Next Article in Journal
The Detection of Kiwifruit Sunscald Using Spectral Reflectance Data Combined with Machine Learning and CNNs
Previous Article in Journal
The Diversification of Adaptive Strategies for Karst-Adaptable Plants and the Utilization of Plant Resources in Karst Ecosystems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Trends and Challenges in Precision and Digital Agriculture

by
Gniewko Niedbała
1,*,
Magdalena Piekutowska
2 and
Patryk Hara
3
1
Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland
2
Department of Geoecology and Geoinformation, Institute of Biology and Earth Sciences, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, 27 Partyzantów St., 76-200 Słupsk, Poland
3
Agrotechnology, Jagiellonów 4, 73-150 Łobez, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(8), 2136; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082136
Submission received: 31 July 2023 / Revised: 13 August 2023 / Accepted: 14 August 2023 / Published: 15 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Precision and Digital Agriculture)

1. Introduction

Real change is needed in the agricultural sector to meet the challenges of the 21st century in terms of humanity’s food needs. Activities related to the modernization of agricultural production must be safe for the intensively exploited environment. In this context, precision agriculture, which is closely linked to the digitization of agriculture, is becoming increasingly important. The role of precision agriculture is to increase yields and support management decision making on farms using modern, advanced technologies such as sensors and measurement and analytical tools. Accordingly, production carried out in accordance with the principles of precision and digital agriculture uses a great deal of data and a variety of information. All this is carried out to effectively reduce labor time, efficiently manage agricultural resources, and rationally use inputs [1,2,3,4,5]. More and more producers are successfully applying information technology to their farms, so the concept of digital agriculture is gaining importance. This solution focuses the automation of machinery and processes, involving the latest developments in artificial intelligence: classical and convolutional neural networks [1,6,7,8,9,10]; analysis of diverse images [8,11,12,13,14]; cloud computing and unmanned aerial vehicles [15,16,17,18,19], etc. Digital technologies in agriculture enable a better understanding of the interdependence of factors that determine various aspects of the business. This is because the collection of data, analysis, and subsequent control of results can be carried out within a single system, and they are compatible with multiple machines and equipment. It is noteworthy that, with appropriate programming, the equipment has the ability to take various simple actions, for example, based on neural models [20,21,22,23,24,25]. The continuous development and improvement of precision and digital farming elements are providing innovative solutions in many aspects. More and more tools for detecting/identifying various undesirable objects in crop conditions, such as weeds or pests, are being researched. Dynamic advances in image analysis in agriculture make it possible to define disease symptoms observed in plants during the growing season. Typically, such identification is subject to fewer errors [2,12,26]. Proper analyses of images from drones or satellites provide a chance to assess the condition of plants in the field at each stage of their growth to identify potential abiotic threats and stress conditions [27,28].

2. Methods Used in Machine Learning

Implementing machine learning (ML) into precision agriculture has the real potential to bring many benefits. However, it requires the right technological infrastructure, properly processed data, and adequate training for farmers to take full advantage of the potential of machine learning. To be able to implement products based on machine learning for agricultural purposes, it is necessary to involve the scientific community. The development of suitable ML models not only requires a large amount of learning data, but a large dataset for model testing is also necessary. Only the most accurate models can find applications in precision agriculture. In this regard, deep learning methods [29] such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are widely used. CNNs are used, among others, in the popular image detection algorithm—YOLO (You Only Look Once) [30,31,32,33]. In addition, CNNs can be successfully used to map various crops [34] or predict soil moisture in vegetated areas [35]. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and random forests (RFs) are appropriate tools for yield prediction [18,28,36,37,38,39,40,41]. In order to obtain more precise and accurate results, efforts are being made to improve existing machine learning methods. The ResNet50 model, Faster RCNN, and Focal Voxel R-CNN have been used to diagnose rice blight, detect defects in groundnut crops, and detect obstacles by automated agricultural machinery, respectively [42,43,44]. Diagnosing agricultural crop diseases or detecting obstacles in real time is not possible without advanced visual technologies. Image analysis combined with ML improves agricultural production and minimizes losses. With advanced technologies and tools, farmers and gardeners can regularly and systematically collect data on plant health, [45,46,47], enabling faster responses and reducing losses [48]. The introduction of smart irrigation systems [49,50,51] and the accurate dosing of fertilizers [52] or crop protection products [53] allows the better use of water resources and minimizes environmental pollution.

3. Precision Agriculture in Plant Cultivation

Due to its versatility, precision and digital agriculture has found applications in all types and specializations of agricultural and horticultural production. Precision fertilization, irrigation, current assessments of vegetation condition, decision support and management systems, yield prediction, and the classification of disease signs and symptoms are implemented in greenhouse crops, production fields, orchards, vegetation halls, etc. [4,37,54,55,56,57,58]. The above solutions are practiced extensively in cereal and rapeseed crops, cotton, and soybeans [15,59,60]. The most popular implementations involve the use of detailed images to assess the state of vegetation by analyzing vegetation indices; yield predictions in qualitative and quantitative terms; and combining the work of various systems that collect important environmental data—meteorological, soil, and yields—quantitatively and qualitatively. In more demanding and specialized production, i.e., vegetable, fruit, potato, and herb crops, the greatest importance is attributed to image analysis, allowing the identification of diseases, physiological disorders, and yield quality defects [8,61,62,63].

4. Data and Sources

Satellite imaging plays a key role in the development of modern agriculture. With the help of advanced satellite technology, farmers can obtain valuable information about their crops and soil, allowing them to optimize their farming processes. More and more scientific work in the field of precision agriculture is focusing on the use of satellite data in the development of ML models. Data from Sentinel 1 and Sentinel 2 satellites [34,64], and the MODIS optical-mechanical scanner deployed on Terra and Aqua satellites [16,65,66,67] are commonly used. These tools allow the collection of spectral and multispectral data, which are aids for calculating vegetation indices (VIs). VIs as parameters or measures are used to assess plant growth and development activity. Based on indicators such as NDVI and GNDVI, it is possible to identify diseases: for example, in cotton cultivation [68]. NDVI has been shown to be strongly correlated with potassium and phosphorus content in the soil [69]. Plant vegetation indices such as EVI, NDRE, SAVI or SARVI are helpful in detecting chlorophyll content: for example, in corn plants [70]. Data for VI calculations are also obtained using UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles). Drones are becoming an indispensable part of digital agriculture, the use of which contributes to the further development of farms. The ability to work on cloudy days, higher image resolution, omni-directional analysis, and positioning accuracy make UAVs have a certain advantage over satellites. These features make drones increasingly applicable to agriculture. Assessing the field germination of soybean plants [71]; determining the nutritional status of spring wheat after the earing stage [72]; and monitoring nitrogen concentrations in walnut [73], cotton [74], or phenotyping in corn breeding [75] are just a few examples of what can be achieved using UAVs and spectral cameras in modern agriculture.

5. Increased Interest in the Area of Precision and Digital Agriculture

Precision and digital agriculture encompasses a vast and growing research area. Global issues such as changes in weather patterns during the growing season, the need to quickly and accurately identify diseases and pests, and monitoring the nutritional status of plants in nitrogen and other elements require further research that will increase the number of publications. To be able to measure the scientific community’s interest in these topics, we conducted an analysis of the number of published papers from the Scopus database. Based on keywords such as agriculture, deep learning, image, UAV, and remote sensing, 23,087 papers were obtained.
The number of publications in the area of precision and digital agriculture has been growing for many years (Figure 1A). The number of papers published in 2022 has increased more than 4 times compared to 2014. By the end of June 2023, 2366 articles had already been published. Among these publications, research articles dominate the body of research (55.9%), as can be observed in Figure 1B. Conference proceedings account for 34.6% of the total published papers, and review articles and chapters in books account for 3.5 and 3.4%, respectively.

6. Conclusions

The future of precision and digital agriculture is a highly complex issue. On the one hand, their daily use is expected to contribute to a real increase in farm income levels; these solutions will ensure that higher yields are achieved with reduced inputs. On the other hand, implementations must be carried out in such a way that they do not pose a threat to the environment. Artificial intelligence is forecasted to play an even more important role in the economic performance of farms. Its latest developments, especially in the areas of deep learning and machine learning, are expected to complement certain elements of precision agriculture that have not yet been developed. All data produced by farms, particularly via various IoT sensors, will be able to feed numerous algorithms based on deep learning and machine learning technologies. These algorithms will facilitate and optimize the operations of food producers by automating agricultural robots and monitoring crops and animals in real time while mitigating environmental impacts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.N., M.P. and P.H.; methodology, G.N., M.P. and P.H.; software, P.H.; validation, G.N., M.P. and P.H.; formal analysis, M.P.; investigation, G.N., M.P. and P.H.; resources, P.H.; data curation, M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.N., M.P. and P.H.; writing—review and editing, G.N., M.P. and P.H.; visualization, M.P. and P.H.; supervision, G.N.; project administration, G.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, P.; Pandey, P.C.; Petropoulos, G.P.; Pavlides, A.; Srivastava, P.K.; Koutsias, N.; Deng, K.A.K.; Bao, Y. Hyperspectral remote sensing in precision agriculture: Present status, challenges, and future trends. In Hyperspectral Remote Sensing; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 121–146. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbas, A.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Alami, M.M.; Alrefaei, A.F.; Abbas, Q.; Naqvi, S.A.H.; Rao, M.J.; Mosa, W.F.A.; Abbas, Q.; et al. Drones in Plant Disease Assessment, Efficient Monitoring, and Detection: A Way forward to Smart Agriculture. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wan, T.; Rao, Y.; Jin, X.; Wang, F.; Zhang, T.; Shu, Y.; Li, S. Improved U-Net for Growth Stage Recognition of In-Field Maize. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moriya, É.A.S.; Imai, N.N.; Tommaselli, A.M.G.; Honkavaara, E.; Rosalen, D.L. Design of Vegetation Index for Identifying the Mosaic Virus in Sugarcane Plantation: A Brazilian Case Study. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bhojani, S.H.; Bhatt, N. Wheat crop yield prediction using new activation functions in neural network. Neural Comput. Appl. 2020, 32, 13941–13951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Y.; Hartemink, A.E.; Huang, J.; Townsend, P.A. Synergistic use of hyperspectral imagery, Sentinel-1 and LiDAR improves mapping of soil physical and geochemical properties at the farm-scale. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2021, 72, 1690–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, D.; Dai, D.; Zheng, J.; Li, L.; Kang, H.; Zheng, X. WT-YOLOM: An Improved Target Detection Model Based on YOLOv4 for Endogenous Impurity in Walnuts. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feng, J.; Hou, B.; Yu, C.; Yang, H.; Wang, C.; Shi, X.; Hu, Y. Research and Validation of Potato Late Blight Detection Method Based on Deep Learning. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pinheiro, I.; Moreira, G.; Queirós da Silva, D.; Magalhães, S.; Valente, A.; Moura Oliveira, P.; Cunha, M.; Santos, F. Deep Learning YOLO-Based Solution for Grape Bunch Detection and Assessment of Biophysical Lesions. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, D.; Yang, C.; Yao, R.; Ma, L. Origin Identification of Saposhnikovia divaricata by CNN Embedded with the Hierarchical Residual Connection Block. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jia, B.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhao, J.; An, N. CA-BIT: A Change Detection Method of Land Use in Natural Reserves. Agronomy 2023, 13, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dai, Q.; Guo, Y.; Li, Z.; Song, S.; Lyu, S.; Sun, D.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z. Citrus Disease Image Generation and Classification Based on Improved FastGAN and EfficientNet-B5. Agronomy 2023, 13, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, C.; Yi, S.; Mao, J.; Wang, F.; Zhang, B.; Du, F. A Novel Segmentation Recognition Algorithm of Agaricus bisporus Based on Morphology and Iterative Marker-Controlled Watershed Transform. Agronomy 2023, 13, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martín, M.P.; Ponce, B.; Echavarría, P.; Dorado, J.; Fernández-Quintanilla, C. Early-Season Mapping of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in Corn Fields Using Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery. Agronomy 2023, 13, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, M.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, L.; Liu, J.; Hou, D. Estimation of Fv/Fm in Spring Wheat Using UAV-Based Multispectral and RGB Imagery with Multiple Machine Learning Methods. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dainelli, R.; Saracco, F. Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis on the Use of Satellite Imagery in Agriculture: An Entropy-Based Approach. Agronomy 2023, 13, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Näsi, R.; Mikkola, H.; Honkavaara, E.; Koivumäki, N.; Oliveira, R.A.; Peltonen-Sainio, P.; Keijälä, N.-S.; Änäkkälä, M.; Arkkola, L.; Alakukku, L. Can Basic Soil Quality Indicators and Topography Explain the Spatial Variability in Agricultural Fields Observed from Drone Orthomosaics? Agronomy 2023, 13, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, C.; Mubvumba, P.; Huang, Y.; Dhillon, J.; Reddy, K. Multi-Stage Corn Yield Prediction Using High-Resolution UAV Multispectral Data and Machine Learning Models. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hammond, K.; Kerry, R.; Jensen, R.R.; Spackman, R.; Hulet, A.; Hopkins, B.G.; Yost, M.A.; Hopkins, A.P.; Hansen, N.C. Assessing Within-Field Variation in Alfalfa Leaf Area Index Using UAV Visible Vegetation Indices. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akkem, Y.; Biswas, S.K.; Varanasi, A. Smart farming using artificial intelligence: A review. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 120, 105899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maraveas, C. Incorporating Artificial Intelligence Technology in Smart Greenhouses: Current State of the Art. Appl. Sci. 2022, 13, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wojciechowski, T.; Niedbała, G.; Czechlowski, M.; Nawrocka, J.R.; Piechnik, L.; Niemann, J. Rapeseed seeds quality classification with usage of VIS-NIR fiber optic probe and artificial neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Optoelectronics and Image Processing (ICOIP), Warsaw, Poland, 10–12 June 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 44–48. [Google Scholar]
  23. Niedbała, G.; Kurasiak-Popowska, D.; Stuper-Szablewska, K.; Nawracała, J. Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Analyze the Concentration of Ferulic Acid, Deoxynivalenol, and Nivalenol in Winter Wheat Grain. Agriculture 2020, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Boniecki, P.; Sujak, A.; Niedbała, G.; Piekarska-Boniecka, H.; Wawrzyniak, A.; Przybylak, A. Neural Modelling from the Perspective of Selected Statistical Methods on Examples of Agricultural Applications. Agriculture 2023, 13, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Niedbała, G.; Wróbel, B.; Piekutowska, M.; Zielewicz, W.; Paszkiewicz-Jasińska, A.; Wojciechowski, T.; Niazian, M. Application of Artificial Neural Networks Sensitivity Analysis for the Pre-Identification of Highly Significant Factors Influencing the Yield and Digestibility of Grassland Sward in the Climatic Conditions of Central Poland. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Danilov, R.; Kremneva, O.; Pachkin, A. Identification of the Spectral Patterns of Cultivated Plants and Weeds: Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices. Agronomy 2023, 13, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fadl, M.E.; Jalhoum, M.E.M.; AbdelRahman, M.A.E.; Ali, E.A.; Zahra, W.R.; Abuzaid, A.S.; Fiorentino, C.; D’Antonio, P.; Belal, A.A.; Scopa, A. Soil Salinity Assessing and Mapping Using Several Statistical and Distribution Techniques in Arid and Semi-Arid Ecosystems, Egypt. Agronomy 2023, 13, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thimmegowda, M.N.; Manjunatha, M.H.; Huggi, L.; Shivaramu, H.S.; Soumya, D.V.; Nagesha, L.; Padmashri, H.S. Weather-Based Statistical and Neural Network Tools for Forecasting Rice Yields in Major Growing Districts of Karnataka. Agronomy 2023, 13, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiao, F.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, R. Fruit Detection and Recognition Based on Deep Learning for Automatic Harvesting: An Overview and Review. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moisa, C.; Copolovici, D.; Lupitu, A.; Lazar, L.; Copolovici, L. Drought Stress Influence on Pea Plants (Pisum sativum L.). Sci. Tech. Bull. Food Sci. Eng. 2019, 16, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Lu, X.; Li, W.; Yan, K.; Mo, Z.; Lan, Y.; Wang, L. Detection of Power Poles in Orchards Based on Improved Yolov5s Model. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; He, Q.; Yue, D.; Zhang, C.; Geng, D. Real-Time Detection System of Broken Corn Kernels Based on BCK-YOLOv7. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jajja, A.I.; Abbas, A.; Khattak, H.A.; Niedbała, G.; Khalid, A.; Rauf, H.T.; Kujawa, S. Compact Convolutional Transformer (CCT)-Based Approach for Whitefly Attack Detection in Cotton Crops. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mao, M.; Zhao, H.; Tang, G.; Ren, J. In-Season Crop Type Detection by Combing Sentinel-1A and Sentinel-2 Imagery Based on the CNN Model. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hegazi, E.H.; Samak, A.A.; Yang, L.; Huang, R.; Huang, J. Prediction of Soil Moisture Content from Sentinel-2 Images Using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Agronomy 2023, 13, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hara, P.; Piekutowska, M.; Niedbała, G. Prediction of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seeds Yield Using Artificial Neural Networks. Agriculture 2023, 13, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Piekutowska, M.; Niedbała, G.; Piskier, T.; Lenartowicz, T.; Pilarski, K.; Wojciechowski, T.; Pilarska, A.A.; Czechowska-Kosacka, A. The Application of Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Yield Prediction of Very Early Potato Cultivars before Harvest. Agronomy 2021, 11, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yildirim, T.; Moriasi, D.N.; Starks, P.J.; Chakraborty, D. Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for Short-Range Prediction of Cotton Yield in Data-Scarce Regions. Agronomy 2022, 12, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Niedbała, G. Simple model based on artificial neural network for early prediction and simulation winter rapeseed yield. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kujawa, S.; Niedbała, G. Artificial Neural Networks in Agriculture. Agriculture 2021, 11, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Niedbała, G.; Piekutowska, M.; Weres, J.; Korzeniewicz, R.; Witaszek, K.; Adamski, M.; Pilarski, K.; Czechowska-Kosacka, A.; Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, A. Application of Artificial Neural Networks for Yield Modeling of Winter Rapeseed Based on Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Data. Agronomy 2019, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shah, S.R.; Qadri, S.; Bibi, H.; Shah, S.M.W.; Sharif, M.I.; Marinello, F. Comparing Inception V3, VGG 16, VGG 19, CNN, and ResNet 50: A Case Study on Early Detection of a Rice Disease. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Y.; Ding, Z.; Song, J.; Ge, Z.; Deng, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Bian, L.; Yang, C. Peanut Defect Identification Based on Multispectral Image and Deep Learning. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qin, J.; Sun, R.; Zhou, K.; Xu, Y.; Lin, B.; Yang, L.; Chen, Z.; Wen, L.; Wu, C. Lidar-Based 3D Obstacle Detection Using Focal Voxel R-CNN for Farmland Environment. Agronomy 2023, 13, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xie, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Liao, F.; Wang, W.; Li, J. Detection of Litchi Leaf Diseases and Insect Pests Based on Improved FCOS. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ojo, M.O.; Zahid, A. Improving Deep Learning Classifiers Performance via Preprocessing and Class Imbalance Approaches in a Plant Disease Detection Pipeline. Agronomy 2023, 13, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Rao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jin, X. The Nondestructive Model of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy with Different Pretreatment Transformation for Predicting “Dangshan” Pear Woolliness Disease. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ma, L.; Yu, Q.; Yu, H.; Zhang, J. Maize Leaf Disease Identification Based on YOLOv5n Algorithm Incorporating Attention Mechanism. Agronomy 2023, 13, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mohammed, M.; Hamdoun, H.; Sagheer, A. Toward Sustainable Farming: Implementing Artificial Intelligence to Predict Optimum Water and Energy Requirements for Sensor-Based Micro Irrigation Systems Powered by Solar PV. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Martins, S.; Lhissou, R.; Chokmani, K.; Cambouris, A. Determining the Beginning of Potato Tuberization Period Using Plant Height Detected by Drone for Irrigation Purposes. Agronomy 2023, 13, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kerry, R.; Ingram, B.; Hammond, K.; Shumate, S.R.; Gunther, D.; Jensen, R.R.; Schill, S.; Hansen, N.C.; Hopkins, B.G. Spatial Analysis of Soil Moisture and Turfgrass Health to Determine Zones for Spatially Variable Irrigation Management. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, H.; Xu, J.; Chen, B.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Liang, H.; Jiang, Q.; He, Y.; Xi, W. Performance of an Automatic Variable-Rate Fertilization System Subject to Different Initial Field Water Conditions and Fertilizer Doses in Paddy Fields. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. da Vitória, E.L.; Krohling, C.A.; Borges, F.R.P.; Ribeiro, L.F.O.; Ribeiro, M.E.A.; Chen, P.; Lan, Y.; Wang, S.; Moraes, H.M.F.e.; Furtado Júnior, M.R. Efficiency of Fungicide Application an Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Pneumatic Sprayer for Control of Hemileia vastatrix and Cercospora coffeicola in Mountain Coffee Crops. Agronomy 2023, 13, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dang, L.M.; Min, K.; Nguyen, T.N.; Park, H.Y.; Lee, O.N.; Song, H.-K.; Moon, H. Vision-Based White Radish Phenotypic Trait Measurement with Smartphone Imagery. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Flint, E.A.; Hopkins, B.G.; Svedin, J.D.; Kerry, R.; Heaton, M.J.; Jensen, R.R.; Campbell, C.S.; Yost, M.A.; Hansen, N.C. Irrigation Zone Delineation and Management with a Field-Scale Variable Rate Irrigation System in Winter Wheat. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Emam, M.A.; Abd EL-Mageed, A.M.; Niedbała, G.; Sabrey, S.A.; Fouad, A.S.; Kapiel, T.; Piekutowska, M.; Mahmoud, S.A. Genetic Characterization and Agronomic Evaluation of Drought Tolerance in Ten Egyptian Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. dos Santos, I.R.; Abdel-Azeem, A.M.; Mohesien, M.T.; Piekutowska, M.; Sheir, D.H.; da Silva, L.L.; da Silva Castro, C.; Carvalho, D.D.C.; Bezerra, J.D.P.; Saad, H.A.; et al. Insights into the Bioprospecting of the Endophytic Fungi of the Medicinal Plant Palicourea rigida Kunth (Rubiaceae): Detailed Biological Activities. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huang, P.; Huang, P.; Wang, Z.; Wu, X.; Liu, J.; Zhu, L. Deep-Learning-Based Trunk Perception with Depth Estimation and DWA for Robust Navigation of Robotics in Orchards. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kong, S.; Li, J.; Zhai, Y.; Gao, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, Y. Real-Time Detection of Crops with Dense Planting Using Deep Learning at Seedling Stage. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xie, S.; Liu, H.; Liu, D.; Hu, H.; Dong, Z.; Wang, T.; Ming, G. Projection of Rainfed Rice Yield Using CMIP6 in the Lower Lancang–Mekong River Basin. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, W.; Zhai, Y.; Xia, Y. Tomato Leaf Disease Identification Method Based on Improved YOLOX. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cai, L.; Liang, J.; Xu, X.; Duan, J.; Yang, Z. Banana Pseudostem Visual Detection Method Based on Improved YOLOV7 Detection Algorithm. Agronomy 2023, 13, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gao, Y.; Cao, Z.; Cai, W.; Gong, G.; Zhou, G.; Li, L. Apple Leaf Disease Identification in Complex Background Based on BAM-Net. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Thirumeninathan, S.; Pazhanivelan, S.; Sudarmanian, N.S.; Ragunath, K.; Kumaraperumal, R.; Srinivasan, G.; Mohan, R. Integrating SAR Sentinel-1A and DSSAT CROPGRO Simulation Model for Peanut Yield Gap Analysis. Agronomy 2023, 13, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Astuti, I.S.; Wiwoho, B.S.; Purwanto, P.; Wagistina, S.; Deffinika, I.; Sucahyo, H.R.; Herlambang, G.A.; Alfarizi, I.A.G. An Application of Improved MODIS-Based Potential Evapotranspiration Estimates in a Humid Tropic Brantas Watershed—Implications for Agricultural Water Management. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Y.; Li, R.; Hu, J.; Wang, X.; Kabeja, C.; Min, Q.; Wang, Y. Evaluations of MODIS and microwave based satellite evapotranspiration products under varied cloud conditions over East Asia forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 2021, 264, 112606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nadeem, A.A.; Zha, Y.; Shi, L.; Ali, S.; Wang, X.; Zafar, Z.; Afzal, Z.; Tariq, M.A.U.R. Spatial Downscaling and Gap-Filling of SMAP Soil Moisture to High Resolution Using MODIS Surface Variables and Machine Learning Approaches over ShanDian River Basin, China. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Zeng, X.; Tang, S.; Lin, F.; Zhang, L.; Meng, X.; Liu, S. Cotton Blight Identification with Ground Framed Canopy Photo-Assisted Multispectral UAV Images. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mazur, P.; Gozdowski, D.; Wójcik-Gront, E. Soil Electrical Conductivity and Satellite-Derived Vegetation Indices for Evaluation of Phosphorus, Potassium and Magnesium Content, pH, and Delineation of Within-Field Management Zones. Agriculture 2022, 12, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qiao, L.; Tang, W.; Gao, D.; Zhao, R.; An, L.; Li, M.; Sun, H.; Song, D. UAV-based chlorophyll content estimation by evaluating vegetation index responses under different crop coverages. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 196, 106775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kurbanov, R.; Panarina, V.; Polukhin, A.; Lobachevsky, Y.; Zakharova, N.; Litvinov, M.; Rebouh, N.Y.; Kucher, D.E.; Gureeva, E.; Golovina, E.; et al. Evaluation of Field Germination of Soybean Breeding Crops Using Multispectral Data from UAV. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Xie, M.; Hou, D. Estimation of Relative Chlorophyll Content in Spring Wheat Based on Multi-Temporal UAV Remote Sensing. Agronomy 2023, 13, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.; Feng, C.; Ma, Y.; Chen, X.; Lu, B.; Song, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R. Estimation of Nitrogen Concentration in Walnut Canopies in Southern Xinjiang Based on UAV Multispectral Images. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wen, M.; Lu, Y.; Ma, F. Accuracy Comparison of Estimation on Cotton Leaf and Plant Nitrogen Content Based on UAV Digital Image under Different Nutrition Treatments. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, B.; Zhou, J.; Costa, M.; Kaeppler, S.M.; Zhang, Z. Plot-Level Maize Early Stage Stand Counting and Spacing Detection Using Advanced Deep Learning Algorithms Based on UAV Imagery. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Number of documents between 2014 and 2023 (A) and types of papers (B). Source: Scopus database at https://www.scopus.com (accessed on 22 July 2023).
Figure 1. Number of documents between 2014 and 2023 (A) and types of papers (B). Source: Scopus database at https://www.scopus.com (accessed on 22 July 2023).
Agronomy 13 02136 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niedbała, G.; Piekutowska, M.; Hara, P. New Trends and Challenges in Precision and Digital Agriculture. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082136

AMA Style

Niedbała G, Piekutowska M, Hara P. New Trends and Challenges in Precision and Digital Agriculture. Agronomy. 2023; 13(8):2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niedbała, Gniewko, Magdalena Piekutowska, and Patryk Hara. 2023. "New Trends and Challenges in Precision and Digital Agriculture" Agronomy 13, no. 8: 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082136

APA Style

Niedbała, G., Piekutowska, M., & Hara, P. (2023). New Trends and Challenges in Precision and Digital Agriculture. Agronomy, 13(8), 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop