Next Article in Journal
Biocontrol Activity of Alternaria angustiovoidea Against Trichothecium roseum Through Inhibiting Its Growth, Pathogenicity, and Gene Expression
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Nitrogen Reduction and Sheep Manure Incorporation on the Soil Characteristics and Microbial Community of Korla Fragrant Pear Orchards
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Boosting Aeroponic System Development with Plasma and High-Efficiency Tools: AI and IoT—A Review

by
Waqar Ahmed Qureshi
1,
Jianmin Gao
1,*,
Osama Elsherbiny
1,2,
Abdallah Harold Mosha
1,
Mazhar Hussain Tunio
1 and
Junaid Ahmed Qureshi
3
1
School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(3), 546; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030546
Submission received: 16 January 2025 / Revised: 18 February 2025 / Accepted: 20 February 2025 / Published: 23 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Agroecology Innovation: Achieving System Resilience)

Abstract

:
Sustainable agriculture faces major issues with resource efficiency, nutrient distribution, and plant health. Traditional soil-based and soilless farming systems encounter issues including excessive water use, insufficient nutrient uptake, nitrogen deficiency, and restricted plant development. According to the previous literature, aeroponic systems accelerate plant growth rates, improve root oxygenation, and significantly enhance water use efficiency, particularly when paired with both low- and high-pressure misting systems. However, despite these advantages, they also present certain challenges. A major drawback is the inefficiency of nitrogen fixation, resulting in insufficient nutrient availability and heightened plant stress from uncontrolled misting, which ultimately reduces yield. Many studies have investigated plasma uses in both soil-based and soilless plant cultures; nevertheless, however, its function in aeroponics remains unexplored. Therefore, the present work aims to thoroughly investigate and review the integration of plasma-activated water (PAW) and plasma-activated mist (PAM) in aeroponics systems to solve important problems. A review of the current literature discloses that PAW and PAM expand nitrogen fixation, promote nutrient efficiency, and modulate microbial populations, resulting in elevated crop yields and enhanced plant health, akin to soil-based and other soilless systems. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) produced by plasma treatments improve nutrient bioavailability, root development, and microbial equilibrium, alleviating critical challenges in aeroponics, especially within fine-mist settings. This review further examines artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) in aeroponics. Models driven by AI enable the accurate regulation of fertilizer concentrations, misting cycles, temperature, and humidity, as well as real-time monitoring and predictive analytics. IoT-enabled smart farming systems employ sensors for continuous nutrient monitoring and gas detection (e.g., NO2, O3, NH3), providing automated modifications to enhance aeroponic efficiency. Based on a brief review of the current literature, this study concludes that the future integration of plasma technology with AI and IoT may address the limitations of aeroponics. The integration of plasma technology with intelligent misting and data-driven control systems can enhance aeroponic systems for sustainable and efficient agricultural production. This research supports the existing body of research that advocates for plasma-based innovations and intelligent agricultural solutions in precision farming.

1. Introduction

The rapid growth of the world’s population, estimated to reach around 9.7 billion by 2050, requires more land, water, and energy for sustainable food production [1]. Conventional farming does, however, face great difficulties like soil degradation, water shortages, fertilizer loss, and the effects of climate change. Although water supply is falling due to climate change, too much irrigation, and groundwater depletion, traditional soil-based farming is progressively unsustainable even while agriculture now consumes 70% of freshwater resources globally. More land, water, and energy are demanded worldwide for sustainable food production as the population grows. However, conventional agricultural methods have resulted in lower yield outputs, nutrient loss, and soil erosion due to excessive irrigation [1,2,3]. With the FAO estimating that 33% of the world’s soil is already deteriorated, intensive agricultural methods also help to cause soil erosion, lower land productivity, and biodiversity loss. As a major amount of fertilizers is lost through leaching, runoff, and volatilization, contaminating water sources and raising greenhouse gas emissions, nutrient inefficiencies aggravate these problems even more. Conventional crop yields are further threatened by the unpredictable nature of extreme weather events, droughts, and irregular rainfall; so, creative ideas are even more important. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) advocates sustainable agricultural methods including hydroponics and aeroponics, which provide soilless farming with up to 95% less water consumption and better nutrient efficiency, in order to meet these difficulties [4,5]. Compared to soil-based and other soilless agricultural systems, aeroponics, a soilless cultivation technique, has shown exceptional efficiency in water use, disease resistance, and growth rates [6,7]. Aeroponic systems supply nutrient-rich water to plant roots via pumps, timers, and spray nozzles, facilitating quick development and enhanced yields [8,9]. Along with these advantages, improving nutrient density, increasing nitrogen fixation, controlling microbial populations, and reducing dependency on artificial fertilizers still present difficulties. Recent innovations in plasma technology have demonstrated great promise in improving nutrient absorption, seed germination, and plant growth in both soil-based and soilless farming systems. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) generated by plasma treatments raise nutrient solubility, promote root development, hasten plant development, and enhance general microbial control [10,11,12]. While PAW has been extensively studied in soil and soilless systems, there are few studies regarding direct PAM application in aeroponics. In aeroponics, it is imperative to look at both direct plasma application (PAM) and indirect plasma therapy (PAW). Recent research shows that in aeroponics, plasma treatments improve plant growth; PAM offers a practical way to provide RONS straight to plant roots, therefore improving nutrient absorption and plant resistance [12,13,14]. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) in aeroponics improves both resource efficiency and agricultural productivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) make it possible to analyze data in a way that precisely controls critical plant growth factors like temperature, humidity, and nutrient concentration.
With the use of smart agricultural technologies, aeroponics can make real-time adjustments. For example, plasma treatments can be adjusted according to how the plants respond and how many nutrients they absorb. In addition, by predicting how crops would react to different plasma treatment parameters, machine learning algorithms improve operational efficiency and scalability [15,16,17,18,19]. According to Yang et al., 2022 [20], these technologies allow precise environmental regulation, water optimization, process automation, and crop production projections. Renewable energy and automated fertilizer distribution boost production, cut labor costs, and promote agricultural sustainability [21].
This review explores the integration of plasma technologies into aeroponic systems, with an emphasis on the efficacy of nutrient uptake, plant growth, and development. Additionally, it explores how AI and IoT might improve irrigation, disease detection, nutrient delivery, and plasma-generated species. A comparative investigation of low-pressure and high-pressure misting systems is conducted, assessing their effects on nutrient absorption and plant health in relation to soil-based and alternative soilless systems. Further, it focuses on the properties and applications of plasma-activated water (PAW) in soil and soilless farming, emphasizing its effects on seed germination, plant growth, and reduced fertilizer dependency. Primary attention is paid to the generation and application of plasma-activated mist (PAM) in aeroponic systems, exploring its role in nitrogen fixation, nutrient accessibility, and plant growth. This review also focuses on the direct use of PAM with DC and RF atmospheric plasma devices. It also explores the importance of AI and IoT in boosting aeroponic farming systems, including nutrient supply, disease detection, irrigation, and plant growth. Furthermore, this review examines the role of AI and IoT in optimizing aeroponic farming systems, including nutrient delivery, disease detection, irrigation applications, plant growth, and yield, and further discusses the literature on the monitoring of PAM and plasma species using radio frequency (RF) and direct current (DC) atmospheric plasma, along with detection methods involving sensors and machine learning approaches for enhanced system optimization, as reported in previous studies. Finally, this review addresses the challenges of applying plasma technology in aeroponic systems, as well as the prospective uses of PAM in agriculture. This review intends to contribute to the future technological development of aeroponic systems and the broader agricultural sector by combining advances in plasma-assisted nutrient delivery, AI-driven optimization, and IoT-based monitoring.

2. Review Methodology

In this section, we talk about the review’s approach, which includes the search criteria, study keywords, and suggestions for article inclusion and exclusion.
This analysis examines how aeroponic systems can use plasma, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things (IoT) to improve plant growth, water efficiency, and nutrient delivery. The examination of current advancements, limitations, and potential research directions was carried out in a methodical manner. The methodology uses a comprehensive approach to literature evaluation, which includes data synthesis, inclusion and exclusion criteria, database selection, and keyword searches. To guide the evaluation process, the following research questions were developed:
  • What developments in plasma-assisted aeroponic systems have occurred recently?
  • How is aeroponic farming enhanced by the integration of AI and IoT?
  • How do plant development and nutrient uptake become affected by plasma-activated water (PAW) and plasma-activated mist (PAM)?
  • What scaling constraints and problems arise when artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and plasma are combined in aeroponics?
  • How may new technologies enhance the sustainability and efficiency of aeroponic systems?
Additionally, the data used in this study came from previously published research articles. The combination of plasma, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things applications in aeroponics has already been the subject of a great deal of scholarly research and material. Therefore, methodically effective approaches were taken into consideration in order to assess the advanced grasp of the topic area. The following keywords were chosen for the online search in order to find relevant literature: (‘High-pressure aeroponic misting’ OR ‘Low-pressure aeroponics’) AND (‘Plasma in aeroponics’ OR ‘Plasma-Activated Mist (PAM) in aeroponics’) AND (‘AI in aeroponic farming’ OR ‘AI-optimized aeroponic systems’) AND (‘IoT-based aeroponic monitoring’ OR ‘Smart aeroponic control systems’) AND (‘Plasma in soil’ OR ‘Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) in soil’) AND (‘Plasma in soilless cultivation’ OR ‘PAW in soilless systems’) AND (‘Sustainable aeroponic technologies’ OR ‘Advanced aeroponic farming’). Boolean operators (AND, OR) were utilized to guarantee the inclusion of relevant research while minimizing irrelevant outcomes.
The search strategy and selected keywords are illustrated in Figure 1. The China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ResearchGate, AGRO, MDPI, Cambridge Journals, IEEE Xplore, Taylor & Francis, Wiley Online Library, ScienceDirect, Hindawi, and Springer were among the online scholarly databases that were extensively searched in order to obtain a thorough review. A total of 276 articles from various countries were reviewed.
This analysis comprised published research work (articles, doctorate theses, and proceedings articles) from journals that Jiangsu University Library subscribes to and open-access publications. The literature was carefully examined and further filtered based on the criteria to include or reject literature for review proceedings after the keywords were searched. If an article had a significant relationship to the study’s chosen keywords, it was directly taken into consideration. The primary dataset for this study was the information gathered by extracting and exporting the literature, including titles, keywords, abstracts, authors, and references. However, the review analysis did not include research articles published in languages other than English. Sections of the document that were topically connected discussed the articles selected for review.

3. Results and Discussion

This section summarizes the findings on the use of plasma technology in current aeroponics, including the development and application of plasma-activated water (PAW) and plasma-activated mist (PAM) in both soil-based and soilless systems. It also investigates PAW’s role in increasing nutrient bioavailability, nitrogen fixation, and microbial control in soil and soilless systems, with a particular emphasis on PAM’s direct application in aeroponic systems to boost nutrient uptake and plant resilience. The section also examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) in optimizing plasma-assisted aeroponic systems, with a focus on RONS species generation and recognition, precision control, nutrient delivery optimization, and problems with plasma.

3.1. Aeroponics

Water scarcity is becoming an increasingly serious concern as the world’s population grows rapidly. This demonstrates the importance of establishing agricultural methods that use water more efficiently and sustainably [22]. Aeroponics is a soilless growing technique that uses nutrient-rich sprays to nourish plant roots suspended in air, resulting in a considerable reduction in water usage when compared to typical agricultural methods [23]. Aeroponic systems mist nutrients onto plant roots on a regular basis using either high-pressure or low-pressure atomization to make sure they get to the roots as efficiently as possible [24]. This strategy improves nutrient uptake and root oxygenation, leading to faster growth and healthier plants, making it a highly efficient and sustainable alternative to modern agriculture.

3.1.1. Impact of Droplet Size in Low-Pressure and High-Pressure Aeroponic Misting Systems

Droplet size is crucial for plant development and health, and it has a direct impact on the efficiency of nutrient misting in aeroponic systems. Low-Pressure Aeroponics (LPA) systems use low-pressure pumps or ultrasonic transducers to produce bigger droplets of roughly 100 µm in size. While this approach provides basic nutrition delivery, it frequently results in irregular root hydration and restricted nutrient absorption. LPA systems are thus more appropriate for small-scale applications, research contexts, or educational settings [25]. On the other hand, the long-term efficacy of LPA systems may be compromised by their insufficient advanced purification and filtration capabilities. High-Pressure Aeroponics (HPA) systems, on the other hand, use high-pressure compressors to make a fine mist that surrounds plant roots and makes the droplets smaller (45–55 µm). This results in improved nutrient absorption, improved oxygenation, and enhanced plant growth. Additionally, HPA systems incorporate sophisticated filtration, sterilization, and biological support technologies, which enhance the longevity and maturation of the crop [26,27]. When compared to growing plants in soil, high-pressure aeroponics has a lot of benefits, such as higher yields, better flavor profiles, and faster plant growth rates. HPA systems have the potential to produce up to three times more than traditional soil-based agriculture when maintained under optimal conditions, according to research.
The operational efficacy of LPA and HPA systems is significantly impacted by the delivery of nutrient mist and the increase in droplet size. LPA systems use ultrasonic transducers or low-pressure pumps, which frequently result in irregular root hydration and restricted nutrient uptake, making them ideal for small-scale or instructional applications. Conversely, HPA systems employ high-pressure compressors to produce fine mists, incorporating filtering, sterilization, and biological support technologies to improve the longevity and maturity of the crop [28].
A study by Wainwright et al. [25] created a low-pressure aeroponic system that uses centrifugal force to distribute nutritional solutions via a spinning cylinder. The device produced droplets ranging from 40 to 80 µm, which improved plant growth and nutrient absorption. It provides a portable alternative to standard aeroponics, allowing indoor growing. In comparison to soil-based approaches, the system improved root development by 25%, increased chlorophyll content by 15%, and decreased insect exposure by 30%. Particularly in relation to hairy root cultures, misting systems have been extensively investigated for their effects on oxygen absorption, root development, and general plant health. Nutrient absorption has shown improvement with high-pressure misting, using droplets between 20 and 50 µm [29]. Systems that produced smaller droplets, around 10 µm in size, significantly increased the accumulation of root biomass, according to Weathers and Wyslouzil [30]. This led to a yield of 83 g of fresh weight per liter (g FW/L) and a growth rate of 0.20% per day. Systems generating larger droplets (greater than 50 µm) often encounter waterlogging and reduced oxygen availability, which inhibits plant growth. According to sources [31,32], problems with gas exchange and liquid accumulation were the reason why the systems examined produced only 36 g FW/L and showed a growth rate of 0.08% each day.
On the other hand, studies by [33] show that droplets smaller than 50 µm improve root development and oxygen absorption, leading to growth rates of up to 0.30% each day. Additionally, research by [34] showed that smaller droplets can increase the production of beneficial growth compounds, with a yield of 50 g FW/L. According to the results, altering droplet size is essential for achieving the best possible gas exchange and nutrient delivery. According to [35], smaller droplets improve absorption efficiency and the uniformity of nutrient delivery, particularly in settings with dense root systems. Similar difficulties were faced by [31,36], which produced only 36 g FW/L and a slow growth rate of 0.08 per day as a result of problems with gas exchange and liquid buildup. Research substantiates the benefits of smaller droplets, indicating that they improve oxygen absorption and root development, achieving growth rates of up to 0.30 per day. Moreover, research showed that smaller droplets promote beneficial growth chemicals, yielding 50 g FW/L. The necessity of modifying droplet size for effective gas exchange and nutrition delivery is highlighted by these results. Lower droplet sizes frequently promote better root contact and nutrient absorption, increasing the general vitality of the plant.

3.1.2. Comparative Analysis of Aeroponic Systems with Soil and Soilless Systems

Aeroponic systems have distinct advantages over soil-based and soilless cultivation because they maximize root oxygenation through direct nutrient misting, which promotes faster growth and higher nutrient uptake. Because aeroponics exposes roots to more oxygen, it uses less water and lowers the risk of root disease than hydroponics, which immerses roots in nutritional solutions. Despite being natural, soil-based systems’ scalability is constrained by problems with resource efficiency and nutrient management. According to our study [37], high-pressure aeroponics performed better in terms of yield, biomass, and water use efficiency than low-pressure, hydroponic, and soil-based systems. The WUE of high-pressure aeroponics was 72.1% greater than that of hydroponics and twice that of soil-based systems. Low-pressure aeroponics improved water use efficiency by 12.5% compared to hydroponics while producing superior antioxidants.
According to Mateus-Rodriguez et al. [38], aeroponics is better than traditional and semi-hydroponic systems for producing seed potatoes. Aeroponics saves water, chemicals, and energy while producing over 900 minitubers per m2 and achieving high multiplication rates (up to 1:45). According to research by Movahedi et al. [39] and Brocic et al. [40], aeroponic systems greatly increase the yields of potato minitubers. According to Brocic et al. [40], aeroponics produced 5.39 times more minitubers than conventional methods, while Marfona plants grown in aeroponics averaged 37.2 minitubers per plant, compared to 12.6 in soil. Both findings support aeroponics as a productive, disease-free technology and suggest scalability optimization. Aeroponics enhanced lettuce root growth, according to [41], with a surface area of 1550 cm2/plant and a root dry weight of 0.78 g/plant to improve shoot growth, but optimization is necessary. The aeroponic cultivation of Coffee Arabica boosted biomass yield by 1500% (16 times higher in leaves, 4.5 times in roots) and leaf caffeine content by 7170% (183 mg/kg in soil vs. 13,300 mg/kg in aeroponics) according to Wimmerova et al. [42]. Rutin was the only bioactive ingredient that increased in Senecio bicolor’s biomass under hydroponic conditions. Both soilless systems produced purer plants; however, they required more fertilizer and energy. Aeroponics can save up to 95% water and 85% fertilizer according to AlShrouf, 2017 [43], and can enhance production by 300% as opposed to 100–150% in hydroponics. In comparison to hydroponics and conventional irrigation techniques, aeroponics produced 11.64% more shoot dry weight and better root development, according to Khater and Ali, 2015 [44]. Aeroponics can improve nutrient uptake and increase dry biomass by 80% when compared to soil and hydroponic techniques [45]. It provides a scalable, resource-efficient solution that optimizes root oxygenation and development potential in contemporary agriculture when paired with non-thermal plasma technology.

3.1.3. Scalability and Resource Efficiency of Aeroponic Systems in Modern Agriculture

Modern agriculture has seen significant advancements because of aeroponics, which maximizes plant health and resource use. This soilless technique greatly reduces water and fertilizer usage by 98% and 60%, respectively, and does away with the requirement for pesticides, as noted by [46]. Because of improved oxygenation and targeted nutrient delivery to plant roots, the system encourages faster development and higher yields (by 45–75%) [47,48]. Aeroponics’ scalability is still constrained by a number of significant issues, despite the fact that these benefits make it especially helpful in controlled environment agriculture (CEA), such as urban farms and space missions [49,50]. The infrastructure needed for high-tech aeroponic operations is a major barrier. For small and medium-sized farmers, aeroponic systems, fertilizer delivery systems, and controlled environment buildings pose serious budgetary hurdles [51]. The expenses of aeroponics can be more than what the current infrastructure can handle. Effective aeroponic operation requires technological expertise in areas such as sensor-driven monitoring, nutrient administration, and system diagnostics. Adoption may be difficult for people without technological experience because it requires trained personnel and control [5]. Moreover, aeroponic systems need a lot of energy, especially when it comes to high-pressure misting. In resource-constrained contexts, increased operational costs heighten sustainability issues, despite these systems improving nutrient absorption [9]. This issue is critical in low-income or rural areas where there are energy shortages. IoT and AI, which optimize water and energy use and automate environmental control, enhance scalability in solar-powered aeroponic systems [52,53]. Despite these obstacles, continuous technological advancements and cost-cutting measures are progressively increasing the accessibility and scalability of aeroponics, especially in space missions and urban agriculture where resource efficiency is crucial [54]. Aeroponics provides effective solutions to critical challenges in contemporary agriculture, including water scarcity, soil degradation, and food security. Figure 2 shows the main benefits of aeroponic systems, which include using less water, better nutrients, and more vertical space for plants to grow. Aeroponics is more environmentally sustainable, versatile at many scales, improves root oxygenation, reduces disease transmission, and optimizes resource use.

3.2. Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) Characteristics

Plasma-activated water has gained popularity in the agriculture and farming sector for its potential for producing reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS), including nitric oxide (NO), hydroxyl radicals (HO), and ozone (O3). These species are most important for healthier seed germination, disease prevention, and fast plant growth. The most common method for producing PAW is dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), which delivers high-voltage pulsed electricity (24 kV at 1.5 kHz) across electrodes separated by dielectric materials like glass or ceramics. When plasma and water interact, plasma-activated water (PAW) is produced. Research has indicated that the low energy consumption of CAP is a major factor in its effectiveness in agricultural applications, particularly in the production of PAW. Techniques such as DBD and Non-Thermal Plasma Jet Discharge (NTPJD) enhance plant development and stress tolerance and provide reactive species for seed treatment and microbial control, as shown in Figure 3 [55,56,57]. PAW delivery improves crop yield, nutrient absorption, and water efficiency [58]. Plasma-based AOPs play a big role in sustainable agriculture because they clean the soil and water, break down pollutants, and boost microbial activity and nutrient cycling [59,60]. A study conducted by [61] observed that reactive species, including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitrates (NO3), in PAW are advantageous for agricultural purposes.
PAW is a fertilizer replacement that is environmentally benign and has been shown to enhance nitrogen uptake and stress tolerance. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) are employed to separate and quantify reactive species, including nitrates (NO3) and nitrites (NO2), in PAW in order to assess the efficacy of plasma interventions [62,63]. The effectiveness of PAW is assessed by measuring the redox potential and the quantities of species (e.g., H2O2, NO) using electrochemical methods such as cyclic voltammetry and amperometry [64]. The precise identification of plasma-generated species is facilitated by the use of mass spectrometry, which contributes to the understanding of their role in plant growth. The influence of reactive species on seed coats and roots is further investigated using imaging instruments like Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) [65].
Various spectroscopic techniques, such as UV–vis, fluorescence, and emission spectroscopy are spectroscopic techniques that provide excellent sensitivity and real-time analysis for monitoring reactive species in plasma-treated water. Nitrite, nitrate, and peroxynitrite improve stress tolerance and germination by speeding up cellular processes. Their concentrations differ depending on discharge type, gas composition, and treatment duration, providing useful information for precision agricultural management [66,67] Plasma treatments in soilless systems in Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) provide PAW and nutrient-enriched mist directly to plant roots, increasing crop production and nutrient uptake while using less water. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species required for nutrition absorption are monitored using techniques such as electron spin resonance (ESR) and optical emission spectroscopy (OES). OES uses spectral wavelengths such as OH (296–310 nm), O (777–844 nm), and NO (214–270 nm) to identify specific reactive species such as hydroxyl radicals (OH), atomic oxygen (O), nitrogen atoms (N), and nitric oxide (NO [55,68,69].
Plasma-activated water (PAW) contains reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), which collectively are referred to as reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). RONS are involved in the oxidation, antibacterial action, and promotion of plant development, as per these sources [70,71]. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) can be categorized as either short-lived or long-lived depending on their stability and storage circumstances. Direct detection is difficult for short-lived species, such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), singlet oxygen (^1O2), superoxide anions (O2), nitric oxide radicals (NO•), and peroxynitrite (ONOO), because they decay in a matter of microseconds to seconds [66]. On the other hand, under some circumstances, long-lived species like ozone (O3), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and nitric oxide (NO) can endure for minutes to years [72]. Because they affect chemical reactivity, plant responses, and microbial inactivation in agricultural and environmental systems, these species are essential in PAW applications. Primary short-lived radicals are formed when plasma-generated species interact with water. These radicals have a high reactivity with both organic and microbiological targets [66]. Similarly, according to these sources [72,73], secondary species have long-lasting effects on PAW’s oxidative potential, pH, and bioavailability. Environmental variables such as temperature, pH, and exposure time all have an impact on the stability and efficacy of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Julák et al. [66] conducted research and found that cold plasma (20–50 °C) preserves reactive species by reducing recombination, while high-temperature plasma enhances their dissociation, thereby limiting their lifespan. PAW applications, such as microbial decontamination, oxidative stress induction, and nutrient enhancement in agriculture, are influenced by the dynamics. Additionally, the chemical properties and biological functions of PAW are influenced by the formation of secondary oxidants, such as nitrous acid (HNO2), as a result of interactions between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS).
A complex mixture of reactive species is present in PAW, which is categorized into short-lived and long-lived species based on their stability and storage conditions. Analytical techniques are very important for classifying and quantifying RONS in PAW in order to find their stability, interactions, and potential applications. Electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy is frequently used to detect superoxide anions (O2) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH) utilizing spin-trap reagents like 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) and 5,5-Dimethyl-1-Pyrroline-N-Oxide (DMPO). In agricultural and environmental systems, this provides information on the degree of the reactivity of these components [73,74,75]. Further short-lived organisms require the use of very sensitive detection methods because of their high reactivity and rapid disintegration. Ultraviolet (UV) absorption spectroscopy, which helps identify characteristic peaks associated with species that are generated from water, nitrogen, and oxygen, further expands the agricultural applications of PAW. It is generally known that short-lived organisms are hard to identify. Because the plasma discharge in the air creates extremely unstable molecules with microsecond lifetimes, direct quantification is difficult [66]. The oxidative potential and prolonged reactivity of PAW are increased by stable species like H2O2 and O3, which can persist for a considerably longer period of time [72]. These species work together to influence how well PAW boosts plant development, inhibits pathogens, and facilitates nutrient absorption. A detailed description and summary of the reactive species generated during PAW treatment, together with information on their lifetimes and related analytical detection methods, are explained in Table 1. These methods are crucial for optimizing plasma treatment parameters and for enhancing PAW applications in sustainable agriculture, water treatment, and food safety.

3.3. Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) in Soil-Based and Soilless Cultivation

Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) has shown considerable advantages in agricultural systems, both soil-based and soilless. PAW promotes increased agricultural yields and sustainable farming practices by enhancing nutrient absorption, lowering chemical inputs, and cutting production costs. Combining PAW with soil and soilless cultivation offers a viable way to increase agricultural yields, reduce environmental effects, and guarantee the effective use of resources, as illustrated in Figure 4 [12,74,87]. Multiple plasma technologies, such as dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) and corona plasma reactors, are utilized to produce plasma-activated water (PAW), thereby enriching nutrient solutions to improve crop performance [10].
PAW enhances soil health in soil-based agriculture and contributes to a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by increasing microbial activity, optimizing nutrient cycling, and decreasing dependency on synthetic fertilizers, as per these sources [88,89,90]. Furthermore, PAW reduces the risk of groundwater contamination and eutrophication by reducing nitrate discharge [91]. Furthermore, its antimicrobial qualities help to reduce pests and illnesses, resulting in less pesticide use and promoting overall ecosystem sustainability. The presence of reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (RONS) in plasma-activated water (PAW) increases nutritional bioavailability and strengthens plant resistance to abiotic stress and pathogens, resulting in better plant tissue health and growth [92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99].
In soilless systems, such as hydroponics and aeroponics, PAW is essential for optimizing nutrient delivery and plant development by increasing ion availability and mitigating microbial contamination, as reported by these studies [81,91,100,101,102,103,104,105]. The consistent provision of nutrient-rich solutions guarantees consistent nutrient uptake, which has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing fertilizer effluent. These studies indicated that PAW is essential for the optimization of nutrient delivery and plant development in soilless systems, including hydroponics and aeroponics, by increasing ion availability and mitigating microbial contamination. The consistent supply of nutrient-rich solutions guarantees stable nutrient uptake, potentially reducing GHG emissions by reducing fertilizer runoff.
Furthermore, PAW facilitates nutrient absorption, thereby enhancing plant growth and improving root absorption efficiency, which results in increased biomass production [12,106,107,108]. The interaction of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) with dissolved nutrients further enhances these effects, thereby contributing to overall plant performance.

3.3.1. Effects of Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) in Soil-Based Systems

PAW holds considerable importance in soil-based systems. The reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) engage with microbial populations and organic matter, facilitating soil chemistry and enhancing nutrient bioavailability [87]. The adoption of PAW can improve access to vital nutrients and reduce the demand for chemical fertilizers, which will reduce GHG emissions even if nutrient uptake in soil-based systems is usually slower [109,110]. Kalachova et al. [111] discovered that soil microbiomes significantly impact plant responses to plasma treatments, opening up new avenues for sustainable agriculture. Zhou et al. [112] found that tomato seeds treated with atmospheric pressure plasma showed notable increases in germination, growth features, and fruit yield; the optimal yield was attained at a high voltage, which resulted in a 26.56% increase over untreated seeds. In soil-based tests, Sivachandiran and Khacef [109] found that plasma-activated water (PAW), which was created by exposing the water to plasma for 15 to 30 min, had an acidic pH (around 3) with moderate quantities of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitrate (NO3). Treating radish, tomato, and sweet pepper seeds with 10–20 min plasma and irrigating with PAW enhanced germination and growth. Tomato and pepper seeds treated for 10 min and irrigated with PAW for nine days showed a 60% increase in stem length, though prolonged exposure was detrimental. Hou et al. [113] examined the impact of plasma treatment on diminishing heavy metal buildup in water spinach cultivated in polluted soil. Various plasma applications were evaluated: seed treatment with non-treated water (PTS + NTW), seed treatment with plasma-activated water (PTS + PAW), and irrigation with plasma-activated water (NTS + PAW). The results indicated that plasma therapy inhibited cadmium uptake, decreasing its bioconcentration factor (BCF) from 0.864 to 0.543, while exerting no significant influence on lead accumulation. Although plasma has the ability to alter heavy metal absorption, it did not enhance crop output. Subsequent research will refine PAW treatment parameters and evaluate its interaction with various heavy metal concentrations.
According to [114], low-temperature plasma (LTP) initially increased shoot and root growth, but it decreased vigor and germination rates from 30 to 150 days post-treatment. According to [92], PAW boosted nitrogen content in maize but negatively impacted chlorophyll and fluorescence, highlighting a trade-off between photosynthetic efficiency and nutritional enhancement. PAW promoted early development at lower concentrations and increased chlorophyll and biomass at greater concentrations in larger pots, according to [107]. PAW increases chlorophyll in many crops, demonstrating its agricultural potential. In Chinese cabbage, lettuce, and maize, it increases the production of chlorophyll, which facilitates quicker germination, better photosynthesis, and generally healthier growth [115,116,117].
According to Lukacova et al. [118], whose study investigated PAW’s effects on maize germination and stress response, PAW pre-treatment enhanced early root growth, accelerated endodermal development, increased G-POX activity, and protected chlorophyll under stress while promoting translocation to leaves. According to [119], the long-term treatment of plasma-treated water (PTW) to barley increased its antioxidant capacity and chlorophyll content under drought stress, boosting stress resilience. Cortese et al. [120] found that plasma-activated water (PAW) raises cytosolic Ca2+ in Arabidopsis thaliana swiftly and persistently, depending on reactive species and storage conditions. PAW may improve plant development and disease resistance in sustainable agriculture. In their study, Wang et al. [121] discovered that PAW-treated wheat exhibited higher mineral and protein content, antioxidant activity, and photosynthetic pigments, which improved growth and stress tolerance. Nutrient uptake was influenced by nitrate concentration, and radicle and hypocotyl length, chlorophyll content, and leaf area were all enhanced in Lactuca by PAW [107]. The profile of green oak lettuce was also improved by PAW, especially when applied as an 8 kV PAW spray, which markedly increased the amounts of nitrate and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) [122]. Furthermore, PAW significantly diminished for conventional sanitizers such as hypochlorite [123]. These findings show the promise of PAW in sustainable agriculture, but more investigation is needed to completely comprehend how it affects crop maturity, yield, and nutrient density.

3.3.2. Effects of Plasma-Activated Water (PAW) in Soilless Cultivation Systems

In soilless systems, PAW has the potential to improve plant growth overall, nutrient uptake, and stress tolerance. It is thought that the RONS in PAW help nutrients dissolve and root enzyme activity, which leads to healthier plant growth and maybe even higher yields [110]. Takahashi et al. [124] found that applying PAW greatly reduced microflora in greenhouse tomatoes. Than et al. [117] used dielectric barrier discharge (Ar-N2-O2) to generate PAW, enhancing lettuce germination, seedling vigor, and chlorophyll content (up to 220%) with 10–20 min treatments. Longer treatments (25–30 min) had minimal additional effects, highlighting the need for optimized reactive species concentration. The varied long-term effects of PAW across crops warrant further investigation.
Further, Mandal et al. [114] say that PAW improves plant health and nutrient uptake because it has a lot of reactive species, like nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O). These reactive species increase plant growth and productivity by improving stress response and nutrient solution efficiency [125]. The effects of cold plasma seed priming on plant growth were examined by [126,127] on Astragalus fridae, showing that treating the plant with plasma and silicon dioxide nanoparticles helped the roots grow and the plant’s health in general. In Abedi’s study of Cichorium intybus and other plants, the plants grew faster, had more flowers and biomass, and were less hurt by selenium nanoparticles. By changing the seed coatings and starting up biochemical pathways, cold atmospheric and low-pressure plasma technologies help seeds sprout, grow, and deal with stress better. Depending on the plant type, treatment settings, and plasma supply, the effects vary [128,129]. According to Shao et al. [130], low-temperature plasma (LTP), particularly at an intensity of 120 W, significantly boosts the vigor and velocity of seed germination in maize. Plasma-activated water (PAW) improves plant growth, nutrient uptake, and stress tolerance, which are essential for food production. In a work by [131], they produced plasma-activated water (PAW) for nitrogen fixation using air gliding arc (GA) plasma. Although the investigation’s findings indicated that PAW included hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), nitrate (NO3), and nitrite (NO2), these quantities rapidly decreased after five days of storage. At 48 and 72 h, PAW made with 5 L/min of airflow was most effective at making the radicle emerge and improving the germination, germination index, shoot length, fresh weight, and dry weight of rice seedlings. This means that making soluble nitrogen through GA plasma is a beneficial way to help rice seeds sprout and grow quickly after planting. Ruamrungsri et al. [12] studied the possible nitrate source of plasma-activated water (PAW) for hydroponically cultivated green oak lettuce. Plants were cultivated utilizing Hoagland’s solution under three conditions: T1 (absence of nitrate), T2 (chemical nitrate), and T3 (plasma nitrate produced by a pinhole plasma jet). According to the results, T3’s growth and yield were on par with T2, and its decreased nitrate accumulation reduced any possible hazards to human health and the environment. Furthermore, PAW-treated plants demonstrated elevated free amino acid concentrations, signifying enhanced nitrogen absorption efficiency. Sajib et al. [132] examined PAW as a sustainable substitute for chemical fertilizers in the cultivation of black grams. High-voltage discharge (3–6 kV, 3–10 kHz) in oxygen-deionized water was used to create PAW. The study found that higher catalase (CAT) activity, which controls H2O2 levels, led to improved seed germination, growth, and development. Molecular docking and VmCAT gene expression validated this process, enhancing plant development. Table 2 provides an overview of research on PAW’s effects in soilless cultures, emphasizing how it affects plant growth, nutrient uptake, and stress tolerance. It illustrates how important these technologies are for raising agricultural yields and lowering chemical inputs.

3.4. PAM Generation in Aeroponics Systems

Modern aeroponic systems use plasma-activated mist generation, an innovative approach that uses plasma-induced reactive species to greatly increase nutrient availability and promote strong plant development. Radio frequency (RF) and high-voltage with low energy direct current (DC) atmospheric plasma generating devices, such as needle discharge, are used to create plasma-activated mist. These devices create ionized gases, which then create reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). These species play a crucial role in improving nutrient assimilation and promoting plant growth. Plasma-assisted technologies enhance nutrient uptake by introducing plasma-generated reactive species into aeroponic nutrient solutions, as seen in Figure 5, which reduces reliance on conventional fertilizers and simultaneously improves crop health and resilience [14,136,137,138,139,140].
Plasma-activated mist droplets contain reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) from air ionization during plasma discharge. In plasma devices such as DC and RF plasmas, the high-voltage discharge produces energetic particles that interact with ambient gases, resulting in the production of these reactive species. These species, particularly ROS and RNS, increase nutritional bioavailability by breaking down complex molecules, allowing plant cells to more easily absorb nutrients. This procedure can boost plant nutrient absorption efficiency and overall development in aeroponic systems. The ionization process creates highly charged ions and free electrons, which make plasma-activated mist more reactive and improve root uptake in aeroponic systems. System design optimization improves mist–plasma interactions, enabling effective exposure to reactive species [139,141,142,143]. Plasma-activated water (PAW) also improves mist droplets by raising the levels of nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), ammonium (NH4+), and hydroxyl ions (OH), which helps plants grow even more. However, additional research is required to refine these methods and assess their long-term effects on aeroponic systems [19]. When these reactive species are mixed with water, they make plasma-activated mist (PAM), which is spread out in the aeroponic chamber and comes into direct contact with plant roots to help them take in more nutrients and maybe fix problems with nitrogen fixation [14,144].
Electron Impact Dissociation: High-energy electrons break nitrogen and oxygen molecules into reactive atoms.
N2+e→2N+e
 O2+e→2O+e
Formation of Nitric Oxide (NO) and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2): Atomic nitrogen reacts with oxygen, forming nitrogen oxides [145].
N+O2→NO+O
 NO+O→NO2
Conversion to Nitric Acid (HNO3) and Nitrites (NO2): After dissolving in water droplets, nitrogen oxides undergo further reactions to form nitrites (NO2) and nitric acid (HNO3). These chemicals exhibit excellent solubility and facilitate nutrient transport to plants.
3NO2+H2O→2HNO3+NO3
 HNO3→H++NO3
Ammonia (NH3) Formation: Water vapor dissociation provides hydrogen for ammonia synthesis [146].
H2O+e→H+OH+e
Reactive nitrogen species can combine with hydrogen (from water vapor) to produce ammonia:
N+3H→NH3
Reactive species such as nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), ammonium (NH4+), and hydroxyl ions (OH) are generated via plasma discharge, hence enhancing nutrient availability in aeroponic systems. These compounds enhance nutrient efficiency and root absorption, thereby diminishing reliance on traditional fertilizers. Henry’s Law says that hydroxyl radicals change nitrogen compounds that are not easily soluble into nutrients that plants can use. Mist droplets enhance the solubility of nitrogen compounds, including nitric acid (HNO3) and nitrous acid (HNO2) [147,148]. New research shows that using plasma-activated nutrient mist in aeroponic systems can help plants grow by creating a clean, nutrient-rich environment. When plasma-treated mist comes into direct contact with plant roots, it makes it easier for nutrients to be absorbed quickly, which speeds up plant growth. This novel method enhances plant health while providing a sustainable substitute for conventional chemical fertilizers, hence diminishing environmental impact and resource utilization [14,136,142]. Further research has demonstrated the efficacy of plasma technology in enhancing plant development through improved nutrient delivery and sterilizing. Nitrogen-sensitive root membranes rapidly absorb plasma aerosols from droplets generated by mist. After that, transporters make it easier for these molecules to move, which makes more nitrogen available for plant growth [149]. Enhanced nitrogen absorption is associated with deeper green foliage, elevated protein levels, and superior grain quality. Plasma-activated mist (PAM) can cause oxidative species like H2O2 and O0 to build up after long-term exposure. These may harm DNA and cells, perhaps reducing growth efficacy at elevated quantities [150]. Researchers have suggested utilizing AI, IoT, and machine learning technologies for accurate regulation to enhance plasma exposure and nutritional distribution. These technologies provide the ongoing surveillance of nitrogen species, chlorophyll concentration, CO2 levels, and mist characteristics [151,152]. To avoid nutrient imbalance, AI-driven models can change the frequency and intensity of the plasma mist on the fly, and sensor networks make it easier for nutrients to reach all areas [153]. These combined methods ensure controlled implementation and immediate supervision, which improves the efficiency of the system and the crop yield.

3.4.1. PAM in Aeroponics

Plasma-activated mist (PAM) has emerged as a viable method for surface cleaning and fog-based culture due to its capacity to efficiently distribute reactive species. PAM interacts with micron-sized droplets in high-humidity environments, allowing plasma-generated reactive species to move from the gas phase to the liquid phase. This action produces hydrated ions and acidic active chemicals within the droplets, which are critical to PAM’s antibacterial efficacy. Furthermore, the size of the droplets and the discharge voltage play a crucial role in influencing the activity and effectiveness of PAM, establishing it as a versatile and efficient technology for a range of applications [154]. High concentrations of nitrogen compounds, such as nitrate (NO3), were effectively generated in micro-droplets utilizing the aeroponic method, referred to as plasma-activated mist (PAM) via plasma-induced reactions. This improved the efficiency of nitrogen fixing considerably, with up to 39 times the energy efficiency of traditional plasma reactors. The solar-powered PAM system delivered nitrogen in a sustainable and renewable manner. This technique exhibited its promise as a cost-effective and eco-friendly nitrogen solution for agricultural use. It is noteworthy that PAM treatment expedited leaf emergence and increased leaf area by 30%. Furthermore, the application of plasma resulted in improvements in plant growth parameters, including stem length and leaf appearance [14].
According to Song et al. [136], ginseng sprout development and bioactive chemical content were greatly increased by plasma-treated water mist (PTWM) that was enhanced with NO3, NO2, and K+. In comparison to the untreated control, PTWM treatment raised the amount of free amino acids and ginsenosides in 25-day-old sprouts and increased shoot biomass by 26.5%. After plasma discharge, PTW developed a weak acidity that aided in nutrient uptake, demonstrating its potential as a liquid nitrogen fertilizer for ginseng. Pathogens such as Salmonella, E. Coli, and Listeria are rendered inactive by plasma-activated mist (PAM) by means of the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) produced at the gas–liquid interface. Smaller droplet sizes and high discharge voltages enhance PAM’s potential for disease control and agricultural disinfection [155,156,157]. He et al. [157] found that plasma-activated mist (PAM) efficiently decontaminated Escherichia coli O157:H7 on nutritional agar plates and fresh food; however, the efficacy varied depending on the variety. Kale showed the greatest reduction (3-log10), followed by spinach and lettuce (>1.5-log10), and strawberries showed the least reduction (0.8-log10). When applied to stacked layers of fruit, the inactivation efficacy declined, reaching slightly over 0.9-log10 for spinach, kale, and strawberries, which is consistently lower than single-layer treatments. A mathematical diffusion model was used to assess PAM’s scalability for industrial decontamination, with a focus on layered spinach layers. Kruszelnicki et al. [147] conducted a study on the solvation dynamics of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) in plasma-activated water (PAW) and mist droplets through the application of 0D and 2D modeling techniques. The findings indicated that micrometer-scale droplets, characterized by a high surface-to-volume ratio, enhance the interaction area for reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) transfer, thereby accelerating the solvation process. The study revealed that hydrophilic species (e.g., H2O2, HNOx) depend on droplet size, with smaller droplets obtaining higher in-liquid densities, whereas hydrophobic species (e.g., O3, N2O) quickly saturate without diminishing gas-phase RONS. The interaction among droplet size, RONS characteristics, and plasma features is underscored by the rapid desorption of low-energy species during plasma afterglow, as well as the impact of plasma non-uniformity on solvation rates. Plasma-activated mist (PAM) technology augments aeroponic systems by facilitating seed germination, promoting plant growth, enhancing nutrient absorption, and bolstering disease resistance. PAM is a sustainable and efficient technique for contemporary farming because reactive species like auxin and gibberellic acid promote early growth, increase nutrient absorption, and lower microbial activity [109,127,158].

3.4.2. Direct Application of PAM

In aeroponic systems, atmospheric-pressure plasma discharge enhances nitrogen fixation and root productivity. Through plasma-treated water (PAW), dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma increases crop shelf life, decreases microbial contamination, and improves nutrient bioavailability [159]. Additionally, O3 ozone produced by DBD improves seed germination and increases nitrogen availability, which promotes plant growth [160,161]. In nutrient solutions, low-energy DC atmospheric plasma generating device systems produce reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), such as NO2, NH3, O3, and H2O2, which promote nutrient breakdown and boost bioavailability [162]. Reactive species produced by plasma, namely H2O2aq and HOONOaq, improve plant metabolism, which raises nutrient uptake and total crop output [147,148]. By using plasma-activated mist (PAM) for continuous and scalable in-flow nitrogen fixation, plasma-based nitrogen fixation offers a sustainable alternative. Plasma-assisted oxidation techniques generate reactive nitrogen species within micron-sized water droplets, allowing aeroponic systems to deliver nitrogen directly to plant roots and enhance nutrient absorption efficiency. PAM is a viable option for sustained nitrogen fixation in aeroponics due to the increased efficiency achieved through energy concentration in droplet micro-reactors, which can utilize up to 39 times more energy than traditional plasma reactors [14,144].
According to Li et al. [140] Plasma-based nitrogen fixation in aeroponics is significantly improved by a cascade discharge system that uses dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) with a three-stage spark discharge. This system changes atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into water-soluble nitrogen molecules, especially N2O5, by reacting NO and NO2 with ozone (O3) made by DBD. By achieving a high nitrogen yield while using less energy, this technique makes aeroponic cultivation more effective and expands the use of dispersed plasma nitrogen fixation in soilless agriculture. High-pressure ultrasonic nozzles (HPUN) and low-energy plasma systems have been proposed to work effectively to provide a self-sustaining plasma source. This combination may improve nitrogen fixation, nutritional absorption, and water efficiency, which could result in longer-lasting, healthier crops. Furthermore, compared to high-energy plasma therapies, plasma-induced oxidative stress may increase plant resistance to damage while using less energy [14,139,141,142]. Plasma-assisted aeroponics has the potential to change agriculture because it improves the delivery of nutrients, the uptake of nitrogen, and the oxygenation of roots.
The direct application of plasma-activated mist to the root zone has been documented in multiple studies as a successful method for improving nitrogen fixation, sterilization, and microbial regulation. This paper provides a hypothesis for the creation of a cost-effective plasma device that may generate equivalent reactive species based on these findings. RF and DC atmospheric plasma-generating devices have undergone extensive study for similar applications [138,140,160,161]. This review suggests that integrating RF and DC atmospheric plasma-generating devices into aeroponic systems could significantly enhance nutrient absorption, as illustrated in Figure 6. Research on nebulizers and fine foggers, which was previously studied by researchers, indicates that the fine mist generated by aeroponic nozzles is essential for the root absorption of plasma-derived species [14,141,160]. If aeroponic systems can make this kind of mist, these reactive species could combine with droplets in a way that makes it easier for nutrients to get to plant roots. Additionally, adding plasma devices to high-pressure ultrasonic nozzles (HPUN) could make plasma-assisted aeroponics self-generating and work better, providing a new way to improve plant growth and nutrient uptake.

3.5. Impact of Control Systems, AI, and IoT in Aeroponic Systems

The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and machine learning (ML) has significantly altered the management of plant growth conditions and resource utilization in agricultural systems, particularly in aeroponics. AI-powered control systems enable the real-time monitoring and management of critical environmental parameters, such as temperature, light intensity, humidity, and nutrient concentrations. Predictive analytics and optimization techniques in machine learning models are essential for enhancing these parameters. The optimization of fertilizer distribution and misting cycle has been accomplished through the application of Reinforcement Learning (RL). Reinforcement learning enhances plant health and optimizes growth efficiency through its iterative learning process.
Additionally, AI systems that analyze sensor data and recognize images can spot early signs of plant stress and disease detection, allowing for preventative actions. Neural networks (NNs) and support vector machines (SVMs) are frequently used to identify these indicators. Many studies have been conducted on AI-based disease detection [163,164,165,166,167], fertilizer and irrigation control automation [168,169,170,171], plant development state recognition [172], and yield prediction [173,174,175,176], all of which help to improve the sustainability and efficiency of aeroponic systems. These developments promote more ecologically friendly farming methods by reducing resource use and improving aeroponic system precision and scalability. Despite advancements, obstacles persist, such as elevated expenses, intricate systems, and data accuracy, which impede the extensive implementation of these technologies. However, it is anticipated that continued advancements in cloud computing, the Internet of Things (IoT), and increasingly complex artificial intelligence (AI) models will overcome these obstacles and improve aeroponic system performance even more [177]. A significant breakthrough in agricultural innovation is represented by the combination of advanced control systems, artificial intelligence, and machine learning in aeroponics. As illustrated in Figure 7, IoT-based smart farming with cloud-based monitoring and aeroponic control systems improve precision in nutrient delivery, environmental regulation, and real-time data analysis, maximizing crop growth and resource efficiency.
Nutrient levels, pH balance, humidity, temperature, and light exposure are just a few of the critical environmental factors that these technologies make possible to precisely control for the best plant growth [17,178,179]. In addition to raising crop yields and quickening growth rates, this strategy improves resource efficiency and reduces environmental effects, all of which support sustainable farming methods [180]. Large volumes of data on plant growth, weather patterns, and nutrient levels can be processed using data analytics. This makes it possible to predict the best growing conditions, which helps farmers maximize the productivity of their aeroponic systems [181,182].
By analyzing sensor data, machine learning algorithms can forecast growth paths, identify possible problems early, and automatically modify operating parameters, which helps to improve cultivation techniques and maximize resource utilization [183,184]. Growers around the world may increase agricultural productivity, enhance crop quality, and maintain their financial stability and environmental sustainability by integrating these technologies seamlessly [185]. IoT, AI, and LED technologies combined with aeroponics have the potential to revolutionize the sustainability and efficiency of agricultural output. These technologies provide the exact regulation of essential development parameters, including temperature, humidity, and fertilizer misting, while also offering real-time environmental surveillance. Because it increases crop output, growth rates, and nutrient uptake, aeroponics is a possible alternative for urban and space-constrained agriculture.
Studies combining sensor-based aeroponic systems with IoT and AI technologies to enhance crop quality, growth, and fertilizer efficiency are compiled in Table 3. These studies show how AI-powered control systems and IoT-enabled real-time monitoring may enhance environmental conditions, automate nutrient distribution, and cut down on resource waste. Numerous crops are studied, showing how these systems increase growth rates, yield quality, and nutrient uptake while adapting to shifting agricultural demands. The studies were selected because they employed cutting-edge techniques backed by peer-reviewed publications from the past ten years, including feedback-driven control loops, machine learning algorithms, and predictive analytics.

Future Prospects of AI and IoT-Driven Plasma Control in Aeroponics

The use of low-energy direct plasma devices, such as radio frequency (RF) or direct current (DC) atmospheric plasma, generates an environment rich in reactive plasma species in aeroponic systems. Plasma-activated water (PAW) can be utilized in mist form, facilitating the generation of plasma species within the aeroponic system [140,144,149,197]. Future advancements in sensor technologies have the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the system through the monitoring and control of these plasma species. Figure 8 shows that many studies have looked into how to find species using gas sensors, spectrophotometry, and optical emission spectroscopy (OES). Specifically, gas sensors like MQ-137 and MQ-131 have been widely used for detecting ammonia (NH3), (O3), and other reactive species. Lai et al. and Tozlu [198,199] created ensemble recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that can use cheap IoT sensors to find CO, O3, and NO2. They obtained excellent results by training the models over and over again. They used an Artificial Algae Algorithm (AAA)-based Elman Neural Network (ENN) model to make ozone (O3) detection and real-time monitoring even better. This suggests that AI can be employed for monitoring atmospheric plasma. Rahardja et al. [200] utilized Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT) to identify pollutants in agricultural environments. The sensitivity and specificity for the classification of NO2 and NH3 have been improved.
Li et al. [201] employed a graphene–polyaniline sensor array alongside machine learning, achieving over 99% accuracy in monitoring NH0 and NO2. The study showed that combining nanomaterial-based sensors with AI algorithms improves the ability to identify species in plasma-treated environments in real-time. Bruno et al. [202] examined selectivity challenges in metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOX) sensors by integrating artificial neural networks (ANNs). This facilitated the process for farmers to locate ammonia. Further, Mahapatra [203] conducted a study on developments in AI-driven gas sensing, highlighting improvements in accuracy, safety, and efficiency through real-time monitoring and predictive diagnostics. The integration of AI with nanomaterials enhances sensitivity and selectivity, which in turn optimizes environmental and health management.
Chen et al. [204] used Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES) and machine learning to study Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jets (APPJs) and were excellent at identifying species. Chan et al. [205] showed that cold atmospheric plasmas (CAPs) could identify tissues non-invasively with 99% accuracy. This shows that similar AI-based monitoring systems could be useful. Özdemir et al. [206] employed ML-based plasma flame analysis to monitor cold plasma spraying. This gave them information about how stable and effective plasma is. AI-driven plasma species detection was also demonstrated by [18] in optimizing H2O2 sensing. The study conducted in [207] presents an IoT-based air quality index (AQI) system that utilizes Random Forest, Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models, demonstrating advancements in the field of environmental monitoring. Tozlu [199], in his study, developed an electronic nose for the detection of methanol, achieving an accuracy of 85.88%, thereby demonstrating the capabilities of electronic sensing technology. Li et al. [201] mixed polyaniline and graphene oxide to make sensors that can find NH0 and NO2 in mining operations. These sensors are designed for wearability and remote monitoring. Listyarini et al. [208] created a GSM-based system for monitoring ammonia levels, while [209] introduced an NB-IoT air quality monitoring device for real-time environmental assessments. Petric et al. [19] created an ammonia detection system based on Arduino and Python-based analytics. This system enables the customizable real-time monitoring of plasma-generated species. Lai et al. [198] enhanced pollution monitoring through the implementation of an ensemble machine-learning model that integrates LSTM, GRU, Bi-LSTM, and Bi-GRU architectures. Scalability was added to the method. Maulini et al. [210] enhanced aquaponics water and fertilizer management using Internet of Things sensors, while Mohammed et al. [211] developed an Arduino-based air quality control system.. Furthermore, a range of machine learning models—including BPNN, DT, GBM, CNNs, SVM, RF, autoencoders, and XGBoost have been widely used to assess plant health by looking at important variables like growth rates, photosynthetic activity, stress levels, water availability, nutrient status, and root health. These models offer real-time monitoring of how environmental factors affect plant productivity [17,212,213,214].
According to the studies, sensor, AI, and machine learning technologies have all been successfully used for real-time plasma species monitoring in a variety of applications. These methods provide significant promise for improving plasma-assisted nutrition delivery, despite the fact that they have not been widely used in aeroponic systems. Through the precise monitoring of plasma-generated reactive species, the integration of gas sensors, spectroscopic methods, and AI-based analysis has the potential to increase system efficiency and encourage plant development. To guarantee the accuracy, stability, and long-term viability in aeroponic environments, issues including sensor calibration, adjustment to dynamic plasma conditions, and the operational costs related to gases utilized in plasma formation must be resolved.

3.6. Challenges and Optimization of Plasma in Aeroponics

System integration, cost control, and energy efficiency optimization are the difficulties in scaling plasma for aeroponic systems. The potential for plasma-based nutrient enhancement and sterilization exists; however, large-scale implementation faces challenges due to elevated power consumption and operational expenses. Many studies have shown that by adopting low-energy DC or RF atmospheric plasma-generating systems, the total cost can be much lowered as these systems do not require extra gases for operation. Feasibility is greatly affected by the choice of plasma gas; for example, air is about $0 [88], whereas helium costs $636,000–$9,096,000 per 1000 h, nitrogen $9000–$72,000, and oxygen $18,000–$144,000. In [215], they demonstrated a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor that broke down N,N-dimethyl formamide for 0.11 EUR/kWh and saved 13.2 mg/kJ of energy. Energy demands are also directly impacted by electrode arrangement and power scaling; research indicates that scaling NTP from the lab to an industrial scale can quadruple the power requirements. Gao et al. [14] discovered that the ns plasma peak power ranged from 160.5 to 231.1 kW, with an energy efficiency of 47.79 MJ/mol and an average power of 3.85 W. Different studies have shown that the system can work in different ways, with energy efficiencies of 1900 MJ/mol [148], 1040 MJ/mol [197], and 96 MJ/mol [216]. Increasing plasma power, say, fom 18 W to 42 W, makes NO1 production better but also dramatically raises energy costs, since 210 MJ/mol of NOx is needed instead of 150 MJ/mol [140]. Even though complex setups like DBD + 3-stage spark discharge make things work better, voltage, frequency, and gas flow rates still need to be tweaked more to find the best balance between energy use and nitrogen fixation efficiency for long-term agricultural uses. Enhancements in cost viability and energy efficiency are also necessary for the scalability of NTP systems. Precision farming and automation are becoming more and more important in sustainable agriculture, yet energy-intensive DBD devices and plasma jets are still expensive. NTP can become more cost-effective by using green energy sources and increasing plasma system efficiency [217,218]. Furthermore, by incorporating it into irrigation systems, plasma-activated water (PAW) can lower chemical input costs [217]. NTP has demonstrated the ability to improve productivity and manage infections sustainably in aquaponics [88]. These things show how important it is to have plasma configurations that are both cost-effective and make the best use of energy, gases, and discharge parameters while also using renewable energy sources to help widespread adoption in agriculture.

4. Conclusions

The review examines previously published research on plasma technologies, plasma-assisted aeroponic systems, artificial intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT) applications, with a special focus on the production and utilization of plasma-activated water (PAW) and plasma-activated mist (PAM). These methods have shown a lot of promise for making it easier for plants to take in nutrients, fix nitrogen, and control microbes in both soil-based and soilless farming systems. PAW, for example, has been widely employed in both soil and soilless systems to improve plant growth by increasing nutrient availability and reducing reliance on traditional fertilizers. Meanwhile, PAM has shown potential in aeroponics, where direct application can increase nutrient delivery and reduce nutritional deficiency. The reactive species in PAM not only change metabolic processes but also help fix nitrogen, which makes plants stronger and helps them grow.
Furthermore, this review underlines the significance of AI and IoT integration in controlling environmental variables such as misting cycles, nutritional concentrations, and plasma species. AI-powered models are especially promising for predicting plant reactions to plasma treatments, optimizing nutrient blends, and improving overall system efficiency, which can minimize resource usage while increasing crop output.
The review also addresses significant issues such as energy consumption, cost-effectiveness, and the effects of plasma treatment on plant physiology. Despite the enormous potential for sustainable agriculture, further study is needed to improve the efficiency and scalability of PAW and PAM in commercial aeroponics systems. Recent years have seen remarkable advancement in the development of plasma applications, AI models, and IoT aeroponics solutions. Despite these major gains, some key challenges remain, particularly in optimizing plasma treatment settings, scaling up plasma generation for large-scale commercial systems and assuring the longevity and stability of sensors in dynamic plasma environments.
By identifying these gaps, we are hoping to help researchers, practitioners, and policymakers improve the economic viability of plasma-assisted aeroponic systems. Despite the challenges, we believe that ongoing advancements in plasma-based technologies, together with AI and IoT, will pave the way for more sustainable and resource-efficient farming approaches.
We hope the findings of this study will encourage further innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration to increase the use of plasma-based technologies in agriculture, resulting in more sustainable and energy-efficient food production systems around the world.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.A.Q. and J.G.; Methodology, W.A.Q.; Validation, J.A.Q. and A.H.M.; Formal Analysis, W.A.Q.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, W.A.Q.; Writing—Review and Editing, W.A.Q., O.E., A.H.M., M.H.T. and J.A.Q.; Visualization, W.A.Q. and O.E.; Supervision, J.G.; Project Administration, J.G.; Funding Acquisition, J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge that this work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Program (Grant No. 51975255) and the Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Grant No. PAPD-2018-87).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest, financial or personal, that could have influenced the research or outcomes presented in this paper.

References

  1. Lal, R. Feeding 11 Billion on 0.5 Billion Hectare of Area under Cereal Crops. Food Energy Secur. 2016, 5, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rhodes, C. Soil Erosion, Climate Change and Global Food Security: Challenges and Strategies. Sci. Prog. 2014, 97, 97–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Weingarten, M.; Mattson, N.; Grab, H. Evaluating Propagation Techniques for Cannabis sativa L. Cultivation: A Comparative Analysis of Soilless Methods and Aeroponic Parameters. Plants 2024, 13, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). Building a Common Vision for Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Principles and Approaches; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Garzón, J.; Montes, L.; Garzón González, J.; Lampropoulos, G. Systematic Review of Technology in Aeroponics: Introducing the Technology Adoption and Integration in Sustainable Agriculture Model. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture—Trends and and Challenges; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar, S.; Fandan, R.; Sachin, P. Hydroponics and Aeroponics: Advancement in Soilless Cultivation; Integrated Publications: Delhi, India, 2023; pp. 99–112. ISBN 978-93-5834-887-3. [Google Scholar]
  8. Balasundram, S.; Shamshiri, R.; Sridhara, S.; Rizan, N. The Role of Digital Agriculture in Mitigating Climate Change and Ensuring Food Security: An Overview. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Min, A.; Nguyen, N.; Howatt, L.; Tavares, M.; Seo, J. Aeroponic Systems Design: Considerations and Challenges. J. Agric. Eng. 2022, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Judée, F.; Simon, S.; Bailly, C.; Dufour, T. Plasma-Activation of Tap Water Using DBD for Agronomy Applications: Identification and Quantification of Long Lifetime Chemical Species and Production/Consumption Mechanisms. Water Res. 2018, 133, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, X.; Wu, C.; Bian, Z.; Ye, Z.; Meng, L.; Xia, L.; Bao, E.; Cao, K. Abscisic Acid and Reactive Oxygen Species Were Involved in Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water-Promoted Seed Germination in Watermelon. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 291, 110581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruamrungsri, S.; Sawangrat, C.; Panjama, K.; Sojithamporn, P.; Jaipinta, S.; Srisuwan, W.; Intanoo, M.; Inkham, C.; Thanapornpoonpong, S. Effects of Using Plasma-Activated Water as a Nitrate Source on the Growth and Nutritional Quality of Hydroponically Grown Green Oak Lettuces. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Date, M.B. Design and Development of Laboratory Scale Hydroponic System for Growing Sweet Basil Using Plasma Activated Nutrient Solution. Master’s Thesis, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao, H.; Wang, G.; Huang, Z.; Nie, L.; Liu, D.; Lu, X.; He, G.; Ostrikov, K.K. Plasma-Activated Mist: Continuous-Flow, Scalable Nitrogen Fixation, and Aeroponics. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 4420–4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Han, Z.; Ahmad, W.; Rong, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhao, S.; Yu, J.; Zheng, P.; Huang, C.; Li, H. A Gas Sensors Detection System for Real-Time Monitoring of Changes in Volatile Organic Compounds during Oolong Tea Processing. Foods 2024, 13, 1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, J.; Zhang, M.; Xu, B.; Sun, J.; Mujumdar, A.S. Artificial Intelligence Assisted Technologies for Controlling the Drying of Fruits and Vegetables Using Physical Fields: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elsherbiny, O.; Gao, J.; Ma, M.; Guo, Y.; Tunio, M.H.; Mosha, A.H. Advancing Lettuce Physiological State Recognition in IoT Aeroponic Systems: A Meta-Learning-Driven Data Fusion Approach. Eur. J. Agron. 2024, 161, 127387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, L.; Yan, D.; Lee, T.; Keidar, M. Self-adaptive Plasma Chemistry and Intelligent Plasma Medicine. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2022, 4, 2100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petric, M.; Dodigović, F.; Grčić, I.; Markužić, P.; Radetić, L.; Topić, M. Ammonia Concentration Monitoring Using Arduino Platform. Environ. Eng.-Inženjerstvo Okoliša 2019, 6, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, X.; Luo, Y.; Jiang, P. Sustainable Soilless Cultivation Mode: Cultivation Study on Droplet Settlement of Plant Roots Under Ultrasonic Aeroponic Cultivation. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Islam, M.R.; Oliullah, K.; Kabir, M.M.; Alom, M.; Mridha, M.F. Machine Learning Enabled IoT System for Soil Nutrients Monitoring and Crop Recommendation. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jain, S.; Srivastava, A.; Khadke, L.; Chatterjee, U.; Elbeltagi, A. Global-Scale Water Security and Desertification Management amidst Climate Change. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 58720–58744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Barak, P.; Smith, J.; Krueger, A.; Peterson, L. Measurement of Short-term Nutrient Uptake Rates in Cranberry by Aeroponics. Plant Cell Environ. 1996, 19, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Clawson, J.; Hoehn, A.; Stodieck, L.; Todd, P.; Stoner, R. Re-Examining Aeroponics for Spaceflight Plant Growth; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wainwright, R.E.; Bissonnette, W.M.; Stoner, I.R.J. Low Pressure Aeroponic Growing Apparatus. U.S. Patent US 6,807,770, 26 October 2004. [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin-Laurent, F.; Tham, F.-Y.; Lee, S.-K.; He, J.; Diem, H.G. Field Assessment of Aeroponically Grown and Nodulated Acacia mangium. Aust. J. Bot. 2000, 48, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gonyer, D.; Jones, S. Modular Automated Aeroponic Growth System. U.S. Patent US 9,516,822, 13 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumari, R.; Kumar, R. Aeroponics: A Review on Modern Agriculture Technology. Indian Farmer 2019, 6, 286–292. [Google Scholar]
  29. Choudhury, M.R.; Dutta, A. Aeroponics. SSRN Electron J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weathers, P.J.; Wyslouzil, B.E. Bioreactors, Mist. In Encyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology: Bioprocess, Bioseparation, and Cell Technology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ramakrishnan, D.; Curtis, W.R. Trickle-bed Root Culture Bioreactor Design and Scale-up: Growth, Fluid-dynamics, and Oxygen Mass Transfer. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, S.-Y.; Hung, C.-H.; Chou, S.-N. Innovative Strategies for Operation of Mist Trickling Reactors for Enhanced Hairy Root Proliferation and Secondary Metabolite Productivity. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2004, 35, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. DiIorio, A.A.; Cheetham, R.D.; Weathers, P.J. Carbon Dioxide Improves the Growth of Hairy Roots Cultured on Solid Medium and in Nutrient Mists. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1992, 37, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, Y.J.; Weathers, P.J.; Wyslouzil, B.E. Growth of Artemisia annua Hairy Roots in Liquid-and Gas-phase Reactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 80, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, Y.; Wyslouzil, B.E.; Weathers, P.J. Secondary Metabolism of Hairy Root Cultures in Bioreactors. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2002, 38, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Williams, G.R.; Doran, P.M. Hairy Root Culture in a Liquid-dispersed Bioreactor: Characterization of Spatial Heterogeneity. Biotechnol. Prog. 2000, 16, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tunio, M.; Gao, J.; Mohamed, T.; Ahmad, F.; Abbas, I.; Shaikh, S. Comparison of Nutrient Use Efficiency, Antioxidant Assay, and Nutritional Quality of Butter-Head Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in Five Cultivation Systems. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2023, 16, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mateus-Rodriguez, J.R.; de Haan, S.; Andrade-Piedra, J.L.; Maldonado, L.; Hareau, G.; Barker, I.; Chuquillanqui, C.; Otazú, V.; Frisancho, R.; Bastos, C.; et al. Technical and Economic Analysis of Aeroponics and Other Systems for Potato Mini-Tuber Production in Latin America. Am. J. Potato Res. 2013, 90, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Movahedi, Z.; Moieni, A.; Soroushzadeh, A. Comparison of Aeroponics and Conventional Soil Systems for Potato Minitubers Production and Evaluation of Their Quality Characters. J. Plant Physiol. Breed. 2012, 2, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  40. Brocic, Z.; Mилинкoвић, M.; Momčilović, I.; Oljaca, J.; Veljkovic, B.; Milošević, D.; Poštić, D. Comparison of Aeroponics and Conventional Production System of Virus-Free Potato Mini Tubers in Serbia. Agroznanje Agro-Knowl. J. 2019, 20, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Q.; Li, X.; Tang, B.; Gu, M. Growth Responses and Root Characteristics of Lettuce Grown in Aeroponics, Hydroponics, and Substrate Culture. Horticulturae 2018, 4, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wimmerova, L.; Keken, Z.; Solcova, O.; Bartos, L.; Spacilova, M. A Comparative LCA of Aeroponic, Hydroponic, and Soil Cultivations of Bioactive Substance Producing Plants. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. AlShrouf, A. Hydroponics, Aeroponic and Aquaponic as Compared with Conventional Farming. Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci 2017, 27, 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  44. Khater, E.; Ali, S.A. Effect of Flow Rate and Length of Gully on Lettuce Plants in Aquaponic and Hydroponic Systems. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Spinoff, N. Innovative Partnership Program; Publications and Graphics Department, NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI): Hanover, MD, USA, 2006.
  46. Park, Y.; Williams, K.A. Organic Hydroponics: A Review. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 324, 112604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Eldridge, B.; Manzoni, L.; Graham, C.; Rodgers, B.; Farmer, J.; Dodd, A. Getting to the Roots of Aeroponic Indoor Farming. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. NASA. Experiments Advance Gardening at Home and in Space; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
  49. Despommier, D. The Vertical Farm: Feeding the World in the 21st Century; Macmillan: London, UK, 2010; ISBN 1-4299-4604-0. [Google Scholar]
  50. Parkes, M.; Azevedo, D.; Domingos, T.; Teixeira, R. Narratives and Benefits of Agricultural Technology in Urban Buildings: A Review. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ampim, P.A.Y.; Obeng, E.; Olvera-Gonzalez, E. Indoor Vegetable Production: An Alternative Approach to Increasing Cultivation. Plants 2022, 11, 2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Méndez-Guzmán, H.A.; Padilla-Medina, J.A.; Martínez-Nolasco, C.; Martinez-Nolasco, J.J.; Barranco-Gutiérrez, A.I.; Contreras-Medina, L.M.; Leon-Rodriguez, M. IoT-Based Monitoring System Applied to Aeroponics Greenhouse. Sensors 2022, 22, 5646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Panotra, N.; Belagalla, N.; Mohanty, L.K.; Ramesha, N.; Tiwari, A.K.; Abhishek, G.; Gulaiya, S.; Yadav, K.; Pandey, S.K. Vertical Farming: Addressing the Challenges of 21st Century Agriculture Through Innovation. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change 2024, 14, 664–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. de Sousa, R.; Bragança, L.; da Silva, M.V.; Oliveira, R.S. Challenges and Solutions for Sustainable Food Systems: The Potential of Home Hydroponics. Sustainability 2024, 16, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Attri, P.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, D.H.; Park, J.H.; Hong, Y.J.; Uhm, H.S.; Kim, K.-N.; Fridman, A.; Choi, E.H. Generation Mechanism of Hydroxyl Radical Species and Its Lifetime Prediction during the Plasma-Initiated Ultraviolet (UV) Photolysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chirokov, A.; Gutsol, A.; Fridman, A. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma of Dielectric Barrier Discharges. Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Deng, S.; Cheng, C.; Ni, G.; Meng, Y.; Chen, H. Bacillus Subtilis Devitalization Mechanism of Atmosphere Pressure Plasma Jet. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2010, 10, 1164–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, Z.; Xiao, A.; Liu, D.; Lu, X.; Ostrikov, K. Plasma-water-based Nitrogen Fixation: Status, Mechanisms, and Opportunities. Plasma Process. Polym. 2022, 19, 2100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gorbanev, Y.; Privat-Maldonado, A.; Bogaerts, A. Analysis of Short-Lived Reactive Species in Plasma–Air–Water Systems: The Dos and the Do Nots. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 13151–13158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pipliya, S.; Kumar, S.; Babar, N.; Srivastav, P.P. Recent Trends in Non-Thermal Plasma and Plasma Activated Water: Effect on Quality Attributes, Mechanism of Interaction and Potential Application in Food & Agriculture. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 2, 100249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Woo, R. RF Voltage Breakdown and the Paschen Curve. Proc. IEEE 1974, 62, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, T.; Qi, X.; Lu, D.; Chen, B. Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometric Classification of Vegetable Oils Based on Digital Image Processing. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 1973–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Arslan, M.; Zareef, M.; Tahir, H.E.; Guo, Z.; Rakha, A.; Xuetao, H.; Shi, J.; Zhihua, L.; Xiaobo, Z.; Khan, M.R. Discrimination of Rice Varieties Using Smartphone-Based Colorimetric Sensor Arrays and Gas Chromatography Techniques. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Do, J.-S.; Chang, W.-B. Amperometric Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Sensor Based on PAn/Au/Nafion® Prepared by Constant Current and Cyclic Voltammetry Methods. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 101, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kumi, F.; Mao, H.; Li, Q.; Luhua, H. Assessment of Tomato Seedling Substrate-Root Quality Using X-Ray Computed Tomography and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2016, 32, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Julák, J.; Hujacová, A.; Scholtz, V.; Khun, J.; Holada, K. Contribution to the Chemistry of Plasma-Activated Water. Plasma Phys. Rep. 2018, 44, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Koppenol, W.H. The Basic Chemistry of Nitrogen Monoxide and Peroxynitrite. Free. Radic. Biol. Medicine 1998, 25, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hossain, M.M.; Mok, Y.S.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Heo, I. Non-Thermal Plasma in Honeycomb Catalyst for the High-Throughput Removal of Dilute Styrene from Air. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Ma, R.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, J. Effect of Plasma Activated Water on the Postharvest Quality of Button Mushrooms, Agaricus bisporus. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ma, R.; Feng, H.; Li, F.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, J.; Becker, K.H.; Fang, J. An Evaluation of Anti-Oxidative Protection for Cells against Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma Treatment. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 123701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kurake, N.; Tanaka, H.; Ishikawa, K.; Takeda, K.; Hashizume, H.; Nakamura, K.; Kajiyama, H.; Kondo, T.; Kikkawa, F.; Mizuno, M. Effects of •OH and •NO Radicals in the Aqueous Phase on H2O2 and NO2 Generated in Plasma-Activated Medium. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 155202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mai-Prochnow, A.; Alam, D.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, T.; Ostrikov, K.; Cullen, P.J. Microbial Decontamination of Chicken Using Atmospheric Plasma Bubbles. Plasma Process. Polym. 2020, 18, 2000052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhou, R.; Zhou, R.; Wang, P.; Xian, Y.; Mai-Prochnow, A.; Lu, X.; Cullen, P.; Ostrikov, K.K.; Bazaka, K. Plasma-Activated Water: Generation, Origin of Reactive Species and Biological Applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 303001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gao, Y.; Francis, K.; Zhang, X. Review on Formation of Cold Plasma Activated Water (PAW) and the Applications in Food and Agriculture. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, Z.; Chen, G.; Obenchain, R.; Zhang, R.; Bai, F.; Fang, T.; Wang, H.; Lu, Y.; Wirz, R.E.; Gu, Z. Cold Atmospheric Plasma Delivery for Biomedical Applications. Mater. Today 2022, 54, 153–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Si, F.; Zhang, X.; Yan, K. The Quantitative Detection of HO˙ Generated in a High Temperature H2O2 Bleaching System with a Novel Fluorescent Probe Benzenepentacarboxylic Acid. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hirano, Y.; Hayashi, M.; Tamura, M.; Yoshino, F.; Yoshida, A.; Masubuchi, M.; Imai, K.; Ogiso, B. Singlet Oxygen Generated by a New Nonthermal Atmospheric Pressure Air Plasma Device Exerts a Bactericidal Effect on Oral Pathogens. J. Oral Sci. 2019, 61, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Alugoju, P.; Jestadi, D.; Periyasamy, L. Free Radicals: Properties, Sources, Targets, and Their Implication in Various Diseases. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2014, 30, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bielski, B.H.J.; Cabelli, D.E. Superoxide and Hydroxyl Radical Chemistry in Aqueous Solution. In Active Oxygen in Chemistry; Foote, C.S., Valentine, J.S., Greenberg, A., Liebman, J.F., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 66–104. ISBN 978-94-007-0874-7. [Google Scholar]
  80. Shih, K.-Y.; Locke, B.R. Chemical and Physical Characteristics of Pulsed Electrical Discharge Within Gas Bubbles in Aqueous Solutions. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2010, 30, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Patange, A.; Lu, P.; Boehm, D.; Cullen, P.J.; Bourke, P. Efficacy of Cold Plasma Functionalised Water for Improving Microbiological Safety of Fresh Produce and Wash Water Recycling. Food Microbiol. 2019, 84, 103226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhou, R.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, R.; Mai-Prochnow, A.; Ponraj, S.B.; Fang, Z.; Masood, H.; Kananagh, J.; McClure, D.; Alam, D.; et al. Underwater Microplasma Bubbles for Efficient and Simultaneous Degradation of Mixed Dye Pollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 750, 142295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shen, J.; Tian, Y.; Li, Y.; Ma, R.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Fang, J. Bactericidal Effects against S. Aureus and Physicochemical Properties of Plasma Activated Water Stored at Different Temperatures. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jiang, L.; Agrawal, A.; Taylor, R. Clean Combustion of Different Liquid Fuels Using a Novel Injector. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2014, 57, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lukes, P.; Dolezalova, E.; Sisrova, I. Aqueous-Phase Chemistry and Bactericidal Effects from an Air Discharge Plasma in Contact with Water: Evidence for the Formation of Peroxynitrite through a Pseudo-Second-Order Post-Discharge Reaction of H2O2 and HNO2. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2014, 23, 015019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Krakkó, D.; Illés, Á.; Licul-Kucera, V.; Dávid, B.; Dobosy, P.; Pogonyi, A.; Demeter, A.; Mihucz, V.; Dóbé, S. Application of (V)UV/O3 Technology for Post-Treatment of Biologically Treated Wastewater: A Pilot-Scale Study. Chemosphere 2021, 275, 130080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Šimečková, J.; Krčma, F.; Klofáč, D.; Dostál, L.; Kozáková, Z. Influence of Plasma-Activated Water on Physical and Physical–Chemical Soil Properties. Water 2020, 12, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sasi, S.; Prasad, K.; Weerasinghe, J.; Bazaka, O.; Ivanova, E.P.; Levchenko, I.; Bazaka, K. Plasma for Aquaponics. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zhao, J.; Cai, L.; Zhang, A.; Li, G.; Zhang, Y.; Filatova, I.; Liu, Y. Simultaneous Remediation of Diesel-Polluted Soil and Promoted Ryegrass Growth by Non-Thermal Plasma Pretreatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhu, N.; Hong, Y.; Cai, Y.; Dong, F.; Song, J. The Removal of CH4 and NOx from Marine LNG Engine Exhaust by NTP Combined with Catalyst: A Review. Materials 2023, 16, 4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Machado-Moreira, B.; Tiwari, B.; Richards, K.; Abram, F.; Burgess, C. Application of Plasma Activated Water for Decontamination of Alfalfa and Mung Bean Seeds. Food Microbiol. 2020, 96, 103708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Škarpa, P.; Klofáč, D.; Krčma, F.; Šimečková, J.; Kozáková, Z. Effect of Plasma Activated Water Foliar Application on Selected Growth Parameters of Maize (Zea mays L.). Water 2020, 12, 3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Puač, N.; Živković, S.; Selaković, N.; Milutinović, M.; Boljević, J.; Malović, G.; Petrović, Z.L. Long and Short Term Effects of Plasma Treatment on Meristematic Plant Cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 214106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Patil, B.S.; Cherkasov, N.; Lang, J.; Ibhadon, A.O.; Hessel, V.; Wang, Q. Low Temperature Plasma-Catalytic NOx Synthesis in a Packed DBD Reactor: Effect of Support Materials and Supported Active Metal Oxides. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 194, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gogoi, K.; Gogoi, H.; Borgohain, M.; Saikia, R.; Chikkaputtaiah, C.; Hiremath, S.; Basu, U. The Molecular Dynamics between Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Reactive Nitrogen Species (RNS) and Phytohormones in Plant’s Response to Biotic Stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Maurya, A.K. Oxidative Stress in Crop Plants. In Agronomic Crops: Volume 3: Stress Responses and Tolerance; Hasanuzzaman, M., Ed.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2020; pp. 349–380. ISBN 978-981-15-0025-1. [Google Scholar]
  97. Rashid, M.M.; Rashid, M.; Hasan, M.M.; Talukder, M.R. Rice Plant Growth and Yield: Foliar Application of Plasma Activated Water. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2021, 23, 075503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Karimi, J.; Bansal, S.A.; Kumar, V.; Pasalari, H.; Badr, A.A.; Nejad, Z.J. Effect of Cold Plasma on Plant Physiological and Biochemical Processes: A Review. Biologia 2024, 79, 3475–3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rizwan, M.; Tanveer, H.; Ali, M.H.; Sanaullah, M.; Wakeel, A. Role of Reactive Nitrogen Species in Changing Climate and Future Concerns of Environmental Sustainability. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 51147–51163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Guo, J.; Huang, K.; Wang, X.; Lyu, C.; Yang, N.; Li, Y.; Wang, J. Inactivation of Yeast on Grapes by Plasma-Activated Water and Its Effects on Quality Attributes. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Khan, M.; Kim, Y.-J. Inactivation Mechanism of Salmonella Typhimurium on the Surface of Lettuce and Physicochemical Quality Assessment of Samples Treated by Micro-Plasma Discharged Water. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 52, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Choi, E.J.; Park, H.W.; Kim, S.B.; Ryu, S.; Lim, J.; Hong, E.J.; Byeon, Y.S.; Chun, H.H. Sequential Application of Plasma-Activated Water and Mild Heating Improves Microbiological Quality of Ready-to-Use Shredded Salted Kimchi Cabbage (Brassica pekinensis L.). Food Control 2019, 98, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Vaka, M.; Sone, I.; Garcia Alvarez, R.; Walsh, J.; Prabhu, L.; Sivertsvik, M.; Noriega Fernández, E. Towards the Next-Generation Disinfectant: Composition, Storability and Preservation Potential of Plasma Activated Water on Baby Spinach Leaves. Foods 2019, 8, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, C.; Liu, C.; Jiang, A.; Guan, Q.; Sun, X.; Liu, S.; Hao, K.; Hu, W. The Effects of Cold Plasma-Activated Water Treatment on the Microbial Growth and Antioxidant Properties of Fresh-Cut Pears. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2019, 12, 1842–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhai, Y.; Liu, S.; Xiang, Q.; Lyu, Y.; Shen, R. Effect of Plasma-Activated Water on the Microbial Decontamination and Food Quality of Thin Sheets of Bean Curd. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Li, B.; Peng, L.; Cao, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Dou, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, C. Insights into Cold Plasma Treatment on the Cereal and Legume Proteins Modification: Principle, Mechanism, and Application. Foods 2024, 13, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Stoleru, V.; Burlica, R.; Mihalache, G.; Dirlau, D.; Padureanu, S.; Teliban, G.-C.; Astanei, D.; Cojocaru, A.; Beniuga, O.; Patras, A. Plant Growth Promotion Effect of Plasma Activated Water on Lactuca sativa L. Cultivated in Two Different Volumes of Substrate. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, Y.; Nie, Z.; Ma, T. The Effects of Plasma-Activated Water Treatment on the Growth of Tartary Buckwheat Sprouts. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 849615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Loganathan, S.; Khacef, A. Enhanced Seed Germination and Plant Growth by Atmospheric Pressure Cold Air Plasma: Combined Effect of Seed and Water Treatment. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ranieri, P.; Sponsel, N.; Kizer, J.; Rojas-Pierce, M.; Hernández, R.; Gatiboni, L.; Grunden, A.; Stapelmann, K. Plasma Agriculture: Review from the Perspective of the Plant and Its Ecosystem. Plasma Process. Polym. 2021, 18, 2000162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kalachova, T.; Jindřichová, B.; Pospíchalová, R.; Fujera, J.; Artemenko, A.; Jančík, J.; Antonova, A.; Kylián, O.; Prukner, V.; Burketová, L.; et al. Plasma Treatment Modifies Element Distribution in Seed Coating and Affects Further Germination and Plant Growth Through Interaction with Soil Microbiome. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 5609–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Zhou, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yang, S.; Chen, W. Introduction of a New Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Device and Application on Tomato Seeds. Agric. Sci. 2011, 2, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hou, C.-Y.; Kong, T.-K.; Lin, C.-M.; Chen, H.-L. The Effects of Plasma-Activated Water on Heavy Metals Accumulation in Water Spinach. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mandal, M.; Sarkar, M.; Khan, A.; Biswas Sarkar, M.; Masi, A.; Rakwal, R.; Agrawal, G.; Srivastava, A.; Sarkar, A. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Reactive Nitrogen Species (RNS) in Plants–Maintenance of Structural Individuality and Functional Blend. Adv. Redox Res. 2022, 5, 100039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Javed, R.; Mumtaz, S.; Choi, E.H.; Han, I. Effect of Plasma-Treated Water with Magnesium and Zinc on Growth of Chinese Cabbage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ka, D.H.; Priatama, R.A.; Park, J.Y.; Park, S.J.; Kim, S.B.; Lee, I.A.; Lee, Y.K. Plasma-Activated Water Modulates Root Hair Cell Density via Root Developmental Genes in Arabidopsis thaliana L. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Than, H.; Pham, T.; Nguyen, D.; Pham, T.; Khacef, A. Non-Thermal Plasma Activated Water for Increasing Germination and Plant Growth of Lactuca sativa L. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2022, 42, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lukacova, Z.; Svubova, R.; Selvekova, P.; Hensel, K. The Effect of Plasma Activated Water on Maize (Zea mays L.) under Arsenic Stress. Plants 2021, 10, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Bussmann, F.; Krüger, A.; Scholz, C.; Brust, H.; Stöhr, C. Long-Term Effects of Cold Atmospheric Plasma-Treated Water on the Antioxidative System of Hordeum vulgare. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 3274–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cortese, E.; Settimi, A.G.; Pettenuzzo, S.; Cappellin, L.; Galenda, A.; Famengo, A.; Dabalà, M.; Antoni, V.; Navazio, L. Plasma-Activated Water Triggers Rapid and Sustained Cytosolic Ca2+ Elevations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants 2021, 10, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wang, J.; Cheng, J.-H.; Sun, D.-W. Enhancement of Wheat Seed Germination, Seedling Growth and Nutritional Properties of Wheat Plantlet Juice by Plasma Activated Water. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 2006–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Matra, K.; Tanakaran, Y.; Luang-In, V.; Theepharaksapan, S. Enhancement of Lettuce Growth by PAW Spray Gliding Arc Plasma Generator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2022, 50, 1430–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Laurita, R.; Gozzi, G.; Tappi, S.; Capelli, F.; Bisag, A.; Laghi, G.; Gherardi, M.; Cellini, B.; Abouelenein, D.; Vittori, S.; et al. Effect of Plasma Activated Water (PAW) on Rocket Leaves Decontamination and Nutritional Value. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 73, 102805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Takahashi, K.; Saito, Y.; Oikawa, R.; Okumura, T.; Takaki, K.; Fujio, T. Development of Automatically Controlled Corona Plasma System for Inactivation of Pathogen in Hydroponic Cultivation Medium of Tomato. J. Electrost. 2018, 91, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Turkan, I. ROS and RNS: Key Signalling Molecules in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3313–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Moghanloo, M.; Iranbakhsh, A.; Ebadi, M.; Nejad Satari, T.; Oraghi Ardebili, Z. Seed Priming with Cold Plasma and Supplementation of Culture Medium with Silicon Nanoparticle Modified Growth, Physiology, and Anatomy in Astragalus Fridae as an Endangered Species. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2019, 41, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Abedi, S.; Iranbakhsh, A.; Oraghi Ardebili, Z.; Ebadi, M. Seed Priming with Cold Plasma Improved Early Growth, Flowering, and Protection of Cichorium intybus Against Selenium Nanoparticle. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2020, 14, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Date, M.; Rivero, W.; Tan, J.; Specca, D.; Simon, J.; Salvi, D.; Karwe, M. Growth of Hydroponic Sweet Basil (O. basilicum L.) Using Plasma-Activated Nutrient Solution (PANS). Agriculture 2023, 13, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Monden, K.; Kamiya, T.; Sugiura, D.; Suzuki, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Hachiya, T. Root-Specific Activation of Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase 1 Enhances Plant Growth and Shoot Accumulation of Nutrient Elements under Nutrient-Poor Conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 621, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Shao, C.; Wang, D.; Fang, X.; Tang, X.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L.; Wang, G. Effect of Low-Temperature Plasma on Forage Maize (Zea mays Linn.) Seeds Germination and Characters of the Seedlings. In Proceedings of the Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture VIII: 8th IFIP WG 5.14 International Conference, CCTA 2014, Beijing, China, 16–19 September 2014; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 437–443. [Google Scholar]
  131. Chuea-Uan, S.; Boonyawan, D.; Sawangrat, C.; Thanapornpoonpong, S.-N. Using Plasma-Activated Water Generated by an Air Gliding Arc as a Nitrogen Source for Rice Seed Germination. Agronomy 2023, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sajib, S.A.; Billah, M.; Mahmud, S.; Miah, M.; Hossain, F.; Omar, F.B.; Roy, N.C.; Hoque, K.M.F.; Talukder, M.R.; Kabir, A.H.; et al. Plasma Activated Water: The next Generation Eco-Friendly Stimulant for Enhancing Plant Seed Germination, Vigor and Increased Enzyme Activity, a Study on Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.). Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2020, 40, 119–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Rathore, V.; Nema, S.K. A Nitrogen Alternative: Use of Plasma Activated Water as Nitrogen Source in Hydroponic Solution for Radish Growth. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.16910. [Google Scholar]
  134. Veerana, M.; Ketya, W.; Choi, E.-H.; Park, G. Non-Thermal Plasma Enhances Growth and Salinity Tolerance of Bok Choy (Brassica rapa Subsp. chinensis) in Hydroponic Culture. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1445791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Takahashi, K.; Kawamura, S.; Takada, R.; Takaki, K.; Satta, N.; Fujio, T. Influence of a Plasma-Treated Nutrient Solution Containing 2, 4-Dichlorobenzoic Acid on the Growth of Cucumber in a Hydroponic System. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 129, 143301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Song, J.-S.; Jung, S.; Jee, S.; Yoon, J.W.; Byeon, Y.S.; Park, S.; Kim, S.B. Growth and Bioactive Phytochemicals of Panax Ginseng Sprouts Grown in an Aeroponic System Using Plasma-Treated Water as the Nitrogen Source. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Capitelli, M.; Ferreira, C.M.; Gordiets, B.F.; Osipov, A.I. Plasma Kinetics in Atmospheric Gases; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 31, ISBN 3-662-04158-8. [Google Scholar]
  138. Fridman, A. Plasma Chemistry; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; ISBN 1-139-47173-2. [Google Scholar]
  139. Fridman, A.; Nester, S.; Kennedy, L.A.; Saveliev, A.; Mutaf-Yardimci, O. Gliding Arc Gas Discharge. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1999, 25, 211–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Li, J.; Lan, C.; Nie, L.; Liu, D.; Lu, X. Distributed Plasma-Water-Based Nitrogen Fixation System Based on Cascade Discharge: Generation, Regulation, and Application. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 478, 147483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Chiappim, W.; Sampaio, A.; Miranda, F.; Petraconi, G.; da Silva Sobrinho, A.; Cardoso, P.; Kostov, K.; Koga-Ito, C.; Pessoa, R. Nebulized Plasma-Activated Water Has an Effective Antimicrobial Effect on Medically Relevant Microbial Species and Maintains Its Physicochemical Properties in Tube Lengths from 0.1 up to 1.0 m. Plasma Process. Polym. 2021, 18, 2100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sakiyama, Y.; Graves, D.B. Corona-Glow Transition in the Atmospheric Pressure RF-Excited Plasma Needle. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2006, 39, 3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Cornell, K.A.; White, A.; Croteau, A.; Carlson, J.; Kennedy, Z.; Miller, D.; Provost, M.; Goering, S.; Plumlee, D.; Browning, J. Fabrication and Performance of a Multidischarge Cold-Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Array. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2021, 49, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Gao, H.; Liu, D. Non-Thermal Plasma Nitrogen Fixation Based on Micron Droplets and Its Application in Aeroponics. Acta Pet. Sin. Pet. Process. Sect. 2023, 39, 1184–1193. [Google Scholar]
  145. Tarabova, B. Investigation of Cold Air Plasma Generation of Aqueous Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species with Focus on Their Detection and Related Antibacterial Effects; Comenius University: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  146. Zhou, D.; Zhou, R.; Zhou, R.; Liu, B.; Zhang, T.; Xian, Y.; Cullen, P.J.; Lu, X.; Ostrikov, K. Sustainable Ammonia Production by Non-Thermal Plasmas: Status, Mechanisms, and Opportunities. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 421, 129544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kruszelnicki, J.; Lietz, A.M.; Kushner, M.J. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Activation of Water Droplets. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019, 52, 355207. [Google Scholar]
  148. Toth, J.R.; Abuyazid, N.H.; Lacks, D.J.; Renner, J.N.; Sankaran, R.M. A Plasma-Water Droplet Reactor for Process-Intensified, Continuous Nitrogen Fixation at Atmospheric Pressure. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 14845–14854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Lamichhane, P.; Veerana, M.; Lim, J.S.; Mumtaz, S.; Shrestha, B.; Kaushik, N.K.; Park, G.; Choi, E.H. Low-Temperature Plasma-Assisted Nitrogen Fixation for Corn Plant Growth and Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tomeková, J.; Kyzek, S.; Medvecká, V.; Gálová, E.; Zahoranová, A. Influence of Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma on Pea Seeds: DNA Damage of Seedlings and Optical Diagnostics of Plasma. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2020, 40, 1571–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Manickam, P.; Mariappan, S.A.; Murugesan, S.M.; Hansda, S.; Kaushik, A.; Shinde, R.; Thipperudraswamy, S. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Assisted Biomedical Systems for Intelligent Healthcare. Biosensors 2022, 12, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Munir, A.; Salah, M.A.; Ali, M.; Ali, B.; Saleem, M.H.; Samarasinghe, K.; De Silva, S.; Ercisli, S.; Iqbal, N.; Anas, M. Advancing Agriculture: Harnessing Smart Nanoparticles for Precision Fertilization. BioNanoScience 2024, 14, 3846–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Shejan, M.E.; Bhuiyan, S.M.Y.; Schoen, M.P.; Mahamud, R. Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Simulating Reacting Flow: From Plasma-Assisted Ignition to Turbulent Flame Propagation. Energies 2024, 17, 4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lan, C.; Yin, Y.; Liu, D.; Lu, X. Nanosecond Pulse Plasma Activation of Micron-Sized Mist Droplets. Plasma Process. Polym. 2024, 21, e2400113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sysolyatina, E.V.; Lavrikova, A.Y.; Loleyt, R.A.; Vasilieva, E.V.; Abdulkadieva, M.A.; Ermolaeva, S.A.; Sofronov, A.V. Bidirectional Mass Transfer-Based Generation of Plasma-Activated Water Mist with Antibacterial Properties. Plasma Process. Polym. 2020, 17, 2000058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kaneko, T.; Takashima, K.; Sasaki, S. Integrated Transport Model for Controlled Delivery of Short-Lived Reactive Species via Plasma-Activated Liquid with Practical Applications in Plant Disease Control. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2024, 44, 1165–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. He, J.; Ortiz, S.; Attri, S.; Bailey, C.; Rabinovich, A.; Fridman, A.; Fridman, G.; Sales, C.M. Comparing Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Fresh Produce Using Plasma-Activated Mist. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 93, 103634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gierczik, K.; Vukušić, T.; Kovács, L.; Székely, A.; Szalai, G.; Milošević, S.; Kocsy, G.; Kutasi, K.; Galiba, G. Plasma-Activated Water to Improve the Stress Tolerance of Barley. Plasma Process. Polym. 2020, 17, 1900123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ziuzina, D.; Patil, S.; Cullen, P.J.; Keener, K.; Bourke, P. Atmospheric Cold Plasma Inactivation of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Listeria Monocytogenes Inoculated on Fresh Produce. Food Microbiol. 2014, 42, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Mitsugi, F.; Abiru, T.; Ikegami, T.; Ebihara, K.; Aoqui, S.-I.; Nagahama, K. Influence of Ozone Generated by Surface Barrier Discharge on Nematode and Plant Growth. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2016, 44, 3071–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Mitsugi, F.; Abiru, T.; Ikegami, T.; Ebihara, K.; Nagahama, K. Treatment of Nematode in Soil Using Surface Barrier Discharge Ozone Generator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2017, 45, 3076–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ueda, Y.; Konishi, M.; Yanagisawa, S. Molecular Basis of the Nitrogen Response in Plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 63, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Sankaran, S.; Mishra, A.; Ehsani, R.; Davis, C. A Review of Advanced Techniques for Detecting Plant Diseases. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 72, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Kamala, K.L.; Alex, S.A. Apple Fruit Disease Detection for Hydroponic Plants Using Leading Edge Technology Machine Learning and Image Processing. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC), Trichy, India, 7–9 October 2021; pp. 820–825. [Google Scholar]
  165. Musa, A.; Hassan, M.; Hamada, M.; Aliyu, F. Low-Power Deep Learning Model for Plant Disease Detection for Smart-Hydroponics Using Knowledge Distillation Techniques. J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 2022, 12, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Raju, S.R.; Dappuri, B.; Varma, P.R.K.; Yachamaneni, M.; Verghese, D.M.G.; Mishra, M.K. Research Article Design and Implementation of Smart Hydroponics Farming Using IoT-Based AI Controller with Mobile Application System. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 4435591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Elsherbiny, O.; Elaraby, A.; Alahmadi, M.; Hamdan, M.; Gao, J. Rapid Grapevine Health Diagnosis Based on Digital Imaging and Deep Learning. Plants 2024, 13, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gul, Z.; Bora, S. Exploiting Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Networks for the Detection of Nutrient Deficiencies in Hydroponic Basil. Sensors 2023, 23, 5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Bhargava, Y.V.; Chittoor, P.K.; Bharatiraja, C.; Verma, R.; Sathiyasekar, K. Sensor Fusion Based Intelligent Hydroponic Farming and Nursing System. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 14584–14591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mehra, M.; Saxena, S.; Sankaranarayanan, S.; Tom, R.J.; Veeramanikandan, M. IoT Based Hydroponics System Using Deep Neural Networks. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 155, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Adidrana, D.; Surantha, N. Hydroponic Nutrient Control System Based on Internet of Things and K-Nearest Neighbors. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications (IC3INA), Tangerang, Indonesia, 23–24 October 2019; pp. 166–171. [Google Scholar]
  172. Elsherbiny, O.; Gao, J.; Ma, M.; Qureshi, W.A.; Mosha, A.H. Developing an IoT-Driven Delta Robot to Stimulate the Growth of Mulberry Branch Cuttings Cultivated Aeroponically Using Machine Vision Technology. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2025, 232, 110111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Cedric, L.S.; Adoni, W.Y.H.; Aworka, R.; Zoueu, J.T.; Mutombo, F.K.; Krichen, M.; Kimpolo, C.L.M. Crops Yield Prediction Based on Machine Learning Models: Case of West African Countries. Smart Agric. Technol. 2022, 2, 100049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Mokhtar, A.; El-Ssawy, W.; He, H.; Al-Anasari, N.; Sammen, S.S.; Gyasi-Agyei, Y.; Abuarab, M. Using Machine Learning Models to Predict Hydroponically Grown Lettuce Yield. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 706042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Reyes-Yanes, A.; Martinez, P.; Ahmad, R. Real-Time Growth Rate and Fresh Weight Estimation for Little Gem Romaine Lettuce in Aquaponic Grow Beds. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 179, 105827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Debroy, P.; Seban, L. A Tomato Fruit Biomass Prediction Model for Aquaponics System Using Machine Learning Algorithms. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2022, 55, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Rathor, A.S.; Choudhury, S.; Sharma, A.; Nautiyal, P.; Shah, G. Empowering Vertical Farming through IoT and AI-Driven Technologies: A Comprehensive Review. Heliyon 2024, 10, e34998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Bijjahalli, S.; Sabatini, R.; Gardi, A. Advances in Intelligent and Autonomous Navigation Systems for Small UAS. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2020, 115, 100617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Roffi, T.M.; Jamhari, C. Internet of Things Based Automated Monitoring for Indoor Aeroponic System. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. IJECE 2023, 13, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Khan, I.H.; Suman, R. Understanding the Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Sector. Adv. Agrochem. 2023, 2, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Bhakta, I.; Phadikar, S.; Majumder, K. State-of-the-Art Technologies in Precision Agriculture: A Systematic Review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4878–4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Dhope, V.; Chavan, A.; Hadmode, N.; Godase, V. Smart plant monitoring system. Int. J. Creat. Res. Thoughts 2024, 12, 2320–2882. [Google Scholar]
  183. Parween, S.; Pal, A.; Snigdh, I.; Kumar, V. An IoT and Machine Learning-Based Crop Prediction System for Precision Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  184. Durai, S.K.S.; Shamili, M.D. Smart Farming Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques. Decis. Anal. J. 2022, 3, 100041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Shaikh, T.A.; Rasool, T.; Lone, F.R. Towards Leveraging the Role of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Precision Agriculture and Smart Farming. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 107119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Jeyabharath, R.; Tamilvani, P.; Karthikeyan, G.; Vijayakumar, P.; Rohini, J.; Hussaini, M. Smart Aeroponic Farms with IoT-Enabled Efficient Automation and Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications Theme: Healthcare and Internet of Things (AIMLA), Namakkal, India, 15–16 March 2024; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  187. Jagadesh, M.; Karthik, M.; Manikandan, A.; Nivetha, S.; Kumar, R.P. IoT Based Aeroponics Agriculture Monitoring System Using Raspberry Pi. Int. J. Creat. Res. Thoughts 2018, 6, 601–608. [Google Scholar]
  188. Niswar, M.; Tahir, Z.; Wey, C.Y. Design and Implementation of IoT-Based Aeroponic Farming System. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Computational Intelligence (CyberneticsCom), Malang, Indonesia, 16–18 June 2022; pp. 308–311. [Google Scholar]
  189. Lucero, L.; Lucero, D.; Ormeno-Mejia, E.; Collaguazo, G. Automated Aeroponics Vegetable Growing System. Case Study Lettuce. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Andescon, Quito, Ecuador, 13–16 October 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  190. Jamhari, C.; Wibowo, W.; Rahma, A.; Roffi, T.M. Design and Implementation of IoT System for Aeroponic Chamber Temperature Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2020 Third International Conference on Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering (ICVEE), Surabaya, Indonesia, 3–4 October 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  191. Vadivel, M. Aeroponics System Using IoT for Smart Farming. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2024, 12, 1607–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Eka Putri, R.; Fauzia, W.; Cherie, D. Monitoring and Control System Development on IoT-Based Aeroponic Growth of Pakcoy (Brassica rapa L.). J. Keteknikan Pertan. 2023, 11, 222–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Francis, F.; Vishnu, P.L.; Jha, M.; Rajaram, B. IOT-Based Automated Aeroponics System. In Intelligent Embedded Systems: Select Proceedings of ICNETS2; Thalmann, D., Subhashini, N., Mohanaprasad, K., Murugan, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; Volume 492, pp. 337–345. [Google Scholar]
  194. Kim, J.; Park, H.; Seo, C.; Kim, H.; Choi, G.; Kim, M.; Kim, B.; Lee, W. Sustainable and Inflatable Aeroponics Smart Farm System for Water Efficiency and High-Value Crop Production. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Rajendiran, G.; Rethnaraj, J. A Machine Learning Approach for Aeroponic Lettuce Crop Growth Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems, Trichy, India, 23–25 August 2023; pp. 99–116, ISBN 978-981-99-1725-9. [Google Scholar]
  196. Åström, O.; Hedlund, H.; Sopasakis, A. Machine-Learning Approach to Non-Destructive Biomass and Relative Growth Rate Estimation in Aeroponic Cultivation. Agriculture 2023, 13, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Gorbanev, Y.; Vervloessem, E.; Nikiforov, A.; Bogaerts, A. Nitrogen Fixation with Water Vapor by Nonequilibrium Plasma: Toward Sustainable Ammonia Production. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 2996–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Lai, W.-I.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Sun, J.-H. Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Accurate Air Pollution Detection Using Commercial Gas Sensors. Sensors 2022, 22, 4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Tozlu, B.H. A Fast and Cost-Effective Electronic Nose Model for Methanol Detection Using Ensemble Learning. Chemosensors 2024, 12, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Rahardja, U.; Aini, Q.; Manongga, D.; Sembiring, I.; Girinzio, I.D. Implementation of Tensor Flow in Air Quality Monitoring Based on Artificial Intelligence. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2023, 6, 1. [Google Scholar]
  201. Li, Y.; Guo, S.; Wang, B.; Sun, J.; Zhao, L.; Wang, T.; Yan, X.; Liu, F.; Sun, P.; Wang, J. Machine Learning-assisted Wearable Sensor Array for Comprehensive Ammonia and Nitrogen Dioxide Detection in Wide Relative Humidity Range. InfoMat 2024, 6, e12544. [Google Scholar]
  202. Bruno, C.; Licciardello, A.; Nastasi, G.A.M.; Passaniti, F.; Brigante, C.; Sudano, F.; Faulisi, A.; Alessi, E. Embedded Artificial Intelligence Approach for Gas Recognition in Smart Agriculture Applications Using Low Cost Mox Gas Sensors. In Proceedings of the 2021 Smart Systems Integration (SSI), Grenoble, France, 27–29 April 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  203. Mahapatra, C. Recent Advances in Medical Gas Sensing with Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Technology. Med. Gas Res. 2025, 15, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Chen, M.-C.; Lee, Y.-C.; Tee, J.-H.; Lee, M.-T.; Ting, C.-K.; Juang, J.-Y. AI-Powered Precursor Quantification in Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet Thin Film Deposition via Optical Emission Spectroscopy. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2024, 33, 105015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Chan, K.J.; Stancampiano, A.; Skinner, K.N.; Robert, E.; Mesbah, A. A Cold Atmospheric Plasma Sensor for Identification and Differentiation of Biological Tissues. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Özdemir, G.D.; Özdemir, M.A.; Şen, M.; Ercan, U.K. Machine Learning to Predict Oxidative Strength of Cold Atmospheric Plasma Activated Water via Paper-Based Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2022 Medical Technologies Congress (TIPTEKNO), Antalya, Turkey, 31 October–2 November 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  207. Islam, T.; Rabbi, F.; Ahmed, R.; Rahman, M.M.; Ahmed, M. IoT Based Air Components Collection for Machine Learning Reinforcement. Doctoral Dissertation, Brac University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  208. Listyarini, S.; Warlina, L.; Sambas, A. The Air Quality Monitoring Tool Based on Internet of Things to Monitor Pollution Emissions Continuously. Environ. Ecol. Res. 2022, 10, 824–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Pizarro Mujica, A.F. Design an Implementation of a Gas Sensing Device Capable of Sending Real Time Data via Narrow Band-IoT. Thesis, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2024. Available online: https://repositorio.uchile.cl/xmlui/handle/2250/200772 (accessed on 19 February 2025).
  210. Maulini, R.; Sahlinal, D.; Arifin, O. Monitoring of pH, Amonia (NH3) and Temperature Parameters Aquaponic Water in the 4.0 Revolution Era. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2022; Volume 1012, p. 012087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Mohammed, A.; Shafiq, O.; Muhammad, S.; Abdulla, A. Air Polluted: Ammonia and CO2 Measurement by Using Arduino. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Architectural & Civil Engineering Sciences, Suzhou, China, 24–26 March 2023; Cihan University-Erbil: Erbil Governorate, Iraq, 2023; pp. 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  212. Arief, M.A.A.; Kim, H.; Kurniawan, H.; Nugroho, A.P.; Kim, T.; Cho, B.-K. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging for Early Detection of Drought and Heat Stress in Strawberry Plants. Plants 2023, 12, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Nayak, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Swain, D.K. Application of Smartphone-Image Processing and Transfer Learning for Rice Disease and Nutrient Deficiency Detection. Smart Agric. Technol. 2023, 4, 100195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Castro-Valdecantos, P.; Egea, G.; Borrero, C.; Pérez-Ruiz, M.; Avilés, M. Detection of Fusarium Wilt-Induced Physiological Impairment in Strawberry Plants Using Hyperspectral Imaging and Machine Learning. Precis. Agric. 2024, 25, 2958–2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Sang, W.; Cui, J.; Mei, L.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, D.; Zhang, W.; Li, Z. Degradation of Liquid Phase N, N-Dimethylformamide by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma: Mechanism and Degradation Pathways. Chemosphere 2019, 236, 124401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Hawtof, R.; Ghosh, S.; Guarr, E.; Xu, C.; Mohan Sankaran, R.; Renner, J.N. Catalyst-Free, Highly Selective Synthesis of Ammonia from Nitrogen and Water by a Plasma Electrolytic System. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaat5778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. He, J. Indirect Non-Thermal Plasma Treatment in Public Health, Agricultural and Food Safety Applications; Drexel University: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2023; ISBN 979-8-3805-8405-0. [Google Scholar]
  218. Rout, S.; Tripathy, S.; Srivastav, P.P. Effect of Cold Plasma for Modulating Macromolecules and Bioactive Composition of Food: Unveiling Mechanisms and Synergies with Other Emerging Techniques. Food Biosci. 2024, 61, 104545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proposed review methodology of the present study.
Figure 1. Proposed review methodology of the present study.
Agronomy 15 00546 g001
Figure 2. Comprehensive advantages of aeroponic systems.
Figure 2. Comprehensive advantages of aeroponic systems.
Agronomy 15 00546 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of PAW-generation models. (a) DBD discharge model; (b) jet spark model.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of PAW-generation models. (a) DBD discharge model; (b) jet spark model.
Agronomy 15 00546 g003
Figure 4. Benefits of PAW in soil and soilless systems.
Figure 4. Benefits of PAW in soil and soilless systems.
Agronomy 15 00546 g004
Figure 5. Schematic of plasma-activated RONS generation and application in an aeroponics system.
Figure 5. Schematic of plasma-activated RONS generation and application in an aeroponics system.
Agronomy 15 00546 g005
Figure 6. (a) Direct application of RF and DC plasma near the root zone. (b) Self-generated plasma species via high-pressure nozzles in aeroponics.
Figure 6. (a) Direct application of RF and DC plasma near the root zone. (b) Self-generated plasma species via high-pressure nozzles in aeroponics.
Agronomy 15 00546 g006
Figure 7. (a) Automatic control system, (b) integrated IoT-based smart farming system with cloud-based monitoring.
Figure 7. (a) Automatic control system, (b) integrated IoT-based smart farming system with cloud-based monitoring.
Agronomy 15 00546 g007
Figure 8. Conceptual model for AI-powered plasma species identification and tracking in aeroponic systems.
Figure 8. Conceptual model for AI-powered plasma species identification and tracking in aeroponic systems.
Agronomy 15 00546 g008
Table 1. Main PAW-generated RONS species and their analytical approaches.
Table 1. Main PAW-generated RONS species and their analytical approaches.
TypeReactive SpeciesHalf-Life TimeAnalytical ApproachesReference
ROSHydroxyl (·OH)10−9~10−10 sESR, BA method[76]
Singlet oxygen (1O2)4.4 μsESR[77]
Superoxide (O2·)10−9 sESR[78]
Hydroperoxyl (HO2)N/AESR[79]
Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2), StableTest strips, UV–vis,
FTIR
[80]
Ozone
(O3)
sIndigo degradation, certified kit[81]
[82]
RNSNitric oxide (NO)sESR[83]
Peroxynitrite (ONOO)10−3 sIon chromatography[84]
Nitrite acid (HNO2),
Nitrate acid (HNO3)
StableNitrite assay kit, UV–vis, ion chromatography[85]
Ammonium ions
(NH4+)
StableUV–vis, ion chromatography[10]
Nitrous acid (HNO2)sN/A[86]
Note: The half-life time of reactive species depends on the surrounding environment. s shows the time in seconds.
Table 2. Plasma-activated water for enhancing soilless crop growth and nutrition.
Table 2. Plasma-activated water for enhancing soilless crop growth and nutrition.
CropApplicationImportanceSignificanceReference
RadishPlasma-activated water (PAW)Enhanced growth and nutrient uptake30% longer roots, 50% higher biomass[133]
Sweet basilPlasma-activated nutrient solution (PANS)Growth enhancement and algae reductionIncreased growth; algae reduced by 24%[128]
Bok choyPlasma-treated nutrient solutionsSalinity stress tolerance and improved growth80.5% higher dry weight[134]
Green oak lettucePAW for nitrate generationAlternative to chemical fertilizersPlasma nitrate yields comparable to commercial nitrate[12]
CucumberPlasma for decomposing allelochemicalsGrowth despite chemical inhibitorsDCBA levels significantly reduced[135]
Table 3. Overview of advanced IoT-based technological integration in aeroponic systems for enhanced crop cultivation.
Table 3. Overview of advanced IoT-based technological integration in aeroponic systems for enhanced crop cultivation.
PlantTreatments Used/TechnologyTechnologyKey Findings and PerformancesReferences
MaizeIoT, temp and humidity control, real-time monitoringIoT-based sensorsAutomates nutrient delivery, reduces labor, optimizes resources, real-time alerts[186]
Crop not specifiedIrrigation, nutrient, and climate controlIoT, Raspberry PiIoT-based auto-monitoring and control[187]
Tomato (Solanumly
copersicum)
Climate, water, evapotranspiration controlIoT for Evapotranspiration MonitoringUses microcontroller for evapotranspiration [188]
Basil (Ocimum basilicum)Nutrient misting, humidity control, real-time monitoringIoT-based monitoring systemReal-time data collection and control[52]
Green leaf lettuceNutrient misting, temp, humidity, irrigation controlArduino-based IoT system40% increase in leaves, 400% in root growth[189]
Mustard greens (Brassica juncea) pH control, automated irrigation, climate controlIoT-based systemOptimizes temperature and humidity for growth[190]
Pakcoy (Brassica rapa. L.)Climate control, nutrient automation, real-time analysisIoT for smart farmingRegulates growth and mist environment[191]
Pakcoy (Brassica rapa. L.)NodeMCU, DHT22, TDS sensors, Blynk appNodeMCU, BlynkSuperior sensor precision, similar growth to control group[192]
Crop not specifiedTemp and humidity control, LED lights, IoT-based monitoringIoT-based systemEnhances growth and stabilizes conditions[193]
LettuceMisting, sealed environment for water and nutrient deliverySmart farm systemReduces water usage, optimal conditions for urban environments[194]
LettuceIoT sensors, machine learning for automationIoT sensors, machine learningImproves yield prediction and automates growth[195]
Crop not specifiedMulti-variate regression, ResNet-50 for growth estimationMachine learning, neural networksMulti-variate regression best for biomass, ResNet-50 for growth rate estimation[196]
Ipomoea reptansLED lighting, IoT control for temp, humidity, lightWemos D1 mini, Thing SpeakControlled temperature and improved growth quality[179]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qureshi, W.A.; Gao, J.; Elsherbiny, O.; Mosha, A.H.; Tunio, M.H.; Qureshi, J.A. Boosting Aeroponic System Development with Plasma and High-Efficiency Tools: AI and IoT—A Review. Agronomy 2025, 15, 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030546

AMA Style

Qureshi WA, Gao J, Elsherbiny O, Mosha AH, Tunio MH, Qureshi JA. Boosting Aeroponic System Development with Plasma and High-Efficiency Tools: AI and IoT—A Review. Agronomy. 2025; 15(3):546. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030546

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qureshi, Waqar Ahmed, Jianmin Gao, Osama Elsherbiny, Abdallah Harold Mosha, Mazhar Hussain Tunio, and Junaid Ahmed Qureshi. 2025. "Boosting Aeroponic System Development with Plasma and High-Efficiency Tools: AI and IoT—A Review" Agronomy 15, no. 3: 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030546

APA Style

Qureshi, W. A., Gao, J., Elsherbiny, O., Mosha, A. H., Tunio, M. H., & Qureshi, J. A. (2025). Boosting Aeroponic System Development with Plasma and High-Efficiency Tools: AI and IoT—A Review. Agronomy, 15(3), 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030546

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop