 40 | 0.611 | 9 | −2.080 | 42 |
LC13 | 0.237 | 11 | 0.453 | 14 | 0.763 | 2 | −1.144 | 33 |
LC14 | −0.112 | 21 | 0.371 | 31 | 0.507 | 16 | −0.588 | 28 |
LC15 | 0.601 | 6 | 0.573 | 5 | 1.000 | 1 | 0.244 | 17 |
LC16 | 0.643 | 3 | 0.421 | 22 | 0.763 | 3 | 2.541 | 3 |
LC17 | −0.418 | 38 | 0.452 | 15 | 0.136 | 39 | −1.808 | 41 |
LC18 | 0.368 | 7 | 0.533 | 10 | 0.394 | 22 | 1.856 | 6 |
LC19 | 0.715 | 2 | 0.565 | 6 | 0.759 | 4 | 0.368 | 14 |
LC20 | 0.620 | 4 | 0.692 | 3 | 0.512 | 14 | −0.349 | 23 |
LC21 | −0.231 | 30 | 0.374 | 29 | 0.178 | 36 | −0.346 | 22 |
LC22 | 0.217 | 12 | 0.332 | 36 | 0.678 | 5 | 3.058 | 2 |
LC23 | −0.128 | 22 | 0.429 | 20 | 0.122 | 40 | −0.374 | 24 |
LC24 | −0.034 | 18 | 0.535 | 9 | 0.380 | 23 | −0.922 | 31 |
LC25 | −0.272 | 33 | 0.383 | 26 | 0.438 | 19 | −1.671 | 38 |
LC26 | 0.244 | 10 | 0.541 | 8 | 0.458 | 18 | −1.426 | 34 |
LC27 | 0.333 | 8 | 0.583 | 4 | 0.243 | 29 | 0.359 | 15 |
LC28 | −0.159 | 26 | 0.359 | 33 | 0.343 | 24 | 0.271 | 16 |
LC29 | −0.234 | 31 | 0.372 | 30 | 0.238 | 30 | 0.905 | 8 |
LC30 | −0.373 | 36 | 0.298 | 38 | 0.542 | 10 | 0.733 | 12 |
LC31 | −0.180 | 27 | 0.450 | 16 | 0.533 | 11 | −0.588 | 27 |
LC32 | −0.343 | 35 | 0.314 | 37 | 0.659 | 7 | −0.113 | 20 |
LC33 | −0.236 | 32 | 0.405 | 25 | 0.525 | 13 | −0.732 | 30 |
LC34 | 0.100 | 13 | 0.696 | 2 | 0.297 | 28 | −0.518 | 26 |
LC35 | −0.413 | 37 | 0.406 | 24 | 0.311 | 27 | −1.476 | 35 |
LC36 | −0.155 | 24 | 0.379 | 27 | 0.145 | 38 | 2.120 | 5 |
LC37 | −0.667 | 42 | 0.295 | 39 | 0.183 | 34 | −1.534 | 36 |
LC38 | −0.220 | 28 | 0.435 | 18 | 0.000 | 42 | 0.524 | 13 |
LC39 | −0.435 | 39 | 0.346 | 34 | 0.330 | 25 | −1.607 | 37 |
LC40 | −0.627 | 41 | 0.376 | 28 | 0.214 | 32 | −1.788 | 40 |
LC41 | 0.057 | 16 | 0.364 | 32 | 0.662 | 6 | −0.472 | 25 |
LC42 | 0.082 | 14 | 0.421 | 21 | 0.508 | 15 | −0.032 | 19 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, N.; Guo, F.; Li, B.; Jing, Z.; Bai, W.; Hou, X. Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Functional Traits and Screening of Key Indicators of Leymus chinensis Germplasm Resources from Northern China and Mongolia. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071880
Liu N, Guo F, Li B, Jing Z, Bai W, Hou X. Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Functional Traits and Screening of Key Indicators of Leymus chinensis Germplasm Resources from Northern China and Mongolia. Agronomy. 2023; 13(7):1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071880
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Na, Fenghui Guo, Bin Li, Zeyao Jing, Wuyun Bai, and Xiangyang Hou. 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological Functional Traits and Screening of Key Indicators of Leymus chinensis Germplasm Resources from Northern China and Mongolia" Agronomy 13, no. 7: 1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071880