Next Article in Journal
Soil Microbial Properties of Durum Grown after Camelina, Carinata, Cover Crops, and Fallow
Previous Article in Journal
An Efficient Aqua-Based Culture Method for the Propagation of High-Quality Arundo donax Seedlings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Does Nitrogen Fertilization Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Spring Wheat?

1
State Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3
National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Production Education (Gansu Agricultural University), Lanzhou 730070, China
4
CSIR-Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute (PGRRI), Bunso P.O. Box 7, Ghana
5
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(9), 2049; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092049 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 13 July 2024 / Revised: 25 August 2024 / Accepted: 4 September 2024 / Published: 7 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Agroecology Innovation: Achieving System Resilience)

Abstract

:
To investigate the effects and mechanism of prolonged inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilization on the N-use efficiency of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a long-term study initiated in 2003 was conducted. The study analyzed how N fertilization affects dry matter translocation, N translocation, soil NO3-N, and N-use efficiency. Five different N-fertilizer rate treatments were tested: N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210, corresponding to annual N fertilizer doses of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively. Results showed that increasing N-fertilizer rates significantly enhanced the two-year average dry matter accumulation amount (DMA) at maturity by 22.97–56.25% and pre-flowering crop growth rate (CGR) by 17.11–92.85%, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1. However, no significant correlation was observed between the dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE) and wheat grain yield. Both insufficient and excessive N applications resulted in an imbalanced N distribution favoring vegetative growth over reproductive growth, thus negatively impacting N-use efficiency. At maturity, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average N accumulation amount (NAA) by 52.04–129.98%, with no further increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1. N fertilization also improved the two-year average N translocation efficiency (NTE) by 56.89–63.80% and the N contribution proportion (NCP) of wheat vegetative organs by 27.79–57.83%, peaking in the lower-N treatment (N52.5). However, high-N treatment (N210) led to an increase in NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layer, with an increase of 26.27% in 2018 and 122.44% in 2019. This higher soil NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm layer decreased NHI, NUE, NAE, NPFP, and NMB. Additionally, N fertilization significantly reduced the two-year average N harvest index (NHI) by 9.89–12.85% and N utilization efficiency (NUE) by 11.14–20.79%, both decreasing with higher N application rates. The NAA followed the trend of anthesis > maturity > jointing. At the 105 kg N ha−1 rate, the highest N agronomic efficiency (NAE) (9.31 kg kg−1), N recovery efficiency (NRE) (38.32%), and N marginal benefit (NMB) (10.67 kg kg−1) were observed. Higher dry matter translocation amount (DTA) and N translocation amount (NTA) reduced NHI and NUE, whereas higher NTE improved NHI, NUE, and N partial factor productivity (NPFP). Overall, N fertilization enhanced N-use efficiency in spring wheat by improving N translocation rather than dry matter translocation.

1. Introduction

Wheat is one of the most widely cultivated and valuable crops for global food security [1]. With the global population projected to reach to reach 7.9−10.5 billion by 2050, the increased demand for wheat may result in potential food shortages in the upcoming decades [2,3]. In China, wheat accounts for 40% of total grain consumption, with a planting area exceeding 218 million hectares [4]. Consequently, China has initiated a new “green revolution” and sustainable initiatives to bolster global food security, targeting “100 billion kilograms of grain” in the hilly regions of the Loess Plateau [5]. Thus, it is crucial to maintain crop yields and improve fertilizer use efficiency within the limited arable land in the semi-arid, rain-fed agricultural regions of the Loess Plateau.
Fertilizers, particularly nitrogen (N) fertilizers, are essential for plant growth, and are often referred to as the “food” of grain. They directly influence the accumulation of aboveground dry matter, photosynthetic characteristics, physiological metabolism, and grain yield in plants [6]. N fertilization has been shown to facilitate the translocation of assimilates from pre-flowering organs to wheat grains, likely due to the insufficiency of post-flowering photosynthetic assimilation to meet grain-filling demands [7]. Studies have indicated that increasing the N-fertilizer rate can enhance the transfer and contribution rates of stored dry matter from wheat leaves and stems to grains pre-flowering [8]. However, other research presents conflicting findings [9]. Therefore, it is essential to investigate further the impact mechanism of N-fertilizer rate on the transport volume, transport rate, and contribution rate of dry matter stored in nutrient organs post-flowering to optimize N fertilization and enhance its efficiency.
In recent years, excessive N fertilization in pursuit of maximum crop yields has become increasingly prevalent [10]. Despite increased usage, crop yields and the efficiency of N fertilizer utilization have not significantly improved, indicating a global trend of declining N-use efficiency [5]. Plants obtain N primarily through two mechanisms: firstly, by directly absorbing N from the soil through their roots; and secondly, by activating and redistributing nutrients stored in aging or previously-used tissues, a process known as N translocation and redistribution within the plant [5]. Understanding the patterns of N absorption, accumulation, and transport in wheat can aid in regulating crop growth, tailoring fertilizer application to the plant’s developmental needs, and enhancing N-use efficiency while boosting yields.
The grain-filling stage is essential for N supply in wheat, during which canopy N levels typically decline as the plant matures [11]. During this stage, the movement of N from leaves and stems to the ear becomes predominant [12]. N in crop grains primarily originates from two sources: post-flowering assimilation and N absorption by senescent organs [13]. The N uptake in various tissues during the vegetative growth period significantly affect the N supply in grains, as plants transport a substantial portion of accumulated N in their nutrient tissues to the grains in later stages [5]. During the grain filling period, N transport occurs mainly via redistribution. Studies have shown that leaves and stems are the primary N sources for grains, while the contributions of glumes (around 15%) and roots (around 10%) are relatively modest [14]. In the early flowering stage, the N content in leaves and stems increases through net nutrient absorption. During flowering, N is transferred to the developing grains, transforming these organs from a “reservoir” to a “source” [5]. Developing grains efficiently absorb N from aging parts, storage sources, and root absorption [5]. By harvest time, approximately 80% of aboveground tissue N has been transferred to the grain [15], accounting for 50–100% of the grain N content at harvest [16].
In wheat, 70 to 95% of grain N is derived from N redistribution stored in vegetative tissues during the early flowering stage [17], with only a minor portion absorbed post-flowering [18]. The N-fertilizer rate influences N absorption by plants, with high N > low N > no N application [19]. Nonetheless, excessive N fertilization can hinder N transport to grains. Cox et al. [20] showed that high-N fertilization pre-flowering increases N uptake post-flowering but reduces N transport capacity, whereas low-N conditions can enhance it [21]. Therefore, the ability to allocate N to stems and leaves during vegetative growth and subsequently transfer it to grains is crucial for determining crop N-use efficiency.
N-use efficiency is a key indicator for assessing N absorption efficiency, impacting both the economic benefits of agricultural production and ecological environment security [22,23,24]. Thus, to advance the “second green revolution”, it is necessary to determine the N fertilizer application based on the actual N demand of crops to enhance N-use efficiency [5]. N-use efficiency is a multifaceted trait, influenced by several steps including N absorption, transport, assimilation, and migration, all regulated by multiple interacting factors [5]. Optimal fertilization practices ensure that all applied fertilizers are absorbed and utilized by crops without wastage [25]. When N fertilization exceeds crop requirements, its uptake efficiency decreases, leading to excess N remaining in the soil or being lost [26]. Conversely, if N fertilizer input falls short of crop needs, soil N will be depleted [27]. Ultimately, crop yield is restricted by N absorption, which is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. These factors can affect the potential for crop yield improvement, disrupting the balance between N fertilization and N accumulation in crops, and ultimately impacting N-use efficiency [28]. Hence, optimizing crop N management and rational N fertilization practices is of paramount importance in agricultural research [29]. However, the N fertilizer recovery rate remains low, between 25% and 50% [30,31], primarily due to the mismatch between N fertilization and crop requirements [32]. Previous studies have predominantly evaluated N-use efficiency based on wheat grain or overall biomass yield. Nonetheless, the effects of dry matter translocation and N redistribution in various wheat organs on N-use efficiency remains unclear.
We hypothesized that N fertilization influences the translocation of both dry matter and N in wheat, ultimately affecting N-use efficiency. Optimizing N fertilization can enhance the migration of dry matter and N, thereby improving N-use efficiency. Our objectives are: (i) to analyze the patterns of dry matter translocation in wheat; (ii) to identify the characteristics of N absorption, transport, and redistribution in wheat; and (iii) to explore the mechanisms affecting N-use efficiency and determine the optimal N-fertilizer rate for spring wheat fields in the arid hilly areas of central Gansu. This research seeks to enhance the management of N in rain-fed agricultural systems and establish a theoretical foundation for sustainable and intensive wheat cultivation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The long-term N fertilization experiment for mono-cropping spring wheat began in 2003 in Anding District, Dingxi City, located in the hilly region of central southern Gansu Province, a typical semi-arid rain-fed agricultural area without irrigation. From 2003 to 2019, temperatures ranged from −22 °C in January to 38 °C in July. The annual mean precipitation and evaporation were 390.7 mm and 1531 mm (variation coefficient 24.3%), respectively. Solar radiation averaged 5930 MJ m−2 annually, with 2480 h of sunshine per year. The mean annual temperature was 6.4 °C, and the accumulated temperature of ≥10 °C was 2240 °C. The frost-free period lasted 140 days. Monthly soil rainfall and temperature data for the experimental area are shown in Figure 1. In 2018, precipitation was 479 mm with an average temperature of 7.2 °C; in 2019, precipitation was 478.4 mm with an average temperature of 7.4 °C. The field had a long tradition of conventional farming, with flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) being the previous crop. The soil properties at a depth of 0–80 cm were 0.78 g kg−1 total N, 5.04 mg kg−1 NH4-N, 27.60 mg kg−1 NO3-N, 8.32 pH, 1.80 g kg−1 total phosphorus, 6.78 mg kg−1 available potassium, and 18.40 g kg−1 total potassium, 221.42 mg kg−1 available potassium, 1.20 g cm−3 bulk density, and 12.20 g kg−1 organic matter.

2.2. Experimental Design and Field Management

The experiment employed a completely randomized block design, repeated three times, with each plot encompassing a 30-square-meter area. Five different N-fertilizer rate treatments were tested: N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210, corresponding to annual N fertilizer doses of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively. Each treatment received the same amount of phosphorus fertilizer (105 kg P2O5 ha−1) before sowing. The high-yielding spring wheat variety Dingxi 38 was sown in mid-March at a seeding rate of 187.5 kg ha−1 with a row spacing of 20 cm. Harvesting occurred from late July to early August. Throughout the growing season, weeds were manually removed, and Roundup® (glyphosate, 10%) was applied as needed during the fallow period post-harvest. Pests and diseases were monitored and controlled following conventional practices in the region.

2.3. Sampling and Analysis

Throughout the various growth stages of wheat, aboveground samples were collected in each test plot. During the jointing stage, samples were taken without differentiating between organs. At anthesis, samples were categorized into leaves, stem + sheath, and ear. At maturity, samples were divided into leaves, stem + sheath, rachilla + glume, and grain. These samples were then oven dried at 70 °C, weighed to obtain the dry matter of each organ, ground, and sieved (<2 mm) for N testing. For the maturity stage, 0.5 m of side rows were removed from each plot before harvesting the remaining plants. After natural drying and threshing, the wheat yield was measured. N concentration was analyzed using the Semimicro Kjeldahl method with a Vapodest 50s (Gerhardt, Königswinter, Germany) [33].

2.4. Calculation

Throughout the wheat reproductive growth stage, it is assumed that the decrease in dry matter and nutrient accumulation in the vegetative organs is transferred to the grains. To quantify this process, various parameters were calculated, including the dry matter translocation amount (DTA, mg stem−1), dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE, %), dry matter contribution proportion (DCP, %), crop growth rate (CGR, kg ha−1 d−1), nitrogen (N) translocation amount (NTA, kg ha−1), N translocation efficiency (NTE, %), and N contribution proportion (NCP, %). These were calculated using Equations (1)–(7).
DTA = dry matter accumulation amount at anthesis − dry matter accumulation amount in vegetative organs (leaf, stem + sheath, and glumes) at maturity
DTE = DTA dry   matter   accumulation   amount   at   anthesis × 100
DCP = DTA grain   yield × 100
CGR = changes   of   dry   matter   accumulation time   interval   between   two   samples
NTA = N accumulation at anthesis − N accumulation at maturity (excluding grain)
NTE = NTA N   uptake   at   anthesis × 100
NCP = NTA grain   N   uptake × 100
N-use efficiency was assessed based on N harvest index (NHI), N utilization efficiency (NUE, kg kg−1), N agronomic efficiency (NAE, kg kg−1), N recovery efficiency (NRE, %), N partial factor productivity (NPFP, kg kg−1), and N marginal benefit (NMB, kg kg−1), which were calculated using Equations (8)−(13).
NHI = grain   N   uptake total   N   uptake  
NUE = grain   yield total   N   uptake  
NAE = grain   yield   of   N-treatment grain   yield   of   non-N-fertilized   control N   application   rate  
NRE = total   N   uptake   of   N-treatment total   N   uptake   of   non-N-fertilized   control N   application   rate  
NPFP = grain   of   N-treatment N   application   rate  
NMB = grain   yield   increase N   application   rate   increase

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 21.0 software. To assess the differences in wheat dry matter translocation characteristics, N translocation characteristics, and N-use efficiency varied with different N-fertilizer rates, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was executed. Post hoc tests were performed to further analyze any significant differences identified by the ANOVA results, using the LSD method (p < 0.05) to assess significant differences among treatments. Additionally, Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was applied to evaluate the linear relationship among various indicators.

3. Results

3.1. Dry Matter Translocation Characteristics

3.1.1. Dry Matter Accumulation

The N-fertilized treatments (N52.5–N210) significantly increased DMA at various wheat development stages, following the trend: maturity > anthesis > jointing. At jointing, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average DMA by 25.91%, 30.47%, 35.02%, and 35.08%, respectively, with no significant difference among N-fertilized treatments (Table 1). At anthesis, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average DMA by 21.76%, 47.90%, 64.38%, and 60.68%, respectively, with higher-N treatments (N157.5 and N210) significantly outperforming lower-N treatments (N52.5 and N105). At maturity, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average DMA by 22.97%, 52.04%, 56.25%, and 50.95%, respectively, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1.
N fertilization significantly enhanced DMAP across various wheat development stages. Before flowering, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average DMAP by 17.43%, 66.05%, 94.93%, and 87.33%, respectively, with higher-N treatments (N157.5 and N210) significantly outperforming lower-N treatments (N52.5 and N105). The DMAP from anthesis to maturity was greatest at 105 kg N ha−1, exhibiting an increase of 28.58–65.90% over other treatments. The CGR responses to N-fertilizer rates mirrored those of DMAP. During the jointing to anthesis period, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average CGR by 17.11%, 66.84%, 92.85%, and 87.72%, respectively, with higher-N treatments (N157.5 and N210) significantly outpacing lower-N treatments (N52.5) and medium-N treatment (N105). The CGR from anthesis to maturity was greatest at 105 kg N ha−1, showing an increase of 28.19–69.75% compared to other treatments.

3.1.2. Dry Matter Distribution

Table 2 shows the impact of varying N-fertilizer rates on the two-year and average DDP in different wheat tissues at various developmental stages. At anthesis, the two-year average DDP of stem + sheath (50.73–56.02%) was greater than other tissues, while at maturity, the ear exhibited the greatest two-year average DDP (49.32–51.57%). The smallest two-year average DDP was observed in the leaf, ranging from 12.81–16.70% at anthesis and 8.79–9.86% at maturity. The overall trend of two-year average DDP at anthesis was stem + sheath > ear > leaf, whereas at maturity, it was stem + sheath > grain > rachilla + glume > leaf. Compared to N0, N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average DDP of leaves at anthesis by 18.78%, 23.21%, 30.37%, and 28.96%, respectively. N fertilization significantly reduced the two-year average DDP of stem + sheath at anthesis, with a decrease correlating with increasing N-fertilizer rates, and had no significant impact on the DDP of ear at anthesis. Compared to higher-N treatments (N157.5 and N210), the two-year average DDP of grain at maturity was lowest at the 105 kg N ha−1 rate, 6.00–7.08% lower than other treatments.

3.1.3. Dry Matter Transport

Figure 2A–C shows the impact of varying N-fertilizer rates on the DTA, DTE, and DCP in wheat. Compared to N0, the N-fertilized treatments led to significant increases in DTA by 81.51%, 46.04%, 120.12%, and 92.62%, respectively. However, the DTA for the N105 treatment was significantly lower than that of other N-fertilized treatments. Additionally, the DTE of the N105 treatment showed a significant reduction when compared to the other treatments, including N0. In contrast, other N-fertilized treatments (N52.5, N157.5, and N210) exhibited DTE values that were significantly 26.97–33.55% greater than N0. The trend of DCP mirrored that of DTE.
The DTA of various wheat tissues followed the order: rachilla + glume > stem + sheath > leaf (excluding N105) (Figure 2D). Compared to N0, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the DTA of leaves by 180.37%, 188.42%, 308.85%, and 276.95%, respectively. Relative to N0, the N52.5, N157.5, and N210 treatments significantly increased the DTA of stem + sheath by 97.87%, 66.03%, and 74.82%, respectively, while the N105 treatment did not show significant improvement. Similarly, N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the DTA of rachilla + glume by 44.60%, 75.10%, 116.17%, and 61.45%, respectively.
The DTE of various wheat tissues followed the order: rachilla + glume > leaf > stem + sheath (Figure 2E). Relative to N0, the N52.5, N157.5, and N210 treatments significantly increased the DTE of leaves by 70.79%, 82.66%, and 86.89%, respectively, with no significant difference between N105 and N0. The DTE of stem + sheath at 105 kg N ha−1 was significantly lower than other treatments, including N0.
The DCP followed the order: rachilla + glume > stem + sheath > leaf (excluding N105) (Figure 2F). Relative to N0, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the DCP of leaves by 94.37%, 64.95%, 144.03%, and 149.80%, respectively. Additionally, higher-N-fertilized treatments (N157.5 and N210) significantly increased the DCP of leaves. Conversely, the DCP of stem + sheath and rachilla + glume at 105 kg N ha−1 was significantly reduced.

3.1.4. Correlation between Yield and Dry Matter Translocation Characteristics

Increases in DMA at various developmental stages, DMAP, and CGR from jointing to anthesis improved wheat grain yield (Table 3). Additionally, a higher DDP in leaves at anthesis, as well as DTA in leaves and rachilla + glumes, also increased wheat grain yield. Conversely, a higher DDP in stem + sheath at anthesis and maturity decreased grain yield.

3.2. Nitrogen Translocation Characteristics

3.2.1. Nitrogen Accumulation

Over a 17-year period, annual N-fertilizer rates significantly influenced the aboveground NAA in wheat (Figure 3). N fertilization significantly increased NAA at various wheat development stages. At anthesis, the N-fertilized treatments increased the two-year average NAA by 96.94%, 167.68%, 169.61%, and 134.60%, respectively. At maturity, the N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average NAA by 52.04%, 129.98%, 126.05%, and 104.78%, respectively, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1.
The NAA of ear (5.27–12.95 mg stem−1) was higher than in other tissues at anthesis. However, at maturity, the NAA in the grain (9.92–18.43 mg stem−1) was higher (Figure 3). At anthesis, the NAA followed the trend: ear >stem + sheath > leaf, while at maturity, the trend was: grain > stem + sheath > glume > leaf. Notably, at anthesis, the N-fertilized treatments increased the two-year average NAA of leaves by 161.61%, 267.26%, 295.88%, and 234.26%, respectively, with no significant increase beyond 157.5 kg N ha−1. The N-fertilized treatments also increased the two-year average NAA of stem + sheath by 82.38%, 125.41%, 141.89%, and 106.48%, respectively. Additionally, the N-fertilized treatments increased the two-year average NAA of ear by 72.05%, 145.75%, 135.48%, and 107.73%, respectively. At maturity, the N-fertilized treatments increased the two-year average NAA of leaves by 122.28%, 226.40%, 246.83%, and 200.88%, respectively. The N-fertilized treatments also increased the two-year average NAA of stem + sheath by 71.20%, 193.34%, 175.20%, and 140.00%, respectively. Furthermore, the N-fertilized treatments increased the two-year average NAA of glume by 111.83%, 181.61%, 201.66%, and 196.74%, respectively. Lastly, the N-fertilized treatments increased the two-year average NAA of grain at maturity by 23.58%, 85.78%, 82.25%, and 62.40%, respectively.

3.2.2. Nitrogen Distribution

Table 4 showed the impact of N-fertilizer rates on NDP across various wheat tissues at different development stages. At anthesis, the NDP of the ear (36.12–41.16%) was higher than that of other tissues, while at maturity, the NDP of the grain (61.78–78.18%) was the highest. The leaf exhibited the smallest NDP (16.60–24.32% at anthesis and 6.20–9.44% at maturity). The overall NDP trend was ear > stem + sheath > leaf at anthesis, and grain > stem + sheath > glume > leaf at maturity. Compared to N0, N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average leaf NDP by 31.93%, 35.70%, 46.50%, and 41.21%, respectively. Additionally, N52.5, N157.5, and N210 treatments significantly reduced the NDP of ear at anthesis by 12.25%, 13.02%, and 11.35%, respectively. N fertilization did not affect the NDP of stem + sheath at maturity. At maturity, N-fertilized treatments increased the two-year average NDP of leaves by 44.46%, 40.69%, 52.22%, and 47.65%, respectively. N52.5, N157.5, and N210 treatments also significantly increased the NDP of glumes by 13.58%, 13.06%, and 14.20%, respectively. Conversely, N-fertilized treatments significantly reduced the two-year average NDP of grain by 18.20%, 19.64%, 19.49%, and 20.97%, respectively. Finally, N fertilization had no effect on the NDP of stem + sheath.

3.2.3. Nitrogen Transport

Compared to N0, N-fertilized treatments increased the NTA of wheat vegetative organs by 95.00%, 143.82%, 146.61%, and 108.46%, respectively (Figure 4A). The N-fertilized treatments also increased the NCP of wheat vegetative organs by 57.83%, 31.13%, 35.19%, and 27.79%, respectively. The N52.5 treatments showed a significantly greater NCP than other treatments (Figure 4C). However, N-fertilizer rate did not significantly affect the NTE of wheat vegetative organs (Figure 4B).
The NTA of different wheat tissues followed the order: glume > leaf > stem + sheath (excluding N0) (Figure 4D). Compared to N0, N-fertilized treatments increased the NTA of leaves by 185.50%, 292.07%, 325.69%, and 254.54%, respectively, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1. N105-N210 treatments increased the NTA of glume by 134.59%, 114.90%, and 80.07%, respectively. The NTE of different wheat tissues followed the order: glume > leaf > stem + sheath (Figure 4E). Higher N-fertilized treatments (N157.5 and N210) significantly reduced the NTE of glume by 8.86% and 13.00%, respectively. The NCP followed the order: glume > leaf > stem + sheath (Figure 4F). Compared to N0, N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the leaf NCP by 128.31%, 108.72%, 132.60%, and 113.79%, respectively. Only the N52.5 treatment significantly reduced the NCP of stem + sheath by 12.23% compared to N0. Similarly, the N52.5 and N105 treatments significantly increased the glume NCP by 29.84% and 25.02%, respectively.

3.2.4. Correlation between Yield and Nitrogen Translocation Characteristics

Table 3 showed the correlation between yield and N accumulation, distribution, and transportation (Table 5). Higher NAA at various wheat development stages (jointing, anthesis, and maturity), NDP of leaves at anthesis and maturity, and NDP of rachilla + glume at maturity all increased wheat grain yield. Additionally, higher NTA of leaves and rachilla + glume also contributed to increased wheat grain yield. However, higher NDP of grain at maturity and NTE of rachilla + glume decreased grain yield.

3.3. Soil NO3-N

The N-fertilizer rate significantly affected NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layer at maturity (Figure 5). Compared to N0, the higher-N treatment (N210) resulted in a 26.27% increase in NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layer in 2018. In 2019, the higher-N treatments (N157.5 and N210) led to increases of 81.58% and 122.44%, respectively, with no significant differences observed among other treatments (including N0). Over the two years, the N-fertilizer rate had no significant impact on NO3-N accumulation in the 0–40 cm soil layer, whereas the N210 treatment showed the highest NO3-N accumulation in the 40–100 cm soil layer.

3.4. Nitrogen-Use Efficiency Indicators

This study evaluated various N-use efficiency indicators, including NHI, NUE, NAE, NRE, NPFP, and NMB (Figure 6). The N-fertilized treatments significantly decreased the two-year average NHI of wheat by 11.08%, 9.89%, 10.06%, and 12.85%, respectively (Figure 6A). Additionally, the N-fertilized treatments led to a significant reduction in the two-year average NUE of wheat by 11.14%, 15.14%, 17.42%, and 20.79%, respectively, decreasing with increasing N-fertilizer rates (Figure 6B). NAE, NRE, NPFP, and NMB also significantly differed among the N-fertilized treatments (Figure 6C–F).
The highest NAE (9.31 kg kg−1) was observed at N105, followed by 8.62 kg kg−1 at N157.5 and 7.95 kg kg−1 at N52.5. The lowest NAE, 5.35 kg kg−1, was observed at N5. Both NRE and NPFP exhibited a declining trend with increased N-fertilizer rates over the years. The highest NRE of 38.32% was observed at N105, while the highest NPFP (47.66 kg kg−1) was noted at N52.5. The NMB trend paralleled that of NAE, with the highest NMB of 10.67 kg kg−1 at N105, followed by 7.95 kg kg−1 at N52.5 and 7.23 kg kg−1at N157.5. The lowest NMB, −4.48 kg kg−1, was recorded at N5, suggesting an over-application of N beyond the crop’s needs. Higher DTA and NTA decreased NHI and NUE, while higher NTE increased NHI, NUE, and NPFP (Figure 7). However, DTE had no significant impact on N-use efficiency indicators. Additionally, higher soil NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm layer decreased NHI, NUE, NAE, NPFP, and NMB, and had no significant effect on NRE.

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of N-Fertilizer Rate on Dry Matter Characteristics

The final grain yield is closely related to the DMA [34,35]. Research indicates that dry matter accumulation exhibits a “slow–fast–slow” pattern across growth stages: slow before jointing, fastest from jointing to anthesis, and slow again post-flowering [36], aligning with the findings of this study. Increasing the N-fertilizer rate can elevate DMA at each growth stage and ultimately increase crop yield [37]. N fertilization significantly increased DMA at various wheat development stages, following the trend: maturity > anthesis > jointing (Table 1). Si et al. [38] reported that DMA was highest at 300 kg·ha−1. We found that N-fertilized treatments significantly increased the two-year average DMA by 22.97–56.25% at maturity, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1. Regional differences contribute to the variation in N-fertilizer rates, with lower N demand in semi-arid rain-fed agricultural areas on the Loess Plateau due to water and variety constraints [39]. Furthermore, consistent with Si et al. [38], increasing N fertilization enhanced the intensity of dry matter accumulation, but a threshold effect was observed, with no significant difference between higher N105-N210 doses (Table 1). This underscores the importance of appropriate N fertilization for DMA [40].
N-fertilizer rate significantly influenced wheat crop growth [41]. Throughout this study, N fertilization significantly increased the DMAP at various wheat development stages, showing an overall trend of pre-flowering > post-flowering, consistent with Ye et al. [38]. During jointing to anthesis, N fertilization significantly increased the two-year average DMAP by 17.43–94.93%, with high-N treatment significantly greater than low-N treatment. N fertilization also significantly increased the two-year average CGR pre-flowering by 17.11–92.85%, with higher averages under higher-N treatments (N157.5 and N210). Nevertheless, the CGR post-flowering was highest at 105 kg N ha−1, increasing by 28.19–69.75% compared to other treatments, further proving the threshold effect of N fertilization on DMA at various growth stages [40]. Additionally, the DDP of stem + sheath (50.73–56.02%) was greater than other tissues at anthesis, while the DDP of ear (49.32–51.57%) was greater at maturity, consistent with Dai et al. [41].
Grain yield can be attributed to two components: the transport of compounds stored in vegetative organs pre-flowering and the accumulation of photosynthetic products post-flowering. Zheng et al. [42] found that approximately 30% of wheat grain yield comes from pre-flowering vegetative organs, while around 60% is derived from post-flowering leaf photosynthesis. Ma et al. [37] found that increasing the N-fertilizer rate boosts the DTA and the DCP to grains post-flowering. Yan et al. [43] and Zhang et al. [44] noted that higher N-fertilizer rates reduce the DCP of pre-flowering, while increasing both the DTA and DCP post-flowering. This phenomenon may be associated with fertilization shortening the nutritional growth period of wheat, advancing the reproductive growth period, initiating spike differentiation earlier, and leading to premature grain filling. In this study, higher-N treatments (N157.5 and N210) were at excess levels, and a moderate reduction of N fertilization proved advantageous in sustaining the growth of wheat and enhancing the role of assimilate accumulation in grain production post-flowering. The N105 treatment resulted in the lowest DTA, DTE, and DCP, with no significant difference observed among N52.5, N157.5 and N210. A too-low N-fertilizer rate fails to meet the N demand during the production and growth stages, often resulting in premature senescence of wheat leaves during grain filling. Conversely, an excessively high N-fertilizer rate can delay crop maturity and is detrimental to dry matter accumulation in grains [45]. Yang et al. [46] also indicated that excessive N fertilization delays wheat aging, leading to a significant amount of non-structural carbohydrates remaining in the straw and reducing grain yield. Appropriate N reduction can improve the transport and filling characteristics of assimilates to grains post-flowering [35]. Additionally, the fitting results between pre-flowering and post-flowering DMA and yield indicate that DMA is fundamental for wheat grain yield (Table 3), which contradicts the conclusion by Yan et al. [43]. This discrepancy indicates certain limitations in using only dry matter characteristics to evaluate grain yield formation.

4.2. Effect of N-Fertilizer Rate on N Translocation Characteristics

N uptake, a critical measure of N limitation on plant growth, requires both N sources and reservoirs [47]. Beyond the available N conditions in the external soil, plant N absorption also influences the N content [48]. N fertilization can alter the effectiveness of soil N [49], thereby affecting plant N absorption and translocation [50]. During crop growth, N accumulates in the form of photosynthetic compounds, and the N in plants is continuously utilized and recycled. While N fertilization can increase the N absorption of crops, it may reduce N absorption efficiency [51]. Studies have shown that the pre-flowering period is the main phase for N absorption in wheat, accounting for about 80% of total N uptake [52]. Liu et al. [53] found that N absorption accumulates more significantly after the jointing stage, accounting for more than 60% of total N absorption, with the highest N absorption rate occurring during the jointing to flowering stage. Additionally, research indicates that N loss occurs in plants post-flowering through various pathways, leading to a decrease in N accumulation during the mature stage compared to the flowering stage [54]. In our study, the NAA exhibited an overall trend of anthesis > maturity > jointing. N105-N210 treatments notably boosted N content in wheat at various developmental stages (Figure 3), in line with Huang et al. [55]. N fertilization significantly increased NAA at various wheat development stages. At anthesis, N fertilization increased the two-year average NAA by 96.94–169.61%, with no further increase observed beyond 157.5 kg N ha−1 (N157.5). At maturity, N fertilization significantly increased the two-year average NAA by 52.04–129.98%, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1, consistent with previous research [51]. However, N52.5, N157.5, and N210 treatments significantly reduced the NDP of the ear at anthesis by 12.25%, 13.02%, and 11.35%, respectively. This suggests that both insufficient and excessive N application can lead to plants allocating more N to vegetative growth, with some of the N not being effectively transported to reproductive growth, thereby significantly impacting N-use efficiency.
From flowering to maturity, N in various organs of wheat is continuously redistributed, primarily transported from vegetative organs to grains. Grain N is sourced from two main pathways: first, direct absorption and assimilation post-flowering; second, the retranslation of N accumulated by pre-flowering plants. Notably, the majority of N in grains originates from N stored in vegetative organs pre-flowering [56]. In our study, N fertilization increased the NTA of wheat vegetative organs by 95.00–146.61% (Figure 3A). Additionally, the NTA of different wheat tissues followed the order: glume > leaf > stem + sheath (Figure 4D), with the highest NTA of glume observed at 105 kg N ha−1. The two-year average NTE ranged from 56.89–63.80%, with the highest value observed in the low-N treatment (N52.5), which was lower than the global meta-analysis estimates of 62.1% [57]. However, N fertilization did not significantly affect the NTE of wheat vegetative organs, which was inconsistent with results in perennial plants [58,59]. N fertilization increased the NCP of wheat vegetative organs by 27.79–57.83%, with the highest value observed in the low-N treatment (N52.5).
Efficient storage and movement of N in plant tissues are crucial for growth and reproduction, ultimately affecting N uptake and distribution in N-deficient environments, which are typically linked to increased plant productivity [60]. In many N-deficient ecosystems, plant N uptake is usually positively correlated with productivity [61]. This research revealed similar findings, demonstrating significant positive correlations between grain yield and NAA, as well as between grain yield and the NDP of leaves at the thesis and maturity stages, and the NDP of rachilla and glume at maturity. Conversely, a significant negative relationship was observed between grain yield and the NDP of grain, as well as the NTE of rachilla + glume at maturity. These findings align with the conclusions drawn by Millard and Grelet [60] in their study on trees, suggesting that increased N transfer and leaf N reabsorption can enhance crop yield. Therefore, increasing N accumulation positively impacts grain yield improvement. During the later stage of wheat growth, senescence can promote N retranslocation in leaves, thereby increasing distribution to grains. Promoting the reutilization and recycling of N in aging plant organs is also a critical strategy for achieving high wheat yield, consistent with Johannes et al. [62,63].

4.3. Nitrogen-Use Efficiency

The primary objective of N fertilizer is to maximize crop growth by ensuring an adequate N supply to crops [64]. Investigating methods to enhance N absorption and utilization in crop farming is crucial for the advancement of sustainable agriculture [65]. N-use efficiency is a common measure of N absorption efficiency [66]. Over-application of N fertilizer can reduce its utilization efficiency and result in economic losses [22,23]. The accumulation of NO3–N in most Chinese farmlands is primarily due to the prolonged and unchecked application of N fertilizers [67]. In this study, compared to N0, the higher-N treatment (N210) resulted in a 26.27% increase in NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layer in 2018 and a 122.44% increase in 2019 (Figure 5). Additionally, higher soil NO3-N accumulation decreased NHI, NUE, NAE, NPFP, and NMB. Thus, optimizing N nutrition for crops and using N fertilizers judiciously is essential [29]. The N uptake efficiency is relatively low, typically ranging from 25% to 50% [30]. A global fertilization experiment at 306 locations found that N uptake efficiency declined as N-fertilizer rates increased [59]. In the northwest Loess Plateau region, N fertilization reduced the NHI of wheat by 9.89–12.85% and the NUE by 11.14–20.79% (Figure 6). The NRE (38.32%) and NMB (10.67 kg kg−1) were highest at 105 kg N ha−1 and lowest at 210 kg N ha−1. Additionally, NMB was negative at 210 kg N ha−1, indicating an over-application of N beyond the crop’s needs, consistent with Li et al. [68].
The decline in N fertilizer utilization efficiency indicates an increase in N availability that crops do not convert into grain yield [69]. Therefore, reducing the N fertilization used by farmers in the region is necessary to enhance N fertilizer utilization efficiency [70]. Ladha et al. [71] also emphasized the importance of N management to enhance absorption efficiency. Consequently, improving N-use efficiency through minimizing N fertilization and enhancing N uptake by crops is essential for sustainable crop yield. Our study found that DTA and NTA showed significant negative correlations with NHI and NUE, whereas NTE demonstrated significant positive correlations with NHI, NUE, and NPFP. However, DTE had no significant impact on N-use efficiency indicators. This indicates that N fertilization improved the N-use efficiency of spring wheat by enhancing N translocation rather than dry matter translocation.

5. Conclusions

This long-term experiment on N fertilization in mono-cropped spring wheat revealed that increasing the rate of N fertilizer significantly enhanced the DMA, NAA, NTE, and NCP of wheat, with no significant increase beyond 105 kg N ha−1. Additionally, the high-N treatment (N210) led to an increase in NO3-N accumulation in the 0–100 cm soil layer, ranging from 26.27% to 122.44%. N fertilization also significantly reduced the two-year average NHI by 9.89–12.85% and NUE by 11.14–20.79%, both decreasing with higher N application rates. However, both insufficient and excessive N applications led to more N being allocated to vegetative growth rather than reproductive growth, thereby impacting N-use efficiency. A rate of 105 kg N ha−1 was identified as optimal for improving wheat DMA, CGR, and NAA, achieving the highest NAE of 9.31 kg kg−1, NRE of 38.32%, and NMB of 10.67 kg kg−1. This N rate improved N-use efficiency by enhancing N translocation rather than dry matter translocation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L.; Data curation, Y.C. and X.W.; Formal analysis, J.X. and C.L.; Funding acquisition, A.X. and L.L.; Investigation, A.X. and C.L.; Methodology, A.X. and L.L.; Project administration, J.X.; Resources, L.L. and A.X.; Software, A.X., Y.C. and X.W.; Supervision, L.L.; Writing—original draft, A.X.; Writing—review and editing, L.L., Z.E. and S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by start-up funds from National Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (23JRRA1412), the Education Department of Gansu Province: Youth Doctoral Support Project (2024QB-069), and the Gansu Agricultural University for openly-recruited Ph.D. graduates (GAU-KYQD-2021−17). We also appreciate the assistance in the field and laboratory by students of the Rainfed Agricultural Experimental Station of Gansu Agricultural University.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Walsh, O.S.; Shafian, S.; Christiaens, R.J. Nitrogen Fertilizer Management in Dryland Wheat Cropping Systems. Plants 2018, 7, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sharma, L.K.; Bali, S.K. A review of methods to improve nitrogen use efficiency in agriculture. Sustainability 2017, 10, 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hickey, L.T.; Hafeez, A.N.; Robinson, H.; Jackson, S.A.; Leal-Bertioli, S.C.; Tester, M.; Gao, C.; Godwin, I.D.; Hayes, B.J.; Wulff, B.B. Breeding crops to feed 10 billion. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grote, U.; Fasse, A.; Nguyen, T.T.; Erenstein, O. Food security and the dynamics of wheat and maize value chains in Africa and Asia. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 4, 617009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kaur, B.; Kaur, G.; Asthir, B. Biochemical aspects of nitrogen use efficiency: An overview. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 506–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, W.F.; Ma, L.; Huang, G.Q.; Wu, L.; Chen, X.P.; Zhang, F.S. The development and contribution of nitrogenous fertilizer in China and challenges faced by the country. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2013, 46, 3161–3171. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ye, Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, H.; Zhu, Y. Effect of Nitrogen Application on Dry Matter Accumulation and Translocation in Wheat. J. Triticeae Crops 2012, 32, 488–493. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, J.H.; Liu, J.L.; Zhang, J.B.; Zhao, F.T.; Cheng, Y.N.; Wang, W.P. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Translocation of Dry Matter and Nitrogen Utilization in Rice and Wheat. Acta Agron. Sin. 2010, 36, 1736–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, M.; Wu, X.; Li, C.; Li, M.; Xiong, T.; Tang, Y. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, partitioning, and translocation in synthetic-derived wheat cultivars under nitrogen deficiency at the post-jointing stage. Field Crops Res. 2020, 248, 107720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Q.; Yan, J. Sustainable agriculture in the era of omics: Knowledge-driven crop breeding. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Christensen, L.E.; Below, F.E.; Hageman, R.H. The Effects of Ear Removal on Senescence and Metabolism of Maize. Plant Physiol. 1981, 68, 1180–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Plénet, D.; Lemaire, G. Relationships between dynamics of nitrogen uptake and dry matter accumulation in maize crops. Determination of critical N concentration. Plant Soil 1999, 216, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lu, J.; Duan, B.; Yang, M.; Yang, H.; Yang, H. Research progress in nitrogen and p hosphorus resorption from senesced leaves and the influence of ontogenetic and environmental factors. Acta Pratacult. Sin. 2018, 27, 178–188. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dobermann, A.; Ping, J.L.; Adamchuk, V.I.; Simbahan, G.C.; Ferguson, R.B. Classification of Crop Yield Variability in Irrigated Production Fields. Agron. J. 2003, 95, 1105–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cregan, P.B.; Van Berkum, P. Genetics of nitrogen metabolism and physiological/biochemical selection for increased grain crop productivity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1984, 67, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gebbing, T.; Schnyder, H. Pre-anthesis reserve utilization for protein and carbohydrate synthesis in grains of wheat. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121, 871–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barraclough, P.B.; Howarth, J.R.; Jones, J.; Lopez-Bellido, R.; Parmar, S.; Shepherd, C.E.; Hawkesford, M.J. Nitrogen efficiency of wheat: Genotypic and environmental variation and prospects for improvement. Eur. J. Agron. 2010, 33, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hirel, B.; Le Gouis, J.; Ney, B.; Gallais, A. The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: Towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2369–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, L.; Green, R.; Klein, G.; Hartin, J.S.; Burger, D.W. Nitrogen source and rate influence on tall fescue quality and nitrate leaching in a southern California lawn. Agron. J. 2010, 102, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cox, M.C.; Qualset, C.O.; Rains, D.W. Genetic Variation for Nitrogen Assimilation and Translocation in Wheat. II. Nitrogen Assimilation in Relation to Grain Yield and Protein. Crop Sci. 1985, 25, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barbottin, A.; Lecomte, C.; Bouchard, C.; Jeuffroy, M.H. Nitrogen remobilization during grain filling in wheat: Genotypic and environmental effects. Crop Sci. 2005, 45, 1141–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, F.; Chen, X.; Vitousek, P. An experiment for the world. Nature 2013, 497, 33–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Malhi, S.S.; Soon, Y.K.; Grant, C.A.; Lemke, R.; Lupwayi, N. Influence of controlled-release urea on seed yield and N concentration, and N use efficiency of small grain crops grown on Dark Gray Luvisols. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2010, 90, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, J.H.; Liu, X.J.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, J.L.; Han, W.X.; Zhang, W.F.; Christie, P.; Goulding, K.W.T.; Vitousek, P.M.; Zhang, F.S. Significant Acidification in Major Chinese Croplands. Science 2010, 327, 1008–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Peltonen, J.; Virtanen, A.; Haggren, E. Using a chlorophyll meter to optimize nitrogen fertilizer application for intensively-managed small-grain cereals. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1995, 174, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. O’Donovan, J.T.; Grant, C.A.; Blackshaw, R.E.; Harker, K.N.; Johnson, E.N.; Gan, Y.; Lafond, G.P.; May, W.E.; Turkington, T.K.; Lupwayi, N.Z.; et al. Rotational effects of legumes and non-legumes on hybrid canola and malting barley. Agron. J. 2014, 106, 1921–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Glendining, M.J.; Powlson, D.S. The effect of long-term applications of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on soil organic nitrogen. Adv. Soil Org. Matter Res. 2003, 329–338. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, H.; Zhang, W.F.; Zhang, F.S.; Du, F.; Li, L.K. Chemical fertilizer use and efficiency change of main grain crops in China. Plant Nutr. Fertil. Sci. 2010, 16, 1136–1143. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zavalin, A.A.; Kurishbayev, A.K.; Ramazanova, R.K.; Tursinbaeva, A.E.; Kassipkhan, A. Fertilizer Nitrogen Use by Spring Triticale and Spring Wheat on Dark-Chestnut Soil of the Dry Steppe Zone of Kazakhstan. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2018, 44, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chien, S.H.; Teixeira, L.A.; Cantarella, H.; Rehm, G.W.; Grant, C.A.; Gearhart, M.M. Agronomic effectiveness of granular nitrogen/phosphorus fertilizers containing elemental sulfur with and without ammonium sulfate: A review. Agron. J. 2016, 108, 1203–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Essono, D.M.; Nkoué, B.B.; Voundi, E.; Kono, L.; Verrecchia, E.; Ghazoul, J.; Mala, A.W.; Buttler, A.; Guillaume, T. Nutrient availability challenges the sustainability of low-input oil palm farming systems. Farming Syst. 2023, 1, 100006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abebe, Z.; Feyisa, H. Effects of nitrogen rates and time of application on yield of maize: Rainfall variability influenced time of N application. Int. J. Agron. 2017, 2017, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bao, S.D. Analysis of Soil Agro-Chemistry; Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 1999. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Ronga, D.; Parisi, M.; Pentangelo, A.; Mori, M.; Di Mola, I. Effects of nitrogen management on biomass production and dry matter distribution of processing tomato cropped in southern Italy. Agronomy 2019, 9, 855–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ouyang, X.Y.; Jiang, G.Y.; Liu, J.G.; Wang, H.Q.; Wang, R.R. Effect of nitrogen reduction on the remobilization of postanthesis assimilates to grain and grain-flling characteristics in a drip-irrigated spring wheat system. Crop Sci. 2023, 63, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ye, G.F.; Zhang, S.J.; Zhang, L.H.; Lin, Y.M.; Wei, S.D.; Liao, M.M.; Lin, G.H. Age-related changes in nutrient resorption patterns and tannin concentration of Casuarina equisetifolia plantations. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2012, 24, 546–556. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ma, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yao, K.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Fan, Y.; Ma, Y. Effect of sowing date, planting density, and nitrogen application on dry matter accumulation, transfer, distribution, and yield of wheat. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2020, 28, 375–385. [Google Scholar]
  38. Si, Z.; Zain, M.; Mehmood, F.; Wang, G.; Gao, Y.; Duan, A. Effects of nitrogen application rate and irrigation regime on growth, yield, and water-nitrogen use efficiency of drip-irrigated winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 231, 106002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, A.; Li, L.; Coulter, J.A.; Xie, J.; Zhang, R.; Luo, Z.; Cai, L.; Liu, C.; Wang, L. Long-term nitrogen addition impact on agronomic traits, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen resorption efficiency of wheat in a rainfed region. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2021, 85, 452–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ercoli, L.; Masoni, A.; Mariotti, M.; Arduini, I. Accumulation of dry matter and nitrogen in durum wheat during grain filling as affected by temperature and nitrogen rate. Ital. J. Agron. 2009, 4, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dai, Z.; Su, W.; Chen, H.; Barberán, A.; Zhao, H.; Yu, M.; Yu, L.; Brookes, P.C.; Schadt, C.W.; Chang, S.X.; et al. Long-term nitrogen fertilization decreases bacterial diversity and favors the growth of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria in agro-ecosystems across the globe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 3452–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, C.Y.; Deng, A.X.; Latifmanesh, H.; Song, Z.W.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, W.J. Warming impacts on the dry matter accumulation, and translocation and nitrogen uptake and utilization of winter wheat on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2017, 41, 1060–1068. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yan, S.; Wu, Y.; Fan, J.; Zhang, F.; Guo, J.; Zheng, J.; Wu, L. Optimization of drip irrigation and fertilization regimes to enhance winter wheat grain yield by improving post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and translocation in northwest China. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 271, 107782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, H.; Han, K.; Gu, S.; Wang, D. Effects of supplemental irrigation on the accumulation, distribution and transportation of 13C-photosynthate, yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 214, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Koutroubas, S.D.; Fotiadis, S.; Damalas, C.A.; Papageorgiou, M. Grain-filling patterns and nitrogen utilization efficiency of spelt (Triticum spelta) under Mediterranean conditions. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 152, 716–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, L. Water deficit–induced senescence and its relationship to the remobilization of pre-stored carbon in wheat during grain filling. Agron. J. 2001, 93, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vilmus, I.; Ecarnot, M.; Verzelen, N.; Roumet, P. Monitoring nitrogen leaf resorption kinetics by near-infrared spectroscopy during grain filling in durum wheat in different nitrogen availability conditions. Crop Sci. 2014, 54, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Killingbeck, K.T. Nutrients in Senesced Leaves: Keys to the Search for Potential Resorption and Resorption Proficiency. Ecology 1996, 77, 1716–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cairney, J.W. Ectomycorrhizal fungi: The symbiotic route to the root for phosphorus in forest soils. Plant Soil 2011, 344, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ostonen, I.; Helmisaari, H.S.; Borken, W.; Tedersoo, L.; Kukumägi, M.; Bahram, M.; Lindroos, A.J.; Nöjd, P.; Uri, V.; Merilä, P.; et al. Fine root foraging strategies in Norway spruce forests across a European climate gradient. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 3620–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ganeshamurthy, A.N.; Reddy, Y.T.N. Fitness of mango for colonization in low fertility soils and dry lands: Examination of leaf life-span, leaf nutrient resorption, and nutrient use efficiency in elite mango varieties. Agric. Res. 2015, 4, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhu, X.; Guo, W.; Feng, C.; Peng, Y.; Ling, Q. Nitrogen absorption and utilization differences among wheat varieties for different end uses. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2005, 11, 148–154. [Google Scholar]
  53. Liu, W.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, D. Effects of Nitrogen-based Recovery Ratio on the Leaf Senescence and the Yield of Different Maturing Phases of Wheat. Hunan Agric. Sci. 2015, 03, 21–24. [Google Scholar]
  54. Garabet, S.; Wood, M.; Ryan, J. Nitrogen and water effects on wheat yield in a Mediterranean-type climate: I. Growth, water-use and nitrogen accumulation. Field Crops Res. 1998, 58, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, J.Y.; Yu, H.L.; Wang, B.; Li, L.H.; Xiao, G.J.; Yuan, Z.Y. Nutrient resorption based on different estimations of five perennial herbaceous species from the grassland in inner Mongolia, China. J. Arid Environ. 2012, 76, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dordas, C. Dry matter, nitrogen and phosphorus accumulation, partitioning and remobilization as affected by N and P fertilization and source–sink relations. Eur. J. Agron. 2009, 30, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vergutz, L.; Manzoni, S.; Porporato, A.; Novais, R.F.; Jackson, R.B. Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants. Ecol. Monogr. 2012, 82, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Reed, S.C.; Townsend, A.R.; Davidson, E.A.; Cleveland, C.C. Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales. New Phytol. 2012, 196, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yuan, Z.Y.; Chen, H.Y. Negative effects of fertilization on plant nutrient resorption. Ecology 2015, 96, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Millard, P.; Grelet, G.A. Nitrogen storage and remobilization by trees: Ecophysiological relevance in a changing world. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, Y.; Niu, S.; Yu, G. Aggravated phosphorus limitation on biomass production under increasing nitrogen loading: A meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2016, 22, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Ma, P.; Meng, Y.; Zhou, J. Effects of tillage, mulching and N management on yield, water productivity, N uptake and residual soil nitrate in a long-term wheat-summer maize cropping system. Field Crops Res. 2017, 213, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Scholberg, J.; McNeal, B.L.; Boote, K.J.; Jones, J.W.; Locascio, S.J.; Olson, S.M. Nitrogen stress effects on growth and nitrogen accumulation by field-grown tomato. Agron. J. 2000, 92, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Khakbazan, M.; Grant, C.A.; Huang, J.; Smith, E.G.; O’Donovan, J.T.; Blackshaw, R.E.; Harker, K.N.; Lafond, G.P.; Johnson, E.N.; Gan, Y.; et al. Economic effects of preceding crops and nitrogen application on canola and subsequent barley. Agron. J. 2014, 106, 2055–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Reddy, G.B.; Reddy, K.R. Fate of nitrogen-15 enriched ammonium nitrate applied to corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1993, 57, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Raun, W.R.; Johnson, G.V. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron. J. 1999, 91, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hu, H.; Ning, T.; Li, Z.; Han, H.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, S.; Zheng, Y. Coupling effects of urea types and subsoiling on nitrogen–water use and yield of different varieties of maize in northern China. Field Crops Res. 2013, 142, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, C.; Wang, C.; Wen, X.; Qin, X.; Liu, Y.; Han, J.; Li, Y.; Liao, Y.; Wu, W. Ridge–furrow with plastic film mulching practice improves maize productivity and resource use efficiency under the wheat–maize double–cropping system in dry semi–humid areas. Field Crops Res. 2017, 203, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Campbell, C.A.; Selles, F.; Zentner, R.P.; McConkey, B.G. Nitrogen management for zero-till spring wheat: Disposition in plant and utilization efficiency. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1993, 24, 2223–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, A.; Li, L.; Xie, J.; Wang, X.; Coulter, J.A.; Liu, C.; Wang, L. Effect of Long-Term Nitrogen Addition on Wheat Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency, and Residual Soil Nitrate in a Semiarid Area of the Loess Plateau of China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1735–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ladha, J.K.; Tirol-Padre, A.; Reddy, C.K.; Cassman, K.G.; Verma, S.; Powlson, D.S.; Van Kessel, C.; Daniel, D.B.R.; Chakraborty, D.; Pathak, H. Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice, and wheat production systems. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Monthly rainfall and temperature for the experimental years.
Figure 1. Monthly rainfall and temperature for the experimental years.
Agronomy 14 02049 g001
Figure 2. The dry matter translocation amount (DTA) in total aboveground (A) and different tissues (D), dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE) of total aboveground (B) and different tissues (E), and dry matter contribution proportion (DCP) of total aboveground (C) and different tissues (F) of wheat according to N fertilizer supply (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively). Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. The dry matter translocation amount (DTA) in total aboveground (A) and different tissues (D), dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE) of total aboveground (B) and different tissues (E), and dry matter contribution proportion (DCP) of total aboveground (C) and different tissues (F) of wheat according to N fertilizer supply (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively). Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02049 g002
Figure 3. Nitrogen (N) accumulation (mg stem−1) in various wheat tissues according to N fertilizer supply (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rate of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively) at (A) anthesis in 2018, (B) anthesis in 2019, (C) anthesis as a two-year average, (D) maturity in 2018, (E) maturity in 2019, and (F) maturity as a two-year average. Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. Nitrogen (N) accumulation (mg stem−1) in various wheat tissues according to N fertilizer supply (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rate of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively) at (A) anthesis in 2018, (B) anthesis in 2019, (C) anthesis as a two-year average, (D) maturity in 2018, (E) maturity in 2019, and (F) maturity as a two-year average. Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02049 g003
Figure 4. Nitrogen translocation and contribution to grain with different nitrogen (N) treatments (mg stem−1). The N translocation amount of wheat vegetative organs (A) and various tissues (D), N translocation efficiency of vegetative organs (B) and various tissues (E), and N contribution proportion of wheat vegetative organs (C) and different tissues (F) according to N fertilizer supply (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively). Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4. Nitrogen translocation and contribution to grain with different nitrogen (N) treatments (mg stem−1). The N translocation amount of wheat vegetative organs (A) and various tissues (D), N translocation efficiency of vegetative organs (B) and various tissues (E), and N contribution proportion of wheat vegetative organs (C) and different tissues (F) according to N fertilizer supply (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively). Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02049 g004
Figure 5. NO3–N accumulation (kg ha−1) in the 0–100 cm soil layers at maturity of wheat in 2018 (A) and 2019 (B) (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively). Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5. NO3–N accumulation (kg ha−1) in the 0–100 cm soil layers at maturity of wheat in 2018 (A) and 2019 (B) (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively). Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02049 g005
Figure 6. (A) Nitrogen (N) harvest index (NHI), (B) N utilization efficiency (NUE, kg kg−1), (C) N agronomic efficiency (NAE, kg kg−1), (D) N recovery efficiency (NRE, %), (E) N partial factor productivity (NPFP, kg kg−1), and (F) N marginal benefit (NMB, kg kg−1) according to N fertilizer supply (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively). Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6. (A) Nitrogen (N) harvest index (NHI), (B) N utilization efficiency (NUE, kg kg−1), (C) N agronomic efficiency (NAE, kg kg−1), (D) N recovery efficiency (NRE, %), (E) N partial factor productivity (NPFP, kg kg−1), and (F) N marginal benefit (NMB, kg kg−1) according to N fertilizer supply (N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively). Vertical bars represent standard errors, and columns with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02049 g006
Figure 7. Correlation coefficients among nitrogen (N) harvest index (NHI), N utilization efficiency (NUE, kg kg−1), N agronomic efficiency (NAE, kg kg−1), N recovery efficiency (NRE, %), N partial factor productivity (NPFP, kg kg−1), N marginal benefit (NMB, kg kg−1), dry matter translocation amount (DTA, mg stem−1), dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE, %), N translocation amount (NTA, kg ha−1), and N translocation efficiency (NTE, %) across N fertilizer treatments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. Correlation coefficients among nitrogen (N) harvest index (NHI), N utilization efficiency (NUE, kg kg−1), N agronomic efficiency (NAE, kg kg−1), N recovery efficiency (NRE, %), N partial factor productivity (NPFP, kg kg−1), N marginal benefit (NMB, kg kg−1), dry matter translocation amount (DTA, mg stem−1), dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE, %), N translocation amount (NTA, kg ha−1), and N translocation efficiency (NTE, %) across N fertilizer treatments. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Agronomy 14 02049 g007
Table 1. Effects of N-fertilizer rate on the dry matter accumulation amount (DMA, mg stem−1), dry matter accumulation amount during specific period (DMAP, kg ha−1), and crop growth rate (CGR, kg ha−1 d−1) 2.
Table 1. Effects of N-fertilizer rate on the dry matter accumulation amount (DMA, mg stem−1), dry matter accumulation amount during specific period (DMAP, kg ha−1), and crop growth rate (CGR, kg ha−1 d−1) 2.
YearTreatment 1DMADMAPCGR
JointingAnthesisMaturityJointing to AnthesisAnthesis to MaturityJointing to AnthesisAnthesis to Maturity
2018N0684 ± 57.2b1184 ± 114.1c1173 ± 100.0d2028 ± 170.1c1532 ± 261.4b65.4 ± 5.5c66.6 ± 11.4b
N52.5722 ± 67.5b1361 ± 106.5bc1572 ± 127.4cd2478 ± 261.1c2426 ± 33.5a79.9 ± 8.4c105.5 ± 1.5a
N1051062 ± 30.4a2192 ± 123.0a2634 ± 230.4a3125 ± 145.8b2885 ± 130.7a100.8 ± 4.7b125.4 ± 5.7a
N157.5872 ± 76.9ab2250 ± 117.0a2249 ± 172.2ab4591 ± 253.5a1572 ± 144.4b148.1 ± 8.2a68.4 ± 6.3b
N5770 ± 80.8b1755 ± 162.8b1827 ± 229.8bc3678 ± 118.4b1830 ± 138.5b118.7 ± 3.8b79.5 ± 6.0b
ANOVA
p-value
0.014<0.0010.002<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
2019N0598 ± 76.7b1309 ± 95.4b1783 ± 105.2c 3245 ± 90.6b1683 ± 142.0b124.8 ± 3.5b51.0 ± 4.3b
N52.5903 ± 1.3a2027 ± 23.1a2100 ± 69.2b3714 ± 313.8b1658 ± 110.4b142.9 ± 12.1b50.2 ± 3.4b
N105909 ± 31.2a2138 ± 57.7a2600 ± 58.0a5631 ± 158.3a2449 ± 329.5a216.6 ± 6.1a74.2 ± 10.0a
N157.5877 ± 88.5a1986 ± 109.0a2486 ± 103.5a5688 ± 203.7a2576 ± 131.8a218.8 ± 7.8a78.1 ± 4.0a
N5853 ± 31.1a2023 ± 12.5a2396 ± 40.3a6199 ± 147.8a1972 ± 240.8ab238.4 ± 5.7a59.8 ± 7.3ab
ANOVA
p-value
0.014<0.001<0.001<0.0010.030<0.0010.030
AverageN02744 ± 14.2b5381 ± 119.3d6988 ± 127.8c2637 ± 129.9d1607 ± 83.2c95.1 ± 4.5d58.8 ± 5.0c
N52.53456 ± 27.6a6552 ± 102.8c8594 ± 149.6b3096 ± 116.8c2042 ± 57.1b111.4 ± 4.4c77.9 ± 1.8b
N1053581 ± 24.7a7959 ± 173.9b10625 ± 159.6a4378 ± 151.6b2667 ± 224.7a158.7 ± 5.4b99.8 ± 7.6a
N157.53706 ± 203.4a8845 ± 121.1a10919 ± 119.4a5139 ± 177.7a2074 ± 12.7b183.4 ± 6.2a73.2 ± 1.2b
N53707 ± 129.6a8646 ± 123.5a10547 ± 172.2a4939 ± 14.7a1901 ± 50.2b178.6 ± 0.9a69.7 ± 2.3bc
ANOVA
p-value
<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.0010.001<0.0010.001
1 N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively. 2 Columns with different letters denote statistically significant differences as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 2. Dry matter distribution proportion (DDP, %) in different wheat tissues at various development stages 2.
Table 2. Dry matter distribution proportion (DDP, %) in different wheat tissues at various development stages 2.
YearGrowth StageTreatment 1DDP (%)
LeafStem + SheathEarRachilla + GlumeGrain
2018AnthesisN010.40 ± 0.34c52.50 ± 1.12a37.10 ± 1.46a
N52.512.24 ± 0.74bc49.76 ± 1.74ab38.00 ± 1.94a
N10513.89 ± 0.11b47.25 ± 0.56bc38.86 ± 0.52a
N157.516.16 ± 0.31a45.68 ± 1.05c38.17 ± 0.74a
N21015.86 ± 1.03a46.10 ± 0.61c38.04 ± 0.85a
ANOVA
p-value
<0.0010.0070.895
MaturityN09.58 ± 0.31a40.23 ± 1.52a19.31 ± 1.30a30.88 ± 0.73ab
N52.511.80 ± 0.88a38.06 ± 1.39a22.28 ± 2.31a27.85 ± 1.81b
N10511.87 ± 0.95a40.68 ± 1.40a19.24 ± 2.10a28.20 ± 0.56b
N157.511.23 ± 0.90a39.81 ± 1.30a19.53 ± 1.79a29.43 ± 0.63ab
N2109.94 ± 0.88a37.83 ± 1.33a19.90 ± 1.27a32.32 ± 0.44a
ANOVA
p-value
0.2280.5150.7380.041
2019AnthesisN015.01 ± 0.72b59.20 ± 2.53a25.80 ± 1.86a
N52.517.22 ± 0.38a56.35 ± 0.48a26.43 ± 0.10a
N10517.72 ± 0.14a57.00 ± 0.52a25.28 ± 0.46a
N157.517.27 ± 0.64a56.44 ± 0.41a26.28 ± 1.05a
N21017.16 ± 0.72a57.57 ± 0.81a25.27 ± 0.09a
ANOVA
p-value
0.0480.5120.866
MaturityN08.30 ± 0.45b41.19 ± 0.70a17.51 ± 0.48a33.00 ± 0.28b
N52.57.86 ± 0.10b40.14 ± 0.44ab17.33 ± 0.80a34.66 ± 0.45ab
N1057.86 ± 0.38b41.01 ± 1.27a17.5 ± 0.22a33.64 ± 1.27b
N157.58.71 ± 0.21ab38.10 ± 0.58b16.56 ± 0.5a36.63 ± 0.76a
N2109.26 ± 0.16a39.65 ± 0.5ab17.94 ± 0.25a33.14 ± 0.56b
ANOVA
p-value
0.0300.0930.4340.033
AverageAnthesisN012.81 ± 0.55b56.02 ± 1.29a31.17 ± 1.25a
N52.515.22 ± 0.56a53.63 ± 0.48ab31.15 ± 0.93a
N10515.79 ± 0.13a52.07 ± 0.64bc32.15 ± 0.64a
N157.516.70 ± 0.21a50.73 ± 0.80c32.57 ± 0.94a
N21016.52 ± 0.77a52.28 ± 0.27bc31.20 ± 0.57a
ANOVA
p-value
0.0020.0070.704
MaturityN08.79 ± 0.33a40.85 ± 0.88a18.19 ± 0.61a32.17 ± 0.21ab
N52.59.51 ± 0.25a39.31 ± 0.44a19.34 ± 0.80a31.85 ± 0.47ab
N1059.84 ± 0.56a40.84 ± 1.25a18.45 ± 1.07a30.87 ± 0.72b
N157.59.86 ± 0.25a38.87 ± 0.8a18.05 ± 1.03a33.22 ± 0.64a
N2109.51 ± 0.4a38.92 ± 0.81a18.72 ± 0.55a32.84 ± 0.27a
ANOVA
p-value
0.3260.3300.8250.057
1 N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively. 2 Columns with different letters denote statistically significant differences as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between dry matter accumulation amount (DMA, mg stem−1), dry matter accumulation amount in period (DMAP, kg ha−1), crop growth rate (CGR, kg ha−1 d−1), dry matter distribution proportion (DDP, %), dry matter translocation amount (DTA, mg stem−1), dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE, %), and grain yield (kg ha−1).
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between dry matter accumulation amount (DMA, mg stem−1), dry matter accumulation amount in period (DMAP, kg ha−1), crop growth rate (CGR, kg ha−1 d−1), dry matter distribution proportion (DDP, %), dry matter translocation amount (DTA, mg stem−1), dry matter translocation efficiency (DTE, %), and grain yield (kg ha−1).
ItemGrain Yield
DMAJointingr = 0.554 *, p = 0.032
Anthesisr = 0.752 **, p = 0.001
Maturityr = 0.726 **, p = 0.002
DMAPJointing to anthesisr = 0.863 **, p < 0.001
Anthesis to maturityr = 0.132, p = 0.638
CGRJointing to anthesisr = 0.863 **, p < 0.001
Anthesis to maturityr = 0.132, p = 0.638
DDPAnthesisLeafr = 0.847 **, p < 0.001
Stem + sheathr = −0.867 **, p < 0.001
Earr = 0.412, p = 0.127
MaturityLeafr = 0.422, p = 0.117
Stem + sheathr = −0.564 *, p = 0.029
Rachilla + glumer = −0.026, p = 0.926
Grainr = 0.333, p = 0.225
DTALeafr = 0.718 **, p = 0.003
Stem + sheathr = 0.184, p = 0.512
Rachilla + glumer = 0.595 *, p = 0.019
DTELeafr = 0.442, p = 0.099
Stem + sheathr = −0.149, p = 0.597
Rachilla + glumer = 0.233, p = 0.404
Correlation coefficients marked with * and ** are considered statistically significant at p-values less than 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Table 4. Nitrogen distribution ratio of various wheat organs (%) 2.
Table 4. Nitrogen distribution ratio of various wheat organs (%) 2.
YearTreatment 1AnthesisMaturity
LeafStem + SheathEarLeafStem + SheathRachilla + GlumeGrains
2018N09.78 ± 0.57c27.91 ± 2.13a56.68 ± 1.76a6.23 ± 0.63b12.17 ± 0.99ab11.64 ± 0.76b75.14 ± 1.99a
N52.513.73 ± 1.91bc26.37 ± 2.00a51.01 ± 1.58b11.46 ± 1.30a10.99 ± 0.67b15.82 ± 0.69a55.98 ± 1.22c
N10516.74 ± 1.11ab24.43 ± 0.98a49.38 ± 1.56b9.81 ± 0.87a14.03 ± 0.59a13.61 ± 1.14ab60.38 ± 1.19bc
N157.519.42 ± 1.06a24.17 ± 0.86a47.94 ± 1.06b10.15 ± 1.20a11.77 ± 0.53ab15.46 ± 0.35a58.91 ± 2.33c
N21017.76 ± 2.51ab23.28 ± 1.85a50.79 ± 2.00b8.47 ± 1.18ab12.74 ± 0.70ab15.80 ± 1.44a64.92 ± 1.07b
ANOVA
p-value
0.0120.3390.0300.0510.1040.044< 0.001
2019N023.39 ± 1.17b26.07 ± 1.67a25.64 ± 1.51a6.20 ± 0.23b13.20 ± 1.75a8.54 ± 1.09b80.50 ± 0.91a
N52.527.42 ± 0.25ab24.44 ± 2.16a25.72 ± 1.53a6.51 ± 0.70b18.24 ± 2.41a11.57 ± 0.77ab70.79 ± 5.76ab
N10528.84 ± 1.95a21.34 ± 2.14a25.32 ± 2.39a7.37 ± 0.43b19.64 ± 2.80a10.55 ± 0.96ab66.81 ± 4.28b
N157.529.14 ± 1.42a24.87 ± 2.01a22.97 ± 1.66a8.84 ± 0.48a19.63 ± 1.71a10.68 ± 1.19ab67.10 ± 2.34b
N21028.62 ± 1.77a24.55 ± 1.32a22.95 ± 0.88a9.63 ± 0.15a17.08 ± 3.42a13.16 ± 1.23a59.42 ± 0.63b
ANOVA
p-value
0.0900.5190.5880.0010.3950.1080.017
AverageN016.60 ± 0.87c26.94 ± 1.80a41.16 ± 1.86a6.20 ± 0.18b12.76 ± 1.42a9.90 ± 0.61b78.18 ± 1.33a
N52.521.90 ± 0.33b25.08 ± 1.80a36.12 ± 0.59b8.96 ± 1.03a14.55 ± 0.82a13.58 ± 0.60a63.95 ± 4.17b
N10522.52 ± 0.75ab23.04 ± 1.04a37.82 ± 0.80ab8.73 ± 0.77a16.76 ± 1.09a12.17 ± 0.89ab62.82 ± 1.04b
N157.524.32 ± 0.75a24.40 ± 1.28a35.80 ± 1.73b9.44 ± 0.76a16.04 ± 1.59a13.06 ± 0.23a62.94 ± 1.66b
N21023.44 ± 0.72ab23.91 ± 0.55a36.49 ± 1.10b9.16 ± 0.49a15.43 ± 2.15a14.2 ± 1.07a61.78 ± 0.35b
ANOVA
p-value
<0.0010.3930.0850.0520.4170.0160.001
1 N0, N52.5, N105, N157.5, and N210 represent annual N-fertilizer rates of 0, 52.5, 105.0, 157.5, and 210.0 kg N ha−1, respectively. 2 Columns with different letters denote statistically significant differences as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 5. Correlation coefficients between nitrogen (N) accumulation amount (NAA, mg stem−1), N distribution proportion (NDP, %), N translocation amount (NTA, mg stem−1), N translocation efficiency (NTE, %), and grain yield (kg ha−1).
Table 5. Correlation coefficients between nitrogen (N) accumulation amount (NAA, mg stem−1), N distribution proportion (NDP, %), N translocation amount (NTA, mg stem−1), N translocation efficiency (NTE, %), and grain yield (kg ha−1).
ItemGrain Yield
NAAJointingr = 0.838 **, p < 0.001
Anthesisr = 0.851 **, p < 0.001
Maturityr = 0.859 **, p < 0.001
NDPAnthesisLeafr = 0.820 **, p < 0.001
Stem + sheathr = −0.448, p = 0.094
Earr = −0.490, p = 0.064
MaturityLeafr = 0.645 **, p = 0.009
Stem + sheathr = 0.459, p = 0.085
Rachilla + glumer = 0.542 *, p = 0.037
Grainr = −0.711 **, p = 0.003
NTALeafr = 0.858 **, p < 0.001
Stem + sheathr = 0.511, p = 0.051
Rachilla + glumer = 0.716 **, p = 0.003
NTELeafr = 0.164, p = 0.559
Stem + sheathr = −0.450, p = 0.093
Rachilla + glumer = −0.567 *, p = 0.028
Correlation coefficients marked with * and ** are considered statistically significant at p-values less than 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, A.; Chen, Y.; Wei, X.; Effah, Z.; Li, L.; Xie, J.; Liu, C.; Anwar, S. Does Nitrogen Fertilization Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Spring Wheat? Agronomy 2024, 14, 2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092049

AMA Style

Xu A, Chen Y, Wei X, Effah Z, Li L, Xie J, Liu C, Anwar S. Does Nitrogen Fertilization Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Spring Wheat? Agronomy. 2024; 14(9):2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Aixia, Yafei Chen, Xuexue Wei, Zechariah Effah, Lingling Li, Junhong Xie, Chang Liu, and Sumera Anwar. 2024. "Does Nitrogen Fertilization Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Spring Wheat?" Agronomy 14, no. 9: 2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092049

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop