Next Article in Journal
Effects of Different Spray Adjuvants on the Permeation of Dinotefuran in Rice Leaves
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Salinity Accumulation on Physical, Chemical, and Microbial Properties of Soil under Rural Domestic Sewage Irrigation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Protection and Modeling in the Use of S, Ca, and Mg Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainable Fertilization Systems

1
Department of Technical and Soil Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 3-5, Mănăștur Street, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Transversal Competencies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Mănăștur Street, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Agricultural Research and Development Station Turda, 27, Agriculturii Street, 401100 Turda, Romania
4
Department of Economic Sciences, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 3-5, Mănăștur Street, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(3), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030515
Submission received: 31 January 2024 / Revised: 16 February 2024 / Accepted: 26 February 2024 / Published: 1 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Soil and Plant Nutrition)

Abstract

:
The complexity of NP and NPK fertilizers in stationary and long-term system yields is proven to determine substantial changes in soil fertility, revealing interaction possibilities related to the chemistry and requirements of other nutrients (S, Ca, Mg, and microelements), while sustainable fertilization can exert control over them through rational fertilization practices and complex nutritive management. Revealing the extent of the modifying effects in the application of S, Ca, and Mg correlated to the soil-plant system conditions relates to the hypothesis of the present research in the context of long-term experiments in Romania at the Office of Pedological and Agrochemical Studies Alba (OSPA Alba) and the Turda Agricultural Research and Development Station (SCDA Turda) with 55 years of a fertilizing effect over the 1967–2022 period, but not solely. This study shows that for sustainable fertilization systems, the complementary application of S, Ca, and Mg with NP and NPK has proven to be effective and unitarily constitutes a measure for the sustainable protection and enhancement of soil fertility.

1. Introduction

In the fields of soil science, nutrition, and fertility, specific studies, particularly in terms of practical fertilization measures, are considered for the optimization of the effective nutrient regime and management. This scientific approach includes organogenic elements—C (45% of plant dry matter), O (42% of dry matter), and H (6.5% of dry matter)—devoid of special application through fertilizers, but also the relevant essential elements for fertilizing interventions, classified as primary macroelements, N (0.2–6% of dry matter), P (0.2–1.7% of dry matter), and K (0.4–6% of dry matter) as well as the secondary macroelements S (0.02–1.3%), Ca (0.01–7%), and Mg (0.1–0.9), which are applied through fertilizers. These secondary ones, by comparison to the primary category, are applied at lower fertilizer rates and under special conditions in the nutrient medium [1,2,3,4,5].
In plant nutrition, these elements are accompanied by trace elements that play an essential role as well, namely Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, B, Mo, etc., with such plant concentrations that do not exceed 0.01% of s.u. and with a range of representation in plant tissues of n.10-2–n.10-6% of dry matter [4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
All elements have essential roles in the crop life cycle, and macroelements mainly play plastic, constitutive, and qualitative roles while trace elements have mainly enzymatic and catalytic roles in plant metabolism [4,5,13,14,15,16].
Such elements mentioned as S, Ca, and Mg have specific functions and roles, interrelated with other elements (S with N and P, with some cations, and Ca, Mg, and K in dependence on the rest of the cations in CEC or T). On an overall basis, they have had less representation in fertilization. However, in the past 2–3 decades, based on these complex dependencies and changing anthropogenic factors in fertilization, especially in sensitive plant species or in high consumers of these nutrients, they are commonly applied in the background of NPK. Obviously, the specificity of their roles and chemistry in a soil-plant system and their changes and efficiency are different and at times more complicated [4,5,17,18].
In long-term experiments and multi-year fertilization without S inclusion, S chemism undergoes modifications and processes, such as the following:
-
With decreasing pH, through acidification, the soil S content decreases by increasing anion adsorption in clay (as SO42−);
-
The organic and mineral S content decreases with the reduction in humus and organic C content through fertilization and conventional technologies;
-
Degradation of the soil S regime occurs as a result of excessive NP and NPK fertilization where excess N is the determining factor [19,20].
In the case of calcium, research needs to consider its chemism and effect in a soil-plant system, as an effect of amendments–reamendments.
For the purpose of this study, it is considered that in long-term experiments and multi-year fertilization, calcium corrects acidity by neutralizing its active forms (Ah, mobile Al), but on reamendment and over-amendment, it disrupts the regime of other cations in CEC, of Mg and K especially [21,22,23,24].
Therefore, balanced fertilization maintains a controllable Ca/Mg and Ca/K ratio and normal fertilization with NPK management ordering calcium functions [25,26].
Magnesium chemism may, in long-term experiments and multi-year fertilization, lead to the occurrence of processes requiring Mg agrochemical control:
-
With pH reduction, acidification and acidity correction (by CaCO3, without CaCO3 and MgCO3) update interferences with Ca2+ and with Al3+.
-
With the promotion of potassium in differentiated NPK systems, there is subsequent interference with K+ alongside frequent deficiency states [27,28,29].
Previous observations on the chemistry of the S, Ca, and Mg elements have led to the present soil investigation and monitoring, through long-term experiments, towards the observation of their fertility changes, determined over several years, and aiming at the formulation of proposals for prevention or remediation through agrochemical measures, amendments (in acidic soils), and balanced fertilization [12].
The application of S, Ca, and Mg has not yet become a widespread practice in Romanian agriculture, but it is still related to changes in fertilization systems and implicitly in their monitoring indicators. Thus, S application is considered for this study as a function of its efficiency as an accompanying anion (SO42−) but also in enhancing N efficiency. The deepening of the chemistry and effects of Ca-Mg has been extended in the present approach, especially to the effects of amending acidic soils [28,29].
In this context, this paper approaches the substantiated correct application of the elements mentioned, which is highly required, and its effects, especially in the context of long-term, stationary fertilization approaches, in areas where S, Ca, and Mg fertilization has been excluded.

2. Materials and Methods

In order to achieve the proposed research objectives, namely determining the chemistry of the S, Ca, and Mg elements in the soil-plant system and then the conditions of opportunity and effect of their application, the following experiments and analyses were undertaken:
1.
An amendment (CaCO3) experiment was carried out to study Ca-Mg-K interaction.
Lime doses from Ah (hydrolytic acidity):
  • -
    0 Ah; 0.5 Ah; 1.0 Ah; 2.0 Ah;
    -
    Fertilizer background: N100P70K60;
    -
    Grain maize crop.
This experiment with increasing doses of CaCO3 was conducted on an amendable, albic luvisol, in order to study the comparative effect of CaCO3-based amendments in relation to the modification of Mg chemistry in this soil, which had been dealkalized, and to evaluate the possibility of using and extending the application of dolomitic limestones (which can favorably regulate this Ca/Mg ratio and physico-chemically balance the new soil).
2.
Long-term experiments [30,31] at the Office of Pedological and Agrochemical Studies Alba (OSPA Alba) and the Turda Agricultural Research and Development Station (SCDA Turda) (for 55 years of fertilizing effect, during the 1967–2022 period), with exclusively mineral NP fertilizations, have endangered the S status and chemistry, previously predicted as exposed to a reduction in the humus reserve of the investigated soils over time. The reduction in this indicator may reveal the need for its application from NP mineral compositions, NP + S + Mg, or from organic input (in organo-mineral fertilizations). The evolution of total S and mobile content was monitored in the following long-term NP experiments at OSPA Alba and SCDA Turda:
-
NP experiments: 0, 40, 80, 120, 160 kg N a.s./ha, wheat;
0, 50, 100, 150, 200 kg N active ingredient/ha, maize;
0, 40, 80, 120, 160 kg P2O5 active ingredient/ha, wheat and maize;
  • -
    Soil: wheat, maize, soya.
3.
The effect of S + Mg application (from MgSO4) on wheat, maize and soybean (5-year average) was monitored as follows:
-
Promotion of S, Ca, Mg fertilization with various simple and complex assortments on various crops.
In the context of Romanian agriculture, these experiments evaluated the possibilities of using some mineral products available on the fertilizer market in compositions usually including either NPK + Kiserit or conventional manure + NPK.
4.
The soil characteristics in the experiments conducted were as follows:
4.1. Alluvial mollisol:
Located in the floodplain of the Mures river, at the basis of its terrace;
Pedological characteristics: protic soil class, Am diagnosis horizon;
Agrochemical characteristics: pH 7.2–7.4 (weak alkaline); humus—2.60–2.90% (medium supply); 10–15 ppm P (medium supply); 150–170 ppm K (good supply).
4.2. Typical preluvisol:
Located in the upper floodplain of the river Mures;
Pedological characteristics: luvisol class, superficial A0 horizon and Bt intermediate one;
Agrochemical characteristics: pH 5.6–5.8 (moderately acidic) borderline amendable; V—80–85%; humus—2.20% (low-medium supply); IN = 1.72; 5–6.5 ppm P (very low supply); 120–130 ppm K (medium supply).
4.3. Albic luvisol:
Located in the Somes-Tur plain;
Pedological characteristics: luvisol class, superficial Ap-Ea-BEw horizon;
Agrochemical characteristics: pH—4.8–5.2; V—38–42%; humus—1.4%; P-AL—8–10 ppm (low supply); 130–140 ppm k (medium supply).
4.4. Chernozem–phaeozem:
Pedological characteristics: in the current taxonomies, vertic clay–loam chernozem or vertic clay–phaeozem;
Agrochemical characteristics: pH—6.90–7.10; T—59.14 m.e.; V—96%; humus—3.92; Nt—0.196%; P—15 ppm; K—250 ppm.
5.
Current agrochemical analyses performed (method):
-
pHH2O, potentiometric; titrimetric Ah; mobile Al [32]; exchangeable Ca and exchangeable Mg spectrophotometry in ammonium acetate extract [33,34,35]; exchangeable (mobile) K in ammonium acetate–lactate (AL) solutions [36].
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the yield, using the Polifact statistical software to identify the significant differences between yields.
6.
Interpretation limits of S, Ca, and Mg chemistry for soil analyses [5,33].
The interpretation of analytical data of the soil supply state and specific and global nutrient consumption of crops was performed considering literature data synthesized in the following Table 1 and Table 2.

3. Results and Discussion

The application of fertilizers in long-term experiments and multi-annual fertilization determine essential changes in soil fertility leading to highly diversified soil-plant environments, which are strongly reflected in the evolution of fertility in the medium and long term, thus having proven effects on soil productivity [22,24,36].
In this context, the experiments at OSPA Alba and SCDA Turda, with the results summarized above, reveal essential changes in pH, organic C, and humus content as well as in the level of nutrient representation. The newly created conditions determine particular and differentiated agrochemical states, influential in making decisions related to soil protection and modeling factors for the existing fertility and environmental conditions.
1.
Results from the study of Ca-Mg-K interaction under conditions of amendment and fertilization of acidic soils:
The acidification of soils over long-term NP and NPK fertilization, where nitrogen is the determining factor, especially in excess or disproportionate doses, raises particular management issues for preventing nitrogen overdosage but also correcting the reaction [21,37,38].
Amendment and reamendment on acidic soils in need of acidity neutralization (with pHH2O < 5.8; V < 75% and mobile Al > 0.3 m.e./100 g soil) with materials containing exclusively CaCO3 mainly cause an increase in the level of base saturation of the adsorbent complex, primarily at the expense of Ca2+ ions and at the expense of Mg2+ ions, with a reduction in their representation in the cation exchange capacity (<% Mg2+ of CEC or T). This essential modification is reproduced at the tissue level, obviously to the detriment of the Mg regime in the context of Ca/Mg interaction. It ultimately leads to a prognosis of nutrient insufficiency. Additionally, the remediation of acidic soils negatively accentuates this interaction (Table 3).
By comparison to acidity neutralization achieved with CaCO3 (exclusively), the alternative of correcting the acid reaction with dolomite (CaCO3-MgCO3) and with an initial content of 20–24% MgO sufficiently controls the Ca/Mg ratio in the soil and plant. Moreover, the agrochemical regime of the elements involved diminishes the predominant effect of Ca2+ in the cation exchange capacity. The priority of using dolomite as an amendment for acidic soils is determined in correcting these soils’ reaction where Mg representation is deficient and is contained in a dissolvable form (Mg soluble in HCl 0.05 N) in amounts less than 1 m.e./100 g soil and in a soluble state (Mg in Ac-NH4) in concentrations less than 50–100 ppm [15,17].
The correction of the acid reaction of soils is enhanced in effect by complex fertilization measures that mutually support each other’s role and effects, proving sustainable and positive for the improvement of acidic soils and soil fertility protection. In this context, fertilization accompanying amendment realigns the interactions of the nutrient ions involved and imposes remodeling in the structure of cations and fertility indicators. Thus, NPK application with the presence of K at doses and levels differentiated according to soil and crop consumption updates the K/Mg interrelationship while also determining a decrease in Mg representation in its exchangeable and soluble forms in the presence of amendments (Table 4).
The one-sided nature of the amendment (only with CaCO3-based neutralizing materials) enhances Ca/K and Ca/Mg antagonism. It even ensures an increase in the concentration of the unexchangeable forms with K cations participating as part of exchange-free fixation processes in the interlamellar spaces of clay minerals (here, illitic), with increased absorption energy. However, the application of limestone amendments with Ca + Mg dolomite (CaCO3-MgCO3) attenuates the negative and depressive K/Mg interrelationship. Also, in the context of the cation exchange capacity, the other cationic relations Ca/K, Ca/Mg, and K/Mg are concomitantly controlled, simply shaping the regime of these essential elements, increasing and redistributing their presence between the forms held in relation to the adsorptive complex. These processes, with the improvement of the composition in the cation exchange capacity, reaching a desired equilibrium should be promoted as a measure to protect and develop soil fertility and prevent nutrient impact or imbalances [39,40,41].
In agricultural soils that do not require the application of amendments, the content modeling for particular exchangeable cations and nutrients, primarily in the case of crops with specific consumption (Cs = kg/t) of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S, is carried out by complex fertilization (Table 5.)
The fertilizer resources applied (involving yields and treatments over a period of 5 years, in a stationary system) included the following variants: AN (with 33.5% N); urea (with 46%N); CAN (with 27%N + min. 7% CaO; min. 5% MgO); NPK complex (15-15-15 + 12.8S); NP complex (20-20-0); NPK + Ca + Mg complex (23-9-9 + CaO + MgO). Soil agrochemical monitoring shows a steady reaction state (pH), with minimal changes (+ΔpH) when applying CAN variants and the maintenance of agrochemical indicators with normal (optimum) contents [21,22,29,31].
The data showing the effect of complex fertilization in sunflowers reveals that a plant with such a high nutrient consumption, even considered a rapacious one, significantly exploits the interactions between essential elements while a complementarity of the complex presence of nutrients is noticed.
2.
Monitoring of total and mobile S content in long-term experiments:
According to the previous formulations and observations, it is estimated that in the humus formula, the organogenic elements can be expressed globally in the following average proportions [42]:
-
Proportion of elements: C14:N1:P0.1:S0.055:H11.4:O57;
-
Gravimetric ratios—elemental: 168pC:14pN:3.1pP:1.75pS:11,4pH:91.2pO;
-
Percentage weights of the elements: 58%C:4.84%N:1.07%P:0.60%S:3.94%H:31.55%O.
In this complex composition of humus, S is in a reduced state as thiol groups, in sulfur-containing amino acids and heterocycles; together with the other organogenic elements, it follows the overall humus changes. Thus, several expressions are known, showing a total dependence of the total S content on the total C content in soils. The changes that occur in humus evolution (organic C) in long-term experiments—a decrease, a constant, or an increase in terms of the humus content—are also evident in total and mineral S [24,30,36].
  • Long-term NP and organo-mineral experiments at OSPA Alba
The analytical data presented above showed several “patterns” of humus (organic) dynamics with values showing their constancy in the typical preluvisol upon NP fertilization and significant changes in the fertilized and amended variants, as well as in those that benefited from more active conventional tillage (in row crops and maize) (Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8).
First and foremost, the results presented show that in acidic, amendable, typical preluvisol, with pH 5.7–5.8, V% 75–78, and mobile Al 0.2–0.3–0.4 m.e./100 g soil by amendment, for four cycles (at 5 years CaCO3 was applied after Ah), there is a substantial reduction in the humus (and organic C) [37] content, more significantly under maize cultivation (as this crop benefits from conventional tillage). Contrary to this phenomenon, due to amendment but also to tillage, in alluvial mollisol (with pH 7.2, humus content 2.6–2.7%, saturated type), the dynamic process of humus content change reveals that the saturation in bases and better soil buffering capacity lead to stability in the soil-plant system and even to positive effects on the humus content. In these instances, at high humus content, the water-soluble humus fractions continuously feed the carbon cycle and maintain the permanent dynamics of the humic components. Moreover, in these cases, relative stability is maintained, and a positive result is observed in the case of soybean as a preplant for wheat. In maize, soil tillage mitigates some positive phenomena in humus dynamics (they may become slower and show better mineralization).
In the context of these phenomena and knowledge of N/S dependencies (in the soil, primarily between organic formations) the evolution of total S and mobile forms of S can be properly studied (Table 9).
In all the analytical control alternatives, the S-l representation in the two soils—preluvisol and alluvial mollisol—is in a poor concentration in the acidic soil and borderline insufficient/sufficient in the alluvial mollisol. Evidently, the representation and evolution of this element correlate with organic C concentrations and changes and, thus, with humus.
  • Long-term experiments at SCDA Turda
Analytical data from the long-term experiment, located at SCDA Turda on a chernozem–phaeozem, with high productive potential, specific to the Transylvanian Plain, show differences in the evolution of humus and implicitly in the evolution of S reserves.
Agrochemical monitoring conducted over the 1969–2020 period generally shows reductions in humus (and organic C) content in both the unfertilized (where the decrease is more significant) and fertilized variants (Table 10).
The clay–loam chernozem with a neutral reaction state (pH), high clay content (50–52% clay), and good humus supply (>3.50%) has a relevant buffering capacity (well represented T and CEC, humus + clay at a high level). In the 52 experimental years with NP fertilization adapted to a 3–5-year crop rotation, the humus content was reduced in the unfertilized variant by 0.66% and in the fertilized variant by 0.49–0.51% after 52 years, the reduction being diminished in the complex N120P120-fertilized variant. The S content, characterized by the “supply index” (IAS = %Humus − %S − 100), decreased by more than one unit in the fertilized variants and by more than two units in the non-fertilized alternative.
Under these conditions (with the three different soils—preluvisol, alluvial mollisol, chernozem), resulting from the reduction in humus (and organic C) content, sulfur being the organogenic element of humus, the application of S resources (here MgSO4) has been experimented with in order to study the effect conditions on wheat-maize-soybean production and changes in soil content as an effect of this technology [38] (Table 11).
It can be assessed from the experimental results obtained that in a soil with low to medium supply of S and Mg, with a long-term reduction (in experimental stationary variants) in S content, concomitant with organic C and humus, the application of S + Mg fertilizer resources (with Mg + S), on an NPK or organo-mineral background, leads to yield increases in the three crops—wheat, maize, and soybean. The effect becomes determined with increasing soil fertilization levels using NPK and organo-mineral fertilization, even in complex fertilizer structures and components. There are previous data supporting the effect of S and Mg determined mainly by N- (or other elements, starting with their accumulation in roots, prior to their accumulation in leaves) [3,4,5,40,41,42,43,44,45].
In this framework of the S + Mg effect, a triggering factor of the phenomenon may also be the initial low representation of S (<0.0017% in total forms or <3.0% IAS and even <10 mg kg−1 mobile S) and Mg < 10 mg. These states may determine the need for fertilizer application with these elements (the initial supply of S and Mg elements to soils may also be related to their interactions and to K application and representation in soils or fertilizer formulations) [39].
In S-cation (K, Mg, etc.) interrelationships, the role of the S anion (SO42−) as a companion anion to these elements is reconsidered alongside the activation effects and roles of cations in general, compared to S and Mg roles in photosynthesis and proteosynthesis [46].
The effect of S + Mg is more pronounced and significant, even in relation to the N and K nutrients, in the form of fertilizing applications of these complexes in diversified assortments [13] (Table 11).
  • Promotion of S, Ca, Mg fertilization with various simple and complex assortments on various crops.
Complex and multi-element fertilizations are proven requirements for most genotypes. In the context of fertilizer application technologies, they are becoming alternative applications and aid in the development of sustainable agricultural systems. They exploit the multiple-factor interactions and elements involved, prevent negative nutrient conditions, and ensure the stability and even development of current and multi-annual soil productivity and fertility [47] (Table 12).
These complex fertilizations can be part of sustainable fertilization systems with economic effects in the soil-plant system that ensure the balance and protection of consumer nutrition, fertility stability, and productivity. These systems are proving directly useful and current, in the context where all platforms of long-term experiments have proven the necessity for real management of fertilizer use and supported medium- and long-term modeling of basic soil indicators—of chemical, nutrition, physical, and biological ones.
The long-term application of fertilizers in stationary systems leads to essential, dynamic changes in the determinants of fertility. In the determinations presented in the current paper, the major changes affect the long-term state of soil reaction through a differentiated supply of ions involved in nutrition. These changes also lead to other modifications in substance reserves in the organic soil component and create a differentiated regime in the soil supply for the main fertilizing elements resulting from the applied fertilizer varieties. This leads to positive and negative realignments and patterns in the soil-plant system, which are constantly subject to the dynamics caused by technological anthropic pressures.

4. Conclusions

In this context, it was shown that the application of fertilizing resources containing S, Ca, and Mg can represent prevention and modeling measures for some essential fertility indicators and thus contribute to nutrition management.
The experimental data presented herein reveal that sulfur application becomes topical as its organic form is reduced (concomitant with organic C and humus in the soil) if fertilization is performed within NP or NPK systems, as essential nutrient ratios favor nitrogen. In this context of N/S ratio modeling, the valorization of the particular and complementary effect of nitrogen leads to control and support for sulfur application. As an accompanying anion (SO42−), it contributes to the modeling and effect of essential cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+).
It has also been shown that calcium (an essential cation in the soil and in the plant) requires control and modeling, both in principle and in practice, upon amendment and reamendment of acidic soils, where the application of dolomitic limestone (CaCO3-MgCO3) supports the Ca/Mg ratio and prevents interference with representative ions.
Magnesium application and modeling, through complex combinations, favor essential cation interaction (Ca, Mg, K), while such fertilizer systems as NPK + S + Mg also favor this model of complex fertilization (a distinct measure compared to Mg interventions in the melioration of acidic soils).
Therefore, the interaction observed in this study between S, Ca, and Mg and the primary chemical elements employed in agriculture (NPK), relevant for multi-annual stationary fertilization, is practical and efficient in such contexts as the application of sustainable fertilizing technologies. From this point of view, further research is recommended in fertility monitoring with amelioratory and protective measures on a sustainable basis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and C.T.; data curation, C.T. and L.M.; formal analysis, M.M., V.C.M., A.O.C., N.T., F.R., M.R. and C.T.; funding acquisition, C.T. and L.M.; investigation, M.R., N.T., F.R. and C.T.; methodology, M.R., C.T., N.T., F.R. and A.O.C.; software, C.T., M.M. and V.C.M.; writing—original draft, M.R., C.T., N.T., F.R., M.M., V.C.M., A.O.C. and L.M.; writing—review and editing, M.R., C.T., N.T., F.R., M.M., V.C.M., A.O.C. and L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in the article are available from corresponding authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bergmann, W. Nutritional Disorders of Plants: Developments, Visual and Analytical Diagnosis; Gustav Fischer Verlang Jena: New York, NY, USA, 1992; Available online: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=815768 (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  2. Marschner, H. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Marschner, P., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2012; Available online: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?&journal=Marschner%E2%80%99s+Mineral+Nutrition+of+Higher+Plants&author=Marschner+H.+(2012).+Marschner%E2%80%99s+Mineral+Nutrition+of+Higher+Plants+3rd+Edn+ed.+Marschner+P.&publication_year=2012 (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  3. Davidescu, D.; Davidescu, V. Agrochimia Horticolă; Academiei Române: București, Romania, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rusu, M.; Marghitas, M.; Mihaiescu, T.; Oroian, I.; Dumitras, A. Tratat de Agrochimie; Ceres: Bucureşti, Romania, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rusu, M. Compendiu Agrochimic; Academic Press: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. Krishna, K.R. Secondary nutrients in soil and their influence on crop productivity. In Soil Fertility and Crop Production; Science Publishers, Inc.: Enfield, NH, USA, 2002; pp. 155–168. [Google Scholar]
  7. Black, C.A. Soil Fertility Evaluation and Control; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dalal, C.R. Plant nutrient availability-intensity, quantity and buffer power. In Encyclopedia of Soil Science; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 996–999. [Google Scholar]
  9. Correndo, A.A.; Rubio, G.; García, F.O.; Ciampitti, I.A. Subsoil–potassium depletion accounts for the nutrient budget in high–potassium agricultural soils. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rusu, M.; Munteanu, V. The Effect of Applying Some Microelements (B+Mo+Zn) to Wheat, Corn and Soybeans; Bul. USAMV; Academic Press: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 1994; 48/2; pp. 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bindraban, P.S.; Dimkpa, C.; Nagarajan, L.; Roy, A.; Rabbinge, R. Revisiting fertilisers and fertilisation strategies for improved nutrient uptake by plants. Biol. Fertil Soils 2015, 51, 897–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cole, J.C.; Smith, M.W.; Penn, C.J.; Cheary, B.S.; Conaghan, K.J. Nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium applied individually or as a slow release or controlled release fertilizer increase growth and yield and affect macronutrient and micronutrient concentration and content of field-grown tomato plants. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 211, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lošák, T.; Válka, T.; Elbl, J.; Kintl, A.; Keutgen, A.; Keutgen, N.; Demková, L.; Árvay, J.; Varga, L.; Hnátková, H.; et al. Fertilization with Magnesium- and Sulfur-Supplemented Digestate Increases the Yield and Quality of Kohlrabi. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mahal, N.K.; Sawyer, J.E.; Iqbal, J.; Sassman, A.M.; Mathur, R.; Castellano, M.J. Role of Sulfur Mineralization and Fertilizer Source in Corn and Soybean Production Systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2022, 86, 1058–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Le Cadre, E.; de Oliveira, A.B.; Arkoun, M.; Yvin, J.C.; Hinsinger, P. Nitrogen fertilization of intercropped cereal-legume: A potassium, sulfur, magnesium and calcium plant acquisition dataset. Data Br. 2022, 40, 107816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sweeney, D.W.; Ruiz–Diaz, D.A. Utilizing soil phosphorus and potassium reserves for soybean production on a claypan soil. Agron. J. 2020, 112, 4386–4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Franklin, R.; Moore, K. Nutrient Management for South Carolina Based on Soil Test Results; EC 476; Clemson University: Clemson, SC, USA, 2001; Available online: https://www.clemson.edu/extension/camm/manuals/publications/nutrient_management_for_south_carolina_ec476e.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  18. Moreira, A.; Moraes LA, C.; Moretti, L.G.; Aquino, G.S. Phosphorus, potassium and sulfur interactions in soybean plants on atypic hapludox. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2018, 49, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kaiser, D.E.; Kim, K.I. Soybean response to sulfur fertilizer applied as a broadcast or starter using replicated strip trials. Agron. J. 2013, 105, 1189–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Putman, J.L.; Ketterings, Q.; Cherney, J.H.; Overton, T.R. Impact of sulfur application on soybean yield and quality in New York. Agron. J. 2021, 113, 2858–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rusu, M.; Mihai, M.; Mihai, V.C.; Moldovan, L.; Ceclan, O.A.; Toader, C. Areas of agrochemical deepening resulting from long-term experiments with fertilizers—Synthesis following 20 years of annual and stationary fertilization. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kurtinecz, P.; Bânățeanu, C.; Ursan, P. Assessing the Environmental Impact of Fertilization and Long-Term Amendment; ADER project 1.5.3; ARDS: Livada, Romania, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kurtinecz, P.; Rusu, M. Certain possibilities for the internation of analytical results from long-term experiments regarding the fertilization and liming of acid soils North-Western Transylvania. In Proceedings of the First International Conference Metagro, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 14–16 June 2007. [Google Scholar]
  24. Christensen, B.T.; Thomsen, I.K.; Eriksen, J. The Askov long-term field experiment (1894–2021) represents a unique research platform. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2022, 185, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hera, C. Fertilizers and Sustainable agriculture. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of International Scientific Centre of Fertilizers (CIEC), Pretoria, South Africa, 27–30 September 2008; “Terra Nostra” Publishing House: Iaşi, Romania, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  26. Krishna, K.R. Agroecosystems: Soils, Climate, Crops, Nutrient Dynamics and Productivity.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gransee, A.; Führs, H. Magnesium mobility in soils as a challenge for soil and plant analysis, magnesium fertilization and rootuptake under adverse growth conditions. Plant Soil 2013, 368, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brodowska, M.S.; Kaczor, A. The effect of various forms of sulphur and nitrogen on calcium and magnesium content and uptakein spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). J. Elem. 2009, 14, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Debreczeni, K.; Körschens, M. Long term field experiments of the word. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2003, 49, 465–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miles, R.J.; Brown, J.R. The Sanborn field experiment: Implications for long-term soil organic carbon levels. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Johnston, A.E.; Poulton, P.R. Phosphorus in agriculture: A review of results from 175 years of research at Rothamsted, UK. J. Environ. Qual. 2019, 48, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Methodology for Agrochemical Analysis of Soils in Order to Determine the Need for Amendments and Fertilizers; Partea I; MAIA; ASAS; ICPA: Bucuresti, Romania, 1981; Volume I.
  33. SR 7184-13:2001; Soils—Determination of pH in Aqueous and Saline Suspensions (Mass/Volume) and in Saturated Paste. ICPA: București, Romania, 2001.
  34. Schollenberger, C.J.; Dreibelbis, F.R. Analytical methods in base exchange investigations on soils. Soil Sci. 1930, 30, 161. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Schollenberger,+C.+J.+and+Dreibelbis,+F.+R.,+1930.+Soil+Sci.,+30,+161 (accessed on 10 January 2024). [CrossRef]
  35. Egnér, H.; Riehm, H.; Domingo, W.R. Untersuchungen Über Die Chemische Bodenanalyse Als Grundlage Für Die Beurteilung Des Nährstoffzustandes Der Böden. II. Chemische Extraktionsmethoden zur Phosphor-und Kaliumbestimmung. K. Lantbrukshögskolans Ann. 1960, 26, 199–215. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nafziger, E.D.; Dunker, R.E. Soil Organic Carbon Trends Over 100 Years in the Morrow Plots. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, J.; Hopmans, J.W.; van Kessel, C.; King, A.P.; Evatt, K.J.; Louie, D.; Rolston, D.E.; Six, J. Tillage and seasonal emissions of CO2, N2O and NO across a seed bed and at the field scale in a Mediterranean climate. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Erhunmwunse, A.S.; Farmaha, B.S. Soybean response to potassium, magnesium, and sulfur fertilization on Southeastern Coastal Plain soils. Agrosystems Geosci. Environ. 2023, 6, e20333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fryer, M.S.; Slaton, N.A.; Roberts, T.L.; Ross, W.J. Validation of soil-test-based phosphorus and potassium fertilizer recommendations for irrigated soybean. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2019, 83, 825–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mitchell, C.C.; Huluka, G. Potassium dynamics in US coastalplain soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2016, 47, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Slaton, N.A.; Golden, B.R.; Delong, R.E.; Mozaffari, M. Correlation and calibration of soil potassium availability with soy-bean yield and trifoliolate potassium. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 74, 1642–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jungers, J.M.; Kaiser, D.E.; Lamb, J.F.; Lamb, J.A.; Noland, R.L.; Samac, D.A.; Wells, M.S.; Sheaffer, C.C. Potassium fertilization affects alfalfa forage yield, nutritive value, root traits, and persistence. Agron. J. 2019, 111, 2843–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pan, G.; Smith, P.; Pan, W. The Role of Soil Organic Matter in Maintaining the Productivity and Yield Stability of Cereals in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Römheld, V.; Kirkby, E.A. Research on Potassium in Agriculture: Needs and Prospects. Plant Soil 2010, 335, 155–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Klikocka, H.; Marks, M.; Barczak, B.; Szostak, B.; Podleśna, A.; Podleśny, J. Response of spring wheat to NPK and S fertilization. The content and uptake of macronutrients and the value of ionic ratios. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Potarzycki, J.; Grzebisz, W.; Szczepaniak, W. Magnesium Fertilization Increases Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plants 2022, 11, 2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Muneer, M.A.; Jin, D.; Zhang, H.; Cai, Y.; Ma, C.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Huang, C.; et al. Characterization of Different Magnesium Fertilizers and Their Effect on Yield and Quality of Soybean and Pomelo. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Optimum average contents of nutrients in soil (limits of interpretation) (taken from various authors, [5]).
Table 1. Optimum average contents of nutrients in soil (limits of interpretation) (taken from various authors, [5]).
ItemIndicatorSupply
InsufficientOptimalExcess
Sulfur
S, SO42−
IAS *<910–19>19
S-SO4, ppm (Method 1, 2)<55.1–10>10
Loss S:<1010.1–50>50
IAS<5
S-SO4, ppm<3
Calcium
Ca2+
Exchangeable calcium from % (TY *)<3535–70>70
Soluble calcium, ppm<100100–150>500
Deficiency Ca:
Ca, % of T<20–30
Soluble Ca, ppm<50–70
Magnesium Mg2+Exchangeable Mg, % of T<22–8>8
Soluble Mg, ppm<6060–500>500
Water-soluble Mg, ppm<33–6>6
Mg deficiency:
Mg, % of T<6
ICMg = Exchangeable Mg/Ksch.FR ***0.30.30–0.60 >0.60
*** T—cation exchange capacity (CEC); * IAS—sulfur supply index; IAS = (%humus × %S) × 100.
Table 2. Specific intakes (Cs = kg/t) of fertilizer elements in some crops [5] (genotypes grown in Romania).
Table 2. Specific intakes (Cs = kg/t) of fertilizer elements in some crops [5] (genotypes grown in Romania).
Crop Fertilizing Elements
Cs/kg/t
NP2O5K2OCaOMgOSoluble S
Wheat-autumn 291629842
Grain maize2818301243
Rapeseed554050502525
Sunflower503060352012
Soya 75 *3040251512
Sugar beet648432
Potatoes749433
* Sixty to seventy percent by symbiotic fixation.
Table 3. Changes in Ca and Mg content of soils and plants under the influence of lime amendment. Crop: maize; soil: albic luvisol.
Table 3. Changes in Ca and Mg content of soils and plants under the influence of lime amendment. Crop: maize; soil: albic luvisol.
Liming Level AhSoil AnalysisPlant AnalysisCa/Mg Ratio
pHH2OExchangeable Ca
n.e.
Exchangeable
Mg
m.e.
Ca% Stems and LeavesMg %
Stems + Leaves RootsRatio 1/2
0 Ah CaCO34.181.20.900.280.270.211.3y = 0.28 − 0.16x
r = −0.800
(Gl-16)
0.5 Ah CaCO35.504.80.630.520.182.962.9
1.0 Ah CaCO36.367.90.530.690.171.764.9
2.0 Ah CaCO37.2111.90.301.600.120.7113.3
1.0 Ah CaCO3·MgCO36.585.81.090.580.381.341.5-
Table 4. Magnesium and potassium chemistry in amended albic luvisol; crop: maize; soil: albic luvisol.
Table 4. Magnesium and potassium chemistry in amended albic luvisol; crop: maize; soil: albic luvisol.
Ah Amendment LevelMg-ppmReport 1/2K-ppm4/5
Ratio
in HCl-0.05 Nin Ac-NH4UnexchangeableExchangeable
CaCO312345
0 Ah CaCO33361083.1614837.4
0.5 Ah CaCO3300763.96373011.3
1.0 Ah CaCO3288644.5657669.9
2.0 Ah CaCO3252367.0734977.6
1.0 Ah CaCO3·MgCO34281442.95821244.2
Table 5. Effect of NP, NPK + S complex fertilization on sunflower; soil: alluvial mollisol; long-term stationary; OSPA Alba (20 years).
Table 5. Effect of NP, NPK + S complex fertilization on sunflower; soil: alluvial mollisol; long-term stationary; OSPA Alba (20 years).
Total Fertilization
kg Active Ingredient/ha
Basic Fertilization
kg Commercial Substance/ha
Active Ingredient/ha
Phase Fertilization
kg Commercial Substance/ha
Active Ingredient/ha
Production
kg/ha
Average Production
(Grain) kg/ha
Sigificance of Difference
N140P80K0400/20-20-0
80-80-0
180/AN; 60 N
130/h; 60 N
220/CAN; 60 N
45404547ns
4520
4580
N140P80K80 + 70S533/15-15-15-12.8S
80-80-80 + 70S
180/AN; 60 N
130/h; 60 N
220/CAN; 60 N
46204603**
4530
4660
N140P100K100 + 70S533/15-15-15-12.8S
80-80-80 + 70S
260/23-9-9 + 0.5CaO + 0.5MgO + 0.05Zn + 0.05B
60-23-23-Mg + Ca + Zn + B
48204820**
N140P80K80 + 70S533/15-15-15-12.8S
80-80-80 + 70S
220/CAN; 60 N + Ca + Mg47004700**
Legend: ns—no significant differences; ** distinct significant differences.
Table 6. Dynamic changes in humus—organic C content in typical preluvisol under wheat cultivation.
Table 6. Dynamic changes in humus—organic C content in typical preluvisol under wheat cultivation.
UnamendedAmended
Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %
P0N02.30P80N02.18P0N02.40P80N02.27
P0N402.23P80N402.30P0N402.29P80N402.24
P0N802.27P80N802.34P0N802.34P80N802.31
P0N1202.32P80N1202.28P0N1202.31P80N1202.16
P0N1602.34P80N1602.34P0N1602.37P80N1602.29
Media2.29-2.62-2.34-2.25
Table 7. Dynamic changes in humus—organic C content in typical preluvisol under maize cultivation.
Table 7. Dynamic changes in humus—organic C content in typical preluvisol under maize cultivation.
UnamendedAmended
Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %
P0N02.10P80N02.15P0N02.14P80N02.26
P0N502.10P80N501.75P0N502.15P80N502.06
P0N1001.89P80N1002.18P0N1002.11P80N1002.07
P0N1502.00P80N1502.03P0N1502.00P80N1502.08
P0N2002.13P80N2001.86P0N2001.98P80N2001.88
Media2.04-1.99-2.07-1.88
Table 8. Dynamic changes in humus—organic C content in alluvial mollisol cultivated with wheat and maize.
Table 8. Dynamic changes in humus—organic C content in alluvial mollisol cultivated with wheat and maize.
Alluvial Mollisol—WheatAlluvial Mollisol—Maize
Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %Fertilization VariantHumus %
P0N02.64P80N02.70P0N02.45P80N02.64
P0N402.65P80N402.76P0N502.70P80N502.65
P0N802.68P80N802.90P0N1002.71P80N1002.75
P0N1202.72P80N1202.91P0N1502.65P80N1502.66
P0N1602.65P80N1602.70P0N2002.60P80N2002.57
Media2.67-2.79-2.62-2.65
Table 9. Evolution of S forms in different soils, fertilized multi-annually (20 years).
Table 9. Evolution of S forms in different soils, fertilized multi-annually (20 years).
Crop/Soil/AmendmentFertilization VariantHumus %Organic C %Total S %IAS *S-SO4 ppm
No amendment wheat/typical preluvisolP0N0–1602.291.330.0204.54/<5
P80N0–1602.281.320.0214.84/<5
Amendment
wheat/typical preluvisol
P0N0–1602.341.350.0213.74/<5
P80N0–1602.251.310.0203.63/<5
No amendment maize/typical preluvisolP0N0–1602.041.180.0183.33/<5
P80N0–1601.991.150.0172.13/<5
Amendment
maize/typical preluvisol
P0N0–1602.071.200.0193.33/<5
P80N0–1601.881.090.0173.03/<5
wheat/preluvisol alluvial mollisolP0N0–1602.671.550.0277.25/7–10
P80N0–1602.791.620.0298.15/7–10
maize/preluvisol alluvial mollisolP0N0–1602.621.520.0277.14/6–7
P80N0–1602.671.550.0277.24/6–7
* S supply index (IAS) = (%Humus × %S) × 100.
Table 10. Humus (%) and sulfur (IAS) content with long-term application of NP fertilization (1966–2020); soil: silty clay loam—vertic.
Table 10. Humus (%) and sulfur (IAS) content with long-term application of NP fertilization (1966–2020); soil: silty clay loam—vertic.
Indicator TrackedNP FertilizationYears/% Humus—% of OriginalDifference from the Original
19681984199519992020
HumusN0P03.783.901033.21843.18843.1282−0.66%
N120P03.723.50943.37913.26883.2186−0.51%
N120P1203.683.831043.47943.31883.1986−0.49%
IASN0P013.113.7 11.2 11.1 10.9 −2.20
N120P12012.913.4 12.1 11.5 11.1 −1.18
Table 11. Effect of MgSO4 application on wheat, maize, and soybean yield (60 kg S-SO4/ha); soil: alluvial mollisol.
Table 11. Effect of MgSO4 application on wheat, maize, and soybean yield (60 kg S-SO4/ha); soil: alluvial mollisol.
Fertilization Variant *Prod. kg/haDiff. kg/haSignificance of the DifferenceProd. kg/haDiff. kg/haSignificance of the DifferenceProd. kg/haDiff. kg/haSignificance of the Difference
WheatMaizeSoya
Control C13056--6591--2253--
NPK-DOE C246991643
-
***81721581
-
***2454201
-
***
NPK-DOE + Mg + S48771821
178
***88832292
751
***2853600
399
***
NPK-DOT 47651709
66
***86942103
522
***2894641
440
***
NPK-DOT + Mg + S48851799
186
***89042313
732
***2979726
525
***
F.O.-1/3-DOE + NPK ind. DOE46641608
−35
***79131322−259
**2627374
173
**
F.O.-1/3-DOE + NPK ind. DOE + Mg + S48611805
162
***82101619
38
***2906653
152
***
F.O.-1/3-DOT + NPK ind. DOT48541798
155
***87742183
602
***3106853
471
***
F.O.-1/3-DOT + NPK ind. DOT + Mg + S49541898
255
***89142323
712
***3246993
792
***
DL C1476 (5%)
641 (1%)
849 (0.1%)
DL C1787 (5%)
1058 (1%)
1401 (0.1%)
DL C1238 (5%)
319 (1%)
423 (0.1%)
Legend: -, no difference; * significant differences; ** distinct significant differences; *** very significant differences. DOE—best economic dose; DOT—best technical dose; F.O.-1/3 of DOE and DOT.
Table 12. Efficient promotion of NPK+ fertilizer varieties (with S and Kiserit) in rapeseed. Soil-chernosem; pH—6.9–7.1; average lot yield = kg/ha.
Table 12. Efficient promotion of NPK+ fertilizer varieties (with S and Kiserit) in rapeseed. Soil-chernosem; pH—6.9–7.1; average lot yield = kg/ha.
Total Fertilization kg a.s./haAutumn Commercial Substance/haSpring Commercial Substance/haYield kg/haDiff. kg/haSignificance of Difference
Control
N120P80K80
300/16-16-16 (MOP)
60-60-60
60-0-0 AN3680-
N120P80K80 + 50 S (K2SO4)400/NPK 15-15-15 +SO4
60-60-60
60-0-0 AN4275495ns
60-0-0 Urea4212532*
60-0-0 CAN4166486-
N120P80K80 + 30S + 17MgO428/NPK+ (14-14-14 + 7S + 4MgO) (from kiserit)
60-60-60
60-0-0 AN4348668**
60-0-0 Urea4366686**
60-0-0 CAN4280600*
N120P80K80 + 30S + 17MgO + CaO + MgO + B + Zn428/NPK+ (14-14-14 + 7S + 4MgO) (from kiserit)
60-60-60
60-23-23 + 0.5CaO + 0.5MgO + 0.05B + 0.05Zn
23-9-9 + CaO+ MgO + B + Zn
4489809***
Legend: -, no difference; ns—no significant differences; * significant differences; ** distinct significant differences; *** very significant differences.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rusu, M.; Mihai, M.; Tritean, N.; Mihai, V.C.; Moldovan, L.; Ceclan, A.O.; Russu, F.; Toader, C. Protection and Modeling in the Use of S, Ca, and Mg Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainable Fertilization Systems. Agronomy 2024, 14, 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030515

AMA Style

Rusu M, Mihai M, Tritean N, Mihai VC, Moldovan L, Ceclan AO, Russu F, Toader C. Protection and Modeling in the Use of S, Ca, and Mg Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainable Fertilization Systems. Agronomy. 2024; 14(3):515. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rusu, Mihai, Mihaela Mihai, Nicolae Tritean, Valentin C. Mihai, Lavinia Moldovan, Adrian Ovidiu Ceclan, Florin Russu, and Constantin Toader. 2024. "Protection and Modeling in the Use of S, Ca, and Mg Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainable Fertilization Systems" Agronomy 14, no. 3: 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop