Next Article in Journal
Impact of Tea Tree Cultivation on Soil Microbiota, Soil Organic Matter, and Nitrogen Cycling in Mountainous Plantations
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Candidate Genes for English Grain Aphid Resistance from QTLs Using a RIL Population in Wheat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on the Growth Dynamics of Tartary Buckwheat Flowers and Grains, as Well as Material Basis and Physiological Changes of Their Seed-Setting Differences
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Use of Magnesium Fertilizer Can Improve the Nutrient Uptake, Yield, and Quality of Rice in Liaoning Province

National Engineering Research Center for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(3), 639; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030639
Submission received: 18 February 2024 / Revised: 16 March 2024 / Accepted: 19 March 2024 / Published: 21 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiological and Growth Response of Crops)

Abstract

:
In this study, the effects of the soil application and foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizers on rice yield and quality in Liaoning Province were investigated. Field experiments were conducted at Kaiyuan, Xinmin, and Dawa in 2022 and 2023. Magnesium fertilizers were used in the soil as magnesium sulfate monohydrate and silicon–magnesium fertilizer and on leaves was magnesium sulfate heptahydrate. The results showed that the application of 12 kg magnesium hm−2 in the soil at the Kaiyuan site can significantly increase rice yield by 14.8% compared with sites without magnesium fertilizer. The use of silicon–magnesium fertilizer showed a more obvious yield increase of 22.2%. The application of 3 kg magnesium hm−2 or 6 kg magnesium hm−2 on the leaf surface increased the rice yield at Kaiyuan by 19.4% and 21.6% and at Xinmin by 17.8% and 5.4%, respectively. The yield increase was more significant under the optimal fertilization treatment compared with the conventional fertilization treatment. The application of magnesium fertilizer increased the magnesium, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents in rice shoots and the potassium and crude protein contents in rice grains. The effect of foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizers was more obvious than soil application. Therefore, the magnesium fertilizer used on the leaf surface plays an important role in improving rice yield and quality in rice-growing areas with relatively rich soil magnesium content. Magnesium fertilizer can compensate for the yield decrease caused by the reduced use of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers by promoting nitrogen and phosphorus absorption in rice. Conclusively, the application of magnesium fertilizer is a promising measure to improve rice production in Liaoning province under a reduced nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer background.

1. Introduction

Magnesium (Mg) is an essential nutrient for plant growth and plays diverse physiological functions in plant systems [1,2], mainly involved in chlorophyll synthesis, photosynthesis, and enzyme activation [3]. Magnesium deficiency can inhibit chlorophyll metabolism and plant photosynthesis, resulting in leaf chlorosis, stunted growth, and ultimately, a decline in crop yield and quality [4,5,6,7,8]. When the human body does not gain sufficient magnesium, various diseases, including high blood pressure, migraines, and other cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases can be induced [9]. In agriculture, with the increase in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers used in soil, the crops take more and more magnesium out of the soil. In addition, the reduction in organic fertilizer use, coupled with a long-term lack of mineral magnesium fertilizer supplements results in increasingly serious magnesium deficiency in soil [10]. Magnesium deficiency most commonly occurs in regions where soils are highly weathered and acidic [11] and where intensive cropping systems are experienced [12]. According to the National Magnesium Nutrition Research Survey, 45.3% of soils in China are severely deficient in magnesium (60 mg kg−1) and 18.3% are relatively deficient in magnesium (60–120 mg kg−1) [13]. There is an obvious spatially declining trend in soil exchangeable magnesium (Mgex) from 227 to 488 mg kg−1 in Northeast China toward 32–89 mg kg−1 soil in South China [14]. Magnesium deficiency can be primarily traced back to a higher depletion of soil Mgex by fruits, vegetables, sugarcane, tubers, tea, and tobacco in tropical and subtropical climate zones.
At present, magnesium deficiency in crops is a widespread and urgent problem all over the world, and using magnesium fertilizers can significantly improve the productivity and quality of crops. Previous researchers reported that magnesium fertilizer increased the yield and quality of sugarbeet [15], oregano [16], potato [17,18], tomato [19,20], soybean and pomelo [21,22,23], rapeseed crops [24], and hazelnuts [25]. The foliar application of magnesium promoted the synthesis of chlorophyll and an increase in the yield of tomatoes, especially in the years characterized by unfavorable weather conditions [17]. The magnesium application on foliar depressed the content of nitrates (V) in tubers, which considerably increased during potato storage [18]. Magnesium-fortified phosphate fertilizers improve nutrient uptake and growth in soybeans [23]. The application of appropriate magnesium fertilizer could increase the seed yield of rapeseed plants [24] and increase the yield of hazelnuts by 51% and total oil content by 4.8% [25]. At present, the positive effect of magnesium fertilizers has gradually developed from cash crops to field crops, and the research related to the impact of magnesium fertilizer on rice is becoming more and more important [26].
Rice is one of the main food crops in the world, and it has an imperious demand for magnesium [27,28]. Soil Mgex for rice healthy growth is 243 mg kg−1 [29]. The application of mineral magnesium fertilizer could increase the chlorophyll contents in the leaves of rice [30], increase the number of effective tillers, and increase the yield of rice by 40.7% [31]. In red soil paddy fields in southern China, the average rice yield increased by 5–18% after using magnesium fertilizers [13]. Recent researchers reported that magnesium fertilizers improved the uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus [32,33], as well as enhanced the dry matter production and its translocation in rice [34]. In the southern regions of China, it has also been reported that magnesium concentrations in rice have undergone a clear decline over the past 60 years. This is most probably due to the dilution of magnesium associated with significant increases in grain yields as well as imbalanced mineral fertilization without considering crop demand for magnesium [35]. The effect of magnesium fertilizer on crop yield was related to the amount of magnesium used in soil and the sensitivity of different crops to magnesium. It was reported that the most suitable magnesium application amount was 24.2–25.3 kg hm−2 according to benefit and yield analysis, and 120 kg hm−2 magnesium could best improve the eating quality of rice [36]. The research and development of magnesium fertilizer application technology is currently in its infancy, and it still needs to be continuously developed and further explored.
At present, the research on magnesium nutrition and magnesium fertilizer application is mostly concentrated in Sichuan, Fujian, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, and other southern provinces in China [37]. However, there are few studies involving the effect of magnesium fertilizer application on rice yield and quality in northern China. Liaoning province lies in the northeast part of China and is an important rice growth region. However, the effect of magnesium fertilizer application on improving rice yield and quality in Liaoning province remains unclear, especially where soil magnesium content is relatively abundant in the region. In this study, we carried out two magnesium fertilizer experiments at four experimental sites in Liaoning province. Different amounts of magnesium fertilizers were used in paddy soil or on rice leaves to obtain reasonable local magnesium fertilizer dosage and methods. The results are expected to provide a theoretical basis for the scientific application of magnesium fertilizer in the rice growth region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experiment Sites

The experiments were carried out at Xinmin, Shenyang (40°99′71.63″ N, 122°68′58.18″ E), Kaiyuan, Tieling (123°54′10.4″ E, 42°33′03.9″ N experiment 1; 123°54′10.8″ E, 42°33′02.7″ N experiment 2), and Dawa, Panjin (122°3′28.7″ E, 41°0′37.9″ N) in Liaoning province in 2022. The four sites were chosen because of the different geographical locations, climatic conditions, soil types, and initial soil exchangeable magnesium contents. The soil physicochemical properties are shown in Table 1. pH was determined using a pH meter after water extraction (2.5:1 = water:soil), alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen was determined by the alkali-diffusion method, available phosphorus was determined using the sodium bicarbonate extraction–molybdenum blue colorimetric method (UV–visible Spectrophotometer 752N, Shanghai, China), available potassium was determined using ammonium acetate extraction–flame spectrophotometry (Flamephotometer6400A, Shenzhen, China), and exchangeable magnesium was determined using NH4OAc extraction-atomic absorption photometry (AAS-4530F, Shanghai, China).

2.2. Experiment Design and Treatments

Experiment 1: The experiment was arranged at the Kaiyuan and Dawa sites. The rice varieties were ‘Meifeng 669′ and ‘Yanfeng 47′, respectively. The experiment used a randomized block design. Each treatment was repeated three times. Each plot had a 300 m2 area, which was surrounded by a higher ridge and was fertilized and irrigated separately. At harvest, a 1 m × 1 m area was selected at the center of the 300 m2 plot, and all rice in the 1 m2 area was collected for yield estimation and sample analysis. Chemical protection against diseases was used three times at the pre-transplanting stage, tillering stage, and jointing stage. The six treatments were conventional fertilization treatment (CON), optimized fertilization treatment (OPT), optimized fertilization treatment +6 kg magnesium hm−2 applied to the soil (OPT + Mg6S), optimized fertilization treatment + 12 kg magnesium hm−2 applied to the soil (OPT + Mg12S), optimized fertilization treatment + 3 kg magnesium hm−2 applied as a foliar spray (OPT + Mg3F), and optimized fertilization treatment + 12 kg magnesium hm−2 + 8.7 kg Si hm−2 applied to the soil (OPT + Mg12S-Si). The magnesium fertilizers were MgSO4·7H2O (Mg ≥ 9.7%) applied as foliar spraying, MgSO4·H2O (Mg ≥ 13.4%), and magnesium–silicon fertilizer (Mg ≥ 9%, Si ≥ 6%) applied to the soil. The amount of fertilizers in each treatment is shown in Table 2. The CON treatment was designed according to the conventional operation of farmers, and the OPT treatment was recommended according to the Nutrient Recommendation System (NE) [38] based on the soil nutrient status of the experiment sites and the amount of fertilizers applied in the previous year. The phosphate and potassium fertilizers in the CON treatment were all applied as base fertilizers, and nitrogen fertilizer (urea) was applied at two rice growth stages (67% as basal fertilizer + 33% as tilling fertilizer). The phosphate fertilizer (calcium superphosphate) in the OPT treatments was used as basal fertilizer; potassium fertilizer (potassium chloride) was used as basal fertilizer (60%) on 20 April and grain fertilizer (40%) on 19 August; and nitrogen fertilizer was applied as basal fertilizer (40%) and tilling fertilizer (35%) on 22 June and grain fertilizer (25%) on 19 August. All magnesium fertilizers applied to the soil were used as basal fertilizers, while magnesium fertilizers as a foliar spray were sprayed twice on 22 June at the tillering stage (50%) and on 19 August at the seed tilling stage (50%), respectively, with a 4% aqueous solution of MgSO4·H2O. The amount of fertilizers in each treatment is shown in Table 2.
Experiment 2: The experiment was arranged at the Kaiyuan and Xinmin sites. The experimental rice varieties were ‘Jinliusi’ and ‘Beigeng16’, respectively. The six treatments were conventional fertilization treatment (CON), conventional fertilization treatment + 3 kg magnesium hm−2 applied as foliar spray (CON + Mg3F), conventional fertilization treatment + 6 kg magnesium hm−2 applied as foliar spray (CON + Mg6F), optimized fertilization treatment (OPT), optimized fertilization treatment + 3 kg magnesium hm−2 applied as foliar spray (OPT + Mg3F), and optimized fertilization treatment + 6 kg magnesium hm−2 applied as foliar spray (OPT + Mg6F). The amount of fertilization for each treatment is shown in Table 3. The nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers were used in the soil at the same rice growth stages as in experiment 1. Magnesium fertilizer was MgSO4·7H2O (Mg ≥ 9.7%) and was used on the leaves twice at the tillering stage (50%) and the seed tilling stage (50%), respectively, with a 4% aqueous solution of MgSO4·H2O.

2.3. Yield Estimation and Element Determination

At harvest, the yield of rice in each treatment was recorded. The shoot and grain samples were collected. After being dried to a constant weight at 60 °C, all the samples were ground and decomposed. The contents of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium in the shoots and grains of the different treatments were determined by the Kjeldahl method for nitrogen (Automatic Kieldahl apparatus JK9870A, Beijing, China), the vanadium molybdate yellow colorimetric method for phosphorus (UV–visible Spectrophotometer 752N, Shanghai China), the flame photometric method for potassium (Flamephotometer6400A, Shenzhen, China), and atomic absorption spectrophotometry for magnesium (AAS-4530F, Shanghai, China). Crude fat in the grain was extracted by the Soxhlet extraction method (Yasuowang CC-6683-08, Shandong, China). The crude protein in the grain was determined by the Kjeldahl method (Automatic Kieldahl apparatus JK9870A, Shanghai, China).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The diagrams were drawn by Microsoft Office Word2016, Microsoft software 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), and Origin 2021 software (OriginLab Inc., Northampton, MA, USA). All values in this study are the means of three independent replicates. The results from the statistical analysis are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Deviations from normality and homogeneity of variance of the data were tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistical method (p > 0.01). One-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) was employed to test the effect of magnesium fertilization on rice yield and quality. LSD at 5% probability was operated as a post hoc test to separate the means where the ANOVA indicated that significant differences were noted. Every analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 data analysis software (IBM Inc., Amok, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Rice Yield and 1000-Grain Weight

In experiment 1, at the Kaiyuan and Dawa sites, the yields of the optimized fertilization (OPT) and OPT + magnesium fertilizer treatments were significantly higher than the yield of the conventional fertilization (CON) treatment. At the Kaiyuan site, the yields of the OPT + Mg12S and OPT + Mg12S-Si treatments were higher than the yield of the OPT treatment. While at the Dawa site, the yield of OPT + Mg3F was higher than the yield of the OPT treatment. The results showed that the application of 20 kg hm−2 magnesium fertilizer at the Kaiyuan experimental site could significantly increase rice yield, and the effect of adding silicon was more obvious (Table 4).
At the Kaiyuan and Dawa sites, the 1000-grain weight of rice under the OPT and OPT + magnesium fertilizer treatments increased significantly compared to the CON treatment, but the 1000-grain weights among several OPT + magnesium fertilizer treatments showed no significant differences (Table 4).
In experiment 2, at the Kaiyuan and Xinmin sites, the yields and 1000-grain weights of the OPT treatments decreased compared with that of the CON treatments. However, the OPT + magnesium fertilizer treatments significantly increased the yields and 1000-grain weights and thus eliminated the yield and 1000-grain weight decline induced by the OPT treatment. The magnesium fertilizer had no such influence on the yield and 1000-grain weight based on the FP treatment (Table 5).

3.2. Contents of Crude Fat, Crude Protein, and Starch in Rice Grain

In experiment 1, at the Kaiyuan site, the contents of crude fat and crude protein in the grain decreased in the OPT + Mg12S-Si treatment compared with those in the CON, OPT, OPT + Mg6S, OPT + Mg12S, and OPT + Mg3F treatments. At the Dawa site, the content of crude fat in the grain decreased in the OPT, OPT + Mg6S, OPT + Mg12S, and OPT + Mg3F treatments, but it increased in the OPT + Mg12S-Si treatment compared with the CON treatment. The content of crude protein among all treatments showed no significant differences (Figure 1).
In experiment 2, at the Kaiyuan site, the content of crude protein in the grain significantly increased under the OPT + Mg3F and OPT + Mg6F treatments compared with the OPT treatment, while the content of crude protein in the grain under the CON + Mg3F and CON + Mg6F treatments showed a slight increase compared to that under the CON treatment. The results suggest that the foliar spray of magnesium fertilizer helped rice accumulate protein in the grain. The starch contents in the grain showed no significant differences among all six treatments. At the Xinmin site, the content of crude protein in the grain slightly increased under the foliar spray of magnesium fertilizer treatments, while the content of starch showed no differences among the six treatments (Figure 2).

3.3. Contents of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Magnesium in Rice Shoots

In experiment 1, the nitrogen content in the shoots of rice treated with OPT was significantly lower than that of the CON treatment at the Kaiyuan and Dawa sites, which may be due to the reduced nitrogen application in the OPT treatment. The nitrogen content in the shoots increased after using magnesium fertilizers, and the OPT + Mg6S treatment had the highest shoot nitrogen content at the two experiment sites (Figure 3). The phosphorus content in the shoots of rice treated with OPT was significantly higher than that of the CON treatment at the Kaiyuan site but was not at the Dawa site. The OPT + Mg12S treatment increased the phosphorus content in the shoots at the Kaiyuan site, while the OPT + Mg6S, OPT + Mg12S, and OPT + Mg3F treatments all increased the phosphorus content in the shoots at the Dawa site compared with the OPT treatment. At the two sites, the OPT + Mg12S-Si treatment decreased the phosphorus content in the shoots, which may be because the magnesium silicon fertilizer decreased the phosphorus availability in the soil (Figure 3). The potassium content in the shoots of rice treated with magnesium fertilizer significantly increased compared with the CON and OPT treatments at the Kaiyuan site, while at the Dawa site, only the OPT + Mg12S-Si treatment increased the potassium content in the shoots (Figure 3). The magnesium content in the shoots of rice treated with magnesium fertilizer did not increase; on the contrary, the OPT + Mg6S treatment at the Kaiyuan site and the OPT + Mg6S and OPT + Mg12S treatments at the Dawa site decreased the magnesium content of the shoots (Figure 3).
In experiment 2, the OPT treatment did not influence the nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, or magnesium contents in shoots compared to the CON treatment at the two experiment sites. At the Kaiyuan site, the foliar magnesium fertilizer slightly increased the nitrogen and phosphorus contents and significantly increased the magnesium content but did not change the potassium content in the rice shoots. At the Dawa site, foliar magnesium fertilizer increased the nitrogen, phosphorus, and magnesium contents and decreased the potassium contents in the rice shoots (Figure 4).

3.4. Contents of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Magnesium in Rice Grain

In experiment 1, at the Kaiyuan site, the nitrogen contents in the grains were significantly lower in the OPT and OPT + magnesium fertilizer treatments than in the CON treatment. Compared with the OPT treatment, the OPT + magnesium fertilizer treatments increased the nitrogen contents in the rice grains; specifically, the OPT + Mg6S and OPT + Mg3F treatments had a larger increase extent. At the Dawa site, the nitrogen contents in the grains showed no notable differences among all treatments. The phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in the rice grains at the two sites showed no consistent changes (Figure 5).
In experiment 2, at the Kaiyuan site, the OPT treatment decreased the nitrogen and phosphorus contents but did not affect the potassium and magnesium contents in the rice grains compared to the CON treatment. Foliar magnesium fertilizer use significantly increased the nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents in grains only based on the OPT treatment but not on the CON treatment. Foliar magnesium fertilizer use had no notable influence on the magnesium content in the rice grains at the Kaiyuan site. While, at the Dawa site, the OPT treatment increased the phosphorus and magnesium contents but did not affect the nitrogen and potassium contents in the rice grains compared to the CON treatment. Foliar magnesium fertilizer use increased the nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents in the grains based on both the OPT and CON treatments (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

The application of magnesium fertilizer can significantly affect the absorption and utilization of nutrient elements in plants [39,40,41]. Magnesium can promote the activation of many enzymes in nitrogen metabolism and promote the synthesis of nitrogen compounds [42]. The present experiment showed that the addition of a small amount of magnesium could promote the absorption of nitrogen by rice, while the high content of magnesium would inhibit the absorption of nitrogen by rice. Further, under optimized fertilization conditions, the content of nitrogen in the stems, leaves, and grains decreased, but after optimizing fertilization together with the application of magnesium fertilizer, the degree of decline decreased. In this research, the soil application of 6 kg hm−2 magnesium had the best effect on promoting nitrogen accumulation (Figure 4). Based on conventional fertilization and optimized fertilization, foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer can significantly increase the content of nitrogen in grains (Figure 6). Therefore, foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer can not only promote the absorption of nitrogen by rice but also promote the transport of nitrogen to grains. Magnesium can participate in various chemical reactions within plants, including oxidative phosphorylation, so the application of magnesium fertilizer will promote the absorption of phosphorus by crop plants. The phosphorus content in rice stems, leaves, and grains will change with the change in rice growth and the development cycle [23]. The study showed that after foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer for 10 days, the phosphorus content in rice stems, leaves, and panicles increased, and the effect was more significant after the rice matured. Many scholars investigated the interaction between potassium and magnesium in plants. For example, the study suggested that a higher concentration of potassium in the growth medium can inhibit the absorption of magnesium by plant roots, resulting in antagonism between the two elements [43]. But sometimes, a low potassium concentration can reversely promote the absorption of magnesium, showing a synergistic effect [44]. In the rice magnesium–potassium interaction experiment, the magnesium concentration in rice leaves and roots decreased significantly when the potassium concentration in the nutrient solution increased, and the higher the magnesium concentration in the nutrient solution, the more significant the effect of potassium on inhibiting magnesium uptake [45]. According to the results of this experiment, the effects of using magnesium fertilizer in the soil and foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer on the contents of phosphorus and potassium in rice stems, leaves, and grains were unstable and varied with different fertilization methods, fertilizer application rates, fertilizer types, and experimental sites. For example, in experiment 1, the magnesium fertilizer used in soil significantly increased the content of potassium in the rice stems and leaves but had no different effects on the content of potassium in grains. In experiment 2, foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer decreased the potassium content in the stems and leaves but increased the potassium content in the grains. The application of magnesium fertilizer in the soil had no significant effect on the content of magnesium in the rice stems and leaves, but foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer significantly increased the content of magnesium in the rice stems and leaves (Figure 4 and Figure 6).
Many studies have shown that the application of magnesium fertilizer can improve the yield and quality of many crops [12,46]. It has been suggested that the application of magnesium fertilizer has a positive effect on the number of tillers and yield of rice [47]. When magnesium in the soil is sufficient, the yield of rice can increase by 67.5–178.5 kg hm−2 under suitable magnesium fertilizer [26]. Magnesium fertilizer can increase the contents of starch, crude protein, and other substances in grains, thus improving the quality of rice [14]. In this experiment, the application of 20 kg hm−2 magnesium fertilizer at the Kaiyuan experimental site could significantly increase rice yield, and the effect of magnesium–silicon fertilizer was more obvious (Table 4). While at the Dawa experimental site, foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer could increase rice yield and also increase the content of crude fat in the rice grain (Figure 1). In recent years, many scholars used foliar spraying to study the effect of magnesium fertilizer on the yield and quality of crops. For example, foliar spraying a certain amount of magnesium fertilizer improved the yield and quality of grapes [48]. Spraying magnesium fertilizer on the leaves of tobacco not only achieved the best smoking state but also improved the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [49]. Foliar spraying proper magnesium fertilizer caused a significant increase in rice yield, but when magnesium fertilizer and nitrogen -phosphorus compound fertilizer were applied together, the rice yield did not increase and the seed setting rate decreased with the increase of the compound fertilizer [26]. In this experiment, based on conventional fertilization in two experimental sites, spraying magnesium fertilizer had no significant effect on rice yield or 1000-grain weight, but spraying magnesium fertilizer based on the optimized fertilizer application significantly increased rice yield and 1000-grain weight (Table 2). Due to the reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus application rates in optimized fertilization, foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer can compensate for the yield decline caused by the reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus. In addition, based on conventional fertilization and optimized fertilization, foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer could increase the protein content of rice grains, especially based on optimized fertilization. The effect of applying magnesium fertilizer to increase yield and improve quality may be related to the promotion of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other nutrients, the mechanism of which needs to be further studied.
In this research, experiment 1 and experiment 2 were carried out only during one growth season, although they were set at two sites, respectively. The mechanism of magnesium fertilizers to improve the yield and quality of rice remains unknown. These topics will be studied in future research. However, the present results of this research provided important evidence that magnesium fertilizers could increase the yield and quality of rice in relatively magnesium-rich soil in Liaoning province. In addition, magnesium fertilizer can, to some extent, compensate for the decrease in yield induced by a reduction in nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer use.

5. Conclusions

Using magnesium fertilizer in the soil and on leaves significantly increased the nitrogen content in the shoots and grains of rice, and the soil application of 6 kg hm−2 magnesium had the best effect on promoting nitrogen accumulation. Foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer can not only promote the absorption of nitrogen by rice but also promote the transport of nitrogen to grains. Based on conventional fertilization and optimized fertilization, foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer significantly increased the content of nitrogen in the grains and affected the content of nutrients in the shoots and grains. In the results of this experiment, the effects of magnesium fertilizer and foliar spraying with magnesium fertilizer on the contents of phosphorus and potassium in the rice shoots and grains were unstable and varied with different fertilization methods, fertilizer application rates, fertilizer types, and experimental sites. Using magnesium fertilizer in soil and on leaves could significantly improve the yield and quality of rice. The application of 12 kg hm−2 magnesium in the soil of Kaiyuan could significantly increase rice yield, and the effect of adding silicon was more obvious, while in the Dawa experimental site, foliar spraying with 6 kg hm−2 magnesium could increase rice yield. In the Kaiyuan and Xinmin experimental sites, foliar spraying with 3 and 6 kg hm−2 magnesium fertilizer based on optimized fertilization could significantly increase rice yield and 1000-grain weight. The application of magnesium fertilizer could also increase the content of crude fat and crude protein in rice grains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and Z.H.; methodology, Z.H. and Z.W.; software, Z.H. and Z.W.; validation, Z.H., Z.W. and J.H.; investigation, Z.H., Z.W., Y.W. and J.H.; data curation, Z.H., Z.W., Y.W. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.H. and Y.W.; writing—review and editing, H.L. and Z.H.; visualization, H.L. and Z.H.; supervision, H.L.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Rice Magnesium Special Fertilizer Product Design Project (201905410310305). This research was supported by the National Agricultural Green Development Research Institute, China Agricultural University.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yingkou Magnesite Chemical Ind group Co., Ltd., China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cakmak, I. Magnesium in crop production, food quality and human health. Plant Soil 2013, 368, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peng, W.T.; Zhang, L.D.; Zhou, Z.; Fu, C.; Chen, Z.C.; Liao, H. Magnesium promotes root nodulation through facilitation of carbohydrate allocation in soybean. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 163, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hansson, M.; Lundqvist, J.; Sirijovski, N.; Al-Karadaghi, S. Magnesium chelatase: The molecular motor of chlorophyll biosynthesis. In Handbook of Porphyrin Science; World Scientific: Singapore, 2013; Volume 28, pp. 41–84. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Z.C.; Peng, W.T.; Li, J.; Liao, H. Functional dissection and transport mechanism of magnesium in plants. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 74, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bybordi, A.; Shabanov, J.A. Effects of the foliar application of magnesium and zinc on the yield and quality of three grape cultivars grown in the calcareous soils of Iran. Not. Sci. Biol. 2010, 2, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, V.; Ladha, J.K. Chapter Six—Direct seeding of rice: Recent developments and future research needs. In Advances in Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; Volume 111, pp. 297–413. [Google Scholar]
  7. Verbruggen, N.; Hermans, C. Physiological and molecular responses to magnesium nutritional imbalance in plants. Plant Soil 2013, 368, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, G.-H.; Yang, L.-T.; Jiang, H.-X.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Chen, L.-S. Physiological impacts of magnesium-deficiency in Citrus seedlings: Photosynthesis, antioxidant system and carbohydrates. Trees 2012, 26, 1237–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rude, R.K. Magnesium deficiency: A cause of heterogeneous disease in humans. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1998, 13, 749–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wei, X.; Hao, M.; Shao, M.; Gale, W.J. Changes in soil properties and the availability of soil micronutrients after 18 years of cropping and fertilization. Soil Tillage Res. 2006, 91, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bai, Y.L.; Jin, J.Y.; Yang, L.P. Study on the content and distribution of soil available magnesium and foreground of magnesium fertilizer in China. Soils Fertil. 2004, 2, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Z.; Hassan, M.U.; Nadeem, F.; Wu, L.; Zhang, F.; Li, X. Magnesium fertilization improves crop yield in most production systems: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, C.J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, F.S. The effect of magnesium fertilizer on the quality of main crops and nutrient use efficiency in China. Chin. Soil Fertil. 2022, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ishfaq, M.; Wang, Y.; Yan, M.; Wang, Z.; Wu, L.; Li, C.; Li, X. Physiological essence of magnesium in plants and its widespread deficiency in the farming system of China. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 802274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hermans, C.; Johnson, G.N.; Strasser, R.J.; Verbruggen, N. Physiological characterization of magnesium deficiency in sugar beet: Acclimation to low magnesium differentially affects photosystems I and II. Planta 2004, 220, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dordas, C. Foliar application of calcium and magnesium improves growth, yield, and essential oil yield of oregano (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum). Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 29, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ciećko, Z.; Żołnowski, A.C.; Mierzejewska, A. Effect of foliar nitrogen and magnesium fertilization on the total, protein nitrogen and nitrates(V) content in potato tubers. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2010, 17, 593–600. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ciećko, Z.; Żołnowski, A.C.; Mierzejewska, A. Impact of foliar nitrogen and magnesium fertilization on concentration of chlorophyll in potato leaves. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2012, 19, 525–535. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jin, S.; Zhou, W.; Meng, L.; Chen, Q.; Li, J. Magnesium fertilizer application and soil warming increases tomato yield by increasing magnesium uptake under PE-Film covered greenhouse. Agronomy 2022, 12, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gemin, L.G.; de Lara, G.B.; Mógor, A.F.; Mazaro, S.M.; Sant’Anna-Santos, B.F.; Mógor, G.; Amatussi, J.D.O.; Cordeiro, E.C.N.; Marques, H.M.C. Polysaccharides combined to copper and magnesium improve tomato growth, yield, anti-oxidant and plant defense enzymes. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 310, 111758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grzebisz, W. Crop response to magnesium fertilization as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant Soil 2013, 368, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Muneer, M.A.; Jin, D.; Zhang, H.; Cai, Y.; Ma, C.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Huang, C.; et al. Characterization of different magnesium fertilizers and their effect on yield and quality of soybean and pomelo. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Degryse, F.; Huang, C.; Hou, C.; Wu, L.; Jiang, R.; McLaughlin, M.J.; Zhang, F. Magnesium-fortified phosphate fertilizers improve nutrient uptake and plant growth without reducing phosphorus availability. Pedosphere 2022, 32, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Geng, G.; Cakmak, I.; Ren, T.; Lu, Z.; Lu, J. Effect of magnesium fertilization on seed yield, seed quality, carbon assimilation and nutrient uptake of rapeseed plants. Field Crops Res. 2021, 264, 108082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Özenç, N.; Özenç, D.B. Effect of magnesium fertilization on some plant nutrient interactions and nut quality properties in Turkish hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). Sci. Res. Essays 2015, 10, 465–470. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Z.; Huang, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, P.; Naseer, M.R.; Che, Y.; Dai, Y.; Luo, X.; Liu, D.; Song, L.; et al. Magnesium fertilization affected rice yields in magnesium sufficient soil in Heilongjiang province, Northeast China. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 645806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, L.; Liao, H. Engineering crop nutrient efficiency for sustainable agriculture. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 710–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, W.; Ma, B. Integrated nutrient management (INM) for sustaining crop productivity and reducing environmental impact: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 512–513, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dobermann, A.; Fairhurst, T. Rice: Nutrient Disorders and Nutrient Management: Handbook Series; Potash and Phosphate Institute: Singapore; Phosphate Institute of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada; International Rice Research Institute: Los Banos, Philippines, 2000; p. 199. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kibria, M.G.; Barton, L.; Rengel, Z. Foliar application of magnesium mitigates soil acidity stress in wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2020, 207, 378–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sipahutar, I.A.; Siregar, A.F.; Anggria, L.; Husnain. Magnesium and silicon fertilizer application to promote rice growth and production. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 648, 012064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choudhury, A.; Yusop, M. Evaluation of effects of nitrogen and magnesium fertilization on rice yield and fertilizer nitrogen efficiency using 15N tracer technique. J. Plant Nutr. 2001, 24, 855–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Panhwar, Q.A.; Naher, U.A.; Shamshuddin, J.; Ismail, M.R. Effects of biochar and ground magnesium limestone application, with or without bio-fertilizer addition on biochemical properties of an acid sulfate soil and rice yield. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Deng, W.; Luo, K.; Li, D.; Zheng, X.; Wei, X.; Smith, W.; Thammina, C.; Lu, L.; Li, Y.; Pei, Y. Overexpression of an Arabidopsis magnesium transport gene, AtMGT1, in Nicotiana benthamiana confers Al tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 4235–4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guo, W.; Nazim, H.; Liang, Z.; Yang, D. Magnesium deficiency in plants: An urgent problem. Crop J. 2016, 4, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alam, S.; Moslehuddin, A.Z.; Islam, M.; Kamal, A. Soil and foliar application of nitrogen for Boro rice (BRRIdhan 29). J. Bangladesh Agric. Univ. 2011, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Noor, S.; Akhter, S.; Islam, M.M.; Shil, N.C.; Abu Kawochar, M. Effect of magnesium on crop yields within maize-green manure-T. aman rice cropping pattern on acid soil. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2015, 61, 1381–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pampolino, M.F.; Witt, C.; Pasuquin, J.M.; Johnston, A.; Fisher, M.J. Development approach and evaluation of the Nutrient Expert software for nutrient management in cereal crops. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 88, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grzebisz, W.; Zielewicz, W.; Przygocka-Cyna, K. Deficiencies of secondary nutrients in crop plants—A real challenge to improve nitrogen management. Agronomy 2022, 13, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Weih, M.; Liu, H.; Colombi, T.; Keller, T.; Jäck, O.; Vallenback, P.; Westerbergh, A. Evidence for magnesium–phosphorus synergism and co-limitation of grain yield in wheat agriculture. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gransee, A.; Führs, H. Magnesium mobility in soils as a challenge for soil and plant analysis, magnesium fertilization and root uptake under adverse growth conditions. Plant Soil 2012, 368, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Peng, W.T.; Qi, W.L.; Nie, M.M.; Xiao, Y.B.; Liao, H.; Chen, Z.C. Magnesium supports nitrogen uptake through regulating NRT2.1/2.2 in soybean. Plant Soil 2020, 457, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xie, K.; Cakmak, I.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Guo, S. Synergistic and antagonistic interactions between potassium and magnesium in higher plants. Crop J. 2021, 9, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fageria, N.K. Ionic interactions in rice plants from dilute solutions. Plant Soil 1983, 70, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ding, Y.; Luo, W.; Xu, G. Characterization of magnesium nutrition and interaction of magnesium and potassium in rice. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2006, 149, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ali, H.; Sarwar, N.; Muhammad, S.; Farooq, O.; Rehman, A.-U.; Wasaya, A.; Yasir, T.A.; Mubeen, K.; Akhtar, M.N. Foliar Application of magnesium at critical stages improved the productivity of rice crop grown under different cultivation systems. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Brohi, A.; Karaman, M.; Topbaş, M.; Aktaş, A.; Savasli, E. Effect of potassium and magnesium fertilization on yield and nutrient content of rice crop grown on Artificial siltation soil. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2000, 24, 429–435. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zlámalová, T.; Elbl, J.; Baroň, M.; Bělíková, H.; Lampíř, L.; Hlušek, J.; Lošák, T. Using foliar applications of magnesium and potassium to improve yields and some qualitative parameters of vine grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 61, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pinkerton, A.; Person, P.N. Effects of foliar application of magnesium sulphate on the quality and magnesium content of flue-cured tobacco. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1974, 14, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Crude fat and crude protein contents in rice grain in experiment 1. Different letters after the data indicate significant differences between treatments at the same experimental site (p < 0.05), the same as below.
Figure 1. Crude fat and crude protein contents in rice grain in experiment 1. Different letters after the data indicate significant differences between treatments at the same experimental site (p < 0.05), the same as below.
Agronomy 14 00639 g001
Figure 2. Crude protein and starch contents in rice grain in experiment 2.
Figure 2. Crude protein and starch contents in rice grain in experiment 2.
Agronomy 14 00639 g002
Figure 3. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in rice shoots in experiment 1.
Figure 3. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in rice shoots in experiment 1.
Agronomy 14 00639 g003
Figure 4. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in rice shoots in experiment 2.
Figure 4. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in rice shoots in experiment 2.
Agronomy 14 00639 g004
Figure 5. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in rice grains in experiment 1.
Figure 5. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in rice grains in experiment 1.
Agronomy 14 00639 g005
Figure 6. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in rice grains in experiment 2.
Figure 6. Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium contents in rice grains in experiment 2.
Agronomy 14 00639 g006
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of soils at the four experiment sites in two experiments.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of soils at the four experiment sites in two experiments.
Experiment SitepHAlkali-Hydrolyzable Nitrogen (mg kg−1)Available Phosphorus (mg kg−1)Available Potassium (mg kg−1)Exchangeable Magnesium (mg kg−1)
Experiment 1Kaiyuan5.66178.418.9113.0245.1
Dawa8.32161.820.6175.3351.9
Experiment 2Kaiyuan5.78163.717.8117.1257.9
Xinmin7.66168.122.9133.3403.1
Table 2. Treatments and fertilizer rates in experiment 1.
Table 2. Treatments and fertilizer rates in experiment 1.
SiteTreatmentFertilizer Rates (kg hm−2)
NitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumMagnesium
KaiyuanCON18837500
OPT165301000
OPT + Mg6S165301006
OPT + Mg12S1653010012
OPT + Mg3F165301003
OPT + Mg12S-Si1653010012
DawaCON29272620
OPT17224620
OPT + Mg6S17224626
OPT + Mg12S172246212
OPT + Mg3F17224623
OPT + Mg12S-Si172246212
Table 3. Treatments and fertilizer rates in experiment 2.
Table 3. Treatments and fertilizer rates in experiment 2.
SiteTreatmentFertilizer Rates (kg hm−2)
NitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumMagnesium
KaiyuanCON20035500
CON + Mg3F20035503
CON + Mg6F20035506
OPT180241000
OPT + Mg3F180241003
OPT + Mg6F180241006
XinminCON22539620
CON + Mg3F22539623
CON + Mg6F22539626
OPT18026830
OPT + Mg3F18026833
OPT + Mg6F18026836
Table 4. Yield and 1000-grain weight of rice under the different treatments in experiment 1.
Table 4. Yield and 1000-grain weight of rice under the different treatments in experiment 1.
Treatment1000-Grain Weight
(g)
Yield
(kg hm−2)
1000-Grain Weight
(g)
Yield
(kg hm−2)
KaiyuanDawa
CON15.9 ± 6.7 b10,327 ± 1062.0 c23.4 ± 2.4 b10,011 ± 432.0 c
OPT22.0 ± 1.8 a11,133 ± 352.5 bc25.5 ± 0.4 ab11,745 ± 238.5 ab
OPT + Mg6S23.7 ± 0.1 a10,969 ± 303.0 bc25.0 ± 1.2 ab11,568 ± 1174.5 ab
OPT + Mg12S23.1 ± 1.2 a12,786 ± 363.0 ab24.2 ± 0.8 ab11,445 ± 1101.0 ab
OPT + Mg3F23.1 ± 1.9 a10,848 ± 64.5 bc24.9 ± 1.1 ab12,967 ± 1026.0 a
OPT + Mg12S-Si22.7 ± 2.1 a13,615 ± 1425.0 a26.5 ± 0.2 a11,076 ± 1068.0 bc
Note: different letters after the data indicate significant differences between treatments at the same experimental site (p < 0.05), the same as below.
Table 5. Yield and 1000-grain weight of rice under the different treatments in experiment 2.
Table 5. Yield and 1000-grain weight of rice under the different treatments in experiment 2.
Treatment1000-Grain Weight
(g)
Yield
(kg hm−2)
1000-Grain Weight
(g)
Yield
(kg hm−2)
KaiyuanXinmin
CON25.6 ± 0.9 a11,439 ± 168.0 b27.1 ± 0.2 ab11,263 ± 177.0 b
CON + Mg3F24.5 ± 0.7 ab10,830 ± 349.5 ab26.7 ± 0.3 ab11,407 ± 232.5 b
CON + Mg6F24.9 ± 0.3 a11,394 ± 294.0 b26.5 ± 0.5 ab11,013 ± 116.7 b
OPT23.5 ± 0.6 b10,308 ± 267.0 c26.1 ± 0.4 b10,456 ± 201.0 c
OPT + Mg3F25.5 ± 1.1 a12,306 ± 303.0 a27.0 ± 0.3 ab12,319 ± 163.5 a
OPT + Mg6F25.4 ± 0.7 a12,537 ± 289.5 a27.2 ± 1.0 a11,025 ± 141.0 b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Z.; Wang, Z.; Hao, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, H. The Use of Magnesium Fertilizer Can Improve the Nutrient Uptake, Yield, and Quality of Rice in Liaoning Province. Agronomy 2024, 14, 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030639

AMA Style

He Z, Wang Z, Hao J, Wu Y, Liu H. The Use of Magnesium Fertilizer Can Improve the Nutrient Uptake, Yield, and Quality of Rice in Liaoning Province. Agronomy. 2024; 14(3):639. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030639

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Zubing, Zhi Wang, Jianxun Hao, Yifan Wu, and Houjun Liu. 2024. "The Use of Magnesium Fertilizer Can Improve the Nutrient Uptake, Yield, and Quality of Rice in Liaoning Province" Agronomy 14, no. 3: 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030639

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop