Next Article in Journal
Effects of Four-Year Oilseed Flax Rotations on the Soil Bacterial Community in a Semi-Arid Agroecosystem
Previous Article in Journal
Reduced Tillage, Application of Straw and Effective Microorganisms as Factors of Sustainable Agrotechnology in Winter Wheat Monoculture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polyphenol Profile, Antioxidant Activity and Yield of Cynara cardunculus altilis in Response to Nitrogen Fertilisation

by
Andrzej Sałata
1,
Renata Nurzyńska-Wierdak
1,
Sara Lombardo
2,
Gaetano Pandino
2,*,
Giovanni Mauromicale
2,
Sara Ibáñez-Asensio
3,
Héctor Moreno-Ramón
3 and
Andrzej Kalisz
4
1
Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
3
School of Agricultural Engineering and Environment, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 València, Spain
4
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-425 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(4), 739; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040739
Submission received: 7 March 2024 / Revised: 26 March 2024 / Accepted: 28 March 2024 / Published: 2 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Innovative Cropping Systems)

Abstract

:
Cardoon leaves are of great pharmaceutical importance due to their high content of polyphenol compounds. Polyphenolic compounds have attracted much interest due to their health-promoting effects. The content of these compounds in C. cardunculus depends on several factors, such as genotype, crop management, plant tissues, harvest time, and storage time. In this study, the effects of nitrogen (N) fertilisation (rates and forms) on the biomass yield and polyphenol profile of the leaves were determined. Increasing the amount of N up to 180 kg-ha−1 in fertilisation did not significantly increase the air-dried biomass yield of the leaves. On the contrary, it led to lower concentrations of total phenolic compounds (TP), total flavonoids (TF), caffeic acid, cynarin, and luteolin. Improvements in performance were achieved when 120 kg-ha−1 N rate was applied and increases in TP, TF content, and radical scavenging activity were observed. The applied N forms (NO3, NH4 or urea) had different effects on the concentrations of individual compounds and leaf air-dried biomass. Higher concentrations of cynarin, luteolin, and luteolin-7-O-glucoside were found when the N forms NH4 and urea were applied; higher caffeic acid content was found when urea was applied. The application of NO3 and urea in fertilisation reduced the level of luteolin-7-O-rutinoside, while the application of NO3 and NH4 reduced the amount of caffeic acid. The obtained results provide a better understanding of the effects of N rates and forms on cardoon leaves over two growing seasons.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The genus Cynara belongs to the Asteraceae family and includes seven species, which, in their natural state, are found only in the Mediterranean region. The species Cynara cardunculus L. consist of the following three botanical varieties: globe artichoke var. scolymus L., cultivated cardoon var. altilis DC, and their common ancestor, the wild cardoon (var. sylvestris Lamk) [1]. Cardoons have long been cultivated in warm climate countries, where the leaves are eaten as a vegetable [2]. In Central Europe, the cultivated cardoon is primarily a valuable herbaceous plant for pharmaceutical raw materials [3,4]. Cardoon is considered a rich source of health-promoting compounds such as polyphenols, inulin, vitamins, and minerals [5,6,7]. In the last few years, polyphenolic compounds have attracted much interest due to their effects on human health, which include cholagogic, cholepoietic, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergenic, and antiviral effects [8,9].
The phytochemicals contained in C. cardunculus leaves are attributed to effective action against disorders of the digestive and circulatory systems, protect the body against cancer, and stimulate the immune system [10]. The phenolic acids have a cholagogic effect, enhancing the transport of bile into the duodenum [11]. They increase the amount and flow of bile, which helps to reduce harmful substances that threaten the liver [12]. The increased bile secretion caused by cardoon extract has the effect of lowering serum triglyceride levels [10]. In patients with lipid metabolism disorders, a reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels after systematic use of cardoon extract was confirmed [13]. The polyphenol compounds of cardoons strengthen and regenerate liver cells [14] and show a liver-shielding effect [15]. The bioactive compounds of cardoons reduce elevated blood pressure, prevent atherosclerosis, and lower triglycerides and cholesterol [16]. The content of these compounds in C. cardunculus depends on several factors, such as genotype [17], crop management [18], and plant tissues [19].
The effect of nitrogen fertilisation on the yield and quality of globe artichokes has been studied by other authors under Mediterranean climate conditions [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Few studies have investigated the impact of N fertilisation in the cultivation of globe artichokes in Central Europe [27,28]. However, published papers on both globe artichokes and cardoons are contradictory. For example, some studies reported that increasing the amount of nitrogen increased the green weight of cardoon leaves but decreased the content of caffeoylquinic acids in the raw material [27,28]. In the Mediterranean Basin, N doses above 100 kg ha−1 delayed the harvest of cardoon baskets without an apparent yield-forming effect. Shinohara et al. concluded that the phenolic content was unaffected by the N rate [22], while Lombardo et al. observed an influence of the N rate on the nutrition quality of globe artichokes [24]. Montesano et al. noted a significant “N rate × globe artichoke cultivars” interaction with respect to flavonoid contents [29]. To our knowledge, data available on the polyphenol profile of cardoons in relation to N rates are missing. It is also known that different N forms significantly affect crop yield and quality [30,31].
For the pharmaceutical industry, the green rosettes of cardoon leaves are of great importance due to the large amount of caffeic acid derivatives. The climatic conditions of Central Europe (Poland) favour vegetative growth (leaf formation) and, therefore, create favourable conditions for the cultivation of cardoons as a medicinal plant. Given the poor availability of data on the cultivation of cardoons for the pharmaceutical industry, this study aims to investigate the effects of N rates and forms on biomass yield, the level of polyphenol compounds, and the radical scavenging activity of cardoon leaves over two growing seasons.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site, Climate, and Soil Characteristics

Field experiments were conducted at the Felin research station of the Lublin University of Life Sciences (51.23° N, 22.56° E). The average temperature of the growing season (April–October) for the years 1955–2012 was 13.7 °C, lower by about 2.9 °C in 2018 and by 1.9 °C in 2019 (Table 1). The total precipitation in the years of the study varied compared to the average multi-year total. In detail, in 2018 the amount of precipitation was 33 mm higher, while in 2019 it was 28 mm lower. The individual growing seasons were characterised by high variability. The highest rainfall was recorded in July 2018 (124 mm) and in August 2019 (102 mm). Compared to the average multi-year total, less rainfall was recorded in 2019 during the period of intensive cardoon growth in June and July (38 mm). From April to October 2018, the mean minimum temperature and the mean daily temperature were higher than in 2019 (1.1 and 1.7 °C, respectively) (Table 2). The highest number of sunshine hours (1349) was seen in the cardoon growing period in 2018.
Cultivation was carried out on grey loam soil [32] made of medium silty clay. The characteristics of the soil on which the experiment was conducted are shown in Table 3.

2.2. Plant Material, Experimental Design, and Management Practices

The trials were carried out using cv. Blanco Avorio, provided by the Rijnsburg Seed Company (Rijnsburg, The Netherlands). This cultivar is characterized by a rapid growth rate, abundant foliage, and high bioactive compound contents [33]. In each growing season, the experiment was set up in a completely randomised block arrangement with three replications. Plants were planted at 0.4 × 0.4 m spacing in plots with areas of 10 m2 (6.25 plant m−2). Experimental treatments included three levels of nitrogen fertilisation [0 (control), 60, 120, and 180 kg of N ha−1], and three forms of nitrogen: NO3, NH4 and CO(NH2)2—urea [27]. In each growing season, the plants were fertilised with the following amounts of nitrogen (kg ha−1): once 60 (10 May), twice 120 (60 + 60, 10 May and 3 June), and three times 180 (60 + 60 + 60, 10 May, 3 June, 10 July). On the first date, nitrogen fertilisation was carried out before planting (10 May); on the second date at the 7–8 leaf stage (3 June); and on the third date at the 18–20 leaf stage (10 July). For each treatment, the same levels of P and K fertilisation were applied before planting, 44 kg ha−1 P2O5 and 140 kg ha−1 K2O as a form of mineral: calcium dihydrogen phosphate (46%) and potassium sulphate (50%), respectively. In 2018–2019, seedlings prepared from sowing seeds (11 April) into pots (90 cm3) in a peat substrate were planted on the same date, 10 May. On the day of planting, the plants were about 12–15 cm tall with 3–5 proper leaves. The cardoons were cultivated according to local practices of ploughing (30 cm deep), harrowing, and fertilising before planting. Common beans were grown in the previous season. Cardoons are grown as annuals because they freeze and die when temperatures drop to around −10 °C. Cardoons are mainly grown from seedlings produced in heated plastic tunnels. In May, after frost, when the plants have 3–5 proper leaves and are about 10 cm high, the plants are planted out in the field. In the field, mineral fertilisation of 90 kg ha−1 is applied in spring. Care of the cardoon crop consists of early weeding and loosening of the inter-rows. In dry periods, mineral fertilisation is often combined with drip irrigation. No crop irrigation was used in this experiment. Hand weeding of the inter-rows was carried out twice during the cardoon cultivation period. No protective measures were applied.

2.3. Harvesting of Raw Material and Post-Harvest Treatment

The leaves’ biomass was harvested once from 120-day-old plants from each plot. The harvest was conducted in 2018 on 10 August and again on 15 August 2019. Plants had similar developmental characteristics (plant height 40.0–45.0 cm, plants formed a leaf rosette). Based on the fresh biomass after drying, the yield of the air-dried leaf mass was calculated. Each of the three replications was randomly sampled for chemical analyses.
The biomass from each combination of N rate, N form, and repetition was dehydrated in a thermal drier (Ventech, Poland) at an air temperature of 60 °C. After drying, the water content of the leaves was observed to be 12–14% over 5 consecutive determinations. The dry material was ground and passed through a 1 mm sieve and used for further chemical analyses, which were carried out over 30 days.

2.4. Chemicals and Standards

The pure caffeoylquinic acids and flavonoids: 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid), 3,4dihydroxycinnamic acid (caffeic acid), 1,3-di-caffeoylquinic acid (cynarin), luteolin-7-O-glucoside, luteolin-7-O-rutinoside that were used for determination or calibration were purchased as certified materials from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All solvents and reagents used for the preparation of standard solutions and extraction of polyphenols were of analytical-grade purity. They were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Methanol, acetonitrile, and other chemicals were purchased from Avantor Performance Materials (Gliwice, Poland).

2.5. Sample Preparation

The powdered cardoon leaves (~3 g) were mixed with methanol (80:20, v:v, methanol to water) in an RVO 400 SD rotary vacuum evaporator (Ingos, Prague, Czech Republic) at a temperature of 100 ± 8 °C for 3 h. After filtration through Whatman filter paper, gradation 42 (Merck, Warsaw, Poland), the residue was re-extracted with 80% methanol for 2 h at room temperature. Solutions were left in the refrigerator for 24 h. The filtrate was degreased by shaking with light petroleum (30 mL each). Then, purified water solutions were extracted with diethyl ether (20 mL each). The extracts with diethyl ether were again shaken with this solvent (10 mL each). Ether extracts were joined and dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. All samples were stored at T = −22 °C until further analysis. All extractions were performed in duplicate.

2.6. Determination of Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids

The Folin–Ciocalteu assay [34] was used to assess the total polyphenol (TP) content. Sodium carbonate (64 mL, 6% in distilled water) was added to the sample extracts (0.2 mL), and after 1 min, 0.2 mL of the freshly diluted Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added. The mixture was incubated for 2 h at room temperature, and the absorbance was read at 750 nm using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Model UV-1800, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). TP content was standardised against gallic acid and expressed as g of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) kg−1 of dry matter (DM).
The aluminium chloride colorimetric method [35] was used for the determination of total flavonoids (TF). The absorbance of the aluminium chloride solution was measured after 45 min against a reference (sample without aluminium chloride) at λ = 425 nm on a Univikon-932 spectrophotometer (Kontron Instruments). The TF content of the raw material was calculated according to the formula, and the results were expressed as g of quercetin equivalents (QE) kg−1 DM:
X = A × K M
where:
  • A—absorbance of the test solution,
  • K—conversion factor for quercetin acid K = 3.5087,
  • M—raw material weight.

2.7. HPLC Analysis

Phenolic compounds of air-dried cardoon leaf extracts were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a Shimadzu series UFLC instrument (Shimadzu Corp., Tokyo, Japan) coupled to a diode array detector (DAD). The separation was performed on a Phenomenex Synergi Fusion-RP column (4 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm i.d., Phenomenex, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a sample injection volume of 20 μL. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (eluent A) and 0.1% of formic acid (eluent B). The following gradient programme was applied: 20% A (0 min), 25% A (10 min), 25% A (20 min), 50% A (40 min), 100% A (42–47 min), and 20% A (49–55 min). The flow rate was 1 ml min−1, and the temperature was 30 °C. Detection was performed by scanning in a wavelength range from 190 to 400 nm. The contents of individual phenolic compounds were expressed from the calibration curves of the respective standards according to the recommended IUPAC numbering system [36]. For the qualitative and quantitative profile of polyphenols, the protocol described by Lombardo et al. [24] was adopted. Values were expressed in mg kg−1 DM.

2.8. Radical Scavenging Activity Assay

2.8.1. 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic Acid (ABTS) Assay

Methanol extracts were used to determine the antioxidant activity by measuring their ability to scavenge free radicals, i.e., ABTS+ [37]. Absorbance was detected at a wavelength of λ = 734 nm using the spectrophotometer. The values obtained for each sample were compared with the concentration curve of a standard Trolox equivalents (TE) solution and expressed as μM TE 100 g−1 DM, respectively.

2.8.2. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP reagent was prepared according to the procedure described by Gouveia and Castilho, with modifications [38]. Briefly, for each analysis, 30 μL of methanolic solution was added to 200 μL of distilled water and 1.9 mL of the FRAP solution. The increase in absorbance was recorded at 593 nm in 15 s intervals, for a period of 30 min at 35 °C.
Methanolic solutions of known Fe (II) concentrations were used to prepare the calibration curve. FRAP results were expressed as μM Fe2+ 100 g−1 DM.

2.8.3. 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Assay

The radical-reducing activity of DPPH was determined according to Choi et al., with cation changes [39]. Ethanolic extracts (0.2 mL) were added to 0.8 mL of 0.2 mM ethanolic DPPH solution and kept in the dark for 15 min. Then, the absorbance was recorded at λ = 515 nm. Results are given as μmol of TE 100 g−1 DM.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data on biomass yield, radical scavenging activity and polyphenol compounds were subjected to a three-factor analysis of variance (N rate × N form × growing season). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Statistica PL ver. 13.0 (StatSof Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). The conformity of the distribution of the determined parameters to the normal distribution was checked using Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance and Shapiro–Wilk’s test for samples. Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05, and homogeneous groups were identified using the Tukey test. All experiments were performed in triplicate and data in tables and figures are averages of three determinations. Relationships between parameters were assessed by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficients. The functions available in the Statistica package were tested, and the most straightforward function with a sufficiently high coefficient of determination (minimum 0.3) was selected.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of N Rate and Form on Leaf Biomass Yields

In the experiment, as the amount of N increased (from 0 to 120 kg ha−1), the weight of dry leaf per plant and the yield of air-dried biomass increased (Table 4). Many previous studies on C. cardunculus have demonstrated that N fertilisation increases the yield at lower/medium N rates [29]. In the crop without N, the yield of air-dried biomass was 4.27 t ha−1. N fertilisation at 60, 120, and 180 kg ha−1 increased the air-dried biomass yield by 50%. In a German study, increasing N rates (from 40 to 240 kg ha−1) increased yields but resulted in lower quality, increased leaf nitrate content, and lower levels of polyphenolic acids and flavonoids [27,28]. In addition, the authors determined an optimal N fertilisation of 120 kg ha−1 before the first leaf harvest and 50 kg ha−1 before the second harvest. In our study, N fertilisation in each growing season affected the mean leaf weight and air-dried leaf yield (‘N rate × growing season’ interaction).
The N forms used (NO3, NH4, urea) in fertilising the cardoon plants affected yields. When the amide form (urea) and NO3 were applied, the dry leaf yield of cardoon was higher by an average of 0.72 t ha−1 compared to the NH4 form. Fertilisation with urea increased the average cardoon leaf weight (151 g). Similarly, Matthes and Honermeier found a reduction in cardoon leaf yield and dry matter when the NH4 form was applied, especially under drought-stress conditions [28]. It has already been stated that, in herbaceous crops, it is crucial to select forms of N that do not harm plant development. High concentrations of NH4 can cause plant death due to ammonia toxicity and lead to reduced yields [27,28].

3.2. Effect of N Rate and Form on Polyphenol Profile

The applied N fertilisation of 120 kg ha−1 compared to the crop without N increased the TF content by 0.57 g kg−1 DM in the leaves of cardoons and did not affect TP levels (Table 5). The application of a higher rate of 180 kg ha−1 in N fertilisation resulted in lower TP, TF levels, and AA values (ABTS, FRAP, DPPH), which is in agreement with the studies of Baier et al. [27] and Montesano et al. [29].
In our study, N fertilisation at 120 kg ha−1, compared to the crop without N fertilisation, increased the content of chlorogenic acid by 28% and cynarin by 30%, and decreased the level of caffeic acid (Table 6). The applied N dose of 120 kg ha−1 did not significantly increase the levels of luteolin, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, and luteolin-7-O-rutinoside (Table 7). At the applied N dose of 60 kg ha−1, plants accumulated less chlorogenic acid, luteolin, and luteolin 7-O-glucoside. At a dose of N 180 kg ha−1, plants accumulated less caffeic acid, cynarin, luteolin, and luteolin-7-O-glucoside.
In a study by Negro et al., N fertilisation increased the content of caffeoylquinic acids and luteolin derivatives but decreased the content of luteolin and apigenin aglycone [40]. A different effect on the accumulation of individual compounds was found in Hypericum pruinatum in relation to the N rate [41]. Moderate fertilisation favours the synthesis of secondary metabolites, and, on the contrary, under conditions of over-fertilisation, the accumulation of polyphenolic compounds tends to decrease [24,27,28]. According to the same authors, excessive N doses increase the degree of vegetative growth, resulting in self-shading of the plants, and, consequently, a reduction in photosynthetic efficiency and the content of caffeoylquinic acids and flavonoids. Stefanelli et al. concluded that, in most cases, the N-deficiency stimulated biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [42].
In this study, the applied N doses in each year of the study significantly (p ≤ 0.01) influenced the chlorogenic acid levels in the leaves of cardoons (‘N rate × growing season’ interaction). An interaction effect of all three factors (‘N rate × N form × growing season’ interaction) on TP, TF, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, luteolin-7-O-rutinoside, caffeic acid, and cynarin contents was found.
In this experiment, the N form did not affect the levels of TP and TF in the leaves of cardoons. Our results were in contrast with the findings of Munene et al., who reported the highest TP content in amaranth species under NH4 supply [43]. In this study, the choice of N form altered the contents of the polyphenol profile. In the variants with NH4 and urea, cardoon leaves contained more luteolin, lutein-7-O-glucoside, and cynarin compared to NO3. The variant with NH4 had higher concentrations of luteolin 7-O-rutinoside (116 mg kg−1) than variants with NO3 and urea, and the variant with urea fertilisation had higher concentrations of caffeic acid (77 mg kg−1) compared to variants with NO3 and NH4. Different behaviours of individual compounds in relation to N forms were observed in tea plants [44]. The applied N form had no significant effect on chlorogenic acid levels in leaf biomass.

3.3. Effect of N Rate and Form on Radical Scavenging Activity

The FRAP and DPPH tests showed the highest radical scavenging activity (RSA) abilities of extracts from plants fertilised with 120 kg N ha−1 compared to plants grown without N (Table 8). In all assays, the leaves of plants fertilised with 180 kg N ha−1 had the lowest RSA. This was likely related to the low TPC found in the same samples. Duan et al. similarly found that blackberries under NO3-N stimulated DPPH activity [45]. On the contrary, amaranth species supplied with NH4-N exhibited superior DPPH activity [43]. The highest results in the RSA assays were obtained for the NO3 form and urea.
The antioxidant activity of the cardoon extracts was correlated with TF content (Figure 1). The correlation coefficients between TF content and the ABTS and FRAP and DPPH test results were 0.67, 0.82, and 0.93, respectively.
The strong positive correlation between the content of TF compounds and the ABTS, FRAP and DPPH results clearly indicates that flavonoid compounds were the antioxidant activity carriers of the cardoon extracts. The results are in line with previous studies.

3.4. Effect of Growing Season on Biomass Yield, Polyphenol Profile and Radical Scavenging Activity

In 2018, the yield of air-dried leaf biomass was 1.12 t ha−1 higher than in 2019 (Table 4). This difference may have been due to the different availability of N from the soil caused by the level of rainfall throughout the growing season. In 2019, rainfall totals from April to October were 61 mm lower than in 2018. Water scarcity and the accompanying high air temperatures in 2019, higher than perennial averages by 1.9 °C, probably reduced the availability of nutrients in the soil (Table 1 and Table 2). There is little information in the available literature on the effect of meteorological trends on phenolic content in humid temperate climates, where vegetation length and herb yield can be highly variable depending on atmospheric factors [4]. In 2018, the content of TF and TP were, respectively, 7–9%, higher than in 2019. In 2018, the average temperature of the growing season was 2.9 °C higher than the multi-year average, with a high sum of sunshine hours (1349). The high TP and TF content in 2018 was accompanied by high radical scavenging activity (Table 8). The high TP and TF levels were the result of high chlorogenic acid, cynarin, luteolin, luteolin-7-O-glucoside and luteolin 7-O-rutinoside contents. It is likely that higher N availability and higher temperatures in 2018 compared to 2019 were responsible for the higher accumulation of TP in cardoon leaves. In addition, higher minimum temperatures during the period of intensive plant growth in 2018 during the night in June and July increased the transpiration rate of the cardoon plants, which may have increased the accumulation of chlorogenic acid, cynarin, luteolin, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, and luteolin-7-O-rutinoside due to lower dilution of the cells. Furthermore, the occurrence of days with high temperatures in 2019 during intensive growth (June–August) may have accelerated plant maturation and consequently reduced TP and TF content. The varying effects of weather conditions on the content of polyphenolic compounds in the cardoons support the hypothesis that the concentration of secondary metabolites in plants depends mainly on the availability of minerals, carbon, temperature, water, and light [46]. Depending on the impact of weather factors, plant metabolism changes and compounds containing mainly carbon in the chemical structure are synthesised first; thus, carbohydrates are formed, followed by phenolic compounds.
Low mineral availability under drought stress is thought to be responsible for the accumulation of phenolic compounds of globe artichokes under Mediterranean climate conditions [24].

3.5. Correlation Analysis of Parameters under Study

The results of the correlation analysis of cardoon leaf bioactive compounds under different N rates are shown in Table 9. Significant correlations (critical value 0.58) were found in 19 cases out of 35 comparisons in the control group; in 16 cases in the group with N fertilisation at 60 kg ha−1; and in 17 cases in the group with N fertilisation at 120 kg ha−1. The lowest values (below the critical value of 0.58) were found in the group with N at 180 kg ha−1. This indicates that the standard correlations between the properties of the bioactive compounds of cardoon leaves were significantly disturbed by the application of a high N rate (180 kg ha−1). The highest correlation coefficients were found between TF content and chlorogenic acid in leaves in the group without N (0.93) and in the group with an N rate of 60 kg ha−1 (0.99). Equally high values of correlation coefficients were recorded between TF content and caffeic acid in the group with an N rate of 60 and 120 kg ha−1 (0.98 and 0.97, respectively). When analysing TP content in leaves, the highest correlation coefficient (0.97) was found between TP and luteolin in the group without N and in the same group between TP and luteolin-7-O-glucoside (0.91). For an N rate of 120 kg ha−1, the highest correlation coefficient (0.92) was found between TP and caffeic acid, and TF and cynarin (0.91). Low correlation values occurred with an N rate of 180 kg ha−1.
The results of the correlation analysis of the bioactive compounds of cardoon leaves with different N forms are shown in Table 10. Significant correlations were found in 14 cases in the group with the NO3 form; in 16 cases in the group with NH4 form; and in 11 cases with the urea form. This indicates that the N forms used had different effects on the concentrations of bioactive substances. The highest values of correlation coefficients in the NO3 form were found between TF content and caffeic acid; cynarin and chlorogenic acid (0.93–0.97); and between TP and luteolin (0.98) and luteolin-7-O-rutinoside (0.83). The highest values of correlation coefficients in the NH4 form were found between the TF content and chlorogenic acid, cynarin and caffeic acid (0.89–0.98), and between TP and luteolin (0.95) and luteolin-7-O-glucoside (0.88). Average correlation coefficients between TF and chlorogenic acid, cynarin and caffeic acid content (0.61–0.78) were found for the urea form, and between luteolin-7-O-rutinoside and luteolin (0.66), and luteolin-7-O-glucoside (0.73).

4. Conclusions

The results of this study confirmed that an acceptable yield with high-quality bioactive compounds can be obtained in the cultivation of cardoons for pharmaceutical purposes under a low N rate. The polyphenol compounds identified in cardoon extracts mainly included chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, cynarin, luteolin, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, and luteolin-7-O-rutinoside. Under an N rate of 120 kg ha−1, the highest values of TF content and radical scavenging activities (FRAP and DPPH) were observed, which did not affect TP levels. Increasing the N form to 180 kg ha−1, the leaf air-dried biomass did not respond positively, and this led to lower concentrations of TF, TP, caffeic acid, cynarin, and luteolin. The applied N forms had different effects on the concentrations of bioactive compounds. Higher concentrations of caffeic acid, cynarin, luteolin and luteolin-7-O-glucoside were found when the NH4 form and urea were applied. Use of the NO3 form led to lower levels of bioactive compounds. Positive correlations of the bioactive compounds of cardoon leaves with the amounts of applied N and with the different N forms were found. This study adds to the existing knowledge and suggests that optimal N fertilisation influences the formation of a favourable composition of bioactive compounds without compromising the leaf air-dried biomass. On the other hand, the growing season could also modulate the yield and accumulation of phytochemicals. Here, in 2018, a season with higher precipitation and a higher amount of sunshine resulted in a higher yield of air-dried herbs with higher TP and TF contents than in 2019.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., methodology, A.S. and G.P., formal analysis, A.S., R.N.-W., S.L. and H.M.-R., investigation, A.S. and R.N-W., writing—original draft preparation, A.S., G.P., S.L., R.N.-W., G.M. and H.M.-R., writing—review and editing, A.S., R.N.-W., G.P., S.L., G.M., A.K., H.M.-R. and S.I.-A., visualization, A.S., H.M.-R. and G.M., supervision, A.S., G.P., S.L. and R.N.-W., funding acquisition, R.N-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available via an email request to the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Portis, E.; Scaglione, D.; Acquadro, A.; Mauromicale, G.; Mauro, R.; Knapp, S.; Lanteri, S. Genetic mapping and identification of QTL for earliness in the globe artichoke/cultivated cardoon complex. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pandino, G.; Mauromicale, G. Globe artichoke and cardoon forms between traditional and modern uses. Acta Hort. 2020, 1284, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sałata, A.; Lombardo, S.; Pandino, G.; Mauromicale, G.; Buczkowska, H.; Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R. Biomass yield and polyphenol compounds profile in globe artichoke as affected by irrigation frequency and drying temperature. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 176, 114375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sałata, A.; Sękara, A.; Pandino, G.; Mauromicale, G.; Lombardo, S. Living mulch as sustainable tool to improve leaf biomass and phytochemical yield of Cynara cardunculus var. altilis. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Borgognone, D.; Cardarelli, M.; Rea, E.; Lucini, L.; Colla, G. Salinity source-induced changes in yield, mineral composition, phenolic acids and flavonoids in leaves of artichoke and cardoon grown in floating system. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kollia, E.; Markaki, P.; Zoumpoulakis, P.; Proestos, C. Antioxidant activity of Cynara scolymus L. and Cynara cardunculus L. extracts obtained by different extraction techniques. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 1163–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pandino, G.; Bonomo, A.; Scavo, A.; Mauromicale, G.; Lombardo, S. Caffeoylquinic acids and flavones profile in Cynara cardunculus L. seedlings under controlled conditions as affected by light and water-supply treatments. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 302, 111180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Del Bò, C.; Bernardi, S.; Marino, M.; Porrini, M.; Tucci, M.; Guglielmetti, S.; Cherubini, A.; Carrieri, B.; Kirkup, B.; Kroon, P.; et al. Systematic review on polyphenol intake and health outcomes: Is there sufficient evidence to define a health-promoting polyphenol-rich dietary pattern? Nutrients 2019, 11, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rana, A.; Samtiya, M.; Dhewa, T.; Mishra, V.; Aluko, R.E. Health benefits of polyphenols: A concise review. J. Food Biochem. 2022, 46, 14264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rossoni, G.; Grande, S.; Galli, C.; Visioli, F. Wild artichoke prevents the age associated loss of vasomotor function. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 10291–10296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gebhardt, R.; Fausel, M. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of artichoke extracts and constituents in cultured rat hepatocytes. Toxicol Vitr. 1997, 11, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Speroni, E.; Cervellati, R.; Covoni, P.; Guizzardi, S.; Renzulli, C.; Guerra, M. Efficacy of different Cynara scolymus preparation of liver complaints. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 86, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kraft, K. Artichoke leaf extract-recent findings reflecting effects on lipid metabolism, liver, and gastrointestinal tracts. Phytomedicine 1997, 4, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bundy, R.; Walker, A.F.; Middleton, R.W.; Wallis, C.; Simpson, H.C.R. Artichoke leaf extract (Cynara scolymus) reduced plasma cholesterol in otherwise healthy hypercholesterolemic adults: A randomized, double blind placebo controlled trial. Phytomedicine 2008, 15, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gebhardt, R. Choleretic and anticholestatic activities of flavonoids of artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L. subsp. scolymus (L.) Hayek). Acta Hort. 2005, 681, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Falco, B.; Incerti, G.; Amato, M.; Lanzotti, V. Artichoke: Botanical, agronomical, phytochemical, and pharmacological overview. Phytochem. Rev. 2015, 14, 993–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pandino, G.; Lombardo, S.; Mauromicale, G.; Williamson, G. Characterization of phenolic acids and flavonoids in leaves, stems, bracts and edible parts of globe artichokes. Acta Hort. 2012, 942, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lombardo, S.; Scavo, A.; Pandino, G.; Cantone, M.; Mauromicale, G. Improvement in the cynaropicrin, caffeoylquinic acid and flavonoid content of globe artichokes with gibberellic acid Treatment. Plants 2022, 11, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pandino, G.; Meneghini, M.; Tavazza, R.; Lombardo, S.; Mauromicale, G. Phytochemicals accumulation and antioxidant activity in callus and suspension cultures of Cynara scolymus L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 128, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghoneim, I.M. Effect of biofertilizer types under varying nitrogen levels on vegetative growth, head yield and quality of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.). J. Agric. Environ. Sci. Alex. Univ. Egypt 2005, 4, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  21. Elia, A.; Conversa, G. Mineral nutrition aspects in artichoke growing. Acta Hortic. 2007, 730, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shinohara, T.; Shinsuke, A.; Kil, Y.S.; Leskovar, D.I. Irrigation and nitrogen management of artichoke: Yield, head quality, and phenolic content. HortScience 2011, 46, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saleh, S.A.; Zaki, M.F.; Tantawy, A.S.; Salama, Y.A.M. Response of artichoke productivity to different proportions of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers. Int. J. Chem. Technol. Res. 2016, 9, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lombardo, S.; Pandino, G.; Mauromicale, G. The nutraceutical response of two globe artichoke cultivars to contrasting NPK fertilizer regimes. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lombardo, S.; Restuccia, C.; Muratore, G.; Barbagallo, R.N.; Licciardello, F.; Pandino, G.; Mauromicale, G. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the overall quality of minimally processed globe artichoke heads. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lombardo, S.; Pandino, G.; Mauromicale, G. Minerals profile of two globe artichoke cultivars as affected by NPK fertilizer regimes. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Baier, C.; Eich, J.; Grün, M.; Wagenbreth, D.; Zimermann, R. Artichoke leaves used for herbal drug production: Influence of nitrogen fertilization on yield and on pharmaceutical quality. Acta Hort. 2005, 681, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Matthes, C.; Honermeier, B. Cultivation of the artichoke as a medicinal plant under temperate climate condition in Germany. Acta Hort. 2007, 630, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Montesano, V.; Negro, D.; Sonnante, G.; Laghetti, G.; Urbano, M. Polyphenolic compound variation in globe artichoke cultivars as affected by fertilization and biostimulants application. Plants 2022, 11, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sabir, M.; Hanafi, M.M.; Malik, M.T.; Aziz, T.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Ahmad, R.A.; Hakeem, K.R.; Shahid, M. Differential effect of nitrogen forms on physiological parameters and micronutrient concentration in maize (Zea mays L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 1836–1842. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun, Y.D.; Lou, W.R.; Liu, H.C. Effects of different nitrogen forms on the nutritional quality and physiological characteristics of Chinese chive seedlings. Plant. Soil Environ. 2014, 60, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources, 2014. In International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; update 2015; World Soil Resources Reports No.106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; p. 192. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sałata, A.; Gortat, M.; Buczkowska, H. Leaf petioles blanching influence on the yield and chemical composition of cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L.). Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus 2017, 16, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dewanto, V.; Wu, X.; Adom, K.K.; Liu, R.H. Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 97, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pharmacopoeia Poland; Polish Pharmaceutical Society: Warszawa, Poland, 2002; Volume 6, pp. 880–881.
  36. IUPAC. Nomenclature of cyclitols. Biochem. J. 1976, 153, 23–31. [Google Scholar]
  37. Prior, R.L.; Wu, X.; Schaich, K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4290–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gouveia, S.C.; Castilho, P.C. Antioxidant potential of Artemisia argentea L’Hér alcoholic extract and its relation with the phenolic composition. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1620–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Choi, Y.; Lee, S.M.; Chun, J.; Lee, H.B.; Lee, J. Influence of heat treatment on the antioxidant activities and polyphenolic compounds of Shiitake (Lentinus edodes) mushroom. Food Chem. 2006, 99, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Negro, D.; Montesano, V.; Sonnante, G.; Rubino, P.; De Lisi, A.; Sarli, G. Fertilization strategies on cultivars of globe artichoke: Effects on yield and quality performance. J. Plant Nutr. 2016, 39, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Radušienė, J.; Marksa, M.; Ivanauskas, L.; Jakštas, V.; Çalişkan, Ö.; Kurt, D.; Odabaş, M.S.; Çirak, C. Effect of nitrogen on herb production, secondary metabolites and antioxidant activities of Hypericum pruinatum under nitrogen application. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 139, 111519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stefanelli, D.; Goodwin, I.; Jones, R. Minimal nitrogen and water use in horticulture: Effects on quality and content of selected nutrients. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1833–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Munene, R.; Changamu, E.; Korir, N.; Joseph, G.O. Effects of different nitrogen forms on growth, phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant activity in amaranth species. Trop. Plant Res. 2017, 4, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.M.; Lu, Y.T.; Qiu, Q.L.; Fan, D.M.; Wang, X.C.; Zheng, X.Q. Influence of different nitrogen sources on carbon and nitrogen metabolism and gene expression in tea plants (Camellia sinensis L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Duan, Y.; Yang, H.; Wei, Z.; Yang, H.; Fan, S.; Wu, W.; Lyu, L.; Li, W. Effects of different nitrogen forms on blackberry fruit quality. Foods 2023, 12, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hamilton, J.; Zangerl, A.; DeLucia, E.; Berenbaum, M. The carbon–nutrient balance hypothesis: Its rise and fall. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Correlation between the total flavonoids content and ABTS (2,2′-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power), and DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay.
Figure 1. Correlation between the total flavonoids content and ABTS (2,2′-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power), and DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay.
Agronomy 14 00739 g001
Table 1. Meteorological conditions during the two growing seasons of the experiment (Meteorological Station in Felin, Poland 51.13° N; 22.37° E).
Table 1. Meteorological conditions during the two growing seasons of the experiment (Meteorological Station in Felin, Poland 51.13° N; 22.37° E).
Growing SeasonMonthAverage/Sum
AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
Average Temperature (°C)
201813.417.118.820.720.715.510.016.6
20199.513.421.519.420.314.511.015.6
1955–2012 7.413.016.217.817.112.612.413.7
Total Rainfall (mm)
2018405665124726836461
2019499337381025229400
1955–2012 39586684695458428
Table 2. Averages temperatures (°C) during the two growing seasons of the experiment.
Table 2. Averages temperatures (°C) during the two growing seasons of the experiment.
Growing SeasonMonthTemperature (°C)Insolation (Sum of Hours)
Average MaximumAverage Minimum
2018April15.113.3216
May18.814.4245
June20.416.5206
July22.619.4169
August23.218.1214
September20.317.7165
October19.716.8134
Average/Total20.016.6209/1349
2019April14.110.3183
May18.013.4128
June22.215.5253
July23.118.4198
August24.219.1205
September18.316.6140
October17.715.8138
Average/Total19.615.5178/1245
Table 3. Soil characteristics and mineral content in the experimental field.
Table 3. Soil characteristics and mineral content in the experimental field.
Characteristics Soil
Silt
(%)
Loam
(%)
Sand
(%)
pH in H2ONa
(mg L−1)
Cl
(mg L−1)
Salinity (g L−1 NaCl)Organic Matter
%C
C/N
6910217.3657.16.130.291.4211.3
Macro and Microelement Content (mg L−1)
N-NO3PKCaMgZnMnCuFe
10.620413212931068.7212.805.2442.8
Table 4. Effects of treatments (N rate, N form, and growing season) on leaf air-dried biomass, yield of leaf air-dried biomass, (±standard deviation) in cardoon leaves.
Table 4. Effects of treatments (N rate, N form, and growing season) on leaf air-dried biomass, yield of leaf air-dried biomass, (±standard deviation) in cardoon leaves.
TreatmentSource of VariationLeaf Air-Dried Biomass
(g plant−1)
Yield of Leaf Air-Dried Biomass
(t ha−1)
N rate (N) kg ha−1089.50 b ± 0.164.27 b ± 0.05
60165.17 a ± 0.226.40 a ± 0.06
120160.83 a ± 0.256.07 a ± 0.19
180162.50 a ± 0.286.22 a ± 0.20
p-value<0.001<0.001
N form (F)NO3143.25 b ± 0.185.91 a ± 0.18
NH4139.25 b ± 0.275.26 b ± 0.16
Urea151.00 a ± 0.236.05 a ± 0.22
p-value0.0010.001
Growing season (S)2018149.00 a ± 0.246.30 a ± 0.43
2019140.25 a ± 0.195.18 b ± 0.38
p-value0.3400.009
N × Fp-value0.2840.065
N × Sp-value0.0340.008
F × Sp-value0.2060.065
N × F × Sp-value0.0020.162
Different letters within each column and main factor indicate a significant difference among means.
Table 5. Effects of treatments (N rate, N form, and growing season) on total flavonoids and polyphenols content (± standard deviation) in cardoon leaves.
Table 5. Effects of treatments (N rate, N form, and growing season) on total flavonoids and polyphenols content (± standard deviation) in cardoon leaves.
TreatmentSource of VariationTotal Flavonoids (g Quercitin kg−1 DM)Total Polyphenols
(g Gallic Acid kg−1 DM)
N rate (N) kg ha−1017.93 b ± 0.1533.05 a ± 1.33
6016.01 c ± 0.2532.52 a ± 3.14
12018.50 a ± 0.1833.28 a ± 1.36
18016.39 c ± 0.2728.12 b ± 0.96
p-value0.008<0.001
N form (F)NO317.33 a ± 0.2533.58 a ± 1.01
NH417.14 a ± 0.1830.60 a ± 1.05
Urea17.15 a ± 0.2931.05 a ± 0.95
p-value0.4300.345
Growing season (S)201817.83 a ± 0.2533.23 a ± 1.98
201916.59 b ± 0.2730.26 b ± 1.05
p-value<0.0010.001
N × Fp-value0.0650.060
N × Sp-value0.3220.716
F × Sp-value0.8680.145
N × F × Sp-value0.003<0.001
Different letters within each column and main factor indicate a significant difference among means.
Table 6. Effects of main factors (N rate, N form, growing season) on chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, cynarin (mg kg−1 DM ± standard deviation) contents in cardoon leaves.
Table 6. Effects of main factors (N rate, N form, growing season) on chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, cynarin (mg kg−1 DM ± standard deviation) contents in cardoon leaves.
Main FactorSource of VariationChlorogenic AcidCaffeic AcidCynarin
N rate (N)
kg ha−1
0542.26 b ± 0.3271.65 a ± 0.0963.35 b ± 0.02
60449.57 c ± 0.2875.77 a ± 0.0582.33 a ± 0.05
120692.80 a ± 0.4567.77 b ± 0.0382.10 a ± 0.06
180511.43 b ± 0.3052.29 c ± 0.0258.60 c ± 0.18
p-value<0.001<0.001<0.001
N form (F)NO3572.67 a ± 0.4861.91 b ± 0.0265.11 b ± 0.04
NH4515.94 a ± 0.5161.54 b ± 0.0573.75 a ± 0.08
Urea558.43 a ± 0.4577.17 a ± 0.0975.93 a ± 0.12
p-value0.1700.0340.001
Growing season (S)2018650.11 a ± 0.6567.77 a ± 0.0576.43 a ± 0.07
2019447.92 b ± 0.2465.97 a ± 0.0266.76 b ± 0.09
p-value0.0060.054<0.001
N × Fp-value0.3780.1150.474
N × Sp-value0.0070.6980.326
F × Sp-value0.2680.8980.075
N × F × Sp-value0.567<0.001<0.001
Different letters within each column and main factor indicate a significant difference among means.
Table 7. Effects of main factors (N rate, N form, growing season) on luteolin, luteolin-7-O-glucoside and luteolin-7-O-rutinoside (mg kg−1 DM ± standard deviation) contents in cardoon leaves.
Table 7. Effects of main factors (N rate, N form, growing season) on luteolin, luteolin-7-O-glucoside and luteolin-7-O-rutinoside (mg kg−1 DM ± standard deviation) contents in cardoon leaves.
Main FactorSource of VariationLuteolinLuteolin-7-O-GlucosideLuteolin-7-O-Rutinoside
N rate (N) kg ha−1040.76 a ± 0.0913.86 a ± 0.01113.43 a ± 0.35
6037.23 b ± 0.0212.66 b ± 0.05115.15 a ± 0.35
12040.90 a ± 0.0513.91 a ± 0.01115.30 a ± 0.36
18035.12 b ± 0.1111.94 b ± 0.05115.20 a ± 0.41
p-value<0.0010.0050.105
N form (F)NO337.38 b ± 0.0612.71 b ± 0.05113.43 b ± 0.45
NH439.15 a ± 0.0213.31 a ± 0.01116.15 a ± 0.34
Urea38.98 a ± 0.0913.25 a ± 0.03114.73 b ± 0.38
p-value0.0010.013<0.001
Growing season (S)201842.15 a ± 0.0714.33 a ± 0.04116.52 a ± 0.15
201934.86 b ± 0.1311.85 b ± 0.01113.02 b ± 0.16
p-value<0.001<0.001<0.001
N × Fp-value0.2050.2160.208
N × Sp-value0.3670.7660.056
F × Sp-value0.4070.3660.344
N × F× Sp-value0.676<0.001<0.001
Different letters within each column and main factor indicate a significant difference among means.
Table 8. Effects of main factors (N rate, N form growing season) on radical scavenging activity (± standard deviation) in cardoon leaves.
Table 8. Effects of main factors (N rate, N form growing season) on radical scavenging activity (± standard deviation) in cardoon leaves.
Main FactorSource of VariationABTS Assay
(µmol Trolox 100 g−1 DM)
FRAP Assay
(µmol Fe2+ 100 g−1 DM
DPPH Assay
(µmol Trolox 100 g−1 DM)
N rate (N) kg ha−1086.65 a ± 0.64203.36 b ± 1.90101.60 b ± 0.80
6084.86 a ± 0.46166.61 c ± 0.9484.59 c ± 0.63
12084.40 a ± 0.40207.09 a ± 1.47106.51 a ± 0.79
18070.30 b ± 0.39148.65d ± 0.8374.15d ± 0.57
p-value0.0410.0230.001
N form (F)NO382.50 a ± 0.42187.33 a ± 0.9496.33 a ± 0.54
NH475.03 b ± 0.36167.40 b ± 0.7582.59 b ± 0.79
Urea87.13 a ± 0.65189.56 a ± 0.8996.21 a ± 0.49
p-value<0.0010.040<0.001
Growing season (S)201888.04 a ± 0.69191.41 a ± 1.24101.1 a ± 0.25
201975.05 b ± 0.45171.45 b ± 0.8382.31 b ± 0.19
p-value<0.0010.005<0.001
N × Fp-value0.9100.3430.056
N × Sp-value0.4070.5170.096
F × Sp-value0.0550.6450.065
N × F × Sp-value0.003<0.001<0.001
Different letters within each column and main factor indicate a significant difference among means.
Table 9. Coefficients of Pearson’s correlation between the chemical composition parameters of cardoon leaves in relation to N rate.
Table 9. Coefficients of Pearson’s correlation between the chemical composition parameters of cardoon leaves in relation to N rate.
Nitrogen Rate
(kg ha−1)
ParameterTFTPLutL7GL7RChCaf
0TF1
TP0.771
Lut0.750.971
L7G0.700.910.581
L7R0.810.820.740.691
Ch0.930.73nsnsns1
Caf0.860.84nsnsns0.731
Cyn0.880.80nsnsns0.890.74
60TF1
TP0.561
Lut0.730.701
L7G0.690.64ns1
L7R0.790.89ns0.411
Ch0.990.78ns0.58ns1
Caf0.980.75nsnsns0.581
Cyn0.860.74nsnsns0.700.75
120TF1
TP0.871
Lut0.800.791
L7G0.880.84ns1
L7R0.910.63ns0.671
Ch0.860.84nsnsns1
Caf0.970.92nsnsns0.671
Cyn0.850.91nsnsns0.700.79
180TF1
TP0.331
Lut0.460.451
L7G0.340.32ns1
L7R0.480.33ns0.341
Ch0.480.31nsnsns1
Caf0.370.33nsnsns0.321
Cyn0.420.33nsnsns0.300.30
TF—Total flavonoids, TP—Total polyphenol, Lut—Luteolin, L7G—Luteolin 7-O-glucoside, L7R—Luteolin 7-O-rutinoside, Ch—Chlorogenic acid, Caf—Caffeic acid, Cyn—Cynarin. ns: not significant.
Table 10. Coefficients of Pearson’s correlation between the chemical composition parameters of cardoon leaves in relation to N form.
Table 10. Coefficients of Pearson’s correlation between the chemical composition parameters of cardoon leaves in relation to N form.
Nitrogen FormParameterTFTPLutL7GL7RChCaf
NO3TF1
TP0.601
Lut0.560.981
L7Gns0.67ns1
L7Rns0.83ns0.341
Ch0.970.51nsnsns1
Caf0.930.45nsnsns0.671
Cyn0.960.59nsnsnsns0.61
NH4TF1
TP0.411
Lut0.470.951
L7Gns0.88ns1
L7Rns0.74nsns1
Ch0.890.74nsnsns1
Caf0.980.66nsns0.440.641
Cyn0.930.75ns0.350.320.65ns
UreaTF1
TP0.331
Lut0.480.481
L7Gns0.42ns1
L7Rns0.360.660.731
Ch0.61nsnsnsns1
Caf0.78nsnsnsnsns1
Cyn0.770.33nsnsnsnsns
TF—Total flavonoids, TP—Total polyphenol, Lut—Luteolin, L7G—Luteolin 7-O-glucoside, L7R—Luteolin 7-O-rutinoside, Ch—Chlorogenic acid, Caf—Caffeic acid, Cyn—Cynarin. ns: not significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sałata, A.; Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R.; Lombardo, S.; Pandino, G.; Mauromicale, G.; Ibáñez-Asensio, S.; Moreno-Ramón, H.; Kalisz, A. Polyphenol Profile, Antioxidant Activity and Yield of Cynara cardunculus altilis in Response to Nitrogen Fertilisation. Agronomy 2024, 14, 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040739

AMA Style

Sałata A, Nurzyńska-Wierdak R, Lombardo S, Pandino G, Mauromicale G, Ibáñez-Asensio S, Moreno-Ramón H, Kalisz A. Polyphenol Profile, Antioxidant Activity and Yield of Cynara cardunculus altilis in Response to Nitrogen Fertilisation. Agronomy. 2024; 14(4):739. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sałata, Andrzej, Renata Nurzyńska-Wierdak, Sara Lombardo, Gaetano Pandino, Giovanni Mauromicale, Sara Ibáñez-Asensio, Héctor Moreno-Ramón, and Andrzej Kalisz. 2024. "Polyphenol Profile, Antioxidant Activity and Yield of Cynara cardunculus altilis in Response to Nitrogen Fertilisation" Agronomy 14, no. 4: 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop