Next Article in Journal
Response of Table Grape to Irrigation Water in the Aconcagua Valley, Chile
Next Article in Special Issue
Differences in Aluminium Accumulation and Resistance between Genotypes of the Genus Fagopyrum
Previous Article in Journal
Cotton Water Use Efficiency under Two Different Deficit Irrigation Scheduling Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Minichromosomes: Vectors for Crop Improvement
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 5
Issue 3
10.3390/agronomy5030374
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Trace Element Management in Rice

by
Abin Sebastian
* and
Majeti Narasimha Vara Prasad
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad-500046, Telangana, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2015, 5(3), 374-404; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5030374
Submission received: 31 March 2015 / Revised: 21 July 2015 / Accepted: 12 August 2015 / Published: 18 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Accumulation and Distribution of Elements in Crop Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Trace elements (TEs) are vital for the operation of metabolic pathways that promote growth and structural integrity. Paddy soils are often prone to TE limitation due to intensive cultivation and irrigation practices. Apart from this, rice paddies are potentially contaminated with transition metals such as Cd, which are often referred to as toxic TEs. Deficiency of TEs in the soil not only delays plant growth but also causes exposure of plant roots to toxic TEs. Fine-tuning of nutrient cycling in the rice field is a practical solution to cope with TEs deficiency. Adjustment of soil physicochemical properties, biological process such as microbial activities, and fertilization helps to control TEs mobilization in soil. Modifications in root architecture, metal transporters activity, and physiological processes are also promising approaches to enhance TEs accumulation in grains. Through genetic manipulation, these modifications help to increase TE mining capacity of rice plants as well as transport and trafficking of TEs into the grains. The present review summarizes that regulation of TE mobilization in soil, and the genetic improvement of TE acquisition traits help to boost essential TE content in rice grain.

1. Introduction

Rice is the main dietary source of trace elements (TEs) in Asian populations. However, rice grain possesses relatively low TE content compared to other cereal grains [1,2,3]. Hence enhancement of TEs in rice could be a practical solution to avoid TE deficiency disorders prevalent among populations which consume rice as staple food (Table 1). Apart from this, rice grain contaminated with toxic TEs such as Cd evokes the need of food safety measures that help to avoid toxic TE accumulation in rice. It is well known that nutrient cycles influence the mineral composition of the crop produce [4,5]. More than 90% of rice is cultivated in low land conditions where the soils are subjected to intermittent wet and dry periods. The field is subjected to water either by rain or irrigation. Occurrence of intermittent flooding especially in low land rain fed fields causes temporal changes in mobility of TEs [6,7,8]. However, irrigation is favorable to control the flooding periods and opens ways to manage TEs in the field through fertilization. The low land fields are also characterized by adequate water supply at the time of flowering, buffering of soil temperature and low risks of weed competition. All these features of low land fields help to prevent crop failure, and hence low land cultivation of rice is the most common cultivation practice.
Table
Table 1. Trace elements (TEs) and human health.
Table 1. Trace elements (TEs) and human health.
TEsHealth Disorder
SeKeshena (China), bone, arthritis, cardio vascular and Cancer
ZnDwarfness (Iran & Egypt) infertility, impaired taste and smell
CuAnemia, Skeletal defects
MnTremors, Stiff muscles
IGoiter
FeAnemia
MgDepression, Nervous system disorders
MoMouth/esophageal cancer, Neurologic damage
CoAnemia
NaComa
Toxic TEsToxicity
HgMina-Mata, Neurological disorders
CdItai-Itai, Bone crippling, Cancer, Heart problems
FYellowing of teeth, Skeletal deformities, Dental caries
PbLung cancer, Neurological disorders
AsSkin, Lung cancer
CrLung cancer, Kidney dysfunction, Skin ulcer
Adaptability of rice plants to varying fertilization strategies promises TE management in low land rice paddies. Most often the rice paddies are fertilized with elements such as nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium that enhance productivity. Zn, Fe, B, Mn, Cu, Mo and Si are the critical TEs for rice growth. Wetland rice fields are prone to Zn deficiency because of increased availability of macronutrient cations during the course of submergence [9]. But Fe and Mn deficiency is common in upland paddy fields due to formation of metal oxides as a consequence of higher aeration [10]. Moisture stress is well known to cause B deficiency in rice paddies whereas deficiency of Si is often related to mineral reserve deficits in soil rich in organic matter. Paddy soils also face Cu deficiency because of the application of lime to correct the acidic soil pH. TEs not only serve as enzyme cofactors but also play an important role in inhibition of plant uptake of toxic TEs such as Cd [11]. Thus one of the major drawbacks of micronutrient deficiency is the increase in availability of toxic TEs to crops.
Rice paddies can also be contaminated with toxic TEs such as Cd because of the usage of Cd contaminated phosphate fertilizer [12,13,14]. Apart from this, irrigation using mine water leachate also contaminates paddy soils with toxic TEs [15]. Thus rice plants are prone to toxic TE accumulation, which ultimately leads to a diet rich in toxic TEs. Since toxic TEs are detrimental to human health, accumulation of these elements needs to be reduced in rice grain. The present review focuses on the role of soil factors and molecular physiological processes on TE management in rice grain. The regulatory roles of nutrient cycles deserve attention as these cycles determine the TE availability to plants [16].The importance of soil physiochemical characteristics and biological activities responsible for TE mobilization in paddy soils is also discussed. It is well known that nutrient acquisition is the key physiological process, which has a direct role in plant uptake of TEs. This process depends on multiple factors such as root architecture, photosynthetic efficiency and activity of metal transporters. Hence the scope of manipulation of these factors is also explored. Advent of fertilization strategies, availability of rice germplasm and knowledge about genes responsible for TE accumulation can help to formulate approaches for TE fortification in rice.

2. Nutrient Cycle and Plant Uptake of TEs

Plant uptake of both toxic and non-toxic TEs depends on nutrient cycling in the soil [17,18]. Hence keeping balance of nutrient cycling is important to ensure crop yield together with restriction of toxic TE accumulation in rice grain. However, nutrient cycling in rice paddy agro ecosystems is often unbalanced due to anthropogenic intervention (Figure 1). Seasonal variations in soil physicochemical processes, especially in lowland rain fed fields where intermittent wet and dry periods occur, cause fluctuations in nutrient cycling. The flooding periods in rice fields cause leaching of cations [19]. Flooding also causes shifts in soil physicochemistry and results in precipitation or co-precipitation reactions of TEs. Soil microbial activity and incorporation of organic matter also affects solubility as well as plant uptake of TEs [20,21]. The difference between nutrient input into the soil through fertilization and nutrient removal during harvest also causes disturbances of nutrient cycles in paddy soils. Most often the fields receive fertilizer input in significantly higher amounts than needed by the rice plants. This could lead to an accumulation of mineral nutrients, especially ammonium, in the field that will reduce soil pH, and hence increase the mobility of soil TEs.
A nutrient cycle comprises the in and out flow of nutrients of the paddy field. Crop harvest is the major route of nutrients outflow in a paddy field. However, fertilizer application often replenishes the nutrient pool. It has been reported that TE availability in the soil depends on the parent material from which the soil is formed [22]. Even though paddy soils around the world are different because of variation in parent material from which they are derived, repeated agricultural practices such fertilization have rendered these soils uniform, especially with regard to macronutrient content.
Agronomy 05 00374 g001 1024
Figure 1. Field management practices that influence TE availability in rice fields (a); Irrigation (b); Puddling (c); Dry land cultivation (d);Mixed or co-cropping (e); Azollacultivation (f); System of rice intensification (g); Fertilizer application (h); Burning of crop residues (i); Rice cultivation near mine tailings.
Figure 1. Field management practices that influence TE availability in rice fields (a); Irrigation (b); Puddling (c); Dry land cultivation (d);Mixed or co-cropping (e); Azollacultivation (f); System of rice intensification (g); Fertilizer application (h); Burning of crop residues (i); Rice cultivation near mine tailings.
Agronomy 05 00374 g001
TE concentrations in most paddy soils are higher than in non-paddy soils because of anthropogenic input. Decay of organic matter also contributes to the TE pool. Crop residue, especially roots and culms account for a major portion of the organic matter in paddy soil. Since the concentration of many of the TEs in rice plants are—in the decreasing order—root, shoot and grain, retention and decay of crop residues in the soil significantly contribute to replenishment of the TEs pool in the paddy soil. Occurrence of TEs in the soil solution is limited as they bind with organic matter or parent material [23]. Thus a majority of TEs are associated with the solid phase of soil where they occur as precipitate or co-precipitate of mineral salts. Co-precipitation usually occurs with newly formed chemical species such as carbonates, phosphates, oxides and hydroxides [24,25]. These kinds of co-precipitation help to limit exposure of toxic TEs to biota, and also slow down the release of TEs into the soil solution. As seen among soil types of the world, when the concentration of a particular mineral nutrient exceeds a certain threshold value, mineral ions precipitate in the paddy soil. Similarly when the concentration of the nutrient ion is lower than the chemical solubility equilibrium, dissolution of that particular element occurs. Nutrient ions in the paddy soil solution are found in association with organic acids, inorganic ion pairs and free ions [26]. All these contribute to the dynamics of nutrient cycling in paddy soils that influence plant availability of TEs (Figure 2).
Agronomy 05 00374 g002 1024
Figure 2. Nutrient cycling and mobilization of TEs in rice paddies.
Figure 2. Nutrient cycling and mobilization of TEs in rice paddies.
Agronomy 05 00374 g002

2.1. Regulatory Role of Macronutrients

Macronutrients are the primary nutrients required for plant growth. Macronutrients affect TEs availability by shifting soil pH and precipitation reactions. Application of ammonium-based fertilizers is common in paddy fields for replenishing soil nitrogen. The applied fertilizer stimulates algal growth in paddy fields with enhanced utilization of CO2. This reduces the carbonic acid content in submerged paddy fields with a subsequent rise of soil pH (even up to a pH of 9). But increase of pH leads ammonia evolution as well as precipitation of TEs. Apart from this, nitrogen loss occurs through leaching as well as denitrification [27]. Ammonia is also produced during the breakdown of organic materials such as manure, and volatilization of this gas further increases soil pH, which causes precipitation of TEs. It must be noted that a significant quantity of ammonia can be adsorbed into soil colloids, and hence plants growing in soils with a lower colloid contents, such as clay and humus, are more prone to suffer from nitrogen deficiency [28]. SO2 held with soil particles causes a lowering of soil pH during submergence, and hence increases mobility of TEs. Microbial degradation of S-containing compounds also releases various S-containing gases, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon sulfide (CS2), carbonyl sulfide (COS) and methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) in submerged paddy soils which can react with TEs, which leads to precipitation of TEs [29,30].
Phosphorous (P) in paddy fields often meets the crop’s demand. However, tillage practices often remove particulate P in the paddy soil through erosion. A significant amount of P loss also occurs during flooding related runoff in submerged rice paddies. In strongly acidic soils, P undergoes a precipitation reaction with elements such as Al, Mn and Fe. These precipitates are sparingly soluble, and hence rice plants growing in such soils face P deficiency as well as a deficit of Mn or Fe [31]. On the other hand, when the field is submerged, TEs undergo a reduction reaction that enables the release of P as well as TEs into the soil solution. Potassium (K) is prone to leaching, and this leads to a shift of soil pH towards the acidic phase, which mobilizes both TEs and toxic TEs. Apart from this, acidic soils tend to mask plant available K, and hence result in K deficiency, which accelerates TE toxicity [32]. It is noteworthy that poultry manure and wood ashes are good sources of K and have the capacity to immobilize toxic TEs [33]. Temporally sequential wetting and drying patterns in the rice field may also lead to the release of fixed K together with mobilization of TEs in the solid phase. Both Ca and Mg are also prone to leaching, especially in acidic paddy soils that cause more availability of toxic TEs for plant uptake. However, application of lime and dolomite in acidic paddy soils not only increases soil pH but also acts as potential source of Ca and Mg that can decrease plant uptake of toxic TEs.

2.2. Regulatory Role of Micronutrients

TEs act on each other with regard to plant availability by co-precipitation and competition for metal binding sites or transporters. Solubility of TEs increases during the course of submergence [34]. Mass flow of elements into roots especially that of Fe and Mn, accelerates at this stage. Similarly, movement of TEs towards the subsoil also increases in speed. Plaque formation in rice roots with Fe and Mn compounds is a noticeable feature of paddy soils during periods of submergence. This process occurs due to the development of an oxygen rich network of aerenchyma tissue in rice roots. When reduced forms of Fe/Mn reach the surface of this oxygen rich zone, these elements undergo oxidation and precipitate with silica or phosphate. This kind of precipitation also occurs in oxygen rich plow sole and surface soil. Thus, during a course of submergence, the movement and precipitation of Fe or Mn causes characteristic paddy soil development where a zone of reddish-brown streaks of the root channels is sandwiched between oxygenated surface layers and the Fe or Mn illuviated zone [35]. It is noteworthy that the downward movement of soluble Fe or Mn towards comparatively oxygen rich zones followed by precipitation reactions cause depletion of these elements from the top soil. The cycling of TEs in the solid phase of soil to the solution phase generally occurs either by adsorption-desorption reactions or precipitation-dissolution processes [36]. TEs in the solid phase often form stable bonds with surface functional groups, and hence the availability of the element to the biota depends on the strength of the bond formed between the particular nutrient element and the functional groups present in the solid phase [37]. Soil microbial processes play a significant role in the breakage of these bonds, and thus microbial action controls TEs availability. The biogeochemical transformation of Fe or Mn not only affects solubility and speciation of Fe or Mn but also the availability of toxic TEs such as Cd. Ability of Fe to form a complex with S reduces the chance of precipitation of Cd in the form of CdS in submerged soils. This situation also decreases the chance of adsorption of Cd to Fe or Mn oxides. Thus reductive dissolutions of Fe or Mn oxides in submerged soils lead to mobilization of Cd from the solid phase of the soil. However, the higher reactivity of FeS2 may favor sorption of some parts of Cd in the solution. Similarly, Fe in the soil protects the rice plants from other toxic TEs.
Periodical changes of submergence and drainage sequences also cause variation in occurrence of forms of TEs in paddy soils, which influence TEs availability to plants (Table 2). For example Zn occurs in at least seven kinds of ionic forms or mineral salts in paddy soils (Zn2+, ZnCl+, ZnSO4, ZnOH+, ZnCO3, ZnS, ZnSiO3). It is well known that availability of nutrient ion to biota depends on the chemical speciation. Most often TEs undergo speciation with OH−, Cl−, SO42−, HCO3− and F−. Humic substances and fulvic acids rich in poly carboxylic acids are also potential speciation agents of TEs in paddy soil [38]. Amino acids and tricarboxylic acids also play a significant role in the speciation of mineral nutrient ions [39,40].TEs in the solid phase are mobilized during suspension of organic matter or soil particles. Apart from these, puddling of rice paddies also contributes to mobilization of TEs in the soil sediments. However, flood related anoxia in the field in turn favors formation of hydroxide salts of TEs that make them unavailable for plant uptake [41,42]. Irrigation with chlorinated water also contributes to mobilization of TEs through the formation of water-soluble TEs salts with chlorine. Environmental factors are also involved in TE cycling in paddy soils [43,44]. Small quantities of TEs are incorporated into the field during rain fall and are deposited by the wind. TEs undergo leaching in the presence of runoff water, and hence rain fed rice paddies often face threat of macronutrient leaching [45]. Leaching of macronutrient cations not only causes nutrient deficiency in the soil but also contributes to soil acidification. On the other hand, acidification of soil accelerates the weathering process which in turn increases the TE pool in the paddy soil. However, this event often favors an increase of Al/Fe/Mn ions and causes Al/Fe/Mn toxicity in rice plants rather than promoting plant growth.
Table
Table 2. Ionic forms of major TEs and toxic TEs in the soil solution.
Table 2. Ionic forms of major TEs and toxic TEs in the soil solution.
TEsOccurrence
MnMn2+
FeFe2+, Fe(OH)2+, Fe(OH)2+, Fe3+
ZnZn2+, Zn(OH)+
MoMoO42−, HMoO4−
BH3BO3−
CuCu2+,Cu(OH)+
CoCo2+
Toxic TEsOccurence
PbPb2+
HgHg2+
CdCd2+,Cd1+
AsAs(III), As(V)
CrCr3+,Cr6+

3. Soil Dynamics Act on Mobilization of TEs

The dynamics of the paddy soil properties occurs mainly due to changes in physiochemical properties, biological activities and fertilization. Physiochemical characters of soils such as redox potential, pH, alkalinity, cation exchange capacity and texture significantly influence TEs mobilization in paddy soil [46,47,48]. An important feature of paddy fields consists of the progressive changes in oxidation and reduction states upon irrigation. Management of water supply of rice in the field leads to temporal changes in the water table called hydroperiods as well as changes in redox status of paddy soils. Submerged rice fields are also characterized by a low reduction potential because of poor aeration. In submerged conditions, TEs in the paddy soil undergo reduction reactions that reduce ionic forms of these elements in the soil solution. Biological processes and fertilization also play a crucial role in mobilization of TEs and hence help to control the mobility of TEs in paddy soils.

3.1. Redox Process

Reducing periods in the paddy soil causes redox depletion of elements such as Fe [49]. Reducing events cause formation of more Fe2+from the Fe3+ pool, which migrate away from reduced zones. The migrated Fe2+ later precipitates as Fe3+ in oxygen rich zones. The process causes depletion of iron coatings from soil mineral grains. This causes the redoximorphic appearance of paddy soils with contrasting colors of redox depletions (gray color) and zones of oxidized Fe (blue-green). TEs posses multiple oxidation states, and the reducing surroundings favor solubility of TEs [50,51]. Most often metal ions such as Cu and Zn occur in association with oxides of other elements such as Mn. Hence the solubility of the oxides of TEs also favors the solubility of other TEs by releasing adsorbed TE ions. Submergence induced anoxia in the field favors the formation of TE sulfides and this makes many of TE cations immobile in soil. The organic matter of soil as well as carbonates also contribute to the above-mentioned anoxia induced TE immobilization in paddy soils.
Paddy soils differ in their degree of depletion of oxygen because of differences in soil texture, bulk density, aggregate stability, organic matter content, bio-pore formation, thermal properties and seasonal variability. The puddled paddy soil, which is saturated with water, undergoes alternate frost action during the winter season that breaks up the large soil masses and hence increases aeration events [52]. When the soil oxygen is depleted (Eh ~ 0.34), N in the NO3− undergoes reduction reactions resulting in the formation of NO2−, N2, etc., and causesa drop in redox potential (Eh ~ 0.24). At this point, Mn reduction followed by a sequence of reduction reactions of other TEs occurs with a drop of the reduction potential of the soil. This indicates transformation of macronutrients and TEs in sequential order. The reduction reactions during submergence follow the sequence N > Mn > Fe > S > C. Many of the TEs other than Mn and Fe undergo reduction reactions preferentially in the order between Fe and S. When the soil is drained, oxidation reactions occur in the reverse sequence. Another characteristic feature of paddy soils is the anoxia mediated methane production [53]. This occurs at Eh below −0.2 V. Thus monitoring of nitrous oxide and methane helps to determine the reducing conditions in paddy soils. It can be concluded that dissolution or precipitation of TEsin paddy soils depend to a large extent on the dynamics in the anoxia mediated shifts in redox potential. Hence control of irrigation, which helps to regulate anoxic conditions in the field, could be a practical solution for the management of TE availability to rice plants.

3.2. Soil pH

Soil pH influences TE solubility and hence TE mobility [54,55]. Lowering of soil pH increases the solubility of TEs. Changes in redox potential are associated with shifts in soil pH. Decrease in reduction potential of soil causes a phenomenon called ferrolysis that accelerates soil acidity mediated weathering of the parent rock material [56,57]. When paddy soils are submerged, cations displaced by Fe2+ migrate out ofthe reduced zone resulting in a deficiency of cations. When such a paddy soil is drained, the Fe2+ in the soil becomes Fe3+, and results in the precipitation of ferric oxide, which adsorbs TEs [58].This often results in the occurrence of a H+ ion as the major cation in the paddy soil and causes lowering of the soil pH. Thus even though solubility of TEs could be higher in paddy soil, plant available TEs are limited.
Rice plants growing in submerged acidic soils often experience TEs or toxic TEs toxicity [59,60]. Al, Mn and Fe are the chief elements that cause metal toxicity in acidic paddy soils. The type of metal toxicity depends on the composition of the parent material from which the paddy soils are formed. For example, rice plants grown in paddy soils derived from Mn rich parental materials experience Mn toxicity during soil acidification. Generally non-acid forming cations such as Ca2+ and Mg2+ form soluble complexes with organic ligands and undergo leaching in acidic paddy soils [61]. Apart from this, organic matter contributes to soil acidity as it contains many functional groups that dissociate into H+ ions. However, many of the acidic functional groups of organic matter dissociate at a higher soil pH. Oxidation of the sulfhydryl group (-SH) results in the formation of H2SO4 and accelerates the lowering of the paddy soil pH. Wet precipitation containing acids is also an agent of soil acidity. Thus rice plants grown in acid soil are confronted with a deficiency of macronutrients (Ca, Mg, K, P, N, and S) and micronutrients (Mo and B) due to leaching with runoff water as well as soil acidity. This situation leads to more availability of elements such as Al, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Cd, Pb and Co in acidic paddy soils. Apart from all the above factors, intensive uptake of non-acidic mineral nutrients by rice plants as well as nitrogen fertilization also contributes to soil acidification in paddy soils that end up in TE toxicity. Hence corrective measures of soil pH play a critical role in the management of plant uptake of both essential and toxic TEs.

3.3. Alkalinity

The alkalinity of the soil often reflects the buffering capacity of the soil. Buffering activity is prominent in alkaline soils. Buffer reactions in paddy soils are mediated by carbonates, bicarbonates, carbonic acid and water [62,63]. Dissolution of carbonate minerals releases bicarbonate ions, which upon hydrolysis produce carbonic acid and hydroxyl ions as follows:
CaCO3 + H2O +H+<----> Ca2+ + H3CO3 + OH−
When acid influx into bicarbonate buffered soil (usually alkaline soil) occurs, the reaction shifts to the right. On the other hand, the reaction will shift to left when the base content prevails in the soil. Both these reactions help in the maintenance of soil pH. Thus variations in soil pH seldom occur in alkaline paddy soil. Hence soil acidification due to nitrogen fertilization is often limited in alkaline paddy soils. In fact, applications of ammonium in alkaline soil help to mobilize TEs. On the other hand, buffering in acidic soil is usually maintained by reversible conversion of aluminum hydroxide (AlOH2+) to gibbsite (Al (OH)3).Thus acidification of soil during fertilizer application is limited to a certain extent in acidic paddy soils due to the presence of hydroxyl groups containing Al compounds. Organic matter in the soil also assists in the maintenance of the buffering activity by protonation and deprotonation, which help to control TE chelation in the soil.

3.4. Cation Exchange Capacity

The cation exchange capacity playsa crucial role in TE mobility in soil solution [64,65]. Hydrogen ions will be attracted to cation exchange complexes where exchange of cations such as Ca2+ occurs. Thus paddy soils having a higher cation exchange capacity tend to resist a decrease in soil pH (especially when pH > 6).The higher cation exchange capacity also indicates higher concentrations of cations, which can be adsorbed to soil. Thus paddy soils with a higher cation exchange capacity favor rice growth by providing more TE cations. Paddy soils with higher clay content were found to have more available TEs [66]. Clay hydroxides assist mineral nutrient retention in soil. However the adsorption of TEs in clay acts as a barrier for cation exchange. This accounts for the relatively lower mobility of TEs ions in alfisols that have more clay content. Hence alfisols retain more toxic TEs such as Cd in the soil solution because of the saturation of clay with TEs compared to vertisols that have lower clay content [67].

3.5. Biological Processes

Soil flora and fauna contribute to biological processes mediating TE accumulation in rice [55,68,69]. Biological activities bring changes in nutrient mobility, and most often these changes increase TE savailable to the plant. Many of the biological activities in paddy soil are found in the plow layer where root biomass is dense. Rhizosphere secretions such as organic acids act as energy sources for soil microbes. This situation increases soil microbial activity and stimulates redox reactions in the soil. These changes not only bring changes in chemical speciation of TEs but also affect solubility. Microbe mediated redox changes often influence solubility of multivalent elements such as As, Se and Fe. Arsenic, which is a toxic metalloid, occurs as As (III) and As (V) forms. Transformation of this metalloid in paddy soil due to oxidation, reduction and methylation is driven by microbes [70]. The addition of organic matter causes an increase in As methylation in paddy soils through microbial activity, and hence enhanced volatilization of As due to microbial activity, as may occur in the form of trimethylarsine, monomethylarsine, dimethylarsinic acid, and arsine. The form of occurrence depends on the concentration of As in the soil as well as the nature of microbes found in the soil.
Soil microbes also secrete compounds having metal binding ligands such as siderophores, which enhance plant uptake of TEs [71,72]. Plant growth promoting bacteria also promote both mobilization of TEs from paddy soils and root growth by hormonal activities [73,74,75]. Aerobic paddy fields are also benefitted by burrowers that enable air and water movement [76]. It is well known that the activity of earth worms incorporates organic matter such as plant residues into soil. Beetles also play a significant role in the dispersal and burial of organic matter that helps to prevent TE loss from green manures. Thus activities of soil fauna bring both temporal immobilizations of nutrients, especially TEs, and favor mineralization of organic matter. Soil microbes assist oxidation reactions that accelerate the formation of the ionic forms of nitrate, sulfates and phosphates in paddy soil which in turn release bound TEs into the soil solution [77]. Secretion of reducing agents such as NADPH, caffeic acids etc. by soil microbes also enhance solubility of TEs in the paddy soil. A characteristic feature of submerged paddy soil is the emission of greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide [78]. This phenomenon occurs due to anoxygenic degradation of organic matter. The periodic draining of paddy soils prevents anoxia, and substantially reduces greenhouse gases, for example methane. Apart from the microbial activities, cellulose degradation by termites also contributes to methane production in well-aerated paddy soils. The degradation of organic matter leads to a decrease of holding capacity of TEs especially that of K, Ca and Mg. Rice plants acclimatize to nutrient deficiency especially that of Fe, by secreting muginenic acid derivatives called phytosiderophores [79]. These compounds lead to dissolution of Fe in the soil. Phenolic secretions are also an adaptive strategy found in rice plants that mobilize Fe into the soil. Similarly, rice plants growing in acidic soil respond to aluminum toxicity by secretion of low molecular weight carboxylic acids such as citrate, malate and oxalate [80]. Thus regulations of biological activities in paddy soils help to control TE availability in rice plants.

3.6. Fertilization

Paddy soils are often spiked with fertilizer to replenish nutrients [81,82,83]. Many of the fertilizers are inorganic salts containing plant available mineral nutrients. Site-specific nutrient management is also carried out in paddy soils [84]. This kind of nutrient management practices incorporate nutrient elements that are deficient in a particular paddy soil. This also helps to avoid the application of wrong fertilizers which otherwise retard crop yield. For example, application of nitrogen in a field deficient in phosphorous delays plant growth more severely. The added nutrients enter complex nutrient cycles in the soil. Fertilizer application often increases cycling of TEs. This is due to the fact that plant uptake of TEs is from the TEs pool in the soil rather than from the fertilizer. Apart from this, the nutrients added in the form of fertilizer are not converted into biomass, and relatively little nutrients (10%–60%) are taken up by plants from fertilizer. This leads to the building up of nutrients in the soil, which stimulate cycling of nutrients including that of TEs.
Fertilizer application in the form of inorganic salts often possesses side effects. For example, nitrogen fertilization in the form of ammonium leads to accumulation of H+ ions in the soil and promotes soil acidity [85]. Agricultural practices that increase crop yield through fertilization are often performed with the application of N, P and K in the field. Application of such a fertilizer mix not only enhances biomass but also depletes TEs. The reason for this effect is that more TEs are utilized to cope with macronutrient stimulated biomass production [86]. To avoid TE deficiency, organic farming or application of micronutrient fertilizers can be a practical solution [87,88]. However, the organic matter treatment must be monitored because of submergence mediated anoxia related changes in the paddy soil, which alter TE cycling. Application of vermicompost enhances soil porosity in aerobic paddy soils and hence supports root growth [89]. Green manures are a more reliable source of plant nutrients compared to composts. This is because about 70%–90% of nutrients taken up by animals appear in manure.
Organic matter as well as organic residue influence the availability of TEs in paddy soils [90,91]. Some organic matter form insoluble TE complexes and many of these complexes release TE cations slowly. Hence it can be predicted that addition of organic matter increases the chance of immobilization of TEs. Submerged paddy soils rich in organic matter often face deficiencies of Cu, Zn and Mn because of the immobilization of these elements by organic matter. TE deficiencies are commonly seen in aerated paddy soils due to high pH, high carbonates and low redox potential due to short-term submergence [92].

4. Nutrient Acquisition Directs TE Accumulation

Nutrient uptake in plants depends on nutrient availability, root architecture, presence of transition metal transporters in the roots and physiological processes such as transpiration [93,94,95]. The radial structure of rice root with aerenchyma in the cortex indicates the flexibility of the rice root to grow under both aerobic as well as anaerobic conditions [96]. It is well known that an extensive root system promotes the uptake of water and nutrients from the soil. Hence rice cultivars with a deeper and extensively branched root system pump more nutrients to aerial parts of the plant. Rice plants grown in upland conditions will have deeper roots than those grown in irrigated conditions. Thus the chance of accumulation of TEs is higher in upland rice compare with lowland rice. Rice plants pose a maximum root density at the time of heading, and the root density tends to decrease at the time of flowering. Hence TEs as fertilizers must be applied during the heading period. However, fertilizer application must be carried out under strict control to avoid limiting of plant growth due to excess mineral salts and resulting saline soils.

4.1. Root Phenology

The phenotypic characterization of rice germplasm indicates the existence of a variation in surface area, number of lateral roots, length, diameter, root hairs etc. among rice cultivars [97,98,99,100]. Rice cultivars with abundant root hairs require attention because root hairs not only help with water absorption but also with TE acquisition. Apart from this, root tip integrity is a critical factor for rice plant growth, as this is where the major quantity of ammonium is absorbed. Ammonium supports cell division in meristematic tissues in roots where carbohydrate is often limited. However, elements such as K, P and Fe are generally taken up by plants though any active locations in the root. Since root growth is an underground process, breeding approaches for utilization of difference in root architecture for better nutrient uptake are restricted, and the research on the development of better root phenotype are focused on quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping [97]. QTLs clusters of rice root development have been observed in Chromosomes 1 (30–40 Mb), 2 (25–35 Mb), 3 (0–5Mb), 4(30–35 Mb), and 9 (15–20 Mb). Some of the major outcomes of QTLs studies on the control of root growth ctivity are presented in Table 3.Among the QTLs, over-expression of the PSTOL1 (PHOSPHORUS-STARVATION TOLERANCE 1) gene was found to enhance root growth and resulted in a 60% increase of crop yield. Expression of this gene was also found to increase the content of P, N and K in rice plants. The increase of P uptake is well suited to inhibit toxic TE allocation to the rice grain because of the ability of P to form insoluble complexes with heavy metals. Expression of another candidate gene DRO1 (DEEPER ROOTING 1) associated with the control of the root angle and deep rooting helps to increase the surface area for TE uptake. It is clear that genetic approaches that enhance root growth activities are highly promising to enhance nutrient fortification of rice grains.
Table
Table 3. Rice root growth and development related genes.
Table 3. Rice root growth and development related genes.
GeneFunctionRefs.
OsGNOM1PIN protein expression and auxin response[101]
OsWOX3AInhibition of PIN protein expression[102]
OsHO1Latteral root initiation[103]
PSTOL1Crown root initiation[104]
ARL1Adventitous root initiation[105]
OsABF2/OsTIR1/OsCYP2Inhibition of lateral roots emergence[106,107,108]
OsIAA11/OsIAA13Lateral root initiation[109,110]
OsLBD3-2Crown and latteral root initiation[106,111]
OsIAA23Quicent center inhibition[112]
OsSCR1Quicent center activation[113]
OsSHR1Endoderm diffewrentiation[114]
OsCAND1/OsPIN1Crown root emergence[115]
OsRPK1Inhibition of root growth[116]
DRO1Root growth[117]
OSGLU3/OSDGL1/OsEXPA8Cell elogation related root growth[118,119,120]
OsORC3Lateral root growth[121]
DESRoot thickness[122]
OsRR1Crown root initiation[123]
RAL1,RAL2,RAL3Radicle initiation[124,125]

4.2. Molecular Physiological Process

Mineral nutrient uptake in plants depends on physiological processes [126,127,128,129]. Transpiration pull accounts for a mass flow of nutrients from the soil solution to the root. Transpiration is also believed to support upward movement of nutrient ions even though metabolic incorporation of ions occurs independently. Recent studies have shown that convective water transport in the xylem, brought about by root pressure, and the resultant guttation and Munch’s phloem counter flow are in itself sufficient for long-distance mineral supply [130]. Negative charges on the root surface attracting cationic TEs also represent a critical factor that regulates TE uptake in plants [131,132]. The polarity of the root surface is maintained by H+-ATPase. This proton pump takes part in pumping H+ ions out of the root, which leads to changes in the rhizosphere pH, and an electrochemical potential difference that affects the movement of ions and solutes across the plasma membrane of the root. Activity of this pump requires ATP, and hence physiological and biochemical events in the root indirectly control plant uptake of TEs. Even though respiration brings ATP for H+-ATPase activity, the process depends on photosynthesis, which produces substrates for respiration. Apart from this, sequestration of metals in the vacuole is mainly assisted with metal chelators generated through photosynthesis [133,134]. Hence maintenance of physiological processes such as photosynthesis is critical for limiting the transport of toxic TEs from the root to the grain. Regulation of action of transition metal transporters, which control the movement of TEs in the plants, is also critical for the enhancement of TE accumulation.

4.2.1. Photosynthesis

Among the physiological processes, photosynthesis plays an important role in the allocation and reallocation of TEs in the plant. The reason for this is that photosynthesis primarily accounts for the production of metabolites that are essential for the synthesis of metal chelators. Metal chelators in rice plants take part in extracellular complexation, rhizo-complexation and vacuolar complexation of metals. Secretion of tricarboxylic acids in response to metal toxicity is well studied among rice plants. Oxalate, citrate and malate are the tricarboxylic acids that are found to secrete into the rhizosphere and decrease aluminum toxicity in rice plants [135]. These acids tend to bind extracellular aluminum and prevent plant uptake of this metal. Organic acids involved in the above process are intermediates of primary metabolisms, especially respiration. Photosynthesis also influences root respiration by providing sugar skeletons, which act as substrates for respiration [136]. Thus rice cultivars that have higher photosynthetic efficiency and biomass productivity are able to avoid toxicity of metals because of their superior capacity of metal chelation. Extracellular chelation of metals is also noticed in rice plants with an excess of Cd, Cr, Fe, Pb and Mn in the rhizosphere [137,138,139]. Muginenic acids derivatives and phytosiderophores make up another class of extracellular chelators that is responsive to mineral nutrient deficiency and enhances plant uptake of TEs, especially Fe [140].
Apart from extracellular chelation of metals, plants have the ability to chelate metals within their roots that prevents the transport of the metals to the aerial parts. This is achieved by the transport and storage of metals in vacuoles of the root cells with help of metal chelators. Chelators involved in vacuolar sequestration of metals can be organic acids or phytochelatins [141,142]. Even though phytochelatins belong to the peptides, the dependency of the aminoacid metabolism on photosynthetic products points at the importance of photosynthesis in the maintenance of metal chelation activity in roots. Photosynthetic activity influenced Cd rhizo-complexation has been reported in rice plants [143]. Transport of TEs from root to leaf, and flag leaf to rice grain also occurs with help of metal chelators especially citrate and nicotianamine derivatives, respectively. Existence of citrate and nicotianamine transporters in plants is well characterized [144,145,146]. Hence the presence of metal chelators and corresponding transporters involved in cellular and vacuolar uptake of TEs complexes chiefly determines accumulation of TEs in rice grain. Site-specific over-expression of transition metal transporters helps to mobilize TEs into rice grains. It is also clear that any alteration in photosynthetic productivity affects production of metal chelators. Hence loss of photosynthetic activity restricts the trafficking of TEs in the plants, which ultimately disturbs the micronutrient composition of the grain.

4.2.2. Transition Metal Transporters

Plant uptake and transport of TEs is mediated by plasma membrane transporters. Transition metal transporter families such as ZIP, CDF, P1B-type ATPases, NRAMP, YSL, IREG1 and CCC1 are involved in the transition TE transport in rice [147] (Figure 3). Regulation of these transporters helps to control TE accumulation in rice plants. Most often deficiency of any of the TEs leads to strategic responses within plants. For example, rice plants secrete muginenic acids derivatives when they are subjected to Fe deficiency. But this will also promote the uptake of toxic TEs such as Cd because of the similarity of chemical properties that enables Cd to bind with these chelators. It is also reported that the OsNramp5 transporter assists with the uptake of both Mn and Cd in rice plants [148]. These reports suggest that the uptake and transport of both essential and toxic TEs are interrelated. This relationship can be used to manipulate plant uptake of specific TEs while limiting availability of toxic TEs. A transition metal ion is able to displace another metal ion from its specific binding site downstream in the Irving-Williams series in the following order: Zn2+ < Cu+ > Cu2+ > Ni2+ > Co2+ > Fe2+ > Mn2+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+. Hence, there is a chance of competitive binding of TEs at metal binding sites where excess of a TEs ion disrupt cellular functions due to displacement of cofactor often occurs.
Over-expression and tissue specific expression of transition metal transporters are potential solutions for both enhancement of TEs and restriction of toxic TEs content in rice plants [11]. A node-based switch in rice plants has been found that regulates Mn allocation in rice shoot [149]. The switch operates through expression and degradation of a Mn transporter, OsNramp3. When there is low Mn in the external medium, OsNramp3 gene expression occurs in the nodes and allocates Mn to young leaves and the panicle. However, in the presence of excess Mn, the transporter degrades, which causes Mn to be allocated to older leaves. This study points to the existence of a feedback regulation of TE trafficking at the molecular level in rice plants. Up regulation of magnesium transporter OsMGT1 was found to enhance Mg accumulation and aluminum tolerance in rice plants [150]. This finding supports that up regulation of specific proteins helps to avoid metal toxicity and to increase the accumulation of beneficial TEs ions. Macronutrient uptake such as that of K also plays a critical role in TE uptake [151]. It has been reported that there is a synergetic relationship between K uptake and Fe and Mn uptake. On the other hand, K is reported to negatively influence plant uptake of Mo. Thus it is clear that uptake of macronutrients influences TE accumulation in rice. However, the advent of studies with transition metal transporters points out that the uptake and distribution of TEs can be regulated by manipulation of transition metal transporters.
Agronomy 05 00374 g003 1024
Figure 3. Transition metal transporters implicated for TEs management in rice.
Figure 3. Transition metal transporters implicated for TEs management in rice.
Agronomy 05 00374 g003
Zinc is essential for rice plant growth. The influence of Zn on plant growth mainly relies on the functioning of redox-mediated processes. It has been reported that OsHMA2 gene expression preferentially loads Zn to developing tissues of rice plants [152]. This transporter was also implicated in Cd transport. OsIRT1 is another candidate gene reported to have a role in excess accumulation of both Zn and Fe in rice plants [153]. Over-expression of OsHMA3 in rice was also found to have a dual role, i.e. enhancement of Zn uptake in the root and Cd tolerance [154]. This gene was found to enhance Zn uptake by over-expressing the ZIP family of metal transporters in the root. Decreased Cd accumulation in rice grain during OsHMA3 over-expression was due to the vacuolar sequestration of Cd in the root. OsYSL16 is a metal transporter involved in Cu transport in rice [155]. This transporter was found to enhance Cu allocation to younger leaves from older leaves and flag leaf to panicle with help of nicotianamine. The transport of Cu from flag leaf to panicle is important to form fertile flowers, and hence this transporter plays a crucial role in ensuring the crop yield. Arsenic accumulation in rice grain reduced during manipulation of the gene OsABCC1 [156]. This gene was found to enhance vacuolar sequestration of As in companion cells of phloem of the upper nodes. This study also indicates the importance of site-specific localization of toxic TEs in rice plants which reduces the accumulation of toxic TEs in the grain.
Polished rice often contains limited concentrations of TEs. However, expression driven by insertion of promoter of OsYSL2, which causes over-expression of OsYSL2, has resulted in a 4.4-fold increase of Fe in rice grain. This transporter was also found to play a crucial role in long-distance transport of Fe and Mn in rice plants [157]. OsYSL6 is a transporter found in rice, which is involved in Mn detoxification [158]. This transporter mediates Mn transport with help of nicotianamine and is functional in the presence of excess Mn. Available reports with transition metal transporters indicate promising role of metal transporters in the restriction of toxic metals in rice grains while enhancing loading of TEs.

5. Trace Element Fortification

TEs such as Fe and Zn are the major TEs that are found to be limited in rice based diets [1,159]. Hence micronutrient fortifications of rice grain are mainly focused on Fe and Zn. Bio fortified rice grains with increased Zn and Fe amounts have been released in India and Bangladesh [160,161]. Bio fortification approaches are mainly focused on plant breeding and transgenic approaches (Figure 4). However, TEs nutrition through fertilization also requires a successful fortification program that provides the ambient availability of TEs for plant uptake.
Agronomy 05 00374 g004 1024
Figure 4. TEs fortification strategies for rice.
Figure 4. TEs fortification strategies for rice.
Agronomy 05 00374 g004

5.1. TEs Supplements

TE availability in the soil is essential for successful bio fortification programs. Some of the practical methods of application of TEs to rice plants are given in Table 4. It must be noted that toxic TEs also potentially enter into plants through transition metal transporters that are meant for TEs [162,163]. Hence more availability of TEs in the rhizosphere will have beneficial effects in the sense that these elements delay plant uptake of toxic TEs by competitive inhibition. Application of redox active TEs such as Mn and Fe in the soil requires attention because they are known to create metal toxicity. Rice plant grown in acidic soils are especially prone to toxicity of these elements [164,165]. In acidic soils, the process of submergence causes depletion of oxygen that results in the formation of reduced forms of Fe and Mn that are more toxic to plants compared to their oxidized form. It is recommended that TE application must be carried out with the help of metal chelators to prevent toxicity of metals. Foliar application of TEs is a widely accepted method. This method helps to avoid accumulation of TEs in the soil that can create metal toxicity. Thus along with prophylactic and a curative benefits, foliar application could be a practical solution for the enrichment of TEs in rice grain. Mineral salts of TEs in the form of sulfate, oxysulfate, oxide and chelate are the commonly applied forms of TEs. Metal chelates are well-suited for the application in soil because the presence of chelators slows down the reactivity of TEs with soil minerals. Application of organic manures is also a potential practical solution for ensuring ambient availability of TEs, especially, Zn and Cu. Silicon is an essential element of rice growth, and the application of silica based gels not only protects rice plants from abiotic stress but also helps to enhance crop productivity [166].
Table
Table 4. TEs supplementpracticesapplicable to rice paddies.
Table 4. TEs supplementpracticesapplicable to rice paddies.
NutrientMode of Application
ZnAddition of compost, Zincated urea and Gypsum (20 Kg Zn/ha), Periodic draining, Foliar spraying or seed treatment of 0.2 to 0.5% ZnSO4
FeAddition of farm yard manure, FeSO4, Fe-EDTA, and Fe-EDDHA (25 Kg Fe/ha). Foliar spraying or seed treatment of 1%–2% FeNH4SO4 (pH5.2).
BApplication of Borax andH3BO3 (1Kg/ha), Foliar spray of 0.5% H3BO3
MnApplication of MnSO4 (2–5 Kg/ha)or Farm yard manure (10 ton/hectare), Foliar Spray of 1% MnSO4 at tillering
MoLiming of acid soils to a pH 6.2–6.5, Dustingof (NH4)2MoO4 at 100–500 g/ha, Foliar spray of 0.1% (NH4)2MoO4
CuAddition of CuSO4 (5 Kg/ha at an interval of 5 years), Root dipping in 1% CuSO4 solution
SiIrrigation with Si rich water, Application of Ca or K silicate (60 Kg/ha), Foliar spray of 0.1% Na2O3Si

5.2. Plant Breeding

Marker assisted selection in breeding programs with help of loci associated with nutrient accumulation in the grain allows the development of TE bio fortified rice as well as restriction of accumulation of toxic TEs. Among the TEs, increase in accumulation of Fe and Zn has gained attention because of the direct human health benefits. The existence of four fold differences in Fe and Zn concentrations among rice germplasm has been identified [167,168]. This indicates vast opportunities for plant breeding that can significantly increase the content of Fe and Zn in the grain. Studies with Indian rice varieties have shown the highest Fe contents to be found in the varieties Varsha (37.5 mg/kg) and Phou Dum (37.2 mg/kg) [160]. It was also found that basmati genotypes, deep-water rice and landraces havehigher iron and zinc contents in the grains compared with Swarna, Jaya, Uma etc. that are widely cultivated. Poornima, Ranbir Basmati, ADT 43 and Chittimutyalu were identified as the Indian rice varieties with the highest Zn content. The trait for high Fe content in grain was located on chromosomes 3, 4 and 8 in the Chittimutyalu variety. QTL mapping indicated four loci of high Fe content on chromosomes 3, 4, 6 and 12 in Ranbir Basmati.
Aromatic rice varieties such as Jalmagna, Zuchem, and Xua Bue Nuo are reported to be rich in both Fe and Zn [161]. The aromatic trait was not pleiotropic for grain-Fe or grain-Zn concentrations even though the linkage was broken at a low frequency. Thus the trait can be used to screen for high Fe and Zn levels in rice grain. Crossing of rice varieties such as BPT 5204 and Chittimutyalu was success to produce rice with higher Zn and Fe content [160]. Results of crossing between IR72 and Zawa Bonday resulted in a higher Fe content as well as an enhanced yield. The progeny of the cross possessed favorable characteristics such as tolerance of rice tungro virus, and P, Zn and Fe deficiency. Breeding of rice varieties is beneficial to prevent accumulation of toxic TEs such as Cd. Natural variation of a 13- to 23-fold difference in grain Cd concentration in diverse japonica rice germplasm points to plant breeding opportunities in the context of Cd minimization. Cd accumulation related QTLs in rice have been found on Chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 [169,170,171]. Cd minimization related alleles are also found to relate with crop yield. Thus approaches that are aimed to reduce Cd accumulation help to enhance crop yield too.

5.3. Genetic Manipulations

Gene based regulation of micronutrient transporters and carriers in the plant promise controlled accumulation of TEs in rice while restricting entry of toxic TEs. Nutrient content in the grain can be enhanced by expression of specific genes in the endosperm or expression of genes that take part in the transport of TEs to the grain. For example, rice endosperm expressing the soybean ferrtin gene, SoyferH1, was found to have a three-fold increase of Fe in seeds [172]. However, when the gene was expressed under endosperm specific multiple promoters such asOsGlb1 and OsGluB1, there was no increase of Fe content in the seeds [173]. This study indicates that the enhancement of nutrient storage capacity alone cannot fulfill the requirement of more accumulation of TEs. Basmati rice (Pusasugandh II) plants over-expressing rice ferritin (OsFer2) under the control of the endosperm-specificGlutelinA2 (OsGluA2) promoter were found to accumulate more Fe and Zn [174]. Simultaneous over-expression of ferritin under the control of the endosperm-specific promotersglobulinb1(OsGlb1) and glutelin B1 (OsGluB1), NAS under the control of the OsActin1promoter, and OsYSL2 under the control of OsGlb1 promoter, and the OsSUT1 transporter promoter significantly increased the Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu concentrations in polished rice [175]. These studies indicate that over-expression of ferritin and metallothionein in grain could enhance TE accumulation in grains because of the ability of these proteins to chelate metals. Over-expression of phytase, which degrades phytic acid, also helps to enhance availability of TE fortification in rice [176].
The nicotianamine synthesis related metabolic pathway plays a critical role in the regulation of metal homeostasis, especially Fe in plants [177]. Activation tagged line of OsNAS3 showed a 3-fold increase of Fe content in polished rice grain [178]. Constitutive over-expression of the OsNAS2 gene also resulted in Fe and Zn-bio fortification of rice endosperm [179]. It has been also demonstrated that over-expression of Fe homeostasis genes in rice such as OsIRO2 increases Fe content in rice plants grown in calcareous soils [180]. Over-expression of deoxymugineic acid synthase gene OsDMAS1 involved in synthesis of muginenic acid also could be a practical solution for enhancement of Fe3+ uptake [181]. Thus it is clear that approaches with over-expression of carriers involved in metal translocation as well as metal homeostasis promotes accumulation of TEs in the grain. Metal transporters are also promising to enhance accumulation of TEs in plants. Hence focus should be placed on transgenic rice plants, which pose the capacity to express transition metal transporters and TEs carriers. OsVIT1 and OsNRAMP7 are potential candidate genes that can be targeted for Zn fortification in rice grain [182]. Over-expression of Fe transporters OsIRT1 and OsYSL15 were found to promote Fe content in grains of rice plants [183]. Expression of OsNRAMP1, OsNRAMP7 and OsNRAMP8 in flag leaves also was also shown to correlate with grain Fe and Zn content [181]. Up regulation of OsZIP1, OsZIP4, OsZIP6 and OsZIP8 was also reported in the above-mentioned study during Fe deficiency. Thus it can be assumed that over-expression of the Nramp and ZIP metal transporter family in the flag leaves of rice plants has the potential to enhance accumulation of Fe and Zn in the grain. However, studies with over expression of OsZIP4, OsZIP5 and OsZIP8 where a decrease of root-to-shoot translocation of Zn and of Zn concentrations in the seed were observed indicate that up regulation of proteins that are observed under nutrient deficiency does not always help to enhance plant uptake of TEs when plants grow with sufficient availability of ambient nutrients [184,185]. Non-specificity of transition metal transporters may lead to the accumulation of non-specified elements during a transgenic approach [186]. For example, over-expression of nicotianamine synthase and ferritin using CaMV 35S not only enhanced accumulation of Fe and Zn in rice but also enhanced Mn accumulation. Entry of toxic TEs can also be blocked in rice plants using transgenic approaches [11]. Cd excluder phenotypes screened in rice cultivars indicate potential Cd excluding traits in the rice genome that help to develop Cd excluder rice [187]. It has been found that transgenic tobacco carrying cDNALTC1, a nonspecific transporter, accumulated low concentrations of Cd [188].

6. Outlook

Rice-based diets often cause TE deficiency in humans. Approaches for enhancing TE content in rice grains can be either implemented on the field level or plant based. Nutrient cycling in paddy soils must be characterized with respect to TE content for ensuring TE availability for plant uptake. Optimal soil physiochemical characteristics for TE accumulation in grains need to be explored under varying environmental conditions especially during dry and wet periods in paddy soils. TE fertilization along with NPK fertilization is recommended. Fertilization often activates nutrient cycling in rice paddies, and hence the dynamics of TE availability to plants under fertilization must be monitored. Adequate management of organic matter in the soil and the soil’s influence on TE accumulation in rice grains must be screened during biodynamic farming. Available data on rice root architecture must be screened for TE mining capacity. Genetic manipulation, especially with genes that control metal chelator production, and transition metal transporters are promising possibilities to enhance accumulation of TEs. Endosperm, representing the major part of the TE reserve in the grain, site-specific expression of metal chelators and transporters that load metal to endosperm are practical solutions for loading TEs into rice grains.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the receipt of financial support ref. DST/INT/THAI/P-02/2012 dated 31-1-13.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bashir, K.; Takahash, R.; Nakanishi, H.; Nishizawa, N.K. The road to micronutrient biofortification of rice: Progress and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lucca, P.; Hurrell, R.; Potrykus, I. Genetic engineering approaches to improve the bioavailability and the level of iron in rice grains. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 102, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Witt, C.; Dobermann, A.; Abdulrachman, S.; Gines, H.C.; Wang, G.; Nagarajan, R.; Satawatananont, S.; Tran, T.S.; Pham, S.T.; Le, V.T.; et al. Internal nutrient efficiencies of irrigated lowland rice in tropical and subtropical Asia. Field Crops Res. 1999, 63, 113–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Andriesse, J.P.; Schelhaas, R.M. A monitoring study of nutrient cycles in soils used for shifting cultivation under various climatic conditions in tropical Asia. II. Nutrient stores in biomass and soil—Results of baseline studies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1987, 19, 285–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chase, P.; Singh, O.P. Soil nutrients and fertility in three traditional land use systems of Khonoma, Nagaland, India. Resour. Environ. 2014, 4, 181–189. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kögel-Knabner, I.; Amelung, W.; Cao, Z.; Fiedler, S.; Frenzel, P.; Jahn, R.; Kalbitz, K.; Kölbl, A.; Schloter, M. Biogeochemistry of paddy soils. Geoderma 2010, 157, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Takahashi, Y.; Minamikawa, R.; Hattori, K.H.; Kurishima, K.; Kihou, N.; Yuita, K. Arsenic behavior in paddy fields during the cycle of flooded and non-flooded periods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 1038–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Carrillo-Gonzalez, R.; Simünek, J.; Sauvé, S.; Adriano, D. Mechanisms and pathways of trace element mobility in soils. Adv. Agron. 2006, 91, 113–180. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wissuwa, M.; Ismail, A.M.; Yanagihara, S. Effects of zinc deficiency on rice growth and genetic factors contributing to tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fieldler, S.; Vepraskas, M.J.; Richardson, J.L. Soil redox potential importance, field measurements and observations. Adv. Agron. 2007, 94, 41–57. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V. Cadmium minimization in rice: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 34, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Williams, C.H.; David, D.J. The accumulation in soil of cadmium residues from phosphate fertilizers and their effect on the cadmium content of plants. Soil Sci. 1976, 121, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bolan, N.S.; Duraisamy, V.P. Role of inorganic and organic soil amendments on immobilization and phytoavailability of heavy metals: A review involving specific case studies. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2003, 41, 533–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Czarnecki, S.; Düring, R.A. Influence of long-term mineral fertilization on metal contents and properties of soil samples taken from different locations in Hesse, Germany. Soil 2015, 1, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pan, J.; Plant, J.A.; Voulvoulis, N.; Oates, C.J.; Ihlenfeld, C. Cadmium levels in Europe: Implications for human health. Environ. Geochem. Health 2010, 32, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vitousek, P. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am. Nat. 1987, 119, 553–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Salt, D.E.; Blaylock, M.; Kumar, N.P.B.A.; Dushenkov, V.; Ensley, D.; Chet, I.; Raskin, I. Phytoremediation: A novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Biotechnology 1995, 13, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sessitsch, A.; Kuffner, M.; Kidd, P.; Vangronsveld, J.; Wenzel, W.W.; Fallmann, K.; Puschenreiter, M. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 60, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tsheboeng, G.; Bonyongo, M.; Murray-Hudson, M. Flood variation and soil nutrient content in flood plain vegetation communities in the Okavango Delta. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2014, 110, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.; Stevenson, F.J. Soil organic matter interactions with trace elements. Dev. Plant Soil Sci. 1986, 25, 73–116. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaoui, H.I.; Zibilske, L.M.; Ohno, T. Effects of earthworm casts and compost on soil microbial activity and plant nutrient availability. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kabarta-Pendias, A. Behavioural properties of trace metals in soils. Appl. Geochem. 1993, 2, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, Y.H.; Watanabe, A.; Kimura, M. Contribution of plant-derived carbon to soil microbial biomass dynamics in a paddy rice microcosm. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2002, 36, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, Y.; Kan, A.T.; Tomson, M.B. Critical evaluation of desorpion phenomena of heavy metals from natural sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5566–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meunier, N.; Drogui, P.; Montané, C.; Hausler, R.; Mercier, G.; Blais, J.F. Comparison between electrocoagulation and chemical precipitation for metals removal from acidic soil leachate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rajmohan, N.; Elango, L. Mobility of major ions and nutrients in the unsaturated zone during paddycultivation: A field study and solute transport modelling approach. Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21, 2698–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Blair, N.; Faulkner, R.D.; Till, A.R.; Poulton, P.R. Long-term management impacts on soil C, N and physical fertility. Part I. Broadbalk experiment. Soil Tillage Res. 2006, 91, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kothawala, D.N.; Moore, T.R. Adsorption of dissolved nitrogen by forest mineral soils. Can. J. For. Res. 2009, 39, 2381–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kanda, K.; Tsuruta, H.; Minami, K. Emission of dimethyl sulfide, carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide from paddy fields. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1992, 38, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Whiticar, M.J. Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem. Geol. 1999, 161, 291–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kuo, S. Application of modified Langmuir isotherm to phosphate sorption by some acid soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1988, 52, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brennan, R.F.; Bolland, M.D.A.; Bowden, J.W. Potassium deficiency, and molybdenum deficiency and aluminium toxicity due to soil acidification have become problems for cropping sandy soils in south-western Australia. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2004, 44, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Inal, A.; Gunes, A.; Sahin, O.; Taskin, M.B.; Kaya, E.C. Impacts of biochar and processed poultry manure, applied to a calcareous soil, on the growth of bean and maize. Soil Use Manag. 2015, 31, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Green, C.H.; Heil, D.M.; Cardon, G.E.; Butters, G.L.; Kelly, E.F. Solubilization of manganese and trace metals in soils affected by acid mine runoff. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32, 1323–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Greipsson, S. Effect of iron plaque on roots of rice on growth of plants in excess zinc and accumulation of phosphorus in plants in excess copper or nickel. J. Plant Nutr. 1995, 18, 1659–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Adriano, D.C.; Wenzel, W.W.; Vangronsveld, J.; Bolan, N.S. Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma 2004, 122, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coleman, D.C.; Reid, C.P.P.; Cole, C.V. Biological strategies of nutrient cycling in soil systems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1983, 13, 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rauthan, B.S.; Schnitzer, M. Effects of a soil fulvic acid on the growth and nutrient content of cucumber (cucumis sativus) plants. Plant Soil 1981, 63, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chiang, K.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Chiang, P. Low-molecular-weight organic acids and metal speciation in rhizosphere and bulk soils of a temperate rain forest in Chitou, Taiwan. Taiwan J. For. Sci. 2006, 21, 327–337. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vinolas, L.C.; Healey, J.R.; Jones, D.L. Kinetics of soil microbial uptake of free amino acids. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2001, 33, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sivapullaiah, P.V.; Prakash, B.S.N.; Suma, S. Electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from soil. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 2015, 5, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chapin, F.S.; Bloom, A.J.; Field, C.B.; Waring, R.H. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. J. Biosci. 1987, 37, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ehrenfeld, J.G. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 2003, 6, 503–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hattenschwiler, S.; Vitousek, P. The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Katoh, M.; Murase, J.; Hayashi, M.; Matsuya, K.; Kimura, M. Nutrient leaching from the plow layer by water percolation and accumulation in the subsoil in an irrigated paddy field. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhou, W.; Lv, T.; Chen, Y.; Westby, A.P.; Ren, W. Soil physicochemical and biological properties of paddy-upland rotation: A review. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shaheen, S.M.; Tsadilas, C.D.; Rinklebe, J. Immobilization of soil copper using organic and inorganic amendments. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2015, 178, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sharma, A.; Weindorf, D.C.; Wang, D.; Chakraborty, S. Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 4. Cation exchange capacity (CEC). Geoderma 2015, 239–240, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Charlet, L.; Markelova, E.; Parsons, C.; Couture, R.; Madé, B. Redox oscillation impact on natural and engineered biogeochemical systems: Chemical resilience and implications for contaminant mobility. Proced. Earth Planet. Sci. 2013, 7, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hoffman, M.R.; Yost, E.C.; Eisenrich, S.J.; Maier, W.J. Characterization of soluble and colloidal phase metal complexes in river water by ultra-filtration: A mass balance approach. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981, 15, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yuan, C.; Wu, H.B.; Xi, Y.; Lo, X.W. Mixed transition-metal oxides: Design, synthesis, and energy-related applications. Angew. Chem. 2014, 53, 1488–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Scharpenseel, H.W.; Pfeiffer, E.M.; Becker-Heidmann, P. Organic carbon storage in tropical hydromorphic soils. In Structure Andorganic Matter Storage in Agricultural Soils; Carter, M.R., Stewart, B.A., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1996; pp. 361–392. [Google Scholar]
  53. Diaz, R.J. Overview of hypoxia around world. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Qureshi, S.; Richards, B.K.; Steenhuis, T.S.; McBride, M.B.; Baveye, P.; Dousset, S. Microbial acidification and pH effects on trace element release from sewage sludge. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 132, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Olaniran, A.O.; Balgobind, A.; Pillay, B. Bioavailability of heavy metals in soil: Impact on microbial biodegradation of organic compounds and possible improvement strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 10197–10228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Brinkman, R. Ferrolysis: Chemical and Mineralogical Aspects of Soil Formation in Seasonally Wet Acid Soils, and Some Practical Implications; International Rice Research Institute: Los Banos, Philippines, 1978; pp. 295–303. [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Ranst, E.; Dumon, M.; Tolossa, A.R.; Cornelis, J.T.; Stoops, G.; Vandenberghe, R.E.; Deckers, J. Revisiting ferrolysis processes in the formation of Planosols for rationalizing the soils with stagnic properties in WRB. Geoderma 2011, 163, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fageria, N.K.; Carvalho, G.D.; Santos, A.B.; Ferreira, E.P.B.; Knupp, A.M. Chemistry of lowland rice soils and nutrient availability. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2011, 42, 1913–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sahrawat, K.L.; Sika, M. Comparative tolerance of Oryza sativaand Oryza glaberrimarice cultivars for iron toxicity in West Africa. Int. Rice Res. Notes 2002, 27, 30–31. [Google Scholar]
  60. Barak, P.; Jobe, B.O.; Krueger, A.R.; Peterson, L.A.; Laird, D.A. Effects of long term soil acidification due to nitrogen inputs in Wisconsin. Plant Soil 1997, 197, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Behera, S.K.; Shukla, A.K. Spatial distribution of surface soil acidity, electrical conductivity, soil organic carbon content and exchangeable potassium, calcium and magnesium in some cropped acid soils of India. Land Degrad. Dev. 2015, 26, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Magdoff, F.R.; Bartlett, R.J. Soil pH buffering revisited. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1985, 49, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pan, Y.; Koopmans, G.F.; Bonten, L.T.; Song, J.; Luo, Y.; Temminghoff, E.J.; Comans, R.N. Influence of pH on the redox chemistry of metal (hydr) oxides and organic matter in paddy soils. J. Soils Sediments 2014, 14, 1713–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Evangelou, V.P.; Philipps, R.E. Cation exchange in soils. In Chemical Processes in Soil; Tabatabai, M.A., Sparks, D.L., Eds.; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 2005; pp. 343–410. [Google Scholar]
  65. Deumlich, D.; Thiere, J.; Altermann, M. Characterization of cation exchange capacity (CEC) for agricultural land-use areas Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2015, 6, 767–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Anda, M.; Suryani, E.; Husnain; Subardja, D. Strategy to reduce fertilizer application in volcanic paddy soils: Nutrient reserves approach from parent materials. Soil Till. Res. 2015, 150, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V. Vertisol prevents cadmium accumulation in rice: Analysis by ecophysiological toxicity markers. Chemosphere 2014, 108, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zheng, R.; Sun, G.; Zhu, Y.G. Effects of microbial processes on the fate of arsenic in paddy soil. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nayak, A.K.; Raja, R.; Rao, K.S.; Shukla, A.K.; Mohanty, S.; Shahid, M.; Tripathi, R.; Panda, B.B.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Kumar, A.; et al. Effect of fly ash application on soil microbial response and heavy metal accumulation in soil and rice plant. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Lomax, C.; Liu, W.J.; Wu, L.; Xue, K.; Xiong, J.; Zhou, J.; McGrath, S.P.; Meharg, A.A.; Miller, A.J.; Zhao, F.J. Methylated arsenic species in plants originate from soil microorganisms. New Phytol. 2012, 193, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rajkumar, M.; Ae, N.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Freitas, H. Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Loaces, I.; Ferrando, L.; Scavino, A.F. Dynamics, diversity and function of endophytic siderophore-producing bacteria in rice. Microb. Ecol. 2010, 61, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Vessey, J.K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 2003, 255, 571–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Noori, M.S.S.; Saud, H.M. Potential plant growth-promoting activity of Pseudomonassp. isolated from paddy soil in Malaysia as biocontrol agent. J. Plant Pathol. Microb. 2012, 3, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Deshwal, V.K.; Kumar, P. Plant growth promoting activity of Pseudomonads in Rice crop. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2013, 2, 152–157. [Google Scholar]
  76. Doi, R.; Pitiwut, S. From maximization to optimization: A paradigm shift in rice production in thailand to improve overall quality of life of stakeholder. Sci. World J. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Bodelier, P.L.E.; Sorrell, B.; Drake, H.L.; Küsel, K.; Hurek, T.; Reinhold-Hurek, B.; Lovell, C.; Megonigal, P.; Frenzel, P. Ecological aspects of microbes and microbial communities inhabiting the rhizosphere of wetland plants. In Wetlands as a Natural Resource; Bobbink, R., Beltman, B., Verhoeven, J.T.A., Whigham, D.F., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 205–238. [Google Scholar]
  78. Redeker, K.; Wang, N.; Low, J.; McMillan, A.; Tyler, S.; Cicerone, R. Emissions of methyl halides and methane from rice paddies. Science 2000, 290, 966–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kobayashi, T.; Nishizawa, N.K. Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kochian, L.V.; Hoekenga, A.O.; Pineros, A.M. How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanism of Aluminium tolerance and Phosphorous efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 459–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ding, L.-J.; Su, J.-Q.; Xu, H.-J.; Jia, Z.-J.; Zhu, Y.-G. Long-term nitrogen fertilization of paddy soil shifts iron-reducing microbial community revealed by RNA-13C-acetate probing coupled with pyrosequencing. ISME J. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhang, A.F.; Bian, R.J.; Pan, G.X.; Cui, L.Q.; Hussain, Q.; Li, L.Q.; Zheng, J.W.; Zheng, J.F.; Zhang, X.H.; Han, X.J.; et al. Effect of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crop Res. 2012, 127, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, C.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y.; Ouyang, Z. Rice root growth and nutrient uptake as influenced by organic manure in continuously and alternately flooded paddy soils. Agric. Water Manag. 2004, 70, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dobermann, A.; Witt, C.; Dawe, D. Performance of site-specific nutrient management in intensive rice cropping systems of Asia. Better Crops Int. 2002, 16, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  85. Eriksson, J.E. Effects of nitrogen-containing fertilizers on solubility and plant uptake of cadmium. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1990, 49, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Das, S.K. Role of micronutrient in rice cultivation and management strategy in organic agriculture—A reappraisal. Agric. Sci. 2014, 5, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wong, M.C.; Ma, K.K.; Fang, K.M.; Cheung, C. Utilization of a manure compost for organic farming in Hong Kong. Biores. Technol. 1999, 67, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tang, J.C.; Inoue, Y.; Yasuta, T.; Yoshida, S.; Katayama, A. Chemical and microbial properties of various compost products. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2003, 49, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V. Cadmium accumulation retard activity of functional components of photo assimilation and growth of rice cultivars amended with vermicompost. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2013, 15, 965–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Shibaharaa, F.; Inubushiab, K. Effects of organic matter application on microbial biomass and available nutrients in various types of paddy soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1997, 43, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kumpiene, J.; Lagerkvist, A.; Maurice, C. Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments—A review. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Li, Z.H.; Horikawa, Y. Stability behavior of soil colloidal suspensions in relation to sequential reduction of soils. II Turbidity changes by submergence of paddy soils at different temperatures. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1997, 43, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Baligar, V.C.; Fageria, N.K.; He, Z. Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2001, 31, 921–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fageria, N.K.; Baligar, V.C. Improving nutrient use efficiency of annual crops in Brazilian acid soils for sustainable crop production. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2001, 32, 1303–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Raun, W.R.; Johnson, G.V. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron. J. 1999, 91, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yoo, Y.; Choi, H.; Jung, K. Genome-wide identification and analysis of genes associated with lysigenous aerenchyma formation in rice roots. J. Plant Biol. 2015, 58, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mai, C.D.; Phung, N.T.P.; To, H.T.M.; Gonin, M.; Hoang, G.T.; Nguyen, K.L.; Do, V.N.; Courtois, B.; Gantet, P. Genes controlling root development in rice. Rice 2014, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Wu, W.; Cheng, S. Root genetic research, an opportunity and challenge to rice improvement. Field Crops Res. 2014, 165, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gowdaa, V.R.P.; Henrya, A.; Yamauchi, A.; Shashidhar, H.E.; Serraj, R. Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Res. 2011, 122, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Thanh, N.D.; Zheng, H.G.; Dong, N.V.; Trinh, L.N.; Ali, M.L.; Nguyen, H.T. Genetic variation in root morphology and microsatellite DNA loci in upland rice (Oryza sativaL.) from Vietnam. Euphytica 1999, 105, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Xue, Y.; Wu, P.; Shou, H. Adventitious root formation in rice requires OsGNOM1 and is mediated by the OsPINs family. Cell Res. 2009, 19, 1110–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yoo, S.C.; Cho, S.H.; Paek, N.C. Rice WUSCHEL-related homeobox 3A (OsWOX3A) modulates auxin-transport gene expression in lateral root and root hair development. Plant Signal Behav. 2013, 8, e25929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hsu, Y.Y.; Chao, Y.-Y.; Kao, C.H. Biliverdin-promoted lateral root formation is mediated through heme oxygenase in rice. Plant Signal Behav. 2012, 7, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Gamuyao, R.; Chin, J.H.; Pariasca-Tanaka, J.; Pesaresi, P.; Catausan, S.; Dalid, C.; Slamet-Loedin, I.; Tecson-Mendoza, E.M.; Wissuwa, M.; Heuer, S. The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature 2012, 488, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Yu, X.; Yu, J.; He, X.; Zhang, S.; Shou, H.; Wu, P. ARL1, a LOB-domain protein required for adventitious root formation in rice. Plant J. 2005, 43, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hossain, M.A.; Cho, J.I.; Han, M.; Ahn, C.H.; Jeon, J.S.; An, G.; Park, P.B. The ABRE-binding transcription factor OsABF2 is a positive regulator of abiotic stress and ABA signaling in rice. J Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 1512–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Xia, K.; Wang, R.; Ou, X.; Fang, Z.; Tian, C.; Duan, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M. OsTIR1and OsAFB2downregulation via OsmiR393 overexpression leads to more tillers, early flowering and less tolerance to salt and drought in rice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Zheng, L.; Mao, W.; Li, M.; Wu, Y.; Wu, P.; Mo, X. OsCYP2, a chaperone involved in degradation of auxin-responsive proteins, plays crucial roles in rice lateral root initiation. Plant J. 2013, 74, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zhu, Z.X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S.J.; Mao, C.Z.; Wu, Y.R.; Wu, P. A gain-of-function mutation in OsIAA11 affects lateral root development in rice. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Kitomi, Y.; Inahashi, H.; Takehisa, H.; Sato, Y.; Inukai, Y. OsIAA13-mediated auxin signaling is involved in lateral root initiation in rice. Plant Sci. 2012, 190, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Guan, X.; Chen, L.; He, Y.; Wang, J.; Lu, G. Genome-wide identification and transcriptional profiling analysis of auxin response-related gene families in cucumber. BMC Res. Notes 2014, 7, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Jun, N.; Gaohang, W.; Zhenxing, Z.; Huanhuan, Z.; Yunrong, W.; Ping, W. OsIAA23-mediated auxin signaling defines postembryonic maintenance of QC in rice. Plant J. 2011, 68, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ni, J.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, P. Definition and stabilization of the quiescent center in rice roots. Plant Biol. 2014, 16, 1014–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Cui, H.; Levesque, M.P.; Vernoux, T.; Jung, J.W.; Paquette, A.J.; Gallagher, K.L.; Wang, J.Y.; Blilou, I.; Scheres, B.; Benfey, P.N. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism delimiting SHR movement defines a single layer of endodermis in plants. Science 2007, 316, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Wang, X.F.; He, F.F.; Ma, X.X.; Mao, C.Z.; Hodgman, C.; Lu, C.G.; Wu, P. OsCAND1 is required for crown root emergence in rice. Mol. Plant 2010, 4, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Xu, M.; Zhu, L.; Shou, H.; Wu, P. A PIN1 family gene, OsPIN1, involved in auxin-dependent adventitious root emergence and tillering in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 1674–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Uga, Y.; Sugimoto, K.; Ogawa, S.; Rane, J.; Ishitani, M.; Hara, N.; Kitomi, Y.; Inukai, Y.; Ono, K.; Uga, Y.; et al. Dro1, a major QTL involved in deep rooting of rice under upland field conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2485–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zhang, J.W.; Xu, L.; Wu, Y.R.; Chen, X.A.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, S.H.; Ding, W.N.; Wu, P.; Yi, K.K. OsGLU3, a putative membrane-bound endo-1,4-beta-glucanase, is required for root cell elongation and division in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Qin, C.; Li, Y.; Gan, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wu, P. OsDGL1, a homolog of an oligosaccharyltransferase complex subunit, is involved in N-glycosylation and root development in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ma, N.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, S.; Kang, Z.; Che, S.; Wang, G.; Huang, J. Overexpression of OsEXPA8, a root-specific gene, improves rice growth and root system architecture by facilitating cell extension. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Chen, X.; Shi, J.; Hao, X.; Liu, H.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chen, M.; Wu, P.; Mao, C. OsORC3 is required for lateral root development in rice. Plant J. 2013, 74, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Wan, J.; Nakazaki, T.; Ikehashi, H. Analyses of genetic loci for diameter of seminal root with marker genes in rice. Breed. Sci. 1996, 46, 75–77. [Google Scholar]
  123. Kitomi, Y.; Ito, H.; Hobo, T.; Aya, K.; Kitano, H.; Inukai, Y. The auxin responsive AP2/ERF transcription factorCROWN ROOTLESS5is involved in crown root initiation in rice through the induction ofOsRR1, a type-A response regulator of cytokinin signaling. Plant J. 2011, 67, 472–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Scarpella, E.; Rueb, E.; Meijer, A.H. TheRADICLELESS1gene is required for vascular pattern formation in rice. Development 2003, 130, 645–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Hong, S.K.; Aoki, T.; Kitano, H.; Satoh, H.; Nagato, Y. Phenotypic diversity of 188 rice embryo mutants. Dev. Genet. 1995, 16, 298–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Siebers, N.; Godlinski, F.; Leinweber, P. Bone char as phosphorus fertilizer involved in cadmium immobilization in lettuce, wheat, and potato cropping. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2014, 177, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Clark, R.B. Physiology of cereals for mineral nutrient uptake, use and efficiency. In Crops Enhancers of Nutrient Use; Baligar, V.C., Duncan, R.R., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 131–209. [Google Scholar]
  128. Gahoonia, T.S.; Nielsen, N.E. Root traits as tools for creating phosphorus efficient crop varieties. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 260, 47–57. [Google Scholar]
  129. Gourley, C.J.P.; Allan, D.L.; Russlle, M.P. Plant nutrient effi-ciency: A comparison of definitions and suggested improvement. Plant Soil 1994, 158, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tanner, W.; Beevers, H. Transpiration, a prerequisite for long-distance transport of minerals in plants? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9443–9447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Palmgren, M.G. Plant plasma membrane H+-ATPases: Powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 52, 817–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Sondergaard, T.E.; Schulz, A.; Palmgren, M.G. Energization of transport processes in plants. Roles of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2475–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Pinto, E.; Siguad-Kutner, T.; Leitão, M.; Okamoto, O.K.; Morse, D.; Colepicolo, P. Heavy metal-induced oxidative stress in algae. J. Phycol. 2003, 39, 1008–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Rauser, W.E. Structure and function of metal chelators produced by plants: The case for organic acids, amino acids, phytin and metallothioneins. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 1999, 31, 19–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Azura, A.E.; Shamshuddin, J.; Fauziah, C.I. Root elongation, root surface area and organic acid by rice seedling under Al3+ and/or H+ Stress. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2011, 6, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wertin, T.M.; Teskey, R.O. Close coupling of whole-plant respiration to net photosynthesis and carbohydrates. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28, 1831–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, P.; Zheng, G.; Zhang, J.; Xu, G. Effects of potassium on organic acid metabolism of Fe-sensitive and Fe-resistant rices (Oryza sativa L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2013, 7, 843–848. [Google Scholar]
  138. Dong, J.; Mao, W.H.; Zhang, G.P.; Wu, F.B.; Cai, Y. Root excretion and plant tolerance to cadmium toxicity—A review. Plant Soil Environ. 2007, 53, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  139. Zhu, X.F.; Zheng, C.; Hu, Y.T.; Jiang, T.; Liu, Y.; Dong, N.Y.; Yang, J.L.; Zheng, S.J. Cadmium-induced oxalate secretion from root apex is associated with cadmium exclusion and resistance in Lycopersicon esulentum. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Negishi, T.; Nakanishi, H.; Yazaki, J.; Kishimoto, N.; Fujii, F.; Shimbo, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Sakata, K.; Sasaki, T.; Kikuchi, S.; et al. cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression during Fe-deficiency stress in barley suggests that polar transport of vesicles is implicated in phytosiderophore secretion in Fe-deficient barley roots. Plant J. 2002, 30, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Raskin, I.; Kumar, P.B.A.N.; Dushenkov, S.; Salt, D.E. Bioconcentration of heavy metals by plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1994, 5, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Krämer, U. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 517–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V. Red and blue lights induced oxidative stress tolerance promote cadmium rhizocomplexation in Oryza sativa. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2014, 137, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Stephan, U.W.; Schmidke, I.; Stephan, V.W.; Scholz, G. The nicotianamine molecule is made-to-measure for complexation of metal micronutrients in plants. Biometals 1996, 9, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Von Wirén, N.; Klair, S.; Bansal, S.; Briat, J.F.; Khodr, H.; Shioiri, T.; Leigh, R.A.; Hider, R.C. Nicotianamine chelates both FeIIIand FeII. Implications for metal transport in plants. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Errécalde, O.; Seidl, M.; Campbell, P.G.C. Influence of a low molecular weight metabolite (citrate) on the toxicity of cadmium and zinc to the unicellular green alga Selenastrum capricornutum: An exception to the free ion activity model. Water Res. 1998, 32, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kramer, U.; Talke, I.N.; Hanikenne, M. Transition metal transport. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2263–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Yokosho, K.; Ma, J.F. Nramp5 is a major transporter responsible for manganese and cadmium uptake in rice. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2155–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Yamaji, N.; Sasaki, A.; Xia, J.X.; Yokosho, K.; Ma, J.F. Anode-based switch for preferential distribution of manganese in rice. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Chen, Z.C.; Yamaji, N.; Motoyama, R.; Nagamura, Y.; Ma, J.F. Up-regulation of a magnesium transporter gene OsMGT1 is required for conferring aluminum tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1624–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Ranade-malvi, U. Interaction of micronutrients with major nutrients with special reference to potassium. KarnatakaJ. Agric. Sci. 2011, 24, 106–109. [Google Scholar]
  152. Yamaji, N.; Xia, J.X.; Mitani-Ueno, N.; Yokosho, K.; Ma, J.F. Preferential delivery of Zn to developing tissues in rice is mediated by a P-type ATPases, OsHMA2. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 927–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Lee, S.; An, G. Over-expression of OsIRT1 leads to increased iron and zinc accumulations in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. Overexpression of OsHMA3 enhances Cd tolerance and expression of Zn transporter genes in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6013–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Zheng, L.; Yamaji, N.; Yokosho, K.; Ma, J.F. YSL16 is a phloem-localized transporter of the copper-nicotianamine complex that is responsible for copper distribution in rice. Plant Cell 2012, 37, 3767–3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Song, W.; Yamaki, T.; Yamaji, N.; Ko, D.; Jung, K.; Fujii-Kashino, M.; An, G.; Martinoia, E.; Lee, Y.; Ma, J.F. A rice ABC transporter, OsABCC1, reduces arsenic accumulation in the grain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 15699–15704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Ishimaru, Y.; Masuda, H.; Bashir, K.; Inoue, H.; Tsukamoto, T.; Takahashi, M.; Nakanishi, H.; Aoki, N.; Hirose, T.; Ohsugi, R.; et al. Rice metal-nicotianamine transporter, OsYSL2, is required for the long-distance transport of iron and manganese. Plant J. 2010, 62, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Xia, J.; Ma, J.F. OsYSL6 is involved in the detoxification of excess manganese in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1832–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Beyer, P. Golden Rice and “Golden” crops for human nutrition. New Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 478–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Ravindrababu, V. Importance and advantages of rice biofortification with iron and zinc. J. SAT Agric. Res. 2013, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  161. Piccoli, N.B.; Grede, N.; de Pee, S.; Singhkumarwong, A.; Roks, E.; Moench-Pfanner, R.; Bloem, M.W. Rice fortification: Its potential for improving micronutrient intake and steps required for implementation at scale. Food Nutr.Bull. 2012, 33, S360–S372. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  162. Clemens, S. Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta 2001, 212, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Hall, J.L.; Williams, L.E. Transition metal transporters in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 2601–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Sahrawat, K.L. Soil fertility in flooded and non-flooded irrigated rice systems. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2012, 58, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Shahid, M.; Nayak, A.K.; Shukla, A.K.; Tripathi, R.; Kumar, A.; Raja, R.; Panda, B.B.; Meher, J.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Dash, D. Mitigation of iron toxicity and iron, zinc, and manganese nutrition of wetland rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) grown in iron-toxic soil. Soil Air Water 2014, 42, 1604–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Chen, W.; Yao, X.; Cai, K.; Chen, J. Silicon alleviates drought stress of rice plants by improving plant water status, photosynthesis and mineral nutrient absorption. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 142, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Gregorio, G.B. Progress in breeding for traceminerals in staple crops. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 500–502. [Google Scholar]
  168. Patne, N.; Ravindrababu, V.; Usharani, G.; Reddy, T.D. Grain iron and zinc association studies in rice (Oryza sativa L.) F1 progenies. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2012, 4, 696–702. [Google Scholar]
  169. Ishikawa, S.; Abe, T.; Kuramata, M.; Yamaguchi, M.O.T.; Yamamoto, T.; Yano, M. Major quantitative trait locus for increasing cadmium specific concentration in rice grain is located on the short arm of chromosome 7. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Ueno, D.; Koyama, E.; Kono, I.O.T.; Yano, M.; Ma, J.F. Identification of a novel major quantitative trait locus controlling distribution of Cd between roots and shoots in rice. Plant CellPhysiol. 2009, 50, 2223–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Xue, D.; Chen, M.; Zhang, G. Mapping of QTLs associated with cadmium tolerance and accumulation during seedling stage in rice (Oryza sativaL.). Euphytica 2009, 165, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Goto, F.; Yoshihara, T.; Shigemoto, N.; Toki, S.; Takaiwa, F. Iron fortification of rice seed by the soybean ferritin gene. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Qu, L.Q.; Yoshihara, T.; Ooyama, A.; Goto, F.; Takaiwa, F. Iron accumulation does not parallel the high expression level of ferritin in transgenic rice seeds. Planta 2005, 222, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Paul, S.; Ali, N.; Gayen, D.; Datta, S.K.; Datta, K. Molecular breeding of Osfer2 gene to increase iron nutrition in rice grain. GM Crops Food 2012, 3, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Masuda, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Ishimaru, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Aung, M.S.; Nakanishi, H.; Mori, S.; Nishizawa, N.K. Iron-biofortification in rice by the introduction of three barley genes participated in mugineic acid biosynthesis with soybean ferritin gene. Front. Plant Sci. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Wirth, J.; Poletti, S.; Aeschlimann, B.; Yakandawala, N.; Drosse, B.; Osorio, S.; Tohge, T.; Fernie, A.R.; Günther, D.; Gruissem, W.; et al. Rice endosperm iron biofortification by targeted and synergistic action of nicotianamine synthase and ferritin. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2009, 7, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Inoue, H.; Higuchi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Nakanishi, H.; Mori, S.; Nishizawa, N.K. Three rice nicotianamine synthase genes, OsNAS1, OsNAS2and OsNAS3 are expressed in cells involved in long-distance transport of iron and differentially regulated by iron. Plant J. 2003, 36, 366–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Lee, S.; Jeon, U.S.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Persson, D.P.; Husted, S.; Schjørring, J.K.; Kakei, Y.; Masuda, H.; Nishizawa, N.K.; et al. Iron fortification of rice seeds through activation of the nicotianamine synthase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 22014–22019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Johnson, A.A.T.; Kyriacou, B.; Callahan, D.L.; Carruthers, L.; Stangoulis, J.; Lombi, E.; Tester, M. Constitutive overexpression of the OsNAS gene family reveals single-gene strategies for effective iron- and zinc-biofortification of rice endosperm. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Ogo, Y.; Itai, R.N.; Kobayashi, T.; Aung, M.S.; Nakanishi, H.; Nishizawa, N.K. OsIRO2 is responsible for iron utilization in rice and improves growth and yield in calcareous soil. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 75, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Agarwal, S.; Venkata, T.V.G.N.; Kotla, A.; Mangrauthia, S.K.; Neelamraju, S. Expression patterns of QTL based and other candidate genes in Madhukar × Swarna RILs with contrasting levels of iron and zinc in unpolished rice grains. Gene 2014, 546, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Chandel, G.P.; Samuel, M.; Dubey, R.; Meena, R.K. In silico expression analysis of QTL specific candidate genes for grain micronutrient (Fe/Zn) content using ESTs and MPSS signature analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Genet. Transgenics 2011, 2, 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  183. Lee, S.; Chiecko, J.C.; Kim, S.A.; Walker, E.L.; Lee, Y.; Guerinot, M.L.; An, G. Disruption of OsYSL15 leads to iron inefficiency in rice plants. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 786–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Ishimaru, Y.; Masuda, H.; Suzuki, M.; Bashir, K.; Takahashi, M.; Nakanishi, H.; Mori, S.; Nishizawa, N.K. Overexpression of the OsZIP4 zinc transporter confers disarrangement of zinc distribution in rice plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2909–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Lee, S.; Jeong, H.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Guerinot, M.; An, G. OsZIP5 is a plasma membrane zinc transporter in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 73, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Wang, H.; Huang, J.; Ye, Q.; Wu, D.; Chen, Z. Modified accumulation of selected heavy metals in Bt transgenic rice. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1607–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zhan, J.; Wei, S.; Niu, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhu, J. Identification of rice cultivar with exclusive characteristic to Cd using a field-polluted soil and its foreground application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2013, 20, 2645–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Antosiewicz, D.M.; Henning, J. Overexpression of LTC1in tobacco enhances the protective action of calcium against cadmium toxicity. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 129, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V. Trace Element Management in Rice. Agronomy 2015, 5, 374-404. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5030374

AMA Style

Sebastian A, Prasad MNV. Trace Element Management in Rice. Agronomy. 2015; 5(3):374-404. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5030374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sebastian, Abin, and Majeti Narasimha Vara Prasad. 2015. "Trace Element Management in Rice" Agronomy 5, no. 3: 374-404. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5030374

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop